My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-169a
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Interlocal Agreement
Approved Date
05/17/2005
Control Number
2005-169A
Agenda Item Number
9.A.1
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver
Subject
Impact Fee Study Interlocal Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4919
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r • <br /> o municipal reporting requirements concerning the collection and transmittal <br /> of impact fee revenues ; and <br /> o development of annual capital improvement programs to expend the fees . <br /> • The administrative charge borne by municipalities will be included within the <br /> impact fee and not as an "add -on" cost . <br /> Imposition , Calculation , and Collection of Impact Fees <br /> • Impact fees may be imposed as early as subdivision approval and as late as the <br /> issuance of the certificate of occupancy . <br /> • Most communities require payment prior to the issuance of the building permit . <br /> • A procedure must be included in the ordinance that allows the applicant to submit <br /> an independent impact fee calculation following a prescribed county <br /> methodology . For example , the current IRC Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance <br /> provides that : <br /> o the County Administrator or designee shall have the right to accept or <br /> reject the applicant ' s Independent Impact Fee Study ; and <br /> o an appeal of the County Administrator ' s decision may be made to the <br /> BCC . <br /> • Impact fee revenue must be deposited into segregated accounts to ensure that <br /> revenues will be expended for the provision of capital facilities for which the fees <br /> are collected . <br /> Use of Impact Fee Revenue <br /> • Collected impact fees may be spent only on the public facilities for which they <br /> were collected . <br /> • Fees cannot be spent for operations and maintenance and must be spent only for <br /> capital facilities and costs incidental to the capital facilities (e . g . , fees can be spent <br /> on additional library books because they are necessary to put the library facilities <br /> to use ) . <br /> • Impact fee revenues spent on privately -owned lands or educational facilities must <br /> revert to the School Board in the event the charter school ceases operation as a <br /> publicly -sponsored school facility . <br /> • Impact fees must be spent within a reasonable period of time to strengthen the <br /> nexus between the fee payer and the benefit provided by the capital facilities . <br /> • Most communities in Florida require fees to be spent within six years . <br /> • Reasonable geographic areas for the demonstration of benefit have been <br /> determined by the courts to be as large as countywide . <br /> • The determination of a proper benefit area depends on the background data and <br /> nature of the service being provided ( see Table I - 1 , which summarizes <br /> considerations associated with service areas and benefit districts in IRC ) . <br /> Tindale-Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> May 2005 I - 7 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.