My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-169a
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Interlocal Agreement
Approved Date
05/17/2005
Control Number
2005-169A
Agenda Item Number
9.A.1
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver
Subject
Impact Fee Study Interlocal Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4919
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Residential Functional Population <br /> It is generally assumed that people spend one -half to two -thirds of their time at home and <br /> the rest of each 24 -hour day away from their place of residence . In developing the <br /> residential component of IRC functional population for fees using a 24-hour versus 1I - <br /> hour approach , an analysis of IRC population and employment characteristics was <br /> conducted . Based on this analysis , it was estimated that, in the case of 24 -hour days , <br /> people , on average , spend 15 . 6 hours, or 65 percent, of each 24 -hour day at their place of <br /> residence and the other 35 percent away from home . In the case of 11 -hour days , people <br /> spend 3 . 8 hours , or 35 percent of their time , at their place of residence and the remaining <br /> 65 percent away from home . This analysis is presented in Appendix A, Tables A -9 <br /> through A - 11 , and resulting percentages are displayed in Tables Il -9 and II - 10 . <br /> Nonresidential Functional Population <br /> Developing estimates of functional residents for nonresidential land uses is more <br /> complicated than developing estimates of functional residents for residential land uses , <br /> given the varying characteristics of non-residential land uses . Nelson and Nicholas <br /> originally introduced a method for estimating functional resident population, now used <br /> internationally . This method uses trip generation data from the Institute of <br /> Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual , information on passengers per <br /> vehicle , workers per vehicle , length of time spent at the land use , and other variables . <br /> Specific calculations include : <br /> • Total one -way trips per employee (ITE trips times 50 percent to avoid double <br /> counting entering and exiting trips as two trips) . <br /> Visitors per impact unit based on occupants per vehicle (trips times occupants per <br /> vehicle minus employees) . <br /> • Worker hours per week per impact unit ( such as nine worker hours per day times <br /> five days in a work week) . <br /> • Visitor hours per week per impact unit (visitors times number of hours per day <br /> times relevant days in week such as five for offices and seven for retail shopping) . <br /> • Functional population coefficients per employee developed by considering time <br /> spent by employees and visitors at each land use . <br /> Table Il -9 shows the functional population coefficients for nonresidential uses/categories <br /> in IRC for the year 2004 based on a 24 hours per day , 7 days per week analysis . <br /> 1 Arthur C . Nelson and James C . Nicholas, " Estimating Functional Population for Facility Planning , " <br /> Journal of Urban Planning and Development 118 (2 ) : 45 -58 ( 1992) . <br /> Tindale -Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> May 2005 II - 8 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.