My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-169a
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Interlocal Agreement
Approved Date
05/17/2005
Control Number
2005-169A
Agenda Item Number
9.A.1
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver
Subject
Impact Fee Study Interlocal Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4919
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table III - 8 presents the unit cost that will be used for the impact fee analysis . This unit <br /> cost was calculated as the addition of the building replacement cost and the equipment <br /> cost, which totals $ 54 , 271 per bed . The table shows a cost per functional resident of <br /> $278 under the LOS standard of 5 . 12 beds per 1 , 000 functional residents . <br /> Table 111 -8 <br /> Unit Cost per Functional Resident <br /> Component Cost <br /> Building and Land Replacement Cost per Bed ' ) $ 51 , 633 <br /> Equipment Cost per Bed(2) JZ, 638 <br /> Total Capital Cost per Bed (3) $ 549271 <br /> Level of Service(4) (Beds/ 1 ,000 Functional Residents) 5 . 12 <br /> Total Capital Cost per Functional Resident(s) $277, 87 <br /> ( 1 ) Source : Table III -5 <br /> (2) Source : Table III -6 <br /> (3 ) Sum of building replacement cost per bed (Item 1 ) and equipment cost per bed <br /> (Item 2 ) . <br /> (4) Source : Table III -4 <br /> ( 5 ) Total cost per bed ( Item 3 ) multiplied by level of service ( Item 4 ) divided by 1 , 000 . <br /> Credit Component <br /> To avoid overcharging new development for the capital cost of providing correctional <br /> facilities , a review of the capital financing program for correctional facilities was <br /> completed . The purpose of this review was to identify any potential revenues , other than <br /> impact fees , generated by new development that could be used for capital facilities , land , <br /> and equipment expansion of the correctional facilities program . Once these revenues <br /> were identified , a credit was given against the impact cost . <br /> Revenue Sources for Capital Expenditures <br /> The IRCSO has two different sources for correctional facility capital expenditures : <br /> • General Fund <br /> • Local Option Sales Tax <br /> Table III - 9 summarizes the capital expenditures and their funding sources over the last <br /> six years . This table also specifies whether the capital expenditure was a replacement or <br /> an expansion to existing capital facilities . <br /> Tindale -Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> May 2005 III -9 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.