My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-283B
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-283B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Lease
Approved Date
11/03/2009
Control Number
2009-283B
Agenda Item Number
8.Q.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Lease Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
described above will produce an effluent suspended sediment concentration of less than 0 .45 g/I . Relating <br /> suspended solids concentration to Florida effluent quality standards — based on the turbidity of the effluent <br /> relative to the ambient turbidity of the receiving waters — is problematic since turbidity depends highly on <br /> the physical characteristics and concentration of the suspended material . However, WES guidelines (Palermo <br /> et al . , 1978 ; Walski and Schroeder, 1978) indicate that this 0 . 45 g/ I falls well below typical standards for <br /> effluent discharged into estuarine waters . <br /> 2. 3. 3 Ponding Depth and Basin Performance <br /> Ponding depth refers to the height ofthe water column (with its suspended sediment load) maintained <br /> above the depositional surface during dredging operations . It is regulated by the height of the weir crest and, <br /> to a lesser extent , by dredge plant output. Given the initial slope of the basin interior (about 0 .2%), ponding <br /> depth will vary within the basin . The ponded water, most shallow nearest the inlet, will increase to its <br /> maximum depth nearest the weir . Conceptually, ponding depth is typically discussed in terms of its mean <br /> value over the entire basin interior. However, as a practical operational criterion , ponding depth is more <br /> usefully specified at the weir where it can be measured directly. At the weir, the excavated grade of the 1R- <br /> 14 basin is - 1 . 2 ft NGVD , or 0 . 8 ft below the average basin depth . Therefore , ponding depth at the weir <br /> exceeds the mean basin ponding depth by approximately 0 . 8 ft. In the remainder of this report, ponding <br /> depth will be given in terms of the mean depth over the basin and, where appropriate, related to the <br /> corresponding depth at the weir. <br /> Ponding should be maintained at the greatest possible depth during dredging operations . Increased <br /> ponding depths produce increased retention times and decreased flow velocities through the containment <br /> basin and therefore improved solids retention and effluent quality . The limiting consideration for increased <br /> ponding depth is the amount of hydrostatic pressure the dike can withstand without loss of structural integrity . <br /> Analysis of sediment settling characteristics established whether the 2 . 0- ft minimum mean ponding <br /> depth produces a basin retention time adequate for acceptable solids retention and effluent quality . The fine- <br /> grained sediment component, because it requires the longest time to settle out of suspension , determines the <br /> required basin retention time and therefore the required ponding depth . <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.