My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-283B
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-283B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Lease
Approved Date
11/03/2009
Control Number
2009-283B
Agenda Item Number
8.Q.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Lease Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
distribution curves and/or Atterberg limits ; and suspended sediment- settling time curves representing the <br /> finest-grained sample from each boring location . <br /> The recommended inlet operation strategy, based on the sediment data presented above, reflects a <br /> poorly graded mix of fine sand and silt-sized particles . This strategy makes no attempt to segregate material <br /> grain - size fractions by inlet manipulation , although some segregation will occur naturally as a result of <br /> differential settling behavior as described above . Tom inimize the mounding ofthe coarsest sediment fraction <br /> and to distribute the deposited material more uniformly, the inlet pipeline should be repositioned during <br /> dredging operations . This will require extending the pipeline and resting each extension on the sediment <br /> mound formed at the previous position . A minimum distance of 100 ft must be maintained between the inlet <br /> and the inside toe of the dike to preclude erosion or undercutting the interior dike slope . This strategy will <br /> also reduce the concentration of the finest sediment nearest the weirs as each deposition mound captures a <br /> portion of the silt- sized particles . ( With a fixed discharge position , these particles would continually wash <br /> from the mound . ) The resulting deposition pattern should maintain a consistent slope from inlet to weir, <br /> should minimize dead zones and channelization, and should reduce the requirement for grading the deposited <br /> material to reestablish the desired 0 . 2% slope between successive dredging operations . <br /> 3. 2. 1 Monitoring Related to Inlet Operation <br /> During active dredging operations, several monitoring procedures related to inlet operations will be <br /> required . Ponding depth , as previously mentioned , is a critical parameter for maintaining acceptable <br /> containment basin performance. Increased ponding depth improves the basin ' s solids retention performance <br /> by increasing retention time. However, under saturated foundation conditions, unbalanced hydrostatic forces <br /> resulting from too great a ponding depth can lead to slope instability, slumping, and the potential for dike <br /> failure. Indications of impending dike instability" include evidence of seepage related to piping and <br /> foundation saturation at the outer dike toe and small-scale slumping . Obviously, such conditions must be <br /> avoided . Therefore, ponding depth should be increased above the 2- ft minimum mean depth only under close <br /> monitoring by visual inspection of dike integrity. As discussed in Section 2 . 2 .2 , a 2-ft mean ponding depth <br /> corresponds to a 2 . 8-ft depth at the weirs as a result of the initial slope of the basin interior. If no effluent <br /> is released at the weir, the output of an 18 - in . dredge ( i . e . , 3 , 560 cy/hr slurry at a 20/80 solids/liquid mix, or <br /> 2, 848 cy/hr liquid) will produce an increase in ponding depth of about 2 . 1 in ./hr and a rise in the water <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.