Laserfiche WebLink
Option C - Utility Bill Comparison Methodology <br /> Option C may be applied to projects in which ( a ) the potential to generate savings must be verified <br /> and ( b ) <br /> actual energy use during the contract term must be measured for comparison with the baseline model for <br /> calculating savings . Option C involves procedures for verifying the same items as Option A plus determining <br /> energy savings during the contract term through the use of whole- building metering data . <br /> All end - use technologies can be verified with Option C , provided that the reduction in consumption is larger <br /> than the associated modeling error and that the ECMs are inter related . This option may be used in cases in <br /> which there is a high degree of interaction between installed energy conservation systems and /or <br />the <br /> measurement of individual component savings is not cost-effective . Accounting for changes ( other than <br /> those caused by the ECMs ) is the major challenge associated with Option C , particularly for <br /> long -term <br /> contracts . <br /> The following points should be considered when conducting Option C analyses for M &V : <br /> 1 . All explanatory variables that affect energy consumption as well as possible interactive terms <br /> ( i . e . , <br /> combination of variables ) must be specified , whether or not they are accounted for in the model . Critical <br /> variables can include weather , occupancy patterns , set points , and operating schedules . <br /> 2 Independent variable data will need to correspond to the time periods of the billing meter reading dates <br /> and intervals <br /> 3 If the energy savings model incorporates weather data , the following issues should be considered : <br /> • Use of the building " temperature balance point' for defining degree -days versus an arbitrary <br /> temperature base . <br /> • The relationship between temperature and energy use that tends to vary depending upon the time of <br /> year . For example , an ambient temperature of 55 ° F in January has a different implication for energy <br /> usage than the same temperature in August . Thus , seasons should be addressed in the model . <br /> • The nonlinear response to weather. For example , a 10 ° F change in temperature results in a <br />very <br /> different energy use impact if that change is from 75 ° F to 85 ° F rather than 35 ° F to 45 ° F . <br /> • Matching degree-day data with billing start and end dates <br /> 4 . The criteria used for identifying and eliminating outliers must be documented . Outliers are data beyond <br /> the expected range of values ( or two to three standard deviations away from the average of the data ) <br /> Outliers should be defined using common sense as well as common statistical practice <br /> 5 . Statistical validity of the final regression model must be demonstrated Validation steps include checks <br /> to make sure that: <br /> • The model makes intuitive sense , that is , the explanatory variables are reasonable and the <br /> coefficients have the expected sign ( positive or negative ) and are within an expected range <br /> ( magnitude ) . <br /> Modeled data are representative of the population . <br /> • Model form conforms to standard statistical practice . <br /> • The number of coefficients is appropriate for the number of observations ( approximately no more <br /> than one explanatory variable for every five data observations ) . <br /> • All model data are thoroughly documented , and model limits ( range of independent variables for <br /> which the model is valid ) are specified . <br /> Option C usually requires at least 9 to 12 months of continuous data before a retrofit and continuous <br /> data <br /> after the retrofit ; the data can be hourly or monthly whole- building data <br /> Indian River County , Florida 21 Indian River County Phase 1 <br /> Phase I Rev . 06/09 <br />