My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-433
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2008
>
2008-433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 11:26:55 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:13:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
12/23/2008
Control Number
2008-433
Agenda Item Number
8.I.
Entity Name
FPL Energy Services, LLC
Subject
Energy Savings Guarantee Annual Energy Cost Savings
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8261
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 7 <br /> Summary of Measurement and Verification Options <br /> All the methods in the FEMP/IPMVP Guideline for determining savings are based on the same concept; <br /> namely , those energy savings are derived by comparing energy usage after a retrofit to the baseline . It is <br /> relatively easy to measure post-retrofit consumption ; however, it is impossible to " measure" what the energy <br /> usage would be without the retrofit. Therefore , it is impossible to " measure" energy savings . <br /> Energy savings can only be determined based on assumptions about the baseline . Four options are <br /> provided to determine energy savings . A particular option is chosen based on the on project-specific <br /> features of each performance contract. <br /> The options differ in their approach to the level and duration of the retrofit verification measurements . For <br /> instance , Options A and B both apply at the system or ECM level , while Option C uses measurements taken <br /> at the whole-building , or whole-facility , level . Option A involves short-term ( if any ) measurements , while <br /> Options B and C use short term and/or continuous or regular interval measurements during the term of the <br /> contract. Option D involves computer simulation techniques . <br /> Each option has advantages and disadvantages based on site-specific factors . <br /> The four options are described in the table below . <br /> Overview of M&V Options (from the FEMP/ IPMVP ) <br /> M &V option How savings are Typical Applications <br /> calculated <br /> A . Partially Measured Retrofit Isolation Engineering calculations Lighting retrofit where <br /> using short-term or power draw is measured <br /> Savings are determined by partial field continuous post-retrofit periodically . Application <br /> measurement of the energy use of the measurements and of controls to vary the <br /> system( s) to which an ECM was applied ; stipulations . load on a constant speed <br /> separate from the energy use of the rest of the pump using a variable <br /> facility . Measurements may be either short- speed drive . Power <br /> term or continuous . draw is measured on a <br /> spot basis , while varying <br /> Partial measurement means that some but not load . Operating hours of <br /> all parameter( s ) may be stipulated , if the total are specified/ stipulated . <br /> impact of possible stipulation error( s) is not <br /> significant to the resultant savings . Careful <br /> review of the ECM design and installation will <br /> ensure that stipulated values fairly represent <br /> the probable actual value . <br /> Indian River County , Florida 18 Indian River County Phase 1 <br /> Phase I Rev ..-1705/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.