My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-433
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2008
>
2008-433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 11:26:55 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:13:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
12/23/2008
Control Number
2008-433
Agenda Item Number
8.I.
Entity Name
FPL Energy Services, LLC
Subject
Energy Savings Guarantee Annual Energy Cost Savings
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8261
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Option A-Spot Measured Savings <br /> The verification techniques for Option A determine savings by measuring the capacity or efficiency of a <br /> system before and after a retrofit and by multiplying the difference by an agreed-upon or " stipulated " factor, <br /> such as hours of operation or load on the system . Option A is best applied to individual loads or systems <br /> within a building , such as a lighting system or chiller. <br /> Option A is an approach designed for projects in which the potential to generate savings must be verified , <br /> but the actual savings can be stipulated based on the results of the " potential to generate <br /> savings " <br /> verification and engineering calculations ( and perhaps on short-term data collection ) . Post-installation <br /> energy use is not measured throughout the term of the contract. Post-installation and perhaps baseline <br /> energy use is predicted using an engineering or statistical analysis of information that does not involve long - <br /> term measurements . Data from the estimates may come from historical data , information from other similar <br /> projects , and/or spot or short-term metering before and after ECM or system installation during the first year <br /> of operation . Spot savings is the easiest and least expensive method of determining savings . <br /> Option A includes procedures for verifying that: <br /> • Baseline conditions have been properly defined . <br /> • The equipment and/or systems that were contracted to be installed have been installed . <br /> • The installed equipment/systems meet contract specifications in terms of quantity , quality , and rating . <br /> • The installed equipment is operating and performing in accordance with contract specifications and is <br /> meeting all functional tests . <br /> • The installed equipment/systems continue , during the term of the contract , to meet contract <br /> specifications in terms of quantity , quality , rating , operation , and functional performance . <br /> This level of verification is all that is contractually required for certain types of performance contracts . The <br /> potential to generate savings may be verified through observation , inspections , and/or spot/short-term <br /> metering conducted immediately before and/or immediately after installation . Annual ( or some other regular <br /> interval ) inspections may also be conducted to verify an ECM ' s or system ' s continued potential to generate <br /> savings . Savings potential are quantified using computational methods . <br /> Indian River County , Florida 20 ___ Indian River County Phase 1 <br /> Phase I Rev . 1 /05/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.