My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-316
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 11:43:02 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 4:01:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
12/08/2009
Control Number
2009-316
Agenda Item Number
8.G.
Entity Name
FPL Energy Services
Subject
Implementation Services Authorization Conservation Measures
Phase 2
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
10897
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 7 <br /> Summary of Measurement and Verification Options <br /> All the methods in the FEMP/IPMVP Guideline for determining savings are based on the same concept; <br /> namely, those energy savings are derived by comparing energy usage after a retrofit to the baseline . It is <br /> relatively easy to measure post-retrofit consumption ; however, it is impossible to " measure" what the energy <br /> usage would be without the retrofit. Therefore , it is impossible to " measure" energy savings . <br /> Energy savings can only be determined based on assumptions about the baseline . Four options <br /> are <br /> provided to determine energy savings . A particular option is chosen based on the on project-specific <br /> features of each performance contract. <br /> The options differ in their approach to the level and duration of the retrofit verification measurements . <br /> For <br /> instance , Options A and B both apply at the system or ECM level , while Option C uses measurements taken <br /> at the whole- building , or whole-facility, level . Option A involves short-term ( if any) measurements , <br />while <br /> Options B and C use short term and/or continuous or regular interval measurements during the term of the <br /> contract. Option D involves computer simulation techniques . <br /> Each option has advantages and disadvantages based on site-specific factors . <br /> The four options are described in the table below. <br /> Overview of M&V Options (from the FEMPIIPMVP) <br /> M &V option How savings are Typical Applications <br /> calculated <br /> A. Partially Measured Retrofit Isolation Engineering calculations Lighting retrofit where <br /> using short-term or power draw is measured <br /> Savings are determined by partial field continuous post-retrofit periodically. Application <br /> measurement of the energy use of the measurements and of controls to vary the <br /> system ( s) to which an ECM was applied ; stipulations . load on a constant speed <br /> separate from the energy use of the rest of the pump using a variable <br /> facility . Measurements may be either short- speed drive . Power <br /> term or continuous , draw is measured on a <br /> spot basis , while varying <br /> Partial measurement means that some but not load . Operating hours of <br /> all parameter( s) may be stipulated , if the total are specified/ stipulated , <br /> impact of possible stipulation error(s) is not <br /> significant to the resultant savings . Careful <br /> review of the ECM design and installation will <br /> ensure that stipulated values fairly represent <br /> the probable actual value . <br /> Indian River County, Florida 17 Indian River County Phase 2 <br /> Phase II Rev . 10/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.