My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-009 (6)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2008
>
2008-009 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2016 10:20:46 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 11:53:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
01/08/2008
Control Number
2008-009
Agenda Item Number
11.I.1
Entity Name
H & J Contracting
Subject
CR 512 Phase IV Improvements
Area
CR 512
Project Number
9611
Bid Number
2008012
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
6832
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r. <br /> nt Practices for Erosion and Sediment Control <br /> Chapter 4 - Best Mara eme <br /> Silt fences composed of a wire support fence and an attached synthetic filter fabric slaw <br /> the flow rate significantly but have a higher filtering efficiency than burlap . Both woven and <br /> non-woven synthetic fabrics are commercially available . The woven fabrics generally <br /> display higher strength than the non-woven fabrics . When tested under acid and alkaline <br /> water conditions , most of the woven fabrics increase in strength . There are a variety of <br /> reactions among the non-woven fabrics . The same is true of testing under extensive <br /> ultraviolet radiation . Permeability rates vary regardless of fabric "type . While all of the <br /> fabrics demonstrate very , high. fettering efficiencies for sandy sediments , there is <br /> considerable variation among both woven and non-woven fabrics when filtering the finer silt <br /> and clay particles . <br /> w Desia�riter�a <br /> 1 , No formal design is required for many small projects and for minor and incidental <br /> applications . Forchannel flow applications refer to FOOT Standard Index 102 , <br /> Chart 1 (plate 4. 06a) for guidance on recommended spacing, <br /> 2 . Filter barriers shall have. an expected usable life of 3 months .oans They <br /> where .applicable <br /> in ditch lines, around drop , inlets , and at temporary .. <br /> construction changes,the earth contour and runoff characterinuous <br /> istics :and where low or <br /> moderate flows (not exceeding 1 cfs) (0 .03 rn / sec. are szpecfed. <br /> 3. Silt fences, because they have much lower permeability thanburlap filter barriers , <br /> r <br /> have their applicability limited to situations in which only sheet or overland flows are <br /> expected. They normally cannot filter the volumes of water. generated by channel <br /> flows , and many fabrics do not have sufficient structural strength tosupport the <br /> weight of water ponded behind the fence line. Their expected usable life is 6 <br /> months . <br /> gotruction Specifications <br /> Materials <br /> y , Synthetic filter fabric shall be a pervious sheet of propylene, nylon, polyester, or <br /> polyethylene yarri . Synthetic filter fabric shall contain ultraviolet ray inhibitors and <br /> -� stabilizers to provide. a: minimum 6 months of. expected usable construction life <br /> at a temperature range of 0°. F to 120° F` (17d to 49.. <br /> r, 2. Burlap shall be 10 ounces per square. yard (340 gfm) fabric. <br /> 3 . Posts for silt fences shall be either 4 inch (10 cm) diameter wood , or 1 . 33 pounds <br /> „ per linear foot (2 kg/m) steel with a minimum length of 5 feet (1 . 5 m) . Steel posts <br /> shall have projections for fastening wire to them . <br /> 4 . Stakes for filter barriers shall be 1 " x 2" (2 . 5 x 5 cm) wood (preferred) , or equivalent <br /> metal with a minimum length of 3 feet (90 cm). <br /> • <br /> 4-23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.