My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-030
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2016 2:19:57 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 7:18:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
02/17/2004
Control Number
2004-030
Agenda Item Number
7.F.
Entity Name
Oklawaha Farms Inc.
Subject
Harmony Oaks Mitigation Project Wetlands restoration
Area
Vero Shores
Project Number
9219A
Bid Number
6045
Archived Roll/Disk#
3209
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3631
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' will constitute a representation by ENGINEER to any examination to ascertain how or for what <br /> OWNER, based on ENGINEER' s observations on purposes CONTRACTOR has used the moneys paid <br /> the Site of the executed Work as an experienced and on account of the Contract Price, or to determine <br /> ' qualified design professional and on ENGINEER's that title to any of the Work, materials, or equipment <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the has passed to OWNER free and clear of any Liens . <br /> accompanying data and schedules, that to the best of <br /> ' ENGINEER' s knowledge, information and belief: 5 . ENGINEER may refuse to recommend <br /> the whole or any part of any payment if, in <br /> a. the Work has progressed to the point ENGINEER's opinion, it would be incorrect to <br /> ' indicated; make the representations to OWNER referred to in <br /> paragraph 14 . 02 .13 .2 . ENGINEER may also refuse <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in to recommend any such payment or, because of <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents (sub- subsequently discovered evidence or the results of <br /> ject to an evaluation of the Work as a function- subsequent inspections or tests, revise or revoke any <br /> ing whole prior to or upon Substantial Comple- such payment recommendation previously made, to <br /> tion, to the results of any subsequent tests called such extent as may be necessary in ENGINEER' s <br /> for in the Contract Documents, to a final deter- opinion to protect OWNER from loss because : <br /> ' mination of quantities and classifications for <br /> Unit Price Work under paragraph 9 .08 , and to a. the Work is defective, or completed <br /> any other qualifications stated in the Work has been damaged, requiring correction or <br /> ' recommendation); and replacement; <br /> c . the conditions precedent to b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br /> ' CONTRACTOR' s being entitled to such pay- Written Amendment or Change Orders; <br /> ment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it <br /> is ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the c. OWNER has been required to correct <br /> Work. defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br /> ' 3 . By recommending any such payment with paragraph 13 . 09 ; or <br /> ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have d. ENGINEER has actual knowledge of the <br /> ' represented that: (i) inspections made to check the occurrence of any of the events enumerated in <br /> quality or the quantity of the Work as it has been paragraph 15 .02 .A. <br /> performed have been exhaustive, extended to every <br /> aspect of the Work in progress, or involved detailed New paragraphs 14 .02 .B.5.e and f have been added. <br /> ' inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> specifically assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract <br /> Documents ; or (ii) that there may not be other Paragraph 14.02.C. 1 has been deleted and replaced with <br /> ' matters or issues between the parties that might a new paragraph. See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally by C. Payment Becomes Due <br /> OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to <br /> CONTRACTOR. 1 . Ten days after- presentatien of tl}e <br /> Appheatien €or ^ Paynnent to 63AWER w <br /> ,,., <br /> 4 . Neither ENGINEER' s review of NGDMED' s renunea'dmier% thezsmeli =t r-eee 2- <br /> CONTRACTOR' s Work for the purposes of recom- ____ded • ub e —et to two provisions e f p , <br /> :. amu—C -vr —_ "o- -r.. <br /> ' mending payments nor ENGINEER's recommenda- 14 .02 .D) beee^_e due and when due 3A411 be paid b <br /> tion of any payment, including final payment, will OWNER to GQi 9 o n GTO <br /> impose responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, <br /> direct, or control the Work or for the means, meth- D . Reduction in Payment <br /> ' ods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of <br /> construction, or the safety precautions and programs 1 . OWNER may refuse to make payment of <br /> incident thereto, or for CONTRACTOR's failure to the full amount recommended by ENGINEER <br /> ' comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to because : <br /> CONTRACTOR' s performance of the Work. <br /> Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br /> not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make <br /> ' 00700 - 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.