Laserfiche WebLink
. a <br /> § 927.07 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE <br /> ' Chapter 901) shall be removed except as planner, unless it can be demon- <br /> expressly approved by the board of county strated by the applicant that the <br /> commissioners , remaining site cannot be designed to <br /> ' L That the tree is located within an accommodate and sustain the substi- <br /> existing or proposed right-of-way; toted tree or trees . All replacement <br /> 2 . That the tree is located within an trees shall be of a mMIMUm four (4) <br /> inches > diameter- at-breast-height <br /> existing or proposed easement, or (dbh)$. . ` <br /> stormwater management tract, pro- <br /> vided that only the minimum area S• That the tree is located on a portion <br /> necessary for the contemplated ser- of the site where . structural develop- <br /> vice or use shall be considered under ment is proposed, provided reason- <br /> this criterion; able . effort. has ` been made to pre- <br /> serve protected trees and specimen <br /> 3 . That the tree is located where its trees to the extent feasible under <br /> continued existence would unreason- this criterion. <br /> ably interfere with the physical con- <br /> struction of the improvements on a (b) Land-clearing permit. No land-clearing <br /> ' particular site as may result from permit shall be issued unless the environ. <br /> interference with the access to the mental planner finds that each of the <br /> site by construction equipment, or following criteria has been satisfied: <br /> with the operation of the equipment I . That the land clearing or grubbing is <br /> on the site in the immediate vicinity necessary in order to make site im- <br /> of the proposed structure or improve- provements, authorized by an ap- <br /> ments; proved site plan, subdivision ap- <br /> 4. That the tree is located where it proval, building permit, or land <br /> creates or will create a safety or development permit, and that the <br /> health hazard, or a nuisance with area to be cleared is the. minimum <br /> ' respect to existing or proposed strut- necessary for such work or, in the <br /> tures or vehicle or pedestrian routes , event the aforementioned approvals <br /> and relocation of the tree on the site are not required by law for the' in- <br /> is not a feasible alternative; tended use of the property, that the <br /> 5 . That the tree is located where it proposed clearing is the minimum <br /> interferes with the installation, de- necessary for the proposed use or <br /> i <br /> livery, or maintenance of proposed mprovement. Land clearing or grub- <br /> or bing of a site associated with a pro- <br /> existing utility services to the site, . posed development . plan (e.g., site <br /> 6. That the tree is diseased, injured, or plan or subdivision preliminary plat) <br /> ' in danger of falling; shall not be allowed to occur prior to <br /> •7 . That the tree is located on a portion county approval of the applicable <br /> of the site to be used for construction development plan, except as specifi- <br /> ' of required parking areas or vehicu- tally exempt in section 927. 06 , <br /> lar and pedestrian ingress and egress 2 . That the .applicant has provided a <br /> areas; provided that, when this cri- reasonable, written plan to control <br /> tenon is used to justify removal of a erosion. which may be expected to <br /> tree or trees located within required occur . as. a result of the proposed <br /> yard setback areas , the applicant clearing or - grubbing. The plan shall <br /> shall replace any such tree or trees incorporate some or all of the follow- <br /> with an equal number of trees of ing means as determined by the ap- <br /> similar ecological or aesthetic value, plicant : '. :temporary seeding and <br /> as determined by the environmental mulching, sodding, diversion berms, <br /> Supp. No, 45 927/4 <br />