My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-094
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2016 11:45:47 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
03/15/2005
Control Number
2005-094
Agenda Item Number
Jt. Mtg.
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver & Associates
Subject
IR County Impact Fee Study Final Report
Archived Roll/Disk#
"
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4830
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
general fund is $ 1 , 356 per year, less than 1 percent of the total expansion expenditures <br /> during the ten-year period included in Table VI- 14 . <br /> It should be noted that it is the County ' s intent to use impact fee revenues as the primary <br /> funding source for future capital expansion needs of libraries and to maintain or reduce <br /> the average annual dollar amount from non-impact fee revenue sources shown in this <br /> study toward capital expansion needs . In other words, the County intends to use non - <br /> impact fee revenue sources as the primary funding source for capital replacement, <br /> operations , and maintenance expenses . As such, credit calculations for optional sales tax <br /> and ad valorem tax do not include an escalation factor. <br /> Vacant Land <br /> According to the Office of Management and Budget, the use of ad valorem taxes toward <br /> library capital expansion is limited and typically is directed to the replacement and <br /> possibly the addition of equipment. To be conservative , however, credit for past <br /> payments of property taxes for vacant land is given . Here , the ratio of total vacant land <br /> (residential, commercial, and industrial) to total taxable value is reviewed to develop the <br /> percentage of countywide vacant land taxable value to the total countywide taxable <br /> property value . <br /> Table VI - 15 <br /> Vacant Land Value Percentage( ' ) <br /> r.r+1 <br /> Vacant Land Value $ 1908098199230 <br /> Countywide Total Property Value(2) $ 12 , 18192505689 <br /> Vacant Land Value as a Percentage of the <br /> Total Property Value(3) 8 . 87% <br /> Percent of Capital Expansion Expenditures <br /> Funded with General Fund(4) 0 . 18 % <br /> Effective Vacant Land Value Percentage(5) 0 . 02% <br /> ( 1 ) Source : Property Appraiser, IRC <br /> (2) Includes structures . <br /> (3 ) Vacant Land Percent = $ 1 ,080, 819 ,230/$ 12, 181 ,250 , 689 <br /> (4) Source : Table VI- 14 <br /> ( 5 ) Vacant land value as a percentage of the total property value <br /> (Item 3 ) multiplied by percent of expenditures covered with <br /> ad valorem taxes (Item 4). <br /> According to the information presented in Table VI- 15 , the countywide vacant land <br /> assessment accounts for 8 . 87 percent of total taxable value . Given that ad valorem tax <br /> revenues were used to pay for 0 . 18 percent of the capital expansion expenditures between <br /> Fiscal Years 98/99 and 07/08 , the total credit amount for ad valorem taxes paid on <br /> vacant land is determined by multiplying the percentage of vacant land value ( 8 . 87 <br /> Tindale-Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> February 2005 VI- 16 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.