My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-094
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2016 11:45:47 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
03/15/2005
Control Number
2005-094
Agenda Item Number
Jt. Mtg.
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver & Associates
Subject
IR County Impact Fee Study Final Report
Archived Roll/Disk#
"
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4830
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
View images
View plain text
*41W <br /> activities ? Only if local police and fire departments collect and maintain detailed records <br /> on responses by land use can this question be answered . For other facilities such as <br /> emergency medical and rescue, it is difficult to allocate demand based on observations . <br /> The traditional method for estimating the current and future demand for certain facilities <br /> is to use the population as the basis . For example, some states have established a <br /> statewide minimum standard of 0 . 3 square feet of library space per capita based on the <br /> resident population of communities meeting minimum thresholds . Yet, communities <br /> with high volumes of nonresidents who use library services may need more than 0 . 3 <br /> square feet per resident to effectively meet this standard . In the case of police , fire, and <br /> emergency medical facilities , the higher the nonresident daytime population, the greater <br /> the need is for service relative to the resident population . Moreover, it is not enough to <br /> simply add resident population to the number of employees, since the service-demand <br /> characteristics of employees can vary considerably by type of industry . Using <br /> unweighted population and employment data to estimate facility needs may result in <br /> substantial error. <br /> For many facilities, there is a convenient way to rationally attribute demand by land use <br /> and to estimate aggregate demand for a community . This method is called "functional <br /> population . " Functional population is the equivalent number of people occupying space <br /> within a community on a 24 -hours-per-day, 7 -days-per-week basis for public facilities <br /> providing around-the-clock services, such as police and fire/EMS services (or alternative <br /> time period such as an 11 -hours-per-day, 5 -days-per-week basis for public buildings , <br /> *4W which are open on the average only a total of 55 hours per week) . <br /> A person living and working in the community will have a functional population <br /> coefficient of 1 . 0 . A person living in the community but working elsewhere may spend <br /> only 16 hours per day in the community on weekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends <br /> for a functional population coefficient of 0 . 76 ( 128 -hour presence divided by 168 hours <br /> in one week) . A person commuting into the community to work five days per week <br /> would have a functional population coefficient of 0 . 24 (40-hour presence divided by 168 <br /> hours in one week) . Similarly, a person traveling into the community to shop at stores, <br /> perhaps averaging 8 hours per week, would have a functional population coefficient of <br /> 0 . 05 . <br /> Functional population thus tries to capture the presence of all people within the <br /> community, whether residents, workers , or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of <br /> effective population needing to be served . Functional population measures are important <br /> to gauge the demand for facilities serving the community 24 hours per day, 7 days per <br /> week for services such as police , fire, and emergency medical services , or 11 hours per <br /> day, 5 days per week for services such as public building services . <br /> This form of adjusting population to help measure real facility needs replaces the popular <br /> approach of merely weighting residents two-thirds and workers one -third (Nelson and <br /> Nicholas 1992) . By estimating the functional and weighted population per unit of land <br /> use across all major land uses in a community, an estimate of the demand for certain <br /> Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc . Indian River County <br /> February 2005 II-7 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).