2005-094 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Proposed Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X-23 •,"00 Future Demand Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -23 EstimatedRevenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X-24 Tables Table I- 1 Impact Fee Service Area Considerations by Program Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I -9 Table I -2 Current and Recommended Standards by Impact Fee ProgramArea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I - 12 Table I-3 Comparison of Fees by Impact Fee Program Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I - 13 Table I-4 Historical and Projected Capital Facility Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . I - 14 Table I1 - 1 IRC Population Estimates and Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II -2 Table II-2 Countywide Residents per Housing Unit . . . 0 * 1 10 , 10 0 00 * 0 0 * * # 90945099 we ' Ile 1100 , 110 1 II-3 Table II-3 Countywide Residents per Housing Unit Excluding Indian River Shores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II -3 Table II-4 Unincorporated County Area Residents per Housing Unit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II -4 Table I1 - 5 Nationwide Residents per Housing Unit — Single Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II -4 Table II -6 Countywide Residents per Housing Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II- 5 Table II-7 Countywide Excluding Indian River Shores — Residents per Housing Unit . . . . , , as , 0001 , 11 111 . 1 . II -5 Table II- 8 Unincorporated County Area — Residents per Housing Unit' " " " . . . . II -6 Table II-9 24-Hour/7 -Day General Functional Population Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . II -9 Table I1 - 10 11 -Hour/5 -Day General Functional Population Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . II- 10 Table II- 11 Countywide Functional Population — Year 2004 Nwaoe (24 -Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II- 11 Table II - 12 Countywide Excluding Indian River Shores Functional Population - Year 2004 (24-Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 12 Table II - 13 Unincorporated County Area Functional Population — Year 2004 (24-Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 13 Table II - 14 Countywide Functional Population — Year 2004 ( 11 -Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 14 Table II - 15 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — Correctional Facilities (Countywide) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 15 Table II- 16 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — PublicBuildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II46 Table II- 17 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — FIRE/EMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11- 16 Table II - 18 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — Law Enforcement . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . II- 17 Table II- 19 Assumptions for Nonresidential Land Uses and Functional Population Coefficients for Impact Fee Schedule - Public Buildings . . , . I , ' , , I " , * , a@ * * @ * 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 " 00000009 II- 18 Table II-20 Assumptions for Nonresidential Land Uses and Functional Population Coefficients for Impact Fee Schedule — Correctional Facilities, Fire/EMS , and Law Enforcement , , , . , , 1100 , 1 10000 II - 19 Table III- 1 Land & Buildings Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-2 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc . Indian River County February 2005 iv Impact Fee Study