Laserfiche WebLink
,%W Imposing a solid waste facilities impact fee serves a two -fold purpose . First, it enables <br /> the County to retain, or possibly reduce, the current assessment fee, while generating <br /> sufficient dollars to accommodate the needs of the existing and new population . Second, <br /> it allows the County to accumulate the necessary fund balance to comply with FDEP <br /> regulations . <br /> To illustrate this point, it is assumed that the assessment fee rate will remain at FY 04/05 <br /> levels upon the adoption of the impact fee . As shown in Table IV-8 , the County reduced <br /> assessment fee rates by an average of one percent per year over a seven-year period . <br /> Keeping the assessment fee rates at current levels over the next 15 years actually results <br /> in a reduction of the fees in terms of real dollars when inflation is taken into <br /> consideration . The study objective is that imposing impact fees will result in the County <br /> not having to increase its assessment fee rates , while still allowing it to carry the <br /> necessary fund balance required to meet FDEP regulations . <br /> Table IV=8 <br /> Changes in the Assessment Fee Rates( l ) <br /> ` f -_ <br /> Residential _ <br /> Per Waste Generation Unit (WG 548.23 $37.56 $47. 56 547.56 547.56 x47.45 546. 86 <br /> Percent Chane - 1 .4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.2% - 1 .2% -0. 5% <br /> Per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) $77. 17 576. 10 $76. 10 576. 10 $76. 10 $75 .92 574.98 <br /> Percent Chane - 1 .4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.2% - 1 .2% 450 <br /> Commercial <br /> Per Waste Generation Unit WGU) 534.45 1 $33 .70 1 533 .70 $33 . 70 1 532.58 1 $32.53 1 $31 . 89 <br /> Percent Change 1 1 .2.2%1 0.0% 0.0% -3.3 % -0.2% -2.0% -1 .3% <br /> ( 1 ) Source : Office of Management and Budget, IRC <br /> In addition, it is assumed that 15 percent of all revenues will be dedicated for capital <br /> expansion of the Solid Waste Program . As shown in Table IV-7, the revenues available <br /> to fund capital ranged from 18 . 2 percent of total revenues in FY 99/00 to 26 . 8 percent in <br /> FY 00/01 , with an average of 18 . 6 percent from FY 99/00 to FY 04/05 . In addition, the <br /> County did not budget any District revenues for capital expenditures in FY 04/05 . To be <br /> conservative, however, this analysis assumes that 15 percent of all District revenues will <br /> be allocated to the capital expansion projects , and this percentage will be used to <br /> calculate the impact fee credit. <br /> (This space intentionally left blank) <br /> Tindale -Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> February 2005 IV45 Impact Fee Study <br />