Laserfiche WebLink
ODOR CONTROL STUDY <br /> • Other relatively minor and transient odor sources exist at the Central WWTF . <br /> Reasonable efforts should be taken to eliminate emissions from these sources . <br /> 3 . 0 Odor Control Alternatives <br /> Several different odor control alternatives were considered for the major sources of <br /> odorous emissions . Descriptions and evaluations of the alternatives are provided below. <br /> In considering these odor control alternatives , those related to the WWTF are presented <br /> in a separate subsection from those related to the RSF . This is because the County is <br /> currently considering alternative sludge management options that could potentially <br /> cause the existing RSF to cease operation . <br /> 3 . 't Wastewater Treatment FacTty - Anoxic Tank <br /> Several alternative improvements were considered for reducing odorous emissions from <br /> the Anoxic Tank. These alternatives are discussed below. <br /> 3 . 1 . 1 Biological Oxidation <br /> Since there are no primary clarifiers at the Central WWTF , raw wastewater exits the <br /> Headworks and proceeds directly to the Anoxic Tank. The wastewater is pumped over <br /> long distances and is therefore likely to be partially septic . It typically contains high <br /> concentrations of dissolved sulfides , such as 1-12S . Return activated sludge is added to <br /> the raw wastewater in the Anoxic Tank . In many Wastewater Treatment Facilities , <br /> anoxic tanks also receive internal recycle from the activated sludge process . There is <br /> currently no internal recirculation system utilized at the Central WWTF . The presence of <br /> such a system would likely improve biological oxidation of the incoming wastewater and <br /> reduce the amount of 1-12S that is released from the Anoxic Tank. <br /> Following the sampling program , PBSU recommended that the County install an <br /> internal recirculation system to improve biological oxidation of the influent wastewater. <br /> Our estimate , absent any site-specific data , is that approximately 50 % of the 1-12S <br /> emissions from the Anoxic Tank could be eliminated by the addition of the internal <br /> recycle . The construction and engineering costs for the internal recycle system is <br /> estimated to be $ 70 , 000 . The operating cost for the internal recycle is estimated at <br /> $2 , 000 per year. The reduction of sulfide emissions after the return activated sludge <br /> system was restored provides evidence that a "fresher" sludge can significantly reduce <br /> sulfide emissions . <br /> 3 . 1 .2 Cover and Control with New Scrubber <br /> An alternative approach or additional step to reduce emissions from the Anoxic Tank <br /> would include the installation of aluminum or fiberglass covers over the Anoxic Tank, <br /> collect the air under the covers , and scrub the odorous air with a packed tower <br /> scrubber. Based on preliminary calculations , approximately 2 , 500 cfm would be drawn <br /> 6 15 Indian River County, Central Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> PBS& #071230, February 2003 <br />