My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-063
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2016 9:33:35 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:25:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
03/11/2003
Control Number
2003-063
Agenda Item Number
11.H.1.
Entity Name
PBS & J
Subject
February 2003, IRC Central Wastewater Treatment Facility Odor Control St
Archived Roll/Disk#
3160
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3185
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h <br /> ODOR CONTROL STUDY <br /> Executive Summary <br /> Odor and sulfur emission inventories and evaluations performed in this study show that <br /> the existing Regional Sludge Facility ( RSF ) Scrubbers , Anoxic Tank , and Sludge and <br /> Septage Storage Tanks are , in order, the major sources of odorous emissions from the <br /> Central WWTF . Hydrogen sulfide ( 1-12S ) and organic sulfides are the major odorants <br /> emitted from these sources . Emission data show that the existing RSF scrubbers are <br /> not adequately removing H2S and organic sulfides . Evaluations also show that <br /> improvements to the RSF scrubbers will provide the most odorant removal . <br /> Although recent efforts to eliminate sludge dewatering filtrate and Aerobic Digester <br /> emissions have reduced total plant emissions by an estimated 25 to 33 % , air dispersion <br /> models shows that additional improvements are needed to further reduce emissions <br /> from the major sources . Air dispersion modeling also indicates that 90 % reduction of <br /> emissions from the major sources should help make the Central WWTF a Is community- <br /> friendly facility" . <br /> Several alternative improvements were evaluated for each of the major sources . Based <br /> on the advantages , disadvantages , effectiveness , and estimated costs associated with <br /> these alternatives , the following improvements ( in order of importance ) are <br /> recommended for the Central WWTF and RSF . <br /> RSF Scrubber Improvements <br /> Install automatic chlorine solution addition facilities to both scrubbers and operate <br /> the existing scrubbers in series , as a two-stage system . <br /> Install oxidation -reduction potential (ORP ) controls on both scrubbers . The ORP <br /> monitors will control the addition of chlorine solution . Add a gas phase chlorine <br /> monitor to the last scrubber to ensure adequate chlorine addition in the last <br /> stage . <br /> Operate the first scrubber with mostly caustic soda . Operate the second scrubber <br /> with mostly chlorine solution . Engineering start-up , testing , and training services <br /> should be used to help determine appropriate operating conditions . <br /> • Install a VFD on the existing blower and add a second smaller blower to the <br /> existing scrubber system . Install an automated damper on the exhaust duct from <br /> the Dewatering Building and operate the large blower at full speed during sludge <br /> dewatering . Operate the small blower at full speed or large blower at half speed <br /> when sludge is not being dewatered . The automated damper should partially <br /> close when sludge is not being dewatered so that much of the air is drawn from <br /> the Sludge and Septage Storage Tanks , <br /> I Indian River County, Central Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> 1111 PBSU #071230, February 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.