Laserfiche WebLink
ODOR CONTROL STUDY <br /> 6 . 0 Improvements To Minor And Transient Sources <br /> As indicated in a previous section , a few minor and transient odor sources were <br /> discovered during the air emission sampling program . The amounts of H2S were not <br /> quantified because representative samples could not be collected . Based on observed <br /> operations , the following improvements could be made to these minor and transient <br /> sources : <br /> • The garage doors in the bar screen dumpster area can be closed if ventilation in <br /> this area is improved . Improved ventilation could be accomplished when the <br /> Anoxic Tanks are covered and ventilated . The ventilated air could be added to <br /> Anoxic Tank controls at a construction cost of approximately $ 80 , 000 . <br /> • Openings exist at slide gates and bar screens on top of the Headworks Structure <br /> could be closed with rubber gaskets . The cost for these gaskets is estimated to <br /> be less than $ 1 , 000 , assuming County personnel install the gaskets . <br /> • The existing grit removal units , dumpsters , and mechanical sludge thickener are <br /> open to the atmosphere at the Sludge Storage Tanks . Emissions from these <br /> sources are the most difficult to control because these emissions are very <br /> transient, highly odorous , and difficult to collect. Ceasing operations or enclosing <br /> these sources are the only options for controlling these emissions . Construction <br /> costs for covering these sources are estimated to be approximately $450 , 000 . <br /> • Since these costs are very high and the amount of sulfur reduction is likely very <br /> low, no improvements are recommended for these sources at this time . The <br /> addition of a local meteorological station (wind speed and direction ) is <br /> recommended for the RSF . Data and information from the local meteorological <br /> station could then be used to make decisions when not to operate these facilities . <br /> 7 . 0 Other Issues <br /> During testing of the Sludge and Septage Storage Tanks , dichlorobenzene was <br /> measured by the GC/MS in the headspace of the tanks at concentrations up to 1 , 200 <br /> ppbv ( 1 . 2 ppmv) . Significantly lower concentrations (< 100 ppbv) were measured in the <br /> RSF Scrubber outlet. There are three different forms of dichlorobenzene : 1 , 2- , 1 , 3. , and <br /> 1 ,4-dichlorobenzene . The form emitted at the Central WWTF could not be distinguished <br /> by the GC/MS . 1 ,44chlorobenzene is commonly used as a portable toilet deodorant <br /> and in moth balls . It is believed that the dichlorobenzene originates in the septage <br /> received at the plant. <br /> OSHA exposure limits for dichlorobenzene are as follows : <br /> • 1 , 24chlorobenzene : STEL — 50 ppmv PEL — 50 ppmv <br /> 1 , 34chlorobenzene : STEL — N .A . PEL — N .A. <br /> .� 28 Indian River County, Central Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> PBSU #071230, February 2003 <br />