My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-063
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2016 9:33:35 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:25:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
03/11/2003
Control Number
2003-063
Agenda Item Number
11.H.1.
Entity Name
PBS & J
Subject
February 2003, IRC Central Wastewater Treatment Facility Odor Control St
Archived Roll/Disk#
3160
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3185
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y <br /> ODOR CONTROL STUDY <br /> • Install a VFD on the existing blower and add a second smaller blower to the <br /> existing scrubber system . Install an automated damper on the exhaust duct from <br /> the Dewatering Building and operate the large blower at full speed during sludge <br /> dewatering . Operate the small blower at full speed or large blower at half speed <br /> when sludge is not being dewatered . The automated damper should partially <br /> close when sludge is not being dewatered so that much of the air is drawn from <br /> the Sludge and Septage Storage Tanks . <br /> • Total construction and engineering costs for the above improvements are <br /> estimated to be approximately $270 , 000 . Additional operating costs are <br /> estimated to be between $ 30 , 000 and $45 , 000 per year. <br /> • Since the RSF dewaters about 13 , 000 wet tons of septage and sludge per year, <br /> these conservatively estimated costs equate to approximately $4 . 50 to $ 5 . 75 per <br /> wet ton of sludge . Based on our experience , these costs probably represent less <br /> than a 10 % increase in sludge dewatering and disposal costs ; and are relatively <br /> minor compared to costs to relocate the RSF or employ an alternative sludge <br /> disposal technology. <br /> • Construct and operate and new sodium hypochlorite storage and feed system if <br /> the existing chlorine generation facility is found to be inadequate upon further <br /> review, or if the new system is desired by the County. Construction and <br /> engineering costs for a new sodium hypochlorite system are estimated to be <br /> approximately $ 130, 000 . <br /> 8 .2 Anoxic Tank Improvements <br /> • Construct and operate an activated sludge internal recycle system to allow <br /> improved biological oxidation of odorous compounds in the Anoxic Tank . <br /> • Construct aluminum or fiberglass covers over the Anoxic Tank and collect <br /> odorous air from the headspace under the covers . <br /> • Construct and operate a modular biofilter for controlling the odorous emissions <br /> from the Anoxic Tank. <br /> • Total construction and engineering costs for the above improvements are <br /> estimated to be approximately $ 520 , 000 . <br /> 8 . 3 Sludge and Septage Storage Tanks Improvements <br /> • Add a permanent drain for the mechanical thickener so that all hatches and <br /> covers can remain closed . <br /> • Open the dampers on the Sludge and Septage Storage Tanks so that the <br /> headspace in the tanks can be ventilated more effectively. <br /> M'' 30 Indian River County, Central Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> PBSW #071230, February 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.