Laserfiche WebLink
i ODOR CONTROL STUDY <br /> Figures <br /> Figure 1 Inventory of Odorous Sources <br /> Figure 2 Mass Odor Emissions for Each Source (Odor - D/T Readings ) <br /> Figure 3 Mass Sulfur Emissions for Each Source - Jerome Readings <br /> Figure 4 Mass Sulfur Emissions for Each Source -Tube Readings <br /> Figure 5 Mass Organic Sulfide Emissions for Each Source - GC-MS Readings <br /> Figure 6 Odor D/T versus Jerome Readings <br /> Figure 7 Comparison of Mass Sulfur Emissions Rates between Tube , Jerome , & <br /> -GC/MS Readings <br /> Figure 8 Sulfur Mass Balance for RSF <br /> Figure 9 Anoxic Tank Emissions (with and without Filtrate ) <br /> Figure 10 Oxidation Ditch Emissions (with and without Filtrate ) <br /> Figure 11 Emission Reduction (April 2002 — October 2002 ) <br /> Figure 12 Maximum Mass Sulfur Emission for Each Source <br /> Figure 13 Odor Impact Model for Hydrogen Sulfide From MOP No . 22 , pg . 107 <br /> Figure 14 ISCST3 Model Results Existing Conditions (April 2002 ) <br /> Figure 15 ISCST3 Model Results Existing Conditions (October 2002 ) <br /> Figure 16 ISCST3 Model Results Option 1 - Elimination of RSF Fugitive Emissions <br /> Figure 17 ISCST3 Model Results Option 2 - RSF Scrubber Improvements <br /> Figure 18 ISCST3 Model Results Option 3 - RSF Scrubber and Fugitive Emissions <br /> Improvements <br /> Figure 19 ISCST3 Model Results Option 4 - Minimum Anoxic Tank Improvements <br /> Figure 20 ISCST3 Model Results Option 5 - Maximum Anoxic Tank Improvements <br /> Figure 21 ISCST3 Model Results Option 6 - RSF & Minimum Anoxic Tank <br /> Improvements <br /> Figure 22 ISCST3 Model Results Option 7 - RSF & Maximum Anoxic Tank <br /> Improvements <br /> Figure 23 ISCST3 Model Results Option 7 — RSF & Maximum Anoxic Tank <br /> Improvements 95 % Control <br /> VII Indian River County, Central Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> PM61 PBSU #071230, February 2003 <br />