Laserfiche WebLink
r Geosyntec Consultants <br /> M 4. QUANTITY AND COMPOSITION OF C&D DEBRIS <br /> Unlike MSW generation which varies directly with the County population, C&D debris <br /> generation depends also on the rate of growth of the County. More C &D debris is generated <br /> per capita during periods of high growth than when the growth is low. Figure 3 shows the <br /> monthly quantities of MSW and C&D debris delivered for disposal at the IRCL facility during <br /> the period April 2006 through March 2007 based on SWDD ' s disposal records. This period <br /> was selected to demonstrate the impact of the slow down of construction in the County on the <br /> r generation of the two types of waste. It can be seen that MSW generation rate is fairly stable <br /> with the exception of the winter effect caused by the transient nature of the County' s <br /> population. More MSW is generated during the winter months than in the summer period . The <br /> C&D debris generation rate, however, shows a clear decline over the period under <br /> consideration because of the steep decline in construction activity in the County. <br /> r <br /> As previously defined in Section 3 . 1 , C&D debris includes concrete, asphalt (pavement and <br /> shingles), wood, gypsum drywall , and metal . These are primary construction materials. Mixed <br /> r C&D debris also includes smaller amounts of other materials, such as packaging (paper, plastic, <br /> and cardboards), carpet scraps, and insulation. While not in the strict regulatory definition of <br /> C&D debris, materials, such as unauthorized dumping of MSW and small quantities of <br /> hazardous waste (e. g. lead flashings, fluorescent lamps) by workers and nearby households <br /> into C&D debris dedicated roll-off containers are also present in C&D debris . <br /> r <br /> C&D debris is generated from many sources and the waste stream varies as a function of these <br /> sources (e. g. building construction vs. road construction, construction vs. demolition, <br /> r residential construction vs . commercial construction) . A 2003 report of the Florida Center for <br /> Solid and Hazardous Waste Management describes a detailed study to characterize Florida' s <br /> C&D debris stream [Townsend„ 2004] . Table 1 summarizes the results of this study. Materials <br /> categorized as other include: paper, plastic, MSW, carpet, insulation, buckets, vegetative <br /> material and dirt. Table 2 presents a list of materials observed in mixed C &D debris . <br /> Demolition debris, in particular, is known to contain hazardous constituents. Materials that <br /> may result in possible risk to human health and the environmental often found in demolition <br /> debris include lamps, thermostats, and light switches containing mercury-, batteries from exit <br /> signs, emergency lights, and smoke alarms that may contain lead and a radiological component-, <br /> lighting ballasts which contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) ; and lead pipes and roof vent <br /> flashings [Townsend et al . , 1998 and 2000] . <br /> r <br /> FLO996-03/7L70184_08- 10-2007.doc.doc 4- 1 2007-08-10 <br />