2003-132 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SJRWMD Alternative Water Supply Construction Cost-Sharing Application Form FY 2002-2003 EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B4. Is the project in an area identified by the SJRWMD Water Supply Assessment as a priority water resource caution area or a delineated area? This will be determined for you by SJRWMD staff. 0-5 points . Yes, Inside caution area = 5; Yes, Inside delineated area = 3; No, Outside caution area and/or delineated area = 0. 5. Projected schedule Projected starting date : mo. Ju___^lx_ yr. 2003 . Completion date : mo. October yr. 2004 . (Funds received through this program may be used only for projects constructed after a cost-sharing contract has been executed and may not be used to reimburse the cost of existing structures or structures already under construction. Cost-sharing contracts will probably be executed in April or May 2003) , 6. Will water from this project directly take the place of an existing or proposed withdrawal from a higher quality water source? , . . . . 1 1 . 0 1 . . . . 0 . . . . , 0 . * . 6 . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * ' . . 0 ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes ✓ No If yes , identify the source and quantity of higher quality water to be replaced. ✓ Floridan aquifer . . . . . . . . . . . 525 . 6 million gallons per year ✓ Surficial aquifer , , , . . , . , , . . . , 525 . 6 million gallons per year Surface water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . million gallons Per year If surface water, state name of water body EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B4. Will water from this project directly and effectively take the place of an existing or proposed higher quality water source? 0-20 points . Based on rater 's assessment of the effectiveness of the project at saving potable water and apparent relative cost effectiveness. Because of the great variation in types of projects, calculations of cost effectiveness for widely dissimilar projects, such as urban reuse and agricultural freeze protection ponds will not be directly compared. Does the project contribute to the recovery of violated minimum flows or levels? This will be determined for you by SJRWMD staff. 040 points . Yes = 10; No = 0. 7. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? Yes ✓ No If yes, then describe benefits? You may add one page attachment behind this page if necessary . Mixing R. O . concentrate water with stormwater and reusing as reclaimed water will reduce concentrate and stormwater being released to the Indian River Lagoon EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 114. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? 0= 10 points . Based on rater 's assessment of the extent and significance of additional benefits. Page A - 4 FAU46tin\ TMrrY . ENGIDrmUNGtprojaa4 • Mlity Comtructiou PartnitsMC . 2003 SJRWN0 Ahwuntiw Won Supply Gum App\St Johns Algrootiw Water Supply ApplicmoaBtiva to North Raliuf Casal.doc