My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-132
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-132
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 9:59:45 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:35:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
06/03/2003
Control Number
2003-132
Agenda Item Number
11.H.6.
Entity Name
St. John's River Water Management District
Subject
Utilities RO Concentrate Rescue Project
Area
Lennie's Lounge
Archived Roll/Disk#
3161
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3266
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Inman river county Utilities <br /> Concentrate Disposal Options <br /> UAB Response. <br /> The UAB decided against pursuit of this option in lieu of other potential options at the <br /> May 4, 2000 meeting. <br /> 3 .4 Stormwater Mixing <br /> Concentrate may be diluted with stormwater for disposal . Mixing the concentrate <br /> with stormwater would require that the stormwater system be available for <br /> connection. Possible problems include retention volume, mixing ratio and reliability <br /> of stormwater volumes . Since concentrate production is constant, a consistent supply <br /> of stormwater would be required for diluting purposes . This option may be <br /> advantageous during wet weather. <br /> UAB Response: <br /> The UAB recommended this option be pursued as an option once the Stormwater <br /> Plaster planning efforts are underway . Further discussions with Indian River Farms <br /> Water Control District are necessary . <br /> 3 . 5 Reuse Mixing <br /> Mixing reuse water with concentrate and disposing the product through the reuse <br /> water distribution system is another possible solution. The concentrate water would <br /> have to be blended with reuse water at a ratio that would allow the water to be land <br /> applied for irrigation purposes . Possible problems would include possible vegetation <br /> intolerance to saltier water and the availability of reuse volume for dilution purposes . <br /> Also the possible gradual buildup of salts in the areas of discharge may become a <br /> problem . See Figure 1 . <br /> UAB Response : <br /> The UAB believes this option in conjunction with other possible options will be the <br /> most immediate and viable means of diverting concentrate from the North County <br /> plant and current discharge point. A pilot study at a nearby golf course pond is <br /> recommended prior to full scale implementation. <br /> 3 . 6 Disposal to North WWTP <br /> The North County WWTP is a one million gallon per day wastewater treatment plant. <br /> See Figure 2. The concentrate could be diverted to the plant, mixed with the influent, <br /> and treated and disposed as the North plant' s effluent. The plant would only be able <br /> to take a portion of the 600,000 gallons per day of concentrate produced at North <br /> County facility . The rest of the concentrate would have to be disposed in another <br /> manner . <br /> UAB Response : <br /> _ The UAB recommended not to pursue this option at the May 4 meeting since salts <br /> pass through the treatment process . <br /> CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 7 <br /> rw�oe.aedt tnaoo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.