HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-227 _ i0 Z
` WORK AUTHORIZATION No. 02
EFFECTIVE DATE JUNE 21 , 2005
In accordance with the Agreement for Professional Services between Indian River County Solid Waste
Disposal District ( "Client" ) , and GeoSyntec Consultants , Inc . ( "GeoSyntec" ) , dated 10 August 2004 , this
Work Authorization describes the services , schedule , and charges for GeoSyntec ' s services on the project
known as :
ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE CLASS I LANDFILL
VERTICAL EXPANSION AT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL
FACILITY
Client Authorized Representative : Polly Kratman , Managing Director, SWDD
Address : 1325 74°i Avenue
Vero Beach , Florida 32968
Telephone No : ( 772 ) 770-5 1 13
GeoSyntec Authorized Representative : Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah
Address : 2258 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32204
Telephone No : ( 904 ) 388- 8821
SERVICES . The scope of services, time schedule and charges are described in GcoSyntec ' s proposal dated 7
June 2005 attached to this Work Authorization , incorporated herein by reference .
TERMS AND CONDITIONS . The terms and conditions of the Professional Services Agreement referenced
above shall apply to this Work Authorization .
Acceptance of the terms of this Work Authorization is acknowledged by the following= signatures of the
Authorized Representatives .
SUBMITTED BY : APPROVED BY :
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
( Consultarill, Solid Waste Disposal District
By : By :
Thomas A . Peel , Ph . D . , Vice President Thomas S . Lowther, Chairman
Approved by BCC : June 21 , 20050
Witness d : Attest: eff -ey K . Barton , Cle of Circuit Court I
j 1
By : _ By . ° � T
E
Anne H . Perry , Office Manag 4,
t
A proved �is 'tq Form and egal S4ficiency : I
e - r
i
Marian , A's�'i pt; Duni ttorney
f � n
By : .Lrr L -
seph A . Ltaird , County Administrator
XL05065UL050 ) 10- rev2 . doc
ORIGINAL
GeoSyntec 2258 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32204 • USA
Consultants Tel . (904) 388-8821 • Fox (904) 388-8163
7 June 2005
Ms . Polly Kratman
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District E
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue SW
Vero Beach, Florida 32968 JN
Subject : Proposal for Engineering Services P� ,""
Class I Landfill Vertical Expansion
Indian River County Sanitary Landfill Facility
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
Dear Ms . Kratman :
GeoSyntec Consultants (GeoSyntec) is pleased to submit this proposal to the Indian
River County (IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) for the provision of
engineering services related to the vertical expansion (hereafter referred to as the
Project) of the Class I Landfill at the IRC Sanitary Landfill Facility located in Vero
Beach, Indian River County, Florida. The proposal presents the scope of work,
schedule, and budget estimate for the design and permitting services for the project .
The proposal was prepared in response to the 6 June 2005 telephone conversation
between Mr. Tanhum Goldshmid of the IRC SWDD and. Dr. Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah,
P . E . of GeoSyntec .
GeoSyntec is well qualified to provide the services required to obtain the permit for
the Class I Landfill Expansion within time and budget . In Florida, GeoSyntec has been
successful in obtaining numerous solid waste management permits or permit
modifications , many in near record time . For example, the firm was recently successful
in obtaining the first construct and operate permit for a greenfield Class I Landfill (the
Oak Hammock Disposal Facility) to be issued by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) in more than seven years . The Oak Hammock
Disposal Facility, located in Osceola County, was permitted through the Central District
Office of FDEP , which is the same permitting office for the IRC Class I Landfill .
Additionally, GeoSyntec has an excellent working relationship with FDEP District
offices , having provided technical assistance to the agency in developing the design
criteria implemented in the 1988 Florida Solid Waste Management Act, including the
XL05065UL050010-final
_ y
GeoSyntec Consultants
Ms . Polly Kratman
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 2
development of rules promulgated in Chapter 62 -701 of the Florida Administrative
Code (F . A . C .) . Since that time, GeoSyntec staff have continued to provide technical
assistance to the Solid Waste Section of the FDEP by serving on various Technical
Advisory Groups (TAGs) , including, most recently, the CCA-treated wood TAG.
The remainder of this proposal presents : (i) project background ; (ii) proposed
scope of work; (iii) schedule ; (iv) budget estimate ; and (iv) the assumptions which were
used in the development of this proposal .
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The IRC SWDD operates both the Class I landfill and Construction and Demolition
(C &D) disposal facility at the IRC Sanitary Landfill Facility located near Interstate 95 ,
Oslo Road, and Rangeline Road in southern Indian River County. The Class I landfill
includes Segment 1 , Segment 2, and an Infill Area under FDEP Operations Permit No .
S031 -0128769 -005 . Segment 1 is unlined and was closed in 1990 . Segment 2 is a
lined Class I landfill located west of Segment 1 . The Infill Area is also a lined Class I
landfill located between Segment 1 and Segment 2 . The total footprint of the Class I
landfill is approximately 63 acres , with 20 acres for Segment 1 and 43 acres for
Segment 2 and Infill Area.
The existing Segment 1 unlined Class I landfill is closed and permitted to elevation
(EL. ) 105 ft. The cover system is comprised of the following ( from bottom to top) : 12 -
in. thick intermediate cover layer, 8 -in. thick compacted clay cap , 6-in . thick protective
soil layer; and 4-in. thick vegetated topsoil layer. The closed landfill has 4 . 3 horizontal
to 1 vertical (4 . 3H : 1 V) sideslopes with three 10- ft wide benches (or terraces) located at
15 -ft to 20- ft vertical height intervals from EL. 25 to EL. 75 ft. The IRC SWDD has
proposed a lateral and vertical expansion of the existing Segment I landfill for the
disposal of C &D material . The expansion of the south and west slopes would be
created by shifting the final toe of slope approximately 25 ft laterally, constructing the
C&D expansion with 3H : 1V sideslope geometry, and using one stormwater bench (i . e .
cover drainage swale) at EL. 85 ft. The westward top of slope would extend to EL .
129 . 5 ft and grade to the east at 5 percent slope to accommodate the future Class I
landfill vertical expansion. A permit application for this C &D expansion was included
as part of the renewal operations permit application submitted to FDEP in July 2004 .
GeoSyntec understands that the proposed C &D expansion has been approved by FDEP .
XL05065UT050010-final
GeoSyntec Consultants
Ms . Polly Kratman
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 3
The Segment 2 Class I landfill is lined and currently in operation. It is permitted
with a final cover meeting the requirements of Rule 62 -701 . 600 ( 5 ) (g) , F . A . C . The
proposed cover system consists of a 40-mil thick textured linear low-density
polyethylene (LLDPE) geomembrane, a 24-in. thick protective soil layer, and sod . The
landfill final cover is permitted for : (i) 4H : 1V slopes from EL . 25 to EL . 55 ft ; (ii)
3H : IV slopes with a 20- ft wide bench at every 20 ft of vertical rise from EL . 55 to EL .
135 ft ; and (iii) 18H : 1V slopes from EL . 135 to EL . 145 ft. GeoSyntec understands
that the proposed cover system has been constructed over a portion of Segment 2 (from
EL. 25 to EL. 55 ft with the 4H : 1V sideslopes) . In order to maximize the disposal
capacity of the landfill, the IRC SWDD has proposed to eliminate the benches by using
311 : IV slopes from EL. 55 to EL . 145 ft with one stormwater bench at EL . 85 ft . An
application for this vertical expansion of Segment 2 was also included as part of the
renewal operations permit application submitted to FDEP in July 2004 . GeoSyntec also
understands that FDEP has approved the proposed vertical expansion of Segment 2 .
The IRC SWDD would like to raise the final elevation of the entire Class I landfill
( Segment 1 , Infill Area and Segment 2) to the proposed elevation in the updated Master
Plan. A liner system will be required for the unlined top (EL. 129 . 5 ft) of Segment 1
used for the C&D expansion . This liner system must tie into the existing liner system
for the Infill Area.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed scope of work includes activities to be performed on behalf of the
IRC SWDD for the design and permitting services for the vertical expansion . The
scope of work is based on the requirements of Chapter 62 -701 (effective 27 May 2001 ) ,
F .A. C . GeoSyntec will provide all engineering services necessary to complete the
permit application and address any comments or requests for additional information
from FDEP for issuance of the permit for the landfill vertical expansion. For the
purpose of budgeting, the scope of work has been divided into three main tasks :
• Task 1 — General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management ;
• Task 2 — Design and Permit Application ; and
• Task 3 — Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Modification .
XL05065UL050010-final
GeoSyntec Consultants
Ms . Polly Kratman
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 4
The remainder of this section presents a general description of the activities to be
performed in each task.
Task 1 — General Consulting/Meeting Support/ Proiect Management
Task 1 consists of three components : general consulting, meeting support, and
project management. GeoSyntec will provide the SWDD with consulting services
necessary to initiate the project and attend pre-application and in-progress review
meetings with the FDEP Central District Office . GeoSyntec will prepare presentation
graphics , engineering drawings , and other documents required to support the meetings
and project coordination activities .
A kickoff meeting with SWDD is proposed before the start of project activities so
that the specific project requirements can be discussed . If requested by SWDD ,
GeoSyntec will prepare for and attend a meeting with the IRC Commission (IRCC) to
explain the project scope and budget requirements, or to provide general technical
assistance . GeoSyntec will also schedule and attend, with the SWDD staff, a meeting
with the Central District Office of FDEP to discuss specific permitting issues . In
addition, review meetings will be held with the SWDD as necessary during design and
prior to the FDEP submittal . Following each meeting, GeoSyntec will prepare meeting
minutes that document decisions reached in the meetings .
Project management activities will include : budget and schedule tracking, invoice
review , and project communications, including the preparation of a monthly progress
report . The project report will include a description of the activities completed during
the month and planned activities for the following month. In addition, the progress
report will identify any technical or administrative issues that require IBC ' s attention
and the current status of the budget and schedule .
For the purpose of this budget estimate , GeoSyntec has included five meetings : (i)
one kickoff meeting with SWDD ; (ii) one design review meeting with SWDD ; (iii) two
meetings with FDEP and SWDD staff; and (iv) one meeting with the IRCC , if requested
by the SWDD .
XL05065UL050010-final
GeoSyntec Consultants
Ms . Polly Kratman
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 5
Task 2 — Design and Permit Application
GeoSyntec will design and then prepare and submit the permit application to FDEP
for the vertical expansion of the Class I Landfill . The design will include the
engineering analyses to demonstrate that the vertical expansion complies with the
specific requirements of Rule 62 - 701 . 430 , F . A. C . The following activities will be
performed to design the vertical expansion and prepare the permit application :
• review the existing permit application and other relevant reports and
documents, including correspondence with FDEP ;
• review geotechnical and hydrogeologic investigations performed at the site and
within the footprint of the proposed expansion for relevant data that will be
used for the engineering analyses required for the expansion permit
application ;
• meet with FDEP to discuss the proposed expansion, including the proposed
liner system and permitting approach (this will be performed as part of Task 1 ) ;
• design the liner system for the unlined part of the vertical expansion and
evaluate the performance to comply with Rule 62 - 701 .430 ( 1 ) (a) , F . A. C . ;
• design the leachate management system for the expansion area, including
relocation of the existing lift station that will be impacted by the vertical
expansion ;
• design the top elevation and final cover configuration for the proposed
expansion to meet the disposal capacity needs of IRC , and at least comply with
those proposed in the updated Master Plan ;
• perform hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for extreme rainfall events and
design the surface-water management system for the expansion area, including
control features to separate surface water from leachate during construction and
operation of the vertical expansion areas ;
XL05065VLA50010-final
GeoSyntec Consultants
Ms . Polly Kratman
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 6
• perform slope stability (liner system, interim and final configurations, and
veneer stability of the final cover system) and settlement evaluations for the
proposed vertical expansion ;
• modify the existing gas collection system to control gas pressure buildup under
the liner system of the expansion areas ;
• prepare permit drawings (with adequate details for permitting) for the proposed
expansion of the landfill (approximately 20 sheets of D- size, 24 inches by 36
inches) ;
• prepare Technical Specifications and a Construction Quality Assurance (CQA)
Plan for all components of construction for the landfill expansion ;
• revise the facility operating plans (Operations Plan, Leachate Management
Plan, Gas Management Plan, and Closure Plan) to incorporate changes, as
needed, from the proposed vertical expansion ;
• prepare financial assurance cost estimate for closure and long-term care of the
proposed expansion; and
• complete the required FDEP form (62-701 . 900( 6)) and prepare the supporting
plans and engineering reports .
Design Analyses
The vertical expansion area of the closed, unlined Segment 1 requires a liner
system that will tie into the existing liner system for the Infill Area. No new liner
system will be required for the vertical expansion of Segment 2 and Infill areas since
these areas are already lined . Similarly, a final cover system meeting the requirements
of Rule 62 - 701 . 600 (5 )(g) , F . A . C . will be required for the vertical expansion of the
Segment 1 area. The geosynthetic and soil components of the liner and final cover
systems will be selected , and the performance will be evaluated by appropriate analyses .
Overall global stability of the landfill under interim and final configurations and the
veneer stability of the final cover system will be evaluated at critical locations . The
stability of the landfill with and without benches and the need for cover drainage swales
XL05065ULA50010-final
Ms . Polly Kratman GeoSyntec Consultants
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 7
(terraces) will be evaluated . GeoSyntec will evaluate total and differential settlements
in the components of the liner and cover systems of the landfill .
A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis will be performed to evaluate the peak runoff
rates and volumes from the proposed final cover system. Hydraulic analysis and design
of the components of the final cover drainage system will be performed . The final
cover system drainage layer will be designed to : (i) minimize infiltration into the
existing and new landfills ; (ii) minimize erosion of cover materials ; (iii) carry the
calculated flow and thereby ensure stability of the cover system ; and (iv) comply with
the cover requirements .
For budget estimating purposes , it has been assumed that no further geotechnical
and hydrogeological investigations are needed to complete the permit application for
the vertical expansion and that available data are adequate for settlement and slope
stability calculations .
OperatingPlans
The CQA Plan will specifically address geosynthetics installation, soil
construction, preparation of record drawings , and reporting requirements in accordance
with applicable sections of Chapter 62 -701 , F . A . C . The Operations Plan will address
the waste filling sequence during the vertical expansion, and will be prepared with input
from Waste Management, Inc . of Florida (WMIF) , IBC ' s current contract operator of
the Class I landfill . The Leachate Management Plan will address changes to the
leachate collection, transmission and disposal system , and will specifically address
relocation of the existing lift station for the Infill Area. The Closure Plan will be
revised to incorporate changes resulting from the vertical expansion, and will include a
new financial assurance cost estimate for closure and long-term care of the proposed
expansion.
FDEP Class I Landfill Permit Application
GeoSyntec will prepare the application for a Class I Solid Waste Disposal Facility
(Permit Application) . The Permit Application will include the engineering reports,
permit drawings and operating plans required in accordance with Chapter 62 - 701 ,
F .A. C . The Permit Application will be signed and sealed by a registered professional
engineer in the State of Florida.
XL05065VI050010-final
Ms . Polly Kratman GeoSyntec Consultants
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 8
GeoSyntec will provide four complete copies of the Permit Application to FDEP
and two copies to SWDD . An electronic file of the Permit Application will also be
provided to FDEP and SWDD .
Response to Regulatory Comments
Following submittal of the Permit Application, GeoSyntec will meet with FDEP to
present and discuss the Class I landfill design for the vertical expansion . GeoSyntec
will provide FDEP with written responses to requests for additional information (RAIs)
throughout the course of the permit review process . For the purpose of the budget
estimate, GeoSyntec has assumed one response to RAI will be required .
Task 3 — ERP Modification
Under this task, GeoSyntec will analyze the effect of adding the vertical expansion
area on the stormwater management system as currently designed and presented in the
ERP . A modification to the ERP will be prepared for submittal to FDEP to account for
any increase in the amount or timing of stormwater runoff due to grading changes or
infiltration differences from the expansion final cover system or other changes to the
landfill drainage systems . As a part of this task, GeoSyntec will provide written
responses to RAIs from FDEP on the ERP modification . For the purpose of the budget
estimate, GeoSyntec has assumed that one response to RAI will be required .
SCHEDULE
GeoSyntec has prepared a schedule for preparing the Permit Application, which is
included as Attachment A. The schedule, as presented, assumes a start date of 20 June
2005 , and projects a Permit Application submittal to FDEP on 14 October 2005 .
GeoSyntec has assumed that the required permit will be obtained within three to six
months of submission. Response to FDEP comments will be performed during this
three- to six -month period . Therefore, it is anticipated that the permit for the vertical
expansion will be issued by 14 April 2006 .
GeoSyntec recognizes the importance of the schedule for SWDD and their need to
obtain the required disposal capacity from the Class I landfill vertical expansion .
GeoSyntec will work with SWDD to refine the project schedule and set the milestones
necessary to meet the needs of the Project . Throughout the duration of the Project,
XI05065UL050010-final
Ms . Polly Kratman GeoSyntec Consultants
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 9
GeoSyntec will work diligently to meet those milestones and the schedule developed for
the Project .
BUDGET ESTIMATE
A budget estimate for the scope of work outlined in Tasks 1 through 3 of this
proposal is summarized in the following table . A detailed budget estimate is provided
as Attachment B . The budget estimate does not include permit fees that will be required
at the time the Permit Application is submitted to FDEP .
• Task 1 — General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management $205223
• Task 2 — Design and Permit Application $ 1285701
• Task 3 — ERP Modification $ 14,600
TOTAL $ 1639524
GeoSyntec will not exceed the budget estimate without prior approval and written
authorization from IRC .
ASSUMPTIONS
GeoSyntec made the following general assumptions in preparing the project
schedule and budget estimate presented in this proposal :
• Electronic copies of the permit drawings for the proposed C &D expansion of
Segment 1 and a recent topographic base map of the Class I landfill will be
available, in AutoCAD format, for use in preparing the permit drawings for this
Proj ect .
• IRC will pay all permitting fees .
• The proposed schedule and budget estimate presented in this proposal are based
on GeoSyntec ' s understanding of the project requirements and experience with
permitting similar facilities . They do not include any delays or concept changes
that may be required by FDEP or IRC during the course of the Project.
XL05065UL050010-final
Ms . Polly Kratman GeoSyntec Consultants
Indian River County
7 June 2005
Page 10
CLOSURE
GeoSyntec appreciates this opportunity to offer our services . If this proposal is
acceptable, please indicate your agreement by signing the attached work authorization
(Attachment C) , which references this proposal . Please return one signed work
authorization to Dr. Badu-Tweneboah ' s attention. Please call either of the undersigned
with questions you may have as you review this proposal .
Sincerely,
j �- `-�
Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph . D . , P . E .
Associate
Kenneth W . Cargill , P . E .
Principal
Attachments
Copies to : Tanhum Goldshmid, IRC SWDD
Nandra Weeks , GeoSyntec
XL05065UL050010-final
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT SCHEDULE
N
O
O
A is
N
Ad A NAVY. IN
N
m
C_
N
AN
d
G
N «
N
N _d
H
E E
0
w w
AAAA . AAAA .
iiij - - - - ' " ' ' iii:(: - - - 41}i: - - - ::«: - - -
A.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - iiia•
- - - -
N
N
O
C
Z
E
E
N E d
E 'o
'n a
v
4.%-.-P-P A 4 1 A I A A A 4 A A A .....%Pp A A A UP
N N
N O
A Nota
LAAN= AN
AN
AN
NOM
'O V y N N R N N R N
v c v o pap v y o v v v o v v .o
Le) 0p N N N � lfi N M � f�+l N N G
CIA g _
wAM
c AAAAN
m « Q m
o a
PON CL 0 0 c
a
CL c c c'
c c a c Ga} .CPAIN ay « LL p E � c EI Ad
N a W NOW
C� c Vl a Q Q W ECL
.N a
c id-
a € W .� c AAAAm 0 CL ON p N « m c 8 « m ai
OA.
d c OE �y yat $ 4 d $ id
SAN
All A,AA,
� y �� y .�
Z H c N p C d 6 a 12 d .EO d € a W G € m W
m d 0 m d m p
co W a fq O a co (A a a' IL W a a' W y
fCL
Im C7 d 0' S t3
W
O 3
ANNIANp N th V' N t0 N ¢] 01 Or � � ^ � PON � � N N NEAR
N
ap
a
0
U
i:•i
y ::::: ;•i:•:•i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :::: - - - - - - - - - - - - - ": - - - :vi:i•
N14
P.
O
d 70
N
d
C_
a
M
0 p C
Y s
p op
E
m d
LU w
PY
qqdpkllpl
o �
i:
•i:•
::::: 4iiii:
o . . . . . ::::•.
r:::. m
Z :•:h?:• - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m
a
r
E
E
m
E U
N E p
n -a
y C
N O
N
a
m - .
4 4
D
O O t'f LO O O Oj M O M N N O
N
O O
ELLU
R Y
Va E H VaJ
c o o y 0.
Od c c N p
p :a W C C
c ac U E c E
a n o
g c c m 'E 5 $ d o
U N g a o O c $ a a 5 y d _�
<` O) •p N Si C 01 oCLV
E 6 c a' Q1 A m a� € a a w p rn y w N �
COd d Q c c d a �' d > > v d 0 c d d O a o
Z c9 a O) w a cn o a h a rt LL a w d w 0 3
W C
U
O N M a O O r co o) m r LO- c r co 0) N N Q N
ao
0 . . ...
lL N i:i•::'
N
ddil
111Y kid. I
N
d
C_
O
♦ . .
m C
y
Y
y _
F
E E
d a
LU w
v
m
� a
:•:;>;
;ii:
-° -
- :»:.
4. m
E
E
m U)
E
N � p
ti o
I Ilk,
m
C
P.
O O
N
d
a ,
I Ilk;
Ilk
'L 9 A 9 '00 S O O 'pO�O pDo 'pO y V p90 90 O O O p
N N N N N O O W M O N N N
r a
CLLU
y
Ua € fes- fn
LL a
o d ra c c
a a
Q w c a
r ¢¢1 `m ��pp �_ _� is 3 a c cg E
kkkk`PO) 'C O CC y A OCC y O O
LL S O C C p O 7
v
E y `m —`�y ,ami m € IIy E a a € w c m w N �n
m Illk.y m N O` C C d 6 d > > d d D C N d D O
U' LL O W o. U) Q d to (n d 1' LL C W d LL 7>
S
U g W y
F (7
� � r r � r N N N
N t7 v a Q
ov
a mCl N
M w C) y
o a.cn
O m D O m m 0 v Q m o '9 m m J 3 (n oZi
CL a
C CL
PIP
° N p� 3. o a,
5 c
to CD
_ =
$ C v g. n
J y
C N N
PIPP%O Q
O N N W V O W t0 O O (T (T (T (T f0
AGN d N �df d �dG d 06
N N d N N N N d y w ANG w
y N N N N y %PcN N N N N N N y N N
N
P.
PIP
I PIP.
1 1411,
N
J
fD
_a. 3
— sit;
a
I Is
Ildl
0
3
m
Z
m
m
a
m
m m1114* 1
IIIdYp
ldlopopdpo 1141".
y
N N
J
N
N
6
D
a
N
O
_ A
r
A A
a �
. ry' N O O O) V O) (T A W Iddoold
N O O O V m Of A W N
do
6 m m O m
<, NO
A N n
T A � co co L O cn 'o m '9 F
UrN m O N O Q Q N p 9 N J J O N N (n N
CNO 0 v $ 3 —5c 0 $ R � 3 3 p� �. � �' J 9
y O S ro v m
3 m v CO' m T p
S7
3H 9' o
' 9 m .
C Nov9 om�
C) g 3
$ CD °m pp
o F EI v o o D
T (�
NO �_ O
F
o a
O (In OO A O o O O o O O A W N p N N O
`OG w `OG y y �0G] `NG `dG d d ANG d N W d d 0
dodo
N N N N N y N N y N j
'1 p+ T T T T —1 —I �+
T O O O O T T �. J. �, J. C C pp O O O_ O_ cn
N N J J
dood.
A0A O0 (t0OD i0ii WN0
AA 0 0 0 0 0J O0 N
WO
NotdoodoodJdood_ NO
V +
OO O
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O) O O N N Vt N Ot Vt N Ut Gi N N N U (T Ut N
� . T� dood
T T T m TO O T T.
TN M. took 7. T
ANot. W O (O A W LJ O O O O (O (O J
M. � A O O) vi
N N A A
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O) O) Ut N T O O
O
� C
cn m
c d
3 rn
w
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
»i» - i - - - - - - - - -
:::::
c
0
N
R
W
m m
mo
3 3
m m
3 m
N x
O N
J
N
O
D
d
Nod loo,lb
D
a
N
A
NIP
Lj
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I . - - - - - - - . . - . . . - . - - :i!4iiii'{ .
. . - :::Ci' - " - . - - - - - - - - - .
C
O
V
W
ATTACHMENT B
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Table 1
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESIGN AND PERMITTING SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLASS I LANDFILL EXPANSION
TASK 1 : General Consulting / Meeting Support / Project Management
ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED
BUDGET
A. Professional Services
a. Principal hr $ 185 8 $ 11480
b . Associate hr $ 160 40 $ 6,400
c . Senior Project Engineer hr $ 142 20 $ 21834
d. Project Engineer hr $ 104) 40 $43349
e . Engineer hr $ 89 0 $0
f. Senior Staff Engineer hr $ 82 0 $ 0
g . Staff Engineer hr $ 68 0 $0
Subtotal Professional Services $ 15,062
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. CADD Designer hr $95 0 $0
b . Senior CADD Operator hr $91 20 $ 15819
c . Drafter/CADD Operator hr $ 54 0 $0
d. Technical/Administrative Assistant hr $ 70 0 $0
e . Technical Word Processor hr $66 0 $0
f. Clerical hr $42 40 $ 19690
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $39509
C . Reimbursables
a. Lodging day $75 0 $0
b . Per Diem day $21 0 $0
c . Communications Fee 3 % labor 0 . 03 189571 $ 557
d. CADD Computer System hr $ 15 20 $ 300
e . Vehicle Rental day $75 5 $ 375
f. 8 . 5 "x11 " Photocopies each $0 . 12 21000 $240
g . CADD Drawings each $3 60 $ 180
Subtotal Reimbursables $19652
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET : TASK 01 $209223
XL05065/JL050010/IRC Budget-final GeoSyntec Consultants
Table 2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESIGN AND PERMITTING SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLASS I LANDFILL EXPANSION
TASK 2 : Design and Permit Application
ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED
A. Professional Services
a . Principal hr $ 185 20 $3 ,700
b . Associate hr $ 160 60 $95600
c . Senior Project Engineer hr $ 142 40 $ 59667
d. Project Engineer hr $ 109 200 $ 21 ,744
e . Engineer hr $ 89 200 $ 17 , 894
f Senior Staff Engineer hr $ 82 200 $ 16, 314
g. Staff Engineer hr $ 68 1 300 $20, 544
Subtotal Professional Services $959463
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. CADD Designer hr $ 95 0 $ 0
b . Senior CADD Operator hr $91 60 $ 51458
c . Drafter/CADD Operator hr $ 54 240 $ 129962
d. Technical/Administrative Assistant hr $70 0 $0
e . Technical Word Processor hr $ 66 0 $0
f. Clerical hr $42 120 $ 59069
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $239489
C . Reimbursables
a . Lodging day $75 0 $0
b . Per Diem day $21 0 $0
c . Communications Fee 3 % labor 0 . 03 $ 1189952 $ 3 , 569
d. CADD Computer System hr $ 15 300 $49500
e . Vehicle Rental day $75 0 $0
f. 8 . 511x1 V Photocopies each $0 . 12 5 ,000 $ 600
g. CADD Drawings each $3 360 $ 19080
Subtotal Reimbursables $9,749
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET : TASK 02 $128,701
XL05065/JL050010/IRC Budget-final GeoSyntec Consultants
Table 3
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESIGN AND PERMITTING SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLASS I LANDFILL EXPANSION
TASK 3 : ERP Modification
ESTIMATED
ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY BUDGET
A. Professional Services
a . Principal hr $ 185 4 $740
b . Associate hr $ 160 20 $3 , 200
c . Senior Project Engineer hr $ 142 20 $ 2 , 834
d. Project Engineer hr $ 109 30 $ 3 ,262
e . Engineer hr $ 89 0 $0
f. Senior Staff Engineer hr $ 82 20 $ 1 ,631
g. Staff Engineer hr $ 68 0 $ 0
$ 11 ,667
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager hr $ 81 0 $ 0
b . Senior Engineering Technician hr $ 60 0 $0
c . Engineering Technician hr $47 0 $0
d. Senior CADD Operator hr $91 0 $0
e . Drafter/CADD Operator hr $ 54 20 $ 100
£ Technical/Administrative Assistant hr $70 0 $ 0
g. Technical Word Processor hr $ 66 10 $659
h. Clerical hr $42 10 $422
Subtotal Technical/Adnninistrative Services $29161
C. Reimbursables
a. Lodging day $75 0 $0
b . Per Diem day $21 0 $0
c . Communications Fee 3 % labor 0. 03 $ 139828 $415
d. CADD Computer System hr $ 15 20 $ 300
e . Vehicle Rental day $75 0 $0
f. 8 . 5 "x11 " Photocopies each $ 0 . 12 100 $ 12
g. CADD Photocopies each $ 3 15 $45
Subtotal Reimbursables $772
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET : TASK 03 $149600
XL05065/JL0500101RC Budget-final GeoSyntec Consultants
ATACHMENT C
WORK AUTHORIZATION