Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-254 WORK ORDER NUMBER 11 This Work Order Number 11 is entered into as of this _ day of 2007 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of 10 August, 2004 ("Agreement'), by and between Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District, a dependent special district of Indian River County, Florida , whose address is c/o Indian River County Utilities Department, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach , Florida 32960 (" DISTRICT") and Geosvntec Consultants. Inc. (" CONSULTANT' ). The DISTRICT has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Attachment 1 , attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Attachment 2 , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference . The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Attachment 3 , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement . Pursuant to paragraph 1 .4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT lI. GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC . INDIAN RIVEWC.OUNTY r SOLID WASTE. ©ISPOSAL DISTRICT ��- � ��� By: By: CZE Thomas A. Peel, Ph. D. , Vice President Gary Cheeler, Chairman Attest: J . K. B r n , Clerk of Cour By: Efejj`bClerk Approved : . rsephA. County Administrator rm legal fficiency: , ssistant County Attorney ATTACHMENT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2258 Riverside Avenue Geosyntec tee © Jacksonville, Florida 32204 l.J l7 ✓V L L li PH 904.388.8821 FAX 904.388.8163 consultants Wxu.geosyntcc.com 13 July 2007 Himanshu H. Mehta, P. E. Assistant Managing Director Solid Waste Disposal District Indian River County 1325 74rh Avenue SW Vero Beach, Florida 32968 Subject: Proposal for Technical and Facilitation Services for Carbon Trading in the Chicago Climate Exchange Indian River County Class I Landfill Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida Dear Mr. Mehta: Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) is pleased to submit this proposal to the Indian River County (IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) for providing technical and facilitation services for carbon trading in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) for the emission offsets from the Class I Landfill at the IRC Landfill (IRCL) facility located in Vero Beach, Indian River County , Florida. The proposal was prepared in response to a verbal request from the SWDD during a 12 July 2007 meeting with you and Mr. Erik Olson, P.E. of IRC, and representatives from Geosyntec. Geosyntec has prepared this proposal as Attachment I under Work Order No. 11 for the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services between IRC SWDD and Geosyntec, dated 10 August 2004 . The remainder of this proposal presents : (i) project background; (ii) proposed scope of work; (iii) budget estimate; and (iv) schedule. PROJECT BACKGROUND The IRCL facility is located in southern Indian River County, east of Interstate 95 , south of Oslo Road, and west of Rangeline Road in Vero Beach, Florida. The SWDD operates both the Class I Landfill and Construction and Demolition Debris (C&D) disposal facility at the IRCL facility . The Class I Landfill includes Segment 1 , Segment 2, and an Infill area located between Segment 1 and Segment 2 . Segment 1 is approximately 20 acres, unlined, and was initially closed in 1990 . Segment 2 and the Infill area are approximately 38 acres in total footprint, lined and currently receiving Class I waste (i . e . , municipal solid waste (MSW) . The IRCL Class I Landfill has a IRC CCX Proposal.doc Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 2 voluntarily-installed gas collection and control system (GCCS) that actively collects gas from Segment 1 , Segment 2, and the Infill area. Geosyntec understands that the IRCL facility is currently regulated under the New Source Performance Standards (HSPS) for MSW landfills as identified in Subpart WWW of 40 CFR, Part 60 (Subpart WWW). The NSPS states that MSW landfills that exceed certain size thresholds (waste-in-place of more than 2. 5 million Mg or 2 . 5 million m3) and emission thresholds (emissions of non-methane organic compounds (NMOC) of greater than 50 Mg/yr) are required to collect and control its landfill gas. Currently, the IRCL does not exceed the emission thresholds prescribed by NSPS, and results of Tier 2 sampling and testing conducted in December 2006 indicated that the projected NMOC emission rate through 2010 is below 50 Mg/yr. Therefore, the Class I Landfill will not be subject to the additional requirements of Subpart WWW to install and operate an active GCCS until that time or thereafter. In October 2006, the SWDD authorized Geosyntec under Task 5 (Technical Support) of Work Authorization No . 05 to evaluate the eligibility of the IRCL facility under the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) Landfill Methane credits program. Geosyntec is a current member of the U. S . Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP), and also joined CCX as an Offset Aggregator on 22 January 2007. As part of the CCX offset project eligibility evaluation for IRCL, Geosyntec performed the following tasks : • evaluated the eligibility of the IRC Class I Landfill to become registered offset project as outlined in the CCX Rule Book based on the summary information provided by SWDD ; • introduced the IRC Class I Landfill project to CCX; • reviewed the IRC' s annual fuel consumption summary information provided by SWDD and performed a preliminary estimation of equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions ; • performed a preliminary evaluation of potential annual emissions offsets for the IRC Class I Landfill based on the summary information provided by SWDD; • completed and submitted the CCX' s offsets project eligibility questionnaire for the landfill after review by SWDD ; and • obtained preliminary approval from CCX. IRC CCX Propo ].dm engineers I scientists I innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 3 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK This proposal presents the scope of work for Geosyntec to provide professional services to assist SWDD to generate revenue by trading emission offsets from the Class I Landfill in the CCX program . For budgeting purposes, the scope of work will be performed under five main tasks, as presented below. Task 1 : General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management Task 2 : Emissions Offsets Trading for 2007 Offsets Task 3 : Emissions Offsets Trading for 2008 Offsets Task 4 : Emissions Offsets Trading for 2009 Offsets Task 5 : Emissions Offsets Trading for 2010 Offsets In addition, Geosyntec has included an optional Task 6 for the Emissions Offsets Trading for 2003 - mid 2007 Offsets. Each of these are briefly described below. Task 1 : General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management Task 1 consists of three components : general consulting, meeting support, and project management. Geosyntec will provide SWDD with consulting services necessary to initiate the project and attend kick-off and in-progress review meetings with SWDD. Geosyntec will prepare presentation graphics and other documents required to support the meetings and project coordination activities. A kickoff meeting with SWDD is proposed before the start of project activities so that the specific project requirements can be discussed. If required by SWDD, Geosyntec will prepare for and attend a meeting with the SWDD Board to explain the project scope and budget requirements. Geosyntec will also schedule and attend review meetings with SWDD as necessary during the course of the project. Following each meeting, Geosyntec will prepare meeting minutes that document decisions reached in the meetings. Project management activities will include: budget and schedule tracking, invoice review, and project communications, including the preparation of a monthly progress report . The project report will include a description of the activities completed during IRC CCX Propml.doc engineel's I scientists I innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 4 the month and planned activities for the following month. In addition, the progress report will identify any technical or administrative issues that require SWDD' s attention and the current status of the budget and schedule. For the purpose of this budget estimate, Geosyntec has included three meetings : (i) one kickoff meeting with SWDD; (ii) one in-progress review meeting with SWDD; and (iii) one meeting with the SWDD Board, if requested by SWDD . Project management and meeting activities proposed herein are only for Tasks 2 and 3 services which will be performed in the very near future. The scope of work and project management and meeting support services for Tasks 4 and 5, and the Optional Task 6 will be submitted to SWDD for approval prior to initiation of each of these tasks. Task 2 : Emission Offsets Tradine for 2007 Offsets The scope of services for Task 2 is to provide SWDD with technical and facilitation services to trade emission offsets from the landfill gas from August through December 2007. Task 2 is then divided into two subtasks, Tasks 2a and 2b. Task 2a consists of mainly engineering services and Task 2b consists of trading activities in the CCX. Task 2a consists of the following activities: • perform a site visit to the IRCL to inspect the gas collection and control systetm (GCCS) and recording equipment (this will be performed as part of the kick-off meeting under Task 1 ); • review and assemble historic information about the GCCS and the landfill; • review SWDD and County data such as fuel records to calculate 2007 annual carbon emissions from County-owned facilities; • perform calculations to quantify carbon emission reductions due to the operation of the GCCS in 2007; • prepare report to present documentation and calculations of estimated emission offsets from 2007; • coordinate with CCX and its approved independent verifier to review data to certify the estimated emission offsets; and • pay registration fees and register emission offsets at CCX (ten percent need to be retired after registration per current CCX rules); IRC CCX Proposal.do engineers I scientists � innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 5 Task 2b consists of the following subtasks : • provide historic and current offset price trends as needed to SWDD to enable them to make decision on when to sell; and • sell offsets when directed by SWDD, pay transaction fees to CCX, deduct aggregator expenses and fees, and pay SWDD. It is noted that the work to be performed by Geosyntec under Task 2 relates to carbon trading of offsets generated from August through December 2007. The offsets from January through July 2007 will be performed as part of the optional Task 6. This is because CCX requirements, such as quarterly calibration of flow meter, are apparently not being implemented at the IRCL facility. Geosyntec will present a memorandum to SWDD surnmarizing the calibration procedures and frequencies recommended to be followed in order to fully comply with CCX rules. Current CCX rules only allow annual sales of up to 50,000 metric tons of carbon equivalent; the rest can remain in the project account and sold in future years as allowed by the CCX Rules . Upon approval of this proposal by the SWDD, Geosyntec will prepare an agreement to be executed by Geosyntec and SWDD that gives Geosyntec the rights to trade these offsets on behalf of SWDD. Task 3 : Emission Offsets Trading for 2008 Offsets Task 3 is divided into two subtasks, Tasks 3a and 3b. Task 3a consists of mainly engineering services and Task 3b consists of trading activities in the CCX . Task 3a consists of the following activities: • review SWDD and County data such as fuel records to calculate 2008 annual carbon emissions from County-owned facilities; • perform calculations to quantify carbon emission reductions due to the operation of the GCCS in 2008; • prepare report to present documentation and calculations of estimated emission offsets from 2008; • coordinate with CCX and its approved independent verifier to review data to certify the estimated emission offsets; and • pay registration fees and register emission offsets at CCX (ten percent need to be retired after registration per current CCX rules); IRC CCX Proposal.do engineers I scientists I innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 6 Task 3b consists of the following subtasks: • provide historic and current offset price trends as needed to SWDD to enable them to make decision on when to sell; and • sell offsets when directed by SWDD, pay transaction fees to CCX, deduct aggregator expenses and fees, and pay SWDD. Tasks 4and 5 : Emission Offsets Trading for 2009 and 2010 Offsets Tasks 4, and 5 consist of emission offsets trading for 2009 and 2010 offsets, respectively. The scope of services for these tasks is similar to the ones presented under Task 3 for emission offsets trading for 2008 . Optional Task 6 : Emission Offsets Trading for 2003 —mid 2007 Offsets As previously discussed the GCCS has been installed at the IRCL since 2003 and therefore SWDD could potentially qualify for trading the emission offsets from 2003 through mid 2007. However, it is known that the quarterly calibration of the flow meter required by CCX was not followed during this period. Also, it is very possible that the gas collection and flare systems were not fully operational in 2003 and 2004 for those years to qualify for offsets trading. The CCX Landfill Gas Subcommittee is currently looking into the possibility of allowing the use of an "as-found calibration curve approach" for past emissions offsets. If this outcome is successful, Geosyntee will perform Task 6 as outlined below. Task 6 is divided into two subtasks, Tasks 6a and 6b. Task 6a consists of mainly engineering services and Task 6b consists of trading activities in the CCX . Task 6a consists of the following activities: • review SWDD and County data such as fuel records to calculate annual carbon emissions from County-owned facilities; • perform calculations to quantify carbon emission reductions due to the operation of the GCCS from 2003 to mid 2007; • prepare report to present documentation and calculations of estimated emission offsets from 2003 to mid 2007; • coordinate with CCX and its approved independent verifier to arrange site visit and data review to certify the estimated emission offsets ; and • pay registration fees and register emission offsets at CCX (ten percent need to be retired after registration per current CCX rules) . IRC CCX Proposal.dm engineers I scientists I innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 7 Task 6b consists of the following activities : • provide historic and current offset price trends as needed to SWDD to enable them to make decision on when to sell; and • sell offsets when directed by SWDD, pay transaction fees to CCX, deduct aggregator expenses and fees, and pay SWDD. BUDGET ESTIMATE A budget estimate for the scope of work outlined in Tasks 1 through 6 of this proposal is summarized in the following table, and a detailed budget estimate is provided as Attachment 2. Task 1 — General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management $13,388 Task 2a — Engineering Services for 2007 Offsets $23,013 Task 3a — Engineering Services for 2008 Offsets $235013 Task 4a — Engineering Services for 2009 Offsets (Subject to adjustment due to annual rate increase) $25,000 Task 5a — Engineering Services for 2010 Offsets (Subject to adjustment due to annual rate increase) $25,000 Optional Task 6a — Engineering Services for 2003-mid 2007 Offsets $35,264 TOTAL (estimated) $144 ,678 Geosyntec will not exceed the cost estimate without prior approval and written authorization from SWDD . The estimates provided for years 2009 and 2010 are subject to change in accordance with annual rate increases, and do not include project management and meeting support services that may be required. For the purpose of this proposal, Geosyntec proposes to use a phased-approach for this work and requests IRC CCX Proposal.doc engineers I scientists I innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 8 authorization of Tasks 1 through 3 . Tasks 4, 5 and 6 will be performed with authorization from SWDD as discussed in the proposal . In addition to the above direct fees to Geosyntec, the following anticipated expenses and fees need to be paid by SWDD at different times. It should be noted that these estimates are based on current fees, offsets estimates, and assumptions, and may change in the future. Anticipated fees needed to be paid by SWDD at the time of carrying out the activity (i .e. verification and registration) are: CCX' s verifier for 2003- mid 2007 Offsets (if eligible) $ 10,000 CCX registration fees for 2003- mid 2007 Offsets $115046 CCX' s verifier for 2007 Offsets $109000 CCX registration fees for 2007 Offsets $3,632 CCX' s verifier for 2008 Offsets $89000 CCX registration fees for 2008 Offsets $8,717 CCX' s verifier for 2009 Offsets $8,000 CCX registration fees for 2009 Offsets $8,717 CCX' s verifier for 2010 Offsets $85000 CCX registration fees for 2010 Offsets $8,717 Anticipated fees that will be deducted by Geosyntec (as an offset aggregator) from the gross sales price for emission offsets before paying SWDD : CCX transaction fees 5 cents per ton sold Expenses for maintaining offset project account $2,500 per year Fee for providing historic market data $ 100 per request IRC CCX Proposal.doc engineers I scientists I innovators Mr. Himarshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 9 Fee for providing offset account information $50 per request Fee for transaction $500 per transaction For the purpose of this proposal, Geosyntee proposes to use a phased-approach for this work and requests authorization of Tasks 1 through 3 . Tasks 4 and 5 will be performed depending on the market requirements and authorization from SWDD. Again, Task 6 r will only be performed if a favorable decision is reached by the CCX Landfill Gas Subcommittee on allowing trading of past emission offsets. Geosyntec will request authorization from SWDD prior to initiation of work. REVENUE PROJECTIONS FOR THE IRC Estimated rough revenue projections for the project are presented in Tables 1 and 2 . Assumptions used in these calculations are listed as footnotes to the table. Based on these calculations SWDD is expected to earn a total net revenue of approximately $370, 149 by trading offsets from years 2005 to 2010 at the CCX. SCHEDULE Geosyntec will be available for a kick-off meeting and site visit within one week of obtaining approval from SWDD. After review and approval from SWDD, the final report will be submitted to a CCX-approved independent verifier for review. A site visit will also be coordinated with the verifier. Geosyntec will closely work with CCX and its verifier during the review process. After approval/verification of the offsets Geosyntec will register them in the exchange, and sell offsets as directed by SWDD . Geosyntec will start the August through December 2007 offsets documentation activities as soon as obtaining approval from SWDD. According to the current volume, of estimated offsets based on the information provided by SWDD and in accordance with current CCX limits on the amount of yearly sales for a project, the sale of offsets registered for this project from years 2005 to 2010 is anticipated to continue until 2013 . Geosyntec will provide the services to sell the registered offsets from years 2005 to 2010 until 2011 . It is assumed that CCX will continue to operate beyond 2010. IRC CCX Pmposal.dcc engineers I scientists I innovators Mr. Himanshu Mehta 13 July 2007 Page 10 CLOSURE Geosyntec appreciates this opportunity to offer our services to this unique project. If this proposal is acceptable, please indicate your agreement by signing the attached work authorization, which references this proposal. Please return one signed work authorization to Dr. Badu-Tweneboah's attention. Please call the undersigned with questions you may have as you review this proposal. Sincerely, Ramachandran Kulasingam, Ph .D. Project Engineer Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph.D . , P .E. Associate Attachments Copies to : Jay Beech, Ph.D. , P.E. (Geosyntec) Tom Peel , Ph. D . (Geosyntec) IRC CCX Pwposal.doc engineers I scientists I innovators Table 1 : Rough Estimate of Projected Revenues to TRC S WDD from the Sale of Offsets from August 2007 To 2010 (Please Refer To Notes For A List Of Assumptions Used In The Calculations). cc _ .w oaw I•vM1nl a°"`m •.rums o.e.n.lry9 . co . Mirror, oftsOff"M Aft', Seel WaVw•bnx• W [e•w ' 04m51 ^ vw N " °u Srn Ms s ` 5 u ew w 4a `mn .•r.r • • [ •. tiR• r, a" adm " lYMlupe aryna• ImKOLM Iwma3l m • 0"01Paltar 16.0141 RI (00=21 ("Vaal 0 1 2003 1 2004 1 2005 1 2006 11 Jan WJul200] II Mg W Oac 2937 7W 45 95 1.327 24.214 24,214 10 21,793 50,000 21.793 0 SW,WO 50.15 $1632 50.05 51,490 53.3 $71.916 S14]22 334,403 549,124 622.701 11 2006 750 45 OS J,t54 56.114 58.114 10 52,so2 SIM W,LM 2.332 $6.003 W.15 $8.717 $0.05 52.593 51.3 Sim," 519,217 $35.813 555,030 $109,970 II 2009 750 45 05 31164 58,114 58.114 10 52,3M 50,000 50,1)(DO 4,110.5 58.000 Sale $8,717 SOAS 52.50] 513 S165.00) $19,217 535,813 $55,030 $100,970 1119 2010 750 45 05 3.184 58,114 58.114 10 52,301 5o,000 50,093 8 WT WOOD 50.15 58.717 $0.05 52.500 $3.3 5185.000 519,217 $35,811 $55,030 6109,970 1119 2011 0 6.937 6.907 0 50.15 50 $0.0 5345 53.3 $22,793 $345 SS,OOo 55.345 $17.448 IIP 2012 5589,709 572716 5146,842 $219,560 3.30.140 Noks'. 1CekNation; were based an reasonable eSlNnalas of gas Mows, meNina contents, aM Ran WeraVA9 bream Actual datamayvaryfrom MeseestImates. 2 Curren COX FNu d0i that 10% d the others W W retired ade1 reseeding. 3 Curren COX nares Side the maximum amual amara W 50.000 am CO2. 4 Current COX fargica0m fees are 15 cane par deal Trenaacrm leen am 5 cenra per aRul. Theae may incnau in the Future. 5 ESWnatW wi8ulion eke at 610.000 k( out TuguaF 2093 Or Cadence,2007 otwla and 50,000 for 2007. 206, 2038, and 2010 oRsen wen auum W. Actual leas may very. 6 Arpin excenaes lar mwWm mm oMfel project •[auntm assumed to oe 52,100 per year. 7 Apdce Of S3.J carOR5N I5iuVTM. Whole the is a nasowbk avmeye for current mahetmnditims, prices may vsry in Ne FuW , 8 COX 15 yet W publish their plans for yaalvls beyae Ne and or 2010. 8 11 is assumed Nal Nm W be 12 VanuCRns, Markel dee, and amoum information requests from me County. IRC COX empns4l dor Table 2: Rough Estimate of Projected Revenues to IRC SK'DD from the Sale of Offsets from 2003 to July 2007 (Please Refer To Notes For A Ctst Of Asstunptions Used In The Calculations). Aming, o ramp amI zgiomam pomp offs Na down. pIm ORmIS cca an,f• No me cos mam en4unm, w Ne+a w 4,oa,w meu, reW rVwu rr rw, R"Aw amem, INn m sre i0'v'0'" vmmmEo-, Sam r I'Somw rme[mm4 Iw r..ewae, rom, r..[ 10"Ifila . emmm Ikrvnl mxa w.nuee eIReMN ve[evu.a aSow) .'camp. Ivmxaa of nw em wr evax a rex. ^ ^ r... vxNan 0.rvuva nrvlavuen, wPvsaa, .pm Na� p.m, r' 1%Ip I%1 (own; M ametm lwtc00 alamKoa i ONN� rM admin n Emmett ml 2003 2004 2005 IIO i0 95 630 25,159 o 0 x550 350 a2 95 1,9 . b 11 Jin JulJoe 3007 750 15 05 1,858 99.87 It quo b Ox 2007 ]].851 ID 66,2]] 5027 Mon 16,3]] $t0,W0 0.15 5+1.0M $0.0 f254J $3.3 1155,000 125.548 f3 .500 f8 .314 ftO .4 00 II 278 163]1 18,9! 0 7.15 $0 fo.03 $9H SJ.J SSJ.]iJ f8U f3.5o0 f9,9t5 1+`0.400 11 2010 III7 2010 1119 2011 111? 1 012 $218,713 sx,3w xa,ze4 ie5,e24 s+s51090 Ndai: 1 Cakulalbns were CdfWw, enatN ee5ma4[ N9a[ Mws. faNanemorng. . enE M,eope,ati,p 4mea. Acluel Ealy mayvary l,wn qe[a u4maNs. 2 Cumml CC% Rome rap, re Nal tpk of µeallse4 bd 5rogNm ro01e1enng. 3 CuvMl CC% Ruk[ limn Pa maximum emuN o ee b 50.70 emlCO2. 4 satmaeld mawneefe femoro 15NOMe tow 203 W Aly 20074Ensees an Scents pu onwt. no" may ewMay y mom.veavaFNa bwp. 5 Ea'mab6 r"powas W 01510.70 NOW Me 2003bcco27] scaSwere 52.500 year lees mayvary. 9 AgOr a$ 3peresrV maintain Vas Whoa project anowntlsassumeab Ce meet pee1eai. ] A at CCXIS "IW ouaaoflaNuemsto,o WeAe IN[ kdpawll of 010, Mwrtenl mahelcmEtlbns, pees may varyN Ne fu4ve. e CCXusetto WElite we IaaopenlNO ,Sayond nNANaw S, of Y0f0. 9 It is auumN NN NVe vAl Oe 1$ Vanptlbni, mdhN 6aU, aM axawrl MO,malia+ eepuesis from Ne Caunly. ATTACHMENT 2 DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE Table 1 BUDGET ESTIMATE EMISSION OFFSETS AGGREGATION SERVICES CLASS I LANDFILL FACILITY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TASK 01 : PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MEETINGS ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED 3 y COST a. Principal Hr $ 185 0 $0 b. Associate Hr $160 36 $5, 760 c. Senior Project Engineer Hr $ 142 0 $0 d. Project Engineer Hr $109 24 $2,609 e. Engineer Hr $89 0 $0 f. Senior Staff Engineer Hr $82 16 $ 1 , 305 g . Staff Engineer Hr $68 0 $0 Subtotal Professional Servicesi $9,674 ',eVWBOXAWlTltrYiS ldtiv@ .Tel a. CADD Designer Hr $95 0 $0 b. Drafter/CADD Operator/Artist Hr $54 8 $432 c. Technical/Administrative Assistant Hr $ 70 8 $562 d . Technical Word Processor Hr $66 8 $527 e . Clerical Hr $42 24 $ 1 ,014 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $2, 534 IN x WOO ur ablesF, a. Travel Trip $300 2 $600 b. Lodging Day $75 4 $300 c. Per Diem' Day $21 4 $84 d . Communications Fee 3% Labor 0 .03 $12,209 $366 e . CADD Computer System Hr $ 15 8 $ 120 f. Vehicle Rental' Day $75 4 $300 g. 8"x11 " Photocopies Each $0. 12 50 $6 h. CADD Drawings Each $ 3 1 $3 Subtotal Reimbursables $ 1 , 179 ' " 7aTAL}ES.7jMATED B DC; I s .T"45 ` ., $ { 43 i In compliance with Section 112 .061 F. S. XL06096/Budget_Estimate_Revised.xls GeoSyntec Consultants Table 2 BUDGET ESTIMATE EMISSION OFFSETS AGGREGATION SERVICES CLASS 1 LANDFILL FACILITY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TASK 02a : AUGUST- DECEMBER 2007 OFFSETS - ENGINEERING SERVICES ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED ,,y E COST a . Principal Hr $ 185 4 $740 b . Associate Hr $ 160 20 $3, 200 c. Senior Project Engineer Hr $ 142 0 $0 d . Project Engineer Hr $ 109 70 $7, 610 e. Engineer Hr $89 0 $0 f. Senior Staff Engineer Hr $82 120 $9, 788 g . Staff Engineer Hr 1 $68 0 $0 r� Subtotal Professional Services $21 ,339 m a. CADD Designer Hr $95 0 $0 b. Drafter/CADD Operator/Artist Hr $54 0 $0 c . Technical/Administrative Assistant Hr $70 0 $0 d . Technical Word Processor Hr $66 6 $395 e. Clerical Hr $42 6 $253 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $649 a. Lodging Day $75 2 $ 150 b. Per Diem* Day $21 2 $42 c. Communications Fee 3% Labor 0 .03 $21 ,987 $660 d . CADD Computer System Hr $ 15 0 $0 e . Vehicle Rental* Day $75 2 $ 150 f. 8'X11 " Photocopies Each $0. 12 200 $24 g . CADD Drawings Each $3 0 $0 Subtotal Reimbursables $ 1 , 026 In compliance with Section 112 . 061 F .S . Notes : 1 . Verification fee for the CCX-approved verifier is not included herein. It is assumed that the IRC will pay the fees directly or through Geosyntec. Anticipated fees are about $ 10,000 XL06096/Budget_Estimate_Revisea.As GeoSyntec Consultants Table 3 BUDGET ESTIMATE EMISSION OFFSETS AGGREGATION SERVICES CLASS I LANDFILL FACILITY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TASK 03a : 2008 OFFSETS - ENGINEERING SERVICES ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST a. Principal Hr $ 185 4 $740 b. Associate Hr $ 160 20 $3,200 c. Senior Project Engineer Hr $ 142 0 $0 d . Project Engineer Hr $109 70 $7,610 e . Engineer Hr $89 0 $0 f. Senior Staff Engineer Hr $82 1201 $9 ,788 g. Staff Engineer Hr 1 $68 0 $0 Subtotal Professional Services $2 ,339..: IMP. a . CADD Designer Hr $95 0 $0 b . Drafter/CADD Operator/Artist Hr $ 54 0 $0 c. Technical/Administrative Assistant Hr $70 0 $0 d . Technical Word Processor Hr $66 6 $395 e. Clerical Hr $42 1 6 $253 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $649 ia� r y WW" � pr < f+- � 'Ci,': y2�RIFflIr5'd Dl �r. ,v T;�``1 2 c ➢y ;. .',i F��, . 7. a�'+s4� a . Lodging Day $75 2 $ 150 b . Per Diem' Day $21 2 $42 c. Communications Fee 3% Labor 0.03 $21 , 987 $660 d . CADD Computer System Hr $ 15 0 $0 e. Vehicle Rental' Day $ 75 2 $ 150 f. 8"x11 " Photocopies Each $0. 12 200 $24 g . CADD Drawings Each $3 0 $0 Subtotal Reimbursables $ 1 , 026 4 . , fx ' � T$( E In compliance with Section 112. 061 F.S. Notes : 1 . Verification fee for the CCX-approved verifier is not included herein . It is assumed that the IRC will pay the fees directly or through Geosyntec. Anticipated fees are about $8,000 XL06096/Budget_Estimate_Revised.xls GeoSynleo Consultants Table BUDGET ESTIMATE EMISSION OFFSETS AGGREGATION SERVICES CLASS I LANDFILL FACILITY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TASK 06a : 2003-mid 2007 OFFSETS - ENGINEERING SERVICES ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST A. Professional Services . a. Principal Hr $ 185 6 $ 1 , 110 b. Associate Hr $160 26 $4, 160 c . Senior Project Engineer Hr $ 142 0 $0 d . Project Engineer Hr $ 109 120 $ 13,046 e. Engineer Hr $89 0 $0 f. Senior Staff Engineer Hr $82 180 $ 14,683 g. Staff Engineer Hr $68 0 $0 Subtotal Professional Services $32, 999 B . Technical/Administrative Services a. Senior Engineering Technician Hr $95 0 $0 b. Drafter/CADD Operator/Artist Hr $54 0 $0 c . Technical/Administrative Assistant Hr $70 0 $0 d . Technical Word Processor Hr $66 8 $527 e. Clerical Hr $42 12 $507 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $1 , 034 C. Reimbursables a . Vehicle Rental Day $ 75 2 $150 b. Communications Fee 3% Labor $0.03 $34 , 033 $ 1 ,021 c. CADD Computer System Hr $ 15.00 $0 $0 d . 8'x11 " Photocopies Each $0 . 12 500 $60 e. CADD Drawings Each $ 3.00 0 $0 Subtotal Reimbursables $ 13231 TOTAL ES'T'IMATED BUDGET : TASK 06al $35,264 In compliance with Section 112 . 061 F .S . Notes : 1 . Verification fee for the CCX-approved verifier is not included herein . It is assumed that the XL06096/8udget_Estimate_Revised.As GeoSyntec Consultants