HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-223 Q Q .
ao0 � - �
WORK ORDER NUMBER 2
BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE
This Work Order Number 2 is entered into as of this 20thday of June
2006 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services
entered into as of December 13 , 2005 ("Agreement'), by and between Indian River
County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Coastal
Technology Corporation ("CONSULTANT").
The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services
set forth on Attachment 1 , attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this
reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee
schedule set forth in Attachment 2 , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof
by this reference . The Consultant will perform the professional services within the
timeframe more particularly set forth in Attachment 2 , attached to this Work Order and
made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set
forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1 .4 of the Agreement, nothing contained
in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the
Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully
set forth herein .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as
of the date first written above.
CONSULTANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Coastal Technolo2v Cot oration OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By: lov, B
Michael P. Walther, P.E. Arthur R,� .. ., aer, Chai a
Title : President Attest ,J � $ anon 'Cler'k�aJ' ourt
B : t '�:<
Y ll � n
eputyCle>Ek f ,
a ,
Approved:
seph A. aird, County Administrator
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Manan I Fell , Assistant" ou tty Attorney
ATTACHMENT 1
SCOPE OF WORK
Indian River County Work Order Number 2
Beach Preservation Plan Scope of Work
Attachment i
General : The "Indian River County Beach Preservation Plan Update" (revised March 16, 1998) and the
"Indian River County Beach Restoration Projects — Engineering Design Report " (by ATM dated February
2000 - hereinafter referred to as "ATM Report") addresses eight ( 8) designated planning sectors from
Sebastian Inlet to the south County line and recommend periodic nourishment of the County' s critically eroded
beaches . During 2004 and 2005 , County beaches were severely impacted by several hurricanes which caused
significant beach erosion and prompted many dune restoration projects and seawall projects, which have
provided limited protection to upland improvements. In light of these changes, it is desirable to update the
County' s Beach Preservation Plan in collaboration with the COUNTY' s Beach and Shore Preservation
Advisory Committee (hereinafter referred to as "Beach Committee"). in general, consistent with the existing
Beach Preservation Plan and the ATM Report , it is anticipated that the updated Beach Preservation Plan
produced via this Work Order, shall prescribe the limits and extent of beach/dune nourishment required to
maintain County beaches.
"Throughout the progress of work, COASTAL TECH will maintain informal contact with the COUNTY and
FDEP staff. Informal contact includes meeting with the COUNTY ' s project manager, telephone contact,
emails, written monthly progress reports to the COUNTY and FDEP and similar activities not involving
special graphics or presentations, or travel outside the project area. COASTAL TECH will maintain and update
an MS Project Schedule as tasks and milestones are met . Each task shall be considered complete for
contractual purposes when the interim work product(s) have been reviewed and accepted by the COUNTY and
FDEP staff. This Work Order includes the following tasks:
Task 1 — CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
Task la - Erosion Analysis : The COUNTY will provide COASTAL TECH with the following existing
data in hard copy and digital form within the County:
a) available controlled digital photography
b) beach profile surveys
c) BPP beach condition analysis report 86 ' -01 ' — (Woods Hole Group July 2002)
d) natural resources maps and characterization — including hardbottom
e) native beach sand sampling and analysis results
f) other design documents (prepared subsequent to the ATM Report)
Based upon the data provided by the COUNTY and otherwise available from the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), COASTAL TECH will conduct a shoreline and volumetric change
analysis to determine historical erosion losses along COUNTY beaches. The erosion analysis shall address
changes (a) from 1972 to 1986, and (b) from 1986 to the most recent data available, shoreline change (at
Oft, 5 ft, and 10 ft elevation) and volumetric change (to an agreed upon depth). The report will include
tabular and graphic presentation of (a) shoreline change data (b) volume change data, and (c) historical
bluff changes - for each monument. The report shall include plots of representative profiles for each sector.
Task lb —Vulnerability Analysis : In general, COASTAL TECH will conduct an assessment of the risk
of damage to upland property, existing structures, public infrastructure and coastal environmental
resources from potential background and storm induced erosion along Counlybeaches. COASTAL TECH
will conduct a field investigation to identify the extent of existing shoreline armoring including seawalls,
rock revetments, and "sand-bag" structures. The likely landward extent of future erosion will be assessed
for 10, 20 and 30 years into the future based upon the updated historical shoreline change data from Task
Ia. COASTAL TECH will plot the predicted limits of erosion (expected bluff location) and extent of
existing armoring onto available digital photography provided by the COUNTY to produce risk
characterization maps .
Page I of
June 9, 2006
Indian River County Work Order Number 2
Beach Preservation Plan Scope of Work
Task lc — Summary Conditions Report: COASTAL TECH will prepare a surmnary report, which
documents the results of the above tasks. COASTAL TECH will review the written smmnary with the
COUNTY, make appropriate revisions as may be identified by the COUNTY, and provide fifteen ( 15)
copies of the written summary for distribution by the COUNTY to the Beach Committee. The final report
for Task I will be a stand-alone document.
Task 2 — ASSESSMENT
In general , based on Task 1 results, COASTAL TECH will identify recommended beach management strategics
appropriate for each sector of beach in Indian River County. Strategies may include, but are not limited to:
I . A natural beach policy zone — no planned routine sand placement activities
2 . A sand transfer re-nourishment zone — where large scale placements of sand derived from Sebastian
hilet should be placed
3 . A sand transfer dune maintenance zone — Where small scale truck haul placements of sand derived
from Sebastian Inlet should be placed to stabilize the present dune line
4. A dune maintenance zone — where periodic sand placements from upland sources should be placed as
needed to maintain the current dune line
5 . A beach restoration zone — where shoreline conditions and vulnerable infrastructure merit the
placement of large quantities of offshore sand to substantially advance the shoreline.
Task 2a - Planning Charette : COASTAL TECH will meet with the Beach Committee and lead a
planning charette to :
1 ) explain the purpose of the updated Beach Preservation Plan , its schedule and expected products,
2) present a range of alternatives eliminated from detailed evaluation and the reasons t'or elimination
3) present the results of Tasks 1 and the beach management strategy recommendations
4) initiate public participation and open discussion regarding appropriate sector boundaries and the
beach management strategy in each sector
5 ) identify the goals and objectives for beach management and erosion control in each sector
6) Identify key stakeholders from each sector.
COASTAL TECH will prepare a draft press release for the charette. The COUNTY will complete and
issue the press release. COASTAL TECH will prepare for and participate in the charette, and will prepare
a written summary of public comments at the meeting. Following the charette, COASTAL TECI1 will
conduct a project team workshop including COUNTY and FDEP staffs in order to :
review the public comments
review the results of the previously completed site characterization tasks
develop specific goals for erosion control in each sector.
Task 2b - Assessment: Based upon the results of Tasks 1 ad 2a, COASTAL TECH will formulate
recommended changes to the boundaries and/or beach management strategies for each sector consistent
with Florida statutes and the goals and objectives as determined from the charette and other input.
COASTAL TECH will subsequently meet with the COUNTY to review the recommended sector
boundaries and strategies for each sector. The COUNTY shall address potential environmental impacts of
alternative strategies. Upon concurrence by the COUNTY as to sector boundaries and strategies
COASTAL TECH will prepare:
1 ) a map of the County showing sector boundaries and proposed strategies,
2) a written description of proposed boundaries and the recommended strategy for each sector,
3) a conceptual opinion of probable initial and annualized maintenance costs- based upon restoration
or maintenance of a historical beach condition .
Page 2 of 3
June 9, 2006
Indian River County Work Order Number 2
Beach Preservation Plan Scope of Work
Task 3 - FUNDING OPTIONS
Task 3a - Public Access Inventory: Based upon documentation available from COUNTY and FDEP
documents, the COUNTY will prepare a summary inventory of existing beach accesses and associated
public facilities (parking, restrooms, etc.) in order to evaluate the degree of public access within each
sector. 'Che COUNTY will prepare tabular summaries (in the form of EXCEL files) and "marked-up"
aerials (in the form of GIS exhibits) to illustrate the length of accessible shoreline and the associated State
cost-share percentages that can be expected under existing State Erosion Control Program policies. The
COUNTY will identify potential beach access points for improvement and/or acquisition to increase the
amount of State funds the COUNTY would be eligible to receive. COASTAL TECII will review the
tabular summaries and aerials for compliance with FDEP rules. COASTAL TECH will confer with County
staff regarding potential beach access points.
Task 3b - Potential Funding Sources : Based on the conceptual designs developed under Task 2b and the
degree of public access from Task 3a, COASTAL TECII will generically identify potential federal , state,
regional and local revenue sources which might be used for future implementation of projects. The
COUNTY will :
1 ) identify potential sources and funding levels,
2) assess the advantages and disadvantages of each funding source, and
3) chart the process and likely time frames for obtaining funds.
Alternative sources may include Sebastian Inlet Tax District, general revenue, Municipal Services Benefit
or Taxing Units (MSBU/M STU), special assessment, tourist tax, Florida Erosion Control Program, and the
U. S . Army Corps of Engineer's Shore Protection Program. COASTAL TECII will confer with COUNTY
staff to identify a long-term funding plan that appears to best address the COUNTY' s goals and objectives.
Task 4 — PLAN FORMULATION
Task 4a - DRAFT Plan : Based on the above tasks ( 1 -3), COASTAL TECH will prepare a DRAFT
Beach Preservation Plan. The DRAFT plan will include the stand alone documents produced in Tasks 1
and 2 and the results of Task 3 . The Plan will be consistent with FDEP Erosion Control Program
guidelines, and maximize State funding for erosion control projects. The Plan will include sections
describing:
1 ) the locally preferred alternatives consistent with Florida statutes for addressing or abatement of
beach erosion in each sector,
2) the necessary restoration and maintenance activities over the next ten years,
3) a 10-year funding strategy, including post storm recovery budget recommendations.
COASTAL TECH will prepare a DRAFT Plan, which documents the results of the above tasks.
COASTAL TECH will review the DRAFT Plan with the COUNTY, make appropriate revisions as may be
identified by the COUNTY, and provide fifteen ( 15) copies of the DRAFT Plan for distribution by the
COUNTY to the Beach Committee. COASTAL TECH will meet with the Beach Committee to present the
results of the above tasks. COASTAL TECH will meet with the Board of County Commissioners to
present the Plan.
Task 4b - Final Plan : COASTAL 'TECH will incorporate revisions to the DRAFT Plan as may be
identified and directed by the COUNTY. COASTAL TECH will assist the COUNTY staff in presenting
the results of the study to the Board of County Commissioners. Following Board review and appropriate
action , COASTAL TECH will provide ten (10) copies of the final Beach Preservation Plan ,
Page 3 of 3
June 9, 2006
ATTACHMENT
FEE SCHEDULE AND TIMEFRAME
Indian River County Beach Preservation Plan Update Work Order 2
Detailed Summary of Estimated Fees
June 9, 2006 R1iWel C4fl Cho Wagner Jeff Bob Rally Lerybanta Cda Peer SaOy Kim Lois Juga JeR fimnhe
.ee Talar WaNrtr - - - Weber Dawson - - --u Hag "bre"
BWde Mi,'ne RaveL Daverlpa_11 :C_q_klad E4war_ds_ _Iq_mp5n Le_e_ Edwatdt
pmrya Dr Cmalal Penpal 51aR SUfl d (aedogel la4 atlal �p geclar Bvglpa¢ $ PemX Ppm /
zo.lan a6 : $205,695 Engmer Fngnro'n Enter Engmwr beat ab aw aSe41a0 G65°eait Thal drmfw C al ab GR 51ree E $paal¢I
TxM Ter1m� cleft Total Fired Costs $Vb1a5k Task
Task Desch tion _ g1 s5 8101 $tt2 591 Est $120 8181 Ees 8]s $141 Et41 8]s 596 S8s $]2 - 548 Fees . unsound
oesvr em total Total
�STSFt -JulF$45 ,753 ;la - ENDg14alysis L I&e.- .s '$ v _ -= _ < ..
zo.nma zsJ,d.os 3s $45,753 ia - 6oslon Analysis
day¢ area a "area trial pews, Moa Pinna S,Gp 1 2 4 2 --i-1-00
: 845.]53
2 20 E2s41 8100-phone
da" n& he"clow Oppat ,"m , an r , aQayza revm 1 1 2 $514
eMrernaavmmelm ,"ge a"me. report neu, a yrepbe 3 6 80 60 30
m 12 160 $31 ,793 $250 erproduv4on -t
amaual n' Fe,i °,eal 1 4 48
P
01-1ut06 , 2sJuw6 21 $18,254 1b -Vulnerability Analysis - 60 $10,455 '
$18,254
ameen rMa -nveztig ' wa�vlryaasMge e " "n"g 2 4 40 - $4594 $as have, P hreeaphs
a,eess MUM abmw ea on New,em en i " eanym 2 5 20 30 $56]5
Plat eimbn 5md5 (10, m. a 3 ) act 5 a Icfig sell Protec y 2 4 4 25 6p $5075$7.997 $500 reproduction
25-Jun06 C&Atg-06 14 $27_,592 1c - Summary Conditions Report $27592
dlpmpam apmmanapm 8 12 8 32 40 2 12 32 48 818,568
wen tie mare" w",m,r„m eoDNry 3 5
re 7 $2.027
atrea"ealsmym 2 4 4 8 16 - 12 24 $6,402 $595 , reproeu tan
_ x S36:r/897a9Pa - Planning
CharaVE ASSESSMENT jf ' . ,,,,;a - #�- _ ._„ Y°•i ` yy` 3:` i'y„ 36;]89 {
0&Aug06 , 32ftu3-1)6 14 $11 ,876 2a Plammn9 Charade
- $11816
"are Prepare pleemwmwemamlwfor vlannag mama 4 2 4 8 2 8 8 10 2 $5,176aevareaaren Press rmeaee
r",we anarena ' 1 - 3 2 Si56 $50 '. reproduction
rtcelr aearh Comite, and ead 10a,1 cati 3 5 6 2 $2,346 -
rumea Imam Stmvy a lure o,,,,,,1, at the rest2 4 4 $1 ,318 Es0 '. mpaduclion
amanata ndx ea"wavh5nm w/coeNrra rDEP las vnmel 3 3 3
22Ant � 12Shnl 21 $24,973 2b - Assessment 3 2 1 $1 ,930 $150 ptrore
$24,9]3
i tm.auw Sears ethanol "m "wwgies 70 12 20 20 $8,282
meeling " CDUNTY 4 6 6
$2,4
'°w ° ""°
° ' 1 2 8 8 32 $4.637
Pmare minor mseMnme1 1 3 12 -
olpmbaekMwa,d ,w,ftedena 2 6 32
r 8 16 $6428 $334 °none
Mond
£UNOING!OP.ITlONBK ""' _ r . .
�.5't �,ra,� '� Agirgi ' s$fl,'C4a
iSAty06 � OSSeP-06 21 $2,794 3a Public Argues Inventory
- elm ¢rem n
11 ear wan TVEP MIe, 4 8 2 Et>90
8250 - reproductions
ifenlrtypW a seam aaaeS. Pol"u ly mprorxmete aoraswbnm 2 4 $]54
12SePU6 030ct46 21 $5,854 3b Potential Funding Soureces
days Nknlily selen6al leCvaL late, ,egunala ke Ir nue 50u¢e, 2 : -
- _ 2 4 $1 ,236 $100 : grace
erwnn COVMYIa elenNy longterm had,9 Plan 4 8
16 4 2 4 $4,518
($661659 4+mPL+ANQRh1ULrAT7ZiN _ a. .;zk -0^. - ' '" t PVote�.. ", d" . _. ,� _. r < aspwM, WEM
0 406 31-1)(146 28 $44,867 43 DRAFT Plan
$44,86]
Prepare oPArr a""m weea."tim Pen 12 24M432
80 20 8 72 40 830,300
taw Gal aanwnb 0"uply 4 7 2 $2491 $200 reproduction
re 'Asm awice 6 6 24 26 $8.564 $500 - aproduaron
'el m" baaan Lanmmtae o weunune pia" 4 _ $2,632 _ $100 ;
31-0d-06 36-Nw-1)6 30 $23,792 4b F' I PI n 8 2 reproduction $23.]92
'an ' amPwaw renslmmRe oanrr w" 12 24 4 8 28 $9,620
hian covrmmPrwen reg resona meoa< ncm"g cpmmew"ers 16 24 $],960 $100 reproduction
Mae, Meer" a 10 one, - 8 8 4 28 $5,412 $500 reproduction
Total Hours : 130 100 0 0 0 0 4 350 0 26 48 516 203 1 ,989
- ToIa COSts: S25,Sw 3101w $16,5761 Ug.312a2.512w fo $0 Go iwa N9aw So ix.ags Sa x]x 53L15x
$s.ym 8201,628 $3,867 $205.695 $205,695
_ $201,828 $205,695 -