Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-378 WORK ORDER NUMBER 7 acro This Work Order Number 7 is entered into as of this 24th day of October, 2006 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of March 2, 2004 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Attachment A, attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Attachment B, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Attachment C, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1 .4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS§10NERS Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COU�T pcC, r / By. 13 0;41 Eric J. Uotke, P.E., BCEE Arthur R. Neu ger, Principal Engineer Attest: J. K. Barton, pClerk of Court By: Deputy Clerk Approved: J seph . Baird, County Administrator proved as to form and legal sufficiency: i E. Fell, At7ststait County Attorney r 1 mn 5K.eac ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN BACKGROUND The Indian River County (County) Department of Utility Services has recently been approached by Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), the Agricultural Advisory Committee (AAC) and the Indian River Citrus League with concerns surrounding the pending North County Water Treatment Plant (WTP) expansion project. The concerns focus on the neighboring land owners, including several functioning citrus groves to the west (upstream) of the WTP, and several smaller residential sites. Many of these properties continue to utilize the artesian flow wells for both irrigation and potable use that were installed by the original citrus farmers. The County has been working diligently with these groups to ensure that no adverse impacts are experienced by the neighboring well owners as a result of the expansion project. Currently, the North County WTP consists of 2 reverse osmosis (RO) treatment skids and 3 production wells. The expansion is planned to include the addition of three RO treatment skids. To provide raw water for the new skids, an additional three production wells are needed. The County has submitted a Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) modification request to the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) requesting the three wells as well as a temporary CUP (TCUP) that will allow for construction of the new wells prior to issuance of the final CUP permit. In the future, an additional expansion will be required to accommodate growth within the County. The future expansion would involve installing an additional three RO treatment skids and the corresponding three production wells (for a total of eight skids and nine wells at buildout) . The SWCD has requested that once the TCUP and subsequent CUP are issued (as is anticipated) for the first three wells, the County explore alternative water supply sources to eliminate the need for the final three wells. As such, the County has requested assistance from CDM to identify possible alternatives to using Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA) wells/ water, develop a comparative budget-level cost analysis for each including the resulting impact on the current rate structure (on a cost per 1,000 gallon basis), determine the feasibility of implementing each option, the schedule that would be required to implement each option, and identify the pros and cons of each option . Services to be provided under this authorization are provided below. SCOPE OF SERVICES CDM will perform the following task services . TASK 1.0 IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLIES CDM will work with County staff and SWCD board members to identify up to five alternative water supplies within the County that would potentially be suitable for potable use. CDM will A-1 mh2582 Alt kdoc hold a kick-off meeting with both parties to determine the options to be considered . CDM will coordinate with SJRWMD and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) to have representatives attend the kick-off meeting and provide input into the feasibility of various options. These options may include but are not limited to a pipeline from the Upper St. Johns Basin reservoir in the western portion of the County, surface water treatment, desalination of ocean water, and/ or expanding the County' s wellfield to include a larger footprint in an effort to minimize local impacts. The options identified in this task will be the basis for the remaining tasks in this Work Order. TASK 2.0 CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS CDM will perform a conceptual analysis for each alternative identified in Task 1 .0 . The analysis will include identifying the pros and cons of each identified alternative, ease of permitting, distance of proposed alternative from existing treatment infrastructure, transmission/ conveyance corridors for pipeline routing, efficiency of treatment process, and the ability to convert existing treatment infrastructure to accommodate new source water. CDM will conduct up to two meetings with SJRWMD and FDEP staff to obtain conceptual considerations and permitting needs on each of the alternatives. CDM will also conduct one meeting with County staff and SWCD board members to discuss the draft analysis and receive comments . TASK 3. 0 COST IMPACTS CDM will establish a planning-level comparison of the costs to implement each alternative identified in Task 1 .0. These cost estimates will include treatment costs, process modifications needed to treat each source if RO is not plausible, piping to/ from the water plant from each alternative source, and estimated operations and maintenance costs. Costs associated with expansion of the existing plants into the UFA will be presented for comparison purposes. This analysis will serve as a basis of comparison for determining which option (s) could be considered further as an alternative to constructing additional UFA production wells. TASK 4. 0 SCHEDULE OF IMPLEMENTATION Once options are identified and cost estimates are established CDM will estimate the time frame necessary to implement each option. Development of implementation schedules will consider the construction time associated with pipelines and other infrastructure needed to tap into the source, including WTP construction/ modifications, in-line booster pump stations (if needed) and/ or storage tanks. Permitting issues will also be factored in to the implementation schedule. Certain options, such as desalination, may have a significantly longer construction time, while tapping the St. Johns upper basin project may require more lead time in the permitting process . TASK 5.0 RANKING OF OPTIONS CDM will summarize the findings/ results of Tasks 1 .0 through 4 .0 and compile a ranking of the alternatives based on various parameters (cost, implementation schedule, etc.), as well as how each schedule relates to the projected demands of the water system. The County has developed projected demands through 2025 based on population projections. The final three wells that would be pursued after the TCUP is issued would be required by the year 2011 to stay ahead of demand. Any alternative considered would have to have an implementation schedule to meet that demand as well . A-2 mh2582 Att A.doc Task 6.0 DRAFT REPORT CDM will compile the findings of Tasks 1 .0 through 5.0 into a summary report. CDM will provide five copies of the draft report to the County for review and comment, and distribute the draft report electronically to SWCD board members for comment also. Once comments are received, CDM will incorporate applicable comments. TASK 7.0 REVIEW WORKSHOP At the request of the SWCD Board members, CDM will hold a public workshop with the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), representatives from SJRWMD and SFWMD, County staff, SWCD board members and interested parties to discuss the results and conclusions of the Alternative Water Supply Plan. CDM will coordinate the attendance of representatives from SFWMD and SJRWMD. CDM will provide a meeting facilitator to optimize the productivity of the workshop. Additional comments will be discussed and received for inclusion into the final report prior to finalizing the report and making the formal presentation to the BOCC. TASK 8.0 FINAL REPORT AND PRESENTATION TO THE BOCC CDM will incorporate final comments resulting from the Workshop outlined in Task 7.0 and finalize the report, provide five copies of the final report to the County, and distribute the final report electronically to SWCD board members. CDM will then prepare a PowerPoint presentation to be given to the BOCC at an official BOCC meeting. CDM will attend the BOCC meeting and deliver the presentation to board members, or assist County staff in delivering the presentation. OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES This authorization does not include: ■ Detailed construction cost estimates (budget-level only) ■ Design services related to any of the identified alternatives COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES The County will provide all reasonable data requested by CDM to perform the evaluation. The County will also provide a timely review of all work products. A-3 mnssez An A.doc ATTACHMENT B PROJECT BUDGET ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Alternative Water Supply Master Plan Category Hours Rate Cost Officer 76 $155 $11,780 Principal/ Associate 72 $140 $10,080 Senior Professional 30 $120 $300 Professional II 172 $100 $17,200 Senior Support Services 16 $75 $1,200 Staff Support Services 12 $65 $780 Project Administration 60 $65 $1290- TOTAL HOURS 438 SALARY $48,540 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $3,300 OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (H. DEAN) $6,500 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS - UPPER LIMIT $58,340 TOTAL ESTIMATED ENGINEERING FEE (UPPER LIMIT) SA340 B-1 mh2M2 da ATTACHMENT C SCHEDULE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN SCHEDULE The following schedule is anticipated assuming authorization of the Work Order by the Board of County Commissioners on October 24, 2006. Draft Master Plan January 24, 2007 Public Workshop February 26, 2007 Final Master Plan March 26, 2007 G1 mh2582 Att C doc