HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-159A {
Application for Funding
2011 Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant ( CDBG )
l
01(11 *
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION CATEGORY
Federal Fiscal Year 2011
Application Due Date : August 15, 2011
( Revised 7 - 11 - 2011 )
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Housing and Community Development
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 2100
Telephone 850/487 - 3644
Fax 850/922- 5609 — p
http : //www . floridacommunitydevelopment . or _ /q cdbg / index . cfm Q
A
1
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tab 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ( page 3 )
Tab 2 NARRATIVE AND GENERAL SCORING ( page 6 )
Tab 3 SOURCES AND USES OF NON CDBG FUNDS ( page 13 )
Tab 4 NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION ( page 15 )
Tab 5 CERTIFICATION AND SCORE SUMMARY ( page 22 )
Tab 6 Appendix A : Maps
Tab 7 Appendix B : Comprehensive Plan Documents
pEpsndu a Chu Rnterr - aca Agreement n1a
DR Hastarooc preserPvatgaru - nja
Tab 8 Appendix E . Local Leverage Resolution
< r % PeIT11d2 " Grrant appy ,acati n preparat an n ja
Tab 9 Appendix G : Readiness to Proceed ( see construction plans and permits)
Tab 10 Appendix H : VLI / LMI Worksheets
Tab 11 Appendix I : Health and Safety ( see narrative, new sewer)
Tab 12 Appendix J : Local Governing Body's Resolution for Signature Designation
pend' z Cis HausOng as gstence Pilar n / a
Tab 13 Appendix L : Public Hearing Documentation
A teen &K Mau SpecQalj Des gnat "Orin nja
2
Application Profile Form G4
Local Government Contact Information .
Local Government Name INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Street Address 1801 27th . Street
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES Indian River County Administration Building
City Zip Code 32960 County INDIAN RIVER
Vero Beach
Main Telephone ( 772) - 2264821 Main Facsimile ( 772) - 770- 5143
Chief Elected Official Bob Solari Title BOCC CHAIR
i
Telephone ( 772) - 2264438 Facsimile ( 772) - 770 - 5143
I j
Email Address SEND EMAILS TO SASAN ROHANI
Financial Officer ( Local Government) JASON BROWN Title BUDGET DIRECTOR
i
Telephone ( 772) - 226 - 1214 Facsimile Fax ( 772) - 770- 5143
Email Address jbrown@ircgov . com
Project Contact ( Local Government) SASAN ROHANI Title Chief, Long - Range Planning Section
Telephone ( 772) - 226- 1250 Facsimile ( 772) - 226 - 1922
Email Address srohani (abircgov . com
Street Address 1801 27th . Street
I
City Vero Beach State FLORIDA Zip Code 32960
Local Governments Grant Consultant (if Name and Address of Firm Te%phone Number
L applicable
7T3
Application Profile
Form G - 1 (Continued)
Application Preparer Information :
Preparer's Name Sasan Rohani Organization Preparing Application :
Private RPC x Local Government
Street Address 1801 27T" . STREET
City VERO BEACH State FL 32960
Facsimile ( 772) - 226- 1922
j Telephone ( 772) - 226 - 1250 Email Address bsolari@ircgov . com
Application Type : Indicate the type( s) of funding requested . A completed application must include the appropriate sections as
provided below .
A Planning and Design Specifications grant will not be offered unless the appropriate Planning and Design Specifications
Grant
box(es) are checked . (These grants are not a separate category but may be offered to an applicant in Neighborhood
Revitalization or
Commercial Revitalization with an application score below the fundable range for a full grant and which does not have
completed construction
plans and specifications . )
I
Commercial Revitalization ( Part IV) _ Economic Development ( Part V)
Housing ( Part VI ) x Neighborhood Revitalization ( Part VII)
Planning and Design Specifications Grant — Neighborhood — Planning and Design Specifications Grant — Commercial
Revitalization Revitalization
If you will accept a Planning and Design Specifications Grant, indicate amount being requested for : 0
Basic Engineering $ Additional Engineering $ Administration $_ _
Funding Preference : The applicant may submit a Commercial Revitalization and a Housing application , or a Commercial Revitalization
and a
Neighborhood Revitalization application, but not a Housing and a Neighborhood application . Applicants will not be considered
for an additional
Commercial Revitalization, Housing or Neighborhood Revitalization grant until . all previously awarded Planning and Design Specifications
grants
have been administratively closed by the Department .
Did you submit more than one application ? Yes No x
If so, what category of funding do you prefer? Neighborhood Revitalization Commercial Revitalization
Dates of Public Hearings on the Application : First Public Hearing July 5, 2011 Second Public Hearing July 19, 2011
Dates of Advertisement of Public Hearings : First Public Hearing June 28 2011 j Second Public Hearing July 13, 2011 _
4
Application Profile
Form G - 1 (Continued)
Demographics
U . S . Congressional District Number 15
Florida Senate District Number 26 Florida House District Number 29, 80
Census Place Unincorporated Census Tract n/a Census Block Group (s) n/a
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Grant Request : Maximum grant requests are based on the jurisdiction 's LMI population as determined by HUD . Please see
the table below .
LMI Population Maximum Grant Request _
! 1 – 499 $600, 000 . 00
!—
500 - 1249 $ 6501000 . 00
1 , 250 – 31999 $700, 000 . 00 �
4, 000 – and above I $7501000 . 00
Local Government's LMI Population 28, 162 Grant Request $ 750,000
Answer the following questions by circling the correct response .
Historic Preservation Yes No
Will the project impact a building , public improvement or planned open space more than 50 years old ?
j(See instructions . )
Interlocal Agreement Yes No
Will project activities require an interlocal agreement? If yes, the interlocal agreement must be provided in the Supporting
Documentation Section . (See instructions . )
State of Financial Emergency Yes No
Has the local government been declared to be in a state of financial emergency pursuant to Section 218 . 50 – 218
. 504 , F . S . , at
any time during the two years prior to submission of the application ?
Grant Preparation Costs
The applicant may request grant funds for the cost of grant application preparation . See instructions if funds are
requested .
Does the applicant wish to request grant funds for the cost of grant application preparation ? Yes
No
Amount $ 3, 000 Advertising, If yes, grant preparation cost documentation must be included in the Supporting Documentation
Section .
Mailing _
National Flood Insurance Program – Indicate whether or not the local government is a current participant in the
NFIP . ! Yes _�No _
5
Project Narrative Form G - 2
Describe the proposed project using the guidelines in the instructions . Use additional pages as needed .
Please see the instructions on the following page relating to applications for Economic Development loans . Specific directions
for Commercial
Revitalization and Economic Development application narratives can be found in the instructions provided for each respective
category .
1 . Narrative
Project Narrative ( Form G - 2)
The information below must be included in the project narrative :
1 . Applications proposing more than one activity or service area must include a narrative for each activity and/or
service area .
Project Narrative ( Form G - 2 ) The information below must be included in the project narrative :
1 . Applications proposing more than one activity or service area must include a narrative for each activity and/or service
area .
The proposed CDBG project consists of the following met need activities, inclusive of SHIP leverage for hook-ups and related fees
and septic abandonment :
As part of the overall West Wabasso Sewer Improvements Plan Phase I project, CDBG funds will be used for improvements
associated with Sanitary Sewer and
flood and drainage . While a portion of the West Wabasso Sewer neighborhood is served by sewer lines, there are some
streets lacking sewers . Problems with
antiquated on -site septic systems form the need for sewer mains . A canal that drains the area is also in need
of dredging to improve drainage and lessen
flooding .
Service Area 1 : New Sewer Hookups ( Met Needs Leverage) ( 64th Avenue, 86th Street & 86th Lane ) (42 HU ) (funded by SHIP
not CDBG )
1 . Install new sewer hookups to LMI households along 64th Ave . , from CR 510 to a lift station located at 8630
64th Ave .
2 . Install new sewer hookups along 64th Ave . from CT 510 to a lift station located in the 8700 block of 64th
Ave .
3 . Install new sewer hookups along 86th St . from 65th St . to 64th Ave .
4 . Install new sewer hookups along 86th Lane from 65th Street . to 641h Ave .
Service Area 1 : New Sanitary Sewer Lines ( Met Needs CDBG ) (64th Avenue, 86th Street & 86th Lane ) (4,000 LF )
The sanitary sewer improvements more specifically will include installation of sewer lines in the following locations :
1 . Install new lift station in the 8700 block of 64th Ave .
2 . Install manholes and about 2, 000 LF of 8" gravity sewer along 64th Avenue from CR 510 to lift station located
in the 8700 block of 64th
Avenue .
3 . Install manholes and about 1, 000 LF of 8" gravity sewer along 86th Lane from 64th Avenue to 65th Drive .
4 . Install manholes and about 1, 000 LF of 8" gravity sewer along 86th Street from 64th Avenue to 65th Drive .
5 . Restoration of pavement, sidewalks, swales, private property and ditches that are impacted as a result of sewer
line installation
6
Service Area 1 : Drainage Improvements 6436 -86th Lane ( Met Needs CDBG ) ( 1 EA)
The storm sewer improvements more specifically will include dredging of outfall canal at the following locations :
1 . 510 people receiving storm drainage from 64th and 63rd
2 . For addressed and unaddressed needs, a narrative description of each proposed activity must include the following information
:
• Activity description , including the need being met
• Explanation of the need for CDBG funding
• Proposed construction start and completion dates
• Quantity and location of activity within the service area
• Cost of the activity
• How the activity meets a national objective
• Purpose of the activity ( if not readily apparent ) ; and
• Beneficiaries (Total , VLI and LMI ) of the activities .
The following matrix provides additional information about the CDBG funded activities.
Met Needs
Activity Need Start/End Location Quant CDBG Funds Leverage National Beneficiaries
Dates ity Obi .
Service Area About 4, 000 Design by Install new sewer mains, 42 HU $6701000 . 00 $ 0 Benefit to Total
— 70
# 1 : linear feet of 9/ 11 and laterals and hookups along low and VLI- 25
New Sewer sewer main and construction 64th Ave . , 86th Lane, 86th moderate LMI — 60
Mains appurtenances by 9/ 12 Street, 65th Drive, 65th income HH Over - 10
Court, 64th Drive, and 64th 29 HH
Court ,
Service Area To improve Complete Improve storm water 42 HU $ 201000 . 00 $0 Benefit to Total — 100
# 1 : storm-water design by 9/ 11 conveyance from low and VLI — 40
Drainage conveyance in complete moderate LMI — 80
Improvements neighborhood construction neighborhood . income Over — 20
Lines by 9/ 12 ersons 50HH
7
Service Area Connections from Design by Hook —ups for income 42 HU $0 $ 125,000 Benefit to Total —
70
# 1 Hook- ups lateral to HH and 9/ 11 and eligible units SHIP low and VLI- 25
related fees, construction funds moderate LMI — 60
septic by 9/ 12 income HH Over- 10
abandonment 29 HH
local leverage )
Total Sewer Construction $ 6701F000AO
Total Drainage improvements $ 20 000 . 00
Administration $ 601000M
Engineering $0
DBG Grant Total $ 750, 000
Future Needs TBD
3 . Describe all activities to be undertaken and the projected cost, without regard to the funding source or whether
such funding will be counted
for leverage . The following table shows the total project cost for each activity .
Activity CDBG Leveraged Other Total Project Cost
Funds funds
Sewer Mains $ 540, 000 . 00 0 0 $540, 000 . 00
Lift Station $ 1301000 . 00 0 0 $ 1301000 . 00
Drainage Improvements $20,000 $0 0 $20, 000
Construction Subtotal $690, 000 0 0 690 000
Engineering $0 0 0 $0
Grant Administration $60, 000 0 0 $60, 000
SHIP Hook- Ups and Related Cost $0 $ 125,000 0 $ 125 , 000 . 00
Total $750, 000 $ 125, 000 0 $8751000 . 00
4 . Describe any activities in which a portion of the construction will occur outside of the applicant's jurisdiction
.
8
None .
5 . Describe any impact that proposed DOT or county road construction will have on the proposed CDBG funded activity
.
No impacts on DOT or county road construction are anticipated . However, any paving that is removed to install the
water and sewer lines will
need to be restored to their original condition .
6 . Specify whether any portion of the project area is located in a flood - prone area and whether the local government
participates in the
National Flood Insurance Program .
The project is located in the 100 year flood plain . Indian River County participates in the National Flood Insurance
Program . Work is limited to
utilities and related repairs within the improved R/W and no impact to the flood plain is expected . A complete
HUD environmental review will be
completed including the early flood plain notice and notice of work in the flood plain for comment, for release
of funds and before commencement
of bidding of construction .
7 . If complementary activities are being undertaken , explain how they relate to the project.
Any paving , landscaping , sidewalks or drainage improvements that are removed to install the sewer lines will need
to be restored to their original
condition .
8 . If funds from other sources are being " leveraged , " describe how the funds will be used (what they will
pay for, etc . ) .
Local funds ( SHIP) will be used for sewer hook- ups and related cost first .
9 . If the removal of public building architectural barriers to handicapped persons is being paid for with CDBG
funds, identify :
• The location and function of each building and The barriers to be removed in each building
• How the expenditure of CDBG funds will resolve the problem
Not Applicable
10 . If using a survey that was completed for a previous CDBG project, state the sub-grant number and year the
survey was conducted .
Not Applicable
9
General Scoring Criteria
Form G - 3
j 1 . Enter the Local Government's Community-Wide Needs Score Score : 52 . 41
This document is posted to the Department's website at :
http : //www . floridacommunitydevelopment . org /cdbg/ index . cfm
I
i 2 . Special Designation Score Score : 0
Check all applicable designations and enter a score of 20 if all activities, are within any of the boundaries
of the following designated areas .
i
Empowerment Zone, Enterprise Community, or Champion _ Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern designated by the
Community, pursuant to the Economic Empowerment Act of 1993 Governor or
_ Rural Economic Development Initiative ( REDI) community
I 1
Area of Critical State Concern pursuant to Chapter 380 . 05 , F. S . _ Florida Enterprise Zone pursuant to Chapter
290 .0065 , F . S .
_ HUD-designated Renewal Community _ Front Porch Community
_ I
- –
3 . Grant History Score If the applicant has not had an open CDBG contract in the NR, CR, or HR Score :
0
.categories within five years of application deadline, claim 100 points .
4 . Outstanding Performance in Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) _
The applicant may claim up to 25 points for achievement in M/WBE contracting in the most recent CDBG grant administratively
closed out not 1
more than four years before application deadline date . Review the M/WBE reports submitted to DCA for that grant and
enter a score based on
the achievement reported . _ — _
Grant Number : E11
$40, 0000 – $690 , 000 X 100 = 5 . 8% M/WBE %Amount Awarded to M/WBE firms
Total Prime Contracts Amount
M WBE % Points
X 5 . 0 – 9 . 99% 5
10 . 0 44 . 99% 10
15 . 0 49 . 99 % 20
20% + 25
If the applicant has not administratively closed out a CDBG grant within
four years of the application deadline date, score 5 points . Score : 5 (Maximum 25 points)
10
General Scoring Criteria
Form G -3 (Continued) _
Local Government Minority Employment — _
The applicant may claim up to 60 points for meeting minority employment goals . Complete the table below to calculate
the applicant's
j percentage of minority employees . _ See instructions for calculations .
Number of Permanent Full -time Number of Permanent Full -time Equivalent Applicant— Applicant's Percentage of
i Equivalent Minority Applicant Employees Minority Employees
Employees I
j 70 I 710 I — l 9 . 86 % j
Enter percentage of minorities in the applicant's county : %
If the " Prorated 60 Points Score" is claimed , complete the following equation : j
Applicant's Percentage of Minority Percentage of Minorities in Applicant's Percentage = Points Claimed
Employees Applicant's County of Minority Employees X 60
f 9 . 86 s 11 . 3 _ 87 . 25 52 . 35
If the applicant has three (3 ) or less employees, 40 points may be claimed . NA j
Total Score ( 60 Points Maximum—
_ 52 . 35 _
5 . Outstanding Performance in Fair Housing
The applicant may claim five points for each of the following Fair Housing goals . See instructions for guidelines and
documentation requirements .
Date - Score
Date Fair Housing Ordinance Adopted XXXXXXX ! 5 -
Date of training or educational program designed for the general public and elected officials July 51 2011 5
Date of training or educational program designed for professionals July 12, 2011 1 5
Total Score ( 15 Points Maximum ) 1 15
Summary Score 72 . 35
(Transfer this score to the Scoring Summary)
> 1
Sources and Uses of Non = CDBG Funds
Private, Participating Party, Public Leverage from Non - Local and Local Funding Sources
Form L- 1
! S uo rce � Amount Amount Type
Claimed for Not Claimed for ( Participating Party, Loan, Grant, Local
ScoringScoring Government Funds, Donated Land, or Other
Leverage)
Activity # Indian River County f $ 125, 000 0 ( SHIP f
!
- 0
0 0
I
j
0 0
!
Subtotals 0 $0
!
Total Leverage Claimed for Scoring11 $ 125, 0000
i
Use the preceding totals to compute the number of points you are claiming for leverage scoring .
12
Leverage Score Summary
I.
I Leverage Points Calculation for CR, NR and HR
$ 125 . 000 - $ 5,000 = 25 Points
Maximum 25 Points
Leverage Points Calculation for ED
$ _ $ 10, 000 = Points
Maximum 125 Points
Summary Score 25
(Transfer this score to the Scoring Summary)
13
_ CDBG Funds and Activity Goals Form N - 1
A _ B C D T E
ACTIVITY NUMBER AND NAME APPROPRIATE RUS ENTER CDBG % OF CDBG PROJECT COST GOAL ! ACTIVITY GOAL SCORE
( *Same points in the activity supported . ) ENGINEERING TABLE ACTIVITY FUNDS (COL C / TOTAL OF COL C) POINTS
( D x E)
01 ACQUISITION ( IN SUPPORT OF) * NO ENGINEERING $
031 j FIRE HYDRANTS 16 TABLE II35
03J FIRE PROTECTION 1 TABLE II $ 35
03I FLOOD AND DRAINAGE 2 TABLE II $ 20,000 2 ,90 50 i 1 . 45
03+ HAZARD MITIGATION ACTIVITIES ' TABLE II $ 50
14A HOUSING REHABILITATION — PLUMBING a NO ENGINEERING $ 50
03FPARKS, PLAYGROUNDS s I TABLE II L $ 25
' 03L PEDESTRIAN MALLS/SIDEWALKS 6 TABLE II ( $ 35
031 E RECREATION/NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER TABLE II $ 25
08 RELOCATION I NO ENGINEERING $ 35
i
10 REMOVAL OF ARCH BARRIERS ' TABLE II $ 35
j 03A j SENIOR CENTER TABLE II $ X25
033 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT TABLE I $ 50
03J E R LINES & COMPONENTS 8 TABLE I !
$670, 000 97 . 10 so 48 .55_
03J ISEWER LINE REPLACEMENT TABLE I $ _ 40
033 SEWER HOOKUPS 10 —TABLE I $ 50
03 SITE DEVELOPMENT 11 TABLE II $ 40
- -- - -- -- --. .-
03J SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL II$ - — 25
03K STREET IMPROVEMENTS 12 TABLE II t $ 40
03K STREET IMPROVEMENTS —REPAVING 13 TABLE II $ 25
14
*Same points as the activity it supports .
CDBG Funds and Activity Goals — Category Score
Form N - 1 (Continues
------------
- --- -- -
-- A — -- — B j C D ! — E ! F
-- -- — — -- APPROPRIATE RUS ENTER CDBG % OF CDBG PROJECT GOAL ACTIVITY GOAL
ACTIVITY NUMBER AND NAME i ENGINEERING TABLE ACTIVITY FUNDS COST (COL C / TOTAL POINTS SCORE
_ _ _ _ __ OF COL C) ( D x E)
J WATER HOOKUPS 14 TABLE II $ 50 �I
03J WATER LINES, NEW — POTABLE is TABLE II $ 50
--- ! _
03J WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 9 TABLE II $ ! 40
i
1 03J WATER TANK/WELL TREATMENT PLANT e TABLE I $ ; 50
I
--- 25 t
25 —f
2 . TOTAL COLUMN C (CDBG PROJECT COST) : $690000
3 . CALCULATE COLUMNS D & F AND TOTAL COLUMN F FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVITY GOAL SCORE :
T _ 50 . 00 50 POINT MAXIMUM_
4 . INDICATE THE APPROPRIATE RUS USED AND ENTER ENGINEERING FUNDS : RUS TABLE USED : I. II_ Both Prorated x
i
BASIC FEE $0 ! y
0 -- -- — —�
RESIDENT INSPECTION FEE $0 —1
_ 0
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FEE $0
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES : $0
5 . TOTAL THE CDBG ENGINEERING FEES : 0
! - - - $o
r 6 . ENTER CDBG ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDS : IF ,
TO
- - — - - — ------ $60,000 --
7 TOTAL THE CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED : 0
$750,000
15
Needs — Activities and Beneficiaries
Form N = 2
Census or survey data must be compiled to complete this and the remainder of the application forms .
A B C D E F G
ACTIVITY # AND NAME ENTER # OF CDBG UNITS OF ENTER # OF ! ENTER # OF VLI ENTER # OF LMI ENTER
# OF TOTAL
UNITS TO BE MEASURE ALL UNITS CDBG BENEFICIARIES CDBG BENEFICIARIES CDBG BENEFICIARIES
ADDRESSED NEEDED
01 ACQUISITION ( IN SUPPORT OF) UNIT, LF
031 FIRE HYDRANTS
03J FIRE PROTECTION UNIT LF
03I FLOOD AND DRAINAGE 1 LF 1 1 40 j so 100
03 j HAZARD MITIGATION UNIT
ACTIVITIES_
14A FHOUSING REHABILITATION - HU
j _P_LUMBING I SITE(S)
-
03F j PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS
03L PEDESTRIAN MALLS/SIDEWALKS LF
03E RECREATION/NEIGHBORHOOD BU
_CENTER
08
� 8� RELOCATION i BU , HU j -I
I
i I
03 REMOVAL OF ARCH BARRIERS BARRIER,
� -
J_ I UNIT
j 03A SENIOR CENTER BU I j
J SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT I PLANT I'
033S WE ER LINES & - - - 41000 LF, UNIT 4,000 - 25 - 60 70
031 SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT LF
x033 SEWER HOOKUPS 42 (SHIP) LF, UNIT I 42 25 60 70
r 03 SITE DEVELOPMENT ! BU, HU ! -
031 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL T LF UNIT
16
Current Needs — Activity Units and Beneficiaries
Form N - 2 (Continued)
- 3 --
ACTIVITY # AND NAME ENTER # OF CDBG UNITS OF ENTER # OF ENTER # OF VLI ENTER # OF ENTER
# OF
UNITS TO BE MEASURE ALL UNITS CDBG LMI CDBG TOTAL CDBG
ADDRESSED NEEDED BENEFICIARIES BENEFICIARIES BENEFICIARIES
03K STREETIMPROVEMENTS LF
03K STREET IMPROVEMENTS - REPAVING LF
03 UTILITY HOOKUPS - OTHER BU , HU
i
033 WATER HOOKUPS I BU, HU
033 WATER LINES, NEW - POTABLE LF 1
j 031 ' WATER LINE REPLACEMENT LF, UNIT I I
033 WATER TANK/WELL/TREATMENT PLANT TANK, WELL, I - - - --
PLANT, UNIT I - --- ---- -- - -'
j
17
Beneficiary Verification Summary by Service Area
Form N = 3
A B i C D E F G H I I J
ENTER ! ENTER ACTIVITIES TO BE ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER CALCULATE CALCULATE
SERVICE COMPLETED IN EACH SERVICE AREA TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF TOTAL # TOTAL TOTAL #
PERCENT OF PERCENT
AREA #/ BENEFIT ( USE MORE THAN ONE LINE FOR HOUSEHOLDS ( HH IN RESPONSES HH RESPOND- OF VLI # OF OF ALL VLI
OF LMI
SURVEY MULTIPLE ACTIVITIES) THE SERVICE AREA REQD ING TO THE BENEFI- j LMI BENEFI- BENEFIT BENEFIT j
METHOD* ( UNIVERSE-COL H ) SURVEY CIARIES BENEFI- CIARIES (F ❑ H ) (G ❑ H )
CIARIES
Sewer hookups
1 / B met need ! 42 42 42 25 60 70 35 . 70 85 . 70
1 / B New Sewer Line 42 42 42 25 60 70 35 . 70 85 . 70
met need (same as above)
2 / B I Flood and Drainage
50 50 50 40 80 100 40 . 00 80 . 00
i —1
%-----------------
- � 0/0
-
�__ %
% %
%
j 134 134 134 90 200 240
* A = Random Sample, B = Small Service Area , C = Census, D = Survey, not more than five years old , from previous
CDBG award
If a random survey was conducted , include as an appendix a description of the methodology which describes the basis
of the universe, the
confidence interval selected , and the procedures used to contact the initial sample before surveying an alternate . The sample
and alternates must
be selected from a random number generator website (such as random . org ) and a print out of those numbers included
in the appendix .
18
Beneficiaries Scores
Form N -4
1 . (a ) Enter the total funds requested (total CDBG $ 750,000 1 . ( b) Enter the total number of grant unduplicated
request) 1 . (a ) VLI beneficiaries : 1 . (b) 60
1 . (c) Enter the total number of grant unduplicated 1 . (d) Enter the total number of grant unduplicated
LMI beneficiaries : 1 . (c) 83 beneficiaries : 1 . (d) 170
i
1 . (e) Enter the total number of unduplicated LMI
households : 1 . (e) 140
a . VLI BENEFICIARY IMPACT SCORE : Calculate the unduplicated VLI UNDUPLICATED VLI BENEFICIARY PERCENTAGE SCORE
beneficiary percentage : 30 . 00% or More 30 x
20 . 00% to 29 .99% 20
1 . ( b) divided by 1 . (d) = 35 % 10 . 00% to 19 .99% 10
Less than 10 . 00% 0
Based on the result, designate with an X the score that is appropriate .
I
b. LMI BENEFICIARY IMPACT SCORE : Calculate the unduplicated LMI UNDUPLICATED LMI BENEFICIARY PERCENTAGE SCORE
beneficiary percentage : 70 . 00% and above 135x
66. 00% to 69 . 99 120
61 % to 65 . 99% 100
1 . (c) divided by 1 . (d ) = 82 % 56 . 00% to 60 .99 75
Based on the result, designate with an X the score that is appropriate.
51 . 01 % to 55 . 99% 50
c. AVERAGE COST PER UNDUPLICATED LMI BENEFICIARY SCORE : Calculate COST PER UNDUPLICATED LMI BENEFICIARY I SCORE
the AVERAGE COST PER UNDUPLICATED LMI BENEFICIARY : $ 11 ,000 or More 0 i
$ 10,000 to $ 10,999 15
1 . (a ) divided by 1 . (c. ) = $5357 $ 91000 to $9,999 30
Less than $9,000 40 x
Based on the result, designate with an X the score that is appropriate.
d . AVERAGE COST PER UNDUPLICATED LMI HOUSEHOLD SCORE : Calculate ' COST PER UNDUPLICATED LMI HOUSEHOLD SCORE
the average cost per unduplicated LMI Household : $ 16,000 or More - 100
$ 13,000 to $ 15,999 40
1 . (a ) divided by 1 . (e. ) = $8,928 $ 11 ,000 to $ 12,999 60
$ 91000 TO $ 10,999 75
Based on the result designate with an X the score that is appropriate. Less than $9, 000 100 x
L_-
19
Readiness to Proceed Score
Readiness to Proceed points cannot be claimed if applicant is applying for a Planning and Design Specifications grant
.
If biddable construction plans and specifications for all activities have been completed and submitted to all applicable
permitting agencies no later
than application deadline, score 100 points . Otherwise, score zero points . Include in the Supporting Documentation Section a
letter from the
engineer who prepared the construction plans and specifications stating the date the biddable construction documents were
completed and that
they have been submitted to all applicable permitting agencies .
Score 100
100 Points Maximum
Option Be A total of 25 points can be claimed if the activity will provide first-time sewer to an area , thereby
addressing the health and safety
issues associated with septic tanks . All CDBG funded construction activities must meet the requirements of this option to
claim the full 25 points .
Health and Safety Score
e . Designate with an X the score that is appropriate : 690, 000 total construction cost 670,000 new sewer = ( 670
/ 690 ) =
. 97 * 25 = 24 . 25
A . Score Be Score x C . Score D . Score E . Score
( 50 Points) ( 25 Points) ( 25 Points) ( 20 Points) ( Prorated )
If D was selected , complete the following equation :
$670, 000 1 $690, 000 , _ . 97 x 25 = 24 . 25
Enter the cost of Enter the CDBG Project Enter the result ( % ) as Enter the Appropriate
activities subject to A ( B, Cost ( not Engineering or a four digit decimal Multiplier ( 20, 25 OR
50) SCORE
C OR D) Admin Costs)
Enter the appropriate Score : 24 . 25 50 Points Maximum
Summary Score 478 . 79
(Transfer this score to the Scoring Summary)
20
I , the undersigned chief elected official or authorized representative of the local government, certify that, to the best
of my knowledge, this
application for Small Cities Community Development Block Grant funding was prepared in accordance with state and federal
rules and regulations,
contains information that is true and correct, and has been approved by the local governing body .
I , the undersigned , certify that the local government (Applicant) .
1 . Has met all citizen participation requirements :
Public hearings were conducted by a member of the local governing body or a duly authorized employee ;
The first public hearing was conducted to obtain citizen views about community development needs and potential uses
of CDBG funding ;
• A second public hearing was conducted to obtain citizen comments on the application ; and
Public notice for the second public hearing was published after the first public hearing was conducted .
2 . Has properly conducted surveys of service areas to document LMI benefit, if applicable .
3 . Will comply with the Intergovernmental Coordination and Review requirements by submitting the required information to
the local Regional
Planning Council and to the State Clearing House ,
4 . Will not attempt to recover, through special assessments, capital costs of public improvements funded in whole or
in part with CDBG funds .
5 . Will ensure that upon completion of housing structures addressed with CDBG funds, each housing structure will meet
the local housing code .
6 . Will administer the grant in conformity with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act,
7 . Will affirmatively further fair housing and undertake one fair housing activity each year.
8 . Has adopted a Community Development Plan or has adopted the Local Comprehensive Plan as the Community Development
Plan .
9 . Has adopted an Anti - Displacement and Relocation Plan and will minimize the displacement of persons .
10 . Has presented accurate information and has documentation on file and readily accessible to Department of Community
Affairs ,
11 . Has authorized the submission of this application by vote of the local governing body .
12 . Is a participant of the National Flood Insurance Program .
21
Failure of the Chief Elected Official to properly sign the application by the deadline, or failure to include
a copy of the ordinance or
resolution of the governing body authorizing another individual to sign the application , will result in a 50 - point
penalty being
assessed against the application that cannot be eliminated during the completeness process .
Signature of Chief Elected Official or Desi (Tf s�oAL , ( a person designated by the local governing body, a copy
of the
resolution must be included . ) v : •Fyt�
Sn e _ , *
fallm
Typed Nae and Title
Z��C9 a eo
Bob Solari, Chairman, INDIAN RIVER COU UNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date - -- — °•w.g000t3 ;.`:�*"
L__ August 9 , 2011
If signed by a person other than the chief elected official , is a copy of the required resolution Yes �No
included in the Appendices? X
I
Signature of Application Preparer if other than an employee of the Local Government
Signature
Typed Name and Title
Name of Firm or Agency
BCC Approved : July 19 , 2011
22
Application Scoring Summary
This form is the applicant's evaluation of the application score . Use the "scores" identified in the application to complete this
form when you have finished filling
out the application . Enter the scores or other information in the appropriate columns . If additional pages are needed ( number
them with a lowercase letter such
as 7a , 7b, 7c, etc . ) . When all of the scores have been transferred to this form, add the scores and enter the
total .
Enter Name of Local Government Applicant : For DCA Use Only : Application
Number
Enter Type of Application (s) m5
Complete this form for each application submitted . _
FORM TITLE/ SCORE PAGE CR ED H NR
1 . Community-Wide Needs Score (250 Points Maximum ) 115 . 09
2 . Outstanding Performance in Equal Employment Opportunity and I 80 .46
_ Fair Housing ( 100 points maximum)
r 3 . Program Impact ( 650 Points Maximum ) :
Special Designation Score (20 Points Maximum ) I 20
� I
Grant History Score ( 100 Points Maximum) 0
• Leverage ( Note : 25 Points Maximum for CR, NR and HR and 25
125 Points Maximum for ED)
Category Score Summary 478 , 79
Total Program Impact Score
r— TOTAL APPLICATION SCORE ( 1000 Points Maximum ) 719 . 34
LESS PENALTIES ASSESSED ( For DCA Use Only)
FINAL SCORE ( For DCA Use Only)
I
!
23