HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-210 le pa / asb o
IC91
A4v /`3 aid
DEP AGREEMENT NO . G0353
AMENDMENT NO. 1
THIS AGREEMENT as entered into on the 80' day of January, 2013 between the STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (hereinafter referred to as the "Department") and
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee") is hereby amended.
WHEREAS, the Grantee was awarded funding under the State Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Grant
Program to offset project costs ; and,
WHEREAS, the Grantee has requested, and the Department has agreed, to amend the Agreement to revise
the Grant Work Plan ; and,
WHEREAS , other changes to the Agreement are necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows :
1 . Paragraph 3A and 31 are hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
A. As consideration for the satisfactory completion of services rendered by the Grantee under the
terms of this Agreement, the Department shall pay the Grantee on a cost reimbursement basis up
to a maximum of $2 ,226,900. 00 (an increase of $ 1 ,376,900 . 00) towards the total estimated cost
for the PC South Algal Nutrient Removal Facility Project of $9 , 551 ,568 .40 . The parties hereto
understand and agree that the funding under this Agreement is comprised of EPA Section 319
(319) funding in the amount of $850,000 . 00 and State TMDL funding in the amount
of
$ 19376,900 .00 .
i . The parties hereto understand and agree that the 319 funding under this Agreement
requires a 63 % match ($ 1 ,440 , 853 .40).
ii. TMDL funding under this Agreement requires a 75% match on the part of the Grantee .
Therefore, the Grantee is responsible for providing $4,049,947 .00 through cash or third
party in-kind, towards the work funded under this Agreement.
iii. All match shall meet the federal requirements established in 40 CFR Part 30, 40 CFR Part
31 and OMB Circulars A-87 (2 CFR 225 ), A422 (2 CFR 230) and A-21 (2 CFR 220), as
applicable .
iv. It is understood that any additional funds necessary for the completion of this project is
the responsibility of the Grantee. The Grantee will report those expenditures to the
Department in the Final Report as required under Task 6 in Attachment A- 1 .
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Amendment No . 1 , Page 1 of 4
I . The table below identifies the funding supporting this Agreement and EPA Grants and TMDL
funds :
Federal Funding Source CFDA Program Title FundingAmount
C9-99451512-0 66 .460 Nonpoint Source $8509000 . 00
Implementation Grants
State Funding CSFA Funding Source Funding Amount
Line Item Appropriation
Water Quality Assurance 37 .039 Statewide Surface Water $376,900. 00
Trust Fund, Line Item Restoration and Wastewater
1662, SFY 2012-2013 Projects
Water Quality Assurance 37 .039 Statewide Surface Water $ 170005000 .00
Trust Fund, Line Item Restoration and Wastewater
16201 SFY 2013 -2014 Projects
Total Funding: $252265900.00
2 . Paragraph 30 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
30. This Agreement has been delivered in the State of Florida and shall be construed in accordance
with the laws of Florida. Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted
in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this
Agreement shall be prohibited or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective
to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision
or the remaining provisions of this Agreement. Any action hereon or in connection herewith shall
be brought in Leon County, Florida.
3 . The following language is hereby added as paragraph 32 :
32 . No payment will be made for deliverables deemed unsatisfactory by the Department. In the event
that a deliverable is deemed unsatisfactory by the Department, the Grantee shall re-perform the
services needed for submittal of a satisfactory deliverable, at no additional cost to the Department,
within ten ( 10) days of being notified of the unsatisfactory deliverable . If a satisfactory
deliverable is not submitted within the specified timeframe, the Department may, in its sole
discretion, either: 1 ) terminate this Agreement for failure to perform, or 2) the Department Grant
Manager may, by letter specifying the failure of performance under this Agreement, request that a
proposed Corrective Action Plan (CAP) be submitted by the Grantee to the Department. All
CAPS must be able to be implemented and performed in no more than sixty (60) days .
A. A CAP shall be submitted within ten ( 10) calendar days of the date of the letter request
from the Department. The CAP shall be sent to the Department Grant Manager for
review and approval . Within ten ( 10) calendar days of receipt of a CAP, the Department
shall notify the Grantee in writing whether the CAP proposed has been accepted. If the
CAP is not accepted, the Grantee shall have ten ( 10) calendar days from receipt of the
Department letter rejecting the proposal to submit a revised proposed CAP. Failure to
obtain the Department approval of a CAP as specified above shall result in the
Department ' s termination of this Agreement for cause as authorized in this Agreement.
Be Upon the Department' s notice of acceptance of a proposed CAP, the Grantee shall have
ten ( 10) calendar days to commence implementation of the accepted plan . Acceptance of
the proposed CAP by the Department does not relieve the Grantee of any of its
obligations under the Agreement. In the event the CAP fails to correct or eliminate
performance deficiencies by Grantee, the Department shall retain the right to require
DEP Agreement No. G0353 , Amendment No . 1 , Page 2 of 4
additional or further remedial steps, or to terminate this Agreement for failure to perform.
No actions approved by the Department or steps taken by the Grantee shall preclude the
Department from subsequently asserting any deficiencies in performance . The Grantee
shall continue to implement the CAP until all deficiencies are corrected. Reports on the
progress of the CAP will be made to the Department as requested by the Department
Grant Manager.
C . Failure to respond to a Department request for a CAP or failure to correct a deficiency in
the performance of the Agreement as specified by the Department may result in
termination of the Agreement.
The remedies set forth above are not exclusive and the Department reserves the right to exercise other
remedies in addition to or in lieu of those set forth above, as permitted by the Agreement.
4 . Attachment A. Grant Work Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment A-1 ,
Revised Grant Work Plan, attached hereto and made a part of the Agreement. All references in the
Agreement to Attachment A shall hereinafter refer to Attachment A-1 , Revised Grant Work Plan.
5 . Attachment F, Special Audit Requirements, Page 5 of 5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
Attachment F, Special Audit Requirements, Page 5 (Revised) of 5 , attached hereto and made a part of the
Agreement.
In all other respects, the Agreement of which this is an Amendment, and attachments relative thereto, shall
remain in full force and effect.
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Amendment No . 1 , Page 3 of 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed the day and year
last written below.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
By: 441, °, ., , By0000000
: 7emosswe
J h E . Flescher, Ma irman ,. vGpONIISS/pti1j., Secretary or Designee
.S�1 . . Fps
Date : October 22 , 2013 ;.� . ee> Date : I I I S 1
mv :
Approved by BCC 10- 22 - 13= k : ' `" ePi
_
e
a mw
ATTEST: Diq ` d °r'' c' Amanda Peck DEP Grant Manager
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Cdre $tp f p� 1 `
441141144 „ 1, 11 , �1l///'//�/�1�\\�y�f_ (/�
\ �f C
By. D �� v�/ /e �� Connie Becker, DEP Grant Manager
APPROVED:
rpproAe DEP Contracts Administrator
vunty A mistrator
ed as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Approved as to form and legality :
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DEP knorney
* For Agreements with governmental boards/commissions : If someone other than the Chairman signs this
Amendment, a resolution, statement or other document authorizing that person to sign the Amendment on behalf of
the Grantee must accompany the Amendment.
List of attachments/exhibits included as part of this Amendment:
Specify ype Letter/Number Description (include number of pages)
Attachment A4 Revised Grant Work Plan ( 14 Pages)
Attachment F Special Audit Requirements, Page 5 (Revised) of 5 ( 1 Page)
DEP Agreement No. G0353 , Amendment No . 1 , Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENT A- 1
REVISED GRANT WORK PLAN
PROJECT NAME : PC South Algal Nutrient Removal Facility
PROJECT FUNDING : $ 850,000 from 31912 ; $ 1 ,376,900 from TMDL grant = $2 ,226,900
REQUIRED MATCH : $ 1 ,440, 853 .40 for 31912 ; $4 ,049,947 for TMDL grant = $ 5 ,490, 800 .40
OTHER ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES/NOT REQUIRED MATCH : $ 1 , 833 , 868
TOTAL PROJECT COST : $915519568 .40
LEAD ORGANIZATION : Indian River County
COOPERATING PARTNERS : State of Florida — DEP Agreement No . LP31010 ($250 ,000 for pilot study & pilot
construction, not identified in project costs in this Agreement), SJRWMD Cost-share agreement No . 27199 ($55 ,795 for
initial design, not identified in project costs in this Agreement)
PROJECT LOCATION AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS :
Geographic Location : Vero Beach ; Indian River County
Impacted Watershed Name : Indian River Farms Water Control District South Relief Canal Drainage Basin
Size of Project Impact : The Algal Nutrient Removal Facility ( ANRF) will be approximately 4 . 5
acres with
associated peripheral facilities requiring approximately another six (6) acres . The developed site will be
approximately ten ( 10 ) acres . The total site property is approximately 12 . 81 acres .
Size of Drainage Area : 17 , 163 acres
Latitude : 27 . 592522
Longitude : 80 . 398530
Hydrologic Unit Code : 03080203
Impaired waterbody affected : Indian River Lagoon ( IRL Central B Project Zone), WBID : 5003B , TMDL adopted
for Nutrients (TN and TP)
Impairment : The health of the Indian River Lagoon ' s seagrass is the benchmark for measuring the progress of the
TMDL process . Healthy seagrass and increasing seagrass coverage is indicative of a health Lagoon. The project
will dramatically reduce the amount of dissolved nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) entering the Indian River
Lagoon ( IRL) through the Indian River Farms Water Control District ' s ( IRFWCD) South Relief Canal . Therefore ,
the project will dramatically reduce the potential for harmful algal blooms, including macroalgae such as Gracilaria
SP. , in the IRL that can be detrimental to seagrass and marine life . The project will also significantly
reduce the
amount of suspended solids and sediment that enter the IRL and it may also reduce to a lesser degree the color of the
water. It will also increase the water' s overall dissolved oxygen levels . Management of these parameters will
benefit the IRL ' s seagrasses by reducing muck deposits, reducing settlement of sediment on seagrass
leaves,
improving oxygen availability , and increasing the penetration of light through the water column .
BMAP Status : Indian River Lagoon BMAP under development
Land Ownership Status : Land necessary for the construction of treatment infrastructure has been acquired in 2012 ,
approximately 12 . 81 acres for $750 ,000 . Title is held by Indian River County .
Land Uses within the watershed : (from GIS information — wetlands and forested areas extrapolated)
Land Use Acres %
Residential 89067 47
Industrial/Commercial 721 4.2
Agricultural 39948 23
Forested 446 2. 6
Wetlands 463 2. 7
Right of Way 29746 16
Institutional 772 4.5
Land Use Totals Acrea a and % 179163 100
REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- I , Page 1 of 14
PROJECT OVERVIEW :
This facility will be the second full-scale facility of its kind in Indian River County and the
nation . Through
engineered design and flow control, high levels of biomass productivity can be maintained. Predictable
nitrogen and
phosphorus removal results from the routine recovery of excess productivity . Several Best Management Practice ( BMP)s are
used for this project : primary screening using self-cleaning trash rakes ; grit/sediment removal ; biological nutrient removal
using the algal nutrient removal facility ; additional suspended solids removal using micro-screening or other highly efficient
screens ; final effluent polishing using high quality wetland systems ; and disinfection of effluent used for irrigation
reuse .
Additionally, the harvested algal biomass is a useful byproduct . Recovered biomass is processed into
marketable end
products including high grade compost or livestock feed .
An AGNRF system will remove dissolved nutrients from up to 10 million gallons per day of stormwater and canal
water and from up to 1 . 5 million gallons per day of reverse osmosis reject water from the South County Reverse
Osmosis
( RO) Treatment Plant. The RO reject water (currently discharged into the South Relief Canal untreated) will be blended with
the canal water and the ANRF will remove dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus from the blended water. Hydrogen sulfide
present in the RO reject water will be dissipated into the atmosphere as the mixture flows over the ANRF surface . The treated
water will be returned to the South Relief Canal where it will continue its journey to the IRL .
The ANRF uses a patented water treatment technology developed specifically to enhance water quality of polluted
waters through the active cultivation of attached algae upon an engineered surface . By cultivation is meant the production
and periodic harvesting of the attached algae (epiphytic and periphytic) and the community of organisms
that become
established on and around the algae . This living community of plants and organisms is known as algal turf and includes
not
only the algal biomass, but also associated invertebrates , bacteria, fungi, organic residues, and
inorganic precipitants .
Through the community ' s biological and chemical dynamics , nutrient pollutants are removed from the water
column,
dissolved oxygen is increased, and oxidation of reduced substances is facilitated. The result is a treated effluent reduced
in
nutrients, high in dissolved oxygen, and relieved of many potentially biologically deleterious and toxic substances . One
or
more final polishing filters, similar to wastewater treatment type filters, will be included in the treatment train downstream
of
the ANRF to remove all remaining solid particles from the treated water and a linear wetland system
will provide final
polishing.
The Algal Nutrient Removal Facility offers the advantage of high areal removal rates for both
nitrogen and
phosphorus, which result in reduced land area requirements and treatment costs . ' Effluent from the ANRF process is highly
oxygenated, often exceeding saturation during the daytime, and typically well above 5 mg/I dissolved oxygen ( DO) during
the nighttime . ANRF units have relatively short hydraulic detention, and thereby avoid accumulation of heavy sediment
loads . As algae rely heavily upon dissolved bicarbonate, carbon dioxide and carbonate as a carbon source, pH levels within
the ANRF effluent can increase during the daytime as alkalinity shifts towards hydroxyl alkalinity . This change
in water
chemistry allows engineered ANRF systems to be optimized for the precipitation and recovery of pollutants
including
phosphorus . ANRF units have also been shown to be effective at removing ammonia and nitrate + nitrite
nitrogen ; and
recovering trace metals and select organic compounds . The ANRF technology was specifically developed to offer low cost
treatment even under low nitrogen and phosphorus conditions .
PC South will greatly improve the IRL ' s health by significantly removing suspended solids and dissolved nitrogen
and phosphorus from the waters of the IRFWCD South Relief Canal before the waters enter the IRL , while increasing oxygen
levels . This will benefit and protect seagrasses and associated fauna, providing them with an environment suitable for their
growth and reproduction . As seagrasses are preserved and proliferate, fish and wildlife populations will increase
. The
potential for dangerous IRL algal blooms, including macroalgae such as Gracilaria sp. , caused by high nutrient loadings
will
also be greatly reduced . A secondary (future) benefit will be the creation of a significant source of treated water for irrigation
purposes for commercial , industrial, and residential users, thus lowering their consumption of water from the surficial
and
Floridian aquifiers, thereby promoting water conservation and preserving groundwater. This will also benefit the IRL
by
reducing the quantity of freshwater discharged into it on a daily basis . Another benefit is the creation of very
high quality
1 For example, STA systems may achieve phosphorus removal rates of 1 -4 g- P/m2-yr or less than 0 . 10 lb- P/acre-day ; WH STM
units at high nutrient concentrations may achieve as high as 25 g- P/m2-yr removal or about 0 . 62
lb- P/acre-day ; ANRF
systems at comparatively low nutrient concentrations have been documented as achieving well over 50 g- P/m2-yr or 1 .24
Ib-
P/acre-day . The implication is that an ANRF unit may provide treatment in 1 acre equivalent to 50 acres of STA or treatment
wetlands .
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 2 of 14
, ,
In
leee
ISO
t
PFF
wr
AIn
do
w �NeIn � In
IN le
In I
Inn, . j
n
e%
r��
�M
ISO
!1
IMP
AIR : 1
INS IF
mm
. 1
In
MelwwF t
. 1 ' If
. d � nk, AueIn I
rr
Yin
iv
ESTIMATED POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION MODEL USED .
For estimating watershed loading, exclusive of the RO Concentrate addition, the Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant
Loads (STEPL) was initially applied, with the land use breakdown as previously noted . In developing these
loads, grass
swales and dry detention were noted as the existing BMP elements . Event Mean Concentrations used were those applied
to
Florida conditions2 shown in Table 1 of the Pollutant Load Calculations Attachment, which are similar to the default
values
within the STEPL model . Load projections for the entire watershed are noted in Table 2 of the Pollutant Load Calculations
Attachment.
There is available long term USGS flow data for the PC -South Relief Canal which represents the composite influence of
the
runoff and base flow associated with the majority of the watershed . Data from 1956 to 19824 reveals an annual average
flow
of 37 . 7 cfs or 24 .4 MGD, with a standard deviation of 13 . 7 cfs ( 8 . 9 MGD) ; a minimum annual average of
15 .2 cfs (9 . 8
MGD) and a maximum annual average of 61 . 6 cfs (39 . 8 MGD) . Using the average flow rates and the STEPL
post BMP
loading values, the average annual concentrations within the canal can be estimated, as noted in Table 3 of the Pollutant
Load
Calculations Attachment . Included in this table is the actual concentrations as monitored in the South Canal, using data
from
USGS from 1972 - 1977 , from Indian River Farms Water Control District from 2000, and from the ongoing PC-South ATSTM
Pilot System .
BMPs Installed TSS TP TN
BMP #1 ATS lbs/yr lbs/yr lbs/yr
Pre- Project 339851 79400 36,834
Post- 16,925 49998 279229
Project
y Load 169926 21402 99607
Reduction
p; % 50% 32. 5% 26. 1 %
Reduction
BMP #2 TSS TP TN
(wetlandpond) lbs/yr lbs/yr lbs/yr
Pre- Project 169925 41998 27,229
a
Project 89463 41953 27,004
Load 8463 45 225
Reduction
p; % 50 % 0. 9% 0. 8 %
Reduction
TOTAL TSS TP TN
lbs/yr lbs/yr lbs/yr
Pre- Project 339851 79400 369834
Project 89462 49953 279004
Load 259389 29447 99830
Reduction
cam. % F75. 0 % 33 . 1 % 26. 7 %
Reduction
ESTIMATED RESIDENCE TIME OF ANY PONDS, SWALES, ETC . : This Section is not applicable . The pollutant
reduction occurs on the algal turf scrubber flow-way .
z CDM, " Little Wekiva Basin Watershed Management Plan" 2005 Orange County, Florida.
3 USGS Station 02253500 Lat 27 ° 36 ' 11 " ; Long 80 ° 23 ' 24"
4 In 1982 RO Concentrate discharge to the canal was initiated and flows reflect this addition after 1982 .
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 4 of 14
TASKS and DELIVERABLES :
TASK NUMBER 1
TASK NAME : Land Acquisition
TASK DESCRIPTION : This process involved the land purchase for construction of the ATS facility . Closing for the sale
and contract was executed on August 24, 2012 for a total cost of $ 754, 528 . 00 . This cost was expended as other
required
expenditures, not required match .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : $754 , 528 for acquiring 12 . 81 acres of land; not required match so additional documentation not
needed other than description of how funds were expended in the final project report.
DELIVERABLES : 12 . 81 acres acquired, closing on August 24 , 2012
TASK NUMBER 2
TASK NAME : Design and Permitting, Bidding
TASK DESCRIPTION : This task involves the surveying, sub- surface exploration, preparation of design drawings and
specifications and application of construction permits . Design services were provided by several engineering consultants
who comprised an engineering team to facilitate an accelerated schedule . The Grantee shall design the system as described in
Tasks 3 , 3A, 313 , and 3C (BMP Construction) and obtain all necessary permits . Permits should be obtained from the
U . S .
Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), St. Johns River Water Management
District, Indian River Farms Water Control District, and Indian River County Specifically , these permits will include :
FDEP
Industrial Wastewater (ww) and environmental resource permit (erp), five (5 ) separate Indian River Farms Water Control
District ( IRFWCD) permits, a St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) consumptive use permit and Indian
River County ( IRC) site plan permit. The Grantee shall prepare and solicit bids utilizing a bid package in accordance
with
state and federal laws and this Agreement. The work will be bid under two (2 ) separate projects : 1 ) The
PC Sourth Algal
Nutrient Facility, including a large pump station located on the IRFWCD South Relief Canal , and 2) A large diameter
force
main from the South Relief Canal Pump Station to the PC South Algal Nutrient Removal Facility Site .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : All costs in this task are additional expenditures to be made by the Grantee, not required match.
The design for site plan, electrical structural , pump station and pipe routing projects have resulted in a total cost
of $778 , 315
in consulting fees . The permit application fees estimate a total cost of $7 ,025 . 00 in contractual review fees ; the
estimated
contractual cost of bidding services is $20,000 . 00 this task includes the permit application
DELIVERABLES : Submission of copy of final design ; copy of all required permits . Submission of a copy of bid package
and selection of contractor documents .
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : Approval of final design is contingent upon approved permits . The Department Grant
Manager will review the bid package and copy of subcontract to ensure compliance with state and federal laws specific
to
this Agreement.
TASK NUMBER 3
TASK NAME : BMP Construction
TASK DESCRIPTION : The Grantee shall develop approximately ten ( 10) acres within a 12 . 81 acre parcel for the purpose
of creating an Algal Nutrient Removal Facility as depicted in Figures 1 and 2 , attached and incorporated herein . The
entire
PC South Algal Nutrient Removal Facility and connecting systems will be composed of the following components, which
will be broken out into subtasks to utilize both 319 and TMDL funding:
1 . Influent flow delivery system , which will be a low head, high flow pumping system (e .g. submersible pumps),
to be
constructed under Task 3A
2 . Intermittent release control device or flow surger, designed to pulse flows in a manner emulative
of oscillatory
waves . This device is an automatic siphon mechanism placed on a surger box . The intermittent surging of
water
helps disrupt the algal cell wall boundary which enhances the rate of diffusion of nutrients, particularly
at low
concentrations, to be constructed under Task 3 B .
3 . An influent distribution system designed to distribute water equitably along the width of the ANRF floway,
with
flow introduced from the flow surger, to be constructed under Task 313
4 . A sloped ANRF floway that includes an impervious concrete surface as an attachment matrix for the algae . Floway
length is determined by treatment requirements and influent characteristics , to be constructed under Task 313
5 . An effluent and harvest flume that runs the full width of the ANRF floway . Typically this flume
is triangular in
cross section, with a variable cross sectional area, increasing as flows accumulate . The slope is designed to ensure at
least 1 . 5 fps velocity throughout the flume, which ensures conveyance of the harvested material . The flume serves
both as a means to move effluent, and, during harvest, to transport harvested algae to an automated self cleaning bar
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 5 of 14
screen (FlexRake), to be constructed under Task 313
6 . An automatic FlexRake, typically as manufactured by Duperon Corporation of Saginaw Michigan. The FlexRake
facilitates capture and removal of harvested algae filaments, as well as continuous removal of sloughed algae and
incidental solids5 , to be constructed under Task 313
7 . Stormwater/Brine Pipeline, a large diameter force main from the South Relief Canal Pump Station to the PC South
Algal Nutrient Removal Facility Site, to be constructed under Task 3C . This pipeline will carry canal water to the
ARNF . Another pipeline will carry brine from the South County RO Water Treatment Plant to the ARNF where it
will mix with the canal water before flowing onto the ARNF .
TASK NUMBER 3A
TASK NAME : BMP Construction — South Relief Canal Pump Station
TASK DESCRIPTION : 319 grant funding will be utilized in part for construction of the South Relief Canal Pump Station .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : The estimated contractual construction costs for the pump station and related components
is
$ 1 , 126 , 000 , of which $563 , 000 maximum will be expended from 319 grant funds and $ 563 ,000 minimum is required
match
expenditure for the 319 grant funds .
DELIVERABLES : 1 ) Dated color photographs of the site prior to and during construction and immediately following
completion of the project; 2) complete installation of the entire pump station ; 3 ) As-built certification for the pump station
; 4)
electronic files of the as-built drawings completed by a professional land surveyor; and 5 ) signed statement from Grantee
' s
project certified engineer indicating construction has been completed in accordance with approved design .
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : The Department Grant Manager will review the photographs and certification of
completion for all components by the Grantee ' s project certified engineer to verify that construction has been completed
for
all components in accordance with the approved plans .
TASK NUMBER 3B
TASK NAME : BMP Construction — PC South Algal Nutrient Removal Facility
TASK DESCRIPTION : TMDL grant funding will be utilized in part for construction of the PC South
Algal Nutrient
Removal Facility and its associated appurtenances and hardware .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : The estimated contractual construction costs for the Algal Nutrient Removal Facility and related
components is $ 5 ,426, 847 , of which $ 1 , 376,900 maximum will be expended from TMDL grant funds
and $4,049,947
minimum is required match expenditure for the TMDL grant funds .
DELIVERABLES : 1 ) Dated color photographs of the site prior to and during construction and immediately following
completion of the project ; 2) complete installation of the entire Algal Nutrient Removal Facility system
per the project
description; 3 ) As-built certification for the stormwater management system ; 4 ) electronic files of the
as-built drawings
completed by a professional land surveyor; and 5 ) signed statement from Grantee ' s project certified engineer
indicating
construction has been completed in accordance with approved design .
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : The Department Grant Manager will review the photographs and certification
of
completion for all components by the Grantee ' s project certified engineer to verify that construction has been completed
for
all components in accordance with the approved plans .
TASK NUMBER 3C
TASK NAME : BMP Construction — Stormwater/Brine Pipeline
TASK DESCRIPTION : TMDL grant funding will be utilized in part for construction of the Stormwater/Brine Pipeline and
their associated appurtenances and hardware .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : The estimated contractual construction costs for these components is $ 1 , 164 , 853 .40, of
which
$287 ,000 maximum will be expended from 319 grant funds and $ 877 , 853 .40 minimum is required match expenditure for the
319 grant funds .
DELIVERABLES : 1 ) Dated color photographs of the site prior to and during construction and immediately following
completion of the project; 2) complete installation of the entire Algal Nutrient Removal Facility system
per the project
description; 3 ) As-built certification for the stormwater management system ; 4 ) electronic files of the
as-built drawings
completed by a professional land surveyor; and 5 ) signed statement from Grantee ' s project certified engineer
indicating
construction has been completed in accordance with approved design .
5 In some cases in which high levels of suspended solids reduction is required, additional processes such as wedge wire
screens, hydroscreens, or sand filters may be included to further polish the effluent after coarse screening through the Flex
Rake .
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 6 of 14
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : The Department Grant Manager will review the photographs and certification of
completion for all components by the Grantee ' s project certified engineer to verify that construction has been completed
for
all components in accordance with the approved plans .
TASK NUMBER : 4
TASK NAME : Public Education
TASK DESCRIPTION : This task includes public presentations and construction of a nature trail with informational signs
explaining the environmental benefits of the ATS system and methods for reducing nutrient loading into the receiving waters
of the state . There is a video currently available for viewing at the dedicated stormwater educational website
(www . irestormwater. com) that describes nutrient removal projects the county has implemented to date, as
well as an
introduction to the PC South project. Walking trails and signage will be constructed, civic forums will
be ongoing . An
updated water quality improvement informational video will be produced to include the ATS Facility, to be broadcast on the
IRC county public television station and couty ' s stormwater educational website .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : Estimated cost of $54,000 . 00 for walking trail , signs and informational/educational video . All
costs in this task are additional expenditures to be made by the Grantee, not required match .
DELIVERABLES : Text and final draft video in electronic format for the website will be submitted to
the DEP Grant
Manager for prior approval before airing and distribution. Submission of CD ' s with the final Public Services
Announcements released to the public with information on when they were aired. Link to the Indian River County website
with information on updates made for the project. Dated photographs of the installed walking trails and signage, dates/sign4n
sheets for when the civic forums are held.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : The DEP Grant Manager will review the draft and final deliverables to verify compliance
with the Agreement ' s terms and conditions, the TMDL grant requirements and the Department ' s policies
on public
education, and will review evidence of the number of contacts made with the public through each component of the outreach
task .
TASK NUMBER: 5
TASK NAME : Monitoring
TASK DESCRIPTION : The Grantee must complete and submit to the Department a Quality Assurance Project
Plan
(QAPP) for monitoring prior to commencement of any monitoring. The monitoring plan will specify the sampling locations,
sampling instruments, and parameters to be sampled. The parameters shall include, but are not limited to : TN ( lbs/yr),
TP
(lbs/yr), TSS ( lbs/yr), Cd, Cr, Cu, Zn, NO2/NO3 , TKN , NH3 , Orthophosphate, Fecal coliform, rainfall and flow. Because
the flow through the system is continuous, discrete sampling during rainfall events is meaningless .
The flow will be
monitored on a timed composite sampling basis during the one-year monitoring period. Monitoring is to be performed
at
inflow and outflow locations of each BMPs installed and in accordance with the approved QAPP . Sampling locations shall
be recorded and verified using a GPS device . Project-specific details must be added during QAPP development . Harvested
material shall be weighed wet with each harvest, either directly or by determining wet density and
volume . Three (3 )
composite samples shall be analyzed for percent moisture , and these composited on a monthly basis
for analysis for
phosphorus, nitrogen, carbon, and ash .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : The estimated contractual costs for the collection and lab analysis of monitoring events results is
$200,000 . All costs in this task are additional expenditures to be made by the Grantee, not required match.
DELIVERABLES : Department approved QAPP and submission of monitoring results . Discussion of analysis
of
monitoring results and the pollutant load reductions from each applicable BMP either as a stand-alone
Final Efficiency
Evaluation Monitoring Report or as part of the Final Project Report .
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : The Department Grant Manager will review the QAPP for compliance with this
Agreement and DEP Standard Operating Procedures for monitoring ; submission of approved QAPP ; and submission
of
monitoring results . Review of Final Efficiency Evaluation Monitoring Report (or equivalent description in the Final Project
Report) to verify that monitoring was completed in accordance with the approved QAPP and the results were analyzed
and
discussed regarding removal efficiency .
TASK NUMBER: 6
TASK NAME : Draft and Final Report
TASK DESCRIPTION : The Grantee must complete and submit to the Department a Final Report . The Final Report is
intended to capture the outcome and results of the selected project, including all tasks included in this
project. It shall
include, at least, the following : a summary of monitoring results and an explanation of any unexpected monitoring results or
unexpected occurrences . This shall include, where applicable, why a BMP did not obtain or exceeded the expected removal
efficiency ; any problems encountered and how those problems were overcome ; an explanation of any project delays ; a brief
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 7 of 14
summary of any additional phases yet to be completed; and any additional information which explains the results
of the
project. The Final Report template , available from the Department ' s Grant Manager, should be followed
as much as
possible . The Grantee shall submit the final report as a draft prior to submitting the final report for project
closeout. The
Grantee will also provide quarterly updates on the project progression for informational purposes .
ALLOWABLE COSTS : Contractual costs estimated at $20,000 for preparation of the draft and final project
report
including discussion of monitoring results . All costs in this task are additional expenditures to be made by the Grantee,
not
required match .
DELIVERABLES : Draft final report; approved final report that meets all of the requirements identified
in the task
description . The Grantee shall provide one paper copy and one electronic copy of the approved
final report to the
Department.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD : The Department Grant Manager will review the draft final report and provide comments
to the Grantee and review the Final Report for compliance with this Agreement.
TIMELINE :
Task Task Description Start Complete
Number
1 Land Acquisition Month 0 Month 6
2 Design and Permitting, Bidding Month 0 Month 9
3 BMP Construction Month 9 Month 24
3A BMP Construction — South Relief Month 9 Month 24
Canal Pump Station
3B BMP Construction — PC South Algal Month 9 Month 24
Nutrient Removal Facility
3C BMP Construction — Month 9 Month 24
Stormwater/Brine Pipeline
4 Public Education Month 14 Month 42
5 Monitoring Month 24 Month 42
6 Draft and Final Report I Month 42 Month 48
REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
DEP Agreement No. G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 8 of 14
i 1 i • 1
All � . g, � � A At
�
4. iy q q et T `t ' .'rt
at TS
+y 1
*„x ,4 � .'� e ' M ids : tc v " `�# n x, x ° '.
a . . . .
A w .
� � • ®1 1 . 1 1 : 1 1
tl
•FAA 'Al Al 1 All
At
Isj 1 1� 1
. ,
AA
YW .. " tx .
x • a • 111 1 • 111 1 1
trot a rD 11
IF
IF
� l l
* a � , a S
A?AAe • • • 11 1 1 . • • , 1
d� * ' $ P � Z
.. if� JIM
AV W,': .. .M "' ' 'fir `�AllA @ ArG,A, a.'at. ? !
$. r. sw .a..
e " • 1111 ' 1 1 1
All,V6F E I
FAA = a • 1 All
t IPA
A Al 1 A
1
':: AA
; At
MA<� t t, C; �J Ac . fin,_ : _ :5a,�. . +'t' kLdAx _ ;r- 6w, A * .AAAF .
• 1 1 1 11 111
kir ' E Rk �A.� IF , fAlk III rJ 'X'' t g�IF
i` .kc+
I All ,
` Ll
firWeill1 1 1 1 111
X
It
A10
At 11A,A
I IF 1 11
DWI
�'h 3, ' Rs ` �` '
Ilk" Az ''All „ W ' i # All”t - 11i w 6 � $ *�pr . y�a ,III - . v �+�'� sk-.
� . .. .
11
` . ' '^ ; . Al
wel%00 °`fit ,,,q? 14
: ,' - Y ++ 's .r a r " A 11 tk;t Mr
t� v
'FIIi III
11
AFAAlffit 1i At FAA 114 fw -71 All I A
k .. 'F AAA ,n m a M #"q' `�, ¢�.6;' � ka " `"Y « ' $,v,AAA ``
.ars ,a `.�5� ." �371% �, � „
It
lb
tl�
g-^a Al 4
<.s.w"E , x,k'ia+',*„' .rn.. c «3f s' p
Awl, ,
1 1 1 1
i
• , i 1
xv. FLA
» � � 011 1
*
I IF {.
* w "fir d y, - �. ,a , '4v a
+,
�.+ y, �}I
" �' Fv . ck'i -su"^ 7 v `� 3c ,+ t', i'. i '' ' 1 _ .� .,,,
.�., .�r �a. -t
Salaries Total
All
Fringe Benefits Total
Travel Total—
Contractual
1 1 1
C • • 1 111 • • 11 S11440F, 853040 $4�0495947 $ 1 ,0799340
Equipment ® 1 1 1
Supplies/OtherExpenses Total
® 1 1 1
g� 7 .
., i.','.' �..' . a ;»x.. _. ,« �„ ::. UL3 .�k„a. .'..;„ , .� .+, : ' ' sae W7.7 .AAA FIF
gg
AIM
...,.�yu.. ...m.... , ;.
Ivr aw , '
• 1 • •
POLLUTANT LOAD CALCULATIONS ATTACHMENT
EMCS USED IN MODEL :
Table 1 : Event Mean Concentrations PC-South Relief Canal Watershed
Total P Total N TSS BOD
Land Use EMC mg/L EMC mg/L EMC mg/L EMC mg/L
Agricultural 0 . 14 2 . 02 70 13
Commercial 0 .29 1 . 34 88 12
Residential 1 . 05 2 . 61 39 8
Industrial 0 . 31 2 . 06 94 10
Forest/Open 0 . 05 1 .44 11 15
Institutional 0 . 31 2 . 07 39 8
Wetlands 0 . 05 1 . 14 5 1 . 5
Table 2 : STEPL Load Projections for PC- South Relief Canal
lb/ ear lb/year lb/year t/ ear
PC -South 145 , 960 19 , 464 666 , 393 11994
Total 145 , 960 19 ,464 666 , 393 1 , 994
Urban 341489 61109 120 ,671 278
Cropland 24 , 800 11971 231 , 858 217
Pastureland 29 , 067 27243 93 , 306 45
Forest 11220 43 929 1
Feedlots 0 0 0 0
User Defined 31333 11332 91418 7
Septic 322 126 11316 0
NEMESES
Gully 0 0 0 0
Streambank 0 0 0 0
Groundwater 0 0 0 0
Total 93 , 232 11 , 825 457 ,4971 547
Table 3 : Comparison of Average Concentrations PC -South Relief Canal
Source TP mg/L TN mg/L TSS mg/L BOD mg/L
Average Average Average Average
Calculated from STEPL and USGS Flow 0 . 159 1 . 25 15 6
Data
Field Data USGS , IRFWCD, IRC 0 . 240 1 . 05 11 <2
DEP Agreement No. G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 10 of 14
These values are reasonably similar. The field data will be used in the following analysis regarding
design loads and
projected reductions. To complete this review, the flows and water quality associated with the RO Concentrate , which is to be
blended at an average ratio of 10 : 1 with flows from the South Relief Canal , needs to be included . The RO
Concentrate is a
highly mineralized, low suspended solids flow with a near neutral pH, and water temperatures consistently at about 26
° C .
The flow rate is presently about 1 MGD . Based upon data collected during the ongoing pilot investigation, the design
water
quality for the RO Concentrate is as noted in Table 4 .
Table 4 • Design Concentrations Ro Concentrate, South Relief Canal and 10 : 1 Blend
Units RO Concentrate Canal Value 10 : 1 Design
Value Average Blend Annual
Average Value
Average
Total P m /L 0 .033 0 .240 0 . 221
Total N m /L 1 . 57 1 . 05 1910
Ammonia-N m /L 0 . 94 0 . 09 0 . 17
TSS m L <2 11 10
Alkalinity mg/L as 723 178 228
CaCO3
Conductivity micros/cm 69135 19941 29322
Color pcu 11 39 36
* Value is typically directly related to concentration in feed water
* * Typically directly related to water temperature
Accordingly, based upon flows of 10 MGD from the canal and 1 MGD as RO Concentrate, the annual design loads
to the
Algal Turf Scrubber® (ATSTM) treatment unit shall be as noted in Table 5 . To determine the reduction associated with
these
loads through the Algal Turf Scrubber®, a first order model —ATSDEM—which is based upon the Monod relationship
.
ATSDEM was developed by HydroMentia, Inc . of Ocala, Florida 6, and will be applied to the water
quality and flow
conditions . The model is based upon projections of specific growth rates and community productivity for the
Algal Turf
Community , which has been shown to be a function of total phosphorus levels ; hydraulic loading rate ; temperature ; tissue
nutrient levels and average standing crop . Critical input parameters are noted in Table 6 .
Table 5 : Design Pollutant Loads from 11 MGD Design Flow Blend
Units 10 : 1 Design
Design Pollutant Loads Blend Annual
Value
Total P lb/year 7 ,400
Total N lb/year 36 , 834
TSS lb/year 334, 851
Table 6 : Critical Input Parameters ATSDEM
6 This model was developed as part of the Contact C - 13933 between HydroMentia, Inc and the
South Florida Water
Management District. " S- 154 Pilot Single Stage Algal Turf Scrubber® Final Report" Submitted to the South Florida Water
Management District. March 2005 .
DEP Agreement No . G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 11 of 14
Parameter Units Value Range
Maximum Specific Growth Rate I /hr 0 . 02 -0 . 04
Because Optimal Growing Temperature °C 28 -31 there is
wide Tissue Phosphorus Level * % of dry weight 0 . 35 - 1 . 0 variability
in ATSTM Tissue Nitrogen Level * % of dry weight 2 . 00-3 . 50
Average Standing Crop * * D - m 250420
Want Hoff-Arrhenius Coefficient Q dimensionless 1 . 054 . 10
Half rate concentrationTP K µ L 60- 100
Half Rate Value Linear hydraulic Loading Gpm/ft 9- 15
Rate Kh
Initial Standing Crop Dry- m 10-20
performance based upon water temperature, it is reasonable to model the system on a monthly basis . Water Quality input data
for an average month, taken from the historical data base is noted in Table 7 . The algal turf information is interpolated
from
data collected from both the ongoing PC - South ATSTM pilot and the operational Egret Marsh Stormwater
Park ATSTM
facility 7 8 , presently under operation .
Table 7 : ATSDEM Water Quality and Algal Turf Input Data
Average Average
Average TP mg/L Average TN mg/L Water T °C Standing
Crop m
Month 10 : 1 Blend 10 : 1 Blend 10 : 1 Blend
January 0 . 136 0 . 75 19 . 7 50
February 0 . 112 0 . 72 2044 55
March 0 . 333 0 . 84 2209 70
Aril 0 . 171 1 . 06 24 .4 90
May 0 . 326 1 . 37 27 .4 100
June 0 . 267 1 . 63 28 . 1 110
July 0 . 148 1 . 14 28 . 9 110
August 0 . 325 1 . 54 28 . 8 100
September 0 . 267 1 . 02 27 . 8 90
October 0 .227 1 . 10 25 . 8 70
November 0 . 167 1 . 12 23 . 7 60
December 0 . 172 0 . 72 19 . 5 50
Alkalinity 228 mg/L as CaCO3
pH = 7 . 81
Tissue P = 0 . 60%
Tissue N = 2 .40%
Initial Standing Crop 10 m2
The ATSDEM projections are presented in Table 8 . These are reasonable conservative projections, when compared to actual
pilot performance from January through April 2011 , as shown in Table 9 . These projections are conservative, but congruent
with the data collected to date associated with the ATSTM PC -South pilot study, as shown in Table
10 , with the actual
performance notably higher than the ATSDEM projections .
" Egret Marsh 10 MGD Algal Turf Scrubber® Final Basis of Design Report" July, 2005 . Prepared for Indian River County
by HydroMentia, Inc .
a Contract G0143 319(h) grant to Indian River County . " Egret Marsh Stormwater Park Algal Turf Scrubber® 319 (h) Grant
Quarterly Performance Report Quarter 1 " Prepared for Indian River County for submittal to FDEP by HydroMentia,
Inc .
January 2011
DEP Agreement No. G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 12 of 14
Suspended solids removal through the ATSTM has been typically been about 50% when influent TSS are less than 15
mg/L .
Quite often laboratory data is reflected as <5 mg/L which is reported as the limit of detection . 50% reduction is
a reasonable
projection.
Table 8 : ATSDEM Performance Projections
PmaX (11hr) 0.032
Ks (Ng/L) 50
Kah (gPm/If) 11
Topt *C 30
Q 1 .09
TP Areal TN Areal
TP Removal TN Removal Algal Turf Net
Influent Effluent removed Rate Influent Effluent removed Rate Productivity Effluent
TP pg/1 TP pg/I Ib g/m2-yr TN mg/1 TN mg/I Ib g/m2-yr g/m2=day pH
January 136 110 75 16 0 . 75 0.64 1 301 65 7. 50 8. 02
February 112 86 74 16 0 . 72 0 .62 295 63 7 . 35 8. 01
March 333 265 193 42 0. 84 0 . 57 774 166 19.26 8 . 34
April 171 108 178 38 1 . 06 0 . 81 714 154 17. 77 8. 30
May 326 213 321 69 1 . 37 0. 92 1 ,284 276 31 . 96 8. 68
June 267 148 337 73 1 . 63 1 . 16 11350 290 33 . 61 8 . 73
July 148 65 235 50 1 . 14 0 . 81 939 202 23. 38 8.45
Au ust 325 193 374 81 1 . 54 1 .01 11498 322 37 . 30 8. 83
Se tember 267 178 253 54 1 . 02 0.66 11013 218 25 . 21 8 . 50
October 227 168 168 36 1 . 10 0 . 86 674 145 16 . 78 8 . 27
November 167 127 113 24 1 . 12 0 . 96 452 97 11 .26 8. 12
December 172 144 78 17 0. 72 0.61 314 67 7 . 81 8. 02
Averages 225 151 45 1 . 12 0.82 182 21 .04 8. 39
Totals 2,402 1 9 ,607
Table 9 : Comparison ATSDEM Performance Projections to Pilot Results January through April 2011
Areal Removal Rate Productivity g/m2" pH
Influent mg/L Effluent mg/L m2_ r da
Pilot Pilot Pilot Pilot Pilot
ATSDEM Data ATSDEM Data ATSDEM Data ATSDEM Data ATSDEM Data
t13
82 110 57 16 22
Jan 0 .64 0 . 64 0 .49 65 170 7 . 50 6 . 03 8 . 02 8 . 37
80 86 45 16 28
Feb 0 . 66 0 .62 0 .42 65 2087 . 35 14 . 32 8 . 01 8 . 54
257 265 45 42 165Mar 1 . 28 0 . 57 0 . 56 166 58919 .26 20 . 98 8
. 34 8 . 35
99 108 30 38 54
Apr 1 . 13 0 . 81 0 . 66 154 369 17 . 77 23 . 28 8 . 30 8 .21
In addition to the ATSTM, the proposed facility will include about 1 acre of polishing wetlands, intended to permit settling
of
periodically sloughed algae and some buffering of pH and water temperature, as well as providing wildlife habitat.
The
removal rates in terms of nutrients and solids through such a wetland/pond system is comparatively modest. At
the Egret
Marsh Stormwater Park, the ATSTM is followed by a wetland\pond system , which over nine months has provided an average
removal rate of 5 g/m2 -yr for TP and 25 g/m2-yr for TN . These removals are reflected in the loading and load reduction
table
included as part of this application.
DEP Agreement No. G0353 , Attachment A- 1 , Page 13 of 14
Figure 2 . General System Layout of Proposed A • Components forConstruction
LEGEND
GreenommmmPiping �
Configuration
Blue � ATS Site
Location
� • • y � � �. 1 ,4 t ^;. �S y t
Proposed ., � Canal � �
Pump - •
' ! • I C Lateral J Canal
Proposed 24" Force Main
Segment ( retained 6 , 200
r�
New . . .
• street
tributary canal
' ,� EXISTING ` SOU H � _
WATER TREATENT ® ' 24 11 Proposed 1
FACILITY
12" Force Main
• - 1 Connectors
ProposedGeneral System Layout ir I
South Relief
Facility Proposed Proposed acre
' Agreement No . 1 Page 14 of 14
1
EXHIBIT — I
FUNDS AWARDED TO THE RECIPIENT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING :
Federal Resources Awarded to the Reci fent Pursuant to this Agreement Consist of the Followin :
Federal State
Program CFDA Appropriation
Number Federal Agency Number CFDA Title Funding Amount Category
Original U. S . Environmental 66 .460 Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants $ 850 ,000 . 00 140076
Agreement Protection Agency
State Resources Awarded to the Recipient Pursuant to this A reement Consist of the Following Matching Resources for Federal Pro
rams :
Federal State
Program Appropriation
Number Federal Agency CFDA CFDA Title Funding Amount Category
State Resources Awarded to the Recipient Pursuant to this A reement Consist of the Following Resources Subject to Section 215.97
F.S. :
State CSFA Title State
Program State CSFA or Appropriation
Number Funding Source Fiscal Year Number Funding Source Description Funding Amount Category
Amendment Water Quality Assurance 2012-2013 37 .039 Statewide Surface Water Restoration $376,900 . 00 140076
No . 1 Trust Fund, Line 1662 and Wastewater Projects
Amendment Water Quality Assurance 2013 =2014 37 .039 Statewide Surface Water Restoration $ 11000 ,000 . 00 140076
No . 1 Trust Fund, Line Item 1620 and Wastewater Projects
Total Award I $2 ,226 ,900 . 00
For each program identified above, the recipient shall comply with the program requirements described in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
[http :// 12 .46 .245 . 173 /cfda/cfda.html] and/or the Florida Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) [https ://apps. fldfs.com/fsaa/sea
rchCatalog. aspxl . The
services/purposes for which the funds are to be used are included in the Contract scope of services/work. Any match required
by the recipient is clearly indicated
in the Contract.
DEP 55 -215 (03/09)
DEP Agreement No. G0353, Attachment F, Page 5 (Revised) of 5