Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-225 WORK ORDER NUMBER �• oC D I This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this 18th day of December 2012 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15 , 2011 , (the "Agreement") by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a - political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . ("CONSULTANT") . The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work) , attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference . The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference . The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1 (Time Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1 . 4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above . CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY aaa•"YPYYYYppppp0, INC . •+•�O��USSIONF9`S'°' • r ,:40 •� A By: c. � . By i � a p Jo eph E , Flescher, Chairman; i X06 a 0 Title: President BCC Approved Date : 12-18- 12 •'•, •' t. , ` •�'• • N V�0• •,���AN R11tER ��+`•oaa YNtlNpYYtl tlPp Attest: JeffrySmith, Clerk of Cpdrt and Comptroller B DeputyClerk Approved . seph . Baird , County Administrator pproved as to form al sufficiency: Alan Pola ich , County Attorney WORK ORDER NUMBER �• oC D I This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this 18th day of December 2012 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15 , 2011 , (the "Agreement") by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a - political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . ("CONSULTANT") . The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work) , attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference . The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference . The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1 (Time Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1 . 4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above . CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY aaa•"YPYYYYppppp0, INC . •+•�O��USSIONF9`S'°' • r ,:40 •� A By: c. � . By i � a p Jo eph E , Flescher, Chairman; i X06 a 0 Title: President BCC Approved Date : 12-18- 12 •'•, •' t. , ` •�'• • N V�0• •,���AN R11tER ��+`•oaa YNtlNpYYtl tlPp Attest: JeffrySmith, Clerk of Cpdrt and Comptroller B DeputyClerk Approved . seph . Baird , County Administrator pproved as to form al sufficiency: Alan Pola ich , County Attorney WORK ORDER NUMBER �• oC D I This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this 18th day of December 2012 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15 , 2011 , (the "Agreement") by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a - political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . ("CONSULTANT") . The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work) , attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference . The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference . The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1 (Time Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1 . 4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above . CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY aaa•"YPYYYYppppp0, INC . •+•�O��USSIONF9`S'°' • r ,:40 •� A By: c. � . By i � a p Jo eph E , Flescher, Chairman; i X06 a 0 Title: President BCC Approved Date : 12-18- 12 •'•, •' t. , ` •�'• • N V�0• •,���AN R11tER ��+`•oaa YNtlNpYYtl tlPp Attest: JeffrySmith, Clerk of Cpdrt and Comptroller B DeputyClerk Approved . seph . Baird , County Administrator pproved as to form al sufficiency: Alan Pola ich , County Attorney WORK ORDER NUMBER �• oC D I This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this 18th day of December 2012 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15 , 2011 , (the "Agreement") by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a - political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . ("CONSULTANT") . The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work) , attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference . The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference . The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1 (Time Schedule) , attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1 . 4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above . CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY aaa•"YPYYYYppppp0, INC . •+•�O��USSIONF9`S'°' • r ,:40 •� A By: c. � . By i � a p Jo eph E , Flescher, Chairman; i X06 a 0 Title: President BCC Approved Date : 12-18- 12 •'•, •' t. , ` •�'• • N V�0• •,���AN R11tER ��+`•oaa YNtlNpYYtl tlPp Attest: JeffrySmith, Clerk of Cpdrt and Comptroller B DeputyClerk Approved . seph . Baird , County Administrator pproved as to form al sufficiency: Alan Pola ich , County Attorney ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL USING CONSTRUCTED LIVING OYSTER REEFS WITHIN THE SPOONBILL MARSH RESTORATION SITE The purpose of this proposed project is to increase the long term nutrient uptake capacity of the Spoonbill Marsh site. The Spoonbill Marsh site has successfully removed nitrogen and phosphorus from the Indian River Lagoon during the first two years of operation. The Spoonbill Marsh has in fact significantly reduced the total inorganic nitrogen concentration to levels below the threshold concentration that defines oligotrophic waters. Most of the nitrogen and phosphorus discharged from the Spoonbill Marsh is in the organic forms. This project would develop an oyster reef across the terminal end of one of the four runnels discharging to the pre-existing mangrove community along the eastern side of the site. This oyster reef would further reduce the overall total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations leaving the constructed portion of the site. However, it would provide an important additional benefit in that the oyster reef is capable of filtering inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Thus this oyster reef could become a primary removal mechanism for reducing the organic portion of the nutrients passing through the site. This project proposes to construct an oyster reef across Runnel 3 in the general location shown by Figure 1 . The oyster reef would extend across the runnel from bank to bank as shown by Figure 2. The reef would be constructed using oyster blocks stacked from the sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line. The blocks will be loosely fitted together to produce a structure with a pore (void) space approximately equal to 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the runnel at the point where the reef is constructed. This should allow the water to pass through the reef without increasing the water depth upstream of the reef. Oysters within and along the outer surface will continue to grow and expand the width of the reef. The reef will be designed to allow the upstream side of the reef to be periodically broken away from the structure to expand the base of the reef up the course of the runnel. Task 1 . Oyster Reef Construction Ecotech Consultants, Inc. (ETC) and Sembler & Sembler, Inc. (S&S) will construct the oyster reef in the location shown by Figure 2. The general dimensions of the reef will be as follows : Base of reef - 3 .0 feet to 4.0 feet wide Top of reef - approximately 3 .0 feet wide Height of reef - from sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line Length - from the north bank to the south bank Geometry of side slopes - to be determined in the field Project pore space (or void volume) - approximately 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the existing channel. Page 1 of 4 ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL USING CONSTRUCTED LIVING OYSTER REEFS WITHIN THE SPOONBILL MARSH RESTORATION SITE The purpose of this proposed project is to increase the long term nutrient uptake capacity of the Spoonbill Marsh site. The Spoonbill Marsh site has successfully removed nitrogen and phosphorus from the Indian River Lagoon during the first two years of operation. The Spoonbill Marsh has in fact significantly reduced the total inorganic nitrogen concentration to levels below the threshold concentration that defines oligotrophic waters. Most of the nitrogen and phosphorus discharged from the Spoonbill Marsh is in the organic forms. This project would develop an oyster reef across the terminal end of one of the four runnels discharging to the pre-existing mangrove community along the eastern side of the site. This oyster reef would further reduce the overall total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations leaving the constructed portion of the site. However, it would provide an important additional benefit in that the oyster reef is capable of filtering inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Thus this oyster reef could become a primary removal mechanism for reducing the organic portion of the nutrients passing through the site. This project proposes to construct an oyster reef across Runnel 3 in the general location shown by Figure 1 . The oyster reef would extend across the runnel from bank to bank as shown by Figure 2. The reef would be constructed using oyster blocks stacked from the sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line. The blocks will be loosely fitted together to produce a structure with a pore (void) space approximately equal to 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the runnel at the point where the reef is constructed. This should allow the water to pass through the reef without increasing the water depth upstream of the reef. Oysters within and along the outer surface will continue to grow and expand the width of the reef. The reef will be designed to allow the upstream side of the reef to be periodically broken away from the structure to expand the base of the reef up the course of the runnel. Task 1 . Oyster Reef Construction Ecotech Consultants, Inc. (ETC) and Sembler & Sembler, Inc. (S&S) will construct the oyster reef in the location shown by Figure 2. The general dimensions of the reef will be as follows : Base of reef - 3 .0 feet to 4.0 feet wide Top of reef - approximately 3 .0 feet wide Height of reef - from sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line Length - from the north bank to the south bank Geometry of side slopes - to be determined in the field Project pore space (or void volume) - approximately 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the existing channel. Page 1 of 4 ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL USING CONSTRUCTED LIVING OYSTER REEFS WITHIN THE SPOONBILL MARSH RESTORATION SITE The purpose of this proposed project is to increase the long term nutrient uptake capacity of the Spoonbill Marsh site. The Spoonbill Marsh site has successfully removed nitrogen and phosphorus from the Indian River Lagoon during the first two years of operation. The Spoonbill Marsh has in fact significantly reduced the total inorganic nitrogen concentration to levels below the threshold concentration that defines oligotrophic waters. Most of the nitrogen and phosphorus discharged from the Spoonbill Marsh is in the organic forms. This project would develop an oyster reef across the terminal end of one of the four runnels discharging to the pre-existing mangrove community along the eastern side of the site. This oyster reef would further reduce the overall total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations leaving the constructed portion of the site. However, it would provide an important additional benefit in that the oyster reef is capable of filtering inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Thus this oyster reef could become a primary removal mechanism for reducing the organic portion of the nutrients passing through the site. This project proposes to construct an oyster reef across Runnel 3 in the general location shown by Figure 1 . The oyster reef would extend across the runnel from bank to bank as shown by Figure 2. The reef would be constructed using oyster blocks stacked from the sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line. The blocks will be loosely fitted together to produce a structure with a pore (void) space approximately equal to 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the runnel at the point where the reef is constructed. This should allow the water to pass through the reef without increasing the water depth upstream of the reef. Oysters within and along the outer surface will continue to grow and expand the width of the reef. The reef will be designed to allow the upstream side of the reef to be periodically broken away from the structure to expand the base of the reef up the course of the runnel. Task 1 . Oyster Reef Construction Ecotech Consultants, Inc. (ETC) and Sembler & Sembler, Inc. (S&S) will construct the oyster reef in the location shown by Figure 2. The general dimensions of the reef will be as follows : Base of reef - 3 .0 feet to 4.0 feet wide Top of reef - approximately 3 .0 feet wide Height of reef - from sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line Length - from the north bank to the south bank Geometry of side slopes - to be determined in the field Project pore space (or void volume) - approximately 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the existing channel. Page 1 of 4 ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL USING CONSTRUCTED LIVING OYSTER REEFS WITHIN THE SPOONBILL MARSH RESTORATION SITE The purpose of this proposed project is to increase the long term nutrient uptake capacity of the Spoonbill Marsh site. The Spoonbill Marsh site has successfully removed nitrogen and phosphorus from the Indian River Lagoon during the first two years of operation. The Spoonbill Marsh has in fact significantly reduced the total inorganic nitrogen concentration to levels below the threshold concentration that defines oligotrophic waters. Most of the nitrogen and phosphorus discharged from the Spoonbill Marsh is in the organic forms. This project would develop an oyster reef across the terminal end of one of the four runnels discharging to the pre-existing mangrove community along the eastern side of the site. This oyster reef would further reduce the overall total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations leaving the constructed portion of the site. However, it would provide an important additional benefit in that the oyster reef is capable of filtering inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Thus this oyster reef could become a primary removal mechanism for reducing the organic portion of the nutrients passing through the site. This project proposes to construct an oyster reef across Runnel 3 in the general location shown by Figure 1 . The oyster reef would extend across the runnel from bank to bank as shown by Figure 2. The reef would be constructed using oyster blocks stacked from the sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line. The blocks will be loosely fitted together to produce a structure with a pore (void) space approximately equal to 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the runnel at the point where the reef is constructed. This should allow the water to pass through the reef without increasing the water depth upstream of the reef. Oysters within and along the outer surface will continue to grow and expand the width of the reef. The reef will be designed to allow the upstream side of the reef to be periodically broken away from the structure to expand the base of the reef up the course of the runnel. Task 1 . Oyster Reef Construction Ecotech Consultants, Inc. (ETC) and Sembler & Sembler, Inc. (S&S) will construct the oyster reef in the location shown by Figure 2. The general dimensions of the reef will be as follows : Base of reef - 3 .0 feet to 4.0 feet wide Top of reef - approximately 3 .0 feet wide Height of reef - from sediments to an elevation approximately equal to the mean high water line Length - from the north bank to the south bank Geometry of side slopes - to be determined in the field Project pore space (or void volume) - approximately 40 percent to 60 percent of the cross sectional area of the existing channel. Page 1 of 4 Task 2 . Monitoring The proposed oyster reef site was selected because it is the easiest of the four easternmost runnels to access, and it is possible to easily access the upstream and downstream sides of the reef without having to walk across the reef. Grab water samples will be collected once per week from a point upstream of the reef and a point downstream of the reef. These samples will be analyzed for total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3), nitrate-nitrite nitrogen (NO,), total phosphorus (TP), ortho phosphorus (OP), and total suspended solids (TSS). The water samples will be taken to the North Water Treatment Plant on 58th Avenue for shipment to the County' s laboratory. Water temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, pH, turbidity, water depth, and secchi depth data will be collected at the upstream and downstream stations each time water samples are collected. Task 3 . Maintenance The oyster reef will be inspected on a weekly basis to remove plant debris from the upstream side of the reef. It is possible that plant species such as Spartina alternflora and Distichlis spicata, and the three mangrove species found along the runnel will root into the top of the reef. Mangroves will be cleared from the top of the reef as they appear in this area. Task 3 . Reporting A monthly report analyzing the status of the oyster reef and analyzing the water quality data will be prepared and submitted to the County for review. A summary report will be prepared that analyzes in detail the water quality data and status of the structural aspects of the reef as they have developed through the first six months of operation. Costs The compensation for services rendered for the scope of services described by this proposal shall not to exceed $9,500.00 without prior authorization from the County. The County agrees to pay for laboratory expenses associated with this scope of services. ETC will collect the water samples and then deliver the water samples to the North County Water treatment Plant for transport to the laboratory contracted to the County. In total 52 samples will be collected and analyzed for TKN, ammonia nitrogen, NOx, TP, OP, and TSS Page 2 of 4 Task 2 . Monitoring The proposed oyster reef site was selected because it is the easiest of the four easternmost runnels to access, and it is possible to easily access the upstream and downstream sides of the reef without having to walk across the reef. Grab water samples will be collected once per week from a point upstream of the reef and a point downstream of the reef. These samples will be analyzed for total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3), nitrate-nitrite nitrogen (NO,), total phosphorus (TP), ortho phosphorus (OP), and total suspended solids (TSS). The water samples will be taken to the North Water Treatment Plant on 58th Avenue for shipment to the County' s laboratory. Water temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, pH, turbidity, water depth, and secchi depth data will be collected at the upstream and downstream stations each time water samples are collected. Task 3 . Maintenance The oyster reef will be inspected on a weekly basis to remove plant debris from the upstream side of the reef. It is possible that plant species such as Spartina alternflora and Distichlis spicata, and the three mangrove species found along the runnel will root into the top of the reef. Mangroves will be cleared from the top of the reef as they appear in this area. Task 3 . Reporting A monthly report analyzing the status of the oyster reef and analyzing the water quality data will be prepared and submitted to the County for review. A summary report will be prepared that analyzes in detail the water quality data and status of the structural aspects of the reef as they have developed through the first six months of operation. Costs The compensation for services rendered for the scope of services described by this proposal shall not to exceed $9,500.00 without prior authorization from the County. The County agrees to pay for laboratory expenses associated with this scope of services. ETC will collect the water samples and then deliver the water samples to the North County Water treatment Plant for transport to the laboratory contracted to the County. In total 52 samples will be collected and analyzed for TKN, ammonia nitrogen, NOx, TP, OP, and TSS Page 2 of 4 Task 2 . Monitoring The proposed oyster reef site was selected because it is the easiest of the four easternmost runnels to access, and it is possible to easily access the upstream and downstream sides of the reef without having to walk across the reef. Grab water samples will be collected once per week from a point upstream of the reef and a point downstream of the reef. These samples will be analyzed for total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3), nitrate-nitrite nitrogen (NO,), total phosphorus (TP), ortho phosphorus (OP), and total suspended solids (TSS). The water samples will be taken to the North Water Treatment Plant on 58th Avenue for shipment to the County' s laboratory. Water temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, pH, turbidity, water depth, and secchi depth data will be collected at the upstream and downstream stations each time water samples are collected. Task 3 . Maintenance The oyster reef will be inspected on a weekly basis to remove plant debris from the upstream side of the reef. It is possible that plant species such as Spartina alternflora and Distichlis spicata, and the three mangrove species found along the runnel will root into the top of the reef. Mangroves will be cleared from the top of the reef as they appear in this area. Task 3 . Reporting A monthly report analyzing the status of the oyster reef and analyzing the water quality data will be prepared and submitted to the County for review. A summary report will be prepared that analyzes in detail the water quality data and status of the structural aspects of the reef as they have developed through the first six months of operation. Costs The compensation for services rendered for the scope of services described by this proposal shall not to exceed $9,500.00 without prior authorization from the County. The County agrees to pay for laboratory expenses associated with this scope of services. ETC will collect the water samples and then deliver the water samples to the North County Water treatment Plant for transport to the laboratory contracted to the County. In total 52 samples will be collected and analyzed for TKN, ammonia nitrogen, NOx, TP, OP, and TSS Page 2 of 4 Task 2 . Monitoring The proposed oyster reef site was selected because it is the easiest of the four easternmost runnels to access, and it is possible to easily access the upstream and downstream sides of the reef without having to walk across the reef. Grab water samples will be collected once per week from a point upstream of the reef and a point downstream of the reef. These samples will be analyzed for total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3), nitrate-nitrite nitrogen (NO,), total phosphorus (TP), ortho phosphorus (OP), and total suspended solids (TSS). The water samples will be taken to the North Water Treatment Plant on 58th Avenue for shipment to the County' s laboratory. Water temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, pH, turbidity, water depth, and secchi depth data will be collected at the upstream and downstream stations each time water samples are collected. Task 3 . Maintenance The oyster reef will be inspected on a weekly basis to remove plant debris from the upstream side of the reef. It is possible that plant species such as Spartina alternflora and Distichlis spicata, and the three mangrove species found along the runnel will root into the top of the reef. Mangroves will be cleared from the top of the reef as they appear in this area. Task 3 . Reporting A monthly report analyzing the status of the oyster reef and analyzing the water quality data will be prepared and submitted to the County for review. A summary report will be prepared that analyzes in detail the water quality data and status of the structural aspects of the reef as they have developed through the first six months of operation. Costs The compensation for services rendered for the scope of services described by this proposal shall not to exceed $9,500.00 without prior authorization from the County. The County agrees to pay for laboratory expenses associated with this scope of services. ETC will collect the water samples and then deliver the water samples to the North County Water treatment Plant for transport to the laboratory contracted to the County. In total 52 samples will be collected and analyzed for TKN, ammonia nitrogen, NOx, TP, OP, and TSS Page 2 of 4 L 5. `. ,ryt , x "'a'e,. '" `{wc r " ."^ 3 '';•a a ^fi ' ' -- , INS If INN If If �'It}t. fyy d A IN I14, tit } i . IN INN ;.: .+ If YyIt .MI IN, E .irk i`.NNW 4 IN S A iIf IN INy r. .,. IN WIII Nq If If I. fIAt NINA r b' - ,rAN }•= moi` r • �. lrIt �z r�� I VTt mi ft IN IN oI Ate IN Ir t N. 01 If 4A 22 �PWmb :.. #J ..... . `�hr , ` , 'rE N0 IN I N4 ". . y,t?b ' ' IN Nn !'� ., If t ti5y �R r 4°tIN w ; # IN WIN> NT, IN .. � 4 LL, 'INNet r+ if IN, 114 . .0 * ..r y ort 24 3 sIlq x + INI rIt. IN IN ;gyp rrIf " . ` . IN y: 1 It NMI IN NIN Not" NA IN t 'AIft.a IN- ft aS ` Y < w ,r Y NI IV im I,q { ANN .. INN If r Vtv. If 8 + na t MNot IN , ? f cIII . If t N If tk }� If t INN INNI IN WIN Iff p. '},mnR "'r `4 t R •'s'�1 in^' r� .3 r.�rr .�M4If 5 d J { X t i iL ' .i . . 64, y, avi ,� + '," ..r�' �c ' r . '� . I.G. ` s'A% �tn„+r :+ ..6 ' �INNfI +•„,.�rn 'x f "�" #xµ`+�. ''. L. *r r'-�` .N=..'m r, ¢ 5 4 F t Air IV P it ddd .. IL > ir� p IV k ti: . _ A?Vi ss. his a 14 + s IV d r � { - _ , zi e 01 gOr 1 •'f1 r '. i a.i l 'r n LI Av { 4 ^' _ Ik{ 14 A 1V I ilL It I IF4 � �' f v r �k Vill rIt 0 Air VI I \ ll, I I le \ At ti 4• r i t� ,d &a x aS D 01' VV WI 0 Viii- jr P yg�G r +, _ '. ` Oil IV Ir 1 41 bA, AI 4 � 40 I IV VI r VrAll It I + : . Tti t . � 4 I I'l Ali .�Y 1 dot 1 1 generallocation 1 the proposed 1 1 the Spoonbill Marsh ' L 5. `. ,ryt , x "'a'e,. '" `{wc r " ."^ 3 '';•a a ^fi ' ' -- , INS If INN If If �'It}t. fyy d A IN I14, tit } i . IN INN ;.: .+ If YyIt .MI IN, E .irk i`.NNW 4 IN S A iIf IN INy r. .,. IN WIII Nq If If I. fIAt NINA r b' - ,rAN }•= moi` r • �. lrIt �z r�� I VTt mi ft IN IN oI Ate IN Ir t N. 01 If 4A 22 �PWmb :.. #J ..... . `�hr , ` , 'rE N0 IN I N4 ". . y,t?b ' ' IN Nn !'� ., If t ti5y �R r 4°tIN w ; # IN WIN> NT, IN .. � 4 LL, 'INNet r+ if IN, 114 . .0 * ..r y ort 24 3 sIlq x + INI rIt. IN IN ;gyp rrIf " . ` . IN y: 1 It NMI IN NIN Not" NA IN t 'AIft.a IN- ft aS ` Y < w ,r Y NI IV im I,q { ANN .. INN If r Vtv. If 8 + na t MNot IN , ? f cIII . If t N If tk }� If t INN INNI IN WIN Iff p. '},mnR "'r `4 t R •'s'�1 in^' r� .3 r.�rr .�M4If 5 d J { X t i iL ' .i . . 64, y, avi ,� + '," ..r�' �c ' r . '� . I.G. ` s'A% �tn„+r :+ ..6 ' �INNfI +•„,.�rn 'x f "�" #xµ`+�. ''. L. *r r'-�` .N=..'m r, ¢ 5 4 F t Air IV P it ddd .. IL > ir� p IV k ti: . _ A?Vi ss. his a 14 + s IV d r � { - _ , zi e 01 gOr 1 •'f1 r '. i a.i l 'r n LI Av { 4 ^' _ Ik{ 14 A 1V I ilL It I IF4 � �' f v r �k Vill rIt 0 Air VI I \ ll, I I le \ At ti 4• r i t� ,d &a x aS D 01' VV WI 0 Viii- jr P yg�G r +, _ '. ` Oil IV Ir 1 41 bA, AI 4 � 40 I IV VI r VrAll It I + : . Tti t . � 4 I I'l Ali .�Y 1 dot 1 1 generallocation 1 the proposed 1 1 the Spoonbill Marsh ' + :' J + t 4 +• . > "� ' t`i r i '4 ✓..3 "Lm ITT IGn+ „.y '�,. .c. °t +w J 6 1 caw ,,, g , Wpu- °' VIA fir .+ ' s b l i.t2` 'F� y � ." `S$ ,, ,5y a .p7 K "�'• ,t{"'� e6+�G 1 ! d a' 4, .,, ) y' ''Ty > „` *"� ' S wt y iF ' �t' • sur G IC lee IT p. tt �b`�. „ �' .: a, la t �• { , h "�' -OW t".. �'11Tyy L ,t p/ ' �b iM:: �, iYf. ^� , +` 1` ;"' ec� Tw,`+I ° p ' i µ d + SIM cif *'� 1 � .TI 4 � ��'S .+. s �Y c. yyi Y : 1 a�& R � a >4 MPj „ �J^_ x t * ` �, ? ,' � +�2'�i +. Jay .�i � AR IT < { +-y/ "�{ �,. �'" > 4 4 ' $ M }.'1' �a1M ti. i3 � FFI.F WIT �, �"'r, ' WWI IT ^yw , Zt•;*5,. `j f ' , ; ' t 7A1,�. '�• � t " ' "' 4 • .�+t i` iy fi * *."R, 1f ` a LLL ,. '� .,'r. Zia A; TO TTW "rIre W fp a r .TI 1 � f" k� areIt s .' ITO OA( 4 n{" % � � n rain d , l. 4 41 ' g '�}. ar �Tbb �a IF IT k,I �t a' .. 10 Sof IT AWT AO w s AT all ' '' 4'1' t +�, ..CC f `y t 1 ;%., ti} ,, «+ Y + s ..- F�, ,+'►;�y {i� { , AT,TIM tAJLa ,> : .t't"A " v v . ,'. 14 w , i a �' 3 � . �' . t44 AW n ." "; d # �.� _ +� i ♦ y ''�! s i �' ' r ° tar = t �+,jIo ,� n 'S' { v •� +1 ,( k .F�{`' ` k sj Y }` - ' p1 :. 's • ,.w "x s,#yi . JITO a' 1, ➢ w •.X P ��C>e .. j : r +{� fir - '` + r'gg.3 d p« , 'is 4 ~ Cb , i �p •« �' '�, •aryl . If IT III IT AXI r tri' a t 'Y,if )'4' at �i r 2TL IWO, TIaP IT i y ' 111 ! 4 } Sk Ifo Sir VIMi ,LLlh y < r. Ag , } , 7 IIWP 'WIT ' 1 N �4y Tom 3, 00 �, ► �° � r fir[ � pa"� '. rr IT W ITT e� +: a« y �,x , ;..ae.I ' aT . " t µ {� APLY ' .. « �, .SIS - w � L 'x i � M�`:" TWA 1 f `p=`° ` "� = YFTIN a """' f 4 - ;Ya II' Mf f�� x raw `vt' g?y Ylli .e + W1. 9 TOM TVrTW WV s � s+ � > ws m , . * s:"> � 5 ._ '• F. . �X• r 1. w 1 &4 IT tt ITT` yd 3 , 11 (`fi$t,, �•r: y++t7d �� JOf ji jwa t'"'+<,{s°°! _ "' ' �, f .. " tiIF l 4 s T + tx : tk. ..' y r , ear, %;}. ,�� � ��� � t 1 S d Ai. wl Red line showsgeneral location / the proposed oyster1 theselected nmnel. . t co } ` »� ? t MON , r r ,_ NINO CD t3 ; � T 4 INti !{' M1 ry � • Not Na MI 4N, f4 IN Na. eNp fA a' _;�w., _ aN 0 INN, � 1 In "^f �'}�y� * , "It IL w> F', wNet CD J " � r 'wL;3 CD ko s _ . It art t at , L I III IN IN Na #iz ' IN t � v r . i •� Mw IN y, +r• ; 7F ;;42 j , ITI NOW + :' J + t 4 +• . > "� ' t`i r i '4 ✓..3 "Lm ITT IGn+ „.y '�,. .c. °t +w J 6 1 caw ,,, g , Wpu- °' VIA fir .+ ' s b l i.t2` 'F� y � ." `S$ ,, ,5y a .p7 K "�'• ,t{"'� e6+�G 1 ! d a' 4, .,, ) y' ''Ty > „` *"� ' S wt y iF ' �t' • sur G IC lee IT p. tt �b`�. „ �' .: a, la t �• { , h "�' -OW t".. �'11Tyy L ,t p/ ' �b iM:: �, iYf. ^� , +` 1` ;"' ec� Tw,`+I ° p ' i µ d + SIM cif *'� 1 � .TI 4 � ��'S .+. s �Y c. yyi Y : 1 a�& R � a >4 MPj „ �J^_ x t * ` �, ? ,' � +�2'�i +. Jay .�i � AR IT < { +-y/ "�{ �,. �'" > 4 4 ' $ M }.'1' �a1M ti. i3 � FFI.F WIT �, �"'r, ' WWI IT ^yw , Zt•;*5,. `j f ' , ; ' t 7A1,�. '�• � t " ' "' 4 • .�+t i` iy fi * *."R, 1f ` a LLL ,. '� .,'r. Zia A; TO TTW "rIre W fp a r .TI 1 � f" k� areIt s .' ITO OA( 4 n{" % � � n rain d , l. 4 41 ' g '�}. ar �Tbb �a IF IT k,I �t a' .. 10 Sof IT AWT AO w s AT all ' '' 4'1' t +�, ..CC f `y t 1 ;%., ti} ,, «+ Y + s ..- F�, ,+'►;�y {i� { , AT,TIM tAJLa ,> : .t't"A " v v . ,'. 14 w , i a �' 3 � . �' . t44 AW n ." "; d # �.� _ +� i ♦ y ''�! s i �' ' r ° tar = t �+,jIo ,� n 'S' { v •� +1 ,( k .F�{`' ` k sj Y }` - ' p1 :. 's • ,.w "x s,#yi . JITO a' 1, ➢ w •.X P ��C>e .. j : r +{� fir - '` + r'gg.3 d p« , 'is 4 ~ Cb , i �p •« �' '�, •aryl . If IT III IT AXI r tri' a t 'Y,if )'4' at �i r 2TL IWO, TIaP IT i y ' 111 ! 4 } Sk Ifo Sir VIMi ,LLlh y < r. Ag , } , 7 IIWP 'WIT ' 1 N �4y Tom 3, 00 �, ► �° � r fir[ � pa"� '. rr IT W ITT e� +: a« y �,x , ;..ae.I ' aT . " t µ {� APLY ' .. « �, .SIS - w � L 'x i � M�`:" TWA 1 f `p=`° ` "� = YFTIN a """' f 4 - ;Ya II' Mf f�� x raw `vt' g?y Ylli .e + W1. 9 TOM TVrTW WV s � s+ � > ws m , . * s:"> � 5 ._ '• F. . �X• r 1. w 1 &4 IT tt ITT` yd 3 , 11 (`fi$t,, �•r: y++t7d �� JOf ji jwa t'"'+<,{s°°! _ "' ' �, f .. " tiIF l 4 s T + tx : tk. ..' y r , ear, %;}. ,�� � ��� � t 1 S d Ai. wl Red line showsgeneral location / the proposed oyster1 theselected nmnel. . t co } ` »� ? t MON , r r ,_ NINO CD t3 ; � T 4 INti !{' M1 ry � • Not Na MI 4N, f4 IN Na. eNp fA a' _;�w., _ aN 0 INN, � 1 In "^f �'}�y� * , "It IL w> F', wNet CD J " � r 'wL;3 CD ko s _ . It art t at , L I III IN IN Na #iz ' IN t � v r . i •� Mw IN y, +r• ; 7F ;;42 j , ITI NOW L 5. `. ,ryt , x "'a'e,. '" `{wc r " ."^ 3 '';•a a ^fi ' ' -- , INS If INN If If �'It}t. fyy d A IN I14, tit } i . IN INN ;.: .+ If YyIt .MI IN, E .irk i`.NNW 4 IN S A iIf IN INy r. .,. IN WIII Nq If If I. fIAt NINA r b' - ,rAN }•= moi` r • �. lrIt �z r�� I VTt mi ft IN IN oI Ate IN Ir t N. 01 If 4A 22 �PWmb :.. #J ..... . `�hr , ` , 'rE N0 IN I N4 ". . y,t?b ' ' IN Nn !'� ., If t ti5y �R r 4°tIN w ; # IN WIN> NT, IN .. � 4 LL, 'INNet r+ if IN, 114 . .0 * ..r y ort 24 3 sIlq x + INI rIt. IN IN ;gyp rrIf " . ` . IN y: 1 It NMI IN NIN Not" NA IN t 'AIft.a IN- ft aS ` Y < w ,r Y NI IV im I,q { ANN .. INN If r Vtv. If 8 + na t MNot IN , ? f cIII . If t N If tk }� If t INN INNI IN WIN Iff p. '},mnR "'r `4 t R •'s'�1 in^' r� .3 r.�rr .�M4If 5 d J { X t i iL ' .i . . 64, y, avi ,� + '," ..r�' �c ' r . '� . I.G. ` s'A% �tn„+r :+ ..6 ' �INNfI +•„,.�rn 'x f "�" #xµ`+�. ''. L. *r r'-�` .N=..'m co } ` »� ? t MON , r r ,_ NINO CD t3 ; � T 4 INti !{' M1 ry � • Not Na MI 4N, f4 IN Na. eNp fA a' _;�w., _ aN 0 INN, � 1 In "^f �'}�y� * , "It IL w> F', wNet CD J " � r 'wL;3 CD ko s _ . It art t at , L I III IN IN Na #iz ' IN t � v r . i •� Mw IN y, +r• ; 7F ;;42 j , ITI NOW