Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-35ORDINANCE NO. 93- 35 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT, THE POTABLE WATER SUB -ELEMENT, THE SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT, AND THE PORTS, AVIATION, AND RELATED FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January, 1993 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on all comprehensive plan amendment requests on April 22, 1993 after due public notice, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency recommended approval of this comprehensive plan amendment to the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal Public Hearing on June 22, 1993, after advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1) and (c), and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of this comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their review and comment, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of this plan amendment, and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs received this Comprehensive Plan Amendment on June 28, 1993, for the State review pursuant to F.S.163.3184(4), and WHEREAS, Indian River County received the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs on October 11, 1993, and 1` l ORDINANCE N0. 93-35 WHEREAS, Indian River County revised this comprehensive plan amendment in response to the ORC Report and pursuant to F.S.163.3184(7), and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on November 23, 1993, after advertising pursuant to F.S.163.3184(15)(b)(2) and (c); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal The amendments to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in section 2 are hereby adopted, and five (5) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs. SECTION 2. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan o Revision to Tables 4.7.2 and 4.7.3 of the Traffic Circulation Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Figures 4.11, 4.13, 4.13.2 and 4.13.3 of the Traffic Circulation Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Table 2.30 of the Future Land Use Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Policy 1.25 of the Future Land Use Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Page 121 of the Future Land Use Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Figures 6.2 and 6.3 of the Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Policy 1.3 of the Potable Water Sub -Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Policy 1.3 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, as shown on Attachment A. o Revision to Policy 3.5 of the Capital Improvements Element, as shown on Attachment A. The provisions of this ordinance may be incorporated into the County Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of the ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions. SECTION 3. Codification The provisions of this ordinance may be incorporated into the County Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of the ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions. SECTION 4. ORDINANCE N0. 93-35 Repeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 5. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of this ordinance and therefore, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 6. Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective upon issuance by the State Department of Community Affairs of a Notice of Intent to find the adopted amendment in compliance in accordance with s. 163.3184(9) or the issuance of a final order by the Administration Commission finding the adopted amendment in compliance with s. 163.3184(10). Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 23rd day of November, 1993. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 16th day of November, 1993 for a public hearing to be held on the 23rd day of November, 1993 at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner Adams and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PIP,' - Pt y oA 6� tfihli lot r It BY* Richard N.,, Birda,'s `Chairmen __ , 5 ✓� F ATTEST BY: a 'Jef fAyje'`K".`, clerk y` �g Pr OPP` It jot tj' It k .. ... .P� b'Y I F4d FY ORDINANCE NO. 93 - Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this 3rd day of December , 1993. Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this 8th day of December , 1993, at 10:00 A. M. A.M./RXM. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Will' G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney c R&Sert Me Keat ng, CP Community Developmen Diretor u\v\j\cpal-93.ord Indian Riv-er Ca Approved Dale Admin. 4? Legal 017 Budget 00001:7 Dept. Risk Mgr. 00 1 1 1. Traffic Circulation Element Tables 4.7.2 and 4.7.3 2. Traffic Circulation Element Figures 4.11, 4.13, 4.13.2 and 4.13.3 3. Future Land Use Element Table 2.30 4. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.25 5. Future Land Use Element Page 121 6. Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities Element Figures 6.2 and 6.3 7. Potable Water Sub -Element Policy 1.3 Be Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Policy 1.3 9. Capital Improvements Element Policy 3.5 NICE WcI 2i 43pil Adds CA ill 00 A Wild, delip fill Cliff 111"R 4=0 0) • i' ; ig C m m CIFID m tP Ndp m a m M III to •P dp. No C � b- 0 oci 1111, 1(am� � p�m� S� m o m nUi ro 141 d .w N .-. ..+ ry �. d-. P. .-• m t� fill N N illi [•> Y'1 N d ry to v. rmr) l!, u, IIlk A _. Lt 1 Eli LEE I e .. All I m Let 6 Ilk It I to 0 CE I CA Of CIA CA I Nil Elk Ad A ._ M 6 N ffif ril IV I III. I me d 'S d d R, n) v -' <' •� 'u G O C• C. O -J C. C, _. _ - IY Lid I _ .. illif0d wv m ICA �l t , .t, -- 11 [u r �.. .r Ili Ili . CA I All ick C3 e ICT I _ W fill -. WWWWild -• wC.d �+Oj N .-. m .-. m m Wilit IW O O m O r21 _• _') _ tt) 7, .,, _.W I_ . fill _d fillW., VIA 110 1 GO I d d z r _. CA I .w G n WC11 n 1=1c _ _ __ d _ n) 4111 N Y) nl P d .Ja -„I J J Ifil G J N J J J _ - .t «, .[, -ol ` yIN ` - A 1-73_ i _ _ ME s s u [u ,i ( S n) 111 S $11 ri .., ¢ 6 W T 2 s '¢ irrC. Ek a t D S A i[ C r It C _ illi .r_ ,>rfll� a- ,i r% o. a. z v. a n. - iAI n n_ r t. a. u. _ - 4tXn: a � Ill U) LLA w ` - ( K W W( FW- � W w H w lal W OAL a. Al: Ift r- 1�. �. i 1 i l _ ..> Led W do I Lo Lid All to 1 0 I'll m G C+ F., mW m m ci m m G m I.A. m WmOC m G m m m m m r~ i„ m m ) d r m mIli ILIm Lid III "I Ili Lid m n C• sl - r[ -_ W 10 O died O mp O G 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O C G C C, l0 [J O n _ ' , J U U U U U v CA CAU U r..) rppm ICA (p U iJ U[ u U c j r..) [u u ) U i) a .we 1=1ri 1170 _' i U Q) 00 r. P � _ _� O wp h) .n O1P(i [rt n CE - CG.• C _ _ _ - _ III III I (� fill m m � '� Irl II Wild Wiff :: IWIS �) "' .-. N -. CIII,_-. n (., a) [., rn .i, m .r III_. rrJ n, I m did Ilk I w 4 U a i i 41111 U Kr r.7 G G G g G U U U /:l G Cl p G I D O C Ci 0 G G G a'a 6 C1 r,> r..) c.) G I O G C, •.J .. C_. •., illi r_I ..I dAll I r CC. m 1 WX All. O O O O O 0 0 0 O g O O C:+ J ._ . i �cu � o '411P 43 n .E do C S �'' �s n pp $ S $ b� o 4:3, Wk � .`_ 'c ps _ -- o o ^ ft lojl .' 'b •0 W " n• O• T V• '1 -<i O- •Ja• .p G u - w r ti wle Nilkill� = N N N to tmV rmn a4i ao .N w r t` a wo (� rdt' o y m CA)<A At N nl ) m w r -t) wild ., „J .-d _ _. $ CO O_ O ., O 0 0 p O pp O pp C) 0 0 NZA O 0 O -q ell • S i O m n _ ) 0 0 m N y w m 0^ m m y m w N d - 7� m d C I If a) r n u-) [n m n Iv) - n n LIMA .. _. r lk .d, N -. .i . C d W d S120 14=0 CIA Q Z LEAL ' O N A i N N and to MICA A~ (OV 00 yO O O nOd V d~-1 • w•Pi IMA 1=6 CO 1120 O ddidel y�l'ClA C CWA _ - - i`L I S w� ^n O •Q -0 N O? N drl All Ad _ d fail r m m C) N (� � n [Nr) f (i1 - =A ell EW . 111 .-• d -d ^• illi. N .ti d..n r .de N .-• illi .-. .-. ..n �. -. .� nJ (` --• col W-4 1AA [) ri y [11 .,� 2 -•- ItTA wile Yi u> m [�CLAS m Of .W. ( d (r N m '4n .-d m At m m Y) .a N Y _ k,l ELL I, S Alt 1 11 `n .•• I .+ d d O m m O N .-r Wit CI r N N ) n Wf, wile N O • .-. U WilCIA [I) Ell 'J aELI IZIP W V I Lid m Cid, r- , NC11- d "4101 Ed O N ti N N N Ilk K1 .up N .JP w� d N t ,S N N [u [u tU R N [u .r r„ n, r.. Yl M N Will CP- M Al.o a a g411.1 'de^ GO I Alt Al 1 €1 4=14 @ $ <J mAli m g'd Qe S �1�lJ�y� L ts r - 4A if •l ! n Z Life I t CA CA u U cn Ge CIE. I Cd rn Ell I �::L cL H 4 .� Q Q PQ- >>> J x z 4 6 Q Pill a. I EPA O O O Cl m C) O O C) G¢ _ f chi -12 —IJ - .a. , rn ,n ell n) ) c_) _ (n rn u) u) � m m U U U U V U U _ .11 u) nl u) rr) r -r, Al AJ, ., C .. r. s., r_, C71 in 4 ELL I III Led I AM OM el: I: S L S Y AT T a LAW. a v< r � ry W ¢ j O -1 0� u O U C - `Z 'i - LL. c., - a. 1 c L( U CA U -) i. r s rL u J. u: S _ L: >- >L, L_ r 1[. Y. �O _ 1711=31 Ak In -, a W o: illi m i.: r df4kALIAdd i p aLk tell I �AEDE- la I"_ - - IIIS W ) .r a1-.'=1•WrZ r�7i1 µ Lid III I Ell ELI it- 411 or�. PII S t ¢ .`-i a. `aCA)': cid; c `_) aril ¢ a "l: a. � a ¢ -. s -~i CIII till, li- J Z U W CIA N u a: ,L 1 ULI W. _- _ R In Vvi n -rY m o Y) [(J r'- - 11 IJ) v) Z3, r ?t e J pW qq - p�� e O p Wd' Q. R¢ rc Co W W IX - W w 1 eLAll. t Y u Ll 6 N G ar ..r w w.. Q .-• 2 ¢ R �J, r c W [� lal I+�ml aC ¢ K y -n N n• w Z Q •'-• s •� _ _ Cil CA (A LAI Life CA Y y/l 2 u I ran CI s to -. > rn m U 1.1`1v) d O O O skill, VI G -O cn firl CA ? Ice ym-, rea O- . CA X1 - - r r) r, .-.Me) S 7J ed- isk m m �aY q p yw W W~ W yw w S = W III to _ QQ-. y 6 4 y¢y a 111 N N N o K KF lY aWC ih: 1QW.. W , 2 i mill Ed AM I et illi ..d ..w illi. `n F- to [s) Ul rn r_ [n 1+ a� Q dr Go I Q c¢ Q¢ e _ ilk Vs )n of Yl Ir'l 111 w o a .moo " o a ¢ n C17.aae l>r tn (n rn rn rnm wwa mr><=a crm n In t `_ J,IdW All. T _ o G _ IT )tn tnmm QF) C110 'fillr.+uu ua.)uu c)[J) m m rnA V, -.Ilk cl-_. `.'� ell illi• ?Ili ell r„ 1 I ISLA ill 1 M,4 mici 1!!7V v CALMS All; I),M lille ommilif MMJp All Imm-MilI I01111" M IM LEMIA LIA pip Ell misi All App Un LAII Lm, (MALMA MMM, kil Imm"T LIMA CIJ r -m IF "ll I1.1 All ill "Ild I (Ny J Ell pp• {�{+y� 1{W O a np VFi [orf � � 110-31 7 " fyL � M r� O .1�p� pip O O m � s �• [amu m W O P m 4lillt d o- o � - )= Iff I1f1 -O M 111 4=A P KT - m A=P 11`f ICA AEI. (orf t ; m .Nn N h-. P ~ •O ¢Jt � M.0 m NCIA1:31,-AT _ _ I-- '. N n1 -• toll to [[[LLL !71 fY N d N P N �• m � vI ~-• N I'1 n) �. ELL .-. nl � AME n Ell _- r. As G II ELL ELL CJ 1 W 1 ATI D 1 AcA I TO ill I a � o o a2 Aa;A II$m O+=A IMAM AT MAA, mill APP I m c 1�i a m ..Al. vl o- 0 4111 A:A LAI ICA A ILI N COMP m Evil < $ N w r rrf ti -. m All FIT ml IMMMI ICA L., ILAI u Ia I � i +ll o I LAI A 0 All i Ell A 1 u i o I u u u u u u v u u c u u u u u u � CIA u III z J A=, 400 Nm PPP-471 A=P a� ICA 4=00 111,1 CIIJ "Mit � -aImomm MAT .-I - aA 4111 t.. u i3 C <.a O N O O p O O N 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 <_,J- IV O b M 4 u nl - �� r�r atl ca .r u� .a ..i i ® mill,, .... Y�� I.. ALL imma U a d d ,,2b FOX Arm, C71F 141 1 LAI I FAT - O �s n 0 9l O C •mispip� AT O M [Ory M d m m G 0 900 RI O M u v C• c - _ _ _ _ mm I All A us I Am, I mm, mimm, .--4 MMM, M., limmo A" All ill "Mme lim-mr, "Mil 171.1 lllmmi Fill limm" .1 m,MM, L -mm, I" Ili Fill Ali) M. MmM* M -M. M,- MMII, IMF ALL I Ili A ill t All! 1 MCI d . SIII I M -- A nl i Source: Wilbur Smith & Assoc., Aug.1989 Rovlaed: Nova 1 993 r 2 U Q O LL V ¢ _O _W w v W LL ZQ ? M p LL U Z :Ijj• r c� �.\Cc . , I J WEEP ( �• lan4 vis 7 A 2 1909 { DAY 4619 iM J JAY PJVV JAY 4602 Ise a 12AR 4600 JAR rut MAY v.92 JAR Rios It » (OAR 8600 O • WE � � o IDAV 0.906 WE Z 1 T I U (aca LL I d m N Q N d O Q U CL Q c o C c 9 I ca ro E � � J cc cc LL !Q 1 cu I � � Q y C3 At n O O C c p o C C U 0 W O O U C) co CI D Q C O N C C C C (9 a a E � c o M U � N r d 2� C Q ir 30 rn c p C N a c 2 � U 7 c .. N '0 0 O � M O V OWED � s � U CO i o m (� O C: U r } F- N Z — D CO) G` n nO ops i iA• Yu IOth AVY 4 Q AY Y)tt � O U A• A4t• U O AY V U W J iA• 4I99 J .N O , AY YIVA O Z D 7 A• nt• O A• •r0• w• 4116 m co Ar Aute) OD m rn a rd co c O N Oi c C C n, �0 co 4 w N Q) Q of �z� c so c O U � O o TABLE 2.30 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL LOCATIONS U.S. 1 & Roseland Road Gibson Street U.S. #1/Sebastian City Limits to Schumann Dr. U.S. #1/Schumann Dr. to Breezy Village U.S. #1 & C.R. 510 (north) U.S. #1/C.R. 510 to Hobart Road U.S. #1/77th Street to 69th Street U.S. #1 & 65th Street U.S. #1/57th Street to 49th Street U.S. #1/49th Street to 38th Lane U.S. #1 & 37th Street U.S. #1/Vero Beach City Limits to 8th U.S. #1/8th Street to 1st Street S.W. U.S. #1/1st Street S.W. to 9th Street U.S. #1/Oslo Road to 17th Street S.W. U.S. #1/17th Street S.W. to S. County C.R. 510 & 62nd Avenue C.R. 512 & C.R. 510 I-95 & C.R. 512 Grand Harbor Gifford S.R. 60 & 58th Avenue S.R. 60 & I-95 Oslo Road & 27th Avenue Oslo Road & 43rd Avenue 43rd Avenue & 1st Street S.W. Oslo Road & 74th Avenue Oslo Road C.R. 510 & S.R. AlA Moorings Revised: November 9, 1993 u\c\c\revflu2.30 Aw Line ±5,602 o The acreage of all parcels and portions of parcels determined to be developed shall be the acreage depicted on the property appraiser's map or the acreage determined by scaling property boundaries on the property appraiser's map. Developed Percentage Calculation: o The developed percentage of a node shall be calculated by dividing the total developed acreage in the node by the total node acreage. POLICY 1.24: Commercial and industrial land use designations approved in response to a land use plan map amendment request by an applicant shall revert to their former designation if construction on the site has not commenced within a two year period, unless such timeframe is modified by the Board of County Commissioners, as part of a development agreement. POLICY 1.25: Eaehmode--shall--ber-des ignated--accordi-nT-to--the general-type-�-e f--denelepment-etAvity--€-or-whiti3sch-+-2:ntendedT Nodes-may-be-destgnated-as-follows eemmereial Industrial eommereialflndustrial Tourist-eemmereial Hospital-eemmeretal Node locations and sizes are listed in Table 2.30. POLICY 1.26: The County shall also designate Neighborhood Commercial Nodes, not to exceed 5 acres, for limited retial and convenience uses. New Neighborhood Nodes shall be no closer than 1 mile to existing commercial nodes, Neighborhood Commercial Nodes are not shown on the Future Land Use Map. The existence of a neighborhood node shall not prevent the expansion of an existing non -neighborhood node. POLICY 1.27: The Public Facilities designation is intended for public facilities and services including, but not limited, to government offices, service centers, public utilities and transportation faculties, schools, parks, libraries, police and fire stations. Not all public land uses are shown on the Future Land Use Map. Public facilities are not. limited to the Public Facilities Land Use designation. POLICY 1.28: The Recreation Use designation is intended for public parks and recreation facilities. Not all recreation sites are shown on the Future Land Use Map. Public parks and recreation facilities are not limited to this land use designation. POLICY 1.29: The Blue Cypress Improvement District is a special land use designation applied to the existing Blue Cypress Fish Camp including the 1989 Christmas freeze, have cast doubts on the long term continuation in other areas of the state. At the same time development pressures in more urban southern_ counties have resulted in the reduction of agricultural land in those areas. Increased environmental awareness has resulted in regulations that have made it nearly impossible to drain land for agricultural purposes as was once the common practice. These factors should contribute to the continued agricultural presence in this area. The Urban Service Area encompasses the remaining 45,700 acres of the county and includes most of the land area east of I-95. It is this area of the county that is scheduled for the infrastructure and services, that are demanded or required by the increasing population. This area contains an ample land area to support continued population growth in the future. Despite land uses which permit urban and suburban residential densities, and the accompanying commercial, industrial and public land uses, much of this area is also not likely to be developed. Land uses in the urban service area include the 5398 5602 acres of designated commercial and industrial land. This land use is primarily located along the U.S. 1 corridor and at 3 locations at I-95. Much of the commercial land in the U.S. 1 corridor is in a strip pattern that has developed historically. This pattern has been enhanced by the presence of the FEC Railroad just to the west. The resulting narrow band or property between these transportation routes has little development potential except as designated. The majority of land in the urban service area has been designated for residential uses. The three residential land groups provide for a variety of development types and densities. The Medium Density land uses (M-1, M-2) provide the highest densities in the county in areas with fully developed services and infrastructure. Medium density areas are located along major transportation routes in proximity to shopping, employment and service centers. Located along U.S. 11 SR 60 and Gifford, these land uses are intended for multi -family apartments, condominiums, townhouses and mobile home developments. These land uses do not preclude the development of single-family residences. Together, the Medium Density districts encompass approximately 6669 acres. The Low -Density districts (L-11 L-2) have the largest land area (25,976 acres) of all the residential districts. These districts fill-in the urban service area between transportation corridors and along the medium density districts. The low density districts are intended for single-family residential development at densities of less than 6 units/acre. Most single-family development in the county ranges from 1.5 to 3 units/acre regardless of the permitted density. The L-2 district is also suitable for townhouse, duplex and limited multi -family development. These land uses also permit a varietydental uses. of non residential uses which support resii II Trees 6,0'-60'_TV Tower 100' ' ICLEA to State Road e0 T !1zONE1 Trees 209 , i l 1 I I T Green Lights...— ®t • t� Heng rs s Red Light a 2 orange cones ®A• ep® s€s€€'I€{flIi{{iiE T': ..........................................:.::::................ range Grove::::::::::: ................(Trees 10' :...... )::i:i::.iii ................................................................ Grove (Trees 10. ............................................ ::::::::::::::.................................... T ... T rase 4 - 0' ti ' O .....................................:::::..................... ................................................::::::::::::::: ............................................................ \ .................................................................................. .............I..":I. ......................... :r..................:::::::::::::::::: r::::::::::::...........::.........:::: • •:::::::: is i:::::::::::: got :::::::r........... �....;;.... r..::........::..... ....................::::::.::..::::........:..:.:...... go ................................................................................. .................................................................................:.: ................................................................................... r3 �. ::: Farm Road VI g 3� (Crosses Runway) .................... h Alj: t;.,.s.j,�;r7, Ditc Power Line 50' f' V. >< • cT Q 'i: AMM t M a1 M ..........::.::::::: T A . ...p goo ae Red Light 8 1 Orange Cone Farm Road T Oran Ditch orange igo. '.iiiE?i�fr Trees I I ICLEARI 12th Street r 1 It* Pole T i �'Housa ZONE Pole Line I I I I T T T T goog T T T T Figure 6.2 NEW HIBISCUS AIRPARK Indian River County, Florida Airpark Elevation: 25 Feet MSL Source: Fla. Dept, of Transportation, Aviation Section Sept. 20 1987 Revised: Nov.1993 J 1 w ®a. /1 O a cr LL w U 0) O LL C6 c N O Z CD O a 41,00 ailittlitil c W LM 0 OM L0 Q U LL 0� a. U. > � O LL LJ o ` aoS Loot Madill ,a t 4 >� \ n' :i A ��h'ti ��1't'* ti ilF e 4U ''' I NO IF too IN IF OF e,/ FON.FOFNJ• _�.5 ��. ), ,.•,.� ,-� +n %t Off, ) ;; �, �� 4i a aQ \ �� i i•lF`a FIJI! � i -) ', ; •h Nola, ll �••c" i ~•�',•) pin, lti ) 5i f 1 t1R�!/v O /•�4.Y` 6 O v to -1Jl .1~,.,, ;nv,.,.-F r i ') Vii) _' f. ,)t'+^ fey ; ; IN "*I i.11 •: .'r . O, • ON ',••w ^f1 t ).y1�'� , ) �,: ) t1. 1 t-ltriy ON iIN i.l:•. G 7 hi .,..n , a.: T 0.ftn - . 1, 1't t.. •r, r'. l .+ t'•'. 1,�.. �) " Vt%3," 17OFF.GI Is 0 IN I ?LI mo ON o.: `) _ , {� )1 LJ" , .^).' .re ).a Noil IN t?") »�•+��l.ON f r , ; , ' r , c Iii ) +;; 1 IF Fl. NO OF III Ft IF,, , ,*h?lty Q ,+ ' ) 1. l .' ', o ; '1t .. t, "„ It ,FN OFF LL IF, IF of Into Ft It a IF it •, Is - \ .t1� 7� tll C . O IN A T.I )r S , ;, Alf * ). t * A I Is it Illik IF ;NF I FIN N 06 .. /''-> f N I Sii i; r'tlO Ab 04 FF I { �,,. i ?,,+� .� \r� i, 'ii )fito t -i 1� +t,t t t t �• f f"y `-� r I {�'.,11}�,n,, - ''.It � )�T:N .. ot I JOIN, O-..FNh .-) ♦ .♦•,\hY s.. IJF"%F1tI% It F 1h, ')N'>`. loON it , •r 1 •t ObLow? 1 0ii,,.,• •, • - '` r,+ !... + 1 -•, 151`*•'.'' NIONAGO t� �!'+°•`^h.{�'K�; m o 11 OFF N %i q �..' IN pit G .�I IF IF I ) 'le� Z )l�� t'ifXo IFl * ,f�'`', ) •gam 1•� 1.1 i ' ,r.) , ), �� ,+) 7 ,)'F h,rt i) it xk5 •1..,�'. ,` ea �' Ft 11 Ill x;. .�, FINOF OF IF Ft o1 N 1 1 l , A,�.;y t')•i )t rti P /, 1'. ,'-,' Lo IF 1` IF IF OFF I Ft OF i %'; '1s)! FIL 1p ti,',4 art \ v / / i'eM�Wk4li� �'yyroZ�.�t V O / IF OF 1Q 'x,:1:11•'.' ' IN to� , IN I OF FIJI, 4: o ? -,- 0 ca/ ''`.'," ...4 • .1 11, ti,IF I N I.t'A, OF ON •,.-.,0. `;; i,,`y N; re,;pct• 1S'iNO :, f .h:: C o. m O c a) 4 O fT mOF CO Fill- C « as • m u > to.m p ~N Z e c c o o v _ n m CL c O N m> > o a (1) rr LL u 0 residential units served is approximately $1,400. Figure 3.B.6 shows the summary of cost and implementation schedule. Capital improvement costs for 1990, 1995 and 2010 are $11,681,000, $39,492,000 and $63,648,000, respectively. GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES It is the goal of Indian River County to have an efficient system of potable water provision to prevent degradation of existing resources, promote orderly growth within the county service area, and to meet existing and projected demands. OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development By 1991, the county will have adopted land development regulations requiring potable water service to be provided concurrent with development. POLICY 1.1: New development within the unincorporated portion of the Indian River County shall be approved only when capacity is available to provide needed potable water service. POLICY 1.2: All authorities within the county service are operating potable water facilities shall monitor facility demands and capacity information as development orders are granted and shall continually advise the county of the remaining capacity and changes in demand. POLICY 1.3: The level of service standards for the county's potable water facilities of 250 gallons per day (GPD) per equivalent residential unit (ERU);-based-on-county-orditnance No7-84—H8; are hereby adopted and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. Wellfield capacity, storage capacity and delivery pressure shall be based on the following. Wellfield capacity shall be the average daily use plus the largest well being out of service Storage tank capacity shall be at least } of the average daily consumption volume High service pump capacity shall at least be equal to the maximum daily demand Pressures of the high service pumps for the county plants shall be a minimum of 40 PSI delivery pressures. SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES It is the goal of Indian River County to have an efficient system of sanitary sewer disposal to prevent degradation of existing resources, promote orderly growth within the county service area, and to meet existing and projected demands. OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development By 1991, the county will have adopted land development regulations requiring sanitary sewer service to be provided concurrent with development. POLICY 1.1: New development within the unincorporated portion of the Indian River County shall he approved only when capacity is available to provide needed sanitary sewer service. POLICY 1.2: All, authorities within the county service area operating sanitary sewer facilities shall monitor facility demands and capacity information as development orders are granted and shall continually advise the county of the remaining capacity and changes in demand. POLICY 1.3: The level of service standards for the county's sanitary sewer facilities of 250 gallons per day (GPD) per equivalent residential unit (ERU) $6///W4/-71/9/, with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25 are hereby adopted and shall be utilized for ,determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. POLICY 1.4: The county shall develop procedures to update facility demand and capacity information as development orders or permits are issued. POLICY -1. 5 The Utilities Department shall prepare annual summaries of capacity and demand information for each facili- ty within the county service area. POLICY 1.6: The county shall continue to allow the use of septic tanks in rural areas for single family units and for small retail establishments utilizing tanks for domestic waste disposal only, where approved by regulatory agencies consistent with the attached water and wastewater connection matrix (Table 3.A.16). OBJECTIVE 2 Correction of Deficiencies By 1995, 40% of the existing residential units and 60% of the existing non-residential units within the 1995 wastewater service make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval. POLICY 3.5: The county hereby adopts the level of service standards for public facilities which are established in the other elements of the comprehensive plan and which are stated below: Drainage: o The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county: New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the Soil Conservation Service Type 2 modified rainfall curves. Post development runoff shall not exceed pre - development runoff unless maximum discharge rate has been adopted for applicable drainage basin and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If the maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for the' applicable basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre -development discharge. 01 All new roads constructed in Indian River County after September, 1990, shall meet the following design criteria. Local Road Protection Level of Service 3 year storm/24 hour duration - no flood encroachment outside existing easement and right-of-way limits, 10 year storm/24 hour duration - limited encroachment of stormwaters in front and rear yards, 25 year storm/24 hour duration - greater encroachment of stormwaters in front and rear yards with no minor street flooding (2 11 max.) 100 year storm/3 day duration - some street flooding, but no flooding of existing or proposed residences. o By 2010, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level -of -service standard: 1. Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets. 2. The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads. All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards: v The county hereby adopts the following water quality level -of -service standards as a minimum, retention of the first 1" of rainfall is required prior to offsite discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by Ch. 17-25.025(9), F.A.C. Potable Water. O The level of service standards for the county's potable water facilities of 250 gallons per day (GPD) per equivalent residential unit ( ERU) ;--baaed--coir--c 6rdinanee--Akr.--8-+-k ; are hereby adopted and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. Solid Waste: o The following level of service standards are hereby adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. Service Area Average Solid Waste Generation Rate County -wide 6.5 pound per capita per day 2.37 cubic yards per capita per year Sanitary Sewer: o The level of service standards for the county's sanitary sewer facilities of 250 gallons per day (GPD) per equivalent residential unit (ERU);--based- -Olt --c�u�ty erdinanee-84-18; with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25 are hereby adopted and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. Recreation & Open Space: o The county hereby adopts recreation levels -of -service as follows: * Urban district parks, specialty parks (beach), and specialty parks (river) are considered countywide parks. The following levels -of -service are applicable countywide. Park Type Acres per_1000 Population Urban District 5 Specialty (Beach) 1.5 Specialty (River) 1.5 * Community park levels of service are hereby set separately for the north and south districts. For the south district, two levels -of -service are set, one for the period from 1989 to 1995 and the other from 1996-2010. District Community 3 Community 1.25 (1989-1995) Community 3 (1996-2010) Traffic Circulation: o The county hereby adopts traffic circulation level of service standards. These standards are as follows. Level of service "C" shall be maintained for rural principal arterials and rural freeways during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions. During peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions level of service "D" or better shall be maintained on all other freeway, arterial and collector roadways. OBJECTIVE 4 Future Development's Share of Capital Costs The county will have a Capital Improvements program which ensures that future developments bear a proportionate share of the cost of