HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-037ORDINANCE NO. 2005 - 037
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S INTRODUCTORY ELEMENT; AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River
County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and
WHEREAS, the county accepted comprehensive plan amendment applications
during its January 2005 amendment submittal window, and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on all
comprehensive plan amendment requests on April 20, 2005, after due public notice, and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation regarding
these comprehensive plan amendments to the Board of County Commissioners, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a
Transmittal Public Hearing on May 10, 2005, after advertising pursuant to F.S.
163.3184(15)(b)(1) and (c), and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of
these comprehensive plan amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs
for review, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal
public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption
stage of these plan amendments, and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs received these
Comprehensive Plan Amendments on May 26, 2005, pursuant to F.S.163.3184(4), and
WHEREAS, Indian River County received the Objections, Recommendations, and
Comments Report dated July 25, 2005, from the Florida Department of Community
Affairs, and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs had no objections,
recommendations, or comments concerning this amendment, and
ORDINANCE NO. 2005 - 037
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on September 13, 2005, after
advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendments to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in
Section 2 are hereby adopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the
State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be
transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
SECTION 2. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
Amend the Introductory Element; (Exhibit A)
SECTION 3. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 4. Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any
provision of this ordinance or these Indian River County Comprehensive Plan
Amendments is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining
provisions.
SECTION 5. Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance and, therefore, this plan amendment shall be
the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or
Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance with Section
163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the
Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by
adoption at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming their effective
status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community
Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Plan Processing Team.
ORDINANCE NO. 2005 - 037
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 29thday of August,
2005, for a public hearing to be held on the 13`h day of September, 2005, at which time it
was moved for adoption by Commissioner Neuberger , seconded by
Commissioner Wheel er , and adopted by the following vote:
Thomas S. Lowther, Chairman
Arthur R. Neuberger, Vice Chairman
Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner
Gary C. Wheeler, Commissioner
Sandra L Bowden, Commissioner
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Thomas S Lowther, Chairman
ATTEST B
•
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of
SEP 2 2 2005 , 2005
4c.,,kkowtedgagpnt from the Department of State received on this 272 day of
Se P _, 2005, at S: ga(g/P.M. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins II, County Attorney
ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -037
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Dire or
Indian River Co.
Legal
Budget
Risk Mgr.,
Approved
Date
G
0
F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlanVan 2005 amendments\Intro Element\Ordinance - Introductory
Element.doc
4 of 4
nd'an R'ver County
2020 Comprehensive Plan
Chaster 1
Indian River County Community Development Department
Adopted: 2005
Supplement # (Entire Element); Ordinance 2005 -
Exhibit A
Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
Introduction
Location
Planning History
Planning Process and Public Participation
Population
Historic Population
Components of Population Change
Characteristics of the Population
Age
Race
Education
Income
Households
Population Projections
Seasonal and Functional Population
Lodging Establishments
Recreational Vehicle Parks and Campgrounds
Visitors with Family, Friends and Relatives
Migrant Labor
Part -Year Residents
Economy
Unemployment
Employment
Appendix A
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005 -
Introductory Element
Page
1
1
1
3
5
6
10
11
11
13
14
15
16
17
21
22
23
23
24
25
27
27
27
30
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan
List of Tables
Table
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.20
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
Title
Introductory Element
Historic Population 1930 - 2004 Indian River County
Population 1960 - 2000 Indian River County, the Treasure Coast and Florida
Percent Increase In Population
Indian River County Share of Population Growth of the Treasure
Coast and Florida
Components of Population Change 1990-2000
Age of Population Indian River County
P ercent of Population by Age Indian River County
Median Age.
Racial Composition 1930-2000 Indian River County
Educational Achievement Persons 25 years and older (1980 - 2000)Years
Completed by Percent
P er Capita Income (dollars)
Income and Poverty Status
Households and Persons Per Household
Population Projections Indian River County
Population Projections Indian River County, Treasure Coast, and Florida
Projected Percentage Rate of Change Indian River County, Treasure
Coast, and Florida 2010-2030 20
Projected Population Change Indian River County, Treasure Coast, and Florida 20
Hotel/Motel Visitors 2010-2030 22
Projected Visitors in Recreational Vehicle Parks and Campgrounds 23
Visitors with Family, Friends and Relatives 24
P art -Time Residents Indian River County 25
Total Projected Seasonal Population Indian River County 25
Functional Population Projections For Indian River County 26
Functional Population Projections For Unincorporated Indian River County 26
2000 Unemployment Rate Indian River County and the State of Florida 27
Employment by Major Industrial Sector Indian River County 28
Indian River County's Largest Employers 29
Page
7
8
8
9
10
11
12
13
13
14
15
15
16
19
20
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
List of Figures
Figure
1.1
Title
Florida and Indian River County
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
Introduction
The Indian River County Comprehensive Plan is a product of the most ambitious planning effort in
the county's 72 year history. Mandated by the State Comprehensive Planning Act of 1985, the
comprehensive plan addresses the many issues and problems associated with growth management.
The Introductory Element provides a summary of much of the information and data. As such, this
element provides background information concerning the historical development of the county and
information common to, and necessary for, the development of the individual elements of the plan.
A brief overview of previous planning efforts in the county and the general requirements and process
of this planning initiative are also included.
Location
Indian River county is located on the east coast of Florida in the Treasure Coast Region. The County
is bounded by Brevard County on the north, the Atlantic Ocean on the east, St Lucie County on the
south and Osceola and Okeechobee counties on the west. The county seat of Vero Beach is
approximately 135 miles north of Miami, 140 miles east of Tampa, 100 miles southeast of Orlando
and 200 miles south of Jacksonville. (see figure 1.1)
In addition to the City of Vero Beach, there are four other municipalities in the county: the City of
Sebastian, the City of Fellsmere, the Town of Indian River Shores and the Town of Orchid. Nearly
two-thirds of the population resides in the unincorporated portion of the county. More than 90% of
the county's residents live along the coast within 10 miles of the Atlantic ocean.
The general land formation of the county is coastal lowland. This is a relatively flat area with
elevations of less than 25 feet above mean sea level. The key physical features of the mainland area
of the county are the St. Johns Marsh in the western portion of the county, the Ten Mile Ridge in the
central part of the county, and the Atlantic Coastal Ridge in the east. An offshore barrier island
extends the entire length of the county separated from the mainland by the Indian River Lagoon. The
natural and physical features of the county are discussed in detail in the Conservation, Coastal
Management and Future Land Use Elements of the comprehensive plan.
Planning History
Early planning efforts in Indian River County were not as formalized nor did these early plans have
the force of law that current regulations possess. These endeavors were undertaken by civic and
business committees and sought solutions to individual problems or were confined to specific
projects. The first formalized regulation was the 1957 Zoning Ordinance, which created districts,
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
1
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
provided for the regulation of the use of land, and placed restrictions on the intensity of those uses.
On May 29, 1975, the county adopted a comprehensive plan, as a guide and advisory tool in the
regulation and control of private property. The legal control of development was still to be vested in
the zoning, platting, and other specific ordinances adopted by the county.
Also in 1975, the state enacted the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act, which required
the designation of a local planning agency as well as the development of comprehensive plan. In
response to that act, the Board of County Commissioners, in 1982, adopted a comprehensive plan
that did have the force of law. Zoning, subdivision, and other land use regulations were required to
conform to that comprehensive plan. In addition, amendments to the comprehensive plan were
subject to review by regional and state agencies and could be submitted only twice annually. Finally,
the Board of County Commissioners designated the Planning and Zoning Commission as the local
planning agency.
•
The state expanded the scope of the comprehensive planning requirement in Florida with adoption of
the 1985 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
commonly referred to as the Growth Management Act. In 1986, the act was further refined with the
requirements set forth in rule 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code. These actions established a
top down planning process in Florida, a process in which plans were developed first at both the state
and regional levels. Consistent with state law, local governments had to develop and must maintain
adopted comprehensive plans which are consistent with both the intent and specific objectives set
forth in the state and regional plans.
On February 13, 1990, pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, Indian River
County adopted its current comprehensive plan. The Growth Management Act and rule 9J-5
recognize that changing circumstances may necessitate amendments to comprehensive plans.
Therefore, amendments to the plan are allowed when certain criteria are met. Since plan adoption,
Indian River County has amended its plan several times. Those amendments have ranged in
significance from minor text changes to substantial future land use map changes.
Another provision of state law recognizes that periodic assessment and evaluation is a required part
of the planning process. For that reason, each of Florida's local governments is required to submit an
adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) to the State Department of Community Affairs
(DCA). Generally, local governments with 1992 populations of more than 2,500 persons must
submit their EAR's to DCA approximately seven years after plan adoption. Indian River County's
EAR was adopted on December 17, 1996 and transmitted to DCA on December 20, 1996.
The EAR identified many changes necessary to update the plan to reflect new data, changes in state
law, and new circumstances in the community. Those changes were incorporated into an EAR based
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
2
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
plan amendment, which was adopted in 1998, and resulted in a major update of the county's
comprehensive plan.
Under rule 9J-5, county plans must contain the following elements and sub -elements: Future Land
Use; Transportation; Housing; Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable
Water; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Coastal Management; Conservation; Recreation and
Open Space; Intergovernmental Coordination; and Capital Improvements. Other elements may be
included at the option of the local government. The Indian River County plan also includes an
Introductory Element and an Economic Development Element.
In addition to establishing the required components of a local comprehensive plan, rule 9J-5
establishes minimum criteria for the preparation, review and compliance determination of
comprehensive plans. These requirements recognize that local governments will play a major role in
accomplishing state and regional goals and policies. The regulations also mandate that local plans be
based on the review and analysis of existing conditions, projected population and service demand,
projected cost of service provision, and sources of revenue for the community.
Planning Process and Public Participation
In addition to meeting the technical requirements of preparing a comprehensive plan, local
governments must provide opportunities for local citizens and property owners to participate in the
development and adoption of the plan.
In January 1988, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a Public Participation Plan to be used
in the preparation of the county's comprehensive plan. That multifaceted plan provided for public
education, public input during plan preparation and development, public hearings during the
adoption process and general provisions to be followed throughout the planning process. The
education component required the development of this Introductory Element of the plan as well as
the presentation of this information to the public.
To provide overall direction in the process of developing the plan, the Board of County
Commissioners appointed the Planning and Zoning Commission as the designated local planning
agency. The Board of County Commissioners also directed existing county boards and commissions,
including the Planning and Zoning Commission, to provide direct input in the development of
individual elements of the comprehensive plan. The Board also acknowledged the role of the county
planning staff and other civic and professional groups and organizations.
Among the Planning and Zoning Commission's responsibilities were: establishing broad goals;
reviewing staff and other advisory group reports; conducting public meetings and hearings; and
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
3
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
recommending the comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendments to the Board of County
Commissioners.
Complementing the role of the Planning and Zoning Commission, existing county boards and
commissions were assigned primary responsibility for the development of individual elements. The
groups were selected on the basis of their interest and technical knowledge of the issues associated
with various individual elements. As existing advisory bodies to the county, these groups also
possessed knowledge of county policies and regulations. The responsibilities of those primary
review groups were: reviewing staff drafts and reports; conducting public meetings; and
recommending draft elements to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Other civic and professional groups were also encouraged to participate in the development and
review of the comprehensive plan by participating in the formal public review process as well as
conducting their own review.
The planning staff had the responsibility of providing the necessary coordination and support
throughout the development and review of the plan. That included: conducting research and
analysis; preparing and presenting draft elements and reports; and conducting public meetings and
workshops.
Upon completion of the elements, the formal adoption process began. Pursuant to the requirements
of Florida Statutes, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and made its
recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. The County Commission then conducted
a public hearing and transmitted the plan to DCA for state review.
As structured, the public participation plan provided for the availability and inspection of documents
by the public; the solicitation and encouragement of the public to provide written comments which
were incorporated into the public record; and the provision of public notice of all public meetings,
workshops and hearings. Other efforts to keep the public informed included the issuance of press
releases, the availability of staff to provide information, and the maintenance of records pertaining to
public review.
Consistent with state law, plan amendments have been processed in a manner similar to the plan
adoption process.
Development of the EAR followed largely the same process as the development of the
comprehensive plan. That process is outlined in the EAR Public Participation Plan, which the Board
of County Commissioners adopted on August 8, 1995. Consistent with state law, the Planning and
Zoning Commission, as the designated local planning agency, was primarily responsible for
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
4
•
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
developing the EAR. Similar to the plan development process, county boards and commissions
provided direct input in the development of the EAR for individual elements of the comprehensive
plan.
When all the EAR elements were complete, the Planning and Zoning commission approved the
proposed EAR. Following two public workshops, the adopted EAR was approved by the Board of
County Commissioners at a public hearing. The EAR recommended amendments to the plan were
adopted through the regular plan amendment process.
Population
One of the key components of any successful long-range planning effort is the reliability of the
assumptions used to assess future conditions or needs. In the development of a comprehensive plan,
an understanding of the future population and the forces, which influence population growth, is
essential. Before projecting the future population, however, it is necessary to first analyze historic
population levels and current population estimates and the trends, which will direct the future.
The following analysis addresses Indian River County's past, present, and future population
characteristics. As structured, the population section focuses on three aspects: historic population,
current trends, and population projections Each of these builds upon the other to provide the
foundation upon which the comprehensive plan rests. The historic population provides insight to the
development and growth, which has resulted in the current status of the community. Together with
the current assessment, past trends provide the basis for formulating population projections.
The focus of this comprehensive plan is the unincorporated portions of the county. Although the
municipalities and small areas of the county possess different demographic characteristics, which
make them unique, the availability of reliable data for small areas of the county is limited. For that
reason, this analysis will focus primarily on the county as a whole. In addition to the three aspects
mentioned above, this analysis will include a comparison of Indian River County with the state and
region.
Since the geographic areas to be studied will remain constant throughout the analysis, the following
definitions are in order. The Treasure Coast Region (Treasure Coast, Region) is comprised of Indian
River, St. Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach Counties. Any reference to Indian River County shall
include the entire county unless specified as the unincorporated county. The unincorporated county
excludes the five incorporated municipalities (Vero Beach, Sebastian, Fellsmere, Indian River
Shores, and Orchid). Census Designated Places (CDP) are small areas within the county so
designated by the US Bureau of Census. As defined by the census, a CDP is a densely settled
population center without legally defined corporate limits or corporate powers. These areas contain a
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
5
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
residential nucleus with a city -type street pattern. In addition to those areas defined above, several
others of local importance have also been added. These areas do not meet the criteria for official
designation, but have experienced significant development and population growth. All areas are
depicted in map form in the Small Area Population section of this analysis.
Historic Population
The historic population of Indian River County from 1930 to the present is shown in Table 1.1. This
chart also provides the numerical and percentage increase of population for each 10 year period. The
data indicate that Indian River County has experienced tremendous growth since its formation in
1925.
Overall, the county's population has experienced a nearly a 19 fold increase, from 6,724 in 1930 to
over 126,796 in 2004, a growth rate of approximately 4.05% per year*. This growth has not been
constant over the years. In the early years of the county, 1920 to 1950, Indian River County's
population increased at an average rate of approximately 2.88% per year. The population did,
however, nearly double from 6,724 persons to 11,872 persons during that time.
In the fifties, the County experienced rapid growth, doubling from 11,872 in 1950 to 25,309 in 1960.
During this time, the population increased 113%, an annual rate of 7.86%.
County growth slowed considerably in the 1960's, to an annual rate of 3.58%. Despite a growth rate
half that of the previous 10 years, the population experienced a sizable increase of 10,683 persons.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
6
Comprehensive Plan
Year
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2004
Introductory Element
TABLE 1.1
HISTORIC POPULATION 1930 - 2004, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Population
25,309
35,992
59,896
90,208
126,796
Numerical Increase
22,739
Increase
Annual growth rates reflect the result of compounding. For example, a population with a 5% annual growth
rate will double in approximately 14 years
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census University of Florida, Bureau of Economic
and Business Research
In the seventies, the County's population increased by over 23,000 persons, an average annual rate of
5.23%.
During the 1980-1990 timeframe, the growth rate of the County slowed to approximately 4.86% per
year; however, the numerical increase was the largest recorded. The growth rate slowed further
during the 1990-2004 timeframe to approximately 4.05%.
Both the State and the Treasure Coast Region have also experienced rapid population growth. Table
1.2 provides the population of Indian River County, the Treasure Coast Region and Florida since
1960. During this period, the county and region have grown five times in size, with the region
slightly outpacing the county. Both areas grew faster than the state, which tripled.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement # ; Ordinance 2005-
7
Comprehensive Plan
TABLE 1.2
POPULATION 1960 - 2000
Indian River County, the Treasure Coast, and Florida
Indian River County
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
25,300
31,300
46,300
59,900
76,400
112,947
Treasure Coast
309,600
397,800
463,900
640,900
787,900
986,800
1,204,782
1,346,259
1,563,564
Introductory Element
Florida
4,951,600
5,961,600
6,791,400
8,485,200
9,747,100
11,287,900
12,938,071
14,149,317
15,982,824
Source: U.S. Census of Population & University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research
1960-1965
1965-1970
1970-1975
1975-1980
1980-1985
1985-
1990-
1990
1995
1995-2000
Source
TABLE 1.3
PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN POPULATION
Indian River County
: U.S. Bureau of Census
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
18.1
8
Treasure Coast
Florida
13
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
During the period from 1960 to 2000, the population of Indian River County increased by 346.4%,
the Treasure Coast by 405% and the state by 222.8%. While these figures are impressive, closer
examination is needed to understand the rapid growth and determine the trends that have occurred.
Because data for the period from 1960-2000 are available for 5 year periods, much of the analysis
will address 5 year intervals. For the 8 periods, percent increases for Indian River County averaged
20.8% compared with 22.7% for the Treasure Coast, and 15.9% for Florida. All three areas
expenenced declines in the 5 year rate of growth from 1965-1995. For all periods, except the most
recent period, 1995 - 2000, Indian River County's 5 year growth rates have been higher than Florida,
indicating overall a faster growth rate than the State as a whole. When compared with the Treasure
Coast, Indian River County rates were greater than those for the Treasure Coast only for the 1975-
1980 and the 1980-1985 periods.
Since 1984, however, the county' s growth has fallen below the pace of the region. Therefore, the
county's share of the regional population has declined. At the same time, the county has experienced
higher percentage increases of population than the state, or nearly identical percentage increases of
population as the state, resulting in an overall increase in the county's share of the state population
total.
1960-65
1965-70
1970-75
1975-80
1980-85
1985-90
1990-95
1995-2000
TABLE 1.4
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHARE OF POPULATION GROWTH
OF THE TREASURE COAST AND FLORIDA
Indian River
County Pop.
Change (Thous.)
Treasure Coast
Pop. Change
IRC % of Change
Florida
Pop. Change
1,211.5
Source: U.S. Bureau of Census, Compiled by Indian River County Planning Division
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005 -
IRC % of Change
Indian River County
1.1
1.1
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
These analyses indicate that, compared to the 1970-1985 period, the pace of growth in the state,
region, and county, for the 1985-2000 period, slowed. The outlook for Indian River County is
continued growth, although at a slower pace than experienced in the late 70's and early 80's. While
outpacing the state growth rate through 1995, and approximately equaling the state growth rate
between 1995 and 2000, Indian River County will continue to grow at a slightly slower pace than the
more urban areas of the Treasure Coast.
Components of Population Change
Population growth is the result of two processes: natural growth and migration. Natural growth
consists of births minus deaths. A population with a high proportion of younger persons and/or a
high birth rate is likely to have a positive natural growth, whereas a population with a high
proportion of older persons and/or a low birth rate is likely to experience a negative natural growth.
Migration on the other hand is the movement of people from one location to another. Many factors
contribute to the decision to relocate to another area: economic, health, climate, and family, to name
a few. Table 1.5 identifies the components of growth in Florida, the Treasure Coast Region, and
Indian River County.
The table indicates that the proportion of growth due to net migration is high throughout the state,
region, and especially the county. Review of historical data indicates that, while migration is
declining as a growth factor for the state and region, it is increasing for Indian River County.
Indian River
County
Treasure Coast
Florida
TABLE 1.5
Components of Population Change 1990 - 2000
# of natural
increase
-2,554
9,113
of natural
increase
0%
# of net
migration
25,293
349,662
2,596,091
Source: University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
10
%of net
migration
100%
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
Characteristics of the Population
This section examines the current socioeconomic characteristics of the population. Since the
decennial U.S. Census is the traditional and most reliable source of these data, much of the data are
1990 figures. Where more current and reliable data are available, they have been included. Also,
comparisons between the county, the region, and the state are presented.
Age
The data in tables 1.6 and 1.7 show the numerical and percentage breakdown of the County's
population by age. All age groups increased in size in each 10 year census period, except fro the 20-
34 year old age group. Despite the fact that nearly all age groups increased in size, there are
differences which can be observed. The most notable is the oldest age group, 65+; this group nearly
doubled in each period, resulting in a 99 fold increase. By contrast, the two youngest groups
combined (ages 19 and under) have increased by a factor of only 9.
Year
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
5 & Under
729
766
1,323
3,837
TABLE 1.6
AGE OF POPULATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
6-19
2,535
9,861
20 - 34
1,711
11,578
20,392
Source: U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Population
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
11
35-64
11,578
20,392
30,322
65+
334
616
3,529
24,592
32,972
Total
25,309
35,992
59,896
90,208
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan
Year
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
TABLE 1.7
PERCENT OF POPULATION BY AGE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
5 & under
6-19
20-34
13.1
Source: U. S. Bureau of Census Census of Population
Compiled by Indian River County Planning Division
35-64
Introductory Element
65+
The percentage of the total population contained in each age group provides a better indication of the
aging of the population. Once again, the most obvious trend occurs in the over 65 age cohort. This
group has consistently commanded a larger share of the population and has increased from just 5%
of the total in 1930 to over 29% in 2000. The only other group that has increased is the 35-64 age
group, which has grown from 28.9% in 1930 to 36.4% in 2000, or an increase of 7.5 percentage
points. The three youngest age groups have all declined as a percent of the total population. The age
group in the workforce, those between 20 and 65, has remained fairly consistent over time, with
54.4% in 1930 and 51.3% in 1990, and dropping to 49.5% in 2000. Therefore, the pre-school and
school age population, those under 20, have lost ground to the elders. This age group represented
21.3% of the total in 2000 compared with 40.6% in 1930, despite a numerical increase of more than
21,000 persons.
Indian River County's population is older than that of Florida. The median age of the county
population in 2000 was 47.0. By comparison, the median age in Florida was 38.7 years. In fact,
Indian River County's median age was the 9th highest of the 67 counties in Florida. Additionally, as
illustrated in Table 1.8, the median age of the county is rising faster than that of the state.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
12
Comprehensive Plan
1970
Florida
Indian River County
Martin County
Palm Beach County
St. Lucie County
3L4
TABLE 1.8
MEDIAN AGE
1980
Source: Bureau of Census, Census of Population; BEBR
Race
1990
Introductory Element
2000
The racial makeup of the County population has also changed over time. As indicated in Table 1.9,
the percentage of blacks has decreased from 28.7% of the population in 1930 to 8.2% in 2000. The
white population increased from 71.3% in 1930 to 87.4% in 2000. In addition to these groups, the
2000 census lists 4,940 persons or 4.4% of the County population as other races. These include
American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, and those identifying themselves as two or more races
others. In contrast, from 1990 to 2000, the proportion of the population of Florida that is black
increased slightly from 13.7% to 14.6%"
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
White
29,409
51,172
81,418
TABLE 1.9
RACIAL COMPOSITION 1930-2000
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Community Development Department
Supplement #; Ordinance 2005-
Black
1,931
5,380
7,765
13
18.1
Other
0/0
9
69
959
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan
Introductory Element
2000 I 98,754 I 87.4 I 9,253 8.2 I 4,940 4.4
Source: U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Population
Education
Educational achievement is measured by the number of years of school completed by adults over 25
years of age, as reported by the U.S. Census. Achievement levels are broken down into three
categories: Elementary School, High School, and College. The High School and College groups are
further broken down to those that completed 1-3 years and those that graduated. Achievement levels
recorded are the highest level (years completed) reached by an individual.
IRC 1980
IRC 1990
IRC 2000
FL 1980
FL 1990
FL 2000
TABLE 1.10
EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT
Persons 25 years and older (1980-2000)
Years Completed by Percent
Elementary
0-8 years
High School,
1-3 yrs.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Population
High School
Graduate
College, 1-3
years
College
Graduate
The table shows that the educational attainment level in the county is slightly lower than that of the
state as a whole. The data also indicate that the educational attainment level in the county increased
from 1990 to 2000. In 1990, 76.4% of the county's over 25 population had at least a high school
education. By 1990, that figure had risen to 81.6%; a slightly smaller increase than the state as a
whole, which increased from 74.5% to 82.5%.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
14
•
Comprehensive Plan
Income
Introductory Element
Comparisons of income utilize three income indicators: per capita income, household income, and
family income, as well as incidence of poverty.
IRC
FL
US
St Lucie
Martin
Palm Beach
TABLE 1.11
PER CAPITA INCOME (dollars)
1997
33,496
36,956
37,284
1998
34,852
26,893
20,525
38,773
1999
35,900
20,993
2000
36,874
28,366
change
1997-2000
13.1
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and 2004 Florida Statistical Abstract.
Indian River County's per capita income compares favorably to the nation and the state. In the 90's,
the county has consistently been above the nation and the state; however, the margin of difference is
decreasing.
When compared to the four county region, Indian River County is 3rd overall behind Palm Beach
County and Martin County. St Lucie County is the only one of the four Treasure Coast counties
with an income below the state average.
IRC
FL
US
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD
INCOME IN DOLLARS
1979
15,101
14,675
1989
28,961
27,483
30,056
1999
39,635
38,819
41,994
TABLE 1.12
INCOME AND POVERTY STATUS
MEDIAN FAMILY
INCOME IN DOLLARS
1979
17,607
17,280
19,917
1989
33,569
32,212
35,225
Source• U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Population
Community Development Department
Supplement #__; Ordinance 2005-
15
1999
46,385
45,625
50,046
% OF PERSONS
BELOW POVERTY
LEVEL
1979
1989
13.1
1999
% OF FAMILIES BELOW
POVERTY LEVEL
1979
1989
Indian River County
1999
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
Table 1.12 provides family and household income and the incidence of poverty for families and
individuals. Just as with per capita income, household and family incomes in Indian River County
were reported above state levels for 1979, 1989, and 1999. While both household and family
incomes were higher than the state within Indian River County, the margin of difference above state
levels, decreased in both categories during this period. Both the state and the county, however,
remain below the nation with respect to median family income.
In contrast, the rate of poverty among families and persons in Indian River County remained below
state and national levels. In fact, the rate of poverty among families remained lower at both the state
and county levels than at the national level.
Households
The number of households and average household size can greatly impact land use planning in a
community. A household is defined as the person or persons occupying a dwelling unit. Therefore,
as the average household size decreases, the number of households or required dwelling units
increases relative to the population.
Table 1.13 shows the number of households and persons per household. Because the average
number of persons per household has decreased, the number of households have increased at a rate
faster than the population as a whole.
Year
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
TABLE 1.13
HOUSEHOLDS AND PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD
Households
(IRC)
3,653
8,247
12,329
23,331
38,057
49,137
Change
Persons/
House -Hold
(IRC)
Change
-14.1
-1.3
Persons/
House -Hold
(FL)
Change
-12.1
-3.5
Source: U.S. Census of Population, & University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
16
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
The average household size is decreasing in the United States due to several factors. Families are
having fewer children and delaying the birth of children; young adults are no longer living with
parents but moving out on their own, and older persons are living longer and not returning to their
children in their later years. Combined, these factors have led to a decrease in the average household
size. As indicated in Table 1.13, the average household size in Indian River County, already less
than the state's, is decreasing. The pace of that decrease, however, slowed down in the eighties, and
even further slowed in the nineties.
Population Projections
Population projections are an essential tool in any planning activity. For land use planning, the
amount of population growth determines future requirements for housing, transportation, recreation,
schools and other public and private facilities and services. Using a population projection that is too
low will likely result in failure to adequately identify and fund future county facility needs (i.e.
roads). Conversely, using a population projection that is too high will result in identifying needs that
will occur beyond the forecasted time period. A population projection is, therefore, an attempt to
provide an accurate forecast of the future population. As with any other forecast, the reliability of a
population projection depends on the accuracy of data, the projection methodology and the
assumptions used.
In Florida, most county comprehensive plans and long range transportation plans rely on countywide
population forecasts prepared by the University of Flonda's Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR). The BEBR population forecasts include "Low", "Medium", and "High" forecasts
by county in five year increments. Section 9J-5.005 of the Florida Administrative Code states that
BEBR medium series projections should be utilized by communities for their planning activities.
Alternatively, Section 9J-5.005 also states that a community may use its own projections, or BEBR
low or high series projections, provided sufficient documentation or analysis is provided justifying
the choice.
While most communities use the BEBR medium forecasts, some Florida counties have determined
that the BEBR "medium" forecast does not adequately reflect anticipated growth. This conclusion is
supported by the findings contained within the BEBR population study titled Projections ofFlorida
Population by County 2003 - 2030 (BEBR February 2004). That study provides a summary of the
methodologies applied to develop the low, medium, and high forecasts These forecasts begin with
four statistical models, from which a total of eight projections are made. The highest and lowest
projections are excluded from consideration, and the medium forecast is.calculated by taking the
average of the six remaining projections. The low and high projections are included "to provide an
indication of uncertainty surrounding the medium projections". The report further states that; two -
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
17
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
thirds of all county forecasts should fall within the low and high forecasts. According to BEBR's
own analysis, 22 of Florida's 67 county forecasts do not match BEBR's medium population
forecasts, and will not even be within the range of the low and medium forecasts. Additionally, the
report states "Given Florida's population growth history, the probability that a county's future
population will be above the high projection is greater than the probability that it will be below the
low projection."
For Indian River County, BEBR medium series projections reflect an average growth rate of 1.7%
through the year 2030. This projected county growth rate is lower than what recent historical data
indicate. For instance, Indian River County's 2003 growth rate was 2.5%, while the county's 2004
growth rate was 4.6%. In fact, the growth rate within Indian River County over the past five years
has remained above 2.10%.
It is expected that the growth trends occurring within Indian River County over the past five years
will continue through 2030. This conclusion is supported by a recognition that there is an increasing
scarcity of developable land in southeast Florida. As a result, population is moving northward into
Indian River County in search of cheaper housing and land. In addition, it is commonly recognized
and understood that the "baby boom" generation is reaching retirement age and that many of the
retirees are moving to the sunbelt states, including to Florida, and Indian River County.
As a traditionally agricultural area, Indian River County has a large mass of available vacant land
that can accommodate growth from the south and growth from the north. In fact, the county has
recently been experiencing an increase in the number of rezoning requests, proposed housing
projects, and potential developer inquiries. This, coupled with the large inventory of existing platted
lots within the county from approved development projects, including existing platted lots dating
back to the 1950's and 1960's, indicates that there will continue to be available space for future
population growth.
Given the combination of national and regional demographic trends, recent development activity,
and the availability of land, a linear regression analysis was determined to be the best approach to
evaluating population growth within the County. The analysis was performed with population
growth over the past five years (2000 — 2004 time period) being the independent variable. The
resulting analysis yielded an average growth rate of 2.1% through 2030, a rate which is higher than
the BEBR medium forecast of 1.7% for the same period. Table 1.14 includes the BEBR medium
series projections as well as adjusted numbers based on recent trend analysis.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
18
Comprehensive Plan
IRC Adjusted
BEBR
2010
139,100
TABLE 1.14
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2015
151,500
•
2020
175,322
2025
Introductory Element
2030
208,478
186,200
Source: University of Florida, BEBR, Mid -Range Projections 2004; Indian River County MPO
As with any projection, the probability of error increases as the projection horizon year is extended.
It is also difficult to make assumptions about a population 20 years in the future.
Because of the importance of migration to the growth of Indian River County, there are many
economic, social, and political factors at the local, state, regional, national, and global level that
could impact the decision of individuals or businesses to relocate.
An examination of the county, regional and state projections reveals that several factors should be
considered in preparing projections for the future In the future, growth will be a major factor with
which local government and the state must contend. By the year 2030, Indian River County will add
approximately 81,682 residents or nearly 3,315 additional residents per year. By that time the four
county Treasure Coast region will increase from about 1.9 million to nearly 2.7 million residents.
With respect to the state, the Census Bureau projects that Florida will likely become the third most
populous state with over 20 million residents, by 2025. During this period, the county will increase
ata faster pace than the state and the region.
Throughout the planning period, the percentage change of population for Indian River County will be
higher than both the state and the region. This percent will decline for all three areas over time.
The basic assumption which forms the basis of these projections is that present demographic trends
will continue. These include a continued reliance on in -migration for population growth and a
resulting influx of many retirees. Birth rates in the U.S. have declined since the 1950's and are
expected to continue to decline. The result of this will be slower U.S. population growth with an
aging of the population. Those over 65 have shown a desire to relocate to locations, which offer the
high quality of life, which is often associated with the mild climate and relatively low cost of living.
These are charactenstics applicable to Florida.
Indian River County's population growth, therefore, is expected to continue to be fueled by in -
migration, with a great many of these being retired persons.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #; Ordinance 2005-
19
Comprehensive Plan
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Introductory Element
TABLE 1.15
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, TREASURE COAST, AND FLORIDA
Indian River County**
158,744
175,322
208,478
Treasure Coast*
1,942,000
2,123,900
2,304,800
2,478,400
2,637,900
19,397,400
21,000,800
22,588,000
24,104,900
25,494,600
Source: *University of Florida, BEBR, Mid -Range Projections 2004; **Indian River County MPO
2010-2015
2015-2020
2020-2025
2025-2030
TABLE 1.16
PROJECTED PERCENTAGE RATE OF CHANGE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, TREASURE COAST, AND FLORIDA
2010-2030
Indian River County**
Treasure Coast*
Florida*
Source: *University of Florida, BEBR, Mid -Range Projections 2004; **Indian River County MPO
2010-2015
2015-2020
2020-2025
2025-2030
TABLE 1.17
PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, TREASURE COAST, AND FLORIDA
Indian River County**
16,578
16,578
16,578
16,578
Treasure Coast*
181,900
180,900
173,600
159,500
State*
1,603,400
1,587,200
1,516,900
1,389,700
Source: *University of Florida, BEBR, Mid -Range Projections 2004; **Indian River County MPO
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
20
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
Seasonal and Functional Population
To accurately determine demand for services and to comply with state law, the comprehensive plan
estimates not only the resident population of the county, but also the functional (or effective)
population of the county. The functional population is the resident population plus the seasonal
population. This population is utilized as needed within the comprehensive plan. In some instances,
the county has utilized the permanent population rather than the functional population. For example,
the establishment of some level of service standards requires the use of permanent population, while
the establishment of other level of service standards requires use of both resident and seasonal
population.
The seasonal population is composed of those persons who visit or reside in the county for a period
of less than 6 months. This group includes tourists, migrant farm workers and other short-term and
long-term visitors.
The seasonal population used in the development of the comprehensive plan is not intended to
provide an enumeration or total count of persons who visit Indian River County throughout any
given year, but rather to provide an estimate of the potential peak seasonal population The seasonal
population figures presented in this document are intended to provide the maximum one day
potential that is likely to occur during the high season winter months.
In the past, Indian River County has accommodated a significant seasonal population that is expected
to increase in the future. Factors that contribute to the seasonal population growth include the mild
climate and natural resources that are a result of the south Florida coastal location and a wide variety
of recreational and social activities.
While not developed as a major tourist area, Indian River County can be expected to have an
increasing number of tourists in the coming years. Some of the factors contributing to the growth of
tourism are the ideal winter climate; access to beaches, water facilities and other recreation facilities;
and proximity to other major attractions in the state.
Agriculture has been a keycomponent of the local economy. The seasonal nature of citrus
production has required the use of migrant labor during the peak harvesting season.
The balance of the seasonal population is the short-term and long-term visitor/resident drawn to the
county for many of the same reasons as tourists. Many of these people are of retirement age, and can
be expected to increase as this segment of the U.S. population increases.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
21
Comprehensive Plan Introductory Element
To determine seasonal population, the county calculated the peak season populations of lodging
establishments (hotels and motels); recreational vehicle (RV) parks and campgrounds; visitors with
family, friends, and relatives; migrant labor camps; and part -year residents.
Lodging Establishments
To estimate the number of persons using county lodging establishments during peak season, the
following formula was used.
number of units X peak season occupancy rate X average number of persons per occupied room
Through a study based on census and survey data, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
projects the number of hotel/motel units in the county. Those projections are made in five year
increments beginning with 1990.
Based on a 1987 survey conducted by the County's Planning Division, the peak season occupancy
rate was estimated to be 90%. Research indicates that the average number of persons per occupied
room is 1.8.
Using these figures, it is estimated that 4,687 persons/day use county lodging establishments during
the peak season. Additionally, the county now projects that 6,867 persons/day will use county
lodging establishments during the 2020 peak season.
Projections for future hotel/motel visitors during the peak season were calculated using 1987
occupancy rates and persons per room as well as a 10% increase in hotel rooms for each five year
period.
Year
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Rooms
TABLE 1.18
HOTEL/MOTEL VISITORS
2010-2020
3,700
Occupancy
Source: Indian River County Planning Division
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
22
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Persons Per Room
Visitors
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan
Recreational Vehicle Parks and Campgrounds
Introductory Element
There were 838 recreational vehicle sites in Indian River County in 1995. A 1987 survey of
operators revealed a 3 month peak season from mid-January until mid-April, and full occupancy for
the duration. Occupancy of recreational vehicles was almost exclusively couples. Based on that
information, it is estimated that there were approximately 1,676 people living in recreational vehicle
parks and campgrounds in the county during the 1995 peak season.
In addition, it is projected that approximately 1,762 people will be living in recreational vehicle
parks and campgrounds in the county during the 2020 peak season That projection assumes that the
number of recreational vehicle sites in the county will increase by 1% every five years.
Year
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
TABLE 1.19
PROJECTED VISITORS IN RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS AND
CAMPGROUNDS
Sites
863
872
881
890
899
Occupancy
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Source: Indian River County Planning Division
Visitors with Family, Friends and Relatives
Persons/Vehicle
Total
In addition to those tourists staying in hotels, motels, recreational vehicle parks and camps, it is
necessary to estimate the number of visitors to the county seeking lodging with family, friends and
relatives. Before being replaced with Enterprise Florida, the Florida Department of Commerce,
Division of Tourism, conducted random sample surveys of out of state visitors. Data gathered from
those surveys were compiled in a report for Florida counties. Among those items questioned are:
purpose of visit; type of lodging; mode of transportation into the state; and primary destination by
county. These data were used to produce a profile of travelers and visitors to counties. This report,
however, was not produced for Indian River County because the number of surveys was not
statistically significant in relation to the total for the state. The Division of Tourism, however, did
report that lodging information was similar for all southern counties.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
23
Comprehensive Plan
Introductory Element
For that reason, Brevard County data pertaining to visitors with family, friends, and relatives will be
used to estimate Indian River County data pertaining to visitors with family, friends, and relatives.
For the first quarter of 1986, lodging with family, friends and relatives in Brevard County
represented 110% of lodgings in hotels and motels. Using that ratio, it is estimated that 5,156 people
stayed with family friends, and relatives during the 1995 peak season. Additionally, it is projected
that 7,554 people will stay with family, friends, and relatives during the 2020 peak season.
TABLE 1.20
VISITORS WITH FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND RELATIVES
Year
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Hotel Visitors
Source: Indian River County Planning Division
Migrant Labor
Family, Friends & Relatives
Visitors
Agriculture and citrus production play a key role in the Indian River County economy. Statistics on
migrant labor are not available at the county level. Therefore, it was necessary to produce an
estimate for the county. To do so, a survey was conducted by the County Agricultural Extension,
Florida Employment Service and the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Service. Through
these sources, a current estimate of 1000 migrant farm laborers was established for the county for the
peak months of February and March. While this figure appears to be low considering the agricultural
segment of the economy, several constraints were identified which support this figure. Migrant labor
camps in the county are currently licensed for approximately 833 persons. Many of the seasonal
farm laborers are year-round county residents. During the peak period, many laborers are bussed into
the county on a daily basis from neighboring counties with higher numbers of migrant labor
facilities.
It was also assumed that, this figure will remain fairly constant in the future due to continued high
demand for citrus products, stable production in the county, changes in technology, and the use of
local labor.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #; Ordinance 2005-
24
Comprehensive Plan
Part -Year Residents
Introductory Element
The final segment of the county's seasonal population is the part-time residents of the county. This
group has been characterized as the "snowbirds" who flock south for the winter months and return to
their primary residences in the north for the remainder of the year. This group maintains a residence
in Indian River County, which is occupied for less than 6 months a year.
Past studies have indicated that the part -year population during the peak season is generally equal to
10% of the resident population. Using that ratio, it is estimated that there were 10,026 part -year
residents living in the county during the 1995 peak season. Furthermore, it is projected that there
will be 15,840 part -year residents living in the county during the 2020 peak season.
Year
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
TABLE 1.21
PART-TIME RESIDENTS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Source: Indian River County Planning Division
Hotel/Motels
Part -Time Residents
13,550
15,941
TABLE 1.22
TOTAL PROJECTED SEASONAL POPULATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Recreational Vehicles
Family, Fnends, and Relatives
Migrant Labor
Part -Time Residents
TOTAL
2010
6,593
13,550
28,863
Source: Indian River County Planning Division
Community Development Department
Supplement #; Ordinance 2005-
25
2015
2020
33,023
2025
15,941
34,086
2030
8,536
35,158
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan
Introductory Element
Seasonal population estimates and projections are presented in Table 1.22. These figures are subject
to influences from both within and outside the county, and will require revision as more timely data
become available.
TABLE 1.23
FUNCTIONAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Resident
Seasonal
Functional
(TOTAL)
2010
28,863
2015
158,744
Source: Indian River County Planning Department
2020
175,322
33,023
208,345
2025
34,086
225,986
2030
208,478
35,158
243,636
The functional population is the largest population that would be expected to use county services and
facilities on a given day. As such, the functional population of the entire county can be determined
by adding the resident and the seasonal populations of the entire county. The functional population
for the unincorporated part of the county was determined by using the unincorporated county's
percentage of the entire county's resident population, and then applying that percentage to the
functional population of the entire county.
Resident
Seasonal
Functional
(TOTAL)
TABLE 1.24
FUNCTIONAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR
UNINCORPORATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2010
18,312
108,511
2015
100,716
120,384
Source: Indian River County Planning Department
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
26
2020
20,952
132,186
2025
121,752
143,378
2030
132,270
22,306
154,577
Indian River County
•
Comprehensive Plan
Economy
Introductory Element
The local economy can greatly influence the stability and quality of life in an area. The following
data are presented as a description of the Indian River County economy. Indicators of the local
economy that are discussed include: unemployment, employment by major industrial sectors and
earnings in those sectors. A detailed discussion of the economy is presented in the Economic
Development Element.
Unemployment
Indian River County's unemployment rate is higher than the state's as a whole. In 2000, the county's
average annual unemployment rate exceeded the state's by 2.6 percentage points.
TABLE 1.25
2000 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Florida
Indian River County
Source: Florida Agency For Workforce Innovation
Unemployment Rate
The county's unemployment rate is also cyclical. Generally the unemployment rate is higher during
the summer months. The cyclical rate is attributed to the seasonal nature of the citrus and tourism
sectors.
Employment
Employment by major industrial sectors is presented in Table 1.26. These data show the number of
persons employed and percent of total employment. From 1995 to 2000 employment increased in all
sectors of the economy except agriculture. In 1995 the services sector was already the sector with
the largest percentage of employees in the county. The trade sector, which includes wholesale and
retail trade, was the next largest. By 2000, the services sector remained the largest, actually
increasing its lead over the trade sector. Much of this growth is due to the increasing number of
relatively affluent residents who demand more services than the younger working population.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
27
Comprehensive Plan
Agriculture
Construction
Manufacturing
Trans/Utilities
Trade
Finance
Services
Government
Total
Introductory Element
TABLE 1.26
EMPLOYMENT BY MAJOR INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1995
Employees
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
3,865
2,113
650
Total
2000
Employees
3,505
11,114
Total
Community Development Department Indian River County
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
28
4
41
Comprehensive Plan
2004
Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2003
Ranking
1
3
2
4
5
11
7
9
8
10
13
18
6
16
NR
14
NR
NR
20
19
12
Introductory Element
TABLE 1.27
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'S LARGEST EMPLOYERS (2004)
Firm/Company
School District of Indian
River County
Indian River County
Indian River Memorial
Hospital
Publix Supermarkets
The New Piper Aircraft
Hale Indian River Groves
City of Vero Beach
Sebastian River Medical
Center
Wal-Mart
John s Island
Winn-Dixie
Indian River Estates
Gracewood Fruit Packing
Visiting Nurse Association
Grand Harbor Management
Disney's Vero Beach
Resort
Macho Products, Inc./MDI
Flight Safety Intemational
Graves Brothers
Dodgertown Complex
Sun Ag, Inc.
Source: IRC Chamber of Commerce (2004)
Community Development Department
Supplement 11 • Ordinance 2005-
NAICS Major Group
Educational Services (NAICS 61)
Public Administration (NAICS 92)
Health Care and Social Assistance (NAICS 62)
Food and Beverage Stores (NAICS 445)
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing (NAICS 336)
Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting (NAICS 11)
Public Administration (NAICS 92)
Health Care and Social Assistance (NAICS 62)
General Merchandise Stores (NAICS 452)
Accommodation (NAICS 721)
Food and Beverage Stores (NAICS 445)
Health Care and Social Assistance (NAICS 62)
Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting (NAILS 1 1)
Health Care and Social Assistance (NAICS 62)
Construction (NAICS 23)
Accommodation (NAICS 721)
Manufacturing (NAICS 31-33)
Educational Services (NAICS 611)
Technical and Trade Schools (NAICS 61 15)
Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting (NAICS 11)
Crop Production (NAICS 111)
Performing Arts, Spectator Sports, and Related Industries
(NAILS 711)
Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting (NAICS 11)
29
Total
2,027
1,373
931
688
500
607
500
540
500
440
306
700
332
290
375
200
199
190
177
120
Employees
2,027
1,373
769
N/A
688
175
555
500
0
250
120
160
140
142
NA
270
200
153
65
92
120
Indian River County
0
72
604
N/A
N/A
325
52
0
0
250
320
146
560
190
NA
75
0
47
125
85
0
VP
Comprehensive Plan
APPENDIX A
Year
1960
1970
1980
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Age
Under 5
6-19
20-64
65+
Introductory Element
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PREVIOUS, PRESENT AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS
Population
25,309
35,992
59,896
125,588
158,744
175,322
208,478
# Increase
23,904
16,578
16,578
16,578
16,578
0/0 Increase
Seasonal
20,579
28,863
35,158
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POPULATION
Age distribution (2000)
Median Age (2000)
Number
Community Development Department
Supplement #; Ordinance 2005 -
Percent
30
Age
White
Black
Other
Effective
122,806
137,632
208,345
225,986
243,636
Racial Composition (2000)
Number
98,754
Percent
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan
Elementary
Secondary
College
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (2000)
Grades
0-8
9-12, no diploma
12
16+
Income (1999)
Median Household
Income
Median Family Income
# of Households
(2000):
$39,635
$46,385
Community Development Department
Supplement #_; Ordinance 2005-
31
Persons
24,572
24,835
19,533
Introductory Element
Percentage
Poverty (1999)
overt 10,325
Persons below p y
level
Average Household
Size (2000)
Indian River County