Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-018ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b)1 requires an annual review and update of the County's Capital Improvements Element; and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3187(1)(f) allows the County, by ordinance, to amend its capital improvements element once per year outside of the standard twice a year amendment limitation threshold and do so through only one adoption public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County advertised :for a Public Hearing to Consider Adopting an Ordinance Amending the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1) and (c); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held an Adoption Public Hearing on November 4, 2008, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; WHEREAS, action on the Capital Improvements Element was tabled until the November 18, 2008 Board of County Commissioners meeting in order to revise the element consistent with comments received at the November 4, 2008 Board of County Commissioners meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. Financial Feasibility The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed amendment of the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible. 1 of ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b)1 requires an annual review and update of the County's Capital Improvements Element; and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3187(1)(f) allows the County, by ordinance, to amend its capital improvements element once per year outside of the standard twice a year amendment limitation threshold and do so through only one adoption public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County advertised :for a Public Hearing to Consider Adopting an Ordinance Amending the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1) and (c); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held an Adoption Public Hearing on November 4, 2008, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; WHEREAS, action on the Capital Improvements Element was tabled until the November 18, 2008 Board of County Commissioners meeting in order to revise the element consistent with comments received at the November 4, 2008 Board of County Commissioners meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. Financial Feasibility The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed amendment of the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible. 1 of ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 SECTION 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 3 is hereby adopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. SECTION 3. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Amended Capital Improvements Element; (Exhibit A) SECTION 4. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 5. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance or these Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendments is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 6 Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18th day of November 2008. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 24th day of October, 2008, for a public hearing held on the 4th day of November, 2008, at which time the Board of County Commissioners decided to continue the public hearing to November 18, 2008, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Wheeler seconded by Commissioner 0' Bryan , and adopted by the following vote: sley S. Davis Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Gary C Wheeler Peter D. O'Brayn Bob Solari AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 SECTION 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 3 is hereby adopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. SECTION 3. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Amended Capital Improvements Element; (Exhibit A) SECTION 4. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 5. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance or these Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendments is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 6 Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18th day of November 2008. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 24th day of October, 2008, for a public hearing held on the 4th day of November, 2008, at which time the Board of County Commissioners decided to continue the public hearing to November 18, 2008, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Wheeler seconded by Commissioner 0' Bryan , and adopted by the following vote: sley S. Davis Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Gary C Wheeler Peter D. O'Brayn Bob Solari AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 BOARD,OF- COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY• Fl escher Vi re Chairman ATTEST BY: i`�� °age/jA D, C • ter : Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this Lfr day of Fcy s �o,�y , 2008'1 Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this 1 2, day of Fe \pw ea,. , 200 at g ' li A.M.<Pt4tt and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Comity Co missioners of Indian River County, Florida. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Director F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlan Amendments\CIE\2008\Ordinance #2 Extra Lang - CIE.doc ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 BOARD OFP,cOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF. IN DIAN RiVERCOUNTY E. Flesther viceChairman .� 3%ea �,1 l 1,A; EI P � ,��.�; ATTEST BY:!'/�u�ii�r// mor : Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this Lfr day of Fc \,0 , 2098'1 Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this '1 2 day of ire 1pw . / , 200 at �' OD A.MJ.Mtt Pand filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Comity Co missioners of Indian River County, Florida. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS J 911 Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Director F:\Community Development \ Users \LONG RANGE\CompPlan Amendments \CIE120081Ordinance 42 Extra Lang - CIE.doc 3 of 3 n e Iv -1 r5 lei r1 rn , iv Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Exhibit A n e Iv -1 r5 lei r1 rn , iv Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Exhibit A Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures List of Tables Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 2 Financial Resources 2 Expenditures 19 Existing Outstanding Debt 23 Local Policies and Practices 24 Analysis 28 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements 28 Needs Assessment 36 Fiscal Assessment 38 Fiscal Assessment Summary 46 Concurrency Management Plan 46 Project Applicability 46 Service Standards 47 Demand 48 Availability of Capacity 50 Regulation 53 Monitoring System 53 Applicability 55 Goal, Objectives and Policies 56 Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring 65 Implementation 65 Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures 67 APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 70 APPENDIX B: PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 87 APPENDIX C: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN 88 APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 91 APPENDIX E • SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE 94 Community Development Department Indian River County 1 Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures List of Tables Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 2 Financial Resources 2 Expenditures 19 Existing Outstanding Debt 23 Local Policies and Practices 24 Analysis 28 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements 28 Needs Assessment 36 Fiscal Assessment 38 Fiscal Assessment Summary 46 Concurrency Management Plan 46 Project Applicability 46 Service Standards 47 Demand 48 Availability of Capacity 50 Regulation 53 Monitoring System 53 Applicability 55 Goal, Objectives and Policies 56 Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring 65 Implementation 65 Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures 67 APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 70 APPENDIX B: PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 87 APPENDIX C: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN 88 APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 91 APPENDIX E • SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE 94 Community Development Department Indian River County 1 Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element List of Figures Figure Title Page 6.1 Ad Valorem Tax Revenue 3 6.2 Enterprise Fund Revenue 3 6.3 User Fees and Charges 4 6.4 Special Assessment Revenue 5 6.5 Impact Fee Revenue 5 6.6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax 6 6.7 Tourist Development Tax 7 6.8 Local Option Fuel Tax 9 6.9 Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue 10 6.10 Half -Cent Local Government Sales Tax 13 6.11 County Revenue Sharing 14 6.12 Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds 15 6.13 County Fuel Tax 15 6.14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax 16 6.15 Mobile Home License Tax 17 6.16 Distribution of Revenue by Category 19 6.17 General Expenditures by Function 22 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures 38 Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 11 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element List of Figures Figure Title Page 6.1 Ad Valorem Tax Revenue 3 6.2 Enterprise Fund Revenue 3 6.3 User Fees and Charges 4 6.4 Special Assessment Revenue 5 6.5 Impact Fee Revenue 5 6.6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax 6 6.7 Tourist Development Tax 7 6.8 Local Option Fuel Tax 9 6.9 Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue 10 6.10 Half -Cent Local Government Sales Tax 13 6.11 County Revenue Sharing 14 6.12 Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds 15 6.13 County Fuel Tax 15 6.14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax 16 6.15 Mobile Home License Tax 17 6.16 Distribution of Revenue by Category 19 6.17 General Expenditures by Function 22 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures 38 Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 11 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element List of Tables Table Title Page 6.1 Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 05/06) 2 6.2 Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities 8 6.3 Local Fuel Tax Rates 10 6.4 Indian River General Revenues by Source 18 6.5 Indian River County Expenditures by Function 20 6.6 Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt 24 6.7 Overall General Revenue Projection Summary 31 6.8 Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element 32 6.9 Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections 32 6.10 Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects Removed from the 5 Year CIP 34 6.11 Concurrency Links Report for Priority Transportation Projects with Construction Start Date Extended 36 6.12 Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County 37 6.13 Indian River County General Expenditures Piojection Summary 39 6.14 Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste 40 6.15 Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections 40 6.16 Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without 41 Public Vote 6.17 Indian River County Bond Schedule 42 6.18 Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities 47 6.19 Monitoring System Design 54 6.20 Monitoring System Tasks 54 6.21 Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix 66 6.22 Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix 68 Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 iii Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element List of Tables Table Title Page 6.1 Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 05/06) 2 6.2 Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities 8 6.3 Local Fuel Tax Rates 10 6.4 Indian River General Revenues by Source 18 6.5 Indian River County Expenditures by Function 20 6.6 Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt 24 6.7 Overall General Revenue Projection Summary 31 6.8 Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element 32 6.9 Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections 32 6.10 Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects Removed from the 5 Year CIP 34 6.11 Concurrency Links Report for Priority Transportation Projects with Construction Start Date Extended 36 6.12 Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County 37 6.13 Indian River County General Expenditures Piojection Summary 39 6.14 Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste 40 6.15 Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections 40 6.16 Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without 41 Public Vote 6.17 Indian River County Bond Schedule 42 6.18 Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities 47 6.19 Monitoring System Design 54 6.20 Monitoring System Tasks 54 6.21 Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix 66 6.22 Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix 68 Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 iii Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Introduction The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to be funded This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements based on the level of need and the availability of funds For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $25,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards or to meet objectives identified m the county s comprehensive plan Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive.plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the concurrency management section, while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 1 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Introduction The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to be funded This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements based on the level of need and the availability of funds For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $25,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards or to meet objectives identified m the county s comprehensive plan Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive.plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the concurrency management section, while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 1 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Existing Conditions Financial Resources One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6 1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2006/07. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources. Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2006/07) ederalSources State Sources Local Sources , Amount ($1,000) % of Total Revenue Amount ($1,000) % of Total Revenue Amount ($1,000) % of Total Revenue Various Grants $14,438 5.00% Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax $8,123 2.81% Ad Valorem Taxes $99,687 34.51% Total Federal $14,438 5.00% County Revenue Sharing $3,084 1.07% Enterprise Funds $46,114 15.96% Constitutional Fuel Tax $1'716 0.59% User Fees and Charges $18,998 6.58% County Fuel Tax $757 026% Special Assessments $494 0.17% Alcoholic Beverage License Tax $54 0.02%Impact Fees $7,007 2.43% Pari-Mutuel Tax $447 0.15% Local Discretionary Sales Surtax $14,550 5.04% Mobile Home License Tax $109 0.04% Tourist Development Tax 81,449 0.50% Various Grants $25,106 8.69% Local Option Fuel Tax $3,290 1.14% Total State $39,396 13.64% Franchise Tax $9,733 3.37% Interest Income $24,987 8.65% Other $8,734 3.02% Total Local $235,043 81,36% Total All Sources $288.877 100% Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 2 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Existing Conditions Financial Resources One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6 1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2006/07. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources. Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2006/07) ederalSources State Sources Local Sources , Amount ($1,000) % of Total Revenue Amount ($1,000) % of Total Revenue Amount ($1,000) % of Total Revenue Various Grants $14,438 5.00% Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax $8,123 2.81% Ad Valorem Taxes $99,687 34.51% Total Federal $14,438 5.00% County Revenue Sharing $3,084 1.07% Enterprise Funds $46,114 15.96% Constitutional Fuel Tax $1'716 0.59% User Fees and Charges $18,998 6.58% County Fuel Tax $757 026% Special Assessments $494 0.17% Alcoholic Beverage License Tax $54 0.02%Impact Fees $7,007 2.43% Pari-Mutuel Tax $447 0.15% Local Discretionary Sales Surtax $14,550 5.04% Mobile Home License Tax $109 0.04% Tourist Development Tax 81,449 0.50% Various Grants $25,106 8.69% Local Option Fuel Tax $3,290 1.14% Total State $39,396 13.64% Franchise Tax $9,733 3.37% Interest Income $24,987 8.65% Other $8,734 3.02% Total Local $235,043 81,36% Total All Sources $288.877 100% Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 2 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Local Sources Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. These local sources are shown in table 6.1, and are described in further detail below. • Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes) Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY 2006/07, Indian River County applied an aggregate millage rate of 5.36220. The Board of County Commissioners' policies allow revenue from ad valorem taxes to be used for both operating and capital project expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 2006/07, Indian River County collected approximately $99,687,000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem taxes represented 34.51% of all revenues collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, ad valorem tax revenue increased 75.04%. Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 -- $40,000 - $20,000 - $o $70,1341 $74,179 [$99,6871 $84,914 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Figure 6 2* Enterprise Fund Reserve $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 - $10,000 $50,238 $49,824 $o 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 3 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Local Sources Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. These local sources are shown in table 6.1, and are described in further detail below. • Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes) Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY 2006/07, Indian River County applied an aggregate millage rate of 5.36220. The Board of County Commissioners' policies allow revenue from ad valorem taxes to be used for both operating and capital project expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 2006/07, Indian River County collected approximately $99,687,000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem taxes represented 34.51% of all revenues collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, ad valorem tax revenue increased 75.04%. Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 -- $40,000 - $20,000 - $o $70,1341 $74,179 [$99,6871 $84,914 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Figure 6 2* Enterprise Fund Reserve $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 - $10,000 $50,238 $49,824 $o 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 3 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Enterprise Funds Within govermnental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title `enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division are enterprises. Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 15.96% of Indian River County's total source of fields for FY 2006/07. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 32.64%. • User Fees and Charges User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. User fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. h1 FY 2006/07, user fees and charges represented 6.58% of all funds collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, revenue from user fees and charges has varied, but overall increased 67.12%. Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $101000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 4 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Enterprise Funds Within govermnental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title `enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division are enterprises. Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 15.96% of Indian River County's total source of fields for FY 2006/07. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 32.64%. • User Fees and Charges User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. User fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. h1 FY 2006/07, user fees and charges represented 6.58% of all funds collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, revenue from user fees and charges has varied, but overall increased 67.12%. Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $101000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 4 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Special Assessments Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services; the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment. Special Assessment funds represented 0 17% of county funds for FY 2006/07 as shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years • Impact Fees An impact fee is a one time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of issuance of subdivision or site plan approval, issuance of a building permit, approval of a certificate of occupancy, or other development or construction approval when any portion of the revenues collected is intended to fund any portion of the costs of capital improvements for any public facilities. Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, hldian River County began to levy Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 m Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $- Figure 6.5. Impact Fee Revenue 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 0 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 5 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Special Assessments Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services; the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment. Special Assessment funds represented 0 17% of county funds for FY 2006/07 as shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years • Impact Fees An impact fee is a one time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of issuance of subdivision or site plan approval, issuance of a building permit, approval of a certificate of occupancy, or other development or construction approval when any portion of the revenues collected is intended to fund any portion of the costs of capital improvements for any public facilities. Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, hldian River County began to levy Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 m Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $- Figure 6.5. Impact Fee Revenue 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 0 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 5 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The current impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, paiks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings Figure 6.5 shows the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the eight new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates. In FY 2003/04, traffic impact fees represented 5.17% of funds collected by Indian River County. In contrast, traffic impact fees and the eight additional impact fees represented 14.31% of funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2004/05. Since FY 2004/05, impact fee funds have dramatically declined with the slowing economy. • Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Local governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, services, rentals, admissions and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000. Under this category, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or 1.0% and a School Capital Outlay Surtax of up to 0.5%. Currently, Indian River County imposes only the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax. Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 - $10,000 - $8,000 - $6,000 - $4,000 - $2,000 $ $11,400 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department The Local Goverment Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. This surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initiated by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection.. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 6 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The current impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, paiks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings Figure 6.5 shows the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the eight new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates. In FY 2003/04, traffic impact fees represented 5.17% of funds collected by Indian River County. In contrast, traffic impact fees and the eight additional impact fees represented 14.31% of funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2004/05. Since FY 2004/05, impact fee funds have dramatically declined with the slowing economy. • Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Local governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, services, rentals, admissions and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000. Under this category, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or 1.0% and a School Capital Outlay Surtax of up to 0.5%. Currently, Indian River County imposes only the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax. Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 - $10,000 - $8,000 - $6,000 - $4,000 - $2,000 $ $11,400 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department The Local Goverment Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. This surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initiated by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection.. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 6 Comprehensive Plan Capital Im rovements Element Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 5.04% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 27.63% over that period. Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population. Twenty of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St Lucie counties do not levy the surtax, while Mai tin County levies a 0.5% infrastructure surtax. Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%, which is another local discretionary sales surtax. • Tourist Development Tax Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax The transient rental trade is the primacy base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax. Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax as well as an additional one percent tax. Fifty-nine Florida counties out of sixty-seven total counties currently levy a tourist tax. Of those fifty-nine counties, forty-one counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax. Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie_Counties have the highest tourist tax levy of the Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 Revenue (in thousands) 2006 2007 Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 7 Comprehensive Plan Capital Im rovements Element Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 5.04% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 27.63% over that period. Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population. Twenty of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St Lucie counties do not levy the surtax, while Mai tin County levies a 0.5% infrastructure surtax. Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%, which is another local discretionary sales surtax. • Tourist Development Tax Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax The transient rental trade is the primacy base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax. Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax as well as an additional one percent tax. Fifty-nine Florida counties out of sixty-seven total counties currently levy a tourist tax. Of those fifty-nine counties, forty-one counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax. Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie_Counties have the highest tourist tax levy of the Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 Revenue (in thousands) 2006 2007 Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 7 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element six counties listed (5.0%). Indian River County and Martin County each have a tourist tax rate of 4.00%. Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy. Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook September 2008. The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county; (4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access; (5) Construct, improve, maintain and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000) Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 1.8, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 8 v S "J -' 6,2;1 yI Tonal TouristfTaxes o Transient Rental„Facilitis Table Q S t r County 1st f `R } 1U 1 1 0 Y` Or { a y r. Tourrst Taxi 0H 3;4 s z mal g, a; { r 4 i 11 ' '. Y ,Y9. x5{ tk X x l 'A. St4KF >Q h Tax izs = S Fy.fljTP'4'z Mon , , zf Y s`3 d t fG C4 4c S' < « s Z 1h 3 x f it "°SP S.Yt� ,rofessronalu5 , xx Sports Franchrsefr di 4K dT`{T +�� p�1+f or a* t rty iiSYd o Tax }. 4 4 q r 3 o- , °, i;i, ,S z a rProfessional x i 1 Yri .ass'' S1�ddltl + ,! atu. Sports, 1r s Franchise M1" 1 '#• TaA� . s 4`tyr onalFSl d i , ....>x4 „ t .,.. ;g1' SbX Maximum uko$ Potential„ Levy •FT 'S �v° /o s F �,, � £x'`� arEpi^L >� £ t • x 04 f �y k d1 } fi Total Levy Brevard 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00% Martin 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00% Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% - - - - 5.00% 3.00% Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% L00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook September 2008. The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county; (4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access; (5) Construct, improve, maintain and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000) Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 1.8, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 8 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element six counties listed (5.0%). Indian River County and Martin County each have a tourist tax rate of 4.00%. Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy. Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook September 2008. The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county; (4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access; (5) Construct, improve, maintain and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000) Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 1.8, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 8 v S "J -' 6,2;1 yI Tonal TouristfTaxes o Transient Rental„Facilitis Table Q S t r County 1st f `R } 1U 1 1 0 Y` Or { a y r. Tourrst Taxi 0H 3;4 s z mal g, a; { r 4 i 11 ' '. Y ,Y9. x5{{{ tk Y x l 'A, St4KF >Q h Tax izs = S Fy.fljTP'4'z Mon , , zf Y s`3 d t fG C4 4c S' < « s Z 1h 3 x f it "°SP S.Yt� ,rofessronalu5 , xx Sports Franchrsefr di 4K dT`{T +�� p�1+f or a* t rty iiSYd o Tax }. 4 4 q r 3 o- , °, i;i, ,S z a rProfessional x i 1 Yri .ass'' S1�ddltl + ,! atu. Sports, 1r s Franchise M1" 1 '#• TaA� . s 4`tyr onalFSl d i , ....>x4 „ t .,.. ;g1' SbX Maximum uko$ Potential„ Levy •FT 'S �v° /o s F �,, � £x'`� arEpi^L >� £ t • x 04 f �y k d1 } fi Total Levy Brevard 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00% Martin 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00% Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% - - - - 5.00% 3.00% Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% L00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook September 2008. The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county; (4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access; (5) Construct, improve, maintain and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000) Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 1.8, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 8 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element (6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations. Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of 2.77%. • Local Option Fuel Tax Local goverinnents are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. These levies are* ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. This tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county- wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.14% of all funds collected by Indian River County foi FY 2006/07. Figure 6.8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the county has decreased overall by 13.63% over the last six fiscal years. This is in part due to a significant increase that occurred in FY 2001/2002, and then a moderation in FY 2002/2003. That large increase in FY 2001/2002 shown in Figure 6.8, can be attributed to a delay in the county distributing funds to the municipalities. Because of a dispute over allocations, money from the prior fiscal year was held until the dispute was resolved. All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-five counties levy the full $0.06, while the remaining two counties levy a portion of the tax. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 9 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element (6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations. Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of 2.77%. • Local Option Fuel Tax Local goverinnents are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. These levies are* ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. This tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county- wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.14% of all funds collected by Indian River County foi FY 2006/07. Figure 6.8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the county has decreased overall by 13.63% over the last six fiscal years. This is in part due to a significant increase that occurred in FY 2001/2002, and then a moderation in FY 2002/2003. That large increase in FY 2001/2002 shown in Figure 6.8, can be attributed to a delay in the county distributing funds to the municipalities. Because of a dispute over allocations, money from the prior fiscal year was held until the dispute was resolved. All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-five counties levy the full $0.06, while the remaining two counties levy a portion of the tax. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 9 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon Those four counties impose the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax. Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Forty-nine of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax. Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. September 2008. As shown in table 6.3, four counties in the region, Martin County, Okeechobee County Palm Beach County, and St Lucie County, levy the entire One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel tax This second local option fuel tax is a one to five cent levy upon every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a county Indian River County can levy this second tax through an ordinance adopted by a majority plus one vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 - $2,000 - $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 p Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 10 ft�� Table l 6.3• 8�n � i.4 nt f ?x L?o°eaL Li'uel Tax a ct 4: °z'7 `'� tit *Rates & -'� f � a c F t � x xstr C� 'C Y'o Cour iF, , One Local to Stx v''i ; tl ®ption> Tax Cent s els 45 C��A f S �,�Cne �t Local IT to i E. ®ption we Cents .„ a Y x uel T ., Nmth ,Lf 5� 1� . F %IS , > CentMFue Tax 13 i fi � TotalxLocaFFue Ly Fk Y .w _ r ,• =Tax Brevard $0.06 $0.06 Indian River $0.06 $0.06 Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Palm Beach $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 St. Lucie $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. September 2008. As shown in table 6.3, four counties in the region, Martin County, Okeechobee County Palm Beach County, and St Lucie County, levy the entire One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel tax This second local option fuel tax is a one to five cent levy upon every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a county Indian River County can levy this second tax through an ordinance adopted by a majority plus one vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 - $2,000 - $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 p Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 10 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon Those four counties impose the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax. Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Forty-nine of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax. Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. September 2008. As shown in table 6.3, four counties in the region, Martin County, Okeechobee County Palm Beach County, and St Lucie County, levy the entire One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel tax This second local option fuel tax is a one to five cent levy upon every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a county Indian River County can levy this second tax through an ordinance adopted by a majority plus one vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 - $2,000 - $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 p Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 10 ft�� Table l 6.3• 8�n � i.4 nt f ?x L?o°eaL Li'uel Tax a ct 4: °z'7 `'� tit *Rates & -'� f � a c F t � x xstr C� 'C Y'o Cour iF, , One Local to Stx v''i ; tl ®ption> Tax Cent s els 45 C��A f S �,�Cne �t Local IT to i E. ®ption we Cents .„ a Y x uel T ., Nmth ,Lf 5� 1� . F %IS , > CentMFue Tax 13 i fi � TotalxLocaFFue Ly Fk Y .w _ r ,• =Tax Brevard $0.06 $0.06 Indian River $0.06 $0.06 Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Palm Beach $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 St. Lucie $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. September 2008. As shown in table 6.3, four counties in the region, Martin County, Okeechobee County Palm Beach County, and St Lucie County, levy the entire One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel tax This second local option fuel tax is a one to five cent levy upon every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a county Indian River County can levy this second tax through an ordinance adopted by a majority plus one vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 - $2,000 - $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 p Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 10 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Franchise Fee/Tax Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the giant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local govermnent's rights-of-way to conduct the utility s business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises. Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 3.37% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 67.90%. • Other Miscellaneous Revenue Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 3.02% of all funds collected in FY 2006/07. • Borrowing The county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating re\ enue and reasonable taxation. Borrowing money to pay for capital improvements can be done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market. The county may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non -ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum. General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county. These bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance. Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 11 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Franchise Fee/Tax Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the giant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local govermnent's rights-of-way to conduct the utility s business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises. Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 3.37% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 67.90%. • Other Miscellaneous Revenue Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 3.02% of all funds collected in FY 2006/07. • Borrowing The county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating re\ enue and reasonable taxation. Borrowing money to pay for capital improvements can be done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market. The county may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non -ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum. General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county. These bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance. Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 11 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non -ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations. In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. Revenue bonds have been issued by the Housing Authority to help finance the provision of more low-income housing units.in the county. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt. Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Pioceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum. Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid -off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal. The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes. • Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax. Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds Authorized Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 12 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non -ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations. In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. Revenue bonds have been issued by the Housing Authority to help finance the provision of more low-income housing units.in the county. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt. Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Pioceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum. Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid -off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal. The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes. • Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax. Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds Authorized Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 12 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing operating, and maintaining atransportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads. The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less, within Indian River County. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility. State Sources Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by the state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below. • Local Govertunent Half -Cent Sales Tax The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.814% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; this account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of these monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies this factor by 8.814% of the sales tax proceeds received for the county. In FY 2006/07, Indian River County received $8,123,000 through the half -cent sales tax. Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $51000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 13 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing operating, and maintaining atransportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads. The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less, within Indian River County. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility. State Sources Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by the state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below. • Local Govertunent Half -Cent Sales Tax The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.814% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; this account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of these monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies this factor by 8.814% of the sales tax proceeds received for the county. In FY 2006/07, Indian River County received $8,123,000 through the half -cent sales tax. Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $51000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 13 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element As shown in table 6.1, that amount represented 2.81% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2006/07 fiscal year Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half -cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County's half -cent sales tax revenue increased 17.44%. Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments aie allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs. • County Revenue Sharing The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. These sources include 2 90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.044% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding these funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness. To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria: (1) That law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements; Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing $3,500 $31000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- 121 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department (2) That certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue; (3) That the county's most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 14 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element As shown in table 6.1, that amount represented 2.81% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2006/07 fiscal year Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half -cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County's half -cent sales tax revenue increased 17.44%. Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments aie allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs. • County Revenue Sharing The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. These sources include 2 90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.044% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding these funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness. To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria: (1) That law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements; Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing $3,500 $31000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- 121 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department (2) That certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue; (3) That the county's most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 14 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.07% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county revenue sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall increased by 30.13%. • Constitutional Fuel Tax Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida) of motor fuel Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler. In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state -shared revenue source for counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.59% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 11.00%. • County Fuel Tax FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 $1,450 $1,400 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department $800 $780 $760 $740 $720 $700 $680 $660 $640 Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 15 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.07% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county revenue sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall increased by 30.13%. • Constitutional Fuel Tax Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida) of motor fuel Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler. In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state -shared revenue source for counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.59% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 11.00%. • County Fuel Tax FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 $1,450 $1,400 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department $800 $780 $760 $740 $720 $700 $680 $660 $640 Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 15 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element used by a county for transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.26% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 10.19%. • Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distnbutors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local govermnents by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation. Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $54,000 from this tax in FY 2006/07, 0.02% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by In.dia.n River County fluctuated, but overall remained about the same. • Pari- Mutuel Tax Revenue generated through license fees and taxes related to Pari-Mutuel betting is deposited into the Pari-Mutuel wagering trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is deducted from the trust fund for equal distributions among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county s general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Pari-Mutuel tax represented 0.15% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 16 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element used by a county for transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.26% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 10.19%. • Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distnbutors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local govermnents by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation. Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $54,000 from this tax in FY 2006/07, 0.02% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by In.dia.n River County fluctuated, but overall remained about the same. • Pari- Mutuel Tax Revenue generated through license fees and taxes related to Pari-Mutuel betting is deposited into the Pari-Mutuel wagering trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is deducted from the trust fund for equal distributions among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county s general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Pari-Mutuel tax represented 0.15% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 16 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Mobile Home License Tax An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth -wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles with proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00 with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Horne Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Tiust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the mobile home license tax represented 0.04% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.15 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased overall by 13.22%. • Various Grants Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 p Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 8.69% of funds received by the county in FY 2006/07. State grant funds received by the county in FY 2006/07 originated from the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida Department of State Division of Library Services, the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, the State of Florida Department of Management Services, the State of Florida Department of Revenue, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 17 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • Mobile Home License Tax An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth -wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles with proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00 with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Horne Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Tiust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the mobile home license tax represented 0.04% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Figure 6.15 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased overall by 13.22%. • Various Grants Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 p Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 8.69% of funds received by the county in FY 2006/07. State grant funds received by the county in FY 2006/07 originated from the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida Department of State Division of Library Services, the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, the State of Florida Department of Management Services, the State of Florida Department of Revenue, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 17 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Federal Sources Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant. During FY 2006/07, the county received approximately $14,438,000 in federal funds. These funds represented 5.00% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Overall Revenue Sources As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years 2001/2002 through 2006/07. Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 18 Table 6 `4 IndIan R><ver County E` eneral°Revenues t.r;. .r.m;. 1r., Source ., .. I3y Fiscal Year { Taxes Licenses Permits & = In ergovernmenta 1 Revenue;. r Charges Services for• ” ; Forfeitures u es & M us scellaneo Revenues Totals 2001/02 $80,488,343 $515,653 $20,802,982 $11,368,399 $1,421,542 $11,600,449 $126,197,368 2002/03 $86,120,084 $567,403 $35,213,140 $13,683,108 $1,584,737 $9,703,817 $146,872,289 2003/04 $95,675,370 $1,033,394 $26,588,303 $14,282,587 $1,508,786 $14,545,961 $153,634,401 2004/05 $104,012,925 $1,354,282 $35,973,818 $18,151,546 $1,715,875 $42,170,294 $203,378,740 2005/06 $116,088,548 $1,274,638 $38,261,489 $18,204,600 $2,069,593 $40,182,777 $216,081,645 2006/07 $130,158,069 $896,612 $54,252,074 $18,997,529 $2,403,093 $26,773,753 $233,481,130 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 18 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Federal Sources Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant. During FY 2006/07, the county received approximately $14,438,000 in federal funds. These funds represented 5.00% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2006/07. Overall Revenue Sources As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years 2001/2002 through 2006/07. Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 18 Table 6 `4 IndIan R><ver County E` eneral°Revenues t.r;. .r.m;. 1r., Source ., .. I3y Fiscal Year { Taxes Licenses Permits & = In ergovernmenta 1 Revenue;. r Charges Services for• ” ; Forfeitures u es & M us scellaneo Revenues Totals 2001/02 $80,488,343 $515,653 $20,802,982 $11,368,399 $1,421,542 $11,600,449 $126,197,368 2002/03 $86,120,084 $567,403 $35,213,140 $13,683,108 $1,584,737 $9,703,817 $146,872,289 2003/04 $95,675,370 $1,033,394 $26,588,303 $14,282,587 $1,508,786 $14,545,961 $153,634,401 2004/05 $104,012,925 $1,354,282 $35,973,818 $18,151,546 $1,715,875 $42,170,294 $203,378,740 2005/06 $116,088,548 $1,274,638 $38,261,489 $18,204,600 $2,069,593 $40,182,777 $216,081,645 2006/07 $130,158,069 $896,612 $54,252,074 $18,997,529 $2,403,093 $26,773,753 $233,481,130 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 18 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 9.19% 1.13% 9.01% 16.48% Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category 2004 62.27% 2002 63.78% 2003 58 64% 2005 51.14% Taxes Charges for Services 9.32% 2006 53.72% 0.39% 18.60% 0.96% 8-.42% Licenses & Permits • Fines & Forfeitures 9.30% 2007 55.75% kir 0.59% --- 23.24% 11 0.38% 17.71% 1.03% 8.14% o Intergovernmental Revenue 9 Miscellaneous Revenues Expenditures In the previous sub -section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by hldian River County were reviewed. This sub -section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the county's needs Table 6 5 presents the county' s overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 2001/2002 through 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 19 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 9.19% 1.13% 9.01% 16.48% Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category 2004 62.27% 2002 63.78% 2003 58 64% 2005 51.14% Taxes Charges for Services 9.32% 2006 53.72% 0.39% 18.60% 0.96% 8-.42% Licenses & Permits • Fines & Forfeitures 9.30% 2007 55.75% kir 0.59% --- 23.24% 11 0.38% 17.71% 1.03% 8.14% o Intergovernmental Revenue 9 Miscellaneous Revenues Expenditures In the previous sub -section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by hldian River County were reviewed. This sub -section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the county's needs Table 6 5 presents the county' s overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 2001/2002 through 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 19 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ource: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county s activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the Last six fiscal years. General Government A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $59,527,672 was spent on general government services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, general government expenditures increased by 194.28%. General government services represented 21.46% of all county expenses in FY 2005/06. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail. Public Safety The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2006/07, spent $73,275,110 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, public safety expenditures increased by 9.39%. Since FY 2001/02, public safety expenditures have increased by 61 57%. Public safety represented 26.42% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 20 Table 6 5 IndianRitiei i Count General'Gove'"k FrnenN t ale Yi, s�"a a r 7: r w m Exendtiires p3` wy m ` ,Function' Y k Fiscal Year` ...'w X200"1/02 , 2002/03,2003/04; w 2004/055, 2Q0$/,v06,. t, , 20'06/07r General Government rn $20,228,495.00 $23,785,570.00 $26,473,300.00 $26,797,183.00 $56,232,514 $59,527,672 Public Safety $45,352,323.00 $47,565,048.00 $55,792,130.00 $57,161,390.00 $66,984,420 $73,275,110 Physical Environment $2,667,619.00 $18,587,122.00 $3,305,670.00 $4,573,196.00 $9,498,973 $35,044,820 Transportation $22,729,769.00 $20,120,969.00 $23,038,234.00 $22,369,128.00 $31,966,926 $55,039,978 Economic Environment $347,096.00 $583,850.00 $627,914.00 $712,517.00 $1,054,239 $968,227 Human Services $5,832,441.00 $6,540,673.00 $7,197,342.00 $7,279,582.00 $12,470,222 $13,862,463 Culture/Recreation $19,323,355.00 $23,253,841.00 $15,022,196.00 $21,359,218.00 $16,919,464 $24,904,678 Court Related $5,802,798.00 $5,998,260.00 $6,210,614.00 $5,630,734.00 $5,915,727 $6,649,724 Debt Service $3,850,379.00 $4,520,637.00 $3,727,534.00 $3,495,500.00 $4,406,090 $8,126,643 TOTAL $126,134,275.00 $150,955,970.00 $141,394,934.00 $149,378,448.00 $205,448,575.00 $277,399,315.00 ource: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county s activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the Last six fiscal years. General Government A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $59,527,672 was spent on general government services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, general government expenditures increased by 194.28%. General government services represented 21.46% of all county expenses in FY 2005/06. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail. Public Safety The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2006/07, spent $73,275,110 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, public safety expenditures increased by 9.39%. Since FY 2001/02, public safety expenditures have increased by 61 57%. Public safety represented 26.42% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 20 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ource: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county s activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the Last six fiscal years. General Government A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $59,527,672 was spent on general government services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, general government expenditures increased by 194.28%. General government services represented 21.46% of all county expenses in FY 2005/06. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail. Public Safety The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2006/07, spent $73,275,110 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, public safety expenditures increased by 9.39%. Since FY 2001/02, public safety expenditures have increased by 61 57%. Public safety represented 26.42% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 20 Table 6 5 IndianRitiei i Count General'Gove'"k FrnenN t ale Yi, s�"a a r 7: r w m Exendtiires p3` wy m ` ,Function' Y k Fiscal Year` ...'w X200"1/02 , 2002/03,2003/04; w 2004/055, 2Q0$/,v06,. t, , 20'06/07r General Government rn $20,228,495.00 $23,785,570.00 $26,473,300.00 $26,797,183.00 $56,232,514 $59,527,672 Public Safety $45,352,323.00 $47,565,048.00 $55,792,130.00 $57,161,390.00 $66,984,420 $73,275,110 Physical Environment $2,667,619.00 $18,587,122.00 $3,305,670.00 $4,573,196.00 $9,498,973 $35,044,820 Transportation $22,729,769.00 $20,120,969.00 $23,038,234.00 $22,369,128.00 $31,966,926 $55,039,978 Economic Environment $347,096.00 $583,850.00 $627,914.00 $712,517.00 $1,054,239 $968,227 Human Services $5,832,441.00 $6,540,673.00 $7,197,342.00 $7,279,582.00 $12,470,222 $13,862,463 Culture/Recreation $19,323,355.00 $23,253,841.00 $15,022,196.00 $21,359,218.00 $16,919,464 $24,904,678 Court Related $5,802,798.00 $5,998,260.00 $6,210,614.00 $5,630,734.00 $5,915,727 $6,649,724 Debt Service $3,850,379.00 $4,520,637.00 $3,727,534.00 $3,495,500.00 $4,406,090 $8,126,643 TOTAL $126,134,275.00 $150,955,970.00 $141,394,934.00 $149,378,448.00 $205,448,575.00 $277,399,315.00 ource: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2007 Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county s activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the Last six fiscal years. General Government A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $59,527,672 was spent on general government services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, general government expenditures increased by 194.28%. General government services represented 21.46% of all county expenses in FY 2005/06. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail. Public Safety The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2006/07, spent $73,275,110 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, public safety expenditures increased by 9.39%. Since FY 2001/02, public safety expenditures have increased by 61 57%. Public safety represented 26.42% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 20 Comprehensive Plan Physical Environment Capital Improvements Element This classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (S WDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $35,044,820 was spent on these activities in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, physical environment expenditures increased by 268 93%. Since FY2001/02, physical enviromnent expenditures have increased by 1,213.71%. Physical enviromnent services represented 12.63% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Transportation Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. These departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $55,039,978 on transportation facilities in FY 2006/07. Since FY 2001/02, transportation expenditures have increased by 142.15%. Transportation expenses represented 19.84% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Economic Environment Included in this category are the costs of providing services; which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this function. Table 6.5 shows that those agencies spent $968,227 on economic environment services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, economic environment expenditures decreased by 8.16%. Since FY 2001/02, economic environment expenditures have increased by 178.95% Economic enviromnent expenses represented 0.35% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Human Services Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the county spent $13,862,463 on human services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, human services expenditures increased by 11.16%. Since FY 2001/02, human services expenditures have increased by 137.68%. Human services represented 5% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 21 Comprehensive Plan Physical Environment Capital Improvements Element This classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (S WDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $35,044,820 was spent on these activities in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, physical environment expenditures increased by 268 93%. Since FY2001/02, physical enviromnent expenditures have increased by 1,213.71%. Physical enviromnent services represented 12.63% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Transportation Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. These departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $55,039,978 on transportation facilities in FY 2006/07. Since FY 2001/02, transportation expenditures have increased by 142.15%. Transportation expenses represented 19.84% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Economic Environment Included in this category are the costs of providing services; which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this function. Table 6.5 shows that those agencies spent $968,227 on economic environment services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, economic environment expenditures decreased by 8.16%. Since FY 2001/02, economic environment expenditures have increased by 178.95% Economic enviromnent expenses represented 0.35% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Human Services Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the county spent $13,862,463 on human services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, human services expenditures increased by 11.16%. Since FY 2001/02, human services expenditures have increased by 137.68%. Human services represented 5% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 21 39.2% Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 2001 Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function 2004 39.5% o General Government Transportation Culture/Recreation 2002 2.1% 18.0% 16.0% 3.1 % 4.6% 2005 38.3% Public Safety Economic Environment 15.8% 2003 31.5% 12.3% 27.4% 2.1% 0 ° 8.2°.6.0700 2006 32.6% 4:6% 0.5% 15.6% o Physical Environment 0 Human Services All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $24,904,678 on these services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, cultural/recreation expenditures increased by 47.20%. Since FY 2001/02, cultural/recreation expenditures have incl eased by 28.88%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 8.98% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Court Related All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from this category totaled $6,649,724 in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, Court Related expenditures increased by 12.41%. Beginning in FY 1997/1998, the State of Florida mandated that the county begin recording Court Related costs as a separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented 2.40% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 22 39.2% Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 2001 Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function 2004 39.5% o General Government Transportation Culture/Recreation 2002 2.1% 18.0% 16.0% 3.1 % 4.6% 2005 38.3% Public Safety Economic Environment 15.8% 2003 31.5% 12.3% 27.4% 2.1% 0 ° 8.2°.6.0700 2006 32.6% 4:6% 0.5% 15.6% o Physical Environment 0 Human Services All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $24,904,678 on these services in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, cultural/recreation expenditures increased by 47.20%. Since FY 2001/02, cultural/recreation expenditures have incl eased by 28.88%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 8.98% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Court Related All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from this category totaled $6,649,724 in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, Court Related expenditures increased by 12.41%. Beginning in FY 1997/1998, the State of Florida mandated that the county begin recording Court Related costs as a separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented 2.40% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 22 Comprehensive Plan Debt Service Capital Improvements Element Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total county debt service expenditures were $8,126,643 in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, debt service expenditures increased by 84.44%. Since FY 2001/02, debt service expenditures have increased by 111.06%. Debt service expenses represented 2.93% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Existing Outstanding Debt At the end of FY 2007/08, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $127,765,000. This is shown in table 6.6. In 1993, the county took advantage of lower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings. Enterprise Funds support 57.9% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 44.17% and Golf Course 13.74%), leaving $57,160,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Enviionmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility. Two bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993 Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional S50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. Finally, the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 23 Comprehensive Plan Debt Service Capital Improvements Element Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total county debt service expenditures were $8,126,643 in FY 2006/07. Between fiscal years 2005/06 and 2006/07, debt service expenditures increased by 84.44%. Since FY 2001/02, debt service expenditures have increased by 111.06%. Debt service expenses represented 2.93% of all county expenses in FY 2006/07. Existing Outstanding Debt At the end of FY 2007/08, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $127,765,000. This is shown in table 6.6. In 1993, the county took advantage of lower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings. Enterprise Funds support 57.9% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 44.17% and Golf Course 13.74%), leaving $57,160,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Enviionmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility. Two bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993 Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional S50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. Finally, the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 23 i Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ource: Indian River County Budget 2008/09. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 24 ° v z Table 4� r 6 r 6: IndtanR"rver2ounty Y a i •. g 4is kst Existing Long Term==Debt la ,} tV z aVL d '` r ! y i ... i .._ Amount Fi nal• f: . r a. tin dit k �" t t Amount r Re is,019 n° 09/30%08' ti M� �., r ,Average'i .. 4 Interest Rate x ....n `� .fid Mit Final a ur�ty • � n > dhR ng ° a . Security Pledge; 3 M . ,, , ,. ,-,. Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds: 1993 A Series $47,190,000 $32,695,000 5.76% 2024 AAA/FGIC (Insured) Water &Sewer Revenues 2005 Series $27,675,000 $24,670,000 3.94% 2022 AAA/FGIC (Insured) Water & Sewer Revenues Recreation Revenue Bonds 2003 Series Refunding Recreational Revenue $6,455,000 $4,175,000 3.65% 2016 AAA/AMAC (Insured) Golf Course Net Income, Fronton Revenue and Subordinate Lien on One Half Cent Sales Tax 2001 Series Spring Training Facility 816,810,000 $13,455,000 4 87% 2031 AAA/FGIC (Insured) State payments, fourth cent tourist development tax, and half -cent sales tax Voted G.O. Bonds Environmental Lands Acquisition 2003 Series $7,800,000 $2,380,000 2.05% 2010 AAA/AMAC (Insured) General Obligation Environmental Lands Acquisition 2001 Series $11,000,000 $6,675,000 3.89% 2016 AAA/FSA (Insured) General Obligation Environmental Lands Acquisition 2006 Series $48,600,000 $43,715,000 -4.22% 2021 AAA/MBIA (Insured) General Obligation Total Bonds Outstanding $127,765,000 ource: Indian River County Budget 2008/09. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 24 i Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ource: Indian River County Budget 2008/09. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 24 ° v z Table 4� r 6 r 6: IndtanR"rver2ounty Y a i •. g 4is kst Existing Long Term==Debt la ,} tV z aVL d '` r ! y i ... i .._ Amount Fi nal• f: . r a. tin dit k �" t t Amount r Re is,019 n° 09/30%08' ti M� �., r ,Average'i .. 4 Interest Rate x ....n `� .fid Mit Final a ur�ty • � n > dhR ng ° a . Security Pledge; 3 M . ,, , ,. ,-,. Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds: 1993 A Series $47,190,000 $32,695,000 5.76% 2024 AAA/FGIC (Insured) Water &Sewer Revenues 2005 Series $27,675,000 $24,670,000 3.94% 2022 AAA/FGIC (Insured) Water & Sewer Revenues Recreation Revenue Bonds 2003 Series Refunding Recreational Revenue $6,455,000 $4,175,000 3.65% 2016 AAA/AMAC (Insured) Golf Course Net Income, Fronton Revenue and Subordinate Lien on One Half Cent Sales Tax 2001 Series Spring Training Facility 816,810,000 $13,455,000 4 87% 2031 AAA/FGIC (Insured) State payments, fourth cent tourist development tax, and half -cent sales tax Voted G.O. Bonds Environmental Lands Acquisition 2003 Series $7,800,000 $2,380,000 2.05% 2010 AAA/AMAC (Insured) General Obligation Environmental Lands Acquisition 2001 Series $11,000,000 $6,675,000 3.89% 2016 AAA/FSA (Insured) General Obligation Environmental Lands Acquisition 2006 Series $48,600,000 $43,715,000 -4.22% 2021 AAA/MBIA (Insured) General Obligation Total Bonds Outstanding $127,765,000 ource: Indian River County Budget 2008/09. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 24 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Existing Level -of -Service Standards Level -of -service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility Level -of -service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. Level -of -service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level -of -service standards for capital facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide) 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Schools (School Service Area): Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 25 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Existing Level -of -Service Standards Level -of -service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility Level -of -service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. Level -of -service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level -of -service standards for capital facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide) 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Schools (School Service Area): Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 25 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year ➢ Stormwater Management • • • • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads All drainage basins will meet the following level -of -service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour stoim event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event ➢ Transportation (Roadways) • Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service `B" plus 20%: • 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave - Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida hltrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C' is adopted for urban areas. ➢ Transit • One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes Level -of -service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan Element. Capital Improvements Program A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs In Indian River County, the CIP Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 26 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year ➢ Stormwater Management • • • • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads All drainage basins will meet the following level -of -service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour stoim event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event ➢ Transportation (Roadways) • Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service `B" plus 20%: • 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave - Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida hltrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C' is adopted for urban areas. ➢ Transit • One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes Level -of -service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan Element. Capital Improvements Program A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs In Indian River County, the CIP Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 26 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element identifies the projects that the county plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources aie sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years. Impact Fees/Capacity Charges Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county uses for implementing the CIE Currently, the county has nine impact fees in place; these are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building department services, and utility services as enterprise funds As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 27 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element identifies the projects that the county plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources aie sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years. Impact Fees/Capacity Charges Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county uses for implementing the CIE Currently, the county has nine impact fees in place; these are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building department services, and utility services as enterprise funds As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 27 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elem services further fromurban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas. Analysis The analysis section of this element assesses the county's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the county' s fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development. As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included. Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewei Sub -Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff's office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Librai les, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation ss stem, the Tiansportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements. Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county's comprehensive plan, the county provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system. Using the county's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the county's water and wastewater connection matrix in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of the new development. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 28 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elem services further fromurban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas. Analysis The analysis section of this element assesses the county's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the county' s fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development. As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included. Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewei Sub -Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff's office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Librai les, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation ss stem, the Tiansportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements. Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county's comprehensive plan, the county provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system. Using the county's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the county's water and wastewater connection matrix in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of the new development. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 28 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. This is accomplished by implementing and enforcing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensure that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future development. If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. This, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives. Appendix A constitutes the county's five year schedule of capital improvements. This CIP is important to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service. Besides implementing the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE. Projected Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period have been calculated. These revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for this process, historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams were considered. This analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. This is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section. While the historical data shows a solid increase in most revenue sources in the most recent five- year period, estimates going forward show a decrease for the first couple years followed by moderate increases. This is consistent with an anticipated economic slowdown in the near future followed by a moderate recovery thereafter. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 29 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. This is accomplished by implementing and enforcing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensure that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future development. If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. This, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives. Appendix A constitutes the county's five year schedule of capital improvements. This CIP is important to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service. Besides implementing the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE. Projected Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period have been calculated. These revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for this process, historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams were considered. This analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. This is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section. While the historical data shows a solid increase in most revenue sources in the most recent five- year period, estimates going forward show a decrease for the first couple years followed by moderate increases. This is consistent with an anticipated economic slowdown in the near future followed by a moderate recovery thereafter. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 29 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances The analysis accounts for such differences. Gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a percentage basis like sales tax. Therefore, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. Property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues have additional behavioral characteristics that were considered in estimating future receipts. All such estimates were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues. The county's general revenues have been projected for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections. • Overall Projected Revenues Table 6.7 summarizes the county's projected overall revenues for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. These revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to decrease slightly over the next few fiscal years and increase by only 1.57% by fiscal year 2012/13. General revenue is projected to increase from $350,090,261 in FY 2008/09 to $355,599,000 in FY 2012/13. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 30 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances The analysis accounts for such differences. Gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a percentage basis like sales tax. Therefore, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. Property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues have additional behavioral characteristics that were considered in estimating future receipts. All such estimates were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues. The county's general revenues have been projected for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections. • Overall Projected Revenues Table 6.7 summarizes the county's projected overall revenues for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. These revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to decrease slightly over the next few fiscal years and increase by only 1.57% by fiscal year 2012/13. General revenue is projected to increase from $350,090,261 in FY 2008/09 to $355,599,000 in FY 2012/13. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 30 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources Earmarked projected transportation revenues are expected to increase by 47.94% over the next five fiscal years, from $24,086,000 in FY 2008/09 to $35,633,000 in FY 2012/13. Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 08/09 to FY 12/13, it is important to note that FY 08/09 transportation revenue is $30,704,701 less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2011/12 and fiscal year 2012/13 is froma planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 31 Ta e 6 7t eer:i a w 1, Gener" aI Revenue :S aetah ProjectiomSummary= x S.. :4 ,.. 2008109 S! " 2009110 2010/1la 2011/12 201, & TOTAL Taxes $117,638,104 $111,168,000 $112,836,000 $115,657,000 $118,548,000 $575,847,104 Licenses & Permits $9,267,500 $8,758,000 $8,889,000 $9,111,000 $9,339,000 $45,364,500 Intergovern- ment $22,437,944 $21,204,000 $21,522,000 $22,060,000 $22,612,000 $109,835,944 Charges for Services $5,373,322 $5,078,000 $5,154,000 $5,283,000 $5,415,000 $26,303,322 & $369,748 $349,000 $354,000 $363,000 $372,000 $1,807,748 Fines Forfeitures Interest &Misc. $10,288,783 $9,723,000 $9,869,000 $10,116,000 $10,369,000 $50,365,783 Other Sources $36,528,987 $34,520,000 $35,038,000 $35,914,000 $36,812,000 $178,812,987 Enterprise Funds: Charges Services for $61,323,693 $57,951,000 $58,820,000 $60,291,000 $61,798,000 $300,183,693 Other Sources $86,862,180 $83,285,000 $84,816,000 $83,599,000 $90,334,000 $428,896,180 TOTAL $350,090,261 $332,036,000 $337,298,000 $342,394,000 $355,599,000 $1,717,417,261 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources Earmarked projected transportation revenues are expected to increase by 47.94% over the next five fiscal years, from $24,086,000 in FY 2008/09 to $35,633,000 in FY 2012/13. Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 08/09 to FY 12/13, it is important to note that FY 08/09 transportation revenue is $30,704,701 less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2011/12 and fiscal year 2012/13 is froma planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 31 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources Earmarked projected transportation revenues are expected to increase by 47.94% over the next five fiscal years, from $24,086,000 in FY 2008/09 to $35,633,000 in FY 2012/13. Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 08/09 to FY 12/13, it is important to note that FY 08/09 transportation revenue is $30,704,701 less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2011/12 and fiscal year 2012/13 is froma planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 31 Ta e 6 7t eer:i a w 1, Gener" aI Revenue :S aetah ProjectiomSummary= x S.. :4 ,.. 2008109 S! " 2009110 2010/1la 2011/12 201, & TOTAL Taxes $117,638,104 $111,168,000 $112,836,000 $115,657,000 $118,548,000 $575,847,104 Licenses & Permits $9,267,500 $8,758,000 $8,889,000 $9,111,000 $9,339,000 $45,364,500 Intergovern- ment $22,437,944 $21,204,000 $21,522,000 $22,060,000 $22,612,000 $109,835,944 Charges for Services $5,373,322 $5,078,000 $5,154,000 $5,283,000 $5,415,000 $26,303,322 & $369,748 $349,000 $354,000 $363,000 $372,000 $1,807,748 Fines Forfeitures Interest &Misc. $10,288,783 $9,723,000 $9,869,000 $10,116,000 $10,369,000 $50,365,783 Other Sources $36,528,987 $34,520,000 $35,038,000 $35,914,000 $36,812,000 $178,812,987 Enterprise Funds: Charges Services for $61,323,693 $57,951,000 $58,820,000 $60,291,000 $61,798,000 $300,183,693 Other Sources $86,862,180 $83,285,000 $84,816,000 $83,599,000 $90,334,000 $428,896,180 TOTAL $350,090,261 $332,036,000 $337,298,000 $342,394,000 $355,599,000 $1,717,417,261 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources Earmarked projected transportation revenues are expected to increase by 47.94% over the next five fiscal years, from $24,086,000 in FY 2008/09 to $35,633,000 in FY 2012/13. Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 08/09 to FY 12/13, it is important to note that FY 08/09 transportation revenue is $30,704,701 less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2011/12 and fiscal year 2012/13 is froma planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 31 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element fiscal year 2012/13, the proposed additional 6 cent per gallon gas tax plus the county's current 6 cent per gallon gas tax (total of 12 cents per gallon) will be bonded to produce a significant revenue increase in FY 2012/13. For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 4.06% over the next five fiscal years, from $31,502,000 in FY 2008/09 to $32,781,000 in FY 2012/13. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 4.06% from $10,824,000 in FY 2008/09 to $11,263,000 in FY 2012/13. is (7; ensive ()table: unitary Sewer" F• iscal;: ear,yt Local Option Gas Tax 2008/09 onstitutional Ga\ Sijax own as Tax,; 1 ceiit optional • salestax tterest on; as,Tax $3,371,000 $1,688,000 $770,000 $2,600,000 $13,257,000 $2,400,000 $24,086,000 $31,502,000 $10,824,000 2009/10 $3,304,000 $1,654,000 $755,000 $3,800,000 $13,323,000 $2,000,000 $24,836,000 $31,817,000 $10,932,000 2010/11 $3,238,000 $1,621,000 $740,000 $7,500,000 $13,456,000 $1,600,000 $28,155,000 $32,135,000 $11,041,000 2011/12 $5,819,000 $1,589,000 $725,000 $10,900,000 $13,725,000 $1,200,000 $33,958,000 $32,456,000 $11,151,000 2012/13 $5,819,000 $1,589,000 $725,000 $12,300,000 $14,000,000 $1,200,000 $35,633,000 $32,781,000 $11,263,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget • Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base projections which are categorized by fund through FY 2013/14. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 32 e . 6 9•,Indian , ... . River County Tax Base and;Millage Pro cations` Tab Frscal� General 21 Fund ep ` t M � �Y y S'T U `" �� n Emergency shlct Services _ s' , � Environmental A�cqutsltion Land Year t k Tax Base Y f P x M111age .y : ^A i'£,` i T 'b ,'. Tac Base F a t Sx Y Millage e, y 8✓, Tax Base ro Mit zt age ` _ Tax BaseM Ufa v fs. ge 2008/09 $17,067,531,116 3.0689 $9,949,359,009 1.0804 $14,527,589,795 1.7148 $17,067,531,116 0.1357 2009/10 $16,128,816,905 3.0689 $9,402,144,264 1.0804 $13,728,572,356 1.7148 $16,128,816,905 0.1357 2010/11 $16,370,749,159 3.0689 $9,543,176,428 1.0804 $13,934,500,941 1.7148 $16,370,749,159 0.1357 2011/12 $16,780,017,888 3.0689 $9,781,755,839 1.0804 $14,282,863,465 1.7148 $16,780,017,888 0.1357 2012/13 $17,199,518,335 3.0689 $10,026,299,735 1.0804 $14,639,935,052 1.7148 $17,199,518,335 0.1357 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 32 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element fiscal year 2012/13, the proposed additional 6 cent per gallon gas tax plus the county's current 6 cent per gallon gas tax (total of 12 cents per gallon) will be bonded to produce a significant revenue increase in FY 2012/13. For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 4.06% over the next five fiscal years, from $31,502,000 in FY 2008/09 to $32,781,000 in FY 2012/13. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 4.06% from $10,824,000 in FY 2008/09 to $11,263,000 in FY 2012/13. is (7; ensive ()table: unitary Sewer" F• iscal;: ear,yt Local Option Gas Tax 2008/09 onstitutional Ga\ Sijax own as Tax,; 1 ceiit optional • salestax tterest on; as,Tax $3,371,000 $1,688,000 $770,000 $2,600,000 $13,257,000 $2,400,000 $24,086,000 $31,502,000 $10,824,000 2009/10 $3,304,000 $1,654,000 $755,000 $3,800,000 $13,323,000 $2,000,000 $24,836,000 $31,817,000 $10,932,000 2010/11 $3,238,000 $1,621,000 $740,000 $7,500,000 $13,456,000 $1,600,000 $28,155,000 $32,135,000 $11,041,000 2011/12 $5,819,000 $1,589,000 $725,000 $10,900,000 $13,725,000 $1,200,000 $33,958,000 $32,456,000 $11,151,000 2012/13 $5,819,000 $1,589,000 $725,000 $12,300,000 $14,000,000 $1,200,000 $35,633,000 $32,781,000 $11,263,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget • Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base projections which are categorized by fund through FY 2013/14. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 32 e . 6 9•,Indian , ... . River County Tax Base and;Millage Pro cations` Tab Frscal� General 21 Fund ep ` t M � �Y y S'T U `" �� n Emergency shlct Services _ s' , � Environmental A�cqutsltion Land Year t k Tax Base Y f P x M111age .y : ^A i'£,` i T 'b ,'. Tac Base F a t Sx Y Millage e, y 8✓, Tax Base ro Mit zt age ` _ Tax BaseM Ufa v fs. ge 2008/09 $17,067,531,116 3.0689 $9,949,359,009 1.0804 $14,527,589,795 1.7148 $17,067,531,116 0.1357 2009/10 $16,128,816,905 3.0689 $9,402,144,264 1.0804 $13,728,572,356 1.7148 $16,128,816,905 0.1357 2010/11 $16,370,749,159 3.0689 $9,543,176,428 1.0804 $13,934,500,941 1.7148 $16,370,749,159 0.1357 2011/12 $16,780,017,888 3.0689 $9,781,755,839 1.0804 $14,282,863,465 1.7148 $16,780,017,888 0.1357 2012/13 $17,199,518,335 3.0689 $10,026,299,735 1.0804 $14,639,935,052 1.7148 $17,199,518,335 0.1357 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 32 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage. Changes to the Capital Improvements Program With the recent downturn in the housing market, the decline of national and global financial markets, and the reduction in building permit activity, both anticipated county funds and developer funds have decreased and are expected to remain lower than projected in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 2007/08 through 2011/12). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 2007/08 through 2011/12 CIP have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended. None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations and only a few changes to the transportation section of the CIP directly impact capacities within the county's concurrency management system. Because of the downturn in the housing market, financial markets, and construction activity, it is anticipated that the capacity associated with these projects will not be needed until later dates. The specific concurrency related projects removed from the transportation section of the CIP are detailed in Table 6.10 and include roadway segments on 16th Street, 41St Street, 43rd Avenue, and 66th Avenue. At least two of the projects in Table 6.10, 13th Street SW from 43r1 Avenue to 58th Avenue and 17th Street SW from 58th Avenue to 27th Avenue, were partially reliant upon developers' financial contributions for their construction. The remaining funds for those projects were to come from county impact fees. Of the projects being deleted from last year's CIP and shown m Table 6.10, none have had their added capacity relied upon for vesting development projects for concurrency. On links that are associated with the deleted projects listed in Table 6.10, the available capacity ranges from 77 available peak hour, directional trips to almost 700 available peak hour, directional trips. With the downturn in the housing market, there are some development projects that previously had trips vested for concurrency but because of expiring concurrency certificates will now have or will soon have their reserved trips removed from the concurrency management system. This will add additional capacity back to County roadways and will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation projects in the County' s CIP. By deleting the transportation projects as shown, the county can utilize limited resources to complete Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 33 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage. Changes to the Capital Improvements Program With the recent downturn in the housing market, the decline of national and global financial markets, and the reduction in building permit activity, both anticipated county funds and developer funds have decreased and are expected to remain lower than projected in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 2007/08 through 2011/12). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 2007/08 through 2011/12 CIP have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended. None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations and only a few changes to the transportation section of the CIP directly impact capacities within the county's concurrency management system. Because of the downturn in the housing market, financial markets, and construction activity, it is anticipated that the capacity associated with these projects will not be needed until later dates. The specific concurrency related projects removed from the transportation section of the CIP are detailed in Table 6.10 and include roadway segments on 16th Street, 41St Street, 43rd Avenue, and 66th Avenue. At least two of the projects in Table 6.10, 13th Street SW from 43r1 Avenue to 58th Avenue and 17th Street SW from 58th Avenue to 27th Avenue, were partially reliant upon developers' financial contributions for their construction. The remaining funds for those projects were to come from county impact fees. Of the projects being deleted from last year's CIP and shown m Table 6.10, none have had their added capacity relied upon for vesting development projects for concurrency. On links that are associated with the deleted projects listed in Table 6.10, the available capacity ranges from 77 available peak hour, directional trips to almost 700 available peak hour, directional trips. With the downturn in the housing market, there are some development projects that previously had trips vested for concurrency but because of expiring concurrency certificates will now have or will soon have their reserved trips removed from the concurrency management system. This will add additional capacity back to County roadways and will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation projects in the County' s CIP. By deleting the transportation projects as shown, the county can utilize limited resources to complete Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 33 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the county needs to delete some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary piojects, the County is also maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element. *Peak hour, directional trips ** Construction funding was removed; right-of-way acquisition funding is retained The nonconcurrency related projects that have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended include several projects within the Conservation and Aquifer Recharge category. These projects include* Lost Tree Islands Restoration Improvements, Archie Smith Fish House, South Prong Preserve, Halstrom Farmsted Russell Grover River Buffer Captain forester Hammock Preserve Beach Access, and Oyster Bar Salt Marsh. All of the referenced projects have been delayed due to the County shifting financial and staff resources to acquisition of property and easements using the county's 2006 $48,600,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 34 Table 6 10 Concurrency L►nks Report for Transportatwn Protects Removed from the, ,5 Year CIP Trans eA emoved<from'.CIP_'`= p ortat . v .i on Pro ect J�� n^ •✓.1 F 3 �,., df Lmk�#, �Vhi td T ,.. ',": tV 3 Lmk`Descrrpt►on pas hf t._.. dr }ir r ,ci,,air® [ �? F t 1 �..� sx�_.., , ; �,u , JS i' EF 1 Ty ,,a �� .. ..::llemand�": s Capacity '^ . Total iB� Available* �? N$ ., ,�.a 27th Avenue/16`h Street 2030E 16th Street, 43rd Avenue to 27`h Avenue 860.00 410.29 449.71 2030W 16th Street, 43`d Avenue to 27th Avenue 860.00 573.84 286.16 2040E 16th Street, 27th Avenue to 20th Avenue 860.00 626.02 233.98 2040W 16th Street, 27th Avenue to 20`h Avenue 860.00 622.33 237.67 41St Street, 43`d Avenue to US #1, three lanes (1 mile) 4440E 41st Street, 43td Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 860.00 250.04 609.96 4440W 415t Highway Street, 43td Avenue to Old Dixie 860.00 249.08 610.92 4450E 41St Street, Old Dixie Highway to Indian River Boulevard 860.00 162 28 697.72 4450W 41st Street, Old Dixie Highway to Indian River Boulevard 860.00 178.16 681.84 43td Avenue, Oslo Road to County Line, 4 lanes 2905N 431d Avenue, S County Line to Oslo Road 950.00 486.00 464.00 2905S 43`d Avenue, S. County Line to Oslo Road 950.00 532.00 418.00 4`h Street/27`t' Avenue 4940E 4th Street, 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue 860.00 306.49 553.51 4940W 4th Street, 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue 860.00 443.63 416.37 4950E 4th Street, 27th Avenue to 20th Avenue 860.00 604.37 255.63 4950W 4th Street, 27th Avenue to 20`h Avenue 860.00 535 20 324.80 66`h Avenue, 45th Street to 77th Street** 3150N 66th Avenue, 45th Street to 65th Street 870.00 748.65 121.35 3150S 66th Avenue, 45th Street to 65th Street 870.00 431.20 438.80 3160N 66t Avenue, 65th Street to 69`h Street 870.00 725.09 144.91 3160S 66`h Avenue, 65th Street to 69th Street 870.00 392.22 477.78 3170N 66th Avenue, 69th Street to CR 510 860.00 782.62 77.38 3170S 66th Avenue, 69th Street to CR 510 860.00 409.58 450.42 *Peak hour, directional trips ** Construction funding was removed; right-of-way acquisition funding is retained The nonconcurrency related projects that have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended include several projects within the Conservation and Aquifer Recharge category. These projects include* Lost Tree Islands Restoration Improvements, Archie Smith Fish House, South Prong Preserve, Halstrom Farmsted Russell Grover River Buffer Captain forester Hammock Preserve Beach Access, and Oyster Bar Salt Marsh. All of the referenced projects have been delayed due to the County shifting financial and staff resources to acquisition of property and easements using the county's 2006 $48,600,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 34 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the county needs to delete some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary piojects, the County is also maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element. *Peak hour, directional trips ** Construction funding was removed; right-of-way acquisition funding is retained The nonconcurrency related projects that have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended include several projects within the Conservation and Aquifer Recharge category. These projects include* Lost Tree Islands Restoration Improvements, Archie Smith Fish House, South Prong Preserve, Halstrom Farmsted Russell Grover River Buffer Captain forester Hammock Preserve Beach Access, and Oyster Bar Salt Marsh. All of the referenced projects have been delayed due to the County shifting financial and staff resources to acquisition of property and easements using the county's 2006 $48,600,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 34 Table 6 10 Concurrency L►nks Report for Transportatwn Protects Removed from the, ,5 Year CIP Trans eA emoved<from'.CIP_'`= p ortat . v .i on Pro ect J�� n^ •✓.1 F 3 �,., df Lmk�#, �Vhi td T ,.. ',": tV 3 Lmk`Descrrpt►on pas hf t._.. dr }ir r ,ci,,air® [ �? F t 1 �..� sx�_.., , ; �,u , JS i' EF 1 Ty ,,a �� .. ..::llemand�": s Capacity '^ . Total iB� Available* �? N$ ., ,�.a 27th Avenue/16`h Street 2030E 16th Street, 43rd Avenue to 27`h Avenue 860.00 410.29 449.71 2030W 16th Street, 43`d Avenue to 27th Avenue 860.00 573.84 286.16 2040E 16th Street, 27th Avenue to 20th Avenue 860.00 626.02 233.98 2040W 16th Street, 27th Avenue to 20`h Avenue 860.00 622.33 237.67 41St Street, 43`d Avenue to US #1, three lanes (1 mile) 4440E 41st Street, 43td Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 860.00 250.04 609.96 4440W 415t Highway Street, 43td Avenue to Old Dixie 860.00 249.08 610.92 4450E 41St Street, Old Dixie Highway to Indian River Boulevard 860.00 162 28 697.72 4450W 41st Street, Old Dixie Highway to Indian River Boulevard 860.00 178.16 681.84 43td Avenue, Oslo Road to County Line, 4 lanes 2905N 431d Avenue, S County Line to Oslo Road 950.00 486.00 464.00 2905S 43`d Avenue, S. County Line to Oslo Road 950.00 532.00 418.00 4`h Street/27`t' Avenue 4940E 4th Street, 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue 860.00 306.49 553.51 4940W 4th Street, 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue 860.00 443.63 416.37 4950E 4th Street, 27th Avenue to 20th Avenue 860.00 604.37 255.63 4950W 4th Street, 27th Avenue to 20`h Avenue 860.00 535 20 324.80 66`h Avenue, 45th Street to 77th Street** 3150N 66th Avenue, 45th Street to 65th Street 870.00 748.65 121.35 3150S 66th Avenue, 45th Street to 65th Street 870.00 431.20 438.80 3160N 66t Avenue, 65th Street to 69`h Street 870.00 725.09 144.91 3160S 66`h Avenue, 65th Street to 69th Street 870.00 392.22 477.78 3170N 66th Avenue, 69th Street to CR 510 860.00 782.62 77.38 3170S 66th Avenue, 69th Street to CR 510 860.00 409.58 450.42 *Peak hour, directional trips ** Construction funding was removed; right-of-way acquisition funding is retained The nonconcurrency related projects that have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended include several projects within the Conservation and Aquifer Recharge category. These projects include* Lost Tree Islands Restoration Improvements, Archie Smith Fish House, South Prong Preserve, Halstrom Farmsted Russell Grover River Buffer Captain forester Hammock Preserve Beach Access, and Oyster Bar Salt Marsh. All of the referenced projects have been delayed due to the County shifting financial and staff resources to acquisition of property and easements using the county's 2006 $48,600,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 34 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element bond. That bond has now nearly completely been expended. The remaining land acquisition bond funds are designated for improvements within the acquired conservation lands. • Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B) The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B) is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity which these roadway improvement projects will produce as available now for development projects where the first building permit for the development project will be issued no later than three years after the specified start date of the roadway project. Within the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program four projects have been removed because they are currently under construction or are now completed Those projects are: CR 512, from Roseland Road to Sebastian Middle School; Oslo Road, from Old Dixie to 27th Avenue; SR 60 from 82nd Avenue to 66th Avenue; and US Highway 1, from South of Oslo Road to South of Indian River Boulevard. In addition, the construction start dates of seven projects were extended. Five of the seven projects and their available peak hour, directional trip capacity are listed in Table 6.11. These projects are being delayed. All of the transportation projects listed in the table have sufficient available peak hour, directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments. Altering the start date of construction, therefore, does not impact already approved developments. Not listed in Table 6.11 are the Oslo Road from 27th Avenue to 43`d Avenue project, and the Oslo Road from 43`d Avenue to 5811 Avenue project. Both of these projects are being delayed approximately 6 to 8 months. While Oslo Road from 2711 Avenue to 43rd Avenue is scheduled to commence in June 2009, Oslo Road from 43`d Avenue to 58t'' Avenue is scheduled to commence in April 2009. Because the delay of the projects is less than one year, neither delay will impact capacity within the County's concurrency management system. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 35 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element bond. That bond has now nearly completely been expended. The remaining land acquisition bond funds are designated for improvements within the acquired conservation lands. • Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B) The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B) is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity which these roadway improvement projects will produce as available now for development projects where the first building permit for the development project will be issued no later than three years after the specified start date of the roadway project. Within the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program four projects have been removed because they are currently under construction or are now completed Those projects are: CR 512, from Roseland Road to Sebastian Middle School; Oslo Road, from Old Dixie to 27th Avenue; SR 60 from 82nd Avenue to 66th Avenue; and US Highway 1, from South of Oslo Road to South of Indian River Boulevard. In addition, the construction start dates of seven projects were extended. Five of the seven projects and their available peak hour, directional trip capacity are listed in Table 6.11. These projects are being delayed. All of the transportation projects listed in the table have sufficient available peak hour, directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments. Altering the start date of construction, therefore, does not impact already approved developments. Not listed in Table 6.11 are the Oslo Road from 27th Avenue to 43`d Avenue project, and the Oslo Road from 43`d Avenue to 5811 Avenue project. Both of these projects are being delayed approximately 6 to 8 months. While Oslo Road from 2711 Avenue to 43rd Avenue is scheduled to commence in June 2009, Oslo Road from 43`d Avenue to 58t'' Avenue is scheduled to commence in April 2009. Because the delay of the projects is less than one year, neither delay will impact capacity within the County's concurrency management system. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 35 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element *Peak hour, directional trips Needs Assessment Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25 000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2012/13 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, la\\ enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element Those projects are found in Appendix D. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-01.8 36 Table 6.11 Concurrency Lin lts Report for Priority Transportation Protects w th Construction Start Date Extended. Transportation Description 6A 1 f "H2-'xid Listed V .; Protectr _ `fir in>CIP , ' EH t YCs4n p i kF Lmk # 8 P C E +' S$ t 4 y X WiY ty'M1 ..t ,f L'mk Description " ;a s Ft a c 0 t'Y 'Ec 4 '(y , ,xr.<t, ,=r °t _a.u.F, n J < � ,. E %RS 24 W s24ri liZ Capacity* ,r rt ro A T. Total Y F �: Demand*,ti AvailableP S f• 5, ;... , . 43td Street, Avenue, 19th Street to 26" add 2 lanes 2930N 43rd Avenue, 16th Street to SR 60 860.00 634.02 225.98 2930S 43rd Avenue, 16th Street to SR 60 860.00 782.28 77.72 2935N 43rd Avenue, SFrr60 to 26th Street 860.00 452.96 407.04 2935S 43rd Avenue, SR 60 to 26th Street 860.00 599.79 260.21 43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 19th Street 2925N 43`d Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 860.00 573.11 286.89 2925S 43td Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 860.00 739.62 120.38 43td Avenue, 12th Street to Oslo Road 2910N 43rd Avenue, Oslo Road to 4th Street 860.00 606.61 253.39 2910S 43td Avenue, Oslo Road to 4th Street 860.00 637.27 222.73 2915N 43rd Avenue, 4th Street to 8th Street 860.00 604.00 256.00 2915S 43td Avenue, 4th Street to 8th Street 860.00 818.00 42.00 CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court 1810E CR 510, CR 512 to 66th Avenue 860.00 458.77 401.23 1810W CR 510, CR 512 to 66th Avenue 860.00 773.45 86.55 CR 510, 75th Court to 6151 Drive 1820E CR 510, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue 860.00 430.15 429.85 1820W CR 510, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue 860.00 782.91 77.09 *Peak hour, directional trips Needs Assessment Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25 000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2012/13 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, la\\ enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element Those projects are found in Appendix D. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-01.8 36 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element *Peak hour, directional trips Needs Assessment Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25 000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2012/13 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, la\\ enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element Those projects are found in Appendix D. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-01.8 36 Table 6.11 Concurrency Lin lts Report for Priority Transportation Protects w th Construction Start Date Extended. Transportation Description 6A 1 f "H2-'xid Listed V .; Protectr _ `fir in>CIP , ' EH t YCs4n p i kF Lmk # 8 P C E +' S$ t 4 y X WiY ty'M1 ..t ,f L'mk Description " ;a s Ft a c 0 t'Y 'Ec 4 '(y , ,xr.<t, ,=r °t _a.u.F, n J < � ,. E %RS 24 W s24ri liZ Capacity* ,r rt ro A T. Total Y F �: Demand*,ti AvailableP S f• 5, ;... , . 43td Street, Avenue, 19th Street to 26" add 2 lanes 2930N 43rd Avenue, 16th Street to SR 60 860.00 634.02 225.98 2930S 43rd Avenue, 16th Street to SR 60 860.00 782.28 77.72 2935N 43rd Avenue, SFrr60 to 26th Street 860.00 452.96 407.04 2935S 43rd Avenue, SR 60 to 26th Street 860.00 599.79 260.21 43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 19th Street 2925N 43`d Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 860.00 573.11 286.89 2925S 43td Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 860.00 739.62 120.38 43td Avenue, 12th Street to Oslo Road 2910N 43rd Avenue, Oslo Road to 4th Street 860.00 606.61 253.39 2910S 43td Avenue, Oslo Road to 4th Street 860.00 637.27 222.73 2915N 43rd Avenue, 4th Street to 8th Street 860.00 604.00 256.00 2915S 43td Avenue, 4th Street to 8th Street 860.00 818.00 42.00 CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court 1810E CR 510, CR 512 to 66th Avenue 860.00 458.77 401.23 1810W CR 510, CR 512 to 66th Avenue 860.00 773.45 86.55 CR 510, 75th Court to 6151 Drive 1820E CR 510, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue 860.00 430.15 429.85 1820W CR 510, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue 860.00 782.91 77.09 *Peak hour, directional trips Needs Assessment Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25 000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2012/13 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, la\\ enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element Those projects are found in Appendix D. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-01.8 36 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years As Indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $397,065,553. Projects within the first fiscal year are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned' revenue sources. `Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems are provided countywide, and the county itself does not have fiscal responsibility for these systems. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 37 •: f Table .. , �. f c td G'"kt t'ar rt +!,1"441 - 1, '.: s< r '4 pk `f i' 1 a'n Mi y{UtF,'a * Y; x w .e ,.F J YT E 4 6 b: .�' 4 e' Y `l.Y ia; ,':n-'" �i v.4i -f -AS 6:12 Future CapitaImprovemenyt I xpenditures 9Yn x#•a � , ,, Indian Jan,. ppm_ , Schooll,D ° uqx ti < for Indian - f "yy. r.ii{ 5 -ui �r b Fix %3 4 11' River County ,a . y z i f istrlct,, x4-.. j It`bf e emen f r . ~ `te o y�Ca Y 3-'. on g y t 1 Y ,`}•� A u�� 099, ♦ �y 5 2 �4A, 1 d �"' ,;, ; /10 '19/ D f' f53HTd L'.^1'Yd. hav��*=`+ N�iEk[ 3RZ-J 3AY?'.S Alii T5`i a.^ i*51 1 x 2"VIsC ISS,FF'¢ts w. fi e�Y. .: .AI "4� t � F.: d �rT. ?n"✓v ip 4V a�.� sd .4"(S�`v �,Ni'.."k Conservation & Aquifer Recharge $900,000 $1,270,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 Emergency Services $ 8,035,477 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $0 $ 2,200,000 General Services $1,600,000 $100,000 $3,150,000 $0 $0 Law Enforcement & Corrections $0 $606,960 $0 $876,100 $224,400 Recreation & Open Space $3,500,000 $2,775,000 $4,105,000 $3,575,000 $4,375,000 Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water $18,757,910 $7,366,739 $9,079,139 $4,329,637 $4,427,400 Solid Waste $8,347,000 $20,530,000 $2,300,000 $5,143,000 $2,109,000 Stormwater Management $7,015,000 $6,400,000 $5,285,000 $8,715,000 $1,400,000 Transportation $76,337,564 $41,777,721 $20,561,226 $67,091,280 $40,300,000 Total $124,492,951 $82,326,420 $44,980,365 $90,230,017 $55,035,800 Public School Facilities* $98,995,681 $24,063,019 $25,282,022 $44,475,041 $27,287,766 *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years As Indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $397,065,553. Projects within the first fiscal year are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned' revenue sources. `Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems are provided countywide, and the county itself does not have fiscal responsibility for these systems. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 37 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years As Indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $397,065,553. Projects within the first fiscal year are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned' revenue sources. `Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems are provided countywide, and the county itself does not have fiscal responsibility for these systems. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 37 •: f Table .. , �. f c td G'"kt t'ar rt +!,1"441 - 1, '.: s< r '4 pk `f i' 1 a'n Mi y{UtF,'a * Y; x w .e ,.F J YT E 4 6 b: .�' 4 e' Y `l.Y ia; ,':n-'" �i v.4i -f -AS 6:12 Future CapitaImprovemenyt I xpenditures 9Yn x#•a � , ,, Indian Jan,. ppm_ , Schooll,D ° uqx ti < for Indian - f "yy. r.ii{ 5 -ui �r b Fix %3 4 11' River County ,a . y z i f istrlct,, x4-.. j It`bf e emen f r . ~ `te o y�Ca Y 3-'. on g y t 1 Y ,`}•� A u�� 099, ♦ �y 5 2 �4A, 1 d �"' ,;, ; /10 '19/ D f' f53HTd L'.^1'Yd. hav��*=`+ N�iEk[ 3RZ-J 3AY?'.S Alii T5`i a.^ i*51 1 x 2"VIsC ISS,FF'¢ts w. fi e�Y. .: .AI "4� t � F.: d �rT. ?n"✓v ip 4V a�.� sd .4"(S�`v �,Ni'.."k Conservation & Aquifer Recharge $900,000 $1,270,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 Emergency Services $ 8,035,477 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $0 $ 2,200,000 General Services $1,600,000 $100,000 $3,150,000 $0 $0 Law Enforcement & Corrections $0 $606,960 $0 $876,100 $224,400 Recreation & Open Space $3,500,000 $2,775,000 $4,105,000 $3,575,000 $4,375,000 Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water $18,757,910 $7,366,739 $9,079,139 $4,329,637 $4,427,400 Solid Waste $8,347,000 $20,530,000 $2,300,000 $5,143,000 $2,109,000 Stormwater Management $7,015,000 $6,400,000 $5,285,000 $8,715,000 $1,400,000 Transportation $76,337,564 $41,777,721 $20,561,226 $67,091,280 $40,300,000 Total $124,492,951 $82,326,420 $44,980,365 $90,230,017 $55,035,800 Public School Facilities* $98,995,681 $24,063,019 $25,282,022 $44,475,041 $27,287,766 *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years As Indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $397,065,553. Projects within the first fiscal year are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned' revenue sources. `Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems are provided countywide, and the county itself does not have fiscal responsibility for these systems. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 37 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element management of the IRCHD, maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county. In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools and health centers. Based on general locational criteria for public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the county by 2012/13 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure. $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures FY 2008/09 Conservation & Aquifer Recharge ® Law Enforcement & Corrections • Solid Waste FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 ® Emergency Services Recreation & Open Space G Stormwater Management FY 2011 /12 FY 2012/13 ❑ General Services • Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water Transportation 2 Fiscal Assessment This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. The School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements for public school facilities listed in table 6.12. The School District' s adopted "Summary of Capital Improvement Program' (Appendix D) and ` Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix E) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 38 i�xw�sf�et+�'iK u`5E 4.h zi£ SGlc1i'09Yt MPA F4.t'aor?"�,tu x. yx_,`xY i �r � l.{ �yy��""p:� �Y' Yy: } '.v3i'irt'.vi+r�o�T3.1 M ^a;h b 41 p�,$A .N'i. 9 Y" Cj crf �u✓bM' 9' R'd'�'Ya.. y� };N *'ugly p b iY +�'�,•, � �a(ySr y �. SY 8£ ytR 2 1. ?k" it'Y'iw4a�'Yi�&' si'� i .�i`��C 3 +ztk 'b K# 4i 3' !. v Y "`�1d i#-� 4ai' J""v'y✓,`,, �O � � � G j¢j �ft4 'ySb��i , „ypU Y t3A�'�+'h',ii`4 .X %'.$ ^Y�y,5 `^Y n'fiiY. $ 4Y' nt^�jE�µx tt,q[k t #*tY L, I-S.yl xI j+�,]E '�^ii y {}`, L fy�`�t a"�E }J., L 1,5tt?3PN'.y.£`�v'A5 RJ' S` ,GM1�✓� �j( f rx15�`y �"' Y�A%a_�'i�P. $.%4.d•,'�- �, 'fix Ln f� tivyY "�, 3' YKrYYJ Sa. � + �✓° {, �;«p""Y'3 - 1"' t W i•" 'n.2'}f.4'�'{ 3 Ss7eid��x5�, S f { }v 53kp�H <S , t.>�,G A?rN.i, $i r�`i a. tr�� a�mPi„}tk �'}{. .M' f+ JiJ i 4`TY�` r eea.k6 r r fY t 4i trS.r. 5 :YhFu .,y t { 1° �s't'1'Y h kr L .. � x Hii+ ♦ 3 AAmt tke xX fj M�L3}`%oil nt �Ml4 'ti S Y/J.tf hYl}u�t •1'f #r S # 2 k + j3 5e { n9rh� r idP` _Yi ass ,'t ��G t t4✓ i'�i b 4.�r£, 1�4” 'b�k.��, �� a �'�Ck ,� �#, 14 } h � ���ii% Ap i s �'#�'i £ i{„ §5rz' ) R,i `a�'jA.� 3�'yy^^] J{ wr`?.q'W°�.5y [ A w -j X,C f'. i �+ K �3�`T� iia SJ} hA•�.��'l 0. �qSt �. 1 '9.ki p �i`k {h WJt •X7153} � }-5:i i ,�i�\y5:. £ pi :i� "�'.�Mi{i 3 i'-tI # i t'f .>�'13..t'JY' R� .�{t YxSlvl:�i tSi2N{`gi°i�'IL�ep.�F"-•4•+ '4 L J �3'iE�' +.�'Sif�i '�i �"':h..}"Y��? t i.. �; I. ,Vy Y F d# hf Y it .tom ,tn T'S 2 -n 3�iY ,ir` itt`h' 'J:*a'�e' St #k a' y" s9 e3 S';9:,,,",.p,� a.vf'Re r t^ °2'} T$'f ,..%"-irokr'rie %`rs «r'{ -SX '� *3•'F F 1 „G''„it *�'w- e?i a� aAc. C,y"'•`* i ,fix r4SYs G ,y 4gw""%3n 1 4Y"Ff s� .7 1;.f.c{i.L sAn . i•c�d"'�Ap}i* h p,4.�'�W 1 I FY 2008/09 Conservation & Aquifer Recharge ® Law Enforcement & Corrections • Solid Waste FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 ® Emergency Services Recreation & Open Space G Stormwater Management FY 2011 /12 FY 2012/13 ❑ General Services • Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water Transportation 2 Fiscal Assessment This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. The School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements for public school facilities listed in table 6.12. The School District' s adopted "Summary of Capital Improvement Program' (Appendix D) and ` Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix E) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 38 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element management of the IRCHD, maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county. In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools and health centers. Based on general locational criteria for public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the county by 2012/13 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure. $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures FY 2008/09 Conservation & Aquifer Recharge ® Law Enforcement & Corrections • Solid Waste FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 ® Emergency Services Recreation & Open Space G Stormwater Management FY 2011 /12 FY 2012/13 ❑ General Services • Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water Transportation 2 Fiscal Assessment This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. The School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements for public school facilities listed in table 6.12. The School District' s adopted "Summary of Capital Improvement Program' (Appendix D) and ` Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix E) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 38 i�xw�sf�et+�'iK u`5E 4.h zi£ SGlc1i'09Yt MPA F4.t'aor?"�,tu x. yx_,`xY i �r � l.{ �yy��""p:� �Y' Yy: } '.v3i'irt'.vi+r�o�T3.1 M ^a;h b 41 p�,$A .N'i. 9 Y" Cj crf �u✓bM' 9' R'd'�'Ya.. y� };N *'ugly p b iY +�'�,•, � �a(ySr y �. SY 8£ ytR 2 1. ?k" it'Y'iw4a�'Yi�&' si'� i .�i`��C 3 +ztk 'b K# 4i 3' !. v Y "`�1d i#-� 4ai' J""v'y✓,`,, �O � � � G j¢j �ft4 'ySb��i , „ypU Y t3A�'�+'h',ii`4 .X %'.$ ^Y�y,5 `^Y n'fiiY. $ 4Y' nt^�jE�µx tt,q[k t #*tY L, I-S.yl xI j+�,]E '�^ii y {}`, L fy�`�t a"�E }J., L 1,5tt?3PN'.y.£`�v'A5 RJ' S` ,GM1�✓� �j( f rx15�`y �"' Y�A%a_�'i�P. $.%4.d•,'�- �, 'fix Ln f� tivyY "�, 3' YKrYYJ Sa. � + �✓° {, �;«p""Y'3 - 1"' t W i•" 'n.2'}f.4'�'{ 3 Ss7eid��x5�, S f { }v 53kp�H <S , t.>�,G A?rN.i, $i r�`i a. tr�� a�mPi„}tk �'}{. .M' f+ JiJ i 4`TY�` r eea.k6 r r fY t 4i trS.r. 5 :YhFu .,y t { 1° �s't'1'Y h kr L .. � x Hii+ ♦ 3 AAmt tke xX fj M�L3}`%oil nt �Ml4 'ti S Y/J.tf hYl}u�t •1'f #r S # 2 k + j3 5e { n9rh� r idP` _Yi ass ,'t ��G t t4✓ i'�i b 4.�r£, 1�4” 'b�k.��, �� a �'�Ck ,� �#, 14 } h � ���ii% Ap i s �'#�'i £ i{„ §5rz' ) R,i `a�'jA.� 3�'yy^^] J{ wr`?.q'W°�.5y [ A w -j X,C f'. i �+ K �3�`T� iia SJ} hA•�.��'l 0. �qSt �. 1 '9.ki p �i`k {h WJt •X7153} � }-5:i i ,�i�\y5:. £ pi :i� "�'.�Mi{i 3 i'-tI # i t'f .>�'13..t'JY' R� .�{t YxSlvl:�i tSi2N{`gi°i�'IL�ep.�F"-•4•+ '4 L J �3'iE�' +.�'Sif�i '�i �"':h..}"Y��? t i.. �; I. ,Vy Y F d# hf Y it .tom ,tn T'S 2 -n 3�iY ,ir` itt`h' 'J:*a'�e' St #k a' y" s9 e3 S';9:,,,",.p,� a.vf'Re r t^ °2'} T$'f ,..%"-irokr'rie %`rs «r'{ -SX '� *3•'F F 1 „G''„it *�'w- e?i a� aAc. C,y"'•`* i ,fix r4SYs G ,y 4gw""%3n 1 4Y"Ff s� .7 1;.f.c{i.L sAn . i•c�d"'�Ap}i* h p,4.�'�W 1 I FY 2008/09 Conservation & Aquifer Recharge ® Law Enforcement & Corrections • Solid Waste FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 ® Emergency Services Recreation & Open Space G Stormwater Management FY 2011 /12 FY 2012/13 ❑ General Services • Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water Transportation 2 Fiscal Assessment This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. The School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements for public school facilities listed in table 6.12. The School District' s adopted "Summary of Capital Improvement Program' (Appendix D) and ` Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix E) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 38 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element The assessment process consists of projecting future receipts of revenues and comparing these receipts against anticipated expenditures. Using this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs associated with operations of the county. Projected Expenditures Table 6.13 shows the county s projected expenditures for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. By fiscal year 2012/1.3, the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling $355,599,000. In FY 2012/13, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Enterprise Funds/Other category. For the five-year period, beginning in fiscal year 2008/09 and ending in fiscal year 2012/13, the county s expenditures are projected to increase by 1.57%. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Eat marked Projected Expenditures Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. Projected expenditures related to capacity charge revenues, however, are not included. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 39 S i 0`.13:` :Indian:River„County: "` vy§� S)' 0 veralliGenera £C+4._e,.).4vi ...>,FIJ Expenditures ..}�.:4. e? i,..i.R„4.,;%.."S Prolectiion Y y/ { Summary ,,n .,e ;FY ,able ., p .4.. :4;1.; `a ... 2008/09 2009/10f F ` 20 ,,f) s 20]1/12 b ° 2012/13 '= General Gov't. Services $28,236,991 $25,272,000 $28,700,000 $26,189,000 $26,844,000 Public Safety $73,572,101 $64,038,960 $62,861,000 $65,309,100 $68,468,400 Physical Environment $12,707,343 $12,199,000 $10,382,000 $13,927,000 $6,230,000 Transportation $83 423,912 $48,474,721 $27,358,226 $74,058,280 $47,441,000 Economic Environment $478,713 $452,000 $459,000 $470,000 $482,000 Human Services $10,256,114 $9,692,000 $9,837,000 $10,083,000 $10,335,000 Culture/Recreation $16,828,982 $15,371,000 $16,890,000 $16,680,000 $17,808,000 Debt Service $1,239,633 $1,171,000 $1,189,000 $1,219,000 $1,249,000 Enterprise Funds/Other $123,346,472 $155,365,319 $179,621,774 $134,458,620 $176,741,600 TOTAL $350,090,261 $332,036,000 $337,298,000 $342,394,000 $355,599,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Eat marked Projected Expenditures Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. Projected expenditures related to capacity charge revenues, however, are not included. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 39 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element The assessment process consists of projecting future receipts of revenues and comparing these receipts against anticipated expenditures. Using this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs associated with operations of the county. Projected Expenditures Table 6.13 shows the county s projected expenditures for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. By fiscal year 2012/1.3, the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling $355,599,000. In FY 2012/13, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Enterprise Funds/Other category. For the five-year period, beginning in fiscal year 2008/09 and ending in fiscal year 2012/13, the county s expenditures are projected to increase by 1.57%. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Eat marked Projected Expenditures Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. Projected expenditures related to capacity charge revenues, however, are not included. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 39 S i 0`.13:` :Indian:River„County: "` vy§� S)' 0 veralliGenera £C+4._e,.).4vi ...>,FIJ Expenditures ..}�.:4. e? i,..i.R„4.,;%.."S Prolectiion Y y/ { Summary ,,n .,e ;FY ,able ., p .4.. :4;1.; `a ... 2008/09 2009/10f F ` 20 ,,f) s 20]1/12 b ° 2012/13 '= General Gov't. Services $28,236,991 $25,272,000 $28,700,000 $26,189,000 $26,844,000 Public Safety $73,572,101 $64,038,960 $62,861,000 $65,309,100 $68,468,400 Physical Environment $12,707,343 $12,199,000 $10,382,000 $13,927,000 $6,230,000 Transportation $83 423,912 $48,474,721 $27,358,226 $74,058,280 $47,441,000 Economic Environment $478,713 $452,000 $459,000 $470,000 $482,000 Human Services $10,256,114 $9,692,000 $9,837,000 $10,083,000 $10,335,000 Culture/Recreation $16,828,982 $15,371,000 $16,890,000 $16,680,000 $17,808,000 Debt Service $1,239,633 $1,171,000 $1,189,000 $1,219,000 $1,249,000 Enterprise Funds/Other $123,346,472 $155,365,319 $179,621,774 $134,458,620 $176,741,600 TOTAL $350,090,261 $332,036,000 $337,298,000 $342,394,000 $355,599,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Eat marked Projected Expenditures Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. Projected expenditures related to capacity charge revenues, however, are not included. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 39 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elemeng All revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure that benefits the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, the amount of revenues and expenditures increases and decreases with development. For this reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. This system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below county minimums. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $32,781,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected expenses of $31,502,000. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $11,263,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected figure of $10,824,000. Operating Cost Projections Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. In fiscal year 2012/13, the county is projected to incur approximately $307,099,600 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.14, the county's operating costs are projected to increase 21.53% between 2008/09 and 2012/13. Table a V:<..w '=�•v4)R�bw_�`�/�slflYw��rSi ci15• 4In Table Iv .tt�'� 7 { s; r 2i 4 " 614 �Pro,lectedaExpenses for Water, v 9a+✓4 ti t ..', . .. .0 s�. F , 2435 ..., .6%wd '�a� x `. a k.r�� A.n 2 r t Sewerpand So 1d �ry�].�,'.x ;r:u lb A i. w. Waste Ftscal`Year, . f` < ,£. �.n � h Pte$' P 4 { 4 53i { y`'YtJI % S` -t ! (C r3 ��t l�.�g'R b'i x�r S c9d F d. Potable Water am a ,ewer ..ti., 3. `..3 lc . ,..it ear ;:rc r: nt� [ '� �� i a Solld .3. #u �>. �, ria]'-��eKa Waste ` s :'"#�,=, sirtfi'"izr 2008/09 int $31,502;000 $10,824,000 2009/10 2008/09 $31,817,000 $252,702,220 $10,932,000 2010/11 $277,606,319 $32,135,000 $11,041,000 2011/12 $32,456,000 2012/13 $11,151,000 2012/13 $32,781,000 $11,263,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $32,781,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected expenses of $31,502,000. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $11,263,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected figure of $10,824,000. Operating Cost Projections Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. In fiscal year 2012/13, the county is projected to incur approximately $307,099,600 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.14, the county's operating costs are projected to increase 21.53% between 2008/09 and 2012/13. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 40 Table a V:<..w '=�•v4)R�bw_�`�/�slflYw��rSi ci15• 4In k,Yx+�psa s R ndlicier ...*Y. +3X..�<4N'X�nMm, i �`awr'Y ,� ;,xc • Ytifi County Overall +`u A..tA�RIA.. d.. ¢� eratzz 0 'mg o Cs 1 oectifi , � \Y.�PA jy 't i cd iA FpS, r T� �F,iscal Year` r ,�,..iiu � Total k rd E tit, Y 0 era x."r.a°t,€£ , int },u 1iNFi,4 os 2008/09 $252,702,220 2009/10 $277,606,319 2010/11 $303,696,774 2011/12 $261,636,620 2012/13 $307,099,600 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 40 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elemeng All revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure that benefits the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, the amount of revenues and expenditures increases and decreases with development. For this reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. This system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below county minimums. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $32,781,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected expenses of $31,502,000. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $11,263,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected figure of $10,824,000. Operating Cost Projections Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. In fiscal year 2012/13, the county is projected to incur approximately $307,099,600 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.14, the county's operating costs are projected to increase 21.53% between 2008/09 and 2012/13. Table a V:<..w '=�•v4)R�bw_�`�/�slflYw��rSi ci15• 4In Table Iv .tt�'� 7 { s; r 2i 4 " 614 �Pro,lectedaExpenses for Water, v 9a+✓4 ti t ..', . .. .0 s�. F , 2435 ..., .6%wd '�a� x `. a k.r�� A.n 2 r t Sewerpand So 1d �ry�].�,'.x ;r:u lb A i. w. Waste Ftscal`Year, . f` < ,£. �.n � h Pte$' P 4 { 4 53i { y`'YtJI % S` -t ! (C r3 ��t l�.�g'R b'i x�r S c9d F d. Potable Water am a ,ewer ..ti., 3. `..3 lc . ,..it ear ;:rc r: nt� [ '� �� i a Solld .3. #u �>. �, ria]'-��eKa Waste ` s :'"#�,=, sirtfi'"izr 2008/09 int $31,502;000 $10,824,000 2009/10 2008/09 $31,817,000 $252,702,220 $10,932,000 2010/11 $277,606,319 $32,135,000 $11,041,000 2011/12 $32,456,000 2012/13 $11,151,000 2012/13 $32,781,000 $11,263,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $32,781,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected expenses of $31,502,000. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 2012/13, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $11,263,000. That is an increase of 4.06% from the 2008/09 projected figure of $10,824,000. Operating Cost Projections Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2012/13. In fiscal year 2012/13, the county is projected to incur approximately $307,099,600 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.14, the county's operating costs are projected to increase 21.53% between 2008/09 and 2012/13. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 40 Table a V:<..w '=�•v4)R�bw_�`�/�slflYw��rSi ci15• 4In k,Yx+�psa s R ndlicier ...*Y. +3X..�<4N'X�nMm, i �`awr'Y ,� ;,xc • Ytifi County Overall +`u A..tA�RIA.. d.. ¢� eratzz 0 'mg o Cs 1 oectifi , � \Y.�PA jy 't i cd iA FpS, r T� �F,iscal Year` r ,�,..iiu � Total k rd E tit, Y 0 era x."r.a°t,€£ , int },u 1iNFi,4 os 2008/09 $252,702,220 2009/10 $277,606,319 2010/11 $303,696,774 2011/12 $261,636,620 2012/13 $307,099,600 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 40 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Projected Debt Capacity Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility. Table 6.16 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bonds without a public vote. The county's bonding capacity is identified for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.16 indicates, the county s available bonding capacity for the next 10 years is $164,700,000, with an additional potential of $301,400,000. Tab CIO :�1G Indlap .iyer County, Estrmatea'Ab OW g,e' i lhty�tgRa><se f Wrthout,A"LPubl><cV,ote,. , 4 Bori`ds ledge ` SoulCes Ten (Bond Interest • 4.60%) , tt - Years Rate)@ a �' � s rt y1 Y ti Twenty n nd iieresta @$ 6 x 9 ary Years�� 4a '%) .. "t t b , ° '' R a 4 � Thu ty Years (Bond'Irite t res R at e @ Half Cent Sales Tax $43,900,000 $69,900,000 $85,600,000 Gas Taxes $47,400,000 $71,300,000 $84,700,000 Tourist Tax $8,600,000 $12,900,000 $15,300,000 First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $2,900,000 Second Guaranteed Entitlement $3,400,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 Sub -Total $104,900,000 $161,500,000 $194,500,000 Possible Pledge Sources Franchise Fees $35,000,000 $52,700,000 $62,600,000 Road Impact Fees $24,800,000 $37,300,000 $44,300,000 Sub -Total $59,800,000 $90,000,000 $106,900,000 TOTAL $164,700,000 $251,500,000 $301,400,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Debt Service Obligations The county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized in table 6.17. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 41 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Projected Debt Capacity Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility. Table 6.16 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bonds without a public vote. The county's bonding capacity is identified for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.16 indicates, the county s available bonding capacity for the next 10 years is $164,700,000, with an additional potential of $301,400,000. Tab CIO :�1G Indlap .iyer County, Estrmatea'Ab OW g,e' i lhty�tgRa><se f Wrthout,A"LPubl><cV,ote,. , 4 Bori`ds ledge ` SoulCes Ten (Bond Interest • 4.60%) , tt - Years Rate)@ a �' � s rt y1 Y ti Twenty n nd iieresta @$ 6 x 9 ary Years�� 4a '%) .. "t t b , ° '' R a 4 � Thu ty Years (Bond'Irite t res R at e @ Half Cent Sales Tax $43,900,000 $69,900,000 $85,600,000 Gas Taxes $47,400,000 $71,300,000 $84,700,000 Tourist Tax $8,600,000 $12,900,000 $15,300,000 First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $2,900,000 Second Guaranteed Entitlement $3,400,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 Sub -Total $104,900,000 $161,500,000 $194,500,000 Possible Pledge Sources Franchise Fees $35,000,000 $52,700,000 $62,600,000 Road Impact Fees $24,800,000 $37,300,000 $44,300,000 Sub -Total $59,800,000 $90,000,000 $106,900,000 TOTAL $164,700,000 $251,500,000 $301,400,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Debt Service Obligations The county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized in table 6.17. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 41 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element bonds. As table 6.17 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational revenue bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 42 6a 17i tart en€o'unty rt Bond},Schedule Ns. a i ,z `..; ,` : t .k., 7.rM,, . ,' .., t ? r :` ...; �alile En ;r t e .✓' . .. : SM t � s ..! C,,., s ..' . ' es r, ' 3.,.� j 4 z;9 t, :Water a - '""^^' �� Sewer; a fi ..: Revenue r' ,Refundmonds�, onds3 Y/, �'. & ks Su f,� f, „� �, ;, g �O,w 1�.t Recreational ; p v4; i, 1 ,, , h ?' [ qqui4� ' a, � ev 4G i Rfevenu, A.P ';e n ; .„ Refundwg� .€z�a,a;:�4 �a �,, 5 ..1� t' nth }%: 't^'4 }c., iS J%}, ,� �Environmenta r xt �zy t'IJ1 +iTF kZ i.'` tiv u''{t, n✓ },.4,::;if:m .+a. Sensitive Aeqursrt�on � --b. ��:<I 4� t1% f % , �� T[ _, � r Land xi,s.:uFrna: 1 y? �C �k� ^ �,k�, ?:''v4, y,� r ,e �s. {fi!Y � � ; V L Y `. 1 i i +Tr>..5 i r ( M, �b� vir , Envu9nmentallyI Fr eii . E Sens�trve Acgmsitton� .' 1M L�S, � k 5 1 5 i �.; 3 i , P rF'.i�fh S d.ik"'f, t r b'1 � vernan ' ., Land ,r , f�I,:r E �N 1},5 Y` °rt i' t.. L i �t XV i : t ✓t Yid 2 sr "�� k' i f �s,(. r �� "�f. `� n2 R'. 5Y Sri �£Y4'.: �3! �' .} y'`t4 Y Environmental] a i iWa . Fini. s r.�Y ks ensrtrve Landt ,fi f ' r' ,. ;1 C msrtton a , q�,;9 �� �za� Ihf tt{�:'n'Y � VPj i 'i �T" G'iA y a41 ae' ik�:^n�ry�r' +klaiT n'Rv.: awe n.��p '.: 14i r d y.: Y ateir"sfX.Ld tz %,�� Iewe �„, �Sgra _ t 4 "" ; `" Revenue& > 15 ,3 r t :a" ,' �Bonds�� <r.tt ��s; �'n�f. ��h4{Y '42.x'.: r c 't= t S $prang $.: n = , a x SET:' ,i Trainmgr Fae�lriy a =Revenues ��onds F dm>,,,f.,"� ;.� : g. 47,19Q0 `3E7airii0 s ,2i Li ea�r 13�`x S.. f� Q31Se,h nes .)1 '• ,455,0 1SereF4 a. i, 00010 3SerrF'SsI rsaa 00,Q0 �Yi C $,&00;0 06yS-0�erresro 2:IGhCSIYSene � 7,675;00 %s?r,2 n% 0_;y.:i 1S7 ..6.48t10 . . ., 4. oi0 0 0,`M,;: 2008 Interest $1,830,500 $160,764 $290,643 $99,775 $2,140,863 $1,092,450 $685,343 Principal $1,310,000 $485,000 $690,000 $1,135,000 $2,320,000 $1,310,000 $545,000 Total $3,140,500 $645,764 $980,643 $1,234,775 $4,460,863 $2,402,450 $1,230,343 Balance $32,695,000 $4,175,000 $6,675,000 $2,380,000 $46,280,000 $24,670,000 $13,455,000 2009 Interest $1,745,350 $148,638 $266,492 $71,400 $2,048,062 $1,053,150 $664,633 Principal $1,395,000 $490,000 $720,000 $1,170,000 $2,565,000 $1,350,000 $560,000 Total $3,140,350 $638,638 $986,492 $1,241,400 $4,613,062 $2,403,150 $1,224,633 Balance $31,300,000 $3,685,000 $5,955,000 $1,210,000 $43,715,000 $23,320,000 $12,895,000 2010 Interest $1,668,625 $135,164 $240,573 $36,300 $1,838,662 $1,012,650 $642,233 Principal $1,475,000 $510,000 $745,000 $1,210,000 $2,775,000 $1,395,000 $585,000 Total $3,143,625 $645,164 $985,573 $1,246,300 $4,613,662 $2,407,650 $1,227,233 Balance $29,825,000 $3,175,000 $5,210,000 $0 $38,270,000 $21,925,000 $12,310,000 2011 Interest $1,587,500 $119,864 $213,007 $1,727,663 $970,800 $618,833 Principal $1,555,000 $520,000 $780,000 $2,885,000 $1,435,000 $605,000 Total $3,142,500 $639,864 $993,007 $4,612,663 $2,405,800 $1,223,833 Balance $28,270,000 $2,655,000 $4,430,000 $35,385,000 $20,490,000 $11,705,000 2012 Interest $1,501,975 $102,964 $183,368 $1,612,262 $925,250 $593,423 Principal $1,640,000 $535,000 $810,000 $3,000,000 $1,480,000 $630,000 Total $3,141,975 $637,964 $993,368 $4,612,262 $2,405,250 $1,223,423 Balance $26,630,000 $2,120,000 $3,620,000 $32,385,000 $19,010,000 $11,075,000 2013 Interest $1,411,775 $83,169 $151,777 _ $1,492,263 $877,150 $566,333 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 42 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element bonds. As table 6.17 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational revenue bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 42 6a 17i tart en€o'unty rt Bond},Schedule Ns. a i ,z `..; ,` : t .k., 7.rM,, . ,' .., t ? r :` ...; �alile En ;r t e .✓' . .. : SM t � s ..! C,,., s ..' . ' es r, ' 3.,.� j 4 z;9 t, :Water a - '""^^' �� Sewer; a fi ..: Revenue r' ,Refundmonds�, onds3 Y/, �'. & ks Su f,� f, „� �, ;, g �O,w 1�.Sft Recreational ; p v4; i, 1 ,, , h ?' [ qqui4� ' a, � ev 4G i Rfevenu, A.P ';e n ; .„ Refundwg� .€z�a,a;:�4 �a �,, 5 ..1� t' nth }%: 't^'4 }c., iS J%}, ,� �Environmenta r xt �zy t'IJ1 +iTF kZ i.'` tiv u''{t, n✓ },.4,::;if:m .+a. Sensitive Aeqursrt�on � --b. ��:<I 4� t1% f % , �� T[ _, � r Land xi,s.:uFrna: 1 y? �C �k� ^ �,k�, ?:''v4, y,� r ,e �s. {fi!Y � � ; V L Y `. 1 i i +Tr>..5 i r ( M, �b� vir , Envu9nmentallyI Fr eii . E Sens�trve Acgmsitton� .' 1M L�S, � k 5 1 5 i �.; 3 i , P rF'.i�fh S d.ik"'f, t r b'1 � vernan ' ., Land ,r , f�I,:r E �N 1},5 Y` °rt i' t.. L i �t XV i : t ✓t Yid 2 sr "�� k' i f �s,(. r �� "�f. `� n2 R'. 5Y Sri �£Y4'.: �3! �' .} y'`t4 Y Environmental] a i iWa . Fini. s r.�Y ks ensrtrve Landt ,fi f ' r' ,. ;1 C msrtton a , q�,;9 �� �za� Ihf tt{�:'n'Y � VPj i 'i �T" G'iA y a41 ae' ik�:^n�ry�r' +klaiT n'Rv.: awe n.��p '.: 14i r d y.: Y ateir"sfX.Ld tz %,�� Iewe �„, �Sgra _ t 4 "" ; `" Revenue& > 15 ,3 r t :a" ,' �Bonds�� <r.tt ��s; �'n�f. ��h4{Y '42.x'.: r c 't= t S $prang $.: n = , a x SET:' ,i Trainmgr Fae�lriy a =Revenues ��onds F dm>,,,f.,"� ;.� : g. 47,19Q0 `3E7airii0 s ,2i Li ea�r 13�`x S.. f� Q31Se,h nes .)1 '• ,455,0 1SereF4 a. i, 00010 3SerrF'SsI rsaa 00,Q0 �Yi C $,&00;0 06yS-0�erresro 2:IGhCSIYSene � 7,675;00 %s?r,2 n% 0_;y.:i 1S7 ..6.48t10 . . ., 4. oi0 0 0,`M,;: 2008 Interest $1,830,500 $160,764 $290,643 $99,775 $2,140,863 $1,092,450 $685,343 Principal $1,310,000 $485,000 $690,000 $1,135,000 $2,320,000 $1,310,000 $545,000 Total $3,140,500 $645,764 $980,643 $1,234,775 $4,460,863 $2,402,450 $1,230,343 Balance $32,695,000 $4,175,000 $6,675,000 $2,380,000 $46,280,000 $24,670,000 $13,455,000 2009 Interest $1,745,350 $148,638 $266,492 $71,400 $2,048,062 $1,053,150 $664,633 Principal $1,395,000 $490,000 $720,000 $1,170,000 $2,565,000 $1,350,000 $560,000 Total $3,140,350 $638,638 $986,492 $1,241,400 $4,613,062 $2,403,150 $1,224,633 Balance $31,300,000 $3,685,000 $5,955,000 $1,210,000 $43,715,000 $23,320,000 $12,895,000 2010 Interest $1,668,625 $135,164 $240,573 $36,300 $1,838,662 $1,012,650 $642,233 Principal $1,475,000 $510,000 $745,000 $1,210,000 $2,775,000 $1,395,000 $585,000 Total $3,143,625 $645,164 $985,573 $1,246,300 $4,613,662 $2,407,650 $1,227,233 Balance $29,825,000 $3,175,000 $5,210,000 $0 $38,270,000 $21,925,000 $12,310,000 2011 Interest $1,587,500 $119,864 $213,007 $1,727,663 $970,800 $618,833 Principal $1,555,000 $520,000 $780,000 $2,885,000 $1,435,000 $605,000 Total $3,142,500 $639,864 $993,007 $4,612,663 $2,405,800 $1,223,833 Balance $28,270,000 $2,655,000 $4,430,000 $35,385,000 $20,490,000 $11,705,000 2012 Interest $1,501,975 $102,964 $183,368 $1,612,262 $925,250 $593,423 Principal $1,640,000 $535,000 $810,000 $3,000,000 $1,480,000 $630,000 Total $3,141,975 $637,964 $993,368 $4,612,262 $2,405,250 $1,223,423 Balance $26,630,000 $2,120,000 $3,620,000 $32,385,000 $19,010,000 $11,075,000 2013 Interest $1,411,775 $83,169 $151,777 _ $1,492,263 $877,150 $566,333 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 42 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 43 Endrri . FY g .. ,..,. >. Refunding WaICT Se Revenue Bonds wen 1' & :6. r'' 9 , , t kRecreahonal ,t i ' F tq ¢ t.,,. l i r, f Revenue rr Refundings Bonds tis y s F 71Y/ .ri s r " k �, }w l # 4:F ya` 44i ; �' I Environmental " `Sensitive Acquisition �! T > a, r Y e ,fir"k Land°v,' <,i n}M1"rt E'*. s i �= ywt 4 "..x,..;§,. 1§ `r *a2�05%0 .k,, ; s�,� la�,�,z -: ,:- Fi ! 4x' a, y�4 3 z. r Environmenta z ' Sensitive `tt 3 Acquisition r ��t ti§, gip` iii- .t t. kyi1 ��2003 Series $7;$0.Qi. yl yy'I 1 Land $t 0 C n s ly t x K b1' t `� �� '..$4,8'-600;000 L ! : § R { Enwronmentall Sensitive Acquisition 1t_r e N; K t'"'I z ' uz Y Land x ` r �} < 'f%4` ,A # 3 c sWater } Revenue ' Sewer Braids z * F r S y T11'411111'g Facility Revenue + nn Bonds g ' ., n i 2006 Series 4 22°°.,, _ -,„ ; 2005, Serres e,r�f3 94% sr r$2.;7i675;000; §2001,; 4:$%0 $16;810000,;; Series,; ,c,:,-..,,',, ^ , `" $4,7 Series xk20033Serres 5 755%of ., 190;000 ;,` 3 T, y $6,455000f,,,,>; "„ s3165%""k3, ," t'1 ���2001 �I' �. iSenesi ��3r89%t! $1ti o bI Principal $1,730,000 $555,000 $845,000 $3,120,000 $1,530,000 $655,000 Total $3,141,775 $638,169 $996,777 $4,612,263 $2,407,150 $1,221,333 Balance $24,900,000 $1,565,000 $2,775,000 $29,265,000 $17,480,000 $10,420,000 2014 Interest $1,316,250 $62,356 $117,978 $1,367,462 $800,650 $537,513 Principal $1,825,000 $580,000 $885,000 $3,255,000 $1,605,000 $685,000 Total $3,141,250 $642,356 $1,002,978 $4,622,462 $2,405,650 $1,222,513 Balance $23,075,000 $985,000 $1,890,000 $26,010,000 $15,875,000 $9,735,000 2015 [merest $1,216,250 $39,881 $80,807 $1,204,713 $736,450 $501,550 Principal $1,925,000 $600,000 $925,000 $3,390,000 $1,670,000 $725,000 Total $3,141,250 $639,881 $1,005,807 $4,594,713 $2,406,450 $1,226,550 Balance $21,150,000 $385,000 $965,000 $22,620,000 $14,205,000 $9,010,000 2016 Interest $1,110,375 $15,881 $41,495 $1,035,212 $652,950 $463,488 Principal $2,030,000 $385,000 $965,000 $3,545,000 $1,750,000 $760,000 Total $3,140,375 $400,881 $1,006,495 $4,580,212 $2,402,950 $1,223,488 Balance $19,120,000 $0 $0 $19,075,000 $12,455,000 $8,250,000 2017 Interest $1,003,800 $893,413 $565,450 $423,588 Principal $2,135,000 $3,705,000 $1,840,000 $795,000 Total $3,138,800 $4,598,413 $2,405,450 $1,218,588 Balance $16,985,000 $15,370,000 $10,615,000 $7,455,000 2018 Interest $891,713 $745,212 $473,450 $381,850 Principal $2,250,000 $3,890,000 $1,930,000 $840,000 Total $3,141,713 $4,635,212 $2,403,450 $1,221,850 Balance $14,735,000 $11,480,000 $8,685,000 $6,615,000 2019 Interest $773,558 $550,713 $376,950 $337,750 Principal $2,370,000 $4,085,000 $2,025,000 $890,000 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 43 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 43 Endrri . FY g .. ,..,. >. Refunding WaICT Se Revenue Bonds wen 1' & :6. r'' 9 , , t kRecreahonal ,t i ' F tq ¢ t.,,. l i r, f Revenue rr Refundings Bonds tis y s F 71Y/ .ri s r " k �, }w l # 4:F ya` 44i ; �' I Environmental " `Sensitive Acquisition �! T > a, r Y e ,fir"k Land°v,' <,i n}M1"rt E'*. s i �= ywt 4 "..x,..;§,. 1§ `r *a2�05%0 .k,, ; s�,� la�,�,z -: ,:- Fi ! 4x' a, y�4 3 z. r Environmenta z ' Sensitive `tt 3 Acquisition r ��t ti§, gip` iii- .t t. kyi1 ��2003 Series $7;$0.Qi. yl yy'I 1 Land $t 0 C n s ly t x K b1' t `� �� '..$4,8'-600;000 L ! : § R { Enwronmentall Sensitive Acquisition 1t_r e N; K t'"'I z ' uz Y Land x ` r �} < 'f%4` ,A # 3 c sWater } Revenue ' Sewer Braids z * F r S y T11'411111'g Facility Revenue + nn Bonds g ' ., n i 2006 Series 4 22°°.,, _ -,„ ; 2005, Serres e,r�f3 94% sr r$2.;7i675;000; §2001,; 4:$%0 $16;810000,;; Series,; ,c,:,-..,,',, ^ , `" $4,7 Series xk20033Serres 5 755%of ., 190;000 ;,` 3 T, y $6,455000f,,,,>; "„ s3165%""k3, ," t'1 ���2001 �I' �. iSenesi ��3r89%t! $1ti o bI Principal $1,730,000 $555,000 $845,000 $3,120,000 $1,530,000 $655,000 Total $3,141,775 $638,169 $996,777 $4,612,263 $2,407,150 $1,221,333 Balance $24,900,000 $1,565,000 $2,775,000 $29,265,000 $17,480,000 $10,420,000 2014 Interest $1,316,250 $62,356 $117,978 $1,367,462 $800,650 $537,513 Principal $1,825,000 $580,000 $885,000 $3,255,000 $1,605,000 $685,000 Total $3,141,250 $642,356 $1,002,978 $4,622,462 $2,405,650 $1,222,513 Balance $23,075,000 $985,000 $1,890,000 $26,010,000 $15,875,000 $9,735,000 2015 [merest $1,216,250 $39,881 $80,807 $1,204,713 $736,450 $501,550 Principal $1,925,000 $600,000 $925,000 $3,390,000 $1,670,000 $725,000 Total $3,141,250 $639,881 $1,005,807 $4,594,713 $2,406,450 $1,226,550 Balance $21,150,000 $385,000 $965,000 $22,620,000 $14,205,000 $9,010,000 2016 Interest $1,110,375 $15,881 $41,495 $1,035,212 $652,950 $463,488 Principal $2,030,000 $385,000 $965,000 $3,545,000 $1,750,000 $760,000 Total $3,140,375 $400,881 $1,006,495 $4,580,212 $2,402,950 $1,223,488 Balance $19,120,000 $0 $0 $19,075,000 $12,455,000 $8,250,000 2017 Interest $1,003,800 $893,413 $565,450 $423,588 Principal $2,135,000 $3,705,000 $1,840,000 $795,000 Total $3,138,800 $4,598,413 $2,405,450 $1,218,588 Balance $16,985,000 $15,370,000 $10,615,000 $7,455,000 2018 Interest $891,713 $745,212 $473,450 $381,850 Principal $2,250,000 $3,890,000 $1,930,000 $840,000 Total $3,141,713 $4,635,212 $2,403,450 $1,221,850 Balance $14,735,000 $11,480,000 $8,685,000 $6,615,000 2019 Interest $773,558 $550,713 $376,950 $337,750 Principal $2,370,000 $4,085,000 $2,025,000 $890,000 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 43 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 44 Ending FY K , _.. t LL ). ,w r'.d_ Water Sewer Revenue` Refunding Bondsj ..,.. f; & 5 " „` y . r" ra s m, £ Ln e. YdhAs ) , Recreational 1, °'; Revenue e f Re`filndingv x ,rr U% rv. '" tfa" .-! Bonds= ', ; .. .GL 4 x i a.* ,..x. : ' ': i h Environmentally, Sensitive�Land; Acquisition t 3,t i d i k a F ti. 5. 8e.f,e4.n l , u °'-s , 3d .5 ?-t. W Enviromnenta11y4 n Sensitive r i kA.<i&&y. ' n m i t Land' Acquisition w. 1 •.a. .m ,... f w i ..li , J .C.ti iM}.J ;, ,Envtr`o`nmentall •- Sensitive Acquisition t 5L ? "41 xT. fr ` ` Y Land , "t4 a` rAa.'STCtSd x x" Water t s x' "' ewer, c , Revenue Bonds, a� L i r sd..,,�...h. w & ' . a ` ....r{ -. {... ..,s Sprin Training Facility Revenue " onds o t t ; ,_. M '� �> r �7i 1 Y ..« ),x t 4 ';5755%i"" s :,a $47;190;000;s �1993A �.v�,a.k.: Series , r SpY k r d, .a ''Ei• *,2003 ty I,�i�3'65% triv{.,�t $6 455,OOOx A -: Series < fT�''£ b t {'l�' 'a+t v: k.P'�I+! ss £ 2001 z389%�d1i; ;$]rF,00,0;000„;` £ 5 qi Series $,x<!� .,.,;'•:ry� i , s t,,, ..,, ' �;2003,Series .2i._d:. 205%F,: .„ vi$,7 800,000 s k- �tiza ,F, ..1'+ y�" 4 � ,p d" Ss _ , , ££i� {, ,?i,itNi ,2;006wSertes 5 £xs?:"' 'dC.rv"k� r,14>221itq,�394/tb,487/oI",., is .$.48,600;000 ir. �as;:Y`pM�p pq i'�7. £"a",;° ski r x.,, ,.,°, iY f; ,u E tr Y.,....;. r�2005' eves .7 x'k �& 9n nk"{ �JL, $27,675,000 i F a, ,i t�,...w;: 2001 Serres�f:, t t5r ,,e r :� "n ,,,, is.,r k�5, , ;$t6 810,000,,E Total $3,143,558 $4,635,713 $2,401,950 $1,227,750 Balance $12,365,000 $7,395,000 $6,660,000 $5,725,000 2020 Interest $649,163 $346,462 $275,700 $291,025 Principal $2,490,000 $4,290,000 $2,130,000 $930,000 Total $3,139,163 $4,636,462 $2,405,700 $1,221,025 Balance $9,875,000 $3,105,000 $4,530,000 $4,795,000 2021 Interest $518,438 $131,963 $186,750 $242,200 Principal $2,625,000 $3,105,000 $2,220,000 $980,000 Total $3,143,438 $3,236,963 $2,406,750 $1,222,200 Balance $7,250,000 $0 $2,310,000 $3,815,000 2022 Interest $380,625 $92,400 $190,750 Principal $2,760,000 $2,310,000 $305,000 Total $3,140,625 $2,402,400 $495,750 Balance $4,490,000 $0 $3,510,000 2023 Interest $235,725 $175,500 Principal $2,905,000 $320,000 Total $3,140,725 $495,500 Balance $1,585,000 $3,190,000 2024 Interest $83,213 $159,500 Principal $1,585,000 $340,000 Total $1,668,213 $499,500 Balance $0 $2,850,000 2025 Interest $142,500 Principal $355,000 Total $497,500 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 44 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 44 Ending FY K , _.. t LL ). ,w r'.d_ Water Sewer Revenue` Refunding Bondsj ..,.. f; & 5 " „` y . r" ra s m, £ Ln e. YdhAs ) , Recreational 1, °'; Revenue e f Re`filndingv x ,rr U% rv. '" tfa" .-! Bonds= ', ; .. .GL 4 x i a.* ,..x. : ' ': i h Environmentally, Sensitive�Land; Acquisition t 3,t i d i k a F ti. 5. 8e.f,e4.n l , u °'-s , 3d .5 ?-t. W Enviromnenta11y4 n Sensitive r i kA.<i&&y. ' n m i t Land' Acquisition w. 1 •.a. .m ,... f w i ..li , J .C.ti iM}.J ;, ,Envtr`o`nmentall •- Sensitive Acquisition t 5L ? "41 xT. fr ` ` Y Land , "t4 a` rAa.'STCtSd x x" Water t s x' "' ewer, c , Revenue Bonds, a� L i r sd..,,�...h. w & ' . a ` ....r{ -. {... ..,s Sprin Training Facility Revenue " onds o t t ; ,_. M '� �> r �7i 1 Y ..« ),x t 4 ';5755%i"" s :,a $47;190;000;s �1993A �.v�,a.k.: Series , r SpY k r d, .a ''Ei• *,2003 ty I,�i�3'65% triv{.,�t $6 455,OOOx A -: Series < fT�''£ b t {'l�' 'a+t v: k.P'�I+! ss £ 2001 z389%�d1i; ;$]rF,00,0;000„;` £ 5 qi Series $,x<!� .,.,;'•:ry� i , s t,,, ..,, ' �;2003,Series .2i._d:. 205%F,: .„ vi$,7 800,000 s k- �tiza ,F, ..1'+ y�" 4 � ,p d" Ss _ , , ££i� {, ,?i,itNi ,2;006wSertes 5 £xs?:"' 'dC.rv"k� r,14>221itq,�394/tb,487/oI",., is .$.48,600;000 ir. �as;:Y`pM�p pq i'�7. £"a",;° ski r x.,, ,.,°, iY f; ,u E tr Y.,....;. r�2005' eves .7 x'k �& 9n nk"{ �JL, $27,675,000 i F a, ,i t�,...w;: 2001 Serres�f:, t t5r ,,e r :� "n ,,,, is.,r k�5, , ;$t6 810,000,,E Total $3,143,558 $4,635,713 $2,401,950 $1,227,750 Balance $12,365,000 $7,395,000 $6,660,000 $5,725,000 2020 Interest $649,163 $346,462 $275,700 $291,025 Principal $2,490,000 $4,290,000 $2,130,000 $930,000 Total $3,139,163 $4,636,462 $2,405,700 $1,221,025 Balance $9,875,000 $3,105,000 $4,530,000 $4,795,000 2021 Interest $518,438 $131,963 $186,750 $242,200 Principal $2,625,000 $3,105,000 $2,220,000 $980,000 Total $3,143,438 $3,236,963 $2,406,750 $1,222,200 Balance $7,250,000 $0 $2,310,000 $3,815,000 2022 Interest $380,625 $92,400 $190,750 Principal $2,760,000 $2,310,000 $305,000 Total $3,140,625 $2,402,400 $495,750 Balance $4,490,000 $0 $3,510,000 2023 Interest $235,725 $175,500 Principal $2,905,000 $320,000 Total $3,140,725 $495,500 Balance $1,585,000 $3,190,000 2024 Interest $83,213 $159,500 Principal $1,585,000 $340,000 Total $1,668,213 $499,500 Balance $0 $2,850,000 2025 Interest $142,500 Principal $355,000 Total $497,500 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 44 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Source: Indian River County Office of Management Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 45 Ending 3 FY i r; rt E xt. 4 Refunding yI...4"-at t s: ater& e ` Sewer x event' Bo` nds xY '' 3, �h 3klhci 4�"'t +"f o- .: Recreational, `en Revenue t Refunding' i 0 t= rBondsx u� x �� r rf `e r ;'. y< 4 ry ipz°»'4�y'r «" *: ; 1. '"' k Environm'entall Sensitive r '6, , ,,t�,';s�. S Y �St. s' r.. `z4 x a.'.,n�v(r ux „r, : < r„ k Yj, . ;F Land r r0 uisition, ' { `fir`'" �,� 5 Environmentall s rSensitive F f 4 S .l z -r N, +'3 x^,�-rP 'r z ,zt' zi AWN- .4 Lands . Aeqursitlon t : a ' .3 ,.:xi ��... ivA,Si :4 ti�4 >,w8 {}3r s` '"•` Environmentally 'Sensrtrve ,� Ac uisition r �.: sr "`�"CRr Land tit �<'aa * r !.r S{. ' y , ,� rk %# Q�Water Sewer Revenue Bonds i ._.�;',. & a ,: "Y .. .1“. }rmgr Train Face Revenue �r B911 ity S su .a ^ ... k k ¢.v a x.Wrx f t 5 S Fe �� ( I: P „ I$47it90,04.00 11993 F�TKIJ 3, 'Y t. �..+,( r" cries $ 755°/u�43:65%tq 4: E�$65, 3 ...^$t • �2003xSenes 39, y r f-" .X i^ t x �' i :'i x eu OQ pr," dy r, lL 4yyri 1 t' Ffsf( r SKAT" },a t e , 2001Sertes t >3 89%+*�� Y. b� _: ' $11,00Q,000a� �`xro.,&i'xit , , ars�F X,k p 7Am tSi�i4y eti 1 h..y�'a7Ci�i S �w i 'YW%^ t f ems ;, x2003 Senes � ` 2+050{r��r.422�0 ty r�irt i y, x + .$7,80,0,000 f� rY�','d "' , «w 20Osi g•-.41.-S1S 4T&:600t��OrS,axr qke $<=_ fq S .S {yF M1 _ �,ti,'`t}� �y;z;"� . ,O a, » 4 q t? / 'i N 'N . t, 2005 Series, y„ j 3 94% �� $27675000't,;rr$16'8IOOO�O1 ,�$_�..> 7, ,._._,.. , 2001pySenes 4$- p , > . Balance $2,495,000 2026 Interest $124,750 Principal $375,000 Total $499,750 Balance $2,120,000 2027 Interest $106,000 Principal $390,000 Total $496,000 Balance $1,730,000 2028 Interest $86,500 Principal $410,000 Total $496,500 Balance $1,320,000 2029 Interest $66,000 Principal $430,000 Total $496,000 Balance $890,000 2030 Interest $44,500 Principal $455,000 Total $499,500 Balance $435,000 2031 Interest $21,750 Principal $435,000 Total $456,750 Balance $0 Source: Indian River County Office of Management Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 45 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Source: Indian River County Office of Management Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 45 Ending 3 FY i r; rt E xt. 4 Refunding yI...4"-at t s: ater& e ` Sewer x event' Bo` nds xY '' 3, �h 3klhci 4�"'t +"f o- .: Recreational, `en Revenue t Refunding' i 0 t= rBondsx u� x �� r rf `e r ;'. y< 4 ry ipz°»'4�y'r «" *: ; 1. '"' k Environm'entall Sensitive r '6, , ,,t�,';s�. S Y �St. s' r.. `z4 x a.'.,n�v(r ux „r, : < r„ k Yj, . ;F Land r r0 uisition, ' { `fir`'" �,� 5 Environmentall s rSensitive F f 4 S .l z -r N, +'3 x^,�-rP 'r z ,zt' zi AWN- .4 Lands . Aeqursitlon t : a ' .3 ,.:xi ��... ivA,Si :4 ti�4 >,w8 {}3r s` '"•` Environmentally 'Sensrtrve ,� Ac uisition r �.: sr "`�"CRr Land tit �<'aa * r !.r S{. ' y , ,� rk %# Q�Water Sewer Revenue Bonds i ._.�;',. & a ,: "Y .. .1“. }rmgr Train Face Revenue �r B911 ity S su .a ^ ... k k ¢.v a x.Wrx f t 5 S Fe �� ( I: P „ I$47it90,04.00 11993 F�TKIJ 3, 'Y t. �..+,( r" cries $ 755°/u�43:65%tq 4: E�$65, 3 ...^$t • �2003xSenes 39, y r f-" .X i^ t x �' i :'i x eu OQ pr," dy r, lL 4yyri 1 t' Ffsf( r SKAT" },a t e , 2001Sertes t >3 89%+*�� Y. b� _: ' $11,00Q,000a� �`xro.,&i'xit , , ars�F X,k p 7Am tSi�i4y eti 1 h..y�'a7Ci�i S �w i 'YW%^ t f ems ;, x2003 Senes � ` 2+050{r��r.422�0 ty r�irt i y, x + .$7,80,0,000 f� rY�','d "' , «w 20Osi g•-.41.-S1S 4T&:600t��OrS,axr qke $<=_ fq S .S {yF M1 _ �,ti,'`t}� �y;z;"� . ,O a, » 4 q t? / 'i N 'N . t, 2005 Series, y„ j 3 94% �� $27675000't,;rr$16'8IOOO�O1 ,�$_�..> 7, ,._._,.. , 2001pySenes 4$- p , > . Balance $2,495,000 2026 Interest $124,750 Principal $375,000 Total $499,750 Balance $2,120,000 2027 Interest $106,000 Principal $390,000 Total $496,000 Balance $1,730,000 2028 Interest $86,500 Principal $410,000 Total $496,500 Balance $1,320,000 2029 Interest $66,000 Principal $430,000 Total $496,000 Balance $890,000 2030 Interest $44,500 Principal $455,000 Total $499,500 Balance $435,000 2031 Interest $21,750 Principal $435,000 Total $456,750 Balance $0 Source: Indian River County Office of Management Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 45 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elemen? Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2008/09 and ending in FY 2012/13. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe and revenue source(s), Table 6 9 provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 2012/13. As shown in Table 6.9, the County will generate $1,713,717,261 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 2008/09 to fiscal year 2012/13. Portions of the money needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,713,717,261. Other sources, including grants and impact fees, will also be utilized to fund capital improvement projects. Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. The total estimated cost of all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list is $397,065,553 for the next five fiscal years. This is 23% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place which provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. This system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards. While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements. The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the county's level -of -service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available. Project Applicability All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level -of -service standards. Development orders are county approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #1.3; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 46 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elemen? Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2008/09 and ending in FY 2012/13. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe and revenue source(s), Table 6 9 provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 2012/13. As shown in Table 6.9, the County will generate $1,713,717,261 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 2008/09 to fiscal year 2012/13. Portions of the money needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,713,717,261. Other sources, including grants and impact fees, will also be utilized to fund capital improvement projects. Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. The total estimated cost of all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list is $397,065,553 for the next five fiscal years. This is 23% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place which provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. This system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards. While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements. The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the county's level -of -service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available. Project Applicability All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level -of -service standards. Development orders are county approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #1.3; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 46 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county's comprehensive plan. According to Section 163.3180(6), F.S., the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities. State law allows such de minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County shall apply the single family de minimus allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13, 1990. Currently, all county maintained roads are operating below the adopted level of service and have additional capacity to accommodate future growth. Service Standards Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements. For each facility, level -of -service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.18 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility These measures are addressed m detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements. *Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 47 Table 618 Servicev eve ,Measur'es for Concurrency Re ate, d Facilities Public Facilityr Category Specific I acuity Capacity Measure Demand Measure 'r ..d._ Geographic Scope " Transportation Roadway Volume of cars accommodated over time Peak Season/Peak Direction/Peak Hour Trips Affected Roadways Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant (GPD) Treatment design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Potable Water Treatment Plant (GPD) Treatment Design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic yards) Generation Rate (tons per capita per year) Entire County Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per thousand population Entire County Stormwater Management Drainage conveyances Volume of water Volume of stormwater outfalling for design storm Basin Education* Public Schools (K- 12) Number of Children accommodated over time Enrolled Students/ Future Student Generation Service Area *Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 47 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county's comprehensive plan. According to Section 163.3180(6), F.S., the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities. State law allows such de minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County shall apply the single family de minimus allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13, 1990. Currently, all county maintained roads are operating below the adopted level of service and have additional capacity to accommodate future growth. Service Standards Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements. For each facility, level -of -service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.18 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility These measures are addressed m detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements. *Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 47 Table 618 Servicev eve ,Measur'es for Concurrency Re ate, d Facilities Public Facilityr Category Specific I acuity Capacity Measure Demand Measure 'r ..d._ Geographic Scope " Transportation Roadway Volume of cars accommodated over time Peak Season/Peak Direction/Peak Hour Trips Affected Roadways Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant (GPD) Treatment design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Potable Water Treatment Plant (GPD) Treatment Design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic yards) Generation Rate (tons per capita per year) Entire County Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per thousand population Entire County Stormwater Management Drainage conveyances Volume of water Volume of stormwater outfalling for design storm Basin Education* Public Schools (K- 12) Number of Children accommodated over time Enrolled Students/ Future Student Generation Service Area *Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 47 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis. Table 6.18 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; this is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways will be those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. All projects, regardless of size, impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project are impacted. For concurrency purposes, roadways that gain 5% or more of the project's traffic or 50 or more of the project's generated trips, whichever is less are included. Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are to apply to all requests for development orders and permits. Level - of -service standards are measurements based on peak -hour trips and based on volume ranges or average travel speed for the peak hour. Demand Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level -of -service for the facility. As depicted in Table 6.18, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management. Existing Demand Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan elements. Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity. Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 48 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis. Table 6.18 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; this is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways will be those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. All projects, regardless of size, impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project are impacted. For concurrency purposes, roadways that gain 5% or more of the project's traffic or 50 or more of the project's generated trips, whichever is less are included. Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are to apply to all requests for development orders and permits. Level - of -service standards are measurements based on peak -hour trips and based on volume ranges or average travel speed for the peak hour. Demand Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level -of -service for the facility. As depicted in Table 6.18, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management. Existing Demand Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan elements. Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity. Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 48 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elerneni measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line. Committed Demand Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the corrnnitted demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. This estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects. Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined. Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip late to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element. Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each mayor roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated. Projected Demand The third type of demand is projected demand This consists of two types One is non- committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990, while the other is new project demand. Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since this type of construction will impact Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 49 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elerneni measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line. Committed Demand Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the corrnnitted demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. This estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects. Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined. Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip late to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element. Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each mayor roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated. Projected Demand The third type of demand is projected demand This consists of two types One is non- committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990, while the other is new project demand. Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since this type of construction will impact Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 49 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion plans. For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and consider the impacts of construction on these lots. The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand. Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing in -the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. According to Chapter 9J-5.0055(3), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency, Florida Administrative Code the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: ➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: 1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S. or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.] ➢ For parks and recreation facilities: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 50 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion plans. For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and consider the impacts of construction on these lots. The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand. Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing in -the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. According to Chapter 9J-5.0055(3), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency, Florida Administrative Code the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: ➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: 1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S. or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.] ➢ For parks and recreation facilities: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 50 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), F.S.] ➢ Transportation supply (capacity): Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is: 1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or 2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and if. a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #1.3; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 51 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), F.S.] ➢ Transportation supply (capacity): Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is: 1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or 2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and if. a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #1.3; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 51 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Eley-,, t to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion (for Indian River County, this is included in policy 5.11 of this element and within Appendix B of this element). ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for hldian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or At the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or 4. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S.] 5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair -share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement. ➢ For school facilities: A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas as defined in Section 163.3180(13)(c), F.S. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 52 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Eley-,, t to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion (for Indian River County, this is included in policy 5.11 of this element and within Appendix B of this element). ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for hldian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or At the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or 4. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S.] 5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair -share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement. ➢ For school facilities: A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas as defined in Section 163.3180(13)(c), F.S. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 52 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Regulation No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan Level -of -service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required. Monitoring System To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level -of -service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility. With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility. Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed. Table 6.19 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public facility category. This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 53 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Regulation No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan Level -of -service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required. Monitoring System To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level -of -service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility. With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility. Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed. Table 6.19 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public facility category. This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 53 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary. Table 6, 6.19:Monito;7 Monitoring System r ng System<DiPsi ria is "i Public Facility Category Specific :' Facilities �. Responsible Total Capaczty .. ry .a1 , Timing ) f ' . ... , FnM"`+, ,' Committed �s , .. ,i`.:4 Demand ' _' ,4;.E➢Y..F x. Xi Available ..v¢L.kr ie Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Capacity . - . f':x ...A" ,.�L.I Ex1stwg Demand, v ..� rv.1, nlc Traffic Roadways Peak season/ peak direction/ peak hour (LOS D) Annual count (average) (peak season/peak direction/peak hour) Volume estimated from approved Development Orders (DO) (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plants Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Potable Water Treatment Plants Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Solid Waste Landfill Active cell design _ capacity Active cell volume used Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand)- (Committed Demand) Recreation Parks Park Acreage (Acres per thousand population) X (existing population) (Acres per thousand population) X (projected population for approved DO's) (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Drainage Drainage conveyances Volume Existing flows Volume of stormwater allowed to outfall for approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Education Public Schools(K-12) Permanent Student Stations (FISH) Annual Enrollment Count (FTE) Students estimated from approved residential Development Orders) (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 54 Table 6 20. Monitoring System as Action , ..� �. Responsible Departme'ht f Timing Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand Engineering Annually Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes MPO Annually Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Annually Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used Utilities Annually Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand Planning Annually Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances Engineering Annually Enter data received from other departments into computer Planning Ongoing Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand School District Annually Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO Planning Ongoing Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated Planning Ongoing Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 54 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary. Table 6, 6.19:Monito;7 Monitoring System r ng System<DiPsi ria is "i Public Facility Category Specific :' Facilities �. Responsible Total Capaczty .. ry .a1 , Timing ) f ' . ... , FnM"`+, ,' Committed �s , .. ,i`.:4 Demand ' _' ,4;.E➢Y..F x. Xi Available ..v¢L.kr ie Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Capacity . - . f':x ...A" ,.�L.I Ex1stwg Demand, v ..� rv.1, nlc Traffic Roadways Peak season/ peak direction/ peak hour (LOS D) Annual count (average) (peak season/peak direction/peak hour) Volume estimated from approved Development Orders (DO) (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plants Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Potable Water Treatment Plants Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Solid Waste Landfill Active cell design _ capacity Active cell volume used Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand)- (Committed Demand) Recreation Parks Park Acreage (Acres per thousand population) X (existing population) (Acres per thousand population) X (projected population for approved DO's) (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Drainage Drainage conveyances Volume Existing flows Volume of stormwater allowed to outfall for approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Education Public Schools(K-12) Permanent Student Stations (FISH) Annual Enrollment Count (FTE) Students estimated from approved residential Development Orders) (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary. Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 54 Table 6 20. Monitoring System as Action , ..� �. Responsible Departme'ht f Timing Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand Engineering Annually Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes MPO Annually Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Annually Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used Utilities Annually Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand Planning Annually Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances Engineering Annually Enter data received from other departments into computer Planning Ongoing Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand School District Annually Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO Planning Ongoing Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated Planning Ongoing Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 54 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Applicability The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level -of - service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 55 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Applicability The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level -of - service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 55 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Goal It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making. Objectives and Policies Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities By 2013, the county will have eliminated existing deficiencies, accommodated desired future growth, and replaced obsolete or worn-out facilities. Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163.31 77(3)(b) F.S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standards are achieved and maintained. Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Puisuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent with Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, defer, or eliminationwill cause the level -of -service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DCA. Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance. ➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; ➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; ➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies; ➢ Maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards; ➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; ➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investments* ➢ Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; ➢ Accommodation of new development andredevelopment facility demands; Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 56 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Goal It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making. Objectives and Policies Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities By 2013, the county will have eliminated existing deficiencies, accommodated desired future growth, and replaced obsolete or worn-out facilities. Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163.31 77(3)(b) F.S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standards are achieved and maintained. Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Puisuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent with Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, defer, or eliminationwill cause the level -of -service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DCA. Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance. ➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; ➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; ➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies; ➢ Maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards; ➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; ➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investments* ➢ Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; ➢ Accommodation of new development andredevelopment facility demands; Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 56 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction; ➢ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas; ➢ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; ➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; ➢ Reduction of operating costs; ➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters. Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub -elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems. Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level -of -service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastiucture. Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%. Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $25,000. Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities. Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 57 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction; ➢ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas; ➢ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; ➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; ➢ Reduction of operating costs; ➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters. Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub -elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems. Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level -of -service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastiucture. Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%. Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $25,000. Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities. Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 57 Comprehensive Plan Capital Im rovements Element. Policy 1.12: The county shall adopt "School District of Indian River County Five -Year Capital Improvement Schedule ' from the School District's adopted Five Year Capital Plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(a)(5) F.S. The Capital Improvement Schedule with be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the School District's Five -Year Capital Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of - service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained. Objective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas Through 2020, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane. P olicy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map. P olicy 2.3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards P olicy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level -of -service standards Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions. Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Objective 3: Maintenance of Established Level -of -Service Standards Through 2020, adopted levels -of -service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities. Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910 Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 58 Comprehensive Plan Capital Im rovements Element. Policy 1.12: The county shall adopt "School District of Indian River County Five -Year Capital Improvement Schedule ' from the School District's adopted Five Year Capital Plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(a)(5) F.S. The Capital Improvement Schedule with be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the School District's Five -Year Capital Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of - service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained. Objective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas Through 2020, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane. P olicy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map. P olicy 2.3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards P olicy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level -of -service standards Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions. Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Objective 3: Maintenance of Established Level -of -Service Standards Through 2020, adopted levels -of -service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities. Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910 Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 58 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level -of -service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level -of -service standard. Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements. Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels -of -service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval. Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to maintain adopted level -of -service standards Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level -of -service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below: ➢ Stormwater Management: The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county: ➢ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves. ➢ Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre -development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre -development discharge. By 2010, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level -of -service standards: ➢ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets. ➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 59 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level -of -service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level -of -service standard. Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements. Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels -of -service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval. Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to maintain adopted level -of -service standards Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level -of -service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below: ➢ Stormwater Management: The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county: ➢ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves. ➢ Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre -development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre -development discharge. By 2010, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level -of -service standards: ➢ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets. ➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 59 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elemen ➢ All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards: By 2007 5-Year/24 Hour Storm Event By 2010 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event The county hereby adopts the following water quality level -of -service standard: ➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law. ➢ Potable Water The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. ➢ Solid Waste The following level -of -service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year. ➢ Sanitary S ewer The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for deteiinining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. ➢ Recreation & Open Space The county adopts the following recreation level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 60 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Elemen ➢ All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards: By 2007 5-Year/24 Hour Storm Event By 2010 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event The county hereby adopts the following water quality level -of -service standard: ➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law. ➢ Potable Water The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. ➢ Solid Waste The following level -of -service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year. ➢ Sanitary S ewer The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for deteiinining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. ➢ Recreation & Open Space The county adopts the following recreation level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 60 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ Transportation The county adopts traffic circulation level -of -service standards as follows: ➢ Level -of -Service D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%. • 27`'' Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C' is adopted for urban areas Policy 3.6: The county hereby adopts level -of -service standards for selected public facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities The county adopts the following correctional facilities level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level -of -service standard of .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level -of -service standard: ➢ Unincorporated County level -of -service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries The county adopts the following Libraries level -of -service standards: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 61 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ Transportation The county adopts traffic circulation level -of -service standards as follows: ➢ Level -of -Service D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%. • 27`'' Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C' is adopted for urban areas Policy 3.6: The county hereby adopts level -of -service standards for selected public facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities The county adopts the following correctional facilities level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level -of -service standard of .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level -of -service standard: ➢ Unincorporated County level -of -service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries The county adopts the following Libraries level -of -service standards: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 61 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Public Buildings The county adopts the following Public Buildings level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Schools The county adopts the following Schools level -of -service standard: Schools (School Service Areas)• ➢ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Transit The County adopts the following transit level -of -service standard: ➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes. Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs Through 2020, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level -of -service standards Policy 4.2: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 62 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Public Buildings The county adopts the following Public Buildings level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Schools The county adopts the following Schools level -of -service standard: Schools (School Service Areas)• ➢ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Transit The County adopts the following transit level -of -service standard: ➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes. Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs Through 2020, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level -of -service standards Policy 4.2: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 62 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Objective 5: Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities Through 2020, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities. Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element. Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority: ➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels ➢ Affordable housing projects ➢ New development orders permitting redevelopment ➢ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement ➢ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services: ➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi -use facilities; ➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; ➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least -cost manner; ➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures. Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources. ➢ olicy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non -enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 63 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Objective 5: Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities Through 2020, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities. Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element. Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority: ➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels ➢ Affordable housing projects ➢ New development orders permitting redevelopment ➢ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement ➢ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services: ➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi -use facilities; ➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; ➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least -cost manner; ➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures. Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources. ➢ olicy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non -enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 63 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources. Policy 5.8: Developments which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non -debt revenue. Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level -of -service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level -of -service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following: ➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; ➢ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or ➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level -of -service for public facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed. Policy 5.11: The county hereby adopts Appendix B as the County's Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule. This schedule provides the project description, estimated date of commencement of actual construction, estimated date of completion, and estimated cost for projects that will increase roadway capacity on priority facilities. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 1.8, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 64 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources. Policy 5.8: Developments which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non -debt revenue. Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level -of -service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level -of -service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following: ➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; ➢ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or ➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level -of -service for public facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed. Policy 5.11: The county hereby adopts Appendix B as the County's Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule. This schedule provides the project description, estimated date of commencement of actual construction, estimated date of completion, and estimated cost for projects that will increase roadway capacity on priority facilities. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 1.8, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 64 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring Implementation An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.21 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.20, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities dischaige their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensuies the maintenance of the adopted level -of -service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level -of -service standards are maintained. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 65 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring Implementation An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.21 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.20, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities dischaige their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensuies the maintenance of the adopted level -of -service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level -of -service standards are maintained. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 65 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 66 6 21 Cap>ttal�Improvement°E1`ementTImplementatloi hs� i .. 4th ��: ' a« e sa *t a t t� Matnx h::. ` table -, Pohe f C r yf f F "� °� I Y,i i`>fiType of�A"ehon'G .�z a 4 �f S' ..� 2:�,.,od in Y.' 1f} 4 �4 .`i d b i 4 i tt J ��� 3 r. ��tir, „� ��±,` -^0. Y 4�y C t iP a _I # i( I . S 'Hid Responstbdtty� F y; .�"k �9..rr*t.eea.7Y:` o�Eu...ri:,F'. 1t.0 f Trni .. �,i7rr..mrva, % # { n"g, ... z Y `Capital Expenditure 1.1 .. .,y+,,. Maintain the CIP OMB/PD 2009-2013 No 1.2 Follow the CIP PD 2009-2013 No 1.3 Prioritize capital improvement projects OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 1.4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County Departments/SD 2009-2013 Yes 1.5 Prioritize and implement programs Appropriate County Departments/SD 2009-2013 Yes 1.6 Maintain previous commitments BCC/PWD/SD Ongoing No 1.7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing No 1.8 Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.9 Define capital improvement PD/OMB Ongoing No 1.10 Capital Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.11 Capital Improvements Management 0M13/SD Ongoing No 2.1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No 2.2 Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU Map PD Ongoing No 2.3 Budget management Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.5 Funding mechanisms BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No 2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategy Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No 3 2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub- Elements Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.3 Maintain adopted LOS standards PD Ongoing No 3.4 Land use decisions BCC Ongoing No 3.5 Adopt LOS standards BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 4.1 Impose regulations Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 4.2 Conduct research OMB/PD Ongoing No Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 66 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 66 6 21 Cap>ttal�Improvement°E1`ementTImplementatloi hs� i .. 4th ��: ' a« e sa *t a t t� Matnx h::. ` table -, Pohe f C r yf f F "� °� I Y,i i`>fiType of�A"ehon'G .�z a 4 �f S' ..� 2:�,.,od in Y.' 1f} 4 �4 .`i d b i 4 i tt J ��� 3 r. ��tir, „� ��±,` -^0. Y 4�y C t iP a _I # i( I . S 'Hid Responstbdtty� F y; .�"k �9..rr*t.eea.7Y:` o�Eu...ri:,F'. 1t.0 f Trni .. �,i7rr..mrva, % # { n"g, ... z Y `Capital Expenditure 1.1 .. .,y+,,. Maintain the CIP OMB/PD 2009-2013 No 1.2 Follow the CIP PD 2009-2013 No 1.3 Prioritize capital improvement projects OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 1.4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County Departments/SD 2009-2013 Yes 1.5 Prioritize and implement programs Appropriate County Departments/SD 2009-2013 Yes 1.6 Maintain previous commitments BCC/PWD/SD Ongoing No 1.7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing No 1.8 Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.9 Define capital improvement PD/OMB Ongoing No 1.10 Capital Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.11 Capital Improvements Management 0M13/SD Ongoing No 2.1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No 2.2 Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU Map PD Ongoing No 2.3 Budget management Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.5 Funding mechanisms BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No 2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategy Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No 3 2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub- Elements Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.3 Maintain adopted LOS standards PD Ongoing No 3.4 Land use decisions BCC Ongoing No 3.5 Adopt LOS standards BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 4.1 Impose regulations Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 4.2 Conduct research OMB/PD Ongoing No Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 66 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.22 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 67 ` Capital` Impi�ouement�h n. .tt. ��. r',.. .. s t, t,P.i<.. lement�Implementa eC41 i'!- . . m:,< L lin Matrix i ,-,/-4:. Table G..., ., §,b ,- i. b Pohcy1 ,. ,4 t Type of Action r....Nx a ..,�.. _..,. _s ��.... "es ,.....:,�� xd' .�._. E ity ._r.�. 5 s Tin A ng ,,,,, .. a . t ture. jtatExpenditurer. _ _,. 4.3 Work with municipalities BCC/SD/Other Local Governments in IRC Ongoing No 5.1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can support land use change BCC Ongoing No 5.2 Prioritize capital improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Appropriate County Departments/Other Government Agencies Ongoing No 5.5 Utilize enterprise funds 0M13 Ongoing No 5.6 Finance non -enterprise fund supported projects OMB Ongoing No 5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB/SD Ongoing Yes 5.8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 5.10 Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate 2013 No 5.1 I Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule BCC/PWD/MPO Ongoing No BCC = Board PDOT = OMB = PWD = Public of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department Works Department SD = School District Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.22 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 67 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.22 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 67 ` Capital` Impi�ouement�h n. .tt. ��. r',.. .. s t, t,P.i<.. lement�Implementa eC41 i'!- . . m:,< L lin Matrix i ,-,/-4:. Table G..., ., §,b ,- i. b Pohcy1 ,. ,4 t Type of Action r....Nx a ..,�.. _..,. _s ��.... "es ,.....:,�� xd' .�._. E ity ._r.�. 5 s Tin A ng ,,,,, .. a . t ture. jtatExpenditurer. _ _,. 4.3 Work with municipalities BCC/SD/Other Local Governments in IRC Ongoing No 5.1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can support land use change BCC Ongoing No 5.2 Prioritize capital improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Appropriate County Departments/Other Government Agencies Ongoing No 5.5 Utilize enterprise funds 0M13 Ongoing No 5.6 Finance non -enterprise fund supported projects OMB Ongoing No 5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB/SD Ongoing Yes 5.8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 5.10 Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate 2013 No 5.1 I Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule BCC/PWD/MPO Ongoing No BCC = Board PDOT = OMB = PWD = Public of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department Works Department SD = School District Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.22 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 67 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element the level -of -service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.22 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of infonnation regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level -of -service standards will be maintained. While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 9J-5.005-(1)(a)(e) F.A.C. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 68 `'L Table6•22;.Ca talIm'rovenents,�ElementEva p Sd Sk Y p 4li' 4 Y,� luatibi '{ �. �Mattat Objective f+f G �yi'ti 3`:+` n r + ' }_ b 6i )2n1 I1` 5> akt srz�'d "`Measure` C •t" S C , ` ;'� xh .. r ., ,r .,r,. Timeframe , 1 Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities 2013 2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area 2020 3 Level -of -service provided for county services 2020 4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2020 5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2020 While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 9J-5.005-(1)(a)(e) F.A.C. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 68 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element the level -of -service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.22 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of infonnation regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level -of -service standards will be maintained. While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 9J-5.005-(1)(a)(e) F.A.C. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 68 `'L Table6•22;.Ca talIm'rovenents,�ElementEva p Sd Sk Y p 4li' 4 Y,� luatibi '{ �. �Mattat Objective f+f G �yi'ti 3`:+` n r + ' }_ b 6i )2n1 I1` 5> akt srz�'d "`Measure` C •t" S C , ` ;'� xh .. r ., ,r .,r,. Timeframe , 1 Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities 2013 2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area 2020 3 Level -of -service provided for county services 2020 4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2020 5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2020 While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 9J-5.005-(1)(a)(e) F.A.C. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 68 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level -of -service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments. The formal Evaluation and Appraisal. Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan. As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. Community Development Department Indian River County 69 Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level -of -service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments. The formal Evaluation and Appraisal. Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan. As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. Community Development Department Indian River County 69 Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Indian River County 70 cc rl O o O O CQ O O G APSE W L "z A Q Q CZ It 4.4 C E O G Uva Pia0 204;, FF F� Env. Land Bonds 0 O O 00 0 M 0 O O 00 N E 1000`OLI`£$ 10$ 1000`009$ 1000`005$ 1000`0LZ`IS 7044 'di �t T-4 EA A Grant ,11 4i:F^3 Grant EA Q 49 A 0 Env. Land Bonds - yqy Env. Land Bonds Grant AYa� Grant Env. Land Bonds 000`O9zs SZ$ o co O o kr, VI O O O o In 49 (o z, ..:,H4, d � 000`OSZ$ 0 0 O O 'n N 69 O O 0 O O en 69 5 ,.a i:0 RO, li O O O Vl O O 'n M 00 69 p� M V EA s O O O O Vl 69 O O O O Ul 69 1 GA fr. ,0; t O 0 0 000`05b$ O 0 O O O Xgiy kF tau O N EA 69 6A 1 69 Env. Land Bonds Grant Total Revenue 1 69 1 69 1 WE 1 EA fr #ti � Yr. yaF lit a :e, 1 49 E 1 69 A Indian River County 70 cc rl O o O O CQ O O G APSE W L "z A Q Q CZ It 4.4 C E O G Uva O Lai!i Env. Land Bonds cti 6, Env. Land Bonds Grant c 0 Env. Land Bonds Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds ct ct 0 Env. Land Bonds 0 Env. Land Bonds - c 6 Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds 0 W40 41� OO 0 O o Vl by co O o kr, VI O O O o In 49 000`OSZ $ O O O O 'n N va O O O O Vl 6A 000`00£ $ O O 0 O O en 69 O O 0 O in N EA O O O 5 kr) N 69 1 69 1 EA O O O O Vl 69 O O O O V7 EA O O O O Vl 69 O O O O Ul 69 1 GA 1 ss 1 EA I EA 000`5£ $ O O O Vl fel 69 Xgiy kF tau EA 69 6A 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 WE 1 EA 1 69 1 49 1 69 1 69 r 69 69 I EA EA 69 69 M 8 eLef): SIN Qi o: w Sw 69 b'JeA jS CV 1 1 69 1 69 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 0 o O N 69 000`052 1 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 1 69 S."i ' �I� a 69 a41j�¢} R k kN K 1 1 69 1 EA 1 69 1 69 1 69 69 1 EA 000`052 $ o`;liO; In N EA 1 69 1 69 1 EA EA 1 69 1 69 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 69 69 69 45 1. D fl'. 2009110 ._z $ 1 69 0 0 0 O Vl 69 000`052 ' $ 000`OSZ $ 000`05 $ 1 69 r 69 000`0SZ 000`OSZ $ 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 CA 1 69 69 FA $ 35,000 $ 35,000 ry O O 0 CD O O 0 o O Vl 69 1 69 1 69 1 EA 1 69 000`00£ O 0 0 O 0 M 69 1 EA 1 69 1 69 1 EA 000`09 $ 000`05 O 0 0 5 In 69 000`05 $ 1 b9 1 EA 1 EA I 69 1 69 1 EA ' lc) 69 00 30 �5w! 5w t< ay�a Iti�k�{ y. �tzxsY: kki�b� nxl4$ tiro y5utr, h h.md Lost Tree Islands Restoration Improvements Archie Smith Fish House Archie Smith Fish House South Prong Preserve South Prong Preserve Environmental Land Acquisition Environmental Land Acquisition Manage/Access to Future Acq. Conservation Lands Manage/Access to Future Acq. Conservation Lands Harmony Oaks - Access Harmony Oaks - Access Halstrom Farmstead Halstrom Farmstead Russell Grover River Buffer Russell Grover River Buffer Ansin Parcel - St. Sebastian River Buffer Ansin Parcel - St. Sebastian River Buffer Wabasso Scrub conservation Area - Public Access Wabasso Scrub conservation Area - Public Access Flinn Tract - Access Flinn Tract - Access Lost Tree Islands Restoration Iml keen Indian River County 70 cc rl O o O O CQ O O G APSE W L "z A Q Q CZ It 4.4 C E O G Uva Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Indian River County 70 cc rl O o O O CQ O O G APSE W L "z A Q Q CZ It 4.4 C E O G Uva Pia0 204;, FF F� Env. Land Bonds 0 O O 00 0 M 0 O O 00 N E 1000`OLI`£$ 10$ 1000`009$ 1000`005$ 1000`0LZ`IS 7044 'di �t T-4 EA A Grant ,11 4i:F^3 Grant EA Q 49 A 0 Env. Land Bonds - yqy Env. Land Bonds Grant AYa� Grant Env. Land Bonds 000`O9zs SZ$ o co O o kr, VI O O O o In 49 (o z, ..:,H4, d � 000`OSZ$ 0 0 O O 'n N 69 O O 0 O O en 69 5 ,.a i:0 RO, li O O O Vl O O 'n M 00 69 p� M V EA s O O O O Vl 69 O O O O Ul 69 1 GA fr. ,0; t O 0 0 000`05b$ O 0 O O O Xgiy kF tau O N EA 69 6A 1 69 Env. Land Bonds Grant Total Revenue 1 69 1 69 1 WE 1 EA fr #ti � Yr. yaF lit a :e, 1 49 E 1 69 A Indian River County 70 cc rl O o O O CQ O O G APSE W L "z A Q Q CZ It 4.4 C E O G Uva O Lai!i Env. Land Bonds cti 6, Env. Land Bonds Grant c 0 Env. Land Bonds Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds ct ct 0 Env. Land Bonds 0 Env. Land Bonds - c 6 Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds 0 W40 41� OO 0 O o Vl by co O o kr, VI O O O o In 49 000`OSZ $ O O O O 'n N va O O O O Vl 6A 000`00£ $ O O 0 O O en 69 O O 0 O in N EA O O O 5 kr) N 69 1 69 1 EA O O O O Vl 69 O O O O V7 EA O O O O Vl 69 O O O O Ul 69 1 GA 1 ss 1 EA I EA 000`5£ $ O O O Vl fel 69 Xgiy kF tau EA 69 6A 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 WE 1 EA 1 69 1 49 1 69 1 69 r 69 69 I EA EA 69 69 M 8 eLef): SIN Qi o: w Sw 69 b'JeA jS CV 1 1 69 1 69 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 0 o O N 69 000`052 1 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 1 69 S."i ' �I� a 69 a41j�¢} R k kN K 1 1 69 1 EA 1 69 1 69 1 69 69 1 EA 000`052 $ o`;liO; In N EA 1 69 1 69 1 EA EA 1 69 1 69 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 69 69 69 45 1. D fl'. 2009110 ._z $ 1 69 0 0 0 O Vl 69 000`052 ' $ 000`OSZ $ 000`05 $ 1 69 r 69 000`0SZ 000`OSZ $ 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 CA 1 69 69 FA $ 35,000 $ 35,000 ry O O 0 CD O O 0 o O Vl 69 1 69 1 69 1 EA 1 69 000`00£ O 0 0 O 0 M 69 1 EA 1 69 1 69 1 EA 000`09 $ 000`05 O 0 0 5 In 69 000`05 $ 1 b9 1 EA 1 EA I 69 1 69 1 EA ' lc) 69 00 30 �5w! 5w t< ay�a Iti�k�{ y. �tzxsY: kki�b� nxl4$ tiro y5utr, h h.md Lost Tree Islands Restoration Improvements Archie Smith Fish House Archie Smith Fish House South Prong Preserve South Prong Preserve Environmental Land Acquisition Environmental Land Acquisition Manage/Access to Future Acq. Conservation Lands Manage/Access to Future Acq. Conservation Lands Harmony Oaks - Access Harmony Oaks - Access Halstrom Farmstead Halstrom Farmstead Russell Grover River Buffer Russell Grover River Buffer Ansin Parcel - St. Sebastian River Buffer Ansin Parcel - St. Sebastian River Buffer Wabasso Scrub conservation Area - Public Access Wabasso Scrub conservation Area - Public Access Flinn Tract - Access Flinn Tract - Access Lost Tree Islands Restoration Iml keen Indian River County 70 cc rl O o O O CQ O O G APSE W L "z A Q Q CZ It 4.4 C E O G Uva Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds C L $ 1,270,000 1 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 3,170,000 oO O to N 69 0 V) N 6A 000`SZ 0 v O N 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A 6A 1 6A 6A 6A 1 6A 1 69 1 EA EA (= ,, lq:;4 �a 000`5Z $ 0 0 0 N N 6A 000`5Z -- $ 000`52 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A 0 0 0 O 0 ON EA Captain Forester Hammock Preserve - Beach Access Captain Forester Hammock Preserve - Beach Access Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Total Expenditures 3+' * 0 0 •--: M EA 0 O M EA 0 , O tn to N I'1 M 1--:r 64) cc o O -A N 7 69 0 6A 0 6A 69 0Sflh='j Elk Een Fm rr`J' N' i. Pa E.'- i tcajPit 4:. 'q 000`oos$ 000`005$ 0 (= ,, lq:;4 �a '1";"14 O' 11{t i t"4 1 N 1 000`005$ 000`005$ o EA M! r yi 1 69 I 6A sa co. o 1 6A c $1,270,000 O 0 0 o N 69 O 6A h^ aN' a s"x°L Ear. w, +? Rot, Jw W 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 6019 O Ny 1 EA pStQ%I et rof :C4 1 6A 1 Total Expenditures Annual Balance a1 GO. p,cn 1 6A 0 0 0 0 EA � yy Cw 41:1 ;_ate Dom artsoi o rgi ii Total Revenue Viabicli! pAi w..XJfJ rn 1)11 Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax 1'a+ 5,- '71,s R t�....p xu. Optional Sales Tax O tn to N I'1 M 1--:r 64) cc o O -A N 7 69 00 0 m .-. r- 0 0 O 0 0 N N 6A $ 8,035,477 S 1,500,000 I S - S - S 2,200,000 I S11,735,477 $ 8,035,477 $ 1,500,000 $ - 1 $ - j $ 2,200,000 1 $ 11,735,477 1 * i. Pa E.'- i tcajPit 4:. O O co O 0 69 RF k Ei 6A 1 6A 1 6A 0 0 O 0 NIw yj i t"4 1 N cei O; Fri;{ i v X4 :'N,' M! r yi 1 69 I 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A i60( 1 6A N wi1 ter' 0. ,<o EElell ?S t .H. 1 69 1 fie 1 be be69 1 1 EA CP N 1 6A 1 69 . &1`>0„.! >'w 1 6A 0 0 0 0 EA 1 6A 1 6A ,.; 6A N; �fy1 b,x aFN t $Si NP v ffi F v Ri S ��t9y'u 4k 1 4^�5 G%E ` p Ty.o yrl In N to M '-4 co 0 N 0 to oe oo --1 N 1 iA j0! 00l Cc4- +4.— .1-‘, 0 0 0 o0 ^. EA 1 6A 1 6A 6A a Ex£ ai... '•" y O`"^L y `` Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax C cc Impact Fees Total Revenue � ityn kF �y 0 O> to N N 609 $ 2,087,729 a 0 00 ^" r 6A } Vr}/y1f 0 0 O O 0 N 6A 1 6A Viabicli! pAi w..XJfJ rn 1)11 Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax Grant Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax Emergency Services Dist. Impact Fees $ 8,035,477 $ 1,500,000 $ - 1 $ - j $ 2,200,000 1 $ 11,735,477 1 i. Pa E.'- i tcajPit 4:. O O co O 0 69 $ 538,644 0 T in N N ^-1 69 aCN N N l-- N O oo N 6A 0 oo -- — 69 $ 2,644,705 0 0 O O ON N 69 1 6A 0 0 O O N N 69 cei O; Fri;{ :'N,' M! 6A 1 69 1 6A 6A 1 6A 1 69 1 6A 1 6A O O O 0 N 6A �'. 0. swj ?S t .H. 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 EA 1 6A 1 6A 1 69 4 el 4 ��a &1`>0„.! >'w 6A 6A 6A 6A 69 6A 6A 6A 69 O NeA Ty.o yrl Nt s l9b 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 69 1 6A 0 0 0 o0 ^. EA 1 6A 1 6A 6A E.N by ;s � ityn O O O O — 6A V V .D 6A 0 O> to N N 609 $ 2,087,729 a 0 00 ^" r 6A to 0 r - 69 0 0 O O 0 N 6A 1 6A 1 69 ;N �E `�" ?at�� xExpendIturest"�^- *." s '' fi' w r,z Emergency Svcs. Station 2 - Replace Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace Emergency Svcs. Station 12 - Addition Emergency Svcs. Station 12 - Addition Emergency Svcs. Station 13 - Addition 800 MHz Radio Expansion Land Acquistion Emergency Svcs. Station 14 - Addition Total Expenditures Indian River County 71 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Env. Land Bonds Grant Env. Land Bonds C L $ 1,270,000 1 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 3,170,000 oO O to N 69 0 V) N 6A 000`SZ 0 v O N 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A 6A 1 6A 6A 6A 1 6A 1 69 1 EA EA (= ,, lq:;4 �a 000`5Z $ 0 0 0 N N 6A 000`5Z -- $ 000`52 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A 0 0 0 O 0 ON EA Captain Forester Hammock Preserve - Beach Access Captain Forester Hammock Preserve - Beach Access Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Total Expenditures 3+' * 0 0 •--: M EA 0 O M EA 0 , O tn to N I'1 M 1--:r 64) cc o O -A N 7 69 0 6A 0 6A 69 0Sflh='j Elk Een Fm rr`J' N' i. Pa E.'- i tcajPit 4:. 'q 000`oos$ 000`005$ 0 (= ,, lq:;4 �a '1";"14 O' 11{t i t"4 1 N 1 000`005$ 000`005$ o EA M! r yi 1 69 I 6A sa co. o 1 6A c $1,270,000 O 0 0 o N 69 O 6A h^ aN' a s"x°L Ear. w, +? Rot, Jw W 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 6019 O Ny 1 EA pStQ%I et rof :C4 1 6A 1 Total Expenditures Annual Balance a1 GO. p,cn 1 6A 0 0 0 0 EA � yy Cw 41:1 ;_ate Dom artsoi o rgi ii Total Revenue Viabicli! pAi w..XJfJ rn 1)11 Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax 1'a+ 5,- '71,s R t�....p xu. Optional Sales Tax O tn to N I'1 M 1--:r 64) cc o O -A N 7 69 00 0 m .-. r- 0 0 O 0 0 N N 6A $ 8,035,477 S 1,500,000 I S - S - S 2,200,000 I S11,735,477 $ 8,035,477 $ 1,500,000 $ - 1 $ - j $ 2,200,000 1 $ 11,735,477 1 * i. Pa E.'- i tcajPit 4:. O O co O 0 69 RF k Ei 6A 1 6A 1 6A 0 0 O 0 NIw yj i t"4 1 N cei O; Fri;{ i v X4 :'N,' M! r yi 1 69 I 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A i60( 1 6A N wi1 ter' 0. ,<o EElell ?S t .H. 1 69 1 fie 1 be be69 1 1 EA CP N 1 6A 1 69 . &1`>0„.! >'w 1 6A 0 0 0 0 EA 1 6A 1 6A ,.; 6A N; �fy1 b,x aFN t $Si NP v ffi F v Ri S ��t9y'u 4k 1 4^�5 G%E ` p Ty.o yrl In N to M '-4 co 0 N 0 to oe oo --1 N 1 iA j0! 00l Cc4- +4.— .1-‘, 0 0 0 o0 ^. EA 1 6A 1 6A 6A a Ex£ ai... '•" y O`"^L y `` Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax C cc Impact Fees Total Revenue � ityn kF �y 0 O> to N N 609 $ 2,087,729 a 0 00 ^" r 6A } Vr}/y1f 0 0 O O 0 N 6A 1 6A Viabicli! pAi w..XJfJ rn 1)11 Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax Grant Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax Emergency Services Dist. Impact Fees $ 8,035,477 $ 1,500,000 $ - 1 $ - j $ 2,200,000 1 $ 11,735,477 1 i. Pa E.'- i tcajPit 4:. O O co O 0 69 $ 538,644 0 T in N N ^-1 69 aCN N N l-- N O oo N 6A 0 oo -- — 69 $ 2,644,705 0 0 O O ON N 69 1 6A 0 0 O O N N 69 cei O; Fri;{ :'N,' M! 6A 1 69 1 6A 6A 1 6A 1 69 1 6A 1 6A O O O 0 N 6A �'. 0. swj ?S t .H. 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 EA 1 6A 1 6A 1 69 4 el 4 ��a &1`>0„.! >'w 6A 6A 6A 6A 69 6A 6A 6A 69 O NeA Ty.o yrl Nt s l9b 1 6A 1 6A 1 6A 1 69 1 6A 0 0 0 o0 ^. EA 1 6A 1 6A 6A E.N by ;s � ityn O O O O — 6A V V .D 6A 0 O> to N N 609 $ 2,087,729 a 0 00 ^" r 6A to 0 r - 69 0 0 O O 0 N 6A 1 6A 1 69 ;N �E `�" ?at�� xExpendIturest"�^- *." s '' fi' w r,z Emergency Svcs. Station 2 - Replace Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace Emergency Svcs. Station 12 - Addition Emergency Svcs. Station 12 - Addition Emergency Svcs. Station 13 - Addition 800 MHz Radio Expansion Land Acquistion Emergency Svcs. Station 14 - Addition Total Expenditures Indian River County 71 Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan a u�Fhe'�yI „F r ' $11,735,477 ["-- 7 V) i r EPS 0 Optional Sales Tax O 0 O O r, ;-cSi r`P7,,rx, „ ,N' K 1 `- 0 0 O Cr O N 69 0 0 O O o N 69 69 M �, 0 O 0 Leitn 0 4-4 FA O O 0 o0 00 vs 69 Rm Y.ry;! '�'';•l-' R- .t4 69 I EA 1 EA 0 69 H rv�d 69 EA 69 69 0 10 z{Fy"e t. CR;iiC, %g x 1 „O; iNI TE4W Sr"t`� 69 69 rOp‘ 147.0-1.4 ,w" rd 000`005`I 00 0 O 0 vi 69 0 C!3 N. w 0 "¢S 1 69 h�'y? +4a�v;`jj ax�Ov4S' w46 ro, >-er.. i`=I tN 69 000`OO' `Z $ l"- eY "1 r) 0 o0 69 $ 8,035,477 0 69 1$ O' § �rw O� 1 Total Revenue Total Expenditures Annual Ralance 1 i i 1 . i 1 e� $ 100,000 0: i"t0: "t ii 41.4 Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance C.) OW n� ajO �.N MG) k Lw e • ,L fi',ittC 0 0 0 00 69 Kyyrr i d3 $ 1,600,000 yi Revenue\Sources ,a Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees Grant Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax O 0 O O r, 000`oos $ 00040S8`t $ 000`008 $ K 1 `- o $ 800,000 O o 0 o h EA $ 2,100,000 0 O 0 Leitn 0 4-4 FA O O 0 o0 00 vs 69 �� 69 kgr N 69 69 69 EA 69 I S.(' -IN. W; 10 z{Fy"e t. CR;iiC, %g x 1 69 69 1 69 1 69 M: I 69 ::: 1�'It N. w -`O FA "¢S 1 69 1 69 69 000`OO' `Z $ O 0 0 0 co, ^. 69 N 1 :It . 'y' 11 MN O' S% s0 s rYp .rm...;...'".' at�'. 1.2I ,w ts. 0 0 f.. O O^ 1 69 I 69 a 1 e� $ 100,000 0: > a c• F Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance 69 n� ajO �.N .r` 00. 0 0 0 (1-) 0 0 0 00 69 Kyyrr i d3 $ 1,600,000 0 69 €"tr. t� "y'1. q j vt pS i; Ic t T:3 y rL4 F u a4,.4N. tainvi v-vvvv-vvvvv, v vv , ExP anc inn of Fiber Ontic Network New Library (Brackett\ New T ihrary (Brackett) V: ..., V 1 R I LI- CCr I L I C ; C; i a Z 69 1) C 0.4 O. K W 69 69 CA d� rr I r A'S M . �xri`y 69 6A EA 69 y 0 0 I $ 3,150,000 O 0 .--K • 1•1 EA 69 EA 0 0 O I 1 O O O \, O O krO r Pi *t: '" to 69 69 CA n x. O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 O 0. 0 O M O V1 O , 0": 00 b .-• N,. .. •s.S� xy 69 69 EA EA < a � s s i tlntinnal Sales Tax IP kk Itt a i I `6 C N V f� .1- e�11c. Lt" • 1 4 � a E 14 ) 0 yi Revenue\Sources ,a Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees Grant Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax F',3N o 3+ix ;.2)11-V4.O K 1 `- O O 0 o 69 $ 800,000 O o 0 o h EA $ 2,100,000 0 O 0 Leitn 0 4-4 FA O O 0 o0 00 vs 69 kgr N 69 69 69 EA 69 69 S.(' -IN. W; 10 z{Fy"e t. CR;iiC, %g x �N' 3 fe r tee 69 69 1 69 1 69 I 69 I 69 ::: 1�'It N. w -`O FA "¢S 1 69 1 69 69 000`OO' `Z $ O 0 0 0 co, ^. 69 $ 3,150,000 :It . 'y' 11 MN O' S% s0 s rYp .rm...;...'".' at�'. 1.2I ,w ts. 0 0 f.. O O^ 1 69 I 69 I 69 69 $ 100,000 0: > a c• F Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance 69 n� ajO �.N .r` 00. 0 0 0 (1-) 0 0 0 00 69 O 0 0 V1 69 i d3 $ 1,600,000 0 69 €"tr. t� "y'1. q j vt pS i; Ic t T:3 y rL4 F u a4,.4N. tainvi v-vvvv-vvvvv, v vv , ExP anc inn of Fiber Ontic Network New Library (Brackett\ New T ihrary (Brackett) V: ..., V 1 R I LI- CCr I L I C ; C; i a Z Dispalced Courtroom 1) C 0.4 O. K W 0 EMI 0 0 d N 69 O O 00 S9 CA 69 69 69 0 O 69 69 Total Revenue Indian River County 72 W 0 00 O O N U "Ci O O 00 C L E L CC • iso Az • M 6a A emiE 0. O G Uvp srr ma��? 5r' ztis °' 000`0518`17$ 000`0ss`t $ 0 69 F',3N o 3+ix 1 69 1 69 0 EA M SNy £t itA ,4N' 17 1 69 1 EA S.(' -IN. W; CR;iiC, %g x 0 O 0 kr) r M 69 0 O O in M 69 0 69 ::: 1�'It : y ! amO_ Vo ?tO: 0 0 0 69 $ 100,000 0 ~ : y. 1,�,N S% s0 O O O — 69 O 0 co — 69 CP y0 a a a; ; > a c• F Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance It 1 ; :0)1 to .,w LI i ea VI gt14'4 Vim, 0 c (4) 0 0 d N 69 O O 00 S9 CA 69 69 69 0 O 69 69 Total Revenue Indian River County 72 W 0 00 O O N U "Ci O O 00 C L E L CC • iso Az • M 6a A emiE 0. O G Uvp Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan a u�Fhe'�yI „F r ' $11,735,477 ["-- 7 V) i r EPS 0 Optional Sales Tax O 0 O O r, ;-cSi r`P7,,rx, „ ,N' K 1 `- 0 0 O Cr O N 69 0 0 O O o N 69 69 M �, 0 O 0 Leitn 0 4-4 FA O O 0 o0 00 vs 69 Rm Y.ry;! '�'';•l-' R- .t4 69 I EA 1 EA 0 69 H rv�d 69 EA 69 69 0 10 z{Fy"e t. CR;iiC, %g x 1 „O; iNI TE4W Sr"t`� 69 69 rOp‘ 147.0-1.4 ,w" rd 000`005`I 00 0 O 0 vi 69 0 C!3 N. w 0 "¢S 1 69 h�'y? +4a�v;`jj ax�Ov4S' w46 ro, >-er.. i`=I tN 69 000`OO' `Z $ l"- eY "1 r) 0 o0 69 $ 8,035,477 0 69 1$ O' § �rw O� 1 Total Revenue Total Expenditures Annual Ralance 1 i i 1 . i 1 e� $ 100,000 0: i"t0: "t ii 41.4 Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance C.) OW n� ajO �.N MG) k Lw e • ,L fi',ittC 0 0 0 00 69 Kyyrr i d3 $ 1,600,000 yi Revenue\Sources ,a Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees Grant Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax O 0 O O r, 000`oos $ 00040S8`t $ 000`008 $ K 1 `- o $ 800,000 O o 0 o h EA $ 2,100,000 0 O 0 Leitn 0 4-4 FA O O 0 o0 00 vs 69 �� 69 kgr N 69 69 69 EA 69 I S.(' -IN. W; 10 z{Fy"e t. CR;iiC, %g x 1 69 69 1 69 1 69 M: I 69 ::: 1�'It N. w -`O FA "¢S 1 69 1 69 69 000`OO' `Z $ O 0 0 0 co, ^. 69 N 1 :It . 'y' 11 MN O' S% s0 s rYp .rm...;...'".' at�'. 1.2I ,w ts. 0 0 f.. O O^ 1 69 I 69 a 1 e� $ 100,000 0: > a c• F Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance 69 n� ajO �.N .r` 00. 0 0 0 (1-) 0 0 0 00 69 Kyyrr i d3 $ 1,600,000 0 69 €"tr. t� "y'1. q j vt pS i; Ic t T:3 y rL4 F u a4,.4N. tainvi v-vvvv-vvvvv, v vv , ExP anc inn of Fiber Ontic Network New Library (Brackett\ New T ihrary (Brackett) V: ..., V 1 R I LI- CCr I L I C ; C; i a Z 69 1) C 0.4 O. K W 69 69 CA d� rr I r A'S M . �xri`y 69 6A EA 69 y 0 0 I $ 3,150,000 O 0 .--K • 1•1 EA 69 EA 0 0 O I 1 O O O \, O O krO r Pi *t: '" to 69 69 CA n x. O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 O 0. 0 O M O V1 O , 0": 00 b .-• N,. .. •s.S� xy 69 69 EA EA < a � s s i tlntinnal Sales Tax IP kk Itt a i I `6 C N V f� .1- e�11c. Lt" • 1 4 � a E 14 ) 0 yi Revenue\Sources ,a Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees Grant Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax F',3N o 3+ix ;.2)11-V4.O K 1 `- O O 0 o 69 $ 800,000 O o 0 o h EA $ 2,100,000 0 O 0 Leitn 0 4-4 FA O O 0 o0 00 vs 69 kgr N 69 69 69 EA 69 69 S.(' -IN. W; 10 z{Fy"e t. CR;iiC, %g x �N' 3 fe r tee 69 69 1 69 1 69 I 69 I 69 ::: 1�'It N. w -`O FA "¢S 1 69 1 69 69 000`OO' `Z $ O 0 0 0 co, ^. 69 $ 3,150,000 :It . 'y' 11 MN O' S% s0 s rYp .rm...;...'".' at�'. 1.2I ,w ts. 0 0 f.. O O^ 1 69 I 69 I 69 69 $ 100,000 0: > a c• F Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance 69 n� ajO �.N .r` 00. 0 0 0 (1-) 0 0 0 00 69 O 0 0 V1 69 i d3 $ 1,600,000 0 69 €"tr. t� "y'1. q j vt pS i; Ic t T:3 y rL4 F u a4,.4N. tainvi v-vvvv-vvvvv, v vv , ExP anc inn of Fiber Ontic Network New Library (Brackett\ New T ihrary (Brackett) V: ..., V 1 R I LI- CCr I L I C ; C; i a Z Dispalced Courtroom 1) C 0.4 O. K W 0 EMI 0 0 d N 69 O O 00 S9 CA 69 69 69 0 O 69 69 Total Revenue Indian River County 72 W 0 00 O O N U "Ci O O 00 C L E L CC • iso Az • M 6a A emiE 0. O G Uvp srr ma��? 5r' ztis °' 000`0518`17$ 000`0ss`t $ 0 69 F',3N o 3+ix 1 69 1 69 0 EA M SNy £t itA ,4N' 17 1 69 1 EA S.(' -IN. W; CR;iiC, %g x 0 O 0 kr) r M 69 0 O O in M 69 0 69 ::: 1�'It : y ! amO_ Vo ?tO: 0 0 0 69 $ 100,000 0 ~ : y. 1,�,N S% s0 O O O — 69 O 0 co — 69 CP y0 a a a; ; > a c• F Total Fxnenditures Annual Balance It 1 ; :0)1 to .,w LI i ea VI gt14'4 Vim, 0 c (4) 0 0 d N 69 O O 00 S9 CA 69 69 69 0 O 69 69 Total Revenue Indian River County 72 W 0 00 O O N U "Ci O O 00 C L E L CC • iso Az • M 6a A emiE 0. O G Uvp Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 4<6tt Vtv k LAC: W' ray, Impact Fees Impact Fees pact Fees Impact Fees 0 EA $ 300,000 i Li � y,� el, �~ .2;1,"A. �;'O CirR o o '0 N co 69 o o O 00 V 69 o o d yr N N 69 o co a. o0 1() EH o cc d- [� 0 h .-. 69 -7E f e k�l;y if= W a �€ tee) Nj 1 69 1 be $ 224,400 1 69 0 0 d d" N N 69 "N ti N' � r 69 �rtT" sN ;S:O rN, 69 00 0 ‘D 00 69 69 69 Ge O ‘6 00 69 .' 0 0 N N 69 t"-- 69 69 1 Fa C4'- Annual Balance PI.. Ilk.H' a=0 S z. 69 69 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 N; ti P a ,a [4.11-' 6lies ', rs "h6dt t .14. O: �it'' a ; gyp.: w i 300,000 w 0 O 0 O 0 N its... yo so CL, -.41 g tOliti YkF `b�xE O' v9 69 0 0 co 00 d' 69 1 69 0 '0 U 00 In 69 0 CD Q 1/4.6'+ 0 69 -4-4 N, y f{•+. 16+ Fla �"Ci a E' (4 y [, co w 1m1 ix.0 iN. O4.. F` 69 69 69 69 69 �+� r1"s O 1 �na?s if (E 3 kSE� 441. >•o .EI K? =f =r. 3 � e 41)Vp _ . Facility 0 Furniture/Equipment for training facility Remodel Old Fleet Facility 10,000 sq ft Evidence Additions 1 Total Expenditures b O 4`. 4 •f r1 Grant Impact Fees O h 0 r O [1/40 VD-- 0 r 69 0 EA $ 300,000 0 0 d0' 69 f �~ .2;1,"A. �;'O CirR NM'', , 0 0 dr N N 69 0 0 d' N N VI 69 I 69 f e ;:41 0 0 O ref d se Nj S O 0 ‘.6 oho 69 0 0 oro 69 69 ti: t$ }�N E rc, $ t,, X41O '+A ,-...;:e4 0 69 4.- [ t 1 a~ .‘ O 143, x%1 0 ;S:O rN, 69 69 69 69 69 fibril, IRIKO tgOil _ IM008/09Sa{, " ;'; EY200940 , o : i 0 0 N N 69 0 ON 0 69 69 69 1 Fa Total Expenditures Annual Balance 69 4`. 4 •f r1 Grant Impact Fees ;;;;.4t :10''. E._:- $ 300,000 0 0 d0' 69 O 0 d0' VC 69 O 0 rn N CV '-' 409 $ 3,500,000 $ 2,775,000 $ 4,105,000 I $ 3,575,000 1 S 4,375,000 1 S 18,330,000 0 0 0 N C. . }� iy,.t I 69 f e 1 69 0 0 O ref d se e� Ar ti S s O: g N I4'-s:', k .. Tth+�y ? .- 4 E rc, $ t,, X41O '+A ,-...;:e4 69 69 69 O O In r 69 ;S:O rN, w .,.:-.�. €aYo. 69 69 $ 1,900,000 0 0 N N 69 69 Q.0 1 N w 1 1 69 69 O co O O 0 .-. 69 O o o 1 r .-. 69 O~. I,H r Y� N; t } lei P a ,a [4.11-' 6lies ', rs "h6dt t .14. e Z Ar:;: jlyY +P tfi S 'E{ �it'' a ; gyp.: w i 300,000 O 0 O 0-44 0 O 0 O 0 N CD O 0 O 0 9 ?C" ,O .+: :.):10' v9 CO .. Y + i y f{•+. 16+ Fla �"Ci a y [, co w Grant Optional Saks Tax Impact Fees Total Revenue 69 69 b9 �+� r1"s a+k Revenue,Source Yom'. FB IP Grant Impact Fees Impact Fees $ 200,000 I $ - ( $ - I $ - I $ - I $ 200,000 I Grant +r45: r q ,..". CD 0 0 0 M 0 00 0 0 N 0 0 ri 0 0 0 N C. iy,.t 4 69 69 69 69 S H 'fit 69 69 69 69 :'-'44-,4 1 1 1 1 H I,H Ao. 1. w Ea 69 69 v9 t~, Irr CitO. w6a 69 69 b9 1 � 1 O' _ TO N y flw t'f? 69 EA 69 EA 0 0 $ 300,000 0 0 0 0 ': 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 M N N j0 O y�P 69 69 fa p3 ,; - Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking S. County Regional Park improvements South County Regional Park Improvements }y �C €nt C cuu41. 1 ..'.'y . s. �7a .; ti'.^.s::.-: Boat Ramp and Parking G W Indian River County 73 414 C ^W1 E L 5 ca O Az C 1 cv E O 0.10 Q c A615 x� e Uva Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 4<6tt Vtv k LAC: W' ray, Impact Fees Impact Fees pact Fees Impact Fees 0 EA $ 300,000 i Li � y,� el, �~ .2;1,"A. �;'O CirR o o '0 N co 69 o o O 00 V 69 o o d yr N N 69 o co a. o0 1() EH o cc d- [� 0 h .-. 69 -7E f e k�l;y if= W a �€ tee) Nj 1 69 1 be $ 224,400 1 69 0 0 d d" N N 69 "N ti N' � r 69 �rtT" sN ;S:O rN, 69 00 0 ‘D 00 69 69 69 Ge O ‘6 00 69 .' 0 0 N N 69 t"-- 69 69 1 Fa C4'- Annual Balance PI.. Ilk.H' a=0 S z. 69 69 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 N; ti P a ,a [4.11-' 6lies ', rs "h6dt t .14. O: �it'' a ; gyp.: w i 300,000 w 0 O 0 O 0 N its... yo so CL, -.41 g zOliti YkF `b�xE O' v9 69 0 0 co 00 d' 69 1 69 0 '0 U 00 In 69 0 CD Q 1/4.6'+ 0 69 -4-4 N, y f{•+. 16+ Fla �"Ci a E' (4 y [, co w 1m1 ix.0 iN. O4.. F` 69 69 69 69 69 �+� r1"s O 1 �na?s if (E 3 kSE� 441. >•o .EI K? =f =r. 3 � e 41)Vp _ . Facility 0 Furniture/Equipment for training facility Remodel Old Fleet Facility 10,000 sq ft Evidence Additions 1 Total Expenditures b O 4`. 4 •f r1 Grant Impact Fees O h 0 r O [1/40 VD-- 0 r 69 0 EA $ 300,000 0 0 d0' 69 f �~ .2;1,"A. �;'O CirR NM'', , 0 0 dr N N 69 0 0 d' N N VI 69 I 69 f e ;:41 0 0 O ref d se Nj S O 0 ‘.6 oho 69 0 0 oro 69 69 ti: t$ }�N E rc, $ t,, X41O '+A ,-...;:e4 0 69 4.- [ t 1 a~ .‘ O 143, x%1 0 ;S:O rN, 69 69 69 69 69 fibril, IRIKO tgOil _ IM008/09Sa{, " ;'; EY200940 , o : i 0 0 N N 69 0 ON 0 69 69 69 1 Fa Total Expenditures Annual Balance 69 4`. 4 •f r1 Grant Impact Fees ;;;;.4t :10''. E._:- $ 300,000 0 0 d0' 69 O 0 d0' VC 69 O 0 rn N CV '-' 409 $ 3,500,000 $ 2,775,000 $ 4,105,000 I $ 3,575,000 1 S 4,375,000 1 S 18,330,000 0 0 0 N C. . }� iy,.t I 69 f e 1 69 0 0 O ref d se e� Ar ti S s O: g N I4'-s:', k .. Tth+�y ? .- 4 E rc, $ t,, X41O '+A ,-...;:e4 69 69 69 O O In r 69 ;S:O rN, w .,.:-.�. €aYo. 69 69 $ 1,900,000 0 0 N N 69 69 Q.0 1 N w 1 1 69 69 O co O O 0 .-. 69 O o o 1 r .-. 69 O~. I,H r Y� N; t } lei P a ,a [4.11-' 6lies ', rs "h6dt t .14. e Z Ar:;: jlyY +P tfi S 'E{ �it'' a ; gyp.: w i 300,000 O 0 O 0-44 0 O 0 O 0 N CD O 0 O 0 9 ?C" ,O .+: :.):10' v9 CO .. Y + i y f{•+. 16+ Fla �"Ci a y [, co w Grant Optional Saks Tax Impact Fees Total Revenue 69 69 b9 �+� r1"s a+k Revenue,Source Yom'. FB IP Grant Impact Fees Impact Fees $ 200,000 I $ - ( $ - I $ - I $ - I $ 200,000 I Grant +r45: r q ,..". CD 0 0 0 M 0 00 0 0 N 0 0 ri 0 0 0 N C. iy,.t 4 69 69 69 69 S H 'fit 69 69 69 69 :'-'44-,4 1 1 1 1 H I,H Ao. 1. w Ea 69 69 v9 t~, Irr CitO. w6a 69 69 b9 1 � 1 O' _ TO N y flw t'f? 69 EA 69 EA 0 0 $ 300,000 0 0 0 0 ': 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 M N N j0 O y�P 69 69 fa p3 ,; - Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking S. County Regional Park improvements South County Regional Park Improvements }y �C €nt C cuu41. 1 ..'.'y . s. �7a .; ti'.^.s::.-: Boat Ramp and Parking G W Indian River County 73 414 C ^W1 E L 5 ca O Az C 1 cv E O 0.10 Q c A615 x� e Uva Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees Impact Fees Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax pact Fees Impact Fees 0 69 r'O rr o CS O M 000`005`I $ O O M kD O 0 N O OM 0 Id' O 0 M o 0 M O M N 00 d Cio 00 d' V 69 1--i --. 'D M 00 69 69 H] 69 69 69 69 $0 0: �w* r. It., k `00. �� -- oj00 0 0 69 0 0 0 zr� rr $ 112,237 l ..._._____.._ ___ ..... __.-.._ Total Revenue Total Expenditures V A 0.1 0 0 0 0 %tr Wi mss 1 SOI VE9TA. '74 40,c 0 0 kn to- 69 69 t( 00 M 2.:; N �r 69 si t � u .-+ N kOff 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 { hteN O 000`052 0 O r/l t` 69 000`00t`Z 0 0 0 O 0. O N Yhel �*8ia4 N O 1� 69 Vl North RO Integrated Water Resource/Spoonbill Marsh Mosquito Impoundment Misc Water Improvements Misc Sewer Improvements - kn tr1 Vl '. .--i 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 O 000`00; $ $ 1,400,000 O 0 ' 0 0 ' 0 O O O OM N 0 O 69 69 EA EA 69 69 O 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 O O O N 10 N .--. --- 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 o 0 0 i i 1 0 O o 0 0 M Vl N EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility Fairgrounds Building Enclosure Parks Maintenance Facility State Road 510 Fishing Pier Land for Future Parks West County Regional Park - penditures a�� ed 000`0££`81$ O 0 M m 69 pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees 0 69 r'O rr e 1 C1 qys' ?P.� N NO c0 o0 O V:D 0 H 0 0 O N GO 00 69 0 $ 4,100,000 00 d Cio 00 d' V 69 H N 69 3Y" 000`501 `t $ 000`SLL`Z $ 000`005`£ i 000`SOI`17 $ 000`SLL`Z $ 000`005`£ O 000`OSZ $ r-1 xp iloi v�N. Xr�r 69 69 et tom" -I0 $0 0: �w* r. It., k `00. �� -- oj00 0 0 69 0 0 0 N 69 0 0 0 EA zr� rr $ 112,237 l ..._._____.._ ___ ..... __.-.._ Total Revenue Total Expenditures V A 0.1 � r£a «qi to OW gg� 69 %tr Wi mss 1 SOI VE9TA. '74 40,c 0 0 kn to- 69 69 t( d Yeti 1¢� , 4,0 fir.p r. y' ':,44., 2.:; .5r , taw et 2y0: sit ao tv :Nsftstrs 69 69 69 69 69 Capacity Charles 't1 N 00 ttsp O 'cY 69 69 69 00 co O t -- roc ro 69 69 69 h 0 N (;Co, 0\ ott re 69 69 N M M 69 00 00 In M 0 N vi 69 69 69 Total Revenue e P�( tsh '�q 2}, 9a a d 71 Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees e 1 qys' ?P.� N NO c0 o0 O V:D 0 0 O O Vl N ^- rA 0 0 O N GO 00 69 0 0 0 0 O 7 N 69 $ 4,100,000 00 d Cio 00 d' V 69 H N 69 Mr."! ,'f1 3744 srw �K 000`OSZ $ 0 Vl 69 69 69 69 dpi 69 rd m -9 i or ,N'. ?.r!'. w tx Nk 0 0 0 N 69 0 0 0 EA EH $ 112,237 l �?i 69 %tr 0 0 0 to N 69 0 0 kn to- 69 69 69 1-t eel N N .... 69 Yeti 1¢� , 4,0 fir.p r. y' ':,44., 2.:; N �r 69 si t � u 000`052 0 0 0 kr; 69 69 69 r- M N roc 69 itIt�' -:07' 0. 69 N S Ik gs^s' { hteN ..-. co O 000`052 0 O r/l t` 69 000`00t`Z $ 4,100,000 $ 112,237 r,o 7, O 0. N Yhel �*8ia4 69 je �V k 3'. x w en iLi a.. ....1 E4i d X W North RO Integrated Water Resource/Spoonbill Marsh Mosquito Impoundment Misc Water Improvements Misc Sewer Improvements - North RO Plant Expansion to 14.3 MGD (Plant Only) West Reg WWTF Expansion 2.0 to 6.0 MGD 77th West of Kings (Tuscanny Lakes) Indian River County 74 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees Impact Fees Optional Sales Tax Optional Sales Tax pact Fees Impact Fees 0 69 r'O rr o CS O M 000`005`I $ O O M kD O 0 N O OM 0 Id' O 0 M o 0 M O M N 00 d Cio 00 d' V 69 1--i --. 'D M 00 69 69 H] 69 69 69 69 $0 0: �w* r. It., k `00. �� -- oj00 0 0 69 0 0 0 zr� rr $ 112,237 l ..._._____.._ ___ ..... __.-.._ Total Revenue Total Expenditures V A 0.1 0 0 0 0 %tr Wi mss 1 SOI VE9TA. '74 40,c 0 0 kn to- 69 69 t( 00 M 2.:; N �r 69 si t � u .-+ N kOff 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 { hteN O 000`052 0 O r/l t` 69 000`00t`Z 0 0 0 O 0. O N Yhel �*8ia4 N O 1� 69 Vl North RO Integrated Water Resource/Spoonbill Marsh Mosquito Impoundment Misc Water Improvements Misc Sewer Improvements - kn tr1 Vl '. .--i 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 O 000`00; $ $ 1,400,000 O 0 ' 0 0 ' 0 O O O OM N 0 O 69 69 EA EA 69 69 O 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 O O O N 10 N .--. --- 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 o 0 0 i i 1 0 O o 0 0 M Vl N EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility Fairgrounds Building Enclosure Parks Maintenance Facility State Road 510 Fishing Pier Land for Future Parks West County Regional Park - penditures a�� ed 000`0££`81$ O 0 M m 69 pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees 0 69 r'O rr e 1 C1 qys' ?P.� N NO c0 o0 O V:D 0 H 0 0 O N GO 00 69 0 $ 4,100,000 00 d Cio 00 d' V 69 H N 69 3Y" 000`501 `t $ 000`SLL`Z $ 000`005`£ i 000`SOI`17 $ 000`SLL`Z $ 000`005`£ O 000`OSZ $ r-1 xp iloi v�N. Xr�r 69 69 et tom" -I0 $0 0: �w* r. It., k `00. �� -- oj00 0 0 69 0 0 0 N 69 0 0 0 EA zr� rr $ 112,237 l ..._._____.._ ___ ..... __.-.._ Total Revenue Total Expenditures V A 0.1 � r£a «qi to OW gg� 69 %tr Wi mss 1 SOI VE9TA. '74 40,c 0 0 kn to- 69 69 t( d Yeti 1¢� , 4,0 fir.p r. y' ':,44., 2.:; .5r , taw et 2y0: sit ao tv :Nsftstrs 69 69 69 69 69 Capacity Charles 't1 N 00 ttsp O 'cY 69 69 69 00 co O t -- roc ro 69 69 69 h 0 N (;Co, 0\ ott re 69 69 N M M 69 00 00 In M 0 N vi 69 69 69 Total Revenue e P�( tsh '�q 2}, 9a a d 71 Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees e 1 qys' ?P.� N NO c0 o0 O V:D 0 0 O O Vl N ^- rA 0 0 O N GO 00 69 0 0 0 0 O 7 N 69 $ 4,100,000 00 d Cio 00 d' V 69 H N 69 Mr."! ,'f1 3744 srw �K 000`OSZ $ 0 Vl 69 69 69 69 dpi 69 rd m -9 i or ,N'. ?.r!'. w tx Nk 0 0 0 N 69 0 0 0 EA EH $ 112,237 l �?i 69 %tr 0 0 0 to N 69 0 0 kn to- 69 69 69 1-t eel N N .... 69 Yeti 1¢� , 4,0 fir.p r. y' ':,44., 2.:; N �r 69 si t � u 000`052 0 0 0 kr; 69 69 69 r- M N roc 69 itIt�' -:07' 0. 69 N S Ik gs^s' { hteN ..-. co O 000`052 0 O r/l t` 69 000`00t`Z $ 4,100,000 $ 112,237 r,o 7, O 0. N Yhel �*8ia4 69 je �V k 3'. x w en iLi a.. ....1 E4i d X W North RO Integrated Water Resource/Spoonbill Marsh Mosquito Impoundment Misc Water Improvements Misc Sewer Improvements - North RO Plant Expansion to 14.3 MGD (Plant Only) West Reg WWTF Expansion 2.0 to 6.0 MGD 77th West of Kings (Tuscanny Lakes) Indian River County 74 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan $ - $ 220,000 Capacity Charges & User Fees zes & User Fees . Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Dacity Charges & User Fees Dacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Jacky Charges & User Fees .nn:1., f`h n rnnr P. 1 C,,,.,. Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Casaci Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees o 0 O 5 69 0 0 O O '0 FA 0 0 O O �0 6A 0 0 O O 0 O� N EA 00040504Z 000`005`I $ 0 0 0 O 69 0 0 0 O 1/40 69 0 0 0 O N 69 000`OSL $ 000`006 $ 0 0 O O On 69 $ 600,000 0 0 N N N 6A 0 0 0 O OM EA 0 0 0 O t:•‘GN0 EA 000`OOS`Z $ 000`OS£`I $ 2,000,000 f 0 O 6A 0 0 in N N 69 0 O O 0 7 69 EA i FA O 0 O O '0 69 i 69 EA 69 i EA 69 i 69 i 69 6A i 69 69 Nn 0' EA i 6A 69 i EA 000`09£ 6A i 69 0 0 0 ON 69 0 O O O N 69 $ 220,000 EA 69 EA 6A EA EA 6A 69 • 6A 69 6A 69 69 a N 0' 69 69 600,000 EA I 000`OSb $ 000`OOS $ 6A 000`SZZ 0 0 N 69 FA $ 650,000 69 EA 69 000OSO`Z $ EA 6A 69 000 OSZ 000`0SZ $ 450,000 6A EA 0 N 0 FA 69 000`00£ $ 000`000`I $ 000`00; 0 O 0 O EA 69 i 6A 6A 69 69 0 O O 69 1 EA 0 O In N EA 69 0 0 O O 6A i EA 1 EA 0 0 O 0 EA 0 0 O 0 6A 000`0Sti $ $ 300,000 69 i 69 0 0 O 0 EA 1 69 O 0 O 0 EA 000`05 1 69 000`00£ $ 1 EA 69 69 69 V3 i 69 0 O 0 inn EA 1 69 0 0 0 0 CO b9 0 0 0 0 ... 6A $ 600,000 EA 69 EA b9 0 0 0 '0 69 bS 0 0 0 ^, b9 6A 69 1 69 1 69 000`0LS $ 69 Svce Transmission Lines Oslo Pk, Villages of VB 6" FM 66th Av 33rd St to 41st St Upgrade 8 " FM to 12" FM from 41st St to 45th along 58th Av 12WM 27th Av to 43rd Av Reuse line from 43rd Ave from 25th St SW to 1st St SW Convert 8"FM to Reuse Lateral G Conversion FM Wm and Reuse on 4th st from 82nd to 98th ave and on 98th from 4th to 8th Master Plan LS 90th Avenue and 510 L 91st Av to79th St & 104th Av (VLE) WM Fm Reuse CR510 incl Bridge 53rd St 58th Ave to 66th Av 12" WM 53rd St 58th Ave to 66th Av 12" FM 16" Effluent Main NWWTF to N Beach River Crossing Convert North County Brine Line to Reuse Main I 16" Effluent Main, CR510 from AIA to Bridge 12" WM on 27th Ave from 13th st SW to 17th St SW (Madera Isles & Echo Lake 12WM & 6"FM on 65th St from Lat G to Old Dixie (High Pointe) " 1 16" WM 69th ST E/O Kingshighway Brine Disposal So RO 58th Av 65th St to 69th St & along 61st and 69th St Purchase Site & construct RIB for central Reel WWTF Effluent Disposa 16th St 16" WM to ease peak hour flow & pressure requirements N of Windsor & Polo Club Extension Indian River County 75 00 00 O O RS 'O L 0 O O C L N y E d CQ � a C z 0 w"0 C -� co aat ometQ aIt ns E E a Ca U vD Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan $ - $ 220,000 Capacity Charges & User Fees zes & User Fees . Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Dacity Charges & User Fees Dacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Jacky Charges & User Fees .nn:1., f`h n rnnr P. 1 C,,,.,. Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Casaci Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees o 0 O 5 69 0 0 O O '0 FA 0 0 O O �0 6A 0 0 O O 0 O� N EA 00040504Z 000`005`I $ 0 0 0 O 69 0 0 0 O 1/40 69 0 0 0 O N 69 000`OSL $ 000`006 $ 0 0 O O On 69 $ 600,000 0 0 N N N 6A 0 0 0 O OM EA 0 0 0 O t:•‘GN0 EA 000`OOS`Z $ 000`OS£`I $ 2,000,000 f 0 O 6A 0 0 in N N 69 0 O O 0 7 69 EA i FA O 0 O O '0 69 i 69 EA 69 i EA 69 i 69 i 69 6A i 69 69 Nn 0' EA i 6A 69 i EA 000`09£ 6A i 69 0 0 0 ON 69 0 O O O N 69 $ 220,000 EA 69 EA 6A EA EA 6A 69 • 6A 69 6A 69 69 a N 0' 69 69 600,000 EA I 000`OSb $ 000`OOS $ 6A 000`SZZ 0 0 N 69 FA $ 650,000 69 EA 69 000OSO`Z $ EA 6A 69 000 OSZ 000`0SZ $ 450,000 6A EA 0 N 0 FA 69 000`00£ $ 000`000`I $ 000`00; 0 O 0 O EA 69 i 6A 6A 69 69 0 O O 69 1 EA 0 O In N EA 69 0 0 O O 6A i EA 1 EA 0 0 O 0 EA 0 0 O 0 6A 000`0Sti $ $ 300,000 69 i 69 0 0 O 0 EA 1 69 O 0 O 0 EA 000`05 1 69 000`00£ $ 1 EA 69 69 69 V3 i 69 0 O 0 inn EA 1 69 0 0 0 0 CO b9 0 0 0 0 ... 6A $ 600,000 EA 69 EA b9 0 0 0 '0 69 bS 0 0 0 ^, b9 6A 69 1 69 1 69 000`0LS $ 69 Svce Transmission Lines Oslo Pk, Villages of VB 6" FM 66th Av 33rd St to 41st St Upgrade 8 " FM to 12" FM from 41st St to 45th along 58th Av 12WM 27th Av to 43rd Av Reuse line from 43rd Ave from 25th St SW to 1st St SW Convert 8"FM to Reuse Lateral G Conversion FM Wm and Reuse on 4th st from 82nd to 98th ave and on 98th from 4th to 8th Master Plan LS 90th Avenue and 510 L 91st Av to79th St & 104th Av (VLE) WM Fm Reuse CR510 incl Bridge 53rd St 58th Ave to 66th Av 12" WM 53rd St 58th Ave to 66th Av 12" FM 16" Effluent Main NWWTF to N Beach River Crossing Convert North County Brine Line to Reuse Main I 16" Effluent Main, CR510 from AIA to Bridge 12" WM on 27th Ave from 13th st SW to 17th St SW (Madera Isles & Echo Lake 12WM & 6"FM on 65th St from Lat G to Old Dixie (High Pointe) " 1 16" WM 69th ST E/O Kingshighway Brine Disposal So RO 58th Av 65th St to 69th St & along 61st and 69th St Purchase Site & construct RIB for central Reel WWTF Effluent Disposa 16th St 16" WM to ease peak hour flow & pressure requirements N of Windsor & Polo Club Extension Indian River County 75 00 00 O O RS 'O L 0 O O C L N y E d CQ � a C z 0 w"0 C -� co aat ometQ aIt ns E E a Ca U vD Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees ges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees y y'T M � ,H 0' �dN Er�C i4' f`,ti vit'3s•' aP-aa pacity Charges & User Fees 1 O nt N 7 ,1 EA 0 pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Jacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees 'N ee ti -ti- 00 00 M 0 N kr) Erg O In N 000`0SZ 0 0 00 .,-- 0 0 O� ..-. O N O O OM ,--iN $ 300,000 0 O N 0 N N $ 825,000 M .M. ICI' 10 000`801 0 0 00n ,--4 S 43,960,825 (.9 6A EA EA 5A EA EA EA EA 6A 0 cA O N N t` En O 000`05Z $ Oi 1 1 Total Revenue 1 i i i i O 00 $ 4,427,400 O O N 00 000 N 00 00 EA EA EA EA fA EA EA EA EA EA EA 6A EA i i 0 1 1 i i 1 1 i i 0 N M O 0 V O 0 N ✓1 V) M 7 cA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA V) EA EA EA FA EA O o O o 1 ' O In ' M ,--' O 7 N I� I� co EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 6A EA EA EA EA EA EA 000`008 $ O $ 44,502 O O 01 1 1 1 1 0 o o i i 1 1 0 O O 0 O O M' t --- vi' 1D 10 M NMN EH EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0004000`I O O 0 $ 825,000 N $ 495,300 $ 8,000 0 1 i 1 1 , 0 0 O O 0 0 0 In 1 - CT r. O o N O N N 7 N N 00 ti EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Gardens Vista Gardens Effluent Main Connection Vista Royale Effluent Main Connection 24"Reuse 82nd Av from WWTF to NWWTF 16" Effluent Main a A1A from CR510 to City of VB Interconnect Wetlands Expansion Effluent #15 IRC & City of VB Regional Deep Injection Well Install 12" WM along 66th Ave from 16th St to SR 60 Install Wells and Pipping at North County RO Plan Install 16" WM along College Lane Install Well No.7 st S. Co. RO Plant per's Agreement Install 6" FM in Conjunction with 43rd Ave Road Widening Install 6" FM along 16th St west of 43rd Ave Install 24" WM along 77th St from 66th Ave to 70th Ave then North to CR 510 Total Expenditures 4ti a C- ttwi azdsi + �e 9 3 N N 00 0 01 0\ ori V' kr) N 00 O b VD enr% 7 69 609 �A { y y'T M � ,H 0' �dN Er�C i4' f`,ti vit'3s•' aP-aa O : 't N '7? rt EA O nt N 7 ,1 EA 0 1eaJ ggneN Em ti $ 4,329,637 $ 4,329,637 0 EA 'N ee ti -ti- 00 00 M 0 N kr) Erg cieN M7-1"_ 01 h O 01 V)C1 in M in N 00 69 ;1 ",.y E N_N'. 4w C. . M{* 0 O O kr) ^ be $ 7,366,739 N 1/46 10 6, i IcoN. IN ; s tom _ ' " 0 0 O N EA O— U 00 '-' EA 0 cA O N N t` En C00 Wrt bye; T ¢ Total Revenue Total Expenditures Annual Balance llpaadxstjo"..uost Edma* "0 VCN ce 01 Trct O wN O 0 O 0; N V 00 M EA O O 0, 00 N M 69 bS EA 6A Assessments & User Fees Indian River County 76 00 O 0 0 O U R L O O O M r+ U y .a E L U Cd O A o O dr en CZ t icia 7 G �G+ G o Uvp Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees ges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees y y'T M � ,H 0' �dN Er�C i4' f`,ti vit'3s•' aP-aa pacity Charges & User Fees 1 O nt N 7 ,1 EA 0 pacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Jacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees Capacity Charges & User Fees pacity Charges & User Fees 'N ee ti -ti- 00 00 M 0 N kr) Erg O In N 000`0SZ 0 0 00 .,-- 0 0 O� ..-. O N O O OM ,--iN $ 300,000 0 O N 0 N N $ 825,000 M .M. ICI' 10 000`801 0 0 00n ,--4 S 43,960,825 (.9 6A EA EA 5A EA EA EA EA 6A 0 cA O N N t` En O 000`05Z $ Oi 1 1 Total Revenue 1 i i i i O 00 $ 4,427,400 O O N 00 000 N 00 00 EA EA EA EA fA EA EA EA EA EA EA 6A EA i i 0 1 1 i i 1 1 i i 0 N M O 0 V O 0 N ✓1 V) M 7 cA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA V) EA EA EA FA EA O o O o 1 ' O In ' M ,--' O 7 N I� I� co EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 6A EA EA EA EA EA EA 000`008 $ O $ 44,502 O O 01 1 1 1 1 0 o o i i 1 1 0 O O 0 O O M' t --- vi' 1D 10 M NMN EH EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0004000`I O O 0 $ 825,000 N $ 495,300 $ 8,000 0 1 i 1 1 , 0 0 O O 0 0 0 In 1 - CT r. O o N O N N 7 N N 00 ti EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Gardens Vista Gardens Effluent Main Connection Vista Royale Effluent Main Connection 24"Reuse 82nd Av from WWTF to NWWTF 16" Effluent Main a A1A from CR510 to City of VB Interconnect Wetlands Expansion Effluent #15 IRC & City of VB Regional Deep Injection Well Install 12" WM along 66th Ave from 16th St to SR 60 Install Wells and Pipping at North County RO Plan Install 16" WM along College Lane Install Well No.7 st S. Co. RO Plant per's Agreement Install 6" FM in Conjunction with 43rd Ave Road Widening Install 6" FM along 16th St west of 43rd Ave Install 24" WM along 77th St from 66th Ave to 70th Ave then North to CR 510 Total Expenditures 4ti a C- ttwi azdsi + �e 9 3 N N 00 0 01 0\ ori V' kr) N 00 O b VD enr% 7 69 609 �A { y y'T M � ,H 0' �dN Er�C i4' f`,ti vit'3s•' aP-aa O : 't N '7? rt EA O nt N 7 ,1 EA 0 1eaJ ggneN Em ti $ 4,329,637 $ 4,329,637 0 EA 'N ee ti -ti- 00 00 M 0 N kr) Erg cieN M7-1"_ 01 h O 01 V)C1 in M in N 00 69 ;1 ",.y E N_N'. 4w C. . M{* 0 O O kr) ^ be $ 7,366,739 N 1/46 10 6, i IcoN. IN ; s tom _ ' " 0 0 O N EA O— U 00 '-' EA 0 cA O N N t` En C00 Wrt bye; T ¢ Total Revenue Total Expenditures Annual Balance llpaadxstjo"..uost Edma* "0 VCN ce 01 Trct O wN O 0 O 0; N V 00 M EA O O 0, 00 N M 69 bS EA 6A Assessments & User Fees Indian River County 76 00 O 0 0 O U R L O O O M r+ U y .a E L U Cd O A o O dr en CZ t icia 7 G �G+ G o Uvp Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 69 69 69 <Fi 69 Total Revenue Indian River County 77 oo O O O U CQ C .b i.. O 00 016 111 E t E L ct U . A CZ A 01)W Eo. 0 M A It f` C E E E 0 Uric :f4 S- i0 * °r.0 },d Assessments & User Fees Assessments & -riser Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees f 71S DOM -`" O.. a 7 s r srnF 0 O 00 MN 69 0 O 69 0 0 in N EA 0 O O en d- ..ti 6A 0 O O NO N EA 0 O O Cr,O N ,--1 EA OO 00 VD N Eli O 0 Vii C EA O O 0 0 Ere 0 0 0 VD EA o 0 0 —4 o 0 N 69 000`OS$ 000`058`8$ o 0 0 0o 69 $ 38,429,000 'i7r. f EA O O 00 EA CA GA I EA O O bA EA I EA 1 EA I b9 1 EA 1 EA I EA O p p oo — b9 EA $ 8,347,000 I $ 20,530,000 1 $ 2,300,000 $ 5,143,000 $ 2,109,000 iG f t .YN ax7 Apia) N W srrY 13r§;N 0 O M 1/4.01n 69 1 EA 0 0 O EA 1 EA 000`05 $ I EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA I b9 bA 0 00 O 0 EA EA { ; fi,r rt,M N IasiEA 11 EA 6A '-1 EA EA EA 000`08£ $ EA EA be EA 6A EA EA EA EA v .-i O ;1+; r } 0, 3'•- < EA 1 6A 0 O 0 p '0 69 1 69 I 6A $ 520,000 O O 0 p O b9 000`0L1`6 $ 1 FA 000`00I `S $ 1 EA 1 b9 1 be O O 0 O O (-4 EA O O 0 O 00 00 CA Xi J 'I' f5i4{4% wiy z a3W' K^3. ya,7,€O, N' rc 5 o 0 o o 5 0 t+1 EA 0 0 o 0 M 6A 1I 6A EA 0 O O p OO Ni b9 $ 215,000 0 0 O s EA 0 0 O 5N d' EA 0 0 p OO N EA 000`OOS`£ $ 000`0£ I $ 000`ZS $ 0 0 O Okr) b9 1 000`QSz $ bA 3;r uii• " } trn i r„ 1t�� �rr�,, 4 FY 1n0�v U; :13-2, d O Relocation & Replacement of Fellsmere Citizens Convenience Center Winter Beach Citizens Convenience Center Phase I Improvements Roseland Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements Transfer Tractor/Transfer Trailers and Roll -off Truck/Containers r,55, per. ' Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill - Phase 1 C&D Debris Placement on Northern Slope Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill Relocation/Replacement 10,000 gal Diesel Fuel Tank Abandon. Relocate 3 Groundwater Monitoring Well Clusters 11 Retrofit of MRF Sequential Partial Closure of Seg -1, Seg -2 and the Infill Closure of Cell h C&D Landfill s C, N d xs up 41:O a tit i(O ! . 1-1 YULiI 2e2A^{n6''z Cyy At51 '2FJ: 9 1 Indian River County 77 oo O O O U CQ C .b i.. O 00 016 111 E t E L ct U . A CZ A 01)W Eo. 0 M A It f` C E E E 0 Uric Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 69 69 69 <Fi 69 Total Revenue Indian River County 77 oo O O O U CQ C .b i.. O 00 016 111 E t E L ct U . A CZ A 01)W Eo. 0 M A It f` C E E E 0 Uric :f4 S- i0 * °r.0 },d Assessments & User Fees Assessments & -riser Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees Assessments & User Fees f 71S DOM -`" O.. a 7 s r srnF 0 O 00 MN 69 0 O 69 0 0 in N EA 0 O O en d- ..ti 6A 0 O O NO N EA 0 O O Cr,O N ,--1 EA OO 00 VD N Eli O 0 Vii C EA O O 0 0 Ere 0 0 0 VD EA o 0 0 —4 o 0 N 69 000`OS$ 000`058`8$ o 0 0 0o 69 $ 38,429,000 'i7r. f EA O O 00 EA CA GA I EA O O bA EA I EA 1 EA I b9 1 EA 1 EA I EA O p p oo — b9 EA $ 8,347,000 I $ 20,530,000 1 $ 2,300,000 $ 5,143,000 $ 2,109,000 iG f t .YN ax7 Apia) N W srrY 13r§;N 0 O M 1/4.01n 69 1 EA 0 0 O EA 1 EA 000`05 $ I EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA I b9 bA 0 00 O 0 EA EA { ; fi,r rt,M N IasiEA 11 EA 6A '-1 EA EA EA 000`08£ $ EA EA be EA 6A EA EA EA EA v .-i O ;1+; r } 0, 3'•- < EA 1 6A 0 O 0 p '0 69 1 69 I 6A $ 520,000 O O 0 p O b9 000`0L1`6 $ 1 FA 000`00I `S $ 1 EA 1 b9 1 be O O 0 O O (-4 EA O O 0 O 00 00 CA Xi J 'I' f5i4{4% wiy z a3W' K^3. ya,7,€O, N' rc 5 o 0 o o 5 0 t+1 EA 0 0 o 0 M 6A 1I 6A EA 0 O O p OO Ni b9 $ 215,000 0 0 O s EA 0 0 O 5N d' EA 0 0 p OO N EA 000`OOS`£ $ 000`0£ I $ 000`ZS $ 0 0 O Okr) b9 1 000`QSz $ bA 3;r uii• " } trn i r„ 1t�� �rr�,, 4 FY 1n0�v U; :13-2, d O Relocation & Replacement of Fellsmere Citizens Convenience Center Winter Beach Citizens Convenience Center Phase I Improvements Roseland Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements Transfer Tractor/Transfer Trailers and Roll -off Truck/Containers r,55, per. ' Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill - Phase 1 C&D Debris Placement on Northern Slope Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill Relocation/Replacement 10,000 gal Diesel Fuel Tank Abandon. Relocate 3 Groundwater Monitoring Well Clusters 11 Retrofit of MRF Sequential Partial Closure of Seg -1, Seg -2 and the Infill Closure of Cell h C&D Landfill s C, N d xs up 41:O a tit i(O ! . 1-1 YULiI 2e2A^{n6''z Cyy At51 '2FJ: 9 1 Indian River County 77 oo O O O U CQ C .b i.. O 00 016 111 E t E L ct U . A CZ A 01)W Eo. 0 M A It f` C E E E 0 Uric Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 78 y�r st; immi P 0 00 N 7r pp re) 69 O 0 N 0 00 M 69 0 69 aM Optional Sales Tax Funds 0 0 M 0 0 OC O N EA 0 0 0 VD N .-+ 69 C c0 c7 'e 00 I� Grant I lt C7 C) 69 5,55; <d U 0 0 M M 0 0 O M 71- vi 69 $ (1,797,700) O 0 0 O N j;` Ili wittl. It 'iceik (ha ‘t 69 ^ArYg`. i?rft 0 0 O in N r-iN 69 $ 3,312,300 O O 0 0 0 M N 69 0 0 M •-' 0 69 000-005't' $ 0 0 O O 0 69 N.� C � :ra Y rl b -M: tIN re= �w $ 3,279,600 0 0 0 O M N 69 0 O 1- O In N .-1 cA ih kip N I 69 I 69 ;:a ADD 'if p 0 rn N— trc N 69 0 o et M 00 69 0 ON [� 0 .--1 69 s N+ 69 I 69 Ci pry; .�a G0 w:i:.i frt4 et X�1111 O. ,'"ti it o CAI acloilt CU G 1 7 c4 Denditures N Q = al CO co t ¢c C/} U= 1 Total Indian River County 78 a r vis aac cigtra �,r...f ty-;F Optional Sales Tax Funds tC C7 1- 0 C cd cl7 C c0 c7 C5-5 cd C7 Optional Sales Tax Funds Grant I lt C7 R7 c7 1- C7 Grant <d U MSTU Assesments r41., #} O 0 0 O N O 0 0 O V' 69 O 0 00 d r 69 $ 2,000.000 O 0 O 0 69 OOO OSL $ O 0 0 O O 69 O O O O 00 69 0 0 O in N r-iN 69 0 0 O O 0 69 000'005'b $ 0 0 O O• 69 000-005't' $ 0 0 O O 0 69 69 b -M: tIN re= �w 'y I 69 I EA 69 I 69 I 69 I 69 69 I 69 I 69 I 69 69 I 69 0 0 0 O M 6q 69 ••447:-. 1 69 I 69 I 69 I 69 1 4/4 I 69 000`005`Z $ 69 EA 000`005`b $ 1 69 1 69 0 0 r1 69 V. 69 .4,..y'. *1 r.Nw O I 1 v9 w 1 49 1 49 be 0 0 0 0 0 N 65 0 1• 0 0 0 v N 69 69 1 s9 1 EA 1 as 69 0 0 0 0 Fa 0; 69 p&Q 1 1 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 000`OSZ`I $ 0 0 O O 0 1kt kktn 000`OSZ wy C:0 69 ter;. sari : spao "itit-----f g00N :z* 0 o o .-1 0 0 0 CT V 69 0 0 0 otn N GA 0 0 0 0 0 N" 69 0 0 0 0 LnN 69 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 .-. 69 1 69 0 0 0 cw r. 69 0 0 0 0 69 I 6A I 69 1• CA 69 49 '.sfij [a 'y rut -r ;gret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I North Relief Canal Treatment System North Relief Canal Treatment System Main Relief Canal Treatment System South Relief Canal Treatment System South Relief Canal Treatment System Rockridge Surge Protection Project Rockridge Surge Protection Project Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III 1 ::a 0 ..:,..<t) yyrY�' ti vQ W CO i gP..i Indian River County 78 Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 78 y�r st; immi P 0 00 N 7r pp re) 69 O 0 N 0 00 M 69 0 69 aM Optional Sales Tax Funds 0 0 M 0 0 OC O N EA 0 0 0 VD N .-+ 69 C c0 c7 'e 00 I� Grant I lt C7 C) 69 5,55; <d U 0 0 M M 0 0 O M 71- vi 69 $ (1,797,700) O 0 0 O N j;` Ili wittl. It 'iceik (ha ‘t 69 ^ArYg`. i?rft 0 0 O in N r-iN 69 $ 3,312,300 O O 0 0 0 M N 69 0 0 M •-' 0 69 000-005't' $ 0 0 O O 0 69 N.� C � :ra Y rl b -M: tIN re= �w $ 3,279,600 0 0 0 O M N 69 0 O 1- O In N .-1 cA ih kip N I 69 I 69 ;:a ADD 'if p 0 rn N— trc N 69 0 o et M 00 69 0 ON [� 0 .--1 69 s N+ 69 I 69 Ci pry; .�a G0 w:i:.i frt4 et X�1111 O. ,'"ti it o CAI acloilt CU G 1 7 c4 Denditures N Q = al CO co t ¢c C/} U= 1 Total Indian River County 78 a r vis aac cigtra �,r...f ty-;F Optional Sales Tax Funds tC C7 1- 0 C cd cl7 C c0 c7 C5-5 cd C7 Optional Sales Tax Funds Grant I lt C7 R7 c7 1- C7 Grant <d U MSTU Assesments r41., #} O 0 0 O N O 0 0 O V' 69 O 0 00 d r 69 $ 2,000.000 O 0 O 0 69 OOO OSL $ O 0 0 O O 69 O O O O 00 69 0 0 O in N r-iN 69 0 0 O O 0 69 000'005'b $ 0 0 O O• 69 000-005't' $ 0 0 O O 0 69 69 b -M: tIN re= �w 'y I 69 I EA 69 I 69 I 69 I 69 69 I 69 I 69 I 69 69 I 69 0 0 0 O M 6q 69 ••447:-. 1 69 I 69 I 69 I 69 1 4/4 I 69 000`005`Z $ 69 EA 000`005`b $ 1 69 1 69 0 0 r1 69 V. 69 .4,..y'. *1 r.Nw O I 1 v9 w 1 49 1 49 be 0 0 0 0 0 N 65 0 1• 0 0 0 v N 69 69 1 s9 1 EA 1 as 69 0 0 0 0 Fa 0; 69 p&Q 1 1 69 1 69 I 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 000`OSZ`I $ 0 0 O O 0 1kt kktn 000`OSZ wy C:0 69 ter;. sari : spao "itit-----f g00N :z* 0 o o .-1 0 0 0 CT V 69 0 0 0 otn N GA 0 0 0 0 0 N" 69 0 0 0 0 LnN 69 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 .-. 69 1 69 0 0 0 cw r. 69 0 0 0 0 69 I 6A I 69 1• CA 69 49 '.sfij [a 'y rut -r ;gret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park - Phase I North Relief Canal Treatment System North Relief Canal Treatment System Main Relief Canal Treatment System South Relief Canal Treatment System South Relief Canal Treatment System Rockridge Surge Protection Project Rockridge Surge Protection Project Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III 1 ::a 0 ..:,..<t) yyrY�' ti vQ W CO i gP..i Indian River County 78 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan $ 915,000 1 $ 1,100,000 1 $ 1000.000 I Ontinnal Sales TRY Fundic 01 S 0 r I 1 1 L Id 0 0 O N 0 0 O .. 00 00 N EA ,0 l0 00 M 69 O O O 0 O in EA S 28,815,000 $ 48,037 378 69 Total Expenditures $ 7,015,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 5,285,000 I_ S 8,715,000 $ 1,400,000 L 0 0 O 0 0 to 69 000`585 $ 1,400.000 69 0 0 0 0 NI - EA EA CN 0 ^-1 l EA 1 6A 000`SIL`S 5 1 69 Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III Indian River County 79 3`s .-.. o0 a 00 0 0 O N 0 0 O .. 00 00 N EA ,0 l0 00 M 69 609 ct `.EtO $ 48,037 378 $ 21,643.809 69 L F „e. tf`I AO 13 1,400,000 $ 1,400.000 1 En W44144 .. T Yy CN 0 ^-1 l oo fE(p raa . 000`SIL`S 5 0 0 h °O 69 1 Annual Balance I $ - t $ - $ - $ Nati q 0, 0 0 O ON 6A fV $ 79,756,778 Riy\ti Fk.4 ,b. 000`S8Z`5 $ O 1(r 00 ri `- �;N�j {ni:t VitA' �,M .x`,�. lsx0 p3tptor' 11 co co 0 ,0 E4473 O co co ,0 E4/40 n ww' V-400 ha ON'' O; $ 7,015,000 0 trc 0 n 69 $ 3,843,000 1 EA Total Revenue I $ 79,859,692 $ 30,666,961 1 $ 30,022,360 $ 25,762,000 Total Revenue Total Expenditures rN P.:.: Comparisc n of Expenditures tg Indian River County 79 3`s ; w O. -+ e h 0 0 EA ,0 M M 00 69 ,0 l0 00 M 69 O, T V' O 6A $ 11,383 797 $ 48,037 378 $ 21,643.809 V• r4-4 ,-. O h 'N-. 69 v1 414) CN rn M CO O, FA O O O 69 $ 246,067,791 O 0 0 EA t x ,t 5h, E.. , CN 0 ^-1 l 1 69 1/40 CO N - — 6A 000`006`P $ 0 O O 0 EA 0 0 O 0 h 69 0 0 O OV N EA 1 6A 0 0 O ON 6A 69 $ 79,756,778 up 6r:riNa d ,b. cY V7 Y.kS` t1 `7 EA {ni:t VitA' �,M .74 0 0 0, ? 1" 1 EA 0 O N --i 6A 000`006`b $ 000`005`Z $ 0 O <t ,0 EA 0 O 0 N 69 $ 600,000 $ 3,843,000 1 EA Total Revenue I $ 79,859,692 $ 30,666,961 1 $ 30,022,360 $ 25,762,000 Et A 0 N' anj W{_ rN P.:.: Ai". <t r b9 S 69 0 0 O 6 Vl 69 0 0 000 CO O -. O 6A 0 0 0 O 0 ,O ^' EA 00 0 0 O 0 O,0 6A $ 2,000,000 0 0 O 0 va O 0 0 O 0 Er) 69 0 0 O 0 ,0 vi O 00 ,0 h ,0 h 69 1 6A O 0 O 0 re) 6A ' +0: }r.;O; rte' ~, 00 M h w ^' 69 1" Tht H L }9: sNx�A O 0 0 1 O 00 '0 10O CA 69 O 0 0 0 N" EA O 0 0 O O .-. EA 000`058 000`00Z`Z $ O O O 69 $ 5,096,281 000`058`17 $ 1 69 00N . 0 .-. E., + Z),•4.„ 69 �:,+i$�# 4 jr, 5 13' a>'x M 0 ,O N O, ,O M 6A 1 EH 0 0 0 O 0 7 N EA h 0\ O, — 00 69 $ 3,133,797 00 h M h en d• 00M N 6A 0, 0 00 err O, T 7 ^-- EA en re) 00 ,0 0 •7 •71: 69 v) h N M kr) N --` 6A 0 O 0 O 0 V --- 69 E..,40 --0! ': : ITEO. N 3--6 +^' Tt iztCY �te.{y`Yx � w;Y to t �rev�s z., � s X cd cri cd 0 Payback from FDOT Interest Grant Dact Fees District I Traffic Impact Fees District II 'act Fees District III Developer Contributions Optional Sales Tax 'act Fees Indian River County 79 a u. ti Cr 9U. 2 cv :s= Gas Tax Gas Tax H 0 Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees II /jai pr' O 0 O h 0 0 O 0 N 69 0 0 O 0 ri EA 000`000`I $ 0 00 O wD vl 69 O 0 0 EA aY.ls EA M 1 %O: i N ice` I 69 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 6A I 69 M h w.::::: i....4:1? i4:1 i ` O O O 0 6A 1 69 1 6A 1 69 0 O 0 NN EA 6A 6A 69 1 6A 1 69 1 EA 14e $ 75,0 Et A 0 N' anj W{_ Ai". 11 EH b9 O 0 0 — EA 0 0 O 6 Vl 69 EA ;IN' 14;i' +x DRi Ere) 69 -$11:7V0 P ;O IN'. " �w. ` 00 fsy EA 6A O 0 O 0 re) 6A 000`000`1 $ 1 EA r1� ��y�c+{ tib. giW ik d, aoo' 1" Tht H L h Ave. SW - 7th St. SW to 9th St. SW 12 Ave. - 8th St. to 9th St. SW 12th Court SW - 7th Street SW to 9th Street SW 12th Street Paving 58th to 66th 12th Street Paving 58th to 66th 12th Street/27th Avenue Indian River County 79 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan $ 915,000 1 $ 1,100,000 1 $ 1000.000 I Ontinnal Sales TRY Fundic 01 S 0 r I 1 1 L Id 0 0 O N 0 0 O .. 00 00 N EA ,0 l0 00 M 69 O O O 0 O in EA S 28,815,000 $ 48,037 378 69 Total Expenditures $ 7,015,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 5,285,000 I_ S 8,715,000 $ 1,400,000 L 0 0 O 0 0 to 69 000`585 $ 1,400.000 69 0 0 0 0 NI - EA EA CN 0 ^-1 l EA 1 6A 000`SIL`S 5 1 69 Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III Indian River County 79 3`s .-.. o0 a 00 0 0 O N 0 0 O .. 00 00 N EA ,0 l0 00 M 69 609 ct `.EtO $ 48,037 378 $ 21,643.809 69 L F „e. tf`I AO 13 1,400,000 $ 1,400.000 1 En W44144 .. T Yy CN 0 ^-1 l oo fE(p raa . 000`SIL`S 5 0 0 h °O 69 1 Annual Balance I $ - t $ - $ - $ Nati q 0, 0 0 O ON 6A fV $ 79,756,778 Riy\ti Fk.4 ,b. 000`S8Z`5 $ O 1(r 00 ri `- �;N�j {ni:t VitA' �,M .x`,�. lsx0 p3tptor' 11 co co 0 ,0 E4473 O co co ,0 E4/40 n ww' V-400 ha ON'' O; $ 7,015,000 0 trc 0 n 69 $ 3,843,000 1 EA Total Revenue I $ 79,859,692 $ 30,666,961 1 $ 30,022,360 $ 25,762,000 Total Revenue Total Expenditures rN P.:.: Comparisc n of Expenditures tg Indian River County 79 3`s ; w O. -+ e h 0 0 EA ,0 M M 00 69 ,0 l0 00 M 69 O, T V' O 6A $ 11,383 797 $ 48,037 378 $ 21,643.809 V• r4-4 ,-. O h 'N-. 69 v1 414) CN rn M CO O, FA O O O 69 $ 246,067,791 O 0 0 EA t x ,t 5h, E.. , CN 0 ^-1 l 1 69 1/40 CO N - — 6A 000`006`P $ 0 O O 0 EA 0 0 O 0 h 69 0 0 O OV N EA 1 6A 0 0 O ON 6A 69 $ 79,756,778 up 6r:riNa d ,b. cY V7 Y.kS` t1 `7 EA {ni:t VitA' �,M .74 0 0 0, ? 1" 1 EA 0 O N --i 6A 000`006`b $ 000`005`Z $ 0 O <t ,0 EA 0 O 0 N 69 $ 600,000 $ 3,843,000 1 EA Total Revenue I $ 79,859,692 $ 30,666,961 1 $ 30,022,360 $ 25,762,000 Et A 0 N' anj W{_ rN P.:.: Ai". <t r b9 S 69 0 0 O 6 Vl 69 0 0 000 CO O -. O 6A 0 0 0 O 0 ,O ^' EA 00 0 0 O 0 O,0 6A $ 2,000,000 0 0 O 0 va O 0 0 O 0 Er) 69 0 0 O 0 ,0 vi O 00 ,0 h ,0 h 69 1 6A O 0 O 0 re) 6A ' +0: }r.;O; rte' ~, 00 M h w ^' 69 1" Tht H L }9: sNx�A O 0 0 1 O 00 '0 10O CA 69 O 0 0 0 N" EA O 0 0 O O .-. EA 000`058 000`00Z`Z $ O O O 69 $ 5,096,281 000`058`17 $ 1 69 00N . 0 .-. E., + Z),•4.„ 69 �:,+i$�# 4 jr, 5 13' a>'x M 0 ,O N O, ,O M 6A 1 EH 0 0 0 O 0 7 N EA h 0\ O, — 00 69 $ 3,133,797 00 h M h en d• 00M N 6A 0, 0 00 err O, T 7 ^-- EA en re) 00 ,0 0 •7 •71: 69 v) h N M kr) N --` 6A 0 O 0 O 0 V --- 69 E..,40 --0! ': : ITEO. N 3--6 +^' Tt iztCY �te.{y`Yx � w;Y to t �rev�s z., � s X cd cri cd 0 Payback from FDOT Interest Grant Dact Fees District I Traffic Impact Fees District II 'act Fees District III Developer Contributions Optional Sales Tax 'act Fees Indian River County 79 a u. ti Cr 9U. 2 cv :s= Gas Tax Gas Tax H 0 Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees II /jai pr' O 0 O h 0 0 O 0 N 69 0 0 O 0 ri EA 000`000`I $ 0 00 O wD vl 69 O 0 0 EA aY.ls EA M 1 %O: i N ice` I 69 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 6A I 69 M h w.::::: i....4:1? i4:1 i ` O O O 0 6A 1 69 1 6A 1 69 0 O 0 NN EA 6A 6A 69 1 6A 1 69 1 EA 14e $ 75,0 Et A 0 N' anj W{_ Ai". 11 EH b9 O 0 0 — EA 0 0 O 6 Vl 69 EA ;IN' 14;i' +x DRi Ere) 69 -$11:7V0 P ;O IN'. " �w. ` 00 fsy EA 6A O 0 O 0 re) 6A 000`000`1 $ 1 EA r1� ��y�c+{ tib. giW ik d, aoo' 1" Tht H L h Ave. SW - 7th St. SW to 9th St. SW 12 Ave. - 8th St. to 9th St. SW 12th Court SW - 7th Street SW to 9th Street SW 12th Street Paving 58th to 66th 12th Street Paving 58th to 66th 12th Street/27th Avenue Indian River County 79 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 80 00 0 0 0 cC C O 0 0 00 L � y E w E L ao ctZ b 0) E a� o d m > A � itCw 4 E E U aj Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 80 00 0 0 0 cC C O 0 0 00 L � y E w E L ao ctZ b 0) E a� o d m > A � itCw 4 E E U aj Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 81 'r Gas Tax (11 O pol • C NCLl CO H NM. al ._. ctl N I.. p o � NG QU d tll G Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees II Gas Tax Optional Sales Tax Developer Contributions Gas Tax cd 11 u rn rdiwG a H di 0 o N C 5 .n C1.., Cl.) a o N QU x - 5 ‘113 0 w .a xo - . C7QU E O c .0 E g. O 05 $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3.000.000 coE O O O 69 o O 0 O in 69 $ 303,776 $ 290.000 1 c 0 0 00 M 69 000 000-1 $ $ 8.441374 0 O 0 LA 69 N fel 0 N 69 000-0066 $ �O ..-r t� .. 69 N VD r 69 000`OOS $ $ 5,505,367 $ 400,000 O 0 0 Cr 69 O N r N .-. 69 O V 7 69 O b h N 69 M V 00 o0 N 69 ON. N 04' 7f 6A r 69 69 r F!i 1 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 Or O O 0 © co) N 69 1 6A 69 rr 69 1 69 69 6A r 69 1 Fig r 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 69 r 49 r 69 r 69 1 69 1 69 r 69 O 00 N in vi 69 0 O O d' N ri 69 0 O 0 O 0 N 69 0 coO OO co M oo 69 000`005 69 69 r 69 69 r 69 1 69 69 1 69 O O O O 0 69 O O O O O O N" 69 69 r 69 r 6A $ 303,776 69 r 69 69 O O O O O vl 69 000'0011 $ r 69 0 0 O o 69 VD l� 'D 00 69 r 69 r 6A $ 219,770 I 69 r 69 1 69 r 69 1 69 $ 2,000,000 1 r 69 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 $ 2,000,000 000`000`I $ 000`008 69 r 69 69 O 0 O O � M 69 '0 M 00 00 M 69 O 0 O 0 0 M 69 n D1 It coO p 69 69 i 69 OM N 0 N ^ 69 r 69 1 69 OO O 0 0 N 69 000`000`1 r 69 O O O O ^ 6A 0 0 O O v1 V3 r EA 0 0 0 6 CT N 49 0 O O O O O .�. 69 r 69 O, 0 l� rn —,en 69 1 69 OD N M N 0 N 69 1 69 i 69 'D M 00 00 Cr. M 69 O 0 O Cr 0 N 69 $ 3,600,000 O O O O O V 69 O O O O O Or% EA r 69 i 445,400 0 7 vl N b9 M 00 ‘.0 o0 69 0- � N D, •--i 69 27th Ave, 5th ST SW to 13th St SW (four lanes (2 miles) 33rd Street, West of 66th Avenue, two lanes (.25 mile) 33rd Street, West of 66th Avenue, two lanes (.25 mile) 33rd Street/66th Avenue 33rd Street/66th Avenue 43rd Ave. 3 -lane and Bridge Replacements 5th Street and 43rd Avenue over S. Relief Canal 43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street, three lanes (.5 miles) 43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 19th Street, four lanes (1 mile) 43rd Avenue,12th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes (2.5 miles) 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 45th Street Beautification 53rd Street — 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 53rd Street — 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 53rd Street— 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 53rd Street — 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 56th Place Bridge over North Relief Canal 56th Place Bridge over North Relief Canal 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection Indian River County 81 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 81 'r Gas Tax (11 O pol • C NCLl CO H NM. al ._. ctl N I.. p o � NG QU d tll G Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees II Gas Tax Optional Sales Tax Developer Contributions Gas Tax cd 11 u rn rdiwG a H di 0 o N C 5 .n C1.., Cl.) a o N QU x - 5 ‘113 0 w .a xo - . C7QU E O c .0 E g. O 05 $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3.000.000 coE O O O 69 o O 0 O in 69 $ 303,776 $ 290.000 1 c 0 0 00 M 69 000 000-1 $ $ 8.441374 0 O 0 LA 69 N fel 0 N 69 000-0066 $ �O ..-r t� .. 69 N VD r 69 000`OOS $ $ 5,505,367 $ 400,000 O 0 0 Cr 69 O N r N .-. 69 O V 7 69 O b h N 69 M V 00 o0 N 69 ON. N 04' 7f 6A r 69 69 r F!i 1 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 Or O O 0 © co) N 69 1 6A 69 rr 69 1 69 69 6A r 69 1 Fig r 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 69 r 49 r 69 r 69 1 69 1 69 r 69 O 00 N in vi 69 0 O O d' N ri 69 0 O 0 O 0 N 69 0 coO OO co M oo 69 000`005 69 69 r 69 69 r 69 1 69 69 1 69 O O O O 0 69 O O O O O O N" 69 69 r 69 r 6A $ 303,776 69 r 69 69 O O O O O vl 69 000'0011 $ r 69 0 0 O o 69 VD l� 'D 00 69 r 69 r 6A $ 219,770 I 69 r 69 1 69 r 69 1 69 $ 2,000,000 1 r 69 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 r 69 $ 2,000,000 000`000`I $ 000`008 69 r 69 69 O 0 O O � M 69 '0 M 00 00 M 69 O 0 O 0 0 M 69 n D1 It coO p 69 69 i 69 OM N 0 N ^ 69 r 69 1 69 OO O 0 0 N 69 000`000`1 r 69 O O O O ^ 6A 0 0 O O v1 V3 r EA 0 0 0 6 CT N 49 0 O O O O O .�. 69 r 69 O, 0 l� rn —,en 69 1 69 OD N M N 0 N 69 1 69 i 69 'D M 00 00 Cr. M 69 O 0 O Cr 0 N 69 $ 3,600,000 O O O O O V 69 O O O O O Or% EA r 69 i 445,400 0 7 vl N b9 M 00 ‘.0 o0 69 0- � N D, •--i 69 27th Ave, 5th ST SW to 13th St SW (four lanes (2 miles) 33rd Street, West of 66th Avenue, two lanes (.25 mile) 33rd Street, West of 66th Avenue, two lanes (.25 mile) 33rd Street/66th Avenue 33rd Street/66th Avenue 43rd Ave. 3 -lane and Bridge Replacements 5th Street and 43rd Avenue over S. Relief Canal 43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street, three lanes (.5 miles) 43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 19th Street, four lanes (1 mile) 43rd Avenue,12th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes (2.5 miles) 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 19th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes 45th Street Beautification 53rd Street — 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 53rd Street — 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 53rd Street— 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 53rd Street — 58th Avenue to US 1, add four lanes 56th Place Bridge over North Relief Canal 56th Place Bridge over North Relief Canal 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection Indian River County 81 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Developer Contributions Developer Contributions GCal L Developer Contributions Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees III Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees II Gas Tax Grant Impact Fees I Gas Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees II Optional Sales Tax 1- ow Grant pact Fees II Optional Sales Tax - $ - $ 400,000 Gas Tax 7 0 $ 3,839,000 000`000`E $ I 000`Oso`i $ '.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 13,224,000 0 000`000`T 3,143,056 0 0 $ 1,730,944 000`OSO`Z OT 0 0 0 OT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n0 eel 0 0 0 OO 1/4.6 O O O 00 O 01/4 oo O r1 In 0 N 0 0 0 In N C1 7 M 00 N O Q‘ O 0 0 N N <n -4 N - -4 N N 69 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 i i 1 i 1 1 1 i 0 o 0 O 1 1 i 0 0 i O O O O 0 0 O OT 0 N 1O N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 6A EA 69 69 69 EA 69 69 EA EA EA 69 i i i i 1 i i i i 1 1 i 000`17Z8`S $ i i 1 0 i I 0 O 0 0 N 69 EA EA EA 6A 69 69 69 EA 69 69 EA 69 EA EA 69 EA EA EA 0, O , 1 00 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N•--i .-r EA 69 69 69 EA EA EA EA EA Err 69 69 EA 69 69 EH 69 EA 69 69 158th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $ 292,597 $ 292,597 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000`00S`l $ $ 750,000 O ; O 1 1 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 N 0 t--- �N r1/4) O M N CT O In ... N" .-. .. -- EA 69 69 69 69 6A 69 EA 6A 69 EA 69 69 EA 69 EA 49 69 $ 3,839,000 o $ 393,316 I 0 0 000`005 $ ‘.0 $ 230,944 000`OOE`I 1 1 0 0 Cr 1 1 1 1 1 1n 1 1 1 O o 0 0 N 0 0 In 00 M O V 00 .- N EA EA EA 6A 69 EA EA EA 69 69 69 6A 69 69 6A 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection 58th Avenue 49th -65th St - 4 lanes 5th St SW/43rd Avenue Canal 5th St SW/43rd Avenue Canal 66th Ave 4th -12th St 66th Ave 4th -12th St 66th Ave 12th to SR60 66th Ave 17th to SR60 66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes, 2 25 miles) 66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St, four lanes, 2 25 miles) 66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St, four lanes, (2 25 miles) 66th Avenue - 45th Street to 77th Street, four lanes, (4 miles) 66th Avenue - 45th Street to 77th Street, four lanes, (4 miles) 66th Avenue,45th Street to SR 60, four lanes 2.5 miles) 66th Avenue,45th Street to SR 60, four lanes 2.5 miles) 66th Avenue Widening Includes Bridges at 33 37 41 45 57 66th Avenue Widening Includes Bridges at 33 37 41 45 57 66th Avenue Widening Includes Bridges at 33.37 41 45 57 81st Street, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue, two lane (.5 mile) Indian River County 82 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Developer Contributions Developer Contributions GCal L Developer Contributions Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees III Optional Sales Tax Impact Fees II Gas Tax Grant Impact Fees I Gas Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees II Optional Sales Tax 1- ow Grant pact Fees II Optional Sales Tax - $ - $ 400,000 Gas Tax 7 0 $ 3,839,000 000`000`E $ I 000`Oso`i $ '.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 13,224,000 0 000`000`T 3,143,056 0 0 $ 1,730,944 000`OSO`Z OT 0 0 0 OT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n0 eel 0 0 0 OO 1/4.6 O O O 00 O 01/4 oo O r1 In 0 N 0 0 0 In N C1 7 M 00 N O Q‘ O 0 0 N N <n -4 N - -4 N N 69 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 i i 1 i 1 1 1 i 0 o 0 O 1 1 i 0 0 i O O O O 0 0 O OT 0 N 1O N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 6A EA 69 69 69 EA 69 69 EA EA EA 69 i i i i 1 i i i i 1 1 i 000`17Z8`S $ i i 1 0 i I 0 O 0 0 N 69 EA EA EA 6A 69 69 69 EA 69 69 EA 69 EA EA 69 EA EA EA 0, O , 1 00 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N•--i .-r EA 69 69 69 EA EA EA EA EA Err 69 69 EA 69 69 EH 69 EA 69 69 158th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $ 292,597 $ 292,597 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000`00S`l $ $ 750,000 O ; O 1 1 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 N 0 t--- �N r1/4) O M N CT O In ... N" .-. .. -- EA 69 69 69 69 6A 69 EA 6A 69 EA 69 69 EA 69 EA 49 69 $ 3,839,000 o $ 393,316 I 0 0 000`005 $ ‘.0 $ 230,944 000`OOE`I 1 1 0 0 Cr 1 1 1 1 1 1n 1 1 1 O o 0 0 N 0 0 In 00 M O V 00 .- N EA EA EA 6A 69 EA EA EA 69 69 69 6A 69 69 6A 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection 58th Avenue 49th -65th St - 4 lanes 5th St SW/43rd Avenue Canal 5th St SW/43rd Avenue Canal 66th Ave 4th -12th St 66th Ave 4th -12th St 66th Ave 12th to SR60 66th Ave 17th to SR60 66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes, 2 25 miles) 66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St, four lanes, 2 25 miles) 66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St, four lanes, (2 25 miles) 66th Avenue - 45th Street to 77th Street, four lanes, (4 miles) 66th Avenue - 45th Street to 77th Street, four lanes, (4 miles) 66th Avenue,45th Street to SR 60, four lanes 2.5 miles) 66th Avenue,45th Street to SR 60, four lanes 2.5 miles) 66th Avenue Widening Includes Bridges at 33 37 41 45 57 66th Avenue Widening Includes Bridges at 33 37 41 45 57 66th Avenue Widening Includes Bridges at 33.37 41 45 57 81st Street, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue, two lane (.5 mile) Indian River County 82 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax Gas Tax Grant Gas Tax Developer Contributions pact Fees I Impact Fees I Developer Contributions Gas Tax Impact Fees I Gas Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees I Gas Tax Optional Sales Tax CO Ri � rL� V Grant Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax 0 L 6 G ct L C7 O ill M D1 000`000`Z 0 0 0 0 a, 0o 000`00S`Z $ 0 0 000`001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 1,1D 0 0 t� b M M $ 300,000 0 O 0 0 7 0 V1 -+ tO 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 N t N 0 o 0 d' O co 0 co 00 0 O O co 0 co O co N 0' M '0 O co V 0\ M .-. 00 N O 0, 00 O, 0, N •cr 110 t� 00 O tri O O O O 0 in N N — M M cr 0, M 0 M N N ^- 69 b9 69 b9 69 69 b3 69 b9 b9 69 69 69 69 b9 b9 bi 69 0 $ 1,100,000 1 i 000`000`E $ 1 0 1 i i 1 1 i 1 I 1 i O 0 O 0 O 0 Q, 0 0` 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 0 69 69 0 69 0 0 69 69 0 69 69 0 i i 000`000`17 $ $ 600,000 1 0 000400S`Z $ 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 O o 0 O O 0 O, O M 0 69 69 69 0 0 0 69 69 0 0 0 69 69 69 69 bi 69 69 i O 0 0 0 i 000`00;`1 $ 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 O o O O o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N •-- be 69 69 69 69 69 0 0 69 69 69 69 0 0 b3 bi 69 69 bi bi 69 O M 0 $ 3,000,000 o, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 00 i 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 00 0 o O O O N '0 0\ 0 0 0O 69 M 99 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 69 0 0 0 o o 000`00S`Z 000`00S`Z $ o O o 00 0 t� M o O 0 o O 1 O 0 1 O 1 1 O 0O O 0 M 1 0 0 • 1 rn O CO 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 00 0 O O 0 0 EO M0 0 M 00 41 0 0 D0 O o 0 0 0 CO 0 0, N 1 00 0 O ,D 0 0 rn O O 1/40 rn N N N --- N N -- N N -r -� 0 69 69 EA 0 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 69 69 69 69 0 69 EA 09 82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening 82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening 8th Street - 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue (2 lane - 1 mile) [CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River (1.6 miles) CR 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (1.5 miles) CR 510, 75th Court to 6Ist Drive, four lanes (L5 miles) CR 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (1.5 miles) CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5 miles) CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5 miles) CR 510, Intercoastal Waterway Bridge (Transfer to FDOT) (1.5 miles) REPAIR CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to 1-95, four lanes (2 miles) CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to 1-95, four lanes (2 miles) CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to I-95, four lanes (2 miles) CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to I-95, four lanes (2 miles) Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North 12th Street Sidewalk -43rd to 27th Ave 12th Street Sidwalk-VBE-11th Ave Indian River County 83 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax Gas Tax Grant Gas Tax Developer Contributions pact Fees I Impact Fees I Developer Contributions Gas Tax Impact Fees I Gas Tax Gas Tax Impact Fees I Gas Tax Optional Sales Tax CO Ri � rL� V Grant Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax 0 L 6 G ct L C7 O ill M D1 000`000`Z 0 0 0 0 a, 0o 000`00S`Z $ 0 0 000`001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 1,1D 0 0 t� b M M $ 300,000 0 O 0 0 7 0 V1 -+ tO 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 N t N 0 o 0 d' O co 0 co 00 0 O O co 0 co O co N 0' M '0 O co V 0\ M .-. 00 N O 0, 00 O, 0, N •cr 110 t� 00 O tri O O O O 0 in N N — M M cr 0, M 0 M N N ^- 69 b9 69 b9 69 69 b3 69 b9 b9 69 69 69 69 b9 b9 bi 69 0 $ 1,100,000 1 i 000`000`E $ 1 0 1 i i 1 1 i 1 I 1 i O 0 O 0 O 0 Q, 0 0` 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 0 69 69 0 69 0 0 69 69 0 69 69 0 i i 000`000`17 $ $ 600,000 1 0 000400S`Z $ 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 O o 0 O O 0 O, O M 0 69 69 69 0 0 0 69 69 0 0 0 69 69 69 69 bi 69 69 i O 0 0 0 i 000`00;`1 $ 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 O o O O o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N •-- be 69 69 69 69 69 0 0 69 69 69 69 0 0 b3 bi 69 69 bi bi 69 O M 0 $ 3,000,000 o, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 00 i 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 00 0 o O O O N '0 0\ 0 0 0O 69 M 99 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 69 0 0 0 o o 000`00S`Z 000`00S`Z $ o O o 00 0 t� M o O 0 o O 1 O 0 1 O 1 1 O 0O O 0 M 1 0 0 • 1 rn O CO 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 00 0 O O 0 0 EO M0 0 M 00 41 0 0 D0 O o 0 0 0 CO 0 0, N 1 00 0 O ,D 0 0 rn O O 1/40 rn N N N --- N N -- N N -r -� 0 69 69 EA 0 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 69 69 69 69 0 69 EA 09 82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening 82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening 8th Street - 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue (2 lane - 1 mile) [CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River (1.6 miles) CR 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (1.5 miles) CR 510, 75th Court to 6Ist Drive, four lanes (L5 miles) CR 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (1.5 miles) CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5 miles) CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5 miles) CR 510, Intercoastal Waterway Bridge (Transfer to FDOT) (1.5 miles) REPAIR CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to 1-95, four lanes (2 miles) CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to 1-95, four lanes (2 miles) CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to I-95, four lanes (2 miles) CR 512 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to I-95, four lanes (2 miles) Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North 12th Street Sidewalk -43rd to 27th Ave 12th Street Sidwalk-VBE-11th Ave Indian River County 83 Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax H Tit V) rEt a 1 �d ' Optional Sales Tax $�..$00 rfel Y t ,i pact Fees III Gas Tax pact Fees III Optional Sales Tax 00 N0 t In Vi- T M 69 1n ELI N 0 s00) ° Developer Contributions x H a O C7 met Fees III I TTT ri N: Gas Tax Gas Tax Optional Sales Tax $9,461,134 -$41,329,280 ~:. N N � O n el w. 000`000`1 $ yrs SS --1 Inc Sb N N '0 In O el EA 0 $ 500,000 0 0 0 O\ $ 500,000 0 $ 445,000 $ 600,000 M $ 286,967 $ 246,067,791 O O Q‘ OT M M 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N In 0 O M 0 00 O V' r 00 In :O N E� �r O O O 0IA 00 O 0— O 0 0 O 1.1 OT T M .-1 M ..I N L, 0 Pi 4 1 CA cdj yO^ qUqq .Ti- --, EA EA 6A 69 EA 69 EA 6A 6A 69 EA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 O O O O 0 0 en, d. 6A EA 69 EA EA 69 EA 69 EA EA EA 69 EA EA 69 EA EA EA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 O 0 O 0 N O O I--1 IIflO 01 O N 6S EA 6A EA EA 69 EA EA 69 EA 6A EA EA 641 E13 EA 69 EA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 I000`Sbb 000`051 $ 1 1 $ 20,561,226 1 0 O O 69 69 69 EA 6A EA EA EA EA 6A 69 bA 6A FA 69 000`005 O O On 0 Total Expenditures I S 76,337,564 S 41,777,721 l O 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 0 1 1 O O 1n 0 O O O O O 0 O o - In --, EA EA EA EA EA EA 6S EA EA EA EA EA EA 69 EA 69 000`005 0 ^-1 In 000`005 $ 000`050`17 $ 1,800,000 0 0 000`005 $ 0 0 M N O OT M 1O 0 1 0 1 0 M O O Cr, N M 00 O O 0 O� 0 O 0 M 0' O 7 _U 00 0 O- - - '1 M 00 N N EA 69 69 EA EA EA EA EA EA 69 69 69 Misc. Intersection Improvements Misc. Right of Way Acquisition Misc. Right of Way Acquisition 0 t Old Dixie Hwy/SRC - included in 3 lane Lvenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes (2.5 miles) Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes (2.5 miles) Powerline Rd., Barber St. to CR 510, in City of Sebastian, two lanes (5 mile) SR AlA , 17th Street to Sea Gull, add two lanes SR A1A Widening — Castaway Blvd to Moorings Traffic controllers Traffic Fiber Optic Traffic Fiber Optic M C 10 b 0 C U V) x Q b O ;mss >Mq CI $ 246,067,791 $ 246,067,791 �d ' 609 $�..$00 rfel Y t ,i 0 0 0 M 0 7 EA 00 N0 t In Vi- T M 69 .>ce -- � F Il ..... r01 t n54 N 4" '0 In N Cr; N 69 13:,r'[i .. Y, �az z ri N: 0 0 O 0 00 N^ O� O h $9,461,134 -$41,329,280 ~:. N N � O n el w. 69 yrs SS H Hen O.: O M N N O Sb N N '0 In O el EA r.1 en Edi - s..a a{.»✓ a.p ?o„rXrc.-N .....oI CT $ 41,777,721 1 N O _ ' r 69 O 0 M +�4 EA 5f R.. h N 0" ip Q\ v 00 $ 76,337,564 $3,522,128 0 :O N E� �r 1T N EA 3 sr.? f �'1m'FYti Total Expenditures Annual Balance s° ,egg,35 441)417 A,I= . ee 115 , ti= :t IS L, 0 Pi 4 1 CA cdj yO^ qUqq 1 Total Revenue Indian River County 84 00 ti 00 O O O be u CC ocr O O 00 • h. E E CC 12) W O CZ wb C caw Po o 6J > the A It C E • a °' Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Optional Sales Tax Gas Tax H Tit V) rEt a 1 �d ' Optional Sales Tax $�..$00 rfel Y t ,i pact Fees III Gas Tax pact Fees III Optional Sales Tax 00 N0 t In Vi- T M 69 1n ELI N 0 s00) ° Developer Contributions x H a O C7 met Fees III I TTT ri N: Gas Tax Gas Tax Optional Sales Tax $9,461,134 -$41,329,280 ~:. N N � O n el w. 000`000`1 $ yrs SS --1 Inc Sb N N '0 In O el EA 0 $ 500,000 0 0 0 O\ $ 500,000 0 $ 445,000 $ 600,000 M $ 286,967 $ 246,067,791 O O Q‘ OT M M 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N In 0 O M 0 00 O V' r 00 In :O N E� �r O O O 0IA 00 O 0— O 0 0 O 1.1 OT T M .-1 M ..I N L, 0 Pi 4 1 CA cdj yO^ qUqq .Ti- --, EA EA 6A 69 EA 69 EA 6A 6A 69 EA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 O O O O 0 0 en, d. 6A EA 69 EA EA 69 EA 69 EA EA EA 69 EA EA 69 EA EA EA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 O 0 O 0 N O O I--1 IIflO 01 O N 6S EA 6A EA EA 69 EA EA 69 EA 6A EA EA 641 E13 EA 69 EA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 I000`Sbb 000`051 $ 1 1 $ 20,561,226 1 0 O O 69 69 69 EA 6A EA EA EA EA 6A 69 bA 6A FA 69 000`005 O O On 0 Total Expenditures I S 76,337,564 S 41,777,721 l O 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 0 1 1 O O 1n 0 O O O O O 0 O o - In --, EA EA EA EA EA EA 6S EA EA EA EA EA EA 69 EA 69 000`005 0 ^-1 In 000`005 $ 000`050`17 $ 1,800,000 0 0 000`005 $ 0 0 M N O OT M 1O 0 1 0 1 0 M O O Cr, N M 00 O O 0 O� 0 O 0 M 0' O 7 _U 00 0 O- - - '1 M 00 N N EA 69 69 EA EA EA EA EA EA 69 69 69 Misc. Intersection Improvements Misc. Right of Way Acquisition Misc. Right of Way Acquisition 0 t Old Dixie Hwy/SRC - included in 3 lane Lvenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes (2.5 miles) Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes (2.5 miles) Powerline Rd., Barber St. to CR 510, in City of Sebastian, two lanes (5 mile) SR AlA , 17th Street to Sea Gull, add two lanes SR A1A Widening — Castaway Blvd to Moorings Traffic controllers Traffic Fiber Optic Traffic Fiber Optic M C 10 b 0 C U V) x Q b O ;mss >Mq CI $ 246,067,791 $ 246,067,791 �d ' 609 $�..$00 rfel Y t ,i 0 0 0 M 0 7 EA 00 N0 t In Vi- T M 69 .>ce -- � F Il ..... r01 t n54 N 4" '0 In N Cr; N 69 13:,r'[i .. Y, �az z ri N: 0 0 O 0 00 N^ O� O h $9,461,134 -$41,329,280 ~:. N N � O n el w. 69 yrs SS H Hen O.: O M N N O Sb N N '0 In O el EA r.1 en Edi - s..a a{.»✓ a.p ?o„rXrc.-N .....oI CT $ 41,777,721 1 N O _ ' r 69 O 0 M +�4 EA 5f R.. h N 0" ip Q\ v 00 $ 76,337,564 $3,522,128 0 :O N E� �r 1T N EA 3 sr.? f �'1m'FYti Total Expenditures Annual Balance s° ,egg,35 441)417 A,I= . ee 115 , ti= :t IS L, 0 Pi 4 1 CA cdj yO^ qUqq 1 Total Revenue Indian River County 84 00 ti 00 O O O be u CC ocr O O 00 • h. E E CC 12) W O CZ wb C caw Po o 6J > the A It C E • a °' Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan iti �4+r: °g4� �, $ 3,170,000�Ky 1` 7 MP N -- 6A 00010581t $ $ F$px �J ii t O O 00 en ^' EA 1 $ 44,903.806 O in in V'1 M 69 1 $ 52.351033 0 0 0 Mtn 6A 0 0 0 to M 69 $ 8.460.825 O 0 Nin 00 M 6A 0 0 O .-� 69 0 M M 00 M N 69 CA 00 M OO 69 0 M 0 VS EA $ 11,383,797 1 o0 M M 0 00.‘,--ir- it 69 0 000 M t0 N 6A trt -- 0 ON 69 N N 00 ,-I 69 N N 0 0 O: t0 69 r.n Lc, t^ ic O Ot M bq Y ;0, Af i �,f -t nea, }. O U 69 t E/3 000`OZO`S $ 1 t 6A 000`OOS`Z $ 1 O 7 [� T 1-i 69 o CA 00 M re-; 69 $ 300,000 t 69 ‘.0O ("1 00 •-• 69 7 U N t0 69 O 0 0 a, N fA o 0 O O h 69 0 O 0 O C N 69 t 69 0 O 0 O ON N 69 ON O V N to 48 00 1� to 69 eit riV 69 u1 w,,N 000`OSZ $ 0 O O '0 ra cte2 0 O 0o [� 69 t 000`OOSi $ $ 2,829,637 00 rn to M rf 0 0 0 0M EA EA 0 o O N CA69 0 O - 7 000`005`Z $ 0 0 0 V EA 0 0 0 0 EA 0 0 0 tD EA69 000`005`Z $ 0 0 M $ 154,523,069 1 $ 48,098,521 1 $ 51,578,448 $ 47,103,037 r -i 0 0 Cr 0r M 69 01-4 O\ N 00 EA r t'y ,, ti; 000`0SZ $ O O v -, ‘0 �"� 6A 69 O 00 Vp O ..-i^' 6A t 6A 000100S11 $ $ 3,703,788 $ 3,312,300 J O O O 0 69 $ 11,916,680 O O O -0 0 0 0 O N N EA 0 0 0 o 0 N E9 0 0 0 0 o d' (A 1 000`005`1 $ $ 2,600,000 I 0 0 0 o O N EH 0 0 0 rnm N --- 6A `N a'c ..-i: k. 0 0 L 00 N h 68 EA o 0 t o O o0 6A 6A 000100S1I $ 6A '0 0 N N m 69 000`0SZ VD \o -- CTO 69 0 0 O N 6A rn 00 N 69 0 0 to 00 69 0 0 0 N N 6A 1 000105L $ Co v ON 0 to 69 000`058 $ 000`120811 $ to M d' 6A S a :p; z$ C„ 0001O517 $ l \0 O 0o W CN 10 -- 69 0 ON to in M - EA $ 23,124,353 0 0 O 0N- M 69 000`00S18Z $ 1 EA 0 O CN to N 69 t 69 t 6A 0 O 0 0 C N 6A 0 O 0 0 M -- 69 $ 3,133,797 $ 28,437,378 CT 0 oo 0 T 7 -' 69 M 00 0 7Y V 6A t` CT .M, iin 69 M 0 ON 1p en 69 ,�,FY20 fW4� t+ �t+ti >r a' „ d. V Env. Land Bonds Grant Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax FBIP Capacity Charges User Fees Assessments & User Fees MSTU Assessments Payback from FDOT 0 0 Impact Fees (Emergency Services, General Servics, Law Enforcement, Parks & Rec.) pact Fees District I pact Fees District II pact Fees District III Developer Contributions Old Traffic Impact Fees Gas Tax rg�„krt {der -�t C:1 iti �4+r: °g4� �, $ 3,170,000�Ky 1` 7 MP N -- 6A 00010581t $ V 0 N - CA $ 18330.000 $ 43,960,825 $ 38,429,000 14[231'; 000100Z1Z $ t EA $ 224,400 $ 4,375,000 O O N V 69 O 0 0 O II N 6A e�rk` ko-trq p0 siN 1 69 69 $ 876,100 O 0 rl to n M 69 $ 4,329,637 Solid Waste I $ 8,347,000 1 $ 20,530,000 1 $ 2,300,000 $ 5,143,000 1 O z � 69 000`OOS $ 00010SI1{ $ t En O 0 to 0 7 EA O� M o N o CT EA `O Y i, 4EA ¢w; ,.o .`:`� 'O; ',>.o.,,, o 0 o O N .-. 6A 000`005`1 $ 000`OOi $ O o-rn rn to O D 6A 0 0 o v7 N N N 6A M t0 t0 M l-- 6A O, fiy7 k!tT ...0; "` $ 900,000 N d' r 00 EA 0 0 o 0 - 6A 1 EH 0 0 Cr 0r M 69 01-4 O\ N 00 EA oo ''C: O aN; z. Ste, tw ems. 0' iltill [ Conservation and Aquifer Recharge Emergency Services General Services Law Enforcement Parks and Recreation Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water sed 'VI Rggg >V tAd: 5- yip AT L Ga7rt': ' Indian River County 85 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan iti �4+r: °g4� �, $ 3,170,000�Ky 1` 7 MP N -- 6A 00010581t $ $ F$px �J ii t O O 00 en ^' EA 1 $ 44,903.806 O in in V'1 M 69 1 $ 52.351033 0 0 0 Mtn 6A 0 0 0 to M 69 $ 8.460.825 O 0 Nin 00 M 6A 0 0 O .-� 69 0 M M 00 M N 69 CA 00 M OO 69 0 M 0 VS EA $ 11,383,797 1 o0 M M 0 00.‘,--ir- it 69 0 000 M t0 N 6A trt -- 0 ON 69 N N 00 ,-I 69 N N 0 0 O: t0 69 r.n Lc, t^ ic O Ot M bq Y ;0, Af i �,f -t nea, }. O U 69 t E/3 000`OZO`S $ 1 t 6A 000`OOS`Z $ 1 O 7 [� T 1-i 69 o CA 00 M re-; 69 $ 300,000 t 69 ‘.0O ("1 00 •-• 69 7 U N t0 69 O 0 0 a, N fA o 0 O O h 69 0 O 0 O C N 69 t 69 0 O 0 O ON N 69 ON O V N to 48 00 1� to 69 eit riV 69 u1 w,,N 000`OSZ $ 0 O O '0 ra cte2 0 O 0o [� 69 t 000`OOSi $ $ 2,829,637 00 rn to M rf 0 0 0 0M EA EA 0 o O N CA69 0 O - 7 000`005`Z $ 0 0 0 V EA 0 0 0 0 EA 0 0 0 tD EA69 000`005`Z $ 0 0 M $ 154,523,069 1 $ 48,098,521 1 $ 51,578,448 $ 47,103,037 r -i 0 0 Cr 0r M 69 01-4 O\ N 00 EA r t'y ,, ti; 000`0SZ $ O O v -, ‘0 �"� 6A 69 O 00 Vp O ..-i^' 6A t 6A 000100S11 $ $ 3,703,788 $ 3,312,300 J O O O 0 69 $ 11,916,680 O O O -0 0 0 0 O N N EA 0 0 0 o 0 N E9 0 0 0 0 o d' (A 1 000`005`1 $ $ 2,600,000 I 0 0 0 o O N EH 0 0 0 rnm N --- 6A `N a'c ..-i: k. 0 0 L 00 N h 68 EA o 0 t o O o0 6A 6A 000100S1I $ 6A '0 0 N N m 69 000`0SZ VD \o -- CTO 69 0 0 O N 6A rn 00 N 69 0 0 to 00 69 0 0 0 N N 6A 1 000105L $ Co v ON 0 to 69 000`058 $ 000`120811 $ to M d' 6A S a :p; z$ C„ 0001O517 $ l \0 O 0o W CN 10 -- 69 0 ON to in M - EA $ 23,124,353 0 0 O 0N- M 69 000`00S18Z $ 1 EA 0 O CN to N 69 t 69 t 6A 0 O 0 0 C N 6A 0 O 0 0 M -- 69 $ 3,133,797 $ 28,437,378 CT 0 oo 0 T 7 -' 69 M 00 0 7Y V 6A t` CT .M, iin 69 M 0 ON 1p en 69 ,�,FY20 fW4� t+ �t+ti >r a' „ d. V Env. Land Bonds Grant Emergency Services Dist. Optional Sales Tax FBIP Capacity Charges User Fees Assessments & User Fees MSTU Assessments Payback from FDOT 0 0 Impact Fees (Emergency Services, General Servics, Law Enforcement, Parks & Rec.) pact Fees District I pact Fees District II pact Fees District III Developer Contributions Old Traffic Impact Fees Gas Tax rg�„krt {der -�t C:1 iti �4+r: °g4� �, $ 3,170,000�Ky 1` 7 MP N -- 6A 00010581t $ V 0 N - CA $ 18330.000 $ 43,960,825 $ 38,429,000 14[231'; 000100Z1Z $ t EA $ 224,400 $ 4,375,000 O O N V 69 O 0 0 O II N 6A e�rk` ko-trq p0 siN 1 69 69 $ 876,100 O 0 rl to n M 69 $ 4,329,637 Solid Waste I $ 8,347,000 1 $ 20,530,000 1 $ 2,300,000 $ 5,143,000 1 O z � 69 000`OOS $ 00010SI1{ $ t En O 0 to 0 7 EA O� M o N o CT EA `O Y i, 4EA ¢w; ,.o .`:`� 'O; ',>.o.,,, o 0 o O N .-. 6A 000`005`1 $ 000`OOi $ O o-rn rn to O D 6A 0 0 o v7 N N N 6A M t0 t0 M l-- 6A O, fiy7 k!tT ...0; "` $ 900,000 N d' r 00 EA 0 0 o 0 - 6A 1 EH 0 0 Cr 0r M 69 01-4 O\ N 00 EA oo ''C: O aN; z. Ste, tw ems. 0' iltill [ Conservation and Aquifer Recharge Emergency Services General Services Law Enforcement Parks and Recreation Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water sed 'VI Rggg >V tAd: 5- yip AT L Ga7rt': ' Indian River County 85 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 86 Ynt'� ^% O fi .r N N 69 a O CC n1 N LSS SYU LOL 1 -) to i 'O ) M en M M3 V) CO r rn M 69 N-.. 59 E9 1 69 �d is. we 0 0 O 0 70 69 0 0 O O OM O 69 UU73 S1.0 SS $ ) 00 r- et N r- IT V; 69 0 0 o0 Vi 0 t 69 o0 r• 'O 1O N 69 ti N w La hY; % i4t" tk 0 0 CO t` 69 0 00 N 4...*O Q\ 0 co 69 - 0 M N c7, 69 r• M 0 M O •^ t--ri 7 69 , 0 O M N c7N 69 0 00 00 ON `. N ^- t 69 zV) v~ 9` e"Y.-ii PE $ 5,285,000 cNv --- .t In 0 N b9 en v O o0 CN V 7 69 06 t- in - in 69 � O o0 rn 'C 17 69 0 o0 C, VI 69 tl N , 47'!: 1W $ 6,400,000 N N N N .-; 69 $ 82,326,420 N 1 o0 a, o 00 69 $ 82,326,420 $ (34,227,899) a. wo<: aft u fyy, uk/ ,O. 000`S10`L $ $ 76,337,564 in 0' N CT d' rgoirN - b9 VZ) 0 M N In 7 kr) 69 $ 124,492,951 00 ^ O M 0 O M 69 00; . O ' O o'N t .•a; rlfiV see zi yi�. 1 Stormwater Management 1 Transportation fin' eJyy r:O ) , 1' T,u:Yal Exp ndifu er s All Citeganes i � ` baar t �"k r°1 ( 7n1 t di tet � Nvo U kni 7 Pie' pat”we trz 3 Indian River County 86 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 86 Ynt'� ^% O fi .r N N 69 a O CC n1 N LSS SYU LOL 1 -) to i 'O ) M en M M3 V) CO r rn M 69 N-.. 59 E9 1 69 �d is. we 0 0 O 0 70 69 0 0 O O OM O 69 UU73 S1.0 SS $ ) 00 r- et N r- IT V; 69 0 0 o0 Vi 0 t 69 o0 r• 'O 1O N 69 ti N w La hY; % i4t" tk 0 0 CO t` 69 0 00 N 4...*O Q\ 0 co 69 - 0 M N c7, 69 r• M 0 M O •^ t--ri 7 69 , 0 O M N c7N 69 0 00 00 ON `. N ^- t 69 zV) v~ 9` e"Y.-ii PE $ 5,285,000 cNv --- .t In 0 N b9 en v O o0 CN V 7 69 06 t- in - in 69 � O o0 rn 'C 17 69 0 o0 C, VI 69 tl N , 47'!: 1W $ 6,400,000 N N N N .-; 69 $ 82,326,420 N 1 o0 a, o 00 69 $ 82,326,420 $ (34,227,899) a. wo<: aft u fyy, uk/ ,O. 000`S10`L $ $ 76,337,564 in 0' N CT d' rgoirN - b9 VZ) 0 M N In 7 kr) 69 $ 124,492,951 00 ^ O M 0 O M 69 00; . O ' O o'N t .•a; rlfiV see zi yi�. 1 Stormwater Management 1 Transportation fin' eJyy r:O ) , 1' T,u:Yal Exp ndifu er s All Citeganes i � ` baar t �"k r°1 ( 7n1 t di tet � Nvo U kni 7 Pie' pat”we trz 3 Indian River County 86 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 87 o O 0\vi 1/4.0,, 6r9 0 0000 O 0 ‘.0 649 O 00 .f) N rn ,D d p a -i04 44 00 ‘D .-. 44 N M 6A 0 O 0cso 44 000`0SS`17$ 0 O O O 0 C nn 44 Do r k nn 4S Q, T V LID 404 Estimated Completion Date Oct -14 c} • r 0. Q O, O u N '-. 1 N G ti June -12 N '-i N C 0 .-.01 C ) 0 --i ^ R. d State Road West of I-95 82nd Avenue Add 2 Lanes and Reconstruct State FY 2008/09 State FY 2010/11 60/Osceola Blvd. 16th/17th Street 500' West of West of US -1 Add Lanes and Reconstruct State FY 2008/09 State FY 2009/10 14th Avenue Estimated Begin Date N .--i O N--•'. ,--� ,-`°i 'r 0 Jan -08 ,: -,a O, O .., D\ 9 Q Improvement Type Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (4.5 miles) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1.5 miles) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (2 miles) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1 mile) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1 mile) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (2.5 miles) Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes tion Cal To 75th Ct Indian River Cri $O N 19th St Oslo Rd N < .En 7 G) 00 V From 512 U d N Q 'o Sebastian Middle School Cn ain , -• 12th St 12th St 27th Ave 43`d Ave w CR 510 CR 510 CR 510 U 43rd Ave 43rd Ave 43rd Ave O O Oslo Rd spafoad SU1103 • Indian River County 87 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 87 o O 0\vi 1/4.0,, 6r9 0 0000 O 0 ‘.0 649 O 00 .f) N rn ,D d p a -i04 44 00 ‘D .-. 44 N M 6A 0 O 0cso 44 000`0SS`17$ 0 O O O 0 C nn 44 Do r k nn 4S Q, T V LID 404 Estimated Completion Date Oct -14 c} • r 0. Q O, O u N '-. 1 N G ti June -12 N '-i N C 0 .-.01 C ) 0 --i ^ R. d State Road West of I-95 82nd Avenue Add 2 Lanes and Reconstruct State FY 2008/09 State FY 2010/11 60/Osceola Blvd. 16th/17th Street 500' West of West of US -1 Add Lanes and Reconstruct State FY 2008/09 State FY 2009/10 14th Avenue Estimated Begin Date N .--i O N--•'. ,--� ,-`°i 'r 0 Jan -08 ,: -,a O, O .., D\ 9 Q Improvement Type Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (4.5 miles) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1.5 miles) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (2 miles) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1 mile) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1 mile) Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (2.5 miles) Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes tion Cal To 75th Ct Indian River Cri $O N 19th St Oslo Rd N < .En 7 G) 00 V From 512 U d N Q 'o Sebastian Middle School Cn ain , -• 12th St 12th St 27th Ave 43`d Ave w CR 510 CR 510 CR 510 U 43rd Ave 43rd Ave 43rd Ave O O Oslo Rd spafoad SU1103 • Indian River County 87 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 4 il 4 W Poi Att Aft 0 0 N U W aq g .§ ƒ o / •� \ ° R r121-1 1;1 0 Th; cu k • 0 7 G = o Hm a t = » / A ad E } • • •-•4 cd & � 716 o ccd _ v § § \ 1.) •-4 ° \ w / rt ± z94-4 rd / VD cu ' rtj o ._ _ z 2 \ o o rt, cci / ) L. '@ a ± \ \ 0 \ O N § % 'Q ® mo r1 N o °yam c = d ctd ) • ƒ ecn s"-", 1/4-) to t Cd ® o cat to CLI o a / c \ ƒ 1:14 4101, / ƒ \ *1-5 - § ° Indian River County 88 1 Cost $109,919,000 1 $112,462,842 $44,372,0471 I I69`9L9`I8$ 4th St 98th Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $16,262,035 12th St 90th Ave 82nd Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,781,786 12th St 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $2,854,618 13th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,041,388 13th St SW 43rd Ave 34th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,560,899 13th St SW 34th Ave 27th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,359,684 13th St SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,922,225 17th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,019,519 / / / \ / In 0 / - 0 / ƒ c / 2 Ni‘ / & & S EA _ Lure Road Type 6 Lane Freeway 6 Lane Divided SIS Total 6 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided ne Divided ion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) Other State Roads Total Plan (Table 4.9.3 of ti ;Base Road Type 4 Lane Freeway 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided N. County Line 82nd Ave Indian River Blvd Oslo Rd 1O1d Dixie Hwy (N) N. County Line To \ From S. County Line 98th Ave 16th Ave S. County Line LAviation Blvd ,Roseland Rd \ On Street kr) 0 SR 60 SR 60 .... I SI1 \ SIS 9®o °mg Indian River County 88 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 4 il 4 W Poi Att Aft 0 0 N U W aq g .§ ƒ o / •� \ ° R r121-1 Th; cu• _ 0 k 0 7 G = o Hm a t = » / A ad E } • • •-•4 cd & � 716 o ccd _ v § § \ 1.) •-4 ° \ w / rt ± z94-4 rd / VD cu ' rtj o ._ _ z 2 \ o o rt, cci / ) L. '@ a ± \ \ 0 \ O N § % 'Q ® mo r1 N o °yam c = d ctd ) • ƒ ecn s"-", 1/4-) to t Cd ® o cat to CLI o a / c \ ƒ 1:14 4101, / ƒ \ *1-5 - § ° Indian River County 88 1 Cost $109,919,000 1 $112,462,842 $44,372,0471 I I69`9L9`I8$ 4th St 98th Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $16,262,035 12th St 90th Ave 82nd Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,781,786 12th St 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $2,854,618 13th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,041,388 13th St SW 43rd Ave 34th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,560,899 13th St SW 34th Ave 27th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,359,684 13th St SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,922,225 17th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,019,519 / / / \ / In 0 / - 0 / ƒ c / 2 Ni‘ / & & S EA _ Lure Road Type 6 Lane Freeway 6 Lane Divided SIS Total 6 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided ne Divided ion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) Other State Roads Total Plan (Table 4.9.3 of ti ;Base Road Type 4 Lane Freeway 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided N. County Line 82nd Ave Indian River Blvd Oslo Rd 1O1d Dixie Hwy (N) N. County Line To \ From S. County Line 98th Ave 16th Ave S. County Line LAviation Blvd ,Roseland Rd \ On Street kr) 0 SR 60 SR 60 .... I SI1 \ SIS 9®o °mg Indian River County 88 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 89 'Cr --- 00 O1 ON M 00 0 $11,850,3251 M $14,387,771i $6,674,370 $3,955,196 $8,678,255 $19,484,669 $12,847,897 $3,974,335 --- 00 �t N 00 O ON ON CD ‘.0 Vl Vi 0 N vD N �t VD V' V1 VD V1 00 'et 'Cr D1 V1 \p --• Cl N 00 ON M V1 0\ N 01 0 ".4 0 '.0 O O N O .� 01 N N M M N 11712 CC O O Vl 00 M V) 0 V7 M M t� 01 --. M Cr‘0\ V1 tn 00 00 — 0M - 0 00 N N -4 M M 00 01 N N M -- 69 69 69 (Ni 00 01 00 00 00 l0 N 00 N M 01 M --4 - 1 69 V) EA b9 64 M EA N 69 69 69 69 69 -- --+ 64 to 69 69 26th St 66th Ave 43rd Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 26th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided Aviation Blvd 43rd Ave U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 27th Ave S. County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 27th Ave Oslo Rd S.R. 60 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided 43rd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 43rd Ave Oslo Rd 8th St 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided 53rd St 82nd Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided 58th Ave S County Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided Line/Koblegard Rd 66th Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided 66th Ave Oslo Rd 4th St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 66th Ave 4th St SR 60 2 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 66th Ave SR 60 C.R. 510 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 82nd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided 82nd Ave 26th St C.R. 510 00 2 Lane Undivided Laconia St C.R. 510 C.R.512 00 2 Lane Undivided Indian River County 89 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan Indian River County 89 'Cr --- 00 O1 ON M 00 0 $11,850,3251 M $14,387,771i $6,674,370 $3,955,196 $8,678,255 $19,484,669 $12,847,897 $3,974,335 --- 00 �t N 00 O ON ON CD ‘.0 Vl Vi 0 N vD N �t VD V' V1 VD V1 00 'et 'Cr D1 V1 \p --• Cl N 00 ON M V1 0\ N 01 0 ".4 0 '.0 O O N O .� 01 N N M M N 11712 CC O O Vl 00 M V) 0 V7 M M t� 01 --. M Cr‘0\ V1 tn 00 00 — 0M - 0 00 N N -4 M M 00 01 N N M -- 69 69 69 (Ni 00 01 00 00 00 l0 N 00 N M 01 M --4 - 1 69 V) EA b9 64 M EA N 69 69 69 69 69 -- --+ 64 to 69 69 26th St 66th Ave 43rd Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 26th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided Aviation Blvd 43rd Ave U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 27th Ave S. County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 27th Ave Oslo Rd S.R. 60 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided 43rd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 43rd Ave Oslo Rd 8th St 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided 53rd St 82nd Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided 58th Ave S County Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided Line/Koblegard Rd 66th Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided 66th Ave Oslo Rd 4th St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 66th Ave 4th St SR 60 2 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided 66th Ave SR 60 C.R. 510 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided 82nd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided 82nd Ave 26th St C.R. 510 00 2 Lane Undivided Laconia St C.R. 510 C.R.512 00 2 Lane Undivided Indian River County 89 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS \CIE\2008\CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT -ADOPTED CLEAN 11.18-08.DOC Indian River County 90 $10.000.0001 O N ON N V) O ,-i 00 $7.596'3061 FSL 9So`9Ts $581,254,1571 - N 00 In '.D 00 N lO M o0 00 00 69 GeM 69 Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) County Roads Total, Easy St (Schumann Dr 00 1 2 Lane Undivided cC O FG 1 c c i t a G F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS \CIE\2008\CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT -ADOPTED CLEAN 11.18-08.DOC Indian River County 90 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS \CIE\2008\CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT -ADOPTED CLEAN 11.18-08.DOC Indian River County 90 $10.000.0001 O N ON N V) O ,-i 00 $7.596'3061 FSL 9So`9Ts $581,254,1571 - N 00 In '.D 00 N lO M o0 00 00 69 GeM 69 Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) County Roads Total, Easy St (Schumann Dr 00 1 2 Lane Undivided cC O FG 1 c c i t a G F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS \CIE\2008\CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT -ADOPTED CLEAN 11.18-08.DOC Indian River County 90 Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE Improvement Program Summary of Capita LL N 0 L d .` CL. co - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O o o 0 m O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE- 0 1. -t 0 0 0) 0 •Od' A O N C 0 V 0 Il N- In N O N r r LO It - Li, Cf) V N a (0 v 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N N O O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u) in o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 Wm' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o o 0 0 0 0 r O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r o o 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 )fJ O O 0- N 0 N r r N M O O 0 0 G O 0 0 O 1)/j o r-- 0 O ti r r N CO O r M O) N 1-- Cr) to 0 O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O t-- O 00 0 0 0r 0 0 r 0 0 M O 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o 'Cr 0 rn o 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 N M O O 0 0 0 O O op 0) O 0 N_ o O 1• N N 0 0 N N O 0) 0 d C0 d O 0 New Construction New Construction and Additions 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 v 0 v_ O O CO O 0 N O) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 N 0 r 0 0 0 r 0 o Administration Facility Elementary School "C" Middle School (BB) Oslo Road Area HS (BBB) N 0 0 )O Q c -0 c 0a) C co m R O C c L- .0 0 0. CU O41: 0 O .0 -0 0 Q N c 0 0 0 ` E N O 2 2 2 M O 0 0 `m 'a 'a 0 m o2 y t0 0 kc cc 0 Q 0) o o c 0 Cr) 0 0 R ccf 0 0 0 w 7 R R R O V C .0 0 0 w 0 ch N co j M N 0 0 0 00 0 0 C0‘.1 N Alternative/Adult.Ed Programs Subtotal Modular Classrooms 0 0 n 0 0 r (0 0 in N La J oo 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 Q c O CI 0 cP 10 0 .0 N Subtotal New Construction 0 .r 0 E 0 0 0 0 ms Cf ce N pa Z y > 0 N C N °c 0 a v o v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 CO 0 r 0 N 0" 0 N N 0 Dodgertown Cafeteria & HVAC Replacement Furniture and Equipment Osceola Magnet Replacement VBHS Freshman Leaming Ctr Re Vero Beach 9 Replacement Vero Beach High School Restoration 0 O O 0 h U 0 0 O C_? 0 0 ) 0 5 4 4 J 0 • • • 4 4 4 N • J 0 4 7 4 i i 7 k 00 0 v E 4 5 o Uvo Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE Improvement Program Summary of Capita LL N 0 L d .` CL. co - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O o o 0 m O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE- 0 1. -t 0 0 0) 0 •Od' A O N C 0 V 0 Il N- In N O N r r LO It - Li, Cf) V N a (0 v 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N N O O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u) in o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 Wm' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o o 0 0 0 0 r O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r o o 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 )fJ O O 0- N 0 N r r N M O O 0 0 G O 0 0 O 1)/j o r-- 0 O ti r r N CO O r M O) N 1-- Cr) to 0 O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O t-- O 00 0 0 0r 0 0 r 0 0 M O 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o 'Cr 0 rn o 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 N M O O 0 0 0 O O op 0) O 0 N_ o O 1• N N 0 0 N N O 0) 0 d C0 d O 0 New Construction New Construction and Additions 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 v 0 v_ O O CO O 0 N O) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 N 0 r 0 0 0 r 0 o Administration Facility Elementary School "C" Middle School (BB) Oslo Road Area HS (BBB) N 0 0 )O Q c -0 c 0a) C co m R O C c L- .0 0 0. CU O41: 0 O .0 -0 0 Q N c 0 0 0 ` E N O 2 2 2 M O 0 0 `m 'a 'a 0 m o2 y t0 0 kc cc 0 Q 0) o o c 0 Cr) 0 0 R ccf 0 0 0 w 7 R R R O V C .0 0 0 w 0 ch N co j M N 0 0 0 00 0 0 C0‘.1 N Alternative/Adult.Ed Programs Subtotal Modular Classrooms 0 0 n 0 0 r (0 0 in N La J oo 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 Q c O CI 0 cP 10 0 .0 N Subtotal New Construction 0 .r 0 E 0 0 0 0 ms Cf ce N pa Z y > 0 N C N °c 0 a v o v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 CO 0 r 0 N 0" 0 N N 0 Dodgertown Cafeteria & HVAC Replacement Furniture and Equipment Osceola Magnet Replacement VBHS Freshman Leaming Ctr Re Vero Beach 9 Replacement Vero Beach High School Restoration 0 O O 0 h U 0 0 O C_? 0 0 ) 0 5 4 4 J 0 • • • 4 4 4 N • J 0 4 7 4 i i 7 k 00 0 v E 4 5 o Uvo Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 0) Cr) tD CO 00 o o CA CA AC, A Etc Lf! N N r r CO (O l' : r 0) 0) O r r c%1 o n Ln CO CO Ln Ln d m M1 1�- At. M1 M1 O N N CA - CO m ) L() 0 r en 0) M1r. L() M1 M1 GI L 4�% an n O O CO CO CD r r r r T re - 0 0 f6 0 0) 0 0 ) 0 CAcuR d to c w. E O) U co. mizatio Subtotal Mod Comprehensive Needs r co O c CA r` co in M M1 co N T r. 0 Lr) r r N. O r 0 CO C7 CO N CO CO N ri r CO CD 0 00 00) ti 0 (O M CO O O O "Cr- O O) 0 co K. O co r --- C.0 (O Cr m N D m N r T r Ln m N- o M1 n- o a m 7 O r, Ln LC) � m O N CO M r CO 0 0 0 00 Cr r 0' CO rr O V O m 00 m n 0 AD V n "Cr m r- N CA- G G 0 0 0 CO O n 0 Lf) r CT O O N O V co co 00 co cn O a m co co co -0 Ln 0 LCI O' CO O) O O' CT f) 0 0) a) n CO LO. in" M1 T a) N r "Cr 0 Cr M CD CO CO O CO LD o O m O D r 00 a) co co (r LCO CV C)") N- CO r m N G 0 (O 0 0 r O O r- OCf Iv G 00 LC) 0 0 In 0 0 0 O O V M1 LC) N LC O O AO - O O CD O O CO Art h- in N Cr 0 0 0 0 O O •cT0 O O N O p O O o N V r 0 0 LS') 0 o o V o O O m O O LD. r N m Lan r CO M1 0) CO O 00. CO 'N AcA N CD O 0 p0p 0 0 0 o O 0 o o 0 co CO N o o M 04 N N- N Li O N CO 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O n O Lf) V- O M1 CO m .- Cr; co co O o o O O O tor 10 O Ln t0 m co 0 0 0 0 O O u') O N m m 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 CO O CO N m L0 Cr; O O 0 O O O O '.r)) 0 ICA CO D O 0. 0 0 O" O O O 0 O) 0 0) N In h- 00 r r CO 0 CO ate- Lf4- 0 V CO Iv N a) T r• m r CO r r o o N N O Cr) CD O O LZ) CO CV O (D V O r M r N Al' N V 0 co V 0 0 Lfj O O a) O m O r O N r O V N CO O O 0 0 O r N M O N Cr; O 0 r t- r 0) r--- 00 M1. r r M OO O) CO o L() L() O O L() rte- ("): CO u ACt ‚- o Cpp V o d N O - CD CD 0 CA o 0) to M1 CO CO 0 r ON N •C} o L() LI) O o m 0) M o !b CD r O rc) m T Tr Ln o 0 Cn C7 IC N N CO 0 0 0 0 0 O O r O CO O O O r <r o V' N O N C0 o (n 0 O 0 O) 0 CT O O N N r O r d co NI- re - co rD O co O O C O er 0) 0 CT m O Cr) � N O r N N M O M CD 0 O, 0) 01 n I1 ID Cr N r.- 0 O LD Ln Lf) •Irr CO V O M r0) O m u) v N N L 5 Capital Maintenance O 0 0) 0 a0) (0 0 0) o n C7 O N M r CO r 0 M1 00 M1 (O N CD C Cr) N O OO Capital Maintenance Minor Capital Projects c 0) E c U O C to W C �C9 t0 CO '-t .co N V CO TO y O a co 0) N o 0 LC) 0 0 o o W CO CO0 0 'cr (O NrLYLD CO T N ADA Compliance Environmental Needs Health & Life Safety North County Bus Parking Facility Pelican Island HVAC. Replacement m CO O Ln N O r m c a) E O .� c W lII °c U 0 w o) m a) CO a R O O 73. CC Relocatable Leasing Relocatable Renovation Subtotal Relocatables Educational Technology o CO CO 0) oco CO m O CO O N N AS 0) (0 m CO Communications District Technology r School Technology - LO 00 co a C 00 0) N M1 r e D H N rr IA Ancillary Fac. & FS Equip 0 V 0 O iture & Equipment Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan 0) Cr) tD CO 00 o o CA CA AC, A Etc Lf! N N r r CO (O l' : r 0) 0) O r r c%1 o n Ln CO CO Ln Ln d m M1 1�- At. M1 M1 O N N CA - CO m ) L() 0 r en 0) M1r. L() M1 M1 GI L 4�% an n O O CO CO CD r r r r T re - 0 0 f6 0 0) 0 0 ) 0 CAcuR d to c w. E O) U co. mizatio Subtotal Mod Comprehensive Needs r co O c CA r` co in M M1 co N T r. 0 Lr) r r N. O r 0 CO C7 CO N CO CO N ri r CO CD 0 00 00) ti 0 (O M CO O O O "Cr- O O) 0 co K. O co r --- C.0 (O Cr m N D m N r T r Ln m N- o M1 n- o a m 7 O r, Ln LC) � m O N CO M r CO 0 0 0 00 Cr r 0' CO rr O V O m 00 m n 0 AD V n "Cr m r- N CA- G G 0 0 0 CO O n 0 Lf) r CT O O N O V co co 00 co cn O a m co co co -0 Ln 0 LCI O' CO O) O O' CT f) 0 0) a) n CO LO. in" M1 T a) N r "Cr 0 Cr M CD CO CO O CO LD o O m O D r 00 a) co co (r LCO CV C)") N- CO r m N G 0 (O 0 0 r O O r- OCf Iv G 00 LC) 0 0 In 0 0 0 O O V M1 LC) N LC O O AO - O O CD O O CO Art h- in N Cr 0 0 0 0 O O •cT0 O O N O p O O o N V r 0 0 LS') 0 o o V o O O m O O LD. r N m Lan r CO M1 0) CO O 00. CO 'N AcA N CD O 0 p0p 0 0 0 o O 0 o o 0 co CO N o o M 04 N N- N Li O N CO 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O n O Lf) V- O M1 CO m .- Cr; co co O o o O O O tor 10 O Ln t0 m co 0 0 0 0 O O u') O N m m 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 CO O CO N m L0 Cr; O O 0 O O O O '.r)) 0 ICA CO D O 0. 0 0 O" O O O 0 O) 0 0) N In h- 00 r r CO 0 CO ate- Lf4- 0 V CO Iv N a) T r• m r CO r r o o N N O Cr) CD O O LZ) CO CV O (D V O r M r N Al' N V 0 co V 0 0 Lfj O O a) O m O r O N r O V N CO O O 0 0 O r N M O N Cr; O 0 r t- r 0) r--- 00 M1. r r M OO O) CO o L() L() O O L() rte- ("): CO u ACt ‚- o Cpp V o d N O - CD CD 0 CA o 0) to M1 CO CO 0 r ON N •C} o L() LI) O o m 0) M o !b CD r O rc) m T Tr Ln o 0 Cn C7 IC N N CO 0 0 0 0 0 O O r O CO O O O r <r o V' N O N C0 o (n 0 O 0 O) 0 CT O O N N r O r d co NI- re - co rD O co O O C O er 0) 0 CT m O Cr) � N O r N N M O M CD 0 O, 0) 01 n I1 ID Cr N r.- 0 O LD Ln Lf) •Irr CO V O M r0) O m u) v N N L 5 Capital Maintenance O 0 0) 0 a0) (0 0 0) o n C7 O N M r CO r 0 M1 00 M1 (O N CD C Cr) N O OO Capital Maintenance Minor Capital Projects c 0) E c U O C to W C �C9 t0 CO '-t .co N V CO TO y O a co 0) N o 0 LC) 0 0 o o W CO CO0 0 'cr (O NrLYLD CO T N ADA Compliance Environmental Needs Health & Life Safety North County Bus Parking Facility Pelican Island HVAC. Replacement m CO O Ln N O r m c a) E O .� c W lII °c U 0 w o) m a) CO a R O O 73. CC Relocatable Leasing Relocatable Renovation Subtotal Relocatables Educational Technology o CO CO 0) oco CO m O CO O N N AS 0) (0 m CO Communications District Technology r School Technology - LO 00 co a C 00 0) N M1 r e D H N rr IA Ancillary Fac. & FS Equip 0 V 0 O iture & Equipment Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan r IL N N ft - CO t0 O O Co) a0 CO 00 N g 4'1 N N O N CO N N ✓ r O CO CO 0 r I1 ✓ 0) o CO O W N O 0) 0 O N O N O co r. W `0 G) a. a O r N E r-' 0 m 0 .0 7 C%) Total Projects Indian River County Public Schools H )110t t 7 N cC C_ 1L 70 7 b v a E 0 t trey O Bo > M d E5 as c. O U rig Capital Improvements Element Comprehensive Plan r IL N N ft - CO t0 O O Co) a0 CO 00 N g 4'1 N N O N CO N N ✓ r O CO CO 0 r I1 ✓ 0) o CO O W N O 0) 0 O N O N O co r. W `0 G) a. a O r N E r-' 0 m 0 .0 7 C%) Total Projects Indian River County Public Schools H )110t t 7 N cC C_ 1L 70 7 b v a E 0 t trey O Bo > M d E5 as c. O U rig Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element APPENDIX E: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY ON ESTIMATED REVENUE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 VVork Plan Revenue 2 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay. Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative distract facilities work prog am. All amounts a e NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP s, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans, etc. Districts cannot use 2 -Mill funds for salaries except for those explici lyassociated with maintenance/repair projects. (101 .71 (5), F.S,) Educational Techndogy $3,333,309 $3,613,306 $3,9261904 $4,124,954 $4,331,202 $19,329,675 Capital Maintenance Buyback $0 $3,474,170 $3,474,170 $3,474,170 $3,474,170 $13,896,680 Local Expenditure Totals: 430,607,708 430,114,939 431,891,746. 432,728,101 $33,287,989 4158,630,483 (2) The Millege projected for discretionary capital outlay per x.1011.71 Revenue 2 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay. Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative distract facilities work prog am. All amounts a e NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP s, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans, etc. Districts cannot use 2 -Mill funds for salaries except for those explici lyassociated with maintenance/repair projects. (101 .71 (5), F.S,) PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance be used for new construction. ill be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot F # u .�s" x'Ifem2x3 x ' k Fun l !20088;>2009 t,Actu-alValue03 p "`"y2009t 2010 ,,;v,Rro)ecledz"-, ; r 2➢10 ;rRoecte ..2011' '%2(f11:11=4720'.1'2 Prolected,5<r 1. 22 rojece >ti 20M1.2 20`x(3 ,`P;rgectedx„j.? t?&M76tal)"X, (1) Non-exempt property assessed valuation ta $18,410,651,454 $18,962,970.998 $19,531,860,128 $20,117,815,931 $20,721,350409 $97,744,648.920 (2) The Millege projected for discretionary capital outlay per x.1011.71 $427,000 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1_75 $806,569 (3) Full value of the 2 -Mill discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 $1.026,000 $30,607,708 $31,525,939 $32,471,717 $33,445,869 $34,449,245 8162,500,478 (4) Value of the portion of the 2- Mills ACTUALLY levied 370 $30,607,708 $31,525,939 532,471,717 $33,445,869 $34,449,245 $162,500,478 (5) Difference of lines (3) and (4) $1,104,000 SO SO $0 So $0 $0 PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance be used for new construction. ill be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. lit mS` -- t1-� r�uii'd' x2/2001 3Auali8uge Hem Vi, z „ F.rid' 0t.1i2,442c01 lti.008 2009 PctdL&idget, 200 r20 1IfFirb)ected 0:°201 ,roJected 20 23 Protected . 1. 22 rojece CO & DS Cash Flow-through Distdbuted 12 2013 j, Prdede,d3 ,. ta PECO New Construction 340 $1,021.497 $177,295 5324,000 $373,000 360 $427,000 $15,324 $89,000 $2,234,497 PECO Maintenance Expenditures $76,620 $806,569 $1.026,000 81,015,000 S192,619 $1,026,000 $1941619 $1,015,000 $4,888,569 S1,828,066 $1,350,000 $1,388,000 $1,4531000 $1,104,000 $7,123,066 CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. Page 4 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 94 lit mS` -- t1-� r�uii'd' x2/2001 3Auali8uge ,6..Cre Prolecie:d 0t.1i2,442c01 r4Jeted . 2911 212 Proeted 20 23 Protected . ota CO & DS Cash Flow-through Distdbuted 360 $177,295 $177 295 $177,295 $177,295 $177,295 $886,475 CO & DS Interest on Undistributed CO 360 $15,324 $15,324 $15,324 $15324 $15324 $76,620 $192,619 $192,619 S192,619 5192,619 $1941619 5963,095 Page 4 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 94 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element APPENDIX E: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY ON ESTIMATED REVENUE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 VVork Plan Revenue 2 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay. Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative distract facilities work prog am. All amounts a e NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP s, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans, etc. Districts cannot use 2 -Mill funds for salaries except for those explici lyassociated with maintenance/repair projects. (101 .71 (5), F.S,) Educational Techndogy $3,333,309 $3,613,306 $3,9261904 $4,124,954 $4,331,202 $19,329,675 Capital Maintenance Buyback $0 $3,474,170 $3,474,170 $3,474,170 $3,474,170 $13,896,680 Local Expenditure Totals: 430,607,708 430,114,939 431,891,746. 432,728,101 $33,287,989 4158,630,483 (2) The Millege projected for discretionary capital outlay per x.1011.71 Revenue 2 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay. Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative distract facilities work prog am. All amounts a e NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP s, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans, etc. Districts cannot use 2 -Mill funds for salaries except for those explici lyassociated with maintenance/repair projects. (101 .71 (5), F.S,) PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance be used for new construction. ill be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot F # u .�s" x'Ifem2x3 x ' k Fun l !20088;>2009 t,Actu-alValue03 p "`"y2009t 2010 ,,;v,Rro)ecledz"-, ; r 2➢10 ;rRoecte ..2011' '%2(f11:11=4720'.1'2 Prolected,5<r 1. 22 rojece >ti 20M1.2 20`x(3 ,`P;rgectedx„j.? t?&M76tal)"X, (1) Non-exempt property assessed valuation ta $18,410,651,454 $18,962,970.998 $19,531,860,128 $20,117,815,931 $20,721,350409 $97,744,648.920 (2) The Millege projected for discretionary capital outlay per x.1011.71 $427,000 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1_75 $806,569 (3) Full value of the 2 -Mill discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 $1.026,000 $30,607,708 $31,525,939 $32,471,717 $33,445,869 $34,449,245 8162,500,478 (4) Value of the portion of the 2- Mills ACTUALLY levied 370 $30,607,708 $31,525,939 532,471,717 $33,445,869 $34,449,245 $162,500,478 (5) Difference of lines (3) and (4) $1,104,000 SO SO $0 So $0 $0 PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance be used for new construction. ill be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. lit mS` -- t1-� r�uii'd' x2/2001 3Auali8uge Hem Vi, z „ F.rid' 0t.1i2,442c01 lti.008 2009 PctdL&idget, 200 r20 1IfFirb)ected 0:°201 ,roJected 20 23 Protected . 1. 22 rojece CO & DS Cash Flow-through Distdbuted 12 2013 j, Prdede,d3 ,. ta PECO New Construction 340 $1,021.497 $177,295 5324,000 $373,000 360 $427,000 $15,324 $89,000 $2,234,497 PECO Maintenance Expenditures $76,620 $806,569 $1.026,000 81,015,000 S192,619 $1,026,000 $1941619 $1,015,000 $4,888,569 S1,828,066 $1,350,000 $1,388,000 $1,4531000 $1,104,000 $7,123,066 CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. Page 4 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 94 lit mS` -- t1-� r�uii'd' x2/2001 3Auali8uge ,6..Cre Prolecie:d 0t.1i2,442c01 r4Jeted . 2911 212 Proeted 20 23 Protected . ota CO & DS Cash Flow-through Distdbuted 360 $177,295 $177 295 $177,295 $177,295 $177,295 $886,475 CO & DS Interest on Undistributed CO 360 $15,324 $15,324 $15,324 $15324 $15324 $76,620 $192,619 $192,619 S192,619 5192,619 $1941619 5963,095 Page 4 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 94 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Fair Share Revenue Source Al legally binding commitments for proportionate fair -share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5 -year district work program. Nothing reported for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific information about any referendum for a 1 -cent a'A-cent surtax referendum during the previous year. Did the school district hold asurtax referendum during the past fiscal year 2007 -2008? Additional Revenue Source Any additional revenue sources 9/24/2008 2:05:05 PM Page 5of17 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 95 ,.� �{ rl4 tfte trf Y, .•f•1z 4< `O�r gj° PtalValUe" ro ced. ... 'feiPted 2 t re.r. Prole ted3s Otal F,yk, Proceeds from a s.1011.14/15 F.S. Loans $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 District Bonds - Voted local bond referendum proceeds per s.9, Art VII State Constitution $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Proceeds from Special Acl Bonds $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 Estimated Revenue from CO & DS Bond Sale $o $0 $o SO $o So Proceeds from Voted Capital Improvements. millage $D $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue for Other Capital Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 Proceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax authorizedby school board $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proceeds from local governmental infrastructure sales surtax $o $o $0 $o $o $0 Proceeds Participation from Certificates of (COP's) Sale $55,000,000 $0 $0 $18,000,000 SO $73,000,000 Classrooms authorized First Bond proceeds amount In FY 1997-98 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Classrooms for Kids $o $D $0 SO $0 $0 District Equity Recognition SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proportionate share mitigation (actual cash revenue only, not in kind donations) so $o $0 $o $0 $0 Impact fees received $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Private donations $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Grants from local governments or not -for- profit organizations SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Interest, Including Profit On Investment $1,424,381 $1,042,381 $1,042,381 $1,042,381 $1,042,381 $5,593,905 9/24/2008 2:05:05 PM Page 5of17 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 95 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Fair Share Revenue Source Al legally binding commitments for proportionate fair -share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5 -year district work program. Nothing reported for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific information about any referendum for a 1 -cent a'A-cent surtax referendum during the previous year. Did the school district hold asurtax referendum during the past fiscal year 2007 -2008? Additional Revenue Source Any additional revenue sources 9/24/2008 2:05:05 PM Page 5of17 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 95 ,.� �{ rl4 tfte trf Y, .•f•1z 4< `O�r gj° PtalValUe" ro ced. ... 'feiPted 2 t re.r. Prole ted3s Otal F,yk, Proceeds from a s.1011.14/15 F.S. Loans $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 District Bonds - Voted local bond referendum proceeds per s.9, Art VII State Constitution $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Proceeds from Special Acl Bonds $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 Estimated Revenue from CO & DS Bond Sale $o $0 $o SO $o So Proceeds from Voted Capital Improvements. millage $D $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue for Other Capital Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 Proceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax authorizedby school board $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proceeds from local governmental infrastructure sales surtax $o $o $0 $o $o $0 Proceeds Participation from Certificates of (COP's) Sale $55,000,000 $0 $0 $18,000,000 SO $73,000,000 Classrooms authorized First Bond proceeds amount In FY 1997-98 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Classrooms for Kids $o $D $0 SO $0 $0 District Equity Recognition SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proportionate share mitigation (actual cash revenue only, not in kind donations) so $o $0 $o $0 $0 Impact fees received $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Private donations $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Grants from local governments or not -for- profit organizations SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Interest, Including Profit On Investment $1,424,381 $1,042,381 $1,042,381 $1,042,381 $1,042,381 $5,593,905 9/24/2008 2:05:05 PM Page 5of17 Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 95 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds from 1 cent or•1/2 cent Sales Surtax SO SO $o $0 $0 $0 Fund Balance Carried. Forward $24,941,868 SO $0 $0 SO $24,941,868 Obligated Fund Balance Carried Forward SO SO SO $o So so Special Facilities.. Account $301000 $30;000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $150,000 One Cent - 1/2 Cent Sales Surtax Debt Service SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 Subtotal $81,396;249 51,072;381 51,072,381 $19;072,381 $1,072,381 $103,685,773 Total Revenue Summary ?A fki n M ri a 40.s}'k, fir'. 1 ,,,Y,3. Item;Name g '&V & � t b .y. cwYz: t Yii-.. 2008 2009 yx Eudgetfi ; i� .rs 2� 20Q9 Proiecied y201O4 2010 � 2Proiected r 201 n f ,x2011 X2012, Pro)ecteii r 3• e1 2012 ;12013 i? P. X/ #;.. y6' dj M{ Fige Year ro al ? Local Two Mill Discretionary Capital Outlay Revenue. $30;607,708 $31;525,939 $32;471,717 $33,445,869 $34,449245 $162,500,478 PECO and 2 Mill Maint and Other 2 Mill Expenditures ($301607,708) ($30,114,939) ($31,891,746) ($32,728;101) ($33,267,989) ($158,630,483) PECO. Maintenance Revenue $806,569 51,026,000 $1,015,000 $1,026,000 $1,015,000 54,888,569 Available 2 Mill for New Construction SO $1,411,000 55791971 $717,768 $1,161,256 $3,869,995 t r ss Item Name E> X '2008;2QO91 Bud etY _ 9, w ; {2009 Pit ec x 1..... of ed y 1 t E'ro 042011 , ecte•d J__. , . 'f;2011 ``2012 ,g Pro ecte L._ G.. 20k{2'20 3 s Pr ected ° PJ ArFWecYearTotel: CO & DS Revenue $192,619 $ 92,619 yi' i•£. $192.619 $192 619 $192,619 Planned Cost: $963,095 PECO New Construction Revenue $11021,497 $324,000 so $373,000 $427,000 $89,000 S2,234,497 Other/Additional Revenue $81,396,249 $1,072,381 $1,0721381 $19,072,381 $1,072,381 $103,685,773 Total Additional Revenue $82,6101365 $1,589,000 $1,638,000 $19;692,000 $1,354,000 $106,883,365 Total Available Revenue Project Schedules $82;610,365 $3;000,0010 $2,217;971 $20,409768 $2,515;256 $110,753;360 Capacity Project Schedules A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrdlment in K-12 programs. Page 6 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 96 .i M1nv" fi 2 ProJectyDoscnption'� im'�iw"Seen.. 01 7 .A` 1 d; iarY+9" ",y'M'^ y L.SS]. ,F K.k s { Locattony Jn i41.,o'w 'phi x?d.k✓a* {yj li �5 4 , {✓ 3u.. 'V nrz :n i'y nS 2008 '2009 a iix n..F� i'S Atf - .,, 3 } 2009 20110 rv.mss �-' w.ei a �Y^t 4 '> x 2010 +201x1 f 333-/ l -t- £a c.vi ii'l 2011" 20121 �,...epi{b : {-Y ski i"'i 20122013 $ �N} Y ^ Totals[ e"uv �f yi' i•£. h ) ^Funded: '. New Middle School "BB" Location not specified Planned Cost: $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 Yes Page 6 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 96 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds from 1 cent or•1/2 cent Sales Surtax SO SO $o $0 $0 $0 Fund Balance Carried. Forward $24,941,868 SO $0 $0 SO $24,941,868 Obligated Fund Balance Carried Forward SO SO SO $o So so Special Facilities.. Account $301000 $30;000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $150,000 One Cent - 1/2 Cent Sales Surtax Debt Service SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 Subtotal $81,396;249 51,072;381 51,072,381 $19;072,381 $1,072,381 $103,685,773 Total Revenue Summary ?A fki n M ri a 40.s}'k, fir'. 1 ,,,Y,3. Item;Name g '&V & � t b .y. cwYz: t Yii-.. 2008 2009 yx Eudgetfi ; i� .rs 2� 20Q9 Proiecied y201O4 2010 � 2Proiected r 201 n f ,x2011 X2012, Pro)ecteii r 3• e1 2012 ;12013 i? P. X/ #;.. y6' dj M{ Fige Year ro al ? Local Two Mill Discretionary Capital Outlay Revenue. $30;607,708 $31;525,939 $32;471,717 $33,445,869 $34,449245 $162,500,478 PECO and 2 Mill Maint and Other 2 Mill Expenditures ($301607,708) ($30,114,939) ($31,891,746) ($32,728;101) ($33,267,989) ($158,630,483) PECO. Maintenance Revenue $806,569 51,026,000 $1,015,000 $1,026,000 $1,015,000 54,888,569 Available 2 Mill for New Construction SO $1,411,000 55791971 $717,768 $1,161,256 $3,869,995 t r ss Item Name E> X '2008;2QO91 Bud etY _ 9, w ; {2009 Pit ec x 1..... of ed y 1 t E'ro 042011 , ecte•d J__. , . 'f;2011 ``2012 ,g Pro ecte L._ G.. 20k{2'20 3 s Pr ected ° PJ ArFWecYearTotel: CO & DS Revenue $192,619 $ 92,619 yi' i•£. $192.619 $192 619 $192,619 Planned Cost: $963,095 PECO New Construction Revenue $11021,497 $324,000 so $373,000 $427,000 $89,000 S2,234,497 Other/Additional Revenue $81,396,249 $1,072,381 $1,0721381 $19,072,381 $1,072,381 $103,685,773 Total Additional Revenue $82,6101365 $1,589,000 $1,638,000 $19;692,000 $1,354,000 $106,883,365 Total Available Revenue Project Schedules $82;610,365 $3;000,0010 $2,217;971 $20,409768 $2,515;256 $110,753;360 Capacity Project Schedules A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrdlment in K-12 programs. Page 6 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 96 .i M1nv" fi 2 ProJectyDoscnption'� im'�iw"Seen.. 01 7 .A` 1 d; iarY+9" ",y'M'^ y L.SS]. ,F K.k s { Locattony Jn i41.,o'w 'phi x?d.k✓a* {yj li �5 4 , {✓ 3u.. 'V nrz :n i'y nS 2008 '2009 a iix n..F� i'S Atf - .,, 3 } 2009 20110 rv.mss �-' w.ei a �Y^t 4 '> x 2010 +201x1 f 333-/ l -t- £a c.vi ii'l 2011" 20121 �,...epi{b : {-Y ski i"'i 20122013 $ �N} Y ^ Totals[ e"uv �f yi' i•£. h ) ^Funded: '. New Middle School "BB" Location not specified Planned Cost: $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 Yes Page 6 of 17 9/242008 2:05:05 PM Community Development Department Supplement #13; Adopted November 18, 2008, Ordinance 2008-018 Indian River County 96 ORDINANCE NO. 2008 - 018 BOARD OFP,cOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF. IN DIAN RiVERCOUNTY E. Flesther viceChairman .� 3%ea �,1 l 1,A; EI P � ,��.�; ATTEST BY:!'/�u�ii�r// mor : Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this Lfr day of Fc \,0 , 2098'1 Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this '1 2 day of ire 1pw . / , 200 at �' OD A.MJ.Mtt Pand filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Comity Co missioners of Indian River County, Florida. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS J 911 Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Director F:\Community Development \ Users \LONG RANGE\CompPlan Amendments \CIE120081Ordinance 42 Extra Lang - CIE.doc 3 of 3