HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/18/1973WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 1973
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE,
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY,JULY 18, 1973 AT 8:30 O'CLOCK
A.M. PRESENT WERE ALMA LEE LOY, CHAIRMAN: EDWARD J. MASSEY,
VICE CHAIRMAN: WILLARD W. SIEBERT, SJR.,' JACK U. DRITENBAS AND
RICHARD BOGOSIAN. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G. KENNINGS, COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR: PAUL D. BURCH, ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS: L.S. THOMAS AND ELIZABETH FORLANI, DEPUTY CLERKS,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AND ASKED
IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF
THE REGULAR MEETING OF .JULY 5, 1973.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REQUESTED ON PAGE 10 LAST PARAGRAPH,
FIRST SENTENCE, BE CHANGED TO READ
"THE ADMINISTRATOR REQUESTED A RELEASE OF ESCROW MONEY
WHICH WAS POSTED BY THE MOORING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE
COMPLETION OF ROADS AND DRAINAGE IN UNIT 2 OF THE MOORINGS AND
STATED THAT ALL WORK HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF A PORTION OF SPYGLASS LANE AND $4,500.00 WILL BE
RETAINED UNTIL THIS PORTION IS COMPLETED."
COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS REQUESTED ON PAGE 12, LAST SENTENCE,
THE WORD "DISCUSS" BE CHANGED TO READ "DISCUSSION
COMMISSLONER DRITENBAS ALSO REQUESTED ON PAGE 13, FIRST
PARAGRAPH, THIRD LINE BE CHANGED TO READ: "LAKEWOOD'PARK, IN
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, AND FELLSMERE",.
THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY =`THE BOARD
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
.JULY 5, 1973, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR
CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF .JULY 12, 1973,
THERE WERE NONE AND ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED
BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF .JULY 12, 1973, AS',"WRITTEN.
m
JL 1 .197 ?.
f
OOii RA.G
THE HOUR OF 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED THE -
DEPUTY CLERK READ.THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION
ATTACHED, TO WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
_.r .
PUBUC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE
River County, Florida
NOTICE
Vero Beach, Indian
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that ma following is a statement slan-
-
marizing a supplemental budget tentatively adopted by the Board of
•
County Commissioners of Indian River County. Florida, showing receipts
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVERt
of said Board for the fiscal year 1972.1973 in excess of the anticfpnted
FLORIDAreteiots
budgeted by said Board for the said fiscal year and showirx. Me
STATE OF
- proposed expenditure the: eof by said Board for Said fiscal year proposed to
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on bath
be adopted by said Board as a supplemental budget for the fiscal year
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
ending September 30,1973, In words and figures followhig;
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached Copy of advertisement, being
GENERALFUND
EXPENDITURES FROM
TO
at 4990798 Fed. Rev. SharingReserve .
..�.
�C iLl�lyR.rt..
EXCESS RECEIPTS
a ._.
WV.2=0
ac 1193 Fed. Rev. Sharing Funds
FINES, FORFETURE FUND
• In the Itmftar of Y�V�ae�� �. • y .�yy .. —_ -
1 1—"-----
EXPENDITURES TO FROM
ac 3101102 SheriWs Budget
Other Safari" 5113 0.00
ac 310130] Sheriff's Budget
Expenses �J100.OD -
a -C 3101105 Sheriff's Budget
Payroll Matching - -9,727.00
Court, was pub-.
-
EXCESS RECEIPTS
ac 1193 Fed. R.w. Sharfnng Funds S 64.777.00
TOTALS. S401.500.00 ft101,600.00 ,
Bshed In add newspaper in the lam of
Said Board will meet In the County Commissioner's Room, Indian
River County Courthouse. Vero Beach, Florida, at 8:30a.m. on Wednesday,
u1S,. 1973 for the purpose hearing requests and complaints from the
publbl Wgic regarding the supplemental bet.
- -.-1--1--r-�--
r
-Thin Sm daY of JuIY 1473.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S OF
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
By •s. ALMA LEE LOY, Chairman
been continuously publishedIn said Indian River. County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
July S. 1g73,
as second class [nail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver.
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver.
tisement far publication in the said newspaper. -
^�
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of—V
vv
(,Business Manager)
(Clark o the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
(SEAL)
-
`THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO -BE HEARD, .THERE
WERE NONE AND ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER VASSEY, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AS FOLLOWS:
_2_
17 pu[221
i
-3-
V P4.4`
J U L 1 1973 sw�
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
TO
FROM
999078 FED. REV. SHARING
$318,907.00
RESERVE FUND
EX SS RECEIPTS
11� FED. REV. SHARING FUNDS
-$318,907.00
FINE AND FORFEITURE
FUND
EXPENDITURES .°
TO
FROM
UT10110 SHERIFFS BUDGET
Z)ALARIES
HER
$ 15,000.00
9101302 SHERIFF'S BUDGET
XPENSES
40,000.00
101105 BUDGET
5SHERIFF'S
AYROLL LATCHING
9,227.00
REC IPTS
REV.
11 FED. SHARING FUNDS
$ 64,227.00
TOTALS
$383,134.00
$383,134.00
i
-3-
V P4.4`
J U L 1 1973 sw�
i .
The purpose of this meeting this morning is for this
Board to explain to the Vero Beach, Moorings, Floralton, Porpoise
Point and Smuggler's Cove Property Owners Associations, the Board's
position on many of the matters raised by the Associations over the past
several months.
Cn November 22 of 1972, this Board received a Petition
presented by Steve Henderson on behalf of the Associations, express-
ing their concern over the increase of multiple family zoning: the, fact
that rezoning was continuing in spite of the Board's failure to complete
a Master Plan, and that "reverse planning" was taking place. The
Petition requested that the Board establish a Moratorium on all re-
zoning until the Master Plan was finally adopted; or in the alternative,
stop any further expenditures of funds on a plan that would be rendered
moot by interim zoning.
This Petition was discussed at length by the Board with
many other citizens representing different: groups expressing their
ideas. The following individuals spoke against the proposed Mora-
torium:
German Suarez - President of Motel -Hotel Association
Dave Albrecht - Contractor
Jim Beindorf - Consulting, Engineer for the County
Don Wilcox - Developer
Al Scattergood - Realtor
Val Brennan - Planner
Ralph Sexton - Indian River County Zoning Commission.
Chairman, speaking personally and for the
Indian River County Zoning Commission.
W. It. Siebert - County Commissioner.
Besides Steve Henderson, who represented the Associa-
tions. the only other individual speaking for a Moratorium was Ad-
miral B. E. Moore of Smuggler's Cove. Commissioner Dritenbas
asked the Planner when the Master Plan would be ready for adoption
and both Val Brennan and Ralph Sexton thcught it difficult to say but
both hoped that it could be ready in January of 1973. Although no
formal vote was taken, the failure of any Commissioner to make a
r=
17 PAS
JUL 1 1973
The discussion ended with their views, and I stated that the Board
would help speed up the process of adopting a Master Plan.
Your Associations, in their letter of May 25, 1973, ac -
cased this Board of not taking any action on the Petition and merely
tabling or setting it aside. From the facts just stated it is clear
that this Board fully considered and discussed the Petition and chose
not to impose a Moratorium or cease work on the Master Plan.
The second criticism in your letter of May 25, 1973,
is that this Board ignored your letter and request of February 13,
1973, which requested some action by the Board on the previous
Petition, requested that the Board comply with the requirements of
Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, or seek anAttorney General's
opinion on whether or not this Board had to comply with Chapter 163.
The Board answers these criticisms, as follows:
First, your Attorney was present at the meeting on,
November 22, 1972, when the Petition was presented by him, dis-
cussed, and the Board chose not to comply with the request and -the
Board assumed the results of this discussion would-be relayed* to
. each of you by your attorney. Second, this Board employs an
attorney in whom it has confidence and has relied on his opinion
that Chapter 163 is permissive only and the actions of the Board are
legal and did not feel that it was necessary to seek an opinion of the
Attorney General. If differences of opinion between the public and
this Board on interpretations of the law were always settled by an
Attorney General's opinion, this Board would not need an attorney,
would be unable to expeditiously carry out its duties, and the staff
of the Attorney General would have to be grea4tly increased.
You are correct in your criticism that the Board did
not formally answer your request for an Attorney General's opinion,
Qa VPW22i4
and for that oversight we apologize and can only say that it was an
oversight and certainly not a callous disregard of concern, as alleged
in your letter of May 25th.
Your attorney again. appeared before the Board on
June -6, 1973. -reviewing the Petition submitted in November of 1972,
.and another discussion, similar to the one held on November 22, 1972,
took place, even though your Associations and your attorney knew the
Board's thoughts on the matter because of the discussion in November..
Because of a very busy schedule. I stated that the Board was aware of
the problems arising from rezoning and.said a special meeting could
be scheduled to discuss the problems.
This meeting had not been scheduled prior to today because,
quite frankly, there has not been time to prepare the documentation
necessary for a proper discussion. This.Board is in the process of .
setting up a county -wide water and sewer program, working on our
new budget, and handling routine business.
Because of our failure to reply to your letter of May
25th, you made your own request for an Attorney General's opinion,
a copy of which was provided to us by the Press. Our attorney deter-
, mined that it was important that the Attorney General know the.
County's position if he intended to give an opinion.
Your letter of June 26, 1973, accuses the Board of
delaying any meeting with you until an opinion had been given by the
Attorney General and further accused our Attorney of trying to
delay the Attorney General's opinion. This Board has never attempted
to delay a meeting with your groups except for the problem of time,
as I have previously.explained, and our attorney has never attempted
to delay the Attorney General's opinion.
Further in your supplemental letter to the Attorney
e
General, dated June 26, 1973, you accuse our attorney of trying to
delay and prevent the Attorney General from giving an opinion on:
the grounds that the Attorney General does not give opinions to
private citizens. I have been assured by our attorney that he has
not in any way tried to prevent the Attorney General from giving w
an opinion, but that it is his opinion as expressed to this Board, that
it is not the practice of the Attorney General to give opinions to
private citizens.
Our attorney did write the following letter to the
Attorney General:
r�
June 13, 1973
Honorable Robert L. Shevin
Attorney General
The Capitol Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32304
Dear Sir:
I have been advised that several Property Owners
Associations in Indian River County have requested your opinions
on eight specific questions dealing with certain agreements be-
tween Indian. River County and the City of Vero Beach on joint
planning in the possible adoption of a Master Plan. If it is
your intent to give an opinion on the eight questions, as County
Attorney for Indian River County, I would appreciate, an oppor-
tunity to make the County's position clear.
I will be gone from Vero Beach on June 8th and will
be out of town until June the 18th attending Florida Air National
Guard summer camp. I would appreciate your notifying me if
you intend to give an opinion on the questions requested in
*'the Property Owner's letter and giving me an opportunity to
answer the same.
PDB:rkj
Sincerely,
Paul D. Burch
County Attorney
IE
From the contents of his letter, we -believe it is an
unfair conclusion on your part that our attorney is doing anything
to delay or prevent your getting an answer from the Attorney General.
This Board has requested and received from its attorney
a written opinion on the County's participation in joint planning with
the City of Vero Beach and the legality of this Board's action, and
I will now read that opinion to you. (attached hereto)
_�_
f �
,
JUL 18 197 •
SUBJECT: Legality of City -County Planning Commission
BACKGROUND:
From my research of County records, I find the first
reference to city -county joint planning in.the minutes of the City of
Vero Beach - Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
Liasion Committee of June 1, 1964, in which it was suggested that
acoordination of planning for the development of Vero Beach and the
County could be accomplished in a more efficient manner if a committee
were formed made up of three members of the Indian River County
Zoning Commission and three members of the City Parks, Planning
and Zoning Board and a seventh person appointed by them. This
committee was to meet regularly and submit recommendations to the
respective zoning boards, the City -Council and Board of County Commi-
ssioners;
This Committee evolved into the Indian River County
Long Range Planning Authority manned by some of the City's and
County's more prominent citizens. On November 25, 1968, this
Committee passed a Resolution recommending to .the Board of County
Commissioners that a City -County Joint Planning Commission be
establis hed.
This recommendation was approved by both the Board of
County- commissioners and the City Council and on August 27,. 1969,
a "Buffer" committee was formed consisting of one member of the
City Council, one member of the Board of County Commissioners, one
member of the Zoning Board, one member of the City Parks, Planning
and Zoning Board, the City Manager, the County Administrator, and
one member of the Dong Range Planning Authurity. The name Vero
Beach - Indian River County Planning Commission was the name
selected for this "Huffer" Committee. This is the' Commission whose
-8-
e on.17PAC4227
activities are now being questioned by certain property owners
associations. -
In 1969 this Commission recommended to the City Council
and the Board of County. Commissioners that a professional planner -
be hired, given an office and staff, and carry out tasks assigned to him
. s
by the City Council and the Board of County Commissioners. In effect,
the Planner had two bosses, the City and the County. To avoid friction,
It was determined that the City and County would work through the Joint
Planning Commission. It .was agreed that the cost of this operation would
be split 50 - 50 between'the County and the City and -appropriate resolu-
tions were passed by both the Board of County I
Commissioners(Resolu-
tion No. 69-71) and the City Council (Resolution No. 2116) to hire a -
planner and split the costs. This Planning Commission has continued
to operate on this basis through the present time. This Commission '
has made requests three times for State and Federal assistance grants
I
for planning. Each of these requests were approved by appropriate.
resolutions by both the City and County.
LEGAL:
The first statutory authority for zoning by the Board of
County Commissionexsof Indian River County was Chapter 21310)Special
Acts of 1941. The purpose.of this act was to allow the Board of County
bomniissionersto establish a Zoning Commission and regulate zoning
within the unincorporated areas of the County. This act was not imple-
mented until 1957 when the first Zoning Resolution was passed and dis-
tricts were established. In the meantime the Legislature had passed
Chapter 133, General Laws of Florida establishing a procedure for- all
counties to control zoning. Chapter 133 excluded those counties al-
ready having local or special acts granting this authority and Indian
River County continued to operate under Chapter 21310 and Chapter
71-14 until Chapter 21310 was repealed in 1973.
Chapter 21310 gave the Board of County' Commissioners
i
Byauthorityof home Rule powers granted under the 15968,,
Constitution, the Legislature passed Chapter 71-14 which greatly in .
creased the powers of the Board of County Commiss ioners tinder
f
F.4pter 125 laws of 1971, the applicable parts t have included here.
This law alloyed the Board of County Commissioners to:
"Establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such
business regulations as are necessary for the pro-
tection of the public.
6
Prepare and enforce comprehensive plans for the
development of the county.
Establish and administer programs of housing, slum
clearance, community redevelopment, conservation, -
flood and beach erosion control, air pollution con-
trol, and navigation and drainage, and cooperate
with governmental agencies and private enterpri-
ses in the development and operation of such pro-
grams.
Enter into agreements with other governmental
agencies within or outside boundaries of the
county for joint performance, or performance
by one unit in behalf of the other, of any of either
agency's authorized functions.
Perform any other acts not inconsistent with law
which are in common interest of the people
of the county,. and exercise all powers and privi-
leges not specifically prohibited by law.
No enumeration of powers herein shall be deemed
exclusive or restrictive, but shall be deemed to
incorporate all implied powers necessary or in-
cident to carrying out such enumerated powers,
including specifically, authority to employ
personnel, expend funds, enter into contractural
obligations, and purchase or lease and sell or
exchange real or personal property.
To make and enter into all contracts and agree-
ments and to do and perform all acts and deeds
necessary and incidental to the performance of
its duties and the exercise of its powers. "
The above cited portions of Chapter 125 provide, sufficient
authority for the Board of County Commissioners to establish zoning
regulations, prepare and enforce comprehensive plans for developer
ment and to enter into agreements with other governmental bodies
:
•. .. .. .... _ fir.
��' ..
F.
for the joint performance of these duties.
I answer the questions raised about Chapter 163
in the following manner:
Chapter 163 is permissive only and not mandatory.
Florida Statute 163. 160(2) points out that it does not repeal or
modify any local or special act relating to zoning or planning; that
the provisions are supplemental and in addition to other powers held
by the governing body. Florida Statute 163.165 (3) states:A.
"Any governing body of any county or any incorporated
municipality may but shall not be required to, exercise
any of the powers set out in this part. "
In general, Chapter 163 provides authority for governing bodies to
{
join together in planning only if they choose to bring themselves
under its provisions. Indian River County has not chosen to proceed
under this act, because ample authority for what it is doing in the .plan-
ning area may be found elsewhere,
Finally, I do not believe that the Vero Beach - Indian River
County Plkn i*+g Commission has any authority to do anything without
the concurrence of both the City Council and the Board of County
Commissioners. Everything this Planning Commission does is
approved by resolution by both the, City and County in advance. It is
a conduit by which the City and County perform a required function
of government at a considerable saving of money to the citizens,. both
City and County, of our area. -
In my opinion the questions raised by the property owners
associations are a result of their fears that a Master Plan will be -
adopted by the County and by the City without the input and considera-
tions of the citizens of the City and the County. This will not happen.
The first of many hearings on the proposed plan was held September
2, 1972, attended by most governmental and civic groups in the area.
Multiple meetings have been held by the County since that date to which
the public was invited and which were attended by representatives of
many. of the property owners associations who. are now questioning
JUL 181973
eDo V fu 0
a
=
* the Commission. Future public meetings will be held by both the,
City and the County and the public will be kept informed. at all times A
and the Planning Commission solicits the thoughts of every citizen
In the area on what the future development of the .area should be.
Naturally there will be differences. of c#piti an and these differences
should be and will be settled by the officials- elected by the City and
County. Any Master Plan for City and County development must be
finally approved by the governing bodies of both the City and the
County. This has not been accomplished and only will be accom-
plished after appropriate public hearings. ��:
I
fW
In addition, your Associations have accused this Board
of failing to expose the -proposed Master Plan, to the public, withholding
it from public consideration, and attempting to retain exclusive control
over planning.land use and zoning.
Meetings of public officials concerned with obtaining
the required material for formulations of a Master Plan were held on:
December 14, 1971
March 14, 1972
April 27, 1972
May 16, 1972
June 20, 1972
August 22, 1972
September 21, 1972
October 10, 1972
October 12, 1972
November 14, 1972
December 6, 1972
December 12, 1972
January 18, 1973
January 24, 1973
February 13, 1973
February 14, 1973
February 28, 1973
March 19, 1973
March 21, 1973,
April 10, 1973
May 7, 1973
June 18, 1973
These were held either by the Board of County Commis-
sioners of Indian River County, The Indian River County Zoning Com-
mission, the City Council of Vero Beach, the Parks, Planning & Zoning
Board of the City of Vero Beach, or the Vero Beach -Indian. River
County Planning Commission. An of these meetings were open to the
public and were attended by some of the members of your Associations.
At many of these meetings, although they were not public hearings,
people were invited to and did express,their thoughts. Many copies of
the work done by the Planner and. the 'consultants were distributed; so .
many that the supply has become exhausted and more have been
ordered and will be available. - Our Planner has assured me that he
has never refused to discuss the proposals being made on the Master
Plan with anyone.
Gentlemen, it is unfair for you to say that this Board,
or any Board involved with the Master Plan, is attempting to do t
something behind anyone's back. It is a very difficult task to please
everyone. I am sure the Master Plan, when finally officially adopted,
will be the result of a community effort. We solicit and will appreciate
your thoughts and comments, and the comments of any of our citizens,
We represent you, but remember, we represent all of the citizens
of this County. We were elected to make the decisions that have to
I
be made and we will endeavor to make those decisions for the benefit
Of all of our citizens.
I was born in Vero Beach and I can identify my.growing
pains with this community. But one thing remains outstanding.in
a lifetime of memory and that is that it is the people of this community
who have been the life and breath of its growth. Our citizens have been
a dedicated family, pledged to a common goal. It is my sincere wish
that this spirit of harmony and cooperation will continue and that
f
different interest groups, as well as individual citizens, will unite
and work toward keeping our County unique. This Board pledges to
do its part. We want your constructive criticism, but help us by
making sure it is constructive and not just criticism..
BOO[E 17 PAcf 3
JUL 18 1973
CHAIRMAN Loy STATED, AT THIS TIME THE MEETING WILL BE
OPENED FOR DISCUSSION.
.JEROME KRAMER REPRESENTING THE VERO BEACH AND MOORINGS
ASSOCIATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF THEIR.ATTORNEY STEVE HENDERSON,
APPEARED AND STATED THAT THE LETTERS FROM THE BEACH ASSOCIATION
AND OTHER GROUPS WERE AN EXPRESSION OF CONCERN AND NOT ACCUSATIONS.
MR. KRAMER FURTHER STATED THAT THERE IS A POINT OF
DIFFERENCE THAT AN ATTORNEY GENERALS OPINION REGARDING
CHAPTERS 163 AND 125 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTE, WOULD CLARIFY.
MR. KRAMER I'S OF THE OPINION THAT THIS BOARD SHOULD ABIDE BY
CHAPTER 163.
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT CHAPTER 163 PROVIDES
AUTHORITY FOR GOVERNING BODIES TO JOIN TOGETHER IN PLANNING ONLY
IF THEY CHOOSE TO BRING THEMSELVES UNDER ITS PROVISION. THIS
BOARD HAS CHOSEN TO PROCEED UNDER CHAPTER 125 WHICH PROVIDES
SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BOARD TO ESTABLISH ZONING REGULATIONS,
PREPARE AND ENFORCE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TO
ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES.
MR. KRAMER THEN QUESTIONED THE LEGALITY OF "CONTRACT
ZONING". ATTORNEY BURCH STATED TT IS NOT LEGAL.
MR. KRAMER CONTINUED THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR A MORATORIUM
*ON ALL MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT UNTIL THE CITY -COUNTY MASTER PLANS
ARE COMPLETED AND APPROVED.
CHAIRMAN-LOY INTERRUPTED THE DISCUSSION AT 9:39 ofCLOCKA.M.
TO.ASk IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SUBMIT A BID
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC NOTICE.REGARDING BIDS FOR TWO AUTOMOBILE
AND A PILE DRIVER. THERE WERE NONE AND THE ADMINISTRATOR WAS INSTRUCTED
TO HOLD IN ABEYANCE THE BID RECEIVED IN THE MAIL.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN CALLED ON VAL, BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR
FOR HIS STATEMENTS.
MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT ON THE BOARDS RECOMMENDATIONS,
NEW ZONING DISTRICTS WILL BE BROUGHT UP AT THE .JULY 26TH. 1973
ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
-15-
JUL 18 1973
o 17 ���
MR. BRENNAN CONTINUED THAT A STATEMENT HAS BEEN MADE
BY THE VARIOUS ASSOCIATIONS, THAT THE`COUNTY`THROAJGH.ITS REZONING
AND,APPROVALS, HAS.AUTHORIZED ENOUGH.RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO
ACCOMMODATE A TOTAL POPULATION INCREASE OF APPROXIMATELY 31,000
WITHIN ONE YEAR. MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT ACCORDING TO HIS RECORDS
THE POPULATION INCREASE WE CAN ANTICIPATE IS 21,700 BY THE YEAR 1978.
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED MR. BRENNAN HOW THE PLANS FOR.-
COMPLETION
OR:COMPLETION AND PRESENTATION OF THE MASTER PLANS ARE PROCEEDING.
MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT OUR CONTRACT TO COMPLETE THE
RESEARCH FOR THE MASTER PLANS WAS .JUNE 300 1973. AT THIS TIME
ALL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES STATE IT
WILL TAKE ONE MONTH TO COMPILE THIS MATERIAL AND HAVE IT PRINTED.
UPON RECEIPT OF THESE PLANS, ALL GOVERNING BODIES WILL RECEIVE
` A COPY AFTER WHICH PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE SCHEDULED, INFORMATION
RECEIVED WILL BE CONSIDERED, AND FINALLY THE.ADOPTION OF THE
MASTER PLANS.
GERMAN SUAREZ REPRESENTING THE HOTEL AND MOTEL ASSOCIATION
APPEARED AND STATED THAT HIS ASSOCIATION IS VERY iNTERESTED IN
THE WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND'REQUESTS THAT THE CITY -COUNTY
MASTER PLANS THAT WILL FIT"THE NEEDS OF THIS COMMUNITY, BE ADOPTED.
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED THE BOARD IF THEY HAD ANYMORE COMMENTS.
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING THE
LEGALITY OF THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THIS BOARD AS IT PERTAINS TO
ZONING AND PLANNING. COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN STATED THAT SINCE
IT -HAS BEEN CALLED TO OUR ATTENTION BY ONE.OR MORE GROUPS, HE
COULD SEE NO HARM IN REQUESTING AN ATTORNEY GENERALS OPINION
ON THE LEGALITY OF THE AUTHORIZATIONS WE ARE PROVIDING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED
ATTORNEY BURCH TO OBTAIN AN OPINION FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT IT IS MANDATORY TO FOLLOW'THE DICTATES
OF CHAPTER 163 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTE, AND ALSO REQUEST AN
OPINION REGARDING OUR REQUIREMENT ON ZONING CHANGES THAT
DEVELOPERS MUST OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT WITHIN SIX MONTHS
AND COMPLETE•CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 12 MONTHS OR THE ZONING MAY
BE CHANGED BACK TO THE PRIOR ZONING DISTRICT.
-16-
L 1 1973soo ��' PAGf235
=1
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED THE BOARD'SDECISION' ON ESTABLISHING
A MORATORIUM ON MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. -
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, STATED HE DID NOT FEEL A MORATORIUM
WAS NECESSARY. IN HIS OPINION, A MORATORIUM IS NECESSARY ONLY
LN AN EMERGENCY SIUTATION AND THIS IS NOT AN EMERGENCY SITUATION,
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF ANY COMMISSIONER WISHED TO
MAKE A MOTION THAT A MORATORIUM ON MULTI -FAMILY REZONING
BE PASSED, THERE WAS NO MOTION MADE,
THE BOARD THEN AGREED TO REQUEST THE ZONING COMMISSION
TO PROCEED AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE WITH SCHEDULING.PUBLIC
PRESENTATION OF THE MASTER PLAN AS IT IS PROPOSED.
.JAMES BEINDORF REPRESENTING DR. ROBERT RADIN APPEARED
AND MADE A PRESENTATION OF A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN SECTION 9,
TOWNSHIP 33, RANGE 39 AND REQUESTED TENTATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE
SITE PLAN APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION OWNED BY DR. ROBERT`RADIN
LOCATED IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 33, RANGE 39 SUBJECT TO THE
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON.THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF
THIS SUBDIVISION REVERTING TO THE COUNTY IF AND WHEN THIS
ADJOINFNG PROPERTY IS SOLD AND DEVELOPED.
THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK P A .AND
RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF .JULY S, 1973, A PUBLIC
HEARING FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY AS REQUESTED BY C.B. AND MARY
GRAY WAS CONTINUED UNTIL THIS MEETING BECAUSE MR. AND MRS. GRAY
HAD ADVERTISED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPERTY THEY DID NOT OWN,
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE PETITIONER WAS TO FURNISH THE EXACT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY THEY OWN THAT THEY WISHED TO
BE REZONED,
AT THIS MEETING THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE
PRESENT TO REPRESENT C.B. AND MARY GRAY, THERE WAS NO ONE AND
UPON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY'COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST FOR A ZONING
CHANGE AS REQUESTED BY C.B. AND MARY GRAY BECAUSE THEY DID NOT
FURNISH THE EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY THEY WISHED
REZONED.
-17-
JUL
17-JUL 181973 0 17 �Aw 2-30
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT AT THE REGULAR MEETING* OF
JUNE 20, 1973, THE BOARD GAVE TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO SUNVALE
SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL -OF AN ENGINEERING DESIGN
SHOWING THE DRAINAGE OF THIS SUBDIVISION. AT THE REGULAR MEETING
OF JULY 5 -*l 19731 VICTOR PA'L-I'SANO',' DEVELOPER OF SUNVALE SUBDIVISION
PRESENTED A SURVEY SHOWING HOW THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE DRAINED.
IT WAS.STATED THAT DRAINAGE IS CONTINGENT ON THE 12TH STREET
DITCH. THE BOARD AGREED THAT MORE INFORMATION . WAS NECESSARY.
VICTOR PALISANO, DEVELOPER AND SHERMAN SMITH I**ii,:.ATTORNEY
APPEARED AT THIS MEETING WITH A PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN PREPARED BY
AL PANDA, SURVEYOR. THE BOARD REVIEW -ED THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN AND
COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS STATED THAT THERE ARE LOW AREAS THAT WILL
BE FLOODED AND HE IS,ESPECIALLY CONCERNED ABOUT HOMES BEING
BUILT -=.2 IN THIS LOW AREA AND HAVING THEM BECOME FLOODED:,
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN ASKED.— IF THIS SUBDIVISION HAS
MET OUR SUBDIVISION REGUIREMENTS AND THE ADMINISTRATOR ANSWERED
THAT IT HAS MET ALL REQUIREMENTS.
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN SUGGESTED MODIFYING OUR
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TO REQUIRE THAT THE FLOOR LEVEL OF A
HOUSE MUST BE AT THE SAME'LEVEL AS THE CENTER LINE OF THE
STREET. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE FLOOR LEVEL OF A HOUSE
MUST CONFORM TO THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE.
I
MR. PALISANO PRESENTED A PROFILE STUDY OF SUNVALE
SUBDIVISION.
COMMISSIONER,I)RITENBAS RECOMMENDED THAT 12TH STREET
BE THE BENCH MARK FOR THAT SUBDIVISION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBASo SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT. THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE
APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO 12TH STREET BEING THE BENCH MARK, AND THE
FLOOR LEVEL OF THE HOMES TO BE CONSTRUCTED ARE A MINIMUM OF 4"
ABOVE THE CENTER LINE OF 12TH STREET, ADJOINING THIS SUBDIVISION.
-18-
lot,
�-,v,w,237 -
VAL BRENNAN,.PLANNING DIRECTOR, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
THE FLORIDA PLANNING AND ZONING ASSOCIATION IS HOLDING A `ZONING
SEMINAR" ON JULY 25, 1973 IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA. THE TOTAL COST
TO HIRE A BUS IS $272.00 WHICH WOULD BE SPLIT 50-50 WITH THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH AND THE COUNTY'S SHARE WOULD BE $136.00.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED VAL
BRENNAN TO HIRE A BUS IN THE AMOUNT OF $136.00 AND TO ALSO
MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR DINNER FOR MEMBERS OF THE ZONING COMMISSION,
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTENDING THE ZONING
SEMINAR ON .JULY 25, 1973 IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA.
MR.�BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND ARE URGING THE ADOPTION OF
A RESOLUTION WHICH WOULD DISCOURAGE,CONSTRUCTIONS OF CANALS IN
THE INDIAN RIVER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT THIS BE PUT ON THE
AGENDA FOR AUGUST 8, 1973 AND COPIES OF THIS REQUEST BE FORWARDED
TO ALL BOARD MEMBERS,
MR. DAVE GROTEFEND REPRESENTING THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
COUNCIL APPEARED AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED
A GRANT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH
CORP AND THEY HAVE EMPLOYED 170 YOUNGSTERS BETWEEN THE AGES OF
14 AND 21, WHO ARE STILL ATTENDING SCHOOL, MR. GROTEFEND-ASKED IF
THE BOARD HAD JOBS FOR THESE YOUNGSTERS.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT CLEAN-UP WORK IS NEEDED ON ALL
BEACHES AND IN CERTAIN AREAS, SUCH AS, GIFFORD, WEST WABASSO,
AND OSLO.
THE CHAIRMAN SUGGESTED THAT MR. GROTEFEND SUBMIT
A LIST TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, WELL IN ADVANCE, OF THE AREAS
THEY WILL BE CLEANING AND TO INDICATE THE PICK-UP POINTS. THE
COUNTY TRUCK WILL THEN COME BY AND PICK-UP THE DEBRIS.
�,
_19-
JUL 18 173 pg(.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED PAYMENT
OF ONE "COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MANUAL" TO BE USED BY THE COUNTY
ATTORNEY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $40.00.
ATTORNEY BURCH BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOARD
A 1972 AMENDMENT TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 - TITLE 7,'WHICH
STATES THAT LOCAL EFFORTS TO END DISCRIMINATION MUST BE MADE AND
REPORTS MUST BE FILED TO DOCUMENT, RACE, SEX, AND SALARY OF ALL
COUNTY PERSONNEL BY OCTOBER 31, 1973.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDED THAT GEORGE MCKENNA, PERSONNEL
DIRECTOR, READ THE NEW LAW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD.
THE, ATTORNEY STATED THAT AN APPLICATION FROM LAMESA I.NC.
FOR "DEVELOPMENT -OF REGIONAL IMPACT" APPROVAL, UNDER FLORIDA
STATUTE 380 WAS RECEIVED.
THE ATTORNEY STATED.THAT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
MUST BE ADVERTISED FOUR WEEKS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. A COPY
OF THE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT MUST BE SENT TO THE DIVISION OF
STATE PLANNING AND ONE TO OUR REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.
ON MOTION.BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS AND COMMISSIONER
BOGOSIAN ABSTAINED FROM VOTING, CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR
AND THE BOARD APPROVED ADVERTISEMENT FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
-AUGUST 22, 1973 FOR LAMESA, INC.
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN STATED THAT HE HAS A PERSONAL
INTEREST IN LAMESA INC. WHICH EXCEEDS 10% AND HE PROPOSES TO
FILE AN AFFIDAVIT WITH THE BOARD CITING WHAT THAT INTEREST IS.
COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS STATED THAT HE ALSO HAS PERSONAL
INTEREST IN LAMESA INC. WHICH EXCEEDS 107 AND HE PROPOSES TO
FILE AN. AFFIDAVIT WITH THE BOARD CITING WHAT THAT INTEREST IS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER.MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ADMISSION
OF DAVID THOMAS MCRAE TO THE FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE
BLIND.
-20-
ohn V pai'239
ON MOTION.BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING
BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE OPERATION OF THE SHERIFFS OFFICE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF OCTOBER I, 1972 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1973.4
ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFER
BALANCE IN CONTINGENCY.FUND: $7,000.00
From Reserve for Contingencies: 1814.00
To Intangible Taxes: 1814.00
From Reserve for Contingencies: 200.00
To Auto Equipment: 200.00
From Reserve for Contingencies 4986.00
To Expenses other than Salaries:4986.00
1, 7000.00 $7000.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE
APPLICATION OF FELIX MANUEL.RODRIQUEZ FOR ADMISSION TO THE
A.G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL,
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND HAVE RECEIVED AN AP-
PLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A SEAWALL ALONG THE SHORELINE
OF THE INDIAN RIVER IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND HAVE
REQUESTED THE BOARD OF COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS TO SUBMIT A LETTER
-STATING THEY HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS
.SEAWALL.
DEAN LUETHJE APPEARED REPRESENTING BEINDORF AND
ASSOCIATES, INC., CONSULTING ENGINEERING.FIRM, WITH A "PLANNED
DESIGN" WHICH IS BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES ALONG'WtITH
A COPY OF GUIDELINES FROM THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL
IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND.
....."�'.3�ai`fi'.'b"S.ffi'1%'RA`�„�'ft-rL'agc �.Tr Pr3+�'-{�`9..-sh.-''at'•:rdt»iffi:.r^.r:��v.'$N:ci�.�`�T}'gutll:''�h'� -�^,i
� tea ar�rF
ate:.
STATE OF FLORIDA ,
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND
ELLIOT BUILDING — TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32304
. .. Joel Kuperberg rrLzPj4cNE 488-8123
Executive Director
AAp lioations to Reclaim Land
Statutory provisions afford a method in which a riparian
owner may recover land previously lost; however, the cause
of such loss is specific and it -must fall within one of
the following,categories:
1. Avulsion, which is defined as a sudden loss
as a result of a storm or other natural phenomena.
2. Artificially induced erosion, which is defined
as a loss caused by man-made structures,_ boat
traffic, failure of seawalls, bulkheads or retain-
ing walls.
Y
An application to reclaim`lannd must be supported with the
following documentary evidenee:
1. Map of ground survey showing:
(a).present shoreline at mean high water
(b) former shoreline at approximate mean
high water
2. Charts, maps or photographs relevant to the
area and representative of time in which change
in location of shoreline occurred.
• 3. Two affidavits by persons having no interest
in the land but who have personal knowledge of
the rate and extent of change and direct cause
of change in location
of shoreline.
g Include the
approximate date of the specific hurricane or
storm, if applicable.
4. Permit issued by the local governing body.
5/17/73
Reubin O'D. Askew Richard (Dick) Stone Robert L. Shevin Fred O. Dickinson, Jr.
Governor Secretary of State Attorney General Comptroller
Thomas D. O'Malley Floyd T. Christian Doyle Conner
Treasurgr Commissioner of Education Commissioner of Agriculture
JUL 18 1973 17 ma -W
OF
PROJECT "
°`i'"r
Sooch !.i nG of "ri+e+ North %z of
G+oo'( Lo't, 9 SCGb• 19, T+.,ps. 31S,
E¢/s£/r79 Rpm. 906., Indian Ridcr Couroty, x 1
/1%CI,fh6vrin5' Florida.
G v
IVar•Eh Lina of Appli,- -rte's property3— MGCv11,0 �QQ 1
a
/".I#* Poet p
I
Sca.ua.N I n at o!/ad GT O i +
YICINITY MAP
* Gop,ed From, uscs s Mop
. � �• //
APPLICATIOM FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A
INDIAN RIYER t. SEAWALL ALONG THE! HoREtINE GF THE
v INDIAN( RIVER IN IRDIAN DIVER COURTY,
o FLORIDA
The seawall shall be placed east of the applicant's
-McCvllers Core
_.�•.. b west property line with exception of having to cross
C - ` said property line to facilitate,,tieing into an ex-
isting seawall at the southwest corner of applicant's
-. Z� project. This will be doneas shown on Sheet 02.
Tieing into an existing seawall at the northwest cor-
VVes-& Line of Rpphcanfs Properi '��, ner of applicant's project will entail locating the
C seawall within the applicant's property line but be-
low the established 0.4 M.H.W.L. This will also be
the case at the tie-in at the southwest corner. Note
q
Sheet 02 for correction methods.
aIt
\1`
RPP hr -A0
IVia.y Cor,•, pony
a
JD, -A, we -r- X COS N.E. FirsE Strcet
3160/
• %Yp�cal SeawaJ/ Scc�ion �'
n9 Alei9hhorin9 .n. a{ HPPlicanE� Propertr�-
Scc� w �. // Legend
-- Props+�'y Line
CNis-tinj Ssa.wa!/
Beindor-F Rnd 91 XSOciQfes,/mac. ........................ Proposed Seo.W4�11
Consu/ting Engineers
I/�ro Beach F/orad s� 31rf60 Gheet 0/ e F 0-1
JL 18 1973
-I
Rubble or/c r✓ort/T i�ropsrE _G/nd O. ' ♦ II%l/r r'roperty
RCina
olacedf4;.d - �o. ' SouEh L,ne;o� 1-he
of
AE PorNt 8a/oaN00 o to G o ✓ t. (mat 9 To c'!. / 9 � �✓p. 32 5 �
0.9 17. M. G. /f ga°o° .��"' R. nJe 40 E. f»d/an. Qi✓er CD U,v't
Sb°l/ 6¢tend Node
Netc 5Qc carr B Fly.
More Th. nSe, ��.0 Proposed 5�-wa.//
S' Frb�
SGawo.// A�/Csed% G.' M
/nSfwl/ed
!pro
part/.G/ne A// /e✓ations S/roWrr ArG 12.4� �\
Re./ative'ro USCAS. PAA vrrrj \ fIL
� ' � 1✓a3$ Property tin¢
0.6 �
1 �Z
j/EsE Property L/ns /��- �► ► � N
. I u _�„�1 "i•i
O.S' I a
� V
Reck kvbble W,//i.s
Be P/acad At
' AU Other PC*.ces C I
Po/nts tae /ow 0.9 � % / /, 11 Q
/t Shall
Ext --,,d Na More,
Than 5" . Fro rya Doo I? -4.6'1,. m
Senw.:
H. !0,..f, d /I/ote Sdrctrov /4
'"---tea oj�a — �1-•
ao�a \ Soy�/r f'�ro r Li►+e
�a`b Pr•ePoseci Segura// ` �
J o•% 3/ �crst/n� Sear�ao.!/
$aut/r P%nert�•L/na"'1 AP)MI-w icon For PGPmik 7-O
Seo wo // Co,?s'6rvC1& A SocLsv--// Along
na Shore line OF The 1"jran
Section �q,�
River, IndoanRruerCoom-ry,
Florida. .
App/tart
Beirrdorf /lyd /ltroc/ates,/NG. - /`%a•y Lomyany ,
�p nsv/tjn y Fn ,.rPtrs Drma/err X La- At. C. Aj, SErsat
✓Cro BQaa/ir F"/or,da. J1 7�0 G/ei., nes v///ae r Florida. .316'0'/
Sheat OZo402
JUL 18 19-73
•
Rubble or/c r✓ort/T i�ropsrE _G/nd O. ' ♦ II%l/r r'roperty
RCina
olacedf4;.d - �o. ' SouEh L,ne;o� 1-he
of
AE PorNt 8a/oaN00 o to G o ✓ t. (mat 9 To c'!. / 9 � �✓p. 32 5 �
0.9 17. M. G. /f ga°o° .��"' R. nJe 40 E. f»d/an. Qi✓er CD U,v't
Sb°l/ 6¢tend Node
Netc 5Qc carr B Fly.
More Th. nSe, ��.0 Proposed 5�-wa.//
S' Frb�
SGawo.// A�/Csed% G.' M
/nSfwl/ed
!pro
part/.G/ne A// /e✓ations S/roWrr ArG 12.4� �\
Re./ative'ro USCAS. PAA vrrrj \ fIL
� ' � 1✓a3$ Property tin¢
0.6 �
1 �Z
j/EsE Property L/ns /��- �► ► � N
. I u _�„�1 "i•i
O.S' I a
� V
Reck kvbble W,//i.s
Be P/acad At
' AU Other PC*.ces C I
Po/nts tae /ow 0.9 � % / /, 11 Q
/t Shall
Ext --,,d Na More,
Than 5" . Fro rya Doo I? -4.6'1,. m
Senw.:
H. !0,..f, d /I/ote Sdrctrov /4
'"---tea oj�a — �1-•
ao�a \ Soy�/r f'�ro r Li►+e
�a`b Pr•ePoseci Segura// ` �
J o•% 3/ �crst/n� Sear�ao.!/
$aut/r P%nert�•L/na"'1 AP)MI-w icon For PGPmik 7-O
Seo wo // Co,?s'6rvC1& A SocLsv--// Along
na Shore line OF The 1"jran
Section �q,�
River, IndoanRruerCoom-ry,
Florida. .
App/tart
Beirrdorf /lyd /ltroc/ates,/NG. - /`%a•y Lomyany ,
�p nsv/tjn y Fn ,.rPtrs Drma/err X La- At. C. Aj, SErsat
✓Cro BQaa/ir F"/or,da. J1 7�0 G/ei., nes v///ae r Florida. .316'0'/
Sheat OZo402
JUL 18 19-73
ON MOTION BY.COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT* THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THEY HAD
NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SEAWALL_ OUTSIDE
THE SHORELINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AS SHOWN IN PRECEDING "PLANNED DESIGN" AS SUBMITTED BY BEINDORF
AND ASSOCIATES'*-. INC.
THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD OF A NOTICE
FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS-OF A .
REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO CONSTRUCT A 16" SEWAGE
FORCE MAIN AND A'16" WATER MAIN, 10 FEET APART, BOTH TO BE PLACED
IN A COMMON DITCH, CROSSING THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, INDIAN
RIVER FROM 17TH STREET ALIGNMENT TO CAUSEWAY BLVD. AND TO THE
DEPTH SHOWN ON THEIR DRAWING. THE SEWAGE FORCE MAIN IS TO TAKE
SEWAGE TO AN EXISTING TREATMENT PLANT WHICH IS TO.BE UPGRADED.
L.S. THOMAS, DEPUTY CLERK, LEFT THE MEETING AT 5:00
O'CLOCK P.M.
COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS LEFT THE MEETING AT 5:10 O'CLOCK
P.M.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE SAFSP PERMIT #73-0596
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FOR A PROPOSED
SUBMARINE 16" FORCE MAIN AND.A 16" WATER MAIN ACROSS THE INDIAN
RIVER AT VERO BEACH, FLORIDA AND AUTHORIZED A LETTER TO BE SENT
,TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WITH, A REQUEST THAT THEY COORDINATE
THEIR PERMIT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH REGARD TO A
PROPOSED SECOND BRIDGE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO BE LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY THE SAME LOCATION AS,MENTIONED ABOVE,
THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WAS IN
RECEIPT OF A CHECK FOR $5,000.00 FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHICH IS THEIR SHARE OF THE COST OF THE URBAN MASS TRANSIT SHORT
RANGEJECHNICAL TRANSIT STUDEY.
COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 5:20
OICLOCK P.M.
SERVE THE NEW VERO BEACH COMMUNITY THEATER AND AUDITORIUM.
THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVED THE DESIGN AS
PRESENTED ALL WORK WILL BE DONE .BY CITY AND.COUNTY FORCES: THE CITY
TO SUPPLY LIMEROCK AND ASPHALT L AND THE COUNTY TO SUPPLY FILL AND
GRADING. THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR
FORMAL APPROVAL. I
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE
COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE WITH THE CITY,IN CONSTRUCTION OF A HOLDING
LANE ON BEACHLAND BLVD. (STATE ROAD SOZ) AND MEMORIAL DRIVE.
THE HOUR OF 9:330 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED
TO WIT:
i
�4
- ¢.4
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RiVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath= rr NOTICE
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being me Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, will
receive sealed bids to the hour of
9:3om., Wednesday, July Is, 1973,
a _L Sz�1' -Z for tha.e following:
TWO (2) New. 1973 Two Door
'Sedans
In the matter of TWO (2) 1968 Chevrolet Nova
_ Sedans will be traded in.
INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS:
_ 1 specifications and bidding forms are
t�L.a.G available at the office of the County
Administrator, Room 115, Indian
River County Courthouse, Vero
in the Court, was pub- Beach, Florida, or will be mailed ori
request.
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF e
fished In said newspaper in the issues of _ — INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, -
FLORIDA
r7 BY: Alma Lee LOy.
— 7 Chairman
June 24,
July 1, 1973.
Affiant rther says that the said Vero Beach Pi ecess-Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has-been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this . ay of A.D.l2
— — ---^— (Business Manager)
(SEAQ (Clerk a66 Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BID WAS RECEIVED, OPENED
AND READ:
i
ARNOLD FORD SALES, INC., VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1973 (2) MAVERICKS - $3,039.72 EACH = $6,079.44
LESS TRADE—INS $25.00
TOTAL BID PRICE $5,254.44
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BID FROM ARNOLD FORD
SALES, INC. FOR TWO -1973 MA VERICKS LESS.TRADE—INS)IN THE
AMOUNT OF $5254.44 AS BEING THE BEST AND LOWEST PRICE MEETING
SPECIFICIATIONS,
-27-
J L 18 1973' DOW 17 ?A .246
.-
THE HOUR OF 9;30.0'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE
DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF
PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of
in the Court was pub -
lisped in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this ---day of. ___ L A.D./ q 73
'qv� v (Business Manager)
(Clerk the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
(SEAL)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, will
receive sbaled bids to the hour of
9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, July 18,
1973, for sale to said County of the,
personal property described below.
Bids will be publicly*opened at this
the regular meeting of the Board on
said date In the County Com-
missioner's Room, County Court
House, Vero Beach, Florida.
ITEM: One new, combination
Pile Driver. and Soil Compactor
Attachment for Hydraulic Ex-
cavator.
Bid forms, specifications and
Instructions for bidders are
available at the office of the County
Administrator, Room 115, County
Courthouse, or will be mailed on -
request.
Any bids received after 9:30 a.m.,
July 18, 1973, wiii be returned
unopened.
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
BY: Aima Lee Loy,
Chairman
June 24, July 1, 1973.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE NOTICE. THERE WERE NONE AND THE COMBINATION PILE
DRIVER AND SOIL COMPACTOR ATTACHMENT WILL BE READVERTISED.
- -28-
COQ 1 ` PACL247
L 18 197 Zii
N� -
COMMISSIONER MASSEY. INFORMED THE BOARD OF A SERIOUS
DRAINAGE PROBLEM IN THE WEST WABASSO AREA.. THIS AREA HAS HAD
DRAINAGE PROBLEMS FOR MANY YEARS,AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO
SOLVE THIS SITUATION. THIS AREA IS LOCATED IN THE SEBASTIAN
RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTo
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED.THAT WE IDENTIFY ALL
THE AREAS THAT HAVE SERIOUS DRAi1IAGE PROBLEMS IN THE COUNTY
AND WORK TOWARDS A SOLUTION~!' .
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COMMISSIONER MASSEY TO INVESTIGATE'
THIS PROBLEM AND PREPARE A REPORT INFORMING THE BOARD OF
THEIR FINDINGS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS.
A BUDGET MEETING WAS SCHEDULED FOR .JULY 19,.19%3,
AT 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M. IN THE -COUNTY COMMISSION ROOM AT THE
COURTHOUSE.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED A BUS TRANSIT SYSTEM FOR THE COUNTY
AND THE NEED TO ESTABLISH A.TRANSIT AUTHORITY IF A BUS TRANSIT
SYSTEM IS IMPLEMENTED. THE BOARD REQUESTED TIME TO REVIEW THE
MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED.
CHAIRMAN LOY BROUGHT TO THE BOARDS ATTENTION THE NEED
TO EMPLOY A LIFEGUARD FOR KIWANIS HOBART PARK.
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN STATED THAT THE LAKE SHOULD BE CLOSED
CERTAIN HOURS AND WHEN OPEN A LIFEGUARD SHOULD BE PRESENT AND THE
SHERIFF`S DEPARTMENT PATROL THE AREA.
THE ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDED THAT THE WHOLE PARK BE
FENCED AND AN -ATTENDANT BE ON DUTY,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EMPLOY A LIFEGUARD AT KIWANIS HOBART
PARK FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. IN THE EVENT THIS LIFEGUARD
POSITION CANNOT BE FILLED, THE LAKE WILL BE CLOSED TO THE
PUBLIC.
_29_
JUL 18 197
17 pAv24
0
0
JUL 181973
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED
AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: -GENERAL'
FUND NOS, 1038- 1094 INCLUSIVE; ROAD AND BRIDGE NOS. 0625 - 0654
INCLUSIVE; -FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND NOS. 0521 - 0528 INCLUSIVE:
SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OFTHE CLERK
OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE
FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED
BY THE RULES OF THELEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD
AND LIST . SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.'
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,* ON MOTION MADE.'
SECONDED AND CARRIED THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:50 O'CLOCK PM.
ATTEST:
LLf.*K
-30-
LHAIRMAN
17 -?Aa�.49
id