The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9/19/1973WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19 1973 AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.I. PRESENT WERE ALMA LEE Loy, CHAIRMAN, EDWARD J. M' SSEY, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR,;.JACK U. DRITENBAS; AND RICHARD P. BOGOSIAN. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; PAUL D. BURCH, ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; L.S. THOMAS AND ELIZABETH FORLANI, DEPUTY CLERKS. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AND ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 24, 1973, THERE WERE NONE AND ON 4OT10N BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 24, 1973, AS WRITTEN. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 51 19731 THERE WERE NONE AND ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, .SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1973, AS WRITTEN. THE HOUR OF 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO WIT: SEP 191973 BOOK 1� FACE x8 �-* VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following is a statement sum- marizing a budget tentatively adopted by the Board of County Com- missionersof Indian River County, Florida, showing receipts of said Board for the fiscal year 1973-74 budgeted by said Board for said fiscal year and showing the proposed expenditures by said Board for said fiscal year proposed to be adopted by said Board as a budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1974, in words and figures as follows: ' GENERAL FUND ESTIMATE OF RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: Federal Sources S 67,250.00 STATE OF FLORIDA State Sources Local Sources 376,230.06--- 76,230.00 Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J, Schumann Ad Valorem Taxes u' 209,500.00— says that he Is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly nei Total Receipts $2,803,345.00 Pct. at -Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of adv Less Pct. oft. 95 Pct. of Estimated Receipts 140,190 00 Cash to be Brought Forward 82,663,155.00 200,000.00-' L E TOTAL EST. RECEIPTS AND GALS. e � . APPROPRIATIONS: $2,863,155.00 . Administrative Taxation $ 714,820.00 ----------� in the matter of ____.____ Judicial 645,000.00 226,150.00 ___ Elections Buildings Planning & Publicity 63,600.0091,200 00 Veterans Service 133,620.00 Fire Control 6,500.00— 206,962.00® Protection & Safety .in the _ _ Sanitation Health & Welfare 167,000.00 Recreation & Culture 164,450 00 131,700.00 Agriculture lisped in said newspaper in the issues Of �.. _ Total Appropriations 16,953.00/ Reserve for Contingencies S2,SM,155.00 155,000.00 G�Resrve for Bal. to Carry Forward L -Reserve Transfer to other Fund 15,000.00 I TOTAL BUDGET 125,000.00 $2,863,155.00 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspl ESTIMATE OF RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, and that the said newspape State Sources $ 711,900 00 been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and Local Sources 62,500 00 as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian Riv Ad Valorem Taxes 295,400.00 for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attache Total Estimated Receipts $1,069,800.00 r tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised an Less 5 Pct. 53,490.00 corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of se 95 Pct. of Total Estimated Receipts 81,016,310.00— tisement for publication In the said news Cash Be I. to be Brought Forward p ��r TOTAL EST. RECEIPTS & BAL. Swom to and subscribed before me this - O �da Ofrl •�_ APPROPRIATIONS: Road Construction $1,566,310.00 and Maintenance 1 $ 903,800.00 Right-of-way Expense 20,000 00� Road Taxes to Municipalities 122,510,0o� Y —' �- New Equipment 80,000.00® Busine Total Appropriations $1,126,310.00/ r 'gr/ Reserve 7 1 Reserve for Special Project 100,00000 4..A Reservefor Bal. to Carry Forward (Clerk o Circuit Court, Indian River Cot TOTAL BUDGET 325,000:00/ 15,000,00/ $1,546,310.00 fSE/W FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND ESTIMATE OF RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: State Sources Local Sources 8 112,500.00 / I i Ad Valorem Taxes 204,200.00 885,205.00. - Total Estimated Receipts t $1,201,905.00 Less5Pct. 1 95 Pct. of Total Estimated Receipts 60,100.00'" $1,141,805.0(` Cash Bal. to be Brought Forward 150,000.001 TOTAL EST. RECEIPTS & BAL. oAPPROPRIATIONS: 1,291,805.00' 4 Judicial S 164,050.00 r Sheriff Other Law Enforcement 977.755 00� 20 00b 00-' Total Appropriations , Reserve for Contingencies $1,161,805.00 - Reserve for Bal. to Carry Forward 111510M.0011 1510W.0011 - TOTAL BUDGET THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT °f CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,291,805.00 . FUND ESTIMATE OF RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Earned Income - WISHED TO BE HEARD, THERE WERE NONE ', Total Estimated Receipts $ 1,000.00✓ r Less 5 Pct. 95 Pct. of Total Estimated Receipts 50.00- $ 950,00 Cash Bat. to AND ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER j 287,551.00 Transfer fromeOtherght Funtlrward % - TOTAL EST. R EC E I PTS & BAL. p�;%PPROPRIATIONS: MASSEY, SECONDED BY 'COMMISSIONER Election—Voting $ 43,501.00 Machines s g 1000000/ 0 Fire Control Building & Equipment Building Improvements 20,000,00 ' p SIEBERT THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY f Parks=Land and Equipment 30 000 00✓ 207,500.00' j Total Appropriations Reserve for Future Capital $ 267,500.00 ADOPTED' THE TENTATIVE BUDGET AS Out...ospitat) 146,001.00 TOTAL BUDGET 5 413,501 00 detailed of Irk of theI cot Court Indian budget t n River County, ADVERTISED, TO BE A TEMPORARY hill meet In the County Commissioner's Florida. The saiid Board Room Indian River County courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, at 8:30 o'clock A.M. on Wednesday, September 19, 1973, for the purpose of hearing requests and Complaints BUDGET AS AUTHORIZED BY THE from the public regarding said proposed budget. i This 6th day of September, 1973. -s-Alma Lee Loy, Chairman STATE COMPTROLLER, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 9ep1: 9, 1973. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, _ FLORIDA. i 3 I i SEP !` 1973 flfl0 �. PAGE JAY SMITH, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR APPEARED REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE A SECOND ".JAWS OF LIFE" RESCUE TOOL. MR. SMITH STATED THAT THE FIRST RESCUE TOOL, APPROVED BY THE BOARD IN MARCH 19730 HAS PROVEN TO BE VERY SUCCESSFUL AND HE IS NOW REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE A SECOND ONE. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS) WILL PAY ONE-HALF THE COST AND THE ROTARY CLUB EAST HAS MADE A DONATION TO THE VERO BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT TO COVER THE REMAINING ONE-HALF. THE TOTAL COST OF THIS ".JAWS OF LIFE" RESCUE TOOL IS $3,825.00. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED .JAY SMITH, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR TO PURCHASE THE ".JAWS OF LIFE".RESCUE TOOL, AS STATED ABOVE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE OUT- OFJlCOUNTY TRAVEL FOR .JAY SMITH, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR TO STARKE, FLORIDA, IN ORDER TO SECURE SURPLUS MATERIALS. GLADYS VIGLIANO, WELFARE DIRECTOR REQUESTED AU111ORIZATION FROM THE BOARD TO HAVE A TELEPHONE INSTALLED IN THEWELFARE OFFICE FOR THE USE OF THE SALVATION ARMY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE SALVATION ARMY HAVING A TELEPHONE INSTALLED IN THE COUNTY WELFARE F9 CE FOR THEIR USE AND AT THEIR EXPENSE. THE ADMINISTRATOR REFERRED TO THE BID PROPOSAL RECEIVED BOWEN ROOFING COMPANY AT THE SEPTEMBER 5, 1973 BOARD MEETING, FOi REROOFING THE JAIL. THIS,BID WAS SUBMITTED WITHOUT A CERTIFIED CHF-tK, CASHIERS CHECK OR BID BOND, WHICH WAS REQUIRED ACCORDING TO11HE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT. THIS BID WAS REFERRED TO .JOHN SCHLITT, THE ARCHITECT WORKING ON THIS PROJECT. THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT MR. SCHLITT DID CONTACT BOWEN, ROOFING COMPANY REGARDING A PERFORMANCE BOND AND HE WAS °-INFORMED THAT THEY WOULD NOT SUBMIT A PERFORMANCE BOND. 3- Book PAGE SEP 9 1973 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED REJECTING THE BID SUBMITTED BY BOWEN ROOFING COMPANY BECAUSE IT DID NOT MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS AS ADVERTISED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMO1. USLY APPROVED READVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR REROOFING THE JAIL 60 DAYS FROM THIS DATE. THE 60 DAY DELAY WAS SUGGESTED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THIS IS THE RAINY SEASON, FRANK ZORC, DEVELOPER OF SUN ACRES SUBDIVISION APPEARED REQUESTING THE ABANDONMENT OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 1, IN SUN ACRES SUBDIVISION. MR. ZORC STATED THAT THIS EASEMENT IS UNDER AN EXISTING HOUSE AND IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A PERFECT TITLE THIS EASEMENT MUST BE ABANDONED. MR. ZORC EXPLAINED THAT WHEN THIS SUBDIVISION WAS - FIRST PLATED THERE WAS A FIVE FOOT EASEMENT ON THE REAR LOT LINE. THESE LOTS WERE LATER EXTENDED AND THEN REPLATED NOT SHOWING THE OLD EASEMENT LINE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ABANDONING THE REAR EASEMENT ON LOT 1 IN SUN ACRES SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY FRANK ZORC, MR. ZORC WILL HAVE THE NECESSARY PAPERS PREPARED AND WILL PRESENT THEM TO THE BOARD TO BE MADE A PART OF THE OFFICIAL MINUTES. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 17TH THROUGH THE 23RD, 1973 AS CONSTITUTION WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. 4 90Ult 18 PAGE �+Jy RESOLUTION No. 73-66 WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United :haters of America gives us the foundation for a free, prosperous and inde. - pendant life for every citizen, but each generation, in time, must work for and claim it; otherwise, through carelessness or indiffer- ence, the rights and liberties we have enjoyed may vanish; and WHEREAS, it is of the greatest consequence that the citizens fully understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution of the United States of America in order to be able to support it properly as, "The greatest document for human liberty in two thousand years of recorded history;" and WHEREAS, the people of the United States should be deeply grateful to their Founding Fathers for the wisdom and foresight they displayed in writing and adopting the Constitution; and i WHEREAS, the independence granted to the American people to enjoy such freedom and liberty, unknown to any other country, should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and activities during Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, as designated by proclamation of the President of the United States in accordance with Public Law No. 915; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, do hereby _proclaim the week of September 17 through 23, 1973,as CONSTITUTION WEEK in Indian River County, Florida, and urge all our citizens to pay special attention during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantages of American Citizenship. is= MADELINE LEECH AND MRS. HAMMON, REPRESENTING THE DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION WERE PRESENT TO RECEIVE THE PROCLAMATION FROM CHAIRMAN.LOY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY ATTORNEY, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE FINANCE OFFICER TO ATTEND THE STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONFERENCE IN MIAMI, FLORIDA ON SEPTEMBER 23RD - 26TH, 1973. CHAIRMAN Loy INFORMED THE BOARD OF A LETTER FROM WILLIAM MCCLURE, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIAN RIVER SCHOOL BOARD, APPOINTING WARREN T. ZEUCH AND THOMAS R. .JONES TO THE TAX ADJUSTMENT BOARD AND DESIGNATED RIVERS ANDERSON AND LOIS KRAMER AS ALTERNATES. ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT .JUDGE D.C.SMITH HAS ISSUED ON ORDER STATING THAT THE JURY BOX FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS IN DANGER OF BECOMING EXHAUSTED AND IT IS ESTIMATED THAT AN ADDITIONAL 350 NAMES SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE JURY BOX. ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT ROSEMARY RICHEY, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IS PREPARING A LIST AND WILL PRESENT IT AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. ATTORNEY BURCH INFORMED THE BOARD OF A LETTER FROM STEVE HENDERSON, ATTORNEY REQUESTING INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD'S POLICY REGARDING THE TAPES OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER'SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING POLICY REGARDING PUBLIC HEARING TAPES BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: THE TAPES WILL BE RETAINED IN THE CLERKS OFFICE FOR 6 MONTHS; THE TAPES WILL NOT LEAVE THE COURTHOUSE BUILDING; ANY ORGANIZATION WISHING TO LISTEN TO THE TAPES OR MAKE THEIR OWN TAPES WILL DO IT AT THEIR EXPENSE AND THEIR TIME. - r PAGE Boot �� ZU CHAIRMAN Loy ASKED THE ATTORNEY WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH REGARDING THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS IN THE ROCK 'RIDGE SUBDIVISION. ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT HE HAS WRITTEN A LETTER TO JOHN V. LITTLE, CITY MANAGER REGARDING THE INSTALLATION OF THE STREET LIGHTS, BUT HAS NOT RECEIVED AN ANSWER, HE STATED HE WILL SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH MR. LITTLE. DEAN LUETHJE, ENGINEER REPRESENTING BREEZY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION APPEARED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SEWER AND WATER i FRANCHISE, BUT FOUND THAT DUE TO A LAPSE OF TIME THIS HAD NOT BEEN ADVERTISED AGAIN. WHILE MR, LUETHJE WAS PRESENT, THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME DISCUSSION BY THE BOARD RE- GARDING CLARIFICATION BY THE DEVELOPER ON INGRESS AND EGRESS INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT THE ROAD FROM U.S. #1 TO THE FLORIDA EAST COAST IS A DEDICATED COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 30 FEET. THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY IS TOO NARROW TO HANDLE THE MOBILE HOMES AND TRAVEL TRAILERS THAT WILL BE COMING INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT AND HE SUGGESTED THAT THIS RIGHT-OF- WAY BE WIDENED TO 60 FEET. MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT IN HIS OPINION, THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE WILLING TO DONATE THE ADDITIONAL 30 FEET AND WILL CONTACT THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD REGARDING DEDICATING 30 FEET TO WIDEN THE RAILROAD CROSSINGi THE BOARD REQUESTED THAT THE DEVELOPER INVESTIGATE THE COST AND AVAILABILITY OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE RAILROAD CROSSING. THE BOARD STATED THAT THIS SHOULD BE DONE BEFORE ANY UTILITY PERMITS ARE ISSUED. -;THE ADMINISTRATOR POINTED OUT THAT THE ABOVE DISCUSSED ROAD CONTINUES TO THE END OF THIS SUBDIVISION. THE COUNTY HAS BEEN GRADING AND MAINTAINING THIS PORTION OF THE ROAD ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT A DEDICATED COUNTY ROAD. THE BOARD STATED THAT THE COUNTY'SHOULD NOT BE MAINTAINING THIS PORTION OF ROAD. MR, LUETHJE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD DISCUSS THIS MATTER WITH HIS CLIENT AND WILL RETURN TO THE BOARD AT A FUTURE MEETING. e 7 -- ,SEP 19 193 .4 ALMA LEE LOY LEFT THE MEETING AT 11:30 O'CLOCK A.M. BOBBY MEADOWS, ADMINISTRATOR, INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL APPEARED AND REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD THE OUTCOME.OF A MEETING BETWEEN THE HOSPITAL'S ENGINEERS AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REGARDING WORK. -THE COUNTY COULD POSSIBLY DO AT THE NEW HOSPITAL SITE. MR. JENNINGS STATED THAT THIS WORK COULD BE DONE WITHOUT DISRUPTING THE ON-GOING WORK OF THE COUNTY. ALMA LEE LOY RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 11:45 O'CLOCK A. M. THE WORK THE COUNTY COULD DO IS: CLEAR AND GRADE THE ACCESS ROAD TO THE HOSPITAL SITE; GRADE PARKING LOTS; MAKE AVAILABLE MARL FOR THE ROAD; DIG DRAINAGE SWAILS.. THE BOARD STATED THEY WOULD DISCUSS THIS LATER IN THE MEETING. THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT 12:20 O'CLOCK P.M. AND RECONVENED AT 1:35 O'CLOCK P.M. CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT THERE WAS A BID OPENING SCHEDULED FOR 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. TODAY AND ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT HAD A BID THEY WISHED TO SUBMIT. THERE WERE NO FURTHER BIDS RECEIVED AND THE CHAIRMAN STATED THESE WOULD BE TAKEN UP LATER IN THE MEETING. THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE.WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO WIT: m>, e� 4 SOQic iv PACE' 2.5 SNOT/te - - - -. I5r •NOTICE ql • p b Wan en rM!•u I for tan a L L' If N ERE9YDireNmN• Mne ataailOr«nm11°r"1° L S' „ L D pSMrn. RN,9r A VERC BEACH PRE5IJOURNAL.r _ M To •M Can-• °s hd,on Rete Covey. fyrme. ns{ Dean m• inM°""°w m...pt, Ta.M• <mlmw mwneett«y I E • Im °ansa. eve we. nano nr. d ' ' Wmk tenININ MPeval b m• Mlmrnry •lone Inc {•m• 1. eta • 7•/m I,ne rMrta • 0•f1F<t 01 . �'• : PNblhhstd arwN ma Matr•n{b m. ]park atlm.N• a Macon a,v« C0w11. atrwW-a mTo 1-1.V1.wW M �a tnr<• +tea .. - F1ofm0.lettWf rt aWtlanlWlY tl00`bm•• m • we.cnm a u a m«a. ntlw SoemxH HI' tmn a p a.e.trb •r ST' ro • .. - Vero teach, Indbus Rhror CONntY, FlOrms tdbn: • a„rN,t• oris. a r«t ,p • • I,m rw Nu•nrmr.Nr aI,rFi. a Tb u coot, T•taCe + . Pemt m m. sow. rIM pl tem • attWfrWn or a rut•t. � ' . - • COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVal lbmv - •orerrnna•,• Lm a: faa t M bat Eau a mr sl: h- owPir ro ms n9M w Nor• - m+..rorr • aars..c• a 1IS.s1 i - AT[ OP FLORIDA PAYS carrw a Nm cmtmm.nt Lot f, th-C. r In that w • pn+en •�. N•Pw ICM IN a•b Gp.rrlml+, W 4 tale r } - Before the aW heray perrdMRY aDpa•rtd J. J, Sthlr..'A it. Wha Orl ea111 fll From flit ROrrM•u carne a DeY.rnrnrt La S. SOt Na„ W Ir,KIY tlpp lett mrn,,PM pOVN Nn9 M N "Int arty d E undtnlaMd ••la eat he h" MSS M Bar of the Veb Reich Frau-loRrnal, •weekly MWSYOer PvWisnad Tevmu•O b SwM, RFet a Ent, m • en•N,c• a of 21 ran; TM,Rf Wm, • QOtmtlron a N m• vV, rbnr t,'er d vN. - ROM A. •{ m.. arta Nora { at Vero S ich N fldan Rr County, Florida; RW the attached CWY of adrtrtnanant, Min• IMmn ave« COanty, ftpm0. ,w Sown Ind aspen. u• ]e- ro m• n9nt Iw ma - N In•e a OO.rrn• - Non. mr Eau of a GoNr - Lal S •alt+en<• el ]IO ]p„nwnf«b • a•SI•np a mens LOr a. Theon ran ww1 1 (..///J -'� •.1? Not b rhe ppnl a bpnnno: Ira N Ntt, cop• p ba{ b Mt ap•p elf9 N A•' •brM I,M a NNe 1 • F��Z TIttM• M Wnt aM DFNWI b rhe herrn a Gar«it Lots !•tt r•pnt a weY a veto atA. Tnarrto rw NpinwlfhrlY C•er«nmtnr Lot . • ..W. d t IT1 )SlwraapWn. brME•Lt alts t a 1a lest: Tn I Mo N M Nm r w,Y • a -,M bo. CPP« d of N ft Nwrw of 80a1n IYaeo •eM• V 200.. 111 , aft c a tm.)i /tyro cop• r VIII,mm.-1 It ate MVa. I. GeVarnmenl Lr S TM a 1.-d 171 afy-N• tope• r Inf poor b.M EntrhaeM T10 fN1nmeetWN M <n.MN R M vMy U^ I. IN, cone. • Nflp,t inpfnbapanr en rhe Etft fam.1Y D•anvl b e.l Pr•r,Ma ' `N`W_ • eat. soft a lfs.l! /•�2_ a4a"'%� Npn a ter r s a u. Na pont aver .- ". Mr �„n,,, Psn„n Isl Ther o«r d GONrnrnMr Lpta Mr to • po-n+: N a Dam •rma ! pf • rW _.. to Ma Ia, IM Nertnwnt«IY OI, et mresut•d • L ) er seN•0•• I4 t--, A Wnttl1M Wn1 Y•9n+a rtYtl _ ' - N 11,1 ['OM/t INS 1 NOM Nb ENt rmnt ar war ham Rin Sot int a Nm Gor«nment Sorin. Rano• At el.l. ,M.sn grvr tawIV. o--. Nam cop• or. SW. RNe •IA; TMnc• M NvrReNrerlY T • Iw DFNItl - 9, T_ IiiWNlY.efp.aN as INrowt: roMO_ NV'VVn•aNlo w•u ' Raw iN Raw M .pLper bl the ImNS OF prNlN b cob 2mlNt ESN d aaa E r rgnr tl 2 o 3 R. AIA a dltrarW a W 1eN; Taeof r.m ° Frem me serrmrnt tpr•p d C'••a°1°Mf LOt 4 sac,_ 14 TOr•ranN It Sven. coca A. rmRtar«a va•a aeM.1A. - d.venN w4t, TMM•afte . NVV n a a.M a w _ at".- NW.. a fS .Igltm, 31' EON. rw ENf NOM me tp,m eM eipnr M Sw•nwrfq.r _lsG�tyw��4 /%73 _ a•romeNt.wNamHf•«n. m• maaN,tl GOY• Mr la 6• anrencea vq-1; Tnan[ew M WNanna3l.$)IHtrome oat tl .ae,Mnp. f a•,ML! a ilo:ib M+ ro E•f1 Ihm a Na Gorarnm.nr Lel S: Tn rw Nerm NOM Nb ENI aor eetWna StoOpren.00'Op'• ro the rent I. sep,MN,NIy M <Mn9N pOm 4•M SMN Famdr 0 am,cr to 4•7 M1•VN Affiant fiat NYS that the Tad Vero BwCh PNoN,Jaumal N a f1mYtPaP.r trd+lldNd at V•ro Reich i Nd 1M, Rirr COfmty, and dW the Nd newipdper hN hemroforo h,b a eprermnnr La s a aNmc, a Ne.0 Int N the DNm a r9a• IO m elms. TMnia .•m • DlNKtm,I a n .toe W. W ro me ten, rw MpmNfr«Ir • OwenMo o•tmut. A oVo,'C N•rm9 IN tpNkIaf�. �' Mtn f:nntinuwtty PObbthed m Nd Itdyn River Calmty, Florida, weekly a,d hN bean entered » Saipr,d CNu ma•1 nytttl ar Me post ONIC. in Vero Reich, M NId IMan RiNr Cewtr•. Flyda n,rw, inmate born RIA shpy a,•ran<e el NO tett, ma• r the cora+o at Im•O, oe*"n M n•er•W an. .atom V om '+ave an M• - - hr 1 De, the y.dr rmar Orececd, ihe brit pvDi,Wtlan N the a.= CVof adver- Pemee ,N D,_ b RT Mal,pm Inf, r0 AWan Man Ka•N tl me sNl,ntk Ocean ane pant a pptw.tr rose MMa w,. o•ad C, - _ tiNmenF and aMiant lurcher Nvs that M Ms r+mf wd Oram,sed arty Ot+san, fi Ot F-" O'sM1 wy, ,�; mane• rexaeme °1p N,a Zen Cemm•fb.n A Y M• Rica! CarrMM ' a .Orpr tW,l im/ mimrrrff, reOam. CMImifNOr1 r miurd fw the pu,pom Of fe0a.ri this ddvC1• or w l21 AN rMl De11 a Gevrnmmt ron to, V- enn.D SCop11. It"m ppm. Co.,... I - COuntY M - Vrro DeaCn. flr.H. M TF/laeY, - TlNnfaftforpublintfOrlintheaNdlfaa••cepa. - RNW. Rams e0 EN+,Maven Rr.er ChW 1Y. SMnVNWIV_f_.-o, Tner,[e seatemaw a, ta], at) -]DPN aM a iN0r410 Want INS QC f ,I L973 Frolba, Inf .M •rC•OrrM the -!W ovua oarcab: Int. w.m pttltcnen •MIs b the rgnt Or u ewreea. N'• rw Nwrmrnrrnv NS N. 1lmaN puaie Nern9 m re•Nan -erste w1. IN, nae aY tRf e:ra a CTuntS afld polNdhed _ �yeP S n •I. TMNYm]Iowatt,o Wnl Np Nat a 5M GwrM•mnt La MtbapentenM91V h l of N,a GOrrmment Lot a tOmmit>•Her• Ot tne•M iIHT 'CAwtY. Fbr,ea. In me ma•en QIrR . Oj tot East et rhe sWbemt towrY Cemf••puSa. n Vna u-, - f$Hitlfp Mil{a[N: 2. }. A orrn N Me beun,rrtr w,Nra Nie GerermnnrLere Z. pr kWert, 0-I10N n: Z. ooM at 1M bpytnWtc eomdalNa Geremm_11.0{ ,r,,,I ate•. GwemmMrlet f; TnaM• COntinrf Nar• mwnmlY M Nine - 0•°raniea]93Mr: Tn«ae r,m wrfaa. en weenn.a Y•s.ptpn0ar W. 19)]. .11.31 P.M INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 20NING COMMISSION ' ' (CNdtrICCilaet CQYYt, bWuof Rim/Comoft, Flodd°I Jw Not.,Nene the WNI tin• in'ttlynf fw NrfR IfN w1C ro B�aRN EONan. •� _ emu - - _ RrNM a e:steMe d 250 1.1; TMMe•rfm an Merbr male. tlatem a /b Mr mint r Nff b me Moen Nlpn WN« a III. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS '" ' - _ )D °fprHb ]0• 20•• Cve •1181t•c tkO Thm INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. - - - 6.vmrnrrl) aif,.a ., MRA /Nr; TI-', mm•n •.noel Sap Mean MyR WNr LOxn• Soumeai,wlr.•reitlm FLORIDA BY: Alma LH ley, 9 - :- bMbr.Maa IO etpM.110' S, No 1nf pont ot eN•mmlo. ' _ - Y a a••yRc. a W.N N.Ml Voro Rin sewn IiM a SnpfO FamM*rchr 10 RJ Mdtip4 •VOvtIU,VmrS, ' 4 • Nb Gwemmml Let e: T'I F DWNihs Dltmkt.•^ --•' - - - •' Yw Wnt NOM M Sa.n Im• a ante fat A -..I N 1•M C. 'FI IRI , .• • • . • .' ' % „ elf a7tOtNl rotM panid seat - M Tf• Ta .. 29•,F,0x: • , I, •. .. - SM°•u rnMst •amt d Oererrr asn9e n, tkWrly- • W_: AYY W.IYMp krs row SiDNot Frem rhe NN11NN CPnef tl • do -Hood perm: Ft the So, VVyl tether a N'0 C'p'r°1°p•t Let L Stctron .. '\ •{• OeWHnN„t W 4 EKrbn I4 16 T.wnfnm]SNalr. Ranp. a0. @n1, rw WN1 °IoM the Sarin Tpmmb •J35oWn. Range f0. ant , Ent •Imp M Sawn +r,e tl Ger W • - OM d Nm Germntmenr LP e e of 1.0 b RN, .•Seance uam eN a o Wptr r19nrawaYa Nate RPtl - • .. QiftN,ttd91pfn1: TMte w,m •aNlecl,end SltleerfN.00'00^ AIA, mm pent d tNghnbpt _ < . - .•-.- - b as Npnr fm, Sana .- I Nb.00 tett: TMMe TMMrrw NrlhWstImlY Nang ° °t nt 1yt of wH • - - -'. •' ' .. -'�.. .•• .. . •,: ' . - .am • tterlNlyn d Nares. N• W ' Naynp a to the; Tneeit IN wn+rlonta -. b IM rw N•rmaaa+«tr •ynr•MInbtNa dw.. et ISO IaN, core r 3wtnWHIr1Y I- b mr Mien Nia. Wath tl auenc• d t0A Sean 1ht - ro d ta• m NI'd m iRe - • .; '- fi„F Ft rl�..l Be Allenik Ocean antl pane a aeln9 MtlliMnfl.n•eVhni.Yn. Devtrnmrtat W L Nd pNM Wnlamt YMt _ INMISI34teaf fgnt a ver a vaf! ReM A IA - - ,INat SerRnwntnlY NO Int cora r Tont• Mm a d~_ tatpM fad SINN,.. _ - ro angiM Nene a S] aNrM. itn %: Thence thw So - taly .loop Nmt caleM . .. c "c �• •� I�le HtOb• NpinwsyNY 3B 00 aft-. a " NNr To- � R_ 0 1 Lot 61 94 Mto"NN, ar 'b .9 rent - •. . •i� Ena the S..~ >bo,-. iTVdi•1•ace M - - Hrmr a •N. aorrnmem W ar Tonce <Hrrnve Ner• 7.0.00 IHC: Tett Nh an Itry, `VV, r y.9 -p7• .a- - - 4Mf.mNY an tpnf <pRN ° aataK•a59Sctet. Thence ]]•• rw E-, • a Mahe• a • _ - .. W,m a a e. ]0' ro 1e0.]t feet: Tnbaa m M Melo/ MOI. 10 doymr•. 01• . . , ion, Rb Yron1 Yon NrtneatyNY • ko'N a••rw N,vmen+rlr•tlntaM• - - - daNM.tl 1<O lHt nblap bn Nome Mr- Nan war« a the d 175 N 1N1bM WW ryMtl Way a $tam Raad AIA; Tn.etet - - - ; Atlantic OHan; T. -C. 11mN1tlr Nm MfM Nyn WO « nm an'WIVW .Mie a to H9ren Wn NrtnwNlrlY ` _ MN Ma SeameNmny tllrictian lb No PM-1aV ..04.It NSM Nb vent,NM.1 way , . • '� Y• i•mNY Ontrkt aamnlpa]lS tea NtopaMd ft - • N Rti_ITNd13 Fam4Y D•txiN• _Ve IV- � S m FNaaY Oexkt ro-8 1 ►I . - _ O/ AN WI ort a Gov<rr,maa 8w,nnS 0•SnkL - _••. -_ -. f for T. baelkn Ie. TawnRfa Aaeufn, RNmtfp@n1.IM•an Coma, O) • porter p,eM tonramrnp •R _ ,. . Rn« IQrtda. ISH. ENt a vN• Rohe mat W, N Gerttnram. Lets L L S L Ste— W Tlrv,aniD 33 ININ, _ - _ • r - _ AIA. INf aM Htts'.9 tH Ia1pYLrF„ertala: RFVI N Ear, tmmen ache Cpr•Iry. Firms. IYm9 Wt,` a St.,. RNNS _ t. A priN M the Nrm•N•1 AIA con mm -Ml the ftto 1p f.TrNv d NIw Gamtmint W i ff10r•prRCWr1Yt1.WDNN: ...'i an -VII. at try MranMien of A- ". j _ .. • ardr•flnR N the Normwnr carrot a Nia GevfmmMl W Rin Sap, v a tad Do— IMC W) aM IM VRNt Cyt w t . . ). 1 7.Ion FAN •bM the Norm the way of Stre RW AM •the - ' � f •... W -Fol o dfuancf a m NN; TI.Nf Mman Mt«ar•n91a0 IRON• WN, NNw Nb so'Ah iM a Goyarnront W r • _ t 974.9 b W I0••rw bevMW,1Y en,- a t)S int: Tone Ft - - - • ding,.. 2153/ ML Trance Wim an hetero~ NVW w IV ynt path mtnm run Nrm • to. 'to .. y • i dearth. 7Y 21• swm• -4,11, . 01.1 e a 175.17 • ottlWi. W S) tlW- 70• b fM mit Iw NrmwnMtY • 1 c Not. ave• r tea. N the coat IOet away d Sat. Road AIAI•bMlMmn .tante. ]00 sea: Tntnc• vete a N oeg,M. or b 1 - e ' _ TneNe N__VNIy NSM alp fto., ,tar NrmW _' • • _ NId ENVril-,..ntmia tl 7N fw. o, "I' to ma ay,p,00 d •3000 NN! Torg• Cel .Nyc,•on to N INN- - - - b CKrNnNmOrMrlt Ubl1laeaN dt I•OWWeematNtf .Ntl romtIxWaNpNWm - • _ .. "I @,rotroa ahe-1rttl .40r- •00N m.vettrna Naeremeb � LMtpabt a 13,MW0 0'roin ryaw.yr t f4NMI-o. ._. c L All mM OerI IyYp ftftw-q �•b a Dane pl theNrm •• GNnL01) b Nm •enN ` �t Y .. _ q ielaN er me as ice' ..nr epMl a p,mp )a° rH N+ a m• wet - g ._ . .. - (--• fgrtMlnent lot 4 SKNpr 16 wa tlSa R , a N aM 1 A ,nrdtfOM Nie N.YIA , • Y TwnNip ]3.oVm. R•IIIx t0. arwp IW a GOranmw.t Lot a1 • 1 Eau ENI M Seen YW of bevtrmmenr Wf• T t w,M I Ra,t • M Mbf N tl - ... b rhe IeR . _ .. Y dsla9,N�•ep r MNm.Nr a dwNa uNdNmctn It aaflaoln - - - r 4 fire I t r,Yf Soumvn •Stl eD ftp•1: TnerNe MN,�r anpr•ar AatgrfN.IB•m'•bey - - - ? L Mlic,iana Otlp„II tl,� INC SoutnWesterlY • atslwCed tse ecce: i ,_ 4 I ro me W fw NeetMNbrlt• a d,u nc. tl 6N Mn core p Ft. anectmna be•ptN.6- - V T to'a ro IN'.0 run NONRrNtMr • atstp,a a ISS ]I INr b • pat eft •Aam Ocean •gran pearl a MpinaM. TMncsrtt,KlnMq On .I. Nrm IMt_IF andGov-1 V - r^ +i 1•at m .Mee <Hrt•. • SDYtRrBtl«IY Lor L ft" aa,Mt Wt", a the S , 1 630 Mt cope r Int: T.- V".• tlNlrlbri vent N9nr.1 war a "No. RNe I L mON ° wwmways ro AM _ L pNP•br aemr: ICN b.pantP Mpsa.M l,Ma p-1m1H _ • I . - F .Ne GOrtmmenl La f Ir•M rte EWof"%VNV• of `'� - • •:: tat S b the Wt1,WCf1 <pen a W !� Tn 1 r!n GtNillm,Matf , t - ' ... - Nle Geammtef Lae TMnn • a ul ete.en. se• I]'• t. tR• - .. - - - I eon,hae NpmvmtHtym {ams � N . auN.c• N Sts tin; •bn1 N ImnI,+ulr OntaMfva Na]IrN roaoeMr. - . IeNPprLfWlNimrb aro• .memrNw 1-u Nbpanrry«,neveHn•t bammWIwVONra ... • _ - • �. - Mc1i4e.a1 Mt cop• p y rhe Moan Ipnl N War er s••y aoM •IM ., - . - IN taco wN« a IM�A«,yNow Tom py atparb N'e•^t�tM anal �. �. ' - L' • • • b YMsn Myr, Warty IIM b • Hr' rainN Normvef•«ry IM prNIN ro arm I]0 fee+ N'n1.1 ., • t• ': . -I- N nee me Wnt Irons a Wer a %I•,. , , ., - pohfa -.N by from p�Ul.bmpa ilmq W AIR It 0$10 lore T pt p Ins. b a HM1 oDON,N L - ' .,IVIN0 O..W tO Tt) MWliplf '41A ONM1kt. N7. Orth a lana tmbMMp Nq perrrmitV N rntR nW paN St.. 0 ep n•pMp say.M Sym POM AIA: TV— r ,. - , - - - WIS q DOv«mment Lett 4 0. /. a, NprnnabrlY •• NH, ..l• b - 3n1.. Ia. Tmrnln,p ]1 feY1R, R." 4 Eau. MMM ft- Cowl. tN0 Sym RN. AIA It a•uNNe a Is tea b me WNr IV. N, I• hj - , . t parly.W.,s rNur,DN ai NNOWf: a Y,0 va•p Rud AIR, 11pr¢e fur SOV1......... .oIq ' ) :. . • � - • -- . t•mmNgmp a rhe sa.,Mn+ ls tam Wra, trot a war ic.ey '- , r •' b<rman rla N rL•moa! n•MLOn `w N«, 0.NSt.'t. Na) N GtheorwNrw.n.alIrml L•eem1 '• - �••t. ' , nWm tomm.N«1 G • � ! •M N .1•m. - • '• ��, .. IN{IF<ta OI.TOfHr r0 nw F•a• v,m RMO AIA 5Y • - ripe a waT a Na Mpn4�w9{ nn:np�IMnte tnapaa teem RIA stMa 0: 0.cM1R1 r0 R 7 Mlrllra• f , • 4 YqM a w•Y • amm.m It 2" Pw.Ny DNRat. .- Iti A pa«N a. 1p+d twl.RrMp f 1 . - ' fare. Nb "yo t •r rlpni N•pIN b ni a weY rw Not. Drt q GOr,lnT.'••• 1plt S [ L setNon. m, le+rnanlD l) bVm. RIVN F M f maaNMyAers,N.cra Tlp Ml. iMncr rIm O• mcnm a N RMp•tSENt,bd•M , I.Mit flm,dt. .m a O«f1VlbtY A , " - ' .N 1/'•yrhe t,vmre bum••a1«m a N>NM. I arar.Non Wm••• Prfrn DW pp,faH•/ rpMt of +({I . ) 'SEP I Bo0!( XP: PA s£ 4U 6 � � s EARL PADGETT AND GERMAN SUAREZ, DEVELOPERS OF VERO MAR SHORES, APPEARED AND MR. PADGETT MADE THE PRE- SENTATION OF THIS PROJECT TO THE BOARD, THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE LOCATED SOUTH OF THE CITY LINE AND NORTH OF THE MOORINGS. IT EXTENDS EAST TO THE OCEAN AND WEST TO THE RIVER: INVOLVES APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES r- 1800 UNITS; AND WILL HAVE AN OVERALL DENSITY OF MORE THAN O UNITS PER ACRE, BUT LESS THAN 10 UNITS PER ACRE. MR. PADGETT STATED THAT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY BORDERING ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THIS PROPERTY HAS PRESENTED AN AFFIDAVIT STATING HE ISNOT OPPOSED TO THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY OR THE PROJECT. MR. PADGETT.STATED THAT THERE IS AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET OF OCEANFRONT LAND THAT WILL BE DONATED TO THE COUNTY AS A PUBLIC PARK, MR. PADGETT FURTHER STATED THAT THIS PROJECT WILL BE IN THE PLANNING STAGE FOR APPROXIMATELY TWO TO THREE YEARS AND WILL TAKE EIGHT TO TEN YEARS TO COMPLETE, THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK AND JEROME KRAMER, 985 REEF ROAD, REPRESENTING THE VERO BEACH ASSOCIATION APPEARED STATING THAT THIS PROJECT COMES BEFORE THIS BOARD WITH A DENIAL FROM THE ZONING COMMISSION. MR. KRAMER STATED THAT THIS PROJECT QUALIFIES AS A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, AS STATED UNDER FLORIDA STATUTE 380, AND HE QUESTIONED:`WHETHER THIS DEVELOPMENT'HAS APPLIED FOR REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVAL. .JAMES BEINDORF, ENGINEER, STATED THAT THERE ARE NEW REQUIREMENTS FROM THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND VERO 14AR SHORES DEVELOPMENT HAS APPLIED FOR REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVAL AND COMPLIED WITH THE NEW REQUIREMENTS. MR. KRAMER ASKED THAT THE PETITIONS FILED WITH THE ZONING COMMISSION REQUESTING THAT THE ZONING OF VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT AND .JONNIE DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT (A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT JUST -SOUTH OF VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT) REMAIN IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONING BE ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD.` ¢ ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THAT THE PETITIONS FILED IN THE ZONING DEPARTMENT OFFICE REGARDING THE REZONING OF VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT AND .JONNIE DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD. IO e SEP 19 7973 max 18 PAGE 27 MR. KRAMER STATED THAT THE COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT AT THIS MEETING ARE COMMENTS REGARDING THE REZONING FOR THE VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT AND ALSO THE BONNIE DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS THE NEXT SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING TODAY AND THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF THE VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT. MR. KRAMER FURTHER STATED THAT NO REZONING SHOULD TAKE PLACE UNTIL THE MASTER PLAN IS ADOPTED. .JACK STURGIS, APPEARED AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS FAMILY HAVE OWNED PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROJECT AND APPROVED OF THIS PLAN AND THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY. LLOYD BERNEGGER♦ REPRESENTING THE VERO BEACH ASSOCIATION APPEARED AND PRESENTED A SURVEY REGARDING REZONING. MR. BERNEGGER STATED THAT THE VERO BEACH ASSOCIATION IS IN FAVOR OF GROWTH, BUT IT MUST BE CONTROLLED.GROWTH, HE ALSO STATED THAT THE SERVICE FACILITIES AT THIS TIME CAN NOT HANDLE THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THIS PROJECT WOULD BRING TO THE BEACH AREA. THE FURTHER STATED THAT THE MASTER PLAN SHOULD BE ADOPTED BEFORE ANY ZONING CHANGES ARE MADE. VALERIE MCINTOSH APPEARED IN SUPPORT OF THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY. .JANEROBINSON APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY. O ALBERTA BIRCH APPEARED IN SUPPORT OF THIS REZONING :AND THIS PROJECT. NINA HAYNES APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING JAND QUESTIONED MR. PADGETT REGARDING A MOTEL BEING INCLUDED IN r - THE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. MR. PADGETT ANSWERED 'THAT THERE ARE PLANS TO BUILD A CLUB HOUSE ON THIS PROPERTY WHICH k IWOULD-'BE THE FOCAL POINT OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS CLUB HOUSE WOULD -ALSO HAVE ROOMS AS AN ACCOMMODATION FOR MEMBERS AND THEIR GUESTS, z PC s 9D0K '18 PAGE. 2.000 BILL ANDERSON, AZAELA LANE, APPEARED IN OP- POSITION TO THE REZONING. WALTER NIELSON, REPRESENTING RIVERSIDE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INFORMED THE BOARD OF THE TYPE OF WORK MR. PADGETT HAS DONE AND CTTE.D: RIVERSIDE GARDENS AS AN EXAMPLE. THOMAS F. VALENZO, REPRESENTING VERO ISLE ASSOCIATION APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING AND IN FAVOR OF A MORATORIUM ON SPOT ZONING. EDWARD W. SCHMORR, INDIAN RIVER DRIVE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF SERVICE FACILITIES, NAMELY THE BRIDGE, BOBBYE KENDRICK, 1936 SURFSIDE TERRACE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY, PAUL REDSTONE APPEARED IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT ANDTHE REZONING, } HEPBURN WALKER, ST. CHRISTOPHER BEACH APPEARED ANDIAGAIN QUESTIONED MR. PADGETT ON THE MEANING OF A CLUB HOU$E FACILITY. MR. PADGETT AGAIN EXPLAINED THAT THE CLUB HOUSE WOULD BE 4N ACCOMMODATION FOR MEMBERS AND THEIR GUESTS. t DON WILCOX, DEVELOPER OF THE .JONNIE DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING TODAY APPEARED AND STATED THAT THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE WHO WANT CONDOMINIUM LIVING ANDIIT IS VERY POPULAR. SWIMMING POOLS, GOLF COURSE , TENNIS COURTS, SECURITY (PEOPLE CAN MOVE AROUND), ARE LUXURIES OF CON MINIUM LIVING AND MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. HARRY WALKER, REEF ROAD REQUESTED THE BOARD TO HIS REQUEST AND ANY OTHER REQUESTS FOR REZONING IN THE BEACH AREA. 12 - f00�� PAGE 21,941 1.3 DR. HERBERT KALE, PRESIDENT OF THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY APPEARED AND REQUESTED THAT THE STATEMENT FROM THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY BE MADE A PART-�OF THESE MINUTES. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED MAKING THE STATEMENT FROM THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY A PART OF THESE MINUTES. PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY P. O. Box 1833 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 W. W. Siebert Indian River County Commissioner Jjn STATEMENT of Pelican Island Audubon.Society concerning requests for rezoning of the south beach area presented at public hearings before the Indian River County Zoning Commission, September 6, 1973 and the Indian River County Commissioners, September 19, 1973. The following statement outlines the position of the Society on the proposed rezoning requests on the barrier island south of Vero Beach, in accordance with policy approved by the Board of Directors. We have stated in the past that we wish to see the present character of the barrier island in Vero Beach and Indian River County be maintained--i.e., primarily residential and low density. Rezoning of the land to a classificiation that will greatly contri- bute to an actual alteration of this present character is not consistent with the aims of many organizations and people in this county --business, governmental, public, private, advisory, and civic --all of whom insist that they, too, want to preserve and protect the present character of our area. Although we agree that the proposed Veromar project may be well designed and considerate of the surrounding community, the fact remains that this project is only the first of many waiting In the wings for this part of the south beach. Rezoning of this parcel today vall set the pattern for the entire area. And without drawing any conclusions, about whether or -not this classification of zoning is right or wrong for the future of the south beach (frankly, we do not now know the answer to that question), we must ask the question "Are we ready for this today?" Several months ago a member of the zoning commission stated that he could not vote for the rezoning of the south beach area until provisions for supportive facilities of water, sewage, and transportation, particularly a second bridge, were available and -in existence. And until that time we can not logically allow the tremendous growth that will surely follow this rezoning. The life support systems of the entire south beach area including construction materials and services, water, food, ,-police protection, hospital and medical services, garbage and _.trash collection, domestic services, and, in the future, sewage _treatment are all based on the mainland. All of these, except 'water,.must cross the one and only bridge now in existence. 13 - "This 3s 100 % recycled paper" BOOK PAGE J (PIAS Statement on Rezoning of South Beach) -2- The most recent statement from the D.O.T. is that the second bridge is now scheduled for completion in late 1976 --three years from now, barring no further delays. We can see no benefits for the people or the economy of this community from a pell-mell rush to develop the barrier island south of Vero Beach before all the necessary provisions for sustaining the projected population are provided, or, at the least, are in the process of being provided. This is still true today, as it was several months ago, and, as a matter of cold reality, as it will be for the next few years. We can not help but repeat our question --"Why the big rush?" If the commission members decide that they can disregard the lack of a second bridge for the next three years, and the inadequacy of other services and utilities for the projected population, and are prepared to materially alter the future character of the beach area, and, thus, are inclined to grant this rezoning request, then we respectfully ask you to first ascertain the major impacts of this particular project, and related projects currently proposed, or projected in the future for the south beach area: For example: (1)What are the projected tax revenues to be received by the county from these projects over the next 5 years? (2) What are the projected requirements and costs for the following: a. Police protection. Will this require hiring of additional sheriff's"deputies, vehicles, and administrative support? b. Fire protection. How many additional Firemen, vehicles, etc., will we have to provide? c. Schools. How many children will live here? How many additional teachers and classrooms will we need? Buses? d. Hospitals. How many additional beds will be required? How many additional ambulance trips engendered? Will this require enlargement of volunteer ambulance facilities and volunteers? e. Governmental services. How many additional publicy supported personnel and services will be required by this population? f. -Transportation. How many vehicles will be added to the road system? HOW many more vehicles:crossings will be added to the' present traffic on Merrill Barber bridge? When is 4-laning of &-1-A scheduled in relation to completion of these projects? g. Service personnel. How many new domestics and other type personnel will be required. Where will their families live, and what will their impact be on city -county services and transportation arteries? h,4 Environmental impacts. (1) Sewage treatment -Will full tertiary treatment be provide&? If only secondary, can 90-100` treatment be guaranteed? Where will effluent be dumped? What are present city and county plans c6bcerning sewage treatment for this area in the future? i- (2) Rainfall runoff -Where will runoff from roads, parking b— g pe. w �c- u,r p�ou,I 18 1.AbL a. (PIAS Statement on Rezoning of South Beach Area) -3- areas, lawns, rooftops, etc., be collected and disposed of? Will it be treated to remove oil, fertilizers, pesticides, etc., before being dumped into the Indian giver and the nearby aquatic preserve?. Runnoff .from lands housing several thousands of people will be considerable after each rainfall. (3) Mangrove and estuary protection, There exists a well-developed fringe of Red Mangrove along the east bank of the Indian River. These are extremely valuable trees vital to the continued well-being of the river and aqu9tic preserve. What plans have been made to insure the preservation of these trees and the nearby shallow water habitat? We are confident that the developers and the city -county planning department with the assistance of various other govern- mental agencies can arrive at answers *6 most of these vital questions. After that we can determine what actions will be -required to insure that we can meet the needs of the area. The time has come when those in position of responsibility and authority --such as zoning commissioners and city or county commissioners --can no longer determine the future course of a community by pieceme=al, off -the -top -of -the -head zoning and site plan decisions. We would be foolhardy indeed to make no attempt to obtain as much information as we need before making these decision's. In a rare instance of unanimity the Citizens Advisory Board, the Chamber of Commerce, the Vero Beach Association and the Audubon Society agreed that questions and answers on the impact of projects and zoning for projects were vital to the planned growth of Indian River County. We were greatly disappointed to see the capacity for this type of planning excised out of the requested budget supplement for the planning department in 1973, but we hope that the city and county will fund this in 1974. The zoning requests under consideration certainly point up the dire need for impact determinations. We want to make it clear that we are not opigRed to development of the south beach area. At the moment we really do not know what would be best for the area. We hear much conflicting opinion about what multiple family zoning will and will not do. We feel that -.the facts and the alternatives of one type of development or the -other have not been adequately presented to the people of the area or the county. We feel this can be remedied by thorough study of the master plan, due to be presented in a few weeks. We all need more information be, -_,fore we can take the final steps that -are being requested here today --actions that will set in concrete the direction the south beach area will go in development. :g (PIAS Statement on R2zoning of South Beach area) -4- In summary, we make two recommendation for your consideration: 1. We urge you to consider the desires and feelings of the majority of the residents and landowners now residing in Indian River County. If this means postponement of your rezoning decision until after the master plan has been discussed and accepted, then that is the step you should take. 2. If you feel you can reasonably disregard these feelings for what you may justifiably consider a wiser course of action through immediate rezoning, then we strongly urge you to first seek the answers to the questions of economic, environmental, and social ,impact of these proposed projects, before we are locked into them. most of us here today who are participating in these deliberations have only a brief time left on this earth, yet, the decisions made today will affect generations yet to come. We urge restraint. The land will not melt away or blow away today or tomorrow. Let us obtain all the facts we can, then set our goals, and then, only lastly, go about the necessary rezoning to meet these goals, if that is what we decide to do. GreggsW. Smith Vice -President on Society z GRANT WORTMAN, SURFSIDE ESTATES APPEARED AND STATED THAT FROM SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMITS TO THE COUNTY LINE SHOULD REMAIN IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONING, RICK MOORE APPEARED IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT AND THE REZONING, CLARK DEPUE, SOUTH AlA, APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO fH*lm11411lffl ADMIRAL BENJAMIN MOORE, SMUGGLERS COVE, APPEARED IN OPPOSIITON TO THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY, ADMIRAL MOORE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY WEST OF AIA IS LOW AND SUSCEPTIBLE TO FLOODING AND RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE SET ASIDE AS A CONSERVATION AREA, " BILL ROBINSON, BONITA BEACH, APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY, MARY LANE MCMILLAN APPEARED IN OPPOSIITION TO THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY, CHAIRMAN LOY READ A TELEGRAM FROM WILLIAM HILL, 603 TULIP LANE. STATING HE WAS AGAINST THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF SERVICE FACILITIES. CHAIRMAN LOY READ A LETTER FROM ALDIS P. BUTLER, WHICH STATED THAT HE WAS IN FAVOR OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORTED THE ZONING REQUEST. CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF THERE IS ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THIS PUBLIC HEARING, THERE WERE NONE, CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR HIS RECOMMENDATIONS. MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT IF THIS AREA WAS DEVELOPED AS A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT THERE WOULD NOT BE AS MUCH OPEN SPACE AS WITH THIS VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT, HE STATED ='THAT THIS IS.A GOOD TYPE DEVELOPMENT, MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THIS AREA COULD BE REASONABLY REZONED FOR MULTI—FAMILY DWELLINGS .:MR. PADGET STATED THAT THE REQUEST FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT—OF—WAY FOR AIA HAS BEEN AGREED_aUPON.: - 17 - { MR. JENNINGS WAS ASKED TO OUTLINE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS PLANS FOR IMPROVING AIA. MR. JENNINGS STATED THAT STATE ROAD AIA IS A PRIMARY ROAD IN THIS COUNTY AND IS ON THE D.O.T. LIST FOR IMPROVEMENT. THE BOARD IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO DEMAND THAT AIA BE IMPROVED; WE CAN ONLY REQUEST THAT IT BE DONE. CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED MR. PADGETT IF HE WOULD CONSIDER CHANGING THE DENSITY TO S UNITS ON THE WEST AND RIVER SIDE AND 12 UNITS ON THE EAST AND OCEAN SIDE AND AN OVERALL DENSITY OF B UNITS PER ACRE. MR. PADGETT AGREED TO THIS. THERE WERE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS AND A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR REZONING AS ADVERTISED WITH ONE EXCEPTION: THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THIS PROPERTY FROM THE OCEAN TO THE RIVER REMAIN IN R -IA, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING, AND THE OVERALL DENSITY OF THE PROJECT BE SET ATS UNITS PER ACRE."' THIS MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER DRITENBAS, THAT THE VEROMAR SHORES PROJECT APPLICATION FOR REZONING, AS REQUESTED BY EARL PADGETT AND GERMAN SUAREZ BE DENIED, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HIS REASONS FOR THE DENIAL OF THIS APPLICATION IS THAT THIS WOULD BE THE INITIAL STEP i FOR MULTI -FAMILY ZONING IN THIS AREA AND HE FEELS THAT THE SOUTH BEACH AREA SHOULD REMAIN IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONING; SERVICES HAVE NOT KEPT UP WITH THE GROWTH; AND HE ALSO MENTIONED THE SPIRALING INFLATION IN LAND VALUES, COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS STATED THAT HIS REASONS FOR DENYING THIS REZONING ARE: THE DIRE NEED OF ANOTHER BRIDGE ACROSS THE INDIAN RIVER TO SERVE THIS AREA; THE NEED FOR IMPROVING A1A. WITH NO INDICATION WHEN"THIS WILL BE COMPLETED; THE IMPACT THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BRING ONTO THOSE TWO MEANS OF GETTING TO TIfiIS AREA; THE STRONG OPPOSITION BY RESIDENTS LIVING IN THIS IMMEDIATE VICINITY. COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN STATED AS HIS REASONS FOR DENYING THIS REZONING THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THIS PIECE OF LAND; SERVICES SUCH AS, HOSPITALS AND ROADS AND BRIDGES ARE NOT ADEQUATE AT THIS TIME, AND WE HAVE NO IDEA WHEN THEY WILL BECOME ADEQUATE. -1B® SEP 191973 BOOK �. �kGt THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT WAS MADE BY CHAIRMAN LOY,' "IN CHECKING THE MINUTES, I REALIZED THAT I APPARENTLY MY REASONS FOR DENIAL OF.THE DID NOT MAKE A STATEMENT RELATIVE TO PROPOSED REZONING APPLICATIONS THAT WERE BEFORE US ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1973: THE VERO MAR PROJECT AND THE APPLICATION OF .JONNIE DAHLSTROM, ETA.L PROJECT, FOR THE RECORD, I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: THE PROPOSED CHANGES WERE CONTRARY TO THE ESTABLISHED LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE AREA AS EVIDENCED BY THE MATERIALS SUB- MITTED REGARDING THE GRADUAL, ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA ACCORDING TO EXISTING ZONING REGULATION, THE PROPOSALS WOULD ALTER THE DENSITY PATTERN WHICH HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ABIDED BY OVER THE PAST MANY YEARS, THESE PROPOSALS WOULD CREATE EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT A TIME WHEN THIS BOARD IS RECEIVING SYSTEMATIC COMPLAINTS RE- GARDING THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON A -IA SOUTH, AND WORKING DILIGENTLY TO SECURE A MUCH NEEDED SECOND BRIDGE TO SERVE THE. AREA, THE GENERAL SAFETY OF THE CITIZENS WOULD BE AFFECTED -UNTIL THESE PROJECTS ARE ACCOMPLISHED, THE PROPOSALS WOULD BE A STIMULUS TO DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AT A TIME WHEN UTILITIES AND GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO HANDLE THE ANTICIPATED IMMEDIATE NEEDS, THE PROPOSALS WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PRESENT PROPERTY VALUES FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMEOWNER, � THESE ARE,MY.PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS BASED ON THE MATERIALS AND INFORMATION AS PRESENTED AND AVAILABLE TO ME," soot vat 010du S• 4 J THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT WAS MADE BY CHAIRMAN LOY,' "IN CHECKING THE MINUTES, I REALIZED THAT I APPARENTLY MY REASONS FOR DENIAL OF.THE DID NOT MAKE A STATEMENT RELATIVE TO PROPOSED REZONING APPLICATIONS THAT WERE BEFORE US ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1973: THE VERO MAR PROJECT AND THE APPLICATION OF .JONNIE DAHLSTROM, ETA.L PROJECT, FOR THE RECORD, I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: THE PROPOSED CHANGES WERE CONTRARY TO THE ESTABLISHED LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE AREA AS EVIDENCED BY THE MATERIALS SUB- MITTED REGARDING THE GRADUAL, ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA ACCORDING TO EXISTING ZONING REGULATION, THE PROPOSALS WOULD ALTER THE DENSITY PATTERN WHICH HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ABIDED BY OVER THE PAST MANY YEARS, THESE PROPOSALS WOULD CREATE EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT A TIME WHEN THIS BOARD IS RECEIVING SYSTEMATIC COMPLAINTS RE- GARDING THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON A -IA SOUTH, AND WORKING DILIGENTLY TO SECURE A MUCH NEEDED SECOND BRIDGE TO SERVE THE. AREA, THE GENERAL SAFETY OF THE CITIZENS WOULD BE AFFECTED -UNTIL THESE PROJECTS ARE ACCOMPLISHED, THE PROPOSALS WOULD BE A STIMULUS TO DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AT A TIME WHEN UTILITIES AND GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO HANDLE THE ANTICIPATED IMMEDIATE NEEDS, THE PROPOSALS WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PRESENT PROPERTY VALUES FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMEOWNER, � THESE ARE,MY.PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS BASED ON THE MATERIALS AND INFORMATION AS PRESENTED AND AVAILABLE TO ME," soot vat 010du STATEXENT BY W. W. SIEB:st'?T, JR. REGARDING DALSTROX-WILCOX AN -D V ,Ko -MAR REZONING APPLICATIONS M It has come to my attention that it is necessary for me to enter into the official records, my reasoning for denying the rezoning applications for the Dalstrom- Wilcox project and the Vero -Mar project. Arguments in support and opposition were almost identical in their presentation; hence, my reasoning for denial was the same for both projects. The impact on available and projected governmental services would have a detrimental effect on the.safety and welfare of our county. State Highway A -1-A does not now have capacity to handle the additional automobile traffic that • would be generated and improvements to this road are, at best, uncertain. We have but one bridge to service the South Beach and it is inadequate to handle todayAs traffic. Although a second bridge is in the planning stages, the immediate prospect for obtaining this critically needed facility is only marginal. Threats. of legal action by the City of Vero Beach and private citizens lead me to believe there could be a serious delay in obtaining this facility. We will soon start construction of a new hospital but we have been warned there may be a shortage of beds the day it opens. The addition of another floor is already under consideration. Recent legislation has reduced state participation in the funding of Indian River County schools, placing additional responsibility on local effort. Our school board has already expressed concern about how overcrowding will affect their goal of quality education. Double sessions have been mentioned. Although the City of Vero Beach has apparently agreed to service the area in question with water, this agreement is subject to reconsideration. A change in attitude by the current City Council i SEP 19 1973 18 a'..3? has confused this situation. Areas outside thA city that were previously to be serviced by them are now indefinite. A county -wide sewer and water system has been tabled and there is no binding agreement with the city to service any of the unincorporated areas of the county. We do not presently enjoy a county -wide fire protection program. There is only one fire station on the entire island. As it is municipally owned and administered, their first obligation is to city residents. Their ability to take on additional territory is suspect. A county -wide system could eventually solve this problem but progress toward this end has been painfully slow due to political and financial difficulties. These are only the most serious service problems and should in no way infer that they are the only problems we can.anticipate. 1 shall not attempt to review the hours of testimony offered by single family property owners except by way of summation. It is important to understand I considered it my responsibility to weigh the evidence as presented, assign it alvalue and make a judgment decision based on t what I thought was in the best interests of our county.' z There is no question in my mind that a vast majority I of the property owners in the South Beach area felt very strongly th4t this rezoning would not be the highest and best use for the land and would have a detrimental effect on their property. It was stated repeatedly that they had purchased homes in lh,i s area only after careful review of the existingzo ing, obtaining assurances from every avail- able sou rcethat single family zoning would be continued, f and an expression of confidence in elected officials 4� that they,would protect their interest's. An this is all s r i t44 I Book wt SEP 19 197 �: . that could be reasonably expected of them, they were entitled to property protection afforded by the zoning; regulations of our county. If a pattern or trend has been established for our South Reach, it has been toward single family de- velopment, The "domino effect's scare is, in my opinion, a valid concern. Real estate records of our county will prove that rezoning dramatically increases property value of the general and surrounding area. Such a trend can only bring increased pressure for multi -family and commercial development. Past experience throughout the state supports the fact this discourages sixigle family development and reverses the values held in such reverence by present home owners.. Action of this kind only benefits the speculator and developer at the expence of the single family home owner and would be irresponsible and arbitrary. x V Lk T 4 sock do SEP 19 999% a THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE FLOOR, THE MOTION WAS THEN PUT TO A VOTE — COMMISSIONER MASSEY VOTED IN OPPOSITION, THE BOARD APPROVED THE MOTION TO DENY THE REZONING APPLICATION AS REQUESTED BY EARL PADGETT AND GERMAN SUAREZ. THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO WIT: �---'' VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published WeeklyC T NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida the Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has given - tentative approval to the following ' - changes and additions to the Zoning COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: Ordinance of Indian River County, STATE OF FLORIDA Florida, which Ore substantially as follows: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath All of that portion of the North 1/2 says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published Government Lots 1 and 2 In at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being Section 21; and all that portion of Government Lot 1, in Section 22, lying of Government Lot 1 In Section 21, and North of a J a line where the South line of said Lot 1 in Section 21, if produced Easterly from the SE ------In the matter of __ - _.�-«.r _ '"-- corner of said Lot 1 in Section 21, would Intersect the Atlantic Ocean, all In Township 33 South, Range 40 East, less and ex- x--_____ - ----- cepting,however, that portion of said hereinbefore described land lying Westerly of State in the — _ Court' was pub Road AIA. be changed from R•IA Single Family District to R-2 Multiple fished in said newspaper in the issues of Family District. �_ — _ A Public Hearing In relation thereto at which parties in Interest �y 7 3-__-_-_ and citizens shall have an op - portunity to be heard will be held by said Zoning Commission in the In- Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at dian River County Courthouse in Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore September 6, 1973, at 7:30 P.M. and a been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered Public Hearing in relation thereto as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida will be held by the Board of County for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- Commissioners of Indian River tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or County, Florida, in the Indian River corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- County Courthouse, In Vero Beach, tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Florida, on Wednesday, September - - -:. 19, 1973, at 1:30 P.M. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY _ Swom to and subscribed before me t is __ ' da of.__ 4C_�'_,—_ A D.�_ �_ g�N� Raipd Sexton,ION 7 Chairman – BOARD OF COUNTY -- —�� (Busine Manager) COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:Alma Lee Loy, Chairman (Clerk o he Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida) (SE/W ;;August 16, 1973. - 19 < 4Q - SEP 19 1973, BOOK 18 PAGe THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD AND DON WILCOX, DEVELOPER OF THIS PROJECT LONNIE DAHLSTROM),, APPEARED AND PRESENTED MR. UGGERBY, ARCHITECT, WHO MADE THE PRESENTATION. MR. UGGERBY STATED THAT THIS PROJECT INVOLVES 28 ACRES TO BE REZONED FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO MULTI—FAMILY DISTRICT. THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF 300 UNITS ON THIS ACREAGE WITH AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 11 UNITS PER ACRE. COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS LEFT THE MEETING AT 6:15 O`CLOCK P.M. RONALD SALES, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE PROJECT SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT AND REFERRED TO IT AS A "DANDY PLAN". COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 6:20 O'CLOCK P.M. CLARK DEPUE, STATED THAT ALL THE REASONS GIVEN IN• THE PREVIOUS PUBLIC HEARING ARE TO BE APPLIED TO THIS PUBLIC HEARING. THIS PROJECT IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT AND IS LOCATED EAST OF AIA TO THE OCEAN. .JEROME KRAMER, VERO BEACH ASSOCIATION, STATED, IN ORDER TO SAVE TIME. TO NOTE THAT ALL THE OBJECTIONS MADE REGARDING THE VERO MAR SHORES PROJECT SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THIS PROJECT. f THE CHAIRMAN STATED, "DO WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE STATEMENTS FROM THE OPPONENTS THAT WERE PUT IN THE RECORD AT THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING WOULD BE THE SAME FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT." MR. KRAMER STATED THAT THEY WERE. GRANT WORTMAN, APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING. BOBBYE KENDRICK QUESTIONED THE AVAILABILITY OF WATER FOR THIS PROJECT, MR. WILCOX STATED THAT THEY HAD APPLIED TO THE CITY OF \tRO BEACH AND PAID FOR 36 TAPS IN FEBRUARY, 1973. `a - 20 poet .1 SSP 19 1973 MR. WILCOX STATED THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO LIVE IN CONDOMINIUMS AND NOT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND THEY SHOULD NOT BE DENIED THIS RIGHT. JACK STURGIS STATED THAT MULTIFAMILY ZONING IS UP -GRADING PROPERTY. CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR HIS RECOMMENDATION. MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE BOARD DENIED THE REZONING FOR VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT, HE RECOMMENDS KEEPING THIS PROPERTY IN R -IA, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING AS REQUESTED BY DON WILCOX - (.JONNIE DAHLSTROM). THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT WAS MADE BY CHAIRMAN LOY. "IN CHECKING THE MINUTES, I REALIZED THAT I APPARENTLY DID NOT MAKE A STATEMENT RELATIVE TO MY REASONS FOR DENIAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING APPLICATIONS THAT WERE BEFORE US'ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1973; THE VERO MAR PROJECT AND THE APPLICATION OF .JONNIE DAHLSTROM, ETA.L PROJECT, FOR THE RECORD, I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: _ THE PROPOSED CHANGES WERE CONTRARY TO THE ESTABLISHED LAND'USE PATTERN FOR THE AREA AS EVIDENCED BY THE MATERIALS SUB- MITTED REGARDING THE GRADUAL, ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA ACCORDING TO EXISTING ZONING REGULATION. THE PROPOSALS WOULD ALTER THE DENSITY PATTERN WHICH HAS BEEN; ESTABLISHED AND ABIDED BY OVER THE PAST MANY YEARS. I THESE PROPOSALS WOULD CREATE EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT / TIME WHEN THIS BOARD IS RECEIVING SYSTEMATIC COMPLAINTS RE- GARIING THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON A -IA SOUTH, AND WORKING DILIGENTLY TO SECURE A MUCH NEEDED SECOND BRIDGE TO SERVE THE. AREA. THE GENERAL SAFETY OF THE CITIZENS WOULD BE AFFECTED 'UNTIL THESE PROJECTS ARE ACCOMPLISHED. t THE PROPOSALS WOULD BE A STIMULUS TO DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT P"ROPERTIES, AT A TIME WHEN UTILITIES AND GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ARE NO_TfAVAILABLE TO HANDLE THE A14TICI"PATED IMMEDIATE NEEDS, THE PROPOSALS WOULD.ADVERSELY AFFECT PRESENT PROPERTY VALUES FOR<THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMEOWNER. THESE ARE MY PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS BASED ON THE MATERIALS AND_ INFORMATIO14 AS PRESENTED AND AVAILABLE TO ME,fl BOOK - 18 PAGE 42 STATEMENT BY W. W. SIEBERT, JR. REGARDING DALSTROM-WILCOX AND VERO-TSAR REZONING APPLICATIONS It has come to my attention that it is necessary for me to enter into the official records, my reasoning for denying the rezoning applications for the Dalstrom- Wilcox project and the Vero• -Mar project. Arguments in support and opposition were almost identical in their presentation; hence, my reasoning for denial was the same for both projects. The impact on available and projected governmental services would have a detrimental effect on the. safety and welfare of our county. State Highway A -1-A does not now have capacity to handle the additional automobile traffic that would be generated and improvements to this road are, at best, uncertain. We have but one bridge to service the South Beach and it is inadequate to handle today traffic. Although a second bridge is in the planning; stages, the immediate prospect for obtaining this critically needed facility is only marginal. Threats of legal action by the City of Vero Beach and private citizens lead me to believe there could be a serious delay in obtaining this facility. 4 We will soon start construction of a new hospital but ice have been warned there may a shortage of beds the day it opens. The addition of another floor lis already under consideration. a ' Recent legislation has reduced state participation in the' funding of Indian River County schools, placing additional responsibility on local effort. Our school board has already expressed concern a.boiit ;how overcrowding will affect their goal of quality education. Double sessions have been mentioned. j Althiough the City of Vero Beach has apparently •agreed to service the area in question with water, this agreement is subject to reconsideration. A ehaheq in attitude by the current City Council .. ' '1 • - SER 19 X973 3.6 r4%E 'qJ M has confused this situation. Areas outside ihP city that were previously to be serviced by them are now indefinite. A county -wide sewer and water system has been tabled and there is no binding agreement with the city to service any of the unincorporated areas of the county. We do not presently enjoy a county -wide fire protection program. There is only one fire station on the entire island. As it is municipally owned and administered, their first obligation is to city residents. Their ability to take on additional territory is suspect. A county -wide system could eventually solve this problem but progress toward this end has been painfully slow due to political and financial difficulties. These are only the most serious service problems and should in no way infer that they are the only problems we can anticipate. I shall not attempt to review the hours of testimony offered by single family property owners except by way of summation. It is important to understand I considered it my responsibility to weigh the evidence as presented, assign it a value and make a judgment decision based on what I thought was in the best interests of our county. There is no question in my mind that a vast majority of the property owners in the South Beach area felt very strongly that this rezoning would not be the highest and best use for the land and would have a detrimental effect on their property. It was stated repeatedly that they had purchased M M that could be reasonably expected of them, they were entitled to property protection afforded by the zoning regulations of our county. If a pattern ortrend has been established for our South Beach, it has been toward single family de- velopment. The 'domino effect" scare is, in my opinion, a valid concern. -Real estate records of our county will prove that rezoning dramatically increases property value of the general and surrounding area. Such a trend . can only bring increased pressure for multi -family and • commercial development. past experience throughout the state supports the fact this discourages single family development and reverses the values held in such reverence by present home owners.. Action of this kind only benefits the speculator and developer at the expense of the single family home owner and would be irresponsible and arbitrary. i 45 5 'i P 19 1973 - ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SlEBERT^ SECONDED BY ' COMMISSIONER BnGOSlAN^ THE Bn»on UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED - °ACELYN KARST, VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR FOR THE YOUTH GUIDANCE PROGRAM, TO USE THE COUNTY ` COMMISSION Room ON SEPTEMBER 28T H ' AND OCTOBER 3RD FOR VOLUNTEER TRAINING. THE ADMINISTRATOR READ A LETTER FROM J. LEWIS GREENG^ ' DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REQUESTING 15^000 TO 20^000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL OR THE RECREATION AREA OF THE Civic 8oTc CENTER SITE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER B«cDSlAN^ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SlEQERT^ THE Bnunn UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ' ' }B]MlNlSTRATOR- TD DETERMINE HOW MUCH FILL IS AVAILABLE FOR THE RECREATION AREA OF THE ClVlC ARTS CENTER SITE AND TO INFORM � m � ^"^" .REENE" ^ � 0 CLOCK . P ^.., _ _ ON MnrlDN BY COMMISSIONER B»cOclA@^ SECONDED BY __ COMMISSIONER qlEBERT^ THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STEP INCREASES �o IN SALARIES OF PERSONNEL IN THE ROAD " AND BRIDGE AND ZONING DE- PARTMENTS AS RECOMMENDED BY GEORGE MrKEwm^ , PERSONNEL DIRECTOR ' AND THE COUNTY A»mlNlSTR/Dl]R, THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO WIT: �A C � VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being _ — _—_—in the matter of — ___— — --- — o the Court, was pub - fished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me yhis ___—S c? of � �- �• A.D. _ -•----„day � ___-_. (Business Manager) (SEAL) (Clerk of Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will receive sealed bids to the hour of •1:30 P.M., Wednesday, September 19,1973, for sale to the said County of the following materials. Asphaltic Concrete; hauling and spreading Asphaltic Concrete; creosote lumber; time rock; corrugated metal pipe; aluminum pipe; "O" ring concrete pipe; gasoline & diesel fuel; ready mix concrete; road base construction for lime rock; soil cement and mixed in place; liquid asphalt; traffic and street signs. Instructions to Bidders, Specifications and special bidding blanks for Motor Fuels and Signs are available at the Office of the County Administrator, Room 115 County Court House or will be mailed on request. Bids for materials other than fuel and signs should be sub - milled on your letterhead or bidding forms. The Board of County Com- missioners reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to make awards in such manner as they consider to be in the best interests of Indian River County. Bids for each item shall be in separate envelopes securely sealed and plainly marked on the outside to show the material being bid on, the item number as shown in the specifications and the date and time of the opening. The bids may be mailed or delivered to the Office of the County Administrator, Room 115, County Court House, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Proposals received after 1:30 F.M., September 19, 1973, will be returned unopened. Board of County Commissioners i of Indian River County, Florida By: Alma Lee Loy, Chairman Aug. 30, Sept. 6, 1973. THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ: DICKERSON, INC. KOPPERS CO., INC. M.J. CARR CREOSOTING CO. PALM BEACH TANK & CULVERT CO., INC. CULVERT MANUFACTURING CO. GATOR CULVERT CO. FLORIDA STEEL CORP. CA12NS CONCRETE PIPE CO. 4 -PAM AMERICAN ENGINEERING CO. MARIANI ASPHALT CO. k UIICIPAL SUPPLY & SIGN CORP. XO6TZ EQUIPMENT CORP.. OF FLA. i ITEM 1 & 2 ITEM 3 & 4 ITEM 3 ITEM 6&7 ITEM 6 & 7 ITEM 6 & 7 ITEM 6 ITEM 8 ITEM 11, 13, 14 ITEM 12 ITEM 15 ITEM 15 ITEM 15 ITEM 15 ITEM 9 ) NO BID ITEM 9 )� ITEM 9 ) V601, Jua 47 SPECIFICATIONS REFERRING TO THE ABOVE ITEMS FOLLOWS: August 27, 1973 _r SPECIFICATIONS 1. Unit,price.per ton on approximately 500 tons of Type II Asphaltic Concrete Surface Course Material in accordance with Florida State Department of Transportation specifications, delivered F.O.B. Vero Beach in various quantities and at various times as needed. 2. Unit price per ton, for approximately 450 tons, for hauling, spreading by an approved mechanical spreader, and finishing Type II Asphaltic Concrete Surface Course Material, all in accordance with Florida State Department of Transportation specifications. 3. Unit price per foot on approximately 2,000 linear feet of 12 pound pressure treated creosote southern pine lumber. Price to be for truck load lots of approximately 1,000 linear feet delivered to .•.-County Garage. Piling to have a minimum 12" diameter at butt and 8" diameter at tip in accordance with Florida State Department of Transportation specifications. Bid prices should be made on piling lengths of 20 feet; 25 feet; 30 feet and 35 feet. 4. Unit price per 1,000 board feet on approximately 7,000 board feet of 12 pound pressure treated creosote southern pine lumber in approximately 7,000 board feet truck load lots delivered to the County Garage for sizes as follows: A. 12" X 12" X 26' length F. 4" X 8" X 12' length B. 3" X 10" X 28' G. 311 X 8" X 16' " C. - 4" X 8" X 14' " H. -4" X 10" X 16' " D. 12" X 12" X 22' I.' 10" X 10" X 16' " 5. Unit price per ton on approximately 150,tons'of .pit -'run, -Miami: Oolite,.Ocala, or Naranga type ' road ' rock meeting Florida_. State Department'of Transportation specifications. Price F.O.B. Vero. Beach, Florida. 6. Unit price per foot bid on asphalt coated corregated metal pipe for any available gauge for approximately 800 linear feet depending upon the County's requirements. Sizes, ranging from 10" diameter to 96" diameter. Delivered to the County Garage. 7. Unit price per foot bid on aluminum metal pipe for any available gauge for the _County's requirements ranging in sizes from 10" diameter to 9611 diameter delivered to the County Garage. 8. Unit price bice on "0" Ring Rubber and/or Neoprene Concrete pipe for any available gauge for approximately 200 linear feet depending upon the County's requirements. Sizes ranging from 10" diameter to 72" diameter. Delivered to the County Garage. i S C SSP 1919 �o �c 18 � . #- 1 w u P SPECIFICATIONS 9. Approximately 200,000 qallons of hi -test qasoline and approximately 60,000 gallons of diesel fuel all in accordance with the specifi- cations and bid proposal forms available at the office of the County Administrator, Room 115, Court House, Vero Beach, Florida. 10. Unit price per yard for approximately 300 yards of 3,000 pound ready -mix concrete for the pouring of bridge slabs at the County Garage. Also unit price per yard for approximately 100 yards of. 2,500 pound ready -mix concrete delivered in as little as one yard quantities for miscellaneous pours at various points in the County for bridges, headwalls and curbs. 11. Unit price bid per square yard for six inch depth soil cement in amounts and in areas as requested by the County. The County to furnish base material graded ready for mixing, to furnish grading of mixed material and final hard planing. Contractor to furnish all necessary equipment for processing in accordance with Indian River County's specifications for cement stabilization of base course. Bid to be on basis of a cement percentage of 8% by volume. Contract price adjusted on the basis of five cents per square yard per one percent increase or decrease in cement percentage by volume. Seal coat shall be a minimum of .15 gallon'of RC-ls asphalt per square yard, the sanding of the seal coat to be furnished by the County. All work to be in accordance with County Specifications. County to furnish initial tests and processing controls. 12. Unit price per gallon for approximately 5,000 gallons of asphalt grade RC -is and/or RS -2; approximately 10,000 gallons of asphalt grade AC -15. Material to meet Florida State Department of Trans- .; ;portationI5pecifications: Prices .quoted. shall be based. on delivery c oLt-_Vero Beach,. Florida, in -4;000' -gallon -.truck load lots. Bids shall specify waiting time allowed, charges for waiting time and charges '•:,;:for: return -shipment of order made for direct delivery on job site. 13. Unit price per square yard for six inch depth of 131nerock, per Florida State Department of Transportation specifications, in amounts and in areas as requested by the County. The County to furnish subgrade and drainage ready for base material. Contractor to furnish all necessary equipment for compacting, and water equipment. Base to be inspected at County's expense and contractor must produce base to meet County's requirements. Seal Coat shall be a minimum of .15 gallon of RC-ls asphalt per square yard, the sanding of �_� the .seal. -coat -.to be- fuinished..by: the County. All work shall be in accordance with County Specifications. The base width furnished by the County shall be within reasonable limits. No forms shall be furnished. Notice of prepared subgrade completion shall be given to the contractor and if deterioration of prepared work is caused by delay in contractor beginning work, the contractor shall rework road ready for base material subject to the approval of the County Administrator. County to furnish initial final grade stakes. Replacement of grade stakes during contractor's operation shall be BSEP 19X97360 4 9 ., SPECIFICATIONS Page 3 :furnished by the contractor. Base shall be a minimum of 20' - 6" in width with a full o" depth. Reasonable deterioration of prepared subgrade ahead of the base work shall be restored by the contractor. If weather deteriorates the road bed prepared by the County after set date of beginning of contract, it shall be the contractor's responsibility to replace same. This is limited to base course construction and not to shoulders, drainage, etc. 14. Unit price per square yard for a 6" mixed -in-place base on the basis of a mixture of three gallons per square yard of asphalt in amounts and in areas as requested by the County Administrator. Also the price per gallon per square yard. The contract price will be adjusted by the combination of these bid figures in order to deter- mine the final price per square yard based on the actual quantity of asphalt used. There will be no reduction of contract price if the amount of asphalt used is less than three gallons per square yard. The contractor to furnish all necessary equipment for the adding of asphalt in proper quantities, proper mixing and the final grading and compaction in accordance with Indian River County Speci- fications._ The County to furnish the base material graded and ready for mixing. The contractor shall furnish a seal coat to be a minimum of .15 gallon of RC -ls asphalt per square yard. Sanding of the seal coat to be furnished by the County. The County will also furnish initial tests and processing control. 15. Unit price bid for stop signs, street signs, and various other signs and hardware all in accordance with specifications and bid proposal forms at the office of the County Administrator, Room 115, Indian River County Court House, Vero Beach, Florida. ONI zl P` ONI zl ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO EVALUATE THE BIDS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING ITEM TO ITEM BUDGET TRANSFERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1972-73. 26 - 51 SEP 191973 ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFERS GENERAL FUND APRIL 18, 1973 Account No. TO FROM 5220205 $ $ 400.00 5220328 400.00 ✓ JULY 27, 1973 2102102 3,000.00 9101601 146,001.00 9990798 149,001:00 AUGUST 8, 1973 2780102 13,000.00 2780402 2,000.00 9990701 15,000.00 SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 2101102 1,800.00 2101105 13,000.00 2101204 2,500.00 2101205 1,800.00 2101329 300.00 2101330 500.00 2101335 1,500.00 2101341 12,000.00 2101402 1,700.00 2102205 2,500.00 2102331 8,000.00 2102338 800.00 2102402 2,000.00 2103328 300.00 2104102 2,000:00 2104328 100.00 2104329 100.00 2104338 100.00 2211204 750.00 1211333 11000.00 2211334 60,000.00 2211402 2,500.00 2212205 5,000.00 2212333 500.00 2212334 3,000.00 2212402 4,000.00 2320204 3,000.00 .2101105 1,870.00 2101205 1,870.00 -1- 0001 U4 ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFERS GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 Account No. TO FROM 2320331 $ 2,500.00 $ 2320334 3,100.00 2320338 500.00 2320402 4,000.00 2324101 875.00 2324102 11,000.00 2324105 825.00 2324302 1,000.00 2324402 6,000.00 2328102 6,000.00 2328204 1,200.00 2328329 20.00 2328338 100.00 2328.402 500.00 2333205 225.00 2440102 2.,700.00 2440204 75.00 2440328 500.00 2440338 100.00 2440402 120.00 2441205 1,200.00 2441333 650.00 2441338 3,200.00 2441339 6,000.00 2552328 250.00 2552341 2,025.00 2670102 700.00 2670337 3,000.00 2670338 1,000.00 2670340 6,000.00 2670341 2,000.00 2670402 2,000.00 2671331 600.00 2671337 1,800.00 Account No. 2780332 2780335 2780338 2780402 9990701 9990701 2991102 2991402 3103341 3322337 3322338 3322402 3440102 3440204 3440402 3991204 3991205 3991335 3991338 3991402 4212204 4212331 5103313 5104204 5104336 5220204 5220205 5220328 5220338 5220341 5220402 5221208 5221308 5221336 5221341- 5222315, 5223319 5341102 5341204 5341328 5341335. ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFERS GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 TO FROM $ 600.00 $ 2,000.00 1,100.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 1,000.00 100.00 50.00 1,000:00 2,000.00 1,800.00 100.00 25,300.00 3,100.00 1,000.00 240.00 120.00 40.00 40.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 100.00 1,500.00 100.00 50.00 200.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 1,500.00 500.00 20,000.00 1,400.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 850.00 100.00 600.00 50.00 - 3 - BOOK 18 : 0. Account No. 5345102 6101304 6102102 6102204 6102402 6102403 6302102 6302205 6302328 6302402 7100102 9210603 9210604 9990.701 9990705 9210603 9210604 Account No. 4102102 4102203 4102204 4102205 4102328 4102329 4102331 4102335 4102337 4102338 4102341 4102401 4102402 4102405 4104404 9990701 ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFERS GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 TO FROM $ $ 15,000-00 5,700.00 2,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 200.00 150.00 200.00 600.00 500.00 3,650.00 7,400.00 3,000.00 181,925.00 5,000.00 100.00 . 100.00 ROAD & BRIDGE SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 TO FROM $ $ 13,000.00 175,000.00 2,500.00 3,500.00 100.00 100.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 ' 3,000.00 30,000.00 100,000.00 5,000.00 200.00 14,000.00 9,000.00 66,900.00 -4- e BQOK is -?Act DO 2320334 7,300.00 2322334 8,000.00 2332341 3,000.00 9990701 3,000.00 2324334 5,000.00 3103341 2,000.00 3990341 8,000.00 9210604 2,700.00 9990701 7,700.00 2324334 ,+'o wC . i -,"i 1,000.00 3103341 1,000.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY _SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 Account No. TO FROM <.3211402 -. $ 8,000.00 $ 5105401 4,000.00 6102403 12,000.00 -5- l 9X973 4 Q, Alp 600x Ma A 3 ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFERS a FINE & FORFEITURE JULY 5, 1973 Account No. TO FROM 3101101 $ 300.00 $ 3101102 300.00 JULY 18, 1973 3101105 1,814.00 3102302 4,986.00 3101402 200.00 9990709 7,000.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 1973 3101302 4,000.00 3101102 4,000.00 SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 3101102 7,734.00 3101302 348.15 3101105 817.00 9990701 8,89.9.15 t 3101102 15,769.00 3101302 10,000.00 9990709 25,769.00 3101302 5,000.00 9990709 5,OQO.00 2333341 2,000.00 9990701 2,000.00 3103341 700.00 2320334 7,300.00 2322334 8,000.00 2332341 3,000.00 9990701 3,000.00 2324334 5,000.00 3103341 2,000.00 3990341 8,000.00 9210604 2,700.00 9990701 7,700.00 2324334 ,+'o wC . i -,"i 1,000.00 3103341 1,000.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY _SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 Account No. TO FROM <.3211402 -. $ 8,000.00 $ 5105401 4,000.00 6102403 12,000.00 -5- l 9X973 4 Q, Alp 600x Ma MR. THOMAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AS OF OCTO BER 15TH, THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT MUST TURN HIS EXCESS FEES OVER TO THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THIS WILL LEAVE HIM WITH NO MONEY FOR OPERATING EXPENSES, MR. THOMAS ALSO STATED THAT THERE IS NO STATUTE WHICH ALLOWS THE CLERK TO BORROW MONEY. THE BOARD IS REQUESTED TO AUTHORIZE AN ADVANCE OF $421000.00 OF NEXT YEARS BUDGET TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY.AUTHORIZED ADVANCING TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT APPROXIMATELY $15,000.00 EACH MONTH, FOR THE MONTHS OF OCTOBER,AOVEMBER AND DECEMBER, IF THAT AMOUNT IS NECESSARY BY HIS OFFICE FOR OPERATING EXPENSES, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFER IN THE SHERIFFS BUDGET, ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFER FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND To FROM 3101102 JISALARIES FOR DEPUTIES & OTHERS $4,000.00 3101302 EXPENSES OTHER THAN SALARIES $4.000,00 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000.00 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTjAPPROVED IN THE MINUTES OF .JUNE 13,. 1973,. A REPORT OF CONVICTIONS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 1973 WAS RECEIVED FROM THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT AND FILED. 4 - 31 - gDol 18 out 57 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR STATE AID TO LIBRARIES, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE OUT-OF-COUNTY TRAVEL FOR FORREST MCCULLARS, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR TO BELLE GLADE TO ATTEND AN EXTENSION ADMINISTRATION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 26, 1973, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE COUNTY VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER,• GEORGE STOKES ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MID-WINTER CONFERENCE IN ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA ON OCTOBER 31 - NOVEMBER 2, 1973. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGO.SIAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE STATE WITNESS PAYROLL FOR THE CIRCUIT COURT, SPRING 1973 TERM, IN THE AMOUNT OF $136.68. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE APPLICATIONS OF L.F. BARKER, VIRGIL .JOHNSON AND DAVID R. BALL FORCPISTOL PERMITS TO CARRY FIREARMS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TABLLNG.7 THE REQUEST FOR A PISTOL PERMIT BY LEROY BROWN UNTIL SHERIFF SAM T. .JOYCE COULD BE PRESENT. THE FOLLOWING CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HAVING BEEN FULLY SIGNED AND COMPLETED IS HEREBY BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. 32 - SEP 191973 . fl00k 18 li;.t 5 8 CONTRACT M County of Indian Ri VV17lorida WHEREAS, by the terms and provisions of Chapter 71-183, Lavas of Florida, 1971 (Sections 589.28-589.34, Florida Statutes, as amended by 1971 Legislature), Indian the County of' River , Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County", is authorized to appropriate funds and to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry, herein- after referred to as the "Department", for the purpose of stimulating the product- ion of timber wealth through the proper use of forest lands within the County and making and keeping the lands best suited to that purpose profitable to the owner thereof, the County and the State; and to protect and improve the beauty of urban and suburban areas, by helping to create in them an attractive and healthy environ- ment through the proper use of trees and related plant associations; WHEREAS, by the provisions of the said Chapter (Section 589.29, Florida Statutes), the Department is authorized to provide forest related assistance to counties and municipalities. Indian WHEREAS, on the 8thday of April 19 ,73 , the River County Commission did, by resolution duly adopted at a regular meeting of the said Indian 'River County Commission, determine that it is to the best interests of the County and individual landowners therein that the produc::on of timber wealth through the proper use.of forest lands and the protection and improvement of the - beauty of urban acid suburban. areas be stimulated by entering into'a cooperative agreement with the Department, as authorized by the said Florida Statutes: NOW, THEREFORE, this Cooperative Agreement made and entered into on this ' 20th day of June , 1973 , by and between the County of Indian ver a duly 33 - P 1 91973., Box � PAct � � r constituted county of the State of Florida, acting by and through the authority a of its County Commissioners heretofore duly elected and qualified, hereinafter designated as the "County", and the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry, a department of government of the State .of Florida, hereinafter designated as the "Department". WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the mutual covenents herein recited of the respective parties hereto to be performed and the carrying into Indian effect the said resolution of the River County Commission and of the provisions of the governing statutes of the State of Florida recited in the pre- amble hereof, it is agreed: 1. This Cooperative Agreement shall be effective on the is t day of October , 19 73 , and continue in full force and effect from year to year thereafter unless written notice is given by either party to the other at least thirty days prior to July 1st of any year of the intention to discontinue the work provided for herein and to cancel this agreement. 2. The County shall pay to the Department from the general revenue funds of the County annually a sum equal to 40% of the amount necessary to provide one man year of assistance up to a maximum of $3,000 per annum for each man year covered by this agreement. This agreement provides for one (1) man year of assist- ance and a maximum payment by the County, of $3,000 per year. The Department shall .provide the balance of the monies necessary to fund the objectives of this agree- menta gree-menta 3. By June 1st each year, the Department shall prepare and 'submit to the E County for its approval an estimate of the cost of providing the assistance covered by this agreement for" the fiscal year beginning on July 1st and ending on June 30th, 34 - SEP 19191 ._ 6GGK PA -PE OU which, when approved by the County, shall determine the amount of money to be provided by the County to the Department during that fiscal year. 4. The amount of money payable by the County to the Department under the terms of this agreement for any fiscal period beginning July 1st and ending June 30th,shall be paid by the -County in two equal payments, one of which shall be paid on or before January 1st and the remainder before July lst, which said payments when made shall be deposited by the Department in the incidental trust fund of the Division of Forestry. 5. The DepartmetIt shall supply one'(1) man year of forestry assistance whose duty it will be to assure continuous growth value to timber landowners, and protection and improvement of the beauty of the urban and suburban areas of the County. The District Forester or his representative shall be responsible to the Director of the Division of Forestry for the faithful performance of the duties assigned to him by the Division in carrying out this agreement. 6. The Department shall select, employ and supervise the work of such per- sons employed to carry out the provisions of this agreement. 7. Upon termination of this agreement, the balance of all unexpended funds shall be returned pro rata to the Division of Forestry and the County as provided in Section 589.33, Florida Statutes. 8. Not later than September 30th following the end of each fiscal year, or ' June 30th, the Department will furnish the County with a report covering the line of work undertaken, the results obtained, and forestry needs of the County. 9. No amendment, revision, alteration, or change in the provisions of this agreement, or any addition thereto or extension thereof, shall be valid and bind- ing upon the parties hereto, or either of them unless each amendment, revision, 35 alteration, change, addition, or extension be reduced to writing and executed by the parties hereto. 10. This agreement when duly executed by the parties hereto, voids and super - Indian sedes the agreement executed by the County of River and the Florida Board of Forestry for similar purposes, dated June 20th, 1973. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed in quadruplicate the day and year first above written. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF Indian River _ COUNTY COMMISSION AGRICULTURE AND CONSLMER SERVICES IndiaRiver COUNTY, FLORIDA DIVISION OF FORESTRY BY Commiss'oner of Agriculture Chairman, Board of County Commissioners t1Q Witness (for Commissioner) ATTEST i?l�,('d14�3� e I!�Gi'�� Clerk A the Circuit Court Witness (for Commissioner) Approv as t fo a d leg y L By: Resident Attorney THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY. HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: b ; GENERAL FUND"elOS. 1272 - 1341 INCLUSIVE: ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND Nos. 0758 - 0787 INCLUSIVE: FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND No-sl . 0552 - 0559 INCLUSIVE: SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST.SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES* THERE BEING NO FURTHER-BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 8:10 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: ' ....................... ... ... ...... t CLERK CHAIRMAN SEP 191973, Aeot 18 Pno,� 6.2-A 37—