Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-039ORDINANCE NO. 2005- 039 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January 2005 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan amendment request on April 20, 2005, after due public notice, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal Public Hearing on May 10, 2005, after advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1), and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process, and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs received these Comprehensive Plan Amendments on May 26, 2005, pursuant to F.S.163.3184(4), and WHEREAS, Indian River County received the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report dated July 25, 2005, from the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and WHEREAS, Indian River County has addressed the comments contained in the aforementioned Report; ORDINANCE NO. 2005- 039 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on September 13, 2005, after advertising pursuant to F. S.163.3184(15)(b); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: SECTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal The amendments to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 are hereby adopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. SECTION 2. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Amend the Transportation Element (Exhibit A) SECTION 3. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 4. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance or these Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendments is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 5. Effective Date The effective date of this ordinance and, therefore, this plan amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance with Section 163 3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming their ORDINANCE NO. 2005- 039 effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Plan Processing Team. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 29tlday of August, 2005, for a public hearing to be held on the 13th day of September, 2005, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Wheeler , seconded by Commissioner NPuhPrger , and adopted by the following vote: 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendments are approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs: AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 29tfday of August, 2005, for a public hearing to be held on the 13th day of September, 2005, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Wheel er , seconded by Commissioner Neuberger , and adopted by the following vote: Thomas S Lowther, Chairman Arthur R. Neuberger, Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler, Commissioner Sandra L Bowden, Commissioner Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Thomas S. Lowther, Chairman ATTEST Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2005-039 Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of SEP 2 2 2005 2005 4Jrnniirlatirrrnent from the Department of State received on this 21 day of Se? , 2005, at 2):33 O/P.M. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Robert M. eating, AI P Community Development Dire ' or F:\Communl y Development \ Users \MPO\Comp Plan\Z005 Comp Plan Update\August 2005 ORC Response\BCC ordinance August 2005.doc Indian River County 2020 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4 Transportation ement Indian River County Community Development Department Adopted: , 2005 Supplemental # (Entire Element) Ordinance 2005- Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Existing and Committed System Besides the current inventory of roadways, the existing system, there are various roadways programmed for construction in the near future. In some cases, these programmed improvements may be underway. Improvements that are budgeted and programmed for construction within five years are considered committed improvements. For travel demand forecasting and transportation planning purposes, committed improvements are considered in place and existing. Table 4.1, identifies the County's committed roadway projects. Facility 43rd Ave 43rd Ave 58th -Ave 16`h/17th St Source: Indian Table 4.1 Committed Roadway Projects From 8th St. 16`h St W. County Line 98th Ave South of IRB 14`h Ave River County MPO Jurisdictional Administration To 6th St.16`h St 26th St. Roseland Rd. 98th Ave. 66th Ave North of IRB # Lanes 4 4 4 4 4 64 6 6 4 Type Divided Divided &Weed Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Like virtually every other area throughout the nation, Indian River County has roadways that are under the jurisdiction of one of several different units of government. In Florida, the applicable jurisdiction was initially established based on how the roadway was functionally classified. Generally, major inter -county roadways, such as I-95, the Turnpike, SR Al A, US 1, and SR 60, were designated as state roads. Similarly, major intra -county roads, such as CR 512, CR 510, Indian River Boulevard, and others, are county roads. Finally, those roads which are entirely within a municipality are generally city roads. In 1995, the state revised Chapter 335, F.S. to establish specific jurisdictional ownership criteria. As now written, 335 F.S. establishes the roadway jurisdictional responsibility as that which existed on July 1, 1995. Further, the revisions to 335, F.S. provided that the jurisdictional responsibilities of roadways may be transferred from one jurisdiction to another only by mutual consent of both jurisdictions. In Indian River County, the state and county have agreed to Community Development Department Indian River County 9 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Counts are most useful when compared to roadway capacity. Using a volume to capacity measure (v/c), roadway level -of -service (LOS) can be determined. Table 4.7.1 and Figure 4.2.2 identify peak hour roadway LOS on the county's roadway network. Lane Geometry The number of through lanes for each facility on the Indian River County roadway network is summarized in Figure 4.2. As shown in that figure, I-95 is the only four lane expressway serving the county. Other north -south travel is provided on US 1 and Indian River Boulevard, both of which are four lane divided facilities. In the east -west direction, the widest road is SR 60, which exists as a four and six lane roadway east of I-95. County Road 512 in the Sebastian area is also four-laned, providing east -west travel in the northern portion of the county. For planning purposes, a roadway's capacity and level -of -service (LOS) are generally based on the number of through lanes. Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure, describing motorists' perceptions of operating conditions within a traffic stream. Capacity, on the other hand, is a quantitative measure of the ultimate number of motor vehicles which can travel over a particular roadway segment during a particular time period (either hourly or daily). These conditions are generally described in terms such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, interruptions to traffic flow, comfort and convenience, and safety. Levels of service are generally designated by letters A through F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions (free flow) and LOS F the worst (forced or breakdown flow). Characteristics of each level of service are listed below: LEVEL OF SERVICE A - Uninterrupted flow - No restriction on maneuverability Few or no delays LEVEL OF SERVICE B Stable flow conditions - Operating speed beginning to be restricted LEVEL OF SERVICE C - Speed and maneuverability restricted by higher traffic volumes - Satisfactory operating speed for urban conditions - Delay at signals Community Development Department LEVEL OF SERVICE D - Low speeds - Mayor delays at signal - Little freedom to maneuver LEVEL OF SERVICE E - Lower operating speeds - Major delays and stoppages -Volumes at or near capacity LEVEL OF SERVICE F - Low speeds - Stoppages for long periods because of downstream congestion Indian River County 12 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element The level of service for roadway links is determined by comparing the traffic volume to the roadway capacity. The result is used to identify the LOS. Level of service calculations are determined using guidelines established in the latest edition of FDOT's Level of Service Handbook. Generalized tables used in this element also are derived from FDOT's Level of Service Handbook. Alternatively, level of service can be determined using other methodologies, including ART -Plan analyses, speed -delay studies or the Highway Capacity Manual method. In Indian River County, LOS "C" is considered the minimum accepted standard for rural level of service "D" is the minimum accepted standard during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions The peak hour/peak season parameter is considered the 100th highest hour of traffic activity during a year. Recently, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) considered several programmed roadway improvement projects. During the public involvement phase of the roadway development process, a considerable amount of citizen opposition arose against two of those roadway projects — the 43rd Avenue and 27th Avenue widening projects. Both 43rd Avenue and 27th Avenue are two-lane undivided facilities that were proposed to be widened to four -lane divided facilities. The proposed widening projects were perceived as leading to higher volumes of traffic, higher travel speeds, increased noise levels, and reduced safety. As structured, the Comprehensive Plan contains a number of proposed roadway projects necessary to maintain an adequate level of service throughout the county. Five-laning 43rd Avenue and 27th Avenue are two of those projects. According to Indian River Count Traffic Engineering, two mdividual roadway segments (43rd Avenue southbound between 16t Street and 12t Street and 43rd Avenue southbound between 12th Street and 8th Street) will soon exceed the PM Peak Hour level of service "D" standard established for those facilities (currently 810 vehicle trips/hour/direction). Based on current traffic volumes, vested trips in the County's concurrency management system, and trips anticipated fromproposed new developments that are not yet vested, it is anticipated that these segments will carry 921 trips in the near-term future. In addition to these two roadway segments, a number of other road segments on both 43rd and 27th Avenues are within 10% of level of service "D" standards and could exceed the standard in the Los D near future when additional trips are placed on these links. In order to maintain the adopted level of service while also maintaining the quality of life of the residents in south Indian River County, the county explored a number of alternatives to four- laning 43rd and 27th Avenues. These alternatives included three-laning 43rd and 27th Avenues; establishing new roadway alignments; and widening parallel facilities In addition, an analysis was conducted to determine the feasibility of maintaining adequate levels of service through expanded transit service on the facilities. In performing the analysis of alternatives, the county employed a number of quantitative techniques, including regional travel demand modeling using FSUTMS on the adopted Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model network. Community Development Department Indian River County 13 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Roadway Alternatives An analysis was performed of:r:tt he imct of ee-laninand 27thAvenues. According to the Gof Service Tables contained in FDOT's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, dividing an undivided facility generally results in a 5% increase in capacity. Applying this increase to the two lane capacity of 43m Avenue, three-laning these facilities would result in a new capacity of approximately 903 vehicle trips/hour/direction. While helping to mitigate level of service concerns, this solution alone does not fully address these concerns, since peak hour directional demand from proposed traffic projects on 43rd Avenue (921 trips) will soon exceed three -lane capacity (903 trips). Nonetheless, three-laning is considered part of the near-term solution and will be implemented in lieu of five-laning. With respect to new roadways and parallel roadways, a number of north/south facilities exist within a distance of approximately five miles of 43rd and 27th Avenues. Two of these facilities (US 1 and Old Dixie Highway) connect residents in both Indian River and St. Lucie counties, while two others (58th Avenue and 20th Avenue) are limited to only Indian River County. In analyzing improvement options for north/south alternatives, it was determined that widening parallel facilities is either not feasible and/or will not result in adequate levels of service on 43rd and 27th Avenues. According to preliminary model runs performed as part of the MPO's 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan update, the widening of US 1 from four to six lanes will still result in level of service deficiencies on 27th and 43rd Avenues. Another roadway alternative that was explored was the extension of 58th Avenue to Indrio Road in St. Lucie County Located approximately 1 mile west of 43rd Avenue, 58th Avenue is a new, four lane divided north -south facility. According to modeled output, extending 58th Avenue south to Indrio Road in St. Lucie County will also not adequately address level of service on 43rd and 27th Avenues. The remaining north -south roadways, 20th Avenue and Old Dixie Highway, are severely constrained by right of way. Both roadways are also classified as collectors, whereas 27th and 43rd Avenues are classified as minor arterials. In addition, land use adjacent to 20th Avenue includes several public and private schools and school crossing zones. Consequently, neither facility can be widened without massive disruption to neighborhoods and businesses; therefore, neither option is cost feasible. No other parallel facilities exist within the corridor. Since the surrounding neighborhoods are largely built out north of Oslo Road, no new parallel roads could be built without displacement of existing neighborhoods. In the course of preparing its 2030 LRTP, the MPO is exploring new alignments and other alternatives to address the 43rd Avenue and 27th Avenue level of service considerations. Preliminary model analysis indicates that a major new roadway corridor, 66th Avenue (modeled as a new, five -lane facility from SR 60 to Oslo Road and as a new three -lane facility from Oslo Road to St Lucie County), could relieve conditions on 43rd Avenue if developed in conjunction Community Development Department Indian River County 14 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element with the alternatives described above. The travel demand model indicates that around 700 peak hour directional trips would be assigned from other north -south roadways to the new 66th Avenue corridor north of Oslo Road. In the current MPO LRTP, however, the 66th Avenue corridor does not exist. Since major projects require substantial cost and feasibility analysis prior to formal adoption, the 66th Avenue 4 laning project cannot be incorporated into the comprehensive plan at this time, but may be incorporated into a future comprehensive plan update upon completion of further study. Transit Alternatives With respect to transit, the Indian River County MPO modeled expanded transit service on the 43rd Avenue Corridor as part of the recently completed five-year Transit Development Plan — Major Update. According to consultant estimates, expanded transit service on 43rd Avenue operating at the system standard one-hour headways would result in 10,843 riders/year. On a peak -hour basis, this would translate into approximately 1,000 riders. Divided out over 250 annual service days, the impact of expanded service on the 43rd Avenue corridor equals approximately 4 peak hour trips. Even if the route were operated at one-half hour headways, the TDP analysis indicates that the route would not carry nearly enough riders to mitigate sufficient trips to maintain level of service "D" on 43rd Avenue. Level of Service Alternatives Given the absence of a viable roadway or transit alternative in the 43rd Avenue/27th Avenue corridor, the only option available to the county is consideration of an alternative level of service standard In order to implement a standard that maintains maximum volumes and threshold capacities, a Level of Service "E" plus 20% must be established as the minimum acceptable level of service standard for the following roadways: • 27th Avenue — South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Avenue — Oslo Road to 16th Street Establishment of Level of Service `B" plus 20%, when applied in conjunction with the three- laning of the above facilities, will enable the maintenance of minimum volumes and threshold capacities until alternative transportation projects (such as the 66th Avenue corridor) can be explored and incorporated into future plans. The minimum capacity established under the "E plus 20%" alternative is 1,020 peak hour directional trips for a two lane facility. This capacity is adequate for the 921 trips anticipated on this facility in the near future. As three -lane facilities, 43rd and 27th Avenues will have a peak hour directional capacity of 1071 trips under "E plus 20%", which will provide ample capacity for new projects in the short term. Existing Roadway Deficiencies • Level of Service Community Development Department Indian River County 15 N N yO J r3 A n re 0 4i CD S i LL Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Table 4.7 shows the results of running the model with 2025 socioeconomic data projections and using the existing and committed road network. The table lists the volumes and v/c ratios predicted for each roadway segment in the county. Those roadway links having a v/c ratio over 1 in Table 4.7 will exceed capacity by 2025. Roads shown to experience more traffic than their acceptable capacity in 2025 are in four general areas of the county. These areas include the north county area near Sebastian; the State Road 60 corridor; I-95; and Indian River Blvd. Based on these results, a Needs Plan was developed for the county road network. The Needs Plan reflects lists the road improvements that will need to be in place in order to accommodate future demand for road facilities. The resulting road widening improvements for the 2025 Needs Plan are summarized in Table 4.7.2. • Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible transportation plan, it is necessary to project the amount of revenue that will be available to construct transportation system improvements. Using historic data, present trends, reasonable assumptions, and FDOT input, transportation capital improvement revenue amounts were projected by five year increments through 2025. These amounts are shown on Tables 4.8a and 4.8b. Not included on Tables 4.8a and 4.8b are potential revenue sources that could be implemented to provide enhancements over and above the basic road widening improvements specified in the plan. These enhancements might include bike paths, sidewalks, landscaping, streetscaping, and lighting. Currently, 40 of Florida's 67 counties impose all or part of the ELMS (Environmental Land Management Study) one to five cent local option gas tax. Among those counties imposing the tax are Brevard and St. Lucie. Because the cost feasible plan is subject to unforeseen interruptions in the traditional transportation revenue stream, the county could consider implementing part or all of the ELMS one to five cent local option gas tax. To impose this tax, an extraordinary vote of the county commission or a countywide referendum initiated by the commission is required. Table 4.7 Projected Volumes & V/C Ratios for 2025 Link Roadway From To 2025 Volume V/C Ratio 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 S.R. AlA S.R. A1A S.R. A1A S.R. AlA S.R. A1A S.R. A1A S. COUNTY LINE S. VB CITY L 17TH STREET S.R. 60 N. VB CITY L FRED TUERK RD Community Development Department S. VB CITY L 17TH STREET S.R. 60 N. VB CITY L FRED TUERK RD OLD WINTER BCH RD 9783 18967 15385 23688 19523 15976 Indian River County 64 0.494 0.729 0.880 1.354 0.751 0.806 Comprehensive Plan Link 2325 2330 2335 2345 2350 2355 2360 2365 2410 2420 2430 2440 2450 2460 2470 2480 2510 2530 2540 2550 2560 2570 2580 2610 2620 2710 2720 2810 2820 2830 2840 2850 2860 2870 2905 2910 2915 2920 2925 2930 2935 2940 2945 2950 Roadway OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE 27TH AVENUE OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD 6TH AVENUE 6TH AVENUE 10TH AVENUE 10TH AVENUE 20TH AVENUE 20T11 AVENUE 20TH AVENUE 20TH AVENUE 20TH AVENUE 20TH AVENUE 20TH AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE 43RD AVENUE From 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST 41ST ST 45TH ST 49TH ST 65TH ST 69TH ST S. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST S.R. 60 ATLANTIC BLVD 82ND AVE 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY 12TH ST 17TH ST ROYAL PALM BLVD S.R. 60 OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST S.R. 60 S. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST 16TH ST S.R. 60 26TH ST 41ST ST 45TH ST Community Development Department Transportation Element To 2025 Volume S. VB CITY L 16TH ST S.R. 60 45TH ST 49TH ST 65TH ST 69TH ST C.R. 510 OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST S.R. 60 ATLANTIC BLVD AVIATION BLVD 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY U.S. 1 17TH ST S.R. 60 S.R. 60 17TH ST 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST S.R. 60 ATLANTIC BLVD OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST 16TH ST S.R. 60 26TH ST 41ST ST 45TH ST 49TH ST 11971 12354 14267 8447 2403 189 2958 3644 10790 11843 10796 8090 10201 10449 5958 5051 1854 9175 5926 11422 5942 12170 14743 8983 8512 10216 10371 8933 12015 13798 23729 22919 24031 11465 10395 9697 10224 10531 14057 12739 11438 12379 8599 3570 V/C Ratio 0:78 0.811 0.814 0-844 058 0.844 Indian River County 67 0.887 1.010 0.720 0.426 0.121 0.010 0.149 0.184 0.545 0.733 0/38 0.413 0.094 0.704 0.637 0.637 0.893 0.802 0.446 0.642 0.716 0.516 0.523 0.753 0.839 0.839 0.712 0.712 0.712 0.579 0.525 0.489 0.836 0.903 0.903 0.385 0.346 0.909 0.703 0.180 Link ID 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1110 1120 1130 1140 1145 1150 1155 1160 1170 1210 1220 1230 1240 1305 1310 1315 1320 1325 1330 1335 Comprehensive Plan On Street INDIAN B D. INDIAN B D. INDIAN BD. INDIAN B D. INDIAN B D. INDIAN BD. INDIAN B D. INDIAN BD. INDIAN BD. I-95 I-95 I-95 I-95 RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER Table 4.7.1 Existing Roadway Characteristics From Street S. COUNTY LINE S. VB CITY L 17TH ST N. VB CITY L FRED TUERK RD OLD WINTER BCH RD 4TH ST @ US 1 8TH ST 12TH ST 17TH ST 20TH ST 2IST ST ROYAL PALM MB BRIDGE N. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD S COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4TH ST @ IR BLVD 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 17TH ST To Street S. VB CITY L 17TH ST N. VB CITY L FRED TUERK RD OLD WINTER BCH RD N. COUNTY LINE 12TH ST 12TH ST 17TH ST 20TH ST 21ST ST ROYAL PALM M13 BRIDGE US 1 @53RD ST OSLO RD S. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4T11 ST @ IR BLVD 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L I7TH ST Community Development Department Transportation Element No. of Exist Road Existing Juris- Functional LOS Length Lanes ROW Type LOS diction Class Standard 4.70 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.39 0.19 0.46 0.71 11.00 2.00 1.56 0.50 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100 120 80 50 100 100 100 100 100 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 300 300 300 300 160 200 80 80 80 80 80 U D D D D U U U U D D D D D D D D D F F F F D D D D D D D A D C D D B B 13 A B C C B B C C B B B B B B B E D D B D D SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR Indian River County 73 MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA I I I I PA PA PA PA PA PA PA D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D G B G B PC PC D D D D D D D Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element No. of Exist Road Existing Juris- Functional LOS Link ID On Street From Street To Street Length Lanes ROW Type LOS diction Class Standard 1840 1905 1907 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1962 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2110 2120 2210 2220 2230 2240 S.R. 60 (EB) S.R. 60 (EB) S.R. 60 (EB) S.R. 60 (EB) S.R. 60 (WB) S.R. 60 (WB) S.R. 60 (WB) S.R. 60 (WB) 16TH ST 16TH ST 16TH ST 16TH ST 16TH/17TH ST 17TH ST 17TH ST 12TH ST 12TH ST 12TH ST 12TH ST W. COUNTY LINE 98TH AVE I-95 82ND AVE 66TH AVE 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE W. OF 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY 10TH AVE W. OF 6TH AVE INDIAN RIVER BLVD ICWW W. OF 20T1-1 AVE OLD DIXIE HWY 10TH AVE 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY INDIAN RIVER BLVD 82ND AVENUE 5811-1 AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 98TH AVE I-95 82ND AVE 66TH AVE 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE W. OF 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY 10TH AVE W. OF 6TH AVE INDIAN RIVER BLVD ICWW OLD DIXIE HWY 10TH AVE W. OF 6TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY INDIAN RIVER BLVD 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE Community Development Department 2.50 14.00 6.52 1.19 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.30 1.10 0.50 0.43 0.35 0.25 0.24 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 3.00 1.00 2 2 2 2 4 4 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 100 100 100 100 234 136 100 100 100 100 70 70 70 70 140 140 80 N/A N/A N/A N/A 50 50 100 100 100 100 100 40 40 40 80 U U U U D D D D D D 0 0 0 0 D D D 0 0 0 0 U U U U D D D U U U U B A A 13 B B B B B C D D D D D D C D D D D B B B B C B B B B B B CR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR Indian River County 75 COL PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA MA MA MA PA PA PA PA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA D EB GB D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Link ID 2250 2260 2270 2305 2310 2315 2320 2325 2330 2335 2340 2345 2350 2355 2360 2365 2410 2420 2430 2440 2450 2460 2470 2480 2510 2520 2530 2540 2550 2560 2570 2580 Comprehensive Plan On Street I2TH ST 12TH ST 12TH ST O LD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY O LD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY OLD DIXIE HWY O LD DIXIE HWY 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE 27TH AVE OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD OSLO RD From Street 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY S. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST US 1 41ST ST 45TH ST 49TH ST 65TH ST 69TH ST S. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST ATLANTIC BLVD I-95 82ND AVE 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY To Street OLD DIXIE HWY OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST 41ST AVE 45TH ST 49TH ST 65TH ST 69TH ST OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST ATLANTIC BLVD AVIATION BLVD 82ND AVENUE 58TH AVE 43RD AVE 27TH AVE 20TH AVE OLD DIXIE HWY Community Development Department Transportation Element No. of Exist Road Existing Juris- Functional LOS Length Lanes ROW Type LOS diction Class Standard 1.00 0.50 0.62 2.20 2.10 0.50 0.35 0.52 2.00 0.50 2.50 2.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.23 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 2.00 0.30 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 80 80 D 35 35 60 60 60 60 60 D 60 60 60 60 60 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 60 60 60 60 30 30 30 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 13 13 B B B B B B B B B C C B B B B B CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR _CR Indian River County 76 MA MA MA COL MA MA MA MA MA MA MA COL COL COL COL COL COL MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA COL COL COL COL MA MA MA D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DE +20% DE +20% PE +20% DE +20% PE +20% DE +20% DE +20% D D D D D D D D D Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element No. of Exist Road Existing Juris- Functional LOS Link ID On Street From Street To Street Length Lanes ROW Type LOS diction Class Standard 2610 2615 2620 2710 2720 2805 2810 2820 2830 2840 2850 2860 2870 2905 2910 2915 2920 2925 2930 2935 2940 2945 2950 3005 3010 3015 3020 3025 3030 3033 3035 6TH AVE 6TH AVE 6TH AVE 10TH AVE 10TH AVE 20°1 AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 20TH AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 43RD AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 58TH AVE 12TH ST 17TH ST S. VB CITY L 17TH ST S. COUNTY LINE 17TH ST. SW 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST S. COUNTY LINE OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST 16TH ST 26TH ST 41ST ST 45TH ST OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST 16TH ST 26TH ST 41ST ST 17TH ST S. VB CITY L ROYAL PALM BLVD 171}1 ST. SW 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST S. VB CITY L 16TH ST ATLANTIC BLVD OSLO RD 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST 16TH ST 26TH ST 41ST ST 45TH ST 49TH ST 4TH ST 8TH ST 12TH ST 16TH ST 26TH ST 41ST ST 45TH ST Community Development Department 0.64 0.13 0.50 0.21 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.50 0.50 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 60 60 60 60 60 30 60 60 60 60 80 80 80 80 50 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 80 U U U U U U U U U U D D D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D D U U B B B C C C C C C C B B B B B B B B B C B 13 C C C C D B B B C C CR CR CR CI CI CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR Indian River County 77 MA MA MA COL COL LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC MA MA MA MA COL COL COL COL MA MA MA COL COL COL COL COL COL COL MA MA MA COL D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DE +20% DE +20% DE +20% DE +20% D D D D D D D D D D D D D TH AVE TH AVE 43RD AVE TH AVE 6TH AVE 74TH AVE 82ND AVE 90TH AVE 98TH AVE 106TH AVE 114TH AVE 122ND AVE 30TH AVE 138TH AVE 46TH AVE 54TH AVE 62ND AVE 170TH AVE Rural Principal Arterial Urban Minor Arterial V O O p 05 N ` U i tu O N U - c m m _ D D �My II 0 07 Z a to ✓ N to a o U 'O Ta y c ✓ 0 c u c W u.. U1 To U JJ Rural Minor Arterial Urban Principal Arterial _= Rural Principal Arterial - Interstate Urban Principal Arterial - Interstate Community Development Department • t St ca‘wiCC CL $ a 7 Or •# a cc onasc 4162 § Transportation El 10114 4124 1114-40211 • 64 CI � as en vas mar a. a. • Comprehensive Plan Community Development Department 0 Functional • U From Street O Q x 0 U a O O O CV N © en 0 N O 0 N O 00 F H N ¢ vi O O O N O V1 x Q N 0 o vi O O O N O O O O a vi 0 O 0 N O Q rx N O 0 p O O O N O Q rx t N 0 0 O O N O O x N 0 in 0 a U O 00 0 CV O N 0 M r H w o 0 tn O O Add 2 Lanes 0 Q 0 0 Add 2 Lanes O O N 0 In ¢ U V 0 F x N 0 N 0 In U Q V O V1 O CV m Add 2 Lanes O 0 U M O H 0 Add 2 Lanes 0 U CI F 0 O kin Add 2 Lanes 0 N Q U V NN c4Q Z co Add 2 Lanes O O N x U 7 MB BRIDGE ROYAL PALM 1 N 0 N Q U N M MB BRIDGE 0 U V O O N N M Indian River County 91 Community Development Department O Functional •O From Street Add 2 Lanes 0 0 M w 1-4 rx w 0 O W 0 U O N Add 2 Lanes 0 M 0 M 1441 x 0 O cG L O N Add 2 Lanes O O O 0 M a cn 1 0 O W 0 cn 0 v3 tn O N Add 2 Lanes 0 0 M CJ cn x w 0 O N OO O O V Add 2 Lanes O O N O 1/40 x en 1 O 0 O U 444-4 v 0 O en Add 2 Lanes 0 N 0 N x V) O M O N O 00 x en 0 in O oo 04 Q cnX MI 1 M 0 00 d a x 1 O tn cn N 441 a O N rn O 00 x 0 OD 1-4 5 m 1-4 0 00 ca x L 5 0 00 Q x CID O H N L tn en M O N O 1• 0 h O a a 04 d 4-1 0 O N O x gzi O in 5 O N 0 x cn Q 1 0 h 441 0 M O N 0 O O H m 5 O N O x cn let O M O x 7 0 5 0 0 O cn 0 M O N O O M H 7 41 5 m 0 0 N O N 0 5 0 00 rn O 1/40 0 N x cn O N 444-4 00 00 en Community Development Department ca b Functional LEI 06) O From Street Add 2 Lanes N O ca O U U 0 In O 0 U O CO 1/40 0 O (3 U (V 0 N 0 U 0 00 Add 2 Lanes O O 0 (1) 04 v) N 0 O 0' Add 2 Lanes O 0 Qa 04 N 00 oo Add 4 Lanes 0 N 0 ca d a 04 N O a O CN Add 2 Lanes en rn N a O O N 0' 0" N 0 N 0 O N 0 N 0 0 O VCD tn N O rn O 0 a O O 00 0 m. 0 00 0 0 w N z rn V m 0 04 v) q 0 N N 0" 0 O N a 0 0 U O ra 04 v) 0 m 0 w 0 0 O N ca 0 M O O 1-1 m 0 h 1-4 0 0 N ca a 0 O Ir 1 Irzrm W. OF 6TH AVE 0" O vet Ca CN 0 m O 00 04 d 0 O O v 0 z O z z ca O V > d 0 O O 0" • z z a 0 mrt N 00 0" Community Development Department • Ji Functional 0 U 0 a From Street O 00 O VD N 0 h F 0) Qx 0 O M N O 00 O CC U enM N Q CG U N M O w Q v O N O 00 O Q 0 c4 U N vi Qx 0 en M N O 00 O a 0 U r4 U N O M N O 00 O a 0 U U N O O F F ON trt M O 00 O 0 U 1x U N O krt w 0 0 O VD M N O 00 O Q a 0 U U N 0 o tn N O 00 0 0 0 U U N O O 0 0 N N _O N 0 a O 00 O 10 U N N 2 27TH AVE O N N 0 N w Add -2-1 Lane o co N O 00 U N O h 27TH AVE O rn 0 O 00 U t N O 1) F N 00 27TH AVE O 0 LI) 2 Add -1 Lane O 00 O 00 U N O S. VB CITY L 27TH AVE O N N 0 w Add -a 1 Lane O 1" CG U O 7 S. VB CITY L H N 0 0 a O 00 cG U 0 N O N N N O CO cG U O O L F N O00 N N 0 00 CG U N O o F� w H N Add 2 Lanes let O VD Q a 0 U U N N O z Z 00> rn 0 O h N Add 2 Lanes N a 0 U cG U O O > z 0 0 0 O N N Add 2 Lanes N O VD a 0 U L4 U N O O w m v 0 0 O 7 In N Community Development Department b Functional 0 a From Street Add 2 Lanes irt N O 1/40 O U 04 U N O O H N O N N Add 2 Lanes O U N H O N 27TH AVE 0 VD O O N Add 2 Lanes 0 M Ll U N O O N 0x 0 oO O N 0 rn O M G1 U O M O O 00 0 00 O 04 U N F N H O N O 00 0 04 U H U F Nr In O O 00 0 04 U O N O kr) 0 v1 vi O N N z 0 U rn rn O O vi F H N W 0 O_ N N 0 U N 0 N N O 0 M 04 U O O N 0 N 0 00 O 04 U N O O 0 0 17TH ST. SW H O O o O U O 04 U N O O N Q 0 _O N O 00 O U O 04 U N O h cn oo W 0 0 N O 00 0 00 0 U O U N O In F H N O 00 N 0 0 00 U 0 W 0 0 N O 00 N N O 0 0 00 04 U Ala O W H O N 0 0 00 U O h cn O 00 00 N O 00 q U N O in O W 0 N O N W N O 0 O kr) 04 U N O O N 0 O m 0 O 0 0 0 a O U 04 U N 0D 0 0 N 0 0 In 0 N a O U 04 U N 0 Ln O W 9d Vl 1T N Add 2-1 Lanes 0 0 U V1 O F F N oo 0 0 Community Development Department is o Functional lD O 0 r..` C) Cist0 From Street Add 2-1 Lanes 0 0 0 00 04 0 0 cn i, rq CT 5 N b 0 0 0 CO cG U N 0 0 0 vi Add 2 Lanes 0 O 00 0 O O vi 0 0 00 0 U 2' U N 0 O N cn F cn V N CN N N 0 0 0 00 0 U N 0 H cnF v 0 0 0 00 0 U N 0 tn O LrI 1) N Add 2 Lanes 0 en 0 Q 0 U 04 0 N O O N W 0 O Gra oo 0 0 M Add 2 Lanes O en 0 0 U 04 U N 0 H 00 0 N b 0 m 0 tn 0 0 U N 0 00 oo O M Add 2 Lanes 0 rn 0 a 0 U 04 0 N 0 In 1/40 00 0 O M 0 cn 0 04 0 v 0 0 cG v] 0 rn 0 cC U '3 H N 1/40 Gra H oo 1/n O O 0 en 0 U N 0 tn cip 7 F N O M 0 o 00 0 0 o.' 0 N 0 0 [2.) 00 M O en O 00 a 0 U 04 0 N 0 O O 0 0 00 0 U 04 U N 00 0 H en h 0 0 00 0 U U N F 2 0 en 0 00 0 0 CL 0 N 0 sn O O 0 en 0 00 Q 0 U U N O N 00 cn 0 Q a 0 U 04 U N H V OSLO ROAD O M New 2 Lanes 0 0 z z cC U z O 0 N Add 2 Lanes set N 0 Q a 0 U cL U N 0 F N 0 vzt vi O N M Community Development Department ehensive Plan Table 4.9.2 - Modeled System Performance Total Network CO f� M to 10 (•- O O M O O n. w U U s— s— co c6 7 Q mU 0 U 0 O E Em .d > U * � Q >> co co a) cri d' N • N O E E co 0 O (7) N � E.0 w 1 E x w O C O 0 CO O O L N >. 0 I T* — Vehicle Miles Traveled. VHT** Vehicle Hours Traveled Source: Indian River County MPO Project Cost (000) 0 F" From Street Phase 1 — 1999 to 2005 -10 b 7J v VD N Cie b: O N1 Can 1/440 0 0 Q oo O v N Roseland Rd. rn N U 0 O 00 O 00 69 v 0 U O_ 0 00 N 69 v N rn N N N M N b9 N 1) O 1/40 t vi O M N Phase 2 — 2006 to 2010 r -- fie 69 0 z O O v N N N 1 s b N v] 0 N N W EA) 0 v N M v] Indian River Blvd O N tio N M N 1 b b V) v rzt 6 O V N 00 69 0 N 5 a> 5 v 0 U vi O N Community Development Department Transportation Element Comprehensive Plan v M Ni O 5 O a b N a N 0 z O 1/40 N o 0' N N ectr '9 69 N Schumann Dr. O N O N_ 69 b b 5 N t N 124 O O Phase 4 — 2016 to 2020 00 00 O N 69 5 N 0 V tll 00 0 O O c:07 69 69 N V N 0 0 0 10 • z sQ z N z 0 0 CA 10 N Phase 5 — 2021 to 2025 M N r N d N N 1/40 PC 1/40N 0 N 0 z O 0 N CA CA Vl 69 b a 0 z O v 0 0 00 69 5 N 0 z O -49 1/40 1/40 O b CN 0 O N n t b b N 0 z O In rel N Source: Indian River County MPO Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES The goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of each comprehensive plan element. This section identifies the transportation element goals, objectives, and policies. This plan uses the following definitions of a goal, an objective, and a policy. Goal: Long term end toward which programs or activities are directed. Objective: A specific, measurable, intermediate end that is achievable and marks progress toward a goal. Policy: The course of action or way in which programs and activities are conducted to achieve an identified goal or objective. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOAL Indian River County shall have a safe, efficient, and accessible transportation system which provides for mobility of all residents and visitors, encourages freedom of choice among alternative modes of travel, respects the natural and built environment, meets the stated needs of local jurisdictions, and is determined to be financially feasible. Traffic Circulation OBJECTIVE 1 ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM The county acknowledges that there are no existing roadway capacity deficiencies within the County. Through 2020, the county traffic circulation system will continue to operate at or above the minimum service levels specified in policy 1.1. POLICY 1.1: The county hereby adopts traffic circulation level of service standards. These standards are as follows: Level of service "C" shall be maintained for rural principal arterials and rural freeways during peak hour, peak s ason and peak direction conditions. During peak how, peak season and pear direction conditions, iLevel of service "D" or better shall be maintained on all other freeway, arterial and collector roadways with the exception of the following two, which will operate at 200/0 in excess of level of service "E":- ° 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 43rd Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street For Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. Community Development Department Indian River County 117