Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/29/1975THURSDAY, MAY 29, 1975 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS_ OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MET IN SPECIAL SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, MAY 29, 1975 AT 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M. PRESENT WERE ALMA LEE LOY, CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., VICE CHAIRMAN; EDWARD J. MASSEY; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., AND EDWIN,S, SCHMUCKER. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; PAUL D. BURCH, ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND ELIZABETH FORLANI, DEPUTY CLERK, THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THIS MEETING TO ORDER AND STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING IS TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF A COMPRE— HENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. THE HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.1. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING iNOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATIOJ ATTACHED: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a .--Z-4.1. __._._-.___._Jn the matter of NOTICE is hereby given that the Board of County ..24,��. _- Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. wil: hold a Public Hearing on May 29, 1975, at 7:30 P.M In the Board of County Commissioners Room in the Indian River County Court House In Vero Beach _ Florida. to consider the adoption of a comprehensive fished in said newspaper in the issues ofL�.r ' z..)land use plan for the unincorporated areas of Indian, River County. Florida. Property owners are invitee to attend. This 7th day of May, 1973. LEGAL NOTICE in the Court, was pub - Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said tndian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or' corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this( (SEAL) MAY 2 9 1975 (Busine' Manager) (C(erk of ircuit Court, Indian River County, Florida) ALMA LEE LOY • Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County Qo6K 22 PACE392 MAY 2$1975 ALSO PRESENT FOR THIS DISCUSSION WERE VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR; ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR; HARRY ADLEY OF ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES, CONSULTANT WHO PREPARED THE ORIGINAL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND THEN WORKED WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON THE REVI- SIONS; AND RALPH SEXTON, CHAIRMAN OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ZONING COMMISSION. CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT THIS PLAN REPRESENTS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF HOURS OF WORK AND STUDY WITH DEVELOPERS AND CONSULTANTS ALL PLANNING TOGETHER TO PRESENT A PIAN FOR THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. RALPH SEXTON, CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, APPEARED AND STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION HAS WORKED ON THIS PLAN SINCE JUNE OF 1971, AND THEY RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF IT TONIGHT. VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, APPEARED AID PRESENTED SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROGRESS OF THIS PLAN TO THIS POINT. MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THE POPULATION CHART PREPARED IN 1971 SHOWED AN ANTICIPATED GROWTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OF 86,090 BY 1990, IN 1974"wE ARE RIGHT ON COURSE WITH 45,933 AS .THE OFFICIAL POPULATION FIGURE FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, THE CITY OF VERO BEACH ANTICIPATED A GROWTH OF 42,000 BY 1990 AND HAS AS ITS OFFICIAL FIGURE FOR 194,14,758, MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THE POPULATION IS INCREASING FASTER IN THE CITY LIMITS, AND THE COUNTY IS FOLLOWING THE GROWTH PATTERN AS OUTLINED ON THEIR CHARTS, MR, BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IF EVERY PARCEL OF DEVEL- OPABLE LAND WERE ACTUALLY DEVELOPED AS THE MASTER PLAN PRESENTED TODAY INDICATES, THE COUNTY COULD HAVE ALMOST 582,640 RESIDENTS. HARRY ADLEY OF ADLEY & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTANTS HIRED TO WORK WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO CREATE THIS MASTER PLAN, APPEARED AND MADE HIS PRESENTATION, HE STATED THAT HE HAS NEVER WORKED ON A MASTER PLAN PROJECT WHERE MORE PEOPLE IN A COMMUNITY HAVE PARTICIPATED, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF MR, ADLEY WOULD ENDORSE THIS MASTER PLAN. MR. ADLEY STATED THAT THIS IS AN ADOPTABLE PLAN, AND HE DOES ENDORSE IT. woe ROOK fagr393 THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK, KENDALL SHARP, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING FRED NICHOLS OF DAYTON, OHIO, APPEARED AND STATED THAT HIS CLIENT OWNS 600 FEET OF OCEANFRONT • PROPERTY ADJACENT AND SOUTH OF THE MOORINGS, EAST OF AIA,- AND HE IS REQUESTING THAT THE MEDIUM DENSITY PROPOSED FOR THE MOORINGS BE EX- TENDED TO INCLUDE HIS PROPERTY, MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THE SOUTH BEACH AREA HAS NOT CHANGED FROM THE LOW DENSITY SHOWN ON THE ZONING MAP, CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF THIS REQUEST HAD BEEN MADE TO THE ZONING COMMISSION PRIOR TO THEIR PUBLIC HEARING AND IF THERE IS ANY IMMEDIATE NEED FOR THE CHANGE, MR, SHARP STATED THERE ARE NO IMMEDIATE PLANS FOR THIS PROPERTY, MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT MR, NICHHOLS DID APPEAR AT A MEETING, THE AREA TO -THE NORTH OF MR, NICHQLS' PROPERTY IS NOW IN MEDIUM DENSITY, AND SINCE THE BOUNDARY LINE ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP IS VERY FLEXIBLE, IT WILL BE UP TO THE ZONING COMMISSION TO RULE ON IT, IR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THEY HAVE TRIED TO PUT IN ROUNDED LINES SO THAT BOUNDARIES CANNOT BE DEFINED BUT RATHER AN APPROXIMATE AREA SINCE THIS IS NOT A ZONING MAP, COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED MR, BRENNAN TO EXPLAIN THE DIFFER- ENCE BETWEEN "LOW, MEDIUM OR NIGH" DENSITIES, MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT LOW DENSITY IS DEFINED AS FOUR UNITS PER ACRE, MEDIUM DENSITY AS EIGHT UNITS PER ACRE, AND HIGH DENSITY AS FIFTEEN UNITS PER ACRE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FURTHER ASKED IF FOUR UNITS MEANS ZERO TO FOUR UNITS OR SOMEWHERE BETWEEN ZERO AND FOUR AS THE MAXIMUM LOW DENSITY, MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT OUR ZONING CATEGORIES WILL BREAK THE DENSITIES DOWN, BUT THAT HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED BY THE ZONING COMMISSION. CARL ARCHER APPEARED AND STATED THAT HE HAS 10 ACRES OF PROPERTY ON SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD WHICH IS LOCATED BETWEEN THE COUNTY LANDFILL AND THE POLICE PISTOL RANGE, HE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY AS INDUSTRIAL, AND NOW ACCORDING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, IT WILL BE RESIDENTIAL, HE IS REQUESTING THAT HIS PROPERTY BE LEFT AS INDUSTRIAL, 3 MAY 2 9 1975 .�.`An r nu" £-Z PA•GEj3 •' 4 MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT IN TIME THE COUNTY LANDFILL WILL BE VACATED AND WHAT THAT PROPERTY WILL BE USED FOR IN LATER YEARS IS NOT KNOWN. THERE IS NO INTENTION TO REZONE MR. ARCHER'S PROPERTY, BUT IT MAY BE REZONED AT A LATER TIME, IF THE COUNTY DECIDES TO SELL THEIR PROPERTY AND INDUSTRY COMES IN, THE AREA WILL REMAIN INDUSTRIAL, BUT IF ITIS TURNED INTO A PARK, THE AREA WILL BE REZONED TO RESIDENTIAL. MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION, UPON THE ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, IS GOING TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY AREAS THAT SHOULD BE STUDIED IN WHICH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE EXISTING AREAS, AND WE ARE GOING TO STUDY THOSE AREAS AND THEN RECOMMEND CHANGES SO THAT THEY WILL CONFORM TO THE ZONING 1AP, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED THAT THE STRAIGHT LINES IN- DICATING BOUNDARY LINES BE ROUNDED SO AS NOT TO BE SO DEFINITIVE. MR, BRENNAN AGREED THAT THE STRAIGHT LINES ARE TOO DEFINITIVE. COMMISSIONER P1ASSEY STATED THAT IT WAS HIS OPINION THAT THOSE BOUNDARY LINES WERE GUIDE LINES AND WE SHOULD ACCEPT IT FOR THAT REASON, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER RECOMMENDED THAT THE INDUSTRIAL AREA DISCUSSED BY SMR, ARCHER BE MADE A BLOB INSTEAD OF A DEFINED AREA, MR, SEXTON STATED THAT THERE WILL BE AN ORDINANCE ADOPTED TO GO ALONG WITH THE MASTER PLAN, AND HE READ FROM THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS: "THE LAND USE PLAN IS NOT A CONSTITUTION BUT A GUIDE ONLY TO THE MOST COMPATIBLE, LEAST DISRUPTIVE, USES OF LAND ON A BROAD, GENERAL AREA BASIS WITHOUT IN SOME CASES CONSIDERING THE PRESENT USE OF LANDS INCLUDED THEREIN, A BROAD BRUSH APPROACH WAS USED WITH THE INTENT THAT BOUNDARY LINES NOT BE INTERPRETED AS BEING PERMANENTLY FIXED OR LOCATED, THE PLAN IS NOT ULTIMATELY DEFINI- TIVE, IT IS SIMPLY A GAUGE FOR DETERMINING THE OPTIMUM DESIRABLE DEVELOPMENT UNDER PRESENTLY KNOWN RESOURCES." MR, SEXTON STATED THAT IF THIS PLAN IS ADOPTED, IT WILL BE USED AS A GUIDE LINE, THE ZONING COMMISSION WILL DO THE REZONING, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THE CONSERVA- TION AREAS, 4 MAY 2 9 1975 ROOK Phcc393 MR, BRENNAN IDENTIFIED .THEM ON THE MAP AS "GREEN" AREAS AND STATED THAT CONSERVATION AREAS MAINLY APPEAR ALONG THE RIVERFRONT, THEIR MAIN PURPOSE IS TO CAUTION DEVELOPERS, AND ALSO TO INDICATE TO THE ZONING COMMISSION THAT THERE IS LAND IN A CONSERVATION AREA AND THEY HAD BETTER USE EXTREME CAUTION IN APPROVING IT FOR DEVELOPMENT, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT THE LAND IN THE PROPOSED DENSITY SHOULD BE CALLED ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND, AS CONSERVATION TO MOST PEOPLE MEANS THAT IT WILL=BE CONSERVED, AND HE SUGGESTED THAT THEY SHOULD BE CALLED ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS AND HAVE A DENSITY, CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF HE IS SUGGESTING THAT ALL THE CONSERVA- TION AREAS BE CHANGED TO A NEW CATEGORY TO BE CALLED ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS? _COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE WAS OBJECTING TO THE METHOD USED FOR PROJECTION OF POPULATION IN VARIOUS LAND USE AREAS, HE FURTHER STATED THAT HE IS ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT A LACK OF HIGH DENSITY AREAS IN THE COUNTY AND FEELS THERE ARE AREAS THAT CAN TAKE IT, MIKE ZIEGLER, A MEMBER OF THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY, APPEARED'TO DISCUSS AN AREA OF CRITICAL WATER RECHARGE, HE SUGGESTED. PLACING AN AREA LOCATED WEST OF THE RAILROAD AND FROM THE NORTH COUNTY LINE TO THE SOUTH COUNTY.LINE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA, THIS AREA OUTLINED WITH A DOTTED LINE SHOULD BE GIVEN A RED FLAG AND SHOULD ONLY BE DEVELOPED WITH EXTREME CAUTION AS THIS IS AN IMPORTANT WATER RECHARGE AREA, JEROME KRAMER, COUNSELOR FOR THE VERO BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION, APPEARED TO CONGRATULATE THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE TRE- MENDOUS JOB THEY HAVE DONE AND RECOMMENDED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- SIONERS ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, FRANK ZORC APPEARED REQUESTING THAT THE AREA KNOWN AS HIBISCUS AIRPORT BE REZONED BACK TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO CONFORM WITH SURROUNDING ZONING, IT IS SHOWN ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP AS 1EDIUM DENSITY, BUT THE LAND ON ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE AIRPORT IS IN Low DENSITY, 5 MAY 29t 5 nook 22 Facr396 COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THE HIBISCUS AIRPORT HAS GONE THROUGH REZONING, WHICH AT THAT TIME THE ZONING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDED REZONING AND THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED, BUT WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT REZONING; WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, MR, ZORC ASKED IF HIBISCUS AIRPORT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR REZONING BY THE ZONING COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT IF THE ZONING COMMISSION DETERMIN 6 IT SHOULD BE REZONED, IT WILL BE REZONED, THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND MADE PART OF THESE MINUTES. • MAY 20 W5 ., lay '.17t-.11. 19/S TOs Indian River County, Commissioners, Zoning Commissioners, Variance ward. •3he attached petitions are being submitted at this public hearing regarding the Overall County Land Use Plan - to be used during discussion tonight, and also to be used whenever any of the above public bodies conduct furthur rear- ings which pertain directly to the zone classification of the Old Hibiscus Airport. Please read petition at each hearing. Eben though this petition probably represents a majority of property cwners in the area, we anticipate more names to be added in the near future. PAC[398 n 2. TOS Indian River County, Zoning Commission, & Commissionersa MAY 1975 AIRPORTI (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, andfor density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding R1 properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons., Please study the records;) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential untix such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except resi ntia -- SIGNED NAME CF PRCP..''RTY COERS _Az 4- &La ei7 eti `elm` - Q .L,rA9 MAY 2 9 1975 Y-1 /f JJs cf � 1 73.- iS ODA .4-41 1 - /7 av-f- ifir / fes' v A ‘, 1 -r-g /V6 1 i5 7 c I /7 e_.. -?6 17 Roux 22 Pncf,3 3 MAY 2 9 1975 3. TO: Indian River County, Zoning Commission, & Commissioners: MAY 1975 AIRPORTS (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agbee with you; It has been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding R1 properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons. Please study the records;) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential until such time a legitimate request -is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,;.. SIGNED NAME CF PRCP✓RTY CMRS r/11i�..v� Cit° zt-r ,tI —Z -L, 1.1,05 1 G ...i.--/ r d- L itr'--- 9f4L ` !-�i •arc /r� • MAY 2 9 1975 5. TOs Indian River County, Zoning Commission, & Commissioners$ MAY 1975 AIRPORT$ (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and.or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding R1 properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years,_for many reasons. Plea e study the records;) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential untix such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,R1.. SIGNED NAME CF PRCPERTY C'I ERS 1 ieV ADDRE5^C J(t /63j /12 -e -•X -//6`;41.Ceeer dZu 2c ///ft • / •T A..5.4 S—f.) r ko >d I (o )6 1 I Tit C.vr_ - / 7,2 / - // it/ ofr. 1121- 1 e4 Pbe.�� f/t1 / 1,q'w or q 714. ,atdad ef 4 /17/- /6 7/ 1/ i4 P,1, 800X PAGE401 • w...A.44d gJ7e/t/51-4 noa,g' '6C?// 20., RAY 2 9 V75 /I 9O d/ /1d • BOOK 22- 4n9 PAGE ti 8. TO: Indian River County, Zoning Commission; & Commissionerss MAY 197$ AIRPORT: (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. &Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, Tor, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long:period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has .been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding Rl properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons. Please study the records;) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential until such time a legitimate request°is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,a. SIGNED NAME CF PRCPERTY =MS' ' ADD? __ ep Uc 1)1/ 9171-/o-'j�_G-L f4 O icP /40 0 /!A /1 S(6-70 a . //.6 /—/a4�-Z e.. /i3/ - 10,m4itie- 11 (t //A /636 //mit 9. TO: Indian River County, toning Commission, & Commissioners: MAY 1975 AIRPORT: (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has .been about 2.years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding Ri properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons., Please study the records;) [. We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential until such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,gi, SIGNED NAME CF PRCP2RTY CWI:ERS AD :_ ; 1. 7 0 G -i474-&-Z-C,----4._ , 1 .��/M - - i iA 1406 -ice �. 1 -� 74%, /0"r r 2 - /9z"` ✓'.•. 14 33 /g Gz\/ 1 43Z-- / / 6.7.1' /1 1 6a6 - MRS 2 9 1915 10. TOs Indian River County, Zoning Commission, & Commissionerss MAY 1975 AIRPORT: (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has .been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding RI properties we, or others own, (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons., Please study the records;) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned Ri Residential until such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,a. • SIGNED NAME CF PRCPERTY CZERS ADDR SS s I e,; _ / s r.CL a.„ eawir, .2+ /', .11," 1 dos.,#?' -k Q.v-e, Jo d 3 o g- MAY 2 9 1975 4A Ag - it ,F,6 - tic �s a„. . 11034, G4-4,1"" 1r. I t? ?22%-0 Id‘ -/J - •=z0)114 4.11.7-vwc.)-1.., I t6,(5— 7(5't4 k4144Att, ' Addg-614/' 1 1 4 /l�f'l =� A.411,6.." ook2 3:1405 - l b r4 11.. TOS Indian River County, Zoning Commission; & Commissionersi MAY 1975 AIRPORTS (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St, & Glendale Rd ) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the.Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has-been about 2:years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was rte -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding R1 properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons., Please study the records:) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned Rl Residential until such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,pj .SIGNED NAME CF PRCP RTY CWZIERS ui , I'7}k-s 17 tt 771 JS _ 1 %7o ,r 1 7G ( 65 -ti Qiu 1 4-g /—C,U (7z..0 . 1 730 1 1,os 13 zR I 6 13t --4_ AY 2 9 1975 MAY 2 9 1975 12. TOs Indian River County, Zoning Commission, & Commissionerss _MAY 1973 AIRPORT& (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you! It has been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was 3e -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (apyrroxl rn tr;1y i ry amen, including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding R1 properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons.Please study the records!) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential until such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,Rl. S GNED NAME CF PRCPERTY C4 ERS &.rn r c m i , /pe.e,; DK ezg.t--. e_e ADDMSS s 1 76 - 31-41 t 7%5 t6t �ll to !_� :� .6.0U, 176 a rd 4c -. c 177� -, 70 i ere /6 4<- 17Ni 1 1 30 (,�v 1 7// 7/1 /G 7-47 — /‘ -1:44 . -� -71 • 173 , e % i4 ( 1 73 I - /44‘ de-- v t,3 _. 1 f Att. CLO -12.', -6. 4 1/Za /H�'��ee' rd6QcL • Flog 22, 143f TOs Indian River County, Zoning Commission,& Commissioners; MAY 1975 AIRPORT$ (Refers to Old Hibiscus Airport on 12th St. & Glendale Rd.) The undersigned are PROPERTY OWNERS, within approximately six blocks of the Airport. You are studying MANY areas in the county, including the airport, which were re -zoned speci- fically for, and or, in conjunction with plans for development. Your concern is that these plans have not been implemented over a long -period of time, and that the approved zoning, and/or density needs reconsideration. We agree with you; It has been about 2 years since the airport was re -zoned. It appears the beautiful plan it was re -zoned for, may never be built, and this logically, nullifies the basis for the present zone. We feel you should consider re -zoning all this airport property, (approximately 80 acres,. including multiple, commercial, & industrial portions), to R1, to conform with all sur- rounding R1 properties we, or others own. (This has been the desire of many adjacent re- sidential property owners for many years, for many reasons. Please study the records:) We hereby petition this property be re -zoned R1 Residential until such time a legitimate request is made with acceptable plan, and approved, for developing otherwise. We feel there is no basis for any other zone presently; except residential,RJ.. SIMED NAME CF PRCn.'.TY CZER.S 1f) 1 ad. X 5-1.--)/;2 .AIRY 2 9 1975 if& g 22-241 /sLe4 J•o I/tLS tlY ' < & /d, -r8. l 3 C i71G 4r v,I / 7 f-4'G,4� ROOK 22 Pict 'P� DON WILCOX APPEARED AND STATED HF WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS HIMSELF TO A SPECIFIC AREA OF THE PLAN - A STRETCH OF LAND ON THE BEACH, SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMITS TO THE COUNTY LINE, WHICH IS ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP AS RESIDENTIAL, EXCEPT FOR EXISTING MEDIUM DENSITY IN THE MOORINGS. MR, WILCOX REQUESTED THAT THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE LAND USE PLAN EXCLUDING THIS SOUTH BEACH AREA AND THAT AN EXTENSIVE STUDY OF THIS AREA FOR DEVELOPMENT BE MADE. '"HEN THIS IS DONE, THE PLAN CAN COME BACK FOR ADOPTION OF THAT PORTION OF THE PLAN. HE FEELS WHEN THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN IS ADOPTED, IT SHOULD BE FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTY, INCLUDING THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AGREED AND ASKED IF IT WOULD BE A REASON- ABLE APPROACH TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN WITH THE PROVISION THAT THERE BE AN ItM1EDIATE RESTUDY OF THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, MR, WILCOX STATED HE FELT THAT IS REASONABLE, AND HE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS, CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF THIS REQUEST WAS MADE TO THE ZONING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION, MR. WILCOX ANSWERED THAT IT WAS, TOM JONES APPEARED AND EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT PROPERTY HE OWNS LOCATED AT THE SOUTH COUNTY LINE NEAR INTERSTATE 95 WHICH WAS IN AN AGRICULTURAL AREA AND NOW ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN IS IN A CONSERVATION AREA. MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THIS WAS DONE BY AERIAL MAPS, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THIS AREA IS NOT SUITABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENT, THERE ARE OTHER AREAS IN AGRICULTURE THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT, THE EXISTING ZONING WOULD HOLD SO THAT IR, JONES CAN DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY IN AGRICULTURE, BUT IF ANYONE WISHED TO GO IN AND DEVELOP IT IN RESIDENTIAL, THERE WILL BE A RED FLAG WHICH MEANS TO PROCEED WITH CAUTION, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS CONSERVATION AREA SHOULD BE IN AGRICULTURE. 17 MAY 2 9 1975 RooK -1140 BOB GRICE, A MEMBER OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, STATED THAT AREA IS NOT ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE, AND IT SHOULD BE AGRICULTURE. IF ANYONE COMES IN TO DEVELOP IT, THEY WOULD HAVE A TOUGH JOB, CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF EVERYONE AGREED WITH '1R. JONES REQUEST THAT PORTIONS OF PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH COUNTY LINE BETWEEN I®95 BE AGRICULTURE AND NOT ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS, THE BOARD AGREED WITH THIS REQUEST. THE ZONING COMMISSION HAD RECEIVED SEVERAL REQUESTS FOR CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, BUT ONLY RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING TWO: ONE WAS FROM HOBART INDUSTRIES REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL PLAN TO SLIGHTLY INCREASE THEIR INDUSTRIAL AREA AND LEAVE THE BALANCE OF THEIR LAND IN AGRICULTURE. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT IT LIES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA, THE USE OF THAT LAND WOULD BE SCRUTINIZED VERY CLOSELY. MR, GRICE STATED AS A ZONING COMMISSION MEMBER HE WAS IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS CHANGE, ":THE OTHER CHANGE RECOMMENDED BY THE ZONING COMMISSION WAS A PROPOSAL FROM MARSHALL BARNES. THE REQUEST IS TO EXTEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA OVER SLIGHTLY TO THE WEST TO INCLUDE A SMALL PORTION OF HIS PROPERTY AND SO THAT IT CONFORMS WITH THE ZONING MAP, CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT INSTEAD OF THE BOUNDARY LINES BEING DEFINITE, IT SHOULD BE A ROUNDED LINE AND IT WOULD INCLUDE 1R, BARNES' PROPERTY, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE SOUTH BEACH AREA. HE STATED THAT HE FEELS IT IS NOT PRACTICAL TO KEEP THE SOUTH BEACH AREA FULLY RESIDENTIAL. IF THIS HAPEENS, WE WILL HAVE CONSTANT PRESSURE FROM THE DEVELOPERS. WE HAVE A CONTINUOUS LINE OF MEDIUM DENSITY ALONG THE NORTH BEACH AND MAYBE THAT SHOULDN'T BE AS CONSISTaNT AS IT IS, BUT THERE SHOULD BE SOME MEDIUM DENSITY ON THE SOUTH BEACH. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FEELS THERE IS A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH BEACH AREAS, THE DIFFER€NCE BEING THE NORTH BEACH AREA IS VIRTUALLY UNDEVELOPED LAND, HE DOES AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER IN THAT POSSIBLY IT WOULD BE BETTER NOT TO 13 V MAY 2 9 .1975 . M:t err' ?R'-'"- ,,,,_.- 410 - HAVE THE WHOLE NORTH BEACH AREA IN MULTIPLE FAMILY, THE REASON HE FEELS THERE SHOULD BE A RESTUDY OF THE.SOUTH BEACH IS THERE IS A LARGE SINGLE FAMILY POPULATION IN THE SOUTH BEACH AREA RIGHT NOW, AND HE DOES NOT FEEL THIS IS THE PROPER TIME TO CHANGE IT,' COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT IT WOULD BE TO EVERYONE'S ADVAN- TAGE TO SEE THAT THAT LAND IS COVERED IN THE RIGHT WAY AS QUICKLY AS POS- SIBLE. HE SUGGESTED AN IMMEDIATE RESTUDY OF THE SOUTH BEACH AREA. THIS RESTUDY, COUPLED WITH THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A P.U,D, ORDINANCE COMING UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING, COULD GIVE THE PROPER CONTROL TO THIS RESIDENTIAL AREA AND AT THE SAME TIME ALLOW THE PROPER MIXTURE IN THAT AREA, COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED WHAT WE SHOULD LOOK FOR IS AN OVER- ALL CONCEPT FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTY WITH A MIXTURE OF THE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE THAT WE FEEL WE CAN PROPERLY PUT IN THE AREAS WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE DE- VELOPED, WITH THE PROPER BALANCE, AND WITH THE PRIMARY CONCERN OF PRO- TECTING AND SAVING OUR AGRICULTURE LAND, WE ARE ADDRESSING OURSELVES PRIMARILY TO THE BEACH AREA AT THIS TIME, THERE IS CONSIDERABLE MULTIPLE FAMILY IN THE NORTH END THAT IS UNDEVELOPED, BUT IT IS MY FEELING THAT THIS IS THE CONCEPT OR PLAN WE ARE LOOKING TOWARDS, "'!E ARE NOT SPECIFI- CALLY TRYING TO TELL A MAN WHO OWNS PROPERTY WHAT HE CAN PUT THERE, BUT WE ARE SAYING THIS IS WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THERE, You KNOW BASICALLY IN THAT AREA WITH THE LOW DENSITY AND THE MEDIUM DENSITY THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THERE, BUT IF IT DEVELOPS A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY LIKE COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SAID WITH THE NEW P,U,D, ORDINANCE WE HOPE TO ADOPT, THIS COULD GREATLY CHANGE THE WAY THE AREA COULD BE DEVELOPED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED THAT IN THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, THEY HAVE NOT PROPOSED ANY MULTIPLE FAMILY, IN THE ORIGINAL PROFESSIONAL MAP SHOWN TO US, IT WAS THE PROFESSIONAL'S OPINION THERE SHOULD BE SOME MULTIPLE FAMILY, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME MULTIPLE FAMILY ON THE MASTER PLAN SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE PRESSURES WE WILL HAVE AT A LATER DATE, SOME MIGHT END UP WITH A HIGHER DENSITY THAN WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THERE, OR THAN WE HAVE NOW, WHEN WE TALK ABOUT "TEDIUM, Low AND HIGH DENSITY, EVERYONE COULD HAVE A DIFFERENT CONCEPT OF WHAT WE MEAN BY Low, MEDIUM AND HIGH, IT HAS BEEN SAID, "WE DON'T WANT A CONCRETE JUNGLE LIKE FORT LAUDERDALE," HIGH DENISTY THERE IS 120 UNITS PER ACRE BUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT HIGH DENSITY HERE, IT IS 15 UNITS. HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMEWHERE IN THE SOUTH BEACH, IN THE AREAS THAT ARE DEFINITELY NOT DEVELOPED NOW, SOMETHING THAT WILL PROTECT THE PRIVATE SINGLE ) FAMILY, BUT HE WOULD LIKE SOME AREAS DESIGNATED FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY, 19 ROOK 2 PAG[411. MAY 2 9 :1975 COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF THE. CHANGES REQUESTED BY MR, BARNES AND HOBART INDUSTRIES SHOULD NOT BE -HANDLED AS A ZONING CHANGE AND NOT CHANGES TO THE LAND USE PLAN, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AGREED WITH COMMISSIONER WODTKE ON THAT POINT, CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER'S ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATION THAT THE SPECIFICALLY DEFINED AREAS THAT FOLLOW PROPERTY LINES BE ROUNDED IN ALL AREAS MIGHT HANDLE THE REQUEST FROM MR, 3ARNES AND HOBART INDUSTRIES AND BE MORE IN LINE WITH THE OVERALL CONCEPT OF THE MASTER PLAN. MR, GRICE STATED THERE WERE MANY REQUESTS FOR CHANGE, AND THESE WERE THE ONLY TWO THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION FELT JUSTIFIED CHANGE, WE.WERE TOLD THAT THE LINES ARE NOT DEFINITIVE; THEY ARE GUIDELINES AND NOT MEANT TO BE DEFINITIVE, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE WOULD PREFER NOT TO HAVE ANY STRAIGHT LINES ON THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS, AND SUGGg$TED THAT THEY ALL BE MADE ROUNDED, *MR, GRICE STATED THAT HE DID NOT AGREE THAT ALL STRAIGHiT LINES ON THE MAP BE ROUNDED, COMMISSIONER MASSEY SUGGESTED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION SET -BACK LINES ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE ALONG THE BEACHES BE SHOWN ON THE LAND USE MAP, MR, BRENNAN STATES THAT THESE ARE NOT SHOWN BECAUSE THAT WILL CHANGE FROM TIME TO TIME, COMMISSIONER MASSEY SUGGESTED THAT RECREATION AREAS BE SHOWN ON THE MAP, MR, SEXTON STATED HE RECOMMENDS THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GO AHEAD AND ADOPT THIS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN WITH THE CHANGES RECOMMENDED, JIM DOOLITTLE OF THE BOARD OF REALTORS APPEARED AND STATED HE WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF HAVING THIS PLAN ADOPTED PROVIDED IT IS NOT ETCHED IN STONE, IT IS FULL OF PROBLEMS, AND THERE WILL BE MANY CHANGES NEEDED TO MAKE THIS WORK, MR, DOOLITTLE WAS IN FAVOR OF IMPLE- MENTING THE PLAN WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, 20 NAY 28 1975 4 ION t t1"E ^, , A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY DELETING THE SOUTH BEACH AREA AND AN IMMEDIATE STUDY TO BE MADE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ALL THE CHANGES SUGGESTED BY THE BOARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND, MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT THAT ALL BOUNDARY LINES BE ROUNDED INSTEAD OF THE STRAIGHT LINES USED IN ALL CASES, MR. BRENNAN STATED .THAT THAT WOULD CAUSE TREMENDOUS PROBLEMS FOR HIM AND HIS STAFF, THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION: COMMISSIONER M"ASSEY, WODTKE, SIEBERT AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN OPPOSITION; COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER VOTED IN FAVOR, AND THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED, ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY CoMMIs- SIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THAT THE TERMINOLOGY BE CHANGED FROM CONSERVATION AREAS TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE \REAS. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THAT IF IT IS THE ZONING COMMISSIONS FEELING THERE IS A PROPER PLACE FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY IN THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, IT SHOULD BE. SHOWN ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE FEELS THE SAME WAY COMMISSIONER WODTKE DOES, BY EXCLUDING THE SOUTH BEACH AREA FROM THE ADOPTION OF THE PLAN, WE ARE SAYING TO THE ZONING COMMISSION THAT WE DO NOT LIKE WHAT HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT THE DAY WILL COME WHEN THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE FAMILY ON THE SOUTH BEACH, BUT TO HOLD UP A PLAN OR EX- CLUDE ANY PART OF IT WAITING FOR A PLAN WOULD BE AN INJUSTICE; COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE PLAN ADOPTED AS IT IS AND THEN HAVE THE ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW THIS SOUTH BEACH AREA, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE AGREED WITH THE POSITION TAKEN BY COMMISSIONERS WODTKE AND SCHMUCKER; HOWEVER, HE FEELS WE NEED A FULL STUDY IN ORDER TO OBTAIN PROPER CONTROL, 4 21 NAY 29um ,r } 900K 22 PAGE413 - r MY 29 Efts THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION: COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND SCHMUCKER VOTED IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS SIEBERT, MASSEY AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CHANGE THE TWO CONSERVATION AREAS LOCATED AT THE SOUTH COUNTY LINE AND I-95 FROM ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE (AREAS TO AGRICULTURE, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER MASSEY, TO INCORPORATE THE CHANGE RECOMMENDED BY THE ZONING COMMISSION WITH REGARD TO HOBART INDUSTRIES' REQUEST TO SLIGHTLY IN- CREASE THEIR INDUSTRIAL AREA AND TO LEAVE THE BALANCE OF THEIR LAND IN AGRICULTURE. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT THIS IS A REZONING RE- QUEST AND NOT A CONSIDERATION FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE fiMOTION; THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED; AND THE MOTION WAS PASSED. :ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT THE REQUEST FROM MARSHALL BARNES)AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZONING COMMISSION, TO INCREASE THEIR INDUSTRIAL AREA BE INCORPORATED IN THE PLAN, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT THE TWO DEFEATED RECOM- MENDATIONS BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY BACK TO THE ZONING COMMISSION FOR STUDY: 1.; THAT ALL BOUNDARY LINES BE ROUNDED INSTEAD OF THE STRAIGHT LINES USED IN ALL CASES, AND 2. RESTUDY OF THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND 'ISE PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY AS AMENDED, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CONTINUING THIS PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL JUNE 4TH AT 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSES OF DIS- CUSSING A PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS LAND USE PLAN, THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON NOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 11:25 O'CLOCK P.M. 22 ABOOK AM141 PAGE 14