HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/18/1975WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 1975
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 1975 AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A,M. PRESENT WERE ALMA LEE
LOY, CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., VICE CHAIRMAN, EDWARD J. MASSEY,
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.; AND EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER. ALSO PRESENT WERE
PAUL D. BURCH, ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JACK G.
JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, COUNTY COORDINATOR;
ELIZABETH FORLANI AND JACK HOCKMAN, DEPUTY CLERKS.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT LED THE PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
AND REVEREND JACK B. HART FROM THE PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD, GAVE THE
INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 29TH, 1975.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED ON PAGE 21, FIRST PARAGRAPH, THAT
PORTION OF THE SENTENCE READING "....OF THE COUNTY WITH NO CHANGES_AND..."
BE CHANGED TO READ ".....OF THE COUNTY DELETING THE SOUTH BEACH AREA
AND ".
CHAIRMAN LOY REQUESTED ON PAGE 5, SIXTH PARAGRAPH, FIRST LINE,
THE WORD "COUNCILLOR" BE CHANGED TO READ "COUNSELOR" AND THE WORD
"ORGANIZATION" BE CHANGED TO READ "ASSOCIATION".
THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COM-
MISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER %DIKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL.MEETING OF MAY 29, 1975, AS WRITTEN,
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 14 1975.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED ON PAGE 19, THIRD PARAGRAPH, FOURTH
LINE, THE WORD "DENITIES" BE CHANGED TO READ "DENSITIES".
THIS CORRECTION HAVING BEEN MADE A MOTION WAS MADE BY COM-
MISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANI-
MOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1975, AS
WRITTEN.
PACE 88
JUN 1 8 1975
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO REOPEN CONSIDERATION OF THE
MINUTES OF MAY 29, 1975.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REQUESTED ON PAGE 21, SEVENTH CARAGRAPH,
THIRD LINE, THAT PORTION READING "ee,PROPER PLACE FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY,,."
BE CHANGED TO READ " „ .PROPER PLACE FOR HIGHER DENSITY WHICH WOULD ALLOW
MULTIPLE FAMILY,.."
THIS CORRECTION HAVING BEEN MADE, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMIS—
SIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 29, 1975 AS WRITTEN.
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT IN TRYING TO GO ABOUT THE LEGAL PROCED—
URE OF HANDLING THE TERMINATION OF A FRANCHISE PRESENTLY OWNED BY MR,
CHADWICK AND MR. DORTON (ANDY'S SANITATION), IT WAS THE DETERMINATION OF
THE COUNTY ATTORNEY THAT IT DID NOT HAVE TO BE AN ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING,
AND IT WAS NOT ADVERTISED, THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS NOT HANDLED ACCORDING TO
OUR USUAL PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND WAS INADVERTENTLY
NOT PLACED ON TODAY'S AGENDA, ATTORNEY BURCH HAD INFORMED ALL THE PARTIES
INVOLVED TO APPEAR THIS MORNING AT 11:30 O'CLOCK AA) BUT THE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR HAS RECEIVED A NUMBER OF TELEPHONE CALLS ASKING IF THIS
PUBLIC HEARING WAS ON THE AGENDA, AND THEY WERE TOLD IT WAS NOT, THE BOARD
AGREED THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC WAS NOT WELL INFORMED OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING
AND THAT IT SHOULD BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT AUTHORIZATION TO REVOKE THE
CHADWICK AND DORTON FRANCHISE IN AN UNADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING BE AN
AGENDA ITEM AT THE MEETING OF JULY 9, 1975, THE TIME TO BE DETERMINED BY
-THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR.
DR. JOHN DAYTON AND DR, DONALD AMES REPRESENTING A GROUP OF
DOCTORS KNOWN AS VERO MED, INC., APPEARED AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS
GROUP IS PLANNING ON BUILDING AN OFFICE BUILDING NEAR THE NEW HOSPITAL ON
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE COUNTY'S UTILITY AREA, THIS PROPERTY IS DESCRIBED
AS THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 32S,
RANGE 39E, VERO MED IS REQUESTING A RELEASE FROM THE COUNTY'S SERVICE
2
[TOOK 23 PEE 69
AREA BY APPROVING A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
SO THAT THE CITY CAN SERVE UTILITIES TO HIS NEW OFFICE BUILDING,
DR. DAYTON STATED THAT THE HOSPITAL IS PAYING FOR THE UTILITY
LINES TO BE PUT IN FOR THE NEW HOSPITAL. THESE LINES WILL THEN BECOME
THE PROPERTY OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. 1.
DR, AMES STATED THAT THE TRANSMISSION LINES TO THE HOSPITAL a�
ARE AVAILABLE AND LARGE ENOUGH FOR THEIR USE, BUT THEY NEED A SEPARATE
ALLOCATION AND CANNOT COME UNDER THE HOSPITAL'S APPROVED ALLOCATION,
DR, AMES STATED THAT THE UTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS BUILDING
AND WHAT THEY WILL BE REQUESTING WILL BE FOR 30,000 GALLONS OF WATER AND
15,000 GALLONS FOR SEWAGE PER DAY,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT QUESTIONED IF THE COUNTY GIVES UP THIS
SERVICE AREA TO THE CITY WILL IT OR WILL IT NOT COUNT AGAINST THE COUNTY'S
ALLOCATION FOR UTILITIES FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS.
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT HE FEELS IF THE BOARD
APPROVES THIS TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY AND VERO MED, IT WILL
REDUCE THE COUNTY'S TOTAL ALLOCATION,
ATTORNEY BURCH.STATED THAT THIS TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT SHOULD BE
PREPARED ONLY FOR THE AREA VERO MED IS PLANNING TO DEVELOP AND NOT FOR
ALL.THE PROPERTY THEY OWN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, COUNTY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A TRIPARTITE AGREE
MENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY, VERO MED AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND THAT THE
COUNTY ENGINEER REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD REGARDING THE COUNTY'S ALLOCATIONS
ALREADY MADE AND THE AFFECT ALL FUTURE ALLOCATIONS WILL HAVE ON THE TRI-
-PARTITE AGREEMENT, THE ALLOCATION TO BE INCORPORATED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS
FOR 30,000 GALLONS' PER DAY FOR WATER AND 15,000 GALLONS PER DAY FOR SEWER,
AT THE MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1975, A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL
OF RIVER TREES SUBDIVISION WAS CONTINUED UNTIL THIS MEETING.
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PRESENTED A REVISED PLAN OF RIVER TREES
SUBDIVISION, WHICH MEETS ALL SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEES REQUIREMENTS,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF THE REVISED
PLAN OF RIVER TREES SUBDIVISION OWNED BY C. E. YODER.
3
AUX 18197
BOOK 23 PACE 70
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PRESENTED A PLAT OF MIRA FLORES
SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS OWNED BY NORMAN HENSICK WHO IS REQUESTING TENTATIVE
APPROVAL. HE STATED THAT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED BY THE SUBDIVISION
REVIEW COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN MET, BUT THE PLAT DOES NOT STATE IF IT IS A
PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF MIRA FLORES
SUBDIVISION, OWNED BY NORMAN HENSICK, WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE SUBDIVISION
REVIEW COMMITTEE, SUBJECT TO DESIGNATING IT AS A PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION
OR MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A COUNTY ROAD SUBDIVISION.
DEWEY WALKER, ZONING DIRECTOR, APPEARED REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR
A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ORDINANCE 74-20 TO BE GRANTED TO WILLIAM Co HOPE
BEING REPRESENTED BY JACK COOPER.
THE FOLLOWING AFFIDAVIT FROM WILLIAM Co HOPE AUTHORIZING
JACK COOPER TO REPRESENT HIM IS HEREBY BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES,
4
JUN 1919'5
�r�
POOR X23 PA 2E � .
. .
.
; f• ir 7 7-11:777.71T- rit r .
13 111111114e11111.1
. .
..
. flitrmi...i 1411111,14111:. tr'14411111;13‘. 11 al ,aat .simi
. ' .111111. 1.
1 11.113.11 11:.,111 1111 1111111
4' ; 4 6. ' ' -. . "41C27. ';:.• i
• MOTORS, -1 '`..-s•
..,1 13
...._ . -. . .
14
""r''2 4 i;;1,;‘,„-itt,ii
-ft
623-627 N.•CAPITOL AVENUE • INDIANAPOLIS. INDIANA 46204 ' ---•
•I'Zi...1C01111V
.F...poomomm,
•
itteProor4c: 5581
JUN 1 8.1975.
•
SALES SERVICE •-ctet,
5
2
ROOK •3 WE. 72
MR. COOPER APPEARED AND STATED THAT MR. HOPE HAS OWNED THIS
PROPERTY SINCE 1968 AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HAS A COPY OF HIS RECORDED
DEED. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED ON A PUBLIC ROAD, BUT THERE IS A •
DEDICATED EASEMENT THAT WILL ALLOW INGRESS AND EGRESS TO MR, HOPE'S PROP-
ERTY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED JACK COOPER REPRESENTING WILLIAM
HOPE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO COUNTY ORDINANCE 74-20 IN ORDER FOR MR, HOPE
TO BUILD ONE RESIDENCE ON HIS PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS PART OF GOVERNMENT
LOTS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 38, LYING EAST OF
U.S.I.
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE BOARD HAD REQUESTED
HIM TO OBTAIN PROPOSALS FOR A WATER PUMP AND WELL TO BE INSTALLED ON
COUNTY PROPERTY FOR THE ROSELAND WOMEN'S CLUB, HE DID OBTAIN A PROPOSAL
FROM JACOBS ELECTRIC IN THE AMOUNT OF $818.00. HE CONTINUED THAT HE CON-
TACTED ANOTHER COMPANY FOR A PROPOSAL, BUT HE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSE
THE PROPOSAL FROM JACOBS ELECTRIC IS FOR A COMPLETE NEW WATER
SOURCE FOR THIS CLUB. THE PRESENT SYSTEM IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT COMMISSIONER MASSEY WILL CHECK THIS PRICE
AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD,
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD OF A LETTER RE-
CEIVED FROM THE CITY OF VERO BEACH REGARDING HAZARDOUS OBSTACLES BEING
REMOVED FROM THE BEACHES, MR, H. BACH NIELSEN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, STATED THAT HE HAD WRITTEN A LETTER TO
COLONEL HOBBS, WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TO
GET THESE HAZARDS REMOVED, THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT, IN HIS
,,.OPINION, THE JOB THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE IS BEING DONE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT A LETTER BE SENT TO THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH STATING THAT WE CONCUR THAT IT IS A HAZARDOUS STTUATION,
AND WE WILL COOPERATE IN ANY WAY WE CAN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED A LETTER, SIGNED BY THE CHAIR-
MAN, BE SENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SUPPORTING THE
6
JUN 181975
^;h f ,
CITY OF VERO BEACH'S DECISION, AND RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE HAZARDOUS
OBSTACLES ALONG THE COASTLINE FROM THE NORTH COUNTY LINE TO THE SOUTH
COUNTY LINE AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY COOPERATION THE DEPARTMENT OF
THE ARMY CAN OFFER, AND ALSO AUTHORIZED A COPY OF THIS LETTER TO BE SENT
TO THE U.S. REPRESENTATIVE L. A. "SKIP" BAFALIS.
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD OF A REQUEST FROM
DOROTHY MANSFIELD GUILD TO PURCHASE LOT 11, BLOCK 9 OF VERO BEACH ESTATES.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF VERO BEACH, WE CON—
TINUED THAT SOME TIME AGO LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION WERE FORECLOSED ON AND
THE COUNTY TOOK OVER TITLE ON SOME OF THESE LOTS, THERE IS A REVERTER
CLAUSE IN THE DEED WHICH STATES THAT THE CITY IS TO USE THIS PROPERTY
TO PUT IN EAGLE TRAIL, IF EAGLE TRAIL IS NOT PUT IN BY THE CITY, THIS
PROPERTY WOULD REVERT BACK TO THE COUNTY, EAGLE TRAIL HAS NEVER BEEN
BUILT AS AROAD, AND AT THE END OF THIS LOT 11, THERE IS A DEAD END,
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ASKED IF THE BOARD WOULD BE AGREEABLE
TO CONTACTING MR. JOHN LITTLE, CITY MANAGER, AND GET THE CITY'S FEELINGS,
IF THEY WILL ABANDON ONE LOT, IT WOULD REVERT BACK TO THE COUNTY, AND THE
COUNTY WOULD THEN HAVE THE OPTION OF PUTTING IT UP FOR BIDS,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT IF THE CITY DOES AGREE THAT
EAGLE TRAIL WILL NOT BE BUILT AND THIS PROPERTY REVERTS BACK TO THE COUNTY,
IT CAN BE PUT UP FOR BIDS AT THE MARKET VALUE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY INSTRUCTED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO CON—
TACT JOHN LITTLE, CITY MANAGER, TO DISCUSS THIS SITUATION,
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT AT THE MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1975, THE
BOARD DISCUSSED THE NEW STATE GUIDELINES ON DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND ALSO
DISCUSSED GUIDELINES FOR OUR CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR REGARDING THE SERVICES
HE PERFORMS FOR THIS COUNTY AND THE AMOUNT OF MONEY PAID HIM FOR DOING
THIS JOB, WE HAVE ASKED STATE OFFICIALS TO APPEAR TODAY IN ORDER TO MAKE
DEFINITE POLICY DECISIONS ON HOW OUR CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR WILL OPERATE
THIS YEAR.
EDWARD JACKSON, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR,.INTRODUCED JAMES LAWSON,
CENTRAL AREA COORDINATOR, DIVISION OF DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND JAMES
DALZELL, STATE DIVISION OF DISASTER PREPAREDNESS,
7
JUN i 81975
PACE 74
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT IT WAS AGREED AT THE LAST BOARD
MEETING THAT WE DO NOT NEED A FULL TIME CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, BUT IN
ESTABLISHING A SALARY, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT A FULL TIME DIRECTOR BE PAID
$12,000 ANNUALLY, AND MR. JACKSON IS TO BE INSTRUCTED THAT THE CIVIL DEFENSE
DIRECTOR FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WILL BE A PART TIME DIRECTOR AT A SALARY
OF $6,000. THE STATE WILL REIMBURSE THE COUNTY $3,000. WE HAVE AN INDI-
CATION THAT THE STATE WILL WORK WITH THIS COUNTY TO TRY AND REMEDY THE
CLERICAL PORTION THAT IS IN QUESTION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT THE SALARY FOR A FULL TIME CIVIL
DEFENSE DIRECTOR FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BE ESTABLISHED AT $12,000.00 AN-
NUALLY AND THAT A CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR BE HIRED ON A PART TIME BASIS
AT A SALARY OF $6,000.00 ANNUALLY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT IT HAS BEEN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY'S INTENTION THAT THE CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR BE A PART TIME EMPLOYEE
TO CARRY OUT DUTIES AT THE DIRECTION OF THIS BOARD.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BAORD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RETROACTIVE OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL
FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER TO ATTEND A
REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT MEETING IN WEST PALM BEACH ON JUNE 13, 1975.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 75-32 AND 75-33 AND
AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN ON THE CONTRACTS FOR THE RESTORA-
TION PROJECT OF THE ROSELAND DOCK IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,300.00 AND THE BUILDIN
OF A BOAT RAMP AT THE WEST CAUSEWAY OF THE WABASSO BRIDGE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,486.00.
8
JUN 181975
inn'
pt`- 7
RESOLUTION NO. 75-32•
WHEREAS, Indian River County has made application
with the Florida Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Recreation and Parks, for funds to improve the Roseland dock;
and,
WHEREAS, the Executive Board of the Department of
Natural Resources at its meeting on June 3, 1975 approved the
request from Indian River County for $2,800.00 under the Flor-
ida Boating Improvement Program, for the purpose of completely
repairing the Roseland dock; and,
WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources has
prepared a contract for the County's signature;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida hereby
accept the contract terms of the Department of Natural Resources
re the improvement of the Roseland dock and hereby authorize
the Chairman to execute all necessary contracts to effectuate
the agreement between Indian River County and the Department of
Natural Resources.
ATTEST:
Clerk
JUN 1$197S
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN Riv1R COUNTY, FLORIDA
By t �7►-�
l
Chairman/
fOO' PAH 76
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF RECREATION AND PARKS
Florida Boating Improvement Program Project Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this /" day of
A.D.,
19 7 `, by and between the Department of NaturaResources, Division of
Recreation and Parks, hereinafter. referred to as Department, and the
County of Indian River
County
hereinafter referred to as
WITNESSETH:
That ,in and for the mutual covenants between the Department and the
County, it is agreed as follows:
1. The Department has found recreational boating improvement to be
the primary purpose of the project known as •Rose land•Dock
and has agreed to enter into this contract with the County for develop-
ment of recreational boating facilities and/or improvements, such deve-
lopments being in accordance with theproject plans attached hereto and
made a part of this Agreement as Exhibit "A".
2. The County agrees to operate and maintain said recreational
boating facilities and/or improvements once completed and covenants. that
it has the fuIl legal•authority and capability to so operate and main-_
tain said facilities and/or improvements.
3. The County agrees to commence construction of the project within
six (6) months., such period beginning on the date of the execution of
this Agreement and further agrees to complete .said project within twelve (12)
months from the starting date of construction.
JUN 181975
40K 2 PCE 7a
4. The County agrees to appoint the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners as the official liaison agent to be responsible for the
successful completion of the project, the prompt implementation of the
articles of this Agreement, and the submission of progress reports at
least every (60).sixty days from the date of the execution of this
Agreement until the project is certified complete by resolution duly
adopted by the County.
5. The Department agrees, in consideration of the promises made
by the County herein, to tender to the County funds in the amount of
$2, 800.00 to be used specifically for the develop-
ment of recreational boating facilities aa?/or'improvements as defined
in Exhibit "A" of this agreement.
6. The Department reserves the right to inspect the site and
facilities, as well as the right to audit any and all financial records
pertaining to this project at reasonable times.
7. Any inequities that subsequently appear in. this Agreement
shall be subject to negotiation upon written request of either party,
and the parties agree to negotiate in good faith as to any such in-
equities.
8. This Agreement is executed in duplicate each copy of which
shall for all purposes be considered and original.
4.
JUN 181975
78
•
9. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto executed this Agreement
on the day and year first above written.
Attest:
•
J U N 8 ig75
By:
EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Harmon W. Shields, Executive Director
Its Agent for this Purpose
APPROVED AS TO
ORM AND LEGALITY
The County of
ORNFY•Dr
irman
Board of County Commissioners
Its Agent for this Purpose
•
79
RESOLUTION NO.
75-33
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida have applied to the State of Flor-
ida, Department of Natural Resources for a grant in the amount
of $6,486.00 under the Florida Boating Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the grant would be to
improve and expand the small boat ramp located on the West
causeway of the Wabasso bridge; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County, through its Planning
Commission has made a study of environmental considerations
that would be affected by improvement of the boat ramp; and
WHEREAS, by letter dated March 25, 1975, from the
Planning Commission, said project was approved as being bene-
ficial to the County with little or no adverse environmental
impact; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is in favor of the
project moving forward without delay;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the
Board hereby approves the repair and expansion of the boat
ramp located on the West causeway of the Wabasso bridge and
requests the various Governmental agencies involved to proceed
with the approval of the application granting to Indian River
County an amount of $6,486.00 for the project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners is hereby authorized that at
such time that contracts are forwarded to the County for signature
to execute same to effectuate completion of the project in accord-
ance with the application submitted.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST: By
Clerk
JUN 181975
Chairman
6001,C s tj PAcE 80
THE CONTRACT FOR THE BOAT RAMP AT THE WABASSO BRIDGE WILL BE
MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AT A LATER DATE.
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT ACCORDING TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE DE
PARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, ONCE THE PROJECT IS UNDER WAY IT WILL
REQUIRE A PROGRESS REPORT EVERY SIXTY DAYS AND THE BOARD INSTRUCTED
'MR. THOMAS TO FOLLOW. THROUGH ON THESE REPORTS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETROACTIVE OUT—OF—COUNTY
TRAVEL FOR A. RONALD HUDSON TO THE REGIONAL MANPOWER BOARD MEETINGS
AS FOLLOWS:
TO SANFORD MARCH 15, 1974
rANFORD COUNTY — I'IAYI9 9191'974
RLANDO JUNE i2, 1975
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETROACTIVE OUT—OF—COUNTY TRAVEL FOR
L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS TO ORLANDO ON JUNE 12, 1975 TO ATTEND A REGIONAL
MANPOWER COUNCIL MEETING.
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of
in the
Ilshed in said newspaper In the issues
Court, was pub-
•
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ..../ .. ... •.y
(SEAIJ
JUN 1 8 1975
4
•
ness Manager)
(Clerk ofCircuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
Ijy
low
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that a Petition has been filed with
the Board of County Com-
missioners of Indian River County,
Florida, by BESSIE TITUS,
requesting that the Board adopt a
Resolution renouncing and
disclatmingany right of the county
and public In and to the land or
Interest therein acquired for
street, road or highway purposes
and park purposes described as
follows:
That section of Sunrise Avenue
lying between lot 6 of Block 1,
and Lot 1 of Block 3, of
Webasso Manor Addition Unit
No. 1, according to the plot
filed In the office of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court of Indian
River County, Florida, In Plat
Book 4, page 68. •
No part of the foregoing street,
road, or highway now constitutes
or was acquired for a State or
Federal highway or park and no
part i5 located within the limits of
any Incorporated municipality.
Said Board will hold a pubtic
hearing thereon of 11:00 A.M. on
June 18th, 1975, In the meeting
roam of the Board In the Indian
River County Courthouse, Vero
Beach, Florida, Persons interested
may appear end be heard at that
time.
Board of County
Commissioners
of Indian River
County. Florida
L)': Alma Loa Loy
Chairman •
r. May 18, 1975. •.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK,
LAWRENCE BARKETT, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING MR. AND MRS. J.B. TITUS
APPEARED REQUESTING ABANDONMENT OF A SECTION OF SUNRISE AVENUE IN WABASSO
MANOR,
ATTORNEY BARKETT PRESENTED A PETITION SIGNED BY ALL PROPERTY
OWNERS ALONG SUNRISE AVENUE IN FAVOR OF THIS ABANDONMENT. THIS PETITION
IS HEREBY BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
1PWe, the undersigned property owners along Sunrise Avenue, do request that
the County Commission abandon that portion of Sunrise Avenue lying between
Lot 6 of Block 1, and Lot 1 of Block 3, of Wabasso Nanor Addition Unit #1."
10
t r A,
_
l�-2i d'7'v f • rot,
A. 4Apizr
MR. J.B. TITUS APPEARED AND REQUESTED ABANDONMENT OF THIS
PROPERTY WHICH HE AND HIS WIFE HAVE MAINTAINED FOR 12 YEARS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A
SECTION OF SUNRISE AVENUE IN WABASSO MANOR ADDITION UNIT 1, SUBJECT
TO THE APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY.
15
JUN 1819T1
PO" 4^
RESOLUTION NO. 75-34
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, resolve:
1. That a petition has been filed with this Board request-
ing this board to renounce and disclaim any right of the county and
the public in and to all lands or interest acquired for.street,
road, or highway purposes in that area described hereafter:
That section of Sunrise Avenue lying between
Lot 6 of Block 1, and Lot 1 of Block 3, of
Wabasso Manor Addition Unit #1, according to
the plat filed in the office of the Clerk of
the Circuit Court of Indian River County,
Florida, in Plat Book 4, page 68.
'The board has determined that none of these streets above described
now constitute or were acquired for a state or federal highway or
park and none are located within the limits of any incorporated
municipality and the board has declared that a public hearing would
be held to consider the advisability of granting the request and
that a public hearing would be held before this board in the County
Commissioners Room in Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida,: at 15:00 A.M. on .June 18;•1975 , at'which time, persons
interested may appear and be heard.
2. This board did publish notice of such public hearing
one time on the ' "1 1 Ft'. day of ..... ' / .. . , 1975, in the Vero
Beach Press Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in said
county, said publication being at least two weeks prior to the date
stated for the public hearing as will more fully appear by Proof of
Publication thereof filed in theminutesof this meeting. At the
time and place stated, the board did hold the advertised public
'hearing and all persons interested were heard and this board did
determine that the streets described above are not located within
the limits of any incorporated municipality'and'were not acquired
for and are not now being used for state or federal highways or
parks.
3. The Board of County Commissioners does herewith renounce
and disclaim any right'. .f the county and the public in and to the
JUN 181975
0'00K
streets and easements described in Paragraph 1, and does
herewith vacate, abandon, discontinue and close all of the same.
4. Notice of the adoption of this Resolution shall be
published one time within thirty days following its adoption in
one issue of the newspaper. of general circulation published in the
county. The Proof of Publication of Notice of the public hearing
and certified copy of this Resolution and Proof of Publication of
the notice of the adoption of this Resolution shall be recorded
in the Deed Records of Indian River County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I, RALPH HARRIS, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River
County, Florida, and ex officio Clerk of the Board of County
Commissioners, do herewith certify that the foregoing is a true and
correct copy of Resolution 75-34 duly adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 1975.
June
d
JUN181975
19th day of
r. .
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
—in the matter of
in the
lashed in said newspaper in the issues of
Court was pub -
/97,5-
Affiant
97S-
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this A.
(SEAL)
JUN 1 81975
(Business Manager)
(Clerk o Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the Board of County Com-
missioners of Indian River County,
Florida, will hold a Public Hearing
on June 18, 1975, at 11:00 o'clock
A.M. In the Indian River County
Courthouse to consider adoption of
a proposed County Ordinance
Amending Indian River County
Ordinance 71-2, 74-22, and 75-2,
providing for on-site Inspections,
requiring blocking andanchoring,
establishing minimium standards,
establishing responsibiilty for
compliance, providing exceptions,
providing for the issuance of
certificates of occupancy and
enforcement and .providing an
effective date.
Board of County
Commissioners
of Indian River County
Florida
By: Alma Lee Loy
• Chairman
May 25, 1975.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A COMMITTEE WAS
FORMED TO PREPARE THIS ORDINANCE. AND THE COMMITTEE INCLUDED MOBILE HOME
OWNERS AND MOBILE PARK OWNERS, DONALD ADAMS, BUILDING DIRECTOR,
REPRESENTATIVE CHESTER CLEM AND HIMSELF. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT
CONTINUED THAT EVERYTHING IN THIS ORDINANCE IS IN THE STATE REGULATIONS,
AND HE THEN PROCEEDED TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WITH THE BOARD.
MR. BORGEN AND MR.WOLD OF SOUTHGATE VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK
STATED THAT THEY COULD FIND NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND '
RECOMMENDED PASSAGE OF IT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 75-4 RELATING TO MOBILE
HOMES, WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ORDINANCE BEING SET AT JUNE 27, 1971
18
FMK 23 P E 85
J UN 1 8 1975
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 75-4
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO MOBILE HOMES, AMENDING
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCES 71-2, 74-22 AND
75-2, PROVIDING FOR ON SITE INSPECTION, RE-
QUIRING BLOCKING AND ANCHORING, ESTABLISHING
MINIMUM STANDARDS, ESTABLISHING RESPONSIBILITY
FOR COMPLIANCE, PROVIDING EXCEPTIONS, PROVIDING
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
AND ENFORCEMENT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That Indian River County Ordinances
71-2, 74-22 and 75-2 are hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1: That, after the effective date of this Ordinance,
every mobile home, modular home and house trailer occupied as a
dwelling shall be blocked and anchored in accordance with the
following standards:
Section 2. Minimum Pier Standards.
(a) Pier foundations shall be. installed directly
under the main frame (or chassis) of the mobile homes. The
piers shall not be further apart than ten (10) feet on
centers, and the main frame, front or back, shall not
extend further than two (2) feet beyond the center line
of the end of the piers.
(b) All grass and organic material shall be removed
and the pier foundation placed on stable soil. The pier
foundation shall be a 16" x 16" x 4" solid concrete pad,
precast or poured in place, or equivalent.
(c) Piers must be constructed of regular 8" x 8" x 16"
concrete blocks, open cells, solid, or equivalent (with
open cells vertical), placed above the foundation. A
2" x 8" x 16" pressure treated wood plate, or equivalent,
shall be placed on top of the pier with shims fitted
and driven tight from both sides of the I -Beam, between
the wood plate and the main frame. Shims shall not occupy
more than one (1) inch of vertical space. Single tiered
block piers shall be installed perpendicular to the main
I -Beam.
Pl'E 8
MINCE 75-4 TO BE AMENDED
TO READ UNDER HEADING "NOMINAL
LENGTH OF MOBILE HOME, "4' TO 60'"
BE AMENDED TO READ 4e' TO 60'.
/ off` '"5
JAN 181975
(d) All piers over forty (40) inches in height shall
be double tiered with blocks interlocked and capped with
a 4" x 16" x 16" solid concrete block, or equivalent, and
cushioned with wood shims or pressure treated plate.
(e) All corner piers over three (3) blocks high
shall be double tiered, with blocks interlocked, and
capped with a 4" x 16" x 16" solid concrete block, or
equivalent, and cushioned with wood shims or pressure
treated plate.
Section 3. Minimum Anchor Standards.
(a) Anchors shall meet the specifications established
in Chapter 15C-1.10 of the Florida Administrative Code.
(b) As a minimum standard, anchors shall be installed
on both sides of the unit for every twelve (12) feet of
trailer length. There shall be a minimum of three (3)
regardless of length, with the further requirement that
one (1) set shall be on each end.
Section 4. Minimum Tie Down Standards.
Unless otherwise specified in this section, the tie -down
specifications are as follows:
(Excluding hitch)
Nominal length of Mobile Home
Single -wide ME Frame ties
per side 3 5 7
Up to 40' 4' to 60' 61' & up
Single -wide MH Over -the -roof
ties -per side 3 3 3
Single -wide MH Number of
anchors per
side
3
5 7
Double -wide ME Frame ties
only per
side
5
-2-
„IQfP 3 PD E E
(b) Tiedown straps
All tie -down straps shall be 1 1/4" x .035"
galvanized (.30 oz. per sq. ft.) steel strap conforming
to federal spec. QQ-S-781F,Type 1, Class B, Grade 1 (or
equivalent).
(c) Single -wide Mobile Homes
The first over -the -roof and frame tie point must
be within twenty-four (24) inches or at first stud and
truss from each end. If the frame does not extend to back
end wall, then the tie shall be installed within six (6)
inches of the end of the chassis. All other over -the -roof
and frame ties shall be as equally spaced as is feasible.
All frame ties shall be secured to the mainsteel beam that
runs the length of the home.
(d) Double -wide Mobile Homes
Double-wides shall have frame ties installed within
twenty-four (24) inches of each end and at intervals as
described on preceding chart (outside mainbeams only). If
the frame does not extend to back end wall, then the tie
shall be installed within six (6) inches of the end of the chassis.
Section 5. Permitted exceptions.
(a) Mobile homes having a permanent type structure
adequate to provide structural rigidity and stability, meeting the
design loads for hurricane zones, as specified in the ANSI A119.1
standards, of twenty-five (25) pounds horizontal and fifteen
(15) pounds uplift, or meets local building codes, and extending
a minimum of two-thirds (2/3) of the length of the mobile home to
which is attached, shall be deemed to have complied with tie -
down standards.
(b) Mobile homes of a model year prior to 1971 may be
exempt from over -the -roof ties, except for a minimum of one (1)
at each end of the mobile home. Frame ties shall be providedas
per regulations.
-3-
JUN 181975
PA 88
(c) Mobile homes having a concrete slab, the top of
which is vertically within twelve (12") inches or less of
the bottom of the floor of the mobile home, and where the bottom
of the floor is within sixteen (16") inches or less of the ground,
will be exempt from having a frame tie, or ties, installed in
this area only. The end frame ties, however, shall not be
exempt.
Provided, that those mobile homes which are presently tied
down in compliance with the requirements of the insurance company
insuring same, and have been approved by the insurer, shall
be deemed to have complied with the tie -down standards of this
Ordinance. Upon relocation of such mobile homes, however, tie
down requirements shall apply.
(d) Other types of piers and methods of blocking, ground
anchors or tie -down cable or cables or couplings may be approved
by the County if deemed the equivalent of the foregoing speci-
fications, and specific written approval is given by the county.
(e) Travel trailers that are not to be in the County more
than fifteen (15) days shall be excluded from this section.
Section 6. New Mobile Homes.
(a) That after the effective date of this Ordinance, prior
to occupancy, every new mobile home, occupied as a dwelling,
must be issued a Certificate of Occupancy after an on site
inspection insuring compliance with State laws, this Ordinance
and State and local regulations, regarding such functions as
blocking and leveling, anchoring, tie -downs, utility connections,
conversion of appliances, and external improvement on the mobile
home.
Section 7. Requirements.
(a) It shall be the responsibility of the owner of the
property or operator of a trailerpark on which a unit is parked
to provide the required ground anchors installed.
Section 8. Enforcement and Penalty Section.
(a) The enforcement of these provisions shall rest
with the City -County Building Department.
(b) Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued by the
—4—
JUN 181975
89
Building Department when the new mobile home complies with
this Ordinance or State law.
(c) The Building Department shall establish reasonable
fees for the service performed in making the on site inspections
and issuing Certificates of Occupancy, consistent with State
regulations.
(d) Written notice shall be given to.anyone in violation
of these provisions, specifying same. A period of forty-five
(45) days shall be granted for correction and the person or
persons correcting the violation shall sign a citation verifying
correction of same.
(e) Upon conviction, violations of this Ordinance shall
constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable in accordance
with law.
Section 9. Intent.
It is the legistative intent of this Ordinance to be
consistent with all State laws and regulations. Where the provisions
of this Ordinance are more restrictive than State laws and regulations,
State Law shall control.
Section 10. Effective date.
The effective date of this Ordinance shall be June 27, 1975.
Attest:
JUN 1$ 1975
INDIAN_ RIVER 0' BOAR OF COMMISSIONERS
Ralph Harris, Clerk
Alma Lee,//Loy, Chairman
EOOK _ 23 PAH. 90
. '�� (� �"• F..,o/ SJR .� 4' .,
JUN 1 8 19 75
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT AT THE JUNE 4TH, 1975 MEETING THE
CHAIRMAN WAS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN TWO EASEMENTS FOR FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
COMPANY, ON HOBART ROAD. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT HAS SENT A CHECK
TO THE COUNTY IN PAYMENT OF THESE EASEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,040.00.
IT WAS THE DECISION OF THE BOARD THAT THIS CHECK BE DEPOSITED
IN THE GENERAL FUND.
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT HE HAS HAD CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND SETTING AN INTER-
AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING ON JUNE 27TH, 1975 TO DISCUSS SECURING
THE SPOIL ISLANDS, BUT HE DID NOT THINK WE COULD BE PREPARED BY JUNE 27TH
AND HE SUGGESTED WRITTING BACK AND ASKING FOR A LATE JULY OR EARLY
AUGUST MEETING.
THE BOARD AGREED WITH ATTORNEY BURCH'S SUGGESTION AND HE WILL
WRITE TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD RE-
QUESTING A MEETING IN LATE JULY OR EARLY AUGUST.
CHAIRMAN LOY INFORMED THE BOARD OF A LETTER RECEIVED FROM THE
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT REGARDING THE COUNTY'S
APPLICATION FOR NON SMSA DISCRETIONARY FUNDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $360,000. HUD HAS STATED THAT THEY
HAVE RECEIVED 41 APPLICATIONS :.TOTALING $11,887,000. THE TOTAL
ALLOCATION TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR DISCRETIONARY GRANTS IS
$4,222,000. AND THE PROCESSING OF THESE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE
COMPLETED UNTIL AUGUST OR SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REPORTED TO THE BOARD THE RESULTS OF
A MEETING HE AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ATTENDED IN WEST PALM BEACH
WHICH WAS CALLED TO DISCUSS THE FORMING OF A NEW PLANNING DISTRICT.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER PRESENTED FOR THE BOARD'S REVIEW. A
PROPOSED RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION TO
APPROVE THE CREATION OF A NEW REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RE-
SOLUTION No. 75-35
24
RESOLUTION NO. 75-35
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CREATION OF
A NEW REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COM-
PRISED OF THE COUNTIES OF INDIAN RIVER,
MARTIN, ST. LUCIE AND PALM BEACH.
WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Department of Administra-
tion has divided the State of Florida into ten districts for the
purpose of regional comprehensive planning as authorized by
$23.0115(1), Florida Statutes; and,
WHEREAS, Martin, Palm Beach and St. Lucie Counties are
in District #10, and Indian River County is in District #6; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is desirous of joining in
the formation of a new Regional Planning District as Indian River
County is more economically, geographically and governmentally
compatible and shares the underlying philosophies concerning
growth, density and developments, primacy of agricultural interests
and scope of activities of the other three counties; and,
WHEREAS, the estimated current populations of these
counties is in excess of 650,000, which is sufficient to create
a separate Regional Planning District; and,
WHEREAS, the Governor has recently approved the four
counties and Okeechobee County for designation as a Health Serv-
ice Area, specifically Area #7, under the National Health Plan-
ning Resources Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-641); and,
WHEREAS, these counties comprise the Fourth District
Court of Appeal; and,
WHEREAS, the juvenile detention activities of these
counties are closely inter -related; and
WHEREAS, the programs of the two Community colleges
serving these counties are compatible with the common concerns
of the proposed district; and,
WHEREAS, these counties have a common interest and have
been historically related by agricultural activity, flood control
measures, transportation planning, solid waste management, law
enforcement and mutual aid.
JUN i 81975
J2
WHEREAS, these counties agree to follow all guidelines
established by the State of Florida necessary to create a new
Regional Planning District.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. That this Board does hereby officially request the
creation of a new Regional Planning District comprised of the
Counties of Indian River, Martin, St. Lucie and Palm Beach,
representing a logical grouping of counties having similar in-
terests and concerns.
2. That the proposed new district be recognized as an
official Regional Planning District with all rights and privi-
leges afforded thereto.
3. That the municipalities within each of said counties
be informed of this action and be invited to participate.
4. That Okeechobee County be informed of this action and
be invited to participate.
5. That certified copies of this resolution be forwarded
to each of the respective Legislative Delegations with a request
for their support.
6. That certified copies of this resolution be hand
delivered by a joint committee representing said counties to the
Secretary of the Department of Administration.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
Cler
JUN 181975
).6
THE BOARD RECESSED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK P.M. AND RECONVENED AT
1:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE POSSIBILIT
OF THE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT PURCHASING A YARD AND ONE-QUARTER
DRAGLINE. THE DRAGLINE BEING USED NOW WAS PURCHASED FROM MOSQUITO
CONTROL IN 1959 AND SHOULD BE REPLACED. A NEW DRAGLINE WILL COST AP-
PROXIMATELY $100,000.00. THE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT HAS $65,000.00
BUDGETED FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND IF THE BOARD APPROVES PURCHASING THIS
MACHINE, $35,000.00 WILL HAVE TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM CONTINGENCY TO
THE HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT.
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THEN DISCUSSED THE ROAD RESURFACING
PROGRAM THAT IS DONE USUALLY DURING JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER AND
WHICH WILL COST THIS YEAR APPROXIMATELY $120,000.00. THERE IS AP-
PROXIMATELY 8 1/2 MILES OF ROAD TO BE RESURFACED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO AD-
VERTISE FOR BIDS FOR A YARD AND ONE-QUARTER DRAGLINE AS SET UP IN THE
BUDGET AND TO TRANSFER $35,000.00 FROM CONTINGENCY TO THE HEAVY EQUIPMENT
ACCOUNT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO
PROCEED WITH THE PAVING PROGRAM AS FOLLOWS:
ROSELAND Between US- #1 &. Old US # 1 0.3. Mile -
ROSELANW Post Of.i ca, 0.2 0
GRK flXER 0.5
WESTGArE_ 3.0 , .
38th AVENUE 4lst Street to•45th:Stieet 0,5.
-17th Ss' 18th AVENUE SOUTH OF 8th STREET 0.S
TLEWILD 1.0
BUCKINCem1.6
LITTLE PORTION- (71st Ave. } 0.3
WASASSO Post Office 0.3 ":
47th AVS H. & S. of 26th Street 0.3
MAGNOLIA ESTATES. ( 16th 4EICt.) 0.3
RIVER SHORES 1.5
GROVENOR.ESTATES • 0.3
JUN 181975
27
Fink 23 PA`s 94
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE APPLICATIONS FOR PISTOL PERMIT
OF THE FOLLOWING:
ENNETH H. LAYELL
HILIP AVELLO
OBERT CLYDMAXWELL
ICHARD H. DONAHEY
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE APPLICATION OF JAMES WILLIAMS FO[I
ADMISSION TO THE A.G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AN ITEM TO ITEM TRANSFER FOR THE SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT DUE TO AN ERROR IN FIGURING THE SHERIFFS SALARY FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1974-75:
FROM: CONTINGENCIES $117.80
To: SALARY FOR SHERIFF 117.00
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
MONTHLY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY, 1975 RECEIVED FROM THE
COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORTFOR THE MONTH OF MAY, 1975 RECEIVED FROM THE
COUNTY COURT EPARTMENT FOR TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS
COPY OF AN AUDIT OF THE ACCOUNTS AND RECORO OF THE PROPERIY
APPRAISER FOR JANUARY 1, 1973- JULY 31, 19/4 - REPORT No, 6458.
JACK HOCKMAN, COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER REQUESTED DISCUSSION WITH
THE BOARD REGARDING PAYMENT OF A STATEMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOS-
PITAL FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT FOR A PRISONER.
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT IN THE COURT ORDER BEING DISCUSSED TODA
IT STATES THAT THE PRISONER SHALL BE TRANSPORTED TO A MENTAL HOSPITAL AS
THE DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH SO DESIGNATES. SHE CONTINUED, THAT POSSIBL
THIS SHOULD COME UNDER THE BAKER ACT AND SUGGESTED THAT THIS BE CHECKED
WITH JUDGE ROYCE LEWIS,,WHO SIGNED THE COURT ORDER IN QUESTION,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT MR. HOCKMAN REQUEST
• JUDGE LEWIS TO INFORM US IF THIS MATTER WAS SUBMITTED TO THE MENTAL
HEALTH CLINIC AND IF IT WASN'T - WHY NOT? ALSO THE BOARD REQUESTED MR.
HOCKMAN TO INVESTIGATE IF THE GENTLEMEN IN QUESTION IS STILL A PRISONER,
JUN 18 1975
28
CrInV
JACK HOCKMAN, COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
RALPH HARRIS, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT WILL NOT HAVE ENOUGH FUNDS TO
COMPLETE THE END OF THIS FISCAL YEAR. HE HAD HOPED HE COULD OPERATE
UNTIL THE END OF THIS YEAR, BUT HE FINDS THAT HE WILL BE SHORT ABOUT
$11,000 TO $15,000. WHAT HE IS ASKING IS TO BECOME A BUDGET OFFICE.
MR. HARRIS IS REQUESTING THIS BOARD TO SIGN A RESOLUTION, AS OUTLINED IN
CHAPTER 145 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES, CHANGING HIS OFFICE TO A BUDGET
OFFICE WHERE THE BOARD WILL PAY ALL HIS BILLS AND HE WILL TURN OVER
ALL HIS FEES TO THE BOARD.
AS A FEE OFFICER, MR. HARRIS, AT THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR
RETURNS HIS EXCESS FEES TO THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND IN THE PAST,
MR. HARRIS HAS RETURNED THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:
1972 - $107,934.27
1973 - 65,016.63
1974 0 54,601.07
CHAIRMAN LOY SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD INDICATE TO MR. HARRIS
THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN HIS BECOMING A BUDGET OFFICE AS HE REQUESTED
AND TO REQUEST HIM TO PRESENT TO THE BOARD THE AREAS IN WHICH HE COULD
REDUCE HIS PRESENT OPERATION WITH A TIME SCHEDULE OF WHEN THIS COULD BE
ACCOMPLISHED. THE AREA THAT WOULD NEED ADJUSTMENT IS THE AREA OF SALARIES.
THE ATTORNEY WILL RESEARCH THE PERTINENT FLORIDA CHAPTERS,
IN ORDER FOR THE BOARD TO CONSIDER MAKING THIS CHANGE AS REQUESTED BY
RALPH HARRIS.
29
JUN 181975
TOOK �m
vE 9C
THE HOUR OF 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J..1. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of
in the
Iished in said newspaper in the issues of
/97.0
Court, was pub -
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement;
duetisernent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. �%
Swam to and subscribed before me this _ 9 ___day ofL ' /
(SEAL)
Manager)
(Clerk o- Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the Board of County Com- •
missionersof Indian River County,
Florida, will hold a public hearing
on June 18,1975, at 3:00 P.M. at the
Indian River County Courthouse in
Vero Beach, Florida, to consider
the adoption of an
Amendment to Indian River
County Ordinance 71-3, by
adding a Section 31, Planned
Unit Development, to said
Ordinance.
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS '
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FLORIDA
By: -s -Alma Lee Loy
Chairman
May 29, 1975.
PRESENT FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING
DIRECTOR, ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR, AND RALPH SEXTON,
-CHAIRMAN OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ZONING COMMISSION,
ATTORNEY BURCH RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD THE DELETION OF PARA—
GRAPH C ON PAGE 1 AS THERE WOULD BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS STATEMENT AND
THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN,
MR, BRENNAN REVIEWED SOME OF THE CHANGES MADE TO THE P,U,D,
ORDINANCE,
ON PAGE 2, FOURTH LINE, THE WORD "POLITICAL" BE INSERTED BEFORE
THE WORD "SUBDIVISION,"
JUN 181975
30
HO91( PAE 9
ON PAGE 10, PARAGRAPH 9, SUB -PARAGRAPH (E), SECOND LINE,
"ONE (1) YEAR" WAS CHANGED TO "EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS."
ON PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH 1,; THE TITLE SHOULD BE CHANGED FROM
"MAXIMUM AREA LIMITATIONS" TO "MINIMUM AREA LIMITATIONS."
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD,
HEPBURN WALKER REQUESTED ON PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH "G", FIRST LINE,
THE WORD "SHALL" BE INSERTED AFTER THE WORD "DEVELOPMENT."
RAY COWELL, A PLANNING CONSULTANT AND ARCHITECT WHO HAS NO
COMMITMENT WITH THE COUNTY AND WHOSE ONLY INTEREST IS PROVIDING THE PLAN-
NING DEPARTMENT AND THE PEOPLE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WITH HIS EXPERIENCE,
MADE HIS PRESENTATION AND THEN STATED THAT HE WAS PLEASED WITH THE DEVELOP-
MENT OF THE P.U.D. ORDINANCE AND, IN HIS OPINION, IT IS AN IMPLEMENTING
TOOL THAT WOULD GO ALONG WITH THE NEWLY ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN'
RALPH SEXTON, CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, STATED THAT '
HE AND THE ZONING COMMISSION HAVE RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF THIS P.U.D.
ORDINANCE TO BE USED AS A TOOL.
JEROME KRAMER, COUNSELOR FOR THE VERO BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION,
APPEARED WITH A LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES,
ON PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH I, SUB -PARAGRAPH A, "INDUSTRIAL 6% OF THE
GROSS AREA," MR, KRAMER CLAIMED THAT THIS IS AN ORDINANCE INDEPENDENT OF
ANY OTHER ORDINANCES AND THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO CIRCUMVENT OTHER ORDINANCES,
MR, KRAMER CONTINUED THAT THE. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM PREPARED BY
ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES t'N JUNE, 1973 STATES THAT THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ORDINANCE IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THIS PROPOSED
ORDINANCE BEING DISCUSSED TODAY IS REPLACING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND
MR. KRAMER ASKED WHY THESE PROPOSALS BY ADLEY-AND ASSOCIATES WERE NOT CON-
SIDERED AND INCLUDED IN THIS NEW PROPOSED ORDINANCE, HE CONTINUED THAT
THE PEOPLE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO THE FLEXIBILITY OF DESIGN, BUT TO THE APPROAC}
BEING TAKEN, IF THIS P.U.D. ORDINANCE WAS PREPARED THE WAY ADLEY AND
ASSOCIATES PROPOSED, IT WOULD BE AN ADDITION TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
MR. KRAMER LISTED THE FOLLOWING PAGES THAT HE FEELS NEED COR-
RECTION OR FURTHER EXPLANATIONS:
PAGE 3 - FIRST PARAGRAPH, FOURTH LINE, A SENTENCE HAS BEEN DE-
LETED AND SHOULD BE CHECKED,
31
JUN 1 8 1975
i'. 0 0 It
3 OS
JUN 18.1975
ON PAGE 5, PARAGRAPH 7, SUB -PARAGRAPH B WAS CHANGED,
ON PAGE 6, PART 1 - THERE WAS A PARAGRAPH G, REGARDING STATE
PERMITS BEING COMPLIED WITH, THAT IS NOW DELETED.
ON PAGE 8, THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT TO MEASURE IMPACT ON EXISTING
NEIGHBORHOODS -THAT HAS BEEN DELETED.
ON PAGE 9, PARAGRAPH C, SUB -PARAGRAPH 1 - THE LAST LINE SHOULD
BE "PLANNING DEPARTMENT."
ON PAGE 10, PARAGRAPH 9, SUB -PARAGRAPH E, FIFTH LINE - THE
WORD "MAY" SHOULD BE "SHALL."
ON PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH G, FIRST LINE READINGe'N...?DEVELOPMENT
NOT EXCEED..." BE CHANGED TO READ ".,,DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED..."
ON PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH I, SUBPARAGRAPH A - THE TOTAL OF PER-
CENTAGES DOES NOT ADD UP TO 100%.
ON PAGE 12, PARAGRAPH J - SOMETHING LEFT OUT.
MR, KRAMER STATED THAT WE THINK ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES' PROPOSAL
WOULD BE A MUCH SIMPLER AND MUCH PREFERRED APPROACH, BUT IF YOU ARE GOING
TO WORK WITH THIS ORDINANCE, WE AGREE WITH ATTORNEY BURCH THAT PAGE 1,
PARAGRAPH C, SHOULD BE DELETED,
PAGE 2 - SUB -PARAGRAPH "CONTIGUOUS" SHOULD BE CHANGED,
PAGE 2 - SUB -PARAGRAPH "FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN" - THE DESIGN
RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS
SUB -PARAGRAPH,
PAGE 3 - PARAGRAPH 2 - SOMETHING IS OMITTED,
PAGE 3 - PARAGRAPH 2 - SUB -PARAGRAPH 'B" AND "C" - WE FEEL
THERE SHOULD BE SPECIFIC APPROVALS,
PAGE 5 - PARAGRAPH 7, SUB -PARAGRAPH "A-1", SECOND LINE READING
"..,AND THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN,.." BE CHANGED TO READ "...AND COMPLIANCE WITH
THE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN,,,"
PAGE 6 - PARAGRAPH I - "COMPLETE DISCLOSURE" SHOULD BE INCLUDED,
PAGE 6 - PARAGRAPH D - MR. KRAMER QUESTIONED IF THERE IS A SITE
PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. HE FURTHER STATED THAT THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW,
PAGE 9 - PARAGRAPH 8 - MR. KRAMER URGED THE BOARD TO PUT IN
REQUIREMENT THAT ALL UTILITY SYSTEMS MEET REQUIREMENTS TO INCORPORATE THEM
INTO A COUNTYWIDE SYSTEM,
32
r,nr
99
ON PAGES 11, 12, AND 13, THE WORDS "GROSS ACRES" NEED CLARI-
FICATION.
ON PAGE 12, PARAGRAPH J - SOMETHING IS MISSING,
ON PAGES 12 AND 13, PARAGRAPH K TOO MANY OPEN SPACES AND TOO
MANY EXCEPTIONS,
ON PAGE 14 - REGARDING SET -BACKS, MR, KRAMER STATED THAT IF
ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATIONS WERE FOLLOWED, THERE WOULD BE SETBACKS
REQUIRED,
MR, KRAMER SUGGESTED FURTHER THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME PROVISIONS
IN THIS ORDINANCE FOR AMENDMENTS AND CHANGES, THERE ARE NONE; THERE SHOULD
BE SOME PROVISIONS BOR SEPARATE BUILDING, THERE ARE NONE; THERE -SHOULD BE
SOME PROVISIONS FOR PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, THERE ARE NONE; AND THERE
SHOULD BE AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THERE IS NONE. HE EXPECTED AFTER THE WORK-
SHOP IN DECEMBER THERE WOULD BE ANOTHER WORKSHOP AND FELT THAT THIS ISNOT
THE RIGHT TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING . HE SAID WE WOULD URGE YOU VERY
STRONGLY TO TREAT THIS AS A WORKSHOP AND CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING IN
ORDER TO CONSIDER THESE SUGGESTED CHANGES, WE FURTHER ASK YOU TO INQUIRE
OF YOUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE AMENDMENTS OR CHANGES PROPOSED TO YOUR
EXISTING ORDINANCE BY ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES IN LINE WITH THEIR TECHNICAL
MEMORANDUM OF JUNE, 1973. THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION BACK IN 1969, ALTHOUGH
CHARACTERIZED AS BEING OPPOSED TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN CONCEPT, HAS
ACTUALLY ONLY BEEN OPPOSED TO THE MODE AND FORM IN WHICH IT HAS BEEN
PRESENTED, P.U.D. AS A CONCEPT FOR SOME FLEXIBILITY AND A MEANS OF CON-
TROLLING GROWTH IS ACCEPTABLE IN THE UNINCORPORATED PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY
AND IN THE CITY TO THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION, PROVIDED IT IS PROPERLY DRAFTED
AND IT INCORPORATES THE EXISTING CONTROLS AND DOES NOT CIRCUMVENT THEM,
HEPBURN WALKER APPEARED AND STATED THAT THE CONCEPT IS
BASICALLY FINE, AND THE ONLY THING THAT CONCERNS HIM IS THE MINIMUM AREA,
HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME MINIMUM AREA, FORTY ACRES HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
FOR A REGULAR P.U.D., BUT NO ACREAGE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR A RESIDENTIAL
P.U.D. HE SUGGESTED A MINIMUM OF 20 ACRES OR 10 ACRES AS 40 ACRES IS TOO
LARGE, THERE SHOULD BE SOME ACREAGE LIMITATIONS.
DON WILCOX, 635 36TH AVENUE, APPEARED AND STATED THAT HE WAS IN
FAVOR OF THE P.U.D. ORDINANCE AND FELT THAT BASICALLY THIS ORDINANCE WOULD
SERVE WELL, HE STATED THAT ONE SERIOUS PROBLEM HE CAN FORESEE IS THAT IT
33
JUN 181975
s �n� 23
,,
100
REQUIRES CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE TO THE DEVELOPER TO GO THROUGH ALL THE
STAGES REQUIRED WHICH WOULD BRING IT TO A POINT FOR THIS BOARD TO APPROVE
OR DENY IT, HE WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE BOARD THINK OF A DIFFERENT
APPROACH, HE SUGGESTED A DEVELOPER COMING IN WITH THE PRELIMINARY BASICS
THAT WOULD SHOW HIS CONCEPT OF THE PLAN AND HIS DENSITY, ANSWER ANY QUES-
TIONS ON WHAT HE PLANS TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY, AND AT THAT TIME GIVE HIM
ANSWERS IN ORDER TO SAVE THE DEVELOPER MONEY AND ALSO THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT'S MONEY AND. TIME, IF THE BOARD GIVES TENTATIVE APPROVAL AND THE
DEVELOPER COMPLETES ALL THE REQUIREMENTS, HE CAN THEN COME BACK FOR FINAL
APPROVAL,
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED MR, WILCOX IF HE HAD MADE THIS SUGGESTION TO
THE ZONING COMMISSION, AND MR, WILCOX ANSWERED THAT HE HAD,
MARGE THOMAS - 3025 GOLFVIEW DRIVE, APPEARED WITH SEVERAL QUES-
TIONS:
ON PAGE 10 - PARAGRAPH E - MS, THOMAS QUESTIONED THAT PORTION
OF THE FIFTH LINE ",,,MAY INITIATE A PETITION TO REZONE,,," STATING THAT
THEY HAVE 90 DAYS AND IF IT IS NOT COMPLETE IT WILL REVERT BACK TO THE
ORIGINAL ZONING,
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT THIS WAS TAKEN OUT BECAUSE IT IS
AGAINST THE LAW, You CANNOT REVERT PROPERTY BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL ZONING:
MS, THOMAS STATED THAT THE SENTENCE SHOULD READ ",,,SHALL
INITIATE A PETITION TO REZONE,,"
PAGE 15 - PARAGRAPH N „SUB -PARAGRAPH 2 - A PORTION OF A SENTENCE
HAS BEEN LEFT OUT,",,, AND SHALL BE EXTINGUISHED AT THE END OF A BUSINESS
DAY,"
MR, BERG STATED THAT WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE END OF A BUSINESS
DAY IS,
MS, THOMAS STATED THAT THIS SHOULD BE IN THE ORDINANCE TO PROTECT
RESIDENTIAL AREAS, As A RESIDENT OF A NEARBY P,U,D „ SHE WOULD NOT WANT
THIS BESIDE HER,
Ms, THOMAS STATED THAT SHE DID NOT SEE THE NEED FOR A P.U.D.
ORDINANCE SINCE WE HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN,
PAGE 11 - PARAGRAPH I - Ms. THOMAS QUESTIONED ARE WE NOT CREATING
A NEW ORDINANCE FOR HOSPITALS AND CONVALESCENT AND DO WE NEED IT IN THIS
ORDINANCE?
JUN 1 8 1975
34
L 0'i r
3 , 101
JUN .1$1975
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THIS IS WHAT WE CAN REQUIRE THEM
TO DO IN THIS SECTION, THE LAND WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THAT BUILDING,
MS, THOMAS STATED THAT IN THAT SAME PARAGRAPH I, SUB -PARAGRAPH A
IN THE OLD ORDINANCE IT WAS STATED THAT 65% OF THE GROSS AREA WAS RESIDEN-
TIAL AND COMMERCIAL WAS 2%, INDUSTRIAL WAS NOT INCLUDED AND NOW YOU HAVE 6`
MR, BERG STATED THAT ON PAGE 11 OF THE LATEST PROPOSED ORDINANCE
INDUSTRIAL - 6% WAS ELIMINATED,
THE BOARD DISCUSSED PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH I, AND IT WAS THE DECISI
OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR THAT THE HEADING SHOULD BE "MAXIMUM AREA LIMITA-
TIONS" AND THE THIRD LINE THE WORD "MINIMUM" BE CHANGED TO "MAXIMUM,"
MS, THOMAS STATED THAT ON PAGE 7 THE AFFECT ON TRAFFIC PATTERN
HAS BEEN OMITTED,
MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT IT IS ON PAGE 7, PARAGRAPH D.
DALE PATCHETT, CITY -COUNTY URBAN FORESTER, APPEARED AND STATED
THAT HE WAS IN SUPPORT OF THE CONCEPT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND HE
WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE MINIMUM STANDARD ESTABLISHED AT 40 ACRES BE
CHANGED AND HE SUGGESTED THAT WITH 20 ACRES THERE WOULD BE BETTER CONTROL,
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THERE IS NO MINIMUM STANDARD ON
REQUIREMENT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY,
MR, PATCHETT CONTINUED THAT THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM SETBACK
ESTABLISHED FOR BUFFER ZONING TO PROTECT THE CONSERVATION AREAS, AND ON PAGI
9, PARAGRAPH D, REGARDING "SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE, IT IS HIS OPINION
THAT IN THE CASE OF A LARGE P,U,D „ A PERSON WITH ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE
WITH THIS COUNTY SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE,
JOHN DUNIGAN STATED THAT HE HAS FOUND MANY ERRORS IN TERMINOLOGY
IN THIS'PROPOSED ORDINANCE, AND HE WILL CORRECT THEM AND PRESENT IT TO THE
BOARD,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT MANY OF THE ITEMS PRESENTED TO-
DAY ARE WORTHY OF FURTHER CONSIDERATION, IT WAS HIS RECOMMENDATION THAT THI
BOARD SIT DOWN AND GO OVER THESE STEP BY STEP AND THEN PRESENT THE CHANGES
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, •
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT) SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL
AUGUST 6, 1975, AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
THE BOARD AGREED TO SCHEDULE A WORKSHOP MEETING ON JULY 17, 1975
AT 1:00 O'CLOCK,
MR, KRAMER REQUESTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT POINT OUT TO
THE BOARD WHY THEY DID NOT FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF ADLEY AND Assoc.
35
��.w 23 . 102
THE BOARD DISCUSSED A MEMORANDUM FROM VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING
DIRECTOR REQUESTING APPROVAL TO REPRODUCE IN COLOR THE COUNTY COMPREHEN-
SIVE LAND USE MAP, TO DISTRIBUTE TO THE PUBLIC, AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED
$300.00.
THE .JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION HAS RECOMMENDED HAVING THE BASE
MAP PHOTOGRAPHED BY SOUTH EASTERN PRINTING CO. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WOULD DO THE NECESSARY WORK ON THIS MAP. THE CORRECTED BASE MAP AND THE
COLOR SEPARATION OVERLAYS WILL THEN BE BE SENT TO THE EAST CENTRAL FLORID,
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL FOR PRINTING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO
PROCEED WITH HAVING 5,000 COPIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP
PRINTED AFTER THE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE HAS BEEN ADOPTED, AT A COST
NOT TO EXCEED $300.00. THESE MAPS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
PUBLIC FREE OF CHARGE.
CHAIRMAN LOY DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A REQUEST FROM THE CITY
OF VERO BEACH THAT THE COUNTY ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AND
SUPPORTING THE PETITION OF SHAWNEE AIRLINES TO PROVIDE AIRLINE SERVICE
FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
AFTER DISCUSSION A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE
COUNTY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF VERO
BEACH EFFORTS TO SECURE AIR PASSENGER SERVICE FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
THE RESOLUTION HAVING BEEN COMPLETED IS HEREBY BEING MADE A
PART OF THESE MINUTES.
36
JUN 181975
t03
RESOLUTION No . 75-36
WHEREAS, Indian River County is presently without
air passenger or cargo service; and
WHEREAS, the City of Vero Beach is attempting to get
such service; and
WHEREAS, this Board recognizes that such service
is needed and would be helpful to the citizens of this County;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that it supports
the efforts of the City of Vero Beach to obtain airline service
for Indian River County.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
ATTEST:
JUN 181975
1240 al0 vdor;:v7
Chairman
0`'104
CHAIRMAN LOY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MRS. AGNES M. HALLS,
CLERICAL ASSISTANT IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR HAS
SUBMITTED HER RESIGNATION EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, 1975.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONERIODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRA.
TOR TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY ECONOMIST AND THE NEW COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR,
WHEN HE IS APPOINTED, IN EMPLOYING A SECRETARY TO COVER BOTH THESE OFFICES.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO .
MAKE CHANGES EFFECTING THE OPERATION OF THE OFFICES OF THE COUNTY ECONOMIST
AND THE COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AS HE DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM A. RICHARD TODD, CHAIRMAN AND VICE
PRESIDENT OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD IS HEREBY
BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
38
•••••••••4•••—sr.m"....",.., '*"." 'a* *"....*
• t • • • •
/1 I /7 ,et..'N
.Uncilicus Loun.ty • tutte_ET c_-/Imturatz.ce wad
P. a. 44)17t4
q/sta 23soc1,
•
June 13, 1975
Miss Alma Lee Loy, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida
tido. - 32960
Dear Alma Lee:
Many months ago it became apparent that with the growth of our
personnel, dormitory facilities at Headquarters were becoming
inadequate.
A study by an appointed committee of squad members submitted -
their recommendations in early March of this year, to the
Board of Directors, to enlarge the men's dormitory, add stor-
age facilities for both the men and women and to provide a
much needed conference room.
Their recommendations were approved in principal and drawings -
were prepared and submitted to three contractors. Only two
bids and copies are attached.
The contract was awarded Richard J. Burket Inc., the low bidder,
on March 20, 1975. The Final Statement.is attached in the
amount of $8598.21 which has been paid out Of our general funds,
--see Burket final statement attached.
Of interest, two local citizens dpnated the. funds to completely
furnish the conference room. Inasmuch as the original building
and subsequent additions were paid for by the County and, there-
fore, is its property on land owned by the County, we would
appreciate the Commission authorizing reimbursement to us for
the monies used from our general fund.
art/bb
enc.
JUN 1 8 1975
Very truly yours,
•
.47 A 7"
ictirC.. ci
A. Richard Todd
Chairman and Vice President
Indian River County Volunteer
Ambulance Squad .
"But a certain Samaritan ... had compassion on him and went to him, and bound
up his w..unds .. and took care of him." St. Luke 10:33-34 •
r 4
23 A 06
•
AFTER DISCUSSION A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER .WODTKE, THE BOARD UINANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED $8,598.21
BEING TAKEN FROM CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT OF THE GENERAL FUND AND DEPOSITED IN
THE CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND AND THEN DISBURSED TO THE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD
FOR THE NEW ADDITION TO THE COUNTY BUIDLING HOUSING THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD.
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS WAITING FOR
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY REGARDING BEACH EROSION CONTROL
FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AS WE HAVE TO BE THE SPONSOR OF ANY PROJECT IN THIS
COUNTY,
CHAIRMAN LOY REVIEWED THE POINTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHE FEELS
THE BOARD, ALONG WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH WHO IS VITALLY INVOLVED, SHOULD
CONSIDER SO THAT A RECOMMENDATION COULD BE FADE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ,
ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT OUR RECOMMENDATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTEI;
TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY JULY 10, 1975. THE CORPS MUST APPROVE THESE
RECOMMENDATIONS IN ORDER TO FORWARD THEM TO WASHINGTON, D.C. FOR FINAL
APPROVAL,
THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWINGG RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. SUPPORT STATE OF FLORIDA'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SEBASTIAN STATE PARK AREi
INCLUDING REQUEST PROJECT BE MONITORED,
THE FEDERAL PROJECT SHOULD PROVIDE FOR A PROTECTIVE AND RECREATIONAL
BEACH AND FUTURE MAINTENANCE NOURISHMENT. IT WOULD BE VERY DESIRABLE
FOR THE PROJECT TO PROVIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A MORE EFFICIENT SAND
TRANSFER SYSTEM AT THE INLET AND PARTICIPATION IN THE OPERATION OF THAT
SYSTEM. WE WOULD PREFER TO.HAVE THE BREAKWATER GROIN SOUTH OF THE INLE1
INCLUDED AS AN AUTHORIZED ALTERNATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY AFTER ITS
NEED IS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED. A MONITORING PROGRAM SHOULD DEFINITELY BI
INCLUDED AS A PART OF A. PROJECT IN THIS AREA. THE MONITORING PROGRAM
WOULD ASSIST IN THE EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT AND IS PARTICULARLY
IMPORTANT FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SAND TRANSFER OPERATION
AT THE INLET AS WELL AS FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR THE DEFERRED
STRUCTURE.
WITHIN CITY OF VERO BEACH
2. RECOMMEND AND CONCUR WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS` RECOMMENDATION FOR
BEACHFILL RENOURISHMENT IN THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT AREA, INCLUDING
BREAKWATER GROIN AS AN AUTHORIZED ALTERNATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY
AFTER ITS NEED IS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED. A MONITORING PROGRAM WOULD
ASSIST IN THE EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT AND IS PRARTICULARLY IMPORTANT
FOR ASSESSING THE RESULTS OF THE BEACHFILL PROJECT.
3. RECOMMEND A TEST REEF KNOWN AS THE SABECON REEF BE AN AUTHORIZED
AUTHORAZIDE FOR EOUTSTATESON, NHLONGRESS.ERTAKEN BYTHIS TESTCORPS
REEF�TOINEERS CONSISTS
AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED
OF TWO TANGENTS OF THE REEF WITH NO BEACH FILL ACCOMPANYING. PROJECT
MONITORED TO EVALUATE RESULTS. BASED ON THE PROFESSIONAL TESTIMONY
PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, THIS PROJECT COULD PROVIDE A NEW
AVENUE FOR BEACH AND SHORE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION FOR THE ENTIRE
COAST OF THE UNITED STATES.
40
JO 18 1975
23
107
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO WRITE A LETTER
TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO INCLUDE THE ABOVE RECOMMENDATIONS.
THE BOARD REQUESTED ATTORNEY BURCH TO PREPARE THE PROPER
RESOLUTION HONORING FORREST N. MCCULLARS, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR
WHO IS RETIRING EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 1975.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE PLANNED USE REPORT RELATIVE TO FEDERAL
REVENUE SHARING FUNDS THAT MUST BE PUBLISHED BY JUNE 30, 1975.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT) SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING PLANNED
EXPENDITURES:
PUBLIC SAFETY $100,000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 100,000
RECREATION 58,720
MULTIPURPOSE AND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT 250.000
TOTAL $508,720
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE POSSIBILITY
OF THE COUNTY MAINTAINING CERTAIN ROADS OWNED BY THE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS.
HE SUGGESTED THAT AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH YEAR, THE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS
COULD OUTLINE ROADS THEY WOULD LIKE MAINTAINED AND THE COUNTY COULD GIVE
THEM AN ESTIMATE OF COST TO MAINTAIN THOSE ROADS. THE COUNTY COULD PRO-
VIDE MAINTENANCE SERVICE WITH THE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS PAYING THE EXPENSE.
COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT THE SUGGESTION HAS MERIT AND
HE WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF INVESTIGATING IT FURTHER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT WE WOULD HAVE A CONTRACT WITH
THE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS AND THE DISTRICTS WOULD PAY THE COUNTY FOR ALL
SERVICES PERFORMED. IT WOULD BENEFIT BOTH THE TAXPAYER WHO IS PAYING
AN ADDITIONAL TAX AND THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT TO HAVE THIS DONE.
CHAIRMAN LOY.STATED THAT THE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS COULD RAISE
THEIR TAXES TO COVER THIS AND THE COUNTY COULD DO THE WORK.
THE BOARD REQUESTED COMMISSIONER SIEBERT TO EXPLORE THIS
POSSIBILITY AND SEE IF THERE IS ANY INTEREST ON THE PART OF THE DRAINAGE
DISTRICT OFFICIALS.
41
JUN 1819?5
A
108d
THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE BUDGET REQUESTS FROM THE CITY OF VERO
BEACH FOR COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN THE 'AREAS OF PLANNING, BUILDING, RECREATION
AND FIRE.
THE BOARD STATED THAT THEY COULD NOT DETERMINE BUDGET PRIORITIES
PRIOR TO THE COUNTY BUDGET SESSIONS, AND THAT THE CITY'S BUDGET REQUESTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED ALONG WITH THE OTHER BUDGET ITEMS DURING THE BUDGET
SESSIONS.
IN REGARD TO THE CITY -COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUDGET, THE
BOARD AGREED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO CONTINUING THE 40 - 60%
FUNDING FOR THAT DEPARTMENT.
IN REGARD TO THE CITY -COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THE POSSIBILITY'
WAS DISCUSSED OF THIS DEPARTMENT COMING UNDER THE DIRECT CONTROL OF THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THAT THE CITY CONTRACT DIRECTLY WITH THE
COUNTY FOR PLANNING SERVICES.
THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED RECREATION AND FIRE SERVICES AND IT
WAS DECIDED_ THAT THESE AREAS WOULD BE FURTHER DISCUSSED AT BUDGET SESSSION
TIME.
THE CHAIRMAN WAS AUTHORIZED TO WRITE THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
OUTLINING THE COUNTY'S POSITION ON THE FOUR AREAS AT THE PRESENT TIME.
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND
WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL FUND NOS. 4496 -
4561 INCLUSIVE; ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND NOS. 2334 - 2375 INCLUSIVE; FINE AND
FORFEITURE FUND Nos. 907 - 914 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING
ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO
ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE
BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR,. REFERENCE TO SUCH
RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 8:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
//7
49,:pei,e);04.‘4
CLERK CHAIRMAN
42
•1lttt19Th
3 `'" 109