HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/5/1975WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1975
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY,
NOVEMBER 5, 1975 AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE ALMA LEE LOY, CHAIRMAN;
WILLARD W..SIEBERT, JR., VICE CHAIRMAN; EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; EDWARD J. MASSEY,
AND WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY AD-
MINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, COUNTY COORDINATOR; JACK HOCKMAN AND
VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERKS. PAUL D. BURCH, ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WAS ABSENT DUE TO ILLNESS AND GEORGE G.. COLLINS, JR.,
ATTORNEY SAT IN FOR HIM.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND
FATHER JOHN B. O'HARE) OF ST. HELEN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH, GAVE THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO
THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 9, 1975. THERE WERE NONE
AND ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER
9, 1975, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 13, 1975. THERE WERE NONE AND ON
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 13, 1975,
AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 22, 1975. THERE WERE NONE AND
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE
BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 22,
1975, AS WRITTEN.
DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPEARED REPRESENTING VISTA
PROPERTIES AND ASKED FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF VISTA ROYAL'S FOREST PARK,
PHASE I, SUBDIVISION. MR. HOWARD STATED THIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 32 HOME-
SITES AND SAID THE SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN. THE RIGHT -
OF WAY.
NOV 51975
8001 24 PAGE
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERMS A 25 FOOT
EASEMENT AROUND THE GOLF COURSE WHICH WAS ELIMINATED BY THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW
COMMITTEE, THEY NOW HAVE A 15 FOOT EAS2MENT INSIDE THE PROPERTY,
THE CONDOMINIUM AREA USES THIS EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE, UTILITIES AND FOR GOLF
CARTS.
THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT ALL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUB-
DIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN TAKEN CARE OF.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF VISTA ROYAL'S FOREST PARK,
PHASE I, SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY VISTA PROPERTIES.
DANA HOWARD, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. NEXT APPEARED REPRESENTING
GEORGE CHILDERS REQUESTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF REBELWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION,
AND STATED THAT THIS HAS BEEN BEFORE THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE AND ALL
THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN MET,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF REBELWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION
AS REQUESTED BY GEORGE CHILDERS,
DANA HOWARD, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. AGAIN APPEARED REPRESENTING,
JAMES MEADE, REQUESTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF BANYAN ACRES SUBDIVISION. MR,
HOWARD HAD APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD AT THE SEPTEMBER 24, 1975 MEETING AND
STATED THAT THE PLAT OF BANYAN ACRES WAS GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL BY THE
BOARD ON OCTOBER 23, 1974, AS A ONE -ACRE LOT SUBDIVISION, BUT THEY ARE NOW
CHANGING THE SUBDIVISION TO ONE-HALF ACRE LOTS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED, AT THAT TIME, THAT THIS PLAT MUST BE
VACATED,
MR, HOWARD STATED THAT MR. MEADE WISHES TO ASK FOR TENTATIVE AP-
PROVAL ONCE AGAIN SO THEY CAN PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AND THEY WILL LATER
COME BACK WITH A NEW PLAT AND VACATE THE PREVIOUS ONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO BANYAN ACRES SUBDIVISION,
SUBJECT TO VACATION OF THE PRIOR PLAT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SOME TIME AGO THE TOWN OF
INDIAN RIVER SHORES,_ PURSUANT TO NEW FLORIDA STATUTE 125, ASKED THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO SUBSTANTIATE THAT THERE WAS NOT DUAL TAX-
ATION ON THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, AND THEY HAVE NOW WITHDRAWN THEIR
RESOLUTION MAKING THIS REQUEST,
ATTORNEY COLLINS CONTINUED THAT THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES IS
R2-
NOV 51975 Haoi : 24 emu 98
BUILDING A FIRE STATION NEXT TO THEIR TOWN HALL, AND IN ANTICIPATION OF FUTURE
COUNTY PLANS AND THE NEEDS OF THE TOWN, AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN DRAFTED TRYING
TO SET OUT THE RIGHTS OF THE VARIOUS PARTIES. HE NOTED THAT WHEN THE COUNTY
BEGINS ITS COUNTYWIDE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM, THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
WILL LEASE THE COUNTY THEIR FIRE STATION, INCLUDING EQUIPMENT, FOR $1.00
A YEAR FOR 99 YEARS, WITH SOME SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ABOUT THE USE OF THE
SECOND FLOOR',
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS AGREEMENT HAD ALREADY
BEEN APPROVED AND SIGNED BY OFFICIALS OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, AND
WE COULD, THEREFORE, ENTER INTO A BINDING CONTRACT TODAY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE AGREEMENT FOR JOINT FIRE PROTECTION BET-
WEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND AUTHORIZED
THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
NOV 51915
voao ft
1904 i P.h
•
NOV 5 1975
AGREEMENT FOR A JOINT FIRE PROTECTION -
PROGRAM BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA AND THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER
SHORES, FLORIDA
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 5th day of
November , 1975, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
MISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as
"County", and the TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES,
FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as "Town", for and in consideration of the
mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, hereby agree as follows:
1. Town and County agree that it is in the best interest of said Town
and County to enter into a joint fire protection program with matching funds
from each party according to the terms of this agreement.
• 2. Town agrees to furnish a building for a new fire station along
with the land on which said building is located, described as Tract 3, Fred
Tuerk Municipal Center, according to plat thereof filed in Plat Book 9, page
22, Indian River County public records. Said building shall be completed
substantially in accordance with architectural plans as drawn by James E.
Gibson, Architect, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "1".
3. Town also agrees to initially equip said fire station with a minimum
of one 1,000 gallons per minute pumper and one tanker with both of said pieces
of equipment fully furnished and equipped for fire fighting services.
4. Town agrees to. operate and staff said fire station when completed
• until County notifies Town in writing that it intends to take over Town's fire
station and equipment and begin operation of the same.
5. Town further agrees that when County begins operation of a
county -wide fire protection system, Town agrees to lease to County for the
•sum of $1. 00 per year, the entire first floor section of said fire station along
with Tract 3, Fred R. Tuerk Municipal Center, and all of the equipment
SHARP, JOHNSTON & BROWN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
8-00( 24 pt4cl1al
NOV 51975
located therein being used for fire protection services. In addition, Town
agrees to give to County a non-exclusive easement on, over and across Alex
MacWilliam, Jr. Lane for the purpose of ingress and egress to said property.
6. Town agrees that the term of said lease shall be for a minimum
period of 99 years from the date County takes over operation of said fire
station.
7. County agrees that Town shall have the use of the second floor
portion of said building until County needs said space for expansion purposes.
County also agrees to give Town one year's notice to vacate that portion of
said second floor needed by County for expansion.
8. Town agrees that as long as Town is operating said fire station,
Town shall provide its own insurance and shall take care of all utilities and
all maintenance and repairs, both to the building and property and to the
equipment. County agrees that when County takes over said fire station and
service, County shall name the Town as an additional insured on all insurance
policies carried by County on the building, property and equipment. County
further agrees that at the time of said take over it shall also be responsible
for all maintenance and repair to that portion of the building used by County
and all equipment located therein. County further agrees that there shall be
at the time of take over separate electrical meters for_ each party and that
County will pay for all water usage within said fire station complex.
9. Town and County agree that for the initial funding of said fire
station and equipment that Town will provide $135, 000.00 in matching funds
:and County will provide $50, 000.00 in matching funds.
10. Town agrees that County may designate from time to time the
area to be serviced by said fire department and that said designation may be
made at any time after said fire station begins operation.
-2-
SHARP, JOHNSTON & BROWN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
eoox C4 PArf.$01
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto set their
hands and seals, the day and year first above written.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
INDIAN RIVER COUN Y, FLAW DA
By:
NOV 51975
Alma Lee Loy, Cha
Ralph4larris, Clerk
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN
RIVEORES, F ORIDA
By:NA 1 t\
/22f4--.6 ioj,f ,p1}),-Lt1I Atte
As to "T."
Roland B. Miller, Mayor
J. W. C ung, Town IL erk
SHARP, JOHNSTON & BROWN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
iraut 24 ? Cf-iO2
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED A PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK TO BE LOCATED
WITHIN THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE VERO BEACH
TRACKING STATION. HE STATED THAT THERE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN SOME ARGUMENT
ABOUT THE RIGHTS TO THE."TRACKING STATION" PROPERTY, BUT THIS HAS.NOW BEEN
RESOLVED AND A .JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND THE TOWN
OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAS BEEN PREPARED. THE GIST OF THIS RESOLUTION IS THAT
THE TOWN PARK ORDINANCE AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS WILL CONTROL, BUT TITLE TO THIS
"TRACKING STATION" PROPERTY WILL BE PLACED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE
COUNTY. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN OBTAINING
THIS PROPERTY FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IN THE EVENT THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER
SHORES ALTERS THEIR PARK ORDINANCE, WOULD WE HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE CHANGE?
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE WORDING OF THE RESOLUTION READS
THAT WE WILL BE BOUND BY "EXISTING" TOWN ORDINANCES, WHICH SHOULD COVER THIS
SITUATION, AND POINTED OUT THAT TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY WILL BE IN THE COUNTY'S
NAME.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COM-
MISSIONER SIEBERT, TO ACCEPT THE .JOINT RESOLUTION Nos. 75-70 AND 160 BETWEEN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES PROVIDING FOR COOPERATION IN
THE PROCUREMENT, OPERATION AND REGULATION OF A PUBLIC PARK WITHIN THE TOWN
OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS THE CULMINATION
OF ABOUT FOUR YEARS WORK AND STATED HE FEELS WE WILL WORK WITH THIS AGREEMENT
AND DEVELOP THE "TRACKING STATION" SITE INTO A PARK THAT NOT ONLY THE COUNTY
CAN BE PROUD OF, BUT ALSO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION.
THE BOARD VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANI-
MOUSLY CARRIED,
7
NOV 51975
I�
Boot 24 ear[ 103
NOV 51975
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
RESOLUTION No. 75-70
RESOLUTION NO. 160
A JOINT RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR COOPERATION
BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, FLORIDA, IN THE
PROCUREMENT, OPERATION AND REGULATION OF A
PUBLIC PARK WITHIN THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER
SHORES, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
+: County, Florida, and the Town Council of the Town of Indian River Shores,
Florida, desire to cooperate to the fullest extent in the procurement and
development of a public park at the Vero Beach Tracking Station property
located within the Town of Indian River Shores, Florida; and
WHEREAS, both parties agree to fully comply with all regulations
promulgated by every governmental agency; and
WHEREAS, both parties agree that title to said property shall be
taken in the name of Indian River County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County, Florida, agrees to maintain said
park in the highest standards in compliance with all existing ordinances of the
Town of Indian River Shores, Florida.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, and the Town Council of the
Town of Indian River Shores, Florida, do hereby agree to cooperate in the
development of a public park at the site of the Vero Beach Tracking Station.
m
1, the undersigned Town Clerk of the Town of Indian River Shores,
Florida, certify the foregoing to be a true copy of a Resolution duly adopted
by the Town Council of said Town at a meeting held on the 3rd day of
November, 1975.
SHARP, JOHNSTON & BROWN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
an o24 NAr f 104
NOV 51975
I, the undersigned Clerk of Indian River County, Florida, certify
the foregoing to be a true copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, at a meeting held
on the 5th day of • November , 1975.
�Verfc
•
SHARP, JOHNSTON 8 BROWN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
eo�‘ . 24 :PACE iO5
L
CHAIRMAN LOY READ THE FOLLOWING LETTER AND THE BOARD REQUESTED
THAT IT BE MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTESe
NOV 5 19 75
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
6001 NORTH A -1-A
INDIAN RIVER SHORES, FLORIDA 32960
Telephone: AC 305-562-1736
Honorable Lawton Chiles
United States Senator
Room 2107 New Senate 'Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Lawton:
Arra.. . .• .. +...,..ffirs. or..- 14$4.3..,r
October 30, 1975
You will recall several weeks ago during our telephone conversation
to you that I had reasons to believe that the park problem would be
resolved within the next few weeks, and please be advised that some
time within the next two or three weeks the Board of County Commis-
sioners and the Town Council of Indian River Shores will make an
agreement for the installation of the park.
It is my understanding that the State of Florida has agreed for the
land swap with the Air Force and that this deal is now in the Air
Force Office, waiting for disposition,so in the meantime, you are
in position .to know that there is no further disagreement between
Indian River County and the Town of Indian River Shores, as the
park will be run jointly.
I happened to be in Lakeland a couple of weeks ago and had a nice
visit with your mother and she looks real well.
10 -
Yours vel y truly,
Roland B. Miller
BOOK 24 Pgr 106
PAUL D. BURCH, ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ENTERED
THE MEETING AT 9:25 O'CLOCK A.M.
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT HE HAD A RESOLUTION FOR THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION TO BE APPROVED IN ORDER TO TRANSFER TO THE STATE A PARCEL
OF•LAND ALONG STATE ROAD 60, FROM 20TH AVENUE TO INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD. THIS
IS FOR DEEDING ANY EXISTING RIGHTS AND INTEREST WE HAVE ON AN ALREADY EXISTING
STATE ROAD. .
.ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY) THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 75-69 APPROVING DEED
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR PARCEL 100) SECTION #$8060-2509, STATE
ROAD 60, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN,
11
NOV 51975 Be
pi 10. .
21 (Rev. 12-1-72)
PARCEL NO. -100.1'
SECTION 88060-2509
STATE ROAD NO. 60
COUNTY INDIAN RIVER
FAP NO.
COUNTY
RESOLUTIUN 75-69
ON MOTION of Commissioner Schmucker , seconded by
Commissioner Massey , the following Resolution was
adopted:
WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Transportation proposes to
construct and improve State Road No_ 60 , Section 88060-2509
in Indian River County, Florida: and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that certain lands now owned by
Indian River County be acquired by the State of Florida for the use and
benefit of the State of Florida Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, said property is not needed for County purposes; and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Transportation having
made application to said County to execute and deliver to the State of Florida
Department of Transportation a deed or deeds in favor of the State of Florida,
conveying all rights, title and interest that said County has in and to said
lands required for right of way for said State Road, and said request having
been duly considered.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
River County that the application of the State of
Lull=
Florida Department of Transportation for a deed or deeds is for right of way pur-
poses which is in the public or community interest and for public welfare and the
land needed for right of way and other road purposes is not needed for County pur-
poses; that a deed or deeds in favor of the State of Florida conveying all right,
title and interest of Indian River County
in and to said lands required for right of way and other road purposes should be
drawn and executed by this Board of County Commissioners. Consideration shall be
$ 10.00
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Resolution be for—
warded forthwith to the State of Florida Department of Transportation at Tallahassee,
Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River . County, Florida
at a meeting held on the 5th day of Novemhr , A.D. 1975
Clerk of tjat' Board f County Commissioners
of_----__.--Indica River - County, Florida
NOV 5 1975
}-OL F'A r{ 1
(Rev. 10-1-75)
1427
15800
COUNTY DEED
OFFICIAL RECO!D
BOOK 503 PAc€11.6
PARCEL NO. 100.1
SECTION 88060-2509
STATE ROAD NO. 60
COUNTY INDIAN RIVER
FAP NO.
THIS DEED, mads this 5th day of November ,•A.D. 19 75
by Indian River
County, Florida, party of the first part, and
mate_o_Ltuzigulttar, party of the send part.
WITNESSETH: that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration
of the sum of $ 10.00 to it in hand paid by the party of the second part,
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the
party of the second party,
land lying and being in
PARCEL NO. 100
his heirs and assigns forever, the following described
Indian River County, Florida:
SECTION 88060-2509
All the Rights and interests of Indian River County into dedicated and
used State Road 60 from NW 20 Ave. to Indian River Blvd. as now.esists
and portions of other dedicated streets lying within the Right -of -Way
as shown on the Right -of -Way Map for Section 88060-2509, State Road 60,
Indian River County, Florida.
s
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY
Yrd-ad Yeez"16°-
BATED 0 C T 2 01975
STArE OF FLORIDA •
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION APPROVED
WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these
presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting
by the Chairman or Vice -Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid.
•e
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
ATTEST:
Clerk (or Deputy Clerk)
Circuit Court
Indian River COUNTY, FLORIDA
By its poIrd of Co
By
Its Chairman (or Vice -Chairman)
NOV 51975
AR 24 PAdddO9
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN LAST YEARS TELE-
PHONE DIRECTORY, THE TELEPHONE LISTINGS OF DEPARTMENTS IN THE COURTHOUSE
HAD BEEN SOMEWHAT CONFUSING AND, IN FACT, THE ADMINISTRATOR, TAX COLLECTOR AND
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS TELEPHONE NUMBERS HAD NOT BEEN LISTED. HE SUGGESTED
PREPARING A LETTER TO BE SENT TO EACH DEPARTMENT HEAD IN THE COURTHOUSE ASKING
THEM HOW THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE LISTED, SO T4AT THE NEW TELEPHONE DIRECTORY
COULD BE SET-UP PROPERLY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO PREPARE A LETTER
ASKING EACH DEPARTMENT HEAD IN THE COURTHOUSE HOW THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE LISTED
IN THE NEW TELEPHONE DIRECTORY.
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN ASKED TO CHECK INTO THE
NEED FOR HAVING A SIGNAL LIGHT AT 8TH STREET (GLENDALE ROAD) AND 2OTH AVENUE.
HE CONTINUED THAT HE DOES FEEL THIS LOCATION WARRANTS A BLINKER SIGNAL AND
THAT THERE IS ONE IN STOCK THAT COULD BE INSTALLED FOR APPROXIMATELY $200 TO
$250.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED'THE INSTALLATION OF A BLINKER SIGNAL AT 8TH
STREET (GLENDALE ROAD) AND 2OTH AVENUE, AS OUTLINED BY THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL TO COMMISSIONER SIEBERT
AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO ATTEND A MEETING WITH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT-
ATION OFFICIALS IN FORT LAUDERDALE, AT A TIME AND DATE TO BE ARRANGED, DURING
THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 10, 1975.
CHARLES SULLIVAN, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING LEROY BROWN, APPEARED
REGARDING A RENEWAL PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED. FIREARM WHICH MR, BROWN HAD
REQUESTED AND WHICH HAD BEEN TABLED AT THE PREVIOUS BOARD MEETING.
MR. SULLIVAN STATED THAT MR. BROWN HAS BEEN A LONG-TIME RESIDENT
OF THIS COUNTY AND HAS NO LEGAL CONVICTIONS AGAINST HIM. MR. BROWN OWNS AP-
PROXIMATELYFIFTY HOUSES IN GIFFORD ON WHICH HE COLLECTS RENT AND IS ONE OF THE
LARGEST TAXPAYERS IN THE COUNTY, MR. SULLIVAN CONTINUED THAT THERE IS .A HIGH
CRIME RATE IN GIFFORD, AND HE FELT MR, BROWN WOULD BE A PRIME CANDIDATE TO BE
ROBBED WHEN HE MAKES HIS COLLECTIONS, HE HAS ALREADY BEEN ROBBED AND SHOT.
14 -
NOV 51975
BOax
COMMISSIONER. SIEBERT SAID THE BOARD HAD HEARD THERE WAS PENDING
LEGAL ACTION AGAINST MR. BROWN,
ATTORNEY SULLIVAN STATED THAT THE CHARGES HAVE BEEN DISMISSED AND
THERE ARE NO CHARGES AGAINST MR. BROWN AT THIS TIME.
, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A RENEWAL PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM
TO LEROY BROWN.
THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED A TITLE
SEARCH ON PARCELS OF PROPERTY ALONG NORTH GIFFORD ROAD BETWEEN U.S. 1 AND
INDIAN RIVER BLVD., BUT IN VIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL -PROBLEMS FROM BARBER AVENUE
NORTH, HE WOULD LIKE AN OPINION FROM THE BOARD AS TO WHETHER THEY WANT TO BE-
COME INVOLVED WITH THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG NORTH GIFFORD
ROAD, AT THIS TIME.
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT SOME OF THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY HAVE
INDICATED TO HIM THAT THEY WILL DONATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY WHEN IT IS TIME TO BUILD
THE ROAD.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED.TO PUT A HOLD ON ACQUIRING -RIGHTS-OF-WAY ALONG
NORTH GIFFORD ROAD BETWEEN U.S.1 AND INDIAN RIVER BLVD. FOR A YEAR AND THEN
REASSESS THE MATTER.
CHAIRMAN- LOY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM
R..J.SCENT, REAL ESTATE BROKER, REPRESENTING ZAPF GROVES WHO ARE. INTERESTED
IN PURCHASING COUNTY PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THIS IS PROPERTY LYING JUST
NORTH OF KINGSBERRY ROAD WHERE THE COUNTY ORIGINALLY HAD A BORROW PIT, WHICH -
WAS FILLED IN AND USED AS A STUMP DUMP. IT IS NOT NOW BEING USED, AND THERE
HAVE BEEN SEVERAL REQUESTS TO PURCHASE IT. -HE NOTED THAT ZAPF GROVES OWNS
PROPERTY ON BATH SIDES OF THE PIECE OF PROPERTY BEING DISCUSSED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SAID HE FELT THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY SHOULD
BE DISPOSED OF AND PLACED BACK ON THE TAX ROLLS.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED
BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY. AGREED TO DISPOSE OF THE PARCEL
OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON THE TAX RECORD AS:
13-32-39, 01 0130 001 0, 8.06 ACRES, 8,060, INDIAN RIVER
FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION PBS 2-12, WEST 9.2 ACRES OF EAST
19.2 ACRES OF TRACT 13 LESS WEST 25.54 FEET;
15 -
NOV 51975
PAGEif
AND INSTRUCTED THE ATTORNEY TO OBTAIN AN APPRAISAL AND THEN ADVERTISE
FOR BIDS IN ORDER TO SELL THIS PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE,
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ
.THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
Ain the matter of
in the
lashed in said newspaper in the issues of
Court, was pub -
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has. heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. -
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 4%20 • . of _� -+ '_ -_ A.D._/ / o 7—
(SEAL
(Busin 'Manager)
=161.044.e'd---
(Clerk of theCircuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that the
Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, will
receive sealed bids for the sale of a
used mimeograph machine to the
highest bidder up to the hour of
9:30 A.M. on Wednesday,
November 5, 1975. Bids will be
opened at that time in the County
Commission Room, Indian River
County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida.
Machine may be seen at the
offices of the County Ad-
ministrator.
The Board reserves the right to
relect any and all bids.
Bids shall be marked "Bids for
Mimeograph Machine, Open Date
11-5.75" and forwarded to Jack G.
Jennings, County Administrator,
Room 115, Courthouse.
Jack G. Jennings
County Administrator
Oct. 19, 1975.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
VERO BEACH BRANCH OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN
AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY OF SEBASTIAN
$25.00
25.00
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE BID OF VERO BEACH
BRANCH OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN AS HE THOUGHT THEIR MEMBERSHIP.WAS A
LITTLE GREATER,
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND,
16
NOV 51975
BOo `-24 -44.12
ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT WE SHOULD WRITE THE TWO BIDDERS EXPLAINING
THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND POSSIBLY THE MATTER WOULD RESOLVE ITSELF, BUT IT WOULD
BE HIS RECOMMENDATIO((TO HAVE THEM RE -BIS).
ON MOTION B' COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO TABLE THE BID ON THE USED MIMEOGRAPH MACHINE
UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING AND HAVE THE ADMINISTRATOR ASK THE TWO BIDDERS TO
EITHER RESOLVE THE SITUATION OR SUBMIT ANOTHER BID,
ATTORNEY COLLINS HAD QUESTIONS' IN REGARD TO THE SETTING UP OF
A COUNTY RECREATION PROGRAM AND WONDERED IF IT WAS TO BE FOR A SPECIFIC
AREA QR THE WHOLE COUNTY, it MENTIONED TWO ALTERNATIVES - FLORIDA STATUTE
418 HAS PROVISIONS FOR PASSING OF A BOND ISSUE FOR PURCHASE OF RECREATION
FACILITIES, HIRING PERSONNEL, ETC. IF, HOWEVER, IT IS DESIRED TO HAVE A
TAX LEVIED, 5% OF THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE COUNTY MUST FILE A PETITION,
AND THE TAX IS LIMITED UP TO ONE MILL,
ATTORNEY BURCH INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY ALSO HAD THE OPTION OF
SETTING UP A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT FOR METROPOLITAN TYPE SERVICES WITHOUT
A REFERENDUM AND IT WOULD NOT HAVE TO GO UNDER THE EXISTING 10 MILL CAP.
MUNICIPALITIES WOULD HAVE TO JOIN IN BY ORDINANCE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT WE ARE COMMITTED TO A
REFERENDUM.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE PUBLIC MUST BE FULLY INFORMED BEFORE THIS
MATTER IS PUT ON A BALLOT, AND THERE ARE MANY QUESTIONS TO BE RESOLVED BEFORE
GOING ANY FURTHER,
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED WHETHER IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THAT A
RECREATION DISTRICT INVOLVE THE ENTIRE COUNTY,
DISCUSSION AROSE ON WHETHER IT WAS FAIR TO INCLUDE THE AREA WEST
OF 1-95 AND IMPOSE A TAX ON LARGE ACREAGES MAINLY AGRICULTURAL.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAD ATTENDED A MEETING IN
SEBASTIAN WHERE IT WAS CONTEMPLATED THAT SCHOOLS WOULD PARTICIPATE MORE
AND MORE IN COMMUNITY RECREATION ACTIVITIES.WITH THEIR EXISTING FACILITIES,
HE CONTINUED THAT HE FELT IT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE TO HAVE AN EMPLOYEE PRE-
FERABLY A PROFESSIONAL, DO AN INVENTORY OF EXISTING RECREATIONAL FACILITIES,
EQUIPMENT AND PROGRAMS AND PREPARE SOMETHING TO WORK FROM TO DECIDE ON
PRIORITIES AND COME UP WITH AN IDEA OF COST AND THE AVAILABILITY OF
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS WOULD DEFINITELY BE TOO MUCH
-17-
NOV 51975
BIM 2 put13.
FOR ONE COMMISSIONER TO HANDLE AND HE DID NOT FEEL THAT THE PLANNING DE-
PARTMENT HAS THE STAFF TO HANDLE THIS AS HE FELT IT WOULD REQUIRE SOMEONE
FULL-TIME TO GATHER ALL THIS INFORMATION, CONTACT OTHER COMMUNITIES REGARDING
THEIR PROGRAMS, ETC., AND GET IT READY FORA REFERENDUM; ESPECIALLY AS ALL
'THIS SHOULD BE DONE BEFORE THE MIDDLE OF .JANUARY.
IT WAS AGREED TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER WITH VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING
DIRECTOR, LATER IN THE MEETING, IN ORDER TO RECEIVE HIS RECOMMENDATIONS.
CHAIRMAN LAY SUGGESTED POSSIBLY WE SHOULD HAVE A STRAW BALLOT,
ASKING PEOPLE IF THEY WOULD WANT TO SUPPORT A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT FOR
RECREATIONAL PURPOSES AND THEN BASED ON1HEIR DECISION, MOVE FORWARD ON THAT
IDEA. SHE CONTINUED THAT, SHE FEELS -THE PROGRAM SHOULD BE VERY BASIC AND
MINIMAL TO :START..
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THE COUNTY COMMISSION SHOULD BE THE
SUPERVISOR OF ANY RECREATION PROGRAM SET UP.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED FOR THE BOARD'S COMMENTS REGARDING A RE-
CREATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH FOR THE
1975-76 BUDGET YEAR.
.THE BOARD DISCUSSED THIS AGREEMENT AND IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED
TO DELETE PARAGRAPH 5.
SPONSORSHIP FEES WERE DISCUSSED AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT
THE CITY HAD SAID, "IF IT WASN'T CHARGED LAST YEAR, IT WOULDN'T BE CHARGED
THIS YEAR." HE FELT WE SHOULD HAVE A STATEMENT IN THE AGREEMENT THAT
SPONSORSHIP FEES WILL NOT EXCEED CHARGES OF THE 1974-75 RECREATION AGREEMENT.
ON MOTION BYJCOMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RECREATION AGREEMENT*BETWEEN THE COUNTY
AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH FOR 1975-76, SUBJECT TO THE DELETION OF PARAGRAPH
5 AND SUBJECT TO THE INCLUSION OF A STATEMENT AGREEING THAT SPONSORSHIP FEES
WILL NOT EXCEED CHARGES OF THE 1974-75 AGREEMENT.
THE AGREEMENT WHEN CORRECTED AND FULLY SIGNED•WILL BE MADE A PART
OF THE MINUTES,
ATTORNEY COLLINS PRESENTED AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
THE COUNTY WHICH WILL ALLOW THE E.O.C. TO MAKE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS TO THE
BOARD INSTEAD OF QUARTERLY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY AND THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL, DATED JANUARY 10, 1973,
ALLOWING THEM TO MAKE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS INSTEAD OF QUARTERLY.
-18-
N OV 51975
-800K 24 �Ac[114
AMENDMENT
THIS AMENDMENT Made and entered into this 5th day of
November , 1975, by and between THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter
referred to as "Board" and ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter called "E.O.C.".
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of January, 1973 the Board
and E.O.C. entered into an Agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties to amend said
Agreement entered into on the 10th day of January, 1973.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree to amend
that said Agreement by deleting Paragraph 11 of said Agreement
and substituting the following:
"11. The E.O.C. agrees to make semi-annual reports
to the Board concerning the utilization of the property,
which reports will contain:
(a) Number of days property is utilized.
(b) Number of participants.
(c) Number of days the property is utilized by other
non-profit community groups.
(d) Income or donations derived from utilization of the
property.
(e) Expenditures on the property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Board and E.O.C. have hereunto
by their authorized representatives, set their hands and seals
the day and year first above written.
NOV 51975
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIgSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER
BY: &Lz -ef
Alma Lee Loy, Chairm
.toe
Ralph H rris, Clerk
ECMIC OPPORTUNITIES COCIL
QF II DI RIVE 7N'�Y, FI�A
C "
r
Attest: �:r�,2, Hr ) ,
eoot 24 c�.35
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED COMPLAINTS
FROM TWO RESIDENTS OF SUMMERPLACE IN REGARD TO A WATER PROBLEM. APPARENTLY,
MCCULLERS WELL DRILLING,"SOME YEARS AGO, DRILLED A DEEP WELL ON A COUNTY
EASEMENT, WITHOUT A PERMIT OR FRANCHISE AND HAS BEEN SERVICING THE PEOPLE
'WITH UNPALATABLE WATER AND COLLECTING FEES. THIS MATTER SHOULD BE CLEARED UP
FROM A FRANCHISE POINT OF VIEW AS WELL AS WITH REGARD TO THE COMPLAINTS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THE WELL IS IN THE EASEMENT AND.THE
EASEMENT IS FOR UTILITIES, ETC.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ATTORNEY FOR MORE RESEARCH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS PREPARED A TRIPARTITE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN VERO MED, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, HE
STATED THAT B.T. COOKSEY, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING VERO MED, HAD WRITTEN HIM
IN REGARD TO RELEASING A 40 ACRE PARCEL, AND IT WAS HIS FEELING THAT IT WOULD
BE BETTER TO JUST RELEASE THE AREA AROUND THE BUILDINGS RATHER THAN THAT
AMOUNT.
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT ATTORNEY COOKSEY HAS REQUESTED TO BE
PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19TH AND THE BOARD
AGREED TO HOLD THIS MATTER UNTIL THAT TIME,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IN REGARD TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT
UTILITIES WATER PURCHASE CONTRACT, HE HAS REVISED THE AGREEMENT, REVIEWED
THE REVISIONS WITH EACH COMMISSIONER INDIVIDUALLY, EXCEPT COMMISSIONER
MASSEY WHO WAS ON VACATION, AND THEN MAILED COPIES OF IT TO CLAUDE GREENE AND
ATTORNEYS OF FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, AND ATTORNEY CHARLES HERRING,
WHO IS REPRESENTING U.D.U.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE SPOKE WITH MR, GREENE YESTERDAY AND
AT THAT TIME HE HAD STILL NOT RECEIVED THE AGREEMENT WHICH HAD BEEN MAILED
THE PAST FRIDAY MORNING.
ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN DISCUSSED SOME OF THE REVISIONS HE HAD MADE IN
THE AGREEMENT. THE MAJOR INTENT IS TO MAKE IT A TWO-TIERED ARRANGEMENT. •IT
WILL FIRST BE SET UP TO SERVE THE EXISTING CUSTOMERS PLUS MIDDLE 6 AND MIDDLE
7 SCHOOLS AND SIX MONTHS LATER, EXISTING STRUCTURES NOT PRESENTLY ON THE
SYSTEM WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO HOOK-UP. AFTER THAT, UPON UPGRADING
OF THE SEWER SYSTEM, U.D.U. WILL BE ALLOWED TO MAKE WATER AVAILABLE TO A
THIRD PARTY. OTHER THAN THESE REVISIONS THE AGREEMENT IS PRETTY MUCH IN
ITS ORIGINAL FORM.
-20m
NOV 51975
;oil 24 PAGfii8
ATTORNEY HERRING MADE COMMENTS ON THE AGREEMENT AS REVISED BY
ATTORNEY COLLINS, HE STATED HE WOULD HAVE A PROBLEM LIVING WITH IT AND
QUESTIONED WHETHER F.H.A. WOULD ACCEPT IT. HE CONTINUED THAT IT WOULD
TAKE FOUR TO EIGHT MONTHS TO PUT IN THE WATER PLANT AND FOR PEOPLE TO BEGIN
TO BE.SERVED, AND NOTED THAT THE WAITING PERIOD IN THE REVISED AGREEMENT
CALLED FOR AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS, OR OVER A YEAR FROM THE PRESENT DATE.
THEN IF ANYTHING WAS TO BE BUILT THERE, MAKING IT POSSIBLE TO REPAY THE
LOAN FOR THE FUNDS TO BE USED FOR THE WATER, IT WOULD TAKE ANOTHER SIX
MONTHS - AND THUS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT 18 MONTHS,
ATTORNEY HERRING POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY PLANNER SEVERAL YEARS
AGO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE OVER 1,500 SUBSTANDARD HOUSES IN THE COUNTY
AND MORE THAN 900 OF THEM WERE IN GIFFORD. THE COUNTY IS PRESENTLY IN A
BUILDING SLUMP, AND HE FELT THERE ARE ADVANTAGES TO GETTING NEW AND BETTER
HOUSES IN THE GIFFORD AREA AND MORE MONEY CIRCULATING IN THE VERO BEACH
ECONOMY. HE STATED THAT ACCORDING TO THE PLANNER, THERE IS AMPLE ROOM FOR
THE 225 HOMES HE IS PLANNING TO BUILD, AND HE FELT THIS WOULD BE A CHANCE
TO UPGRADE A LOT OF THINGS IN ONE FELL SWOOP IT IF WEREN'T FOR THE "TIERED"
SUPPLY OF WATER, WHICH WILL CAUSE MANY COMPLICATIONS. HE STATED HE COULD NOT
SUPPLY THE SEWER UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES AND HE WOULD,OF NECESSITY, HAVE
TO WRITE TO THE F.H.A. WASHINGTON OFFICE WHICH WOULD GRANT THE LOAN AND
ADVISE THEM THAT THE CONDITIONS UPON WHICH THE GRANT AND LOAN WERE PREDICATED
INITIALLY HAVE NOT SURVIVED.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE SIX MONTHS'
TIME RESTRICTION IS THE MAJOR OBJECTION?
ATTORNEY HERRING SAID YES, AS WAITING AN ADDITIONAL YEAR AS HE HAD
JUST EXPLAINED WOULD HAVE TO AFFECT THE FINANCING,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED IF WE ALL AGREE THERE WILL BE
ENOUGH WATER EVEN AFTER YOU BUILD YOUR 225 UNITS, COULD WE NOT JUST REMOVE
THE SIX MONTH PERIOD AND MAKE IT SIMPLY ON THE PREMISE THAT THE SEWAGE PLANT
IS UP AND WILL BE IMPROVED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD WANT THE F.H.A. TO AGREE TO
SUBORDINATION AND THEY COULD JUST CONCUR WITH THE REST OF IT.
- 21 -
NOV 51975
24 34117
Nov 5 NM
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE SIX MONTHS WAS
-TO GIVE THE PEOPLE IN GIFFORD WHO ARE NOT ON THE SYSTEM AT THE PRESENT TIME
AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO ON THE SYSTEM AFTER THEY SEE THERE IS PROPER WATER
THERE.
CHAIRMAN LOY POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE NOW WAITING FOR AN ANSWER FROM
F.H.A. ON THE AGREEMENT SENT THEM BY ATTORNEY COLLINS.
ATTORNEY HERRING STATED THAT U.D.U. HAS ALREADY MET ON THE "LAG"
SITUATION AND IT WAS NOT AGREEABLE TO THEM.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE, AT THIS TIME, TO
COMMENT ON ATTORNEY HERRING'S STATEMENTS TO THE PRESS LAST WEEK, HE FELT
THEY WERE TOTALLY IRRESPONSIBLE AND UNCALLED FOR, ESPECIALLY IN REGARD TO
CHAIRMAN LOY, AND HE REGARDED THEM AS AN ATTACK ON THE INTEGRITY OF THIS
BOARD, THE PHRASE "BLACK WATER FOR BLACK PEOPLE° PRESENTED RACIAL OVERTONES
THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN BROUGHT INTO THIS SITUATION.
COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER STATED APPARENTLY THE DEVELOPMENT HINGES ON
WHETHER THE SEWER SYSTEM IS IMPROVED OR NOT, AND AS LONG AS WE HAVE THE
PROTECTION THAT THE SYSTEM HAS TO BE IMPROVED IN ORDER TO GET THE WATER
ALLOCATION, HE DID NOT SEE WHERE THE SIX MONTHS LAG IS NECESSARY.
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED SHE FELT WE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL WE HEAR FROM F.H.A.
THEY ASKED US TO COME BACK WITH SOMETHING AGREEABLE TO US AND WHEN THEY HAVE
REVIEWED THE AGREEMENT SENT BY ATTORNEY COLLINS, SHE FELT SURE WE WILL BE
ABLE TO WORK SOMETHING OUT AGREEABLE TO ALL.
ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID HE COULD NOT RECOMMEND GIVING IN ON ANYTHING
BEFORE WE HEAR FROM F.H.A.
COMMISSIONER MASSEY POINTED OUT IF THE ORIGINAL SYSTEM HAD BEEN DONE
PROPERLY THE FIRST TIME, WE WOULD NOT HAVE THIS SITUATION NOW AND WE NEED TO
BE SURE IT WILL BE DONE RIGHT THIS TIME.
VICTOR HART, SECRETARY -TREASURER OF U.D.U. APPEARED AND SAID, YOU
KEEP TALKING ABOUT F.H.A., THE COUNTY AND CHARLES HERRING AGREEING ON AN
AGREEMENT AND EVERYBODY SEEMS TO FORGET U.D.U. THEMSELVES,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REMARKED THAT CHARLES HERRING HAS STATED THAT
HE IS U.D.U.'S REPRESENTATIVE AND THUS WE ARE NOT FORGETTING U.D.U.
MR. HART STATED HE FELT THERE SHOULD BE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM U.D.U.
IN ADDITION TO ATTORNEY HERRING, TO WORK ON THIS AGREEMENT AS AFTER EVERY-
BODY AGREES, U.D.U. STILL HAS TO GO OVER IT AT THEIR BOARD MEETING
BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE.TO.SIGN THE AGREEMENT,
ATTORNEY HERRING STATED THAT HE DISCUSSED THIS AGREEMENT WITH U.D..U.
AND IT WAS NOT AGREEABLE. F.H.A. IS THE BANKER; U.D.U. HAS TO PAY IT BACK.
-22-
80131 24 PMM[ 118
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, TO DELETE THE SIX MONTHS WAITING PERIOD, PARAGRAPHS C AND E OF THE
PROPOSED WATER PURCHASE CONTRACT; AND TO SUBORDINATE TO THE UTILITY COMPANY
THAT WILL BE COLLECTING THE FEES AND MAINTAINING THE SYSTEM AND NOT TO
SUBORDINATE TO F.H.A.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO HEARING F.H.A.'S COMMENTS ON THE
AGREEMENT SENT TO THEM FOR REVIEW.
CHAIRMAN LOY CALLED FOR THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE VOTED IN FAVOR;
COMMISSIONERS MASSEY, SIEBERT AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN OPPOSITION AND THE
MOTION WAS DENIED.
ATTORNEY BURCH LEFT THE MEETING AT 12:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
THE BOARD THEN RECESSED AT 12:30 O'CLOCK P.M. AND RECONVENED AT
2:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A SUGGESTION
FROM THE VERO BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION THAT ON ALL ZONING APPLICATIONS THERE
BE A REQUIREMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF ALL THE OWNERS OF BENEFICIAL AND EQUITABLE
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BEING REZONED. HE STATED THIS IS STRICTLY A MATTER
OF POLICY AND IF THE BOARD DESIRES IT, THERE WOULD BE NO DIFFICULTY IN
INSTITUTING SUCH A POLICY,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS PROCEDURE WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED
BY THE ZONING COMMISSION AND HE FELT IT WAS A GOOD POLICY ESPECIALLY AS IT
MIGHT SERVE TO GIVE THE PUBLIC MORE CONFIDENCE IN THE ZONING COMMISSION,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY/ TO INSTRUCT THE ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF THE OWNERS AS THEIR BENEFICIAL AND EQUIT-
ABLE INTEREST IN PROPERTY ON WHICH REZONING IS BEING REQUESTED,
VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, ASKED IF THIS WOULD APPLY TO ALL
ZONING REQUESTS AS HE FELT IT WAS THE INTENT THAT IT APPLY MAINLY TO LARGE
DEVELOPERS.
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED THAT THIS POLICY WOULD BE
DISCRIMINATORY UNLESS APPLIED TO ALL.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION. THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
AND THE MOTION WAS CARRIED.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO A REZONING REQUESTED BY JOSEPH
FINK, TO REZONE HIS PROPERTY FROM LM -1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT TO
R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT WAS CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 22, 1975
UNTIL 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. TODAY.
VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, SHOWED SLIDES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
-23-
NOV
3
NOV 51975
iax 24 YAIE119
WHICH IS LOCATED OFF OF SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD AND IS IN AN LM -1 DISTRICT. THIS
PROPERTY IS BOUNDED ON TWO SIDES BY LM -1 AND ON THE OTHER TWO SIDES BY M-1
AND THE AIRPORT, MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THIS A GOOD AREA FOR INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE AND RESIDENCES SHOULD NOT BE MIXED WITH INDUSTRIAL.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT THE BOARD WOULD BE
DOING THE FINKS AA INJUSTICE TO CONSIDER SUCH A REZONING AND WANTED THEM
TO UNDERSTAND THE SITUATION, HE POINTED OUT THAT THE VALUE WOULD BE
GREATLY. INCREASED BY LEAVING IT IN INDUSTRIAL, AND SECONDLY, MR, FINK
WOULD HAVE TO SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY ACCORDING TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS IN ORDER TO PUT ANY MORE DWELLINGS ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH
COULD BE QUITE EXPENSIVE, ALSO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AIRPORT COULD
PRESENT PROBLEMS,
MR, FINK APPEARED AND SAID THAT HE ONLY WISHED TO BUILD ONE
HOUSE FOR ONE OF HIS SONS AND WOULD LIKE TO BUILD ON THE CORNER NEAREST
THE R-1 ZONING,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT EVEN IF THE PROPERTY
HAD REMAINED R-1 AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY, "IR. FINK WOULD STILL HAVE TO SUB
DIVIDE.
COMMISSIONER '.'IODTKE STATED THAT IF 1R, FINK COULD ACQUIRE
ACCESS TO A PUBLIC ROAD, THEN POSSIBLY HE COULD BUILD ONE HOUSE ON HIS
PROPERTY,
DEWEY WALKER, ZONING DIRECTOR, STATED THAT MR. FINK WOULD HAVE
TO HAVE 73 FEET ON A PUBLIC ROAD,
DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON HOW TO WORK OUT THIS PROBLEM FOR 1R.
FINK AS HE DEFINITELY DOES NOT WANT TO SUBDIVIDE. POSSIBLY SOMETHING
COULD BE WORKED OUT IN REGARD TO LOCATING THE HOUSE ON SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD
INSTEAD OF THE OTHER END OF THE PROPERTY OR POSSIBLY THE SIZE OF THE
PARCEL TO BE REZONED COULD BE REDUCED, IT WAS AGREED TO GIVE PSR, FINK
TIME TO DISCUSS THIS WITH HIS FAMILY.
ON LOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY. COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING
ON A REZONING REQUEST BY MR. FINK UNTIL THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1375,
AT 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
DISCUSSION ON THE ZONING CHANGE FROM A -AGRICULTURAL AND R-1
SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT TO R-1PM PERMANENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT
REQUESTED BYJOHN D. COLE AND BOB HOFMANN ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE AREA
OF KINGS HIGHWAY AND LINDSEY ROAD WAS CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF
@24
NOV 51975
1001. 241A 1i2O
OCTOBER 8, 1975. A PUBLIC•HEARING WAS HELD ON THIS MATTER AT THE
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 24, 1975, AND CLOSED IN ORDER FOR THE BOARD TO DO
MORE RESEARCH.
ATTORNEY STEVE HENDERSON APPEARED REPRESENTING MR. HOFMANN,
THE DEVELOPER, AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RESEARCHED THE MATTER
OF WHETHER THE MOBILE HOME OWNER HAS AN OPTION AS TO THE MANNER IN WHICH
HE IS TAXED. IIE STATED HE HAD CONTACTED ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL,
KEN TUCKER, AND IT WAS "MR. TUCKER'S OPINION THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION
74-150 WAS STILL IN EFFECT AND HAD NOT BEEN MODIFIED BY THE ADOPTION 1)F
FLORIDA STATUTE 193.075. IN OTHER WORDS, WHILE A MOBILE HOME OWNER MAY
HAVE THE OPTION OF PURCHASING A ""9V" TAG, WHEN THE MOBILE HOME IS ATTACHED
TO A PERMANENT FOUNDATION ON LAND OWNED BY THE MOBILE HOME OWNER, IT IS
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION THAT THE OWNER AT THAT POINT HAS EXERCISED
HIS OPTION TO TREAT THE MOBILE HOME AS REAL PROPERTY, AT THAT POINT, THE
MOBILE HOME OWNER IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN AN "RP" TAG AND THE MOBILE HOME
AND LOT IS THEN TAXED AS REAL PROPERTY."
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED HE HAD DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER, BUT MR. FLETCHER TAKES THE POSITION THAT IF A STRUCTURE CAN BE
MOVED FROM ITS FOUNDATIONS WITHOUT DAMAGE TO THE STRUCTURE, HE DOES NOT
CONSIDER IT PERMANENTLY AFFIXED, MR, HENDERSON POINTED OUT, HOWEVER,
THERE ARE TAX ADVANTAGES JUST BY HAVING THIS PROPERTY BECOME A SUBDIVISION,
ATTORNEY HENDERSON NEXT DISCUSSED WHETHER DRI WAS REQUIRED, AND
STATED THAT IF A DEVELOPER IS WILLING TO RESTRICT HIS LAND BY DEED RE-
STRICTION TO LESS THAN 500 UNITS, IT WILL NOT BE TREATED AS A DRI.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER COMMENTED IN REGARD TO MR, FLETCHER'S
INTERPRETATION IN REGARD TO THE TAXING OPTION, ALMOST ANY HOUSE IN THE
COUNTY COULD BE MOVED AND THIS HAS BEEN DONE MANY TIMES.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER
CAN USE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION AS A GUIDELINE, BUT CAN USE HIS
OWN DISCRETION IN APPLYING IT,
COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT EVEN IF MORE TAXES ARE PAID IN,
THIS IS NOT ALWAYS SUCH A GREAT BENEFIT, AS IT ALSO INCREASES THE TAXES
THAT HAVE TO BE PAID TO SUPPORT MORE SERVICES.
-25-
NOV 51975
1
NOV 51975
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STRESSED THE FACT THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT
WOULD BE CONSIDERED LOW COST HOUSING BECAUSE OF THE AVAILABILITY OF LONG
TERM FAA, FINANCING
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THE BOARD COULD APPROVE THE
ZONING BUT LIMIT THEM TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE.
• ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID THIS COULD NOT BE DONE.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS TO BE SUB—
DIVIDED AND WILL HAVE TO SHOW FOUR UNITS PER ACRE AT THAT TIME, HE SUG—
GESTED CREATING ANOTHER ZONING CLASSIFICATION AT THIS DENSITY,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER MADE A MOTION TO REFER THIS ZONING
REQUEST BACK TO THE ZONING COMMISSION TO CREATE ANOTHER R -1P9 DISTRICT
WHICH WOULD RESTRICT DENSITY TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE.
MMOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON SUGGESTED THIS REZONING REQUEST BE HELD IN
ABEYANCE WHILE THE BOARD ASKS THE ZONING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS
ON A NEW CLASSIFICATION,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER MADE A MOTION TO TABLE THE REZONING
REQUEST OF .JOHN'COLE AND BOB HOFMANN AND REQUEST THE ZONING BOARD TO ES—
TABLISH A NEW R-1Pi DISTRICT WHICH WOULD HAVE A FOUR—UNIT TO THE ACRE
RESTRICTION AND REQUIRE UNITS TO BE ON PERMANENT FOUNDATIONS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT PROCEDURALLY A MOTION TO TABLE
MUST BE A SEPARATE MOTION, AND THIS 'LOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO REQUEST THE ZONING COMMIS—
SION TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL R-1PM CLASSIFICATION
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OF LOWER DENSITY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE FELT WE SHOULII REFER THIS MATTER
TO THE ZONING COMMISSION TO SEE WHETHER IN THEIR JUDGMENT THERE COULD BE
A MORE ADVANTAGEOUS ZONING IN THE R-1PM CLASSIFICATION AND WHETHER IT
WOULD BE WORTHWHILE TO CREATE ONE.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON POINTED OUT THAT IF THIS DEVELOPMENT WEREClO
HAVE 7 OR 8 UNITS PER ACRE, IT WOULD BECOME A DRI AND WOULD EVENTUALLY BE
REFERRED BACK TO THE BOARD,
-26-
BOOK
?a QE 122
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THERE WAS ALWAYS THE POSSI-
BILITY OF SOME OF THE PROPERTY BEING SOLD OFF.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION, IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER WODTKE, TO TABLE THE REZONING REQUEST OF JOHN COLE AND BOB HOFMANN
ON THE BASIS THAT THERE IS NO LEGAL WAY OF RESTRICTING THIS DEVELOPMENT
TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE AS PRESENTED AS THE R-1PM ZONING REQUESTED CATEGOR-
ICALLY ALLOWS 8 UNITS PER ACRE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO ESTABLISH A
ZONE WHICH WOULD LEGALLY RESTRICT THIS DEVELOPMENT TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE,
COMMISSIONERS SCHMUCKER AND WODTKE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION,
COMMISSIONERS MASSEY, SIEBERT AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND
THE MOTION WAS DENIED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT THE REZONING REQUEST
UNDER CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE ACTED ON AT THIS TIME AS HE DID NOT NECES-
SARILY FEEL THAT LIMITING IT TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE MADE IT THAT MUCH
MORE DESIRABLE IN THE OVERALL PICTURE,
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, TO DENY THE PETITION OF JOHN D. COLE AND BOB HOFMANN FOR A RE-
ZONING TO R -1P'1 FOR REASONS STATED BEFORE AS TO THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE
OF THE LAND; THE IMPACT ON COUNTY SERVICES, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN CLARIFIED;
AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH THE MASTER PLAN,
COMMISSIONERS SIEBERT, MASSEY AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN FAVOR,
COMMISSIONERS SCHMUCKER AND WODTKE VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MIOTION
TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST WAS CARRIED,
THE BOARD DISCUSSED WITH VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, THE
IDEA OF HIRING SOMEONE TO DO AN INVENTORY OF RECREATION FACILITIES,
EQUIPMENT, ETC., AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY AND RESEARCH OF RECREATION PRO-
GRAMS, INCLUDING INVESTIGATION OF OTHER COMMUNITIES' PROGRAMS, LONG RANGE
PLANS, ETC,
MR, BRENNAII SAID IF HE HAD THE HOARD'S PERMISSION TO HIRE A MAN
ON A PART-TIME BASIS TO HELP PUT THIS TOGETHER AND CORRELATE IT WITH THE
INFORMATION THEY ALREADY HAD, HE THOYGHT HIS DEPARTMENT COULD HANDLE IT,
ALTHOUGH THE TIME ELEMENT MADE IT A PROBLEM, 1E SAID HE FELT MANY MEETINGS
WOULD BE NECESSARY AS THIS STUDY PROGRESSED TO BE SURE THEY ARE ON THE
RIGHT TRACK,
27
NOV 51975
MRe BRENNAN ASKED THE BOARD'S PERMISSION TO HIRE ONE MAN TWO
DAYS A WEEK,
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED HE WOULD RATHER HAVE IR,
HIRE A MAN FIVE DAYS A WEEK FOR TWO OR THREE MONTHS,
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED SHE FELT IT WAS IMPERATIVE THE INVENTORY
OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE BE STARTED IMMEDIATELY AND SUGGESTED
THAT MR, BRENNAN MEET WITH COMMISSIONER SIEBERT TO WORK OUT THE PROCEDURE
TO BE FOLLOWED AND POSSIBLE COST AND REPORT ON IT AT THE NEXT MEETING,
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS REPORTED THAT THE "201" CONSULTANTS HELD
A MEETING TODAY IN HIS OFFICE AND THEY SUGGESTED THAT VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING
DIRECTOR, BE APPOINTED TO THE 201 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPOINTED VAL BRENNAN TO THE 201 TECHNICAL
ADVISORY COMMITTEE,
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ROBERT CAIRNS IS
TRUSTEE AND OWNS SEA OATS, WHICH IS PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF :JOHNS ISLAND
ON STATE ROAD A1A AND 'WHICH WAS RECENTLY REFERRED BACK TO THE ZONING
COMMISSION FOR RESTUDY WITH THE IDEA OF BRINGING THIS PROPERTY BACK INTO
LINE WITH REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THE OWNER WHEN THE DENSITY WAS GRANTED,
IR, CAIRNS NOW FINDS HIMSELF IN A SITUATION WHERE HE NEEDS TO KEEP THE
PROPERTY IN A ZONE THAT WILL GIVE HIM THE FLEXIBILITY OF A DENSITY OF 15
IN SOME PLACES AND AS LOW AS EVEN 1, 2 OR 3 IN OTHERS, SO IT CAN BE MORE
IN LINE WITH PAD. BEFORE 112, CAIRNS SELLS THIS PROPERTY HE WANTS TO
BE SURE IT WILL NOT BE "DOWN—ZONED" BACK TO A RESIDENTIAL AREA,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER FROM
MR, CAIRNS' ATTORNEY IN ORLANDO IN REGARD TO AN AGREEMENT IR, CAIRNS WOULD
LIKE THE BOARD TO SIGN WHEREBY AN OVERALL DENSITY IS AGREED UPON BUT THE
ZONING WILL REMAIN R-2 MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT, THE LETTER DISCUSSED
"CONTRACT" ZONING AND QUOTED CASES WHICH WOULD SUBSTANTIATE THAT 'IR,
CAIRNS PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY IS A VALID AND LEGAL ONE,
ROBERT CAIRNS TOOK THE FLOOR AND STATED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS
IDEALLY SUITED FOR A P.U.D. APPROACH, HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE SIGNED AN
AGREEMENT BEFORE THAT THEY ARE LIMITING THEMSELVES TO A DENSITY OF 8, BUT
28
NOV 51975
� ' 4 °A:124
WANTED TO HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY OF 15 CLUSTERED HERE AND THERE, IR, CAIRNS
POINTED OUT THAT THEY ARE ALREADY ZONED R-2, AND HE FELT AN AGREEMENT
SUCH AS HE IS SUGGESTING WOULD BE HELPFUL TO THE COUNTY RATHER THAN
CREATING MORE AND MORE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, !1E CONTINUED THAT HE HAS
ALREADY SIGNED AN AGREEMENT SUCH AS ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED WHICH
WOULD AGREE ON AN OVERALL DENSITY,
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF THIS HAS BEEN DONE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
ATTORNEY KENDALL SHARP, REPRESENTING MR, CAIRNS, SAID THAT IT
HAS BEEN AND IS DONE A LOT IN THE ORLANDO AREA, AND IT HAS NEVER BEEN
BROUGHT TO COURT IN FLORIDA,
VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS
REVIEWED MR, CAIRNS` AGREEMENT, NOT FROM A LEGAL POINT OF VIEW BUT FROM A
PLANNING POINT OF VIEW, HE STATED THAT HE LIKES THE FACT THAT THE AGREE-
MENT WILL BE SIGNED BY BOTH THE COMMISSIONERS AND THE OWNERS WHICH MAKES
IT MUCH STRONGER THAN A DEED RESTRICTION BY THE OWNER WHICH CAN BE TORN
UP AT ANY TIME, BUT ADDED THAT HE DID HOPE THAT SUCH AN AGREEMENT WOULD
NOT CAUSE THE COUNTY TO GIVE UP ITS RIGHT TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY AT ANY
TIME IN THE FUTURE,
ATTORNEY SHARP STATED THAT BEFORE THE NEW ORDINANCES WERE BROUGHT
OUT, THE REPRESENTATION WAS MADE THAT THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE HELD TO 8
UNITS PER ACRE, AND BY THIS AGREEMENT, WE ARE LIMITING OURSELVES TO THE
ORIGINAL REPRESENTATION,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THE IDEA IS FINE, BUT HE FELT
THE BOARD SHOULD HAVE TIME TO STUDY THIS SITUATION BEFORE SIGNING ANYTHING,
MR, CAIRNS STATED THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH A TIME LIMIT AS
HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS AGREEMENT SIGNED BEFORE HE SOLD THE PROPERTY,
MR, BRENNAN NOTED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION -MEETS AGAIN TO-
MORROW NIGHT, AND THEY HEARTILY RECOMMENDED THE PREVIOUS AGREEMENT WHICH
WAS PRESENTED TO THEM,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FELT IF THE COUNTY SIGNED THIS
CONTRACT, IT MAY WELL WORK AS AN ESTOPPEL ON A FUTURE BUYER,
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED SHE FELT IT WAS THE GENERAL OPINION OF THE
BOARD THAT THIS MATTER WOULD HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED FURTHER BEFORE SIGNING
THE AGREEMENT, AND IT WOULD BE BROUGHT UP AGAIN AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEET-
ING OR POSSIBLY AT A SPECIAL MEETING.
-29-
NOV 51975
BON .Nta125
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION
HAS RECOMMENDED AMENDING SOME ORDINANCES. ONE OF THE PROBLEMS REVOLVES
AROUND FUNERAL HOMES, WHICH ARE NOW ALLOWED ONLY IN A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
THE ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THEY BE ALLOWED IN MORE THAN ONE
AREA AND FELT THEY WOULD BE COMPATIBLE IN AGRICULTURAL, THIS PROBLEM
AROSE WHEN FLOYD-STRUNK WANTED TO BUY AN OLD HOUSE ON THE CORNER OF KINGS
HIGHWAY AND ROUTE 60 TO USE AS A FUNERAL HOME,
MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT HE CAN SEE THEIR REASONING IN THIS CASE)
BUT WHAT ABOUT WHEN ANOTHER OWNER COMES IN AND WANTS TO PUT A RETAIL USE
IN AN AGRICULTURAL ZONE? HE ALSO NOTED THAT THE ADJACENT OWNER TO THE
PROPERTY IN QUESTION OBJECTED TO COMMERCIAL ZONING WHEN IT WAS REQUESTED,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT FUNERAL HOMES MIGHT BE
COMPATIBLE IN A B-1 DISTRICT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT CEMETARIES
ARE ALLOWED IN AGRICULTURAL ZONING,
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, ON 1OTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE
ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE A PUBLIC HHEARING TO AMEND ORDINANCE 10. 71-3, A -
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND B-1 PLANNED BUSINESS DISTRICT TO ALLOW FUNERAL
HOMES UNDER SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION ALSO RECOM-
MENDED AMENDING ORDINANCE 10, 71-3 AND 10, 72-1 IN REGARD TO TEMPORARY
TRAILERS AS THERE HAVE BEEN SOME PROBLEMS WITH TEMPORARY TRAILERS BEING
PUT ON CONSTRUCTION SITES EVEN BEFORE A PROJECT BEGINS, THEY HAVE RECOM-
MENDED AMENDING SECTIO"J 25 (0) AS FOLLOWS:
(3) TEIPtORARY TRAILERS: TRAILERS USED TEMPORARILY IN CONNECTION
WITH CONSTRUCTION USED AS A DWELLING, OFFICE OR SALES ROOM MAY BE
LOCATED TEMPORARILY UP TO ONE YEAR IN ALL DISTRICTS DURING THE
PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, UNDER A TEMPORARY ZONING PERMIT
ISSUED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ^iDMINISTRATOR,
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, SUCH TEMPORARY PERMIT MAY BE EXTENDED BY THE
SAID COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR AN ADDITIONAL THREE-MONTH BEYOND THE
ONE-YEAR PERIOD ABOVE ESTABLISHED, AND FURTHER, UPON ADDITIONAL
PROOF OF GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MAY EXTEND SAID
PERMIT FOR AN ADDITIONAL THREE-MONTH PERIOD, BUT IN NO EVENT SHALL
SUCH TEMPORARY PERMIT EXTEND BEYOND A TOTAL 13 -MONTH LIMITATION,
30
NOV 51975
e 24 FA:GE-126
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE
A PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND ORDINANCES X40. 71-3 AND No. 72-1 WITH REGARD
TO TEMPORARY TRAILERS AS ABOVE SET OUT,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE APPLICATION OF IICHAEL PHILLIP
CARROLL TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL PERMITS FOR JAN KROMHOUT
AND J. RONNIE GRICE TO CARRY CONCEALED FIREARMS,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED -BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A REQUEST FOR OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL
BY JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD, EXTENSION HOME ECONOMICS AGENT, TO ATTEND THE
FOLLOWING:
NOVEMBER 5 COCOA AREA COUNTY DIRECTORS CONFERENCE
WITH UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOOD Q
RESOURCE ECONOMIST
NOVEMBER 17-20 GAINESVILLE FAMILY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAIN -
(ON STATE.TRAVEL FUNDS) ING - FOR LESSONS TO BE TAUGHT IN
RETURN ON THE 20TH THE COUNTY,
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
REPORT FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF CONVICTIONS FOR THE MONTHS OF
MAY, JUNE, JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER, 1975
REPORTS FROM COUNTY COURT OF ARRESTS AND CONVICTIONS FOR
THE MONTHS OF JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER, 1975
AUDIT REPORT FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL ON THE
HEAD START PROGRAM
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ISSUING A DUPLICATE TAX SALE
CERTIFICATE TO J. KOUTNIK, TAX SALE CERTIFICATE NO, 713.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT PAT FLOOD, A CITY
OF SEBASTIAN COUNCILMAN, HAD ASKED HIM IF THE COUNTY COULD CLEAR SOME
LAND IN SEBASTIAN FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL PURPOSES, HE TOLD MR. FLOOD
THAT THE COUNTY COULD CLEAR THE LAND, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE CLEAR-
ANCE ON THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO USE COUNTY
EQUIPMENT TO CLEAR THE UNDERBRUSH FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN FOR PARK AND
RECREATIONAL PURPOSES FROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING DEED:
.1975 - 31
NOV 5 a oo I 24 PAq 127
1.;
iy
a�
NOV 51975
.'. PION!
•
ocn. spurs
1 1 Pt
®• IKON*
IENTARY
SUR 1Ax
}F.00.55
156574
DEED
THIS maw! DEED made and executed the 16th day of July, 1975, by GENERAL
11EvEL PMENr CORPORATION, a corporation existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware, authorized to transact business in the State of Florida and
baying its principal place of business at
au south %�� Miami,, FloridaDriveshore
da 33131
1
hereinafter called the Grantor, to
THE CTPY OF SEBASTIAN, an incorporated
municipality, whose post office address is:
hereinafter called the Grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms
"Grantee" include all the parties to this instrizrent, as wilt as their
successors and assigns).
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sun of $10.00 and other
valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby adaaowledged, by these
presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, revise, release, convey and
confirm unto the Grantee, all that certain land situate in Indian River
County, Florida, viz:
TRACT "N" according to the Plat of "Sebastian Highlands
Unit 16" as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 45 of the
Public Records of Indian River County, Florida,
containing approximately 4.08+ acres.
Subject to restrictions and easements and covenants of records and
applicable taxes for the year 1975.
The property herein is to be used specifically for recreational purposes
for the Grantee herein and should said property ever cease being used for
ssayidpurposes it shalll`innnediately revertrtotheGrantor herein.
y�i1 R with all the tenements, ents, h�{.aren1 s andammiummuoes there=
belonging or in anywise appertaining.
'IO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that it is lawfully
seized of said land in fee simples that it has good right and lawful
authority to sell and convey said land; that it hereby fully warrants the
title to said land will defend the same against the lawful claims of all
persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encunbranoes.
IN WITNESS WHE'RwF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be
executed in its name, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its
proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above .
written.
S• TATE of FLORIDA1
n �-• uoC'UMENTARY STAMP
az a O, PT.Ui REYENU�:,t:+:.� 0 0. 3 0.1
• l'.b
The Instrument probated by:
JACK B. SPIRA, CORPORATE COUNSEL
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
1111 SO. SAYSHORE DR., MIAMI. FLA. 33131
mammas sEAL)
OF!' C1 } i. RECORD
„J n
+'.
ira3u�
Nov 499 mcall.3
•O.
C O
ATTEST: !'
Assistant SecreLary
d0'wiCi)j. RECO t1 Pea 409 pg414
Sinned, sealed and delivered in the
presence o f :
•!<t}.+:.,. Oi. rifT,.A/
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BY:
tienior Vice. ProB i e,E
STATE OF )
COUNTY OF )
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT on this day, before me, an efficer duly
authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments,
p.:rsonally appeared C.C. CRUMP and WAYNE L. ALLEN
well known to me to be the Senior Vice President and
Assistant Secretary respectively of the Corporation named as grantor
i:, the foregoing deed, and that they severally acknowledged executing
the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and
voluntarily under authority duly vested in them by said Corporation and
that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal of said
Cvrporation.
WITNESS my hats and off ' ci 1 seal in the County and State last
aforesaid this $` day of , A.D. 1975.
N• ARY PU=LIC
Large
WAIF Platte MAT! OF RONDA AT tAR
My Commission Expires: Nt camases ei rn'g /AIL. se. 1470
ICNOMO TMIU GIN[I& INSui MVO UNMMOtN
This Instrument prepared by:
.00 Ibis infArumentWARprptxaQhyt
°J v...1' 13. SFIIIA, CORE C?I.%IIi COUNCrt.
GENCNAI DIVE OP N I CO1lPONA•1 ION
1111 Su. r.AY:.riIt,rr: rli., MIAMI, FLA. 31131
NOV 51975
I
-. c.
•
Al ..1e/
:.-1••/..
'rTd
Co
o4 4 ?aq129 129
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT BROUGHT UP THE ST, JOHNS RIVER BASIN, ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECT.
. CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT THE BOARD HAS RECEIVED RESOLUTIONS FROM
VARIOUS GROUPS SUPPORTING THIS PROJECT, AND SHE FELT POSSIBLY WE SHOULD TAKE
'SOME ACTION. SHE NOTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN SOME WORK DONE IN BREVARD COUNTY
AND LAND ACQUISITION IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. THIS PLAN WOULD GIVE US THE
RESERVOIR •IN THE BLUE CYPRESS AREA.
JAMES BEINDORF SPOKE EXPLAINING THE PROJECT.
CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED, IF THE COMMISSIONERS AGREED, POSSIBLY WE COULD
PREPARE A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REMARKED THAT THERE ARE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS
OBJECTING TO THIS PROJECT STRENUOUSLY AND INFORMED THE:BOARD THAT THERE IS A
PRESENTATION ON THIS SUBJECT THAT IS MOST INFORMATIVE AND HE FELT THE BOARD
REALLY OUGHT TO SEE IT BEFORE TAKING ANY ACTION.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD ATTENDED A MEETING
WITH SOME OF THE OFFICIALS OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. AT SEBASTIAN HIGH-
LANDS, AND THEY HAD INVITED THE COUNTY TO TAKE OVER THE OPERATION OF THEIR
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO GO BACK
ON NOVEMBER 24, 1975 TO MEET WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS GROUP. THEY WILL
OFFICIALLY CHARTER THEMSELVES AS AN ASSOCIATION AND WANT SUFFICIENT INFORMA-
TION AS TO WHAT WOULD BE INVOLVED WITH SETTING UP A TAXING DISTRICT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAD TOLD THEM THAT THE COUNTY
HAD NOT ACCEPTED THE PROPERTY YET, AND, IN FACT, THE ROADS WERE ONLY RECENTLY
ACCEPTED, HE FURTHER TOLD THEM THAT IF THE COUNTY DID TAKE OVER THIS PROPERTY
AS A PARK, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, nE STATED THAT
HE FELT HE NEEDED SOME LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN REGARD TO THIS MATTER AND RE-
QUESTED THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS ATTEND THIS NEXT MEETING WITH HIM,
CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT SHE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER FROM ALFRED
WEBBER TENDERING HIS RESIGNATION AS THE BOARDS REPRESENTATIVE ON THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNCIL ON AGING AND ALSO ON THE.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON AGING OF THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING
COUNCIL EFFECTIVE AS OF DECEMBER 15, 1975, WHICH LETTER IS HEREBY BEING
MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
33 -
NOV 51975
o 4 PAe[13O
Alfred 1-t. Webber
1816 32ND AVENUE . INNINNMEE
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960
Nov. 3, 1975
To the Honorable Board
of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida.
Lady and Gentlemen:
After serving for eighteen months.it becomes necessary
for me to tender my resignation as your representative on
the Board of Directors of the Indian River Council on
Aging, and also on the Advisory Committee on Aging of the
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council. I request
that my resignation become effective as of December 15, 1975.
I feel sure that the local Council on Aging would
appreciate your notifying them as to the identity of my
successor sometime in advance of their annual election of
officers which is scheduled for early in January 1976.
Their address is 848 =20th Place (P.O.Box 2102) Vero
Beach, Florida.
As yet. the details regarding the exact address and
personnel of Indian River County's new areawide organization
on aging have not been definitely determined by the State
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services..
Respectfully yours.
W..1'G G` "Ge"
cc:
Mr. Hubert Poole, Exec. Dir.
Indian River County Council on Aging
Alfred H. Webber
THE BOARD ACCEPTED MR. WEBBER'S RESIGNATION AND WILL NOTIFY
THE COUNCIL ON AGING AIiD ASK FOR THEIR. RECOMMENDATION,
®34
NOV 51975
OK
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON ASKING THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN IF THEY
WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT SOMEONE TO SERVE AS THE COUNTY'S SECOND REPRESEN-
TATIVE ON THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.
ON (IDTIDN BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ASK THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO
APPOINT A REPRESENTATIVE TO SERVE ON THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL.
PLANNING COUNCIL.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE PRESENTED A REPORT REGARDING POSSIBLE
LOCATIONS TO HANDLE IMMEDIATE SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR COUNTY OFFICES,
AFTER DISCUSSION, COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED TO SECURE ADDITIONAL INFOR
MATION,
THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HUGH DAWSON WAS
AT THE COURTHOUSE YESTERDAY ABOUT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3LOCK riRANT
PROGRAM, AND HE AND 1R, DAWSON FINISHED THE REMAINING PAPER WORK FOR
THIS PROGRAM AND HOPED TO START DRAWING ON THE FUNDS WITHIN A WEEK,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT JACELYN BLOCK,
.JUVENILE VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR, IS RESIGNING AND A REPLACEMENT FOR HER
WILL BE NEEDED,
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY HAVIIG BEEN
AUDITED WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS
ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL FUND i0, 5091 -5093
INCLUSIVE; ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND Jo. 2631 - 2633 INCLUSIVE; FINE AND
FORFEITURE FUND j0, 972 - 974 INCLUSIVE AND TREASURY FUND 10. 59,991 -
50,191 INCLUSIVE, SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE
RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED
BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST
SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES,
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 5:55 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
35 -
NOV 51975
n 24 rl,;E x 32