The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2/18/1976WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1976 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY .19, 1976 AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR. CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., VICE CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy; EDWARD J. MASSEY AND EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, COUNTY COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JACK HOCKMAN AND ELIZABETH FORLANI, DEPUTY CLERKS. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. .COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND REVEREND NATE KILLIAN OF THE FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH, GAVE THE INVOCATION. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO .THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 29, 1976. COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED ON PAGE 3, THIRD PARAGRAPH, THE WORD "DoMMITTEE" BE CHANGED TO READ "COMMITTEE. THIS CORRECTION HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE; THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY -29, 1976, AS WRITTEN. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 4, 1976, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED ON PAGE 3, THIRD PARAGRAPH, THIRD LINE, 'CHARTER STUDY" BE CHANGED TO READ"COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY MEETINGS". THIS CORRECTION HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy,. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 4, 1976,'AS WRITTEN. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 4, 1976. COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: ON PAGE 21, THE FIRST PARAGRAPH BE CHANGED TO READ: "MR.BOGOSIAN STATED THAT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT WILL CHARGE FOR a INSTALLING EVERY LIGHT POLE IF THERE IS NO TAXING DISTRICT". ON PAGE 27, SECOND PARAGRAPH, SEVENTH LINE, "$1,500.00" BE CHANGED TO READ $15,000.00". Bet �d E FEB18 1976 s CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: ON PAGE 8, FIFTH AND TENTH PARAGRAPHS, THE WORD °° DESCRIPTION °° BE CHANGED TO READ PRESCRIPTION ON PAGE 9, FIRST PARAGRAPH, FIRST LINE BE CHANGED TO READ, "ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE PROBLEM OF FUTURE SALES SHOULD BE REFERRED.... ON PAGE 10, SIXTH PARAGRAPH, BE CHANGED TO READ: "THE BOARD REQUESTED A LETTER FROM BARBARA DURHAM STATING THAT SHE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE ABANDONMENT OF THIS PROPERTY It ON PAGE 15, THIRD PARAGRAPH, SECOND LINE BE CHANGED TO READ, ....... TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL VOTE BEING TAKEN IN THE CREATION OF A TAXING AUTHORITY.°P ON PAGE 28, SECOND PARAGRAPH, THIRD LINE BE CHANGED TO READ, "...REGARDING A SUBSIDY RELATIVE.TO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE LEGISLATION..`.` THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY e4, 1976, AS WRITTEN. RICHARD BOGOSIAN, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING IXORA UTILITY INC. APPEARED REQUESTING APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A RATE INCREASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IXORA SEWER AND WATER FRANCHISE. THIS WAS DISCUSSED AT THE FEBRUARY 4TH MEETING AND WAS CONTINUED UNTIL THIS MEETING. MR. BOGOSIAN STATED THAT ENGINEERING FIGURES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT MUST BE MADE TO THIS SYSTEM, ARE NOT COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THE UTILITY COMPANY OFFICIALS HAVE AGREED TO NOTIFY ALL THE PEOPLE ON THEIR SERVICE OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING, AND MR, BOGOSIAN STATED THAT THEY HAVE AGREED TO DO THIS. COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT THERE IS A CONSIDERABLE JUMP FROM THE PRESENT RATES TO THE RATES BEING PROPOSED AND•ASKED IF THE PROPOSED RATES ARE IN LINE WITH TODAY °S RATES, MR, BOGOSIAN STATED THAT THE PROPOSED RATES ARE IN LINE WITH WHAT OTHER UTILITY COMPANIES ARE CHARGING AND IN LINE WITH TODAY`S COSTS. 8t?�K 25 c19c. 62 FEB 18 19.6 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER 1 MASSEY THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADVERTISEMENT FOR A PUBLIC { HEARING ON A RATE INCREASE FOR IXORA UTILITIES, INC. WITH THE DATE AND TIME TO BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. L. S, "TOMMY" THOMAS, COUNTY COORDINATOR, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT LEE NUZIE HAS RESIGNED FROM THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COM- MITTEE AND COLONEL WILLIAM BENNETT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED AS HIS REPLACEMENT 014 THIS LOCAL BOARD. IT HAS ALSO BEEN RECOMMENDED THAT JOY SNELL, A MEMBER OF THE SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, BE APPOINTED TO THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COUNCIL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RESIGNATION OF LEE NUZIE FROM THE EMER- GENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND APPOINTED COLONEL WILLIAM BENNETT TO SERVE ON THIS LOCAL COMMITTEE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPOINTED JOY SNELL TO SERVE AS THE COUNTY'S REPRE- SENTATIVE ON THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COUNCIL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE DOCUMENT FOR A PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A BOAT RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE WABASSO CAUSEWAY, THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD THE COUNTY'S PRIORI- TIES ON A FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM - FOR THE YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 - FOR THE USE OF SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS. HE STATED THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HAS SCHEDULED A PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 8, 1976 AND THE FIVE YEAR PROGRAM WILL BE PRESENTED AT THAT TIME, HE PRESENTED THE LIST OF ROAD PRIORITIES AND EXPLAINED THAT EACH YEAR THE BOARD HAS THE OPTION TO MAKE CHANGES AND REVISE THE FIVE YEAR PROGRAM, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SEC- Y ONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ON THE REVISED PRIORITY LIST AND TO ADOPT THE REVISED LIST WHICH !FILL BE PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AT THEIR MARCH 8TH PUBLIC HEARING. '3 - COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED CHANGES TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE NEXT PRIORITY SCHEDULE OR WHEN THE MONEY BECOMES AVAILABLE. THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT POSSIBLY THERE WILL BE MONEY AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THROUGH PRIORITY ITEM 4 THIS YEAR AND AGREED WITH COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER'S•SUGGESTIONS THAT THE PRIORITY LIST BE CHANGED SO THAT PRIORITY ITEM NOS. S AND 9 BE REVERSED WITH 6 AND 7. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION. THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY VvTED IN FAVOR AND THE MOTION WAS PASSED, THE LIST OF PRIORITIES FOR THE FIVE f YEAR SECONDARY ROAD PROGRAM FOR YEARS 1926-77 THROUGH 1980-81 IS AS FOLLOWS. -4- FEB 18 1976 , 4 a SHEET OF LXHI BIT COUM PRIORITIES FOR FIVE-YEAR SECONDARY ROAD PROGR.M FOR YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 1 e SECTION IIs This Board requests that the following listeunderstood thattheDepartment Cwill yprogram ithe nfollowingalistedr am for the use of Secondary Road Funds. It is projects in order of priority and subject to the availability of funds. PROJECT DESCRIPTION O TYPE OF WORK EST. D.O.T. SECTION Prod. FROM T PRIORITY B.I. No. No. No. RD. NO. , LENGTH PROJECT NAME t -Wide P E E1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 425363 425365 425360 425360 425352 425335 425334 425331 425332 425342 425349 425364 425358 425357 88511 (NOTE: Co 88501 88506 88503 88508 88601 88507 88504 88600 88505 88563 1601 structi 1602 1602 1601 1601 1601 1602 1604 I88501 1602 88520 _ 88505 n State 1 S-711 S-711 S-609 S-606 S-519 S-609 S-711 Coun y County -Wide Signing County -Wide Signals County -Wide Pavement Markings 1.5 mi. arber Avenue SR 5/U.S. 1 The Indian River .om S..R. 5/ .S, 1 to Indian River oulevard) arber Avenue 1.3 mi. radian Waver Boulevard S.R. 60 0.9 mi, ndian River Boulevard 17th Street R. 60 4,"0 mi. nch Road Barber Avenue_ Winter Beach Road 2.8 mi, toren Grove Road ateral "A" Rd.. R. 5/U.S. 1 5.0 mi. slo Road 5.0/W of 609 anch Road (SR S609) 3.7 mi. 22nd Ave, Extension slo Road sceola Boulevard 1.0 mi. itrus Road ings Highway lemans Avenue 0.5 mi. 6th Street 20th Avenue ixie Ave. (SR 605) 4.6 mi, lue Cypress Road lue Cypress Lk. sceola Blvd. (SR 60) 2.0 mi, nch Road Winter Bch. Wabasso Road Road 1.3 mi, ndian River Blvd, Barber Avenue gorth Gifford Road 1.2 mi. orth Gifford Road SR 5/U.S. 1 Indian River Blvd. 0.7 mi. Winter Beach Road SR 5/U.S. 1 rhe Indian River 11 1 ON -MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN ON RESOLU- TION #76-12 FOR USE OF SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS ADOPTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1976- 1980 FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: Ifflic • Boot 25 F. J • i i RESOLUTION N0, 76-12 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY RESOLUTION ON USE OF SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS YEAR 1976 COUNTY Indian River v WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 206.47, Florida Statutes and Section 9°, Article XII Constitution of the State of Florida, the Florida Departmert of Transportation will receive a portion of the surplus of this County's pro -rata share of the 5th and 6th cent gasoline tax to be used within this County; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 339.08 and Section 339.081, Florida Statutes, the expenditure of such funds shall be as prescribed by regulations of the Department and pursuant to an adopted resolution by this Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 334.21, Florida Statutes, the County is required to submit to the Department of Transportation a ,plan of work for the construction and maintenance of roads and streets within its jurisdiction for the five-year period beginning 1976 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Florida Department of Transportation is hereby re- quested to use the aforesaid funds for the purposes and projects listed in EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof and that the Department consider the listed items in accordance with priorities shown and to the i extent of available funds in the preparation of its annual program of work for the above -listed fiscal year with the remaining requests constituting a i continuing program to be scheduled in accordance with estimated available funds during the succeeding four years. 2. That the actual scheduling of work by the Department on the re- quested projects be in the order of priorities listed insofar as is practicable, but not to the extent of retarding the whole program or precluding the grouping of similar type projects in one construction contract. 3. That allocations and expenditures of funds by the Department shall not be restricted by an estimate of cost shown herein, and that' FB 18 1976BOOR PaG 67 .a this Board concurs in the use by the Department of any available funds' necessary incidental to making those road projects listed in Exhibit "A" fully operating facilities within the termini described in said Exhibit, and as shown on the accompanying map. 4. That if, at any time, this County's secondary funds programmed allocations become over or under -programmed in the amount of 10%, the Depart- ment -will adjust the Secondary Program with the approval and recommendations of this Board to bring said program into bale.�ce. 5. That*the methods and standards employed by the Department for the determination of major improvement features, including specific alignment, types and width of pavement, types of materials, and the Department's standard specifications for construction are concurred in and approved by this Board. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED IN OPEN SESSION March 10, 1976 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF Indian River COUNTY, FLORIDA BY • illar W. Z4Siert, Jr Chairman ATTEST: C erko oard • 1 FEB 181910 d EXHIBIT"A" RESOLUTION ON USE OF SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS ADOPTED FOR FISCAL YEARS 1976-1980 COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER SECTION I: The Board of County Commissioners concurs in the use of aforesaid funds for the following purposes and projects', and their - inclusion in the Florida Department of Transportation's Annual Budget and Program of Work for the above -listed five-year period. DESCRIPTION (a) Right -of -hay for the following Primary Roads: Budget Item State Job State Road Number Number Number Description 415310 8806C-3509 19th Place/SR-60 One-way Pair.from NW 20th Ave. to SR 5/U.S. 1; 1.1 Miles 415332 88080-3501 19th Place/SR-60 One-way Pair from SR 5/U.S. 1 to Indian River Blvd.;. 0.7 Miles 415311 88003-1501 17th Street Bridge/ From SR 5/U.S. 1 to East of the Indian River; 2.0 Miles SR -656 415341 88060-1513 S.R. 60 Bridges From W. of Br. #9 to -E. of Br. #14 o CilF f.4 j *ard other high-priority n primary projects as may bt deemed necessary v .. .. . .... - u arn.,«„.,, n v« ,...a+: „w •. gym.. ...... .ins .... ,�": aq:: - d9` . ,k`i �;�ra : uS6+�7��s..-saJ�. - ",iS�,GL': a - - .t �s, df`n OU 00 SCFIIDULE W FUNDS A`TAT.LABLE FOR SECONDARY WORK PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGI 1980-81 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1&/76 - 6/30/76 197_ 6-77 1977-78 1978-79 $1;103,018 $665,300 $683,500 $703,300 1979-80 1980-81 $731,800 $762,000 The figures indicated in Fiscal Years 1976-77 through 1980-81 are the Estimated SeoonaazZ► Revenues and Eames on Revenues, after deductions for Debt Service MI *Represents the Balances as of 1/1/76. Please bear in mind that this and subsequent years are subject to the Cash Flow Forecasts. t Q z <i ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE URBAN BOUNDARY PLAN PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHOWING THE URBAN BOUND— ARIES OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH; THE'CITY COUNCIL HAS APPROVED AND SIGNED THIS PLAN.` HUGH RUSSELL, CHAIRMAN FOR THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE, APPEARED REQUESTING THE BOARD TO ENDORSE THE APPOINT- MENT OF A TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHICH WILL BE MADE UP OF LOCAL y PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH LOCAL PROBLEMS AND ISSUES, WHO COULD MAKE RECOMMENDA— TIONS AND IDENTIFY ISSUES OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT FOR THIS YEAR'S PROGRAM, THIS TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WOULD REPORT TO THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTATION OF COASTAL RESOURCE ISSUES. MR, RUSSELL CONTINUED THAT THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS APPOINTED AS REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, VAL Q BRENNAN AND/OR ROBERT BERG, ,JIM BEINDORF, MARVIN CARTER AND RICHARD THOMAS, HE IS REQUESTING THE BOARD TO ENDORSE THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ABOVE TO THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. MR. RUSSELL ALSO DISCUSSED AND REQUESTED APPROVAL TO RENEW THIS YEAR'S CONTRACT WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL .d WHICH REQUIRED THE SETTING UP OF THE INDIAN RIVER CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THE COUNTY WOULD RECEIVE APPROXIMATELY $5,200.00 TO BE USED BY THE COMMITTEE FOR WORK ON THIS PROGRAM, MR, RUSSELL STATED THAT IF THE BOARD DOES NOT RENEW THIS CONTRACT, THE PLANNING COUNCIL WILL DO THE WORK THAT THE -COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS NOW DOING. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, TO APPROVE THE NEW CONTRACT WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL FOR NEXT YEAR FOR THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,200.00 AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN +' TO SIGN THE NECESSARY PAPERS. 0-0-M �oc� 5 PAG€ 71 a MR. RUSSELL REPORTED THAT THE MASTER PLAN AS REFERRED TO WILL BE KNOWN AS THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND IT WILL HAVE THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF LAW IN 1979. REZONING IS NOW MADE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE. MASTER .4 PLAN. HE SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER DIRECTING THE PLANNING DEPART— MENT TO UNDERTAKE A REVIEW OF THE MASTER PLAN THEY PRESENTED TO THE BOARD. JERRY KRAMER, REPRESENTING THE �'ERO BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION, AP= PEARED AND STATED THAT HE HAD REVIEWED THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES AND FOUND THAT COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CAN EFFECT CHANGES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. MR. RUSSELL STATED THAT THEY CANNOT. A CORRELATION EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO TRY AND GET OUR LOCAL DESIRES INTO THE COASTAL ZONE PLAN. MR. KRAMER STATED THAT THERE ARE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE COUNTY PLAN AND THE PLAN GENERATED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND ASKED IF THERE WILL BE PUBLIC INPUT BEFORE THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS ADOPTED. MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT UNDER THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT, PUBLIC MEETINGS ARE REQUIRED. MR, KRAMER STATED THAT OUR PLAN IS CONTROLLED, BUT DOWN THE ROAD THERE MAY BE DIFFERENCES AND WILL THEY BE REVIEWED AT A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLAN IS CHANGED? CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE COASTAL ZONE MAP IS TO BE ADHERED TO ALONG WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. MR, RUSSELL STATED THAT THERE WILL BE DIFFERENCES, AND HE HOPED THEY WOULD BE RECONCILED. CHAIRMAN $IEBERT ASKED, "WHEN IT WAS STATED THAT THERE WOULD BE PUBLIC HEARINGS, WERE YOU REFERRING TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGS PRIOR TO THE ADOP. TION OF THE COASTAL ZONE MAPS OR PRIOR TO CHANGES OF tHE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP?" MR, BRENNAN ANSWERED, PRIOR TO CHANGES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP. CHAIRMAN $IEBERT STATED THAT THERE IS REALLY NO PUBLIC HEARING PRO— . a CEDURE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE COASTAL ZONE MAP OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP. — 12 — FEB j19i. �r 25 Fay=_ 72 MR. KRAMER STATED THAT WE HAVE SPENT YEARS PREPARING THE COMPREHEN- SIVE LAND USE MAP AND SOME REMOTE GROUP CAN MAKE CHANGES THAT MIGHT BE IN- CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE HAVE ADOPTED, HE CONTINUED THAT ANY INCONSISTENCY WITH OUR LOCAL PLAN SHOULD BE RECONCILED AT PUBLIC HEARINGS AND THAT THE .0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAKE KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND THE COASTAL ZONE MAP, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT QUESTIONED IF A PERSON WOULD HAVE TO CONFORM TO BOTH THE COASTAL ZONE MAP AND THE LAND USE MAP. MR. RUSSELL STATED THAT FROM ALL INDICATIONS HE HAS RECEIVED, IF THERE IS A DIFFERENCE, THE ONE MAP THAT IS THE MOST STRINGENT WOULD PREVAIL. IT WAS ASKED, WITH THE PROPOSED REDISTRICTING OF PLANNING DISTRICTS AND WE ARE ASSIGNED TO A NEW PLANNING DISTRICT TO THE SOUTH OF US, WHAT EFFECT WILL THIS HAVE WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL? COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE DOES NOT FEEL IT WOULD HAVE ANY EFFECT. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO COMPLETE ALL STARTED PROJECTS BUT SHE DOES NOT FEEL THIS RESDISTRICTING WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BEFORE THE FALL OF 1976, THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY VOTED IN FAVOR AND THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COASTAL ZONE MAN- AGEMENT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN THEIR APPOINTMENT OF A TECHNICAL ADVIS- ORY COMMITTEE AS REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO INCLUDE VAL BRENNAN OR ROBERT BERG, .JAMES BEINDORF, MARVIN CARTER AND RICHARD THOMAS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WHEN THE LONG RANGE JOINT PLANNING COM- MISSION WAS DISSOLVED, THE ENVIRONMENTAL.REVIEW COMMITTEE WAS ALSO DISSOLVED, AND HE SUGGESTED REESTABLISHING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, 6 # MR. RUSSELL, AS A MEMBER OF THE CHARTER COMMISSION AND CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE, STATED THAT HIS COMMITTEE HAS BEEN WORKING `ON THIS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS DOES NOT PERTAIN TO THE WORK THAT THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT IS DOING; THIS IS A COMMITTEE THAT ASSESSES INPUT IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IN ZONING CHANGES ON A LOCAL LEVEL AND NOT LONG RANGE STUDIES THAT THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT IS DOING. HE ASKED IF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEES THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE TO HELP THEM IN MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS ON LOCAL ZONING CHANGES, -13- a gat ��a bF 73 MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT A SEPARATE COMMITTEE WAS NOT -NECESSARY THAT I THEY COULD .USE A COMMITTEE UNDER THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT IN HER OPINION CHAIRMAN SIEBERT IS COR - RENT THAT WE DO NEED AN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, BUT SUGGESTED HOLDING THIS IN ABEYANCE SO THAT THE BOARD COULD GIVE IT ADDITONAL THOUGHT, THE -BOARD AGREED TO COMMISSIONER LOY'S SUGGESTION, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WITH THE WORK ON THE 701 PROGRAM COM- PLETED HE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT GATHER MATERIALS REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND THE MASTER PLAN TO BRING THE BOARD UP TO DATE. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE PROJECTS COMING UP BEFORE THE BOARD THAT POSSIBLY COULD COME UNDER A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT HE WILL PREPARE AND GATHER THIS DATA FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BILL FROM ADLEY ASSOCIATES, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $299.74, WHICH IS HEREBY ATTACHED, FEB 2 1976 CONSULTING PLANNERS AND ECONOMISTS 1620 MAIN STREET, SARASOTA, FLORIDA 33577 -- 613/366.2420 46 FIFTH STREET, N.E., ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30308 - 404/881-1964 STAT PLEASE REPLY TO SARASOTA OFFICE January 31, 1976 mr. Valentine E. Brennan County Planning Director 1036 - 20th Street 4 Vero Beach, Florida •32960 I `- For Professional.Services rendered in connection with preparation of Pre -Application for Community Development Program F/Y 1976-1977. Pursuant to our contract April 9, 1975.and your authorization of --January 15, 1976.. Staff time @ $30.00/hour (9 hours) $ 270.00 Telephone calls 29.74 Total Due and payable $ 299:74 . Thank you. Harry C. Adle A.I.P. President' ADLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. v 14 HCA:r Ban* 2-5 PAI FEB 18.1976 U 74 I 9. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT BACK IN OCTOBER, 1974, THE -BOARD APPROVED AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND BREEZY VILLAGE, LTD..# y. REGARDING THE PAVING OF VICKERS ROAD -AND THE SIGNALIZING OF THE RA,,ILROAD CROSSING AT VICKERS ROAD, THE FLORIDA EAST CENTRAL RAILROAD.IS REQUESTING, IN ORDER TO -COMPLETE THEIR RECORDS, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RAILROAD TO GO-AHEAD WITH THE SIGNALIZING OF THIS CROSSING, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTG, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY TO EXPEND MONEY UP TO $17,000.00 WITH THE RAILROAD PAYING THE BALANCE. -15- i FEB 181976 0 I ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THE BOARD TO AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE 70-1 - FESTIVALS, CIRCUSES, TENT CONVENTIONS AND REVIVALS. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE RETURNED TO THE ZONING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW, IT WAS HER FEELING THAT THEY TRIED TO PUT TOO MUCH INTO ONE ORDINANCE AND' MANY OF THE ITEMS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE, SHE CONTINUED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION WOULD NOT BE OPPOSED TO LOOKING AT IT AGAIN AND POSSIBLY SEPAR- ATING SOME OF THE ITEMS, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED REQUESTING THE ZONING COMMISSION TO RECONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES RELATIVE TO TENTS, CARNIVALS AND CIRCUSES. JACK HOCKMAN, FINANCE OFFICER, AND HAROLD DEWEIN, DATA PROCESSING MANAGER, APPEARED TO DISCUSS WITH THE BOARD MODIFYING THE COUNTY'S DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM TO PROVIDE COMPUTER SERVICE TO THE COUNTY COURT'S TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU, THE COST FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL WOULD BE $6,175.00 FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS FISCAL YEAR, WITH A YEARLY CHARGE THEREAFTER OF ABOUT $4,600.00, MR. DEWEIN EXPLAINED THE NEED FOR THIS ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT STATING THAT UNDER A REVISION OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION, COUNTY COURT MUST ABSORB ALL MUNICIPAL COURT FUNCTIONS BY .JANUARY 1, 1977, MR, DEWEIN HAS ANTICI- PATED AN APPROXIMATE INCREASE OF 100% IN THE NUMBER OF CASES COUNTY COURT WILL HAVE TO HANDLE AFTER THE JANUARY 1, 1977 DEADLINE, MR. DEWEIN CONTINUED THAT COUNTY COURT NOW HAS FOUR EMPLOYEES AND, WITH THE INCREASE IN WORKLOAD, WILL NEED FOUR ADDITIONAL. PEOPLE. WITH THE PROPOSED NEL"! EQUIPMENT, THEY WILL STILL NEED ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL, BUT COULD POSSIBLY MANAGE WITH ONE PERSON INSTEAD OF FOUR, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THE THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS IS ALARMING, DAVID DOUGLASS, CIRCUIT COURT ADMINISTRATOR, APPEARED AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT DATA PROCESSING CAPABILITIES WOULD NOT BE NEEDED TO SATISFY — 16 FEB 18. 19 A• oo�e� 76 ' A REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTING REPORTS TO TALLAHASSEE, THE CASE DISPOSITION REPORTING REQUIRED BY TALLAHASSEE .INVOLVES ONLY SMALL CLAIMS, CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL MATTERS AND CRIMINAL MATTERS',. THERE WOULD BE"NO NEED FOR DATA PROCESSING TO MEET REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS* THOSE REPORTS WOULD STILL HAVE TO BE MADE MANUALLY BY FILLING OUT THE BACKS OF THE TRAFFIC CITATION FORMS, HE CONTINUED THAT THIS EQUIPMENT IS NOT A REQUIREMENT AS FAR AS TALLAHASSEE IS CONCERNED, BUT IT WOULD BE AN ASSIST- ANCE TO COUNTY COURT. MR. DEWEIN STATED THAT RECORDS CANNOT BE TAKEN OUT OF THE COUNTY COURT OFFICE, AND WE WILL NEED TO HAVE A KEY PUNCH IN THAT OFFICE AND TRAIN SOMEONE TO USE IT. AFTER DISCUSSION, MR. HOCKMAN STATED THAT THE MONEY TO COVER THIS NEW EQUIPMENT WILL COME FROM THE GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY AS NO MONEY HAS BEEN SET ASIDE IN THE BUDGET FOR NEW EQUIPMENT. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT WE DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE, AND WE ARE / FORTUNATE THAT WE HAVE MEN WHO CAN SERVE IN DUAL CAPACITIES AND WHO ARE NOT LIMITED TO ONE AREA, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED BY HAROLD DEWEIN AND JACK HOCKMAN TO UPDATE THE PRESENT DATA PROCESSING EQUIP - MENTI -17- a�� 25 naf 77 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE STATE WITNESS PAYROLLS, CIRCUIT COURT, FALL TERM,1975, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $482.44. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETRO- ACTIVE APPROVAL OF WALTER LEROY FOR ADMISSION TO THE A.G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL. ON•MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE -BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS TO CARRY CONCEALED FIREARMS OF THE FOLLOWING: .JOHN W. MURPHY; CRITTENDEN F. BROTSCH; FRED W. KEUTHAN ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THEBOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE APPLICATIONS FOR RENEWAL PERMITS TO CARRY 11 CONCEALED FIREARMS OF THE FOLLOWING: GORDON R. WOLFF; EDWIN M. BUTTERFIELD; VERLIN C. WAUGH EDWIN E. KIRKLAND; AND GILBERT SWIGER THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: 3 REPORT OF CONVICTIONS - CIRCUIT COURT - .JANUARY 1976 REPORT OF CONVICTIONS - COUNTY COURT - .JANUARY 1976 REPORT OF INSPECTION OF COUNTY .JAIL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ISSUING A DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATE N0, 177 TO LLOYD H. TURMAN, FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS SMITH PLAZA SUBDIVISION LOT 20, BLOCK 3. e CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT:• FOR THIS YEAR, HE STATED THAT RATHER THAN FOLLOWING PREVIOUS PROCEDURE OF COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS, HE WOULD LIKE EACH COMMISSIONER TO ACCEPT A PORTFOLIO'OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY. WHILE A COMMISSIONER MAY ELECT TO APPOINT OTHERS To REPRESENT THE COMMISSION ON 'SPECIF,IC BOARDS OR COMMITTEES, HIS SUPERVISION AND EXPERTISE IN AREAS THAT COMPLEMENT ONE ANOTHER SHOULD All THE BOARD IN THEIR POLICY AND BUDGET DELIBERATIONS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED THE NECESSITY OF SITTING ON THE INDIAN RIVER MENTAL HEALTH CENTER AND THE DISTRICT 18 MENTAL HEALTH BOARD. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED AND COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED THAT SINCE CHAIRMAN ENNS OF THE ST. LUCIE BOARD•OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS PRESENTLY SERVING ON THE INDIAN RIVER MENTAL HEALTH CENTER BOARD, IT WOULD BE THEIR SUGGESTION THAT COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUE TO SERVE ON THE DISTRICT 18 MENTAL HEALTH BOARD, AS THAT BOARD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH ALL AGENCIES RECEIVING STATE MENTAL HEALTH FUNDS. - 18 - AFTER DISCUSSION A LOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE•COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS AS OUTLINED BY THE CHAIRMAN IN HIS MEMORANDUM OF FEBRUARY 12TH. , February 12, 1976 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Y FROM: W. W. Siebert, Chairman r, SUBJECT: Committee Assignments Rather than following our.standard procedure of committee assignments,.I would like each Commissioner to accept a portfolio of primary responsibility. While you may elect to appoint others'to represent the Commission on a specific '. board or committee, your supe-_Nyision and expertise in areas that compliment one another should aid us in our policy and budget deliberations. I have attempted to assign•catagories• and specific responsibilities in accord with each Commissioner's area of interest. If these areas are acceptable to you and �- you approve.of.this precedure I would like to take formal action at our -meeting of February 18th: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION- COMMISSIONER MASSEY 1. Water Resources 2. Environmental Review Committee . 3. Spoil Islands 4.. Land Acquisition PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY - COMMISSIONER WODTKE 1. Fire Study Committee - Chairman 2. Civil Defense 3. 911 Emergency Telephone.,System.-..Chairman 4. -Law Enforcement 5. Safety Council 6. Indian River Mental Health'Center • --.7. District -18 Mental Health Board 8.- District HealtYi Planning Council 4 9. Tri -County Rehabilitation Center I- -- 10. Alco -Hope -- . 11...' Emergency Services - , LAND MANAGEMENT -,COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER -. 1. Regions -1 Planning Council 2. Coastal Zone Management Advisory Committee 3. Subdivision Review Committee 4a Community Development. COMMUNITY SERVICES - COMMISSIONER LOY 1. Bicentennial Committee - 2. Indian River Council on Aging 3. Indian River County Volunteer Youth.Guidance -Project Director 4. Vero Beach Recreation Commission.. . _ .......:.• . 5. Manpower Planning Council 6. Indian River County Library.Association 70 Economic Opportunity Council.of Indian -River County -19 - FE 8'1976 THE CHAIRMAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ELIZABETH FORLANI HAS BEEN NAMED AS SECRETARY AND AIDE TO THE BOARD AND WILL WORK UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED WITH REGRET THE RESIGNATION OF GEORGE STOKES, COUNTY VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 9, 1976, AND OF GLADYS VIGLI ANO, COUNTY WELFARE DIRECTOR, WHO ?S RETIRING EFFECTIVII APRIL 1, 1976. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO PREPARE RESOLUTIONS HONOR- ING GEORGE STOKES, VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER, AND GLADYS VIGLIANO, COUNTY WELFARE DIRECTOR, ON THEIR RETIRING AND LEAVING THE EMPLOY OF THE COUNTY. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN HIRING A CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER AND A WELFARE DIRECTOR. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT GUIDELINES SHOULD BE SET UP FOR THE VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER AND THE WELFARE DIRECTOR. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE PER- SONNEL DIRECTOR, ROBERT DONLON BE AUTHORIZED TO ADVERTISE AND TO ACCEPT APPLICATIONS; A COMMISSIONER BE APPOINTED TO WORK WITH SIR. DONLON, AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO BRING RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD FOR FINAL APPROVAL, COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD WORK WITH MR, DONLON AND MR. KENNINGS IN REVIEWING APPLICATIONS FOR THE POSITION OF CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR. THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE POSITION OF AGRICULTURAL AGENT WHICH HAS BEEN VACANT FOR SOME TIME, COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE.HAS TALKED WITH DR. PAULINE CALLOWAY, DISTRICT AGENT, REGARDING AN AGRICULTURAL AGENT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WAS AN APPLICANT SHE FOUND SUITABLE FOR THIS JOB, BUT HE WAS HIRED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AND IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS IN ORDER TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH DR, CALLOW" IN SELECTING AN AGRICULTURAL AGENT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH MR, DONLON AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR IN REVIEWING APPLICATIONS FOR THE COUNTY WEL- FARE DIRECTOR. - 20 - COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH MR, DONLON AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR IN REVIEWING APPLICATIONS FOR THE POSI- TION OF COUNTY.VETERAN SERVICE AGENT.. THE BOARD RECESSED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK MOON AND RECONVENED AT 1:45 0 CLOCK P.M; THE BOARD CONTINUED THEIR DISCUSSION REGARDING THE HIRING OF A CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, AND COMMISSIONE" WODTKE STATED THAT MR. DONLON HAS RECEIVED 13 APPLICATIONS FOR THAT POSITION. THE STATE HAS SET DOWN GUIDE- LINES, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF THE COMMISSION HAS GUIDELINES THEY WISH TO SET DOWN. HE CONTINUED THAT THE STATE HAS REQUESTED THAT WE SEND THE APPLICATIONS TO THEM FOR SCREENING, AND THEY WOULD SEND US THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS, IT WAS COMMISSIONER WODTKE`S RECOMMENDATION THAT WE SCREEN THE APPLICANTS AND POSSIBLY SELECT THREE APPLICANTS AND FORWARD THOSE APPLICA- TIONS TO THE STATE FOR THEIR CONCURRENCE, OR WE COULD MAKE THE SELECTION AND JUST SEND THAT APPLICATION TO THE STATE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WAS TOLD Ta STATE WOULD LOOK AT THE APPLICATIONS AND NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE MAN, JUST THE QUALIFICATIONS. THIS POSITION MEANS WORK- ING WITH MANY PERSONALITIES AND VOLUNTEER GROUPS, AND THIS PERSON WILL HAVE TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO WORK WITH PEOPLE AND HE FEELS WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO PICK THAT PERSON, COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SINCE WE WANT THIS PERSON TO BE A MULTI-PURPOSE PERSON, OUR NEEDS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE STATE`S, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT MR. LARSON WITH THE STATE,BE CON- TACTED AND ASKED IF OUR PROCEDURE IN SELECTING A CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR WILL BE ACCEPTED, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THIS BOARD SHOULD DO WHAT THEY FEEL IS BEST, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE MAYOR OF SEBASTIAN HAS REQUESTED THE BOARD ITO HOLD A WORKSHOP SESSION IN SEBASTIAN IN ORDER TO MEET WITH THE RESIDENTS FROM THE SEBASTIAN AREA, ON MARCH 17TH. -21- 0 =I COMMISSIONER MASSEY WAS OPPOSED TO THE BOARD GOING TO SEBASTIAN TO MEET AND STATED THAT COUNTY BUSINESS SHOULD BE HANDLED IN THE COUNTY COURT- HOUSE, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT IT IS DIFFICULT FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE NORTH COUNTY AREA TO GET TO THE COURTHOUSE FOR MEETINGS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE FEELS IT WOULD BENEFIT ALL. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT MAYOR CRAGG MADE THIS SUGGESTION SO' THE CITIZENS COULD MEET AND TALK WITH THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND SO THE COMMISSIONERS COULD UNDERSTAND COMMUNITY PROBLEMS IN THE NORTH COUNTY, COMMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT HE FEELS IT SHOULD BE GIVEN MORE THOUGHT. ' CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT IF THE BOARD WOULD RATHER THINK ABOUT IT, HE WILL INFORM MAYOR CRAGG THAT THE MARCH 17TH DATE IS NOT A GOOD ONE, AND IT WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING OF MARCH LOTH, THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TC -WIT: - 22- w' . Root 25 82 4 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Published Weekly that the zonig Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has . tentatively approved the following Vero Beach, Indian Rider County, Florida changes and additions to the Zonig Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath changed In order that the following described -property situated in says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published Indian River County, F�rida, to at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being wit: ' The East 10 acres of Tract 3, Section Township Range 39 -East, according t n a the last general plat of lands of Indian River Farms Company tiled in the office of the Clerk Lucie in the matter of of the Circuli Court of St. County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, page 25; LESS AND EX- CEPT the following described property: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the East in the Court, was pub-. 10 acres of Tract 3, Section 28, Township 32 -South, Range 39 - East, thence run South along the West line of said East 10 Ifshed in said newspaper in the issues of KXG.Geon-�C�ti acres a distance of 250 feet, thence run East along a line parallel to the North line of said East 10 acres a distance of ` 60 feet, thence run North along Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press4ournal is a newspaper published at a line parallel to the West line of said East 10 acres a distance Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore in Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered of 250 feet, thence run West a distance of 60 feet to the Point been continuously published said as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida of Beginning. TOGETHER for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or with and including an easement 10 feet wide on the corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- West side of the property described above as "Less and tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Except," for drainage and Swum to subscribed before me this �L'tj' day of - AD, public utilities. SUBJECT to a 20 20 foot wide easement ad- and lacent to the East side of the property described above as •'Less and Except" for road �- us' anagen? right of way and Ingress and • egress. LESS AND CEPT: The the • �U,� North 688 South 274 feet of _ �y, —+ (Clerk Op. Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida) feet of theaW st 6es o feetof t 3e (SEAL) Section 23, Township 32 -South, Range 39 -East, according to the tastgeneral plat of lands of the Indian River Farms Company filed In the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, page 25; said land ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR AND VAL now lying and being In Indian River County, Flerida. an TOGETHER with easement 20 feet in width BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, WERE PRESENT FOR THIS he above described property, and aboeedesnt oibedproperty, the East side and running North to the North - DISCUSSION. Gifford Road. LESS AND EXCEPT: The West 60 feet of the South 164 feet of the North 414 feet of the rTract MR. BERG STATED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED Eatacesof3sh, too IN THE AREA OF NORTH GIFFORD ROAD AND 43RD STREET. Range 39 -East, according to the last general plat of lands of Farms the Indian River Company filed In the office of IT IS AN EXISTING TRAILER PARK WHICH IS 1./3 DEVELOPED.the Clerk-ofthe Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, In f Plat Book 2, page 25; said land THE ZONING COMMISSION HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF now lying and being in Indian a River County, Florida. THIS REZONING. MR. BERG CONTINUED THAT THE ZONING j: Be changed from M•1icted Ind,r trict estRr1MP Mobilerial Homes oPark District. A public hearing in relation COMMISSION WAS ADVISED OF THE FACT THAT THIS PROPOSED thereto at which parties In Interpst and citizens shall have an opppr- - _ } REZONING IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE MASTER PLAN, tonity to be heard, will be held by said Zoning Commission in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero r Beach, Florida, Thursday, January 22, 1976, at 7:30 P.M., after which a public hearing in relation thereto at which parties In Interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of County . Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Room, Indian River ' County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, February • 16, 1976, at 2:00 P.M. Indian River County A Zoning Commission By: Ralph Sexton a_ Chairman Board of County 71 Commissioners Indian River County A' By: Alma Lee Loy 23 _ Chairman Dec.. g5, 1975. LAkRY LEWIS, CO-OWNER OF THE PROPERTY APPEARED AND STATED THAT THERE ARE 13 EXISTING TRAILERS THERE NOW AND THIS REZONING REQUEST CAME ABOUT BECAUSE OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND ZONING DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS WITH r THE FACILITIES THEY HAVE, THERE ARE -CONTINUAL PROBLEMS, AND IT IS ECONOMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GO TO THE EXPENSE OF IMPROVING IT. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THEY x= TRY TO EXPAND THESE FACILITIES. THEY ARE IN THE LAND CLEARING AN6 ASPHALT PAVING BUSINESS AND FOR THAT REASON IF REZONED THEY COULD ECONOMICALLY DEVELOP IT. THEY HAVE MADE APPLICATION TO THE VARIANCE BOARD, AS THIS PROPERTY IS NOT AS LARGE AS REQUIRED FOR A MOBILE FIME PARK, AND THE VARIANCE WAS GRANTED. THEY HAVE APPEARED BEFORE THE ZONING COMMISSION FOR REZONING APPROVAL AND i IT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD THAT IT BE APPROVED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT'QUESTIONED IF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WOULD TIE INTO THEIR SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM, MR. LEWIS STATED THAT THE ADJOINING MOBILE HOME PARK OWNER HAS STATED HE WOULD BE INTERESTED IN TYING INTO THIS SYSTEM; THAT PARK HAS 13 EXISTING_ MOBILE HOMES IN IT. OF COURSE, ALL THE PEOPLE IN HIS DEVELOP- MENT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO TIE INTO THIS SYTEM, MR..LEWIS STATED THAT HE IS PLANNING ON APPROXIMATELY 60 SITES, WHICH WILL BE LARGER THAN REQUIRED SIZE, AND HIS PROPERTY IS A LITTLE LESS THAN IO ACRES. THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE AMOUNT OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY IN THIS AREA. DEWEY WALKER, ZONING DIRECTOR REFERRED TO THE R -IMP -MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND STATED THAT THIS WOULD BE TREATED THE SAME AS ANY SUBDIVISION. MR. BERG STATED THAT THE MOBILE HOMES ARE NOT NEW AND HE FEELS SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES WOULD BE A BIG HELP AND IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO PROVIDE THIS FACILITY TO THE PARK THAT ABUTTS THEM, AS THEY ARE IN WORSE SHAPE. AFTER DISCUSSION A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO APPROVE THIS REZONING REQUEST TO R -IMP I MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT, AS REQUESTED BY LARRY LEWIS AND CHARLES PRICE BECAUSE IT WAS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE ZONING COMMISSIONER AND IT HAS . BEEN APPROVED FOR A VARIANCE BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT. p COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER CONTINUED THAT WE WOULD BE IMPROVING AN f EXISTING AREA WITH BAD CONDITIONS AND PERHAPS THIS WILL BE AN INTERIM FOR °-24- INDUSTRIAL ZONING IN THE FAR FUTURE. IT COULD BE THAT THESE MOBILE HOMES CAN NO LONGER BE KEPT IN THIS AREA THAT .INDUSTRY WILL -PUSH THEM OUT. IT MIGHT ALSO BE WE HAVE TOO MUCH INDUSTRIAL IN THE COUNTY. THERE ARE s MOBILE HOMES ALREADY ON 1/2 THIS PROPERTY AND 1/2 OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. COMMISSIONER-WODTKE STATED THAT HE CAN SEE VERY GOOD PROS AND CONS AND THIS REQUEST IS SOMETHING WE ARE GOING TO GET INVOLVED WITH BECAUSE OF EN— VIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND CONTROLS THAT WILL BE IMPOSED, THAT WILL REQUIRE GETTING INTO SEWER SYSTEMS AND POSSIBLY THERE WILL BE ECONOMIC PROBLEMS; HE COULD UNDERSTAND THAT PROBLEM, BUT H4. CAN ALSO LOOK AT THAT AREA AND SEE WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IF THIS REZONING IS APPROVED. IT WILL TAKE AN AREA SET ASIDE AS A DESIROUS INDUSTRIAL AREA AND THIS PROPOSED REZONING WOULD PRETTY WELL DO AWAY WITH THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE AND FOR THIS REASON HE IS OPPOSED TO IT. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT HEALTH PROPLEMS AND THAT THE AREA SHOULD BE ON A SEWER SYSTEM. HE PUTS RESPECT IN THE ACTUAL LAND USE REPORT AS FAR AS ENFORCEMENT, BUT POSSIBLY IT WAS A BAD DECISION TO GO IN THAT AREA AND PUT IT IN AN INDUSTRIAL ZONE WHEN IT WAS PREDOMINATELY A MOBILE.HOME AND RESIDENTIAL AREA. COMMISSIONER MASSEY ASKED HOW MANY MOBILE HOME PARKS OF THIS SIZE, DO WE HAVE IN THE COUNTY. MR. WALKER STATED THAT, AT A ROUGH GUESS HE WOULD SAY APPROXIMATELY 28 TO 30 SIMILAR PARKS IN THE COUNTY. COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT THESE PARKS AND LACK OF SEWER SYSTEMS- . t ARE NOT DANGEROUS TO THEMSELVES AT THIS TIME, BUT IF THEY WERE TO BECOME. LARGER THEY COULD BECOME DANGEROUS. LARGE SEWER SYSTEMS ARE NOT ALWAYS THE BEST THING FOR AN AREA EITHER, BUT RATHER THAN HAVE A BUNCH OF THESE SMALL PARKS SPRING UP THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY, WHICH IS THE VERY THING WE ARE TRYING TO CONTROL HE WOULD HAVE TO OPPOSE THIS REZONING. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE IS CONCERNED THAT THE AREA WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO BE RESIDENTIAL, WITH THE REZONING OF NORTH GIFFORD ROAD AREA WE STILL HAVE A HODGE—PODGE OF ZONING...:WHEN THE RESIDENTS OF THIS AREA REQUESTED THAT IT REMAIN IN M-1 — RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, WE:CONSIDERED LEAVING IT BECAUSE IT WAS THE START OF GETTING THE ENTIRE --AREA IN ONE CLASSIFICATION WHERE THE LAND USE. PATTERN IN THAT AREA WOULD EVENTUALLY WORK ITSELF OUT, BUT NOW, IN CONSIDERATION OF THIS REZONING REQUEST, WE ARE GOING BACK THE OTHER WAY BY SAYING WE ARE GOING TO CREATE STILL ANOTHER PARK: SO RATHER THAN CLEANING IT UP WE ARE CREATING A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN WE HAVE NOW, COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED WITH CHAIRMAN SIEBERT'S STATEMENT. -25- FEB 18 1976 85 MR. BERG CONTINUED THAT IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT THIS BE DENIED BECAUSE IT WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE MASTER PLAN MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THIS IS A MOBILE HOME PARK; THESE PEOPLE ARE READY TO DEVELOP IT, PUT IN SEWERS AND PROVIDE NEEDED HOUSING AND THE ZONING COMMISSION FEELS IT WOULD DO NO HARM IN THE AREA, BUT.THE PEOPLE LIVING IN THE AREA WANTED "INDUSTRIAL" ZONING AND NOT MOBILE HOME ZONING. HE CONTINUED THAT WE HAVE A TECHNICAL PROBLEM AND A LEGAL PROBLEM AS THIS DQES NOT CONFORM WITH THE MASTER PLAN AND WE ALSO HAVE A HUMANE PROBLEM TO PRO- VIDE NEEDED HOUSING FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY. ON AUGUST:%; 1974 A PUBLIC HEARING.WAS HELD TO CONSIDER REZONING THIS AREA TO RESIDENTIAL, BUT THE PEOPLE IN THE AREA WANTED IT TO REMAIN IN INDUSTRIAL. IF THIS WAS REZONED THE WAY IT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED, THIS PROPERTY WOULD HAVE BEEN ZONED RESIDENTIAL. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHAT THE MASTER PLAN SHOWS FOR THIS AREA. MR, BERG STATED THAT THE MASTER PLAN SHOWS INDUSTRIAL FOR THIS AREA. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE MASTER PLAN, AS IT NOW EXISTS, IS REALLY WHAT THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE SHOULD BE, IT IS A GUIDE TO HELP IN REZONING EFFORTS TO CREATE CONSISTENCY IN THE COUNTY. THIS BOARD CAN TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE MASTER PLAN, BUT THERE ARE NO MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS TO CONFORM ALL ZONING WITH THE PLAN AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS. HE SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD USE THE MASTER PLAN IN THEIR CONSIDERATIONS, BUT IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE THE DOMINATING FACTOR, THE BOARD SHOULD -CONSIDER ALL THE FACTS PRESENTED TODAY AND THEN MAKE THEIR DECISION. MR. BERG STATED THAT THIS AREA IS RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. • -26- r s:. MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT WE LISTENED TO THE PEOPLE IN THE AREA AND WE DID WHAT THEY WANTED. IN OTHER AREAS OF GIFFORD THERE ARE SOME NICE HOMES AND THE PEOPLE WANTED PROTECTION AND WANTED THE. M-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OUT, IN THIS AREA PEOPLE WANTED TO PROTECT THE VALUE OF THEIR PROPERTY S AND REQUESTED THAT IT BE KEPT IN INDUSTRIAL. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTIONS COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER VOTED IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONER MASSEY, COMMISSIONER t0Y AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN OPPOSITION, THE MOTION WAS DENIED. j THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: 19'76 -27- Root 25 m� ; 87 VERO BEACH PRESSJOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personalty appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a d/ c un C� in the, matter of - to the Cour., was pub - lisped In said newspaper in the issues of��_ Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper, l Swom to and subscribed before me this : 1� day of � A.D. / 92 (Bus ess Manager) ro" �"v (Clerk o Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida) (SEAQ PRESENT FOR THIS DISCUSSION WAS ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR AND VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR. MR. BERG STATED THAT THE MASTER PLAN SHOWS A PORTION OF THIS AREA TO BE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA BECAUSE THE PROPERTY IS VERY LOW. MR. BERG CONTINUED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WEST OF THE RAILROAD AND SOUTH OF VICKERS ROAD, AND KNOWN AS BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK, Wle NOTICE f NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively approved the following changes and ' additions to the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to - wit: i Tract 1 That portion lying West of the Florida' East Coast Railroad right of way of the North 1/2 of the SW 114 of the NE rA and the South 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the N E 'A of Section 20, Township 31 - South, Range 39 -East, Indian River County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPT the following described pracel: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of the SW 1/4 of the N E r/4 of I Section 20, Township 31 -South, Range 39- East, with the 4. Westerly right of way line of F the Florida East Coast - Railrgad (said right of way being 50 feet Westerly from the parallel to the centerline of the main track of the Florida East Coast Railway; and from r thence run Southeasterly along said Westerly right of way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad a distance of 400 feet; thence Southwesterly at right angles to the said Westerly right of way line, 150 feet; thence Northwesterly on a line 150 feet Westerly of and paraliei to said Westerly right of way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad to a point on the North line of the SW V4 of the NE 1A of Section 20; thence run East along said North line to the point of Beginning. AND Tract 2 South r/2 of the SE rA of the NW W of Section 20, Township 31 - South, Range 39 -East, Indian River County, Florida. And Tract A That portion lying East of the Florida East Coast Railroad right of way of the SW r/4 of the NE rA of Section 20, Township 31 -South, Range 39 -East, In- dian River County, Florida. And Tract B That portion of the North 1/2 of the SE rA of the NE 1/4 lying West of U,S. Highway No. 1, excluding therefrom the North 345 feet; in Section 20, Township 31 -South, Range 39- a East, said land lying and being in Indian River County, ti Florida. Less: Excluding from the above Tract 1 and Trdct A, the, following: The North 30 feet of the SW 114 of the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 31 -South, Range 39 - East, less the Florida East Coast Railroad property and right-of-way, all land being in Indian River County, Florida. • 8e changed from R -IMP Mobile Home Park District, and R-ITM Transient Mobile Home District, to R-iPM Permanent Mobile Home Subdivision District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which parties In interest and citizens shall have an op- portunity to be heard, will be held by said Zoning Commission In the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, Thursday, January 22, 1976, at 7:30 P.M., after which a public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in Interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, In the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, February 18, 1976, at 2:00 P.M. Indian River County Zoning Commission By: Ralph Sexton Chairman { Board of County Commissioners Indian River County By: Alma Lee Loy Chairman k'. Dec. 25, 1975. t t• FEB 1819761 25 8 A r�. MR. BERG STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, AND THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AS A SUB— DIVISION. THIS WOULD BE A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION WHICH MEANS THE LOTS WILL BE SOLD. r THE 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOES CALL THE BOARD'S ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR REZONING IS IN A LOW AREA CALLED A SAVANNA, AND THERE WOULD BE A DRAINAGE PROBLEM IN THAT LOW AREA, 4 COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT THIS PORTION OF PROPERTY IS NOT IN s A DRAINAGE DISTRICT; THEREFORE, IT IS LANDLOCKED, THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE MET ON .JANUARY 12TH AND FEBRUARY 2ND, AND IT WAS AGREED THAT THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS TO THIS SUBDIVISION AS PRESENTED. i MR. BERG STATED THAT A SITE PLAN HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED FOR A a MOBILE HOME PARK IN THIS LOCATION. THE ZONING COMMISSION DID TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT IF THEY TURNED THIS DOWN THERE WOULD STILL BE A MOBILE HOME PARK IN THIS AREA, AND THEY FELT IT WOULD BE BETTER TO HAVE A PARK WITH d INDIVIDUAL OWNERS THAN A RENTAL PARK, DEAN LUETHJE AND JAMES BEINDORF, ENGINEERS REPRESENTING EDWARD KARR, OWNER AND DEVELOPER OF BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK, APPEARED, AND MR. LUETHJE EXPLAINED TO TIME BOARD THAT THE EXISTING AREA THAT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED IS A RENTAL MOBILE HOME PARK, THEY ARE ALSO ASKING FOR A VARIANCE FOR A PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION. THE VARIANCE WOULD BE RELATIVE TO THE WIDTH OF THE RIGHT—OF—WAY. 50 FOOT WIDTH IS REQUIRED, BUT BECAUSE IT IS AN EXIST— ING MOBILE PARK, THEY ARE REQUESTING 40 FOOT WIDTH AND THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD BASE BE CHANGED FROM S" TO 6". MR. LUETHJE CONTINUED THAT THE SAVANNA IS IN THE WEST SECTION OF THIS PROPERTY, AND THEY HAVE PLANNED TO REMOVE THE MUCK, FILL IN WITH 4 OR 5 FEET OF FILL;. AND MOVE THE RIDGE TO THE WEST. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHAT AFFECT THAT WILL HAVE ON THE SAVANNAS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH, MR, BEINDORF STATED THAT THE WATER LYING IN THIS SAVANNA DOES NOT 9 MOVE NORTH OR SOUTH. - 29 - 3 -MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING A REZONING FROM R -IMP MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT AND R-ITM TRANSIENT MOBILE HOME DISTRICT TO R -IPM PERMANENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT. ORIGINAL TRANSIENT MOBILE HOME DISTRICT APPROVAL WAS GRANTED FOR 362 UNITS. THE OWNERS HAVE NOW®PLANNED A TOTAL OF 292 UNITS. COMMISSIONER LOY QUESTIONED WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTE- NANCE OF THE PRIVATE STREETS, MR. UUETHJE STATED THAT THE. OWNERS OF THE LOTS WILL FORM A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND WILL MAINTAIN THE STREETS, COMMISSIONER MASSEY QUESTIONED WHAT PLANS WERE MADE FOR SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES. MR, LUETHJE ANSWERED THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING SYSTEM WHICH WILL BE USED. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD, MR, BERG STATED THAT MR. KARR IS REQUESTING REZONING OF THE ENTIRE TRACT, HE DOES NOT KNOW IF YOU CAN REZONE AN ENTIRE TRACT IN MOBILE HOMES UNTIL THE SUBDIVISION AND PLAT IS APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION i REGULATIONS. MR, BERG READ FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE - SECTION 13 - R-lPM PERMA- NENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT: "NO LOT OR PARCEL SHALL BE ZONED R -IPM PERMANENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT UNTIL SUCH LAND HAS BEEN SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH °SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA/ AND RECORDED BY THE OWNER IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY." ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT YOU CANNOT RECORD SOMETHING THAT IS NOT REZONED, MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THIS SECTION 13 WAS PREPARED BECAUSE A DE- VELOPER COULD COME IN AND GET MOBILE HOME ZONING AND LET THE PROPERTY SIT. THE BOARD SAID UNLESS YOU PUT YOUR PLAT ON FILE, YOU DO•NOT GET ZONING. THE DEVELOPER MUST GO THROUGH THIS BEFORE THE REZONING IS APPROVED, THIS SECTION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED AS WRITTEN. MR, LUETHJE EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT THE ORIGONAL UNIT WAS PLANNED AS R -IMP MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT. THERE ARE 57 ACRES IN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND MR, KARR PLANS TO SELL THESE-LOTS,.it -3p- 25 go FEB 18 197- I 0 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST UNTIL AFTER THE REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL OF BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE NOME SUBDIVISION IS HEARD, MR,.LHETHJE STATED THAT THIS REQUEST IS FOR TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL FOR BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE NOME SUBDIVISION UNIT 1. HE PRESENTED THE PLAT TO THE BOARD FOR REVIEW AND STATED THAT THEY ARE ALSO REQUESTING A VARIANCE IN REGARD TO THE WIDTH AND TYPE OF.CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADS IN THIS PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE SUBDIVI- SION REVIEW COMMITTEE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A VARIANCE REGARDING THE WIDTH AND TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADS IN BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION UNIT 1, AS REQUESTED BY EDWARD KARR, THE BOARD REOPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AS ADVERTISED REGARDING A PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME SUB- DIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY EDWARD KARR. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGEr AS REQUESTED FOR BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK FROM R -IMP "MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT AND R-1TM TRANSIENT MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT TO R -IPM PERMANENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT$ ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE READS THAT PRIOR TO REZONING, THE PLAT MUST BE APPROVED AND RECORDED, IN ORDER TO WORK WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE ORDINANCE, HE RECOMMENDED CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING WHEN THE FINAL PLAT OF BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR APPROVAL AND THEN THE REZON- ING CAN AGAIN BE CONSIDERED, MR. KARR HAD NO OBJECTIONS TO CONTINUING THIS PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS MOTION. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CONTINUING THIS PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING OF BREEZY VILLAGE MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION UNTIL MARCH 10, 1976 AT # 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. - 31. - ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE 71-2 SECTION I3A. THE HOUR OF 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED TO—WIT: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a CA: in the matter of rylrNiu/ F EXeA✓AT10Af In the Court, was pub- Iished in said newspaper in the Issues of 629"AR-X Z 1974 Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River"County, Florida, weekly -and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this qday of A && A.D. /97& .- (/ (usiness n er (Cler of the cuit Court, Indian River County, Florida) (SEAQ t NOTICE NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN 'that the Board of County Corn. m)ssionemof Indian River County, Florida, will hold a public hearing On February IS, 1976, at 3:00 O'clock P.M. at the Indian River County Courthouse to consider the adoption of an Ordinance Amending County Ordinance 71.3, Section 25, by adding an entirely amended Sub Paragraph (R) "Mining and Excavation" containing definition, permitted uses, conditions of permit, Provisions for continuing operation, review by the In. dian River .County Zoning Commission, operating per- mits, filing fees, bond, permit, revocations, violations and Penalties, annual progress report, applications for per. mits and providing for an effective date. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County Florida By: Willard W. Siebert Jr. r Chairman Feb. 1, 1976. DEWEY WALKER, ZONING DIRECTOR, APPEARED AND REVIEWED THE PROPOSED AMENDED MINING ORDINANCE WITH THE BOARD, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT UNDER ITEM 7 - PROVISIONS FOR CONTINUING OPERATION — IT STATES THAT SITE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 180 DAYS, THE 180 DAYS WAS ESTABLISHED DURING A TRANSITIONAL PERIOD, AND IT WAS HIS FEELING THAT IT BE CHANGED TO 30 DAYS. MR. WALKER STATED THAT ALL MINING OPERATORS HAVE SUBMITTED THEIR PLANS, AND THEY HAVE BEEN APPROVE?D. -32- r,; 92 FEB 11970 THE BOARD AGREED TO CHANGING 180 DAYS TO 30 DAYS. DEWEY WALKER PRESENTED TO THE BOARD PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORDINANCE THAT HAD BEEN WORKED OUT BY THE MINING REVIEW COMMITTEE, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REFERRED TO ITEM 6-B - REGARDING PUTTING UP STAKES AND SUGGESTED THAT WHERE THERE IS 'AN OBVIOUS PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT THAT A STAKE NOT BE REQUIRED, MR. WALKER STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION WILL WORK THIS OUT AND SUGGESTED THE WORDING REMAIN AS IS, THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM 6-A - CONDITIONS OF A PERMIT, COMMISSIONER MASSEY QUESTIONED THAT PORTION READING "THE BANKS OF CREATED WATER AREAS BY MINING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE SLOPED AT A RATIO OF 3:1, GRADED AND DRESSED UP," ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR, STATED THAT IN THE EVENT A CHILD FELL IN THE EXCAVATION, THE WATER WOULD NOT BE TOO DEEP WITH A 3:1 SLOPE, COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT THE WAY THIS ITEM 6-A IS WRITTEN, AN OPERATOR CAN DIG STRAIGHT DOWN UNTIL HE REACHES WATER LEVEL AND THEN HE STARTS HIS 3:1 SLOPE, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THIS SHOULD BE AMENDED TO READ:, "ALL BANKS OF CREATED WATER AREAS BY MINING OR EXCAVATION SHOULD BE SLOPED AT A RATIO OF 3:1, GRADED AND DRESSED UP." THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM 9 - OPERATING PERMITS. i THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED ITEM 11 - BOND. COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF A PERSON HAS 100 ACRES AND PUTS UP THE REQUIRED $10,000.00 BOND AND DOES NOT RESTORE THE PROPERTY ACCORDING TO REQUIREMENTS, WE ONLY HAVE $10,000.00 TO RESTORE THE PROPERTY WHEREAS IF A PERSON HAS 5 ACRES, HE HAS PUT UP A $5,000.00 BOND, AND IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT RESTORED ACCORDING.TO REQUIREMENTS, IT CAN BE RESTORED WITH THE $5,000.00 _ BOND, THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT A PERSON COULD NOT COME IN AND WORK 100 ACRES WITH A $10,000.00 BOND; HE WOULD HAVE TO WORK IN PHASES OF APPROXIMATELY ZO ACRES AT A TIME, ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED AMENDING THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND IN-" SERTING IN ITEM 11 .. "SHALL DIVIDE INTO PHASES NOT TO EXCEED 10 ACRES PER - 33 - 93, r - PHASE WHICH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND THE BOND BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH PHASE" THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED THAT PHASES BE 20 ACREPS, AS 10 ACRES, IN HIS OPINION, IS TOO SMALL A PARCEL FOR A MINING OPERATION. MR. WALKER STATED THAT THE MINING OPERATORS ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS SECTION. THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED ITEM 12 - PERMIT REVOCATED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED ACCORDING TO ITEM 12, THE BOARD WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO REVOKE OR SUSPEND AN OPERATING PERMIT IN THE EVENT THERE IS A VIOLATION, BUT HE SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE STOP ORDERS ON THE SPOT IF THERE IS A VIOLATION AND NOT HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THERE IS A BOARD MEETING TO ISSUE THIS ORDER. THE COUNTY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BE GIVEN THE AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND AN OPERATING PERMIT AND THE COUNTY COMMIS- SIONERS HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REVOKE A PERMIT. ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION ISSUED THE PERMIT, AND THEY SHOULD BE THE REVOKING AUTHORITY. HE REQUESTED TIME TO RE- VIEW THIS FURTHER, THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM 12A - VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES - AND THEY WERE IN FAVOR OF A PENALTY BEING IMPOSED ON THOSE NOT FOLLOWING THE ORDINANCE. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ANY VIOLATION OF A COUNTY ORDINANCE IS A MISDEMEANOR. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THERE IS NOTHING IN THE ORDINANCE STAT- ING THAT THEIR BOND WILL BE FORFEITED IF REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT COMPLIED WITH. THE ATTORNEY WILL INVESTIGATE THIS. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK. THERE WERE NONE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE 71-2 - SECTION 25 - BE CLOSED. ATTORNEY COLLINS WILL PREPARE THIS AMENDED ORDINANCE, AND IT WILL BE AN AGENDA ITEM AT THE NEXT MEETING OF MARCH 10, 1976. -34- FEB V 18 1976 Y t DR. DAVID SMITH AND JAMES BEINDORF, COUNTY CONSULTING ENGINEERS �^ APPEARED AND REPORTED TO THE BOARD THE PROGESS BEING MADE ON THE 201 PROGRAM. DR. SMITH STATED THAT THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO RESOLVE THE QUESTION OF POPULATION WHICH IS A COMPLICATED ONE BECAUSE OF THE UNKNOWN FACTOR OF TOURIST u TRADE. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE INITIATED ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR DEVELOPING INTEGRATED SEWER FACILITIES IN THE COUNTY AND HOPEFULLY WITHIN THE NEXT TWO OR THREE MONTHS THEY WILL BE ABLE TO BRING BEFORE THE TECHNICAL AD- VISORY COMMITTEE THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE. THE SOLE OBJECTIVE OF THIS PROGRAM IS TO FIND OUT WHAT COULD BE DONE THAT MOST OF THE PEOPLE WILL AGREE T0, THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IS BEING PREPARED AND MUST BE REVIEWED BY ALL FEDERAL AGENCIES. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN REFERRED TO THE FOLLOWING LETTER. 456 y. e i FEB 1916 r UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ota, AGRICULTURE RECEIVED ~` FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION Florida 32602 igtd3 �1 Gainesville, g 3STEM RETURN RECEIPT PzgmTED o February 2a 1976 •; Mr. Jack G. Jennings �. County Administrator County Courthouse Rama 115 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Deer mrr. Jennings: approved a loan of tao,639,� to the Board of we ou May 25 s 1-9' 9 to develop a central Indian River County, ? " __.County Commissioners, This loan has not been Processed further '--' water and sevrer system. has been unable to meet our loan conditions. . since the County that they plan to Proceed with If we do not hear from the Board of the Project, the loan obligation wi71 be can-. al,. or a portion celled on February 27, 1976. operation is appreciated.ycur °. r sincerely 7=3i s ChAUDE L. GREENS, JR. state Director 9- - 35 - y.; I � 4 FEB18 1970 DR. SMITH STATED THAT F.H.A. HAS ARRIVED AT A POINT•WHERE THEY ARE ASKING IF THE COUNTY CAN FORESEE A USE FOR THIS MONEY, HE CONTINUED THAT THIS MONEY COULD BE USED FOR THE FOLLOWING; 1. WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF ANY PART OF THE COUNTY. 2. IN THE WASTE WATER AREA THEY ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 201 PROdESS. EVEN- TUALLY ONE OF THE TAC MEETINGS WILL DISCUSS THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INVOLVED AND ANY OF THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY AT THAT TIME. THE OPTIONS ARE THAT EITHER THERE WOULD BE A PROGRAM OR THERE WILL NOT BE A PROGRAM. 3. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT - THIS IS A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDED IN THE COUNTY. DR. SMITH STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE LETTER FROM F.H.A. IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE A CUT-OFF DATE BEYOND WHICH THIS LOAN COMMITMENT WILL NOT BE HELD UNLESS THE BOARD REQUESTS A CONTINUANCE OF THE LOAN OR PART OF THE LOAN, THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE SOLID WASTE PROGRAM AND THE COUNTY ADMINIS- TRATOR REPORTED TO THE BOARD ON A WORKSHOP MEETING IN GAINESVILLE THAT HE ATTENDED RELATIVE TO TRAINING RESEARCH AND EDUCATION. IT WAS THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OPINION THAT THE BOARD CONTINUE IN PERFECTING OUR LANDFILL OPERATION. AT THE WORKSHOP MEETING A RESOURCE RECOV- ERY SYSTEM WAS DISCUSSED, BUT HE STATED THAT THAT IS TOO PREMATURE FOR THIS AREA, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS STATED THAT THE COUNTY HAS TO HAVE A RECOV- ERY PLAN BY .JULY, 1978. THEY HAVE NOT SIAD YOU MUST HAVE THIS PLAN IN OPERA- TION BY 1978, ONLY THAT YOU MUST HAVE A PLAN. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE ANY FUNDS FOR THIS PLAN NOR DOES THE STATE. THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED FOR THE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION APPOINTING A WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD TO LOOK AT THIS AND WORK WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE PEOPLE FROM TALLAHASSEE WERE MOST COOPERATIVE AND WILLING TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE PROBLEMS WE HAVE IN OUR OPERATION. IT IS A BIG PROBLEM.TO COME UP WITH A RELIABLE MARKET FOR RECOVERY AND THE MONEY, BUT WE ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK BY PERFECTING OUR LANDFILL OPERATION. THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED AN ADVISORY BOARD TO KEEP ON TOP OF THIS AND WORK PREPARING AGREEMENTS THAT MUST BE FILED BY .JULY, 1978. HE' CONTINUED THAT THIS MIGHT BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF F.H.A. FOR SOME OF THIS MONEY. - 36 - MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT THE STATE HAS GIVEN US ABOUT ONE YEAR TO MOVE WITH THE LANDFILL OPERATION,. WE HAVE UNTIL 1978 TO ESTABLISH A PLAN ACCEPTABLE TO THE STATE, IF THE MONEY IS AVAILABLE IN WHICH TO ACQUIRE LAND TO BUILD A NEW LANDFILL, THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED ALONG WITH THE PbSSIBILITY OF A WATER AND SEWER PROGRAM, DR. SMITH STATED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED THE IMPRESSION THAT F.H.A. WOULD LIKE A LETTER INDICATING A QUESTION OF INTEREST IN RETAINING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE LOAN COMMITMENT FOR WHATEVER PURPOSES THE BOARD AGREES ON; THEN THEY WOULD WANT TO KNOW A TIME TABLE THE COUNTY WOULD NEED TO COME BACK WITH SPECIFIC PROGRAMS, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED WRITING A LETTER TO F.H.A. OUTLIN- ING THE VARIOUS ITEMS DISCUSSED TODAY AND REQUEST TO RETAIN THE LOAN COMMIT- MENT, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT AT ONE TIME THE BOARD CONSIDERED PUR- CHASING SMALL UTILITY COMPANIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THE 201 PROGRAM IS JUST FOR SEWERS. MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT THE 201 PROGRAM IS A FEDERAL GRANT TO STUDY WASTE WATER, COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE AREAS BEING CONSIDERED ARE: SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL; POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WILL COME OUT OF THE 201 STUDY; AND CONSIDERATION OF ACQUIRING SEWER TREATMENT FACILI- TIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT,A DATE SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE REQUEST, WITH A DATE INDICATING WHEN SPECIFIC INFORMATION WILL BE FORWARDED. t COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT WE ALLOW 60 DAYS IN WHICH TO FORWARD DEFINITE INFORMATION IN THE AREAS WE ARE CONSIDERING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO REQUEST THE COUNTY CONSULT- ING ENGINEERS TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO RESPOND TO THE LETTER FROM F.H.A. AND TO COME UP WITH SPECIFIC FIGURES AND A TIME SCHEDULE ALONG THE LINES OF THE ABOVE DISCUSSED ITEMS, - 37 - i FEB. 18 1976 P • a COMMISSIONER Loy PRESENTED TO THE BOARD A PROPOSAL REGARDING PROP— ERTY LOCATED WEST OF COUNTY—OWNED PROPERTY AND THE TRACKING STATION TO STATE ROAD AIA IN THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES. SHE INFORMED.THE BOARD THAT THE 0 PROPOSED OPTION CARRIED A MARCH 1, 1976 TERMINATION DATE. SHE CONTINUED THAT THE COUNTY OWNS ONE ACRE OF BEACHFRONT PROPERTY, THIS PARCEL BEING OFFERED FOR SALE IS 5.38 ACRES. THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL HOMES IN THE AREA, AND SHE PROCEEDED TO POINT ^UT REASONS FOR SECURING THIS PARCEL OF PROPERTY. 1. THIS SITE WOULD PROVIDE ACCESS TO COUNTY—OWNED LAND ALONG THE BEACH AND WOULD PROVIDE EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE BEACHES. 2. RESIDENTS IN THE AREA SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE COUNTY'S DECISION TO DEVELOP THIS INTO A PARK AREA. THERE IS A SEWER TREATMENT PLANT ON THE PROPERTY. THIS PLANT HAS A 250 HOME CAPACITY — IT IS USED BY FOUR DEVELOPMENTS AND IS ASSESSED AT $78,000.00, THE TAXES ON THE PROPERTY ARE $1,354.20. THIS EXACT PARCEL OF PROPERTY WAS OFFERED TO THE COUNTY IN APRIL, 1974, AND WE THEN•OBTAINED AN APPRAISAL WHICH CAME IN AT $303,000, BUT BEFORE WE COULD COMPLETE THE NEGO— TIATIONS, THE PROPERTY WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE OWNERS BECAUSE OF OPPOSITION BY THE RESIDENTS IN THE AREA. THIS PROPERTY IS NOW BEING OFFERED TO THE COUNTY FOR $200,000 PLUS CLOSING COSTS AND 1975 TAXES. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE IS NOT SUGGESTING THAT WE GET INTO THE SEWER BUSINESS, BUT SHE DOES NOT FEEL WE CAN WAIT ANY LONGER ON.THIS PROPERTY. THE ONLY MONEY AVAILABLE IS FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS. WE HAVE $185,000 IN REVENUE SHARING FUNDS THAT WILL HAVE TO BE SPENT BY .JUNE, 1976, AND SHE FEELS WE SHOULD USE THESE FUNDS. WE COULD THEN APPLY FOR DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, THE PURCHASE OF THIS PROPERTY SHOULD STRENGTHEN OUR 1 POSITION WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND HOPEFULLY EXPEDITE OBTAINING THE TRACKING STATION PROPERTY. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THERE ARE PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPERTY RELATIVE TO THE SEWER TREATMENT PLANT. HE CONTINUED THAT THIS IS A VALUELESS PARCEL OF PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THE SEWER TREATMENT PLANT LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF IT. THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAD PLANNED TO HAVE A e -38 - FEB 18 1976 844 J >_ 8 1A SEWER SYSTEM, BUT THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE AND THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE DECREASE IN PRICE. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THERE IS A THREE PARTY INTEREST IN THE r PLANT, AND IT WOULD BE IMPERATIVE THAT THE COUNTY GAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PLANT. THE PLANT, AT THIS TIME, IS PAYING FOR ITSELF, BUT NOT MAKING ANY MONEY, ATTORNEY COLLINS REVIEWED THE CONTRACT AND STATED THAT IF THE COUNTY TAKES AN OPTION, THEY WILL GIVE US UNTI; JUNE 30TH OR AUGUST 30TH TO CLOSE ON THE PROPERTY. IF WE WAIT UNTIL AUGUST 30TH TO CLOSE, THERE IS AN ADDI- TIONAL CHARGE OF $5,000.00. HE STATED THAT GETTING THE SEWER PLANT PROBLEM RESOLVED BY MARCH LST WOULD BE A PROBLEM, BUT COULD BE DONE BY JUNE 30TH.. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT-ASKED IF WE COULD GET AN OPTION THROUGH MARCH 12TH RATHER THAN MARCH 1ST, HE CONTINUED THAT HE IS INTERESTED IN THIS PARCEL OF PROPERTY, AND FELT IF WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP THIS PIECE OF PROP- ERTY, IT WOULD ENHANCE OUR CHANCE OF GETTING THE OTHER PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE "TRACKING STATION." CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THE APPRAISAL WE HAD PREPARED WILL COVER US IF IT IS THE DECISION OF THE BOARD TO PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE APPRAISAL SHOULD BE UP -DATED. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN PURCHASING THIS PROPERTY, BUT IS CONCERNED ABOUT THE SEWER PLANT. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED COMMISSIONER LOY AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NEGOTI'ATING WITH THE ATTORNEY FOR THE OWNERS TO OBTAIN AN EXTENSION OF THE OPTION DATE TO AFTER MARCH 12TH, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY SIGNED THE TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, CITY OF FELLSMERE AND THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN FOR FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,600.00 TO BE USED TO IMPROVE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AT WASHINGTON PARK, CITY OF FELLSMERE, PARK IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN,'SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER AND SEBASTIAN LITTLE LEAGUE FIELD. -39- 'r; i Reel 25,��. 99 0 TRI -PARTITE RECREATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into the 18th day of February , 1976, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, CITY OF FELLSMERE AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN; .WHEREAS, the CITIES OF FELLSMERE and SEBASTIAN have requested the COUNTY for funds to improve recreational facilities located on the following described properties: WASHINGTON PARK, City of Fellsmere Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 97, TOWN OF FELLSMERE, according to the Plat filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, pages 3 and 4; said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. CITY OF SEBASTIAN ------------- 4.081 acres SUBDIVISION UNIT 16, TRACT N. SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OCEAN BREEZE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, Lots 1 - 8 , inclusive, Block 2 SEBASTIAN Little League Field located on Main Street, Sebastian and; WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to allocate Seven Thousand 1 Six Hundred Dollars ($7,600.00) of Revenue Sharing Funds for the purpose of improving the facilities and equipment used by the Muncipalities on the properties described; and WHEREAS, all parties agree that the monies allocated shall be under the control of the COUNTY Administrator to be disbursed in his discretion based on a plan submitted by the NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMMITTEE; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY shall allocate Seven Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($7,600.00) from Revenue Sharing Funds for the purpose of improving the recreation facilities and equipment in the Recreation Areas described above. 2. The CITY OF SEBASTIAN and the CITY OF FELLSMERE agree that when the COUNTY has established either a County -wide Recreation Program or a County Program, with boundaries encompassing the above described property, that both CITIES will permit their recreation facilities to be included in the COUNTY Recreation l Plan at no cost to COUNTY and further that the facilities will i 25 ;t c TRI -PARTITE RECREATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into the 18th day of February , 1976, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, CITY OF FELLSMERE AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN; .WHEREAS, the CITIES OF FELLSMERE and SEBASTIAN have requested the COUNTY for funds to improve recreational facilities located on the following described properties: WASHINGTON PARK, City of Fellsmere Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 97, TOWN OF FELLSMERE, according to the Plat filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, pages 3 and 4; said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. CITY OF SEBASTIAN ------------- 4.081 acres SUBDIVISION UNIT 16, TRACT N. SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OCEAN BREEZE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, Lots 1 - 8 , inclusive, Block 2 SEBASTIAN Little League Field located on Main Street, Sebastian and; WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to allocate Seven Thousand 1 Six Hundred Dollars ($7,600.00) of Revenue Sharing Funds for the purpose of improving the facilities and equipment used by the Muncipalities on the properties described; and WHEREAS, all parties agree that the monies allocated shall be under the control of the COUNTY Administrator to be disbursed in his discretion based on a plan submitted by the NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMMITTEE; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY shall allocate Seven Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($7,600.00) from Revenue Sharing Funds for the purpose of improving the recreation facilities and equipment in the Recreation Areas described above. 2. The CITY OF SEBASTIAN and the CITY OF FELLSMERE agree that when the COUNTY has established either a County -wide Recreation Program or a County Program, with boundaries encompassing the above described property, that both CITIES will permit their recreation facilities to be included in the COUNTY Recreation l Plan at no cost to COUNTY and further that the facilities will i 25 r i * Cities shall retain full ownership of all properties. i be used by all COUNTY residents on an equal basis. i 3. The Parties agree that the COUNTY Administrator will have complete control over the funds as allocated and he shall, without further authority, disburse in partial payments, the' necessary funds to pay for the improvements that are constructed according to the Plan of Improvement submitted by the NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMMITTEE. Said disbursement shall be made directly to the Contractors and L4uipment Suppliers based on invoices presented. All work shall be bid to the COUNTY Administrator's satisfaction prior to letting Contracts. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ByTJ' /� WiI lard W. biebert, yr. Chairman ATTEST: Clerk. r` Approved as to Form: County Aft rney CITY OF FELLSMERE / WOR . W. Mumik A EST: `1 c I Clerk Appproved as to Form: City At orney CITY OF SEBASTIAN . _ MAYOR O. EUGENE CR G-.. ATTEST: Clerk Approved as to rm: City Attorney FEB 18 197 '� e I i COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED TO THE BOARD THAT THE 911 PLAN WAS FORWARDED TO TALLAHASSEE WITH A COVERING LETTER STATING THAT AT THAT TIME WE HAD NOT RECEIVED THE CONCURRENCE OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE, BUT THAT IT WOULD BE FORTHCOMING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS NOW RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE CITY OF FELLSMERE STATING THEIR CONCURRENCE; AND THIS WILL i BE FORWARDED To-TALLAHASSEE. I COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE URBAN FORESTER, DALE I €-r, HAS EXPRESSED HIS DESIRE TO HAVE OFFICE SPACE WITH THE PLANNING, DEPARTMENT OR IN THE COURTHOUSE, OR IN THE DOWNTOWN AREAJAS 50% OF HIS WORK IS WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. THE CONTRACT WITH THE STATE FOR AN URBAN FORESTER IS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000.00, AND $1,500.00 IS PAID BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. THERE IS NOTHING IN THE CONTRACT THAT STATES THE COUNTY IS RE- SPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SPACE FOR THE URBAN FORESTER. THE URBAN FORESTER NOW HAS OFFICE SPACE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BUT THOSE OFFICES WILL BE VACATED BY MARCH 1, 1976. THE COUNTY HAS BEEN PROVIDING SPACE FOR THE URBAN FORESTER. COMMISSIONER WODTKE WAS REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND ASK IF THEY WILL PROVIDE SPACE FOR THE URBAN FORESTER WITH NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE AS IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THEM TO HAVE HIM IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. IF NOT, THE COUNTY HAS OFFICE SPACE FOR THE URBAN FORESTER IN THE AGRICUL- TURAL BUILDING ON STATE ROAD 60. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A STREET PAVING PROGRAM AND QUESTIONED IF THE BOARD WAS AGAINST SOME PROGRAM BEING ESTAB- LISHED. HE SUGGESTED $25,000.00 AS A BASE TO START A PARTICIPATION PROGRAM IN THE COUNTY. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WOULD CONTRIBUTE 1/2 OF THE TOTAL COST OF THE PROGRAM. THE CITY OF VERO BEACH HAS A PROGRAM SET UP ON A 2/3-1/3 RATIO. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH COUNCIL HAVE AGREED TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE BILL THAT IS TO BE INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE CHESTER CLEM AND KNOWN AS THE "CLEM BILL." THIS BILL WOULD PUT AN ANNUAL CAP OF 10 PERCENT ON TAX MILLAGE. THE CHAIRMAN IS SUGGESTING THAT THE ATTORNEY DRAW UP A RESOLUTIONw FOR CONSIDERATION REGARDING THE OPPOSITION TO THIS BILL. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE IS NOT OPPOSED TO THIS BILL, AND, IN FACT, IS IN FAVOR OF IT. •' r _y2_ i . f THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION AGREEMENT WHICH IS FULLY°SIGNED, WHICH QUALIFIES THE COUNTY TO RECEIVE 1975-76 STATE AID FUNDS FOR LIBRARY SERVICE, HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND IS BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. o 06 fEB 18 1976 2.5 rr_ 1 n' I 1 06 fEB 18 1976 2.5 rr_ 1 n' I t t FEB I " 1976 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES a APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR STATE AID TO LIBRARIES The Board of County Commissioners of INDIAN RIVER County hereby applies to the Division of Library Services of the Florida Department of State for an operating grant for public library service as authorized under Chapter 257, Florida Statutes, for the fiscal year begin- ning October 1, 1975, and ending September 30, 1976. We certify that the following amounts were expended for the opera- tion of public library service during the fiscal year ending September 30, 1974. Local Expenditures, October 1, 1973 - September 30, 1974 ...........$ 92,683,95- Less, 2,683,95,Less, State Aid ..................................$ 3,666 Less, LSCA Program Grants ........................$ 9.800 Less, Any Funds not Expended Centrally ...........$ 11,897.25 (workroom addition Total Local Expenditures Qualified for Matching We certify that the following amounts, exclusive of federal and state grants, will be available and expended for public library use during fiscal year 1975-76. County Appropriations (County funds from local $6113.60 sourcesonly) ................................. *City Appropriations (City funds from local $ sourcesonly) ................................. Other (specify) ......................... ................................................. * Append an affidavit from each city providing funds. TOTAL $77,080.00 This library service is provided through contracts with the follow- ing cities and counties: The yield of a one mill tax in this county is NA ` 76-A1 J The Applicant agrees to expend any grant(s) awarded pursuant to this Application and Agreement in full compliance with the terms and conditions of Chapter 257, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 1B-2, Florida Administrative Code, relating to county free public libraries and the State Library, which Chapters are incorporated by reference as part of this Application and Agreement and attached hereto. ---M-rk ofAhe C1 cuit�Lourf Chairman, Indian River Count Y SEP 2 197 5 Board of County Commissioners Date The Division of Library Services of the Florida Department of State acknowledges receipt of the aforegoing Application and hereby approves said Application for grant(s) in the total amount of $ 5,128 dated this 31 day of October 1975, at Talla see, Florida. 6" Attest: ��. CE C L P. BEACH, IRE OR Division of Library Services Florida Department of State I i FEB 1 1976 BQ�.r 25 Pd 05 � @ | ' ' THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, °U0TY, HAV2NG BEEN AUDlTED/ WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL FUND Nos. 5106 _ 5107 INCLUSIVE; ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND No. 2644 - 2645 INCLUSIVE; FINE AND FORFEIT- URE FUND NOS`^ 987 - 988 INCLUSIVE; AND TREASURY FUND 0Os" 50859 - 50958 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ' CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS GU ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS ' BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOON AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST 8O RECORDED BEING MADE & PART OF THESE MINUTES, THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:30 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: ` � � ^~ ��cnw ^ ^~^'~~r` ^ b�_- `° ~ � / { � �