HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/7/197614
a
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 1976
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN•RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA,
ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 1976, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W.
SIEBERT, .JR., CHAIRMAN: WILLIAM C. WODTKE, .JR., VICE—CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE
LOY; EDWARD J. 14ASSEY AND EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G.
.JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, COUNTY COORDINATOR;
GOERGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS;
.JACK HOCKMAN, FINANCE OFFICER, AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER LOY LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND
REVEREND .JILES B. LUNSFORD OF FOREST PARK BAPTIST CHURCH GAVE THE I.NVOCA—
TIONs
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1976.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT ON PAGE 1, 9TH PARAGRAPH,
"DR. PAULINE CALLOWAY, DISTRICT AGENT" BE CHANGED TO READ "DR. PAULINE
CALLOWAY, SUPERVISOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA EXTENSION SERVICE."
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT PAGE 45, PARAGRAPH 2, THE
WORD "SELL" BE CORRECTED TO READ "WELL," AND THAT IN THE SAME PARAGRAPH
"CHAIRMAN LOY" BE CORRECTED TO "COMMISSIONER LOY."
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REQUESTED THAT ON PAGE 6,.6TH PARAGRAPH,
IT BE CHANGED TO READ "THE RIGHT—OF—WAY IS PAID FOR..."
THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1976, AS WRITTEN.
.JOE EARMAN OF FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT APPEARED ACCOM—
PANIED BY MICHAEL SLATON OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. MR. EARMAN SPOKE
OF THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CLEAN—UP CAMPAIGN IN WHICH IT IS PLANNED TO
,,REMOVE DEBRIS, SUNKEN VESSELS, ETC., FROM THE WATERWAY. HE STATED THAT
•IN ORDER TO OFF—LOAD THE MATERIAL CLEARED FROM THE WATERWAY, THEY NEED
TO BE GRANTED A TEMPORARY SPOIL DISPOSAL EASEMENT IN WHICH THE COUNTY
WILL ALSO AGREE TO REMOVE THE MATERIAL OFF—LOADED TO A DISPOSAL SITE.
71976
Ll
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD REVIEWED THE
EASEMENT SUBMITTED AND FOUND IT TO BE IN PROPER FORM, BUT HE WOULD SUGGEST
THAT THE SPECIFIC AREA BE STAKED SO THERE COULD BE NO POSSIBLE PROBLEM
ABOUT WHERE THE DEBRIS IS TO BE PLACED. HE NOTED THAT HE HAD DISCUSSED
THIS WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR.
MICHAEL SLATON OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS STATED THAT HE HAS
BEEN WORKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH COUNTY COORDINATOR THOMAS, WHO HAS BEEN
OF GREAT HELP IN LOCATING OBJECTS THAT NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE WATER-
WAY.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE SIZE OF SOME
OF THE OBJECTS THAT MIGHT BE REMOVED FROM THE RIVER AS THE COUNTY COULD
HAVE DIFFICULTY HANDLING UNUSUALLY LARGE OBJECTS,
MR. SLATON EXPLAINED THAT SUFFICIENT NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN, AND
IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO LOAD DIRECTLY FROM THE BARGE ONTO COUNTY TRUCKS,
WHICH SHOULD ELIMINATE THE HANDLING PROBLEM,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE TEMPORARY SPOIL DISPOSAL
EASEMENT REQUESTED BY THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SUBJECT TO PROPER STAKING
OF THE DISPOSAL AREA, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
APR 7 1976
2
t
4
APR 7 1976
2
TEMPORARY SPOIL DISPOSAL EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this 7th day of April 1976
by and between the COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER, hereinafter referred
to As the Grantor, whose address is: County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, 32960
and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter referred to as the
Grantee, whose address is: c/o District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer
District, Jacksonville, P. 0. Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida, 32201.
WHEREAS, the Grantor is the owner or holder over the land herein-
after described and the Grantee requires the said land for the place-
ment of old piling, decking, and general debris,
NOW, THEREFORE, WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the premises and the benefits to
be derived and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant, bargain,
sell and convey unto the Grantee, and its assigns, a non-exclusive
Temporary Spoil Disposal Easement, for a period of twelve (12).months
from the.date of this document to the following described land
situated in the County of Indian River, State of Florida, to wit:
A parcel of land in Section 2, Township 32 South, Range
39 East, lying east of a paved road running east from
Winter Beach, Florida and being on the west bank of the
Indian River narrows. Said parcel being shown on the maps
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
for the following purpose:
For the placement of old piling, decking, and general debris
on said land described above that is removed by the Grantee from the
Intracoastal Waterway confined to the Indian River County area from
the North Boundary Line to the South Boundary Line.
7' ,kr _ 1-
�;A
'�•_ fes.:=
r
TEMPORARY SPOIL DISPOSAL EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this 7th day of April 1976
by and between the COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER, hereinafter referred
to As the Grantor, whose address is: County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, 32960
and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter referred to as the
Grantee, whose address is: c/o District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer
District, Jacksonville, P. 0. Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida, 32201.
WHEREAS, the Grantor is the owner or holder over the land herein-
after described and the Grantee requires the said land for the place-
ment of old piling, decking, and general debris,
NOW, THEREFORE, WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the premises and the benefits to
be derived and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant, bargain,
sell and convey unto the Grantee, and its assigns, a non-exclusive
Temporary Spoil Disposal Easement, for a period of twelve (12).months
from the.date of this document to the following described land
situated in the County of Indian River, State of Florida, to wit:
A parcel of land in Section 2, Township 32 South, Range
39 East, lying east of a paved road running east from
Winter Beach, Florida and being on the west bank of the
Indian River narrows. Said parcel being shown on the maps
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
for the following purpose:
For the placement of old piling, decking, and general debris
on said land described above that is removed by the Grantee from the
Intracoastal Waterway confined to the Indian River County area from
the North Boundary Line to the South Boundary Line.
It
� r �
Upon placing the old piling, decking, and general debris on
said land described above, title to the material is vested in the
Grantor and the material is then the responsibility.of the Grantor.
j By signing this easement, the Grantor agrees to remove and dispose of
I
the old piling, decking, and general debris in a manner that it will
1 not return to the Intracoastal Waterway and become a hazard to
navigation, which shall be accomplished at no cost to the Grantee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has set hereto his hand on the
i
day and year above written.
i
WITNESSES:
A,2
Chairman,
Board of County Commissioners
F
.
Attest*. -
Ralph ilarrls, Clerk
i
t
I
i
a
4
1
3
i
a
�#
;APR 7 0976
OPP' 25 225
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETRO -ACTIVE APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION
OF WILLIE OLIVER FOR ADMISSION TO THE A. G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLLS, CIRCUIT COURT,
FALL TERM, 1975, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $139.20.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,'SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION OF .JUDITH D. LEWIS FOR A
PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM.
DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPEARED REPRESENTING
ROGER SKILLMAN, AND REQUESTED.TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF WINTER BEACH PARK
SUBDIVISION. HE EXPLAINED THAT THIS HAS BEEN BEFORE THE SUBDIVISION RE-
VIEW COMMITTEE, AND THEY ARE IN FAVOR OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL BEING GRANTED
SUBJECT TO THE EXISTING TREES BEING•PRESERVED WHEREVER POSSIBLE AND A 50'
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND AN ADDITIONAL 5' EASEMENT ABUTTING THE EAST AND WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES BEING PERMITTED FROM SOUTH WINTER BEACH ROAD NORTH TO
THE INTERSECTION OF THE FIRST EAST AND WEST CUL-DE-SAC STREET. MR HOWARD
STATED THAT THESE CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE ACCORDING TO THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS
AND WOULD AFFECT THE TIER OF LOTS ON THE SOUTH END. ALSO, THEY WILL WORK
WITH THE URBAN FORESTER, DALE PATCHETT, IN REGARD TO THE TREES AND HOPE
TO BE ALLOWED NOT TO REMOVE ANY TREES THAT ARE JUST SLIGHTLY WITHIN THE
i
RIGHT-OF-WAY (NO MORE THAN 5').
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
1
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO WINTER BEACH PARK SUB-
DIVISION,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT DISCUSSION WOULD BE CONTINUED
IN REGARD TO THE REQUEST OF MR. AND MRS. .JOHN DRAGAVON FOR ABANDONMENT OF
A PARK AREA IN MELROSE PARK SUBDIVISION, WHICH HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY BROUGHT
BEFORE THE BOARD AT THE MEETING OF MARCH 211TH. HE ASKED ATTORNEY COLLINS
TO EXPLAIN THE LEGAL PROBLEMS INVOLVED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN RESEARCHING THIS
MATTER, HE HAD DETERMINED THAT WHILE THE COUNTY HAD ABANDONED A PARK IN
1963, THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY AVAILABLE AT THAT TLME HAS SINCE BEEN DE- w.
LETED. HE CONTINUED THAT HE COULD FIND NO SPECIFIC GRANT OF AUTHORITY
s, 5
APR 7 1976
ft
APR 7
WHICH WOULD ALLOW A MUNICIPALITY TO ABANDON OR VACATE A PARK PROPERTY
AND, THEREFORE, DID NOT FEEL THAT THE COUNTY COULD LEGALLY PROCEED ON THE
ABANDONMENT REQUESTED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE BROUGHT UP THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVING THE
EASEMENT WITHIN THE PARK.
MR. DRAGAVON NOTED THAT THE PARK UNDER DISCUSSION IS ONLY ABOUT
25 FEET WIDE NOW BECAUSE THE DRAINAGE DITCH TAKES UP THE REST OF THE AREA.
HE INQUIRED HOW THE PROPERTY OWNERS ACROSS THE STREET FROM HIM GOT AUTHORITY
TO PLANT IN THE PARK AREA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FELT THERE WAS'NOTHING INCONSIS—
TENT WITH THE LAW AS TO THE BALANCE OF THE PARK PROPERTY BEING PLANTED AS
LONG AS IT REMAINED DESIGNATED AS A PARK AND FELT MR. DRAGAVON IS ENTITLED
TO DO WHAT HIS NEIGHBORS ARE DOING.
MR. DRAGAVON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS PLANTED THERE IN THE
PAST, BUT THE CHILDREN JUST DESTROY THE PLANTS. HE STATED THAT HE ALSO
WATERS, FERTILIZES AND MOWS THIS AREA,
COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY HAS NEVER MAINTAINED
THIS PARK AND NOTED THAT THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS NEVER OBTAINED PERMIS—
SION TO PLANT IN THE PARK AREA; THEY JUST DID IT.
MRS. DRAGAVON ASKED WHY COULDN'T THE DITCH BE MOVED BACK WHERE
IT ORIGINALLY WAS? THERE IS NO LONGER A 40' PARK. THE CHILDREN HAVE BEEN
CHEATED OUT OF A PLACE TO PLAY, AND THEY VENT THEIR ANGER ON THE NEIGHBORS
BECAUSE OF THIS SITUATION. SHE ALSO NOTED THAT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
STREET A ROW OF TREES HAS BEEN PLANTED, SHRINKING THAT PARK AREA DOWN TO
ONLY ABOUT 10 FEET. SHE THEN QUESTIONED WHETHER IT HAD BEEN PROPER TO
MOVE THE DITCH IN THE FIRST PLACE.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THERE ARE LEGAL PROVISIONS
FOR ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENTS, AND THE ABANDONMENT OF THE EASEMENT AND SUB—
SEQUENT MOVING OF THE DITCH HAD BEEN ADVERTISED AND CARRIED OUT THROUGH
PROPER LEGAL PROCEDURE,
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THE DRAGAVONS FENCE THEIR PROP—
ERTY, BUT THEY FELT THEY COULD NOT PUT ONE UP THAT WOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH
TO BE EFFECTIVE.
1976 6
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS VISITED
THIS AREA AND LISTENED TO THE MANY SIDES PRESENTED BY THE PEOPLE LIVING
THERE, SOME OF WHICH ARE SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING LETTERS FROM MRS.
RYMER AND MRS. .JOINES.
dprtl.5, 1976
Chairman Siebert &
Members of the Board of
County Commissioners
Indian diver County
hero Beach, Florida
Be: Dedicated Park Areas in
Nelrose Gardens Subdivision
Due to my employment, I will be unable to attend the meeting
scheduled for the above referenced matter on April 7, 1976.
2'hts letter is written to voice my objections to the release,
abandonment, or any action whatsoever on the part of the -County
Commission on the above referenced property.
'I -am not the adjacent property owner to the park area on the
east side of .35th Avenue, next to Mrs. Dragavon, but I am the
adjacent property owner to dedicated park area on west side.
I researched the records when I purchased my property and purposely
purchased the lot adjacent to the park for property protection. There
were approximately five (5) homes in the area when I purchased my lot
so I had plenty to choose from. I realized that by owning this
particular lot, I would be assured of having more than 20 feet
between houses. If you abandoned this area, the owners now or future
will be able to make additions to their homes within ten feet of the
new property line. I realize that Mrs. Dragavon does not intend to
build on this area, but she may sell at a future date and I do not
believe you can transfer legal title to a piece of property and forbid
the owner to use it. This .would not invade my privacy, but the owners
next door to me will be able to do the same thing. Perhaps Mrs.
Dragavon feels her privacy is being invaded because of the park area,
but the situation existed when she purchased.
I appeared, along with Mr. Gerald Young, before the County Commission
On July 24, 1974 to ask for release of a 20 ft. easement north of said
park areas. We were granted the release and I paid $'205.00 to have
the Swale ditch moved to the park area.. I did not ask for this release
for a selfish reason. Mr. Young has a lot only 70 feet wide and his
existing gravel driveway was already on part of the easement. He wants
to concrete the driveway and had to have the easement released in order
to accomplish this. He went to the County Road & Bridge Department and
was told that he would have a better chance of releasing the easement
tf both property owners requested it. I did not need the additional
,footage but I ask for it to help my neighbor. If I would have thought
for .one minute I was trading my rights to the park area for the release
of. -the easement, you can rest assured that I would have forgotten the
whole idea. I was told prior to my request that the county would not
even consider releasing any part of a dedicated park area. There is
a definite need'for the county to maintain sufficient area for drainage
and future improvements.
; 7
' APR 7 1976-
'A
0
i
Fhen Mr. St. Pterre started developing the remaintng •lots to our
area, he went to the County Zontng Department on the posstbtltty
i of acqutrtng the park areas to use them as part of a homestte. He
was told that tt would be considered tf he supplied a petttton
contatntng signatures of 100 of the property owners. Mr. St.Pterre
started wtth the resident at the southwest corner of 35th Avenue and
1 12th Street. The owner refused to sign the petttton. The same
answer was given on the southeast corner. Mr. St.Pterre never made
tt to our end of the street because he realtzed that 100f agreement
was an tmposstbtltty. The parks remained and he developed wtthou t
them.
The county required the subdtvtder, Mr. Snyder, to dedicate these
i park areas before approval was given. I have to thtnk tt was for
a very good reason or I'm sure Mr. Snyder would have objected to
! gtvtng away 80 feet.of property.
j
' Our zontng ordinances are being adopted stressing open or green
area. I am against gtvtng away any open area. When you are to a
subdtvtston, with houses 20 feet apart, open area becomes very
Important.
I do not object to Mrs. Dragavon beauttfytng the park as long as
she assumes Ztabtltty for Injury received.as a result of children
beteg to this area (relating to dangerous or offensive plants).
Your consideratton to this matter wtll be greatly appreciated.
Yours t 1
Mrs. Ester° L. Rymer
3d -Z'
� �.�.�i,�,�.-�,. . `�° �''`e"�' � tri ... ��, •�.� cSL`cA" .
d-16
9 U 1�, �r t�-p �' � 3 S ' I
00-1
e
_..cveC4,
THE ADMINISTRATOR THEN SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY COULD ASSUME
.THE EXPENSE OF MOVING THE DITCH TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PARK, WHICH WOULD
• e
PUT IT NEXT TO MR. AND MRS. DRAGAVON'S LOT, AND THEN IF THE DRAGAVONS PUT
UP A FENCE, HE FELT IT MIGHT SOLVE THE PROBLEM. HE NOTED THAT A 20' EASE-;'
MENT MUST BE MAINTAINED FOR THE COUNTY FORCES TO WORK IN, BUT THE DITCH
DOES NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE THAT WIDE,
E`f
8
APR 7 1976 X19
9
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF AT THE SAME TIME THE COUNTY COULD
REMOVE THE TREES PLANTED IN THE PARK AREA ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET.
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ENTIRE PARK AREA COULD BE
CLEARED,
MR. DRAGAVON STATED THAT RATHER THAN HAVE THE COUNTY GO TO THIS
EXPENSE AND TROUBLE, HE WILL JUST TOLERATE THE PROBLEM AND WITHDRAW HIS
REQUEST.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS HAS
PREPARED A PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO THE D.U.T. IN REGARD TO AN ACCESS POINT
TO INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD. HE CONTINUED THAT HE FELT THIS MATTER COULD BE
RESOLVED SATISFACTORILY FOR ALL CONCERNED, AND ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT
WISHED TO SPEAK IN THIS REGARD.
a
LOMAX GWATHMEY, DIRECTOR OF VERO ISLES ASSOCIATION, APPEARED AND
STATED THAT THE ASSOCIATION HAD BEEN MISLED BY THE D.O.T. WHEN THEY RE—
VIEWED THE SITUATION WITH THEM IN DECEMBER, AS THEY WERE LED TO BELIEVE
THAT PARK AVENUE COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR AN ENTRANCE AS IT WAS TOO
CLOSE TO 21ST STREET, AND THEY WERE TOLD THAT ALL THAT WAS NEEDED TO HAVE
THE ENTRANCE PUT AT STARFISH DRIVE WAS A JOINT REQUEST FROM VERO ISLES
ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, WHICH HAS BEEN DONE.
I MR. GWATHMEY CONTINUED THAT NOW THE D.U.T. HAS APPARENTLY RE—
VERSED THE SITUATION AND GIVES ONLY TWO CHOICES, 21ST STREET OR 23RD STREET,
f
EITHER OF WHICH WILL DEGRADE SOMEONE'S PROPERTY. HE THEN REQUESTED THAT
BEFORE THE BOARD MAKES A RESOLUTION THEY EXPLORE WITH THE D.O.T. THE
I POSSIBILITY OF OFFSETTING 21ST STREET APPROXIMATELY 140 FEET TO THE NORTH
t
SO THAT IT WILL LINE UP WITH PARK AVENUE AS HE FELT THIS WOULD OFFER THE
LEAST OBJECTIONABLE SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM,
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHAT THE OBJECTION WAS TO KEEPING
21ST STREET STRAIGHT.
MR. GWATHMEY REPLIED THAT THIS WOULD DEGRADE THE PROPERTY OF
CHARLES PARKS AND WOULD, IN ADDITION, NECESSITATE TWO RIGHT—ANGLE TURNS
/
IN ORDER TO GET TO THE PUBLIC PARK.
i
' ROBERT GRAVES STATED THAT HE WAS MAINLY CONCERNED WITH THE NEED
FOR A TRAFFIC LIGHT AS THERE ARE QUITE A FEW ELDERLY PEOPLE LIVING IN VERO
ISLES, AND IT IS DIFFICULT TO ENTER THE TRAFFIC.
i
76 9
APR 7 6
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REMARKED THAT ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS FOR THE
OBJECTION TO AN ENTRANCE AT STARFISH DRIVE WAS THAT IT COULD NOT BE SIG-
NALIZED WHILE AT 21ST STREET, YOU COULD HAVE A TRAFFIC LIGHT. HE CONTINUED
THAT HE FELT THE OFFSETTING OF 21ST STREET COULD BE PRESENTED TO THE D.O.T.
AS AN ALTERNATIVE.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT SUCH AN OFFSETTING MIGHT
CAUSE PROBLEMS WHEN THE ROAD IS EVENTUALLY 4-LANED, AND HE DEFINITELY FELT
4 THE D.O.T. SHOULD STUDY THIS SUGGESTION.
COMMISSIONER Loy MADE A MOTION,SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR BE AUTHORIZED TO CONVEY TO THE D.O.T. THAT THE COM-
MISSION DESIRES THE STUDY OF AN OFFSET TO ALLOW 21ST STREET TO INTERSECT
INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD; THAT 21ST STREET IS THE PREFERRED LOCATION FOR THE
INTERSECTION; AND THAT OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL BE AUTHORIZED FOR THE ADMINI-
STRATOR AND CHAIRMAN TO ATTEND A MEETING WITH THE D.O.T. IN FORT LAUDERDALE
ON THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 1976.
IN DISCUSSION, COMMISSIONER WODTKE SAID HE WOULD LIKE TO BE SURE
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT WE WANT THE INTERSECTION AT 21ST STREET, BUT WOULD
LIKE TO ENCOURAGE THE D.Q.T. TO GO ALONG WITH THE REALIGNMENT WITH PARK
AVENUE IF AT ALL FEASIBLE.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MOTION.
CHARLES PARKS APPEARED AT THIS TIME AND EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD
THE VARIOUS PROBLEMS IT WOULD CREATE IF 21ST STREET CAME STRAIGHT ON TO
INTERSECT INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, WHICH WOULD BRING IT IN ON THE REAR OF
j HIS PROPERTY AND, IN HIS OPINION, WOULD DESTROY ITS VALUE. HE STATED HE
WOULD MUCH PREFER IT IF IT COULD BE REALIGNED WITH PARK AVENUE,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED GLADYS VIGLIANO, FORMER COUNTY WELFARE
DIRECTOR, TO COME FORWARD AND READ TO HER RESOLUTION N0. 76-21 ACKNOWLEDG-
ING HER RETIREMENT AND PRAISING HER FOR HER YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN PRESENTED HER WITH A SILVER TRAY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RESOLUTION N0. 76-21,
y
25 231
APR 7 1976 10
I
14
t
RESOLUTION No. 76-21
WHEREAS, GLADYS VIGLIANO is retiring from the position
of Indian River County Welfare Director, which' position she
has held since March 6, 1962; and
WHEREAS, during her tenure as the Indian River County
Welfare Director GLADYS VIGLIANO has contributed a great
--service to the residents of Indian River County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida wish to publicly*acknowledge GLADYS
VIGLIANO for her tireless years of service on behalf of Indian
River County;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER 'COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the
Commissioners praise GLADYS VIGLIANO for her many years of
dedicated service to the people of Indian River County and wish
her good health -and success in her future endeavors.
This Resolution shall become effective as of the -7th
day of April 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
;
IN:I R R ELO Fa,7IDA
BY,0
Willard W. fSibbert, Jr. C59
Ralpb-,Harrisa, Clerk
a
'A
s
0
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED TO THE BOARD IN REGARD TO THE
APPOINTMENT OF A CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR. HE STATED THAT MR. DONLON, PER-
SONNEL DIRECTOR, RECEIVED 16 APPLICATIONS FOR THIS POSITION. THESE WERE
REVIEWED AND RATED AND THEN HAD TO BE APPROVED BY THE AREA SUPERVISOR AND
TALLAHASSEE. THE TOP 6 WERE FORWARDED AS REQUIRED FOR SCREENING AND
APPROVAL, AND MR. DONLON RECEIVED A LETTER FROM MR. LAWSON OF THE DEPART-
MENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RECOMMENDING THREE APPLICANTS AS FOLLOWS:
STATE OF FLORIDA
04 BEST"T� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
WEI
W �
V R
REUBIN 0'D. ASKEW, GOVERNOR DIVISION OF
WILLIAM H. RAVENELL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS SECRETARY CENTRAL AREA
March 22, 1976
Ser. 76-132
Mr. Robert T. Donlon
Personnel Manager
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Donlon:
I have reviewed the applications and resumes of the six
applicants for the position of Disaster Preparedness Director.
The State Division of Disaster Preparedness recommends the
following applicants:
1. Thomas Stanley Medford
2. S. Lee Nuzie
3. James E. Towle, Jr.
Having such qualified applicants makes the process of selection
very difficult, but I am sure your personal observations will
lead you to the -wisest choice for the well being of the County.
Sincerely,
4K J
aures R. Lawson
JRL/7
t
AP 7 1976
Jct. Huey St. 8 SR 44-A, P.O. Box 207, Wildwood, Florida 32785 (904) 748-1616
I
12
2
Itt f jJ:/
{
COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IT IS HIS AND
MR. DONLON'S RECOMMENDATION THAT S. LEE NUZIE BE APPOINTED CIVIL DEFENSE
DIRECTOR EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL 19, 1976.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY COLLINS TO PREPARE RESOLUTION
N0. 76-23 APPOINTING S. LEE NUZIE CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR AT AN ANNUAL SALARY
OF $12,000.00, PRO -RATED ON A MINIMUM WORK SCHEDULE OF 50%, EFFECTIVE
APRIL 19, 1976, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
4
APR 7 197
e'
t
13
RESOLUTION NO. 7623
WHEREAS, The.Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, desire to appoint a new County
Civil Defense Director; and
WHEREAS, LEE NUZIE meets the County's standards for
the Civil Defense Director and has received approval from
the State Civil Defense Office;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that LEE
NUZIE is hereby appointed as Indian River County Civil
Defense Director at an annual salary of Twelve Thousand
($12,000.00) Dollars, prorated on time spent as County
Civil Defense Director, with•a minimum work schedule of
fifty percent (50%) of the time or twenty (20) hours per
week; and
BE IT FURTHER.RESOLVED, that this appointment shall
become effective April 19, 1976.
Such Resolution shall become effective as of the
7th day of April , 1976.
1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN%RIVER CO Y F RI
09
By �C f
W-11lard Sie ert, Jr. i an
'A' test: �
Ral arras, Clerk
. t
l
APR 7,,1976
s
Put 25; ?A 235
G
COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT WHILE INTERVIEWING APPLICANTS
FOR THE POSITION OF CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, THEY ALSO TALKED WITH THEM
EXTENSIVELY ABOUT -THE 911 PROGRAM AND THE POSSIBILITY OF THIS BECOMING A
FULL-TIME POSITION, AND HE FELT THAT WE HAVE APPOINTED A MAN WHO CAN WORK
IN THIS DUAL CAPACITY WHEN IT IS NEEDED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WITH THE BOARDS APPROVAL HE WOULD
WRITE A LETTER TO MAYOR JAY SMITH THANKING HIM FOR HELPING US OUT BY
SERVING AS INTERIM DIRECTOR OF CIVIL DEFENSE AND !NOTIFYING HIM THAT THIS
POSITION HAS NOW BEEN FILLED, WITH COPIES BEING SENT TO THE AREA SUPERVISOR
AND THE DIVISION OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.
THE BOARD AGREED,
ATTORNEY COLLINS PRESENTED A PROPOSED RESOLUTION IN REGARD TO
SETTING UP A CITIZENS RECREATION COMMITTEE WHICH HE STATED HE HAD REVIEWED
WITH COMMISSIONER Loy.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 76-22.
15 eo�2 Q�236
t
e
,; j
�, �r'
RESOLUTION NO. 76-22
WHEREAS, on March 9, 1976 the citizens of Indian
River County voted on a Recreation Question'and the result
of that vote was that a majority of the voting residents
throughout Indian River County, including its municipalities,
felt that recreation was a proper function of government;
and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is attempting to establish
a Recreation Program throughout the County; and
WHEREAS, to further the aims of establishing a
Recreation Program, it is deemed by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that a
Citizens Advisory Committee be designated to supply
input into the creation of a County Recreation Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that a
Citizens Recreation Committee for Indian River County
is hereby established and said Committee shall be made
up of seven (7) members, which members shall come from
diverse areas and backgrounds, and shall be appointed by
the Indian River County Commission and serve at its
pleasure; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Committee when
established shall formulate its own rules and procedures
and shall commence its function of helping to establish
a County -wide Recreation Program that will be satisfactory
to all segments of Indian River County.
j Such Resolution shall become effective as of the
7th day of April , 1976.
• R'� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY /F,LORIDA
V161
• Willar W. Siebert, Jr. C airman
Attest:
1 h Ha is, .,Clerk
APR 7
197 --''•... ` „ Bevy .?� .237
. g ^,*,�m';•� ',kms, ,'`�'
7",
�a,a�R""i -`a°'R t ;`rP
} � �'._ �.�.kY` ° i��*:.- l�'�4� � i� � _ t �y5,e a }�,� '
G
i
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT PROCEDURES SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED
i
FOR SETTING UP THE CITIZENS RECREATION COMMITTEE, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT
ASKED COMMISSIONER LOY TO RESEARCH THIS MATTER,
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND
STATED THAT HE HAS GATHERED QUITE A LOT OF INFORMATION ON THIS MATTER FROM
MR. BRENNAN, COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR, AND WOULD LIKE SOME DIRECTION ON
HOW THE BOARD WISHES HIM TO PROCEED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE BOARD HAD PREVIOUSLY ASKED THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO COME UP WITH A PACKET SUMMARIZING THE INFORMATION
! GATHERED SO FAR, AND THE BOARD IS AWAITING THIS INFORMATION BEFORE MAKING
ANY FURTHER DECISION.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FELT AT SOME POINT THERE SHOULD
BE A WORKSHOP SESSION IN THIS REGARD TO MAKE SOME DECISIONS AS TO WHAT
FORM OF P.U.D. WE WOULD PREFER AS P.U.D. HAS A GREAT DEAL OF FLEXIBILITY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS MEET
WITH MR. BRENNAN TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE ANTICIPATES THE
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY IN THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
FOR PARK PURPOSES WILL BE CLOSED ON PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING AND HE
WOULD LIKE TO BE SURE THE CHAIRMAN HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SIGN THE DOCUMENTS
NECESSARY TO CLOSE ON THIS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, AND
COMMISSIONER Loy SAID SHE WANTED TO BE SURE ALL THE EXPENSES INVOLVED WITH
THIS TRANSACTION ARE TAKEN FROM REVENUE SHARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN AND THE ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE
1
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE A CONTRACT FOR SALE ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED
AS: The South one-half of Government Lot 9 less the North 620
feet thereof; and Government Lot 10 less the South 1070.63
feet thereof all in Section 19, Township 32 South, Range
40 East and lying East of State Road AIA; also the North 320
feet of the South 1390.63 feet of Government Lot 1, lying
West of the East 10.69 acres of said Government Lot 1,
Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Indian River
County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of Pebble Beach Develop-
ment No. 2 according to a plat filed in Plat Book 7, page 83A, j
Public Records of said Indian River County and running thence
N 89' 53'• 24" E, 421.88 feet-along.the South boundary of said
t Pebble Beach Development No. 2; Thence, run S. 00 06' 36" E,
20.00 feet along said South boundary; Thence, run N 890 53' 24"
E, 344.28 feet to the Southeast corner of Pebble Beach
Development No. 2; Thence, South 0° 22' 34" E, 320 feet along
' the West boundary of the East 10.69 acres of said.Government
Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 E; Thence,
i S 89° 53' 24" W, 654.33 feet more or less to the Easterly
right-of-way of State Road AIA; Thence, N'17* 54' 12" W,
357.06 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning,
Containing 5.386.acres more or less. ,
17
2
197
4
AND AGREED THAT ALL EXPENSES INVOLVED IN THE PURCHASE OF THIS PIECE,OF
LAND BE PAID FOR OUT OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS; THAT THE FINANCE
OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE A CHECK IMMEDIATELY UPON REQUEST OF THE
CHAIRMAN AND THE ATTORNEY; AND THAT THE CHAIRMAN BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS AS AUTHORIZED BY ATTORNEY COLLINS.
�7/%
f CONTRACT FOR SALE
1
RICHARD GALE, Individually and as Trustee,
the Owners, in consideration of the sum of $ 5, 000.00 received from
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
the Buyer, hereby, on this 7th day of Auril 1976, agrees to
sell to the Buyer, and the Buyer hereby agrees to buy from the Owner, for the
purchase price of $ 200, 000.0 0 (of which the consideration paid for
this contract is a part), the real property in Indian River County, Florida, de-
scribed as:
•' i
i The South one-half of Government Lot 9 less the North 620
feet thereof, and Government Lot 10 less the South 1070.63
feet thereof all in Section 19, Township 32 South, Range
40 East and lying East of State Road AlA; also the North 320
feet of the South 1390.63 feet of Government Lot 1, lying
West of the East 10.69 acres of said Government Lot 1,
Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Indian River
County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of Pebble Beach Develop-
ment No. 2 according to a plat filed in Plat Book 7, page83A,
Public Records of said Indian River County and running thence
N 890 53' 24" E, 421.88 feet along the South boundary of said
ti Pebble Beach Development No. 2; Thence, run S. 00 06' 36" E,
20.00 feet along said South boundary; Thence, run N 890 53' 24"
E, 344.28 feet to the Southeast corner of Pebble Beach.
Development No. 2; Thence, South 00 22' 34" E, 320 feet along
the West boundary of the East 10.69 acres of said Government
Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 E; Thence,
S 890 53' 24" W, 654.33 feet more or less to the Easterly
right-of-way of State Road AlA; Thence, N 170 54' 12" W,
357.06 feet more or. less to the Point of Beginning,
Containing 5.386 acres more or less.
and further agree that:
Buyer
1. Within 15 days after the date of this contract, the VWMMr
will pay for and deliver to the Buyer evidence of title in the form of an abstract
of title prepared by an abstracter licensed to do business in Indian River County,
Florida, purporting to be an accurate synopsis, of the instruments affecting the
title to that real property recorded in the public records of that county to the
date of this contract, showing the title to be conveyed to be
ye good and marketable.
14
2. If the evidence of title shall meet the requirements above speci-
fied, the Buyer shall have 45 days after delivery thereof to pay, the
balance of the purchase price, the amount paid as consideration for this con-
tract being credited thereupon. If the Buyer shall not do so within that time,
the Owner g4x�gslq�pkxrx€ct4�xC'X
terminate
MaNY4 this contract, and if the Owner shall elect to terminate this contract,
the amount paid as consideration for this contract shall not be refunded, but
shall be retained as liquidated damages.
3. If the evidence of title shall not meet the requirements above
specified, and the Buyer shall so notify the Owner in writing within 20
days after delivery, specifying the defects, The Owner shall have 120 days
after receipt of that notice to cure the defects, and will in good faith exercise
due diligence to do so. If the defects are cured within that time, the Owner
shall so notify the Buyer in writing and the Buyer shall have to days
after receipt of that notice to pay the balance of the purchase price; and if the
Buyer shall not do so within that time, the Owner)dWlcMVMMI=M-Vf,,t
terminate this
I�cl�t� contract, and if the Owner
shall elect to terminate this contract, the amount paid as consideration for
this contract shall not be refunded, but shall be retained as liquidated damages.
If the defects are not cured within that time, the Buyer shall have l0 days
after expiration of that time to pay the balance of the•purchase price notwith-
standing the defects; and if the Buyer shall not do so within that time, the
Owner will promptly refund the full amount of the consideration paid for this
contract, and this contract shall terminate.
4. Upon receipt of the balance of the purchase price within the time
allowed, the Owner will promptly execute and deliver to the Buyer a good and
sufficient warranty deed, containing all the usual common law covenants of
title, conveying that property to the Buyer in fee simple.
5. Either party failing to comply with the terms of this contract
will pay all expense, including a reasonable attorney's fee, incurred by the
R 7 197
I
w
r
2. If the evidence of title shall meet the requirements above speci-
fied, the Buyer shall have 45 days after delivery thereof to pay, the
balance of the purchase price, the amount paid as consideration for this con-
tract being credited thereupon. If the Buyer shall not do so within that time,
the Owner g4x�gslq�pkxrx€ct4�xC'X
terminate
MaNY4 this contract, and if the Owner shall elect to terminate this contract,
the amount paid as consideration for this contract shall not be refunded, but
shall be retained as liquidated damages.
3. If the evidence of title shall not meet the requirements above
specified, and the Buyer shall so notify the Owner in writing within 20
days after delivery, specifying the defects, The Owner shall have 120 days
after receipt of that notice to cure the defects, and will in good faith exercise
due diligence to do so. If the defects are cured within that time, the Owner
shall so notify the Buyer in writing and the Buyer shall have to days
after receipt of that notice to pay the balance of the purchase price; and if the
Buyer shall not do so within that time, the Owner)dWlcMVMMI=M-Vf,,t
terminate this
I�cl�t� contract, and if the Owner
shall elect to terminate this contract, the amount paid as consideration for
this contract shall not be refunded, but shall be retained as liquidated damages.
If the defects are not cured within that time, the Buyer shall have l0 days
after expiration of that time to pay the balance of the•purchase price notwith-
standing the defects; and if the Buyer shall not do so within that time, the
Owner will promptly refund the full amount of the consideration paid for this
contract, and this contract shall terminate.
4. Upon receipt of the balance of the purchase price within the time
allowed, the Owner will promptly execute and deliver to the Buyer a good and
sufficient warranty deed, containing all the usual common law covenants of
title, conveying that property to the Buyer in fee simple.
5. Either party failing to comply with the terms of this contract
will pay all expense, including a reasonable attorney's fee, incurred by the
R 7 197
I
I
0
"0i
other party because of that failure.
6. Ad valorem taxes for the year in which the balance of the pur-
chase price is paid will be pro -rated between the parties. The premium on
any hazard insurance policy in force covering any improvements on the prop-
erty will be pro -rated between the parties or the policy will be cancelled, as
the Buyer may elect. All pro -rating will be as of the date the balance of the
purchase price is paid.
7.
Costs and charges incident to this transaction will be paid as
follows:
(a)
Contract for sale
Buyer
(b)
Deed
Buyer
(c)
i
Note and mortgage
(d)
Stamps on deed
Buyer
(e)
Stamps on note
(f)
Tax on mortgage
(g)
Recording deed
Buyer
(h)
Recording mortgage
(i)
Abstract of title
Buyer
(j)
Examination of Abstract
Buyer
(k)
Title insurance
r
API
8. Possession of the property shall be transferred from the Owner to
the Buyer simultaneously with delivery of the warranty deed and payment of the
balance of the purchase price,
9. In the interpretation of this contract the singular shall be the
plural and vice versa whenever the context requires or common sense admits.
10. The Buyer may have the property surveyed and the corners
thereof established by a registered land surveyor, at the expense of the
_ Buyer . Encroachments either way .across the boundary lines of the
property or violated building restriction, set -back lines or governmental
-3-
- 242
t
I
zoning ordinances or resolutions shall ipso facto make the title to be conveyed
to be bad and unmarketable.
11. Mortgages, liens and other encumbrances on the property, when
specified as defects by the Buyer, may be satisfied by the Owner simultaneously
with delivery of the warranty deed and payment of the balance of the purchase
price, provided that proper satisfaction instruments and the cost of recording
the same are then and there delivered to the Buyer.
12. Neither public utility easements on, in or under not larger than
five foot strips along the rear or side boundary lines of the property nor un-
violated restrictions or covenants imposing no greater restriction of use than
is imposed by existing governmental zoning ordinances and resolutions shall be
deemed defects in title, provided, however, that any right of reverter or con-
dition with right of re-entry for breach shall be deemed a defect in title.
13. The Buyer will pay the balance of the purchase price by
$200,000.00 cash at.time of Closing of which
this deposit shall be a part.
14. Seller agrees to convey all of its interest in the sewer
plant and related fixtures and equipment located on the subject
property by Bill of sale,.free and clear of all liens and encumbrance*
15. The following Agreements by third parties are a condition
to Buyer making the above described purchase. In the event any of
the third parties fail to join in this Document as to the provision
affecting them, agreeing to that provision's terms, then Buyer at
its election may terminate this Contract:
A. EDGAR L. SCHLITT hereby individually agrees to enter
into a Contract with INDIAN RIVER COUNTYupon terms previously discussed
and acceptable to both the attorney for EDGAR L. SCHLITT and the
attorney for INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
INDIAN RIVER and TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC.
B. X= UTILITIES; INC./ hereby agrees to convey
a Quit Claim Deed to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, conveying any interest the
corporation may have in the described.property and a Bill of Sale con -
4
1.
veying any interest the corporation may have in the utility sewer plant
and related utility fixtures and equipment and Agreements entered into
by the corporation with third parties relating to the utility plant.
In consideration thereof, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY and INDIAR gil R
UTILITIES INC., agree that they will enter into a separate Contract
INDIAN RIVER
which shall
provide that 3M UTILITIES, INC. shall at its
expense continue to operate and maintain the sewer plant without
any ownership interest therein until such time as a governmental
body provides sewer service to the area now serviced by the sewer
INDIAN RIVER
plant. During the duration of the Contract term,
UTILITIES, INC. shall receive all income generated from the sewer
plant's operation. The parties agree that the Contract to be
entered into may be terminated by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY only for
cause after proper notice. The parties agree that during the
term of the Contract, the sewer plant may not be expanded although
additional hookups may be added up to its present capacity.
dear. L. S,ch.l.itt
i C. PEBBLE BAY, INC., by and througi 3�s surviving Trustee,
shall convey all of its interest in the sewer plant and related
utility fixtures and equipment, including the Franchise, to INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY by.appropriate Bill of Sale, free and clear of all
encumbrances.
i
D. EDGAR L. SCHLITT, as Trustee, snall assign all of
f
hin interest in the sewer plant and related Agreements to Indian
River County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the natural parties hereto have set their
hands and seals and the corporate parties have caused this contract
to be executed in their names by their duly authorized officers
and their corporate seals to be affixed, all in
counterparts, on the day and year first above written.
i Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presences of:
olooll
Richarda e, n ly and as
Trustee
Ato Gale
! SELLER
_1.976_ - _
• s
INDIAN RIVER COi�NT '
By i%x"tel
Attest:
As to India iv County
{ BUYER
EDGAR L. SCHLITT, individually and as Trustee, hereby executes this
c
Aqreement as to Paragraph No. 15-A an 15
ga L ch tt, indii ually and as
Tr ee
TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC. hereby agrees to execute this Agreement
as to Paragraph 15-B.
TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC.
By
Attest:
As to Treasure Coast Utilities, Inc.
PEBBLE BAY, INC. hereby agrees to execute this Agreement as to Paragraph
15-C.
PEBB , C
By
gar .� tt, as Trustee
AtiMISIM
INDIAN RIVER UTILITIES, INC. hereby agrees to execute
this Agreement.
INDIAN RIVER UTILITIES, INC.
By:
r,1
As to Indian River Utilities, Inc.
,
0
0
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By
Attest:
As to Indian River County
BUYER
EDGAR*L. SCHLITT, individually and as Trustee, hereby executes this
ement as to Paragraph No. 15-A a -D
dga L itt, i ividually and as
► Trustee
. Schlitt
TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC. hereby agrees to execute this Agreement
as to Paragraph 15-B.
f TREASURE CO UTILITIES,
By
50,
40 -
Attest:
Ws fo Treasure Coast Utilities, Inc.
PEBBLE BAY, INC. hereby agrees to execute this Agreement as to Paragr:1:
15-C.
PEB
By j
ga tt, ,Ia.,£' Trustee
As t e Bay, Inc.
INDIAN RIVER UTILITIES, INC. hereby agrees to execute
this Agreement.
INDIAN RIVER,,51LITIES, IN
By-
Ab
y:Aa to Indian River UWlitieb, Inc.
j i
PR 7 1976 Des' 25),a.;1246
It
El
U
ATTORNEY'COLLINS REPORTED THAT IN REGARD TO THE URBAN DEVELOP-
MENT UTILITIES WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENT, HE HAD JUST RECEIVED A SIGNED
COPY OF THE SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, FARMERS
HOME ADMINISTRATION, SUBORDINATING THEIR RIGHTS ON FIRST INCOME TO THE
RIGHTS OF THE COUNTY FOR FEES TO WHICH THE COUNTY WOULD BE ENTITLED. THE
ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT THIS AGREEMENT ALSO CALLS FOR PUTTING THE CITY OF
VERO BEACH ON NOTICE AS TO THE COUNTY'S INTENT TO USE PART OF THEIR WATER
ALLOCATION FOR THIS PURPOSE AND STATED THAT HE NEEDS THE BOARD'S AUTHORITY
TO PUT THE CITY ON NOTICE.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE ATTORNEY ADVISE THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
AS STATED ABOVE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT BY ORDINANCE 74-26 A
ZONING CATEGORY KNOWN AS "MP" (MARINE PARK) DISTRICT HAD BEEN CREATED, AND
STATED HE WOULD LIKE AT THIS TIME TO ADVERTISE THE SPOIL ISLANDS FOR RE-
ZONING TO MARINE PARK DISTRICT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE A PUBLIC HEARING
IN REGARD TO REZONING THE SPOIL ISLANDS TO MARINE PARK DISTRICT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THE BOARD THAT SOMETIME AGO THE PEOPLE
LIVING ALONG .JUNGLE TRAIL ATTEMPTED TO HAVE.THIS NAMED A "SCENIC DRIVE,"
AND IT TURNED OUT THAT THIS INVOLVES COMPLYING WITH A NUMBER OF STATE AND
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE
ADMINISTRATOR AT LENGTH AND THEY HAVE WORKED WITH COUNTY COORDINATOR
THOMAS GATHERING INFORMATION, AND HE WOULD NOW SUGGEST THAT THE COUNTY
FILE A MAINTENANCE PLAT ON .JUNGLE TRAIL IN ORDER TO MORE READILY ESTABLISH
THE COUNTY'S OWNERSHIP OF THIS ROAD. THIS WOULD BE AN ACTION INDEPENDENT
OF THE "SCENIC DRIVE" REQUEST PREVIOUSLY MADE,
COMMISSIONER MASSEY ASKED IF THE ADMINISTRATOR HAD SURVEYS OF
THE ENTIRE ROAD OR JUST THAT PORTION OF .JUNGLE TRAIL STARTING AT WABASSO
ROAD AND RUNNING SOUTH TO WINTER BEACH RIGHT-OF-WAY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED.THAT HE HAS SURVEYS OF .JUNGLE TRAIL
RUNNING BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH FROM WABASSO ROAD, BUT THE PORTION NOW UNDER
DISCUSSION IS JUST THAT PORTION FROM WABAS30 ROAD SOUTH,
APR 7 1976-
26
14
0
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO FILE A MAINTENANCE
PLAT ON JUNGLE TRAIL SOUTH OF WABASSO ROAD.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MARTIN COUNTY HAS
FILED A BILL WITH THE LEGISLATURE ATTEMPTING TO MAKE IT GENERAL LAW TO
RE-ENACT THE POWERS OF THE BOARD OF TAX ADJUSTMENT OVER THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER. THE INTENT OF THIS BILL IS TO RE-ESTABLISH THE PRESUMPTION OF
CORRECTNESS ON THE BOARD OF TAX ADJUSTMENT ON THOSE APPEALS THAT GO UP TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE WHEN THE BOARD OF TAX ADJUSTMENT MAKES A DECISION
CONTRA TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECOMMENDATION. ATTORNEY COLLINS CON-
TINUED THAT MARTIN COUNTY HAS ASKED FOR OUR SUPPORT, AND AFTER REVIEWING
THE MATTER, HE SEES NO OBJECTION TO THE COUNTY SUPPORTING THIS BILL, IF
IT IS SO INCLINED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT AS IT STANDS NOW,
THERE IS A PRESUMPTION THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IS CORRECT, AND EVIDENCE
MUST BE PRESENTED TO REFUTE HIS RECOMMENDATION. THIS PROPOSED BILL WOULD
REVERSE WHO HAS TO PROVE HIS CASE; I.E., THE PROPERTY APPRAISER WOULD HAVE
TO PROVE THE TAX ADJUSTMENT BOARD WAS INCORRECT.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED HE FELT THERE WAS NOT MUCH POINT
IN HAVING A TAX ADJUSTMENT BOARD IF THE DECISION AUTOMATICALLY REVERTS
BACK TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECOMMENDATION.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED
BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO
DRAW UP RESOLUTION NO. 76-24 SUPPORTING THE BILL PROPOSED BY MARTIN COUNTY
AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
27 aoac u.snt 28
t
27 aoac u.snt 28
RESOLUTION NO. 76-24
i
WHEREAS, a Bill amending Florida Statute 193.122 (1)
providing for a presumption of correctness with respect
to changes made by the Board of Tax Adjustment in the
______Property Appraiser's Rolls has been submitted to the
Legislature for approval; and
4
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida desires to pass this Resolution
supporting said amendment to Florida Statute 193.122 (1);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the
Legislature of the State of Florida amend Florida Statute
193.122 (1) by providing a presumption of correctness with
respect to changes made by the Board of Tax Adjustment in
the Property Appraiser's Rolls.
Such Resolution shall become effective as of the 7th
day of April , 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By r
Willard W. Siebert, Jr. airman
Attest:;2Z����
,'. Ralph rris, Clerk
e
25 A+atU
• e t•
0
ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT ST. LUCIE COUNTY IS PROPOSING A
BILL TO BE SENT TO THE LEGISLATURE THAT WILL REVOKE THE AUTHORITY OF A
COUNTY OFFICIAL TO APPROPRIATE COUNTY FUNDS FOR PURPOSES SET OUT BY THE
STATE LEGISLATURE, UNLESS APPROVED BY A REFERENDUM;'AND ALSO THAT SUCH
REFUSAL BY A COUNTY OFFICIAL TO APPROPRIATE SUCH FUNDS SHALL NOT BE GROUNDS
FOR HIS REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THIS MATTER
BE.REFERRED TO..THE CHARTER COMMISSION FOR STUDY.
!
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT COPIES OF THIS PROPOSED BILL BE
GIVEN TO ALL OF THE COMMISSIONERS SO THEY COULD STUDY IT ALSO.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO
ST. LUCIE COUNTY SET UP THE MACHINERY TO OPERATE A D.W.I. (DRIVING WHILE
INTOXICATED) SCHOOL FOR A FOUR -COUNTY AREA, AND HE HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT
ABOUT $20,000.00 HAS GONE INTO THE GENERAL FUND OF ST. LUCIE.COUNTY FROM
THIS SCHOOL. HE CONTINUED THAT THE COURTS IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SENTENCE
PEOPLE TO ATTEND THIS SCHOOL, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS OF THIS PRO-
GRAM ARE CREATING A TERRIBLE PROBLEM FOR THE COURTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS
STATED THAT THE GENERAL TREND NOW IS FOR EACH COUNTY TO HANDLE THEIR OWN
D.W.I. CHARGES, AND HE FEELS WE SHOULD SET UP AND OPERATE OUR OWN D.W.I.
SCHOOL IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THIS SCHOOL RUNS ON A FEE SYSTEM
AND PAYS FOR ITSELF.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ANSWERED THAT IT DEFINITELY DOES, WITH A SURPLUS.
i
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS
SHOULD CONTACT COUNTY .JUDGE STIKELETHER TO DISCUSS SETTING UP THE MACHINERY
TO OPERATE SUCH A SHCOOL IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS REPORTED TO THE BOARD ON THE RESTRICTING
OF TRAFFIC ON 43RD AVENUE AND 27TH AVENUE SOUTH OF OSLO ROAD. HE EXPLAINED
1
THAT WHEN THIS WAS ORIGINALLY POSTED, "THRU TRUCK TRAFFIC" WAS INTERPRETED
i
TO MEAN INTERSTATE TRUCKS. IT WAS NOT INTENDED TO AFFECT LOCAL CITRUS
'
TRUCKS, BUT, ON THE CONTRARY, THIS WAS ACTUALLY MEANT FOR THEIR BENEFIT.
,,APPARENTLY OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, THE CONCEPT OF THE IDEA HAS CHANGED,
f
AND LOCAL DEPUTIES HAVE BEEN ENFORCING THIS RESTRICTION ON ALL TRUCKS,
1
THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT HE HAS HAD CALLS FROM A NUMBER OF CITRUS
PEOPLE WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE REASSURED THAT LOCAL TRUCKS ARE ALLOWED TO USE
I
THESE AVENUES.
F
_
29 Boot 25 ;ray;=.250.
Ll
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SAID THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS
PROBLEM WITH THE SHERIFF AND HAVE HIM DISCUSS IT WITH HIS DEPUTIES AND
POSSIBLY POST SOME NOTICES IN TRUCK STOPS AS HE FEELS THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT
HAS BEEN LOST SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO ALLOW
THE ADMINISTRATOR TO DO THIS AS A GREAT DEAL OF CONFUSION HAS ARISEN.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FEELS THERE IS A REAL PROBLEM
AS HE DOESN'T FEEL YOU CAN INTERFERE WITH INTERSTATE COMMERCE AND NOT
TREAT IT THE SAME AS LOCAL TRUCKS, ESPECIALLY AS THESE ARE STATE ROADS.
THE BOARD SUGGESTED THE ADMINISTRATOR CHECK THIS MATTER WITH
THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NEXT BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
BOARD THE REQUEST MADE BY NORMAN GREEN, ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY, FOR RENO—
VATION OF THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN THE COURTHOUSE AT AN ESTIMATED
COST OF $1,218.71.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY AN AUXILIARY OFFICE
AND A CONVENIENCE FOR THEM AS THE COUNTY PAYS RENT FOR SPACE IN THE PRO—
FESSIONAL BUILDING FOR THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON WHETHER THERE WERE FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR
SUCH RENOVATION AND WHETHER IT WAS REALLY NECESSARY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO NOTIFY MR. GREEN
THAT THE COUNTY DOES NOT HAVE ANY FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR RENOVATION OF COURT—
HOUSE OFFICES AT THE PRESENT TIME,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD A REQUEST HAD BEEN
RECEIVED FROM THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE TO LEASE 18 ACRES OF PROPERTY
AT THE OLD COUNTY DUMP ON OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, AS PER THE FOLLOWING LETTER:
i
s
i
a i
APR 7 19761
14
a
Affiliated with
F.O.P. National Lodge
VERO BEACH LODGE No. 69
Post Office Box 1588
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960
March 31, 1976
Mr. Willard W. Siebert, Jr.
Chairman, Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Siebert:
We are respectfully requesting a lease on eighteen (18)
acres of property at the County Dump on Old Dixie Highway
and South Relief Canal; boundries 600 feet along the South
Relief Canal commencing from the North-South Canal as
indicated on the aerial map. .
This property will be used for:
1. To build a weapons training range that will be used in
the training of Police Officers of this county.
2. For further training of Police Officers in other phases
of law enforcement.
3. Erect a building to be used by the Fraternal Order of
Police.
4. To work with the underprivileged children of our
community.
5. For training citizens in this community in the use of
firearms and self defense for their protection in the
home.
6. A family picnic area with the following facilities
planned for the future:
a. Softball Field
b. Recreation, gym, and meeting building
c. Camping area
d. Tennis and handball courts
e. Archery range
f. Man-made lake (for water safety)
Respectfully submitted,
G. E. Fitzgeya�d, President F.O.P.
-77
i'
APR 7 1976
252
L
1
i
i
i
t
i
-i
a
Affiliated with
F.O.P. National Lodge
VERO BEACH LODGE No. 69
Post Office Box 1588
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960
March 31, 1976
Mr. Willard W. Siebert, Jr.
Chairman, Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Siebert:
We are respectfully requesting a lease on eighteen (18)
acres of property at the County Dump on Old Dixie Highway
and South Relief Canal; boundries 600 feet along the South
Relief Canal commencing from the North-South Canal as
indicated on the aerial map. .
This property will be used for:
1. To build a weapons training range that will be used in
the training of Police Officers of this county.
2. For further training of Police Officers in other phases
of law enforcement.
3. Erect a building to be used by the Fraternal Order of
Police.
4. To work with the underprivileged children of our
community.
5. For training citizens in this community in the use of
firearms and self defense for their protection in the
home.
6. A family picnic area with the following facilities
planned for the future:
a. Softball Field
b. Recreation, gym, and meeting building
c. Camping area
d. Tennis and handball courts
e. Archery range
f. Man-made lake (for water safety)
Respectfully submitted,
G. E. Fitzgeya�d, President F.O.P.
-77
i'
APR 7 1976
252
L
1
0
i
THE ADMINISTRATOR QUESTIONED WHETHER 600 FEET WAS ACTUALLY
NEEDED.
L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, COUNTY COORDINATOR, STATED THAT THEY HAVE
ACTUALLY ASKED FOR THE OPTIMUM AND POINTED OUT THAT -THIS WOULD NOT BE A
SALE BUT AN IS YEAR LEASE SO THAT AT -THE END OF 18 YEARS ANY IMPROVEMENTS
WOULD BECOME COUNTY PROPERTY.
--- CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THIS IS BEING REQUESTED AS A SORT OF
SOCIAL FUNCTION FOR THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT THE MAIN PROJECT IS THE PISTOL
RANGE, BUT THERE WILL BE SOCIAL ACTIVITIES.
THE QUESTION AROSE AS TO WHETHER YOU WILL HAVE TO BE A MEMBER
OF THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE IN ORDER TO USE THE PROPOSED FACILITIES.
MR. THOMAS STATED THAT HE FELT THIS NORMALLY WOULD BE JUST FOR
THE MEMBERS, BUT NOTED THAT IN THE LEASE YOU COULD STIPULATE WHO WOULD BE
ALLOWED.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT MOST OF THE PROPERTY IN
` THIS AREA IS RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AND STATED HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT A PISTOL
RANGE IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO DEFER THIS MATTER
UNTIL MORE INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED, AND THE BOARD INSTRUCTED THE
COUNTY COORDINATOR TO CONVEY TO THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE THAT WE ARE
! CONCERNED BECAUSE OF THE ZONING AND THE PROXIMITY TO RESIDENCES AND TO
DETERMINE IF THEY WOULD CONSIDER SUCH A LEASE PROVIDED THE FACILITIES RE-
FERRED TO ARE FOR THE CONTROLLED USE AND BENEFIT OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST
FROM CHIEF .JUDGE D. C. SMITH FOR A SOLID DOOR TO REPLACE THE HOLLOW DOOR
WHICH OPENS FROM HIS OFFICE INTO THE CIRCUIT COURTROOM AS HE HAS A SERIOUS
PROBLEM WITH VOICES BEING HEARD THROUGH THE HOLLOW DOOR, WHICH INTERFERES
WITH PROCEDURES TAKING PLACE BOTH IN THE CIRCUIT COURTROOM AND IN HIS
PERSONAL OFFICE.
i
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,i
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO COMPLY WITH .JUDGE
t
SMITH'S REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF A SOLID DOOR6
j
#pu 25 F1453
32
� I)
1
APP 7 1976
41
1
o
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE INDIAN RIVER
SAFETY COUNCIL IS PROMOTING A DEFENSIVE DRIVING CAMPAIGN FOR THE MONTH
OF APRIL, WHICH IS TRAFFIC SAFETY EMPHASIS MONTH, AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO
OBTAIN COMMITMENTS FROM LOCAL BUSINESSES TO INVOLVE•THEIR EMPLOYEES IN
THIS CAMPAIGN. HE CONTINUED THAT A NUMBER OF THE NEW ROAD AND BRIDGE
DEPARTMENT DRIVERS HAVE NEVER TAKEN THIS.COURSE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO PAY
THE $2.00 FEE FOR EMPLOYEES IN HIS DEPARTMENT TO TAKE THIS COURSE. HE
STATED THAT TAX COLLECTOR GENE MORRIS HAS ALREADY AGREED TO DO THIS sFOR
THE EMPLOYEES IN HIS DEPARTMENT,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT THE INDIAN RIVER SAFETY COUNCIL
WILL PUT ON THIS PROGRAM AT THE COUNTY GARAGE IN THE AFTERNOON AFTER THE
CLOSE OF WORK, IF THE BOARD PERMITS, AND ALSO HERE IN THE COMMISSION ROOM
FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE COURTHOUSE COMPLEX. THE ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDED
THAT WE GO INTO THIS PROGRAM AND THAT THE OTHER OFFICERS IN THE COURTHOUSE
WORK WITH HIM IN THIS REGARD,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED PAYMENT OF FEES TO THE INDIAN RIVER SAFETY
COUNCIL FOR PROVIDING THE DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE FOR THOSE DEPARTMENTS
UNDER THE COUNTY COMMISSION.
THE ADMINISTRATOR REPORTED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER DATED
APRIL 1ST FROM THE ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
IN REGARD TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRAINAGE OUTFALL DITCH FROM THE NEW
HOSPITAL SITE TO THE INDIAN RIVER. HE STATED HE WILL DISCUSS THIS MATTER
WITH THE D.O.T. AT THEIR MEETING IN FORT LAUDERDALE TO SEE IF IT CAN BE
COORDINATED WITH THEIR DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THE BARBER AVENUE AND INDIAN
RIVER BOULEVARD PROJECTS.
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN
AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS
ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL FUND NOS. 5113 - 5114;
ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND NOS. 2651 — 2652; FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND NOS. 993 -
994; AND TREASURY FUND NOS. 51384 - 51502 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND
ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT,
APR 7 1976
33
I
THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE
SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE
AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART
OF THESE MINUTES,
TWERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT I1:I5 O'CLOCK A.M.
ATTEST:
CLER
34 x� INA OFt 255
-
A