HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/6/1976WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1976
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA,
ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1976, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, .JR., CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., VICE
CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE LOY; EDWARD J. MASSEY; AND EDWIN S. S'CHMUCKER. ALSO
PRESENT WERE .JACK G. .JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY"
THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JACK HOCKMAN, FINANCE OFFICER;
AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER MASSEY LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,
AND REVEREND RAYMOND COPPAGE OF KING`S BAPTIST CHURCH GAVE THE
INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER ZZ, 1976.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED THAT ON PAGE 4, THIRD LINE FROM THE
BOTTOM IT BE CHANGED TO READ "...CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THAT MRS.
FORLANI,...."
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT ON PAGE 40, IN RESOLUTION NO. 76-67
THE DISTRICT NUMBERS AS SET OUT IN PARAGRAPH 3 INADVERTENTLY HAD BEEN
REVERSED. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT ROBERT GRICE HAS NOT MOVED INTO
DISTRICT 3, BUT HAS BEEN LIVING THERE ANP A CHANGE IN GUIDELINES HAS
NECESSITATED THAT APPOINTEES REPRESENT THE DISTRICT WHERE THEY RESIDE,
COMMISSIONER LOY STATED THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS HAS PREPARED A RESOLUTION
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76-67 IN THESE PARTICULARS.
r
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0, 76-73 AMENDING RESOLUTION
No, 76-67 AS ABOVE.
CT 61976
�tja, t 0�
I
RESOLUTION NO. 76-73
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76-67
WHEREAS, ROBERT GRICE was appointed to the Indian
River (bunty Zoning Commission as an appointee from District 5;
and
WHEREAS, the criteria for appointments has changed;
and
WHEREAS, the appointive seat from District 3 has
recently been vacated through a resignation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That ROBERT GRICE
shall continue to serve his term as a Member of the Indian River
County Zoning Commission but shall serve as appointee from
District 3 rather than District 5.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that
Resolution No. 76-67 is hereby amended by rewording Paragraph 2
and correcting Paragraph 3 to read District 3 instead of Dis-
trict 5.
This Resolution shall become effective as of the
6th day of October, 1976. i
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN IVER COUNTY, LORIDA
By
Willard/W.!Si bert, J firman
Attest: e- xi A A47A .
Ralph Ham is, Clerk � _
Book 27 ?A^T 02
I
THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY.COMMISSIONER
Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER ZZ, 1976, AS WRITTEN.
DISCUSSION AROSE AS TO THE REQUEST OF .JUDITH WAKEFIELD FOR
OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL TO GAINESVILLE, AND IT WAS DECIDED TO HOLD THIS
MATTER FOR DISCUSSION UNTIL DR. CALLOWAY ARRIVES AT THE MEETING THIS
AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT DR. CALLOWAY HAD EXPLAINED TO
HIM THAT THE REASON MRS. WAKEFIELD HAS TO ATTEND SO MANY MEETINGS OUT
OF COUNTY IS THAT SHE IS SERVING IN A DUAL CAPACITY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CARRY
A CONCEALED FIREARM OF MARK LADERWARG.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REQUESTED FINANCE OFFICER HOCKMAN
TO EXPLAIN HIS REQUEST TO ADVERTISE A PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO
APPROVING AN AMENDED BUDGET.
FINANCE OFFICER HOCKMAN EXPLAINED THAT WHEN THE BUDGET WAS
PREPARED LAST YEAR WE HAD NO IDEA OF RECEIVING A GRANT FROM H.U.D.; ALSO
WE HAD NOT FIRMLY PLANNED TO SPEND ANY REVENUE SHARING FUNDS OTHER THAN
THOSE BUDGETED AND WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE ANOTHER PARK. THESE
ARE ITEMS THAT WERE NOT ON THE ORIGINAL BUDGET BUT ARE PROVIDED BY
OTHER FUNDS. HE NOTED THAT THE BUDGET CAN ONLY BE CHANGED WHEN THERE
ARE UNANTICIPATED REVENUES FOR WHICH AN APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION MAY BE
MADE. HE POINTED OUT THAT IF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS NOT MADE, WE
WILL NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY FROM THE CONTINGENCY FUND TO COVER THESE
ITEMS AND STATED THIS IS THE ONLY LEGAL WAY TO AMEND A BUDGET.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADVERTISING A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD
8:45 O'CLOCK A.M., WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1976, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
APPROVING AN AMENDED BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS:
H.U.D. GRANT - GENERAL FUND $300,000 GRANT
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND $203,116 PARK
SECONDARY ROADS TRUST FUND $200,000 MAINTENANCE
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ISSUING DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATES
3
OCT 61976
BtQ` 2% ya 03
OCT 81976
TO THE FOLLOWING:
TRI -COUNTY ACCEPTANCE CORP. - TAX SALE CERTIFICATE #847
MILDRED J. LONG - TAX SALE CERTIFICATE #62
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ATTACHED LIST OF CLERKS AND INSPECTORS
TO HOLD AND CONDUCT THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
2, 1976,
1.
4
scot 27 y: 0�
N IT I C E
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County has this day selected the Clerks -and Inspectors
of the several voting precincts to hold and conduct the'General
Election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1976.
Precinct No: I j Roseland) Community Hall
Clerk ,',Beckya Cri fines
Inspectors, f?e ra`ti3) Vergie Herbert, Claudia P. Norris
Sylvia B. Scocoizo
Precinct No. lA (Fellsmere) Fellsmere City Hall
Clerk, Elaine Carter
Inspectors, Myrtle Frisby, Eva King; Gladys Chard,
Dorothy Bussey
Precinct No. 1B (Sebastian) Sebastian City Hall
Clerk, Gladys M: Donnelly,
Inspectors, Magdalen Storch, Janet C. Baptiste, Lydia
Gulledge, Marguerite M. Dillon, an
pe Townsefjit--
Precinct No. 1C (Wabasso) Wabasso School Building
Clerk,
Clerk, Alma L. Robertson
Inspectors, Betty Wintermute, Murield McMechan,rraine
Z`fialfan Pauline Jones, Patsy Cadenhead �'-"-"
Precinct No. 2 (Winter Beach) Old Winter Beach School Building
Clerk, Ruby Williams
Inspectors, (Helen Laura E. Hurst, Eunice Walker,
Tedi E nnell ) -
Precinct No. 2A (Northwest Vero Beach, outside city limits) Clemanns
School
Clerk,.Lula Carlsward,
Insper-Urs, Margaret C. Griffis, Dorothy L. Friburg,
John "P: -Sawyer, Helen Whi tesi ¢e,�f�iitH111 �-Wi ni_fred -Zentner
Precinct No: 2B Country Club Pointe Area) Elks Club Building
Clerk, Joseph H. McLoughlin -.-
Inspectors ,
._Inspectors, Ruth Havenner, Violet_.E.• Wobfter, FIffie C. Rogers')
Precinct No. 2C Gifford area) Indian River Middle School 7
Clerk, Walter M. Jackson
Inspectors, Willie Mae Darrisaw, Beulah Dupree, Omie P.
Sanders, Anna L. Lane, iHettie•EngIisYi Smith;*"Audre;y B. Hunter
Precinct No. 2D (North AlA - outside city limits) Indian River Shores
Town Haig
OCT 61976
C1erk,.E`:'RI: Eichman
Inspectors,.'Eliiabeith H. Schwerin,Q.David M.'Alleny..LKatherine
�Alfenn John S. Parker;
05
Precinct No. 3 - (North Vero Beach City limits) Cultural& Physical
Arts Center 14th Avenue
Clerk, Roseanne .Helseth
Inspectors, A. Gladys_McNulty� Maureen M. O'Brien,
LVlasti -Boo th;'Harvey Booth,1,_Gladys Lem Diana Quesnel
Precinct No. 3A - (South Vero Beach) YMCA 16th Street
Clerk ,'George-0_._._Russe l 1.
Inspectors,,Kathryn McCarthy, Beatrice Goodwin; Elinor Wilk-
inson, Patricia Brengle, AAliceT._fiurch'am Edith Plondke
Precinct No. 3B - Southwest Vero Beach, outside City limits) Asbury
Methodist Church 43—r—venue
Clerk, Mamie S.mi-th
Ins pectors_.ddn.a__Kc.Dapiel;>Ellen Rushton, Harriette Jackson,
rEl izaibeth Johns ori: dred Johnson C!6il Erat,
Precinct No. 3C - (South Vero Beach, outside citY limits, east of 27th r
Avenue. an west o rai roaGlendale ant it IIM, a
Clerk,"George A. Leach`
Inspectors, Adell Fletcher,',phyliss R. Bards ley t Barbara
;`A.'Hildreth; Jeannette Matysuk, Eunice Wood,,,Anne K. Dixon
Anna -'L." Rochowi ak Susan A. _S.1gafoed,, Eleanor Creswell,
Nellie Koch.
Precinct No. 4, South Vero Beach- Youth Center - 19th Street
Clerk, Jean Acer,,_ _.
Inspectors, -Rose Yantz, Mae Weaver, Florence Hilliard,
Pearl Cook, Clinton H. Stocker, John G. Vicek
Precinct No. 4A,(S..14. Vero Beach, outside city limits, west of 27th
Avenue, to 74th -Avenue an Hort o t treet S.,w.T Citrus Schoo
Clerk, C. C. Carden
Inspectors,' Sue .Ann. tlusick_;juby �41air; Leah Rad.zikowski'l
Eloise Bowling, Elise Hi11s, Patricia Prange"--'—'"
Precinct No. 4B (East Vero'Beach and Oslo) Comm -unity Center at Vero
Beach Highlands 21st. Road S. W.
Clerk, Dorothy...Yount,
Ins pectors,,Cecilia:.Nasbir, Althea Smulbach, Glenn F. Joyce,
Mary S. Southerland, Frances I.-Sherman;�Marion Erbj Sharon
-MacKenzie
L- ...__.,.. -....- .•.
Precinct No. 5 - (Vero Beach, East of railroad) Carpenter's Hall, corner
of 2th Avenue an 26th Street
Clerk, Helen Bass
Inspectors, -Alberta Hillen, R. L. Bass,(�Evelyn Schneider;
LM(ftl—J9.4o-G.ordy;_Dorgthy Scott Hpgan,30edys Marie Smftfi 1
.(J!L phine Schmidt, la. W. Pugh-C�
Precinct No. 5A -.(Vero Beach, east of Indian River,'south of
Clerk, Betty Lloyd
Inspectors, Betty Ann Monroe,Anita R. Flinghum; Elizabeth
Coppy,<Alice Dunlap-, Viola L. Serapfiine;Ug ine_Bonelli-,�
Michael F. Baird
OCT 61976 06
OCT 61976
Precinct No. 5B - Southeast Vero Beach, west of Indian River
Rockridge Community Bul ng
Clerk, Joseph F. Blake,
Inspectors, Charles E. Thomas, Corinne M. Blake, Aleda Dixon,
(Hazel�I. Coeyma`�ri? 'Martha Leeper,Z Grace Mel l uizo�
Precinct No. 5C - Vero Beach, east of Indian River, North of Beachland
Blvd.) Jaycee Building North AIA
Clerk, Victor Fucigna'�
Inspectors; -Henrietta Clark 'Elizabeth Jeffrey; Sandra
L. Bowden,, Josefa Kunert„R4%h� E . Brown> John J. Sushko,
Madeleine Kimsey�'�
Dated this the 6th day of October, 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
IF YOU CANNOT SERVE, PLEASE CALL RALPH HARRIS, CLERK 569 - 1200
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, CIRCUIT
COURT, SPRING TERM, 1976, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $250.80; $64.56; $123.00;
AND $50,00.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD FOR 1975-1976, AS RECEIVED AND PLACEDU ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RETROACTIVE OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS TO ATTEND A MEETING WITH
THE D.O.T. IN FORT LAUDERDALE ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1976.
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, COUNTY COURT, FOR AUGUST, 1976, WAS
RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION HAS A
VACANCY FROM HIS DISTRICT AND HE WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND THAT MARK FALB
BE APPOINTED AS THE DISTRICT 5 REPRESENTATIVE.. HE READ TO THE BOARD
A RESUME' ABOUT MR. FALB, WHO IS SECRETARY OF RALMAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
AND A DEVELOPER OF LUXURY CONDOMINIUMS AND ALSO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES
IN CACHE CAYE, AND STATED THAT HE HAS TOTAL CONFIDENCE IN MR. FALB'S
HIGH STANDARD OF ETHICS,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0, 76-69 APPOINTING MARK.FALB
DISTRICT 5 REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INDIANIRIVER COUNTY ZONING COMMISSION.
H
wear 97 08
Fil
CT 61976
RESOLUTION NO. 76-69
WHEREAS, the Representative from District 5 on the
Indian River County Zoning Commission has moved to District
3; and
WHEREAS, there now exists a vacancy on the Indian River
County Zoning Commission from District 5; and
WHEREAS, Commissioner Siebert desires to appoint MARK
FALB to fill the vacancy on the Indian River County Zoning
Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That MARK
FALB is appointed as the District 5 Representative of
the Indian River County Zoning Commission to be effective
immediately.
This Resolution shall become effective as of the 6th
day of October , 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN VER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By.�VeW� ://, 1/4" 1 712
Willard . Sieber. , Jr. , an
Attest:--3�j��
Ra rlf`H�a'r , Clerk
®,9,
J
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INTRODUCED VISITING SENATORS, PHILIP LEWIS,
DON CHILDERS AND HARRY A. .JOHNSTON, WHO DISCUSSED VARIOUS MATTERS BRIEFLY
WITH THE BOARD AND THEN RETIRED TO THE ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE TO MEET WITH
THE PUBLIC.
S. P. MUSICK, SURVEYOR, APPEARED REQUESTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL
OF EXECUTIVE MANOR SUBDIVISION AND STATED THAT THE CHANGES REQUESTED BY
THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN MADE; THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG
WALKER AVENUE CANAL HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM 30 TO 35 FEET, ETC.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS STATED THAT HE WAS SATISFIED WITH THE
REVISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO EXECUTIVE MANOR SUBDI-
VISION.
DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPEARED REQUESTING
TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF CRYSTAL SANDS II SUBDIVISION ON BEHALF OF BRYANT
CARTER. HE NOTED THAT THIS IS LOCATED NEAR THE NEW RECREATION PARK IN
GIFFORD AND HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE.
° DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND DRAINAGE DITCHES, AND
MR. HOWARD STATED THAT THE STREETS WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY AND
PAVED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO CRYSTAL SANDS II SUB-
DIVISION.
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO• -WIT:
10
OCT 61976
eoo� 97 Flo
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a `7/etc/
in the matter of'ifs%
in the Court was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of D e 197
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach; in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this y f- A.D. /9?
(Business Manager)
(SEAU (Clerk of thoOlfircuit Court Indian River County, Florida)
.ti
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
Of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will receive bids to the hour of
9:30 A.M. Wednesday, October 6, 1976, for sale
to the said county of the following materials.
Asphaltic Concrete; hauling and spreading
Asphaltic Concrete; creosote lumber; lime
rock; corrugated metal pipe; aluminum pipe;
"O" ring concrete pipe; gasoline & diesel fuel;
ready mix concrete; road base construction for
lime rock; soil cement and mixed in place;
liquid asphalt; traffic and street signs.
Instructions to Bidders, Specifications and
special bidding blanks for signs are available
Of the Office of the County Administrator,
Room 115, County Court House, or will be
mailed on request. Bids for materials other
than signs should be submitted on your let.
terhead or bidding forms.
The Board of County Commissioners
reserves the right to reject any or all bids and
to make awards in such manner as they can.
Sider to be In the best Interests of Indian River
County.
Bids for each item shall be in separate en.
velopes securely sealed and plainly marked 6n
the outside to show the material being bid on,
the item number as shown in the specifications
and the date and time of the opening. The bids
may be mailed or delivered to the Office of the
County Administrator, Room 115, County Court
House, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Proposals
received after 9:30 A.M. October 6, 1976,.will be
returned unopened.
Board Of County Commissioners
of Indian River County
Florida
By: W. W. Siebert Jr., Chairman
Sept. 9. 12, 1976.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
i
— 11
ao 27pai
I
October 6 Meeting of Board of County Commissioners
Bid Opening for Materials - Annual Requirements
Item #
Material
Name of Firm Submitting
Bid
1
Asphaltic Concrete
Dickerson Inc.
Stuart, FL
2
Placing Asphaltic Concrete
Dickerson Inc.
Stuart, FL
Pan American Engr. Co.
Vero Beach, FL
3
Piling - Southern Pine
The Langdale Co.
Valdosa, GA.
Koppers Co.Inc.
Gainsville, FL
4
Lumber - Southern Pine
Koppers Co. Inc.
Gainesville, FL
5
Limerock
Dixie Lime & Stone Co.
Atlanta, GA.
6
Asphalt Coated Steel Pipe
Southern Culvert
Pinellas Pk. FL
Gator Culvert Co.
Lantana, FL
+
P.B. Tank & Culvert Co.
W.Palm Beach, FL
7
Aluminum Metal Pipe
Southern Culvert
Pinellas Pk. FL
Gator Culvert Co.
Lantana, FL
P.B. Tank & Culvert Co.
W. Palm Beach, FL
8
Concrete Pipe
Southern Culvert
Pinellas Pk, FL
Carns Concrete Pipe Co.
Orlando, FL
9
Petroleum Products
Treasure Coast Oil Inc.
Ft. Pierce, FL
McMillian Oil
Vero Beach, FL
Earman Oil Co.
Vero Beach, FL
Standard Oil Co.
Tampa, FL
10
Mixed Concrete
Russell Concrete Co.
Vero Beach, FL
11
Soil Cement Base
Pan American Engr. Co.
Vero Beach, FL
Dickerson Inc.
Stuart, FL
12
Liquid Asphalt
E.A.Mariani Asphalt Co.
Tampa, FL
13
Limerock Base
Dickerson Inc.
Stuart, FL
Pan Americen Engr. Co.
Vero Beach, FL
14
Mixed in place base
Pan American Engr. Co.
Vero Beach, FL
15
Signs
Vulcan Signs & Stampings,Foley,
AL
Dave Smith & Co. Inc.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
McCain Sales of F1a.Inc.
Ft. Pierce, F1
Municipal Supply & Signs
Naples, FL
Corp.
1976
OCT 61976
aor 27 �Q�r2
OCT 61976
THE FOLLOWING LIST OF SPECIFICATIONS PERTAINS TO THE
FOREGOING BIDS,
Item Number SPECIFICATIONS
1. Unit price per ton on approximately 500 tons or Type II
Asphaltic Concrete Surface Course Material in accordance
with Florida State Department of Transportation specifica-
tions, delivered F.O.B. Vero Beach in various quanities
and at various times as needed.
2. Unit price per ton, for approximately 5000 tons, fo- hauling
spreading by an approved mechanical spreader, and finishing
Type II Asphaltic Concrete Surface Course Material, all in
accordance with Florida State Department of Transportation
specifications.
3. Unit price per foot on approximately 2,000 linear feet of
12 pound pressure treated creosote southern pine lumber.
Price to be for truck load lots of approximately 1,000 linear
feet delivered to County Garage. Piling to have a minimum 12"
diameter at butt and 8" diameter at tip in accordance with
Florida State Department of Transportation specifications.
Bid prices should be made on piling lengths of 20 feet;
25 feet; 30 feet and 35 feet.
4. Unit price per 1,000 board feet on approximately 7,000 board
feet of 12 pound pressure treated creosote southern pine
lumber in approximately 7,000 board feet truck load lots
delivered to the County Garage for sizes as follows:
A. 12" x 12" x 26' length F. 4" x 8" x 12' length
B. 3" x 10" x 28' G. 3" x 8" x 16' "
C. 4"x 8"x14' H. 40x10"x16' "
D. 12" x 12" x 22' " 1. 10" x 10" x 16' "
S. Unit price per ton on approximately 150 tons of pit run, N.iami
Oolite, Ocala, or Naranga type road rock meeting Florida State
Department of Transportation specifications. Price'F.O.B.
Vero Beach, Florida.
6. Unit price per foot bid on asphalt coated corregated metal pipe
for any available gauge for approximately 800 linear feet depend-
ing upon the County's requirements. Sizes, ranging from 10" dia-
ttieter to 96" diameter. Delivered to the County Garage.
7. Unit price per foot bid on aluminum metal pipe for any available
gauge for the County's requirements ranging in sizes from 10"
diameter to 96" diameter delivered to the County Garage.
8. Unit price bid on "O" Ring Rubber and/or Neoprene Concrete
pipe for any available gangs for approximately 200 linear
feet depending upon the County's requirements. Sizes ranging
from 10" diameter to 72" diameter. Delivered to the County
Garage.
9. Approximately 100,000 gallons of hi -test gasoline and approxi-
mately 65,000 gallons of diesel fdel all in accordance with the
specifications and bid proposal forms available at the office
of the County Administrator, Room 115, Court House, Vero Beach,
Florida.
10. Unit price per yard for approximately 300 yards of 3,000 pound
ready-mix concrete for the pouring of bridge slabs at the
County Garage. Also unit price per yard for approximately
100 yards of 2,500 pound ready-mix concrete delivered in as
little as one yard quantities for miscellaneous pours at
various points in the County for bridges. headwalls and curbs.
11. Unit price bid per square yard for six inch depth soil cement
in amounts and in areas as requested by the County. The County
to furnish base material graded ready for mixing, to furnish;
grading of mixed material and final hard planing. Contractor to
furnish all necessary equipment for processing in accordance
with Indian River County's specifications for cement stabilize-
tion of base course. Bid :o be on basis of a cement percentage
of 8% by volume. Contract price adjusted on the basis of, five
cents per square yard per one percent increase or decrease in
cement percentage by volume. Seal coat shall be a minimum of
.15 gallon of RC-19 asphalt per square yard, the sanding of
the seal coat to be furnished by the County. All work to be
in accordance with County Specifications. County to furnish
initial tests and processing controls.
12. Unit price per gallon for approximately 5.000 gallons of asphalt
grade RC-ls and/or RS-2; approximately 10.000 gallons of asphalt
grade AC-15. Material to meet. Florida State Department of Trans-
. Paz'
qr
portation specifications. Prices quoted shall be based on deli-
very at Vero Beach, Florida, in 4,000 gallon truck load lots. Bids
• dhall specify waiting time allowed, charges for waiting time
Y and charges for return shipment of order made for direct delivery
on job site.
.13. Unit price per square yard for six.inch depth of limerock, per
Florida State Department of Transportation specifications, in ,
amounts and in areas as requested by the County. The County.
to furnish subgrade and drainage ready for base material. Contrac-
tor to furnish all necessary equipment for compacting, and water
equipment. Base to be inspected at county's expense and contrac-
tor must produce base to meet County's requirements. Seal Coat
shall be a minimum of •15 gallon of RC-ls asphalt per square
the sanding of the seal coat to be furnished b the County.
Yazd • 4 Y Y
All work shall be in accordance with County Specifications. The
base width furnished by the County shall be within reasonable
limits. No forms shall be furnished. Notice of prepared subgrade
completion shall be given to the contractor and if deterioration
of prepared work is caused by delay in contractor beginning
work, the contractor shall rework road ready for base material
subject to the approval of the County Administrator. County
to furnish initial final grade stakes. Replacement of grade
stakes during contractor's operation shall be furnished by the
contractor. Base shall be a minimum of 20' - 6" in width with
a full 6" depth. Reasonable deterioration of prepared subgrade
�- ahead of the base work shall be restored by the contractor. If
j weather deteriorates the road bed prepared by the County after
jset date of beginning.of contract, it shall be the contractor's
responsibility to replace sate. This 'is limited to base course
construction and not to shoulders, drainage, etc.
14. Unit price per square yard for a 6" mixed-in=place base on the
basis of a mixture of three gallons per square yard of asphalt
in amounts and in areas as requested by the County Administrator.
Also the price per gallon per square yard. The contract price
will be adjusted by the combination of these bid figures in
order to determine the final price per square yard based on the
actual quantity of asphalt used. There will be no reduction of
contract price if the amount of asphalt used is less than three
gallons per square yard. The contractor to furnish all necessary
equipment for the adding of asphalt in proper quantities, proper
mixing and the final grading and compaction in accordance with
Indian River County Specifications. The County to furnish the
• base material graded and ready for mixing. The contractor shall
furnish a seal coat to be a minimum of .15 gallon of RC-ls
asphalt per squarc'yard. Srnding of the seal coat to be furnish-
ed by the County. The County will also furnish initial tests and
processing control.
,i 35. Unit price bid for stop signs, street signs, and various other
signs and hardware all in acdordance with specifications and.
f bid proposal forms at the office of the County Administrator. 9
Room 115, Indian River County Court house. Vero Roach, Florida.
15 I
I
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED TO THE
ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS REPORTED ON THE NEED TO
CONSIDER PROJECTS FOR USE OF MONIES AVAILABLE UNDER THE LOCAL PUBLIC
WORKS ACT OF 1976 (TITLE 1). HE NOTED THAT PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING
INCLUDE COURTHOUSES, LIBRARIES, SCHOOLS, POLICE AND FIRE STATIONS, WATER
AND SEWER LINES, STREETS AND ROADS, CIVIC CENTERS, ETC. HE CONTINUED
THAT WE ARE VERY ELIGIBLE, HAVING THE THIRD HIGHEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IN
THE STATE,
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT THIS MIGHT BE THE PLACE TO
CONSIDER GETTING THE MONEY TO PUT US IN THE WATER BUSINESS AS SHE FEELS
WATER IS NOW THE PRIMARY NEED IN THE COUNTY, AND ACCORDING TO THE
.GUIDELINES, SUCH A PROJECT WOULD QUALIFY.
JAMES BEINDORF, COUNTY ENGINEER, STATED THAT HE ALREADY HAS
A SET OF PLANS AND COULD BE READY TO GO WITHIN 90 DAYS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THIS WOULD INVOLVE THE ACQUISITION OF
URBAN DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES.
MR. BEINDORF ANSWERED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THAT WAS INVOLVED AS
THIS PROJECT WOULD BE MAINLY TO RUN A TRUNK LINE UP THERE AND ADD
STORAGE, BUT NOTED THAT ULTIMATELY THE U.D.U. SYSTEM WOULD NEED TO BE
ACQUIRED BY THE COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE FELT THIS WOULD BE THE TOP
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT AND NOTED IT WOULD REQUIRE CONSULTATION WITH FHA
AND OUR ENGINEERS. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER FNA WOULD STILL BE
INVOLVED AS THIS WOULD BE AN OUTRIGHT GRANT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT ANOTHER AREA WE MUST ADDRESS VERY
SHORTLY IS THAT OF SOLID WASTE ALTHOUGH HE DOUBTED WE COULD HAVE PLANS
READY IN TIME, AND COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT THE TIME ELEMENT WOULD
PROBABLY ELIMINATE THIS PROJECT.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATER THOMAS NOTED THAT AS FAR AS THE
BILL IS CONCERNED, A WATER SYSTEM PROJECT FITS EVERY CRITERIA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ESTABLISH THE SECURING OF A
WATER SYSTEM FROM THE NORTH LIMITS OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO THE
NORTH PART OF THE COUNTY AS THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY FOR APPLICATION UNDER
15
OCT 6196 soot c I ?a^= 15
- , L
THE LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS ACT OF 1976 FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING A GRANT
UNDER THIS PROGRAM TO FACILITATE THE COUNTY PROVIDING THIS NECESSARY
SERVICE.
FOSTER V. WRIGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF BLUE CROSS — BLUE SHIELD,
APPEARED AND PROPOSED REFIGURING OF THE GROUP LIFE INSURANCE RATES BY
DROPPING MATERNITY BENEFITS AS SET OUT IN HIS LETTER TO ADMINISTRATOR
.JENNINGS AS FOLLOWS:
Az ! y t P. O. Box 1798 4
532 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville. Florida 32201 `
r+ . (904) 791-611 t j
' Me Cross Btu Shield A
oar a , +
s'y . .
1 "' yY L- ., e .. ._ - : •- - ._ .art tii i vl mf a e � :" ` i - `
August 17, 1976
' A � + L c _.. •r a ,j ,ir } '.�Yrr�f i t�rltL .'^ itiy ..
c ° ` Mr. Jack Jennings, County Administrator
?r Indian River County
P. 0. Box 1028 ,
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 -,
r+`• '.:' f it i 7:h/ t 1 1Ylt L L>il fl. � 't �p - + - -
(, z Re: Group 21122
Dear Mr. Jennings: -
- I`:'have taken the liberty'of refiguring your Li`_e Insurance rate since''
t we have consolidated the Road & Bridge Grose with The Board of County
t ' •Commission payroll. Your present rate of -$I.08 per thousand :could 3e
} reduced to $ .95 per: thousand if
__all insured are increased to $5,000.
_ I would Iika'to make' recommendation that we drop the maternity in your
-.group-since it only pays out a total of $163. -This is costing:the.County
6_ $1.08 per month on family contract. ?,
I am proposing you increase your Life Insurance from $2,000 to $5,000.
Y :Since you are now paying $2.16•per.month now, th_e increase to,$5,000 would
`he$1:51 per month. t:T
As you know, $2,000 doesn't do what it used to when we added Life Insurance
to your group about 10 years ago.- $5,000 is a more. realistic figure in
these inflationary times. j•
. t
in the event of Accidental
' Death, the amount would be doubledH
to .$10,000
I hope this idea meets with your approval.
!�9/,fir ltf :Jr T s-.
Sincerely, t
BLUE CROSS & BLUE ' SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.
41.
Foster V. Wright �
'< Representative
`• Fw/vsc ,
16
OCT 61976
COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF
REVIEWING OUR INSURANCE PROGRAM, AND HE FELT THIS INFORMATION SHOULD
BE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY BEING MADE. THE BOARD AGREED.
MR. DONLON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT OTHER COMPANIES HAVE BEEN
ASKED TO SUBMIT PROPOSALS WHICH ARE DUE BEFORE OCTOBER 30TH. THESE
ARE NOT BIDS, HOWEVER, AS THE BLUE CROSS - BLUE SHIELD GROUP INSURANCE
DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL NEXT APRIL.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE REQUEST OF
WILLIAM BIDLINGMAYER FOR PREFERENTIAL TAX TREATMENT ON HIS PROPERTY
WHICH HE INTENDS ESTABLISHING AS A NATURE PRESERVE. ATTORNEY COLLINS
NOTED THAT MR. BIDLINGMAYER HAD COME BEFORE THE BOARD WITH THE SAME
REQUEST IN DECEMBER OF 1973, AT THAT TIME PROPOSING TO DONATE HIS 35
ACRES TO THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, AND THE BOARD HAD LOOKED FAVORABLY
ON HIS REQUEST. SOME PROBLEM AROSE, HOWEVER, BETWEEN MR. BIDLINGMAYER
AND THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, AND THE MATTER WAS DROPPED. ATTORNEY COLLINS
CONTINUED THAT NOW MR. BIDLINGMAYER HAS FOUND A NEW AGENCY WHICH WILL
ACCOMPLISH HIS PURPOSE AND HAS COME BACK WITH THE SAME REQUEST. 'HE
NOTED THAT A PROPERTY OWNER CAN FILE A COVENANT FOR PREFERENTIAL TAX
TREATMENT UNDER STATUTE 193.501, WHEREBY HE DECLARES THAT HE WILL NOT
DEVELOP HIS PROPERTY FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD OF TIME.
MR. BIDLINGMAYER APPEARED AND STATED THAT HIS MAIN PURPOSE IS
TO PROTECT THE LAND PERMANENTLY AND HE HAS FOUND A NEW AGENCY TO WORK
WITH, THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND, THAT W4.L ALLOW HIM TO BE CUSTODIAN
OF THE PROPERTY AND MAINTAIN HIS RESIDENCE THERE. HE NOTED THAT HE
IS VERY INTERESTED IN CONSERVATION AND FEELS IT IS A GREAT ASSET TO THE
COUNTRY TO HAVE AREAS LEFT IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION. HE SAID THAT
HE WOULD NOT ASK THAT THE PREFERENTIAL TAX TREATMENT APPLY TO HIS HOME
AND THE ONE ACRE THEY WILL RETAIN,
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT HE COULD DEED THE LAND TO THE
COUNTY AND RETAIN IT AS A LIFE ESTATE AND NOT PAY ANY TAXES.
MR. BIDLINGMAYER STATED THAT HE WOULD PREFER TO DEAL WITH THE
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND AS THE PARK DEPARTMENT PEOPLE ARE NOT BOTANISTS
AND SOMETIMES CLEAR OFF TREES THAT SHOULD BE `PRESERVED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT IF THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDS IS
A RELIABLE ORGANIZATION AND IS INVOLVED WITH THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL
RESOURCES, HE WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST,
17
OUR2 pa^= 17
ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT MR. BIDLINGMAYER HAVE THE
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDS SEND US SOME INFORMATION AND NOTED THAT IF IT
IS A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION, THERE WOULD BE NO TAX INVOLVED ANYWAY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED REQUESTING THE URBAN FORESTER TO
MAKE A REPORT ON THIS MATTER. IT WAS NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED
JUST NORTH AND SLIGHTLY WEST OF VERO SHORES ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S.
HWY.1 AND HAS NO SALT MARSH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE MINUTES OF
DECEMBER 5, 1973, STATED THAT THE BOARD WAS IN FAVOR OF MR. BIDLINGMAYER`S
REQUEST AND AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO WRITE HIM A LETTER TO THAT EFFECT,
AND ASKED IF THE BOARD WOULD LIKE THIS TO BE AGAIN RECORDED IN THE
MINUTES.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THE BOARD IF THIS WAS SATISFACTORY TO
THEM, AND THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE STILL WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE LAND TRUST.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO REQUEST THE
URBAN FORESTER TO CONTACT MR. BIDLINGMAYER IN ORDER TO GIVE A REPORT
ON THIS PROPERTY.
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT:
I
m
OCT 61976
Boor 27 ?a.
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of
/Y\-6 Q t .* Q. n P O
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of p n / - / q % (-
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tiserrent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this � A.D. /
(Business Manager)
y ,.
(SF.AU dt /
(CI of tlwircuit Court, Indian River County. Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on
October 6, 1976, at 11:00 o'clock A.M. at the
Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, to consider the adoption of an
Ordinanceof Indian River County, Florida,
requiring the Sheriff of Indian River
County. Florida, to carry liability In-
surance on all motor vehicles owned or
leased by the Sheriffs Department to the
Wentof $250.000.00 Bodily Injury Liability
per person; $ W WQ.OD for each oc.
currence; $100,000.00 Property Damage
Liability for each accident; and providing
an effective date.
Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County,
Florida
By: Willard W. Siebert Jr.
Chairman
Sept. 14, 1976.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHED TO BE
HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. FF
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 76-16 IN REGARD TO LIABILITY
INSURANCE ON ALL MOTOR VEHICLES OWNED OR LEASED BY THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
19
�Gqr 27 ?Q f .19
OCT 61976
ORDINANCE NO. 76-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REQUIRING
THE SHERIFF OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
TO CARRY LIABILITY INSURANCE ON ALL MOTOR VEHICLES
OWNED OR LEASED BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO THE
EXTENT OF $250,000.00 BODILY INJURY LIABILITY PER
PERSON; $500,000.00 FOR EACH OCCURRENCE; $100,000.00
PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY FOR EACH ACCIDENT; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, is authorized as a local subdivision
of the State to purchase and carry liability insurance on all motor
vehicles owned or leased by the County or any Department thereof as required
by Section 455.06, Florida Statutes, and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, feels it advisable and in the best
interests of the people of Indian River County to adopt an
ordinance providing for liability insurance on all motor vehicles owned
or leased by the Indian River County Sheriff's Department as
required under -Section 455.06, Florida Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, does hereby
require that the Sheriff of Indian River t County, Florida, maintain
insurance against legal liability for the death, injury, or disability
of any person arising from or in connection with the operation of any
motor vehicle owned, leased, or operated by the Sheriff of Indian River
County, Florida, or any of his employees, to the extent of $250,000.00
bodily injury liability per person; $500,000.00 bodily injury liability
per occurrence;$100,000 property damage liability per accident.
BUOk27
r., U
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Ordinance take
effect on the 11th day of October, A.D., 1976, following this
Board's notification from the Secretary of State that this.
Ordinance has been duly filed with the Secretary of State.
Enacted this 6th day of October, A.D., 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COU Y, FLORIDA
By
Willard . Siebert, Jr., C airman
ATTEST:
IF(alphXiarris, Clerk
' OCT 61976
pi
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A
LETTER FROM MS. .JAN BARKER RESIGNING FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
COUNCIL AND SUGGESTING AS HER REPLACEMENT MRS. LADYE FLANAGAN, WHICH LETTER
IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES.
ST.iTE OF FLORIDA -`4,J-ry v'\
DEPARTMENT OF Reubtn o'D Askew. G'oversor -'
` Health & Rehabilitative Services
P. 0. Drawer
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 September 30, 1976
Mr. Bunny Siebert
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida 32906
Dear Mr. Siebert:
In January of this year the Board of County Commissioners appointed
me to serve as a Board member on the Economic Opportunities Council. I
have enjoyed my involvement with EOC and feel the Board has brought about
some constructive changes. However, I find that with my new employment
responsibilities that I am not able to devote the pime required to
-represent Indian River County on the EOC Board. Therefore, I would request
that you accept my resignation of this appointment effective October 31,1976.
As an employee of the Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services,
R feel that we work closely with EOC. Many clients are served by both agencies.
To facilitate cooperation and reduce duplication I would suggest that you
consider replacing me with Mrs. Ladye Flanagan, Direct Service Supervisor of
Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services in Indian River County.
Mrs. Flanagan has lived in the county on an off for the last fifteen -years.
She is most interested in EOC and has attended some of the meetings.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
(Ms.) Jan Barker
JB: mmb
22
OCT 61976
J
OCT 61976
r
MRS. IONS HENRY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
COUNCIL, WAS PRESENT AND STATED THAT MRS, FLANAGAN IS WILLING TO SERVE,
AND THEY APPROVE OF HER AND WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE BOARD WILL APPOINT
HER.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT AT ONE TIME THE
BOARD WAS ASKED TO MAKE SIX APPOINTMENTS TO THE E.O.C. AND IT SEEMS
SOME CONFUSION HAS ARISEN IN REGARD TO THE GUIDELINES. COMMISSIONER
MASSEY WAS ONE OF THE APPOINTMENTS MADE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THAT THIS APPOINTMENT BE HELD OVER UNTIL
MRS. FORLANI, SECRETARY TO THE BOARD, COULD RESEARCH THE MATTER AND
DETERMINE IF WE ARE SUPPOSED TO APPOINT ANOTHER MEMEBER, HE NOTED THAT
HE PERSONALLY FELT IT IS BETTER TO HAVE SOMEONE OTHER THAN A
COMMISSIONER APPOINTED TO THIS BOARD BECAUSE OF THE MANY CONFLICTING
MEETINGS THEY MUST ATTEND.
MRS. HENRY NOTED THAT DURING THIS PAST YEAR, THE E.O.C. HAS
BEEN ABLE TO GET MORE FUNDS THAN USUAL AND THUS SHE FEELS IT IS EVEN
MORE IMPORTANT TO HAVE GOOD PEOPLE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED WHETHER A MEMBER OF THE BOARD SHOULD BE
ON THE E.O.C. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND IT WAS AGREED IT WOULD BE BETTER
TO FIND OTHER WORKING MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY TO SERVE.
MRS. HENRY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WILLIE ADAMS HAS BEEN
REPRESENTING A TARGET AREA IN GIFFORD AND HIS TERM IS LIMITED TO FIVE
YEARS WHICH HAS NOW EXPIRED. SHE STATED THAT HE HAS BOTH KNOWLEDGE
i
AND EXPERIENCE AND POINTED OUT THAT IF HE WERE APPOINTED BY THE BOARD
AS THEIR REPRESENTATIVE THERE WOULD BE NO LIMIT TO THE TIME HE COULD
SERVE,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 76-70 APPOINTING WILLIE
ADAMS TO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
COUNCIL AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
23
OCT 6 1976
RESOLUTION 76-70
WHEREAS, there is a need for the Indian River County
Commission to appoint a representative to the Board of Directors of
the Economic Opportunity Council,and
WHEREAS, WILLIE ADAMS is a conscientious citizen
residing within Indian River County and well-qualified to represent
the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
that WILLIE ADAMS is appointed as the County Commission's repre-
sentative on the Economic Opportunity Council effective October 6, 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Cha' man
ATTEST:
'Gj�'.
/Clerk
i
sour 7:^ 24
J
VAL BRENNAN, COUNTY PLANNER, APPEARED TO REVIEW WITH THE BOARD
THE APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL
HEAD START PROGRAM FOR 1977 AND ALSO FOR THEIR CONDUCT AND ADMINISTRATION
PROGRAM FOR 1977.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED ABOUT THE PROPORTION OF FUNDS SPENT
ON SALARIES.
MRS. HENRY STATED THAT LAST YEAR THEY RECEIVED $27,000 FOR THE
FOOD AND NUTRITION PROGRAM. THIS YEAR THEY EXPECT TO RECEIVE $40,000
AND HAVE PLANS FOR INCREASED SERVICES, INCLUDING TEACHING PEOPLE HOW TO
CAN THEIR OWN FOODS. THEY ALSO HOPE TO GO INTO DAY CARE AND WILL NEED
ADDITONAL TRANSPORTATION. SHE REPORTED THAT THEY ARE CONDUCTING A MEALS
PROGRAM AND TRYING TO COOPERATE WITH THE COUNCIL ON AGING. SHE
CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE 240 CHILDREN IN THE HEAD START PROGRAM, AND THEY
HAVE OFFICE WORKERS, A REGISTERED NURSE, TRANSPORTATION, TEACHERS AIDES
AND MANY SUPPORT PEOPLE, ETC., FOR 13 CLASSROOMS. SHE NOTED THAT FOR
THE YOUNGER CHILDREN THEY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE TWO TEACHERS AND TWO
AIDES FOR EACH CLASSROOM. MRS. HENRY INFORMED THE.BOARD THAT THEY ARE
CLOSELY REGULATED BY HEAD START PROGRAM STANDARDS AND ARE AUDITED ONCE
A YEAR. SHE NOTED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SALARIES ARE SMALL, BUT THE TOTAL
IS HIGH, ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY ARE IN SEVERAL BUILDINGS AND THUS
REQUIRE, FOR INSTANCE, SIX COOKS AND SIX CUSTODIANS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY STATED THAT THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL HEAD START PROGRAM FOR 1977 AND THEIR
CONDUCT AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM FOR 1977 AND HAVE NO OBJECTION
TO THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THESE PROGRAMS - ECFRPC
No. IR -77-3 AND ECFRPC No, IR -77-4.
ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT COUNTY PLANNER, INTRODUCED WESLEY
CARROLL WHO IS WORKING ON THE STREET NAMING AND NUMBERING SYSTEM.
VAL BRENNAN, COUNTY PLANNER, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE
MET WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE FIRE AND AMBULANCE SQUADS, POST OFFICE
OFFICIALS AND OTHERS WHO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM OF STREETS DAILY. ONE
SUGGESTION WAS THAT THE.NORTH-SOUTH LINE SEPARATING THE EAST AND WEST
AREAS OF THE COUNTY BE CHANGED AND FOLLOW EITHER THE RAILROAD TRACKS
OR THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. HE NOTED THAT THIS POSES A PROBLEM WITH
REGARD TO THE SMALL SOUTHEAST SECTION ON THE MAINLAND AT VERO HIGHLANDS
AND WOULD NECESSITATE CHANCING STREET SIGNS ALL ACROSS THE. SUBDIVISION.
25
OCT 61976 Boot 27 .25
ANOTHER SUGGESTION WAS TO NAME THE STREETS BY AREAS, SUCH AS VERO
BEACH HIGHLANDS, AND THEN USE THE STREET NAME, BUT THIS ALSO POSES
A PROBLEM. HE CONTINUED THAT IN ORDER TO SET UP AN ORDERLY NUMBERING
SYSTEM, THEY HAVE DIVIDED THE COUNTY INTO A GRID PATTERN AND WILL
DETERMINE THE NUMBERING OF STREETS FROM THIS GRID. THEY HAVE SO FAR
COVERED FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF THE COUNTY TO SLIGHTLY NORTH OF ROUTE 60.
MR. BRENNAN NEXT DISCUSSED THE SIGNS THAT NEED TO BE CHANGED AND
POINTED OUT THAT THE STREET NAMES WILL NOT BE CHANGED, BUT THE SIGNS WILL
DESIGNATE STREETS BY BOTH NAME AND NUMBER.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF,IT WAS INTENDED TO WORK WITH THE
DEVELOPER TO CORRECT THE SIGNS TO INCLUDE THE STREET NUMBERS.
MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THEY HOPE TO WORK THROUGH THE PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION TO ACCOMPLISH THIS. HE CONTINUED THAT HE IS JUST
REPORTING TO THE BOARD TODAY AND DID NOT WANT ANY OFFICIAL ACTION IN
REGARD TO CHANGING ANYTHING AT THIS TIME, BUT FELT THE PUBLIC SHOULD
BE MADE AWARE THROUGH THE NEWS MEDIA OF WHAT IS TAKING PLACE.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHAT REACTION MR. BRENNAN HAD RECEIVED
FROM THE AGENCIES HE MET WITH ABOUT THIS PROBLEM.
MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THEY ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT RENUMBERING
IS NECESSARY AND WISH TO HAVE A MAP INDEXED WITH THE NEW NUMBERING.
FORGE GONZALEZ OF THE MOORINGS APPEARED TO EXPRESS HIS CONCERN.
HE AGREED THAT THERE IS SOME NEED TO STANDARIZE, BUT WONDERED IF ALL THE
CASES ARE SIMILAR. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE SIGNS IN THE MOORINGS HAVE
BEEN SPECIALLY DESIGNED BY AN ARCHITECTIAND HE FELT POSSIBLY THESE
SHOULD NOT BE DEALT WITH IN THE SAME WAY. MR. GONZALEZ FELT THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD BE HEARD ON THIS SUBJECT,
MR. BERG, ASSISTANT COUNTY PLANNER, POINTED OUT THAT THE MOST
IMPORTANT FEATURE OF HAVING A UNIFORM NUMBERING SERVICE IS TO PROVIDE
EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE CITIZENS.
AT THIS POINT CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED.THE COUNTY PU NNER
TO DETER FURTHER DISCUSSION ON HIS MATTERS UNTIL LATER IN THE MEETING
AND INTRODUCED TO THOSE PRESENT U.S. SENATOR RICHARD STONE, WHO SPOKE
BRIEFLY AND OFFERED HIS HELP IN OBTAINING FUNDS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS
PROGRAM.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECESSED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK
P.M. AND RECONVENED AT 1:45.0' -CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT.
wt
OCT 61976
8001 27 2s
OCT 61916
CITY MANAGER .JOHN LITTLE AND CITY ATTORNEY INNES CORDISCO
APPEARED AND PRESENTED TO THE BOARD RESOLUTION No, 2696 PASSED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH ON THE 5TH OF OCTOBER IN
REGARD TO THE CORRIDOR TO THE 17TH STREET BRIDGE, WHICH RESOLUTION IS
HEREBY MADE PART OF THE MINUTES.
27
Book '27 k 27
RESOLUTION NO. � z
A RESOLUTION FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A
CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND ONE HUNDRED FEET WIDE
RUNNING EASTWARD FROM THE INTERSECTION OF
INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD AND SEVENTEENTH STREET
TO THE WESTERLY BANK OF THE INDIAN RIVER IS NO
LONGER USEFUL, NECESSARY OR PROFITABLE IN THE
OPERATION OF THE CITY ELECTRIC SYSTEM AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE PROPER OFFICERS
TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER TO THE COUNTY OF INDIAN
RIVER AND/OR THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR RIGHT-OF-
WAY PURPOSES A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT OVER
SAME TO BE USED FOR THE APPROACH TO A PROPOSED
BRIDGE CONNECTING SEVENTEENTH STREET WITH
CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD, UPON PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY
OF INDIAN RIVER OF THE SUM OF $403,600.00.
WHEREAS, the State of Florida, by its Department of Transportation,
hereinafter "DOT," has formulated plans for -.the construction of a bridge in
-the City of Vero Beach, crossing the Indian River between 17th Street and
Causeway Boulevard; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Vero Beach, hereinafter "City," owns fee
simple title to a 100 foot wide strip of land running between the intersec-
tion of 17th Street and Indian River Boulevard and the westerly bank of the
Indian River, which strip of land is necessary for the westerly approach
to said proposed bridge; and,
WHEREAS, the City has heretofore constructed in said strip of
I
land, electric lines and -water and sewer lines and pipes which must be
relocated in order to facilitate the construction of said proposed bridge,
which relocation has been estimated at $403,600.00; and,
WHEREAS, at a meeting held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on
June 4, 1976, between representatives of DOT, the City and the County of
Indian River, hereafter "County", and DOT made it clear that if it were
to pay for the relocation of said facilities, said cost would be back -
charged to the County's secondary road fund entitlement; and,
WHEREAS, the parties at said meeting, units of local,:government
and a state agency, striving for harmony in the public interest, attempted
to resolve any problems which were of concern to all parties; and,
F
WHEREAS, as a result of said discussions, the County agreed in
principle to pay to the City for said right-of-way, the cost of relocat-
ing the City's said facilities, then estimated at $390,000.00, which
figure has been modified upwards because of requirements imposed by the
United States Department of Transportation, which agency is contributing
to said project; and,
WHEREAS, the County, by its Commissioners, in meeting, assembled
on October 5, 1976,. agreed to pay to the City of Vero Beach, such sum of
$403,600.00 for said right-of-way.
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved by the City of Vero Beach
by its Council, assembled, and it hereby resolved by authority of the same:
SECTION I
In accordance with paragraph 11, Final Judgment, Case No. 75-106,
Barbara Jenkins, Plaintiff, vs. City of Vero Beach, Defendant, Circuit
Court of the 2nd Judicial Circuit, Leon County, Florida, City Council
hereby finds and determines that Disposition of the property described
or identified in Section II below constitute a Disposition of the property.
interests which are."no longer necessary, useful or profitable in the
operation" of the City electric system.
SECTION II
The City of Vero Beach will accept fiom the County of Indian
River as full payment for the right-of-way to the westerly approach to
the 17th Street bridge strip of land 100 feet wide running from the
intersection of Indian River Boulevard and 17th Street to the westerly
bank of the Indian River, the sum of $403,600.00.
SECTION III
Upon the presentation and tender of such payment, the proper
City officers be and they are hereby directed to execute and deliver to
the County of Indian River or the State of Florida, if the County of
Indian River so directs, the necessaryinstrument conveying such right -
of -way.
ight-of-way.
2 -
OCT 1976 27 29
I
SECTION IV
The conveyance will be for a road right-of-way in the usual
form containing exceptions and reservations; however, with respect to
the City's continued right to maintain electric, sewer and water lines,
as now in place or as may be relocated in connection with the construc-
tion of the proposed bridge.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed by
City Council of the City of Vero Beach on the r�day of
1976.
ATTEST: CITY OF VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
By °u'i Q
AGT/�L
PtyC�lerk Jay A. Smith, Mayor
- 3 -
OCT 61976
Book - 27 30
I :I
CHAIRMAN 81EBERT ANNOUNCED THAT HE FEELS DISCUSSION OF THE
RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND THE RESOLUTION PASSED
BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS NECESSARY AS IT SEEMS THERE HAS BEEN A.
MISUNDERSTANDING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING DISCUSSION OF THE ABOVE ITEMS TO.
TODAY'S AGENDA.
CHAIRMAN 81EBERT STATED THAT IT WAS HIS IMPRESSION AFTER LAST
MEETING WITH CITY.OFFICIALS THAT WE HAD SAID THE MONEY FROM THE COUNTY
WOULD BE USED FOR THE RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, BUT RESOLUTION No. 2696
PASSED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH STATES THAT THE $403,000 AGREED UPON
IS TO BE USED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF LAND, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
THE DIFFERENCE EXPLAINED.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED CITY MANAGER LITTLE AND CITY ATTORNEY
CORDISCO AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO EXPLAIN HOW
THE DIFFERENCE IN THE RESOLUTIONS CAME ABOUT AFTER THREE .CITY COUNCILMEN
HAD MET WITH THE COUNTY AND AGREED TO THE TERMINOLOGY TO.BE USED IN THE
COUNTY'S RESOLUTION N0. 76-68.
MR. LITTLE SAID THAT HE COULD NOT EXPLAIN THIS, BUT HE IS HERE
IN A DIFFERENT CAPACITY. HE STATED THAT HIS MAIN INTEREST IS THAT A
NONREIMBURSABLE CHECK FOR $403,000 BE ADVANCED TO THE CITY TO BE USED
TO DEFRAY UTILITIES RELOCATION COSTS DUE TO THE MULTIPLICITY OF
ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS WHICH WOULD ARISE OTHERWISE. MR. LITTLE INFORMED
THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SIGN A NOI-REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT; HAVE
THE CITY RELOCATE THE UTILITIES; AND LET THE ATTORNEYS ADDRESS THE
PROBLEM OF TERMINOLOGY.
CITY ATTORNEY CORDISCO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE DRAFTED THE
CITY'S RESOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS THE CITY COUNCIL'S
DESIRE, AND FELT THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF THE AGREEMENT IS THAT THE CITY
BE REIMBURSED AND THAT THE COUNTY RECEIVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE APPROACH
TO THE BRIDGE.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT IT WAS NEVER THE INTENT OF THIS
BOARD TO PURCHASE THE RIGHT-OF-VIAY AND CONTINUED THAT SHE HAD THOUGHT
IT WAS THE CITY'S INTENT TO GIVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE COUNTY.
ATTORNEY CORDISCO STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THE CITY WOULD
GIVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ANYONE WITHOUT REMUNERATION AND THEY ARE ONLY
RELEASING IT TO THE COUNTY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE RECEIVING THE RELOCATION
COSTS. 31
OCT 61976 Book 7 .
■
MR. LITTLE STATED THAT HE COULD NOT SPEAK FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
BUT WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE TWO ATTORNEYS GET TOGETHER AND WORD THE
RESOLUTION IN ANY WAY THAT IS ACCEPTABLE, AND IF THE BOARD WISHES TO
HAVE IT CALLED UTILITY RELOCATION COSTS INSTEAD OF SHOWN AS A PURCHASE
OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, HE BELIEVED IT COULD BE HANDLED AT THE COUNCIL LEVEL,
ATTORNEY CORDISCO SUGGESTED THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS
PREPARE AN AGREEMENT TOGETHER THAT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO EACH -SIDE,
PRESENT IT TO THE RESPECTIVE BOARDS FOR APPROVAL, AND THEN ADOPT A
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SAID HE THOUGHT THIS HAD BEEN THE PURPOSE
OF THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL AND THE BOARD HE HAD
REQUESTED.
CITY MANAGER LITTLE SAID HE THOUGHT IT WAS JUST THE AMOUNT
THAT HAD BEEN AGREED UPON AND NOT THE WORDING.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT IT WAS HIS IMPRESSION THAT
WHEN THE COUNTY AGREED UPON THE AMOUNT OF $403,600, MAYOR SMITH SAID THE
MATTER IS RESOLVED; THE CITY WILL TAKE CARE OF ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS
AND TITLE TO THE BRIDGE RIGHT-OF-WAY.WILL BE GIVEN TO THE COUNTY. HE
NOTED THAT HE LIKED THE SUGGESTION OF HAVING THE ATTORNEYS GET TOGETHER
AND DRAW UP A RESOLUTION AND HAVE BOTH BODIES SIGN THE SAME RESOLUTION.
MR. LITTLE AGREED THERE SHOULD BE AN AGREEMENT THAT SPELLS OUT
WHAT IS GOING TO TAKE PLACE AND THEN IF A RESOLUTION IS NEEDED, IT CAN
BE WRITTEN TO AGREE WITH THE TERMS OF THE iCONTRACT. HE EMPHASIZED
AGAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COUNTY SIGNING A NON -REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT
AND GIVING THE CITY A CHECK IN ADVANCE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FEELS THIS IS A RADICAL
DEPARTURE FROM WHAT HAS BEEN MUTUALLY AGREED TO OVER THE LAST FOUR MONTHS.
HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY'S POSITION HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT THEY WOULD PAY
REOLOCATION COSTS NOT TO EXCEED A SET AMOUNT FOR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES
WITHIN A SPECIFIC AREA, AND HE FELT IT WOULD BE VERY IMPRACTICAL FOR THE
COUNTY TO GIVE A LUMP SUM PAYMENT WHEN THE ACTUAL RELOCATION COSTS HAVE
NOT BEEN DETERMINED AND THE COUNTY COULD NOT VERIFY THAT THE SUMS WERE,
IN FACT, SPENT ON THE SITE.
MR. LITTLE SUGGESTED AN AGREEMENT COULD BE WORKED OUT SO THAT IT
IS AUDITED AFTER THE FACT AS IT WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT TO HAVE ALL BILLS,
ETC., SENT TO THE COUNTY TO BE PAID AND HE WOULD NOT WANT TO SEE US GET
32
��M
�ti 127 : �3
OCT 61976
INTO AN ARGUMENT EVERY TIME AN INVOICE IS SUBMITTED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS ARE NOT
REIMBURSABLE AND STATE AUDITORS WOULD DEFINITELY NOT APPROVE OF THE
COUNTY TURNING OVER A BLANK CHECK FOR SERVICES NOT PERFORMED.
MR. LITTLE NEXT SUGGESTED THAT IF THE FINAL COST, AFTER THE
ACTUAL BIDS ARE MET AND THE LAST CHANGE ORDER IS MADE, SHOULD AMOUNT
TO LESS THAN $403,600, AN ADJUSTMENT COULD BE MADE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DISCUSSED THE PROBLEM OF HOW TO HANDLE CHANGE
ORDERS AS THIS AMOUNT IS TO BE PAIL► OUT OF SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE FELT THERE MUST BE SOME CONTROL
BY THE COUNTY,
MR. LITTLE SAID IN THAT EVENT HE FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD GO TO
CONDEMNATION AND THE CITY WILL RELOCATE THE UTILITIES.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT COULD BE DONE, BUT FELT WE SHOULD
HAVE COOPERATION BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY.
MR. LITTLE SAID HE DID NOT FEEL WE CAN HAVE CHANGE ORDERS GOING
THROUGH TWO BODIES WHILE THE CONTRACTOR STANDS AROUND WITH IDLE CREWS.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED HE FELT THAT THE TWO ATTORNEYS
SHOULD GET TOGETHER AS SUGGESTED BEFORE TO FIGURE OUT A LEGAL WAY FOR THE
CITY TO GET THE MONEY TO PAY THE CONTRACTOR AND THE COUNTY TO BE LEGALLY
ABLE TO JUSTIFY THE EXPENSE WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE LAND.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WANTED IN WRITING
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA THAT SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS CAN
BE USED IN THIS MANNER, r
ATTORNEY CORDISCO SUGGESTED THAT THE STATE AUDITORS BE ASKED
FOR A PRECONTRACT RULING ON THIS MATTER AND THEN THAT RULING WOULD BE
AN EXHIBIT ATTACHED TO THE AGREEMENT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE D.Q.T. ATTORNEYS
ARE CHECKING THIS WITH THE STATE THIS MORNING AND THE ADMINISTRATOR
IS RIGHT NOW TALKING TO THEM IN THIS REGARD,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER THE WORDING IN THE COUNTY'S
RESOLUTION IN REGARD TO FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT WAS NECESSARY AND ALSO AS
TO WHETHER THE CITY ACTUALLY OWNED THE STRIP OF LAND IN QUESTION.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR A MOTION TO INSTRUCT
THE TWO ATTORNEYS TO WORK TOGETHER ON PREPARING -AN AGREEMENT, AND THE
BOARD DID NOT FEEL A MOTION WAS NECESSARY AS THEY FELT THIS HAD BEEN
33
�oo27 33
r-�
AGREED UPON AT YESTERDAY'S MEETING.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THE BOARD IF THEY WOULD AGREE THAT AN
AGREEMENT SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES WITH THE.SAME WORDING AND SUPPORTED BY
A RESOLUTION OF EACH GOVERNING BODY IS THE PROPER APPROACH.
ATTORNEY CORDISCO SUGGESTED THAT FIRST AN AGREEMENT BE PRE-
PARED THAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO BOTH THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND THE CITY
ATTORNEY, AND.THEN IT BE PRESENTED TO THE RESPECTIVE BODIES WITH THEIR
ATTORNEY'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND WITH PROPER RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING THE
SIGNING OF THE AGREEMENT,
THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT
HE LIKED ATTORNEY CORDISCO'S SUGGESTION THAT THE RULING BY THE STATE
IN REGARD TO THE USE OF SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS BE ATTACHED TO THE
AGREEMENT AS AN EXHIBIT.
MR. LITTLE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED AUTHORIZATION
LAST NIGHT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO PUT THE PROJECT OUT FOR BIDS
IMMEDIATELY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT HE WAS VERY HAPPY TO HEAR THAT
THEY ARE PROCEEDING ON THE PROJECT, BUT NOTED THAT MR. LITTLE DURING
PREVIOUS CONVERSATION HAD MENTIONED CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD, WHICH THE
CHAIRMAN POINTED OUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFIC AREA WE.ARE TALKING
ABOUT.
MR. LITTLE AGREED THAT CAUSEWAY BLVD. IS NOT INCLUDED.
DR. PAULINE CALLOWAY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, AGRICULTURAL
EXTENSION SERVICE, APPEARED WITH .JUDITH WAKEFIELD, HOME ECONOMICS AGENT
AND ACTING COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR. DR CALLOWAY STATED THAT FOR A
NUMBER OF MONTHS SHE HAS BEEN LOOKING FOR AN EXTENSION DIRECTOR FOR THIS
COUNTY AND HAS ADVERTISED AND INTERVIEWED A NUMBER OF APPLICANTS BUT WAS
UNABLE TO FIND ONE SHE FELT QUALIFIED FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE POSITION.
SHE NOTED THAT THERE ARE TWO POSITIONS TO CONSIDER, ONE RELATED TO HOME
ECONOMICS AND ONE TO AGRICULTURE AND THE TITLE OF DIRECTOR CAN GO WITH
EITHER ONE. DR. CALLOWAY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE INTERVIEWED
MRS. WAKEFIELD IN GAINESVILLE AND ARE COMPLETELY SATISFIED WITH HER
HANDLING OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE OF THE POSITION, AND SHE WOULD,
THEREFORE, LIKE TO RECOMMEND JUDITH WAKEFIELD BE MADE COUNTY EXTENSION
DIRECTOR. DR. CALLOWAY CONTINUED THAT SHE WOULD THEN LIKE TO TRY TO
FIND SOMEONE TO FILL THE POSITION WITH REGARD TO CITRUS OR AGRICULTURE
AND WOULD TRY TO KEEP IT AT A SPECIALIST LEVEL. SHE NOTED THAT SHE WILL
34
OCT 61976
80or 27 :�.� 34
ADVERTISE VERY SPECIFICALLY FOR A CITRUS SPECIALIST.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT WE DO NEED A CITRUS SPECIALIST.
CHAIRMAN $IEBERT THEN DISCUSSED THE REQUEST OF MRS. WAKEFIELD
FOR OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL TO TRANSPORT TWO 4 -HERS TO GAINESVILLE TO MEET
THEIR TRANSPORTATION SOURCE TO THE NATIONAL JUNIOR HORTICULTURE
ASSOCIATION CONVENTION IN PENNSYLVANIA.
DR. CALLOWAY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE TRIP COULD SERVE A
DUAL PURPOSE - THAT MRS. WAKEFIELD COULD PICK UP THE TWO 4 -HERS AFTER
SCHOOL, TRANSPORT THEM TO GAINESVILLE, PICK UP SUPPLIES FROM DR. CALLOWAY,
AND RETURN IN THE MORNING.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED HOW THE 4 -HERS WOULD BE TRANSPORTED
BACK FROM GAINESVILLE AFTER THE CONVENTION, AND DR. CALLOWAY STATED THAT
DR. JAMES STEPHENS WILL RETURN THEM TO VERO BEACH,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE DO NOT LIKE MRS, WAKEFIELD'S
HAVING TO TRAVEL OUT OF THE COUNTY AS MUCH AS SHE HAS, AND IF WE GET A
CITRUS SPECIALIST, THIS SHOULD REDUCE THE NECESSITY FOR MRS. WAKEFIELD TO
LEAVE THE COUNTY SO FREQUENTLY,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR JUDITH
WAKEFIELD, EXTENSION HOME ECONOMICS AGENT AND ACTING COUNTY DIRECTOR,
TO TAKE TWO WINNERS OF A TRIP TO THE NATIONAL JUNIOR HORTICULTURE
ASSOCIATION CONVENTION IN PENNSYLVA14IA TO MEET THEIR TRANSPORTATION SOURCE
IN GAINESVILLE, OCTOBER 27 P.M. AND OCTOBER 28 A.M. AND TO USE THE
COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR'S AUTOMOBILE FOR THIS PURPOSE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED WHAT AMOUNT WE HAVE BUDGETED FOR OUR
PORTION OF THE EXTENSION DIRECTOR'S SALARY.
FINANCE OFFICER HOCKMAN STATED THAT $8,953.00 IS BUDGETED FOR
THE POSITION -OF AGRICULTURAL AGENT AND $8,817.00 FOR THE POSITION OF
HOME ECONOMICS AGENT,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO MAKING THE HOME ECONOMIC AGENT
THE COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR AND REVERSING THE SALARIES.
DR. CALLOWAY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SALARY OF AN EXTENSION
DIRECTOR FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS APPROXIMATELY $19,000.00 AND STATED
THAT GAINESVILLE WILL PICK UP THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AMOUNT THE
COUNTY HAS BUDGETED AND THIS FIGURE. SHE CONTINUED THAT THEY WILL DO
THIS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO SEE -THE SALARY KEPT AT A COMPETITIVE LEVEL SO
35
OCT 01976 7
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAN KEEP UP TO THE STANDARDS OF OTHER COUNTIES
AND HAVE A PERSON OF PROPER CALIBER IN THIS POSITION. SHE ALSO STATED
THAT THEY FEEL THE SAME ABOUT OBTAINING A CITRUS SPECIALIST FOR THE
COUNTY AND WILL TRY TO GET SOMEONE OF TOP-NOTCH QUALITY, AND IT WILL
NOT COST THE COUNTY ANY MORE THIS YEAR.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 76-71 ACCEPTING THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AND JOINING WITH THEM IN THE
APPOINTMENT OF JUDITH WAKEFIELD AS DIRECTOR OF THE AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
SERVICE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, HER TITLE TO BE COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR/
HOME ECONOMICS AGENT AND THE COUNTY'S SHARE_ OF HER SALARY AS DIRECTOR/
AGENT TO BE $8,953.00 PER YEAR.
36
OCT 61976
I
Book 27 Ja 36
RESOLUTION 76-71
WHEREAS, the State of Florida has recommended to the
Indian River County Commission that the County Commission appoint
a County Extension Director, and
WHEREAS, JUDITH WAKEFIELD is qualified to fill the
vacancy that now exists;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
that JUDITH WAKEFIELD be appointed County Extension Director with
prime duties as Home Economics Agent, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Indian River County
Commission's share of the County Extension Director. / Home Economics
Agent's salary shall be Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Three Dollars
($8, 953.00) per year.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Z z -,XI
By r
airman
ATTEST:
erk
3
S
OCT 5197
r rr7 ; 37
DAN MATTHEWS AND J.H. FRANK APPEARED IN REGARD TO THEIR REQUEST
FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENTS ALONG THE REAR LOT LINE IN BLOCK M OF DIXIE
HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, UNIT 4.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS REQUEST WAS
PREVIOUSLY BROUGHT BEFORE THE BOARD AT THE MEETING OF .JULY 7, 1976, BUT
IT WAS FELT MORE INFORMATION WAS NEEDED AND THE MATTER WAS TABLED, HE
CONTINUED THAT THE PROBLEM IS THAT THESE GENTLEMEN DO NOT REPRESENT ALL
THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE BLOCK, BUT ARE INTERESTED ONLY IN THE _RELEASE
OF EASEMENTS ON THE LOTS THEY OWN. THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT THERE
IS NO DRAINAGE SWALE IN THIS LOCATION AND ACTUALLY THE REAR EASEMENT SERVES
NO PURPOSE AT THIS TIME, BUT THE PROBLEM IS IN THE RELEASING OF PART OF AN
EASEMENT AND KEEPING PART OF AN EASEMENT,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INQUIRED ABOUT THE NEED OF AN EASEMENT FOR
FUTURE WATER AND SEWER LINES, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR AGREED THIS WOULD BE
A POTENTIAL USE.
MR. MATTHEWS NOTED THERE IS A HIGHER ELEVATION IN THE.REAR AND A
SEWER LINE WOULD PROBABLY HAVE TO BE RUN THROUGH THE ROAD. HE STATED THAT
MR. FRANK WISHES TO ERECT A FENCE AROUND HIS PROPERTY AND HE WISHES TO
BUILD A 24 X 24 FOOT GARAGE ON HIS LOT SEPARATED FROM HIS HOUSE, BUT IS
PREVENTED FROM DOING SO BY THE EASEMENT UPON WHICH NO PERMANENT STRUCTURE
MAY BE PLACED. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE DOES NOT WISH TO BUILD THE GARAGE
ON THE ADJACENT LOT WHICH HE OWNS AS HE MAY LATER WISH TO SELL THIS LOT.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED HE FELT THIS MATTER SHOULD GO TO THE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINI AGREED. IT WAS POINTED OUT TO
MR. MATTHEWS AND MR. FRANK THAT THE RELEASING OF EASEMENTS REQUIRES
ADVERTISING AND PREPARING OF DOCUMENTS BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS, WHICH IS
COSTLY AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CAN EITHER GRANT THE USE OF THE EASE-
MENT OR WAIVE THE SETBACK LINE WHICH WOULD ALLOW THEM TO CARRY OUT THEIR
PROJECTS,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED TO THE APPLICANTS THAT THEY PETITION
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR RELIEF IN THE MATTED OF THEIR REAR LOT LINE
EASEMENTS AND AGREED THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILL NOTIFY
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT THAT WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AS THEY HAD
INSTRUCTED, HE WROTE MS. MADELINE KAYE THAT HER REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF
EASEMENT IN THE A.A. BERRY SUBDIVISION WAS BEING PLACED ON THE AGENDA TODAY
AND NOTIFIED HER THAT HE COULD NOT RECOMMEND RELEASE OF THIS EASEMENT.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN MANY REQUESTS FOR
RELEASE OF EASEMENTS IN SUBDIVISIONS AND HE FELT POSSIBLY THEY SHOULD BE
REFERRED TO THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR STUDY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS AGREED THAT POSSIBLY THEY SHOULD GO BEFORE
THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE BEFORE BEING PLACED ON THE AGENDA, BUT
NOTED THAT THERE ARE MANY OF THESE REQUESTS THAT ARE NOT AS CONTROVERSIAL
AS THIS PARTICULAR ONE,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL IT WOULD BE
NECESSARY TO SEND ALL OF THE REQUESTS FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENTS TO THE
SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE AND FELT THE DECISION AS TO WHICH OF THEM
SHOULD BE SENT SHOULD BE LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED -INITIATING THIS AS STANDARD PROCEDURE
IN THE FUTURE. THE BOARD AGREED AND, THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED ADMINISTRATOR
JENNINGS TO USE HIS DISCRETION IN THIS REGARD.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THE LETTER HE RECEIVED FROM
MS. MADELINE KAYE REQUESTING THE RELEASE OF THE EASEMENT RUNNING OVER
THE BACK PART OF HER PROPERTY WAS ALSO SIGNED BY SIX ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS. SAID LETTER IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
39
OCT 61976
Sint- 'Cr- 1, ,
iP 1?ac wrtt� 'K is i3 *�
The ling ,_signed being adjacent pro-ert1 owners to the va ementr
described'in the attached letter, co hereby Join Madel; Paye
in requesting tY+�- cot:nty to vacate or release -�, easccte_:t in
-Lot;-.,2a, A A. BerrY Subdzvi5ion
i, ;itAk 3 3 ,
,�
w
It.NAbSx'-1" F l`f f% i t i ,t rt1 L
,LFG L DESCRIPTION
y ~ i !4 •�� ri 7� t )
y et
7
4.
t.r
.t
"W 4 t'•} ,'f ;.•;` t, 7 1 frJ r ttt: tittj ll'".,E it '.
i
"��✓ (C�"cam,/ r♦1'';j Gfic�wti f'''✓'('/�Aif.H'w�
����1 �y,Gt ✓v..,!�. �'�.-t.r.�:..�'`i`,�� �G� '� lE �iS! 7t r' � il+:-�t{, , r #w' }.t-�, it,r. 'i'1.
''b - J/f� � { j; ] e�1 (. •y'f� - - i+ t' t, ,t - i � it d t� +d 1 � r t , f _.
i //�'l- �,V'.A- "f /Y`�^ +r rt{� �, S; �! i ` {� ,it 1 f J,+{�� r G #,' - r 1�• E is r}�i,E7� r i ''.{
{a �Af �tli"1 wr ..fi+� C+•_� `.� r y l + 0,.. 1 + 9,<
/_-'_L #�:! •` /_'/' S.r+ j__., %. rr1 �'u1 ! t� tti.
j } � r.;_ d n ;. , t 1 t � ve y 7 kw 7 r/ '� $•
#� `I'3 yr } ! +� y# r r�+: r{ t� ;J� �� f i' \9 ♦$i•#'� t d 1. i * �� ° 0' '," � } gr j�:t E / ... it ! .
F�rel4 r + % t �t �� � 4r �, 9``1 } 'dt _ ?Jrr i � ♦ ti r 1 S' t. � n - + ,, 1
� p�'., U'�1 ry.. i. t iF1�r,v ,.+!. ); r; 2 :'.t. f,i r7^ 61tjt},.•'• 1. .r)'i 3u,. i +,.1 id �'- +. ' e
197C
14
. t_ __ter
':r # w:-- 1:�t f,. •�.•♦' .7 ,�-t �,:+`\
September 3, 76
. "r'j"µ' �9•ti..!'•"d . t y, +i! �!^ v _:rte }.� +,+
-.Jennings'
Jack'
r
Countyd ministrator
Indian River County Courthouse
Vero Beach,` Flcrid.a
a
-Re:;#,...Madeline Kaye.,easement relea-Ze
Lot 28,,A.A. ` Berry Subdivi s on
,r�
Dear Mir. Jennings:
7
I: wousd.'like to request a release of the drainage
orope,ty. ,.. Tha 3
running over the back part of • nY r .le al descr i.�tion �_s
r ^
♦r �� feet of _r7e i
oF I _
e:_.rl- 1 2
L:
p4
_tot: 28 of A.A *Berry plat of FlelninG (3rant,- .
t'
.Section '21, Tovnship 30 South, ian e 32 East_ '.
`'
4e lying arxl bring -:in Inian , R Iver : Count Y
,
tr
The` easement Liras originally granted to -the cctlnty on December -0, 1°t;3
Ei
ir.� a deed recorded P+arch 12, 19r� ' at. Official .;trorci Seo}; 309, page ;0,
7
a -copy cf . k ticiz is attached.-,_
.
;Mx^he
ditch where' he easement tom, ` is not being main ;.aired and t1. 12
.....;,..drainage
Yrrould,be better -
effected b rain
having the d ac ;es f
ae on the sic
. _ _
the roads in the urea.
copy Qt tee dub iivs-sor lat is
y' 41so enclosed.
,
A'
I can be o� an f � 'r
y further �t..si�Lar.,r�, r..ea_e� contact me.
Sint- 'Cr- 1, ,
iP 1?ac wrtt� 'K is i3 *�
The ling ,_signed being adjacent pro-ert1 owners to the va ementr
described'in the attached letter, co hereby Join Madel; Paye
in requesting tY+�- cot:nty to vacate or release -�, easccte_:t in
-Lot;-.,2a, A A. BerrY Subdzvi5ion
i, ;itAk 3 3 ,
,�
w
It.NAbSx'-1" F l`f f% i t i ,t rt1 L
,LFG L DESCRIPTION
y ~ i !4 •�� ri 7� t )
y et
7
4.
t.r
.t
"W 4 t'•} ,'f ;.•;` t, 7 1 frJ r ttt: tittj ll'".,E it '.
i
"��✓ (C�"cam,/ r♦1'';j Gfic�wti f'''✓'('/�Aif.H'w�
����1 �y,Gt ✓v..,!�. �'�.-t.r.�:..�'`i`,�� �G� '� lE �iS! 7t r' � il+:-�t{, , r #w' }.t-�, it,r. 'i'1.
''b - J/f� � { j; ] e�1 (. •y'f� - - i+ t' t, ,t - i � it d t� +d 1 � r t , f _.
i //�'l- �,V'.A- "f /Y`�^ +r rt{� �, S; �! i ` {� ,it 1 f J,+{�� r G #,' - r 1�• E is r}�i,E7� r i ''.{
{a �Af �tli"1 wr ..fi+� C+•_� `.� r y l + 0,.. 1 + 9,<
/_-'_L #�:! •` /_'/' S.r+ j__., %. rr1 �'u1 ! t� tti.
j } � r.;_ d n ;. , t 1 t � ve y 7 kw 7 r/ '� $•
#� `I'3 yr } ! +� y# r r�+: r{ t� ;J� �� f i' \9 ♦$i•#'� t d 1. i * �� ° 0' '," � } gr j�:t E / ... it ! .
F�rel4 r + % t �t �� � 4r �, 9``1 } 'dt _ ?Jrr i � ♦ ti r 1 S' t. � n - + ,, 1
� p�'., U'�1 ry.. i. t iF1�r,v ,.+!. ); r; 2 :'.t. f,i r7^ 61tjt},.•'• 1. .r)'i 3u,. i +,.1 id �'- +. ' e
197C
OCT
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS GAVE THE BOARD THE HISTORY OF THIS
PARTICULAR DITCH, NOTING THAT IN 1968 IN A PERIOD OF HIGH WATER, THE
PEOPLE THERE ASKED THE COUNTY TO OPEN UP A DITCH FOR DRAINAGE, AND IT WAS
DONE AS AN EMERGENCY MEASURE TO RELIEVE THE SITUATION TEMPORARILY. LATER
THE COUNTY DID OBTAIN SIX EASEMENTS, WHICH ARE RECORDED$ HE CONTINUED
THAT ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO PEOPLE STARTED TO FILL IN THE DITCH, THE
COUNT WENT UP TO OPEN IT UP, AND THERE WAS.A BIG DISAGREEMENT WITH SOME
OF THE PEOPLE WANTING IT OPENED AND SOME WANTING IT FILLED UP. THE
ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE DITCH HAS NEVER BEEN MAINTAINED,
AS MS. KAYE CLAIMS, BECAUSE OF THE DISAGREEMENT, BUT*HE FEELS THAT THE
COUNTY SHOULD RETAIN THIS EASEMENT BECAUSE IT IS IMPORTANT TO THE
DRAINAGE OF THIS AREA ESPECIALLY AS IT DEVELOPS,
PETE MUSICK, SURVEYOR, STATED THAT HE HAS SURVEYED PROPERTY ON
BOTH SIDES OF THIS DITCH, AND FEELS IF THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY IS ABANDONED AND
THE DITCH FILLED IN, DRAINAGE PROBLEMS IN THE AREA WILL BE GREATLY MULTI-
PLIED. HE STRONGLY URGED THAT THE BOARD DENY THIS REQUEST,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST OF MS. MADELINE KAYE
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO RELEASING THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN LOT
28 A.A. BERRY SUBDIVISION,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED
A PETITION SIGNED BY RESIDENTS OF 44TH AVENUE REQUESTING THAT THE UNPAVED
SECTION OF 44TH AVENUE BE PAVED. SAID PETITION IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF
THE MINUTES.
i
41
E T I T 1 .O rd
t... Sriptember 15,* •19?6 `
' Tc:
The Administrator s
Indlan 'Ri ver Coli-vii.
Yero eac z.
:Florida,
• 1 '. r �! d rt li 4 i 41
�'t r y r 'S'. ' { t +- ,: 1 t r 9,t,r �4� r e, .i•;..
We
t tp1e un �9rs`1 tet? bein. 2°t`�lde%`.<' O�Tnd?_a t Ri.Ver
_ 1 -
County c�r�d residing, on 4jrth Avenu4,''betw�en •lith Stze�:l:
'u t ut�d. 16 th'`Stee U rccaes that i nxs` unpavEd 'sect�'c+:2 caf '' r
t,y i
;t�4th 'Avonue. be' 'caved..
,
77*
14
+ 1. � ^ f� •_. i-%���a - .,:.:
,t: '"�{ _,.;^.!+''.�. : f�`,••�r a =-. ,S ..i: : _,l i t{- +
- ytit.y+ + r� �/t 1 .:.....-% /•,. !� + r t i' , + t.t j f t y i
' jis t"• _- be Y 8•r - _. \t L�.�i it -/ • r _ -1 +
{t ry} j• t � f
t ,
a
i Fy1 t ; `f l+�r /'�t r �! `��. ('•_ � f ," � + -i\ a tl .s , t.y .r�i (r:..r ' jrV t t{
! ..y. / Vii.{ .°' K �" U. c` { •
ill
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT THIS IS A SUB -STANDARD ROAD
WITH DRAINAGE PROBLEMS, AND WHAT IS REALLY NEEDED TO FIX THE ROAD PROPERLY
BEFORE ANY PAVING CAN BE DONE IS SUFFICIENT RIGHT-OF-WAY, HE NOTED THAT
THIS ORIGINALLY WAS A SEMI -PRIVATE AREA, BUT SINCE THE SHOPPING CENTER WAS
DEVELOPED, THE ROAD HAS PICKED UP A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND REALLY SHOULD BE
PAVED.
.JAMES AYERS, A RESIDENT OF 44TH AVENUE NOTED THAT THE DITCH
GOES FROM 16TH STREET TO 18TH STREET, WHERE IT DISAPPEARS AND THERE IS
42
y
NO DRAINAGE BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH STREET. HE SUGGESTED THAT THE DRAINAGE
COULD BE EXTENDED FROM 19TH STREET TO THE`16TH`STREET CANAL WITHOUT ANY
FURTHER EASEMENT AND A 22 FOOT ROAD COULD BE PAVED ON THE EXISTING EASE-
MENT,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SAID THIS WOULD REQUIRE A CURB AND GUTTER
ROAD, WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN CONSIDERED PREVIOUSLY AS IT COSTS CONSIDERABLY
MORE. HE POINTED.OUT THAT TO CONFORM TO STANDARDS A MINIMUM OF 50' OF
RIGHT-OF-J'IAY IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE FOR PROPER SHOULDERS, ETC. HE ALSO .
NOTED THAT EVEN IF THE PROPERTY OWNERS GAVE AN ADDITIONAL 25' EASEMENT
THE HOUSES ARE SET FAR BACK AND THERE WOULD BE SWALE AND SHOULDER BEFORE
YOU GOT TO THE ACTUAL PAVEMENT, IfIR. AYERS SAID IT WAS HIS. UNDERSTANDING
THAT THEY HAD ALREADY GIVEN 25', AND AN ADDITIONAL 25' WOULD COME (QUITE
CLOSE TO SEVERAL HOUSES,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT SOME YEARS AGO A PROBLEM
AROSE IN REGARD TO SURVEYS IN THIS AREA.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED ABOUT THE ORIGINAL SURVEY AND WHERE THE
25' ACTUALLY IS LOCATED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED WHAT THE COST OF SURVEYING'AND DOING A
TITLE SEARCH WOULD BE.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE HAD NO IDEA AND FELT WE
SHOULD HAVE THIS EASEMENT FLAGGED SO WE KNOW WHAT WE HAVE AND CAN DETER-
MINE WHERE IT IS NEEDED.
MRS. BETTY HOGAN APPEARED AND STATED THAT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE SHOPPING CENTER, THE ROAD HAS BECOPE PRACTICALLY A GARBAGE DUMP.
COMMISSIONER'LOY INQUIRED IF MRS. HOGAN THOUGHT THE PROPERTY
OWNERS WOULD BE WILLING TO GIVE AN ADDITIONAL 25' IF IT WERE NEEDED.
MRS. HOGAN STATED THAT SHE DOUBTED THE LAWTONS WOULD AS THEY ARE
QUITE CLOSE TO THE ROAD.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER OVER THE YEARS THE ROAD MIGHT
NOT HAVE BEEN PUSHED OVER A CONSIDERABLE DISTANCE SO THAT ACTUALLY AN
ADDITIONAL 25' EASEMENT MIGHT NOT GO MUCH FURTHER INTO THE PETITIONERS'
PROPERTY THAN IT ALREADY DOES.
i
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT A SEARCH BE MADE OF THE
/.RECORDS TO TRY TO DETERMINE WHAT WE NOW OWN AND THEN FLAG THE WEST RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF WHAT WE CAN SUBSTANTIATE OWNERSHIP -TO AND SEE WHERE IT IS
LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING ROAD.
- 43
J
RESOLUTION 76-72
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida desire to appoint a representative from the
Commission to the Mental Health District Board No. 9, and
WHEREAS, WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR. has served as the
Commissioner Representative to the Mental Health District Board;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
that WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR. is hereby appointed as the Commissioner
f
Representative for Indian River County, Florida on the Mental Health
District Board No. 9.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
C(hairman
ATTEST:
Clerk
i
COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO
SERVE ON THE MENTAL HEALTH DISTRICT BOARD NO. 9 BETWEEN NOW AND 'JANUARY
WHEN IT WILL BE GETTING ORGANIZED, HIRING STAFF AND A DIRECTOR, AND
DETERMINING A LOCATION TO SERVE FIVE COUNTIES, ETC. HE RECOMMENDED THAT
AFTER THIS TIME HE BE REPLACED BY SOMEONE MORE QUALIFIED IN THE FIELD
OF MENTAL HEALTH NEEDS AND CARE, AS HE FELT IT WOULD BE IN THE BEST
INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY.
ASSISTANT COUNTY PLANNER ROBERT BERG PRESENTED TO THE BOARD THE
RECOMMENDED CENSUS TRACT MAP FOR I980 AND STATED THEY HAVE MADE ONLY ONE
CHANGE FROM THE 1970 CENSUS TRACT MAP. HE NOTED THAT BEFORE IT FOLLOWED
THE CITY LIMITS, BUT THEY WERE REQUESTED TO FOLLOW PHYSICAL LANDMARKS
INSTEAD. HE POINTED OUT THAT ONE OF THE LINES IS THE OLD INTERCOASTAL
WATERWAY. MR. BERG RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD THAT THEY FORM A CENSUS TRACT
COMMITTEE AND STATED THAT THE CENSUS BUREAU SUGGESTS THAT IT BE COMPOSED
OF MEMBERS FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, THE
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, ETC., PLUS
ANY PEOPLE WHO ARE DATA USERS. HE ASKED THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE
CENSUS TRACT MAP AS IT IS NOW DUE AT THE CENSUS BUREAU.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CENSUS TRACT MAP FOR 1980 AS OF THIS
DATE TO BE FORWARDED TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BUREAU OF THE.
CENSUS, AND COPY TO BE DATED AND PLACED ON RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK.
Ai
• (ORIGINAL FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK) (APPROVED I0-6-76)
. yr
• ` ���� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
«— ♦�♦.r� ^ CENSUS TRACT
1% MAF.
• s i 1980
• f°,7tifAt � � � e �
n
L, �� ------ ....roaoa.r..,.
df
,A
/ 0 8 ; --•_
04
0569
9oe
`� ♦ rJ
" 1 �,,t, / / siz • v mae
0503 {
• / a ATLAIV77C
O, 02 -- y
OCrAN
• 0506
{ yy
sae : . - ..._—___"_.—. ._.._-• ♦... - - I
x
I
e
e.
OCT 61976
Book w 47
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN GAVE THE BOARD AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT HE
HAS DELVED OUT OF STATE REPORTS ON THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HE NOTED
THAT HE HAS TRIED TO DIG OUT WHAT WE ARE EXPECTED TO DO AND WHAT MUST.BE
DONE AND POINTED OUT THAT THINGS THE COUNTY "MAY" DO NOW WILL LATER BECOME
"MUSTS." HE THEN DISCUSSED WHETHER IT WAS NECESSARY FOR ANYONE TO ATTEND
THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STATED HE DID NOT
FEEL WE NEED TO OBJECT TO ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE SHOULD HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE ATTEND IN
ANY EVENT, AND MR. BRENNAN SAID HE WOULD BE GLAD TO DO SO.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LAY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY
TRAVEL FOR THE COUNTY PLANNER TO ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE STATE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN ORLANDO ON OCTOBER 11-121 1976,
VAL BRENNAN DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE COST OF PRINTING THE
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN IN COLOR.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THE BILL OF THE EAST
CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN THE AMOUNT OF $344.09 FOR
PRINTING OF THE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN IN COLOR,
MR. BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS
RECEIVED A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $54.00 FROM THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT FOR PRINTING OF PLATS AS THEIR OFFICE EQUIPMENT IS INADEQUATE FOR
THIS PURPOSE. HE NOTED THAT THEY CHARGE THE CLERK'S OFFICE THE SAME
AMOUNT THAT THE CLERKS OFFICE CHARGES THE PUBLIC - $2.00 PER PLAT AND
ASKED IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO HAVE THESE MONIES CREDITED TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND THE BOARD AGREED THAT SUCH A PROCEDURE
WAS NOT POSSIBLE; THAT SUCH CHECKS MUST BE TURNED OVER TO THE FINANCE
DEPARTMENT TO BE PROPERLY CHARGED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LAY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR THE COUNTY
PLANNER, VAL BRENNAN, TO ATTEND THE FLORIDA CHARTER AMERICAN INSTITUTE
OF PLANNERS FALL CONFERENCE, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1976, AT SANIBEL ISLAND.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LAY, THE -BOARD UNAMIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR ASSISTANT
COUNTY PLANNER BERG TO ATTEND THE MEETING OF THE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF
OCT 61976
Boor 27
BUILDING AND ZONING OFFICIALS AT THE STATE ASSOCIATION COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
47TH ANNUAL CONVENTION OCTOBER 21-22, 1976, AT DAYTONA BEACH,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT TREASURE COAST
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL NEEDS FUNDS FOR THEIR INITIAL OPERATING
EXPENSES AND ARE ASKING THAT WE SUBMIT AT LEAST ONE -TWELFTH OF OUR
DESIGNATED CONTRIBUTION, OR $613.00, AS SOON AFTER OCTOBER IST AS
POSSIBLE, HE NOTED THAT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CALLS FOR THE TOTAL
AMOUNT TO BE SUBMITTED BY NOVEMBER IST AND ASKED THE BOARD IF THEY WISHED
TO PAY THE TOTAL AMOUNT NOW OR PAY THE SMALLER AMOUNT,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS FELT THE TOTAL AMOUNT SHOULD BE
PAID,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
U)Y, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PAYMENT OF $7,359,02 TO TREASURE
COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AS STIPULATED IN LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER
28, 1976, FROM THE SECRETARY -TREASURER OF THE COUNCIL AND PURSUANT TO THE
OFFICIAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL
PLANNING COUNCIL AND INSTRUCTED THAT THE FINANCE OFFICER BE NOTIFIED TO
MAKE THIS PAYMENT AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, SAID. LETTER IS HEREBY MADE A
PART OF THE MINUTES AND SIGNED COPY OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS ALSO
MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS AUTHORIZED AT THE MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1976,
k
49
OCT 1917's � ?7 49
September 28, 1976
Mr. Jack Noble
County Administrator
Martin Board of County Commissioners
P. 0. Box 626
Stuart, Florida 33494
Subject: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council;,Funding
Dear Mr. Noble:
At its meeting of September 17, 1976, the Council authorized the Executive
Director, upon the signatures of the Chairman and the Secretary -Treasurer,
to draw up to $2,500 in initial operating expenses prior to the October Council.
There was also the suggestion that the member counties make their designated
contribution in the amount of at least one -twelfth. It is important that the
member counties submit the designated one -twelfth as soon after October 1 as
possible. The Executive Director will assume his duties on October 4. He
will have certain office expenses, he will be hiring staff, and setting up
his temporary office.
As Secretary -Treasurer, I have computed the estimated amount based on the
suggested figures of the State Division of Planning. Using the $76,000
recommended for Palm Beach County, dividing that by the County's population,
the following figures would apply:
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION
Palm Seach County $ 76,000.00
Indian River County 7,359.02.<�
St. Lucie County 10,990.47
Martin County 7,593.21
01,942.70
ONE -TWELFTH CONTRIBUTION
Palm Beach County $ 6,330.80
Indian River County 613.00
St. Lucie County 915.50
Martin County 632.51
8,491 X81
Please submit your vouchers to Mervin McIntyre, Secretary -Treasurer, Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council, 711 Ibis Way, North Palweach, Florida 33408.
Sincerely,
Mervin McIntyre
Secretary -Treasurer
MM:ip
cc: Sam Shannon, Executive Director
Maggy Hurchalla, Chairman
Budget Committee
OCT 0 1976 97
_• ry'
Y1
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
CREATING THE TREASURE COAST
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
4,
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of
'fi�`1�•r) 1976, pursuant to authority of Section
163.01-,: Florida Statutes; by and between:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
-
ST. �UCIE COUNTY,
MARTIN COUNTY,
T
.. - and
PALM BEACH COUNTY
1.11TNESSETH:
artm
the Secretary, Department
Dep
. znt of Administration of ERcA ,
State of Florida, has authorized the creation of a new
.a'the
regional planning district to be comprised of Indian River
r-
County, St. Lucie County, Martin County and Palm Beach County;
yhich shall be known as the Treasure.Coast Regional Planning
/ 1
' Council; and, f"
f
WHEREAS, Section 163.014, Florida Statutes, provides that
"a public agency of the State of Florida may exercise jointly ?
s
with any other public agency of the State, or any other state
or of the United States Government any power, privilege or
authority which such agencies share in common and which each
might exercise separately;" and, - ---
_x,
• -
i
"�ER�''`� it is the desire of the parties hereto to estab-
lish an advisory council to constituent local government in
regional, metropolitan, county, and municipal.planning matters 4
involving land use, water resources, highways, recreational
areas, public.schools, sewage and garbage disposal, public
libraries, urban development and other matters concerning the
''
acquisition, planning, construction, development, financing,
r;,
control, use and improvement and disposition of land, build -
,
t OCT 6 191U
QD
.PA^t
ings', structures,facilities, goods or services in the interest
91
of the public, or for public purposes involving the expenditure
of public funds; and,
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to make the most efficient
use of their powers to cooperate for mutual`advantage in conduct-
ing the comprehensive regional planning process for the area
within this comprehensive planning region; and,
_
WHEREAS, the Division of State Planning, Department of
Administration of the State of Florida, is required by Part I of
Chapter 23, Florida Statutes, to integrate the services and plans
_
of local governments and regional planning agencies into the
State planning process through the extent feasible; and,
WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act
of 1475, Section 163.3184(3) of the Florida Statutes assigns
to regional planning agencies the responsibility to determine
the relationship and effect of a local government's plan or
element thereof to or on any regional comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Land and. Water Management Act,
Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, assigns to regional planning !i
agencies the duty to study, review andmakerecommendations
concerning "areas of critical state concern" and "developments'
of regional impact;" and,
/r
WHEREAS, the Office of Management and Budget, Executive i
Office of the President, designates tht comprehensive regional
planning agencies as areawide clearinghouses responsible for
review and coordination regarding certain Federal programs. 4
=.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual promises,
-
covenants, benefits to accrue from conduct of a comprehensive
<.
regional planning process, and agreements herein contained and a
set forth, the principal member units do hereby establish the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council as a -regional planning F _I
and coordinating agency, hereinafter referred to as the COUidCIL,
a separate legal entity, and do further delegate such of their
E
-
powers as are specified herein and agree as.follows:
2
CT
eeaw .2 �'�'"
- J
- .: _ - - --... :: ': .:.-T-a--;•,atm- �
1. Purpose. ' The purposes of this agreement are:
a. To provide local governments with a means of ex-
ercising the rights, duties and powers of a .regional .planning
agency as defined in Chapter 23, §163.01, and Chapter
380, Florida Statutes, as amended, including those functions
enumerated hereinabove by preambles and other applicable Federal,
State and local laws.
b. To provide a means for conducting the comprehensive
regional planning process.
c. To provide regional coordination for the members
of the COUNCIL.
d. To act in an advisory � .
capacity to exchange, inter-
change and- review the various programs referred to it by the
individual members which are of regional concern.
e::. To Promote
communication nication anion
gmembers and the
identification and resolution of common regional-scale problems. i
f
f. To cooperate with Federal State local and non- i
governmental agencies and citizens to insure the orderly and
harmonious pious
coordination ton of Federal, State to and ZocalLan i
p n ng �
and development programs in order to assure the orderly, and
i
balanced growth and development of this region, consistent with
'the
protection of the natural resources an
d
envir
onment of the
y region, and to promote safety, welfare and.quality of life of -g
the residents of the region. s
fi 7
g• To encourage and promote ote commu
nications between I
�
, . neighboring regional planning districts in an attempt to in-
sure compatibility in development and long-range planning goals._ 1
2. Definitions.
a. Alternate - one that takes the place of an absent
appointed representative.
b. Appointed representative - a member of the Council.
c. Member government - any county or incorporated
municipality or any association representing a group of munici-
palities located within the region.
3
0 C"1970
6l1Qtf ��'p4^r.
I
d. Participating member unit - any incorporated
P
municipality or any association representing a group of
municipalities located within a county.
e. Principal member unit - a county signatory to
this agreement.
3. Effective Date, Duration, Amendment, Withdrawal
and Termination.
a. The effective date of the COU' shall COUNCIL .,.
.a 11 be
upon execution b
Y the principal member ber units.
b. This agreement shall continue in effect until
-
terminated as provided in Section 3.e.
C. Any amendment to this agreement shall be in
writing and set forth an effective date. To put into
effect any amendment, each principal member unit shall
adopt by a majority vote of the full board a resolution
authorizing the chairman to execute the amendment,
d. Any principal member unit hereto may withdraw
itsmembershipby resolution duly adopted by its governing
;._`.
body, and upon giving at least three (3) months written
notice of withdrawal to the Chairman or chief elected {
official of the governing body of each principal member
i
— -unit without the effect of terminating this agreement. The
3
withdrawal shall only be effective at the close of the fiscal
year (September 30),with all funding and;contr'Actual obli- i
gations of the withdrawing principal member unit continuing t
until the effective date. All property, real or personal, j
I
of the COUNCIL on the effective date of such withdrawal
shall remain the property of the COUNCIL and the withdrawing f
p.-in.ipal member unit shall have no right thereto.
-
e. This agreement may be terminated by resolution
duly adopted by the governing g body of all principal al m ber -
units. The effective termination date shall be three (3) months
OCT-
-
clo ��� 511
after the date of said resolution unless contractual obliga-
tions would require a later termination date.
f. ., In. the event there is a complete termination of
this agreement, as provided for in Section 3.e. , which would
'- involve the disposition of the property of the COUNCIL, such
property shall be liquidated and each principal member unit
shall be entitled to a share of the proceeds bearing the same
ratio to the total proceeds as the contribution of the principal
member-unit during the preceding fiscal year of the COUNCIL.
g. Further, in the case of a complete termination
of this agreement, the non-Federal matchingcontribution ntribion re-
� r
quired to match any approved Federal or State grant shall be
firm. The project(s) shall be completed and the required re-
ports and accounting shall be submitted to the appropriate
agency. However, the preceding notwithstanding, if the program
may =be canceled or terminated early, then it shall be and any
excess matching funds contributed by the COUNCIL shall be dis-
tributed to each principal member unit in accordance with
Section 3.f. above.
4. Membership, �, Votin and Term.
_
a. Indian River County, St. Lucie County and Martin j
County, as principal member units, shall each be represented
by two -(2) members. Palm Beach Count as a Y, principal, member o
b
unit, shall be represented nle
_ Y three (3 tubers'. All members
- shall be selected from the respective elective governing body.
j b. Each principal member unit shall appoint at least
one .(1) alternate which may be either an elected official or
staff personnel. Said alternate(s) shall be approved by a
majority vote of the principal member unit.
C. Indian River County, St. Lucie County and Martin
County, in addition to the membership in Section- 4.a. , shall �
i
be entitled to one (1) member each to serve on the COUNCIL.
Palm Beach County, in addition to the membership in Section
4.a. , shall be entitled to three (3) members to serve on the
COUtiCIL. Such members shall be elected officials nominated by
- 5 -
•k r
UCT. 6197V d
ua 7 ,�� 55 -
M
a participating member unit and.must be approved by a majority
vote of the full board of the principal member unit in which
they are located.
d. Each participating member unit shall nominate an
alternate, except in Palm Beach County where there shall be three
(3) nominations. Said alternates shall be elected officials.
e. The names of all of the appointed representatives
and their alternates shall be recorded in the COUNCIL minutes.
f. For the conducting of all business, each appointed
representative or alternate shall have an equal vote which shall
be one (1) vote for each appointed representative.
g. The basic term of office for appointed representatives
and alternates of the COUNCIL shall be for one (1) year commencing
with the January meeting in each year. The original members
shall serve from the first regular meeting of the COUNCIL to the
first January meeting. All appointed representatives shall be
eligible for reappointment.
5. Officers. The officers of the COUNCIL shall consist of:
a. A chairman, who shall be chief policy officer, shall
be responsible for overseeing the working organization of the
COUNCIL, for seeing that all policies of the COUNCIL are carried
out, and for presiding over all COUNCIL meetings. The chairman
or his designated representative shall be ex officio member of
all subsidiary committees and boards.
b. A vice chairman, who shall act in the chairman$s
absence or inability to act. The vice chairman shall perform
such other functions as the COUNCIL may from time to time assign
to him.
c.- A secretary-t-rea ,u,-er, who shall be -responsible
for minutes of the meeting, keeping the roll of members, the
financial affairs of the COUNCIL and such other duties as may
be assigned to him.
d. The original officers shall be elected at the first
regular meeting of the COUNCIL and shall serve until the first
annual election meeting as determined in Section 6.a.
6 -
CT 6 1976
either at his discretion or when he is requested by at least
three (3) appointed representatives, none of which may be
from__the same member government; provided adequate notice
shall be given to all appointed representatives stating the
date, hour and place of the meeting and the purpose for which
such meeting is called, and no other business
shall be
trans-
acted at that meeting. However, if a determination to hold
&-special meeting is reflected upon the record of any COUNCIL
meeting, no additional notice is necessary.
. _ d. The Place an
d time
of each meeting shall
be
determined by the membership prior to the e adjournment of the
previous meeting. In the absence of such determination,.the.
time and place of the meeting(s) shall be determined by the
chairman.
e. All official meetings of the -COUNCIL shall be
peen to the public as required by the Florida Sunshine Law,
f Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, and shall meet the requirements
of the applicable sections of the Florid Administrative Pro-
cedure Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
f. A quorum at any meeting shall consist of a majority
of the membership of the COUNCIL. A quorum shall be required
for the conduct of all official business. When a quorum has
been deteLmined to be present, a majority of those present and
voting may take action in all m t
ter
s P r
es
en
ted a
t the-meeti
ng.
Proxy voting is prohibited; however, it is understood that the
vote of an authorized alternate is not to be considered a proxy.
f. g. The secretary -treasurer or his nominee, in accord
with Florida's Public Records Law, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes,
shall keep minutes of each meeting, and distribute a copy thereof
to each member government.
7
OCT's 196
a.2 7u�
such cash amount per capita on the total population of its
county as is required to make up the remainder of each annual
budget. The population base for calculating such pro -rata
j
i
contribution shall be the most current reported for each
county in acccrdance with the official annual estimate of pop-
ulation established pursuant to Section 23.019, Florida Statutes.
c. Assessment shall be paid in full no later than
November 1.
i
t
d. Each member government who does not remit the
a
.
assessed amount by November 1 shall lose all voting privileges
until payment is made.
e. The COUNCIL shall have the right to receive and
accept in furtherance of its function: gifts, grants, assist-
i
f
ance funds, bequeaths, and services from Federal, State and
local governments or their agencies and from private and com-
munity sources, and to expend therefrom {such sums of money as
shall be deemed necessary from time to time for the attainment
a.
of its objectives in accordance with all applicable laws.
�
8. Powers. The COUNCIL shall have all powers granted
f
-
herein: including:. _
a_ The powers granted by Chapter 23, §163.01,
6163.31$4(3), and Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, as now existing
or as from time to time amended.
b. To conduct studies of the region -'s resources with
,.'
respect to existing and emerging problems of industry, commerce,
transportation; population, housing, agriculture, public services,
human resources, natural resources, government, and other matters
!c
which are relevant to regional planning. -
,
Cel
OCT 6 1glu
^:
�4 -27 Pao,
c." To adopt rules of procedure and bylaws, to regulate
its affairs and conduct its business.
d. To adopt an official seal.
e. To maintain office space at such placeswithinthe
region as may from time to time be required in performance of
its duties.
f. To employ and set the compensation of the Executive
-
Director who shall serve at the pleasure of the COUNCIL. The
Executive Director shall employ and discharge professional,
technical or clerical staff as may necessary to carry out
the purposes of the COUNCIL. The-Executive Director may make
agreements with local planning or other public agencies, within
ar without the geographic boundaries of the region, for temporary
transfer, loan, or other cooperative use of staff employees and,
withtheconsent of the COUNCIL or pursuant to procedures .estab-
lished by the COUNCIL, may acquire the services of consultants
and enter into contracts on behalf of the COUNCIL.
g. To authorize compensation for appointed represent-
..atives of the COUNCIL and staff for per diem, travel, and other
reasonable expenses for meetings, hearings and other official
business.
h. To hold public hearings, sponsor public forums,
and conduct other activities whenever deemed necessary or use-
ful in the execution of the functions cif the`•COUNCIL.
i. To acquire, own, operate, maintain; lease or sell
_
real or personal property and hold title thereto in the name
of the COUNCIL.
j. To fix and determine in accordance with applicable
laws by resolution, rules and regulations relating to advertise-
ment for bids, manner of bidding and amount below which same
:..will not be required.
k. To sue and be sued, implead and be impleaded, complain
and defend, intervene and appeal in all courts and administrative
.::.
agencies.
%'« =
1. To accept gifts, apply for use grants, assistance
funds or bequests of money or other property from the United
- 9 -
k
,
UVI 76
�
UQIJ n'
States, the State, a local unit. of.government or any person
for any COUNCIL purpose and to enter, into agreements required
in connection therewith, and to hold, use, and dispose of such
monies or property in accordance with the.terms.of -the gift,
grant, loan or agreement relating thereto.
m. To make and enter into all contracts and agree-
ments and do and perform all actsanddeeds necessary or
incidential to the performance of its duties and the exercise
of its powers..
n. To prescribe all terms and conditions for the
employment of officers, employees, and agents including but.
not 'limited to the fixing of pay and classification plans,
benefits,.and the filing of performance and fidelity bonds
and such policies of insurance covering itself and employees
as it may deem advisable.
o. To participate with other government agencies,
educational institutions, and private organizations in the
coordination of the activities above.
p. To determine and collect charges or fees for any
lawful purpose, including but not limited to, reviews, referrals,
and for providing local assistance for special services.
- To select and appoint such a
4• dbisor
PP bodies as the
Y
COUNCIL may, find appropriate for the conduct of its activities.
1 y `
r. To enter into contracts to provide, at cost, such
services related
to its responsibilities p les as may be requested
y by localovernments within the region -*
g g nand which the COUNCIL
finds feasible _ e Bible toP erform.
.. 9. Severability. If any Provision of
this agreem
ent or
the application of such prevision toP
an erson or circumstance
lance
Y.
Y
shall be held invalid, such invalidity shad not affect other
provisions or applications of this agreement which can be given
effect without the invalid provisions or applications, and to
.this end the provisions of this agreement are declared severable.
- 10
OCT 6 1976'.- - ----- - -� � __ - ,
���� 60
_h
S-<
7T
tiT
10:. Signatories. It is expressly understood- that the terms
and conditions of this agreement shall be effective be and
among those parties signatory he and that the validity,
force and effect of their agreement shall not be affected by
one or more of the parties named herein not joining in this
agreement, any other provisions of this agreement to the con-
trary notwithstanding.
IN WITNESS 'WHEREOF, the parties have officially adopted
and --caused this agreement to be executed and their signatures
i
to be affixed by their respective Commission Chairman :as of
t. the day and year first abovewritten.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY CO1k1- BY ITS BOARDS OF COUNTY
MISSIONERS . COMISSIONERS .
�` Chairman
VAL BRENNAN DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
TO BE FOLLOWED IN CARRYING OUT THE STREET NUMBERING AND NAMING PROGRAM,
THE BOARD AGREED, AS SUGGESTED EARLIER IN THE MEETING, THAT
BOTH THE STREET NAMES AND NUMBERS SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON THE STREET SIGNS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT AN AMENDMENT COULD BE MADE TO
THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ORDINANCE TO THIS EFFECT.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS RECOMMENDED THAT DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS
.JOHNS ISLAND OR THE MOORINGS TO ALLOWED TO DESIGN THEIR OWN SIGNS IF
THEY WISH, BUT THEY MUST INCLUDE BOTH THE STREET NAME AND NUMBER.
MR. BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN RECORDED SUBDIVISIONS
,WHICH HAVE NAMED STREETS WHICH ARE NOT YET DEVELOPED, HE WOULD LIKE TO
SUBMIT TO THE BOARD NUMBERS FOR THESE STREETS TO BE ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION
AND HAVE THE NAMES PHASED OUT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT AN ORDINANCE COULD BE SET UP FOR
THIS PROCEDURE,
MR. BRENNAN NOTED THAT PASSING AN ORDINANCE TAKES A WHILE TO
ACCOMPLISH, AND PRIORITIES MUST BE ESTABLISHED FOR MAKING THESE CHANGES,
HE CONTINUED THAT WHEN SIGNS ARE CHANGED, HE THOUGHT THE ADMINISTRATOR
SHOULD ADVISE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WHAT SIGNS ARE CHANGED AND WHERE,
AND THEN THE OWNER, TAX ASSESSOR, AMBULANCE SQUAD, FIREMEN AND POLICEMEN,
ETC,, MUST BE NOTIFIED,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS`IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE
RESPONSIBILITY AND NOT UP TO THE BOARD AFTER THE ORDINANCE IS PASSED.
ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG POINTED IOUT -THAT PLATS ARE RECORDED AND
COPIES DISTRIBUTED BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER, AND WHEN CHANGES ARE MADE,
THE STREET SIGNS WILL NOT AGREE WITH THE PLATS. VAL BRENNAN DISCUSSED
CHANGING THE NAMES ON THE PLATS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT NAMES ON PLATS THAT HAVE
BEEN RECORDED CANNOT BE CHANGED; A NEW PLAT WOULD HAVE TO BE FILED. HE
NOTED THAT NUMBERS COULD BE ADDED, HOWEVER.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED, AND THE BOARD AGREED ATTORNEY COLLINS
SHOULD RESEARCH THIS MATTER WITH COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN REGARD TO THE 10,000
' J
G.P,D. WATER ALLOTMENT APPROVED FOR DOCTORS OFFICES NEAR THE NEW HOSPITAL
AS REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY .JACKSON, HE HAS RECEIVED.A LETTER FROM CITY
MANAGER .JOHN LITTLE WITH REGARD TO TAP -IN PROCEDURES.INTO THE WATER
62
C
01976 . a
PLANT, AND COUNTY ENGINEER_JAMES BEINDORF FELTITWAS A REASONABLE
APPROACH. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MR. BEINDORF COME
UP WITH SOME COST FIGURES TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH RALMAR
ASSOCIATES IN THIS REGARD,
THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT BY OVERSIGHT,
THEY HAVE NOT IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS PASSED A RESOLUTION COMBINING
ALL OF THE MILLAGES FROM ALL OF THE SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND SENT
IT TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER. HE NOTED THAT THE APPRAISER HAS RECEIVED
THIS INFORMATION, BUT NOT ALL IN ONE DOCUMENT, AND HE NOW WOULD LIKE
THE BOARD TO APPROVE SUCH A RESOLUTION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONERLOY,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 76-74 ESTABLISHING MILLAGES
FOR ALL OF THE SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS IN THE COUNTY.
RESOLUTION NO. 76-74
WHEREAS, all acts having been performed and all proceedings
has as required bylaw preliminary to the levy of taxes in Indian River
County, Florida, for the year 1976; and
WHEREAS, the respective Boards and taxing districts being
authorized to fix and levy taxes upon property situated, within Indian
River County, Florida, as provided by law, fixed such tax levies and
have certified the same to the Board of County Commissioners and this
Board having accepted the same and having found them to be proper;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida:
1. Estimates having been made by the Board of Commissioners
of the INDIAN RIVER MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, and a certified copy
of the Resolution filed with this Board, as required by law, and as estimated
by the Board of Commissioners, it is determined and hereby declared that
a tax rate of thirty six hundredths (. 36) mill upon the dollar be levied, and
is hereby fixed and assessed for the year 1976-77, on all of the property
taxable for such purpose as provided by law in the County of Indian River,
lying and being within the boundaries of said Indian River Mosquito Control
District, described in Chapter 61-2278, Laws of Florida, Regular Session
1961.
2. Estimates having been made by the Board of Commissioners
of SEBASTIAN INLET DISTRICT and a certified copy of Resolution filed
with this Board as required by law and as estimated by said Board of
Commissioners, it is determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of
zero (0) mill upon the dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and assessed
for the year 1976 on all of the property in the County of Indian River lying
and being in the boundaries of said Sebastian Inlet District, which said
boundaries are as follows, to -wit: All that part of Indian River County
OCT 61976
64
(5) Klein Printing Company
1020 HIGHLAND AVENUE / P. O. BOX 3686
ALBANY, GEORGIA 31706
JOHN BEAVERS 912) 436-1584
P. O. BOX 632 eoLLeer
LA BELLE. FL. 33935
813) 675-1358
M M r
which comprised and made up the First Commissioner's District of St.
Lucie County, Florida, as the same was located and established on May
23, 1919; and all such area or territory as may exist by reason of the
changes of the boundaries of Brevard and Indian River Counties, Florida,
as approved at the Special General Election held on November 3, 1959,
in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 59-486, Laws of Florida
of 1959, which said levy shall be used as a maintenance fund for the
purposes authorized and prescribed in the Act creating said District;
namely Section 15, Chapter 7976, Laws of Florida, as amended by
Chapter 12259, of the Laws of Florida.
3. Estimates having been made by the Board of Commissioners
of the CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT,
and a certified copy of the Resolution filed with this Board, as required
by law and as estimated by said Board of Commissioners, it is determined
and hereby declared that a tax rate of three hundred sixty five thousandths
(. 365) mill upon the dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and imposed and
assessed for the year 1976, on all of the property in the County of Indian
River lying and being within the boundaries of the Central and Southern
Florida Flood Control District, the boundaries of said District being de-
scribed as including all of the County of Indian River.
4. Estimates having been made by the Board of Trustees of
the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, .and a certified copy
of the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is
determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of zero (0) mill upon the
dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and assessed for the year 1976 on all
of the property in said District, the same being as set forth in Chapter
61-2275, Acts of the 1961 Florida Legislature, for such purposes as
provided by law.
-2-
n k
OCT
boa 65
f'
5. Estimates having been made by the Board of Trustees of
the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, and a certified copy
of the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is
determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of six thousand four hundred
eight one hundred thousandths (.06408) mill upon the dollar be levied and
is hereby fixed and assessed for the year 1976 on all the property in
Indian River County for the purpose of paying interest upon and providing
a Sinking Fund for bonds of said District dated August 1, 1959.
6. Estimates having been made by the Board of Trustees of the
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, and a certified copy of
the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is
determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of fifty six thousand eight
hundred forty one hundred thousandths (. 56840) mill upon the dollar be
levied and is hereby fixed and assessed for the year 1976 on all the property
in Indian River County for the purpose of paying interest upon and providing
a Sinking Fund for bonds of said District dated 1973, the same as being
set forth in Chapter 61-2275, Acts of the 1961 Florida Legislature, for
such purposes as provided by law
7. Estimates having been made by the Board of Trustees of the
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, and a certified copy of
the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is
determined and hereby declared that a tax rateoffifty four thousand
four hundred four one hundred thousandths (. 54404) mill upon the dollar be
levied and is hereby fixed and assessed for the year 1976 on all the
property in Indian River County for the purpose of paying interest upon
and providing a Sinking Fund for bonds of said District dated 1975, the
same as being set forth in Chapter 61-2275, Acts of the 1961 Florida
Legislature, for such purposes as provided by law.
-3-
OCT 619766
E9U4 �� ��:•., �
OCT 61976
M
8. Estimates having been made by the Board of Commissioners
of the FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT, and a letter stating that
this motion was passed, being filed with this Board, it is determined and
hereby declared that no tax rate be levied for the year of 1976 on all the
property in the County of Indian River lying and being within the boundaries
of the said Florida Inland Navigation District, the boundaries. of said
District being described as including all of the County of Indian River.
9. Estimates having been made by the Town Council of the
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, and a certified copy of the Resolution
thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is determined and
hereby declared that a tax rate of three and one hundred twenty four
thousandths (3. 124) mills upon the dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and
imposed and assessed for the year 1976 on all of the property in the County
of Indian River lying and being within the boundaries of the Town of Indian
River Shores, the same being two and eighty one hundredths (2.81) mills
for the current operating expenses of said Town and three hundred fourteen
thousandths (. 314) mill for the purpose of making payments into the Interest
and Sinking Fund heretofore established for that purpose.
10. Estimates having been made by the City Council of the CITY
OF FELLSMERE, and a certified copy of the Resolution thereof filed with
this Board as required by law, it is determined and hereby declared that
a tau rate of six and two thousand forty ten thoiisandths (6.2040) mills upon
the dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and imposed and assessed for the
year 1976 on all of the property in the County of Indian River lying and being
within the boundaries of the City of Fellsmere.
11. Estimates having been made by the Town Council of the
TOWN OF ORCHID, and a certified copy of the Resolution thereof filed
with this Board as required by law, it is determined and hereby declared
that a tax rate of one and nine thousand nine hundred seventy five ten
thousandths (1.9975) mills upon the dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and
-4-
���r 27:A., 67
and imposed and assessed for the year 1976 on all of the property in the
County of Indian River lying and being within the boundaries of the Town
of Orchid.
12. Estimates having been made. by the City Council of the CITY
OF SEBASTIAN, and a certified copy of the Resolution thereof filed with
this Board as required by law, it is determined and hereby declared that
a tax rate of five and thirty five hundredths (5.35) mills upon the dollar be
levied and is hereby fixed and imposed and assessed for the year 1976 on
all of the property in the County of Indian River lying and being within the
boundaries of the City of Sebastian.
13. Estimates having been made by the City Council of the CITY
OF VERO BEACH, and a certified copy of the Resolution thereof filed with
this Board as required by law, it is determined and hereby declared that a
tax rate of three and fifty two hundredths (3.52) mills upon the dollar be
levied and is hereby fixed and imposed and assessed for the year 1976 on all
of the property in the County of Indian River lying and being within the
boundaries of the City of Vero Beach, the same being three and fifty two
one hundredths (3. 52) mills for the current operating expenses of said City.
14. Estimates having been made by the Board of Supervisors of
the ROCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT and a
certified copy of the Resolution thereof filed w*h this Board as required
by law, it is determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of Six Thousand
Nine Hundred Forty Eight Ten Thousandths (.6948) mill upon the dollar be
levied and is hereby fixed and assessed for the year 1976. The district
shall include all that portion of Indian River County, Florida, outside the
boundaries. of any incorporated municipality as follows:
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 1, Plat Book 4, page 23
Rock Ridge Subdivision Replat Unit No. 2, Plat Book 4, page 50
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 3, Plat Book 4, page 64
-5-
OCT 61976
b°6t
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 4, Plat Book 5, page 7
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 5, Plat Book 5, page 2
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 6, Plat Book 5, page 67
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 7, Plat Book 5, page 81
Rock Ridge. Subdivision Unit No. 8, Plat Book 6, page 53
Rock Ridge Subdivision Unit No. 9, Plat Book 6, page 23
as shown in the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida.
15. Estimates having been made by the State Board of Health of
the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, and a certified copy
of the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is
determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of one thousand three hundred
eighty four mills (. 13 84) upon the dollar be levied and is hereby fixed and
imposed and assessed for the year 1976 on all of the property in the County
of Indian River lying and being within the boundaries of the said Indian River
County Health Department.
16. Estimates having been made by the Board of Supervisors of the
INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, and a certified
copy of the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is
determined and hereby declared that a tax rate of $3.00 per acre is hereby
fixed and imposed and assessed for the year 1976. This District shall
include that land as described in that Special Apt created by same. Said
maintenance tax shall be equal and uniform in amount upon each acre of land
assessed and the minimum drainage tax shall be not less than the one -acre
tax rate herewith established and said minimum drainage tax shall apply to
any one parcel separately assessed to maintain and preserve the ditches,
drains and drainage works of this District and to repair and restore the
same when needed and for the purpose of defraying the current expenses
of this District.
-6-
1.
OCT 1976
17. Estimates having been made by the Board of Supervisors of
ST. JOHNS DRAINAGE DISTRICT, and certified copies of the Resolutions
thereof filed with this Board as required by law, it is determined and hereby
declared that a tax rate of $17.00 per acre is hereby fixed and imposed and
assessed for the year 1976. This District shall include that land as des-
cribed in that Special Act created by same. Said maintenance tax shall be
equal and uniform in amount upon each acre of land assessed, and the
minimum drainage tax shall not be less than the one -acre tax rate here-
with established, and said minimum drainage tax shall apply to any one
parcel separately assessed to maintain and preserve the ditches, drains
and drainage works of this District and to repair and restore the same when
needed and for the purpose of defraying the current expenses and installment
obligations of this District.
18. Estimates having been made by the Board of Supervisors of
FELLSMERE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, and a certified copy of
the Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, that this
Board does herewith levy a maintenance tax for the year 1976 of $5.25 for
each three acres or fraction of three acres, and an additional $1.75 per acre
for each acre or fraction thereof in excess of three acres, in order to
maintain and preserve the ditches, drains and drainage works of this
District and to repair and restore the same when needed and for the pur-
pose of defraying the current expenses of the District.
19. Estimates having been made by the Board of Supervisors of
SEBASTIAN RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, and a certified copy of the
Resolution thereof filed with this Board as required by law, that this Board
does herewith levy a maintenance tax for the year 1976 of $2.25 per acre,
or any portion thereof, upon all lands located and being situated within the
confines of the Sebastian River Drainage District boundary lines, as more
particularly described as follows:
-7-
6 CT 61976
ectUi 7 =ri 70
All of the South Half of Sections 25 and 26, and all of Sections
35 and 36 of Township '31 South, {Range 38 East, Indian River
County, Flor ida;
The Southwest Quarter of Section 29; the South Half of Section
30; all of Section 31; the West Half of Section 32; EXCEPT
the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter of
Section 32, less canal right-of-way, and EXCEPT the South-
east Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32; all in
Township 31 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County,
Florida;
All Sections 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25, 26, 35 and 36,
in Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County,
Florida;
Said maintenancettax, shall beequal and uniform in amount upon
each acre of land assessed, and the minimum drainage tax shall not be
less than the one -acre tax rate herewith established, and said minimum
drainage tax shall apply to any one parcel separately assessed to maintain
and preserve the ditches, drains and drainage works of this District and to
repair and restore the same when needed and for the purpose of defraying
the current expenses of this District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Property Appraiser of Indian
River County, Florida, be and he hereby is directed to assess and levy all
of the foregoing taxes upon the taxable property in Indian River County,
Florida, just and due taxation within the respective boundaries upon which
such taxes are levied and the Tax Collector of Indian River County, Florida,
be and he is hereby directed to collect said tabes and pay over the same and
that a certified copy of this Resolution be furnished to the County Appraiser
of Taxes and the County Collector of Taxes.
Attest: i/'moi' llc��✓ �.tr���
, ctlnix MAN
-8-
OCT 61976
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REMINDED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE AN AGREE-
MENT WITH THE FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION WHEREBY THEY WILL CONTRIBUTE
$12,000 TOWARDS THE COST QF REPAIRING AND PAVING 38TH COURT, PINEVIEW PARK
EXTENSION SUBDIVISION IN GIFFORD, AND STATED THAT HE NOW HAS SUFFICIENT
RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO PROCEED. HE CONTINUED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THIS ROAD
SHOULD BE PAVED UNTIL THE SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM IS WORKED OUT, BUT MARL
COULD BE PUT DOWN AND THE ROAD MAINTAINED AND MADE FIT TO TRAVEL ON. THE
ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO CONTACT CLAUDE
GREENE OF THE FHA AND REACH SOME UNDERSTANDING WHEREBY WE CAN HOLD THE
FUNDS IN ESCROW UNTIL THE WATER SYSTEM IS WORKED OUT.
THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL
FROM ALEX KRASOTKIN COMPLAINING THAT FLORIDA CABLEVISION CORPORATION IS
REPLACING CHANNEL 35 WITH CHANNEL 6, AND HE FEELS THEY ARE RENEGING ON
THEIR PROMISE TO SUPPLY AN INDEPENDENT CHANNEL.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT CHANNEL 35 IS OFF THE AIR BECAUSE OF
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS,
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR
,THOMAS TO CHECK ON HOW MANY CHANNELS.ARE REQUIRED IN FLORIDA CABLEVISION
CORPORATIONS FRANCHISE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED IN REGARD TO OUR FIRE INSURANCE RATE
THAT IT IS THE OPINION OF FORREST SMITH, CHIEF OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
FIRE DEPARTMENT, THAT THERE ARE AREAS IN THE COUNTY THAT SHOULD QUALIFY
FOR A BETTER RATE. HE ALSO NOTED THAT HEkIS TRYING TO FIND OUT THE PROCESS
TO GO THROUGH FOR A RATE STUDY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED THAT CHIEF
SMITH ALSO STATED HE HAS RECEIVED FINAL APPROVAL FOR A FIRE TOWER AND WILL
GET UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITHIN TWO WEEKS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE DISCUSSED
THE $15,000 THE COUNTY IS CONTRIBUTING TOWARDS THIS FIRE TOWER AND ASKED
IF THE TOWER WILL BE IN THE NAME OF THE COUNTY WITH THE CITY STAFFING IT
AND OPERATING IT OR WHETHER WE ARE GOING TO FUND IT DIRECTLY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE CITY IS GOING TO BUILD THE FIRE
TOWER AND LEASE THE LAND BACK TO US FOR,$1.00 A YEAR UNTIL IT IS NO LONGER
USED AS A TRAINING FACILITY.
W5
OCT 61976 72
OCT* 61976.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REPORTED THAT CITY MANAGER .JOHN LITTLE
HAD CALLED DURING THE MEETING AND SUGGESTED THAT THE CITY GIVE US THE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES FOR THE 17TH STREET BRIDGE,
AND THE COUNTY COULD ADVERTISE FOR BIDS AND PAY THE CONTRACTOR.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT WANT THE COUNTY TO BE
INVOLVED IN DIRECT DEALINGS WITH THE CONTRACTOR.
DISCUSSION AROSE ABOUT GENERAL PERMITS BEING ISSUED TO THE CORPS
OF ENGINEERS FOR PRIVATE DOCKS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS
STATED THAT BUILDING DIRECTOR DON ADAMS WILL APPEAR AT THE NEXT MEETING
IN THIS REGARD.
COMMISSIONER Loy INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE AND ADMINISTRATOR
.JENNINGS HAVE TO ATTEND A MEETING IN REGARD TO BEING RELIEVED OF DESIGNA-
TION AS A RESOURCE RECOVERY AREA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR THE
ADMINISTRATOR AND COMMISSIONER LOY TO ATTEND A MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATIONS COMMISSION IN MIAMI THURSDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1976.
RESOLUTION N0. 76-30 IN REGARD TO RELEASING SIDE LOT EASEMENTS
BETWEEN LOTS Z AND 3 IN HAMPTON WOODS SUBDIVISION AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT,
HAVING BEEN PREPARED BY THE APPLICANT AND APPROVED BY ATTORNEY COLLINS,
ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS AUTHORIZED AT THE MEETING OF
MAY 5, 1976.
73
�cUr � :�
73
OCT 61976
RESOLUTION NO. 76-30
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida have been requested to release the
20' wide easement centered on the interior side lot line
dividing Lots 2 and 3 of Hampton Woods Subdivision, according
to the plat thereof filed in the office of the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida in Plat Book 9,
page 16; and
WHEREAS, said 20' easement was dedicated on the Plat
of Hampton Woods Subdivision for public utility purposes;
and
WHEREAS, the request for such release for easement has
been submitted in proper form;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the
following 20' easement in Hampton Woods Subdivision shall be
released, abandoned and vacated as follows:
The south 10' of Lot 2 and the north 10' of Lot 3,
less the east 20' of Lot 2 and Lot 3 and less the
west 20' of Lot 2 and Lot 3, Hampton Woods Sub-
division, a subdivision of Indian River County,
Florida, plat book 9, page 16.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court
be, and they are hereby authorized an¢3 directed to execute
a release of said lot line easements hereinabove referred to
in form proper for recording and placing in the public records
of Indian River County, Florida.
This 5th day of May , 1976.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN IVER CO, F O IDA
BY
Willard W.t Seibert, Jr., C r an
Attest:
Ralf!7Hary�rs, rk of the
Circuit Court
oM7Q 74
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
This Release of Easement executed this 5th day of
May 1976, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Political Subdivision of the
State of Florida, first party, to HAROLD L. BROOKS and
BARBARA L. BROOKS, his wife, whose post office address is
1566 - 28th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida, party of the second
part,
WITNESSETH:
That the said party of the first part.for and in con-
sideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other good and
valuable consideration in hand paid by the said second party,
does hereby remise, release, abandon and quit claim unto the
second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim
and demand which the said first party has in and to the follow-
ing described easement, lying on land situate in the County of
Indian River and State of Florida, to wit:
The south 10' of Lot 2 and the north 10' of Lot 3,
less the east 20' of Lot 2 and Lot 3 and less the
west 20' of Lot 2 and Lot 3, Hampton Woods Sub-
division, a subdivision of Indian River County,
Florida. Plat Book 9, page 16.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all and singular the
appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining
and all the estate, right, title, interest, equity and claim
whatsoever of the said first party tither in law or equity to
the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second
party forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and
sealed these presents by the parties so authorized by law the
day and year first above written.
BOARD OF COUNTY CO ISSIONERS
OF IND RIVER CO NTY FLORIDA
By
Wil and W. Seiber , Jr., a' n
Attest:
R laR ph'Hdr is; Clerk or the
Circuit Court
OCT
��}r 7'�"' 75
ON=
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
r
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer
duly authorized in the State aforesaid and the County aforesaid
to take acknowledgements, personally appeared WILLARD W. SEIBERT,
JR.-, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, a Political Subdivision of the State of
Florida, and RALPH HARRIS, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, to me
known to be the persons duly authorized by said County to
execute the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged before
me that they executed the same for and on behalf of said
Political Subdivision.
WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last
aforesaid this 13th day of October
1976.
40
No ary ublic
State of Florida at Large
My Commission Expires:
(Seal) woi4n OUILICTATR OF rtoRroA AT �
MY CO
rM1 hU Cfl�µl ��Nce i w1
E9 n►�
76
THE AGREEMENT IN REGARD TO FEEDING OF CITY PRISONERS HELD IN
THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY .JAIL, NOW BEING FULLY SIGNED, IS HEREBY MADE A PART
OF THE MINUTES AS AUTHORIZED IN THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF AUGUST 4,
1976,
77
OCT;, 1976
�ODr 27 -a,� . 77
A G R E E M E N T
':.; THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into the day of
4�r 1976, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the CITY
S
OF VERO BEACH, their successors and assigns;
WITNESSETH:
For and in consideration of the mutual promises contained }
herein, the parties agree as follows:
i
1. Pursuant to Florida Statute 125.01 (p) the parties
agree as to CITY OF VERO BEACH'S participation in the feeding ;
of City prisoners held in INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Jail. i
- e
a. The CITY OF VERO BEACH shall be billed at the " !
rate of ONE DOLLAR -AND SEVENTY CENTS ($1.70) per
day per prisoner, and an additional TWENTY-FIVE 4
i
CENTS (.25) per day for each Trustee designated
!; by the CITY OF VERO BEACH.
b. The total amount billed each month shall be
paid by the CITY OF VERO BEACH to INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY. !
c. As additional consideration, an annual charge i.
of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00) per year will
r
be charged to the CITY OF VFFO BEACH as an annual
turnkey expense. t
2. This Agreement may be terminated by either party
on thirty (30) days notice to the other. 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officials of the
City of Vero Beach, Florida and County of Indian River, Florida, 1
I
5
' � t
• _ i o
- r
Z
have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.;
CITY OF VER BEACH I
By: ,
SEAL Mayor }.
ATTEST:
City Clerk,Acno&
- i
Appr ved a o Form:
y t to i
INDIAN RIVER CO Y., F RDA
•,
By:
61fairmanj Boar of tfool
SEAL Commissioners
Attest: }
!✓ '
Clerk
1 i
Appr ed as •t Fo .M :
onntj• Attorney
1 -
- t
i
i
t
T t
1
OCT 61976 �a 79
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN
AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS
ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND Nos. 52771 53096
INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE
FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE
RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO
RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:03 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
IM � I W,,F//AAF ruorl" ffJ"/
ecat 27 : h80
OCT 6 1976