The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2/28/1977MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1977 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN SPECIAL SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON MONDAY, MARCH 28, 1977, AT 5:01 O'CLOCK P.M. PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W..SIEBERT, JR„ EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; AND R. DUN DEESON. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY .ADMINISTR4TOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, .JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCED IT WAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOLDING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FINAL APPLICATION FOR 1977/78. THE HOUR OF 5:01 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: aoea vrn eie..ee r.e o [ • GRV Yii'idl [ [ Ri,iei�,1 V V R. V/'96 Published Weekly { Vero Peach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally. appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being ``p� .p 0 In the matter of Q9 &n 2 zf aw._r'a —1 M o_ C O .p in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said !ndian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tiserr:ent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this y o�� Q Q AQ �q • vyt. ' (Business anger) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian Rivertcjunty, Florida) (scAu 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice Is hereby given that the County Commission of Indian River County, Florida, will hold a Public Hearing in the Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, 2145 114th Avenue; on March 28, 1977, at 5:01 p.m. to i consider: f Community Development Discretionary Block Grant Final Application for the year 1977-78. This application will include the Housing Assistance Plan and Grantee Per. formance Report for the previous year's. C.D. ' activities to be submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development by May 13, 1977. Copies of the Performance Reports and Application will be available for examination by the Public between the hours of 8:30 a.m.' and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, after the Public Hearing, at the office of the County Administrator at the address set out above. Board of County'Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida By: William C. WodtkeJr., Chairman Mar. 13,16, 20, 23, 27,1917. vfx Z. -c'42 COUNTY PLANNER, VAL BRENNAN, APPEARED AND NOTED THAT THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS TO REVIEW THE FINAL APPLICATION FOR A HUD GRANT IN THE AMOUNT i OF $203,000. AFTER THIS HEARING, .THE APPLICATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO TALLAHASSEE FOR A-95 REVIEW, AFTER WHICH IT WILL BE SENT ON TO HUD NO LATER i THAN IiAY 13TH FOR FINAL REVIEW AND FUNDING, MR. BRENNAN INTRODUCED BILL BRISSOM AND HIS ASSOCIATE, STEVE SHEIDLER, OF ADLEY ASSOCIATES, WHO HAVE WORKED ON THE PREPARATION OF THIS APPLICATION. MR, BRENNAN NOTED j THAT IT HAS BEEN QUITE AN UNDERTAK:.!G TO GET THIS DONE IN THE ALLOTTED TIME, BILL BRISSOM, SENIOR -CONSULTANT WITH ADLEY ASSO'.'IATES;,. DISCUSSED THE CHANGES MADE SINCE THE PRE -APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AND NOTED THAT THE PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTANDARD HOUSING HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM 9% TO 19%. THEY FELT THE OLD FIGURE CAME FROM THE 1970 CENSUS AND WAS NOT ACCURATE ANY MORE. MR. BRISSOM STATED THAT THE 19% FIGURE APPLIES ENTIRELY TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY AND NOTED THAT THE INCREASE IN THE PER- CENTAGE FIGURE OF SUBSTANDARD HOUSING IS BENEFICIAL SINCE IT SHOWS A GREATER NEED. MR, BRISSOM CONTINUED THAT THE LONG TERM OBJECTIVES ARE IDENTICAL AND THE BUDGET IS IDENTIrAL TO AT SUBMITTED IN THE PRE - APPLICATION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SPLITTING OUT OF ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING AND MANAGEMENTS COSTS, THE TOTAL, HOWEVER, REMAINS THE SAME, AND THE ACTUAL ACTIVITIES ARE IDENTICAL, MR. BRISSOM CONTINUED THAT THERE r ARE TWO PORTIONS OF THE APPLICATION WHICH WERE NOT PREVIOUSLY GONE OVER THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN AND THE PERFORMANCE REPORT - AND ASKED -MR. SHEIDLER TO REVIEW THESE. -STEVE SHEIDLER NOTED THAT BASICALLY THE TABLES IN THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN REPORT TO HUD THE'HOUSING CONDITIONS AND SITUATION IN THE UNINCORPORATED PART OF THE COUNTY, AND HE FELT THEY PRESENT THE SITUA- TION MUCH MORE ACCURATELY THAN IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR S APPLICATION, HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND MR. BRISSOM CONDUCTED THEIR OWN SURVEY, WHICH THEY FELT WAS CLOSER TO THE TRUTH THAN THE OLD CENSUS DATA AND NOTED THEY GOT THE VACANCY RATE FROM FLORIDA POWER & EIGHT FIGURES. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE ADOPTION OF THE BUILDING CODE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE INCREASED FIGURE FOR SUBSTANDARD HOUSING. 2 F 1I l �I 1.2 MAR 2 1977x. MR. SHEIDLER SAID THAT IT HAD NOT; THAT THIS SURVEY WAS A VISUAL OUTSIDE SURVEY. HE FELT IF THEY HAD DONE AN INTERIOR SURVEY, THE FIGURE MIGHT HAVE,BEEN EVEN HIGHER. HE NOTED THAT THE FIGURE APPLIES TO ALL HOUSIN - NOT JUST SINGLE FAMILY. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT (QUESTIONED THE PERCENTAGE OF RENTAL UNITS IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY SAID TO BE SUBSTANDARD. MR. SHEIDLER EXPLAINED THF METHODOLOGY USED TO ARRIVE AT THIS FIGURE, WHICH IS EXPLAINED ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN, AND NOTED THAT YOU MAY GET A DISTORTED AMOUNT OF RENTAL SUBSTANDARD. MR, BRISSOM POINTED OUT THAT THE ONLY WAY TO IMPROVE THESE FIG- URES WOULD BE TO RUN ANOTHER SURVEY, WHICH WOULD NOT BE THAT VALUABLE AS THE RENTAL PROBLEM CANNOT BE ADDRESSED IN ANY EVENT; THE OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING IS WHAT WE ARE DEALING WITH, AND HE FELT THIS FIGURE IS REASONABLY ACCURATE. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED HOW THEY DETERMINE WHAT IS CONSIDERED SUBSTANDARD - WHETHER IT MIGHT BE JUST A MISSING WINDOW SCREEN? MR. $HEIDLER SAID THAT IF A WINDOW WERE BROKEN AND NOT REPLACED, THAT WOULD BE PART OF IT, AND MR. BRISSOM STATED THAT SUBSTANDARD IS USU- ALLY A COMBINATION OF FACTORS. MR, SHEIDLER THEN DISCUSSED TABLE II IN REGARD TO THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS.' HE NOTED THAT A PERSON MAY NEED ASSISTANCE IF HIS RENT IS OUT OF PROPORTION TO HIS INCOME. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT SOME COULD HAVE SUBSTANDARD HOUSING BUT NOT NEED ANY ASSISTANCE IF THEY ARE ECONOMICALLY ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF.THAT HOUSE. MR, SHEIDLER EXPLAINED THAT TABLE II IS ACTUAL NEEDS AND IS NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO TABLE I - THE SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT IN CER- TAIN COMMUNITIES A GREAT NUMBER OF THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE ARE ELDERLY, MR. SHEIDLER NEXT DISCUSSED THE CURRENT YEAR GOALS, REPORTING THAT UNDER FHA, THE HOUSING ALLIANCE IS WORKING -AND HELPING, BUT THAT DEVELOPERS SEEM TO HAVE LITTLE INTEREST IN TRYING TO WORK UNDER SECTION S. HE NOTED THAT THE THREE-YEAR GOALS ARE NOT QUITE THREE TIMES THE CURRENT YEAR GOALS. 3 I R281977 0. P"Gti 29 126 CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IN REGARD TO TABLE IV, SECTION B, WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IT IS TO PRINT THE PUBLIC NOTICE IN REGARD TO SECTION S DEVELOPMENT.! MR. SHEIDLER STATED THAT HUD ADVERTISES THE NOTICE FOR SECTION S.iI HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HUD DID ONE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE 5 -COUNTY AREA,: i BUT HE DID NOT BELIEVE THEY DID A LOCAL ADVERTISEMENT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. MR. SHEIDLER CONTINUED THAT THE PROCESS TO GO THROUGH FOR SECTION S IS VERY CUMBERSOME AND THE PROFIT SMALL SO THAT DEVELOPERS BACK AWAY FROM IT. HE NOTED THAT HE KNOWS OF NO COMMUNITY IN FLORIDA THAT HAS MET ITS SEC- TION 8 GOALS AND THIS IS WHY HE PUTS MUCH MORE EMPHASIS ON FNA OR HUD RE- HABILITATION. MR. SHEIDLER POINTED OUT THAT THE SECTION S PROGRAM IS OPEN TO ANYONE, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE. MR, SHEIDLER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PERFORMANCE REPORT COV- ERING THE MONIES EXPENDED ON THE FIRST AND SECOND YEAR PROGRAMS WILL BE ABAILABLE BEFORE APRIL 25TH. HE NOTED THIS REPORT WILL SHOW WHAT WAS DONE h(ITH THE MONEY, WHO BENEFITED, THE ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT, AND HOW THEY RELATED TO HELPING MINORITIES, ETC. (HE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE, ATTORNEY COLLINS QUESTIONED THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD ON THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION. MR. BRISSOM STATED THAT TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE HELD ON THE PRE - APPLICATION AND ONE ON THE FINAL APPLICATION, OR THREE ALTOGETHER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE 1977/78 FINAL •COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NON -METROPOLITAN DISCRETIONARY BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR HUD FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $203,000 AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN TO THE APPLICATION AND THE PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATE. MAR '29? 4 J .424-101 . t,• ,•.:t• a e,•;?r reg;11^.r,.•-, y'e 'y" t STANDARD FOR0.s 424 PAGE L (10-7ru) . ' ... •r: i.)• at;\,i:....... tJ°ravcribed by GSA. Fed Tet Maxed meat CireC:ar 14-y v' ['�LI� : f' � t» r' r' • 1 ,, `r , ; .. �r2. Al Pi 1. r. t.,. „ 1 3. (: (A I C. e. 60^LUG __-�_-•---._Y.._,�___» ��; TION . _ 1. TYPt i1 -•w hi:Lfi'I'L;C1Tl(li{T APFILI• b. DATE IDCttTI• D. OAIE Yrar month day OF t-•+ )',or month dot, ACTION al GPPLICAIIprd CATION 1977 29 IICR ASSICNED 19 (AtorF aa* n n7TIricialon OF 111TFNT (Opt) proyriale CLP.OM CF ri[)MAL ACTION Blank ' 4. LLGAL APPLICANT/ItEC1PICUT 5. rEDCRAL UPAPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. 0, Applicant Herne =Indian River County, Florida 59/60006 74 b. Organization Unit i Indian River County Planning Dept. c. Strett/P.O, on 12121 14th Avenue PRO, a. NUMBER 1114 e' !2 11 1 j C city :Vero Beach a. county :Indian River GRAM b. TITLE (From Community Development I. State' t Florida e. ZIP We: 32960 rttf"al ikon -Metropolitan h. contact Penn, (Name Jack G. Jennings, County Adm-istrator °t atop) Discretionary Block Gra R 6: trtephons No.) nq t y 7. TIT(.£ AND DESCRIPTI r OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT S. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT Provision of marl surfacing, or street paving A -slate H-CommunilyAction AEency 11-lotentato 1- Q cr Educational institution where justified, on presently unimproved dirt C-Substate )-Indteo Tribe roads; rehabilitation of substandard houses; Count`' r.-olnor (Specify) D -Count' E -City k and removal of vacant dilapidated residential F-ScbaolDistrict t`3 C-Spscfal Purpose structures In low and moderate income areas of District Enter approi itaLetter® the. County. 9. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE A -Casio Grant D-Insuran:o B-Su;picmenttl Grant E -Other Enter api•raMA - Flcan priate let!er(c) 10. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (?.'omen of cities, counties. 11. ESTUiMATED NUM. 12. TYPE OF APPLICATION States, cte.) DER OF PERSONS A-Nrw C -Revision E -Augmentation Indian River County BENEFITING B-Rcnaeal D -continuation t�-p�� 2,000 Enter approTrfa(e fetter nA 13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 15. TYPE OF CHANGE (For 12c or J2e1 a. APPLICANT b. PROJECT A-Inerecse Dollars "then (Specify)= a. FEDEPJL S 2O3,000 .00 B -Decrease DoNan b. APPLIC6NT OD 10 10 C-Incteass Dura:;on D-Cscrease Duraiion 14A e. STATE .00 1G. PROJECT' START 17. PROJECT-- OAT ROJECT E-GenceDatiai DATE 1 month c'av OURA11ON rider appro- d. LOCAL .00 19 12 mmfhe priater letter(.) e. OTHER ,00 10. ESTIMATED DATE TO Year m: th dny 19. FXO57ING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE SU81411TED TO L TOTAL S 203,0 Q.eo FEDEP.AL AGENCY 6 19 77 5 13 NIA 20. FEDE:P.AL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Name. City, Stats. ZIP code) 2L REMARKS ADDED 1 Housing and Urban Dev. Jacksonville'Area Ofc. 32204 p Yes JA No 22. a. To the bast of my Lnewle", In beltrf, b. If rel0ted by OIdB Circular A-95 this drfl .tion was submitted, pursuant to In. No tee - 0 data to 651s preop?:ic3t:en/aFpllcatien sto stru:tans therein, to appropriate clearinghouses and all respansas are a:lachad: epon'se attached a�E THE true and correct, the document has barn APPLICANT duly authorized by the gw1eming body of y CERTIFIES the a„licant and Do a� Ecsnt will cct,ply (,),Treasure Coast F a. Reg. PI ng. Counci 1 ❑ TIIATp with Me attached sraurancea it the assist- wBurcau of Intergovlt. RP1., Div, of State ❑ ❑ Y *ties Is sporcasd. I (a) Pin ricJriva u u 23. a. TYPED RAMI AND TITLE b. SIGNATURE a DATE SIGNED CERTIFYREPRE.ING William C. Wodtke, Jr. , Year mouth a(ay�t SENTATIVE Chmn., County Commission G��" aJ I. 197 24. AGENCY NAME 25. PPLICA• Year month day TIORECEIVED 19 26. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 23. FEDCRAL APPLICATION npe IDENTIFICATION 29. ADDRESS - 30. FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION 31. ACTION TAKEN 32. FUNDING Year month day 34. Year month day sc STARTING ' a a. AWARDED a. FEDERAL i .00 33. ACTION DATE � 19 DATE 19 It. REJECTED b. APPLICANT ,00 3S. CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMA• 36. Year month day TION (.Yams and te(ephone %amber) ENDING 11 c. RETURNED FOR c. STATE .00 DATE 19 AUENDMEhl d. LOQ .00 37. REMARKS ADDED (] d. WERRED e. OTHER ' .00 (a o. YIIDIDRXWN f. TOTAL S C0 []Yes 1DNa 30. e. In lakict above action, any eemments trceivrd from eleatinrbeints wets con- b. fEDERAL AGENCY A-95 OFFICIAL tidarll. It etancY response la due under Frovistona o= Part ), OMll Circular M95, (Name and trlapAone ao.) ' FEDERAL 'it eaaaaaysr . P AGENCY ie Ms haen er n saint made. A-95 ACTION - .424-101 . t,• ,•.:t• a e,•;?r reg;11^.r,.•-, y'e 'y" t STANDARD FOR0.s 424 PAGE L (10-7ru) . ' ... •r: i.)• at;\,i:....... tJ°ravcribed by GSA. Fed Tet Maxed meat CireC:ar 14-y v' ['�LI� : f' � t» r' r' • 1 ,, `r , ; .. �r2. Al Pi 1. r. t.,. „ 1 3. (: (A I C. e. 60^LUG __-�_-•---._Y.._,�___» ��; TION . _ 1. TYPt i1 -•w hi:Lfi'I'L;C1Tl(li{T APFILI• b. DATE IDCttTI• D. OAIE Yrar month day OF t-•+ )',or month dot, ACTION al GPPLICAIIprd CATION 1977 29 IICR ASSICNED 19 (AtorF aa* n n7TIricialon OF 111TFNT (Opt) proyriale CLP.OM CF ri[)MAL ACTION Blank ' 4. LLGAL APPLICANT/ItEC1PICUT 5. rEDCRAL UPAPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. 0, Applicant Herne =Indian River County, Florida 59/60006 74 b. Organization Unit i Indian River County Planning Dept. c. Strett/P.O, on 12121 14th Avenue PRO, a. NUMBER 1114 e' !2 11 1 j C city :Vero Beach a. county :Indian River GRAM b. TITLE (From Community Development I. State' t Florida e. ZIP We: 32960 rttf"al ikon -Metropolitan h. contact Penn, (Name Jack G. Jennings, County Adm-istrator °t atop) Discretionary Block Gra R 6: trtephons No.) nq t y 7. TIT(.£ AND DESCRIPTI r OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT S. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT Provision of marl surfacing, or street paving A -slate H-CommunilyAction AEency 11-lotentato 1- Q cr Educational institution where justified, on presently unimproved dirt C-Substate )-Indteo Tribe roads; rehabilitation of substandard houses; Count`' r.-olnor (Specify) D -Count' E -City k and removal of vacant dilapidated residential F-ScbaolDistrict t`3 C-Spscfal Purpose structures In low and moderate income areas of District Enter approi itaLetter® the. County. 9. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE A -Casio Grant D-Insuran:o B-Su;picmenttl Grant E -Other Enter api•raMA - Flcan priate let!er(c) 10. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (?.'omen of cities, counties. 11. ESTUiMATED NUM. 12. TYPE OF APPLICATION States, cte.) DER OF PERSONS A-Nrw C -Revision E -Augmentation Indian River County BENEFITING B-Rcnaeal D -continuation t�-p�� 2,000 Enter approTrfa(e fetter nA 13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 15. TYPE OF CHANGE (For 12c or J2e1 a. APPLICANT b. PROJECT A-Inerecse Dollars "then (Specify)= a. FEDEPJL S 2O3,000 .00 B -Decrease DoNan b. APPLIC6NT OD 10 10 C-Incteass Dura:;on D-Cscrease Duraiion 14A e. STATE .00 1G. PROJECT' START 17. PROJECT-- OAT ROJECT E-GenceDatiai DATE 1 month c'av OURA11ON rider appro- d. LOCAL .00 19 12 mmfhe priater letter(.) e. OTHER ,00 10. ESTIMATED DATE TO Year m: th dny 19. FXO57ING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE SU81411TED TO L TOTAL S 203,0 Q.eo FEDEP.AL AGENCY 6 19 77 5 13 NIA 20. FEDE:P.AL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Name. City, Stats. ZIP code) 2L REMARKS ADDED 1 Housing and Urban Dev. Jacksonville'Area Ofc. 32204 p Yes JA No 22. a. To the bast of my Lnewle", In beltrf, b. If rel0ted by OIdB Circular A-95 this drfl .tion was submitted, pursuant to In. No tee - 0 data to 651s preop?:ic3t:en/aFpllcatien sto stru:tans therein, to appropriate clearinghouses and all respansas are a:lachad: epon'se attached a�E THE true and correct, the document has barn APPLICANT duly authorized by the gw1eming body of y CERTIFIES the a„licant and Do a� Ecsnt will cct,ply (,),Treasure Coast F a. Reg. PI ng. Counci 1 ❑ TIIATp with Me attached sraurancea it the assist- wBurcau of Intergovlt. RP1., Div, of State ❑ ❑ Y *ties Is sporcasd. I (a) Pin ricJriva u u 23. a. TYPED RAMI AND TITLE b. SIGNATURE a DATE SIGNED CERTIFYREPRE.ING William C. Wodtke, Jr. , Year mouth a(ay�t SENTATIVE Chmn., County Commission G��" aJ I. 197 24. AGENCY NAME 25. PPLICA• Year month day TIORECEIVED 19 26. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 23. FEDCRAL APPLICATION npe IDENTIFICATION 29. ADDRESS - 30. FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION 31. ACTION TAKEN 32. FUNDING Year month day 34. Year month day sc STARTING ' a a. AWARDED a. FEDERAL i .00 33. ACTION DATE � 19 DATE 19 It. REJECTED b. APPLICANT ,00 3S. CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMA• 36. Year month day TION (.Yams and te(ephone %amber) ENDING 11 c. RETURNED FOR c. STATE .00 DATE 19 AUENDMEhl d. LOQ .00 37. REMARKS ADDED (] d. WERRED e. OTHER ' .00 (a o. YIIDIDRXWN f. TOTAL S C0 []Yes 1DNa 30. e. In lakict above action, any eemments trceivrd from eleatinrbeints wets con- b. fEDERAL AGENCY A-95 OFFICIAL tidarll. It etancY response la due under Frovistona o= Part ), OMll Circular M95, (Name and trlapAone ao.) ' FEDERAL 'it eaaaaaysr . P COMMUN)TY DEVELOPHiENT PLAN SUMMARY (SWEMENT OF NEEDS) 3. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ORIGINAL AMENDMFNT Indian River County, Florida 4. PROGRAM YEAR iEntit/ementAppIkontsOntyl FROM: 7/1/77 TO: 6/30/78 A• 1 Need for basic street and drainage improvements essential to the conservation -of the housing stock in low and moderate income areas of the County. Residential substandardness and blight are most prevalent in ED's 3,4,5,6,1; & 49 comprising,the areas commonly known'as Gifford, Wabasso and Oslo. The prevalence of unsurfaced, potholed, dirt streets and poor drainage condi- tions in the above areas are particularly detrimental to the expansion, or con- -servation and upgrading of existing, low or moderate income housing. The conditions tend to inhibit normal maintenance efforts and limit private incen- tive to upgrade housing and neighborhood environs. . All of the above ED's, but parti^ularly ED's 4,5 and 6 (Gifford) contain very. -high concentrations of minority group members, housing substandardness, inade- quate public facilities and blight. These areas are all known to be primarily populated by low and moderate income persons. Dsta&ourao: Neighborhood Analysis, Indian River County, 1972 A- 2 Need for removal of vacant, dilapidated residential structures'. There exist, throughout the'County, but particularly in ED's.3,4,5,6, 11 and 49, a number of dwelling units which are unsafe for human habitation. Due to the low incomes of many of the owners of these units, the cost of demolition would be an economic hardship. There is the need to assist these persons in the demolition of those structures that are presently vacant, or as they become vacant, in order to prevent their further occupancy and eliminate these blight- ing influences. D,u s,ut,,: Neighborhood Analysis, Indian River County, 1972 A 3 Need for rehabilitation of substandard dwellings in low and moderate income area At the present time it is estimated that approximately 19% of the housing units in the unincorporated portions of the County are structurally substandard. The 1972 Structural Conditions Windshield Survey revealed that the greatest concen- trations of substandardness are located in ED's 4 and 5 in which were located 43% of all such designated units. Substandard units accounted for greater than 50% of the housing inventory of ED's 3,4,5,6, and 11. Uatasource: CD Application, 1976/77; Neighborhood Analysis, 1972 page -1 of I Pages MAR 2 1977 F 29 •_ 1?9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (LONG-TERM OBJECTIVES) t. NAME OF APPLICANT4,'APPLICATION NUMBER 3, ORINGINAL AMENDMENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY a. PROGRAM YEAR (fntrt/cmen( IViPI+cants Onlyl FROM: 7/I/77 To: 6/30M B-1. CONSERVATION OF SOUND NEIGHBORHOODS through. . . a. Code Qnforcement and vigilance, b. The prevention or elimination of blighting influences, and c. The provision or improvement of public facilities in or serving the neighborhoods, such as, but not limited to, streets, sidewalks, curbs °end gutters, utilities, parks and recreation.facilities. suppons Need(s) No: A - I, A-2 e-2. REVITALIZATION OF DETERIORATING NEIGHBORHOODS and the elimination of conditions detrimental to health,'safety and the public welfare through. . . a. Clearance of dilapidated and dangerous structures, b. Code enforcement and rehabilitation of deteriorated structures�t c. The prevention or elimination of blighting influences, and d. The provision or improvement of public facilities in or serving the neighborhoods, such as, but not limited to, streets, sidewalks, curbs • and gutters, utilities, parks and recreation facilities. supports Necd(sl No: A-1 9 A-2 A-3 3. INCREASE IN THE SUPPLY OF STANDARD HOUSING through code enforcement, rehabilitation, and/or the encouragement of new construction, with emphasis on actions benefiting 1 -ow and moderate income families and individuals, elderly, handicapped, racial minorities and households with female heads. Supports Need(s) No: A-3 Pope 0l 'j Popos HUD -7015.3 (11-75) 1 MAR 281977 �t..4 10 HUD -7015.3 (11-75) MAR -281977 Popo 2 of 2 Popo � � �u COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (LONG•TCRM OBJECTIVES) L.NAME OF APPLICANT Z. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. (rte ORINGINAL • r_.j AMCNUI✓r NT INDIAN RIVCR COUNTY a. PROGRAM YEAtt (Entidement Aopleconts Only; 1. FROM: 7/1/77 TO: 6/30/78 4. DECONCEPdTRATION OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS by avoiding undue concentrations of persons receiving public assistance for housing in areas,already containing high proportions of low-income persons. Supports Need(s) No: A-1 o $oppatts NeedGl No: ' HUD -7015.3 (11-75) MAR -281977 Popo 2 of 2 Popo � � �u COMMUNITY DEVELOPMRNT PLAN SUMMARY (SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES) 1. NAME OF APPLICANT Indian River County, Florida Z. APPLICATION NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR 3' [A ORIGINAL El AMENDMENT Oplicaner Only) FROh/: 7/1/77 TO: 6/30/78 c-1 Provision and upgrading of basic public facilities essential to the conservation and expansion of the housing stock in, low and moderate income areas. Street surfacing improvements in the form of marl surfacing, or paving where r -o -w has been deeded and development is sufficient to justify the improvements, in order to eliminate potholes, ,mud, dust and blighting influences attendant to unimproved dirt roads. Basic street/surface drainage improvements in low and moderate income areas Suffering from excessive flooding and stagnant waters which create a potential health hazard. The intention is to remove influences which inhibit home maintenance, and engender increased neighborhood pride whereby overall neighborhood upkeep is improved and adjacent vacant properties may become more desirable.for development of low and moderate income homes on a private basis. The above activities will be concentrated in ED's 3;4, and 5. Supporta Noed(s) No:' A-1 c'2 Demolition of vacant dilapidated residential structures. .To steadily reduce-the'inventory of unsafe housing unfts in the County and to prevent their continued use. The removal of such structures through the CD r Program may also serve as an inducement for development of new.low or moderate priced homes on the parcels. Demolition activities will be undertaken in-ED's 3,4.;;5, 11 a0*A9 which represent' the primary areas of housing substandardness and lower income.: r Supports Nvodrsr No: A-2 c-3 Rehabilitation of Substandard residential structures in low and mocerate income ,areas. The County -has earmarked funds for rehabilitation in its 1976/77 CD Program. Eleven homes have been -identified and the eligibility of their owners is under investigation. The funds available during the second year are insufficient to address all eleven; therefore, in order to maintain a continuity of effort, rehabilitation is proposed for the coming year. After these units have been completed the program will be evaluated and if efforts have proven .satisactory an expanded program may be developed in future years. The units to be rehabilitated will be located in areas which will be recieving basic street and drainage improvements in order to achieve maximum benefit/ �r_pporh t *001st No: A-3 Pogo � of � ivOOt O MAR .2 8 1977 HUD -7015.4 (11-75) 2 # . X32 IL L NAME OF AR'LICANT 2. APPLICATION NO, 3• RIGINAL ' ❑ AMENDMENT 'Indian DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANb URBAN DEVELOPMENT River County; Fl dd EtJTITLL-N1EN7APPLICAt:TSOPILY YEAR: � r ComMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM orl 4. PROGRAM i FROM 7/1/77 '-TO: 6/30/78 i CENSUS COST {$000) ? ff t RELAT?0 TRACT/ ENVIRONMENTAL RELATED RELATED BUDGET BLOCK GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SHOA'' TERM ENUMER- ATION REVIEW STATUS LINE p1tOGRAM SUBSEQUENTF TOTAL SOURCE J OBJECTIVE DISTRICT ITEM YEAR YEAR FAOUNT (fol I lJ1 12J 13J NJ (5) 16J (71 (81 !Street.improvements in the form of C-1 ED's 3,4,5• Assessment 2 171 -- t 171. --, -- narl or paved surface and surface drainage improvements in Gifford, j !;::.basso and Oslo areas. # , ;e^olition ofvacant, dilapidated C-2 ED's 3,4,5, Clear..Comp. 4 3 _» 3 -- -- Iresidential structures 1 & 49 ,.e �' habilitation of substandard C-3 ED'%3,4 Clear. Comp. 5 20 -- 20 -- -- 'residential structures Planning and Management Development All and 5. All Exempt 13• 5 -- 5 i ministration and Audits All All Exempt 14 4 ' "" 4 j t GRAND TOTA S $2�3 $ i>,:R . � t}UD-7015.1 it i »75) ' IL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET A. EX ORIGINAL ❑ AMENDMEN B. APPLICATION NO. C. NAME OF APPLICANT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA D. PROGRAM YEAR FROM: 7/1/77 TO: 6/30/78 LINE NO. E. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT FOR HUD USE ONLY 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY ' 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES,SITE IMPROVEMENTS 171,000 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE,DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 3,000 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS - 20,000 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENTS FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME S. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 8. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES ' 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL/NDP PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT 5,000 14, ADMINISTRATION and Audits 4,000 15. CONTINUATION OF MODEL CITIES ACTIVITIES 16. SUBTOTAL (Sum of Lines 1 thru 151 203,000 17.. CONTINGENCIES AND/OR UNSPECIFIED LOCAL OPTION ACTIVITIES Not to exceed 109E of fine 161 18. TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS (Sum of Lines 16and 17J ?ni. n0Q E LINE NO. F. RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS 1. ENTITLEMENT OR DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT 203,000 w... f 2. LESS DEDUCTIONS � yw 3 - ENTITLEMENT/DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES (Line 1 minus 2J 203,000 4. PROGRAM INCOME 5. SURPLUS FROM URBAN RENEWAL/NDP SETTLEMENT 6. LOAN PROCEEDS 7. REPROGRAMMED UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM PRIOR PROGRAM YEAR 8. TOTAL RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS (Sumofl.ines3.7) 203,000 t ❑Check box ijeosts include indirect costs which require approval oja cost allocation plan as required by Federal Management Circular 74.4. EDITION OF 10-74 IS OBSOLETE MAR 2 8 1977 e - nw•rv�a.a I� rias I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HQ�, 'ING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE: t. SURVEY *OFHOUSING CONDITIONS A. HOUSING STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS IN THE COMMUNITY I. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 3. Lrl ORIGINAL !!'DIA;4 RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Eu AMENDMENT. DATE: (Unincorporated) 4. PROGRAM YEAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVZ*f(S) USED FR')m- 7-1-77 TO: 6-30-78- 12-72 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS ALL UNITS. OWNER RENTER YEAR. STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS OF. SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL- SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL SUITABLE TOTAL SUITABLE TOTAL .A SU:TBLE FOR FOR FOR REHABILITATION* REHABILITATION* REMABILITATIO%* (c) W Occ-upied Units Total 3-772,032 10,231 8,199 0. svbstcndcrd 1,960 708 917' 304 1,043 404 It. Stend--rd and All Other (Line I minus line to) .8,271 7,282 989 1 2-Voccnt Avcilc'ble Units — Total 3-77 •1 . 1329 480 849 1 e. Substanccrd 327 186 46 24 281 162 b. SIcne.-rd cnd Al; Other Wne:? minus lino 2a) 1,002 434 568 3. Housing Steck Available Total (sum oflines I and.;) 3-77 11,560 894 8,679 1 328 2,881 566 4, Vcccncy Rate rtine 3+ 7) 11.5% 5.5% 29.5% U -%;is 561Wc ftf Rel,abilltct;on" must be included as a subtotal If the applicant Is proposing a rehabilitation prograrr on Table III, Goals for Lower Income Housing Assistance. B. DEFINITIONS, DATA SOURCES, AND METHODS (Attach additional pages) 1. Definition of substcridard" used. SEE AITACID PAGE "suitable 2.+ Dc(initior of for rehabilitation" used. 3. Datc sources and methods used. 1 I STATEMENT: H. A. P. - TABLE I. SURVEY OF HOUSING'CONDITIONS B. DEFINITIONS, DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: 1. Substandard structures includes "deteriorating" and "dilapidated" structures, as defined below: 2. Definition of "deteriorating" used: These houses have sufficient visible deficiencies to indicate that deterioration is present. These houses could economically be repaired to continue to give safe and adequate shelter. Examples of these deficiencies could be loose or missing boards, sagging porches, obvious need for re -roofing, loose screens, broken window panes, etc. Such deficiencies are signs of neglect which could lead to serious structural damage. Based on a complete interior survey, some structures classed as marginal may be later classed as dilapidated. 3.. Definition of "dilapidated" used: This class consists of dilapidated houses which are lacking in basic facilities and are in such a state of deterioration that it would not be economically feasible to repair them. Examples of these deficiencies include holes; open cracks or missing materials over large areas of the floors, walls or roof; leaning walls or structures; damage by fire or weather; structures built of make -shift materials, etc. The only feasible course of action would be demolition. 4. Definition of "suitable for rehabilitation" includes only those structures that are deteriorating and excludes those that are dilapidated. METHODOLOGY - SURVEY 6F HOUSING The unincorporated owner and renter total and ratio from the 1970 Census were updated by building and demolition permits, 1970 through 1976 and current oc- cupancy inforipation. The current vacancy rate was applied to the totals, then divided by the 1970 owner/renter vacancy. Occupied substandard units were based on 1970 relationship of occupied owner/renter units lacking plumbing updated by the 12/72 survey, that stated the total number of substandard units and the .•percentage of units suitable for rehabilitation. The substandard vacant ratio, based on DHUD special census data was applied to the updated figures. *Note the"Analysis of Neighborhood Study Areas" 12/72 contained a structural conditions survey. The survey was used on this table even though it appears to overstate the number of substandard units, yet it is still more useful than 1970 Census data. DATA SOURCES 1970 Census - General and Detailed Housing Characteristics 1970 Census, Special Tabulation DHUD Structural Conditions Survey Analysis of Neighborhood Study Areas 12/72 Building Permits, Occupancy Information, and Demolition Data, 1970 - 1976 Vero Beach/Indian River County Building Department Florida Power and Light Company vacancy data University of Florida, population, household size and vacancy data i i MAR 2 81977 Fern Apprevwt nun N.._ 69R—te71 Pose 1 or 2 1970 Census, Special Tabulation, DHUD 1960 Census, General Social and Economic Characteristics Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitive Services METHODOLOGY see attached 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSI40 AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT j HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE 11. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS � 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2.AP PLICA rION/GRANT NUMBER 3. ® ORIGINAL I INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA � — [] AMENDMENT, DATE: j (Unincorporated) t 4. PROGRAM Y EAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEYS' USED • s • -•FROM: 7-1-77 Tot 6-30-78 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL FEMALE -HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ALL MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS. — REOUIRING ASSISTANCE ELDERLY OR -FAMILY LARGE FAMILY ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMI LY ELDERLY OR FAMILY `AR.Z;_ FA:! (. TOTAL HANDICAPeED (4 or less (5 or more TOTAL HANDICAPPED (¢ or less (5 or more TOTAL HANO!CAPPED, (•, or less ! _ r• r, •r:_ < (1.2 persons! persons) persons) s (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (1-2 persors)i persarsj II I perso:; 1 (c) (b•1) (b•2) (b-3) (6-4) (e-1) (o-2) (e-3) (c-4) W-1) U-2) { (d•3) (c -t' A. O""NER HOUSEHOLDS ' (E.tclm ing displacers) 375 107 106 162 138 47 33 58 195 43 62 90 2 S. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS �F.z�l2:rtr. di.a lnrccs 1,062 304 547 217 467 764 221 82 437 72 I { 224 ' 141 C. 5Ci SE'r,OLDS EXPECTED TO.SE DISPLACED I i 3 i'; YEAR (Jun of lines Cl and C2) i 1. %::-e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0 1 s l 2. R=_ -lets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' D. ACCIT2NAL FA;tILIES EXPECTED TO RESIDE 1 6 (Sum of lines Dl and D2) 84 4 54 26 i 7 1 1. AS a res,It of planted e.-,olovTent 13 1 . 8 4 i ! s 1 2. A; =ta e-plo,ed i.i locality 71 3 46 ZZ E. TOTAL ryUSi;;"u ASSISTANwE NEEDS 9 (Sun of lines A. R, C. and DJ 1,521 415 701 405 i0 Percent cf Total 1000/0 27.3° 46.1% 26.6% F. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS (roach additional pages) i SOURCES ^ 1970 Census: General S Detailed Housino, Charantprintira 1970 Census, Special Tabulation, DHUD 1960 Census, General Social and Economic Characteristics Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitive Services METHODOLOGY see attached 1 Pee* 2 of 2 IL 1 U.S: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN — TABLE il. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS t. NAME OF APPLICANT. 2. APPLICATIOII/GRANT NUMBER 3. ORIGINAL ,�-,- Q AMENDMENT. DATEI INDIAN RIVER•COUNTY, FLORIDA - — — — LB I i 4. PROGRAM YEAR Unincorporated FROM: 7-I-77 . 6-30-78 I PROVIDE DATE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF MINORITY HOUSEHOLD, AS APPROPRIATE • (Cheek appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) 1. BLACK/NEGRO 4. Q ORIENTAL 1. O BLACK/NEGRO 4. [-ORIENTAL 1. Q BLACK/NEGRO 4. ORIENTAL STATUS OF 2. Q SPANISH-AMERICAN •S. Q ALL OTHER 2. I] SPANISH-AMERICAN S. Q ALL OTHER 2. Q SPANISH-AMERICAN 5.0 ALL OTHER HOUSEHOLDS REOUIRING MINORITIES MINORITIES MINORITIES • 3. Q AMERICAN INDIAN •3.0 AMERICAN INDIAN S. Q AMERICAN INDIAN ASSISTANCE " ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY • TOTAL HANDICAPPED (¢ or less (5 or more TDTAL HANDICAPPED ($ or less (5 or more TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less ($ or more (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (1-2 persons) persons) person sl t (o) (e-1) (e-2) (e-4) (e -5i (f•1) ((-2) (f-3) (f•4) (9-1) (9-2) (9-3) (9-4) ' A. 07,'tiER HOUSEHOLDS I95 43 62 90 (ex.•lurine displacees) - Total 2 i 3. R_NTER FOUSEHOLDS 437 72 224 I4I Tetal - EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED 3 IN vuRi,'f. YEAR (Sum of lines 1 and 2) 0- re:s o 0 ► R ;s D.TuThL !Sum of lines .4,8, and C) 632 I I5 286. 23I I I IL 1 F P TABLE II 11OUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME 11OUSE11OLDS 1977 The 1970 Census, Special Tabulation DHUD, stated the number of owner and renter households by income, race, and if elderly, that were inadeequatly housed in the county. Section 8 income limits and a income adjustment factor were applied to give the total number of households needing assistance. Vero Beach and all other incorporated communities were subtracted out by their appropriate percentages. The handicapped houseboils were estimated based on the number of receipients of Public Assistance for the blind and disabled. The 1970 totals were updated to 1977. The percentage growth of households receiving A.F.D.C, payments from the state from 1969 to 1976 was compared to the state growth in households and the unincorporated County's growth in households. This factor was applied to owner and renter households for the 1977 needs. Minority households statewide and in the County have not grown at the same rate as total population. The 1960 -to 1970 growth rate for blacks in the County was about a third of the total County growth rate. This factor was applied to the 1970 to 1977 overall growth rate to obtain the new households requiring assistance. Households living in assisted housing constructed since 1970 were subtracted out. Female Headed Households were 61% of all households with incomes less than 125% of the.poverty level. This was applied to the total lower income households requiring assistance. The percentage of female headed households from Vero Beach and other* communities were subtracted out. The 1970 totals were updated by the same means as total households. There are no known plans that would result in displacements during the program year. EXPECTED TO RESIDE was based on . 1970 Total County population 35,992 Total work force 12,328 793 worked in the County and resided in St. Lucie County 290 worked in the County and resided in Brevard County 9 worked in the County and resided in Okeechobee County 1092 worked in the County and resided outside of the County 1976 Total County population 46,185 Total work force estimated 15,819 Total work force from outside the County estimated 1,401 16% of workers living outside of the County are lower income 16% of 1,401 = 224 224 X unincorporated County's population 61% -.137 137 X estimated lower income households needing assistance 52% = 71 This was applied to the sub groups and modified to reflect the percentage of elderly in the work force. MAR 2 8 1977 •� I onn Approvrd U.S. DE:PAR71AENT Of HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE 111. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME ROUSING ASSISTANCE CURRENT YEAR GOAL I- NAME OF APPLICANT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (Unincorporated) u 3. LAJ ORIGINAL r_ Q AMENDMENT, DATEI 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR FROM: 7/1/77 TO: 13/30/78 B — TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED ELDERLY OR ALL HANDICAPPED HOC SERO LOS (1-2 persons) LARGE FAMILY FAMILY (4 or less persons) (S or more persons) (�) (b) (c) G. (e) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS 1 1. Section 8—HUD 2 2. State Agency—Total (Sum of nes a and b) 3 a. Section 8 4 b. Other 5 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (identify) . Total a. $4. Total (Sum of lines 1, 2, and 3) B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1. Section 8—HUD to 2. State A enc —Total (Sum of lines a and b) I t a. Section 8 t2 b. Ott a 13 9. A.t.er F.', rC•t'1 Q.4� Ii.......C. J� p.... :'IO.....' Y (ldentifr) — Total 14 a. .s b 16 4. Total (SLIM Of lines 1.2,.and 3) C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS 17. 1. Section 8—HUD 24 10 5 Is 2. State A enc —Totol (Sum of lines a and b) i9 a. Section 8 z 20 b. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify) — Total 22 a. z3 b. 24 4. Total (Sum of lines 1. 2. and 3) ' D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1. CD Block Grants 4 1 : 2 1 26 2. Section 235 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners (Identify) - Total 2P a 29 b. 30 4. Total (Sum of lines 1. 2, and 3) E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 31 J. SccAk 235 32 2. Other (Ldentify) — Total a. Farmers Home Administration Self He E34 23 110 12 m 35 3. Total (Sum of lines 1 and 2) 3e F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS (Suer ti( lines A4.114. C4, D4, and I:3) 51 12 21 18 MAR 2 8 1977 HUO-7015.10 02-4S) i 15 M4M.t `~•_U•,.-ULPANIMLNI U1 HOUSING A14D UP, bAli DLYLLOPMCNr (SumEli-Is I,2, and 3; 14*ETot.1 HOUSING: ASSISIANCE PLAN 17 1. Section 8 -HUD 68 2 TABLE Ill.- GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME MUSING ASSISTANCE 19 a.• Section 8 THREE YEAR GOAL i I. NAME OF APPLICANT 3. [Xj ORIGINAL. (ldcatify)- Total INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (Unincorporated)AMENDMENT, DATE:' a, 2. APPLICATION! GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR 24 4. Total (Sum of lines 1, 2, and 3) D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1. CD Block Grants 1 2e 2. Section 235 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or , B Prospective Homeowners'Identift) - Total '- B2s 0. - 30 4. Total (Sum of lines 1, 2, and 3) FROM: 7/1/77 TO: 6/30/78 I NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED I 31 ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ' 32 TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE ALL HANDICAPPEDFAMILY (I or less { 37 HOUSEHOLDS (1_2 persons) parsons) (5 or more 3 34 persons) 35 (o) (b) (c) (d) (a) 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 142 35 60 47 A. NEW DENTAL UNITS 37 F32 10040 24.6 ro 42.3 % 1 3.1 '° 2.Stote A gnc =Total (Sum of lines a and b) See Attached , 0. Section 8 • HUD -7015.10 (ta-ts) 4 b. Other s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (Identify) - Total 6 a. 7 b. - 4. Total (Sum of lines 1. 2. and 3) B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1. Section 8 -HUD 10 2. State A envy -Total (Sure of lines a and b) it o. Section 8 12 b. OtherI 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of --nta1 Housing ' 1 (ldcati fy) - i otol 1 4 a 15 M4M.t (SumEli-Is I,2, and 3; 14*ETot.1 C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: 17 1. Section 8 -HUD 68 2 to 2. State A enc -Totol (Sum of lines a and b) 19 a.• Section 8 20 b. Other 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing 21 (ldcatify)- Total 22 a, 23 b, 24 4. Total (Sum of lines 1, 2, and 3) D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1. CD Block Grants 1 2e 2. Section 235 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or , 27 Prospective Homeowners'Identift) - Total '- B2s 0. b. 30 4. Total (Sum of lines 1, 2, and 3) E.' NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE OMEOWN 31 1. Section 235 32 2. Other (ldcnti v) - Total 37 -.Farmer Home AdministrationSelf Het 3 34 . Pro( ram. 35 3. Total (Sum of lines I and 2) 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 142 35 60 47 (Sum of lints .4.1. 1i•1. C 1. 11.1, and Ell' 37 PERCENT.OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS 10040 24.6 ro 42.3 % 1 3.1 '° G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES(Allaah udditional pages) See Attached , • HUD -7015.10 (ta-ts) MAR ' 2 8 1977 F*1--� 141.. MAR* 2 8 1977 ; STATEMENT EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES The priorities were plac,d in the programs most likly to succeed. The private non- profit "Self Help" program has the leader- ship, land,and economics to succeed. The '.`Housing Rehabilitation" is under full County controle. Work will be done in-house with the use of county crews, thus insuring the most for the dollar spent. Emphasis will be placed on rental structures, for this has good potential if the economics to a developer can be improved. Units are availzb e, but there has been little interest. There has been very limited interest in new Section 8 on the part of contractors or developers. The Citizen Advisory Committee and the County Commission are looking for solutions to this prob].m. 1'r-tm Ap!--I r161R No. 6:38.1471 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSNIG ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE IV - GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED LONER INCOME HOUSING 1. IJAIAE OF APPLICA14T - 9. kj(J-ORIGINAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (Unincorporated) L_] AMENDMENT, DATE: 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMVER A. PROGRAM YEAR ' FRoM:7/1/77 TO: 6/30/78 A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION 1. New Ginstrucfin: & Section 8 existing rentals ALL AREAS ALL CENSUS TRACTS 2: Rehabilitation: Census Tract Numbers ENUMERATION DISTRICTS 3, 4, & 5 B. EXP AIIATION OF SELECTION OF IFNERAL LOCATIONS 1. ,New CDnstructJon Section 8 existing rentals New construction is being undertaken by a private non-profit organization, working with the Farmers Home Administration Self Help Program. Any location in the county m,%y be suitable.. The locations are decided primarily by the future residents. Presently lots are availible and activity is underway in enumeration districts 49 and 12. Section 8 existing rentals will be decided by the private market. the current state of over building and high vacancies may induce developers to endure the red tape and lower rentals for some return on investment. The section 8 for new construction is $108,688. Public notice for interested bidders was supposed to be advertised in the local paper in early 1976, as of this writing, nothing has . been advertised. 2 Rcbabilitation Rehabilitation areas were selected by condition of structures, streets,drainage, utilities and other environmental blighting influences in which low and moderate minorities reside. 111)0-7015.11 (12-75) MAR '2 8 1977 • , . i r r . U.S. t)EPAHT°AEN'f OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ASSURANCES The applicant hereby assures ar•.d certifies with respect to the grant that: (1) It pusws c, i",:,i authority to apply fur the grant, and to execute the proposed program, r (2) its governing body has duty adopted or passed as an offi fiat act a resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the filing of the application.' including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and designating e the authorized n:prewnlative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional j information as may be required. (3) <'t has complied with all the requirements of 01(11 Circular No. A-95 as modified by Sections 570.300(c) (for i entitlement applicants) or 570.400(4) (for discretionary applicants) and that either i (f) any comments and recommendations made by or through clearinghouses are attached and have been considered prior to submission of the application; or (ht) the required procedures have leen followed and no comments or recommendations have been received. (4) Prior to submission of its application, the applicant has: ' I () provided citizens with adequate information concerning the amount of funds available for proposed community development and housing activities, the range of activities that may be undertaken, and other im�ortanl program requirements; i (ii) held at least two public hearings to obtain the views of citizens on community development and housing needs; and ; (iii) provided citizens an adequate opportunity to articulate needs, express preferences about propu6ed activities, assist in the selection of priorities, and otherwise to participate in the development of the application. i (5) Its chief executive officer or other officer of applicant approved by HUD: (i) Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Envircrueental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such Act apply to the applicant's proposed program pursuant to 24 CFR 570.603; and i (ii) is authorized and consents on behalf of the applicant and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts I for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. . I (6) The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which %ill benefit low or moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. Where all or part of the community development program activities are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency, such needs are specifically describe '-n the application under the Community Development Plan Summary. (7) It will comply with the re>_ulations. oolicics, guidelines and reou'uements of 1-ederal 1lanaeement f'irculars 74-4 and 74-7, as they relate to the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally -assisted program. (8) It will administer and enforce the labor standards requirements set forth in Section 570.605 and HUD regulations issued to implement such requirements. (9) It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, � and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. (10) It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11296, relating to evaluation of (food hazards } • (11) It )till comply with: 1 t (1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CPR Part 1), which provides that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be v excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any i measures necessaryto effectuate this assurance. If an real y property or structure thereon is provided or i improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the applicant, this assurance shall obligate the applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real F property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another t purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. • P i (if) Title Fill of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-284) as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; and will take action to affitmttively further fair housing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provkion of brokerage services within the applicant's jurisdiction. e e HUD -7015.12 (11.75) 1 P 1 a MAR 2 8 1977. (iii) Section 109 of the llnusine and Community Development Act of 1974, and the ici;ulalions issued pursuant thereto 04 CPR 570.601). which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the ; rmmd of race, color, national origin or sex, be excluded from participation in, he denied the benefits of. or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Title I funds. (iv) Executive Order 11063 on equal opportunity in housing and nondiscrimination in the site or rental of housing built with federal assistance. (v) li.,ccutive Order 11246, and all regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CPR Part 130), which provides that no. person shaft be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in all phases of employment during the performance of Federal or federally - assisted contracts. Such contractors and subcontractors shall take affirmative action to incur. fair treatment in employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of .compensation and selection for training and apprenticeship. (vi) Section 3 of the (lousing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given lower income residents of the project area and contracts fur work in connection with the project be awarded to eligible lousiness concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by, persons residing in the area of the project. (12) It will: (i) In acquiring mal property in connection with the conlrnunily development block grant program, be guided to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by ill--- real property acquisition policies eel out under Section 301 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L.. 91.646) and the provisions of Section 302 thereof: (ii) Pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Section 303 and 304 of the Act; and (iii) Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures provided for under HUD regulations (24 CFR Part 42). (13) It will: (i) Provide fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance in accordance with Sections 202, 203, and 204 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and applicable HUD regulations (24 CYR Part 42), to or for families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations displaced as a result of any acquisition of real property for an activity assisted under the program; (ii) Provide relocation assistance programs offering the services described in Section 205 of the Act to such displaced families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations in the manner provided under applicable HUD regulations; (iii) Assure that, within a reasonable time prior to displacement, decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings will be available to such displaced families and individuals in accordance with Section 205(c) (3) of the Act, and tha. such housing will be available in the some L,,ge of choices to all such displaced persons regardless of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source or income; (iv) Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures provided for under HUD regulations; and (v) Carry out the relocation process in such a manner as to provide such displaced persons with uniform and consjstent services, including any services required to insure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment to such displaced persons on account of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income. (14) It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of beinginotivated by a desire for private gain for *themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. (15) It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees. (16) It will give HUI) and the Comptroller General through any authorized representative access to and the right to examine a0 records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. 0 �foa• 6 Q0� y �U B z:'1? O� d4 zm.�aoaJ s ..sr.sa+.rn<., B R E Y A R 0 C 0 U N T Y ._�.—. �.e_—..�..—a-:.fir— �.—.—.—.—. mss.—..�-�_—.—• � co�. •i" I_ •- _ ler•1 r.. 1 SEBASTIa 2 � •, t Atlantic Occ =. BLUE '` loLill, ` 1 CYPRESS 1®, LAKE`:Al 16 13 . 4 64 51 �. 0, R E E C N 0 B E E I �i4�i?°�'•-j ).5� ` - at 14 1 4lj. �7- $ L i9 A 0 43, 47 46 ` —. -.—.— — -- — — 49 ' C 0 U N T Y S T l U C 1 E y� n S� Q! 4 �/ f� r /� i b'Z` F�i:,V,-fj .6eU L DEV�4'LJA .MENL4 l._'J ZINUMERATION DISTRICT DELINEATIONS �l i TARGET AREA I DENT IFICATION FACTORS. - ll _ 41.1 I v TARGET -AR t +♦ FACTORS 5' - 1: .t. CON3Fciii I T Y DEVELOPMENT PPOMRA'51 LOCATIC=1S OF MINORITY CO,iCEi;'r nT IO,',S SOURCE ED's with > 2E 2 Blaci: Poral ati cn 1973 Census of Population. ED's with > 75o Black Pceulaticn I N Areas (•;ot in Application Area INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 111 TARGET AREA ; .�� FACTORS i ^•e r.^, •trr _.__. CarsTc UNITY 4DIVELCHIE.NT PIROGRAM CONCENTRATIONS OF HOUSING SUBSTANDAPDNESS SOURCE ED's with 50-740 Substandard Units _ ED's with 750 or more Substandard N Analysis of Nefghborh od Areas Not in Application Area ' HOAsing Study Areas,1 72 ""' INDIAN RIVER COLIrITY, FL^^1�:; 00 = �i N C 0 M kM U N I T V D E V E L 0 P7,11: i'J'T F R 0 G R A M, LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Demo., Rehab., Street and Drainage Irp's v111111, Demolition #Is Enumeration Districts I a WILLIAM C. WUD I KE_, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vico Chairman WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR. i EDWIN S. SCIiMUCKER R. DON DEESON j i JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 329(, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATION I, William C. Wodtke, Jr., in my official capacity as Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, do hereby certify and assure that pursuant to Section 570.303 (4) and Section 570.402 (g) the County, in the prep&ration of its 1977/78 Discretionary Grant Application has: A. Provided citizens with adequate information concerning the amounts of funds available for the proposed community development and housing activities, the range of activities that may be undertaken, and other important program requirements; B. Informed citizens of the maximum discretionary grant for which the applicant may apply, the criteria for selection of preapplications, and may substantially exceed the number of applications that may ultimately be approved from the available funds; C. Held at least two public hearings to obtain the views of citizens vn community development needs; and D. Provided citizens with an adequate opportunity to articulate needs, express preferences about proposed activities, assist in the selection -of priorities, and othe Nise to participate in the development of the preapplication. `ATTEST: Q Freda Wright Clerk March 28, 1977 MAR 2 81977 William C.'Wodtke, Jrfft Chairman peck ;j.:!.. 151 COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED THAT AN EMERGENCY ITEM BE ADDED TO I THE AGENDA IN REGARD TO FUNDING OF TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE ABG.E EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA. SAM SHANNON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLAN— NING COUNCIL, APPEARED AND PRESENTED A RESOLUTION FOR THE BOARDS CONSID— ERATION. HE STATED THAT A SUB—COMMITTEE HAS RECOMMENDED PUTTING !ANGUAGE IN THE APPROPRIATIONS BILL THAT WOULD PROVIDE THAT ALL TEN PLANNING COUNCILS IN EXISTENCE PRIOR TO TREASURE COAST PLANNING COUNCIL BE FUNDED, BUT THAT TREASURE COAST PLANNING COUNCIL RECEIVE NO FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1977/78. HE STATED THAT HIS PROPOSED RESOLUTION SETS OUT SOME OF THE CON— CERN AND BACK GROUND THAT SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE LEGISLATURE. MR. SHANNON CONTINUED THAT HE HAS TWO MAJOR CONCERNS: (1) THAT THE SUB—COMMITTEE BY THEIR PROPOSED LANGUAGE IS SUGGESTING THAT TAXES COLLECTED STATEWIDE AND PLACED IN THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE BE SPENT STATEWIDE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE 4—COUNTY AREA OF MARTIN, ST. LUCI-E, INDIAN RIVER AND PALM BEACH CCUdTIES; AND (Z) THAT THE SUB—COMMITTEE IS TRYING TO WRITE SUBSTANTIVE LEGISLATION THROUGH THEIR COMMITTEE AND WITHOUT GOING THROUGH NORMAL CHANNELS, HE POINTED OUT THAT IF STATE FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE PLANNING COUNCIL BUT THE RESPONSIBILITIES ARE STILL THERE, SOMEBODY WILL HAVE TO PAY THE TAB, WHICH IS ABOUT $46,000. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO HOW THE 11TH DISTRICT CAME INTO BEING, COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHETHER THE INITIAL MONIES THAT WERE AP— PROPRIATED FOR OUR NEW DISTRICT CAME FROM THE STATE GENERAL FUND OR IF THEY WERE TAKEN AWAY FROM THE OTHER DISTRICTS, s MR. SHANNON SAID THAT THERE WAS $500,000 ORIGINALLY INTENDED FOR THE TEN DISTRICTS, BUT IT WAS SPLIT UP AMONG THE ELEVEN DISTRICTS. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE 11TH DISTRICT HAS BEEN CREATED AND IS A VIABLE FUNCTIONING ENTITY, SHE, THEREFbRE, FELT IF THE LEGISLA— TURE DOES NOT WISH ANY FURTHER DISTRICTS CREATED, THEY SHOULD TAKE STEPS TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING INSTEAD OF DESTROYING SOMETHING THAT IS ALREADY CREATED. 5 MAR.2 81977 THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION. COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT THE WORDING IN PARAGRAPH 1 BE CHANGED FROM NOT PROVIDE FUNDING" TO READ TO DELETE FUNDING," AND THAT IN PARAGRAPH Z "PROVIDING FUNDING TO THE COUNCIL ON THE SME BASIS" BE CHANGED TO READ "PROVIDE FUNDING TO THE COUNCIL ON AN EQUAL BASIS." COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED THAT IN PARAGRAPH 1 "OPPOSES ANY INTENDED ACTION" BE CHANGED TO READ ('OPPOSES ANY ACTION...." MR. SHANNON SUGGESTED REMOVING THE DITTO MARKS AROUND THE PHRASES_ IN THE FIRST AND THIRD WHEREP.- PARAGRAPHS AND REPLACING THEM WITH PAREN- THESES, AND COMMISSIONER LOY FELT COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION SHOULD ALSO BE SENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION. f THE BOARD AGREED. j UPON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0._77-34 WITH THE ABOVE SUGGESTED CORRECTIONS AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. MAR 2 8 1-977 ; w 6 29 �v4e�41 J RESOLUTION NO, 77,34 WHEREAS, the State of Florida has established a Regional Planning District'(hereinafter referred to as the Region), composed of Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin and Palm Beach Counties, pursuant to Chapter 23 Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS,,the Region presently is the fifth largest planning district in the State; and WHEREAS, the Counties of Indian River, St, Lucie, Martin and Palm Beach have joined together to establish the Treasure Coast Re- gional Planning Council (hereinafter referred to as the Council), pursuant to Chapter 163.01 Florida Statutes, to serve the Region; and WHEREAS, the State of Florida has recognized and designated the Council as the Regional Planning Agency pursuant to Chapter 380,06 Florida Statutes and Chapter 163.3191, Florida Statutes; and WHE^.EAS, the Council has responsibilities to perform certain planning activities vu,:suant to its designation as a Regional P1�Pning Agency; and WHEREAS; the State of Florida has provided funding to designated Regional Planning Agencies for the past five fiscal years from the General Fund; and ° WHEREAS, the Governor has recommended funding for Regional Planning Agencies, including the Council, for fiscal year .1977-78; and WHEREAS, the Florida House of Representatives Appropriation Sub -committee "2" has indicated that all Regional Planning Agencies, with the sole exception of the Council, should receive funding for fiscal year 1977-78 from the General Fund; and WHEREAS, the Council has the same responsibilities under State designation as all other Regional Planning Agencies, NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that 1. The County opposes any action of the Florida House of Representatives Appropriation Sub -committee "2" to delete funding available to the Council to assist in the carrying out of the re-• sponsibilitics under Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes and Chapter 163,3191 MAR 2 8-1977 , VOTIA---v454 0 Florida Statutes, 27 The County strongly urges the Florida House of Represent- atives Appropriation Sub -committee "2"' to reconsider their position and to provide funding to the Council on an equal basis as is provided to all other'Regional Planning Agencies throughout the State, 3. A copy of this Resolution be provided to each member of Florida House of Representatives Appropriation Subtcommittee "2" -an -1, each member of the Legislature which represent any area within the Region. Copies to be sent to the Department of Administration; DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED this" ' .28th:... day of Marchi 1977 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY4i,am Wo t e r t Chairman ATTEST; Tr.T...d Fr --da . I_i.6ltV, V1GL'-2�v r cin KA MAR 2 8 1977 THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:15 O'CLOCK P.M. E �i ATTEST: CLERK CHAIRMAN f 1 s 0 MAR 2 8 1977