HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/1977 (2)I
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19,'1977
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH,
FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1977, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M.
PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE
CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; AND R. DON
DEESON. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G. .JENNINGSf COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR;
L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G.
COLLINS, .JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; WILLIAM
P. .JACKSON, FINANCE OFFICER; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE
FLAG, AND REVEREND .JAMES RATCLIFF OF CHRIST METHODIST BY THE SEA
CHURCH GAVE THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR COR;
RECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1977.
COMMISSIONER DEESON REQUESTED THAT ON PAGE 6, PARAGRAPH 6,
"INVEILED. BE CORRECTED TO READ "UNVEILED;" THAT ON PAGE 23, PARA-
GRAPH 4, "STANDRADIZE" BE CORRECTED TO READ "STANDARDIZE;" AND THAT
ON PAGE 37, PARAGRAPH 1, "INFROMED" BE CORRECTED TO READ "INFORMED."
THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANI-
MOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21,
1977, AS WRITTEN.
DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE
LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT, AND ON MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTING AS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LAUREL -
WOOD SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1977, AND THE MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 26, 1977, OF LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DIS-
TRICT, AS WRITTEN.
JL MR
� � r
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR COR-
RECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1977.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1977, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR COR-
RECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1977.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1977, AS WRITTEN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR
A PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF FERDINAND KULIMA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GAVE RETRO -ACTIVE APPROVAL OF
ADMISSION OF .JAMES WILLIAMS TO A. G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLL,
CIRCUIT COURT, SPRING TERM, 1977,.IN THE AMOUNT OF $42.88.
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, SEPTEMBER, 1977, WAS
RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REPORTED THAT, AS REQUESTED AT THE PRE-
VIOUS BOARD MEETING, HE HAS CHECKED INTO THE CLERKS REQUEST FOR
COUNTERS TO BE BUILT FOR THE RECORDING DEPARTMENT AND CIVIL DIVI-
SION - COUNTY COURT AND NOW CAN BETTER UNDERSTAND WHY THESE ARE
NEEDED, HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTERS IN THE RECORDING DEPARTMENT
WILL GIVE THE PUBLIC A LOT MORE ROOM TO VIEW THE MICROFILM AND
WILL ALSO PROVIDE SECURITY FOR THE RECORDER PRINTERS WHICH THE
PUBLIC WILL NOT HAVE ACCESS TO.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR
TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUEST OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT FOR COUNTERS
FOR THE RECORDING DEPARTMENT AND CIVIL DIVISION -COUNTY COURT.
2
191977
BOOZE 31 �����
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD
RECEIVED THREE PROPOSALS IN REGARD TO A REVERSE CYCLE AIR CONDITION-
ING UNIT FOR THE PROBATE OFFICE AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE LOWEST ONE
FROM TRIMM HEATING.AND AIR CONDITIONING IN THE AMOUNT OF $400.00
INSTALLED BE ACCEPTED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT.ASKED IF THIS UNIT HAD HEAT STRIPS,
AND THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED HIM THAT THEY HAD ASKED FOR HEAT
STRIPS BUT THE PROPOSAL DID NOT STATE WHETHER THEY WERE INCLUDED OR
NOT. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD CHECK ON THIS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE LOW PROPOSAL OF TRIMM
HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING FOR A REVERSE CYCLE AIR CONDITIONER FOR
THE PROBATE OFFICE, SUBJECT TO HEAT STRIPS BEING PROVIDED.
ROSEMARY RICHEY, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, CAME BEFORE THE
BOARD IN REGARD TO APPROVAL OF TWO NEW POLLING PLACES. SHE STATED
THAT SHE WISHED TO CHANGE THE POLLING PLACE FOR PRECINCT I -B FROM
SEBASTIAN CITY HALL TO THE CITY COMMUNITY CENTER AND PRECINCT 3
IN VERO BEACH OVER TO THE NEW VERO BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER, MRS.
RICHEY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE MUNICIPALITIES APPROVE THESE
CHANGES AND THE PROPOSED POLLING PLACES HAVE ALL THE PROVISIONS
REQUIRED FOR THE HANDICAPPED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE SUPERVISOR OF
ELECTIONS TO MOVE THE POLLING PLACE FOR PRECINCT I -B IN SEBASTIAN
FROM THE CITY HALL TO SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER AND PRECINCT 3 IN
VERO BEACH FROM THE CULTURAL ARTS BUILDING TO THE NEW COMMUNITY
CENTER AND TO ADVERTISE THESE CHANGES.
DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPEARED BEFORE
THE BOARD REQUESTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL DF ARBOR OAKS SUBDIVISION.
HE NOTED THAT LOTS I, 2 AND 3 RECEIVED TENTATIVE APPROVAL LAST APRIL
AND THEY NOW WISH TO ADD LOTS 4, 5 AND 6.
DISCUSSION AROSE IN REGARD TO THE ROAD IN THIS SUBDIVISION,
AND MR. HOWARD STATED THAT THE ROAD WILL BE ALL PAVED FROM THE NORTH
LOT LINE OF LOT I SOUTH TO THE CUL-DE-SAC, BUT FROM 33RD STREET SOUTH
TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT I, THE PAVED AREA WILL BE ONLY A HALF ROAD.
9
CT 191977pe c 31 Alim
HIS CLIENTS OWN ONLY HALF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THUS CAN ONLY DEDICATE
HALF,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE OTHER
HALF OF THE -ROAD WAS PUT IN ON A METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SOME
TIME AGO, BUT NOW THE SUBDIVISION OWNERS WANT A DEDICATED ROAD.
THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT IT IS A PRIVATE ROAD WHICH
THE COUNTY WOULD NOT HAVE TO MAINTAIN, AND STATED THAT IT IS AC-
CEPTABLE TO PAVE HALF A ROAD FOR A SUBDIVISION WHEN YOU DO NOT OWN
THE OTHER HALF.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED HOW THIS SHOULD. BE SHOWN ON THE PLAT,
AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT YOU CANT PLAT PROPERTY UNLESS IT
IS DEDICATED BY THE FEE OWNER SO YOU WOULD -JUST HAVE TO SHOW HALF
A ROAD ON THE PLAT UNLESS THE ADJOINING OWNERS AGREE TO TIE IN.
MR. HOWARD STATED THAT HE WOULD TRY TO CONTACT THE ADJOIN-
ING OWNERS, BUT NOTED THAT ONE HAS MOVED AWAY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO ARBOR
OAKS SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS JOINING IN
ON THE ROAD DEDICATION OR IT BEING SHOWN ON THE PLAT THAT THEY HAVE
NOT JOINED IN.
THE NEXT ITEM TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD WAS A REQUEST FOR
TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF MITCHELL ESTATES.
COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER FILED THE FOLLOWING AFFIDAVIT IN
REGARD TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT AND
LEFT THE MEETING ROOM AT 9:10 O'CLOCK A.M.
0
ST 1919 -
4
wx 31
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA .
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIPER
Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER, of 610 Wall. Street, Vero Beach, Florida, who agys:
1. This affidavit is given pursuant to Florida Statues Chapter 112.313
which provides standards of conduct for officers and employees of state
agencies, counties, cities and other political subdivision, legislators and
legislative employees.
-` 2. That I am a duly elected County Commissioner of Indian River County,
Florida, and that in addition to my duties as County Commissioner, -I am a
licensed professional engineer in Florida and erigage in private practice as
-a consulting engineer.
3. That I am the President of TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida
Corporation in good standing which corporation has represented the Client ,
Ronald Mitchell to request a preliminary subdivision plat approval for
Mitchell Estates lying in the SW 4 of NW 4 of Section 13, Township 33. South,
Range 39 East.
4. The decision for'the rezoning of this property will be referred to
the Board of County Commissioners for their action on said rezoning at which
time the affiant proposes to abstain from voting because of the above conflict
• w
of interest. 1
rn
rtoo
rr,
x
Sworn to and subscribed before me this nth day of October , 1977.
• ^�I/� . " �s1:d..�i • �� tel(` � , Y
EDwni S. sm=CKER NOTARY PUBLIC, STA OF 1,UHIDA AT LARGE
My Commission Expires:
• u
lorida at
Notary Public State of
Filrsua� Lae
1478
My Commission Expires.
OCT 191977
ft
HARLAN PETERSON OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., CAME BEFORE
THE BOARD REPRESENTING RONALD MITCHELL OWNER OF MITCHELL ESTATES.
HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS SUBDIVISION, WHICH CONSISTS OF JUST
OVER 40 ACRES, IS LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH STREET (CITRUS ROAD) AND CON-
TLNUES TO COLONIAL TERRACE. MR. PETERSON STATED THAT MITCHELL ES-
TATES IS DIVIDED INTO 89 LOTS AND LOTS I AND 2 OF SECTION G ARE RE-
SERVED IN THE EVENT. A WATER PLANT IS CONSTRUCTED. THE SUBDIVISION
COMPLIES WITH THE COUNTY MASTER PLAN, AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT ROADS BEING CUT THROUGH IN-
TO COLONIAL TERRACE AND POINTED OUT THAT THE 50' RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND
60' RIGHTS-OF-WAY DO NOT ALIGN.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT BEFORE THE PLAT IS
FINALIZED THEY CHECK WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON THE STREET
ALIGNMENT. HE NOTED THAT LOTH COURT MAY HAVE TO BE CHANGED TO LOTH
AVENUE.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED DRAINAGE, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE
SUBDIVISION HAS CURB AND GUTTER ROADS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER Loy, TO GRANT TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO MITCHELL ESTATES.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED THAT THE MINUTES REFLECT THAT
BEFORE THE DEVELOPER COMES BACK FOR FINAL APPROVAL, HE SHOULD DOUBLE
CHECK THE STREETS TO BE SURE THEY CONFORM.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED, WITH COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ABSTAINING.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 9:20
0 CLOCK A.M.
.JAMES BEINDORF, ENGINEER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENT-
ING DRIFTWOOD OF VERO BEACH, INC.; OWNERS OFA PREVIOUSLY UN -NAMED
SUBDIVISION NOW TO BE KNOWN AS OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES. MR. BEINDORF
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE SUBDIVISION
REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THEIR SUGGESTIONS COMPLIED WITH IN REGARD TO
SHOWING DRAINAGE, SIZE OF CULVERTS, ECT., ON THE PLAT AND ADDING A
DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES. MR. BEINDORF
0
CT 191977
CONTINUED THAT EVEN THOUGH THESE ARE 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, THEY WILL
HAVE CURB AND GUTTER ROADS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. HE NOTED THAT
THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED IN AN AREA OF LARGE ESTATES, AND THEY
ARE TRYING TO PRESERVE AS MANY TREES AND AS MUCH VEGETATION AS
POSSIBLE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO OLD
SUGAR (KILL ESTATES.
MR. BEINDORF, ACTING AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR RANDY SEXTON,
NEXT DISCUSSED THE REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF RAIN TREE
CORNER SUBDIVISION. HE NOTED THAT THIS IS A 10 -ACRE SUBDIVISION
AND WAS RECENTLY REZONED TO R -1A. THE PROPERTY LIES SOUTH OF ROSE -
DALE ROAD, AND THE TRACTS ARE 1/2 ACRE OR SLIGHTLY LARGER. MR.
BEINDORF STATED THAT THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUESTED
LEAVING A 25' ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS THE SOUTH END OF THE
PROPERTY, AND THIS WAS DONE. HE NOTED THAT THEY CHANGED THE SET-
BACKS FOR LOTS 8 AND 9 SO THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY WOULD NOT BE VIOLATED.
MR. BEINDORF FURTHER STATED THAT THIS IS NOT A CURB AND GUTTER ROAD-
WAY, BUT IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO WORK OUT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC. IF
THIS CANNOT BE WORKED OUT, THE EASEMENTS ARE THERE FOR OVERHEAD
UTILITIES.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO RAIN
TREE CORNER SUBDIVISION.
MR. BEINDORF REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD THE REQUEST FOR
TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF THE MOORINGS UNIT #S AND NOTED THAT THIS IS
THE LAST LARGE LAND MASS OF THE MOORINGS TO BE DEVELOPED AND COM-
PRISES 149 LOTS. HE NOTED THAT IT CONFORMS ALMOST EXACTLY WITH
THE PLAN THE BOARD APPROVED ALMOST NINE YEARS AGO, HE STATED THAT
IT IS ZONED R -1A, HAS CURB AND GUTTER ROADWAY, CITY WATER, AND ITS
OWN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. MR. BEINDORF CONTINUED THAT THIS DE-
VELOPMENT DOES HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL AFFECTS, BUT IT PREVIOUSLY RE-
CEIVED APPROVAL FROM ALL THE REGULATORY AGENCIES, AND HE FEELS IT
WILL BE ABLE TO GET APPROVAL AGAIN. HE NOTED THAT THE SEA WALLS
HAVE BEEN IN FOR SEVEN YEARS, AND THERE.IS NO DREDGING AND FILLING
NEEDED.
U
T 191977
.30 . mcf
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO THE MOORINGS
UNIT #5 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ALL STATE AND REGULATORY AGENCIES.
MR. BEINDORF NEXT TOOK UP THE REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL
OF CITRUS HIDEAWAY SUBDIVISION, NOTING THAT THIS IS THE PROPERTY
WHICH WAS JUST REZONED ABOUT.A MONTH AGO TO R -IE FOR KEITH MARTIN.
HE NOTED THAT THE LAND SHOWN ON THE PLAN AS "NOT INCLUDED" WILL BE
INCLUDED, AS SUGGESTED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND DESIGNATED AS
TRACT A�UNLESS IT IS SOLD IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT IT HELPS FROM THE TITLE STAND-
POINT
POINT TO HAVE AS MUCH PLATTED AS POSSIBLE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THIS SUBDIVISION HAS A
DEED RESTRICTION WHICH RECOGNIZES THAT IT IS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE
OF A CITRUS AREA AND COULD ANTICIPATE SPRAYING, ECT., AS RELATED TO
THE CITRUS BUSINESS. HE FELT THIS SHOULD BE NOTED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT COULD BE REQUIRED THAT A NOTE BE
PUT ON THE. PLAT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS WOULD BE DOUBLE PRO-
TECTION FOR A PROSPECTIVE BUYER, BUT HE FELT IT WAS ONLY NECESSARY
TO HAVE SUCH A STATEMENT ON THE FINAL PLAT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO CITRUS
HIDEAWAY SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO A NOTE IN REGARD TO THE DEED RE-
STRICTION BEING INCLUDED ON -THE FINAL PLAT.
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO -WIT:
BON %134
A
r
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Veto Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
In the matter of
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of C ,,, '0t4 -Z A
�C�ez•-��-e��r � 07� / 9 �' 7
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement, and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. m
Sworn to and subscribed before me this � a of C �' A.D. / `7 ?
_ (B iness Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, indianlover County, Florida)
(SEAL)
I , ., � NOTICB
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will receive bids to the hour of
4:30 A.M. Wednesday, October 19, 1977, for the
following:
Concrete Scale Pit and Platform located at
New Sanitary Landfill, Indian River County,
Florida
Specifications, instructions to bidden and
bidding blanks are available at the Office of
the County Administrator, Room 115, County
Court House, or will be mailed upon request.
The Board of County Commissioners
reserves the right to reject any or all of the
bids and make awards in any manner which
Y the Board considers to be in the best interest of
Indian River County, Florida.
All bids must be submitted on the blank
forms provided by the County, and must be
accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 5
percent of the bid. A 100 percent Performance
Bond with Surety, satisfactory to the Indian
River County Commission, will also be
required of the successful bidder.
Bids for the above item shall be submitted
i in an envelope securely sealed and marked on
the outside to show the item being bid on and
the date and time of the opening. The bids may
be mailed or delivered to the Office of the
County Administrator, Room 115, County
Court House, Vero Beach, Florida 31960.
Proposals received after 9:30 A.M. October 19,
1977, wiil be returned unopened.
Indian River County, Florida
Board of County Commissioners
By: William C. WodtkeJr., Chairman
Sept. 18, Oct. 1,1977.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED,: OPENED
AND READ:
COLT INDUSTRIES, FAIRBANKS WEIGHING
DIVISION -
CONCRETE SCALE PIT AND PLATFORM $13,941.00
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SIEBERT, TO REFER*THE ABOVE BID TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR
EVALUATION ,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS STAFF
AND THE ENGINEERS CONTACTED THE LOCAL PEOPLE IN THE CONCRETE BUSINESS
IN REGARD TO THE CONCRETE SCALE PIT AND PLATFORM, BUT NO BIDS WERE
RECEIVED FROM THEM. HE NOTED THAT NOTHING LIKE THIS HAS BEEN BUILT
ANYWHERE AROUND HERE, AND THE BID THAT HAS BEEN RECEIVED IS FROM A
COMPANY THAT DOES THIS KIND OF WORK ALL THE TIME. HE CONTINUED THAT
0
p CT 191977
0
RON X 4A 9
IT IS PRECISE WORK AND REQUIRES CLOSE TOLERANCES.
ENGINEER BEINDORF AGREED, POINTING OUT THAT IT IS AN ELEC-
TRONIC TYPE OF SCALE PIT AND THEREFORE, THE TOLERANCES ARE CRITICAL.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE BIDDER SAYS HE WILL COMMENCE
WORK WITHIN IO DAYS OF THE AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT AND COMPLETE IT
WITHIN 25.
ENGINEER BEINDORF FELT THAT THE TIMING IS ALSO A CRITICAL
ELEMENT TO CONSIDER AND ADDED THAT MANY OF TAE CONRTACTORS HE TALKED
TO WERE VERY BUSY AND WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MEET SUCH A TIME FRAME.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE ADMINISTRATOR AND THE
CONSULTING ENGINEER WERE SATISFIED THAT THIS IS A FAIR BID AND
DOESNIT NEED ANY FURTHER EVALUATION.
THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ENGINEER BEINDORF AGREED THAT THEY
WOULD RECOMMEND ACCEPTING THE BID, ESPECIALLY IN VIEW OF THE CRITI-
CAL TOLERANCE INVOLVED AND THE TIMING , BUT SUGGESTED THAT THEY RE-
VIEW THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED TO SEE THAT EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER AND
REPORT BACK LATER IN THE MEETING,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10
� I I
LOO Ala
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING
PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF
PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
NOTICE OF LEASE
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida '
OF REAS. ESTATE
tsursuarlt to Florida Statute 125.35, the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will accept written bids to the
hour of 9:30 A.M. Wednesday, October 19,1977,
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
for lease of the following described County
STATE OF FLORIDA
Properly.
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
Indian River Farms Company Subdivision
PBS 2-25 W. 10 A. of E. 20.54 A of Tract 8
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
described on the tax roll as 21 33 39 01 0080
002.0.
•
The Board of County Commissioners
a
reserves the right to reject any or all of the
bids and make awards in any manner which
the Board considers to be in the best interest of
in. the matter of �–�
Indian River County, Florida.
All bids shall be for one (1) y2ar lease, in
��C ///���
writing by legal description as listed above and
x
shall include a check payable to Indian River
ro
County for 10 percent (10 percent) of the lease
price — with the balance due five (5) days
In the Court, was pub-
after acceptance, submitted in an envelope
securely sealed and marked on the outside
"SEALED BID FOR LEASE OF COUNTY
LAND" along with the date and time of the bid
Iistted in said newspaper in the issues of
opening. The bids may be mailed or delivered
to the office of the County Administrator,
Room 115, County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Z 9 J'
Florida 32960. received offer
need
A.M. October 19, 1977, will be returned
19, 1977
unopened.
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County, Florida
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
Oct. 2,9,1977.
continuously
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a perm of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
7 7
Sworn to and subscribed before me this A
L
.
(Busin ss Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian Rivr County, Florida)
(SEAQ
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BID WAS RECEIVED, OPENED
AND READ:
FRANK BURDICK — FOR RENT OF LAND TO BE
USED FOR VEGETABLE FARMING AND RETURNED
TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AFTER HARVESTING.... $250.00 PER YEAR
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE FELT SUCH A USE WOULD GREAT—
LY IMPROVE THE PROPERTY, BUT THAT THE BIDDER SHOULD SUBMIT PROOF OF
ASSUMPTION OF ALL LIABIL:I.TY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THE BOARD SHOULD REQUIRE AN.INSUR-
ANCE POLICY WITH AT LEAST $100,000 LIABILITY COVERAGE WITH THE COUNTY
AS A NAMED INSURED, PLUS A LEASE PREPARED BY MR. BURDICK INDEMNIFYING
THE COUNTY FROM ANY LIABILITY RESULTING FROM HIS OPERATION,
THE CHAIRMAN DISCUSSED FENCING THE PROPERTY, BUT IT WAS
AGREED THAT THIS WAS NOT NECESSARY, I
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF FRANK BURDICK,
BASED UPON USE OF THE LAND AS SET OUT IN HIS BID, AS BEING THE LOWEST
AND BEST BID IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.00 PER YEAR, SUBJECT TO MR. BURDICK
PREPARING A LEASE AND PROVIDING INSURANCE AS SET OUT BY THE ATTORNEY
ABOVE AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE SUBJECT TO'APPROVAL BY
THE ATTORNEY.
12
;c�
1 ma '408
THIS LEASE, Made and entered into this 19th day of
October, 1977, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called "LESSOR",
and FRANK R. BURDICK, hereinafter called the "LESSEE":
WITNESSETH:
That in consideration of the covenants herein contained,
on.the part of the said Lessee to be kept and performed, the
said Lessor does hereby lease to the said Lessee the following
described property, located in the County of Indiah River, State
of Florida, to -wit:
Indian River Farms Company Subdivision
PBS 2-25 W. 10 acres of E. 20.54 acres
of Tract 8, described on the tax roll as
21 33 3901 0080 002.0
1. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises for
a term of one (1) year, commencing on the 19th day of October,
1977 to and including the 18th day of October, 1978.
2. The Lessor hereby leases to the Lessee and the Lessee
hereby leases from the Lessor the above described premises for
the term set out in this Lease for the total rent of Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
3. At the expiration of the term, the Lessee will yield
up to Lessor the demised premises in the same condition as
they were received.
4. The Lessor shall provide liability insurance in an
amount of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00)
per occurrence, naming Lessor as a co-insured under said liability
insurance policy.
5. Lessee, by acceptance of this Lease, hereby agrees to
indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any damages that may
result while Lessee exercises his rights under this Lease and
to pay all costs including court costs and reasonable attorneys'
fees resulting therefrom.
lam
6. The Lessee will not make or suffer.any unlawful or
improper use of the premises. Premises are being leased for
the purposes of vegetable farming.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto
executed this instrument for the purpose herein expressed, the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered a
in•the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
William C. Wodtke, Jr /, Chairman
*4 h A.A.0eti*Ao Attest: cif(�l/t t -
As t County Freda Wright, Cler
LESSOR
Frank R. Burdick
As to Burdick
LESSEE
5
p CI 19 1977 .
tkm A Foal 2.70
��':. �Crfi#1C21fC �f �11n11I'2111CC v'
FLORIDA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. D
SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.]
Is. O. BOX 730
GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32602
J
DATE October 19, 1977
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Company named above has issurd polic0es) to the insured name below. If such policylies) are canceled or changed
during periodls) of coverage as stated herein, in such a manner as to affect this certificate, --days Written notice will be mailed to the Party de•
• signoted below for whom this certificate is issued.
DESCRIPTION OF
INSURED OPERATION This includes -Indian -River Farms Co. Sub., PBS 2251k,
`W 10 Acres of E. 20.54 Acres of Tract 8, Sec. 21, Twp. 33, Rge• 39
PAY TO TH
ORDER
OF
er
in FLORIDA NiBST NATIONAL BANS
A7 nn.r�cr
FOR
►1:0670-06 31�1:
H
- —ZO—/
63-636
t922
''''77 �� 670
F. R. BURDIdK CITRUS
�� e,- '. , . �e
T
111, LO b 29 LII'
BOOK vil PAU 271
J
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REPORTED THAT HE AND ENGINEER
BEINDORF HAVE REVIEWED THE BID DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY COLT INDUSTRIES
ON THE CONCRETE SCALE PIT AND PLATFORM, WHICH ARE IN ORDER, AND THEY
RECOMMEND THAT THE BID OF COLT INDUSTRIES BE ACCEPTED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF COLT INDUSTRIES,
FAIRBANKS WEIGHING DIVISION, FOR A CONCRETE SCALE PIT AND PLATFORM,
AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $13,941.00.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT WE MUST NOW BE PAR-
TICULARLY CAREFUL TO ENFORCE THE DUMPING REGULATIONS.
THE ADMINISTRATOR AGREED AND SUGGESTED THAT IF THE SHERIFF
DOES NOT HAVE AN EXTRA MAN TO ENFORCE THIS, THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER
HIRING SOMEONE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR RE-
PORT BACK AT THE NEXT MEETING IN REGARD TO A SPECIAL DEPUTY TO ENFORCE
REGULATIONS IN REGARD TO ILLEGAL DUMPING.
.JOSEPH MATTHEWS, CDP SYSTEMS MANAGER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD
TO REVIEW HIS PRESENTATION IN REGARD TO EXPANDING THE COMPUTER SYSTEM
AND TO ASK FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PLACE A LETTER OF INTENT WITH IBM TO
UPGRADE OUR SYSTEM/3 MODEL 10 TO A SYSTEM/3 MODEL 15. HIS LETTER
AND PRESENTATION ARE AS FOLLOWS:
ACT 191977 .
13
1
MCI L
0
FREDA WRIGHT
CLERK. CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
P. 0. BOX 1028
VERO BEACH - FLORIDA
32960
October 19, 1977
To: Indian River County Board of County Commissiogers
Subject: Model Upgrade of Existing Computer System
For some time we have examined the County's Data Processing Requirements
for the Board and the Clerk's Office. My decision to become your Systems
Manager was based on your decision to meet the County's needs with an in-house
approach. 7 respectfully request that you now authorize my first official
action which is to place a letter of intent with IBM to upgrade our System/3
Model 10 to a System/3 Model 15. I have attached a draft copy of the proposed
letter.. The letter is necessary for the County to obtain the required delivery
schedule from IBM.
Our work to upgrade the system has begun in earnest and I can assure the
Board and the Clerk that our progress will be significant over the next five
years. Again, I ask that you authorize me to proceed with the implementation
of our long range goals and objectives by providing me with your concurrence
in this matter.
septi T. Matthews, CDP
Systems Manager
cc: Clerk of Court
County Administrator
Finance Director
JTM/srk
d
CT i 91977
4
FREDA WRIGHT
X• 41
- a � � q U CLERK. CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
P.O. BOX 1028
VERO BEACH - F L O R I D A
32960
(To be dated)
DRAFT
Mr. Peter Bradish
General Systems Division
I.B.M. Corporation
7900 North Astronaut Blvd.
Cape Canaveral, Florida 32952
Dear Sir:
Please take whatever steps are necessary to insure that the equipment
at -Attachment A will be available for delivery, if authroized by the Indian
River County Board of County Commissioners.
This order is contingent upon formal budgetary approval by the Board.
We realize that some of the equipment for our upgrade has a lead time
of several months. However, with this advance notification, you should have
no difficulty in meeting our shipping schedules when approved.
Sincerely,
Joseph T. Matthews, CDP
Systems Manager
• I
JTM/srk
r
i
• _ i
OCT 191977 31 PuM
FREDA WRIGHT
1I I CLERK. CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
LM
P. O. BOX 1028
V E R O BE AC H • FLOR I DA
32960
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTION
System 3 Model 15 Processor
Printer
Disk Drives
Terminals
Programmer's Work Station
UHANITY
1
1
2
8
1
R
gyp. � ♦ .
. fAGEr'd X%J
OPTION PAPER
The present data processing operation is not really paying it's way.. The
work which is now being done by the computer could be done cheaper by hand. We
are left with two choices. Unplug the computer and go back to manual systems,
or increase our use of this resource.
The rationale for choosing the first course of action would be immediate
reduction in tangible costs. Several new clerical employees would be required.
However, the savings in computer rental and technical staff elimination would
more than offset the new salaries and amortization of furniture and floor space
expenses.
There are several considerations for choosing the second course. If we
chose to abandon electronic data processing at this time, we know that a point
would be reached in the future when we would be forced to consider it again. If
computerization of certain functions is, indeed,.inevitable it is wiser to work
the problems while they are small and still manageable. We now have a sizeable.
investment in programs and training. It would be inefficient to sacrifice these
at this time and duplicate the costs later.
The intangible side of the equation should also be considered. Just as
we pay for the intangible benefits of insurance, the present systems offer
several intangible benefits. Having information sooner often makes the information
more accurate and valuable. Providing the Board with better historical data
at budget meetings will allow better budgetary control. Helping the Finance
Director to control cash balances will allow reduced idle cash and improve interest
m-enue from short term investment. Providing better controls will improve
audits and provide a safeguarding of taxpayers money Rot available from insurance
companies. And perhaps most importantly, increased responsiveness will help us
to improve our good relationship with our real employers, the taxpayers.
I therefore recommend that the second course of action be chosen.
-i-
.P
OCT 191971
The applications now being performed are:
A. Budgetary Accounting
B. Clerk's and Board's Payroll
C. Sheriff's Payroll
D. Jury and Witness Payroll
E. Accounting for Traffic Fine Receipts
F. Control of Fixed Assets
G. Automobile License Tag Processing
Each system has room for expansion or Improvement. The possible improvement
is, however, restricted by the capacity of our present equipment.
Additional areas where we may perform a worthwhile service are County
Planning, County Landfill Billing, Utility Billing and Collecting for Urban
Development Utilities, Document Recording and Indexing, Criminal Justice, and
,an interface with our present micro -film effort.. Possibilities beyond these
may develop when a successful track record can be established. Our present
computer system, however, does not have the capacity to tackle some of these
possibilities.
A second decision, then, is whether to upgrade our present System/3 Model
. 10 computer. An upgrade in our data storage and an increase in printer speed
would allow us'to handle the Planning and the Utility Billing and Collecting
functions. The Document Recording and Indexing function could still not be
attempted. There would also be relatively little service which could be
provided to the Court area of the Courthouse.
I cannot recommend this option. Even with these upgrades we would outgrow
this computer within the next five years. Also, the monthly lease payments on
this upgraded model (which are subject to inflation) are competitive with monthly
amortization schedules for lease/purchase of a larger computer (which we know
would fill our needs for at least the next seven to ten years). The loan payments
_2-
a
Ci 191977 JL�
would be stable and could not rise with inflation.
A third option then is whether to upgrade to a larger model of our present
computer, with the possibility of eventual purchase. The purchase versus lease
equation yields a far lower price for purchase, so long as interest rates are
favorable. A second way to compare lease versus purchase is to calculate the
foregone interest expense in place of loan interest. I chose the second method
for this comparison because investment interest rates are stabler and easier
to predict.
Because this third option represents at least a seven year commitment, it
can only be considered when a stable situation exists. The people making the
decision must feel comfortable with the performance of the equipment, and the
department operating it, before this should be feasible. I would not recommend
purchase at this time because there have been too many unfulfilled promises in
the -.past.
What may be considered at this time is a'lease/purchase option. .Under this
arrangement the equipment would be leased for one or two years at a price which
would be immune from inflation. Approximately sixty percent of our lease payments
would go towards eventual purchase. At any point in time we could either purchase
the equipment or go on leasing. There are two local precedents for purchase.
Both the cities•of Melbourne and Cocoa have purchased the same model computer
which I am recommending we lease.
The main reason for not selecting this course of action is that direct costs
would increase initially if not offset by cost reductions in other areas or by
outside revenue. Because the Board has been promised cost reductions before which
never materialized these are difficult to count upon too heavily. What may be
considered instead is my personal track record and what I have delivered in the
past.
The Cocoa City Council purchased their System/3 Model 15 computer upon
-3-
d'
i
®CT 191977
s,
0
delivery under the recommendation of our city auditors and myself. We first
forestalled the need to enlarge the city payroll by eliminating the need to
create at least one new job position. We then went on to eliminate, through
attrition, six job positions in four departments. People were simply not
replaced when they left. It is interesting to note that while several new
job positions were added,.the over-all head count of employees in these
departments is the same now in 1977 as it was in 1971 (including the new
data processing staff).
Many other savings and improvements of a.less tangible nature were also
realized. A valuable benefit appeared when representatives of the Customer
Service Department handled irate customers by displaying their master records
on terminals. The customers (and taxpayers) began to raise their former
evaluations of City Hall's efficiency. The Finance Director began checking
his cash balance on a terminal each morning and investment revenue increased.
Back -logs of manual posting disappeared and records were accurate and up to
date. Better information was available at budget hearings to control costs.
Yearly audit letters improved. Services were provided and double checking
was performed which there had never been time for before.
Secondly, at Cocoa approximately seventy thousand dollars per year of
revenue was generated by doing utility billing and collecting for the cities
of Cocoa Beach and Rockledge, Brevard County, and several small private
utility companies.
It is my belief that we could make the larger model computer save money
in the long run; but let's put the hypothetical aside for a moment and look
at hard data. Our present computerwould be outgrown in less than eight years
even if no additional applications were added. So, for a worst case test of
my recommendation let's compare the lease of our present model computer.(with
absolutely no upgrades) for eight years to a lease/purchase of the larger model
-4-
OCT 191977 � , BOOK
I
over the same term. Appendix B shows this financial analysis. The average increase
in cost, over an eight year period, would be $28,000. This increase in expenditure
(even if absolutely no compensating cost reductions occurred) would buy us an
extension in capability shown at the right hand column of Appendix A.
This increase in expenditure would probably now really be reached. It is my
best estimate that even if we attempt no new applications, we would still need
upgrades to our present computer. The Analysis at Appendix C shows what the
additional cost would be if the present model was upgraded in October of 1980 by
increasing data storage capacity and printer speed. The increased cost in this
eventuality would be an average of $8,500 per year over an eight year period.
It is my personal opinion that, ignoring possibilities of cost reduction or
outside revenue, the analysis shown at Appendix C is the more realistic estimate.
It would probably not be realistic to upgrade our current computer now to undertake
the County Planning and Utility Billing and Collecting functions. As shown at
Appendix D, this option would entail the upgrades described above beiiig needed as
early as October of 1978. This would make the lease of our present model computer
even more expensive than the lease/purchase of the larger model.
In case the lease/purchase option is considered, the possibility of changing
vendors rather than upgrading our present I.B.M. System/3 computer has also been
carefully investigated. My findings in previous analyses dealing with this
subject have been re -confirmed. There is no viable alternative which offers
sufficient compatibility to avoid a major and costly conversion.
In Fiscal Year 1973-74 we spent $1,708,000 on direct personnel expense. Our
budget for the 1977-78 Fiscal Year is $3,247,000, an increase in four years of 90%.
These increases in personnel expense are the resulta.of several factors. Each year
our citizens demand and expect additional and improved services. An increased
burden has been placed on the County Court System. State and Federal agencies
continue to increase their reporting requirements. As our population increases the
-5-
d
0
CT J 91977
paper -work stream continues to swell out of proportion. We have begun to bridge
this stream of paper with electronic data processing, but we have only gone half
way. We stand now with one foot on either bank and we must make a. decision. Shall
we cross to the other bank or should we give up, abandon our half constructed
bridge, and flounder back to shore?
I personally recommend to the Board, with Mrs. Wright's and Mr. Jackson's
concurrence, that we upgrade our existing computer and finish the work which
has been begun. This will require an additional appropriation not to exceed
$50,000 for Fiscal Year 1977-78. The exact amount will be dependent upon the
date of delivery. Because these delivery times can easily range out to half
a year, it is imperative that we reserve our place in line as soon as possible.
IM!
0
APPENDIX A
SYSTEM COMPARISON
ITEM CONSIDERED CURRENT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
SYSTEM SYSTEM
A.
Number of programs which can run simultaneously
1
19
19 times
B.
Main Memory
16K
1608
10 times
additional processor in programmers work
none
48K
station
C.
Disk Capacity
1OM8
500 M8
50 times
Comparitive Speed
10 times
D.
Tape Drive (on programmers work station)
none
1
E.
Diskette Drive
1
2
twice
F.
Printer Capacity
200 LPM
465LPM
twice
Additional slave printer
none
1
Additional plotter
none
1
G.
• Terminals
none
8
*.
• r
CT V91977
1977
r
BOOK 31 AH
».a'av'z.__ � .. 9 -^ '.'R^..' 1 '.... r , . ;n . ••..^. .'. � .., . � :a •..-•-a ,. � , : a:.-:a�w+d'_ � : meq°>li3S�.'�':.;.. .--'s :ft "%," .. .r �.7a a_ -
a
9/3U/77
.,,.."..+RrT, Mw:T'x. �s.�i.w�t..-,-<+-� .. s�:.� ;.s.ramw^...n. vn�
7�y'$+�"R4..:p.•T..",q�':.:`.'
:.•vn m.�,�.ayua^w ;•.-ar .r-+w+.rw.w........,n,n.+Nt+ipt wa...zaa^T -: � P
EIGHT YLAR
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
F
PALE 1
MU:VfH
MUUFL 10
MUOLL 10
MOOtL 10
I/84
HOUFL 15
MUOFL 15
FUKEGUNt
MOULL 15
LtASL
Sul, IWAKt
IulAL
PUWiA�.f
MAINZ.
SLFTWAKE
IM ERLSI
TOTAL
+++++++++ FISCAL YtAR
1117/la ALKLAUY
bUUGETtD
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION - 44,000.00
FISCAL
YEAR 19 77/7b
TUTALS -
3v91Uu.0U
93r100.Ou +
UCTOBER
/b 3.439.95
81.12
3011.07
3.922.15
1.410.00
141.44
1,425.99
69899.54
,UVLMOER
UE4cm hR
3:439.95
3,439.45
bl.12
dt.11
3r IZL.U1
3:521.0/
3:944.15
3.922.15
1.410.00
L:410.00
141.44
141.44
1,410.56
1,395.18
6rb84,11
6:868.77
JA'iuARY
FEaAUAKY
79 3:4!1.95
3,419.•15
bl.ld
61.12
Sr541.U1
3r�11.L1
3:921.15
3:924.15
1:41U.U0
1,41u.00
141.44
14(.44
1.319.11
6,855.36
MA'tGH
3:439.15
91.11
3:511.01
3:921.15
1.41(/.00
141.44
1r3o4.31
1.348.96
4,b3l.16
6:811.55
APi1L
hAY
31439.15
dI.IG
3,521.()1
3:992.15
1,41U.UU
141.44
1,333.56
6,bQ1.15
3x439.95
bl.LZ
3:511.07
3:922.15
1,410.00
141.44
1:318.15
6:711.74
JUVc
3.439.95
01.14
3:54L.ul
3,942.15
L,41u.U0
141.44
1:3U2.75
6x116.34
JULY
AU.:UST
39439.95
3,439.95
•b1.12
n1.L1
3:511.0/
3"121.07
3,921.15
3:9kZ.15
1r41u.00
1941G.00
141.44
141.44
1:2d7.35
1,411.94
b,76U.94
SfPItMBER
3,439.95
b1.L2
3,511.01
3:922.15
1"410.00
L4L.44
1x256.54
6:145.53
0.730.1'3
FISCAL
YtAk 19 78/79
TOTALS -
42.252.84
8L177d.22 +
UCT6d$R
79 3:b63.55
84.36
3x741.91
3,922.15
1:480.50
147.10
1,240.14
6:789.89
.IOjEHbek
3.663.55
u4.36
3,741.91
3,941.15
1.480.50
147.10
1,413.74
b:173.49
uE4tRbbt
JA'aUAKY
3:663.55
80 3:bb3 55
b4.36
b4.36
3,741.91
3:741.9i
3,91.2.15
3:924.15
L.4bU.50
L,460.50
147.LU
147.10
1,207.34
1.196.95
0:757.09
FEzAUAAY
3"663.55
b4.36
3:7~1.91
3r 922.15
1r4bU.50
147.10
1,174.45
6,14u.10
6:114.30
hAtUH
APi1L
3#bc3.55
:663.55
64.36
b4.36
3r 14/.91
3:747.91
3:922.15
3,922.15
1,460.50
1r4bu.50
141.10
147.10
1,158.15
1.141.'76
60701.90
6,69L.51
MAY
JU.vE
"663.5i
3"063.55
b4.36
3r 747.91
3.922.15
1,4d0.50
147.10
1:12 .36
0:615.11
JULY
3:063.55
64.36
84.36
3,147.91
3,141.91
3,922.15
3.924.15
1:480.50
1,4b0.50
147.10
147.10
1,106.96
1,092.56
6,656.71
AppouST
3"663.55
64.36
$:747.91
3"922.15
1,48u.50
147.10
1,016.11
b,642.31
6#615.92
SEPTEMBEk
30663.55
a4.3b
3"747.91
3r 922.15
1:4bu.50
147.10
I u59.17
0:609.51
FISCAL
YEAR 19 79/80
TOTALS -
44x974.91
63,396.45 +
OCT DERa
NGYeMBEK
130 3:101.68
d7.73
3,369.41
3:922.15
1:554.53
152.98
1"042.32
6,611.99
UcccMbtA
3:901.68
3:901.68
b7.13
d7.7.1
3"949.41
399.1.41
3:922.15
3,922.15
1:554.53
L:554.53
152.98
152.98
1r 024.86
1:007.41
6,654.52
6,637.0
FJA'AUARY
tdAUARY
B1. 3.941.68
3,901.a8
b7.13
b7.73
i:9dV.4L
3,999.41
3:922.15
3:922.15
L:554.53
1:554.53
152.98
152.98
989.9b
9'12.50
6.619.62
hAAGr1
3:901.68
07.73
3.989.41
3:922.15
1.554.53
152.48
955.05
6.601.16
6,584.71
APMIL
3,901.68
67.73
3:949.41
3.921.15
1,554.53
152.9d
937.59
6,567.25
MAY
JUNE
3,901.68
3.9Ul.bd
87.73
67.73
3"9b9.41
3.964.41
3:9"42.15
3,942.15
1,554.53
1:554.53
152.98
152.9b
920. L4
902.61
6,549.80
b,532.35
JULY
AUoUST
3,901.68
3:901.68
87.73
3.909.41
31922.15
1,554.53
152.98
885.23
4,514.89•
SEPT HOEK
3,901.68
b7.73
b7.73
3,909.41
3,9d9.41
3r 922.15
3:922.15
1,554.53
1:554.53
152.16
152.9if
867.78
850.33
4:497.44
b:419.99
FISCAL
YEAR 19 40/81
TOTALS -
47"872.92
78,911.78 +
U``Tl16Ert
81 4,155.29
91.24
4:246.53
3:922.15
1:632.26
159.10
831.75
0.545.26
ut7YinDER
LEGc1"BCR
4,155.49
4,155.1.4
91.14
4,246.53
3.922.15
1.632.26
159.10
813.11
0"526.6b
91.24
4r24o.53
3,924.15
1:634.26
159.10
794.59
6:500.10
�A"OAkY
62 4,155.29
91.24
4,'446.53
3:922.15
1,632.26
159.10
776.01
6:499.52.
FtOKUAkY
4:155.49
91.24
4:246.53
3x922.15
1.634.26
159.10
157.43
6:470.94
MAir:H
4:155.19
91.24
4,246.5.*
3.924.15
1:632.26
L59.10
738.05
6.452.36
AP3IL
4:155.29
91.24
4"246.53
3.912.15
1.631.26
159.10
720.2d
o,433.79
MAY
4.155.19 -
91.24
4,246.53
3:922.15
1.632.26
159.10
701.70
6"4(5.11
Ju -4E
4"155.19
91.24
4:246.53
3.912.15
1r 631.J�6
159.10
683.12
6:396.63
JULY
4, 155.19
91.24
4:146.53
!,924.15
1.631.16
159.10
664.54
61374.05
AU::u$T
4x155.29
91.14
4,24b.53
3,922.15
1,632.26
159.10
645.96
b:359.47
St?TtMBfk
4,L5S.d9
91.24
4,246.53
3r92d.15
1"632.26
159.10
627.313
6,340.89
FISCAL
YtAR L9 a1/62
TOTALS -
50,958.36
771316.90 +
OCTOBER
82 4,425.38
94.89
4.520.27
3:922.15
1.713.87
165.46
607.61
6r 409.09
nUVSMdtR
40425.38
94.89
4,54'1.27
3:921.15
1:713.67
L65.46
587.83
6:389.31
UkccMOEA
4:425.38
94.89
4,520.27
3,922.15
1.713.87
165.46
56b.06
6.3b9.54
J»luARY
FtbituARY
b3 4r 425.38
4,425.38
94.89
94.89
4:570.27
4,5G41.27
3,922.15
3:922.15
1,7L3.d7
1:713.87
165.46
545.28
6,349.76
14AA{.ri
4:415.3b
94.69
4,710.27
3,922.15
1,713.87
165.46
165.46
528.50
508.73
6:329.90
6:310.21
APALL
4:425.36
94.89
4:520.27
3r 922.15
1:713.87
165.46
48b.95
6:290.43
MAY
4#425.38
94.89
4r5ZO.27
3,922.15
1,713.d7
165.46
469.17
6r27G.65
JUVE
4"425.38
94.89
4.514.27
3,922.15
1.713.87
161.46
449.40
b:250.84
JULY
4,425.38
14.b9
4:52U.27
3:922.15
1:713.87
165.46
429.62
6.231.10
AUZ.UST
4,425.38
94.49
4.510.27
3:924.15
197L3.d7
165.46
409.65
6.ZL1.33
StritMBER
49425.3b
94.89
4,520.27
3,922.15
1.713.87
165.46
390.07
6,191.55
FISCAL
YEAR 19 82/83
TOTALS -
54.243.24
75,603.83 +
OCTOBER
8.3 4:713.03
98.69
4x811.72
3.922.15
1,799.56
172.08
369.02
6"262.81
NT,VthbEA
4:713.03
98.69
4"di1.71
3:9222.15
1:799.56
172.08
347.97
6:241.76
i:ECtnbEK
49113.03
98.69
4:811.72
3.922.15
1:799.56
172.08
326.92
6:220.71
JA:4UAKY
84 4:713.03
9b.69
4.8L1.72
3:912.15
1,799.56
172.Od
305.86
6:199.65
FEORUAkY
4:7L3.03
9E.69
4:d11.12
3,924.15
1r 799.56
172.U8
1b4.81
6:118.6Q
nAALH
4,713.03
9b.b9
4,d11.72
3:922.15
11799.56
172.0b
263.76
6:157.500
APKIL
4,713.03
98.69
4:011.71
3,912.15
1:799.56
172.08
442.71
0:136.50
MAY
4,7L3.03
98.69
4r 411.72
3:911.15
1,799.56
172.08
221.66
6,115.45
JUNE
4,113.03
98.09
4,811.72
3.911.15
1:799.56
172.08
200.61
6,094.40
JULY
4,113.03
96.69
4,011.74
3:912.15
1:799.56
172.U8
119.56
6.013.35
AU+UST
4:1.13.U3
98.69
4,811.72
3:922.15
1,799.56
172.08
L5b.51
6:052.30
SEPTEMBER
4,113.03
98.09
4,dL1.72
3"922.15
1,799.56
172.08
L31.45
o:031.24
FISCAL
YEAR 19 b3/84
TOTALS -
57.740.64
73,764.32 +
UCTO6ER
84 5:OI9.38
102.64
5:121.02
39922.t5
1,889.54
L78.96
115.05
6:105.70
?igVrMbtR
5#.19.3d
107..64
5,1d4.U2
3:922.15
1:889.54
176.96
92.64
a:063.29
OCLtMBEk
5,019.38
102.64
5x112.02
3r 924.15
1 889.54
178.96
10.23
6r06U.86
JA'AUARY
b5 5,U19.38
102.64
5,121.01
3,971.15
1,889.54
178.96
47.91
or 036.41
FtdRUAKY
5.019.36
LUZ.64
5rltd.u2
3:911. LY
1,889.54
178.96
15.41
b,0L4.U6
MAnCH
5:UL9.38
101.64
50121.02
3:911.15
1 b89.54
178.96
3.u0
5,993.65
APRIL
5:U19.ld
lU1.b4
591ct.U2
Sr 921.15
1rb89.54
178.90
.00
5,990.65
MAY
5:019.3d
lu1.6,1
5:112.02
3,912.15
Lxb69.54
178.96
.00
5:9911.65
JOVE
5,u11.38
1U2.64
5,122.u4
3,921.15
1:889.54
118.96
.00
5"490.65
JULY
5,019.38
IGZ .64
5:112.01
3:922.15
1,8!:9.54.
178.96
.00
5:990.65
AU40ST
5.0 1.313
102.64
,,124.01
3,911.15
1 b64.54
178.96
.UO'
5:990.65
SEPTEMdtK
5,019.38
102.64
S"t11.Od
3:922.15
1,889.54
17d.96
.00
59910.65
FISCAL
YcAR 19 b4/85
TOTALS -
61#464.24
729241.95 +
tIGHT YEAR
TOTALS -
3991207.16'
6231713.45 ++
6.508
ANNUAL 114FLATIUN APVLILU
A+,AIiAST LLASE CBST
'
4.Uu.
A.6.UAL 1"ILAII..w APVLILU
nuAL.:,T ,UtIWAftT- DOST
AYtKAf,E LHANuE
5.007
AN.vUt.l iAFLAiluti -PPL LU
4UA1.ST M I iLNANLE LUST
280U63.49
/ YEAH
POAt UIINt
IN TC.AFSI CALCULATFII
UN BASIS OF 5.25%
OF U.APAIU
JALA.:Ci.
U,.PAIU %ALA'oLF
LALULAII.0 A•, I14111A1.
LASH uUTLAY
KIK PUIcLtxAbr I•l•,uS Lt
ASt PAYML.AI
WHILH dl.LLU UAVL btLN
PAID LUT
uN MlLrL Lu.
-
'1
.,,.."..+RrT, Mw:T'x. �s.�i.w�t..-,-<+-� .. s�:.� ;.s.ramw^...n. vn�
7�y'$+�"R4..:p.•T..",q�':.:`.'
:.•vn m.�,�.ayua^w ;•.-ar .r-+w+.rw.w........,n,n.+Nt+ipt wa...zaa^T -: � P
:.. gym„'-°..""
F
..i�.sYr+...__.c...Weil..�Yw'a.....L:...ivH'Av.:�2+ie.'nNta......en....r.LOursNa
wub,....+...ua.l+.✓rx..aY<JM�..w..+adad�.1...�+1w11wi•r
•ws'.+.d:i �.W..s.d.Yliry
-� �- _�+r+•dlPaiAV+YW.Ln�v..xn
OCT
1911977
Boux
131 AGE 283
r
LL616 Z 130
�n,•„�•+--. a..sre�7�-rv-,-....-.r>...•«she-'�^.-_"^'.!'r'-`+"'._._......,.v,w..+.,,..........--..o.-..�mm.*•.-�...._.._.. ;.,,.�•�r:...-.e.•,,.....--...-�.�;..�c-.,...__,-,.-,-.,-«,....-«r..,...�_.., a ...
ha'ma:.ra=•.�..,.,ww.mi.c.«....s...:,..,.•_w^.&.mvhsie�im::.e_,•-.:xr:*wa..,w.d..._.......-> .F._._..-:.e,••.........�...�...a..•d.....-.....w.... -- -:tea.•., �..
0 XIQNXddEi
6Rw'Y,: ...s_:..,. .unnC4 ir. •��m+n'. �sr... --P�ir,.u..a.•A..�dY 6MitYL++... �..7117-+-+7--`--
•....q,.v:'.t.+of ra.. a...n:+tiawwlw.. w...,.. a.....�..w n,.S... ..a wn i.Y�...:u ..w a.
i__.. ..._...:�'�•'s,.,.A.;.,--....i.....��.'L3u.+.r. __..__.�_m. �..i��,. _........,.''aa'v.:. ._ ...a.� ..._. .,�-...-'.i.':... tt-._o.:: v:• ..3�6t::&Eu rT; �'"a4:��. ._.5.4.17..: �.-.�-.... ._.
•n1 ll^.nw t<n
1^n n1VA
N718 SAV"
"I.1.1P HIM1"10AVd
-1SV11
"(0.1w IS'/'79d
'I woo
wim 11
Pr11(11
ASVIr.) ZS?'4r
4 S SVQ
v1n]IV7R1SaVOJt1!
44m%)vaan
BVIA / 10•409148
1Sn9 4'14VN11N1Vw
ptgV^V
nllldw hn11Vl#N1
JVnf'ly
Y•n0'4
?'.)gVH1 40VNIAV
iSOn 3tvw1.l91
1S41Vnv
nllldA7 f:n(IVlahl
1yn•n'V
-100'4
1S00
3SVll ISNIW V
011IddV tdnllvi-m
lvnuMv
104'9
ss 16'018'£19
44.96019.,5
- S1V101 MV3A
1"914
t 08.188111
9.995.46
- S1H1111
cP/tR 6T NV4A IVISTd
59•'66'5
00
46'811
.,5'689.1
51'776 `f
7,7.•748.1
1£1"77
TA'1SQ41
N?RW41d25
59•nA6•5
59.06645
00•
n0'
96•RL'T
96'RL[
'.,S'6RB•T
"5'ARR't
51.7764£
5117741E
7Z'?RR'1
7Z•7RR'i
lF•"77
Tf'hL7
16'759'1
T6•t59'L
1Snnnv
Alnr
,
59'n66'5
49.066'5
n0•
On'
96.811
96'911
",6RR•I
W6RA•t
51.7764E
51.7761£
7Z•ZOR'I
7Z'ZaR11
if #77
Tf'h77
T6't59'1
76•1594L
3Nnr
AVW
S9'n6615
59'066'5
00•
00'
96.8[1
96 •BIT
"4'LHR1i
Vc, •f.9R'l
cl"76'C
.sl•_26-F
ZZ•7QR41
2?•7RR.'1
If'h72
Tf•-177
i6•tc911
T6'/59`1
Il)jdv
H9NVW
,
49'06645
no.
9A•R/I
h4'hRR:l
41'-76'f
27'7RR4L
Tf•'-1?Z
16'159'1
AVvnY9ld
59'46645
00'
96'Rll
h5'6RR'1
SI.7?6'f
7Z'7R9.1.
1£'477
[6.149'1
58 ANVOo'Vr
'
59.06615
00•
96.811
44.689'1
57'776•f
77,•798'1
lf•"Z7
T6'1SQ1L
N49W173n
59'06645
00'
96.811
"5.498.1
ST'7Z6'f
ZZ•7.Qr1I
7£'427.
[6.15'•1
V3owztnN
,
59.06615
00'
96•OLI
45'68811
SI'ZZ6'E
72'7.98.1
If *t'77
76.1S9'1
tN y3Rnl?O
s 9h1SZ140L
751419199
- SIW101
.,8/£8 6T 1IV3A iV9SId
611£.69'5
00•
P01ZIT
95.66111
ST•7Z6'f
77.90.,'C
R91STZ
£5.061'!
N3gW31A4Q
61'£68'5
001
90.711
95'66117
4T•?76'£
17.•nnh't
R9'ST7
E5'n6T'!
fc'067'1
1Sn^nV
Alnr
61'£68'5
6Cf,6P';
00•
001
90•ZLl
Sn•ZLT
95.661'1
9S•6611T
51.7761£
51'7Z6'F
l7.90h•L
17.904'1
R9.512
RQ1S77
£4.06[1[
?tinr
.
61'i6R`S
On -
RO.21T
95'661.1
51.776•£
17'904'1
99'ST?
£.5.06[41
AVN
6L'E69'S
O•
80.71[
95'661 1
57.7764E
I2.9n"1t
891ST?
£5.067'!
liYdV
61'£68`5
00'
R0 ZLl
95'461'1
4[•7.76'£
SZ'9nh'l
90'ST7
ES Wt
HOYVM
,
6L E6919
00•
90•Z1T
94.66L'1
5[•726`£
I? Qnh11
R9'STZ
£5'067'1
ANvnYQ33
6L'E68•5
00•
RO•ZLT
95'66L1i
S7'7Z6'£
it'90h•G
991ST?
£4.06141
-1A Allwntivr
61'f6R'S
On'
80'ZL7
95'66L•1
91.2Z6'f
12'00h'I
Q9.577
£5'061'1
Y34W27gn
61•£68'5
61'£68'5
00'
DO•
AO.711
80'711
9S'66L•7
96 66L11
5T•776'E
61'ZZ6'£
[7.904'1
TZ'9nh'L
991ST?
09'STZ
£5.06141
£5'06141
1139w4A nM
f8 VR801on
.
i 99'696411
t19'Bns&CR
- SIV101
£8/7R 61 WV3A
IVOSId
ZO.O£845
45'82
9h'S9l
LR•fT1:7
51:776-C
40.65649
PPLO?
19.741.9
I138Wa1d3g
L.,-09815
66'85
9"-591
LR'fTG'I
ST'7264f
50.64619
PE'LO7
L9•ISL`9
1Sn^n�
[6.068'5
E.,'6R
9.,•59T
IR•E11'1
91 ;!z6'E
40.65649
Rf•1n2
L9.751'9
AW
9£'T764c
88.617
94.591
t8-EIG11
-fit`
57'?76'f
c0.65E.'Q
9f-Ln2
Rf'Ln7
L9.157.'9
10'i5I'9
3mr
AVW
08.756.5
SZ Z86'S
Zf'OSI
11'091
94.591
940•591
L8
t9•EIL•T
51.776'£
SI.7Z6'F.
SO'6c6'9
40.5(-6'9
Rf'L02
L9.15L49
1J�YAV
01'210.9
2Z•ITZ
91•59l
LB'Fit'I
51.2764E
59'656'9
RE•Ln?
!9'151'9
H.NVW
4 •£.,049
99'1"2
9"'591
L8•ElL4i
57.7Z6'f
50'656.9
Rf'10?
19.15119
AVV0Y4?j
65'£/019
il'ZL?
94,.591
LR'Eli 1
41'776`£
40'6cf•'Q
PF.•Ln2
L9'T5/49
is ATlvr*Mr
;
EO'"0719
55.70£
9-1•991
LR•fI4'I
Si•Z76'C
50.656'9
RE•107
G9•I5t49
y3RW3730
9h•hf119
00•£Ef
9"'591
184£11'1
51.726'£
40.95449
RE'L07.
L9•IS1.9
Y3PMgAQ%
£6.49119
st'*M
9h•S91
18•EIL•I
&I•Z26'f
50.65649
9f.-LOZ
!9'15719
Z9 V390L9n
s 56.917'51
•n0'99h'RL
- SiV101
78/14 61 MA
IVISTd
Ob'1nT49
681E6E
01.651
97'7£911
4;1 -??6'f
n0.6fS'9
nh16h7
09'6Ef49
Y38N31d34
IO'9fI'9
05'ZZ.,
0('657
97.7£911
Sl'7?64f
O9.6f5Q
.,667
00'6EF49
iSn'1nv
Y
791.,91.4
ZL6
07•65T
0I'651
92'?£9
91
9ZZE7
ST'7761f
ST 776's
n0'65'9
006£540
O"1h6T
O"•66T
09'6£9
09.6££49
Alnr
NnrE2£67'a
£9'72249
7£•805
01'6cl
97-ZE911
Sl'7Z6'f.
n0 -6f4'9
0.,•66T
09.6ff.•9
AVW
h.,•057'9
£619£5
01'6SI
9Z'?£91I
ST'776'C
nO'6f5'9.
04,1661
09.6SE19
IIVd"
{`
SO'61Z'9
"5'595(11'64;7
97'?f9'T
ST•776'f
00.6VS19
04.661
09.6Ef'9
Hd)Nvw
Q9•LOE'Q
5T•b6S
07.657
9Z'7E9.1
9T'7Z6'F
n0'6CS19
0"•667
0916Ef49
AVvnva?a
l2'9ff1Q
91'2?9
01.651
97•ZEQ'T
51'7,26'£
nn•6£c'Q
n"•6 AT
09.6fc'9
79 AVVnt:Vr
18•"9£'9
9£•I69
07•667
97.2£941
51.7?6'f
n0'6f$'Q
0117'66i
09.6EF'9
s39w'.-j30
Rb•£g6£•9
16'619
01.651
9Z•ZE9'I
Si'ZZ64E
OO'6ES'0
n-1•667
0916££49
N99W'AON
60'ZZ"19
R5'80t
01'651
92•ZE9'7
51'226•£
00'6fS`4
0.,•661
09'6ff19
TR V39f'lOn
s 6E•91l'PL
Z6 ZEL'ft
- Slvt01
IMP 61 VV?A lvdjSld
4
58.99£19
6711£1
96•ZST
f.5'"SS/T
5i•2761E
Th'".,l'9
£1.761
P9•Z5645
N3RNIld3e
" EL'f6f'9
LO•"9L
96.2ST
ti5'h5517
51.776'£
14,.4'•149
f1'I6i
B9•Z564S
- 1Sn"nv
19.02-1•Q
56.06L
PA•ZST
FS -455'1
91'7Z6•f
Th'"4719
£L'T6i
90'25615
A'Inr
6"-L""'Q
EP.1118
96'7.57
F5•-1SS1l
4i'ZZ6•£
Ib "."119
ft'I6T
89.756/5
3t4ne
Pf'"1.,19
Z!•-1"8
86.751
E5'.,55.1
51 ?Zb'f
i -1'""T'9
F.G'T6T
99•Z56'S
AVW
92•TO519
00.119
P61Z5T
£51455`7
57.2764E
T -1'h"119
£1.167
99.756.5
11NdV
47'82514
P-1•868
R61Z5T
£51455.7
ST'7?6'f
Th'""T'9
£1'161
99'Z960S
H?L1VW
Q
70'555'9
9E'S76
96-ZST
ES•hS5'T
SI.7Z61C
T -1•""I'0
f/ -T61
89.25615
AWVne.03.1
-•
06'186'9
"7.•ZS6
P6•ZST
£5'455'1
41.7.76'£
141.,19
£1.161
99.755
7R ANvr@•vr
6L•Rn9'9
E1.616.
86•ZSI
E5'-155'1
51•Z764£
Ihhh49
99.75615
Nigw"In
,
L9SE98Q
Tn•900'1
R6'Z51
ES•.,51
51276E
it "119
£1161
99•75A'S
Y384QAON
5799.9
687£01
86•Z57
f5 -1554T
SI'ZZ64E
1.,•.,7'9
ELI67
89ZC619
98 1739£119'
s S41•9E•E408
761.,L6'"h
- S1V1n1
OP/61 61 NV?A IV'1S14
75.609.9
L1 -65n'T
O7'Ltl
•1"7
OS'0P"1T
511776'£
•7764E
16'1"1'f
.9f•"9
OF*"
SS• 994E
NVBW?Ad3S
1S ^nv
'
76'5Z94Q
TE•7"9•4
11•910'1
95'Z60•1
OT
01'1"T
05.09447
n5•nPh4l
5T
5I'7Z6'f
T6.1"11f
16.1"1`£.
U."
55'£99'£
SS•f99'£
9W
TIM91Q
96'907'1
OT•Lhl
OS'n9"'T
51.776'£
T6'L"!'£
9 1-1R
SS'f991f
Nnr
IT•51940
9E'S?T'1
07.1-11
OS-ORt"T
51'77.641
76'1"11F
9E'"A
SS•F991£
AVw
15'169'9
91•T -17 'I
Oi•L"i
OS'n8"•I
Si'Z76'f
76'POPE
9f'.,R
54•£99•£
11YdV
06•LQ71'9
ST•R67.1
OT 'I tl
054^4"17
51.7Z64f
T6•G"1'£
Qf'9R
SS'f99•f
91'IYVW
nE'" 119
55•"Li'1
01.167
n4'OB"'I
Sl'7Z6'E
76'1"1'F
9f•"R
55'f091f.
A11VnYQ34
,
01'O"L'4
46'0(-711
07.1-1i
05.0R -1'T
57.276'£
-6'L"/1£
9f -4,R
54•f09•f
OR ANM^•ror
30'151'0
"£•107'1
O7'L"T
ns 08-Y
5T17Z6'f
16't"1•E
9F'hR
55•f994F
li3At4z1tan
6.,1£11.9
41'£7747
OT'L-1T
OS'nQ"'T
57.776'£
16.1"11£
9f •4,4
55 •f99•E
Y39W3An4
68.691'9
hT'O"2'[
OT•tbl
OS'nov I
SI'ZZ6`E
76'th['f
9£•hR
54•E99'f
6L N3finl3n.
,
s 27.811'18
4',8.257.174,
- SWIM
61./8L 61 NVIA Iv9S14
ET'0f1'9
"5'95741
h-1'l"T
00'01.,'t
51.7261f
1n-l75•f.
71174
56'6£"•£
VIPW1Id3S
,
£5'54110
"6'11711I
-1"•141
ntl•Olh'tt
ST'2764f
'0.774'f
71.14
4
46'6£'£
lSn^nv
"6.09L1Q
6'£•91119
5£1147.1
SL•Znf.'l
""41-11
""•T"1
nO.clit'
Qn•nl-'I
51'?764f
51.7261f
to 170f
/01T7S'F
71.79
71.1`?
Sh•f,E"1E
S6'6F"'£
AW
2h-nr
t1VT61•9
cl•RIF 'I
""'I -1I
n0'Oih1T
ST'ZE61F
19•1?4'f
71 -TQ
56.6f"•f
AVW
57./n819
94'Efc4l
44.7"1
On'nT"'1
ST'?76'f
1O.17c'f
77•TQ
c6.6fh•E
lfvdV
c5'77Q•Q
96'94£'1
h"•l"i
n0'nT"•T
51'776 f
10.175'f
71-T0
c6.6Ch'E
96•If R'9
!f'hQf'7
"-1'i"1
On•nT"•i
51.77h'f
in 1744C
77'10
56.6f+, 1f
ABVnqu34
.
9£'fc9'9
)1'6If'1
"b•ihi
on1n1-1•1
41'776•£
[0.175'£.
77 -IR
c6.6fh'f
AL ANanvvr
,
111a9R19
0T•46F'T
.,"•Thi
nn•o1-141
SI'7?4,'f
in•775'f
71.14
5A•bf"'E
N3RN'►lati
Li•"9R•9
AS'Ol-1'7
""11-11
no nT"•7
51.27.64(-
In 171; f
71.18
-c 6.6f.,'f
IIlOwmAnoi
95.66849
66'S?h'i
-1"'141
00.074.1
51.7Z6'E
Ln'72S•f
7i•1R
S6'6f.h'f.
81 Nlfrt119O
♦ nO.OnL4fP
00•nOL•6f
- SIMI
91/11 61 bVIA iV'3SI4
40'00n'hh -
N011V1VdObddV iVNOILinnV
nal39nn8
AnV3wiv RI/L161 mv3A 1VISId
atatsssss
ivJnl
194NllkT
3NVM1inS
'IH1vw
3SV11iNnd
IVIf'1
3NVN14nS
ICv11
ST ilnnW
3N'193wnd
Si 13nOW
51 Il7nw
4,9/7
OT ilnOW
OT T:1nnw.
01 13n'1W
141NnW
T 30Vd
SISAiVNV iv19NVNId
MA 1H0I3
LL/Of/b
0 XIQNXddEi
6Rw'Y,: ...s_:..,. .unnC4 ir. •��m+n'. �sr... --P�ir,.u..a.•A..�dY 6MitYL++... �..7117-+-+7--`--
•....q,.v:'.t.+of ra.. a...n:+tiawwlw.. w...,.. a.....�..w n,.S... ..a wn i.Y�...:u ..w a.
i__.. ..._...:�'�•'s,.,.A.;.,--....i.....��.'L3u.+.r. __..__.�_m. �..i��,. _........,.''aa'v.:. ._ ...a.� ..._. .,�-...-'.i.':... tt-._o.:: v:• ..3�6t::&Eu rT; �'"a4:��. ._.5.4.17..: �.-.�-.... ._.
APPEIMIX D
is
w'.•✓Fm�gP+rar..�x+4+%!o.. -�•s '1
9/3U/71
LIGHT YLAR
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
PAGE 1
MU,9IH
MUDEL 10
MUUEL LO
MUULL lJ
1/84
MODEL l5
MUDEL 15
FUREGUNEUtL
M4 15
LtAbt
SUFIWAkE
IJIAL
PUKCl1ASE
MAINZ.
buFIWAKE
INTERLSI
UTAL
itittiiit
FIbCAL YLAR
L917/18 ALkLAUY bUUOEItU
ADDITIONAL
APPKOPkIAIION
- 449000.00
FISLAL
VLAR 19 77/7d
TOTALS -
39,700.00
e3#fOD.00 i
UCTJdER
T8 5:[47.95
177.12
5,425.07
3:922.15
1#410.00
141.44
1,417.66
69891.25
wvcmUEK
59147.95
1!1.12
5:415.U7
3r 922.15
1:41U.00
141.44
19393.92
6,867.51
DtC�,nuLA.
5,441.95
171 I-
5,415.01
3:91!.15
1,41U.UU
141.44
1,310.19
0#b43.lb
JA.4uAAY
79 5114/.95
171.11
i,415.U1
3:911.15
1,41U.UO
141.44
1,346.45
6:81U.04
FbL,AuAKY
5,441.95
11 L 11
5:4L5.u1
3:911.15
1,410.OU
141.44
1,312.12
6s1'ib.31
MA,LaH
5:[47.95
Ill. l[
59415.01
3:911:15
1:41U -.UO
141.44
11-•id.90
0r7fL.51
APAII
5#141.99
117.11
5:415.41
3, 91-.15
1r 41U.UU
141.44
1,115.25
br 146.44
MAY
5:147.95
111.12
5:415.01
3.9[[.15
1,4LO.UO
141.44
11[51.5►
6:7-5.14
JU,4t
S,L4f.95
177.12
5,4-5.()1
3:9-2.15
1.41U.UU
141.44
1.147.70
097.1. I
JULY
5.[47.95
111 .11
5,425.07
3:91-.15
1,410.00
L41:44
1.-04.115
6,611.64
AUGUST
Sr -47.95
177.11
5,415.07
3,911.15
1,410.00
14144
1IbU.31
6,6i3.9u
StYltMbtK
5.147.95
177.14
5.425.U7
3,911.15
19410.OU
141.44
1,156.58
6e63U.17
F/b,.AL
YEAR 19 7b/79
TUTALS -
65,100.84
81,128.48 •
uCTubER
79 5,5d9.u1
Lb4.LU
5,713.27
3:922.15
1,480.50
147.10
1.131.32
o:6d1.01
NOUViMBEK
5.509. U7
►04.2u
5:11:.27
3,922.15
1:4dO.50
147.10
1,106..6
0.655.81
utcc.AbEK
JASuAKY
5,5d9.Ui
60 5,509. U7
Lb4.ZU
L84.2U
5,713.27
5,713.27
3.922.17
3,924.15
1,480.50
147. 0
I1ud0.b0
6:6 1`:55
FtiNuARY
5.5d9.u7
184.20
5:713.27
3:921.15
1#4b0.50
1.48v.50
147:10
147.10
19.55.54
1 030.29
o,6u5.29
6158U.U4
MA"h
S.,yb9.u7
104.20
5:713.27
3,922.15
1.4bu.50
147. 1u
Ir0u5.03'
6:554.70
AP.(1L'
5.589.U7
164.10
5,713.27
31924. i5
1:480.60
147.10
919.71
6,549.51
MAY
5,989.07
164.Zu
51713.21
3r9c2.15
1r4d0. 0
147.10
954.51
6:5u4.4b
JUC#t
S.y69.u7
164.40
5,713.27
3,922.15
1,480.5 J.
111.1.
929.25
6.419.44
Ju4Y
59569.07
1b4.Z0
5,713.11
39912.15
114bO.50
147.10
9u4.UU
6.433.75
AUL.JST
5.5b9.u7
164.2u.
5:773.27
3:92[.15
1,480.50
141.10
478.74
u:41o.49
bbeitMdcR
5.589.47
Ld4.20
5.713.27
3992[.15
1#4bU.50
L47.10
653.44
6,401.Z3
FISCAL
YEAR 19 79/80
TOTALS -
69,219.24
789505.79 •
UCIJBEK
60 5,952.36
191.57
69143.93
3,922.15
1:554.53
152.98
826.60
6.450.26
• NOVcMdER
59.152.36
191.57
6:143.93
3,921.15
1.554.53
152.98
799.72
0,429.38
UE6c"DLA
5,952.36
191.57
6,143.93
3,922.15
1,554.53
152.98
772. b4
6.401.50
JA•#uARY
81 5#952.36
191.51
b:143.93
3:922.15
1:554.53
152.98
745.90
6.375.62
FEoAuARY
5,952.36
191.57
6,143.93
3,921.15
11554.53
152.96
719.08
b, 340.14
MAkjh
APR
5,•152.36
5,952.36
191.57
191.57
6,143.93
3,922.15
1.554.53
152.98
692.2u
6.321.66
LL
MAY
5,95'.36
19l.57
b1143.9.9
6,143.93
3:922.15
3:912.15
1.554.53
1:554.53
152.98
152.98
665.32
630.44
6,294.98
6.268.10
JUNE
5,95.36
191.57
6:143.93
3,9[2.15
Lr 554.53
152.98
611.50
09Z41.22
JULY.
- 5.952.36
1.11.57
x:143.93
3,912.15
1.554.53
152.98
584.68
o,214.34
AI�4UST
5.952.36
191.5.7
6.14'3.93
3,922.15
1.554.53
152.98
55I.eu
b:181.46 '
SEPliMbER
5.952.36
►91.57
6.143.93
39922.15
1,554.53
152.9b
530.92
6.100.5d
FISCAL
YtAR 19 80/61
TOTALS -
73:727.16
159701.04 i
OCIuoEk
bl 6,339.26
L99.23
6,53d.49
3:922.15
1.632.26
159.10
542.32
6:2L5.83
ilu✓cMBEK
6,339.16
199.23
6#538.49
3992[.15
1.632.26
159.10
473.71
6.141.22
UECcMeEK
6,339.26
199.23
6,53b.49
3:922.15
t,631.26
159.10
445.11
6,15b.61
JA.ru"RY
62 6,339.26
L99.23
6r53o.49
3:921.15
Lr 631.26
159.LO
416.50
69130.01
FEn.iuARY
6,339.tb
199.23
6,53b.49
3,922.L5
1,632.26
159.10
3b7.09
6,101.40
MAdi.H
- 6.339.26
199.23
0r53b.49
3..921.15
1 b32.26
159.LU
359.26
0,011.80
APA1L
6#139.16199.13
6,SJ0 ✓,9
3.92[.15
1:632.26
159.10
33U.bb
6:044.19
MAY
6.339.16
199.23
69530.49
31921.15
1,632.26
159.10
302.Oo
6,U15.59
Jul#[
6,639.26
.199.23
6:536.49
$:922.15
L,632.26
159.LO
273.47
5,96b.96
199.23
6:53b.49
31922.15
1.632.26
159.10
Z44.bb
5,958.37
AW6.339.[6
Au�UST
6,339.16
199.23
6#53b.49
3,922.15
11632.26
159.10
216.26
5,929.77
SEPTkhbER
6,339.26
L99.43
a 530.49
39912.15
1:632.16
159.10
167.65
5,9.1.16
FISCAL
YEAR 19 0L/82
TOTALS -
78:461.88
729701.94 i
UCTilbER
NOVEABEA
82 6,15L.31
69751.31
207.2u
2U7.du
6,958.51
6,95b.51
3,922.15
3,922.15
1.713.87
165.46
157.21
5.951.69
JtCcMBtil
6:751.31
207.20
br95b.51
3992'[.15
1.713.87
19713.87
165.46
165.46
126.77
96.31
5#928.25
5:897.80
JANUARY
63 69751.31
207.20
6:958.51
3.912.15
1s713.d7
165.46
65.06
5,867.36
Ft6.7_uAkY
6.751.31
Zu7.20
6.956.51
3,922.15
1.713.87
165.46
35.43
5,836.91
MAK�H
6,/51.31
207.10
6.958.51
3,922.15
1,713.b7
165.46
4.99
5:806.47
APRIL
6,151.31
2u7.2u
6:956.51
5:922.15
10713.87
165.46
.00
5r6u1.4b
MAY
6,751.31
207.10
6.950.51
31922.15
1,713.01
165.46
.00
5.80►.4b
JUNE
6,751.31
2u7.Zu
6:956.51
3.922.15
1.713.81
165.46
.00
59801.4b
JULY
6,751.31
107.20
6r95b.51
3r 921.15
1:713:87
165.40
.00
5.d01.48
AUGUST
6,751.31
1U7.20
6.958.51
3:922.15
1#713.81
165.46
.UO
598.1.46
SEPTcMBEk
6.751.31
Zu7.ZO
6,95b.51
3r 922.15
1,713.87
165.46
.00
59801.48
FISCAL
YEAR 19 d1/83
TOTALS -
83:502.12
,
70:104.36 t
UCTUOER
83 79190.15
Z15.49
7:405.64
3#924.15
1:799.56
172.08
.00
5:893.79
NUVcMOE,4
7.190.15
215.49
71405.64
39922.15
1r 799.56
172.08
.00
5r 893.79
GECthBEK
T9190.L5
[15.49
7#4.5.64
39922.25
19799.56
172.08
.Ou
5:d93.79
JANUARY
84 79190 .15
215.49
7,405.64
'1,9[1.15
1,799.56
172.06
.00
5,893.79
FEBRUARY.
7,L90.15
215.49
7.405.64
31922.15
10799.56
172.08.UU
59893.79
MARCH
79L9U.15
215.49
1.4J5.64
3,922.15
11799.56
172.08
.00
59893.79
APRLL
1,190.13
215.49
794()5.04
3.924.15
1.799.56
172.u8
.UJ
5:b93.79
MAY
7.190.L5
215.49
1,405.64
3;921.15
1r 799.56
172.08
.UO
5#493.79
• JUINE
7,190.15
215.49
7.4u5.64
3.922.15
19799.56
1T2.u8.00
5:893.79
JULY
71190.15
215.49
7r4u5.64
3:92-.15
L,799.56
172.06
.OU
51893.19
AUGUST
7#190.15
215.49
7,4U5.64
39922.15
1.799.56
172.08
.00
5:893.79
SEP ItMbcK
7,L90.15
215.4-3
1 4J5.64
3:941. 15
11799.56
L72.u8
.00
5,493.79
FISCAL
YEAR 19 83/84
TOTALS -
88,867.68
10,125.48 t
UCTUbER
64 7#657.51
224.11.
7,881.62
3,922.15
1,889.54
176.96
.00
5.990.65
NUVcMbEk
7#657.51
Y24.t1
79861.62
3:921.15
1,689.54
178.96
.00.
59990.65
DECchbtK
7,657.51
214.11
7:0o1.6/
31921.15
1,889.54
17b.96
.Ou
5:99U.65
JA•WARY
85 1.057.51
114.11
1,d81.62
3e9Z2.15
I889.54
178.96
.00
5.940.65
Fk Q,%UAKY
79657.51
1"[4.11
7:do1.6Z.
3.91[.15•
1,885.54
L78.96
.OU
59990.65
MA -CH
7:657.51
214.11
1x881.62
3r 921.15
11889.44
178.96
.00
5:990.65
APRLL
7:657.51
214.11
7.801.02
3.92-.15
1:b89.54
178.96
.OU
5:990.65
MAY
1,U51.51
"4. 11
798d1.61
3:911.15
1:bH9.54
118.96
.UO
5:99U.65
Juit
7,657.51
/24.11
1.801.62
3,•11[.15
1r 889.54
178.96
.Ou
5,940.65
JULY
7,651.51
-24.11
1rb01.6Z
3.912.15
1,889.54
118.96
.00
5.990.65
AUUJST
7#657.51
214.11
7,661.61
3,9--.15
1,889.54
176.96
.uu
5:990.65
StPELMbER
7,657.51
1Z4.1L
7:edl.b2
3991[.15
1,b89.54
178.96
.00
5,990.65
FISCAL
YLAR 19 84/85
TOTALS -
949519.44
71,887.80 i
EIGHT YEAR
TOTALS -
593.218.36•
604,454.89
0.509.
ANNUAL INFLATIu'4 APPLILU
AGAINST LLASE OUST
4. Uu±
AN.4UAL INrLAiIu.J wYPLLtO
AoAI.#�T �utIKAPL
COST
AVERAGE CHANGE5.0u.
A....UAL 1141-LATIu I APPL1tU
AuA14�.1 •MAINtLUANCE OUST
194U4.51 / YtAK
• FUKcvUt:t
INTLKLSI CALLULATEU
IiN .ASIS OF 5.25%
OF UWAI0
dALA.4LL. UN✓AlU bALA'.CL LALULAttI) (.S INI I l,,L
LASH UUILAY
FUK PUKUhASt 1+I,+uS LLA4L
PAYfrt141
WHICH wuUlu HAVL• btLN
• PAI. Uul UN MUucL IU.
BOOK e �
MR. MATTHEWS SAID HE FELT ALL INDICATIONS POINT TO EXPAND-
ING THE SYSTEM AND HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE BOARDS CONCURRENCE TO WRITE
A NON-BINDING LETTER TO IBM TO HOLD OUR PLACE IN LINE IF WE DECIDE
TO GO THIS WAY.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF HE HAD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT
SUCH A LETTER WOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO HOLD OUR PLACE IN LINE AND
THAT IT WOULD TAKE SIX TO EIGHT MONTHS TO OBTAIN THIS PIECE OF EQUIP-
MENT. MR. MATTHEWS AGREED THAT THESE STATEMENTS WERE BOTH CORRECT.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHETHER THERE WOULD BE ANY PROBLEM
WITH CANCELING THE ORDER IF OUR THINKING SHOULD CHANGE IN THE INTERIM.
MR. MATTHEWS STATED THAT THIS TYPE OF LETTER IS NOT BINDING
IN ANY WAY, AND POINTED OUT THAT IBM CANT SHIP ANY PIECE OF EQUIP-
MENT UNTIL THEY RECEIVE FORMAL NOTIFICATION -THAT IT HAS BEEN APPROVED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT NEEDS
TO BE PUT "ON LINE" DURING THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AS IT IS A NON -
BUDGETED ITEM.
MR. MATTHEWS STATED THAT HE FEELS WE SHOULD MOVE AS QUICKLY
AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO AVOID WASTING ANY MONEY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REQUESTED THAT MR. MATTHEWS EXPLAIN
EXACTLY HOW MUCH MORE THIS NEW EQUIPMENT WILL,BE PER MONTH,
MR. MATTHEWS SAID THAT HE HAD RUN OFF HIS ANALYSIS BASED
ON A DECEMBER DELIVERY, BUT NOTED THAT THE OPTIMUM ADDITIONAL COST
WOULD BE ABOUT $44,000 FOR A NINE MONTH PERIOD. HE FURTHER NOTED
DELIVERIES ARE NOW OUT INTO APRIL AND MAY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT THE PROPOSED EIGHT TERMINALS,
AND MR. MATTHEWS STATED THAT THEY WOULD COST A TOTAL OF $$,000 AND HE
ANTICIPATED PUTTING ONE IN FINANCE, ONE IN RECORDING AND ONE IN THE
COURT SYSTEM; ALTHOUGH HE WOULD AT FIRST BRING IN ONLY TWO.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INQUIRED WHETHER THERE IS SUFFICIENT
PERSONNEL AT THE PRESENT TIME TO HANDLE THIS, AND MR. MATTHEWS FELT
THAT THERE IS.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED ABOUT A POTENTIONAL REDUCTION
OF PERSONNEL IN THESE AREAS.
MR. MATTHEWS STATED THAT HE DID NOT ANTICIPATE LETTING ANY-
ONE GO, BUT FELT THE EXPANDED SYSTEM WOULD FORESTALL THE NEED TO HIRE
ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL'AS WE BECOME MORE AND MORE DELUGED WITH PAPERWORK.
27
OCT 191977 .
aoox 31 faun 286
a
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHETHER THE PROPOSED EXPANSION IS
MERELY AN UPGRADING IN ORDER TO BE IN A POSITION TO HANDLE THE ADDI-
TIONAL WORK AND WHETHER WE WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO USE EVERYTHING WE
HAVE NOW.
MR. MATTHEWS STATED THAT IS CORRECT AND NOTED THAT HE HAS
MADE THIS SAME UPGRADE BEFORE AND IT IS A VERY SIMPLE PROGRAM. HE
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PROGRAMS WRITTEN ON THE COMPUTOR WE HAVE
NOW WILL GO DIRECTLY TO A NEW COMPUTER. THIS SYSTEM ISNOT IN "COBALT."
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT BROUGHT UP THE MATTER OF DISCUSSING
THIS PROPOSED EXPANSION WITH THE OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS, AND
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER HAS INDICATED AN
INTEREST AND EVEN WENT SO FAR AS TO REQUEST THAT THE COUNTY NOT MAKE
ANY LONG TERM COMMITMENTS WITHOUT TALKING TO HIM IN REGARD TO HIS
FUTURE NEEDS. THE CHAIRMAN SUGGESTED THAT ONE COMMISSIONER, THE
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT, AND MR. MATTHEWS MEET WITH THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER, AS HE FELT IT WOULD BE FOR THE
BENEFIT OF THE TAXPAYER.
'CHAIRMAN WODTKE CONTINUED THAT, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING
THAT WE ARE NOT PLACING AN ORDER, HE FELT WE COULD SEND OUT THE
LETTER OF INTENT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE NEEDS A LITTLE MORE
.CONVINCING THAT THE URGENCY OF THIS IS SUCH THAT IT HAS TO COME
UNDER THIS YEAR S BUDGET, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME TIME TO
DISCUSS THIS MORE THOROUGHLY WITH MR. MATTHEWS.
MR, MATTHEWS SAID THAT HE IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THIS AND
HE FELT TOUCHING BASE WITH MR. LAW COULD TAKE SEVERAL MORE WEEKS.
HE NOTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO ISSUE HIS DRAFTED LETTER, IF POSSIBLE.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER•NOTED THAT HE IS NOT COMPLETELY
SOLD ON HOW THEY ARE GOING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE BIGGER COMPUTER,
ESPECIALLY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL.
OUT 19 19,11-71 31 PAU'2307
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REQUESTED THAT MR. MATTHEWS COME UP WITH
A SCHEDULE AS TO THE EXISTING PROGRAMS AND WHAT THEIR FUNCTIONS
WOULD BE WHEN THEY GO "0 N LINE" AND ALSO FUTURE PROGRAMS SO THE
BOARD CAN HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT CAN BE DONE.
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT WE WILL HAVE TO RESPOND TO THE WISHES
OF THE COMMISSIONERS FOR ADDITIONAL TIME AND THAT WE ALSO NEED TO
RESPOND TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S INTEREST, BUT SHE ADVISED THAT
WE NOT "DILLY-DALLY" SO LONG THAT WE LOSE ALL OF OUR LEAD TIME AS
FAR AS ACTUALLY PLACING AN ORDER THAT CAN BE CANCELED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED MR. MATTHEWS THAT THE BOARD WOULD
LIKE TO HOLD OFF ON AUTHORIZING THE LETTER OF INTENT UNTIL MR,
MATTHEWS CAN HAVE A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION WITH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER.
HE STATED THAT THIS MATTER WILL BE PUT BACK ON THE AGENDA FOR THE
NEXT MEETING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT LEE NUZIE, DIRECTOR
OF CIVIL DEFENSE, WISHES TO ATTEND A CENTRAL FLORIDA AREA CIVIL
DEFENSE MEETING IN.WILDWOOD AND HAVE ONE OF HIS VOLUNTEERS ACCOMPANY
1�
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, TO APPROVE OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR CIVIL DEFENSE
DIRECTOR, LEE NUZIE, AND ONE OF HIS VOLUNTEERS TO ATTEND THE CENTRAL
FLORIDA AREA CIVIL DEFENSE MEETING IN WILDWOOD ON OCTOBER 26, 1977.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THE
BOARD SHOULD PAY FOR THE VOLUNTEER TO ACCOMPANY MR. NUZIE.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THEY WOULD BE TRAVELING IN THE
SAME CAR AND SHARING A ROOM, SO THIS WOULD AMOUNT TO VERY LITTLE.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONER LOY,
SIEBERT, DEESON, AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE VOTED IN FAVOR. COMMISSIONER
$CHMUCKER VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE MOTION CARRIED.
ATTORNEY SAMUEL BLOCK APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENT-
ING NUMEROUS RETAIL LIQUOR BUSINESSES IN THE COUNTY TO REQUEST A
PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO EXTENDING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
IN THE COUNTY ONE ADDITIONAL HOUR. HE PRESENTED A PETITION CONTAIN-
ING SIGNATURES OF APPROXIMATELY 40 BUSINESSES IN THE COUNTY.
0
OCT 191977
mfl
Sao 31 P�vr 28$
M
PETITION
TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
We, the undersigned owners and/or operators of business
I
establishments which sell and dispense alcoholic beverages within Indian
River County, are desirous of the consideration of the Board of County
fCommissioners of Indian River County, Florida in changing the ordinance
of said County relating to the time of closing of such establishments.
At the present time, this time is set at 1:00 a.m. and we feel it would
be in the best interests of our industry that this time be extended until
2:00 a.m.
We would appreciate your giving consideration and attention
to a change in the ordinance of Indian River County, Florida as above
set forth.
ILI
fi
U
4 " - n f l
��
OCT 1919`17 1 Ma 31.4ou
PETITION
TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
We, the undersigned owners and/or operators of business
establishments which sell and dispense alcoholic beverages within Indian
River County, are desirous of the consideration of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida in changing the ordinance
of said County relating to the time of closing of such establishments.
At the present time, this time is set at 1:00 a.m. and we feel it would
be in the best interests of our industry that this time be extended until
2:00 a.m.
We would appreciate your giving consideration and attention
to a change in the ordinance of Indian River County, Florida as above
set forth.
OCTti977-
Po6` -2 -2
aQtc2.90j
PETITION
W
TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
We, the undersigned owners and/or operators of business
establi3hments which sell and dispense alcoholic beverages within Indian
` River County, are desirous of the consideration of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida in changing the ordinance
of said County relating to the time of closing of such establishments.
At the present time, this time is set at 1:00 a.m. and we feel it would
be in the best interests of our industry that this time be extended until
2:00 a.m.
We'would appreciate your giving consideration and attention
to a change in the ordinance of Indian River County, Florida as above
set forth.
f
CT 191977.
BOOK 31 PAcr 291
.11
PETITION
C—OU N 7-,V CX rA f" eo,) eA -1, ZU 3.14
TO THE HONORABLE= ----
FLORIDA:
We, the undersigned owners and/or operators of business establish-
-,V b /h �
ments which sell and dispense alcoholic beverages within
are desirous of the consideration of
the City Council of said City in a change of the ordinance of said City
relating to the time of closing of such establishments. At the present
time, this time is set at 1:00 a.m. and we feel it would be in the best
interests of our industry that this time be extended until 2:00 a.m.
We would appreciate your giving consideration and attention
to a change in the . ordinance of the City of Vero Beach as above set forth.
CCT 191977 - ' BOOK 31 SASE 292
ATTORNEY BLOCK INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS CLIENTS CONSIST
OF MOTELS, HOTELS, LOUNGES AND RESTAURANTS, AND THEY EMPLOY IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD OF 780 EMPLOYEES, WHOSE GROSS WEEKLY WAGES AMOUNT TO
$72,000, AND PAY MONTHLY UTILITY BILLS AND SALES TAX AMOUNTING TO 1.7
MILLION DOLLARS. ATTORNEY BLOCK NOTED THAT QUITE A FEW OF THE OWNERS
AND OPERATORS HAVE BECOME INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, AND THERE
HAVE BEEN A MINIMUM OF PROBLEMS WITH THIS INDUSTRY IN THE COMMUNITY.
HE STATED THAT THEY ARE NOT NOW TALKING OF THIS MERITS OF THE SITUA-
TION, BUT MERELY DESIRE THE BOARD TO PROVIDE THEM WITH A PUBLIC.FORUM
WHERE THEY CAN PRESENT THEIR SIDE AND THEN HEAR FROM THE COMMUNITY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE IS WILLING TO HAVE A
PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THIS BOARD HAS ALWAYS BEEN EX-
TREMELY LIBERAL IN GRANTING PUBLIC HEARINGS, BUT SHE FELT UNLESS
ATTORNEY BLOCK HAS SOME VERY GOOD REASON THAT MAKES THIS INDUSTRY SO
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM ANY OTHER IN THE COUNTY, SHE WOULD PREVAIL
UPON HIM NOT TO MAKE THE BOARD PUT THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THIS AGAIN.
ATTORNEY BLOCK STATED THAT THIS INDUSTRY IS DIFFERENT;
THEY ARE RESTRICTED BY A 1 O'CLOCK A.M. CLOSING HOUR. HE POINTED
OUT THAT THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOW CHOSEN TO TAX.THE CIGARETTE AND
LIQUOR INDUSTRY TO MAKE UP A DEFICIT IN THE BUDGET, AND, THEREFORE,
THESE OWNERS DO HAVE PROBLEMS. HE CONTINUED THAT THESE TAX FUNDS
GO INTO THE SCHOOLS AND COME DIRECTLY BACK TO US, AND HE FEELS THAT
THESE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO PRESENT THEIR PROBLEMS TO THE BOARD
AND THE PUBLIC. ATTORNEY BLOCK NOTED THIS HAS BEEN A CLEAN INDUSTRY
AND THERE HAVE BEEN NO PROBLEMS WITH ENFORCEMENT.
COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT THE PEOPLE IN THIS IN-
DUSTRY CHOSE IT EVEN THOUGH THEY KNEW IT IS HIGHLY REGULATED, BUT
STATED SHE WOULD NOT VOTE AGAINST A PUBLIC HEARING IF THE OTHER
BOARD MEMBERS WANT IT.
34
CT 191977.
RON 293
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS—
SIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO
ADVERTISE A PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO CHANGING THE ORDINANCE TO
ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE COUNTY FOR ONE ADDITIONAL
HOUR; THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 17TH AT
3:00 P.M.
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
4
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in (Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of
G
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
-C-2 -� e.f , /--?, 19"7 7
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisernent, and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this qday ofC, - /_ - A.D. 197-7
OCT 191977
(Business
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River
1
35
Florida)
NOTICE
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on October 19,
1977, at 11:00 o'clock A.M. in the County
Commission Meeting Room of the Indian River,
County Courthouse, the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, will hold a public hearing for the
purposes of:
Obtaining public input prior to passage of a
County Resolution Establishing a Franchise
with Florida Power & Light Co. and Setting
Franchise Fees within the Resolution
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE
COUNTY'S ACTION OF ESTABLISHING A
FRANCHISE AND CHARGING FEES WILL
NOT INCREASE YOUR UTILITY BILLS.
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
By: William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
Oct. 12,1977.
a
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IN GOING OVER THIS MATTER
WITH THE BOARD PREVIOUSLY, ONE STATEMENT HE MADE WAS INCORRECT. HE
HAD SAID THAT IN THOSE COUNTIES THAT DO NOT ASSESS A FRANCHISE FEE,
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT BENEFITED BY THAT MARGIN DIRECTLY AND THAT
STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED BECAUSE FP&L, ALTHOUGH THEY PROVIDE
IN THEIR RATE SCHEDULE FOR A FRANCHISE FEE IN THE COUNTIES WHERE
THEY ARE NOT ASSESSED,THE SAME MONIES ARE USED TO PAY FRANCHISE
FEES IN OTHER COUNTIES AND THE MONEY DOES NOT NECESSARILY GO INTO
THE COFFERS OF THE COMPANY. THE ATTORNEY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
HE HAS SUGGESTED ONE CHANGE IN THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION. THIS CHANGE,
WHICH FP&L HAS AGREED TO, IS IN SECTION 9 AND CHANGES "LOCAL GOVERN-
MENTAL ENTITY" TO "COUNTY."
TED BLOUNT OF FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT LEGAL AFFAIRS WAS PRE-
SENT WITH HARRY SCHINDEHITTE, DISTRICT MANAGER. MR. BLOUNT INFORMED
THE BOARD THAT THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VOTED ON MONDAY TO OPEN
A DOCKET ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE METHOD OF CHARGING
FRANCHISE EXPENSES TO FP&L CUSTOMERS SHOULD BE CHANGED. MR. BLOUNT
EXPLAINED THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME FP&L HAS OVER 160 FRANCHISES.
THE FEES THAT THEY PAY REPRESENT A CERTAIN OPERATING EXPENSE, AND
3.7o OF THE AMOUNT BILLED EACH CUSTOMER REPRESENTS THEIR FRANCHISE
EXPENSE. HE STATED THAT THE PSC IS CONSIDERING CHANGING THAT METHOD
SO THAT RATHER THAN EACH CUSTOMER PAYING 3.7% THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE
FP&L SYSTEM, THE SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF THE FRANCHISE COST IN A FRAN-
CHISE AREA WOULD BE PASSED ONTO THE CUSTOMERS IN THAT PARTICULAR
AREA, I.E., IN AREAS WHERE NO FRANCHISE EXISTS, THE CUSTOMERS WOULD
PAY NO FRANCHISE FEE AT ALL AND IN AREAS WHERE FRANCHISES DO EXIST,
THE CUSTOMERS WOULD PAY,THE EXACT AMOUNT OF FP&L'S EXPENSE FOR THAT
PARTICULAR FRANCHISE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE 3.7% NOW CHARGED EACH CUSTOMER
INCLUDES ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FOR BILLING AND COLLECTING, AND MR.
BLOUNT STATED THERE IS NO ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE INCLUDED; THAT THE
3.7% IS SIMPLY THE TOTAL OF ALL FRANCHISE FEES THEY PAY.
COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED WHEN THEY EXPECT A RULING FROM
THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.
k-1
OCT
Box 31 PAGE 295
4
MR. BLOUNT STATED THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW AND NOTED THAT
UNDER THE PRESENT METHOD, IF THEY WERE TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT
IN REGARD TO A FRANCHISE FEE, THERE WOULD BE NO IMMEDIATE IMPACT ON
THE 3.7% CHARGE. HE POINTED OUT THAT IF THE METHOD SHOULD CHANGE,
THAT WOULD HAVE SOME SIGINIFICANCE FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CUSTOMERS.
COMMISSSIONER SIEBERT ASKED THE REASON FOR THE CHANGE OF
THE WORDING OF THE RESOLUTION FROM "LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY" TO
"COUNTY."
MR. BLOUNT STATED THAT THERE IS SOME MINOR DISTINCTION IN
THE FRANCHISE FEE FORMULA FOR COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES.
COMMISSSIONER DEESON ASKED IN'WHAT OTHER COUNTIES THEY HAVE
FRANCHISES, AND MR. BLOUNT REPLIED DADE, BROWARD, SARASOTA AND BREVARD
COUNTIES.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE
PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONED TO SEE WHAT THE PSC IS GOING TO DECIDE.- HE
POINTED OUT THAT ONLY FOUR COUNTIES ARE DOING THIS NOW, AND STATED
THAT HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT THE IMPACT WILL BE WHEN NUMEROUS
COUNTIES FALLOW SUIT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS A BUILT-IN SAFE-
GUARD BECAUSE FP&L HAS TAKEN THE POSITION THAT -A COUNTY HAS TO HAVE A
SPECIAL ACT OR THEY CAN'T IMPOSE THIS FEE. WE WERE FORTUNATE TO HAVE.
HAD SUCH AN ACT, AND THE ATTORNEY FELT THIS ACT MAKES IT SELF-LIMITING.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING TO CON-
SIDER RESCINDING THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION IF THE PSC MAKES A CHANGE,
AND FURTHER NOTED THAT IT COULD TAKE THE PSC A VERY LONG TIME TO MAKE
A DECISION.
COMMISSIONER DEESON AGREED WITH COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, NOT-
ING THAT THE TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING A FEE AT THE PRESENT TIME AND GET-
TING NOTHING IN RETURN.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED HOW LONG HAS FP&L BEEN CHARGING THE
FRANCHISE FEE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
MR. BLOUNT ANSWERED THAT FRANCHISE FEES HAVE BEEN TREATED
AS AN OPERATING EXPENSE OVER THE PAST 30 OR 40 YEARS, BUT IT HASN'T
BEEN SHOWN ON THE BILL UNTIL LAST YEAR.
37
f
a -
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE RESOLUTION WERE ADOPTED, WHEN
IT WOULD BECOME EFFECTIVE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT FP&L HAS 30 DAYS TO ACCEPT„THE
RESOLUTION AFTER IT IS MAILED TO THEM, AND UPON ACCEPTANCE BY THEM,
IT WOULD BECOME EFFECTIVE.
COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER STATED THAT IT BOTHERS HIM THAT FP&L
CAN LEVY A TAX IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO PAY OTHER FRANCHISE FEES.
MR. BLOUNT AND MR. $CHINDEHITTE POINTED OUT THAT FRANCHISE
FEES ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE TAXES; THAT THEY ARE OPERATING EXPENSES
JUST LIKE THOSE OF ANY OTHER COMPANY.
COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT IF THE PSC SHOULD MAKE A
CHANGE IN THE METHOD OF CHARGING FRANCHISE FEES, WE CAN CERTAINLY
RESCIND OUR RESOLUTION, BUT SHE FELT WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SECURE
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTY.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.-
ON
EARINGON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER VOTED IN OPPOSITION, THE BOARD ADOPTED
RESOLUTION N0. 77-104 GRANTING FP&L AN ELECTRIC FRANCHISE.
4
OCT J91977 Bm 31 fA,r2'97
c
RESOLUTION NO. 77- 104
A RESOLUTION GRANTING TO FLORIDA POWER &
LIGHT COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,
AN ELECTRIC FRANCHISE IN THE UNINCORPORATED
AREAS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; IM-
POSING PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS RELATING
THERETO; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENTS BY THE
FRANCHISEE TO THE COUNTY; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That there is hereby granted to Florida Power &
Light Company (herein called the "Grantee"), its successors and assigns,
the non-exclusive right, privilege or franchise to construct, maintain, and
operate in, under, upon, over and across the present and future streets,
alleys, bridges, easements and other public places throughout all the
unincorporated areas of Indian River County, Florida, (herein called the
"Grantor"), and its successors, in accordance with established practice
with respect to electrical construction and maintenance, for the period of
thirty (30) years from the date of acceptance hereof, electric light and power
facilities (including conduits, poles, wires and transmission lines, and, for
its own use, telephone and telegraph lines) for the purpose of supplying
electricity to Grantor, and its successors, the inhabitants thereof, and
persons and corporations beyond the limits thereof.
Section 2. That the facilities shall be so located or relocated
and so erected as to interfere as little as possible with traffic over said streets,
alleys, bridges, and public places, and with reasonable egress from and
ingress to abutting property. The location or relocation of all facilities shall
be made under the supervision and with the approval of such representatives
as the governing body of Grantor may designate for the purpose, but not so
as unreasonably to interfere with the proper operation of Grantee's facilities
and service. That when any portion of a street is excavated by Grantee in the
location or relocation of any of its facilities, the portion of the street so
®C� 91977 _ . Booth �v
excavated shall, with a reasonable time and as early as practicable after
such excavation, be replaced by the Grantee at its expense, and in as good
condition as it was at the time of such excavation. Provided, however, that
nothing herein contained shall be construed to make the Grantor liable to the
Grantee for any cost or expense in connection with the construction, re-
construction, repair or relocation of Grantee's conduits, poles,. towers,
and appurtenances thereto in streets, highways and other public places made
necessary by the widening, grading, paving or otherwise improving by said
Grantor, of any of the present and future streets, avenues, alleys, bridges,
highways, easements and other public places used or occupied by the Grantee,
except, however, Grantee shall be entitled to reimbursement of its costs as
may be provided by law.
Section 3. That Grantor shall in no way be liable or responsible
for any accident or damage that may occur in the construction, operation
or maintenance by Grantee of its facilities hereunder, and the acceptance
of this Resolution shall be deemed an agreement on the part of Grantee to
Indemnify Grantor and hold it harmless against any and all liability, loss;
cost, damage, or expense, which may accrue to Grantor by reason of the
neglect, default or misconduct of Grantee in the construction, operation or
maintenance of its facilities hereunder.
Section 4. That all rates and rules and regulations established
F
by Grantee from time to time shall be at all times reasonable and Grantee's
rates for electricity shall at all times be subject to such regulation as may
be provided by law.
Section 5. That no later than sixty (60) days after the first
anniversary date of this grant and no later than sixty (60) days after each
succeeding anniversary date of this grant, the Grantee, its successors and
assigns, shall have paid to the Grantor and its successors an amount which
added to the amount of all taxes as assessed, levied, or imposed (without
regard to any discount for early payment or any interest or penalty for
-2-
=I
BOOK 31 pru 299 i
® CT 3.91977.
M
late payment), special assessments, licenses, excises, fees, charges
and other impositions of any kind whatsoever (except the County school
tax and the taxes for County school districts levied under Article VII,
Section 9, of the Constitution of the State of Florida as constituted on the
date of this grant and except amounts for assessments for special benefits,
such as sidewalks, street paving and similar improvements) levied or
Imposed upon the Grantee's electric property, business operations, and
those of Grantee's electric subsidiaries within Indian River County, Florida,
by the Grantor for itself, or for the benefit of any other general or special
public or other governmental body located in whole or in part within the
limits of Indian River County, Florida, or so levied or imposed by or under
any authority other than municipalities for the benefit of any general or
special public or other governmental body, located in whole or in part
within the limits of Indian River County, Florida, including the Grantor,
for the preceding tax year, will equal six percent (616) of Grantee's reve-
nues from the sale of electrical energy to residential, commercial and
Industrial customers within the unincorporated areas of Indian River County,
Florida, for the twelve (12) fiscal months preceding the applicable anni-
versary date. In calculating the amount which Grantee shall have paid
Grantor no later than sixty (60) days after the first annual date of this grant,
revenues from the sale of electrical energy to residential, commercial and
Industrial customers during the first fiscal month after the effective date of
this grant shall be excluded. Nothing herein shall be construed to be a,
limitation on the assessment and collection of valid taxes, special assessments,
licenses, fees, charges or other impositions by the Grantor or other public
or governmental body on or from the Grantee in excess of such six percent
(6%) amount.
-3-
BOOK 31 PAGE 300
Section 6. Payments of the amount to be paid to Grantor by
Grantee under the terms of Section 5 hereof shall be made in estimated
monthly installments. The eleven (11) monthly installments for the first
twelve (12) fiscal months of this grant shall commence one hundred twenty
(120) days after the effective date of this grant. For each succeeding
twelve (12) fiscal months of this grant, the twelve (12) monthly installments
shall commence ninety (90) days after the grant's anniversary date. Each
estimated monthly installments shall be calculated on the basis of ninety
percent (90%) of Grantee's revenues (as defined in Section 5) for the
monthly billing period ending sixty (60) days prior to each scheduled
monthly payment. The final monthly installment for each fiscal year of
this grant shall be adjusted to reflect any underpayment or overpayment
resulting from the estimated monthly installments made for said fiscal
year.
Section 7. As farther consideration of this franchise, the
Grantor agrees not to engage in the business of distributing and selling
electricity during the life of this franchise or any extension thereof in
competition with the Grantee, its successors and assigns.
Section 8. That failure on the part of Grantee to comply m
any substantial respect with any of the provisions of this Resolution shall
be grounds for a forfeiture of this grant, but no such forfeiture shall take
I.
effect if the reasonableness or propriety thereof is protested by Grantee
until a court of competent jurisdiction (with right of appeal in either party)
shall have found that Grantee has failed to comply in a substantial: respect
with any of the provisions of this franchise, and the Grantee shall have
six (6) months after the final determination of the question, to make good
the default before a forfeiture shall result with the right in Grantor at
its discretion to grant such additional time to Grantee for compliance as
necessities in the case require; provided, however, that the provisions of
-4 -
OCT 191911
CT 1t��
BOOK X Pic:
1977
M
this Section shall not be construed as impairing any alternative right or
rights which the Grantor may have with respect to the forfeiture of
franchises under the Constitution or the general laws of Florida or the
Charter of the Grantor.
Section 9. If, during the term of this franchise, the Grantee
enters into a franchise with any other county which provides for benefits
which are greater than those provided to the Grantor herein, then Grantee
agrees upon request of the Grantor to enter into a new franchise with the
Grantor containing similar greater benefits provided that such new fran-
chise includes benefits to Grantee at least equal to those provided by its
franchise agreement with such other county. Grantee further agrees that
if, during the term of this franchise,. the Grantee enters into a franchise
with any other county covering unincorporated areas only or incorporated
areas only which provides for payments at a higher percentage rate than
the six percent (616) rate provided to the Grantor herein, then Grantee
agrees upon request of the Grantor to enter a new franchise with the
Grantor containing a higher percentage rate provided that such new
franchise includes benefits to Grantee at least equal to those provided
by its franchise agreement with such other county.
Section 10. That if any Section, paragraph, sentence, clause,
term, word or other portion of this Resolution shall be held to be invalid,
the remainder of this Resolution shall not be affected.
Section 11. As a condition precedent to the taking effect of this
grant, Grantee shall have filed its acceptance hereof with the Grantor's
Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption. And this Resolution shall
take effect on the date upon which Grantee filed its acceptance.
Section 12. Grantor reserves the right to increase or decrease rates
charged herein depending upon the method the Pabli.c Service Commission
for the State of Florida uses in establishing rates state-wide. In no event
shall any increase in rates by Grantor exceed the maximum rates established
within this Franchise Agreement.
-5-
1977
5-
BOOK OJL PAGE -302
I
DONE and ADOPTED in regular session this 19th day of
October 1977.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
William C. Wodtke, . , Chairman
ATTEST: `,,
C-)IeAL Cl
.� 1977 BOOK. Pau€ .
OC
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE HOUR OF 11:00
O#CLOCK A.M. WAS SET FOR HOLDPNG A HEARING IN REGARD TO THE DEMOLISH-
ING OF A HOUSE OWNED BY MRS. EMILY NICHOLSON AT 1580 6TH AVENUE, HE
REPORTED THAT HE HAD INFORMED MRS. NICHOLSON OF THIS BY CERTIFIED
MAIL AND HAD RECEIVED AN ANSWER FROM HER. ATTORNEY COLLIN'S NOTIFI-
CATION TO MRS. NICHOLSON AND HER ANSWER HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE
MINUTES.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER
R. DON DEESON
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
October 6, 1977
Mrs. Emily Nicholson
345 West 86th Street
New York, New York 10024
.Dear Mrs. Nicholson:
This letter is to advise you that the Board of County
Commissioners, pursuant to due process, will hold a hearing
on October 19, 1977 at 11:00 o'clock A.M. in the County
Commission Meeting Room of the Indian River County Courthouse
for the purposes of determining whethar or not the dilapidated
structure you own at:
1580 - 6th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida
Lot 3, Block 4
Rockridge Subdivision
should be demolished and a lien placed against the property.
You are hereby notified to be present at the time and
place above stated for the purposes of presenting any defenses
you may have to the matter.
Sincer ly, /
GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR.,
GGC,Jr/ph Attorney to the Board
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
.
OCT 191977
45
ma 31 PA -UE 3.04
....-xl+i'0'?'.ty••,r-,. ♦•rt. ,r1- - /[/%��/!�,/�,+�4.j e' s•�( ��,.;�..s'/,�i�}.•a�..y
�ti� i` �I �n ir;'ai:..t} • . 'C..:1?t� •''l' a i . "). �,,," / , t..., j o7 14
•�., 1 Chit •tiv .: i .} 'i•i. , P.t ;�
OCT 19
rn
B0,'lJ7D COIJ
rr>r
Apt
I �
.:.'f.ts '..�/ •��•� .W t/p ":�sa"' F6�/'_ _!'jv,�,a ��o+� � /'�� � � a
ff SLC.^ Y a -S ,"b��%�`
('�Jt � � fI ♦I ir.• �_ !.d.,sy' =� ��!'`''�'i ' N.s �,i'.�.* �'l�' +�•G::,::-`L.R� j'�.
Ar
!♦'At
DON ADAMS, BUILDING DIRECTOR, PRESENTED PICTURES OF THIS
DWELLING TO THE BOARD AND NOTED THAT HE FIRST BECAME INVOLVED WITH'
THIS MATTER IN OCTOBER OF 1975. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MRS.
NICHOLSON HAD ACCOMPANIED HIM ON AN INSPECTION OF THIS PROPERTY, AND
HE CAUTIONED HER AS TO THE HAZARDS. HE STATED THAT SHE SECURED NAMES
OF THREE PROMINENT CONTRACTORS AND ATTEMPTED TO GET BIDS TO RENOVATE
THE HOUSE, BUT AFTER A YEAR OR SO OF NEGOTIATING, SHE CAME BACK TO
46
pC1 19 1977
80a# r
0 Cl 1919` 7
HIMFORNAMES OF MORE CONTRACTORS. MR. ADAMS CONTINUED THAT MRS.
NICHOLSON WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE FIGURES THEY QUOTED AND HAS
DONE NOTHING, AND IN THE MEANTIME THE NEIGHBORS HAVE BEEN COMPLAIN-
ING BECAUSE THE SITUATION HAS GOTTEN EVEN MORE HAZARDOUS AS THE
STRUCTURE CONTINUES TO DETERIORATE. MR. ADAMS STATED THAT HE HAS
CONDEMNED THE BUILDING FOR DEMOLITION AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAS
UPHELD HIS POSITION.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THE BUILDING HAS BEEN CLEANED
OUT, AND MR. ADAMS STATED THAT AN EXTENSION WAS GIVEN TO THE 15TH
OF SEPTEMBER FOR THIS PURPOSE, BUT HE DOES NOT BELIEVE•THAT THE
CONTENTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE
ADMINISTRATOR. TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS OR HAVE COUNTY CREWS DO THE WORK,
THE COSTS TO BE RECOVERED BY A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY, AND TO RE-
MOVE THE CONTENTS OF THE HOUSE AND PUT THEM IN COUNTY STORAGE TO BE
DISPOSED OF AFTER A CERTAIN PERIOD.
BUILDING DIRECTOR ADAMS NOTED THAT EVERYTHING ON THE PRE-
MISES SHOULD BE INVENTORIED AS IT IS REMOVED, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS
AGREED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR
TO PROCEED WITH THE DEMOLITION OF THE DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE OWNED BY
EMILY NICHOLSON AT 1580 6TH AVENUE IN THE MANNER SUGGESTED BY ATTOR-
NEY COLLINS.
BUILDING DIRECTOR ADAMS THEN BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF
THE BOARD OTHER CONDEMNATION ORDERS WHICH HE HAS HAD PENDING IN HIS
FILES FOR YEARS. MR. ADAMS STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO PURSUE THIS
MATTER, BUT POINTED OUT THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO CONTINUE TO CONDEMN
WHEN YOU HAVE STRUCTURES THAT HAVE BEEN CONDEMNED FOR TWO OR THREE
YEARS AND THE NOTICES ARE DISREGARDED. HE MENTIONED A STRUCTURE
OWNED BY ROSALIE STEWART, WHICH HAS NOW FALLEN DOWN, AND THE OLD
DRIVE-IN THEATRE OWNED BY ARTHUR LEE HENDERSON, WHICH WAS CONDEMNED
AND THE NOTICE IGNORED. MR, ADAMS NOTED THAT YOU CAN PROSECUTE THESE
PEOPLE FOR NOT HAVING THE STRUCTURES REMOVED.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THESE WERE SUBMITTED TO THE COM-
MUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OR WHETHER SOME OF THESE PEOPLE ARE
.
47
mix 31pAfj.306
FINANCIALLY ABLE TO HANDLE THIS THEMSELVES.
MR. ADAMS STATED THAT SOME OF THEM ARE AND SOME AREN'T.
CHAIRMAN WODKTE SUGGESTED THAT A LETTER BE WRITTEN THESE
PEOPLE BY THE BOARD STATING THAT IF WE DO NOT RECEIVE A RESPONSE,
THE BOARD WILL AUTHORIZE ACTION TO BE TAKEN THROUGH THE COURTS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS-FELT RATHER THAN WRITE A LETTER, THE
BOARD SHOULD SET UP HEARINGS AND TAKE ACTION, AND BUILDING DIRECTOR
ADAMS AGREED, NOTING THAT THE BUILDING CODE HAS A SECTION ON SUB-
STANDARD HOUSING WHICH SHOULD BE ENFORCED.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON WHETHER TO WRITE A LETTER FIRST
OR PROCEED TO TAKE ACTION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO NOTIFY
PROPERTY OWNERS OF UNSAFE STRUCTURES THAT HAVE BEEN CONDEMNED THAT
HEARINGS WILL BE HELD IN REGARD TO DEMOLITION AND ALSO TO DETERMINE
IF ANY OF THESE QUALIFY UNDER THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT HE WOULD LIKE THE BOARD AT
THIS TIME TO REACH A DECISION AS TO THE MID -FLORIDA RATE INCREASE
REQUEST,
THE CHAIRMAN STATED, THAT AS FAR AS HE IS CONCERNED, AFTER
REREADING THE MINUTES AND THE TESTIMONY, THERE DEFINITELY SEEMS TO
BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER WITNESSES AS
TO THE CONDITION OF THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. HE NOTED THAT WE
HEARD AT ONE HEARING THAT THE PROBLEM WAS IN THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
AND AT THE NEXT HEARING THAT IT WAS NOT. CHAIRMAN WODTKE CONTINUED
THAT WE ALSO HEARD TESTIMONY BY AN EXPERT WITNESS ON THE CONDITION
OF PIPES FROM THIS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, WHICH PIPES THE WITNESS HAD
NOT SEEN REMOVED FROM THE GROUND, THIS WITNESS TESTIFIED THAT THE
PIPES WERE IN -BETTER THAN NORMAL.CONDITION, BUT THE CHAIRMAN NOTED
THAT WHEN HE EXAMINED THEM HIMSELF, HE FOUND THERE WERE HOLES IN
THE PIPES AND YOU COULD EVEN PUSH A PAPER CLIP THROUGH THEM. CHAIR-
MAN WODTKE ALSO NOTED THAT EXTENSIVE FLUSHING OF THE SYSTEM WAS
CARRIED OUT JUST PRIOR TO THE HEARINGS, BUT THE SYSTEM HAD NOT BEEN
FLUSHED THAT EXTENSIVELY ON A ROUTINE BASIS PREVIOUSLY.
48
CT i 9197 . I
ma 31 w307
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED FURTHER THAT TESTS WERE DONE WHICH
SHOWED THAT THE WATER DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STATE STANDARDS. HE
CONTINUED THAT THE TESTIMONY HE REVIEWED SHOWED THAT THERE HAD BEEN
NO ATTEMPT TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE WATER NOR ANY SPECIFIC
INDICATION THAT ANYTHING WILL BE DONE. CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT
THAT MR. FOX TESTIFIED AS TO THE PLANT AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND
AS TO THE QUALITY OF WATER IN THIS AREA, BUT ADMITTED THAT HE HAS
NOT PERSONALLY MADE ANY TESTS TO BACKUP HIS EXPERT TESTIMONY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED IN PARTICULAR THE GREAT NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS
MADE BY THE RESIDENTS WITHIN THE FRANCHISE AREA AND STATED THAT HE
WOULD HAVE A PROBLEM APPROVING THE RATE INCREASE BASED ON WHAT WAS
PRESENTED.
COMMISSIONER LAY CONCURRED WITH THE CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENTS
AND ALSO SAID SHE DID NOT BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IN ANY WAY INDICATED
ANY PROPOSAL TO UPGRADE THE SYSTEM OR PROVIDE BETTER SERVICE. COM-
MISSIONER LOY FURTHER NOTED IT WAS INTERESTING TO COMPARE THE TESTIMONY
MARKED `EXHIBIT 2 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RATE CASE" WITH THE RATE CASE
PRESENTED IN 1972 AND SEE THAT THE FORMAT HAS BEEN CHANGED CONSIDERABLY.
NOWHERE IN THE NEW MATERIAL DOES IT INDICATE THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS
OR THE GALLONAGE THEY ARE USING OR PROVIDE IN ANY WAY AN OPPORTUNITY
TO FIGURE OUT APPROXIMATELY WHAT THE RATE INCREASE WOULD MEAN TO THE
CUSTOMER, THOUGH ALL KINDS OF INFORMATION WAS SUPPLIED AS TO EXACTLY
WHAT IT WOULD MEAN TO THE COMPANY. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT SUCH
A BREAKDOWN IN REGARD TO THE CUSTOMERS WAS SUPPLIED AT THE HEARING IN
1972 AND ASSISTED THE BOARD IN THEIR DETERMINATION IN MAKING AN INCREASE
AT THAT TIME. COMMISSIONER LOY STATED THAT SHE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO
SUPPORT THE REQUEST FOR A RATE INCREASE BASED.ON THE TESTIMONY PRE-
SENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE CONCURRED WITH WHAT
HAS BEEN SAID BY THE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONER LAY, AND HE FURTHER
POINTED OUT THAT THE COMPANY SAID THEY WERE NOT KNOWLEDGEABLE OF THE
COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE WATER SYSTEM. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SAID HE DID
NOT SEE HOW THEY COULD DENY THIS KNOWLEDGE SINCE ALL THESE COMPLAINTS
WERE REGISTERED AT THE PREVIOUS RATE HEARING AND THERE WAS NO WAY FOR
THEM NOT TO KNOW ABOUT THEM. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER CONTINUED THAT HE
49
0Cl 19 1977 . •
80% 31 wil-as
91977
i
PERSONALLY IS NOT SATISFIED THAT A COMPANY SHOULD OBTAIN A CERTAIN
AMOUNT OF RETURN ON THEIR INVESTMENT REGARDLESS OF THE KIND OF PRODUCT
THEY PRODUCE. HE STATED THAT HE FELT THE COMPANY SHOULD SHOW THAT
THEY ARE TRYING TO IMPROVE THEIR PRODUCT AND DO REASONABLE AND LOGICAL
THINGS TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCT BEFORE THEY ASK THE INDIVIDUAL TO PAY
MORE FOR THEIR WATER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CONCURRED. HE ALSO POINTED OUT THE
CONFLICTING TESTIMONY OF MR. WRIGHT AS TO THE COMPANY'S AWARENESS OF
THE CONDITION OF THE SYSTEM AND THE COMPLAINTS OF THE CUSTOMERS, NOTING
THAT HE HAD POINTED OUT TO MR. WRIGHT THAT THESE SAME COMPLAINTS HAD
SEEN BROUGHT UP AT PREVIOUS RATE HEARINGS AT WHICH TIME THE COMPANY
SAID THEY WERE GOING TO IMPROVE. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT
TO HEAR THEY WERE UNAWARE OF THE COMPLAINTS WAS BEYOND HIS UNDERSTANDING.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FURTHER STATED THAT THE PIPE BROUGHT IN ACTUALLY
HAD A BAND TO HOLD IT TOGETHER AND HOLES IN IT, AND HE FELT THAT THE
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE CONFLICTED WITH THE EXPERT S TESTIMONY THAT THE
PIPE WAS IN GOOD SHAPE. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CONTINUED THAT THE EVIDENCE
INDICATED THAT THE COMPANY REALLY HAD NO INTENTION OF MAKING CORREC-
TIONS TO IMPROVE THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THEIR MAIN CONCERN SEEMED
TO BE THE RETURN ON THEIR INVESTMENT REGARDLESS OF THE QUALITY OF
WATER OFFERED. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FEELS, AS COM-
MISSIONER SCHMUCKER DOES, THAT A COMPANY`IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY ENTITLED
TO A RATE OF RETURN: THAT IT HAS TO BE EARNED. HE DOES NOT FEEL THAT
IT HAS BEEN, AND HE STATED HE COULD NOT SUPPORT THEIR REQUEST FOR A
RATE INCREASE.
COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT HE CONCURS WITH THE STATEMENTS
MADE AND THERE IS NOT A GREAT DEAL HE CAN ADD. HE CONTINUED THAT BASED
ON THE TESTIMONY SUBMITTED, HE CERTAINLY COULD NOT CONCUR WITH A RATE
INCREASE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE RATE INCREASE REQUESTED BY
MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC., BASED ON THE REASONS SET OUT ABOVE AND
THE REASONS GIVEN IN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SET OUT IN THE MINUTES,
EXHIBITS, ETC.
50
mix - 1 -A 09
01
•
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE POSSI-
BILITY OF WRITING A LETTER TO THE CORP OF ENGINEERS EXPRESSING INTER-
EST IN A WATER RESOURCE —FLOODING PROBLEM STUDY TO BE MADE BY THE
CORPS AND DETERMINE IF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MIGHT BE ELIGIBLE FOR SUCH
A STUDY. THIS STUDY IS EXPLAINED IN THE FOLLOWING NEWSPAPER ARTICLE.
J//.
�dy- 7?1-
TODAY. Friday, October 7, 1877 36
Vater
S Ii0.� Study .
To --Begin Here Soon
By B.J. HUEHN
has occurred, said Clyde
But it is too early to say
tranAY rami wale.
Smith, chief of the Corps'
exactly what the study will
A U.S. Army Corps of
urban studies genion. -
concern, he added.
.Engineers study of
The Corps' Jacksonville
The general intention of
Brevard's water resources
office this week received
the program, Smith said.
and flooding problems
$15.0XI for the first year of
will be to look at the "long
shattd get under way
the program which will be
range water supply for the
within the next two months•
devoted to holding public
county and localized flmd-
a Corps official said Thurs•
meetings and consulting
mg problems where there
day
with county officials about
has been construction to
The study, which may
the problems the study will
flood prone areas."
ultimately cost nearly
address. Smith said.
The goal isn't to een-
is aimed generally
Don Findell. director of
erate a Corps' construction
.$=,ODD.
blt proposing solutions to
the Brevard County Rater
project." Smith empha.
water supply problems in
Resources Department.
sized. Rather, he said. the
the county and also at spe-
said Thursday he will be
study, which could ia,c up
eUie areas where flooding
workmp, with the Corps to
to five years. will be to pro.
set up the "plan of study."
pose alternative solutions to
He said he must approve
long-range oroblems.
the study plan before any
more funds can be released
for the program.
The Florida Depart-
ment of Environmental
'
Regulation has already sub-
mitted u request to Con-
gress and the Office of
Management and Budget
for 83d0,000 for the second
year of the program.
No local funds will be
involved to the project. Fin -
dell said.
Some of the problem
areas that may be adl
dressed by the program
could be South Brevard's
water supply problems
where drinking water short-
ages have often threatened'
and flooding problems in
Satellite Beach and Rest
,
i Melbourne. Findell said.
PLANNER BRENNAN NOTED THAT IT TOOK BREVARD AND VOLUSIA
COUNTIES TWO YEARS TO GET THIS STUDY FUNDED, HE FELT THIS MIGHT BE
AN OPPORTUNITY TO UPDATE THE STUDY MADE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOME
YEARS AGO BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT OVERLAPPING
STUDIES ON WATER QUALITY, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS
STATED THEY JUST WISHED PERMISSION TO INVESTIGATE A POSSIBLE GRANT
AND DETERMINE JUST WHAT IT COVERS AND WHETHER IT OVERLAPS OTHER
PROGRAMS,
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT THE PLANNER CONTACT BREVARD
COUNTY TO OBTAIN BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE STUDY, AND PLANNER
BRENNAN AGREED THAT HE WOULD GET IN TOUCH WITH THE BREVARD COUNTY
PLANNER.
51
Sao 31
.310
COMMISSIONER LOY BROUGHT UP THE MATTER OF FLOOD INSURANCE
FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY AND REQUESTED THAT THE
COUNTY PLANNER OBTAIN MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT.
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD HIS
MEMO IN REGARD TO THE FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION AS
FOLLOWS:
October 13, 1977
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
Courthouse
2145 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Fla. 32960
SUBJECT: Request to attend Florida Community Development Association
meeting, Clearwater, November 2 - 5, 1977
ATTENTION: William Wodtke, Chairman
This is to request authorization for Val. Brennan to attend the F.C.D.A.
meeting in Clearwater November 2 - 5. Cost will run about $175. - $200.
per person. This is in connection with the Community Development Block
Grant Program and new regulations which are being instituted.
The members'of Citizens Advisory Committee (C.D.B.G. Program) have been
advised of this meeting, and Mr. Joe Idelette has signified an interest in
attending. Authorization for him to attend at County expense is also re-
quested.
This expense is chargeable to the C.D. Program (Federal Grant).
Others of Citizens Advisory Committee may also desire to attend, in which
case County Commission should put a limit on the number that should be able
to go, and it will be handled on a first come first go basis.
L
Consideration might be given also to authorizing Jack Flint to attend since
he attended the meeting held by HUD in Jacksonville, and there may be new
bookkeeping rules as a result of the new regulations.
MEMBERSHIP: The County Conmission last year voted to approve a $100. membership
in this new Association. It took a year to organize; so we didn't become a
member. Now that the Association is organized, I again request the County
Conu:rission to approve a $100. County Membership in this Association tor• 1977-
78.
Literature Enclosed. y
VEB : j t
i
Val. E. Br4inan
Planning Director
52
p Cj 19 1977 •
Boa. w, .
tie
PLANNER BRENNAN NOTED THAT NEW REGULATIONS PUBLISHED BY
HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT WITH REGARD TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WILL
BE DISCUSSED AT THIS MEETING. HE CONTINUED THAT LETTERS WERE SENT
TO MEMBERS OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND .JOE IDLETTE DOES
WISH TO ATTEND THIS MEETING.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT KNOWLEDGE OF THESE NEW
REGULATIONS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
AND HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE PLANNER BRENNAN AND MR. IDLETTE ATTEND.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED WHETHER JACK FLINT WHO DOES THE BOOK-
KEEPING FOR THIS PROGRAM SHOULD ALSO ATTEND, BUT IT WAS FELT HE
COULD NOT BE SPARED FROM HIS OFFICE WORK FOR THREE DAYS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER LOY TO AUTHORIZE OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR COUNTY PLANNER,
VAL BRENNAN, AND CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER, .JOE IDLETTE, TO
ATTEND THE FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION MEETING IN
CLEARWATER NOVEMBER Z - S, 1977, AND TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF THE
$100 MEMBERSHIP'FEE TO THIS ASSOCIATION FOR 1977-78.
,COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT HE HAD RESERVATIONS ABOUT
JOINING AN ORGANIZATION LIKE THIS, BUT STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT
OPPOSE THE MOTION.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
53
fl
BOOK Gf.32
=1
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
NOTICE
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the
Zoning Commission of Indian River County, I
er of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
says that he is Business Manager
Florida, has tentatively approved the
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached. copy of advertisement, being
following changes and additions to the Zoning
Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida,
which changes and additions are substantially
`�
a 3 t t e ' p
1
as follows:
Va. That the Zoning Map be changed in
order that the following described property
in the matter of Tn ^ r </ �o •-� : sr //
situated in Indian River County, Florida, li
wit:
Tract 4, Section 11, Township 33 South,
Range 38 East, LESS the North 743.91; AND
the N. 19.03 acres of Tract S, Section 11,
Township 33 South, Range 38 East, LESS R-
W's of Record.
in the Cant, was pub -
Be changed from R -IMP Mobile Home Park
District, to R -IPM Permanent Mobile Home
lished in said newspaper in the issues of 12 19 172
Subdivision District.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
• parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be .held by said
Zoning Commission in the County Commission
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero
Beach, Florida, Thursday, September 15, 1977,
, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County,
at 7:30 o'clock P.M., atter which a public
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
hearing in relation thereto at which parties in
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
to be heard will be held by the Board of County
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
Commissioners of Indian River County,
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
Florida, in the County Commission Room,
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, all Wednesday, October 19, 1977, at
Swam to and subscribed before me this day ofa.S�. A.D.
,2: 00 o'clock P.M.
Board of County Commissioners
1�
Indian River County
By: William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
Indian River County Zoning Commission
ness Manager)
)\ �
Ralph Sexton, Chairman
Aug.17,1977.
Aug.
u
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, IndianLR•' er County, Florida)
(SEAQ
'54
OCT 9.91977
Boy 31 fn313
E71
GOLDSTONE REALTY, INC., IN CARE OF THEIR AGENT, CARTER
ASSOCIATES, INC., WAS SENT THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEAR-
ING BY THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE
125.66.
:-BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR„ Chairman
—ALMA LEE LOY. Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT. JR.
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER
8. DON DEESON
JACK G. JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach. Florida 32960
August 17, 1977
Carter Associates, Inc.
1708 21st Street
Vero,Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Rezoning application for Goldstone Realty, Inc.
Gentlemen:
In compliance with Florida Statute 125.66 the following
is a Notice of Public Hearing for rezoning as requested by
<Goldstone Realty, Inc.
NOTICE
The Zoning Map will be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County; Florida to -
wit:
Tract 4, Section 11, Township 33 South, Range 38 East,
LESS the North 742,9'; and the N. 19.05 acres of Tract
5, Section 11, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, LESS
. •R/W's of Record.
Be changed from R -114P Mobile Home Park District, to
R-1PM Permanent Mobile Home Subdivision District.
A public hearing in relation thereto will be held by the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida in the
-County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida on Wednesday, October 19, 1977 at 2:00 o'clock P.M.
Sincerely yours,
Freda Wright, Clerk
Board of County Commissioners
of
OCT 191977
55
p Ci 91977
ORDINANCE NO. 77-25
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto,
held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard: NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River
County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as
follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the follow-
ing property owned by Goldstone Realty, Inc., Repre-
sented by Carter Associates, Inc;, situated in Indian
River County, Florida, to -wit:
Tract 4, Section 11, Township 33 South, Range 38 East,
LESS the North 742.9'; AND The N. 19.05 acres of Tract
5, Section 11, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, LESS
RJW's of Record.
Be changed from R-lMP Mobile Home Park District, to
R-lPM Permanent Mobile Home Subdivision District.
All within the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described in said Zoning Regulation.
This Ordinance shall take effect October 24, 1977.
0
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS PROP-
ERTY IS LOCATED ON 90TH AVENUE ACROSS FROM TWIN LAKES MOBILE HOME
PARK. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE INTO LOTS FOR MODULAR
HOME DEVELOPMENT AND SELL THE LOTS TO INDIVIDUALS FOR DEVELOPMENT,
HE NOTED THAT THE AREA IS SURROUNDED BY MOBILE HOME ZONING, AND THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DID NOT CONCUR WITH THE ORIGINAL REQUEST TO RE-
ZONE TO R - ']A, BUT DOES APPROVE THE REQUESTED CHANGE TO R-lPM
PERMANENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT. THE PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION ALSO APPROVES.
DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES EXPLAINED THAT THE PUR-
POSE OF THE REZONING IS TO MAKE IT A SUBDIVISION SO THEY CAN SELL
LOTS AND POINTED OUT THAT IT CONSEQUENTLY.WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH
THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR. HOWARD HAD A LETTER MAKING
HIM AN OFFICIAL AGENT REPRESENTING GOL.DSTONE REALTY, AND MR. BRENNAN
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE INITIAL APPLICATION WAS SIGNED BY MR.
KENNEDY OF GOLDSTONE REALTY, INC.
.THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE N0. 77-25.
.
BOOK, t mu .5
J
M.
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero. Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr, who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
in the matter of *—Q 0 S 5 -
In
in the Court was pub -
fished in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. �� r� r�
Swam to and subscribed before me this !�Ia of A.D. " r
0)
U
' ess Manager)
Z_�ZZ /� �
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Ind n River County, Florida)
° (SEAU
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that fire
Zoning Commission of Indian River County,
Florida, has tentatively approved the
following changes and additions to the Zoning
Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida,
which changes and additions are substantially
as follows:
t. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
In Indian River County, Florida, to wit:
The North 255 feet of the South 510 feet of
Government Lot 2, Section 17, Township 31
South, Range 39 East, and the North 255 feet of
the South 510 feet of that part of the Southeast
V4 of the Northwest ya of Section 17, Township
31 South, Range 39 East lying East of U.S.
Highway No. 1.
Be changed from C -IA Restricted Com.
mercial District and R-3 Multiple Dwelling
District, to R -IRM Residence -Mobile Home
District.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
Parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Zoning Commission in the County Commission
Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero
Beach, Florida, Thursday, September 15, 1977,
at 7:30 o'clock P.M., after which a public
hearing In relation thereto at which parties in
Interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard will be held by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, in the County Commission Room,
Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, on Wednesday, October 19, 1977, at
2:00 o'clock P.M.
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
By: William C. WodtkeJr., Chairman
Indian River County Zoning Commission
By: Ralph Sexton, Chairman
Aug. 17, 1977.
CLARENCE AND ANITA CONDE, ETAL, IN CARE OF THEIR ATTORNEY,
STEVE L. HENDERSON, WERE SENT THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC
HEARING BY THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE'
125.66.
11
BOOK 31 PnE T17
. o
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
• WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman
,Q .-.�,► � ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Ghairmarb j
WILLARD W. SIEBERT. JR.
t EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER
F�ORiQ�' R. DON DEESON
JACK G. JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
•August 17+ 1977
Mr. Steve L. Henderson, Esquire
3405 Ocean Drive
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: -Rezoning application for Clarence and Anita Conde, etal
Dear Mr, Henderson:
In compliance with Florida Statute 125.66, the following is
a Notice of Public Hearing for rezoning as requested by you.
NOTICE
The Zoning Map will be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -
wit: 1
The North 255 feet of the South 510 feet of Government
Lot 2, Section 17, Township 31 South, Range 39 East,
and the North 255 feet of the South 510 feet of that
part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 17, Township 31 South, Range 39 East lying East
of U.S, Highway No. 1.,
Be changed from C-lA Restricted Commercial District and
R-3 Multiple Dwelling District,•to R -IRM Residence -Mobile
Home District.
A public hearing in relation thereto will be held by the Board
Of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida in the j
County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, i
Florida on Wednesday, October 19, 1977, at 2:00 O'clock P.M. 4
Sincerely yours,
Freda Wright',
Clerk -to the Board of County
Commissioners
CT
x.91977 B0% PAvF
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS PROP-
ERTY IS LOCATED ON U. S. 1 JUST SOUTH OF SEBASTIAN AND EXTENDS TO
THE INDIAN RIVER. MR. BRENNAN NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS DEVELOPED
MANY YEARS AGO WITH MOBILE HOMES BEFORE THE ZONING CHANGED. THERE
ARE BOTH MOBILE AND
REGULAR HOMES LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF IT. MR.
BRENNAN EXPLAINED THAT THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY REQUESTED THAT A FEW
HUNDRED FEET ON U. S. 1 BE LEFT IN COMMERCIAL ZONING, BUT THE PLANN-
ING DEPARTMENT PREVAILED UPON THEM TO REQUEST THAT THE WHOLE PROP-
ERTY BE REZONED TO R-1RM, WHICH THEY HAVE DONE. THIS WOULD ALLOW
BOTH MOBILE HOMES AND CONVENTIONAL HOMES ON THIS PROPERTY. HE NOTED
THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE WHAT IS THERE CONFORMING, BUT WANT TO DEVELOP
THE REMAINING PROPERTY ONLY IN MOBILE HOMES.
COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED WHY SHOULDN'T THE FRONT HUNDRED
FEET BE LEFT IN COMMERCIAL IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT
IS LOCATED NEAR SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS. HE STATED THAT HE PERSONALLY
FELT THAT THIS AREA AND POSSIBLY HALF A MILE NORTH AND SOUTH OF IT
ON U. S. 1 SHOULD BE COMMERCIAL.
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN EXPLAINED THAT THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT HAD WANTED TO DO AWAY WITH SOME OF THE COMMERCIAL ON U. S. 1,
AND THIS REQUEST GAVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A SPOT TO STOP THE
COMMERCIAL. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAVE HAD SOME OBJECTIONS SINCE WORD OF
THIS HAS SPREAD.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT THE MINIMUM LOT AREA RE-
QUIRED IN R -IRM. `
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT IT IS 10,000 SQ. FT. HE
CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT LOT OWNERS, AND NOT
ALL HAVE THE MINIMUM AREA REQUIRED BUT THEY WILL BE ISSUED DEEDS
WHICH WILL CONVEY LOTS 75 x 133 TO GIVE THEM THE NECESSARY 10,000
SQ. FT. HE NOTED THAT IN ORDER TO DO THIS, SETBACKS WILL BE MEAS-
URED FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND POINTED OUT THAT IN FIGURING
SQUARE FOOTAGE, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO USE THE EASEMENT. ATTORNEY
HENDERSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT, CONTRARY TO MR. BRENNAN'S EARLIER
STATEMENT,' THE CONDES DO NOT INTEND TO SUBDIVIDE ANY FURTHER; THEY
ARE JUST TRYING TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO CONFORMANCE WITH ITS
EXISTING USE SO THE PRESENT LOT OWNERS MAY IMPROVE OR REPLACE THEIR
0 Ci 191977 , .
l
Boox 31 QAtf 319
L9
EXISTING MOBILE HOMES.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT NO PERMIT CAN BE OBTAINED FOR
ANY FURTHER BUILDING WITHOUT SUBDIVIDING, AND ATTORNEY HENDERSON
AGREED AND POINTED OUT THAT PART OF THIS PROPERTY ON THE RIVER IS
MAINLY MARSH AND COULD NOT BE DEVELOPED WITHOUT CONSIDERABLE INVEST-
MENT. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT DEED RESTRICTIONS WOULD ALLOW IT TO' BE
USED FOR MOBILE HOMES ONLY.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED MR. BRENNAN IF, BASED ON THE MASTER
PLAN, THERE IS ANY REASON WHY THE CUT OFF POINT FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING
COULDN'T BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH END OF THIS PROPERTY INSTEAD OF THE
NORTH. SHE NOTED THERE IS EXISTING COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTH NOW.
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN STATED THAT THERE IS ACTUALLY NO
REASON THIS PROPERTY COULDN'T BE LEFT COMMERCIAL AND ANOTHER CUT-OFF
"POINT ESTABLISHED TO THE SOUTH.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON NOTED THE APPLICANTS ORIGINALLY ATS ..
TEMPTED TO RETAIN SOME COMMERCIAL, BUT DID AGREE TO CHANGE. HE
• POINTED OUT THAT -IF THIS PROPERTY IS LEFT IN C-lA,MR. & MRS. CONDE'S
SINGLE FAMILY HOME WILL BE NON -CONFORMING. HE FELT THEY ARE WILL-
ING, HOWEVER, TO GO EITHER WAY.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT,WISHED TO BE HEARD.
JOHN ZIMMERMAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE OWNS A LOT IN
THIS PROPERTY AND HE OBJECTS TO THE WAY THEY WANT TO DO THE RE-
ZONING. HE STATED THAT THEY WANT TO GIVE HIM 33' OF THE ROAD WHICH
HE WOULD HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON AND KEEP UP, AND HE STILL WOULDN'T BE
ABLE TO PUT A 60' TRAILER ON HIS LOT.. HE NOTED THAT HE HAS A 50'
TRAILER THERE NOW, BUT WANTS A LARGER ONE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT HE DOESN'T HAVE TO
ACCEPT THE 33' IF HE DOESN'T WISH TO, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED
THAT MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON THESE TYPE LOTS GO TO DOUBLEWIDE TRAILERS.
THE BOARD FURTHER POINTED OUT TO MR. ZIMMERMAN THAT WITH
THE EXISTING ZONING, HE CAN'T REPLACE OR REPAIR HIS EXISTING MOBILE.
HOME AND WITHOUT THE ADDITIONAL 33', HE CAN'T CONFORM TO THE PROPOSED
ZONING.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT MR. ZIMMERMAN WAS ORIGINALLY
PART OF THE REQUEST FOR REZONING, BUT THEN WITHDREW. ATTORNEY
HENDERSON FELT THAT HE COULD PETITION TO HAVE MR. ZIMMERMAN'S PROPERTY
61
M��
Boos 31 pm,f VO
® ® r
REZONED BECAUSE IT IS PART OF THE LARGER PARCEL AND IT WOULD NOT BE
LOGICAL TO LEAVE ONE LITTLE PARCEL R-3.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT WOULD BE TO MR. ZIMMERMAN'S ADVAN-
TAGE TO GO ALONG WITH THE NEW ZONING WHICH WOULD GIVE HIM MORE FLEXI-
BILITY. HE NOTED THAT TAXES.ON THE -33` WOULD BE MINIMAL.
MR. ZIMMERMAN COMPLAINED THAT HIS DEED DOES NOT GIVE HIM
ACCESS -TO THE RIVER, BUT ATTORNEY HENDERSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
THE CONDES ALLOW -MR. ZIMMERMAN TO USE THEIR ACCESS.
MR, ZIMMERMAN STATED THAT THEY COULD SELL THIS PROPERTY.
COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT IF THE ZONING CHANGE IS
MADE, THE OWNER COULD NOT.SELL ANYTHING UNTIL THE LAND IS PLATTED
AND SUBDIVIDED.
EDWARD KITCHING INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND HIS WIFE
OWN PROPERTY JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND WHILE THEY ARE
NOT OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED REZONING, THEY DO.OPPOSE TAKING THE .
FRONT PART OUT OF COMMERCIAL.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED THAT A LETTER WRITTEN BY MR. & MRS.
KITCHING BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES.
a
62
Ci 91977 . , soon 31 pAu.32.
ro.
d
n91977
September 27, 1977
POB 307
Sebastian, Fla 32958
To Mr. William Wodtke,'Jr. - Chairman, County Commission
REE Clarence P. and Anita Conde
IRC Z-77-12
We own land on the east side of U. S. #1 in north
Indian River County. We are immediately south of the
Sebastian City Limits. Our land is zoned C1A Restricted
Commercial District. We have a temporary home on the land
and a "log cabin" which was once my father's newspaper office.
It is now remodeled and designed for business use. We also
have a small open-air market and a nursery business beginning,
with parking space, on our property there beside U.S. #1.
Our customers come from Twin Lakes, across the highway, from
Sebastian Highlands, Barefoot Bay, Whispering Pines, mostly
.from the areas of Wabasso and Sebastian. We are building a
business and our plans have involved the commercial use of
our property for a long time. •We have carefully followed
zoning rules and regulations.
• Now we have received notice that a zoning change has been
requested next door to us, apparently to accommodate mobile
home owners who bought property there from our neighbor. We
sympathize with him and his purchasers, but we also feelthat
a.zoning change would be as bad for us as it is good for him.
We don't want mobile homes beside our commercial property -
and the future owners of these mobile homes probably won't want
to have our businesses next door to them.
We know that the State has told the County to work out a
master plan for zoning, and that county planners are trying
to do it. They say there is too much commercial property
here and that it is wrong for,commercial land to be in strips
along the highways and right for homes to be in strips along
.-high speed highways. We are told that zoning is a police
power and we know that the picture is very' -big and we are
• very little. But we still don't want mobile homes parked next
door to our place of business, which has just begun to
grow, as we hoped it'would, with the Sebastian Area.
Therefore we would like the record to show that we are
opposed to the requested change in zoning next door to us,
copy attached, from CTA Restricted Commercial District and
R-3 Multiple Dwelling District to R-1RM Residence Mobile
Homes.
-Sallydale Wimbrow Kitching
Edward Kitchin
5 •
Book 31 PAGE 3922
ATTORNEY HENDERSON ASKED MR. CONDE IF HE WOULD HAVE ANY
OBJECTION TO HAVING THE FRONT PART OF THE PROPERTY REMAIN COMMERCIAL,
AND HE HAD NO OBJECTION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT TO LIMIT CONSIDER-
ATION ONLY TO THE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY ZONED R-3.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON POINTED OUT THAT THIS WOULD INCLUDE SOME
OF THE MOBILE HOMES, BUT STATED THAT THEIR ORIGINAL PETITION HAD A
DESCRIPTION WHICH WOULD EXCEPT THIS PROPERTY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS MOTION.
THE BOARD STUDIED THE PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBMITTED
BY ATTORNEY HENDERSON, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD
MAKE THEIR INTENT KNOWN, BUT CONTINUE THE DECISION-MAKING PART OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THE BOARDS INTENT IS TO
INCLUDE ALL OF THE MOBILE HOMES IN THE ZONING CHANGE TO R -IRM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER,'THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY TABLED A DECISION ON THE ZONING
CHANGE REQUESTED BY CLARENCE AND ANITA CONDE, ETAL, UNTIL THE NEXT
MEETING WHEN AN EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION CAN BE OBTAINED.
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO -WIT:
-64
BOOK 31 pmx 3 43
1
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
fiorlce
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the
Vera Beach, Indian River County, Florida
Zoning Commission of Indian River County,
Florida, has tentatively approved the
followichanges and additions to the Zoning
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
Ordinancng e of Indian River County, Florida,
which changes and additions are substantially
STATE OF FLORIDA
as follows:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
Commencing at the N.E. corner of the SW iia
of SE Ua of Section 20, Township 31 South;
r
Range 38 East, Indian River County, Florida,
a
run South 0 degrees 32'3111 W. along the East
line a distance of 108.65' to the South right of
IJc1
way of SR S12; from said point continue S. 0
In the matter of _AL k V G4 re"Cl _ tc� -Q
degrees 32137" W. along said line a distance of
—i
to
' to the point of beginning; thence S. 0
de____
degrs 32'37" W. a distance of 1,0891, thence
run N. 89 degrees 15'23" W. a distance of 8001,
more or less to the East right of way of limited
'access line of 1.95; thence run N. along said
right of way a distance of 1,094', more or less;
in thethence
_ Court, was pub-
run S. 89 degrees, 15'23" E. a distance
of 780', more or less to the point of beginning.
Said property contains 20 acres in Sections 20
Iished in said newspaper in the Issues of _CL& -,_,c, 17 1 q rl �
--
and 29.
,
Be changed from A -Agricultural District,
and C-1 Commercial District, to R.1TM
Transient Mobile Home District.
Affiant further says that the, said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly has been
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Zoning Commission in the County Commission
and entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun Florida
for a period of one year next preceedingthe first �'
publication of the attached
Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero
Beach, Florida, Thursday, September 1S, 1977,
copy of adver•
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the
at 7:30 o'clock P.M., after which a public
hearing in relation thereto at which parties in
purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard will be held by the Board of County
Swam to and subscribed before me isday of 0, 1 ` . A.D. 19 9 1
Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, in the County Commission Room,
Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, on Wednesday, October 19, 1977, at
2:00 o'clock P.M.
Board of County Commissioners
- (YAsiness Manager)
Indian River County
By: William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
Indian River County Zoning Commission
By: Ralph Sexton, Chairman
cseAu (Clerk of the Circuit Court, lndiqrvkiver County, Florida)
Aug. 17,1977:
THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO
RO—ED CORPORATION CIO TOTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BY THE CLERK OF
CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66.
0
65
®C� 9191.7
soon11 jr
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
• - WILLIAM C. WOOTKE, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY. Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER
R- DON DEESON
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator I 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach. Florida 32960
August 17, 1977
.Mr. Edwin S. Schmucker
Total Development Corporation.
P.O. Box 10
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
-Re: Rezoning application for Ro-Ed Corporation
Dear Mr. Schmucker:
1n compliance with Florida Statute 125.66, the following
is a Notice of Public Hearing for rezoning as requested by
-Ro-Ed Corporation.
• , -NOTICE.
The Zoning Map will be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida to -
Vit: .
.Commencing at the N.E. corner of the SW 1/4 of SE 1/4
..of Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Indian
River County, Florida, run South 0 degrees 32'37" W along
the East -line a distance of 108,65' to the South right -of
-way of SR 512; from said point continue S.0 degrees
32' 37" W. along said line a distance of 540.5' to the point
of beginning; thence S. 0 degrees 32' 37" W.*a distance of
1089', thence run N. 89 degrees 15' 23" W. -a distance of
800', more or less to the East right-of-way of limited
..access line of I-95; thence run N. along said right-of-
-way a distance of 1094', more or less' thence run S. 89
degrees, 15' 23" E. a distance of 780', more or less to the
_ point of beginning. Said property contains 20 acres in
Section 20 and 29.
Be changed from A -Agricultural District, and C-1 Commercial
District, to R-lTM Transient.Mobile Home District.
A public hearing in -relation 'thereto will be held by the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida in the
in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse,
Vero Beach, Florida on Wednesday, October 19, 1977; at 2:00
o'clock P.M.
Sincerely yours,
Freda Wright, erk
Board of County Commissioners
=j
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD
FILED THE FOLLOWING AFFIDAVIT IN REGARD TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
WITH THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT AND LEFT THE COMMISSION ROOM AT
3:07 O'CLOCK P.M.
66
919` 7
Bork - 31 �5
46
AFFIDAVIT`
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared
EDWIN S. SCMCJCKER, of 610 Wall Street, Vero Beach, Florida, who sVys:
1. This affidavit is given pursuant to Florida Statues Chapter 112.313
which provides standards of conduct for officers and employees of state
agencies, countXes, cities and other political subdivision, legislators and
legislative employees.
2. That I am a duly elected County Commissioner of Indian River County,
Florida, and that in addition to my duties as County Commissioner, I am a
licensed professional engineer in Florida and engage in private practice as
_ .._ . a consulting engineer. ......
3. That I am the President of TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC..$' a Florida
Corporation in good standing which corporation has represented the Client ,
Ro-Ed Corporation to request a rezoning from A -Agricultural and C-1 Commercial
districts to R1 -TM Transient Mobile Rome District property in Section 20 and
e
29: Township 31 South,'Range 38 East lying South of Fellsmere Road and East of
I-95. i
4. The decision for the rezoning of this property will be referred to
the Board of County Commissioners for their action on said rezoning at which
time the affiant proposes to abstain from voting because of the above conflict
of interest.
r
Sworn to and subscribed before me this j th day of October , 1977-
EDWIN S. SCMWCKER NOTARY PUBLIC, STA4E OF JWP,T..•DA AT LARGE
My Commission Expires:
M. CS Notary public, State of Florida et Large
C.%
,any Cwnmisaion Expires August' IS. 1478
W - 4i►-�`'-
Cwtly
B:="
W
LA-
W}
C] C.3 �.
U. u
i >!
m
o o 191977 A wa 316
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN STATED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED
NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF S. R. 512 AND 1-95, AND BORDERS ON A C-1
DISTRICT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY
VACANT, BUT IS FOR A PROPOSED KOA CAMPGROUND. THE ACCESS WILL BE
THROUGH 108TH AVENUE.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF WE HAVE ANY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS
FOR THIS TYPE CATEGORY, AND MR, BRENNAN REPLIED THAT THE SPECIFIC
CATEGORY IS R-1TM WHICH IS DESIGNED FOR OVERNIGHT TRANSIENT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BORDERING THIS
PROPERTY ON THE EAST, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT POSSIBLY THE ACCESS IS
NOT ADEQUATE.
MR. BRENNAN POINTED OUT THAT THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE
$ITE PLAN REVIEW AND IF THERE IS NOT. PROPER ACCESS,.IT WILL BE TURNED
DOWN AT THAT TIME. HE DID NOT BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN REFUSE ZONING
BASED ON INADEQUATE ACCESS AND NOTED THAT THEY DO HAVE A 40' RIGHT-
OF-WAY.
HARLAN PETERSON OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT STATED THAT Ro-ED
CORPORATION OWNS THE PROPERTY UP TO $TUCKEY'S, BUT HE DOES NOT KNOW
WHETHER OR NOT THEY OWN $TUCKEY'S, WHICH PROPERTY GOES UP TO FELLS -
MERE ROAD.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT THE HEARING BE RE-
CESSED UNTIL SOMEONE CAN RESEARCH TO DETERMINE WHO OWNS THROUGH TO
FELLSMERE ROAD, AND MR. PETERSON REQUESTED THAT THIS BE DONE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE RECESSED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR HALF AN
HOUR.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 3:55
O'CLOCK P.M.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED SO
THAT A MEETING OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD COULD BE
HELD.
68
®C, i 91977 8009 31 ma