HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/22/1978f
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1978
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH,
FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1978, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M.
PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT,
-JR.; EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; AND R. DON DEESON. ABSENT WAS VICE CHAIRMAN
ALMA LEE LAY, WHO WAS OUT OF THE COUNTRY. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G.
JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COORDINATOR., GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS; BAILIFF DAN FLEISHMAN; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY
CLERK,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,
AND REVEREND RICHARD C. "DICK" STEVENS, OF LIFE FOR YOUTH RANCH, GAVE
THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1978.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS
BE MADE:
PAGE 8, 3RD PARAGRAPH - "1977" BE CHANGED TO "1978."
PAGE 12, 5TH LINE - "DTERMINED" BE CORRECTED TO "DETERMINED."
PAGE 13, 6TH LINE - THE PHRASE "WITH NO INGRESS" BE CHANGED TO
READ "WITH LIMITED EGRESS..."
PAGE 14, 14TH PARAGRAPH - INSERT "THE" IN THE FIRST LINE PRECEDING
"REQUEST."
PAGE 15, 3RD PARAGRAPH - INSERT "THOMAS" AFTER "COORDINATOR" AND
INSERT "A" BEFORE "LETTER OF CREDIT."
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT THEN DISCUSSED PARAGRAPH 4 ON PAGE 22,
WHERE IT STATES " THIS ORDINANCE SHALL APPLY ONLY TO NEW CONSTRUCTION
OR ENLARGEMENT," WHICH FIE FELT DID NOT MAKE IT CLEAR THAT IN THE
LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE THE BOARD INTENDED TO REFER ONLY TO THE
PORTION THAT WAS ENLARGED,
FEB 2 21979
BOOK 34 PAU
ATTORNEY.COLLINS f ELT THE INTENT WAS CLEAR, BUT SUGGESTED
THAT THE PHRASE it IT BEING THE INTENT OF THE BOARD THAT THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE SHALL APPLY ONLY TO THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS"
BE INSERTED IN PARAGRAPH 4, PAGE 22, DIRECTLY AFTER THE ABOVE
QUOTATION, AND THE BOARD AGREED.
COMMISSIONER DEESON REQUESTED THAT ON PAGE 6, 5TH LINE,
"IN WEDNESDAYS" BE CORRECTED TO READ " ON WEDNESDAYS;" ON PAGE 14
LAST PARAGRAPH, "THEY HAVE NOW HAVE" BE CORRECTED TO READ It
THEY
NOW HAVE;" AND ON PAGE 79, 2ND PARAGRAPH, "MR. COLLINS" BE CORRECTED
TO READ "MR. CARSON."
® THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE,REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1978, AS
WRITTEN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A
PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF: CRITTENDEN F, BROTSCH
EDWARD E. KIRKLAND
ANNIE M E WHITE
ROBERT tNGBORG
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR
.JUDITH WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AND PETE SPYKE,
AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST, TO FORT PIERCE, MARCH 8, 1978, FOR A STAFF
MEETING WITH DR. CALLOWAY AND OTHER AGENTS IN THE AREA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ISSUANCE OF DUPLICATE TAX SALE
CERTIFICATE No. 181 TO W.A. BOWYER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE VIITNESS PAYROLL, CIRCUIT
COURT, FALL TERM, 1977, IN THE AMOUNT OF 166,68,
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
COUNTY COURT -SPECIAL TRUST FUND -RECEIPT FOR DEPOSIT OF
COUNTY FUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
2
FEB 2 219784.
r
P
#1288 - NOVEMBER, 1977 - $1,657.00
# Q - DECEMBER, 1977 - 853,p0
i - .JANUARY, 1978 - 1,634.00
TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME - JANUARY, 1978
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO
CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF HUGO E. SUHR, JR., AND JIMMIE MACK
ARTHUR COLLINS.
DISCUSSION AROSE IN REGARD TO THE REQUEST OF E. WAYNE
BAKER FOR A PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO REQUEST A MORE DETAILED
REASON FROM WAYNE BAKER IN WRITING AS TO WHY HE NEEDS A PERMIT TO CARRY
A CONCEALED FIREARM.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS DISCUSSED -WITH THE
BOARD AN APPLICATION BY ST. FRANCIS MANOR FOR A DOT GRANT FOR THE
PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A BUS TO TRANSPORT THE ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED
FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT, HE INFORMED THE BOARD THE DOT WOULD PAY
80%, AND THAT FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR
THE 20% MATCHING FUNDS,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED WHO WOULD MAN AND STAFF THIS VEHICLE,
COORDINATOR THOMAS STATED THAT HE APPROACHED THE AMBULANCE
SQUAD ABOUT SETTING UP A NON -EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, BUT THEY WISHED
TO STICK STRICTLY TO EMERGENCIES, HE NOTED, HOWEVER, THAT THERE ARE
ABOUT SIX FORMER AMBULANCE DRIVERS, WHO, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOW 65,
CAN NO LONGER DRIVE EMERGENCY VEHICLES, BUT CAN DRIVE NON -EMERGENCY
VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE MEN LIVE AT ST. FRANCIS MANOR, AND THEY ARE
WILLING TO FURNISH THIS SERVICE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THESE SERVICES WOULD BE AVAILABLE
TO ALL THE ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED IN THE COUNTY AND NOTED THAT A
BUS SERVICE IS ALREADY PROVIDED BY THE COUNCIL'ON AGING.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS STATED THAT THESE
SERVICES WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE COUNTYWIDE AND POINTED OUT THAT
THIS WOULD DIFFER FROM THE BUS SERVICE OFFERED BY THE COUNCIL ON
AGING, WHICH IS DONE ON A ROUTINE SCHEDULE AND A FIXED ROUTE.
3
34 mei
FEB 2 2 1978
THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED WHETHER THIS COULD BE BUDGETED
FOR NEXT YEAR INSTEAD OF BEING DONE ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS, AND
COORDINATOR THOMAS POINTED OUT THAT GRANTS BECOME AVAILABLE AT
DIFFERENT TIMES THROUGHOUT THE YEAR AND HAVE VARYING DEADLINES
WHICH MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT TO BUDGET FOR THIS CONTINGENCY, HE
NOTED THAT HE BELIEVES COMMISSIONER LOY FEELS THAT THIS IS A VERY
.MUCH NEEDED SERVICE,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT THE NECESSITY FOR A 15
PASSENGER BUS, AND THE COORDINATOR AND ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT IT
IS THE SMALLEST SIZE AVAILABLE THAT WILL SERVE THE PURPOSE AND
HAVE THE NEEDED REFINEMENTS, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DELIVERY DATE
COULD BE A CONSIDERABLE LENGTH OF TIME, POSSIBLY EVEN A YEAR,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION AS TO WHO WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE, INSURANCE,
OPERATING EXPENSES, ETC., AND ALSO WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOMEONE FROM
ST. FRANCIS MANOR EXPLAIN HOW THEY WILL MAKE THE BUS AVAILABLE TO
ALL RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTY,
THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT HE FELT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY FOR
THE BOARD TO HAVE A WRITTEN CONTRACT WITH ST. FRANCIS MANOR COVERING
THESE POINTS, AND THE ATTORNEY AGREED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INSTRUCTED .THE .INiERG-OVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR
TO ARRANGE FOR A MEMBER OF THE ST. FRANCIS MANOR BOARD TO COME BEFORE
THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADD TO TODAY'S AGENDA
AN EMERGENCY ITEM IN REGARD TO A COMMUNITY .AFFAIRS GRANT FOR THE SWIM
PROGRAM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE RECEIVED A LETTER ABOUT
THIS GRANT YESTERDAY AND THE DEADLINE FOR ANY ACTION ON IT IS FEB'
RUARY 28TH.
TERRENCE MARR, DIRECTOR OF THE YMCA, NOTED THAT LAST YEAR
THE COUNTY MADE A 50o MATCH ON A GRANT FOR THE SWIM PROGRAM, HALF
IN KIND AND HALF IN CASH.. HE CONTINUED THAT LAST FALL THE "Y°
APPLIED AGAIN, BUT SEVERAL OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN THE COUNTY ALSO
APPLIED SO THEY WITHDREW THEIR APPLICATION, THEREFORE, THE COUNTY
4
FEB 2 2* 1979 met 34 wa 0
r
COMMISSION HAS FOOTED THE BILL FOR THE SWIM PROGRAM THIS YEAR IN ITS
ENTIRETY. THE GRANT THEY ARE NOW DISCUSSING IS STRICTLY SUPPLEMEN-
ARY MONEY AND WOULD HAVE TO BE SPENT NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER OF NEXT
YEAR. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO SAY "EXPLORE MORE
FULLY" AND NOTED THAT THIS GRANT MIGHT AMOUNT TO AROUND $3,000, WHICH
THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE TO MATCH $750 IN CASH AND $750 IN KIND.
ON POTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
'SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 73-13 AUTHORIZING
COORDINATOR THOMAS TO SUBMIT THE APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
GRANT FOR THE SWIM PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
FEB 2 21979 fooK PACE l"S'
J •.J
RESOLUTION OR q(?ARXRVA%XX N0 .--78- 13
A RrSOLUT1014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
COUNTY) ,_Indi_an RiverCounty FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING AND DIRL•'CTING TILE I k j(XV/CHAIRMAN
OF THE BOA1;D) _gaar_t.Qf_CDun_ty Cormntuioners
TO SIGN AN AGRLE'MEHT WITH THE STATE' OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS UNDER THE FLORIDA
j FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ACT.
!I .
{ IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY TILE QMX/COUNTY OF
Indian River ,OF Indian River
COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. That the X%%/Chairman is hereby author-
ized and directed to sign in the name and on behalf of the City
Commission or the Board of County Commissioners an Agreement
between the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the
Indian River County under the Florida Financial Assistance
name of city or county)
for Community Services Act, as per copy attached hereto and made
part hereof.
Section II. That all funds necessary to meet the contract
obligations of the city, or county and its delegate agencies (if
applicable) with the Department have been appropriated and said
funds are unexpended and unencumbered and are available for pay-
ment as prescribed in the contract. The city -or county shall be
responsible for the funds for the local share notwithstanding the
fact.that all or part of the local share is to be met or contri-
buted by other source, i.e., contributions, other agencies or
organization funds.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF February 11978
,
°
APPROVED:
rS7(X3;'� or Chairir,an f County
Commissions
William C. Wodtke, Jr.
ATTEST:
Freda Wright, Clerk)
FEB 2 2 1978 Box
GRANT APPLICATION Page 1 of 7
(Type and Complete All Items)
Application for State Assistance Through the
'COMMUNITY SERVICES TRUST FUND
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ,
DIVISION OF COMMUNITY. SERVICES SUBMIT FOUR (4) COPIES
2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST OF THIS 1PPLICATION
TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 Due Date: "IARGH 15, 1978
1. Local Governmental Unit Applying for Grant:
Name: Indian River County Commission Telephone: (305 ) 562-4186
name of town, city or county)
Address: Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Fla. 32960
County: Indian River
2. Date Submitted: March 3, 1978
3. Official with over-all responsibility of grant: (Our Department will
contact this person should questions arise in the application process):
Name: Terrence D. Marr Tele?hone: ( 305) 562-9037
Address: 3705 16th St. -.Vero Beach, Fla. 32960
Sianature:
4. Due to new legislative requirements, all services must be certified by
the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) District
Administrator as not being duplicative. In -order to accomplish this
requirement, all applicants must contacL the District Administrator
prior to development of program proposals. Therefore, complete the
following:
HRS person contacted: Dr. Richard Grimm
(District Administrator)
Telephone: (305) 683-6603 Date: March 2, 1978
Contacted by: Terrence D. Marr
Telephone: ( 305) 562-9037
5. Following the completion of the grant application, formal approval of
the program proposal must be given by the HRS District Administrator.
Anvlications will not be accepted unless the following statement is
completed by the HRS Administrator:
11 _nr_ Richard Grimm , the District HRS Administrator
for District' .Jg , hereby certify one of the following statements of
fact:
�C 1. The particular services to be offered in the
signature) listed programs are not duplicative of'HRS proarams.
Although similar services may he available from HRS,
we cannot provide these particular services to these
clients without the use of this money.
2. HRS has made maximum use of federal funds for the
(signature) above listed program areas:
3. Funds for this program are available from HRS and
signature) the applicant will be eligible for funding during
the current grant period. The applicant should con-
tact Mr./Ms. for further
information.
Page 1-C
FEB 2219.7
r
GRAVT APPLICATION Page 2 of 7
Local Governmental Unit Applying: Indian RiVer-County Commission
name of town, city, county,etc.)
Answer these questions for each program. (Attach additional sheets if
necessary.)
6. Explain why this program is needed.
This program is needed in order to provide worthwhile Summer involvement
for low income Youths situated in the outlying Rural Areas of this County.
Most have been deprived of such an involvement in the past because of a lack
of transportation and being unable to afford private camps.
Further, this program will enhance the intellectual growth of those
involved by exposing them to experiences normally out of the reach of children
of low income house holds.
7. Describe the financial status of persons to be served by this
program. How many persons will be served? Duplicated?
unduplicated? 245
Nearly 90% of the children involved will come from families whose income
falls below the Federal .Poverty Guidlines. We plan to integrate this group with
children from higher income families in order to broaden social involvement
and awareness.
A minimum of 245 different children will be served for a 10 week period.
6:y
8. How will this program be integrated with other programs serving
the same type of persons? What other social service agencies will
be contacted?
This program will be integrated with the YMCA'S Summer Camp Program
utilizing YMCA staff to instruct and using the YI=C:! Pool for instructional
Swimming Lessons. Also, we will work closely with the Youth Involvement Program
of the Economic Opportunities Council, ensuring that a maximum number of children
become involved. The County School Board will also be involved, for they will
provide transportation and lunch at no cost to the participants.
9. Explain how recipients of public assistance will benefit from
this program.
They will benefit greatly in that instead of having nothing to do
all Summer they will be able to continue their physical, moral and
intellectual growth by becoming involved in this program. They will be
exposed to numerous cultural experiences and will develop an increased
social awareness by being involved with children from all Social Strata.
Finally, they will receive a nutritionally sound meal each noon.
(Applications will not be processed unless
All questions are answered in detail)
Page 2-C
FEB 2 21978 pra
W
rn
E GRANT APPLICATION Page 3 of 7
Local Governmental Unit Applying: Indian River County Commission
� Town, -County, or City)
00 10. WORK PROGRAM -Plan cLf Operation •
(Use one sheet for each Program)
1. Program Title: A Worthwhile Summer Person Responsible:
'TLmrrPnrP D_ Marr 567-00
telep one
2. Program Objectivies 3. Major Activities and Substeps 4. Planned Results
Through Through Through Throug
i2f3_1_/_7-:? 4741-/-74 6-1-34/7.& 9/30/78
To provide free Recreation and Instruction
to approximately 245 low income Children
(ages 5-14) for 10 weeks this summer. This
program will be for those children living
in the North or West County area and will
be held on the premises of a North County
School and at the Vero Beach YMCA complex.
The aim is to offer organized athletic
activities for the Children; to provide
classes in Music, Drama, and Art; and to
teach all Non -Swimmers how to swim. The
latter. is 60% of the total of 245 children
or 147.
CPU
0
cs
R
W
Each morning at 8A.M. County school busses will
transport the children to the new North
County Middle School. Here children will be
grouped by age and scheduled into daily activi-
ties. Lunch will be provided for them by the
County.
During the day all children will be transported
to the YMCA to be taught how to swim or to im-
prove existing skills. YMCA Staff will instruct
in swimming and also act as group leaders and
staff at the School.
Children will be transported home at 5P.M. by
County School busses.
Page 3-C
To provide meaningfu Summer Recreation and
Education to 245 chi dren of low income Fam$
lies. Also, to teach approximate'y 147 Non -
Swimmers in that gro p of 245 how to swim.
The other 98 will re eive advanc d Swimming
Instruction to impro a on existi g skills.
1
1
C
GRANT APPLICATION Page 4 of 7
Name of. Applicant: Indian River County Commission
Fiscal Officer Responsi'hle for Grant:
Name: Mr. William Jackson Finance Officer
Address: County Courthouse 2145
Telephone: j305, 562-7927
1. RF. VEN UE
11. TOTAL BUDGET
(Include figures from all programs operated)
6
1. State Grant _ _ _ _ _
2. Cash match (- federal -f i - -- - - - - - 4130.00
- T • _ i nds, ex9eQt „•XeVeauQ sha��� aj1•DWed) 2065.00
3. I`n-Kxnd Match 3100.00
------------------ -- 9295.00
r1'AXTr•F ADMINISTPATTVF F.XPENSF
5. Salaries 0
6. Pental --
SLace-------------- - - - - -- 0
7. Travcol---------- -- - - -- - - -
R. Suonl i -es - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -
9. Otho -r. (s -re ifv on attachment) - ` - - - ` - - '-' - �-
10. Total-(lints_5'throuah,9) - _ _ ` , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
DELEGATE ADMTNISTRATIVF. FXPENSF
11. Salaries _ - ' '- -' - 1100 in kind 1,139.00
12. Rental Space -
13. Travel -----------------------
14. SupnIies-------------- - - - - -. - --
15. Other .(specify --on attachmentT ` - -' - - - "
i 16. Total (lines _ _ 11 through 16) _ _- - - _- - _` _- - _- _` _ 1,p05 00
17. - - An!%�INISTP•A- - -C- - (Line 10 -and -Line 16)
GRANTEF PP.OGRAM EXPENSE
18. Salaries
19. Rental_Space- - - - - - - " - 0
20. Travel ---------------------- 0
21. Rq'd cment---------------- - - - - -- 0
0
22. Other (sneci fv on attachments ` ` - ` _ - "' " '" "' - 0
23. Total dines 1R tthrouah 22) - - ` - ` -
Drj.PgATr Pnn!'Z*;A*, FXPF.NSF
24. Salaries 2000 in kind 5,600.00
•2.5. penial Snacc� "------------ -- �-
26. Tr -ANY -01 - - - - - - - - -------- - - - --- OE
M-
26.
1�:c,Livmc- - -_ _ - 365.00
nt ------------- ---
2R, ntrhor. (s- -i v -on attachment) 425.00
29. Total (lines 2Q tu
hrogh 2Aj - - - ` - - - `" - - - _ 200.00
30. Tn..AL rrnrt:>m r'<pr�1SF.S (Line -23 and line 29) $ 090.00
31. TOTAL 1?XP?^JntTtTRFS (Linc' -17 and l.ine_30)- - - - - - •- 9,295.00
g0LE: TOTAL PrVEN11F MUST rQUAL TOTAI, EXPENDITURES
*"ay not exceed 15Y, of 2 times the state Brant
RXAMPI, :: State Crant 10,000
Cash Match 5,000
In -Kind Match in, non
TOTAL 1tKVY'.91TE, -25,006
"axiT-nm Adrlini.r.trai-ive Cnst.s - 15t of 2 x $10,000 (State Grant-)
15% of 20,000
Page 4-C
FEB2 21979oo�c :+
11
1
F��
GRANT APPLICATION Page 5 of 7
Local Governmental Unit Applying: Indian River..County Commission
(Town, County, or Cxty)
12. Casa and In -Kind Match
I. Cash Match
Source
1. Indian_Riyer County Commission
2.
3.
4.
(Continue On Separate Sheet if Necessary)
II. In -Kind Match
A. Salaries and Benefits
Position Title and Name of Person
1. Exec. Dir.
Terrence D. Marr
2. Aouatics Dir.
Dudley C. Duncan
3. Proeram Dir.
Michelle Van D.vke
4. _Cama Dir.
Arthur Jones
(Continue On
Separate Sheet if Necessary)
B. Other In -Kind
on line 2, page
Description
Source
1.
, 1
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
6.
6.
7.
7.
Amount
1. 2065.00
A
Unit Costs
(or cost per
square feet
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Number of Units
(or number of
square feet)
1.,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
TOTAL MATCH PROVIDED 5165.00
Page 5-C
Amount (Unit cost'(X) number of urits)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. 3100.00 *,
Total In -Kind Match 3100.00
*This figure must equal the figure
specified on line 3, page 4.
9-
4D
Total
Cash Match
2065.00
*This
figure must
equal the figure specified
on line 2, page
4.'
Number
of Hours
Hourly
Rate
To Be Worked
Amount (hourly rate (X) number of
hours to be worked)
1.
8.00
1.
50
1.
400.00
2.
5.00
2.
100
2.
500.00
3.
5.00
3.
400
3.
2,000.00
4.
4.00
4.
50
4.
200.00
Unit Costs
(or cost per
square feet
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Number of Units
(or number of
square feet)
1.,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
TOTAL MATCH PROVIDED 5165.00
Page 5-C
Amount (Unit cost'(X) number of urits)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. 3100.00 *,
Total In -Kind Match 3100.00
*This figure must equal the figure
specified on line 3, page 4.
9-
4D
GRANT APPLICATION Page 6 of 7
Local novernmental Unit Applyincr: Indian River County Commission
town, county, or city
13.CONTRACTTTAL TNFbRMATTt1N - Complete. one for each Delegate Agency
General
Mame of. Deleaate Acrencv: Vero Beach YMCA
Address: 3705 16th st. Vero Beach, Fla. 32960
Contact Person: Terrence D. Marr
Telephone: _(305 ) 562-9037
Tax Exempt Numher: * 05-00162-00-41
*If none, -attach a copy of the certificate of incorporation
DELEGATE AnENCY BUDGET FOR THIS PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATIVE FXPFNSFS
1. Salaries1100 in kind 16 hrs. at 3 1139.00
2. Rental-STace- _ _------------------
3. Travel- ---------_ -.----------- 4
0.
4. RuEpli;s-- --- -- ----- .-------
5. Other (specify on attachment) - - - - - - p�
6. *?'OTAL (lines-1^throu_________________ 1205.00
PROCPAM FXPFNSPS
7. Salaries _ _ _ _ _ 2000 in kind 5600.00
8'. Dental S-aace_ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ - - - - - - - 1500.00
9: Travel- ----------_- __------ 365.00
10. FouiFment _ - - - - - 425.00
11. Other (speci___v_on attachment_] - - - - - - - - •-- - 200.00
12. TOTAL (lines 7 tFirouoh 11.) - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ 8090.00
13. TOTAL EXPFNSE.S-(line-6-and-line 12) - - - - - - - - - 9295.00
�Mav not exceed 15% of line 13.
THE DRLFGI+TF. Arr ICY HEREBY APPROVES THIS APPLICATION AND ]JILL COMPLY
'KITH ALL QTILFS, VFC-TTLATTONS AND CONTRACTS RELATING THERETO:
hPVVnt1FD nv: Exec. Director YMCA
(Title) Signature)
ATTESTPD Rv: Administrative Secretary
Title S.io a�ture
Page 6-C
' s •
I
GRANT APPLICATION Page 7 of 7
Local Governmental Unit Applying: Indian River County Commission
14. THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT THE DATA IN THIS APPLICATION AND
ITS VARIOUS SECTIONS INCLUDING BUDGET DATA, ARE TRUE AND
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE AND THAT THE
FILING OF THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED AND UNDER-
STANDS THAT IT WILL BECOME PART OF THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
DEPARTMENT AND THE APPLICANT. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS-
SIONERS (OR THE CITY COUNCIL) WILL PASS A RESOLUTION WHICH
AUTHORIZES THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE SPECIFIED PROGRAMS.
IF FEES OR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TO BE UTILIZED AS MATCHING FOR
THIS GRANT, OR IF A DELEGATE AGENCY IS TO PROVIDE THE MATCHING
SHARE, AND THESE FUNDS ARE NOT FORTHCOMING, THIS RESOLUTION
ALSO SPECIFIES THAT THE CITY OR COUNTY WILL PROVIDE THE NECES-
SARY MATCH.
_-THE APPLICANT FURTHER CERTIFIES, DUE TO NEW LEGISLATIVE INTENT
,,�_.__NpT TO DUPLICATE SERVICES AND-THAT,THESE PARTICULAR SERVICES
ARE NOT BEING PROVIDED NOR ARE THEY AVAILABLE FROM ANY OTHER
-STATE AGENCY. ALTHOUGH SIMILAR SERVICES MAYBE AVAILABLE, THE
-APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT NO OTHER RESOURCE EXISTS TO PROVIDE
`-"'THESE PARTICULAR -SERVICES TO -THESE CLIENTS WITHOUT THE'USE OF
` THIS MONEY.
Wiliam C. odtke, Jr.
1
i — Name (typed) - ----Signature
Chairman Board missionerg
Title (Mayor or Chairman of Board of County Commissioners)
Indian River County Courthouse = -- = - -- ---- .-
2145 14th Ave.
--Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 - = --
Address
ti
1305) 569-1940
Telephone
ATTESTED BY: Freda WRfght— - -
Name typed)Signature
Page 7-C
FEB 2 2 1978
MR. MARR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE IS ALSO PRESIDENT OF
THE ECONOMIC.OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL, WHICH IS APPLYING FOR FIVE VE-
HICLES UNDER A DOT TRANSPORTATION GRANT, AND THE YMCA IS ALSO APPLY-
ING FOR A VEHICLE. HE STATED THAT THE GRANT PROPOSAL WOULD BE PUT
TOGETHER CONTINGENT ON THE YMCA GETTING A VEHICLE TO ENLARGE THEIR
INVOLVEMENT WITH THE NORTH COUNTY AREA WHERE TRANSPORTATION IS A
LARGE PROBLEM. HE STATED THIS WOULD BE USED IN THE SUMMER CAMP PRO-
GRAMS, AND HE FELT THE FORTH COUNTY IS IN DESPERATE NEED OF A
SUMMER PROGRAM.
COMMISSIONER DEESON AGREED WITH MR. MARR THAT ONE OF THE
NORTH COUNTY'S MAIN PROBLEMS IS TRANSPORTATION.
ZONING DIRECTOR DEWEY WALKER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD IN
REGARD TO A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ORDINANCE 74-20 REQUESTED BY LEWIS
AND RITA ROMMEL. THE ROMMELS HAVE SUBMITTED A DEED SHOWING THAT THEY
HAVE OWNED THIS PROPERTY SINCE .JANUARY OF 1971, AND THEY NOW WISH
TO BUILD A HOME ON THEIR PROPERTY. ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER STATED
THAT THIS PROPERTY IS JUST SOUTH OF KINGS MUSIC LAND SUBDIVISION
AND WEST OF KINGS HIGHWAY. IT IS ON A PRIVATE ROAD AND THERE ARE
25' EASEMENTS WHICH ALLOW INGRESS AND EGRESS.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS AGREED THAT THIS WOULD AUALIFY FOR
A ROUTINE SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION
TO ORDINANCE 74-20 To LEWIS AND RITA ROMMEL.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER THEN REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD THE
REQUEST OF THE FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FOR ABANDONMENT OF A 60`
EASEMENT BETWEEN THEIR LOTS 6-10, BLOCK 2, AND 11-15, BLOCK 2, LONE
PALM PARK SUBDIVISION,UNIT N0. 1. MR. WALKER STATED THAT THIS IS
ACTUALLY A 60' ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 12TH PLACE, WHICH IS A PLATTED
ROAD, BUT THERE IS NO ROAD BUILT THERE AT THIS TIME. THE CHURCH
IS ALREADY BUILT AND THIS EASEMENT IS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THEIR
PROPERTY.
FEB 2 21979 B0 �; I
11 1
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THIS DATES BACK TO THE
OLD mBOOM It DAYS, AND HE SEES NO REASON FOR NOT ABANDONING THIS OLD
RIGHT-OF-WAY WHICH SERVES NO PURPOSE,
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT SINCE THIS WOULD BE A VACATION
OF A PLATTED STREET, IT WILL REQUIRE PUBLICATION AND NOTICE,
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER $IEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESQN, TO AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF ABAN-
DONMENT OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY,
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE APPLICANT
SHOULD PAY FOR THE ADVERTISEMENT,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION, IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
COMMISSSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS A
LIST OF RECOMMENDED MEMBERS FOR THE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE,
CONSISTING OF FRED BAKER, DOROTHEA MCGRIFF, LEON YOUNG, BILL KOOLAGE,
BOB GRICE AND MRS, PEARL JACKSON, WHO IS WITH THE MIGRANT PROGRAM,
HE NOTED THAT SEVERAL OF THESE PEOPLE HAVE SEMINARS THEY MUST ATTEND
SO THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE THEIR FIRST MEETING UNTIL THE WEEK
OF MARCH 8TH,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT HE HAD ALREADY APPOINTED DOROTHEA
MCGRIFF AND LEON YOUNG TO THIS COMMITTEE AND WOULD APPOINT THE OTHERS
AT THIS TIME,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER $IEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0, 78-12 FORM-
ALLY MAKING THE RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENTS TO THE HOUSING ADVISORY
COMMITTEE,
01
FEB22 1978 Boa 34 pau 1
t
RESOLUTION NO. 78-12
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the following members are
appointed to the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
and the County Commission Representative shall be named as
Chairman of that Committee:
Willard W. SIEBERT, JR. Chairman
FRED BAKER
DORETHEA McGRIFF
LEON YOUNG
WILLIAM KOOLAGE
BOB GRICE
PEARL JACKSON
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 22nd
day of February , 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
William C. Wodtke, Jr., C airman
Attest:
Freda Wright, Cl k
E B 2 2.1979 PA. -UE
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
7
a 2 ixA7 J
/ r
In the matter of l"
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of f/t��'%� ��/ 9711
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this 4 day of A.D.—I'779
(Bus Manager)) U)/, A,
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian RiV;d County, Florida)
(SEAU
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will receive sealed bids to the
hour of 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, February 22,
1978, for the following:
Aerial Photo coverage of Indian
River County, Florida
Instructions to Bidders, specifications and
bidding forms are available at the office of the
County Administrator, Room 115, County
Court House, or will be mailed upon request.
The Board of County Commissioners
reserves the right to reject any or all of the
bids and make awards in any manner which
the Board considers to be in the best interest of
Indian River County, Fiorida.
Bids for the above item shall be submitted in
an envelope securely sealed and marked on the
outside to show the item being bid on and the
date and time of the opening. The bids may be
mailed or delivered to the Office of the County
Administrator, Room 115, County Court House,
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960. Proposals
received after 9:30 a.m. February 22, 1978, will
be returned unopened.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA
BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
MISSIONERS
By: William C. Wodtke Jr.
Chairman
Jan. 2S, 29,1978.
8COK 34. PACE 17
11 •
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED
AND READ:
KUCERA AND ASSOCIATES, INC., L.AKELAND
FIRST SET AERIAL PHOTOS
• SECOND SET ORDERED AT SAME TIME
CONTINENTAL AERIAL SURVEYS, INC., BARTOW
SINGLE SET AERIAL PHOTOS
TWO SETS
ABRAMS AERIAL SURVEY CORP., ST. PETERSBURG
505 SHEETS
HAMRICK AERIAL SURVEYS, INC., CLEARWATER
ONE SET AERIAL PHOTOS
$14,393.00
$ 7,525.00
$28,91.1..25
$42,672.50
$14,910.00
$1.7,675.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED
TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER FOR EVALUATION.
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Board
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
of County Commissioners of Indian River
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
County, Florida, will receive bids to the hour oP
9:30 a.m. Wednesday, February 22, 1978, for
the following:
a �f �,
Fire Extinguisher Service for Indian
River County for the year beginning
� _
March 1, 1978
15"z
in the matter of 14 • ZZ'( ,/
Specifications, instruction to bidders and
bidding blanks are available at the office of the
County Administrator, Room 115, County
Court House, r I bmailedon request.
TheBoardof County- Commissioners s
reserves the right to reject any or all of the
bids and make awards in any manner which
the Board considers to be in the best interest of
In the Court, was pub-
Indian River County, Florida.
Bids for the above item shall be submitted in
[�
25 / �7Vf/
ane nvelope securely sealed and marked on the
outside to show the item being bid
lisped in said newspaper in the issues of ���% (
on and the
7•'
date and time of the opening. The bids may be
mailed or delivered to the Office of the County
Administrator, Room 115, County Court House,
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960. Proposals
received alter 9:30 a.m., February 22, 1978,
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
will be returned unopened.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
County, paper has heretofore
Vero Beach, in said Indian River Count and that the said news
BOARD OF COUNTY COM -
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
MISSION E RS
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
By: William C. Wodtke Jr.
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
Chairman
fisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
Jan. 25, 29.
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
t
Sworn to and subscribed before me this y f A.D. Ld
IB7invb. Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian Rivet County, Florida)
(SEAL) 9
FEB 2 2.1976 Bea 3 4 PAA 8
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF.BIDS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE IOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED
AND READ:
INDIAN RIVER FIRE EQUIPMENT, FT. PIERCE
ANNUAL INSPECTION AND TAGGING OF ALL
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 75� EACH
SEPARATE PRICES SET OUT FOR RECHARGING
ALL TYPES AND WEIGHTS OF EXTINGUISHERS
A A FIRE EQUPTMENT OF VERO BEACH
ANNUAL INSPECTION AND TAGGING OF ALL
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 1.25 EACH
` SEPARATE PRICES SET OUT FOR RECHARGING ALL
TYPES AND WEIGHTS OF EXTINGUISHERS
VERO BEACH FIRE EQUIPMENT, FT. PIERCE
ANNUAL INSPECTION AND TAGGING OF ALL
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 75� EACH
SEPARATE PRICES SET OUT FOR RECHARGING ALL
TYPES AND WEIGHTS OF EXTINGUISHERS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION.
THE HOUR OF 0:30 O`CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT:
10
ma 34 pArx
f
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a ---
In the matter of
in the —Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of—
Affiant
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this y of -4'` A.D. 17Y
(Bu i Manager)
� c /
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian Rjp� County, Florida)
(SF.AU
4
NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE
Pursuant to Florida Statute 125.35, the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will accept written bids to the
hour of 9.30 o'clock a.m., Wednesday,
February 22, 1978, for the cash purchase of the
following described County property:
S.W. Va of S.W. 1/4, South of South Relief
Canal Described on the tax roll as 13-33-39-00-
5000-040.0.
The Board of County Commissioners reserve
the right to reject any or all bids and make
awards in any manner which the Board con-
siders to be in the best interest of Indian River
I County, Florida.
All bids shall be for a cash purchase, in
writing by legal description as listed above and
shall include a check payable to Indian River
County for ten percent (10 percent) of the bid
price — with the balance due five (5I days
after acceptance — submitted in an envelope
securely sealed and marked on the outside
"SEALED BID FOR COUNTY LAND —
FEBRUARY 22,1978, AT 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M."
The bids may be mailed or delivered to the
office of the County Administrator, Room 115,
County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida,
32960. Proposals received after 9:30 a.m. on
February 22, 1976, will be returned unopened.
BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
MISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
William C. Wodtke Jr.
Chairman
Jan. 29, Feb. 5, 1918.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED
AND READ:
ROBERT Ar VAN MATTA, ATTORNEY, AS
AUTHORIZED BY MOHAWK HOMES,.INC,
$6,100.00
IT WAS NOTED THAT I.N AN APPRAISAL DONE ON THIS PROPERTY BY
FLOYD WILKES, THE FAIR MARKET VALUE 14AS SET AT $2,500.00.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF ROBERT A. VAN MATTA,
ATTORNEY, AS AUTHORIZED BY MOHAWK HOMES, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,100.00, ON TAX PARCEL NO. 13-33-39-00-5000-040.0, SUBJECT TO
ATTORNEY COLLINS CHECKING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
11
FEB 2 21978 4 m
ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG INTRODUCED TO THE BOARD THE NEW
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER, DAVID MARSH, WHO WILL BE WORKING ON THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES OF FELLSMERE AND
SEBASTIAN.
MR. BERG THEN DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD PLANS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF WABASSO BEACH PARK. HE STATED THAT HE AND MR. PANGBURN,
DIRECTOR OF THE WABASSO CIVIC ASSOCIATION, VISITED THE PARK TOGETHER,
AND THEY AGREE THAT THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS THERE NOW ARE TRAFFIC AND
MISUSE OF THE DUNE AREA. MR. BERG PRESENTED THE BOARD WITH A
SUGGESTED PLAN WHICH PROPOSES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE-WAY ROAD
SYSTEM WITH A TURN -AROUND AND PARKING AREAS AS A POSSIBLE FIRST STAGE
OF DEVELOPMENT. MR, BERG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT PROMISCUOUS DRIVING
AND PARKING IS HURTING THE DUNE LINE, AND THEY ARE RECOMMENDING THAT
POLES BE EMBEDDED IN THE GROUND ENCIRCLING THE TURN -AROUND AND STRUNG
WITH HEAVY WIRE TO HELP CONTROL THIS PROBLEM. MR. BERG CONTINUED
THAT HE HAS OBTAINED A ROUGH ESTIMATE ON THE ASPHALT REQUIRED FOR
THE PAVING, WHICH WOULD AMOUNT TO ALMOST $8,000, BUT AS YET HE HAS
NO INFORMATION ON THE COST OF THE PROPOSED BOARDWALK AND RAMPS,
MR, BALL OF SUMMERPLACE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ON A
RECENT WEEKDAY, HE COUNTED OVER 1.00 VEHICLES PARKED AT WABASSO REACH
PARK, INCLUDING SOME BIG MOBILE CAMPERS.
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED
PLAN CALLS FOR 37 PARKING PLACES, AND MR. BERG POINTED OUT THAT
NOW VEHICLES PARK ALMOST ANYWHERE, INCLUDING ON THE DUNES,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED IF WE ARE GOING TO DO THIS
PROJECT, WE SHOULD DO A REALLY FIRST CLASS JOB, BUT SUGGESTED THAT
THE FIRST PHASE WOULD BE TO PUT IN JUST THE ROAD SYSTEM, NOT THE
PARKING. HE FELT A SECOND PHASE WOULD BE TO PUT IN A CONCESSION
STAND, PUT IT OUT FOR BID, AND THEN MAKE THE CONCESSIONAIRE THE
CARETAKER.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT ANY TIME STATE FUNDS ARE USED, IT PROHIBITS A CONCESSION
STAND.
1:2
FEB 2 2 1978 34 rux
_
r
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT THE LAND PURCHASED
WITH STATE FUNDS IS THE LAND TO THE NORTH, AND HE FELT THIS WOULD
NOT APPLY TO THE REMAINING AREA,
BETTY WINTERMUTE STATED THAT WATER IS REALLY NEEDED AT
THE PARK, AND SHE FELT THERE SHOULD BE PROVISIONS MADE FOR THIS
WITH POSSIBLY A PUMP HOUSE AND SHOWERS. SHE ALSO STATED THAT SHE
WOULD HATE TO SEE THE ACCESS TO THE PARK LOCKED AT NIGHT AND FELT
THAT JUST THE FACILITIES SHOULD BE FENCED OFF.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT ONE OF THE BIG
ABUSES OF THE PARK IS CAMPERS PARKING OVERNIGHT, AND DISCUSSION
FOLLOWED AS TO THE POSSIBILITY OF A WALKWAY THAT COULD BE LEFT OPEN
FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO FISH AT NIGHT.
IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME TO
PUT IN ANY FACILITIES WITHOUT PUTTING UP A FENCE AND HAVING SOME
TYPE OF SECURITY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT IF A CONCESSION
STAND IS ALLOWED, IT COULD ALSO HOUSE RESTROOMS AND SHOWERS AND
POSSIBLY SOMEONE COULD LIVE THERE, WHICH HAS WORKED OUT WELL AT
HOBART PARK. HE NOTED, HOWEVER, BEFORE SUCH FACILITIES COULD BE
PUT IN',' WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A FENCE AND BE ABLE TO CLOSE THE
PARK AT NIGHT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT BEFORE CONSIDERING INSTALL-
ING ANY FACILITIES, WE MUST DETERMINE THE COST OF A FENCE PLUS
GATES,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED WE GO AHEAD AND PAVE THE
ROAD AND THE PARKING LOT AND THEN GO FROM THERE.
ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG AGREED, NOTING THAT THIS IS AN
INITIAL STEP THAT WOULD NOT BE GREATLY AFFECTED BY VANDALISM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT SOME CIVIC
ORGANIZATION MIGHT TAKE THIS PARK ON AS A PROJECT AND ASSIST THE
COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER DEESON FELT THAT IT IS IMPORTANT TO GET
13
FEB 221978
SOME KIND OF CROSS-OVER TO PROTECT THE DUNES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
AND ALSO INSTALL POLES STRUNG WITH WIRE TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM
DRIVING OVER THE DUNES, DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO SETTING
POLES ALONG THE SETBACK LINES ON THE BEACH, AND IT WAS DECIDED TO
LEAVE THIS TO THE DISCRETION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR,
KEN PANGBURN COMPLAINED OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE PORT -0 -LETS
AND.ASKED IF THEY COULDN'T BE STABILIZED SO THEY COULDN'T BE TIPPED
OVER EASILY.
THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT THESE PORT -O -LETS ARE
LEASED AND STATED THAT HE WOULD FORWARD THEIR REQUEST TO THE PORT -
0 -LET COMPANY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED PROCEEDING WITH THE PLAN
SUBMITTED FOR THE PAVING OF THE.ENTRANCEWAY AND THE PARKING AND
REQUESTED THAT THE ASSISTANT PLANNER COME BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
WITH SOME FIGURES FOR INSTALLATION OF FENCING AND CROSSOVERS FOR THE
DUNES.
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED.
TO -WIT:
14
FEB 2108 Boa 4 pAcE z
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA NOTI CE
NOTICE ISHEREBY IGIVEN thattheBoard
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath of County Commissioners Indian River
er of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a week) newspaper County, Florida, will hold a public
blic hearing on
says that he is Business Manager y p per published February 22,.1978 at 11:00 o'clock a.m. at the
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being Indian River County Courthouse to consider
the adoption of
An Ordinance relating to the times during
a , the week that alcoholic beverages may besold,
consumed or served or permitted to be served
or consumed in any plac& holding a license
in the matter of % [� ,�!_��Q i��/ under the State Beverage Division of Florida,
defining the term alcoholic beverage,
] providing for enforcement and penalties for
violations,
providing FCOUNTY U NT Y C O
effective
BOARD M-
L//� MISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: William C. WodtkeJr.,
In the Court, was pub- Chairman
Jan. 25,1976.
lished in said newspaper In the issues of �r nz� / 7
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tiserrent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. y� q
X i/ Cv( �.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this n day of '� A.D.
tO
I
07L
Manager)
(SF.AU (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian R` r County, Florida)
CHAIRMAN WODTKE..INFORMED THOSE PRESENT THAT ALL THE
MUNICIPALITIES IN THE COUNTY HAVE BEEN CONTACTED AS TO THEIR
INTENTIONS IN REGARD TO ESTABLISHING HOURS FOR SERVING ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES. HE THEN READ ALOUD THE FOLLOWING LETTERS RECEIVED
FROM THE MUNICIPALITIES AND INSTRUCTED THAT THEY BE MADE A PART
OF THE MINUTES.
15
FEB 2 21978`800K 34 PAcE 2
k
ti
r '
i
' i 1
/ f
t � t
au It 0/'
ROUTE 2, BOX 66, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
. % 2
MAYOR, GEORGE LIER n �.•� .. ,
VICE MAYOR, ANNE DENBY MICHAEL January 10, 1978
TOWN CLERK,)46Kq&X*X*Wt•YSW /,� •, , `'
Wanda H. Anderson
r• „
P0rc>•
e�
,'
Board of County Commissioners �''"J(" '
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Flo+ida 32960
Gentlemen:
At a meeting today of the council members of the Town of Orchid
it was voted to remain neutral on the subject of the hours of closing of bars in
Indian River County at this time as there are no bars in the Town of Orchid.
Therefore, we have no comments either for or against the closing hours of bars
in Indian River County at this time.
Sincerely,
George O. Lier, Mayor
S
FEB 2 21979
Book34 PAuE J
P
4
• r
City of Vero Beach
P, 0. BOX 1389 - 1053 - 20th PLACE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA - 32960 3 A
Tdep&ve 567-5151
OFFICE OF THE n J 1/�`I �),
MAYOR U/ I
�.:` 8
• ti ���'l;l�i`s t�
N DBOARD COpNiy ;
January 4, 1978 Lc•`:
The Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman, Indian River County Commission
2145 - 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Chairman Wodtke,
The Vero Beach City Council, at its Regular Meeting,
January 3, 1978, considered your letter of December 28th
and Resolution No. 77-126, regarding the extension of
hours to serve alcoholic beverages. Following discus-
sion, Council voted four -zero to deny any extension of
hours to serve alcoholic beverages within the corporate
limits of the City of Vero Beach.
We truly appreciate your asking tie City to consider
this matter.
aerely,
Don C. Scurlock, Jr y
Mayor
DCS:cp
"f7ly of lkaulifid lieadjel„
FEB 2 21979 .34 PAGE
'.4
ol
• r
e
00) Of SCbmtlftn
s
POST OFFICE BOX 127 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
Pat Flood, Jr. TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330 Florence L. Phelan
Mayor City Clerk
January 10, 1978
Mr. William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
2145 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Wodtke:
The City Council, at its Regular Meeting on
January 1978, unanimously agreed not to extend the
closing hour of the bars in the City of Sebastian.
Sincerely,
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Florence L. Phelan
City Clerk
FLP/ec
"H 6 M F. O F P R L I C A N I S L A N D"
�+�
F E B 2 219 i ��� i
FEB 2-2 1978
34
f
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
600I NORTH A -I -A
INDIAN RIVER SHORES, FLORIDA 32960
Telephone: AC 305-562-1736
Council Members
J. NOLAN, Mayor
CHESTER E. CLEM
Town Attorney
EDWARD
SUZANNE M. BODEN, Vice -Mayor
JAMES W. YOUNG
FRIZZ E. CIERHART
PAUL X PARENT
Town Clerk
ROBERT F. LLOYD
THAD D. WILKINS
Town Engineer
January 27, 1978
U
Mr. William C. Wodtke, Jr. Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
2145 - 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Wodtke:
At a Council Meeting held on 26 January 78,
it
was decided not to make any changes in our
present ordinances pertaining to hours of sale
of alcoholic beverages.
It appears that when the County makes a change,
the Town Council will change our ordinance
to
be compatible with the County's.
Yours very truly,.
Edward J. Nolan
Mayor
Town of Indian`liver
Shores
EJN: em
FEB 2-2 1978
34
,
C
• I
• • 1 a
`CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
PHONE: 571.0116
POLICE DEPT.
PHON€: 671-1360 , ig of L172�
11 � ire g
• .. `��dd� INDIAN RIVERCOUNTY�• '' ��
POST OFFICE SOE 96
FELLSMERE. FLORIDA - 32948
0.
January 13, 1978 {{����; Vic_, yy
L: Bp ' 0:j00
Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Chairman Wodtke:
At its Regular Council Meeting on January 12, 1978,
the Fellsmere City Council unanimously voted to oppose the
extention of hours of liqueur service in Indian River County.
HDS/jm
FEB 221976
Sincerely,
AA
11omer D. Simpson
Alayor of Fe 1.1smere
BOOK 34 ixa
t I
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT A LETTER HAS BEEN RECEIVED
FROM ATTORNEY SAMUEL BLOCK ON BEHALF OF THE RETAIL LIQUOR BUSINESSES
IN THE COUNTY REQUESTING THAT THEIR PETITION FOR EXTENSION OF THE
HOURS BE WITHDRAWN. HIS LETTER IS HEREBY MADEA PART OF THE MINUTES
0
JAMES T. VOCELLE
FRED T. GALLAGHER
SAMUEL A. BLOCK
LAW OFFICES
VOCELLE, GALLAGHER & BLOCK
401 COMMERCIAL BANK BUILDING
POST OFFICE Box 1900
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
February 21, 1978
Mr. William Wodtke, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
Florida
Dear Mr. Wodtke;
TELEPHONE
(305) 567-3424
On behalf of the retail liquor businesses in this county, which I
represent, I herewith request that the Petition for Extension of
the hours of sale of alcoholic beverages in this county be with-
drawn.
On behalf of the retail liquor businesses which i represent, I
wish to request that when the County Commissioners adopt an
ordinance setting out the closing hours for businesses dispensing
alcoholic beverages, that the closing hours not be earlier than
those set out in the present resolution.
Yours very truly,
Samuel A. Block
.5 FE131978
` RECEDVED
9
21
FEB 2 21978
�� .34 PAutJ
d
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THOSE PRESENT THAT THIS PUBLIC
HEARING IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTING OUT THE HOURS FOR THE SERVING
OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN ORDINANCE FORM.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH TWO
EXTENDED PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS MATTER; WE HAVE HEARD ALL THE PROS
AND CONS; AND NOW WE HAVE':DETERMINED WHAT THE MUNICIPALITIES INTEND
TO DO. HE CONTINUED THAT HIS ORIGINAL MOTION WAS TO EXPRESS THE
BOARD'S INTENT TO EXTEND THE BAR HOURS, WITH THE RESERVATION THAT
THIS WAS ONLY FOR THE COUNTY AND WE NEEDED TO LEARN THE MUNICIPALITIES`
4.
VIEWS. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE NOW INTENDS TO SUPPORT
KEEPING THE HOURS AS THEY ARE EXCEPT FOR EXTENDING THE CLOSING
HOUR ON NEW YEAR'S EVE TO 3';00 A.M.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AGREED THAT TO HAVE THE COUNTY
ALLOW LATER HOURS THAN THE MUNICPALITIES WOULD BE A VERY AWKWARD
SITUATION, AND HE WOULD, THEREFORE, ALSO SUPPORT KEEPING THE HOURS
AS THEY ARE NOW EXCEPT ON NEW YEAR's EVE.
COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT HE PREVIOUSLY TOOK THE
POSITION OF OPPOSING ANY EXTENSION OF HOURS AND STILL DOES, BUT
THAT HE WOULD NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH ALLOWING EXTRA HOURS ON
NEW YEAR'S EVE,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE ALSO HAS.BEEN GREATLY
CONCERNED WITH THE HOURS FOR THE COUNTY AND THE MUNICIPALITIES
BEING THE SAME, AND NOW AFTER HEARING THE REPLY FROM THE
MUNICIPALITIES AND, IN ADDITION, THE PETITION'IBEING WITHDRAWN,
HE WOULD NO LONGER BE IN FAVOR OF THE HOURS BEING EXTENDED, BUT
WOULD LIKE TO CORRECT THE INEQUITIES ON NEW YEAR'S EVE.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE No. 78-4
ESTABLISHING HOURS FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONSISTENT WITH
RESOLUTION Ilo. 68-26, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ALLOWING A 3;00 A.M. CLOSING ON NEW
YEAR'S EVE.
aul
Book 34 PA -GE 3-1
6
FEB 2 21978
ORDINANCE NO. 78-4 f
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
The hours of sale of alcoholic beverages within the
territory of Indian River County, Florida, not included within
any municipality are established as follows:
(a) No alcoholic beverages, that is, all beverages contain-
ing more than one per cent of alcohol by weight, may be
sold,consumed or served or permitted to be served or
consumed in any place holding a license under the
State Beverage Division of Florida between the hours
of 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. of each Tuesday, Wednesday,
Thursday, Friday or Saturday.
(b) No alcoholic beverages, that is, all beverages contain-
ing more than one per cent of alcohol by weight, may be
sold, consumed or served or permitted to be served or
consumed in any place holding a license under the
State Beverage Division of Florida between the hours
of 1:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. on each Sunday.
(c) No alcoholic beverages, that is, all beverages contain-
ing more than one per cent of alcohol by weight, may be
sold, consumed, served or permitted to be served or
consumed in any place holding a license under the
State Beverage Division of Florida between the hours
of 12:01 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. on Monday of each week.
(d) The above established hours shall not apply to December
31st.(New Year's Eve), which shall be extended until
3:00 a.m..on January 1 (New Year's Day).
This Ordinance shall become effective March 6, 1978.
mm 34 mcx "3222
1' S
ATTORNEY O'NEILL APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD TO CONTINUE
DISCUSSION OF THE COMPLAINT OF HIS CLIENT, JESSE WASHBURN, IN REGARD
TO A ZONING VIOLATION BY LOIS CRUZE, OWNER OF GOLF ACRES NURSERY,
HE REPORTED THAT MRS. CRUZE HAS DONE A GREAT DEAL IN REMOVING MANY
OF THE APPARENT VIOLATIONS, BUT THEIR MAIN CONCERN IS THAT SHE MAY
BE CONTINUING TO IMPORT PLANTS TO SELL ON THE PREMISES. ATTORNEY
O'NEILL STATED THAT IF THEY CAN AGREE THAT THIS WON'T BE DONE; HE
FELT IT WOULD SOLVE THE MATTER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT QUESTIONED MRS. CRUZE FURTHER ABOUT
THE STATUS OF CLEARING UP THE VIOLATIONS, NOTING THAT IN ATTORNEY
O'NEILL'S LETTER OF .JANUARY 30, 1978, HE LISTED MANY THINGS THAT
HAD NOT BEEN DONE.
MRS, CRUZE STATED THAT SINCE THAT TIME, MOST OF THE THINGS
LISTED HAVE BEEN CORRECTED: THE PLANTS HAVE BEEN MOVED OFF THE
DRAINAGE DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND SHE NOW KEEPS THE FERTILIZER
IN AN ENCLOSED BARN.
ATTORNEY SULLIVAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MRS. CRUZE
HAS DONE ALL SHE IS GOING TO DO, AND IF THE COUNTY FEELS SHE IS DOING
SOMETHING ILLEGALLY, THEN THEY SHOULD TAKE ACTION ON IT. HE POINTED
OUT THAT MRS. CRUZE RAISES 70% OF THE PLANTS SHE SELLS AND ONLY
IMPORTS ABOUT 30%,1 AND THE REAL PROBLEM IS THAT MR. WASHBURN HAS
BLOCKED OFF ANY INGRESS TO HIS HOME EXCEPT ACROSS THE DRAINAGE
DISTRICT PROPERTY. ATTORNEY SULLIVAN CONTINUED THAT OUT OF 38
PEOPLE IN THIS AREA, THERE ARE ONLY TWO WHO OBJECT, ONE OF THEM
BEING MR, WASHBURN, AND THE REST OF THEM FEEL THE NURSERY IS AN
ASSET TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, HE THEN SUBMITTED A STATEMENT TAKEN FROM
38 RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE
MINUTES..
24
FEB2 2 19 78 goon 34 FADE '�
L_ 7
3
�m� •�' a CGS-c.��..�1� c� %LQ �'�" ek xeo�_Azn
`)o Vii_`_ ._ _ r��Z� --
-- �/�I A/��/'J � -4%.jam/J{//gam-r�—�Y/ • -- ) d
_—tea'_.-'�'�_�-_- ��/f-/✓r^L____•. �-=—W._��- _-- __•//
FEB 2-2 1978 600K 34 PACE 3
e
-67
-A-4.
/J
FEB 2.2'978
L-
BOOK 34 PAGE 35
j.
-A�2- -) " f,4-1
—xv bow. 41� - 0-!e, dt. '
4 324 btr File';
4A
U
a
u 4,d
7- q V Z--
FEB 2 21976 BOOK 34 PAGE
FED 2 21973
800K 34 PArH 3-7
r o clzx ez, ,
a
FEB 221978 •
BOdK 34PAG�
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT ATTORNEY O`NEIL- SAYS IF MRS,
CRUZE DOES NOT IMPORT PLANTS, THEY WILL BE VERY WILLING TO SETTLE
THE MATTER, BUT ATTORNEY SULLIVAN IS SAYING SHE IS GOING TO CONTINUE
TO IMPORT PLANTS,
ATTORNEY SULLIVAN REITERATED THAT IF THE BOARD FEELS MRS,
CRUZE IS VIOLATING THE LAW, THEY SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, BUT
HE DOES NOT FEEL THAT THEY CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT HER IMPORTING ON
A 70/30 BASIS.
ATTORNEY O`NEILL POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY ORDINANCE
PROVIDES THAT A NON -CONFORMING USE CANNOT BE EXPANDED OR ALTERED.
HE CONTINUED THAT IN REGARD TO THE STATEMENTS OBTAINED FROM PEOPLE
IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, MR. WASHBURN HAPPENS TO BE THE ONLY ONE ADJACENT
TO THIS COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE, WHICH IS CUT OFF ON ALL OTHER SIDES
FROM THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY, ATTORNEY O`NEILL.STATED THAT IN HIS
OPINION, IF MRS. CRUZE CONTINUES TO IMPORT PLANTS, IT IS A VIOLATION
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND IF SHE WILL NOT DESIST, HE REQUESTS THAT
THE BOARD ENFORCE THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
ATTORNEY SULLIVAN STATED IT IS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND HOW
THIS COULD BE A PROBLEM AS MRS, CRUZE HAS BETWEEN 20-25,000 PLANTS
ON THIS PROPERTY, AND 10% MORE OR LESS WILL MAKE LITTLE OR NO DIF-
FERENCE. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE IS NO PRACTICAL WAY TO ENFORCE
THIS PROVISION, AND POINTED OUT THAT MRS. CRUZE HAS CLEANED UP ALL
THE THINGS THERE THAT POSSIBLY COULD BE OFFENSIVE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, THIS
MATTER MAY HAVE TO END UP IN THE COURTS IF A SOLUTION CANNOT BE
REACHED BETWEEN THE ATTORNEYS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE WISHED TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THIS BOARD
WAS REQUESTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER AND HAS'
TRIED TO GIVE THE ATTORNEYS AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK THIS MATTER OUT,
BUT THE.BOARD WILL TAKE WHATEVER ACTION IS NECESSARY. HE POINTED
OUT THAT WE HAVE HAD MANY PROBLEMS OVER THE YEARS WITH FRUIT STANDS,
PEOPLE GROWING VEGETABLES, ETC,
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED ATTORNEY O`NEILL IF HE HAS BEEN
ABLE TO ESTABLISH WHETHER MRS. CRUZE WAS IMPORTING PLANTS IN 19581
30
FEB 221978
BOOK 34 PAGE •�i�
AND ATTORNEY O'NEILL STATED THAT THEY HAVE NOT DEFINITELY ESTABLISHED
THIS.
MRS. CRUZE STATED THAT SHE DID IMPORT PLANTS IN 1958, AND
THAT SHE HAS NEIGHBORS WHO WOULD VERIFY THIS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD REFER THIS MATTER
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR AND THE ATTORNEY TO SETTLE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE IS GREATLY DISTURBED BE-
CAUSE IT SEEMS FROM THE INFORMATION PRESENTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN
A SEVERE EXPANSION OF THIS OPERATION. HE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE
OTHER AREAS WHERE SITUATIONS EXIST SIMILAR TO THIS, AND HE FEELS IT
IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE DEAL WITH THIS PROPERLY. THE CHAIRMAN
INSTRUCTED THAT THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
THE ATTORNEY AND THAT THEY BRING A RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE BOARD.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE ZONING COMMIS-
SION HAS RECOMMENDED SOME CHANGES PRIMARILY IN DEFINITE SECTIONS OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND HE WOULD LIKE AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE THE
RECOMMENDED CHANGES,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE
FOR A PUBLIC.HEARING ON THE FOLLOWING:
1. DEFINITION OF PARKING SPACE AND MINI WAREHOUSES.
2. SEPARATION OF SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS IN R -2C MULTI -FAMILY DISTRICT.
3. SEPARATION OF SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS IN R -2B MULTI -FAMILY DISTRICT.
4. SEPARATION OF SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS IN R -2A MULTI -FAMILY DISTRICT.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS RE-
CEIVED A LETTER FROM NORTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RECREATION, INC. RE-
QUESTING FILL DIRT FOR THE FOOTBALL FIELD IN SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS, AS
FOLLOWS:
31
FEB 2 21979 aoo c ; zz
f
COMMISSIONER DEESON EXPLAINED THAT THIS SITE NEAR THE
TENNIS COURTS, WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED FOR A FOOTBALL AND SOCCER
FIELD, IS A VERY SANDY AREA WHICH NEEDS A BASE IN ORDER TO GROW SOME
GRASS, HE BELIEVED THE ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF SOIL NEEDED WAS PRO-
VIDED BY NIEHAUS LANDSCAPING,
ADMINISTRATOR .KENNINGS STATED THAT HE DID NOT KNOW WHERE WE
COULD GET TOPSOIL AS WE DO NOT HAVE ANY BLACK DIRT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED WE AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATOR TO
CHECK THE•SITE AND SEE WHAT WE MIGHT HAVE THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE AND
GIVE US A COST ESTIMATE,
COMMISSSIONER DEESON NOTED THAT TIME IS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR
AS FAR AS GETTING THE GRASS PLANTED AND ASKED IF HE COULD CALL NEIHAUS
LANDSCAPING AND TRY TO DETERMINE EXACTLY WHAT IS NEEDED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT IT MIGHT COST AS MUCH AS
$1,500 FOR THIS TYPE OF MATERIAL IF WE HAD TO BUY IT,.AND THE ADMINIS-
TRATOR FELT IT WOULD BE CONSIDERABLY MORE THAN THAT.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THE
32
BOOK 34 PAvE 491
NORTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RECREATION, INC.
P.O. Box 38
Fellsmere, Florida 32948
February 15,
r1
1978
N
Jack Jennings
County Administrator
w .y�+ "I`
.� County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida
32960
Dear Mx. Jennings,
?. .',,This letier is
to request that upon approval of the County Commissioners
r
that the County supply
us with 600 cubic yards of fill dirt with topsoil
qualities and deliver
it to the proposed site of the combination Football and
a
Soccer field on Schuman Drive in Sebastian Highlands.
1
t The property is
the 4.08+- acerage covered in the original agreement made
by the County and the
Cities of Sebastian and Fellsmere.
Your help and assistance
in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth A. Coughlin
NIRCR Director
COMMISSIONER DEESON EXPLAINED THAT THIS SITE NEAR THE
TENNIS COURTS, WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED FOR A FOOTBALL AND SOCCER
FIELD, IS A VERY SANDY AREA WHICH NEEDS A BASE IN ORDER TO GROW SOME
GRASS, HE BELIEVED THE ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF SOIL NEEDED WAS PRO-
VIDED BY NIEHAUS LANDSCAPING,
ADMINISTRATOR .KENNINGS STATED THAT HE DID NOT KNOW WHERE WE
COULD GET TOPSOIL AS WE DO NOT HAVE ANY BLACK DIRT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED WE AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATOR TO
CHECK THE•SITE AND SEE WHAT WE MIGHT HAVE THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE AND
GIVE US A COST ESTIMATE,
COMMISSSIONER DEESON NOTED THAT TIME IS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR
AS FAR AS GETTING THE GRASS PLANTED AND ASKED IF HE COULD CALL NEIHAUS
LANDSCAPING AND TRY TO DETERMINE EXACTLY WHAT IS NEEDED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT IT MIGHT COST AS MUCH AS
$1,500 FOR THIS TYPE OF MATERIAL IF WE HAD TO BUY IT,.AND THE ADMINIS-
TRATOR FELT IT WOULD BE CONSIDERABLY MORE THAN THAT.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THE
32
BOOK 34 PAvE 491
ADMINISTRATOR TO CHECK INTO THIS MATTER, DETERMINE WHAT IS NEEDED, AND
REPORT BACK,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NEXT DISCUSSED PLACING A TRAFFIC
SIGNAL AT ROSELAND ROAD AND U.S.1, HE REPORTED THAT THIS HAS BEEN
EVALUATED BY THE DOT, AND WE HAVE OBTAINED A PERMIT AND BEEN GIVEN A
DESIGN FOR THE INSTALLATION. THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT AT PRESENT
THE CITY OF VERO BEACH INSTALLS AND MAINTAINS ALL OUR TRAFFIC SIGNALS,
BUT APPARENTLY THEY HAVE A HESITANCY ABOUT GOING CLEAR UP TO THE COUNTY
LINE, WHICH THEY SEEM TO FEEL IS OUT OF THEIR RANGE. ADMINISTRATOR
.JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY HAS NOT ACTUALLY REFUSED TO DO THIS
s
WORK; IT IS JUST THAT THE DEPARTMENT HEADS ARE QUESTIONING GOING THIS
DISTANCE, AND HE FEELS THE MATTER NEEDS CLARIFICATION BECAUSE IF WE
HAVE TO GO TO CONTRACT FOR THIS WORK, IT WILL BE MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO CONTACT
CITY OFFICIALS ON THIS MATTER AND REPORT BACK.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REPORTED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED A RE—
QUEST FROM THE CLERK FOR NEW FLOORING IN Room 111. HE NOTED THAT THE
TILE WHICH HAS BEEN ON THIS FLOOR FOR MANY YEARS IS A VERY THIN TILE,
AND WE NO LONGER HAVE ANY AND CANNOT OBTAIN ANY OF THE SAME THICKNESS
TO REPLACE THE BROKEN PIECES.
AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO INSPECT THIS AREA
TO DETERMINE WHAT IS NEEDED AND TAKE IT UP LATER ON.THE MEETING.
THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED AT 12:00 NOON FOR LUNCH AND
RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
THE ADMINISTRATOR PRESENTED THE BOARD WITH THE FOLLOWING
EVALUATION OF THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE BIDS.
W
FEB 2 21978 Boa 34 mu '42
loua.is :
6 20
BeaPAS 43
A.A.
Ind.
River
Vero
Beach A.A. I.R. V.B.
i.
.,%Annual Inspection and tagging of
all Fire Extinguishers $ 1.25
$ •.75
$ .75
X
X
Recharge regular dry chemical Ext.:
23 pound 3.40
2.50
2.35
X
5 pound 4.00
3.00
3.35
X
10 pound 7.00
5.00
5.20
X
20 pound 10.00
i
9.00
8.40
X
Recharge -Purple K or ABC chemical Ext.:
.2' pound 3.40
2.95
2.75
X
5 pound 4.7.5
3.95
4.20
X
10 pound 8.75
6.00
6.90
X
20 pound 14.75
14.00
12.75•.
Recharge Co2 Ext.:
212- pound 3.25
2.50
2.00
X
3 through 5 pounds 3.25
2.95
3.20
X
6 through 10 pounds 4.50
4.95
4.20
X
11 through 15 pounds 6.00
6.95
5.75
X
16 through 20 pounds 6.80
7.95
6.75
X
Hydro test Co2 Ext.:
2h pound 4.75
4.50
3.75
X
3 through 5 pounds 4.75
4.50
3.75
X
6 through 10 pounds 4.75
4.50
3.75
X
• 11 through 15 pounds 5.25
4.50
3.75
X
16 through 20 pounds 5.25
4.50
3.75
X
Recharge soda/acid Extinguishers 2.00
1.45
1.20
X .
' Hydro test soda/acid Extinguishers 1.70
1.45
1.25
X
Recharge Pressure Water Ext. 2.00
1.45
1.20
X
`-Hydro test -Pressure Water Ext. 1.70
1.50
1.25
X,
Recharge 2�- gallon foam Ext. 2.00
2.00
1.20
X
' Hydro test 2� gallon foam Ext. 1..70
1.50
1.25
X
loua.is :
6 20
BeaPAS 43
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT VERO BEACH
FIRE EQUIPMENT OF FORT FIERCE, IS LOW IN TWENTY CATEGORIES, AND THEY
ARE, THEREFORE, THE LOW BIDDER,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF VERO BEACH FIRE
EQUIPMENT OF FORT PIERCE FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE FOR THE YEAR
BEGINNING MARCH 1, 1973, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING SPECI-
FICATIONS, AS SET OUT ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE,
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NEXT REPORTED TO THE BOARD THAT OF THE
FOUR BIDS SUBMITTED ON AERIAL PHOTO COVERAGE, ONE WAS SUBSTANTIALLY
HIGHER THAN ALL THE OTHERS, AND THAT ONE COMPLIED WITH ALL SPECIFICATIONS,
OF THE OTHER FIRMSJONE DID NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED DEPOSIT CHECK AND
THE OTHER TWO ONLY GAVE A PRICE ON ONE SET OF PRINTS, THE ADMINISTRATOR
NOTED THAT THE BOARD COULD DECIDE TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF THE DEPOSIT,
BUT HE FELT SINCE ALL SPECIFICATIONS WERE NOT MET, WE SHOULD REBID,
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED HE ACTUALLY DID NOT SEE ANY REAL
REASON TO REQUIRE A DEPOSIT, BUT IT WAS REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS,
HE DID NOT FEEL THERE WOULD BE ANY REAL PROBLEM WITH ACCEPTING THE LOW
BID AND WAIVING THE DEPOSIT.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT THE LOW BIDDER STATED
IN HIS LETTER THAT THEIR CHECK WAS ARRIVING BY CERTIFIED MAIL,
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT OF A DEPOSIT CHECK AND
TO ACCEPT THE BID OF KUCERA AND ASSOCIATES, INC,, OF LAKELAND, FOR
AERIAL PHOTO COVERAGE IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,393,00 FOR THE FIRST SET
AND $7,525.00 FOR THE SECOND SET, AS THE LOWEST AND BEST BID,
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD DID NOT FEEL IT WOULD BE
FAIR TO REBID NOW THAT THE BIDS HAVE BEEN OPENED AND MADE KNOWN,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION, COMMISSIONERS DEESON,
SCHMUCKER, AND SIEBERT VOTED IN FAVOR, CHAIRMAN WODTKE VOTED IN
OPPOSITION, THE MOTION CARRIED.
W
FEB 2 2 1978
I
WARREN ZEUCH, .JR., APPEARED AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE IS
CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO PRO-
MOTE A TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS APPROVED BY HOUSE BILL No. 2064.
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IS REQUESTING THE BOARD TO SET UP A TOURIST
DEVELOPMENT TAX BOARD AND LEVY THIS TAX. MR. ZEUCH NOTED THAT OTHER
COUNTIES IN THE STATE, INCLUDING BREVARD, HAVE ALREADY ACTED ON THIS.
J. B. NORTON, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,
OUTLINED BRIEFLY PORTIONS OF THE HOUSE BILL. HE NOTED THAT IT PROVIDES
FOR 1% OR 21 TAX, AND THEY WOULD OPT FOR 2% AS THE MAJORITY OF COUNTIES
HAVE. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS WOULD PRODUCE AT THE MOST
$245,000 PER YEAR BASED ON LAST YEAR S OCCUPANCY AND ACCOMMODATIONS
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. MR. MORTON NOTED THAT HE PERSONALLY DOES NOT
LIKE THE SECTION OF THE BILL THAT DEALS WITH THE SIX MONTH LIMITATION
ON RENTALS BECAUSE HE FEELS THIS WOULD NOT BE FAIR TO SOMEONE INTENDING
TO MAKE THIS THEIR PERMANENT RESIDENCE. ALSO, THE BILL NOW IS VERY
SPECIFIC AS TO WHAT THE MONEY MUST BE USED FOR, BUT HE FELT THAT BOTH
THESE FACTORS WILL BE LOOKED INTO AND POSSIBLY CHANGED, AND IT MAY BE
THAT IT WILL BE PERMITTED TO USE A PERCENTAGE OF THE MONEY FOR BEACH
RESTORATION PROJECTS. MR. NORTON POINTED OUT THAT ONE OF THE INTENDED
PURPOSES OF RIVERSIDE THEATRE WAS TO RENT IT FOR LARGE CONVENTION MEET-
INGS, AND UNDER THIS BILL, THE FUNDS COULD BE USED TO HELP SUPPORT
THAT FACILITY, IPJ ADDITION TO PROVIDING JOBS AND OTHER ECONOMIC BENEFITS
TO THE COUNTY. MR. NORTON REQUESTED THAT IF THE BOARD INTENDS TO START
THIS OPERATION, THAT THEY ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO LEVY SUCH A
TAX AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF THE WORK THAT WILL BE REQUIRED
BEFORE THIS GOES TO THE VOTERS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT WE NEED TO HEAR FROM A LOT OF AREAS AND
THAT WE SHOULD SET UP A WORKSHOP MEETING AND INVITE THE CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE , THE BOARD OF REALTORS, THE HOTEL -MOTEL ASSOCIATION, ETC.
HE NOTED THAT THE CITRUS INDUSTRY MIGHT HAVE WORKERS COME THROUGH AND
RENT, AND THIS WOULD AFFECT THEM ALSO.
MR. NORTON STATED THAT THE BOARD OF REALTORS AND THE HOTEL -
MOTEL ASSOCIATION DID ENDORSE THIS TAX SOME TIME AGO.
36
FEB 2 1978.
BOOK . 34 PAGF 45
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT ALL WE ARE DOING
IS SETTING THIS UP TO COME BEFORE THE VOTERS.
MR. NORTON AGREED AND NOTED THAT IT WILL TAKE QUITE SOME TIME
TO INSTITUTE AN EDUCATIONAL PROCESS SO THAT COUNTY RESIDENTS REALIZE
THE TAX WILL NOT AFFECT THEM, HE POINTED OUT THAT THIS TAX IS LEVIED
STRICTLY ON ACCOMMODATIONS AND WILL NOT AFFECT RESTAURANTS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKED NOTED THAT IT DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT
RENTING YOUR HOME, BUT MR. NORTON FELT THIS WAS THE INTENT.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON ALTERING THE BILL IN REGARD TO LEVYING
THIS ON ANYONE WHO INTENDS TO BE A PERMANENT RESIDENT AND TAKES OUT A
DECLARATION OF DOMICILE. IT WAS NOTED, HOWEVER, THAT YOU CAN CHANGE
YOUR DOMICILE AS OFTEN AS YOU WISH.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAD HEARD SOME DISCUSSION FROM
PEOPLE IN. THE HOTEL -MOTEL BUSINESS WHO ARE OPPOSED TO THIS TAX, AND HE
WOULD LIKE TO DETERMINE JUST HOW ACCEPTABLE IT IS TO THIS INDUSTRY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED MR. NORTON IF IT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE
FOR THIS MATTER TO GO ON THE NEXT AGENDA AND IN THE MEANTIME ASK THE
HOTEL -MOTEL ASSOCIATION IF THEY STILL SUPPORT THIS.
SMR. NORTON NOTED THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF STATES HAVE ALREADY
LEVIED A TOURIST TAX RANGING FROM 2% TO 12%. HE POINTED OUT THAT
VOLUSIA COUNTY AND DADE COUNTY HAVE AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR TOURIST DEVEL-
OPMENT, MR. NORTON CONTINUED THAT WE NEED MONEY TO COMPETE WITH OTHER
COUNTIES FOR THE TOURIST TRADE, AND THIS IS A WAY THAT DOESN'T COST OUR
RESIDENTS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE AGREED, BUT STATED HE IS CONCERNED THAT,
ALTHOUGH THEY TELL US HOW WE CAN USE THIS MONEY FOR TOURIST DEVELOPMENT,
THEY DO NOT GIVE ANY RELIEF TO THE TAYPAYER WHO HAS TO PAY FOR THE EXTRA
SERVICES THAT NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE TOURISTS.
MR. NORTON AGREED THAT THE BILL NEEDS SOME REFINEMENTS AND
FELT THAT SOME WILL BE MADE IN REGARD TO THE VERY THINGS THAT THE CHAIR-
MAN BROUGHT UP, BUT HE NOTED THAT IF WE HAD NO TOURISTS, WE WOULD HAVE
TO PAY FOR THESE SERVICES ANYWAY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT IF THE BOARD IS READY TO ADOPT A
RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO LEVY A TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX, HE IS WILLING
AND DOES NOT HAVE TO HAVE A WORKSHOP AS THIS WILL HAVE TO BE SETTLED BY
THE ELECTORATE AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION. THE BOARD AGREED.
S
FEB 221978
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INSTRUCTED THE ATTORNEY,TO DRAW UP THE NECES-
SARY RESOLUTION AND PUT IT ON THE AGENDA OF THE NEXT MEETING, AT WHICH
TIME PUBLIC DISCUSSION CAN BE HELD. THE CHAIRMAN REQUESTED THE CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE TO NOTIFY ALL ORGANIZATIONS THEY FEEL WOULD LIKE TO BE
HEARD ON THIS SUBJECT.
MR. NORTON REQUESTED PERMISSION FROM THE BOARD TO BORROW A
VOTING MACHINE TO BE USED TO SHOOT A COMMERCIAL FOR THE BASEBALL HALL
OF STARS, -OF WHICH TOM LASORDA, MANAGER OF THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS,
WILL BE THE SUBJECT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
m
HAS RULED THAT BEFORE VOTING MACHINES MAY BE LENT OUT, IT MUST BE DE-
TERMINED THAT IT IS FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
AND THE ADMINISTRATOR TO MAKE A VOTING MACHINE AVAILABLE TO THE CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE TO BE USED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE.
DEWEY WALKER, ZONING DIRECTOR, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD IN REGARD
TO A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTED BY ROBERT AND WENDY MCIVER. HE NOTED
THAT MR. MCIVER'S PROPERTY IS PART OF A PIECE OF PROPERTY GIVEN BY
MR, OSGOWICZ TO HIS RELATIVES FOR THEM TO BUILD HOMES ON, AND IT DOES
NOT FRONT ON A PUBLIC ROAD. ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER NOTED THAT THIS
PROPERTY WAS RECENTLY REZONED FROM AGRICULTURAL TO R-lE SO THAT HOMES
COULD BE BUILT THERE.
DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO WHY THIS PROPERTY IS NOT SUBDIVIDED,
AND ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER STATED THAT IT IS, BUT BY METES AND BOUNDS
DESCRIPTION, WHICH WAS DONE BEFORE ORDINANCE 74-20 WAS ADOPTED,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS AGREED AND NOTED THAT THIS DOES FALL
UNDER THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION CATEGORY,
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED MR. MCIVER IF HE HAD LOOKED INTO THE
POSSIBILITIES OF FILING A PLAT ON THE PROPERTY.
MR. MCIVER STATED THAT HE HAD, BUT THE VARIOUS PEOPLE INVOLVED
DO NOT WANT TO.PROCEED WITH IT AT THIS TIME; ALTHOUGH, THEY PROBABLY
WILL AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE. HE STATED THAT HE JUST WISHED TO
GET PERMISSION TO BUILD HIS HOUSE AND POINTED OUT THAT NONE OF THEM CAN
FEB 2 2 1979 r
Boa 34 PA -GE 47 #
SELL ANY OF THIS PROPERTY WITHOUT IT BEING PLATTED FIRST. MR. MCIVER
11
CONTINUED THAT EACH OF THE DEEDS HAS A 15' EASEMENT SO THERE IS A 30'
EASEMENT DOWN THE CENTER OF THE PROPERTY FOR A ROAD,
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER NOTED THAT 50' IS NECESSARY FOR A ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED MR, MCIVER IF HE WOULD BE WILLING
TO MAKE AVAILABLE AN ADDITIONAL'10' EASEMENT ON THE FRONT DEDICATION IN
ORDER TO PROVIDE A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY IF ALL THE OTHERS WERE, AND HE STATED
THAT HE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION AND DID NOT FEEL THIS WOULD PRESENT ANY
PROBLEM.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THIS 10 ACRE PROPERTY
WAS ZONED AGRICULTURAL, WHERE.YOU CAN ONLY BUILD ON 5 -ACRE PARCELS,
AND IT WAS ASSURED THAT, UPON REZONING, THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE SUBDIVIDED.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED THAT MR. MCIVER GO BACK TO
HIS FAMILY AND DISCUSS PLATTING BECAUSE NOT HAVING PROPER INGRESS AND
EGRESS COULD VERY WELL GIVE HIM A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE FUTURE.
MR. MCIVER STATED THAT THE ORIGINAL INTENTION WAS THAT THESE
LOTS SHOULD GO TO THE FAMILY TO BUILD ON THEM IF THEY WISHED. HE FELT
THAT THIS PROPERTY WILL BE PLATTED IN THE FUTURE, BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO
START DEVELOPING HIS OWN LOT NOW.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT WE SHOULD AT LEAST BE SURE OF THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY AND NOTED THAT WHEN THIS PROPERTY IS SUBDIVIDED, THE ROAD WOULD
HAVE TO BE PAVED,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY IS
HELD IN THE FAMILY NOW, THIS WOULD BE THE BEST TIME TO SUBDIVIDE AND
END ALL THE PROBLEMS. HE POINTED OUT THAT THEN, IF MR. MCIVER WISHED
TO MOVE AT SOME TIMEIN THE FUTURE, HE WOULD BE ABLE TO SELL THE PROPERTY,
WHICH WOULD BE LEGALLY ACCESSIBLE.
MR, MCIVER STATED THAT HE JUST WISHES TO TAKE A CHANCE WITH
HIS MONEY TO DEVELOP HIS PROPERTY AND LIVE ON IT AND THAT HE TRUSTS
HIS FAMILY.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO THE'PROBLEMS INVOLVED FOR
MR. MCIVER, AND THE REZONING TO R-lE.
39
FEB 2 2 1978 Boot 34 PA -11 48
J
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER POINTED OUT THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS
ORIGINALLY ZONED R-1 AND THEN WHEN THE ROUTE EO STUDY WAS DONE, IT WAS
REZONED TO AGRICULTURAL.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, TO GRANT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT
AND WENDY MCIVER.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WILL VOTE FOR THE LOTION, BUT
FELT IT IS THE CONCURRENCE OF THIS BOARD THAT THEY STRONGLY RECOMMEND
THE PROPERTY BE SUBDIVIDED FOR THE BENEFIT AND PROTECTION OF MR. MCIVER
AND ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND THAT IT IS VERY NECESSARY TO GET PROPER
RIGHT-OF-WAY SET ASIDE IMMEDIATELY TO AVOID FUTURE PROBLEMS,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE WILL HAVE TO VOTE
AGAINST THE MOTION BECAUSE HE FEELS IT ACTUALLY IS A DISSERVICE TO
MR, MCIVER AND HE MAY VERY WELL REGRET IT IN THE FUTURE.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONERS DEESON
AND SIEBERT AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE VOTED IN FAVOR. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER
VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE flOTION CARRIED.
JAMES BEINDORF, ENGINEER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING
VICTOR KNIGHT AND ASKING FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF BRIARWOOD SUBDIVISION.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO DRAINAGE PROBLEMS IN THIS
AREA, AND THE BOARD REVIEWED THE MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF APRIL ETH
AND .TUNE STH, 1977, WHERE THIS WAS DISCUSSED. THIS PROPERTY, FORMERLY
KNOWN AS BOUGAINLEA SUBDIVISION, WAS ORIGINALLY DIVIDED UP INTO NUMEROUS
SMALL LOTS, EACH HAVING A.5' REAR LOT LINE EASEMENT, IT WAS LATER RE -
SUBDIVIDED INTO TWO TRACTS OF APPROXIMATELY S ACRES EACH, AND RELEASE
OF ALL THE ORIGINAL 5' REAR LOT LINE EASEMENTS WAS APPROVED, CONTINGENT
ON THE GIVING OF A 5' EASEMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY FROM
THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. AT THE MEETING OF
.JUNE 8, 1977, MR, KNIGHT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAD GIVEN AN
ADDITIONAL 50' EASEMENT, WHICH WOULD TAKE CARE OF -ANY DRAINAGE PROBLEMS.
THE RELEASE OF EASEMENT WAS NEVER PREPARED AND RECEIVED FOR RECORDING,
BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THIS WOULD NOT AFFECT APPROVAL OF THE FINAL
PLAT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF BRIARWOOD SUB-
DIVISION.
49
FEB 2 21978 BooK34 Ao 9
� � r
ENGINEER BEINDORF REPORTED ON THE STATUS OF THE 12TH STREET
AND 6TH AVENUE SEWER LINE AND PRESENTED THE BOARD WITH A MAP OF THE
AREA SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE REQUESTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE BY PROPERTY
OWNERS TO TIE ONTO THIS LINE. HE EXPLAINED THAT THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS
APPROXIMATELY SS ACRES. IT IS NOT DONE IN ANY CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER AND
DOES NOT SHOW ANY OF THE EXISTING TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE AREA. MOST
OF THE ZONING IN THE AREA IS. R-2, WHICH WILL ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY
SOF 15, OR A'POTENTIAL OF ABOUT 2,600 PEOPLE, MR. BEINDORF FELT THIS
PROBABLY IS A LITTLE MORE THAN THE LINE IS CAPABLE OF SERVING; THEY HAD
FIGURED ON ABOUT 2,000. HE ALSO STATED THAT OF OUR ORIGINAL WATER
a
ALLOCATION, THERE IS' PROBABLY A LITTLE MORE LEFT THAN THIS LINE COULD
PROPERLY HANDLE.
ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT, AS HE SEES IT, THE BOARD HAS
THREE ALTERNATIVES. THE FIRST WOULD BE TO TAKE OVER THE LINE AND HAVE
THE PEOPLE TIE ON AS COUNTY CUSTOMERS, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT THE COUNTY
WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE LINE, DETERMINE HOW CUSTOMERS WOULD TIE ONTO
THE LINE, HAVE THE SEWAGE FLOW METER INSTALLED, AND SET UP A DEPARTMENT
TO COLLECT THE MONIES FOR THIS SERVICE. THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE WOULD
BE TO ASK THE CITY TO TAKE THESE PEOPLE AS THEIR CUSTOMERS, WHICH IS
BASICALLY WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WITH VERO MALL. THIS AREA IS NOT SERVED
WITH CITY WATER, AND SO THERE MUST BE COOPERATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND
THE CITY AND THE LAND OWNERS TO BE SURE THE CITY COULD COLLECT THE
MONIES, ALSO, THE CITY WOULD WANT ASSURANCE ABOUT THE TYPE OF WATER
COMING INTO THEIR SYSTEM. THERE WOULD BE NO NEED ON THIS BASIS FOR A
METER ON THE AMOUNT OF WATER GOING INTO THE CITY PLANT, AS A THIRD
ALTERNATIVE, THE COUNTY COULD SAY WE WANT TO DO THIS OURSELVES AND
COTRACT TO ANOTHER PARTY TO HANDLE COLLECTIONS, ETC,
• ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IF THE FLOW
METER HAS TO BE INSTALLED,' IT COULD TAKE ANYWHERE FROM 90 DAYS TO SIX
MONTHS TO GET ONE DELIVERED, WHICH IS ONE REASON THE DEVELOPER WANTED
TO PUT UP THE CHECK INSTEAD OF HAVING TO PURCHASE THE METER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE PERSONALLY FELT THAT WE ARE
NOT READY FOR OPTION #1, WHICH IS TO ACCEPT SERVICE, METER OUR OWN
OPERATION,AND ESTABLISH OUR OWN DEPARTMENT. HE FELT HE WOULD PREFER TO
41
FEB 2 2 197-8
oaK 34 PAGE
GO TO OPTION #3 AND TRY TO GET A CONTRACT FOR AN OPERATOR, POSSIBLY THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND THEN HOPEFULLY IN A LITTLE WHILE WE MAY BE ABLE
TO WORK OUT OUR LONG RANGE PROBLEMS WITHOUT GIVING UP THE CUSTOMER.
ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT HE DOES NOT FEEL THE REAL PROBLEM
IS THE SEWAGE, BUT THE WATER. HE NOTED THAT MID FLORIDA CAN'T SERVE
ANY MORE CUSTOMERS, AND HE DOES NOT FEEL THE OTHER COMPANIES ARE CAPABLE
OF PRODUCING WATER THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THE CITY HAS MADE IT PRETTY WELL KNOWN
THAT THEY WOULD RATHER NOT HAVE CUSTOMERS FOR SEWER ONLY, AND HE DOUBTED
THEY WOULD WANT DIFFERENT TYPES OF WATER MIXED IN WITH THEIRS.
6
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT THE CITY IS COMMITTED TO
SERVE THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, AND HE DOES NOT FEEL THEY WILL GIVE CONSID-
ERATION TO ANY NEW AREA UNTIL THAT AREA IS WORKED OUT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS HAD SEVERAL
MEETINGS WITH THE CITY, AND WORK IS PROCEEDING ON THE SURVEY AND THE
TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT, HE FELT, HOWEVER, IT WOULD BE PREMATURE TO MAKE
ANY DECISIONS UNTIL WE HAVE A REALLY SOLID BASIS TO WORK ON AND KNOW
WHAT THE CITY IS REALLY WILLING TO DO, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE ARE TALKING
ON GOOD GROUNDS WITH THEM AND IT LOOKS AS THOUGH THERE ARE MANY AREAS
WHERE WE WILL BE ABLE TO SOLVE SOME MUTUAL PROBLEMS.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THAT MEANT THE CHAIRMAN IS
THINKING ABOUT NOT MAKING ANY DECISION ON THE 6TH AVENUE SEWER LINE
UNTIL JANUARY OF 1979, BUT CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT SOMETHING POSSIBLY
COULD BE WORKED OUT IN THE INTERIM ON A TEMPORARY BASIS.
ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT THE NUMBER OF REQUESTS IS DE-
CEIVING BECAUSE SOME ARE VIABLE PROJECTS AND SOME ARE HIGHLY SPECULATIVE.
HE REPEATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY SHOULD GET INTO THE SEWER
AND WATER BUSINESS NOW AND STATED HE WOULD RECOMMEND EITHER OPTION #2 OR
#3.
FRANK ZORC INFORMED THE BOARD THAT, AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF ONE
OF THE BIGGEST ACREAGES IN THE AREA, HE HAS SPOKEN TO THE CITY AND HAS
BEEN GIVEN REASON TO BELIEVE THAT CITY WATER MIGHT BE AVAILABLE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED.IF THE CITY INDICATED TO MR. ZORC THAT
THEY WOULD ALSO SERVICE THIS AREA WITH SEWER.
MR.- ZORC STATED THAT THE CITY INDICATED TO HIM THAT THEY WOULD
PREFER BOTH WATER AND SEWER. HE FELT OPTION #3 WOULD BE THE SIMPLEST
42
FEB 2 21979 Boa 34 pAia"' 51
f
f
I.
SOLUTION, AND THE SOONER THE BETTER. MR. ZORC CONTINUED THAT AS THIS
MATTER GETS MORE PUBLICITY, THERE WILL BE MORE AND MORE REQUESTS TO TIE
ONTO THE LINE FROM FARTHER AND FARTHER AWAY, AND HE FELT THAT THE BOARD
MUST SET A LIMIT ON THE DISTANCE WHERE THEY WILL CONSIDER A HOOK-UP,
JOE GARDNER SPOKE REPRESENTING VILLAS OF VERO BEACH, WHICH
BIS LOCATED FOUR BLOCKS SOUTH OF THE LINE, AND AGREED WITH MR. ZORC.
HE NOTED THAT AT THE SAME TIME HE MADE A REQUEST TO BE ALLOWED TO TIE
ONTO THE LINE, HE ALSO SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR PERMISSION FOR A PACKAGE
PLANT IN THE EVENT THEY CANNOT GET ON THE LINE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT UNTIL SPECIFIC ARRANGEMENTS
CAN BE MADE WITH THE CITY, HE DOES NOT BELIEVE WE CAN MAKE ANY DECISIONS.
HE STRESSED THAT HE DOES NOT WANT THIS DONE ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS LIKE
THE TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT, WHICH IS AN AGREEMENT WE NEVER SHOULD HAVE
HAD TO LIVE WITH.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THOSE PRESENT THAT WE ONLY
AGREED TO OVERSIZE THE LINE BECAUSE WE INTENDED TO SERVICE THAT AREA
AT SOME INDEFINITE TIME IN THE FUTURE, NOT AS SOON AS THE LINE WAS PUT
INTO SERVICE.
ENGINEER BEINDORF FELT POSSIBLY SOME OF THIS COULD BE WORKED
OUT AT A JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY.
FRANK ZORC INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE MAY HAVE TO GO TO A
SEPTIC TANK OR PACKAGE SYSTEM ON HIS PROJECT, BUT IN ORDER TO GET A
PERMIT, HE WILL NEED A LETTER TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM THE BOARD
STATING THAT HE CANNOT TIE ONTO THE LINE NOW AND THAT IT IS INDEFINITE
WHEN HE CAN.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE ADMINIS-
TRATOR WRITING A LETTER TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ADVISING THEM THAT AS
OF THIS DATE THE BOARD HAS NOT MADE A DECISION AS TO HOW ADDITIONAL
CUSTOMERS WILL BE ALLOWED TO HOOK ONTO THIS LINE, AND HE INSTRUCTED
THAT ENGINEER BEINDORF AND THE ADMINISTRATOR GET TOGETHER AND WRITE THIS
LETTER.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REPORTED ON THE PROGRESS OF THE GIFFORD
WATER SYSTEM AND REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD A MAP DELINEATING THE AREAS
OF EXPANSION RECOMMENDED BY THE GIFFORD WATER AND SEWER ADVISORY
43
FEB2 21978
BOOK 3 4 Pmu, E 5
COMMITTEE AND DESIGNATING THEM AS AREAS A THROUGH F ON THE WEST SIDE
OF U.S. Z AND AREA G ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S. 1 NORTH OF THE HOSPITAL
AND SOUTH OF THE TRUCK STOP. HE STATED THAT THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
THAT THE COUNTY CONSIDER DISPOSING OF THE WASTE WATER TO THE CITY OF
VERO BEACH INSTEAD OF PURCHASING ADDITIONAL LAND FOR A SEWAGE TREATMENT
PLANT. THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO GET THE
PRESENT SYSTEM RENOVATED SO THE SCHOOLS CAN BE HOOKED UP.
ENGINEER BEINDORF INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PLANS AND SPECI-
FICATION FOR RENOVATING THE OLD SYSTEM ARE FINISHED, AND THEY HOPE TO
RENOVATE THE OLD SYSTEM AND DO THE EXPANSION WORK AT THE SAME TIME.
HE NOTED THAT THE COMMITTEE WANTS TO EXPAND INTO ALL THE DESIGNATED
AREAS, INCLUDING AREA G, WHICH IS EAST OF U.S.l, AND HE DOES NOT KNOW
WHAT EXTRA COST WE WILL RUN INTO IN THAT AREA, MR. BEINDORF NOTED
THAT THERE IS SOME EXTRA MONEY BECAUSE OF THE LOW BID AND THE PROVISION
THEY HAD MADE FOR CONTINGENCIES, BUT THEY WILL NOT KNOW EXACTLY HOW
FAR THEY CAN GO UNTIL THE BIDS ARE IN.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT QUESTIONED WHETHER THEY SHOULD BID THE
ENTIRE PROJECT WHEN WE ARE NOT SURE THERE IS ENOUGH MONEY, BUT CHAIRMAN
WODTKE NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS SAID THEY WILL SERVICE THE ENTIRE AREA,
AND HE FELT WE MIGHT AS WELL GET THE DRAWINGS DONE FOR THE WHOLE AREA,
ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT IF THERE WERE NOT ENOUGH MONEY,
SOME AREAS COULD BE DELETED VERY EASILY AS THIS IS JUST A FRINGE AROUND
A CENTRAL SYSTEM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD TALKED WITH FHA
ABOUT USER AGREEMENTS, AND THEY STATED THAT IF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT
WOULD NOT ISSUE ANY SEPTIC TANK PERMITS AND THE COUNTY HAD AN ORDINANCE
REQUIRING MANDATORY HOOK-UP, WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO GET USER AGREEMENTS.
HE CONTINUED THAT THE COMMITTEE, AFTER SOME CANVASSING, FEELS THAT NOW
IS NOT THE TIME TO GO TO MANDATORY HOOK-UP, EXCEPT AS A LAST RESORT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT IT IS EXPENSIVE TO PRO-
VIDE THIS SERVICE AND THEN SAY THAT IT IS OPTIONAL WHETHER THEY USE IT
OR NOT, HE ALSO NOTED THAT MANDATORY HOOK-UP MIGHT MAKE THE SERVICE
CHEAPER.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REMINDED THE BOARD THAT WE ARE AT A POINT RIGHT
NOW WHERE WE NEED TO GIVE SOME DIRECTION TO THE ENGINEERS AND AUTHORIZE
PREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
44
FEB2 2197ot�K fiauF �3
r
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE GIFFORD
WATER AND SEWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND AUTHORIZED THE ENGINEER TO PRO-
CEED WITH CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ON THE PROJECT AS OUTLINED, INCLUDING
AREASA THROUGH F AND G ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S.1.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REQUESTED THAT A STUDY BE DONE IN
REGARD TO PLACING A BLINKER LIGHT AT SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD AND KINGS HIGHWAY,
WHICH HE FELT IS SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION AT NORTH GIFFORD ROAD AND
KINGS HIGHWAY.
i ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO REQUEST
THE DOT TO MAKE A STUDY IN REGARD TO A BLINKER LIGHT AT SOUTH GIFFORD
ROAD AND KINGS HIGHWAY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS BROUGHT UP AN EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS IN REGARD TO THE PROPER ESTABLISH-
MENT OF CERTAIN BOND ACCOUNTS
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADD TO TODAY'S AGENDA THE
EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY COORDINATOR THOMAS AS SET OUT IN THE FOLLOW-
ING MEMO.
MEMORI',WDUM
February 22, 1978
TO: Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator
and County Attorn
FROM: L. S. "Tommy" Thomas/�
SUBJECT: Landfill Bond Accou s
I have requested various information concerning the
establishment of certain bond accounts as required by the
bond covenants and'bfficial statement".
In as much as I am not an accountant, I am not able
to determine from the information that I have as to'whether
the accounts have been properly established. I would, therefore,
recommend to -the Board of County Commissioners that they
immediately hire an outside certified public accountant to
handle this matter for the Board.
��
FEB2 21978. 8ca 34 PAGE 54
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE FEELS IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE
BOARD VERIFY HOW THE DEPOSITS ARE SET UP AND WHETHER THE FUNDS ARE
PLACED IN ACCOUNTS CONSISTENT WITH THE BOND ATTORNEYS OPINION.
ON iMOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR AND THE
CHAIRMAN TO EMPLOY A CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FOR THE PURPOSES OUT-
LINED, IN THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR`S MEMO DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1978,
EDWARD REGAN, DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ADLEY ASSOCIATES, INC., HAVE
RESUBMITTED THEIR CONTRACT IN REGARD TO PREPARATION OF THE PREAPPLICA-
TION FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FOR 1975-79, THEY HAVE
NOW STATED THAT IF THEY CANNOT BE ASSURED OF DOING THE COMPLETE APPLICA-
TION, IF INVITED BY HUD, THEY CANNOT DO THE PREAPPLICATION FOR THE SUM
OF $2,000, BUT WOULD HAVE TO CHARGE $5,000 BECAUSE THEY WERE LOOKING
TO THE PREPARATION OF THE FINAL APPLICATION TO RECOUP SOME OF THE INITIAL
COST OF PREPARING THE PREAPPLICATION. IF HUD SHOULD NOT INVITE THEM
TO SUBMIT A FINAL APPLICATION, THEN THEY WOULD STAND THE LOSS. MR.
REGAN NOTED THAT IF WE CHANGE A VERY FEW WORDS IN THE CONTRACT, IT WOULD
NO LONGER BE CONTINGENT ON THE COUNTY'S OPTION, AND IF THEY GET US A
BID TO GO ON WITH THE SECOND PHASE, THEN THEY WOULD BE CONSULTANTS FOR
THE ENTIRE APPLICATION,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO GOING
BACK TO THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT WITH ADLEY ASSOCIATES, INC,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO CONCENTRATING ON THE HOUSING
ELEMENT, AND ISR, REGAN STATED THAT WOULD BE THE LOGICAL NEXT PHASE AS
WE HAVE DONE ROADS AND DRAINAGE AND MUST MOVE ON TO REHABILITATION,
HE NOTED IT IS ACTUALLY A LOT EASIER TO TURN OUT NEW UNITS THAN TO RE-
HABILITATE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CONTRACT WITH ADLEY ASSOCI-
ATES, INC., AS REDRAFTED AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN`S SIGNATURE.
46
FEB 2 21978 aoaK 34 en- F�
f
y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
CONTRACT FOR PLANTING SERVICES
By and Between
f INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
and
ADLEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Sarasota, Florida
PART -I - AGREEMENT
22nd February '1978 ,
THIS AGREEMENT entered into this day of
by and 'between Indian River County, Florida, hereinafter referred to
as the "County" and Adley Associates, Inc. of Sarasota, Florida hereinafter
referred to as the "Consultant".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the County anticipates entering into an agreement with the
United States of America providing for financial aid under Title I
of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and
WHEREAS, a prerequisite for award of Community Development Block Grant
funds under the Small Cities Program is preapplication to the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development and subsequent invitation
to submit a full application; and
WHEREAS, the County desires to engage the Consultant to assist in the pre-
paration of the preapplication, and full application if invited to do so by
DHUD, for Community Development Block Grant funds under the Small Cities
Program, and render certain technical advice and assistance during the
execution, and' impler:ientation of the Community Development Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
Page 1 of 15
FEB 2 2 1978
BOOK 34 PAGE 50'
i
_ M
FEB 2 21973
I.' SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Consultant shall perform and carry out in a satisfactory and proper
'manner all necessary services provided under this Contract as required
by the County in connection with its Community Development Program. In
,addition, this Scope of Services provides for continuing services to
be available to the County through the end of FY 1978-79 to advise and
assist the Community Development staff with planning, implementation
and .management activities. The continuing services will be provided
only upon request, and the County will be charged only for those services
so requested.
The Consultant will provide advice and assistance, or assume responsibi-
lity for specific activities in accordance with the following Scope of
Services:
A. Preapplication
1. Scheduling and Control
The Consultant,in close coordination with the local staft will
prepare a work program and schedule of activities in written
and/or graphic form indicating the steps which must be under -
..taken and completed to produce an acceptable preapplication for
Community Development Block Grant funding within the time avail-
able. The schedule of activities will indicate projected com-
pletion dates and latest allowable completion dates of each
separably identifiable element in the program. The schedule
will also indicate the division of primary responsibilities
between the County and the Consultant, and be prepared in a
format which will facilitate control of the work program by
the County in meeting established deadlines.
2. Preapplication Document
The•Consultant,.in coordination with the County, will prepare
the County's Preapplication for a Comprehensive Grant (either
single or multi-year) or Single Purpose Grant, as deemed appro-
Page 2 of 15
Boa 34 PAce 5 7
priate by the County. The following is predicated upon the filing
for a Multi -Year Comprehensive Grant, the most complex of the three
programs. If the County should choose to file for either a Single
Funding Comprehensive Grant or Single Purpose Grant, the requirements
of the•proposed regulations pertaining to such Preapplication shall
apply. At County's option the Preapplication fora Comprehensive
`• Multi -Year Grant will include the following:
t a. Standard Form 424
The Consultant will assist the County in preparing the
required Form 424.
b. Program Narrative Statement
The Consultant, in coordination with the County, will pre-
pare a Program Narrative Statement meeting the requirements
of Section 570.427 (b) (2) of the CDBG Small Cities Program
proposed regulations, as follows:
(1) Description of problems/needs to be addressed by
the program.
(2) Identification of "Program Design Criteria" to be
addressed by the program. The Consultant will assist
the County in selecting the "Program Design Criteria"
by which the County's Small Cities Program Preapplica-
tion will be rated against other applicants.
(3) Description of the proposed program.
(4), Estimated cost of the proposed program.
(5) Statement of relationship of the proposed program
activities to HUD's criteria for selection, including
demonstration of the impact of the program on the criteria.
.' . Page 3, of 15
FEB 221978
gay 34 ma
M r
r t
(6) A brief statement of the overall housing strategy
". including CDBG funds which will be used to implement
that strategy.
c. Haps
The Consultant will prepare the following map or maps of the
• ' - local jurisdiction, suitable for reproduction by the County,
-to be included in the Preapplication pursuant to Section
570.427 (b) (4):
(1) Census tracts and/or enumeration districts;
(2) Location of the proposed activities;
.(3) Concentrations of minority. groups;
(4) Concentrations of lower-income persons; and
(5) General locations for proposed new or rehabili-
tated housing.
d.' Status Report
The Consultant will assist the local staff in the prepara-
tion of a status report regarding performance of prior
grants, as relates to the following,pursuant to Section
570.425 (c) of the proposed regulations:
(1) The rate of progress achieved in community develop-
ment activities;
(2) The rate of expenditure or obligation of funds;
.(3) The ability of the community to respond to impedi-
ments or modify its program'to take advantage of
opportunities;
Page 4 of 15
FEB 2 21978
ao .34 Fa�E9
_ M
(4) The actual progress achieved in meeting its Housing
• Assistance Goals; and,
• (5) The performance of the community with respect to
compliance with applicable laws, regulations and Executive
Orders pertaining to•the CDBG Program.
e. " Citizen Participation
The Consultant shall be available to attend the required
Public Hearing prior to the submission.of the County's
Preapplication. The Consultant shall be available.to attend
additional formal meetings as requested by the County under
the Continuing Services portion of this Contract.
f. Other Preapplication Requirements
It shall be the County's sole responsibility for meeting
those require�,,�ants of the Act not specifically cited herein
as a responsibility of the Consultant. Such -requirements
may include, but are not limited to the following: certifi-
cations and assurances; A-95 reviews; Citizen Participation
implementation; and, public hearing and public information
requirements. However, the Consultant shall be available
to assist the County on these or other areas of activity
if so requested by the County under the Continuing Services
part of this Contract.
The County will provide the Consultant at no•cost with all maps
and data on hand relating to Community Development needs/problems,
and performance, etc., and will make available department heads
and others as appropriate to guarantee a full and complete Pre -
application. New data will be developed by the Consultant only
in those instances when.existing data is inadequate.
.. Page 5 of 15
FEB 2 21978 Soak PA'a 6U
W
B. Full Application
If the County is invited by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (DHUD) to submit a full application for a Comprehensive
Program (either single funded or multi-year) or a Single Purpose Program,
the Consultant shall assist the County in its preparation of the full
application. The following is predicated upon the submission of a.full
application for a Multi -Year Comprehensive Grant, the most complex of the
three programs. If the County should elect to file for either a Single -
Funding Comprehensive Grant or Single Purpose Grant, the requirements of the
proposed regulations pertaining to such application shall apply. The full
application for a Multi -Year Comprehensive Grant will include the following
and the Consultant agrees to perform services generally as follow:
1. Scheduling and Control
The Consultant, in close coordination with the local staff, will
prepare a work program and schedule, of activities in written
and/or graphic, form indicating the steps which must be under-
taken and completed to produce an acceptable application for
Community Development Block Grant funding within the time avail-
able. The schedule of activities will indicate projected com-
pletion dates and latest allowable completion dates of each
separably indentifiable element in the program. The schedule
will also indicate the division of primary responsibilities
between the County and the Consultant, and be prepared in a
format which will. facilitate control of the work program by the
County in meeting established deadlines.
2. Full Application Document
a. Standard Form 424
The Consultant will assist the County in preparing the
required Form 424.
. .Page 6 of 15
FEB 221979 34 PAcE 61
FEB 221978
r
b. Community Development Pian '
(1) Community Development and Housing Needs
The Consultant, in coordination with the County, will pre-
pare a Summary of Community Development and Housing Needs
incorporating a community profile and narrative summary of
needs pursuant to Section 570.304 (a) of the Act.
The County will provide the Consultant with all data on
hand relating to community development and housing needs
and will make available department heads and others as
appropriate to guarantee a full and complete needs identifi-
cation. New data will be developed by the Consultant only
in those instances when existing data is inadequate.
(2) Comprehensive Strategy
Based on the identified needs and funding limitations, the
Consultant will assist the County in developing a compre-
hensive strategy. This will include a summary description
of the strategies for; neighborhood revitalization, improve-
ment of housing conditions, meeting its community facilities
and economic development needs, as applicable, pursuant to
Section 570.304 (b).
The Consultant will prepare the draft Comprehensive Strategy
for review by the County, reflecting input received from local
staff, citizens and County officials.
(3). Three -Year Activity Summary
The Consultant will, at County's request, assist in the.
development of the County's Three -Year Activity Summary to
implement the Comprehensive Strategy. It will consist of a
summary of the proposed CDGG funded projects for the coming
three years, pursuant to Section 570.304 (c).
Page 7 of 15
BOOK 34 PAU,E 62
,
f7
FEB 221978
r
b. Community Development Pian '
(1) Community Development and Housing Needs
The Consultant, in coordination with the County, will pre-
pare a Summary of Community Development and Housing Needs
incorporating a community profile and narrative summary of
needs pursuant to Section 570.304 (a) of the Act.
The County will provide the Consultant with all data on
hand relating to community development and housing needs
and will make available department heads and others as
appropriate to guarantee a full and complete needs identifi-
cation. New data will be developed by the Consultant only
in those instances when existing data is inadequate.
(2) Comprehensive Strategy
Based on the identified needs and funding limitations, the
Consultant will assist the County in developing a compre-
hensive strategy. This will include a summary description
of the strategies for; neighborhood revitalization, improve-
ment of housing conditions, meeting its community facilities
and economic development needs, as applicable, pursuant to
Section 570.304 (b).
The Consultant will prepare the draft Comprehensive Strategy
for review by the County, reflecting input received from local
staff, citizens and County officials.
(3). Three -Year Activity Summary
The Consultant will, at County's request, assist in the.
development of the County's Three -Year Activity Summary to
implement the Comprehensive Strategy. It will consist of a
summary of the proposed CDGG funded projects for the coming
three years, pursuant to Section 570.304 (c).
Page 7 of 15
BOOK 34 PAU,E 62
i
r
• S
y Department heads, and other County employees as appropriate,
will be available to assist the Consultant in the preparation
of cost estimates for program activities to ensure that they
are realistic and reflect local experience with such projects.
(4) _"as
{ The Consultant will prepare the following maps, suitable for
reproduction by the County, to be included in the application
pursuant to Sections 570.304 (a) (3), 570.304 (d) and 570.305.
(a) Extent and location of low and moderate income persons.
(b) Extent and location of minority group residents.
..(c) Extent and location of substandard and deteriorating
housing.
(d) Location and service areas of projects and boundaries
of any designated Comprehensive Neighborhood Revitali-
zation Areas (CNRA). "
(e) Location and service areas of proposed -activities
in Annual CD Program.
'(f) Locations of proposed new construction and sub-
stantial rehabilitation.
(5) Annual Community Development Program Prepared
At County's Request
Reflecting the highest priority areas of concern in the
Three -Year Activity Summary and citizen input as organized
by the County, the Consultant will assist in
Page 8 of 15 .
BOOK 34 PAGF 63
i
the development of a one-year Community Development
Program in narrative and graphic form pursuant to
Section 570.305. The Program will include:
(a) Description of activities to be undertaken
'fn Program Year 1978-79, their locations and
service areas;
(b) Estimate of the population benefitting and
• methodology employed in this determination;
(c) Estimate of program activity costs and timing;
(d) Indication of resources other than Block
Grant funds expected to be made available for
program activities; and
(e) Environmental review status.
(6) Housing Assistance Plan
(a) 'Assessment of Needs
The Consultant shall prepare the assessment of
Housing Condition and Housing Assistance Needs
(generally referred to in the past as HAP Tables
I and 2) pursuant to Sections 570.306 (b) (1).
and (2) of the Act. These assessments will be
developed using readily available data. No new
field surveys will be conducted by the Consultant.
•(b) Housing Assistance Goals Reconciliation
The Consultant shall prepare a statement showing
the County a reconciliation of previous HAP Goals
pursuant to Section 570.306 (a) (4) (i) and indica-
ting the proportional constraints within which
the Housing Assistance Goals for program year 1973-79
P,cge 9 of 15
FEB 2 2 1978
BOOK 34 PA -UE 64
.s
must be developed. -The County will provide the
Consultant with all pertinent data relating to
previous HAP Goals and housing assistance provided
and anticipated through the end of the 1977-78
• program year.
(c) Three -Year Housing Program and Annual Housing
Action Program
The Consultant will advise and assist the County, upon
request; in the development of its Three -Year and Annual
Housing Programs for implementation of its Community
Development and Housing Strategy pursuant to Section
570.306 (b) (3) and (4).
•(7) Environmental Reviews
The Consultant shall prepare the environmental reviews for
those projects and activities which have been previously
• assessed or are logical extensions of previously approved
activities. The Consultant shall not be responsible for
.the conduct of environmental reviews for new activities
unless so requested by the County under the Continuing
Services portion of this Contract.
(8) Meetings
The Consultant shall be available to attend one (1) public
hearing and one (1) Citizen Advisory Committee meeting in
the locality prior to submission of the application to
DHUD. The Consultant shall be available to attend additional
formal meetings as requested by the County under the con-
tinuing Services portion of this Contract.
Page 10 of 15
•
Bou 34 PuE 65
P
w (9) Other Application•Reguirements
It shall be the County's sole responsibility for meet-
tnq those requirements of the Act not specifically cited
herein as a responsibility of the Consultant. Such
• requirements may include, but are not limited to,the
- following; certifications and assurances; A-95 reviews;
environmental reviews of new projects or activities;
development of the Citizen Participation Pian and its
implementation; etc. However, the Consultant shall be
available to assist the County on these or other areas
of activity if so requested by the County under the
Continuing Services part of this Contract.
C.''Continuing Services
The Consultant shall be available to the County to provide Continu-
ing Professional Services, relating to its Community Development
Program, through the end of the CD 1978-79 fiscal year. These
services may relate, but are not limited, to the environmental
revieers for CD activities, meetings, planning, management processes
and implementation.
The Consultant's Professional Services will be provided only upon
request of the County, and the County will be charged only for those
services so requested. It is understood and agreed that "request
of the County" shall interpreted to mean a written request directed
to the Consultant and signed by the 'County Administrator, or
Planning Director of the County.
The Services to be provided by the Consultant will be generally
described in the letter requesting such services and authorizing
the Consultant to proceed. These letters of request and authoriza-
tion may prescribe the maximum number of man-hours/days to be
billable for each specific request; or, may authorize a fixed fee
amount for a specific project to be undertaken.
Page 11 of 15
FEB 2 21978 BOOK 34 mUfin
ty
The Consultant, however, retains the right to decline, for stated
reasons, any particular request; or, offer an alternative man-hour
limitation, fixed fee, or scope of services within 10 working days
;of receipt of the County's.request/authorization.
Each such letter of request and authorization to proceed, and its
delineation of services to be provided, shall be considered a part
' :`:.of•Section I, Scope of Services, under this Contract.
t Al. AMENDMENTS
`The determination of the County of the need for planning activities not
included in the Scope of Services, above, required to support or
further document the Community Development Block Grant application will
provide basis for renegotiation of this Contract for professional
services, with regard to the total Scope of Services, to compensation
and method of payment for services rendered, and to the time of per-
formance. Revisions to this Contract so negotiated and mutually accept-
able both to the County and the Consultant may be incorporated as
amendments thereto.
III. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services of the Consultant will commence within 10 days upon execu-
tion of this Contract for Professional Services, and will be undertaken
and completed in such sequence as to assure their expeditious completion
with consideration to the purpose stated under Section I, Scope of Services.
The Continuing services under item C, Section I, will become available
as of the date of the Contract and will continue to be available until
the end of the County's 1978-79 CD Program Year.
IV.. -COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. Preapplication
The•County shall pay to the Consultant a professional fee of $2,000.00
as full -and complete compensation for all services provided by the
Page 12 of 15
FEB 2 21979
BOOK .3 �q PAH 6 f
Consultant as enumerated under Item A, Section I, Scope of
Services.
The professional fee shall -be payable in a series of monthly pay-
ments based upon submission to'the County of a description of the
percentage of the total Scope of Services completed in the preceding
month or portion thereof. A written description of the activities
conducted during the billing period will accompany the statement.
B. Full Application
If invited by DHUD to submit a full application, the County shall pay
to the Consultant a professional fee based upon the following schedule,
dependent upon the nature of the application to be submitted.
Type of Application Professional Fee
.1. *Single Purpose Grant $ 3,900
2. Single Funding Comprehensive Grant $ 8,250
3. Multi -Year Comprehensive Grant $11,550
The professional fee shall be payable in a series of monthly payments
based upon submission to the County of a description of the percentage
of the total Scope of Services completed in the preceding -month or
portion thereof. A written description of the activities conducted
during the billing period will accompany the statement.
C. Continuing Services
For additional services requested under Section I, Scope of Services,
item C; Continuing Services.. Payment shall become due upon receipt by
the County of a requisition for payment from the Consultant.
1. For all such services rendered on a per diem basis at the
request of the County, the County shall pay to the Consultant
an amount not to exceed $280 per man -day expended plus direct.
costs as full and complete compensation for Consultant's
• •Page 13 of 15
FEB.2 21975
services and full reimbursement for all expenses incurred by
the Consultant in the provision of such services. Payment shall
become due upon receipt of a billing statement from the Con-
sultant specifying the number of man -days expended and direct
• costs experienced in the provision of services as requested
,by the County; such statements will be prepared no more often
. than once per month.
2. Fixed -Fee Projects
For all projects wherein the Consultant provides services for
a "Fixed -fee", the Consultant shall submit his invoices to the
County monthly, on a percentage of completion basis. Payment
shall become due upon receipt of a billing statement from the
Consultant specifying the percentage of completion and amount
due for professional services and direct cost experienced in
the provision of these services, if applicable.
3. Definition/Description of "Direct Costs"
In all cases where "Direct Costs" are referred to, the following
shall apply:
Travel expenses to Indian River County or to other communities
in which the traveller does not permanently reside will be
subject to the following limitations: Air travel at direct
cost, automobile rental at National Car Rental (or equivalent)
intermediate size rates, 18 cents per mile driven for personal
automobiles, Holiday Inn (or equivalent) hotel room at single
occupancy, meals at cost plus 15°S tip, and other expenses such
as parking and long-distance telephone at actual cost incurred.
Other direct costs include such items as printing, drafting,
typing, special equipment, etc. at actual costs incurred. The
Consultant will certify that all costs for which reimbursement
is claimed due were incurred in the direct performance of
services as otherwise provided in this Section, and will supply
receipts upon the request of' the County.
•
..Page 14 of 15
FEB 2 21979 .
• �. 900K 34 ma
F
4 r
ATTEST
By:
Indian River County, Florida
t Executed on: !�'-�,�F / 7gP' -
ATTEST
By:
Adley Associates, Inc.
• • Page 15 of 15
FEB 221979
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS ASKED THE BOARD IF THEY DESIRED TO ORDER
THE SECOND SET OF AERIAL PHOTOS FROM KUCERA AERIAL PHOTO SERVICE. HE
NOTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAD REQUESTED A SET AS WELL AS THE
PROPERTY APPRAISER.
AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, IT WAS DECIDED TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER
WITH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS ASKED THE BOARD WHAT THEY WISHED TO DO
ABOUT REPLACING THE FLOORING IN ROOM 111 AS REQUESTED BY THE CLERK
THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO OBTAIN SOME PRICES
FOR TILE AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD.
COMMISSIONER DEESON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE FOOTBALL FIELD SITE IN SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS DEFINITELY REQUIRES
TOPSOIL, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR HAS INFORMED HIM THAT WE DO NOT HAVE ANY.
PROPERTY APPRAISER LAW APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD AND INFORMED
THEM THAT IT HAS BECOME NECESSARY THAT HE SEND A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE INCREASING HIS BUDGET BY $35,600. THIS HAS
COME ABOUT BECAUSE, DUE TO LACK OF PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE, HE UNDERESTIMATED
THE AMOUNT OF WORK AND PERSONNEL REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE REVIEW OF ALL
PROPERTIES FOR THE 1978 TAX ROLL, HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE IS
BEHIND SCHEDULE ABOUT TWO MONTHS DUE TO COMPUTER DELAYS SO HE WILL NEED
ADDITIONAL PART-TIME HELP. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAD ANTICIPATED BEING
THROUGH IN APRIL, BUT DUE TO THE DELAY WILL BE RUNNING THROUGH JULY AND
MAY POSSIBLY HAVE TO REQUEST AN EXTENSION FOR THE PRELIMINARY ROLL.
WITH ADDITIONAL PART-TIME HELP, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY HE CAN GET DONE
IN THE REQUIRED TIME.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER°S
ORIGINAL BUDGET WAS LESS THAN THE YEAR BEFORE.
PROPERTY APPRAISER LAW STATED THAT IT WAS, AND ALSO AT THE
CLOSE OF THE YEAR, HE RETURNED TO THE COUNTY OVER $90,000 EXCESS FUNDS
FROM THE 1976-77 BUDGET, AFTER PAYING OFF A LOAN_ OBLIGATION ON'A COMPUTER
SETTLEMENT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER HAS ANY
CONTINGENCY FUNDS IN HIS BUDGET, AND THE APPRAISER STATED THAT HE HAS
A $10,000 CONTINGENCY FUND, OF WHICH HE HAS UTILIZED SOME, BUT HE WILL
62
NEED IT IN ALL THE MONTHS AHEAD, HE NOTED THAT, IN ANY EVENT, IT IS
NOT NEARLY ENOUGH TO COVER HIS NEEDS. MR. LAW STATED THAT THIS RE-
EVALUATION SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO CARRY US THROUGH ANOTHER THREE YEARS
AND REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD ENDORSE HIS LETTER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ENDORSED THE LETTER OF PROPERTY AP-
PRAISER LAW DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1978, AND WRITTEN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
'REVENUE. COPY OF LETTER IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES.
63
FEB 2-2 1978
o K34 FAoE l
r
BILL C. LAW
PROPERTY APPRAISER
"WHERE
THE TROPICS
BEGIN"
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE ANNEX P.O. BOX 580
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 PHONE (305) 562-4173
February 22, 1978
Mr. Frank Smith
Supervisor of Budgets
Bureau of Assessing & Collecting Standards
Department of Revenue
Tallahassee, Florida 32304
RE: Budget Amendment - Request #3
Dear Mr. Smith:
Please find enclosed our Budget Amendment representing
Request No. 3. This Amendment would increase our Budget
from $$469,968.00 to $505,568.00 for the 1977-78 Budget
Year.
I under estimated the amount of work and personnel that
would be required to complete the 1978 Tax Roll Review.
Based upon two months experience, I have projected the
need of additional people and time to complete the work.
Our previous budget item for temporary employees was only
$15,000.00, and this amount will be used up by the end of
March. Without the additional people and funds to pay for
this help, we will not be able to complete the review for
the 1978 Roll.
Yours very truly,
Bill C. Law
Property Appraiser
BCL/rjn
Enclosures
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
FEB 221979
Boa -34 PA -E
r
M
DR 404
New 1/1/76
BUDGET AMENDMENT -
County Indian River Request Number 3 Date 2/22/78
Property Appraiser (X) Collector ( ) Official's Name Bi 11 C. Lair
Request authorization to amend the following items in my budget covering the period ending September 30, 197—
Property Appraisers only.
Changing original appropriation comes under provisions of
Section 195.087,(I) (a), F.S.
** Tax Collectors only Signed by
Fee officers may obtain additional funds from excess fees. Bill C . LaWfficial)
Approval
Pursuant to Section 195.087, (1) (a) and (2), F.S., the Division of Ad Valorem Tax has reviewed and hereby approves this
request.
Date
(INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE)
F E B 2 2 19 78 34, PAu 74
E
to
Page ? of _-
COUNTY
PROPER'L'Y APPRAISER'S
r,X}iIB1T
.t
SUMMARY Or THr, 1977.78 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION CATEGORY
ACTUAL.
APPROVED
EXPENDITURES 1976 - 77
�--
INCREASEJ(DECREASE)
AMOUNT
EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
REQUESTED
APPROVED
ACTUAL
—
ESTIMATE
7_78
APPROPRIATION CATEGORY
1975=76
7
10/1/76.3/31/77
4/1/77.9/30/77
TOTAL
1977.78
AMOUNT
%
1577-78
(1)$
. (2)
(3)
(4a)
(4b)
(4c)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
$ a
$
$
SALARIES 6 BENEFITS
(SCH I . la)
306 ,846.
311 ,846.
5,000.
OTHER PERSONA
IAIj SERVICES
47,822.
78,422•
30,600.
EXPENSES
(SCH. uq
76,850.
76,850.
E D P
(SCH. IIIA, II11T)
34,750•
34,750•
OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY
(SCH. IV)
3,700.
3,700.
PAYMENT TO PROPERTY
ASSESSMENT LOAN FUND
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$
T¢
ii69,968.
$
$
105,568.
$ 35,600.
$
COL (S) — (3) COL (6)
CDL (3)
NUMBER OF POSITIONS
LM
i—
IleC
p
JUSTIFICATION FORM
New Expenditure
or
S
S
'
Position Category
e
Amount
Justification
d.
(4)
(I)
(2)
(3)
Schedule II
Other Personal Sery
ces
30,600.00
Underestimated the amount of work and
the personnel required to complete
the review of all properties for the
197$ Tax Roll.
Schedule IA I Amount needed for additional hours
Overtime - Salaries 5,000.00 of regular employees to complete the
& Benefits computation of reviewed properties
for the1978 Tax Roll.
35,600.00
1
1
1
MONTH
January
February
March
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT - ACCOUNT NO. 1201
PRESENT PART TIME EMPLOYEES - NO OVERTIME.
EXPENDED BALANCE OF
AMOUNT TO DATE ACCOUNT
1,118.25 4,789.75 9,510.25
2,900.00
6,789.75
9,689.75
7,510.25
4,610.25
BUDGETED 14,300.00
ADDITIONAL ^MPLOYEES PROJECTED
One @ $3.50/Hr.. **OVERTIME BALANCE OF
Three @ $3.00/Hr. ALL PART-TIME ACCOUNT �
9,510.25
364.00 - 7,146.25
.arc
1,196.00 2,325.00 725.25
April
2,500.00
1.2,189.75
2,110.25
1,092.00
1,860.00
- 4,726.75
May
2,900.00
15,089.75
- 789.75 -
1,196.00
2,325.00
-11,147.75
June
2,750.00
17,839.75
- 3,539.75 -
1,144.00
1,860.00
-16,901.75
July
2,750.00
20,589.75
- 6,289.75 -
1,144.00
1,860.00
-22,655.75
August
2,900.00
23,489.7.5
- 9,189.75 -
1,196.00
2,325.00
-29,076.75
TOTALS
19,818.25
7,332.0'0.
4 12,555.00
SOCIAL SEC.
MATCHING - 335.00
s
445.00
760.00 1,540.00
-30,616.75
**Overtime 10 temp employees'@ 10 hrs. per week
ave;. 4:65 per hour - $465.00/Wk.
Schedule IA - Overtime - Needed for Regular Employees ......... ................................................ 5,000.00
TOTAL REQUESTED 35,616.75
ROUNDED FIGURE - 35,600.00
C::)
r—
l.LJ
LA-
THE BOARD DISCUSSED WITH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER THE NEED
FOR MORE THAN ONE SET OF AERIAL PHOTOS, AND IT WAS AGREED TO. ORDER
ONE SET.
RESOLUTION N0. 78-10 AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT TO RICHARD AND
ARLYNE ZORC ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE
REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1978.
i
X
FEB 2 21978
800K 34 PnE 1B
M M M
RESOLUTION NO. 78-10
WHEREAS, there is a drainage and utility easement on each side
of the side lot lines of Oslo Park, as filed in Plat Book
3, page.96, Indian River County, Florida, records` and
WHEREAS, Richard J. Zorc, and Arlyne A. Zorc, his wife, are the
owners of Lots 14 and 15, Block A, of Oslo Park, herein-
before described; and
WHEREAS, said property is under Contract for Sale and the prospec-
tive Purchasers are contemplating the erection of a building on said lots,
which said building will lie over the side lot line easements on each
sidb of the boundry line between Lots 14 and 15.
WHEREAS, the said Purchasers will not complete said sale unless
and until such side lot line easements are released by the theCounty
Commission of Indian River County, Florida;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, as follows,
1. The Board does hereby release the 5 -foot side lot line easement
on either side of the side lot line between Lots 14 and 15 on Block A of
said Oslo Park,
2. That the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners be aut-
orised to.sign a Release of Easement as above set out, and to have said
Release recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
.Dated this 8th day of February , 1978.
ATTES`P,
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT CdtRT
By__4 L&Y
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Or, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ByV:
=:
William C. WodtY.e, Cairman
34 PAw
M
RELEASE O1-' EASs9sV1
THIS RELEASE OF EASEIAENT; made and executed this 8thday of February]
between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, party of the first part, and
Richard J. Zorce and Arlyne A. Zorc, his wife, parties of the second
part;
WITNESSETHt
For and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND N0/100 (10.00)
Dollars and other good valuable considerations, in hand paid by the
party of the second part, the receipt whereof being hereby acknowledged,
the said party of the first part does herewith release, discharge and
quit claim unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs, legal
repres6ntatives, and assigns, forever, the easements in favor of the
party of the first part on real property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, which said easements are as follows,
The South 5 feet of Lot 14;
The North 5 feet of Lot 15;
All on Block A of OSLO PARK, according to the Plat
thereof filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Indian River County, Florida, in Plat Boob 3, page 96; said land
lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first party, by virtue of the
authority vested by law in the Board of County Commissioners, and for
and on behalf of the County of Indian River, State of Florida, have
caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Chairman and
its seal to be affixed, attested by its Clerk of the Circuit Court.
Signed, sealed, and delivered
in the presence oft BOARD OF COUNTY CMUdiSSIONERS
f �-2 OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLO IDA
f� By ✓���lf
William C. Wodtke, Chairmrh
ATTEST s
FREDA WRIGHT, Clerk of the Circuit
Court
By
(Seal)
FEB 2 21978F
r
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER r `
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer
duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledg-
ments, personally appearod WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., as Chairman of
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, State of
Florida, and acknowledged before me executing the above and foregoing
'instrument, in the presence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and
voluntarily, under the authority duly vested in him by Law, and that
the Seal of the said Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, State of Florida, affixed thereto in the true seal of the
i
foregoing.
Witness my hand and official seal in said State and County
this th day ofd t/trrw.% f�,1R78,
Not ry N tblic , IS/tate aff,.lurida
at Larg�
My Commission Expirest
NOTAP PUSLIC SATS EBF Flo -.410A 14T LOC :
MY C0A4h%'SS10N MfCSS IMY C. 197,4
�./. F TN®(� RF Nffi A( IaCIJoA 1.CR (IF([%CCt/NI.PC(!S
F E B 2 2 1978 3, 4, PA'E `..
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND
WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND PHOS.
57337 - 57424 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM
THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS
•PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH
RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES..
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:10 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
aLkICLERK
73
poox 34 PAGE 82