HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/23/1978WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1978
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT"THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH,
FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1978, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT
WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, .JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN;
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, .JR.; EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; AND R. DON DEESON. ALSO
PRESENT WERE .JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY"
THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, .JR., ATTORNEY
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE
OFFICER; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE
FLAG, AND REVEREND BERT SAUNDERS OF THE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH GAVE
THE INVOCATION.
COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED THAT FOUR BUDGET AMENDMENTS IN
REGARD TO THE COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE, THE ANTI -RECESSION FUND AUDIT,
THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING AUDIT, AND THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT, BE
ADDED TO THE CLERK'S AGENDA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE ABOVE FOUR ITEMS TO THE
CLERKS AGENDA AS REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER Loy.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT
TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF THE FOLLOWING:
ANTHONY E. D'ANGELO, COL. USA RETD.
WALLACE CARTER
J. HUNTER SMI.TH, M.D.
MARGARET MADSEN
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
,DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER's MISCELLANEOUS
SUPPLIES ACCOUNT FOR THE BALANCE OF THE FISCAL YEAR, AS FOLLOWS:
�CCOUNT TITLE COUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE
MISC. SUPPLIES & EXPENSE 01-2101-204 250.00
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701 250.00
AUG
3 1978 BOOK J PAGE D3
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET
AMENDMENT
TO PROVIDE
MONIES NEEDED BY VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS TO FUND THE
BALANCE OF
THE FISCAL
YEAR AS FOLLOWS:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No.
INCREASE
DECREASE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMM.
INSURANCE 01-2101-106.00
222.00
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
INSURANCE 01-2104-106.00
33.00
COURTHOUSE & ANNEX
INSURANCE 01-2670-106.00
33.00
BUILDING & ZONING
INSURANCE .01-3440-106.00
345.00
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00
633.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET
AMENDMENT
TO PAY FOR THE
XEROX MACHINE IN THE COUNTY .JUDGE'S OFFICE -FOR
THE"BALANCE
OF THE FISCAL
YEAR, AS FOLLOWS:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No.C
E SDECREASE
RENT - Em IP�iENT 03-2324-331.10
280.00
COMMISSION & FEES 03-2324-334
280.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET
AMENDMENT
TO PAY FOR
- THE TELEPHONE ACCOUNT FOR THE COUNTY EXTENSION
SERVICE FOR
THE BALANCE
OF THE FISCAL YEAR, AS FOLLOWS:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No,
JNCREASE.DECREASE.
COMMUNICATIONS 01-6302-235.00
200.00
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00
200.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,
SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY -APPROVED A BUDGET
AMENDMENT
TO PAY FOR
THE AUDIT OF THE ANTI -RECESSION FUND BY W. 0. DALEY
& CO.,
AS
AccQuNT TITLE ACCOUNT PJO.
C SE
E R
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64-2101-341.01
750.00
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 64-9990-701.00
750.00
2
i9 `�
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO PAY FOR
THE AUDIT OF THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND BY W.O. DALEY & CO., AS
FOLLOWS:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO, INCREASE DECREASE.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 62-2101-341.01 2,370.00
RES. FOR CONTINGENCIES 62-9990-701.00 2,370.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE THE
$900.00 APPROVED FOR MATERIALS TO BE USED AT THE PARK IN•GIFFORD, AS
FOLLOWS:
ACCOUNT TITLE A(COUNT NO, INCREASE DECREASE
EQUIPMENT .62-6101-402.99 900.00
RES. FOR CONTENGENCIES 62-9990-701.00 900.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR PETE
SPYKE, AGRICULTURAL AGENT, AS FOLLOWS:
AUGUST 28 GAINESVILLE PESTICIDE TRAINER'S WORKSHOP
SEPT. 6-7 LAKE ALFRED YOUNG TREE DECLINE CONFERNCE AT
EDUCATION
KE ALFRED RESEARCH AND
�ENTER
R
ON LOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETRO -ACTIVE APPROVAL OF ADMISSION
OF EDWARD BROWN TO A.G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLL CORRECTION,
CIRCUIT COURT, SPRING TERM 1978, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $12.00.
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON -FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
PORT OF
ONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, Ju Y 1978
NANCIAL
MINANCIAL
EPORT, COUNTY COURT, TrRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU, JUNE,
����
REPORT, OUNTY COURT, R/�FFIC QLATION BUREAU, ULY,
�tS
TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME - JULY I
PLANNING DIRECTOR STAN REDICK CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO MAKE
PRESENTATIONS RE TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF VARIOUS SUBDIVISIONS AND
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS HAVE WORKED
OUT A SYSTEM WHERE PRELIMINARY PLATS ARE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING
3
AUS 231978 6Tj
DEPARTMENT AND THEN GO TO THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE SO THAT
WHEN A PLAT COMES TO THE BOARD, IT WILL EITHER BE COMPLETE, OR
HE WILL KNOW WHERE IT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE.,
THE FIRST TENTATIVE APPROVAL REQUESTED WAS FOR TRACT FOUR
SUBDIVISION. MR. REDICK STATED THAT SOME QUESTION HAS ARISEN WITH
REGARD TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THIS SUBDIVISION, AND HE ASKED THAT IT BE
REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS CONCURRED AND STATED THAT APPARENTLY IN
THIS PARTICULAR MATTER, THERE IS A QUESTION BETWEEN THE OWNERS
THEMSELVES. HE DID NOT FEEL THE BOARD SHOULD BECOME INVOLVED UNTIL
THIS HAS BEEN CLEARED UP.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK NEXT TOOK UP TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF
WHITE SURF SUBDIVISION, OWNED BY .JAY LESHAW, HE INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT THIS IS A SMALL THREE -LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED SOUTH OF ROUND ISLAND
PARK ON THE EAST SIDE OF STATE ROAD AIA, AND IT WAS REZONED A FEW
MONTHS AGO. MR. REDICK STATED THAT THIS SUBDIVISION DOES MEET THE
STANDARDS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN ALL RESPECTS; HAS MADE ALL THE
CHANGES REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE; AND HE WOULD
RECOMMEND ITS APPROVAL.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE PLAT STATES "PUBLIC"
WATER SUPPLY.
DANA HOWARD, AGENT FOR MR. LESHAW, EXPLAINED THAT IT IS A
REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEM AND ACTUALLY WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED, BUT WILL
BE OWNED JOINTLY BY THE THREE LOT OWNERS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE PLAT SHOULD NOT STATE "PUBLIC"
WATER SUPPLY AND THAT THE WORD "PRIVATE" SHOULD APPEAR ON THE PLAT.
DANA HOWARD AGREED THAT THIS COULD BE DONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO WHITE
SURF SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO CHANGING THE WORD "PUBLIC" WATER SUPPLY
TO `PRIVATE,"
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK INFORMED THE BOARD THAT CARLSWARD
SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS LOCATED NORTH OF SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD AND EAST
OF RANGE LINE ROAD, HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW
COMMITTEE AND RECOMMENDED FOR -APPROVAL
THE BOARD DISCUSSED POSSIBLE FUTURE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
A WATER RESERVOIR IN THIS AREA,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF
CARLSWARD SUBDIVISION,
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A
NUMBER OF CHANGES WERE MADE ON THE PLAT OF CASTAWAY COVE SUBDIVISION,
UNIT #2, AND STORM DRAINAGE, LOT DIMENSIONS, AND PLANTING EASEMENTS,
ARE NOW SHOWN, HE NOTED THAT THIS IS A PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION; ALL
THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE HAVE
BEEN MET; AND IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL,
ROBERT LLOYD, AGENT FOR IDLEWYLD CORPORATION, DEVELOPER OF
THIS SUBDIVISION, NOTED THAT THIS PLAT IS PART OF AN OVERALL
DEVELOPMENT PLANT, ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS DUNES OF DEAUVILLE,
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS CONCURRED AND STATED THAT THE OVERALL
PLAN WAS APPROVED SOME TIME AGO,
COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED ABOUT THE 60` R/W FOR THE ENTRANCE,
AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS COMPLIED WITH,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO CASTAWAY
COVE, UNIT #2,
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK THEN DISCUSSED TREASURE COAST
DEVELOPMENT CORP, SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS LOCATED EAST OF SOUTH STATE
ROAD AIA BETWEEN PORPOISE POINT SUBDIVISION AND FLORALTON BEACH, HE
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERE WAS A SLIGHT REDESIGN OF THE SERVICE
ROAD AND SOME LOTS AND SOME AGREEMENTS AS TO THE MEANDERING OF THE
PAVEMENT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SHARP CURVE ON REEF ROAD, MR,
REDICK CONTINUED THAT THERE WAS ALSO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OWNER
AND THE ADMINISTRATOR IN REGARD TO A SPLITTING OF COSTS IN REPAVING
THE ROAD FROM SEA GRAPE DRIVE TO REEF ROAD,
E
a) P"'P'F , k.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THIS PORTION OF THE ROAD
IS READY TO BE RESURFACED IN ANY EVENT AND IS ONE OF THE ROADS THE
COUNTY ALREADY MAINTAINS.
MR. LLOYD, AGENT FOR TREASURE COAST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
NOTED THAT BECAUSE OF THE MORATORIUM ON SEWER FRANCHISES, THE
SUBDIVISION WAS PLATTED INTO 1/2 ACRE LOTS, BUT STATED THAT AS SOON
AS THE MORATORIUM IS LIFTED, THEY INTEND TO PUT IN SEWERS.
IN DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PLAT STATES THE SEWAGE
WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH.
MR. LLOYD INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IS INCORRECT, AND THAT THEY
HAVE MADE ARRANGEMENTS TO TIE INTO THE MOORINGS SEWAGE SYSTEM.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER Loy, TO GRANT TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF TREASURE COAST
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO CORRECTING THE PLAT
TO STATE THAT SEWAGE COLLECTION WILL BE PROVIDED BY PRIVATE FACILITIES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED POSSIBLE LATER REPLATTING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION, AND MR. LLOYD POINTED OUT THAT BECAUSE OF THE MORATORIUM
THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN SUBDIVIDE RIGHT NOW AND COMPLY IS WITH 1/2 ACRE
LOTS. HE STATED THAT WHEN THEY CAN PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER, THEY
PROBABLY WILL REPLAT INTO SMALLER LOTS..
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MR. LLOYD ASKED IF CERTIFICATES OF �1EPOSIT WOULD BE
ACCEPTABLE INSTEAD OF A CASH BOND, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THEY
WOULD BE IF THEY WERE IRREVOCABLY COMMITTED TO THE COUNTY.
TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF ORANGE TERRACE SUBDIVISION WAS NEXT
BROUGHT UP.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FILED THE FOLLOWING AFFIDAVIT IN REGARD
TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND LEFT
THE MEETING AT 9:05 O'CLOCK A.M.
AUG 2 3 1973
A F F I D A V I T
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared
EDWIN S. SCHNAJCIQ':R, of 610 Wall Street, Vero Beach, Florida, who says:
1. This affidavit is given pursuant to Florida Statues Chapter 112.313
which provides standards of conduct for officers and employees of state
agencies, counties, cities and other political subdivision, legislators and
legislative employees.
2. That I am a duly elected County Commissioner of Indian River County,
Florida, and that in addition to my duties as County Commissioner, I am a
licensed professional engineer in Florida and engage in private practice as
a consulting engineer.
3. That I am the President of TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida
Corporation in good standing which corporation has represented the Client ,
Mr. Frank Zorc on a minor item of a subdivision plat on 6th Ave.
4. The decision will be referred to the Board of County Commissioners
on 8/23/78 for their action at which time the affiant proposes to abstain
from voting tecause of the above conflict of interest.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 3 `` day of 197
d
epi JJ4�. ,Z".' > . 4a
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER NOTARY PUB ; STATE OF FLORIi& AT LARGE
Vy Commission Expires:
t40TARY PUBLIC ST -NTE O= FLORIDA Al LARGE
MY CCt: IAISSION EXPIRES JULY 8 191B2
GONDED THRU GEWR1L INS. UNDERWRITERS
00-0
F�.
u
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK STATED THAT ORANGE TERRACE
SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH AVENUE AND
14TH STREET AND CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY NINE ACRES WHICH THE OWNER
PROPOSES TO SUBDIVIDE INTO 12 -LOTS. HE CONTINUED THAT A NUMBER OF
CHANGES WERE MADE IN THE PLAT AND IT NOW MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE ORDINANCE IN FULL. THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE IS SATISFIED
WITH THE CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE
SUBDIVISION.
FRANK ZORC, AGENT FOR ORANGE TERRACE SUBDIVISION, DISCUSSED
DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SUBDIVISION
AND ASKED IF IT WOULD BE ALL RIGHT TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ONLY
ON ONE SIDE AS IT IS POSSIBLE THESE ROADS MAY NEVER GO IN.
MR. REDICK NOTED THERE IS CURRENTLY A HALF STREET ON THE
SOUTH AND JUST A DITCH EXTENDING IT TO SIXTH AVENUE. THE HALF STREET
ON THE NORTH GOES INTO 14TH STREET AND DOES GO ALL THE WAY BACK INTO
THE AREA THAT IT IS ANTICIPATED WILL DEVELOP SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE,
WHICH IS WHY THEY FELT THE ROAD.SHOULD BE DEDICATED.
MR. 'ZORC STATED THAT HE WAS TOLD A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS
ACCEPTABLE FOR A COUNTY ROAD AND ASKED IF THE PLAT COULD BE AMENDED
TO SHOW 50' INSTEAD OF 60'.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONCURRED WITH CHANGING THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY FROM 60' TO 50', BUT STATED HE FIRMLY BELIEVED THAT THE
RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON BOTH THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SUBDIVISION SHOULD
BE CONTINUED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ABSTAINED, THE BOARD GRANTED TENTATIVE
APPROVAL TO ORANGE TERRACE SUBDIVISION, AND AGREED THAT THE 60'
RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE ENTRANCE ROAD BE CHANGED TO 50'; ALL ROAD
RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND UTILITIES TO BE AS LOCATED ON THE TENTATIVE PLAT,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 9:15
O`CLOCK A.M.
ROBERT LLOYD, ENGINEER, NEXT APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD IN
REGARD TO VACATION OF PART OF A DIRT ROAD IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN
THE VICINITY OF .JUNGLE TRAIL. HE STATED THAT HIS CLIENT, Cy LAPLANT,
H
AUG 23 1978
WISHES THIS VACATED SO IT DOESNIT SPLIT HIS TRACT IN HALF, HE
CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE NO HOMES LOCATED THERE NOW; THIS IS UNDER
ONE OWNERSHIP; AND THEY INTEND TO MAKE A COMPARABLE ROAD, HE
POINTED OUT THAT THIS WOULD RESULT IN A BETTER INTERSECTION ON
STATE ROAD Alk AND ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS CONCURRED,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADVERTISEMENT OF A PUBLIC
HEARING IN REGARD TO VACATION OF PART OF A DIRT ROAD IN GOVERNMENT
LOT 2, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, AS REQUESTED
BY ROBERT LLOYD,
EDWIN WARD APPEARED REPRESENTING PAULINE WILKERSON IN
REGARD TO OBTAINING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION ON HER PROPERTY, WHICH IS
LOT.47, SECTION 22, FLEMING GRANT, IN ROSELAND, MR, WARD STATED
THAT MRS, WILKERSON HAS NO ACCESS ON THE RIVER OR TO ANY PAVED
ROAD, BUT THERE IS AN APPROXIMATELY 20' WIDE SHELL RIGHT-OF-WAY
WHICH SERVES THIS LOT AND SEVERAL OTHERS AND HAS BEEN IN USE FOR
SEVENTY YEARS, HE NOTED THAT THIS IS THE ONLY ACCESS AVAILABLE,
AND THERE I,S NO POSSIBILITY OF PUTTING A PAVED ROAD INTO THIS
PROPERTY, MR, WARD CONTINUED THAT MRS, !lILKERSON HAS OWNED THIS
PROPERTY'SINCE LONG BEFORE 1973, AS EVIDENCED BY THE DEED MADE OUT
TO PAULINE SWEIGERT, HER MAIDEN NAME, AND SHE WISHES TO BE ABLE TO
OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT TO PUT ONE RESIDENCE ON THIS ACREAGE,
MR, WARD STATED THAT MRS, WILKERSON IS IN CALIFORNIA, AND HE DID
NOT KNOW WHETHER SHE INTENDS TO BUILD HERSELF,
ZONING DIRECTOR DEWEY WALKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS IS
A ROUTINE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PAULINE
S. WILKERSON.
DEWEY WALKER, ZONING DIRECTOR, DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A
REQUEST BY EARL MCGRIFF FOR RELEASE OF SIDE LOT LINE EASEMENTS IN OSLO
PARK, HE NOTED THAT THESE LOTS HAVE 2-1%2` SIDE LOT LINE EASEMENTS AND
5' REAR LOT LINE EASEMENTS, BUT THEY ARE REQUESTING RELEASE OF THE SIDE
LOT LINE EASEMENTS ONLY,
AUG 2 3.1978
w
Rt a c
pz� 71
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS CONFIRMED THAT THE 5' DRAINAGE
UTILITY EASEMENTS ON THE REAR OF ALL THE LOTS ARE NOT TO BE RELEASED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS QUESTIONED THE WORDING PROPOSED IN THE
RELEASE WHICH REFERS TO THE EASEMENTS RUNNING "ALONG THE LOTS.
HE FELT THIS SHOULD BE "BETWEEN," AND FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE WOULD
BE NO RELEASE OF THE SIDE LOT EASEMENTS ON THE NORTH ENDS OF LOTS
12 AND 13 OR THE SOUTH ENDS OF LOTS 7 AND 16.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 78-54 APPROV-
ING RELEASE OF EASEMENTS IN BLOCK H, OSLO PARK AS REQUESTED BY EARL
MCGRIFF AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE TO THE DOCUMENTS,
WHICH ARE TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT. THE EASE-
MENTS WHICH ARE TO BE RELEASED.IN BLOCK H, OSLO PARK, ARE AS FOLLOWS:
THE NORTH SIDE LOT LINE OF LOT 7;
THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDE LOT LINES OF LOT H;
THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDE LOT LINES OF LOT 9;
THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDE LOT LINES OF LOT 10;
THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDE LOT LINES OF LOT 11;
THE SOUTH SIDE LOT LINE OF LOT 1Z;
THE SOUTH SIDE LOT LINE OF LOT 13;
THE NORTH AND SOUTH LOT LINES OF LOT 14;
THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE LOT LINES OF LOT 15; AND.
THE NORTH SIDE LOT LINE OF LOT 16.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER DISCUSSED THE RELEASE OF SIDE LOT
LINE EASEMENTS REQUESTED BY WILLIAM DEAUGUSTINIS IN GRANADA GARDENS,
AND SOME QUESTION AROSE,AS TO THE OWNERSHIP OF LOT 3.
•ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY TABLED CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST FOR
RELEASE OF EASEMENTS MADE BY WILLIAM DEAUGUSTINIS UNTIL THE NEXT
MEETING SO THAT CORRECT OWNERSHIP MAY BE DETERMINED.
REVEREND DON BROWN PRESENTED TO THE BOARD A LETTER FROM
J RALPH LUNDY, PRESIDENT OF THE GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE IN
REGARD TO A SITE FOR DUMPSTERS IN THE GIFFORD AREA, AS FOLLOWS:
AUG 2 31978
10
$� au 'w 72
THE GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE
24.20 45th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
August 20,1978
To: The Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
RE: Dumpster for The Gifford Area
Dear Commissioners:
After making a careful study on a possible site for two or more
dumpsters to be stationed in the Gifford area, we are making the fol-
lowing recommendation:
The Gifford Progressive Civic League is appealing to the county
officials to designate a small portion of the old county dump former -
located on South Gifford Road as the site for a dumping station.
By stationing the dumpsters in this area, on county property on
or near the old dump would adequately serve all of the Gifford area
without creating other problems.
We will appreciate you approving this request at your August 23
meeting.
Gratef ,
J. Ralph Lundy
League President
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THIS LOCATION IS THE SITE THAT
WAS DESIGNATED FOR THIS PURPOSE, AND THE CHAIRMAN AGREED THAT IT IS
THE SITE WE HAD HOPED WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE.
DALE WEHR REPORTED -THAT THEY ARE MOVING ALONG RAPIDLY ON
THE TENNIS COURTS AT THE GIFFORD PARK AND ARE RECEIVING FULL
COOPERATION FROM THE COUNTY, HE STATED THAT THEY WILL BE READY FOR
THE LIMEROCK IN THE NEXT DAY OR SO, AND GROUPS ARE PREPARING FOR
FUND RAISING ACTIVITIES, MR. i'JEHR NOTED THAT AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING
CHAIRMAN WODTKE HAD SUGGESTED PLACING TREE TRUNKS AROUND THE PERIMETER
OF THE TENNIS COURT AREA TO KEEP VEHICLES OFF, BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE
11
7mm",
I
P:.
Ts
ENOUGH TREES AND WOULD LIKE TO BORROW A CHAIN SAW FROM THE COUNTY
TO CUT DOWN MORE TREES TO BLOCK OFF THE AREA,
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT OUR INSURANCE
DOES NOT COVER LENDING EQUIPMENT OUT, THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED
THAT IF MR, WEHR WOULD FLAG THE TREES, AND THE BOARD APPROVES, HE
WOULD ARRANGE FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE BY THE ROAD AND BRIDGE
DEPARTMENT,
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT SHOULD
COOPERATE WITH MR, WEHR ON THIS MATTER,
THE HOUR OF 10:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO WIT: pug
v Cd J.isM, l•." _. re ^f '`..4 &- a°... _.. r.... n:_.i..,...: .d,.. q4 y. — xlr y a s•� a. *.. ,�,•Agifg:. .. ,.. .. ,..4 -• s
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA r f
Before the undersigned authority pefsonally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River
County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of N--\. t1
in the Court, was pub -
fished in said newspaper In the issues of QLLL, 2"my
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tiserr.ent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom tp�znd subscribed before me this y f A.D_ 12 79
' (B ine Manager}
AiL
(SEAQ ve Co
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian R unty, Florida)
NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ABANDONING, DISCONTINUING,
' - AND CLOSING OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
_.. TO AND
IT MAY CONCERN:
YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, at 10:00 o'clock a.m. on
the 23rd day of August, 1978, in the County
Commissioners' Meeting Room at the County
Courthouse in Vero Beach, Florida, will hold a
i Public Hearing to consider and determine
whether or not the County will vacate, aban•
don, discontinue, close, renounce and disclaim
any right of the County and the public in and to
the following right-of-way running through the
t following described property, to wit:
' All that portion of Pecan Road situate in the
South 1/2 of Section 9, Township 32 South, .
Range 39 East, or in the North In of Section 16,
Township 32 South, Range 39 East, iying and
being East of a point that is 60 feet East of the
Westerly boundary of Tract 21 in the South 'A
of Section 9, Township 32 South, Range 39 East,
and West of the Westerly Right of Way of
Lateral "G" Canal.
PERSONS INTERESTED MAY APPEAR
AND BE HEARD AT THE TIME AND PLACE
I ABOVE SPECIFIED.
Board of County Commissioners
Of Indian River County, Florida
By: -s -William C. Wodtke Jr.
July 26,1978.
104
0513PAG�691
12
s
UG 231978
t.
JAMES BEINDORF, ENGINEER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING
FLORIDA LAND COMPANY, HE NOTED THAT AS DISCUSSED AT A PREVIOUS
MEETING, THIS PROPERTY IS BEING DEVELOPED INTO AN ATTRACTIVE GOLF
COURSE PROJECT. THE GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT HAS BEEN SELECTED AND
CONSTRUCTION WILL COMMENCE WITHIN A 30 -DAY PERIOD. MR. BEINDORF
STATED THAT THE REASON FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND RELOCATION OF THIS
RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS BECAUSE IT IS IN
THE WAY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE ROAD ENDS AT THE LATERAL G CANAL
WHICH IS OWNED BY THE 11ATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. MR. BEINDORF
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE APPEARED BEFORE THE DRAINAGE
DISTRICT BOARD, AND HAVE BEEN GIVEN APPROVAL BY THE DRAINAGE
DISTRICT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL AND ABANDONMENT BY THE COUNTY COMMISSION.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON-, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOU,UTION No. 78-56 ABANDONING
A PORTION OF PECAN ROAD AS ADVERTISED; THE PAPERS TO BE PREPARED
AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE
CHAIRMAN ON APPROVAL BY THE ATTORNEY,
13
AUG ? 11978
40" PA '� 79 .
... ... ..... .......:.,.,. ,.,., ... .. : ::, <_�_;.=,..vsa4+'+YavtarW.,.'s �PYr.•x!t`i�•..�rao."r pi.•�. ,i�r<w •rpi.;r:-..: ir.,gY•N.- s:.=:.-�.,. ,.. .. e.,,rri�4i.o'ear.. v-;�'a!1se.rj.'d'�ax+-�v.
R E S G L U T I O N NO. 78-56
WHEREAS, INDIAN RIVER TRAILS LAND TRUST, did petition the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, requesting
said Board to adopt a Resolution to vacate, abandon, discontinue
and close certain public streets and roads as hereinafter de-
scribed; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held by said Board on
August 23, 1978, at 10 A.M., pursuant to Notice thereof duly
published
published in the Vero Beach Press Journal, a newspaper of general
.circulation in Indian.River County, which said publication was
had two weeks prior to the public hearing as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has duly con-
sidered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THIS BOARD does find
and determine the following:
1. That this Board has published a Notice of Hearing on
the petition of INDIAN RIVER TRAILS LAND TRUST one time in the
Vero Beach Press Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in
Indian River County, Florida, said publication being published at
least two weeks prior to the time stated thereon for such public
hearing.
2. That the land hereinbelow described is not a part of
public road and street required by the State of Florida, by the
Federal Government as part of the State of Federal Highway
System and said portion of the right-of-way as described herein-
below is not located within the corporate limits of any minici-
pality and is located in Indian River County, Florida, the fol-
lowing described land is not needed for street, road, highway or
other public purposes by Indian River County, Florida.
,
AU 513 PAGE 0 b 0 0
Co
=:-
m
r�
co
P
Iv
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County for and on behalf of Indian
River County, Florida; does hereby renounce and disclaim any
right, title or interest in and to -'the following described public
street or road to -wit:
All that portion of Pecan Road situate in the
South 1/2 of Section 9, Township 32 South,
Range 39 East, or in the North 1/2 of Section
16, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, lying
and being East of a point that is 60 feet East
of the Westerly boundary of Tract 21 in the
South 1/2 of Section 9, Township 32 South,
Range 39 East, and West of the Westerly Right
of Way of Lateral "G" Canal.
and that the same be and is hereby vacated, abandoned, discon-
tinued and closed and that all express or implied dedications
thereon and resulting therefrom are hereby vacated, abandoned,
discontinued and closed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Notice of the adoption of
this Resolution shall be published once in the Vero Beach Press
Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in Indian River
County, Florida, and proof of publication of the Notice of Public
Hearing, a certified copy of this Resolution as adopted and proof
of the publication of Notice of adoption of such Resolution shall
be recorded in the deed records of Indian River County, Florida,
as required by law.
o
William C. Wodtke, Jr., Chairman
I do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resoluti-� 'r'i -, a
duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of•indian River
,e
County at its regular meeting of
Freda Wright
Clerk of the Board of County Circuit
Court of Indian River County, Florida.
®u 0 5 3 d1A4'
III fQb 0 Q
ev Pp), 1
1�J
EDWARD REGAN, DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM,
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERE STILL IS A SMALL MATTER THAT NEEDS TO
BE RESOLVED IN REGARD TO ROUGH GRADING THE LIMEROCK FOR THE GIFFORD
TENNIS COURTS.
MR. WEHR STATED THAT THE GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE
WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE ROUGH GRADING OF THE LIMEROCK
WOULD BE DONE BY THE COUNTY, BUT THIS WAS NOT BROUGHT UP AGAIN AT
THE LAST MEETING, AND HE NOW UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST BE AUTHORIZED.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS FELT THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO THE
COUNTY GOING IN AND ROUGH GRADING THE LIMEROCK AS LONG AS IT IS
THOROUGHLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ASPHALT, ETC., IS NOT TO BE APPLIED
UNTIL OTHERS HAVE FINE GRADED THE LIMEROCK. HE STATED THAT WE HAVE
THE CAPABILITIES FOR ROUGH GRADING, BUT HE WOULD LIKE THE MINUTES
TO SHOW THAT THE FINISH GRADE, THE DRESSING, CROWNING, ETC., OF THE
1
LIMEROCK MUST BE DONE BY OTHERS BEFORE THE ASPHALT IS APPLIED.
MR, WEHR STATED THAT DICKERSON WILL DO ALL THAT, AND
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHY THEY CANT DO THE ROUGH GRADING. MR.
WEHR STATED THAT HEIS TRYING TO SAVE MONEY.
. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REPEATED THAT THE COUNTY CAN ROUGH
GRADE, BUT IF THIS IS NOT FINISHED IN A PROPER MANNER, THE
COURT WILL NEVER BE SATISFACTORY SO HE WANTS IT THOROUGHLY UNDERSTOOD
THAT THE COUNTY IS ROUGH GRADING ONLY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD JUST INSTRUCT
THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PUSH THE PILES OF LIMEROCK DOWN AS THE TRUCKS
COME IN, AND THEN DICKERSON CAN COME IN AND FINISH THE JOB,
CHAIRMAN VIODTKE STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH
INSTRUCTING ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS TO GO.UP AND ROUGH GRADE THE
LIMEROCK.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR SHOULD COOPERATE
IN ROUGH GRADING THE LIMEROCK, BUT EMPHASIZED THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINE GRADING AND LAYING IN THE ASPHALT.
16
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER DISCUSSED PAYING THE TREASURE
COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL ASSESSMENT FOR 1978-79, WHICH
AMOUNTS TO $9,261.56 AND IS DUE BY NOVEMBER IST, HE NOTED THAT
THIS IS ABOUT A $2,000 INCREASE OVER LAST YEARS ASSESSMENT, BUT
IT IS DUE TO MONEY SPENT FIGHTING THE DRI WHICH WAS IN LITIGATION
FOR A LONG TIME.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THIS CAN BE TAKEN CARE OF IN OUR
REGULAR BUDGET,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A LETTER HAS BEEN
RECEIVED FROM THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AS FOLLOWS:
17
PM
!
AUG 2 3 197 cr.
rn:
The attached proposal was unanimously approved by all members of the Town Cot;rdcil !
at a special meeting 10 August 78.
G 197E
TOWN Or INDIAN RIVER SHORES
6001 NORTH A -i -A
INDIAN RIVER SHORES, FLORIDA 32960
Telephone: AC 305-562-1736
Council Members � " � � 4
4Y " ';; � CHESTER E CLEM
EDWARD J. NOLAN, Mayor _' •• t'� a Town Attorney
SUZANNE M. BODEN, Vice -Mayor ",:..:_ { JAMES W. YOUNG
FRITZ E GIERHART nom" �` r :?, Town Clerk
PAUL X. PARENT. ROBERT F. LLOYD
,.. l
THAD D. WILKINS k. 'tom , .- Town Engineer 4
Y�s:�CtimiT.i
August 10, 1978
Board of County Commissioners r
Indian River County Court House I
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
SUBJECT: T014N OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
PROPOSAL,.,TO COUNTY COUNCIL MMOERS RE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN
RIVER SHORES, FLORIDA
L. Indian River Shores will extend its best efforts toward the i
creation of a south county taxing district through a referendum
by the end of 1978. We urge professional planning, either by i
NFPA or ISO.
2. If a south county taxing district is created, Indian River Shores fire iE
operation will be integrated into a south county fire system and �!
funded by the county.
. s
3. If a south county taxing district is not created by the end of 1978,
the county will enter into an agreement with Indian River Shores, j
mutually satisfactory to both, whereby the county will contribute
a reasonable sunt to the operation expenses of the fire department
of Indian River Shores in return for the fire equipment being
available to county residents other than Indian River Shores and the
abrogation of the current contracts between the county and Indian i
River Shores, whereupon'Indian River Shores will withdraw its com-
plaint for declaratory judgement against the county.
4. The county will contribute one-half of the 1978-79 Indian Fiver
Shores operating budget forthe fire department - $92,000.00.
Yours very truly,
• TOWN OF INDIAN RIVED. SHORES
Edward J. Nolan, lay r RECEIVED
µr
lftlmirstrator's office
llice
rre NLi
C�i✓ fh�4j�'�`, �. �rad,.
AUG 2 3 19.78
x
L
THE CHAIRMAN FELT THE TOWN WANTS TO MAINTAIN THEIR FIRE
DEPARTMENT ON THE SAME STATUS AS LAST YEAR, I.E. OPERATE IT THEMSELVES.
HE FELT IN THIS MEMO THEY HAVE SAID IF THE COUNTY WILL CONTRIBUTE
ONE-HALF OF THE OPERATING BUDGET, THEY WILL SUPPORT THE TAXING
DISTRICT AND POSSIBLY DROP THE SUIT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DID NOT FEEL THE BOARD SHOULD DISCUSS
THE SUIT, BUT JUST RESPOND THAT IF WE ARE UNSUCCESSFUL IN THE SUIT,
WE HAVE BUDGETED THE $48,010, WHICH IS THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE COUNTY
TOTAL TAX CONTRIBUTION FOR FIRE CONTROL. THIS WILL BE'PAYABLE IN
INSTALLMENTS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE LEGAL QUESTION IS RESOLVED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IT WILL BE SOME TIME.BEFORE THE
LITIGATION IS CONCLUDED AND THAT SOME DECISIONS WILL HAVE TO BE
MADE NOW PENDING THE OUTCOME.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THE BOARD SHOULD MAKE ANY SPECIFIC
RESPONSE TO OTHER AREAS MENTIONED IN THE --MEMO.
1
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HIS ATTITUDE IS THAT THIS IS
A RATHER ONE-SIDED EX PARTE MEMO, AND HE FELT THE BOARD SHOULD ONLY
RESPOND TONNE AREAS WHERE THEY COULD HAVE SOME PRODUCTIVE RESPONSE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT PARAGRAPH 3 IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE TO HIM AND HE WOULD RATHER NOT EVEN ADDRESS IT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT LEGALLY THERE IS PROBABLY NO
WAY TO SET UP A FIRE DISTRICT BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR. HE ASKED
IF THE BOARD WISHED TO AUTHORIZE PROCEEDING WITH SETTING UP A FIRE
DISTRICT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE SUIT WILL HAVE TO BE RESOLVED
FIRST, BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD HATE TO SEE THE
PERIOD OF TIME BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN THE LITIGATION IS COMPLETED GO BY
WITHOUT WORKING ON SETTING'UP A FIRE DISTRICT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE THOUGHT THE MEMO INDICATED THAT THE TOWN IS
RECEPTIVE TO THE TAXING DISTRICT IDEA, BUT THAT THE WAY THE MEMO IS
WRITTEN INDICATES TO HIM THAT IF THE BOARD WILL GIVE THEM $92,000,
THEY WILL SUPPORT A TAXING DISTRICT FOR THIS YEAR.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED A LETTER
'FROM ONE GROUP OF FIRE FIGHTERS ENDORSING THE CONCEPT OF THE FIRE
DISTRICT.
19
AUG 2:3 1978
-
J
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT THE DOLLARS WE ALLOCATE WILL
HAVE TO BE BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE WE ARE RECEIVING AND THE
AVAILABILITY OF THE EQUIPMENT AS SET UP IN OUR CONTRACT. HE
BELIEVED THAT THE $48,000 BUDGETED IS VERY ADEQUATE IN RELATION
TO THE AVAILABILITY OF EQUIPMENT AND RESPONSE WE WILL GET IN THE
COUNTY,
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WE MUST ACT CONSISTENTLY WITH THE
AGREEMENT WE ALREADY HAVE WITH THE TOWN.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED WORDING IN REGARD TO MONTHLY
PAYMENTS AND FELT IN THE EVENT WE WERE SUCCESSFUL AND DID TAKE OVER
THE STATION, THIS MUST BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
IT WAS NOTED THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE A REFERENDUM
TO SET UP A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT WHICH INCLUDES THE
MUNICIPALITIES.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT BELIEVE WE CAN ACCOMPLISH THIS BY
THE FIRST OF THE YEAR, BUT WOULD LIKE TO BE WORKING ON IT IN THE
MEANTIME.
r%COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT EVERYTHING HINGES ON THE LAWSUIT
It
AND DID NOT FEEL THE TOWN HAD CHANGED ANYTHING BECAUSE THEY STILL
WANT US TO CONTRIBUTE HALF OF THEIR OPERATING EXPENSE AND CANCEL
THE AGREEMENTS WITH THEM. THE ONLY NEW THING IS THAT THEY ARE
STATING THEY WOULD FAVORABLY CONSIDER A TAXING DISTRICT.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE THE CHAIRMAN
TO RESPOND RELATIVE TO THE AMOUNT SET OUT IN THE BUDGET AND INFORM
THEM THAT WE ARE TAKING STEPS TO SET ABOUT CREATION OF A TAXING
DISTRICT.
CHAIRMAN 14ODTKE STATED THAT HE WILL RESPOND THAT WE HAVE
BUDGETED $48,010 FOR OUR PARTICIPATION IN THEIR OPERATIONAL BUDGET
NEXT YEAR AND REQUEST THAT THE TOWN COOPERATE WITH US AS THEY HAVE
INDICATED IN SETTING UP A TAXING DISTRICT.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS REPORTED TO THE BOARD
ON THE REQUEST OF LEONARD NEEDHAM OF EAGLE PRODUCTIONS TO USE
KIWANIS-HOBART PARK FOR A BLUEGRASS MUSIC CONVENTION NOVEMBER 3RD,
20
ffz* 36'pAcr .1
4TH AND STH, 1978, HE STATED THAT HE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO
CONTACT MR. NEEDHAM. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE WAY MR. NEEDHAM
HAS REQUESTED THE FESTIVAL BE SET UP WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH
THE TERMS OF OUR ORDINANCE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE APPLICATION OF LEONARD NEEDHAM
TO USE KIWANIS-HOBART PARK FOR A BLUEGRASS MUSIC CONVENTION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
CERTIFICATE RE THE ADMISSION OF SANDRA H. ROSS TO THE FLORIDA
SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND.
FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND -THE BLIND
Wzmwd J. MCCLunE, President
ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA
TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
u ust 23
• (Date)..A.......:$,..»«..»«.»'1978 ..............».».»»...
Gentlemen:
This is to certify that the bearer, .3(r�.i'1am.....................
is a resident of this county and that.Co... is entitled to free admission to the
Plarida School for the Deaf and the Blind. ,
(Signed) ..... 21/'�rn, Board o/ra!
""'
,« County,,, Commi ss qn
Indian River County, Fla.
Board of County Commissioners of
..»««..».»......... ........... «..County.
21
{
-�. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
! 1426 19th Street - P. 0. Box 2648 • Vero Beach, Florida 32960 JOE N. IDLETTE, JR.
Telephone (305) 567 • 7165 Chairman
RICHARD A. BOLINGER
WILLIAM H. McCLURE. Superintendent Vice -Chairman
RUTH R. BARNES
GARY W. LINDSEY
DOROTHY A. TALBERT
August 26, 1978
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is to state that I have known Sandra Ross, dob 1-12-65 since
January of 1975, and I am recommending placement this year in the
Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind located in St. Augustine,
Florida.
ry R. Hurst�I'—
.Coordinator Exceptional Child Services
Bwgp
AUG 2 31978
"WhelLe The Vtopicd Begin"
3
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS RECEIVED
A LETTER FROM EDWARD NOLAN, MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES,
ASKING TO BE APPOINTED TO THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RE THE
201 FACILITIES PLAN. CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THIS COMMITTEE NEEDS
TO BE UPDATED AND FELT A RESOLUTION SHOULD BE ADOPTED CORRECTING
TITLES.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE APPOINTMENTS SHOULD BE MADE BY
THE BOARD BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR
AND THE ATTORNEY WILL DRAFT A NEW RESOLUTION, AND THE SECRETARY
TO THE BOARD WILL ADVISE MAYOR NOLAN ON THE STATUS OF THIS MATTER.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NEIL NELSON REPORTED ON
OBTAINING SECURITY GUARDS FOR THE HOSPITAL AND INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT HE HAS ASKED FOUR DIFFERENT AGENCIES FOR PROPOSALS, HE
POINTED OUT THAT WE NEED TO BE READY TO GO IN WITH SECURITY IMMEDIATELY
WHEN WE TAKE OVER THE HOSPITAL. MR. NELSON CONTINUED THAT WE HAVE
TWO MAINTENANCE MEN ON DUTY DURING THE DAY AND RECOMMENDED THAT WE
HAVE SECURITY PERSONNEL OF ONE MAN AT NIGHTTIME DURING THE WEEK AND
24 HOURS DURING THE WEEKENDS, MR. NELSON CONTINUED THAT PINKERTON,
WHO IS CURRENTLY THE SECURITY AGENCY, AND THE ONLY ONE NOT ARMED,
SUBMITTED THE LOWEST PROPOSAL. MR, NELSON NOTED THAT FOR
COMMUNICATION THEY ALL RELY ON THE TELEPHONE, EXCEPT MACKENZIE
WHO HAS A RADIO AND A VEHICLE THEY WOULD HAVE ON THE PREMISES. HE
NOTED THE COSTS RANGE FROM APPROXIMATELY $500 PER WEEK TO $768
FOR MACKENZIE#PINKERTON HAS ONE COST FOR SEPTEMBER TO JANUARY
AND GETS HIGHER AFTER JANUARY,
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON RECOMMENDED PINKERTON
BECAUSE THE PEOPLE ARE LOCATED THERE NOW AND DO KNOW THE HOSPITAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE PROPOSAL OF PINKERTON
SECURITY AGENCY AND AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED TO ENGAGE
THEM.
23
NZ
AUG 2 3 197
s
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THIS WILL INCLUDE THE WAREHOUSE,
AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THIS SHOULD BE'NEGOTIATED WITH THE
HOSPITAL BOARD BECAUSE THEY WILL BE LEASING IT.
PAT FLOOD, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, CAME BEFORE THE
BOARD TO DISCUSS THE PROBLEM OF "DUAL TAXATION.' MAYOR FLOOD REQUESTED
THAT THE BOARD ITEMIZE WHERE THEY ARE USING THE MONEY SEBASTIAN IS
PAYING IN SO HE CAN DETERMINE WHERE THEIR MONEY IS BEING SPENT AND
WHERE IT IS FILTERING BACK TO THE CITY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE BOARD HAS THREE
FUNDS INVOLVED IN THEIR BUDGET - THE GENERAL FUND, THE ROAD & BRIDGE,
AND FINE AND FORFEITURE. HE INFORMED MAYOR FLOOD THAT OUR TOTAL
EVALUATION LAST YEAR, ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER, WAS
APPROXIMATELY $33,332,500. WHICH WAS ASSESSED AT 4.9633 MILLS. THIS
RESULTED IN TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES OF $163,960 FOR SEBASTIAN, OR
3.5% OF THE TOTAL AD VALOREM TAX OF THE -COUNTY.
MAYOR FLOOD STATED THAT THE $163,960 IS WHAT HE IS CONCERNED
WITH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED MAYOR FLOOD THAT FINANCE OFFICER
BARTON WILL ITEMIZE AS BEST HE CAN, BUT POINTED OUT THAT THE BURDEN
IS NOT ON THE COUNTY TO SHOW THAT PHYSICALLY $163,960 CAME BACK
DIRECTLY TO THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION
TALKS OF MONIES THAT ARE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE
PEOPLE IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS, AND THIS IS NOT THE AREA MAYOR
FLOOD IS CONCERNED ABOUT. THE ATTORNEY NOTED THAT TAX DOLLARS ARE
SPENT FOR BENEFITS THAT MUNICIPAL RESIDENTS RECEIVE EVEN THOUGH
THEY MAY NOT ACTUALLY BE IN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE MUNICIPALITY
I.E., ROADS, SHERIFF PROTECTION, THE COURT SYSTEM, ETC.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON CONFIRMED THAT THE APPROACH HE
TOOK WAS IN GENERALITIES AS TO UNINCORPORATED AND INCORPORATED
AREAS, AND HE FELT TO BREAK THESE FIGURES DOWN INTO FIVE DIFFERENT
MUNICIPALITIES WOULD BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE.
MAYOR FLOOD STATED THAT STARTING 1979 A LAW WILL COME INTO
EFFECT REQUIRING THAT THIS BE BROKEN DOWN AS TO DIFFERENT MUNICIPALITIES,
6M
BOONS 00 PAGE
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET
AS IT STANDS FOR 1978-79 WE ARE TALKING REVENUE SOURCES OF $11,671,400,
OF THAT TOTAL, 33,24% COMES FROM AD VALOREM TAXES, OR $3,879,452, PER
THE.TAX COLLECTOR'S ESTIMATES, 119,85, IS IN INCORPORATED AREAS AND
50,415% IS IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS, THIS WOULD RESULT IN $1,923,626
BEING GENERATED FROM THE INCORPORATED AREAS, AND THIS FIGURE
REPRESENTS 16,48% OF ALL REVENUES,
MAYOR FLOOD FELT THAT THE $163,000 WOULD BE ABOUT 8% OF
WHAT THE INCORPORATED AREAS ARE PAYING, AND REITERATED THAT HE JUST
WANTS TO KNOW WHERE THIS WAS SPENT.
FINANCE OFFICER 'BARTON THEN REVIEWED IN DETAIL THE
PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 1978-79 GOING OVER ALL THE DEPARTMENTS AND
SERVICES INCLUDED, (LEGISLATIVE, ADMINISTRATIVE, PROPERTY APPRAISER,
TAX COLLECTOR, CLERK, THE COURTS, POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION,
ETC.) AND EXPLAINED HOW THESE EXPENSES ARE.ALLOCATED, I.E. ON A
POPULATION BASIS, LAND AREA BASIS, VALUATION BASIS, ETC, FINANCE
OFFICER BARTON NOTED THAT WHILE 16,48% OF COUNTY REVENUES ARE
COLLECTED FRgM THE INCORPORATED AREAS, 20.643% IS EXPENDED ON THE
INCORPORATED AREAS,
'MAYOR -FLOOD AGREED THAT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DOES COME
UP WHEN THEY ARE CALLED, BUT HE FELT THE SEBASTIAN CITY POLICE TAKE
CARE OF MOST OF THEIR PROBLEMS AND THAT THEY FAR OFFSET THE COST
ASSESSED FOR POLICE PROTECTION.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT ALL THE SERVICES MUST BE
CONSIDERED SUCH AS PROCESS SERVING, FELONY INVESTIGATION, ETC.,
AND FURTHER NOTED THAT ANOTHER THING TO BE CONSIDERED IS THAT THE
BENEFIT IS NOT ALWAYS IMMEDIATELY WITHIN THE CITY, AND SINCE THE
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT PROVIDES -SERVICES THAT PREVENT LAWLESSNESS,
IT BENEFITS THE CITY INDIRECTLY,
MAYOR FLOOD DISCUSSED FINES AND FORFEITURES, HE NOTED THAT
ALTHOUGH THEY ARE GENERATING $66,000 THEY STILL HAVE TO PAY FOR
COPIES, COURT COSTS, ETC,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE FINES GO BACK
-
TO -THE CITY.
25
BOOK J6 Fu r
MAYOR FLOOD THEN STATED THAT MOST OF THE ROADS IN THE CITY
OF SEBASTIAN ARE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY, BUT THERE IS SOME COUNTY
RIGHT-OF-WAY. HE FELT THE COUNTY COULD GO INTO THE CITY AND CLEAN
THE DITCH ON INDIAN RIVER DRIVE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE PEOPLE IN THE CITY
OF SEBASTIAN USE ALL THE ROADS IN THE COUNTY, AND THE TEST IS THAT
THE MONEY MUST BE PUT IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA IN GENERAL,
MAYOR FLOOD THEN STATED THAT EVERYTHING GIVEN TO THEM FOR
RECREATION HAS HAD STRINGS TIED TO IT, AND EVERYTHING THE COUNTY
PEOPLE ARE PAYING, THEY ARE PAYING ALSO, HE NOTED THAT THIS YEAR
THEY PAID 1.02 MILLS FOR FINE AND FORFEITURE IN THE CITY AND
PROBABLY PAID THE SAME IN THE COUNTY.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT THE COUNTY CHARGED 4,9633
MILLS FOR ALL THREE FUNDS,
MAYOR FLOOD CONTINUED THAT THE C0UNTY DID HIRE A MAN TO
REPRESENT SEBASTIAN FOR ZONING PURPOSES, BUT WHEN THEY WANTED HIM TO
STAY UP IN SEBASTIAN TWO DAYS A WEEK, -THE BOARD WOULDN'T AGREE TO IT,
HE.DID NOT FFEL THE BOARD HAS JUSTIFIED THE EXTRA $163,000 THE
CITIZENS ARE PAYING IN SEBASTIAN,
COMMISSIONER LOY AND COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT
THAT THE FIGURES SHOW THAT SEBASTIAN IS GETTING MORE IN SERVICES THEN
THE COUNTY IS COLLECTING,
ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT MAYOR FLOOD TAKE THE FIGURES
PRESENTED TODAY, REVIEW THEM AND ISOLATE THE PROBLEM AREAS, AND THEN
IF DESIRED, ANOTHER MEETING CAN BE HELD ON THIS MATTER AFTER BUDGET
HEARINGS ARE OVER,
MAYOR FLOOD COMMENTED TO THE BOARD THAT HE BELIEVES THERE IS
A NEW LAW WHEREBY THE COUNTY MAY BE ABLE TO OPEN UP THE LANDFILL IN THE
NORTH OF THE COUNTY. HE FURTHER STATED THAT NICK SUIT, PRESIDENT OF
THE NORTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, WILL NOT BE
PRESENT TODAY TO DISCUSS DUAL TAXATION,
THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT 12;00 NOON AND
RECONVENED WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT AT 1;30 O'CLOCK P.M.
26
is •, ' `�'
RICHARD VOTAPKA, ENGINEER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO REQUEST
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER N0. I FOR DRIVEWAYS, INC., WHO IS WORKING ON
THE GIFFORD WATER SYSTEM. MR. VOTAPKA EXPLAINED THE ADDITIONAL WORK
NEEDED AS FOLLOWS:
I. INSTALLATION OF A NEW CONNECTION AT THE TRANSMISSION MAIN ON
THE EAST SIDE OF 28TH AVENUE NORTH OF 43RD STREET, WHICH IS
NECESSARY TO RAISE THE PRESSURE FOR DISTRIBUTION AND PROVIDE
ADEQUATE FLOW.
2. INSTALLATION OF A GATE VALVE FOR THREE HYDRANTS'. MR. VOTAPKA
NOTED THAT WHEN THE SYSTEM WAS BUILT, THESE WERE LEFT OFF, AND
CONSEQUENTLY IF ONE OF THESE HYDRANTS WAS HIT, YOU WOULD HAVE
TO SHUT OFF AN ENTIRE SECTION.
3. INSTALLATION OF A BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY IN ONE SUBDIVISION WHERE
THERE IS NO OTHER WAY OF FLUSHING THE LINE.
4. REPLACEMENT OF TWO BRONZE VALVES., AFTER THE CONTRACT WAS LET,
IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THESE WERE BROKEN,
MR. VOTAPKA DID NOT FEEL THERE WILL BE MANY CHANGE ORDERS, BUT
STATED THAT,_,THIS WORK HAS TO BE DONE AND THE INCREASE AMOUNTS TO $5,025.
HE NOTED THAT THE MONEY WE WILL RECEIVE BACK AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FROM
PDM AND THE CONTINGENCY FUND SHOULD COVER THIS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS
REVIEWED THIS CHANGE ORDER WITH MR. VOTAPKA AND FEELS IT IS IMPORTANT
THAT THIS BE EXPEDITED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CHANGE ORDER #I AS
PRESENTED BY ENGINEER VOTAPKA FOR FOUR ITEMS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,025,
MR. VOTAPKA COMMENTED THAT DRIVEWAYS INC., IS ALSO ASKING
FOR FIVE ADDITIONAL DAYS IN ORDER TO GET THESE ITEMS.
CHAIRMAN ,',ODTKE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN THEM
75 DAYS EXTENSION AND THEY HAVEN'T EVEN STARTED YET. HE DID NOT SEE
WHY THEY HAVE TO HAVE FIVE ADDITIONAL DAYS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO ALTERNATIVES TO ADDING FIVE
DAYS.
27
s� �r
J P�G,R y
AUG 2 3 1978 f
P
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT WE JUST WOULD BE ADDING FIVE
DAYS TO THE ENTIRE CONTRACT NOT TO THE EXTENSION AND SINCE WE ARE
ADDING THIS AMOUNT OF WORK, FIVE DAYS DOES NOT SEEM UNREASONABLE.
SHE POINTED OUT, HOWEVER, THAT.WE WANT THEM TO GET STARTED PROMPTLY
..AND THIS TIME SHOULD BE ADDED ON AT THE END OF THE CONTRACT,
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THIS SHOULD NOT AFFECT THE STARTING
DATE AND THAT A LETTER SHOULD BE SENT TO DRIVEWAYS, INC., URGING THEM
TO GET STARTED.
ENGINEER VOTAPKA DISCUSSED THE PROBLEMS INVOLVED AND DELAYS
ENCOUNTERED IN TRYING TO HOOK UP THE SCHOOL. HE STATED THAT THEY ARE
TRYING TO GET AUTHORITY TO HOOK INTO THE CITY'S LINE TEMPORARILY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE, ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS AND ATTORNEY COLLINS
LEFT THE MEETING AT 1;50 O'CLOCK P.M.
VICE CHAIRMAN LOY TOOK OVER THE MEETING.
r
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND
REPORTED THAT AN INVENTORY HAS BEEN MADE LISTING ALL ITEMS WE WANT TO
KEEP AS PER THE AGREEMENT WITH THE HOSPITAL BOARD. HE REVIEWED THE
LIST WITH THE,,BOARD AND EXPLAINED THAT IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE TO KEEP
ALL SURPLUS KITCHEN AND RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT IN THE EVENT IT IS DECIDED
TO HAVE A RESTAURANT AVAILABLE FOR THE PEOPLE WORKING THERE, HE
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ALL ICE MACHINES AND AIR CONDITIONERS ARE
INCLUDED AND THE FURNITURE LISTED CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF DESKS,
FILE CABINETS AND CHAIRS, MR, NELSON RECOMMENDED THAT THE LISTED
ITEMS BE RETAINED BY THE COUNTY TO BE USED WHEN THE HOSPITAL IS
RENOVATED INTO AN OFFICE COMPLEX.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, CHAIRMAN !A+ODTKE BEING TEMPORARILY ABSENT FROM THE MEETING,
THE BOARD APPROVED THE HOSPITAL INVENTORY LIST AS RECOMMENDED BY
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON. SAID LIST IS HEREBY MADE A PART
OF THE MINUTES,
AM
28 e 7g rm".
In accordance with section it of "Contract for sale and Purchase",
dated June 21, 1978, the Board of county Commissioners of Indian River
h a list of all items on Schedule "B"
County, Florida, submits herewith e
which that needs iatnedms,intaes ndlsi.sttoedusesiiaatll tbh
ecoomld hthoesppitraople. rtyIt oif s thune dBeury-
er
stood th
at closing.. Said list is as follows:
MISCELLANEOUS SUR . PLUS ITrMS LOCATED IN VARIOUS AREAS NOT LISTED
ELSEVIIIERE. IN THIS, =) i.e.
All surplus kitchen and restaurant equipment.
All ice machines.
All refrigerators.
All air -conditioners.
All nurse calls and intercoms.
All window drapes.
All built-in shelving and cabinets.
All bulletin boards.
All other items on this list are now located as follows:
ist r Looiz
Surgery, private dining room, cafeteria, kitchen and central
storeroom.
2nd FLOOR
Nurses, station and adjacent corridor to north.
3rd FLOOR CcU Rooms.
lst FLOOR _04�15C -
5 seating units - 3 seat
1 lounge seat - 3 place
9 swivel chairs w/arms
2 11 It w/o arms
8 reception room chairs
3 students chairs
28 TOTAL
METAL SINGLE CHAIRS
(STACK, STRAIGHT OR SIDE
206 on 1st floor
9 on 2nd floor
53 on 3rd floor
268 TOTAL
STENO C!TAIRS
40 on 1st floor
5 on 2nd floor
7 on 3rd floor
5 2 TOTAL
BOOK ci Phu,.
AUG ?, 31978
L
r
(-
. •t>,;d'�tFS'..:Y4.i•
...n•.�ay:s•••rga',1a•,S�d*y ��t••••A 44 K•nfrAM'+M::�fld. .. vr'•ei q,t,••'_kwiP,•4 •t. :5e•a:I:h'1t'".t'''>ya'1 {•Afa,i k:
>y,a V:-^ . .... ,a.a�..
e CHAIRIS t•!/AIZ�IS
a
78 on 1st floor
35 on 2nd floor
24 on 3rd floor
<1
s
13 7 TOTAL.
WOODEN STRAIGIiT CHAIRS
5 on 1st floor
;
1 on 3rd floor
`
'
6 TOTAL
LOUNGE SEATS - 2 PLACE
2 on 1st floor
1 on 3rd floor
'
3 TOTAL
• STOOLS
3 metal adjustable - on.lst floor ,_•
1 wooden = r on :1st floor
1 wooden - on 2nd floor
"
5 TOTAL
DESKS
i
1st FLOOR
7 double pedestal - Metal
4 H - Wood
3 single pedestal -,Wood
1 small metal,,desk
15 TOTAL
LAMPS
_•
1st FLOOR
3 table lamps ,
4 floor lamps - metal
1 so .9 —wooden
1examining
w/goose neck
2nd FLOOR
2 tall table lamps'
1 floor lamp
13 TOTAL
CARTS, ..
;
1st -FLOOR
1 wooden top w/casters
3 metal w/casters
1 stainless steel w/titheels
5 TOTAL
- 2 -
.w• -.n^.
rq. ..,.f.-
.. •''rSk+.. pq, •- -b•• _ ^'.K Y.f•R•••an o_ .^TI—F..,e"K, .,; .. ,raYf.d.,:•or.. :,,r;•;a...nfn..
. np.•r"•: w_ ....., .. ._t r.
arim
3'
AUG 23 1978
J
-
_..
Y
'- , „»v y....n :tW+bfa r•.,,T. Infri...w; ... t7' sC t.tit .. ..v, r .. ... .. ..
::n,+. r, y„I,+. .: e+srle.-v ti•.
..
ra'N.+n'.+nc...;
..
. ..� •' , • . •];IJ_CTI :ICAT, lt'1'TrIT�F1Cl�
(Also see 1)a9C 1. )
1 electric range
y
Compactor
'•
1 portable electric heater
1 electric toaster - 230 volt
2 large pedestal fans ,•
'
1 fan, floor
' TABLES
lst FLOOR ;
9 small'wooden w/one drawer
12 metal
1 doctor's conference table
1 bedside table w/casters
1 wooden w/one drawer on wheels
23 cafeteria tables
s
1 metal 18x18
`
1 homemade wooden
3 w/formica tops
1 lamp -table
1 heavy wood w/formica top
1 formica table top
2 wood tables 30x60 r ,
1 metal 24x60 on wheels
1 metal 36x36 w/formica top
1 porcelain top table
1 large wooden counter
1 ;t, w/formica top'
2nd FLOOR
-�
1 small wooden 18x3 6
1 ff 1! rr w/glass top
2 cafeteria tables +
1 metal 36x36 - pedestal
3rd FLOOR
2 wooden writing tables _.
5 end tables
1 conference table - pedestal
1 writing table w/compartment
76 TOTAL
FOOT STOOLS
lst FLOOR
2 metal
CABINJ:rPS , TtOC?::CAC1:S & SJiT LVING
(Also see page L.)
lst FLOOR
1 beds"I e C.Ibinet w/CaStcr
1 ,even shelf cabinet
3 --
P
.._....._._-..�..»r<...w..„•.....,uaww:tas.•olrsama.,-,;.,rrM>yw•!i�'.^'a4?'t •.^..i r•.-� �.:_
toot
Y.
W
I Small cabinet
1 woo0en shelf cabinet (24 I)jn)
I wooden cabin et 2 door &.2 drawer
3 wooden cabinets 3- drawer
1 wooden storage cabinet
3 metal cabinets - 2 door
2 36x72 metal storage cabinets 2 door
1 wooden cabinet
.2 wooden cabinets w/bins
I wooden shelf
1 large 4 -door cabinet (dietary)
1 metal cabinet, 2 -door
6 bedside cabinets wood !-A4
_metal
1 small safe w/attached drawers
1 locker - 6 unit
1 locker - single
32 racks metal shelving (in central storeroom)*
1 unit bookshelves
3 small bookcases
2 wooden bookcases
5 large wooden bookcases
1 wooden book -case w/bins
2nd FLOOR
6 bedside cabinets wood
3rd FLOOR
2 wooden cabinets
1 cabinet floor stand
6 bedside cabinets
99 TOTAL
FILING CABINETS
lst FLOOR
3' 4 drawer - legal vertical
1 3 drawer -
4 2 drawer
3 4 drawer - letter
2 2 drawer
1 1 drawer w/compartment with door
18 small card cabinets
1, card file 4 drawer
1. 2 drawer lateral file
.1 3 drawer
I 12 drawer visible index file
.1 4 drawer letter file (-in central storeroom)
3rd FLOOR
I small wooden correspondence file (12 shelves)
38 TOTAL
OVERDED TIMES
2 on first floor
3 cin second floor
10 on third floor
1.5 TOTAL
4
W
x
♦*P•,t Y�iV}aY4t¢gfrba^Np tV.1r'ta!a`.6srM{.a•th.an,.•n4y..�sq�Msh.4•:r/•1^..:<f7TYnrr.Y'.'1'�., t. •tr•PL•1'. •.f :9 •'..•If•.�.�.r rxA.,.v.Y.w•r'4T4 •/••
.. .... •..w
•....
.
SMALL STAMPS
1st FLOOR
,
5..
6 typewriter stands = •�
.'.•
1 small wooden
1 w./shelf
.2 stands w/casters
11 ash stands -
3rd FLOOR
1 ash stand ..
..
22 TOTAL
P
FLOWER STANDS
2 on first floor
17 on second floor
19 on third floor
38 TOTAL
C014TAINERS
1st FLOOR ..
1 round trash can w/lid
1 tall trash receptacle w/cover
3 garbage cans - metal
3 waste baskets
2nd FLOOR
2 wastet-baskets
3rd FLOOR
2 waste baskets
1 garbage can - metal
2. garbage cans - plastic
15 TOTAL
MISC . EQUIPMENT
(Also vee page 1.)
1st FLOOR
1 tan screen
2 red screens
__?_step ladders (in central storeroom)
5 TOTAL
AUG 2 1978
/
ZONING DIRECTOR DEWEY WALKER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD IN REGARD
TO REMOVAL OF A HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY JOHN GAINES AND INFORMED
THE BOARD THAT MR. GAINES HAD BEEN DULY NOTIFIED OF THIS HEARING AS
FOLLOWS:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT. JR.
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER
'R. DON DEESON
JACK G. JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue I Vero Beach. Florida 32960
July 28, 1978
Otc+
A,-
C//Mr. John Gaines ' eo , 40CI
`•�_
Post Office Box 5083°r•,`^oma"�,,
Gifford, Florida
as �>
In Re: Lot 9, Block 3, Ranch Estate' •:� '_ =�:1
s
Dear Mr„Gaines: •
You have been previously notified that your structure
located at Lot 9, Block 3, Ranch Estates has been declared
by the Indian River County Building Department a hazardous
and nuisance structure. The building has been declared
unsafe and use and occupancy of the building has been
prohibited.
You have been further notified to abate the nuisance
by removing the structure or reconstructing the same accord-
ing to the Indian River County Building Code. You have, as
of this date, failed to take any action on the matter.
Please be advised that on August 23, 1978 at 2:00 o'clock
P.M., in the County Commission Room of the Indian River County
Courthouse, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will hold a hearing for the purpose of
determining any reason why the Board should not order the
nuisance and hazardous structureabated and removed and a
lien filed against your property for the cost of said removal.
In the event the hazardous structure is removed prior to
the hearing date, said hearing will be cancelled. In the event
you do not appear at the hearing, the Board will take necessary
action to remove the hazardous structure.
Please guide yourself accordingly.
Sincerely,
GEORGI3 G. COLLINS, JR.,
Attorney to the Board
GGC,Jr/ph
cc: Jack Jennings
Liz Forlani
CrRTIFIrD PIATL
RETURN I ECHIPT I:I1`QUXSTPD 34
AUG 93 1978
Fecs 36 ma A6
JOHN GAINES APPEARED AND STATED THAT HE HAS TRIED TO REPAIR
THE HOUSE, BUT HAS HAD PROBLEMS EVER SINCE HE MOVED IT AND WAS NEVER
ABLE TO GET THE PERMITS NECESSARY TO DO THE WORK. MR. GAINES STATED
THAT HE WENT TO SEE THE BUILDING DIRECTOR, MRS. RYMER, AND SHE
TOLD HIM HE COULD NOT REPAIR THE HOUSE, ONLY TEAR IT DOWN. THIS HAS
BEEN GOING ON SINCE 1970. HE NOTED THAT MR. ADAMS ADVISED HIM NOT
TO PUT ANY MORE MONEY IN THE HOUSE, BUT HE POINTED OUT THAT HE
ALREADY HAS $8,000 TIED UP IN IT.
MR. WALKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A PERMIT WAS GRANTED FOR
MR. GAINES TO MOVE THE HOUSE TO ITS PRESENT LOCATION. HE NOTED THAT
MR. GAINES HAS WORKED ON THE HOUSE, BUT VERY LITTLE AND ON A VERY
INCONSISTENT BASIS. MR. WALKER DID AGREE THAT MR. GAINES HAD TAKEN
THE OLD STUCCO OFF, BUT NOTED.THAT IN THE MEANTIME, THE WHOLE
STRUCTURE HAS DETERIORATED.
i
MR. GAINES STATED THAT EVER SINCE HE MOVED THE HOUSE THERE,
THE ATTITUDE HAS BEEN THAT IT SHOULD COME DOWN. HE WANTED TO GET
TEMPORARY ELECTRICITY TO WORK ON THE HOUSE, BUT COULDNIT GET A PERMIT.
COMRISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT MR. GAINES WAS NOTIFIED
MONTHS AGO, AND MR. GAINES STATED THAT HE HAD NOT RECEIVED ANY NOTICE
BEFORE THE ONE HE JUST RECEIVED. HE AGREED THAT THERE IS STILL A
LOT OF WORK TO BE DONE ON THE HOUSE, BUT STATED THAT HE IS WILLING TO
DO IT IF HE CAN GET A PERMIT. MR. GAINES POINTED OUT THAT THERE
ARE CONDEMNATION NOTICES ON OTHER HOUSES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR
YEARS AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE ABOUT THEM.
COMMISSIONER Loy INFORMED MR, GAINES THAT A MONTH AGO THIS
BOARD AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO TEAR DOWN AT LEAST B OR 10
STRUCTURES AND NOTED THAT MR, GAINES IS ONE OF THE FEW WHO HAS HAD
EIGHT YEARS TO WORK ON HIS HOUSE.
MR. GAINES REITERATED THAT HE HAS WORKED ON IT, BUT
COMMISSIONER Loy NOTED THAT HE COULD NOT HAVE WORKED ON IT
CONSISTENTLY OR IT WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW.
MR. GAINES FELT THAT IT IS NOT FAIR TO MAKE HIM TEAR IT
DOWN WHEN HE WANTS TO FIX IT UP.
35
a 3fj PA''F
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED HOW LONG IT WOULD TAKE TO FINISH
REPAIRING THE HOUSE, AND MR. GAINES FELT HE COULD DO IT BY THE END
OF THE YEAR,
ZONING DIRECTOR IIALKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE HOUSE
IS IN SUCH A DETERIORATED CONDITION NOW THAT HE FELT IF MR, GAINES
SPENDS ANOTHER $10,000, HE WILL STILL HAVE ONLY A SHELL NOT SAFE
TO LIVE IN, AND POINTED OUT THAT MR. GAINES IS TELLING THE BOARD
THE SAME THINGS HE SAID IN 1970,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT EIGHT YEARS IS A LONG
PERIOD OF TIMEjAND MR, GAINES SAID THAT HE HAD RUN INTO .HARD TIMES
BUT IS NOW IN A POSITION WHERE HE CAN DO THE NECESSARY WORK.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAS NOT SEEN THE HOUSE
AND WOULD LIKE TO LOOK IT OVER PERSONALLY,
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED TO HOLD THIS MATTER
�-
OVER UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING AT 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
ZONING DIRECTOR NEXT DISCUSSED REMOVAL OF A HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURE OWNED BY FRANK WALLBERG AND STATED THAT MR, WALLBERG ALSO
HAD BEEN DULY•NOTIFI:ED OF THIS HEARING BY CERTIFIED MAIL. HE
INFORMED. THE BOARD THAT MR. I`IALLBERG HAS BEEN SENT SEVERAL NOTICES.
MR. 14ALLBERG WAS NOT PRESENT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER; CHAIRMAN WODTKE BEING TEMPORARILY ABSENT FROM THE MEETING,
THE BOARD AUTHORIZED THE REMOVAL OF THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY
FRANK D. WALLBERG, LOCATED IN VAN BERGEN AND HENDRY SUBDIVISION,
TAX PARCEL 03-0010-001.9, AND INSTRUCTED THAT LIEN BE FILED AGAINST
THE PROPERTY FOR THE COST OF REMOVAL.
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE REQUEST OF THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER IN REGARD TO RADIOS HE WISHES TO PURCHASE AND TIE INTO
THE COUNTY'S RADIO SYSTEM. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER
DOES HAVE IN HIS BUDGET THE MONEY NEEDED TO PURCHASE THESE UNITS.
36
..�X/M17
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, CHAIRMAN WODTKE BEING TEMPORARILY ABSENT, THE BOARD GRANTED
APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF TWO MOBILE RADIO UNITS AND ONE REMOTE
CONTROL UNIT BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER TO BE TIED INTO THE COUNTY'S
RADIO SYSTEM,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE, ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS AND ATTORNEY COLLINS
RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 2:25 O'CLOCK P.M.
HAMILTON ARDEN OF ARDEN INSURANCE SERVICES CAME BEFORE THE
BOARD AND STATED HE HAD WRITTEN A LETTER TO FINANCE OFFICER BARTON
IN RESPONSE TO A MEMO RECEIVED FROM MR. DONLON REGARDING WORKMEN'S
COMPENSATION INSURANCE, BUT NOTED THAT HE DID NOT COME TODAY
PREPARED TO MAKE A PRESENTATION AS NO ONE HAD THE COURTESY TO INFORM
HIM THAT HE HAD A BID SITUATION FACING HIM. MR. ARDEN STATED
THAT HE WAS ASKED TO BE HERE -TODAY TO.ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE BOARD
MIGHT HAVE AS TO RENEWAL OF A POLICY THATiIS CURRENTLY IN FORCE,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT WE ARE NOT IN A BID
SITUATION- JUST LOOKING AT PROPOSALS.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT HE DID NOT CALL FOR
A
BIDS, BUT WAS TRYING TO GET AN ACCURATE FIGURE FOR BUDGET
INFORMATION SINCE IN THE PAST WE ALWAYS SEEMED TO HAVE A LOWER
FIGURE THAN WAS NEEDED FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION. MR, BARTON
CONTINUED THAT WHILE HE WAS TRYING TO GATHER THIS INFORMATION,
SOMEONE CAME IN AND WISHED TO BRING IN ALTERNATE PROPOSALS.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED HOW MUCH THE ESTIMATES
WERE OFF THIS YEAR, AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT WE HAD
TO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $25,000.
COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT THE BOARD TODAY IS JUST
GOING TO HEAR FROM PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN ENDORSED BY THE STATE
ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO PRESENT A PROPOSAL TO MANY
OF THE COUNTIES IN REGARD TO SELF-INSURANCE.
MR. ARDEN FELT IT POSSIBLY MIGHT BE IN THE BOARD'S FAVOR
TO GO INTO A RISK POOL ASSOCIATION, BUT ASKED IF THE BOARD IS
AWARE THAT IN THE LAST YEAR THEIR RISK PREMIUM WAS $66,000 AND
HIS COMPANY PAID OUT $118,000. HE AGREED THAT SELF-INSURANCE
37
AUG ?�, 1978
IS AN ALTERNATIVE, BUT NOTED THAT WHEN YOU SELF -INSURE, YOU HAVE TO BEAR
WHAT AN INSURANCE COMPANY NORMALLY DOES FOR YOU. HE FELT THESE PEOPLE
MUST UNDERSTAND THE COUNTY'S LOSS RECORD AND NOTED THAT HE HAD REQUESTED
THE COUNTY TO HIRE A SAFETY DIRECTOR, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN DONE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WILL AGREE THAT THIS
SITUATION WAS HANDLED EXTREMELY POORLY, AND FELT THAT IF WE WERE
GOING TO ACCEPT PROPOSALS, WE SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED THE PERSON WHO
HAS THE PRESENT POLICY.
BEN PARTRIDGE OF RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., CAME
BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN ASKED BY THE STATE
ASSOCIATTON OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO PRESENT THIS SELF-INSURANCE
PROGRAM TO THE BOARD, AND NOTED THAT HE HAS A QUOTATION TO PRESENT
WHICH IS BASED ON THE SAME PAYROLL FIGURES MR. ARDEN JUST MENTIONED.
MR. PARTRIDGE STATED THAT SOME TIME AGO THE STATE
ASSOCIATION STARTED LOOKING INTO A SELF-INSURANCE POOL FOR
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND AS OF ONE MONTH AGO, THEIR EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE VOTED TOWARDS STARTING SUCH A FUND ON OCTOBER 1ST.
MR. PARTRIIYGE CONTINUED THAT HIS COMPANY IS BASED IN ORLANDO AND
PRESENTLY SERVES 14 DIFFERENT ASSOCIATIONS IN THE STATE, THE
MOST RECENT OF WHICH IS THE FLORIDA MUNICIPAL SELF -INSURER'S
FUND WHICH PRESENTLY HAS 51 MUNICIPALITIES IN IT, INCLUDING
VERO BEACH. HE EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAVE TO USE THE SAME RATES
AND METHODS OF COMPUTING AS DOMESTIC CARRIERS D0, BUT THEY
ARE DIFFERENT IN SEVERAL WAYS. THEY OFFER A 15% DISCOUNT ON THE
MANUAL PREMIUM, AND THE COUNTY WOULD BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ASSIGNED
RISK CLASS. ALSO THIS IS A NON-PROFIT FUND AND ALL EXCESS MONIES
ARE RETURNED IN THE FORM OF A DIVIDEND AT THE END OF THE YEAR.
THEY PROVIDE A COMPUTER PRINT-OUT TO THE MEMBER COUNTIES ON A
MONTHLY BASIS, WHICH GIVES A BREAKDOWN OF LOSSES AND AN ACCURATE
PICTURE OF WHAT IS CAUSING THEM.
r.
N PAGF 4j
MR. PARTRIDGE STATED THAT THEY HAVE TWO MUNICIPAL PROGRAMS
CURRENTLY GOING IN ALABAMA, AND AT THE END OF THE YEAR, THE CITIES
DECLARED A DIVIDEND OF 7% AND THE COUNTIES OF 25%. HE NOTED THAT
ALL THE PREMIUM DOLLARS PAID IN DRAW INTEREST. THE EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR OF THE STATE ASSOCIATION WOULD BE THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
FUND AND A BOARD OF TRUSTEES IS MADE UP OF ELECTED OFFICIALS FROM
AROUND THE STATE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THERE ARE ONLY NINE CLASSIFICATIONS
OF WORKERS LISTED ON THE INFORMATION GIVEN US.
MR. PARTRIDGE STATED THAT THIS WAS DONE ON A GENERAL BASIS•
ACTUALLY THERE ARE SEVERAL HUNDRED CLASSIFICATIONS AND BEING PROPERLY
CLASSIFIED MAY WELL SAVE YOU MONEY,
DISCUSSION RETURNED TO ASSIGNED RISK, AND MR. ARDEN STATED
THAT THE COUNTY HAS BEEN ON ASSIGNED RISK ONE YEAR NOW�PROMPTED
BY THE UNFORTUNATE PAST YEAR S EXPERIENCE..
IT WAS NOTED THAT THE -CITY OF VERO BEACH HAS A SAFETY
DIRECTOR WHO HAS DONE GOOD WORK, BUT THE PREMIUMS DO NOT SEEM TO BE
GETTING ANY LOWER.
COMMISSIONER Loy QUESTIONED. MR. PARTRIDGE ABOUT THE RESPONSE
THEY HAVE BEEN GETTING TO THEIR SELF-INSURANCE POOL, AND HE STATED
THAT THEY HAVE HAD A FAVORABLE RESPONSE AND ANTICIPATE ABOUT SIX
COUNTIES GOING IN AS OF OCTOBER 1ST. HE NOTED THAT THIS PROGRAM IS
NOT.SET UP FOR THE LARGE METROPOLITAN COUNTIES, BUT TO ENABLE THE
SMALLER COUNTIES TO GROUP TOGETHER TO SELF -INSURE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE THANKED MR. PATRIDGE FOR HIS PRESENTATION
AND NOTED THAT THE BOARD NEEDS TIME TO STUDY THE LITERATURE GIVEN
THEM.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED MR. ARDEN IF THE LETTER WRITTEN
TO FINANCE OFFICER BARTON IS HIS PROPOSAL, AND MR. ARDEN STATED THAT
HE IS JUST PROPOSING THE COUNTY RENEW THEIR PRESENT POLICY AND WOULD
LIKE TO KNOW IF THE COUNTY IS SEEKING PROPOSALS BECAUSE HE IS IN
THE PROCESS OF RENEWING.
MR. DONLON STATED THAT WE ARE NOT SEEKING PROPOSALS.
39
AUG 23 1978
1 -1 ENF-F-m
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT DISCUSSION OF WORKMEN'S
COMPENSATION INSURANCE WILL BE PUT BACK ON THE AGENDA FOR THE
NEXT REGULAR MEETING, AND ASKED THAT MR, ARDEN ALSO SUPPLY THE
BOARD WITH INFORMATION ON AW ERRORS AND OMISSIONS POLICY FOR
THE BOARD,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS RECEIVED
A LETTER FROM JOHN EMMI REQUESTING WATER FOR HOMES AT OLD SUGAR
MILL ESTATES, THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT HE ALSO RECEIVED A
LETTER FROM MAYOR SCURLOCK DATED JULY 18TH DISCUSSING CITY WATER
SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS ON THE!MAINLAND, BUT ASSUMED AFTER
TRAVELING TO ATLANTA TO DISCUSS THE INTENT OF THE TRIPARTITE
AGREEMENT WHERE THE CITY HAD MADE IT CLEAR THAT THEY UNEQUIVOCALLY
WOULD NOT SERVICE ANY AREA OUTSIDE THE CITY THAT THEY ARE NOT
SERVICING NOW, THAT THE LETTER DID NOT REQUIRE A RESPONSE, HE.
NOTED THAT MAYOR SCURLOCK HAS SINCE CALLED AND STATED THAT THEY
WILL GIVE THIS MATTER SOME CONSIDERATION AND ASKED THAT THIS LETTER
BE CONSIDERED, SAID LETTER IS AS FOLLOWS:
40
ff0 � p.�
City of Verb Beach
P. 0. BOX 1389 - 1034- 20th PLACE
VERO BRACH, FLOR;DA - 32960
Trlrphoar 567-5931
July 18, 108
a
The Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman, Board of County Com" issioners
Indian River County !
Post Office Box 8
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: City Water Service - Outside City Limits On
Mainland.
Dear Bill:
Al
By letter dated February 22, 1978, John Tittle maileda
letter to you requesting that the City and the County come to
'an agreement to settle ambiguities -in the bilateral agreement
as amended and clarified, and which became effective upon the
attachment of Annexes I and II in November of 1973.
Paragraph 4 on page 3 of the tentative bilateral agreement
of January 11, 1973 provides that: "It is the intent of the
County to provide all water and sewer, services to the mainland
portion of the County, except within areas where the City now
(January 1973) provides water and sewer service."
Paragraph 5 on page 4 of the tentative bilateral agreement
of January 11, 1973 provides that the City may sell to the
County its water distribution facilities in those mainland
areas where the City supplies water services only, subject to
bond ordinance, a cost formula, and certification by the City's
consulting engineer. It is -the City's interpretation that
paragraph 5 is still applicable because the one year time period
noted therein begins to run upon the County's written request
to purchase and not merely within one year from either January 11,
1973 or November 6, 1973.
The questions regarding; the "areas served in 1973" is further
confused by the language on pages 1 and 2 of Annex I to the said
agreement where it reads: "The City ray continue to serve those
customers connected to the City systems as of the date of this
Annex (November 6, 1973), until the County is capable of and
authorized to take over such service. The County may provide
sewage collection service and water distribution service to the
mainland. outside the City subject to paragraph 5, page 4 of the
"City (f 1"r.ue6j"11113"Wba
�7
Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr.
July 18, 1978 `
Page 2
Re: City Water Service - OutsideCity Limits On Mainland.
AGREEMENT, as it relates to City owned water distribution
facilities." A literal reading of the first sentence could
be construed to mean.that the City was not authorized to
connect any water or sewer customers outside the City limits
on the mainland except by tripartite agreements, even in
"areas the City was serving in 197'3." The second sentence
obviously means that the County can offer to purchase the
City's water facilities in the subject meas provided the
City is serving those areas with water service only at the
time of the offer to purchase or, perhaps, the closing of
the sale.
As you can see,, several points of agreement are very
ambiguous'regaarding the limited areas adjacent to the City
limits on the mainland.
The City -proposes to resolve 'these questions, hopefully,
once and for all.
The City proposes to assume the specific land areas as
shown in the cross -hatched areas on the enclosed map as the
City's temporary water service areas until such time as the
City and the County might agree to sell paid facilities to
the County. The possible sale does not include the three (3)
areas shown in a yellow color. The City does not provide
either water or sewer service in those areas and does not
plan to do so. Elliott Grosh states that those areas are not
necessary to logically divide the area from either a system
reliability standpoint or from the standpoint of the physical
access to a later to be constructed County water and/or sewer
system. The City provides sewer service only to the golf course
club house north of 33rd Street (Vero Beach Country Club area)
and to two (2) small subdivisions (Phyl-Ann Terrace and Vantrician
Park) along 40th Avenue between 14th Street and 12th Street and
along 42nd Avenue between 14th Street and 12th Street. The City
does not plan to extend sewer service in any areas adjacent to
the City limits on the mainland except to serve lots, if any, in
those two (2) subdivisions which are not now being served by the
City.
The City's engineering staff believes it makes sense for
the City to retain the golf course club house for both water and
sewer service. There are no compelling engineering; reasons why
the City could not sell both the water and sewer facilities in
the two •(2) subdivisions to the County provided the County would
pay the costs for relocating an existing pumping station located
PAGE
F;
1`
t4
Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr.
July 18, 1978 `
Page 2
Re: City Water Service - OutsideCity Limits On Mainland.
AGREEMENT, as it relates to City owned water distribution
facilities." A literal reading of the first sentence could
be construed to mean.that the City was not authorized to
connect any water or sewer customers outside the City limits
on the mainland except by tripartite agreements, even in
"areas the City was serving in 197'3." The second sentence
obviously means that the County can offer to purchase the
City's water facilities in the subject meas provided the
City is serving those areas with water service only at the
time of the offer to purchase or, perhaps, the closing of
the sale.
As you can see,, several points of agreement are very
ambiguous'regaarding the limited areas adjacent to the City
limits on the mainland.
The City -proposes to resolve 'these questions, hopefully,
once and for all.
The City proposes to assume the specific land areas as
shown in the cross -hatched areas on the enclosed map as the
City's temporary water service areas until such time as the
City and the County might agree to sell paid facilities to
the County. The possible sale does not include the three (3)
areas shown in a yellow color. The City does not provide
either water or sewer service in those areas and does not
plan to do so. Elliott Grosh states that those areas are not
necessary to logically divide the area from either a system
reliability standpoint or from the standpoint of the physical
access to a later to be constructed County water and/or sewer
system. The City provides sewer service only to the golf course
club house north of 33rd Street (Vero Beach Country Club area)
and to two (2) small subdivisions (Phyl-Ann Terrace and Vantrician
Park) along 40th Avenue between 14th Street and 12th Street and
along 42nd Avenue between 14th Street and 12th Street. The City
does not plan to extend sewer service in any areas adjacent to
the City limits on the mainland except to serve lots, if any, in
those two (2) subdivisions which are not now being served by the
City.
The City's engineering staff believes it makes sense for
the City to retain the golf course club house for both water and
sewer service. There are no compelling engineering; reasons why
the City could not sell both the water and sewer facilities in
the two •(2) subdivisions to the County provided the County would
pay the costs for relocating an existing pumping station located
PAGE
F;
1`
f
a 1i
. I8
Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr.
July 18, 1978
Page 3
Re: City Water Service - Outside City Limits On Mainland.
At 40th Avenue and 14th Street, and to pay for the facilities
pursuant to the conditions of paragraph 5 on page 4 of the
January AGREE' NT. ,
The City would pay the material and labor costs of
physically separating the City's water and sewer system at
the various City limits.
We would propose to formalize the above agreement with an
Annex III to the basic AGREEMENT, with your cooperation, at
the earliest possible time.
Please place this proposal on your Board Meeting Agenda
for July 19, 1978, or as soon thereafter as possible.
Sincerely yours,
Don C. Scurlock, Jr.t_
Mayor
Enclosure (map)
cc: All Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
George J. Collins, Jr., County.Attorney
fl n
U ,,qq
x
z
a
C3 (
l,l .....59th Ave. v
a Kin 11 r '
� 1
AH
�__-- »I %—• f `
N _
SMA. S UI 8
• �.{'7 ,¢IRAN-_ I .
A
rn .e
a
(, 49th An I f' 4 '"
�'• 1lrads Wry; r gu... _- • '; .F.� -.. j�� t� 91W AtL I / p S , .
F } 46 A.e \ •r ..�.. __.471h Aw _ I . z
46th An a
»"
Stn .e
A.
dC1__-_i
' O Ara ti 5 3 t" 42nd An I �1 t p 1
141,1 Are'. 1_O„� '1r s a C O Raj �y�q- _� ' r 1 ._. (-•-=i 41tlAre. - ami r r z t
_.40th Avg...39th Ave
3sth Ave
t• --''791A Aw r aµ s I � O i `
39th An o.. _1 _ n ✓ '
i31th Aw i i• 8 f 0 p -
36th Ct
36th Ave
•�::.�StnA�e; _- '. � _ ....._t.•_.__.____•_—_—9?thAre; 3�,_.,;.�.1_. �� t ate1�Q ..` .`�
Sun yt9t,p } • 34th Ave _ ._....., _ . _-_ . w 34th AV?
1 n L__�_._23rdAw_ ro y~ IH RnFocr
32nd.Avt _ ov, find Aw_
31st AveIs
h
.. A. - b -• - I .laipi i
Apptwrar
t11 128th Ail
•a, y__.�•9_� t_-._ �ayl'` II 7nOm II /�//ti
__,,,271H 11n
I � •� .: a z s L�
°!°.
I6tttAt� 1. _ ZStH Avg ' " 25th Aw �� Fi J b �,, �'%i°
,_. _ �--
ys 24th Avg :_ I '24th 0.N • �, L % 4 y 3 z
• y22nd Ct _Y.—_.'fid Aw ( � Qe'�.'.��a09 Aol: ` • " � ^x`
22trd4wl r x t
y r 21st Ct ) •y u wl =• 1 0'
1st Ct , a n
- l.2 > r• 21,1
-•'j... N ly> •31 !R s' � f 4_� _�..t.Yar°�BeattiP•• .,o.�
2101hAn'
S $a�}l31khAa
t� I :s Ih11eyn_A i1lthAw x ���o}7thAro (� -
�c c.--,�_F_mn_:,�,6tNArel..{w-N� - --- •T�^ t.a'.u�/ .
:.--- 151nAw °HrD•
_ a _ _ ,,i., tstn ar. a r, _ � Hill Ave ^_ A ]s j - I 114th Ave _
113th An �_.-]t_.'..; O - - ' 44 tlp°�uaS •' • i • Y • •• • r 13th Aw^ ' 1 1 to Ave
n. °ttp\k s Lh Ct o : •.,alk" ovtl4221 r - -- zm o
i2lA.AN m �• �/ '1• 1p ; _.!T Ilhh Ave I I �;� r ur Oaks to a p Z
I A i %• tri a+tl v"0 I I /f } I ..:'�111A
l"'llthAn�o '
t
10111 Clls 19thC1 r A.i 'peeUAd 4Ve1O loth t - I o
X14911 < NtlQg10h CI a
3 IOtM1AN }QI r . aAtotal3 10thAnI. II \ n"�'m �
•- ve - f• H ,q, Y o
,ptn A1 Tropical Ave I z z
is (
9th Ave....
' � W ! I I
d } f 11,9, '. ••A%`v� /.. !104M9 Anuno9 lli 7 rA•pC0
• .7tH z ! '�. ^� v t� t; )1 '' .. falome 0 I I � ,.., t , w .r, �
214 Altt i ` •- - r11h An I� �:�^ 9 '� i csi I I 11� .,,• 0°�1 v..VA"pPoorpvl III O <n T
Gil, �
Ct x i I t r y
`� •• �
Gtl,lAm I r Ul %;;a; • 0 m ;� aV ,td R I CCC%%
t 5th Cl 5th 1:1 •: n :'„�'' d�5tM1 A.~ 1 y �� Z �.. ,--_•... __._�.._._ ,_
I UI 516 !'Aw �+ 1 r 3' vv
S1h An V Sth Av, I v, Cvntrt .-e ^1 ly :r'y+y rgw^e
r 4th Ct Un l'1 �' is '• ', �� i ' t I 1 , �1
cf 4th Aw 411, A ^C
...�__.,_.,.... �•' J'dCl_.; tit! .3' r �;:":1 •� i
w
W«a tt.nhnt ih J j ij I ' •-'��~
A. .,n ( 1 .. .III,I�Itl�'k"0.✓z;{ 1 ::�I •r�� ��� t'' ,� ,� ♦ ��J/'7 .="..-� ���
7,-,
UG 23 197
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ENGINEER BEINDORF
HAS PREPARED A LARGE MAP, SHADING IN THE AREAS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE
1973 TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT, VERIFYING THE AREAS BEING SERVED AND WHAT
THE CITY IS PROPOSING, APPARENTLY THE CITY IS TRYING TO SQUARE OFF
SOME AREAS AROUND COUNTRY CLUB POINT AND BETWEEN GOLF VIEW ACRES
AND THE CITY LINE.
ENGINEER BEINDORF FELT IT MIGHT BE WISE TO CONSIDER HAVING
THE CITY SERVICE GO ALL THE WAY UP TO THE NEW HOSPITAL SO THERE
WOULD BE NO HIATUS, HE NOTED THAT WEST OF 10TH COURT AND 11TH AVENUE,
THERE IS A LITTLE AREA ZONED MULTIPLE FAMILY WHICH WOULD BE MOST
DIFFICULT FOR THE COUNTY TO SERVE. THE AREA AROUND GOLF VIEW ACRES
WOULD SQUARE UP WITH 50TH AVENUE AND SOUTHWEST OF TROPICOLONY, HE
FELT THE PROPOSAL TO SQUARE OFF THESE AREAS MAKES SENSE,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED HOW THIS AFFECTS THE "201"
FACILITIES PLAN, BUT ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT ONLY INVOLVES WASTE
WATER AND WOULD NOT BE INVOLVED.
THE BOARD CONTINUED TO REVIEW THE MAP AND THE AREAS IN
QUESTION.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF IT IS CORRECT TO ASSUME THAT THE
CITY HAS INDICATED THEY WOULD LIKE TO SQUARE THESE OFF AND WOULD LIKE
TO ACCEPT THESE AREAS AS THEIR SERVICE AREAS AND THE ALLOCATION OF
THE WATER.WOULD NOT COME OUT OF THE COUNTY'S ALLOCATION. SHE ALSO
ASKED IF AND WHEN THE COUNTY WOULD LIKE TO SERVE THESE AREAS, WHETHER
WE CAN REQUEST THEY BE TURNED BACK TO US AND WE CAN REIMBURSE THE
CITY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE IN THERE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WE WILL JUST HAVE TO PUT A PROPOSAL
IN WRITING AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IT IS CONCEIVABLE THE COUNTY
EVENTUALLY WILL HAVE A PLANT IN THE SOUTH COUNTY AREA AND BE IN A
POSITION TO RELIEVE THE CITY,
ENGINEER BEINDORF AGREED, BUT NOTED EVEN IF.THE COUNTY
COULDN'T PURCHASE THESE SERVICE AREAS BACK, IT WOULD NOT BE THAT
MUCH OF A PROBLEM.
Me=
LSI
mrm 6 cr 137
CHAIRMAN W.ODTKE FELT THE BOARD IN ADDITION, MUST CONSIDER
THE REQUEST FOR WATER SERVICE FROM OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES AND THE
LETTER FROM CITY MANAGER LITTLE ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF UTILIZING
THE LINE TO THE COLLEGE. THE CHAIRMAN DISCUSSED POSSIBLE
REALLOCATION OF THE COLLEGE S WATER OR REQUESTING THEM TO LET
SOMEBODY ELSE USE IT. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE CITY
TAKE THE ENTIRE AREA OUT TO KINGS HIGHWAY AND FELT IT WOULD BE
LOGICAL TO ASK THE CITY IF THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT TO DO.
MR. REINFORF AGREED AND NOTED THAT 50% OF THIS AREA IS IN
GROVES AND WILL BE LOW DENSITY SO THE COUNTY WOULD NOT BE GIVING UP A
GREAT DEAL.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF WE CAN AUTHORIZE.THE CITY TO
UTILIZE THE WATER ALLOCATED TO THE COLLEGE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THIS COULD NOT BE DONE WITHOUT
THE COLLEGES CONSENT.
VINCENT MONTUORO, OWNER OF A LOT IN OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES,
FELT THE COLLEGE HAS BEEN ALLOCATED MUCH MORE THAN THEY NEED AND CAN
USE WITH THE RESULT THAT THEY CAN T EVEN DRINK THE WATER BECAUSE IT
IS STALE FROM STAYING IN THE PIPE SO LONG. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAVE
HAD TO DUMP WATER TO FLUSH THE PIPE. MR. MONTUORO FELT WE WOULD
BE DOING THE CITY, THE COUNTY AND THE COLLEGE A FAVOR BY UTILIZING
SOME OF THIS WATER.
ENGINEER BEINDORF FELT IT MIGHT HELP THE SITUATION TO SOME
DEGREE AND AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER TO USE THE WATER THAN
DUMP IT ON THE GROUND.
COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED, BUT POINTED OUT THAT THE FIGURES
ESTIMATED FOR THE COLLEGE WERE GIVEN US BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
MR. MONTUORO STATED THAT THE POINT HE IS MAKING IS THAT THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH HAS A LARGE ENOUGH LINE AND WATER TO SERVICE
THAT WHOLE AREA,
COMMISSIONER, SIEBERT FELT WE OUGHT TO ACCEPT THE CITY'S
PROPOSAL IN PRINCIPLE, SUGGESTING EXTENSION OF THE PROPOSED AREAS
AND THEN LET THE ENGINEERS GET TOGETHER WITH THE CITY TO SEE WHAT CAN
BE WORKED OUT.
73M
46
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER Loy, TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
RE EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE AREA IN PRINCIPLE AND ASK THEM TO
EXTEND DOWN 12TH STREET FROM THE END OF THEIR PROPOSED SERVICE
AREA OUT TO KINGS HIGHWAY, NORTH TO THE RELIEF CANAL, AND BACK EAST
TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE AREA, AND ALSO EXTEND THE SERVICE AREA WEST
FROM THE VERO REACH COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE TO THE EAST SIDE OF
U.S. 1 AND NORTH TO THE CITY LIMITS AS ADJUSTED BY THE ENGINEERS
AND ATTORNEY.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF IT IS THE INTENT OF THE,MOTION THAT
WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE OPTION TO EVENTUALLY TAKE OVER THE SERVICE
AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, AND COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT STATED THAT IT IS.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
.JOHN EMMI AND JACK DRITENBAS THANKED THE BOARD FOR THE ACTION
JUST TAKEN AND THEIR EFFORTS TO SECURE WATER FOR THE AREA NEAR THE
COLLEGE. �
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS RECEIVED
A LETTER FROM THE MOORINGS AGREEING TO OUR REQUEST TO RELEASE 31
WATER TAPS TO THE COUNTY, SUBJECT TO THE COUNTY AND THE CITY ENTER-
ING INTO AN AGREEMENT AS TO THE USE OF THE TAPS. THE LETTER IS AS
FOLLOWS:
47
August 18, 1978
Mr. George G. Collins, Jr.
Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Joe,
This letter is in response to your letter of July 21st to Michael
O'Haire in which you request The Moorings to release 31 water
taps to the County without restrictions.
r
We have carefully reviewed our future tap requirements and we
are willing to release them, gambling that additional water
supplies will become available to the South Beach area before
the Moorings needs the last 31 taps.
However;�wq have been advised by counsel that we do not have
the authority to release any water taps to the County without the
concurrence of the City of Vero Beach. We, therefore, suggest
that the County negotiate an agreement with the City for the
release of these 31 taps, having our assurance that if a satis-
factory arrangement is made with the City, the Moorings will
reduce by 31 the number of taps which it holds for future service
from the.City. Additionally, we wish to stipulate that said 31
water taps shall be limited to 5/8" in size.
We assure you Of our desire to be helpful to the County and to
the South Beach residents, and will await .your response.
Sincerely,
MOOR
INGS DEVELOPMENT CO.
!
Richard Allen
Vice President
cc:
RSA/mcp
3355 SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE . P.O. BOX 3160, BEACH STATION, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 . 305-567-5131
THE ATTORNEY STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AUTHORITY TO GO AHEAD AND
DISCUSS THIS WITH THE CITY ALONG WITH THE OTHER WATER MATTERS,
48
AUG 2 3 1978
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY COLLINS TO DISCUSS THE USE OF THE
31 WATER TAPS RELEASED BY THE MOORINGS WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE RECEIVED
A TELEPHONE CALL FROM HUD IN ATLANTA RELATIVE TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE
ORDINANCE STATING THAT THE ORDINANCE IS DEFICIENT, AND HE ASKED THEM
TO GET SOMETHING TO US IN WRITING. PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK STATED
THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS HAVE PUT TOGETHER A REVISED EMERGENCY
FLOOD ORDINANCE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE FLOOD ORDINANCE PASSED TWO
WEEKS AGO IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE ONE PASSED BY BREVARD COUNTY
AND APPROVED BY HUD, BUT APPARENTLY THEY HAVE NOW ADDED SOME NEW
REQUIREMENTS. HE CONTINUED THAT WHEN MR. REDICK RECEIVED THE LETTER
YESTERDAY, THEY AMENDED THE ORDINANCE AND ADDED IN THE ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK REVIEWED IN DETAIL THE VARIOUS
NEW REQUIREMENTS ADDED TO THE ORDINANCE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS
EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS A SITUATION WHERE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
HAS MANDATED WHAT YOU -':MUST DO IN ORDER TO GET THE BENEFIT. HE
STATED THAT HE AND THE PLANNING DIRECTOR ARE VERY APPREHENSIVE
ABOUT THE ORDINANCE, BUT FEEL THAT THIS IS THE BEST THAT CAN BE
.DONE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES,
.PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK AGREED THAT THE ORDINANCE SETS
OUT THE ABSOLUTE MINIMUM RESTRICTION THAT HE FEELS WE CAN GET
BY WITH,
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER LAY, TO DECLARE THAT AN EMERGENCY SITUATION EXISTS
AND ADOPT EMERGENCY ORDINANCE N0. 78-25 AMENDING ORDINANCE 78-22
IN TOTO.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER EXPRESSED A GREAT CONCERN WITH THE
STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE WHICH COULD RESULT IN
CONSIDERABLE COST FOR A DEVELOPER, BUT AGREED THAT WE HAVE NO
ALTERNATIVE,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION, IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
AUG 2 3 1978
49
59 Four 1
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE 78- 25
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 78-22
IN TOTO APPLYING TO MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PRO-
CEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENTIAL AND
NONRESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES UNDER THE FEDERAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, That Indian River County Ordinance 78-22 is amended
in toto as follows:
ARTICLE IX - FLOOD PROTECTION
Sections 4-110-120 of the Code of Ordinances
Section 1. PURPOSE AND INTENT.
The purpose of this Article is to provide for adequate minimum standards
and procedures for the construction of new residential and nonresiden-
tial structures, including prefabricated and mobile homes, and for
such structures that are substantially improved so that such structures
can be eligible for insurance under the Federal Flood Insurance Pro-
gram and so that the construction of such structures will be in conform-
ity with recognized construction techniques designed to offer flood
protection.
Section 2. DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this Section, the following definitions shall apply
in the interpretation, enforcement and intent of this Section. When
not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense
include the future, words in the plural number include the singular,
and words in the singular number include the plural. The word "shall"
is always mandatory and not merely directory.
BUILDING PERMIT: The permit as required by The Standard Building Code,
as adopted in the Indian River County Code, which shall in addition
include a permit for dredging and grading as provided for herein.
COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA: The portion of a coastal floodplain having
food hazards that is subject to velocity waters, including hurricane
wave wash and tidal waves and which is designated as a "V" zone on
the applicable flood maps.
FLOOD OR FLOODING: A general and temporary condition of partial or
complete inundation of normally dry land areas from (a) the overflow
of streams, rivers or other inland waters or (b) abnormally high
tidal waves or rising coastal water resulting from severe storms, hur-
ricanes or tidal waves.
FLOOD MAPS OR FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAPS: The set of six (6) separate
maps of various areas of Indian River County, Florida, which were
approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Said
set of maps, dated July 3, 1978, consists of the introductory or
index map and five (5) individual maps mumbered 120119 0005A through
120119 0025A,.which numbers are indexed to the introductory map.
FLOODPROOFING: Those adjustments to properties, structures and
building contents which are designed or adapted primarily to reduce
flood damages to lands, potable water and sanitary facilities and
structures. It shall include structural and nonstructural additions,
changes and engineering techniques which seal structures and keep
them free from encroachment of floodwater below the one -hundred -year
flood level. Any person who attemps to use the floodproofing
techniques in order to satisfy the requirements of this Article as to
..r
nonresidential structures shall provide the Indian River County
Building Official with a certification from a professional engineer
who is registered in the State of Florida that said structure is
floodproofed or has adequate floodproofing provisions designed
within said structure.
LEVEL OF ONE -HUNDRED -YEAR FLOOD: The highest level of flooding that
on the average is likely to occur once every one hundred (100) years
(or_has a one (1) per cent chance of occurring each year).
LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATIONS: The elevation of the lowest supporting
member of the lowest floor of any building including basements.
SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT: Any repair, reconstruction, or improvement
of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50%)
per cent of the actual cash value of the structure either before
the improvement is started, or if the structure has been damaged
and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Substantial
improvement is commenced when the first alteration of any structural
part of the building is begun.
Section 3. ADOPTION OF FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY AND STUDY MAPS.
The flood hazard boundary maps, including the zone designations
on said maps and all explanatory material noted thereon, and the
flood insurance study, dated January 1978, prepared by the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Insurance
Administration, are hereby incorporated into this Article by
reference in their entirety. Said maps and study shall be kept
in the custody of that individual delegated the administrative
responsibility by the administrative director of Indian River County
for the approval and issuance of building permits. Said maps shall
be referred to for a determination of the flood -prone and specified
hazard areas and the one -hundred -year base flood elevation line for
a calculation of the construction requirements for any structure
within the unincorporated areas of Indian River County under the
provisions of this AKticle.
Section 4. REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION.
Within those unincorporated areas of Indian River County designated
as flood hazard areas by the flood maps, all new construction of
residential structures or substantial improvements of existing
residential structures including prefabricated and mobile homes
shall have the lowest floor of such structure, including basements,
elevated to.or above the applicable level of the one -hundred -year
:flood.
Section 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION.
Within those unincorporated areas of Indian River County designated
as flood hazard areas by the flood maps, all new construction of
nonresidential structures shall have the lowest floor including
basements, elevated to or above the applicable level of the
one -hundred -year flood; or, together with attendant utility and
sanitary facilities, such nonresidential structures shall be
floodproofed up to the applicable level of the one -hundred -year
flood.
Section 6. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREAS; NONCONFORMING USES.
Within those areas designated as coastal high hazard areas by the
flood maps, all nonconforming uses on land below the one -hundred -
year flood level shall not be expanded.
Section 7. DEVELOPMENT OF COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREAS.
Within those areas designated as coastal high hazard areas by the
-2-
AUG ? 3 1978
flood maps, no land below the level of the one -hundred -year flood
shall be developed unless the new construction or substantial
improvement shall:
(1) Be located landward of the reach of the mean high tide;
s (2) Be elevated on adequately anchored piles or columns to
a lowest floor level at or above the applicable one -hundred -
year flood level and securely anchored to such piles or
columns; and
(3) Have no basement and have the space below the lowest floor
free of obstructions so that the inpact of abnormally high
tides or wind -driven water is minimized.
Section 8. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS REVIEWED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE.
Within those unincorporated areas of Indian River County designated
as flood hazard areas by the flood maps, all building permit
applications for new construction or substantial inprovemgnts of
"-'residential and nonresidential structures including prefabricated
and mobile homes shall be reviewed to assure that the proposed
construction shall:
(1) Be protected against flood damage;
(2) Be designed or modified and anchored to prevent flotation,
collapse or lateral movement of the structure;
(3) Use•construction materials and utility equipment that are
resistant to flood damage;
(4) Use construction methods and practices -that will minimize
flood damage;
(5) Determine that all necessary federal and state permits have
been previously obtained and copies of all permits required
by federa-1 and state agencies shall accompany the ap-
plications for building permits;
(6) Determine that -all space below the lowest supporting member
of the lowest floor including basements shall be open so as
riot to impede the flow of water;
(7) -'*Determine that all buildings or structures located in "V°'
zones shall be securely anchored on pilings or columns which
shall be designed and anchored so as to withstand all applied
loads of the base flood flow in compliance with this sub-
section, and that such anchoring be certified by a registered
professional engineer or architect;
(a) Use no fill as structural support;
(9) Make no alterations of sand dunes or mangrove stands which
could increase potential flood damage; and
(10) In any case where breakaway walls are planned, they, not be
part of the structural support of the building.
Section 9. SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS:
(1) All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need
to minimize flood damage;
ovap 36 FLUE 114
(2) All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and
facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems
located and constructed to minimize flood damage.
(3) All subdivision proposals shall have adequate drainage provided
to,reduce exposure to flood hazards.
s
(4) Base flood elevation data shall be provided for subdivision
proposals and other proposed development which is greater than
the lesser of fifty lots or five acres.
Section 10. PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS.
11
(1) All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed
to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into
the system.
(2) (a) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed
to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into
the systems and discharges from the systems into the flood
waters.
(b) On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid
impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding.
Section 11. MOBILE HOME STRUCTURES.
(1) (a) No mobile home shall be placed in a floodway or Coastal
High. Hazard Area, except in an existing mobile home park or
existing mobile home subdivision.
(b) All mobile homes in Flood Hazard Areas shall be
anchored to resist flotation, collapse or lateral move-
ment by providing over -the -top and frame ties to ground
anchors. Specific requirements shall be that:
(i) over -the -top ties be provided at each end of the
mgbile home, with one additional tie per side at an
intermediate location on mobile homes of less than
fifty feet and one additional tie per side for mobile
homes of fifty feet or more;
(ii) frame ties be provided at each corner of the
home with four additional ties per side at intermediate
points for mobile homes less than fifty feet long and
one additional tie for mobile homes of fifty feet or
longer;
(iii) all components of the anchoring system be
capable of carrying a force of 4,800 pounds; and,
(iv) any additions to the mobile home be similarly
anchored. ,
(2) For new mobile home parks and subdivision; for expansions to
existing mobile home parks and subdivisions; for existing mobile home
parks and subdivisions where the repair, reconstruction or improvement
of the streets, utilities, and"pads equals or exceeds fifty per cent of
value of the streets, utilities and pads before the repair, .recon-
struction or improvement has commenced; and, for mobile homes not placed
in a mobile home park or subdivision require:
(a) stands or lots are elevated on compacted fill or on pilings
so that the lowest floor of the mobile home will be at or above
the base flood level;
-4-
1
(b) adequate surface drainage and access for a hauler are pro-
vided; and,
(c) in the instance of elevation on pilings: (i) lots are large
enough to permit steps; (ii) piling foundations are placed in
stable soil no more than ten feet apart; and (iii) reinforcement
is provided for pilings more than six feet above ground level.
Section 12. OTHER STRUCTURES.
(1) In those areas where base flood elevation date has not been provided
prior to the issuance of a building permit a review shall be made of all
base flood elevation data available from a federal, state or other
source, in order to administer criteria for requiring new or substantial
improvements of residential structures to be elevated to or above the
base flood elevation. A like review shall be made for all new or
substantial improvements of nonresidential structures to be elevated
or to be floodproofed to or above the base flood level. Said review
shall be performed by the Indian River County Planning acid Zoning
Department upon request of the Indian River County Building Department.
(2) In all unincorporated areas of Indian River County East of the
Florida East Coast Railway right-of-way no building permit shall be
issued for any structure having less that five feet first floor
elevation as defined in Sections 4 and 5 of this Ordinance.
Section 13. DREDGING AND GRADING.
In all Flood Hazard Zones East of the Florida East Coast Railway in the
unincorporated areas of Indian River County no dredging or grading
shall be performed without a building permit issued by the Indian River
County Building Department.
THIS ORDINANCE shall become effective August 23, 1978.
THIS ORDINANCE was passed on an emergency basis after the Board
determined an emergency existed. The vote on the Ordinance was:
Commissioner
Deeson
Aye
Commissioner
Schmucker
Aye
Commissioner
Siebert
Aye
Commissioner
Loy
Aye
Chairman Wodtke
Aye
PAGE
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THERE WILL BE A RESIGNATION
AND AN APPOINTMENT TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISAL :ADJUSTMENT BOARD NEXT
MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 1978, AND HE SUGGESTED THAT THE CHAIRMAN MAKE THIS
APPOINTMENT NOW SO THAT IT WILL BE REFLECTED IN THE COMMISSION
MINUTES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE THEREUPON APPOINTED COMMISSIONER DEESON TO
REPLACE COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT
BOARD AS OF MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 1978,
ATTORNEY COLLINS SPOKE OF PETITIONS RECEIVED ,FROM THE
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES IN REGARD TO DUAL TAXATION AND STATED
THAT HE FEELS THE INDEPENDENT MUNICIPALITIES ARE ENTITLED TO SOME
SPECIFIC INFORMATION AND THAT THE COURTY IS GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE
IT. ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT FINANCE OFFICER BARTON DOES
NOT HAVE THE TIME TO SPEND ON THIS AND SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY
HIRE AN ADVISOR TO ASSIMILATE THIS INFORMATION FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES,
PARTICULARLY THE TOWN OF INDIAN'RIVER SHORES.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT WE NEED AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO ANgWF,R, AND'THE ATTORNEY AGREED THAT WE SHOULD ASK INDIAN
RIVER SHORES FOR AN EXTENSION, BUT THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE
COUNTY PROCEED WITH HIRING SOMEONE WITH EXPERIENCE IN PUTTING
TOGETHER SUCH INFORMATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE HIRING OF SOMEONE WITH
THE EXPERIENCE NECESSARY TO ASSIMILATE THE INFORMATION IN REGARD TO
DUAL TAXATION DESIRED BY THE MUNICIPALITIES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE WILL WRITE THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME.
COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED IF THE TOWN OF SEBASTIAW COULD BE
ADVISED OF THE ACTION WE ARE TAKING, AND THE BOARD AGREED THIS COULD
BE DONE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS HEARD
FROM SEVERAL SOURCES THAT THE PRESIDENT OF INDIAN RIVER UTILITIES AND
TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, LOWELL LOHMAN, HAS LEFT THE COUNTY. THE
55
111
ATTORNEY NOTED THAT WE HAVE HAD A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE PEBBLE
BAY SEWER PLANT DUE TO LACK OF MAINTENANCE AND HAVE BEEN UNABLE
TO LOCATE MR. LOHMAN. HE CONTINUED THAT WE AMENDED THE AGREEMENT
WITH MR. LOHMAN SO WE COULD TERMINATE WITHOUT CAUSE, AND UNDER
THE CIRCUMSTANCES,HE FELT THE COUNTY COULD AND SHOULD TERMINATE
THE CONTRACT WITH TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC., IMMEDIATELY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY TERMINATED THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COUNTY AND TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC., DATED APRIL 15, 1976.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE
AREA HAVE BEEN SENDING THEIR BILLS TO MR. LOHMAN AND HE SUGGESTED
THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATOR TO SEND A NOTICE TO EACH OF THE
CUSTOMERS INDICATING THAT NO MORE PAYMENTS ARE TO BE MADE TO
MR. LOHMAN BUT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THE ADMINISTRATOR OR WHOEVER
THE BOARD WISHES TO DESIGNATE. {
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THEY HAVE A LIST
OF THE PEOPLE ON THAT SERVICE RIGHT NOW, AND NOTED THAT THERE WILL
BE A GREAT NUMBER OF EXPENSES INVOLVED BECAUSE THE PLANT IS IN BAD
SHAPE,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
.Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO
IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CUSTOMERS ON THE PEBBLE BAY SEWER SYSTEM NOT
TO MAKE ANY FURTHER PAYMENTS TO INDIAN RIVER UTILITIES OR TREASURE
COAST UTILITIES, BUT TO MAKE ALL FUTURE PAYMENTS TO INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, AND FURTHER INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ARRANGE WITH
THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO GET THIS ON THE COMPUTER FOR HANDLING.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY
HAVE MADE A DETAILED INSPECTION OF THE PEBBLE BAY TREATMENT SYSTEM,
AND THE FOLLOWING THINGS NEED TO BE DONE TO THE SEWER PLANT ITSELF:
1. REPAIR AND REINSTALL CHLORINATION SYSTEM,
2. OBTAIN A NEW PUMP AS ONE IS MISSING.
3. REWORK THE ALARM SYSTEM AND INSTALL TIME CLOCKS
TO SET OFF THE PUMPS.
56
'� PAGE
I
l
- h
W
HE CONTINUED THAT AT PEBBLE BAY LIFT STATION #1 THE MOTOR AND PUMP
ARE CURRENTLY BEING OVERHAULED;AND AT THE LIFT STATION ACROSS THE
STREET FROM THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, THE SECOND MOTOR AND PUMP
ARE MISSING AND NEED TO BE INSTALLED. ALSO THE PUMP GOING RIGHT
NOW NEEDS TO BE REWORKED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO
INVENTORY ALL THE ASSETS OF THE PEBBLE BAY SEWER TREATMENT PLANT;
MAKE A DETERMINATION OF WHICH ASSETS ARE MISSING; TAKE SUCH STEPS
AS ARE NECESSARY TO ASCERTAIN WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MISSING EQUIPMENT;
AND APPROVED THE FOLLOWING BUDGET AMENDMENT, AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $5,000 OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY
ACCOUNT TO MAKE THE IMMEDIATE MAINTENANCE CORRECTIONS NECESSARY
TO KEEP THE SYSTEM FUNCTIONING;
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO, INCREASE DECREASE
MAINT. BLDG. & GROUND 01-7101-338.00 $5,000
RES. FOR CONTINGENCY 01-9990-701.00 $5,000
ADNRINISTRATOR JENNINGS ASKED ABOUT THE OTHER SMALL SEWER
PLANTS IN THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, AND THE BOARD FELT THAT ANY PROBLEMS
WITH THESE COULD BE HANDLED AS THEY ARISE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD GIVE SOME THOUGHT
TO THE POSSIBILITY OF TAKING ACTION AGAINST THE DEVELOPER AND THE
BONDING COMPANY WITH REGARD TO THE DEFAULT ON SEMINOLE SHORES, BUT
NOTED THAT IF ANY ACTION WAS TAKEN, THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE TO PUT
IN THE IMPROVEMENTS.
FURTHER DISCUSSION ENSUED IN REGARD TO THE POSSIBILITY OF
OTHER EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ARISING WITH OTHER SEWER FRANCHISE
OPERATIONS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR, THE CHAIRMAN
AND THE ATTORNEY TO TAKE WHATEVER ACTION IS NECESSARY IN THE EVENT
ONE OF THE SEWER FRANCHISE OPERATIONS GETS INTO AN EMERGENCY SITUATION.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT SAFETY CITY NEEDS SOME POSTS
PUT ALONG THEIR PAVED ROADWAY IN ORDER TO KEEP CARS OUT OF THE CENTER
57
NOR 36 PAGF L
x=
h
e
SECTION OF THEIR PROJECT. SHE STATED THAT THEY .ARE URGENTLY TRYING
TO COMPLETE THIS BY SEPTEMBER 10TH AND TURN IT OVER TO THE SCHOOL
BOARD AND NEED THE COUNTY'S HELP IN DIGGING THE HOLES AND PUTTING
IN THE MARKERS. SHE ASKED IF THE ADMINISTRATOR HAD ANY ESTIMATE
OF WHAT IT MIGHT COST TO DO WHAT SAFETY CITY WANTS DONE.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT IT WOULD TAKE FOUR OF
OUR PEOPLE NOT OVER THREE DAYS TO DO THE JOB.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ASSIST
SAFETY CITY IN FINALIZING THEIR DRIVEWAY MARKERS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS NOT YET
RECEIVED A REPLY FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD SUGGESTING TWO APPOINTMENTS
TO THE VACANCIES ON THE EOC BOARD AND WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE THIS
TO THE NEXT MEETING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No, 78-55 HONORING
.JACK DOWNS FOR HIS SERVICE AS A BOARD MEMBER ON THE ECONOMIC
OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL.
9.9
AUG36 120
23 1978
AUS 3 1978
LSI
A 0
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. 78- 55
WHEREAS, JACK DOWNS, was appointed by the Board of County
ommissioners of Indian River County, Florida, to serve as a
oard Member on the Economic Opportunities Council in Decdmber
of 1975; and
WHERE -AS, JACK DOWNS has'served on the Fjoard of Economic
Opportunities Council with distinction, representing the interests
f all of the people of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure as a Board Member on the Economic
Opportunities Council JACK DOWNS served as a-Member'of the Executive
Committee during the year 1977, as,a Member of the Planning
Committee during the year 1977, and as a Member of the Finance
Committee during the year 1978 until his resignation in June of
1978;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board,
on behalf of itself and the citizens of Indian River County,
Florida, expresses its deep appreciation to JACK DOWNS for a job
well done; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board wishes JACK DOWNS
every success in his future endeavors.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 23rd
day of August 1978.
V,
Ze
t 'Ile "Let
Ps-Chairman, County Commis loiters
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
tot PAUL.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS REQUESTED PERMISSION TO INSTALL
SOME CORRUGATED PIPE UNDER DITCH 9 IN FELLSMERE FOR DRAINAGE
PURPOSES,
ON.MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO INSTALL
30' OF 15" CORRUGATED PIPE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DITCH 9 IN
FELLSMERE,
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED
AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND
NOS, 58892 - 58974 INCLUSIVE, SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS
SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL
MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR,
REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF
THESE MINUTES,
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED
AND CARRIED,RTHE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 5:05 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
2 at 4;
CLERK CHAIRMAN
AUG 23 1978
o 36 122