HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/4/1978ti
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1978
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSi OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH,
FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1978, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT
WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN;
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.; EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; AND R. DON DEESON. ALSO
PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY"
THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY K. PARTON, FINANCE
OFFICER; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIR MN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,
AND REVEREND WAYNE EDIE, FIRST CHURCH OF GOD, GAVE THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 23, 1978.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEET-
ING OF AUGUST 23, 1978, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1978.
ON MOTION ;BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEET-
ING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1978, AS WRITTEN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A-PERL?IT
TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF RONALD RAY BOEHL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE ON THE
APPOINTMENT OF THE FOLLOWING DEPUTY SHERIFFS BY SHERIFF .JOYCE:
BIRCH R..HALE, JR.
DENNIS MICHAEL CIANCIULLI-
WILLIAM REICHERT, JR,
WILLIAM M. RANSOM, JR.
acox 36 PxE 391
TO IM HONORABLE BOARD OF-COMMSSIONERS Or iNJDIAN AMR COUNTY, FL,
I herew4th appoint Hale' -3-F.
-o'eacfi.
Florida, a Deputy Sharifi-;f Indian River Coun% Florida to act under
me.0 Sheriff Of Said County,
• Us assne and number of the voting precinct of said Deputy is eainctr Ar
ShavviL4,1"Am River ugty- wide
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER,*
— Birch R. Ha'l'e do solemanly-awear that I will Support, protect and defend the Con-
stit,�Iom and'Gove.rument of the United Stitiai aid of the State of Florida; that fain duly quallh;d to hold office undar'th-e
Constitution of the State, sad that I will wall and faithfully perform the "duties of Deputy Sheriff of Indian River County,
Florida, in which I am novo, about to= nter, So help =6 God.
ej
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN To BEFORE M
AT VERO BEACH, INDIAN Rrv!Ea MY
.14 11"
CO
FLORM-
7i3tS 7"'0 AY OF
FLORID,
I'MarY Public. State Of F13Hda at Lar. -.a
AY commission exPriij. Oct -.'13, 19W
FM WITH hm 7ins QDAY OF '—
Clerk, Circuit Cour, Indian River
only, Flcrida
Filed with the Board of County Commissioners of Indian lUvgv County, Florida, this' day of--efda&
Chairman, Board of County Comnli M
:.A. Ts
Clerk
max 36 POU
OCT
M
• TOTi'z>+HONORABEBOARD 07•COMMISSIONERSOlt MMX RIVER COUNTY, FLIr� ,
I herewith appoint Dennis Michael Ci anti ul 1 i
'a. Vero Beach , Florida, a Deputy Sheriff -;f Indian River County, Florida to act under
sne,M Sheriff of said County. a:a
• 9'6a earns and number of the voting praciact of said Deputy. L Pr tint
. .. 0 �.
k . r , .' Sheriff, an` ver�al ,Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA , . .•
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER .
I•� Denni s Michael • Ci anti ul l i do solemnly swear that I wi11 support, protect and defend die Con-
atitution and Government of the United States and of tha State of Florida; that I wn duly qualified to hold office under the
Constitution of the State; and that I will wall and faithfully perform the'dutios of Deputy Sheriff of Indian River County,
Florida, In which I am nolo, about tot nter. So help ma God.
• • • : lV
SUBSCRMED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME . .
AT VERO BEACH, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY z • ' ' ' • ; : ,r ' , , . ''
FLORIDA, Vis 5th DAY OF April
19 Q78
:..�., rSG.rrx� ....�.. otaryPublia •.• w '
Notary Pubn-. Stata of Florida' at large '
My. Wininksion exp, es Oct. 13, 10,30 '1"41 "
F37ED WlTEi M$ TRIS DAY 07 X0/1/ 1 �P1 _ 17 K
'„ : ' ; •l: ;_,' Clerk, Circuit Court, Indian RiverCounty, Florida
- i•/..••••� o.r•� r•• w.r•r r r r•rrr,r�r'r r•r r ,
Filed with the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, this day of A&AL
?'I"u wrChairman, Board of County Commis jlonors
' ,� 3 '• • •. � ,'•ATTEST, -
,r• �' •• ; +�'"'• ;' Clerk U
1
•
• 's
back 36 PpIjF 3�
� OCT 4197 .. J
0
id a
' 'PO'M HONORABLE BOARD OF•COMMISSIMMAS OF INDIAN RIPER COUNTY, FLtot
' William Reiche7t, Jr.
• • • E herowltb appoint _ ;
lero Beach7 , Florida, a Deputy Sheriff -of Indian River County, Florida to act under
meat Sheriff of said County..
The same and number• of the voting preci= of said Deputy, Ss46h,
tinct �
' , In 3rrt'y' orida
•
STATE OF FLORIDA ,
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER ,
Wi 11iam 1 pi rhert _ .l Y• _ ' . do solemnly swear that I will support, protect and defend the Con-
Ititution and Government of the United States and of tho State of Florida; that I asn duly qualified to hold office under the
Constitution of the State; and that I will wall and faithfully perform the duties of Deputy Sheriff o£ Indian River County,
Florida, in which I am now about to enter. So help =0 God.
'• :i
••' ' ' •• •, . . , ' �1 %f ' . r ' ' . �• '
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
AT VERO BEACH, INDIAN RIVER CO Y
r r'
FLO , -r'HlS cuege--'i DAY OF _r - ` �• t .
i9t,„r i , I
Notary Public, State of Florida at Eads
• `� : ' ,My commission Wries Oct. masma. •' ,4r .,w
• �•r r • • r]•.r ••r ... ..r r • r r r r r • a • r .
a '
FILED W= ME 71iI DAY OF
• '• • .; .'• 1.';�,• • Clerk, Circuit Couto, Indian River C4untys Florida
• tri.r.r •r �.i •'r•r•r r.r rt•.r. r,• r r•r r r �"�'• r.r • � .
Filod with the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, this day of
, t
,'. . •. 4
°•' 4 Chairman, Board o£ County Goa cslonors
i ATTESTS Ac fi
�,• ` . .
•.t!•: � Clerk ..
t
. .. .. - _.....__ • _•--- _.�..__... .. _,. _' _fir._....-• ------- ---..._.. ___..__�...... .. .j. .. � ! _ _ •
o
NEX24
OCT 41978 '
46
io 7M HONORABLE BOARD OF -COAGIISSIONEM OF INDIAN AMR COUNTY, FIL.,
I imerewia appdtln'�— - Will-iam M. Ranson Jr.*
of FlOdds, A Deputy Sherifi.;f Indian River County, Florida to act under
MG.M Sheriff of said County,
%%Olt
•The Dun and number- of the voting precinct of maid Deputy is ct
CAL -
I Indian,
ndian River ty# arida
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
William V Ransom, Jr..
do solemnly swear that I will support, protect and defend the Con-
stitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I swn duly qualified to hold office under the
.Constitution of the State; and that I will wall and faithfully perform the duties of Paputy Shexiij of Indian River County,
Florida, In which I am now about to enter. So help me Gods
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ANM
AT VERO BEACH, INDIA.N RIVER CQU"rA Y
nok—IQLA THIS -U-0 DAY
sr %
Rotary Pubgc. Sfate of Florida at Larl,73
MY COMMission.-0pro'as Oct. .13, 191:,0
Mw WITH M.2 7jus DAY OF
Cle&' Circuit Court,. Indian Riiei County, Florida
•J to
Filed with the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, this day a
war,
Chairman, Board of County Commifo'ers
14 r .
A.=Ts
Clerk
.4 1
L
a
am 36. PACE 325
.ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD'UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR JUDITH
WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AND PETE SPYKE, AGRICULTURAL
AGENT, AS FOLLOWS:
JUDITH WAKEFIELD:
OCT. 2 COCOA PLAN DISTRICT 4-H ACTIVITIES WITH OTHER
AGENTS IN THE AREA.
OCT. 3 FT. PIERCE AREA STAFF CONFERENCE WITH DISTRICT AGENT,
DR. CALLOWAY
OCT. 26 BARTOW TO RECEIVE TRAINING ON WEIGHT BALANCING FOR
HOMEMAKER LESSON SON STATE TRAVEL FUNDS)
OCT.31-
NOV. 2 GAINESVILLE COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING TO RECEIVE TRAIN-
ING IN MAKING VISUALS TO USE IN LESSONS.
(ON STATE TRAVEL FUNDS)
PETE SPYKE:
OCT. 3. FT. PIERCE STAFF CONFERENCE WITH DISTRICT AGENT,
DR. CALLOWAY
OCT. 6 BELLE GLADE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS
OCT 11 ORLANDO IN-SERVICE TRAINING (ON STATE TRAVEL FUNDS)
19, 2�
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLL, CIRCUIT
COURT, SPRING TERM, 1978, IN THE AMOUNT OF $104.86.
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
RECEIPT FOR DEPOSIT OF COUNTY FUNDS, COUNTY COURT SPECIAL TRUST FUND
APRIL, 1978 $1,140.00
MAY, 1978 758.00
JUNE, 1978 1,128.85
JULY, 1978 1,285.00
AUGUST, 1978 945.00
GREG CLARK, URBAN FORESTER, PRESENTED HIS ANNUAL REPORT, AS
FOLLOWS:
6
OCT 4197
ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF URBAN FORESTER
315 Individual Homeowners -Assists
50% Insect and disease controls and identification
15% Tree transplanting information
10% Tree identification
10% Protection from tree root damage
10% Incidental (general forestry information)
5% Tree removal assists
Public Education Program
20 News releases on local tree related problems
12 Programs for groups - Civic Organizations (870 people)
6 Local radio shows dealing with local forestry problems
2 Arbor Day programs for schools
1 Seedling sale to promote landscaping of homeowners properties
County Government Assist
Consult with County Planning Department
Landfill planting program (on going)
Review site plans in reference to Landscape Ordinance (on going)
Assist Assistant County Administrator
Advise Technical Review Board
Assist Land owners with technical forestry information
Sample Mayor Projects
Forest management plan for land owners (one used in tax appeal case)
Planted forty-five (45) acres of landfill sites
Completed MacDonald Board Walk
Vegetative study of large site to be mined
MR. CLARK REVIEWED HIS VARIOUS PROJECTS, AND INFORMED THE
DOARD THAT HE IS LEAVING TO TAKE A POSITION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
IN ANOTHER STATE,
DANA HOWARD CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND PRESENTED A PLAT OF
V'IEST SIDE VILLAS FOR FINAL APPROVAL ON BEHALF OF HIS CLIENT, VICTOR
PALISANO. HE*NOTED THAT THEY STILL NEEDED TO ADD THE STREET NUMBERS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS FELT IT SHOULD BE INDICATED ON THE
PLAT THAT THE ROADS ARE PRIVATE ROADS AND ASKED MR. HOWARD IF HE HAD
ANY OBJECTION TO ADDING THIS TO THE PLAT. MR. HOWARD DID NOT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INQUIRED ABOUT THE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP,
AND MR. HOWARD STATED THAT IT WAS FILED ALONG WITH OTHER DOCUMENTS
ATTACHED TO THE PLAT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE CLERK HAS A PROBLEM WITH
FILING SEPARATE PAPERS ATTACHED TOGETHER AND ASKED IF IT COULD BE
INCLUDED ON THE PLAT. MR. HOWARD FELT THAT COULD BE DONE ON THIS PLAT
7
M.
AS THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM, ALTHOUGH THERE MIGHT NOT ALWAYS BE ON
OTHER PLATS.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT WHENEVER POSSIBLE
THE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, BUT IF
THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, THEN THE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP SHOULD BE FILED
FIRST AND THE RECORDED NUMBERS BE REFERRED TO ON THE PLAT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THIS WAS A GOOD IDEA, AND SHOULD
BE MADE A GENERAL POLICY IN THE FUTURE.
ON (MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO SEND A
MEMO TO ALL PRACTISING SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS DESCRIBING THE NE4
PROCEDURE IN REGARD TO FILING CERTIFICATES OF OWNERSHIP AS SET OUT
ABOVE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF GEST SIDE
VILLAS SUBJECT TO ADDING THE WORDS "PRIVATE ROADS" ON THE PLAT AND
PUTTING THE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP ON FILE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
NECESSITY FOR C & J AMBULANCE TRANSFER SERVICE AND AUTHORIZED THE
SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
8
ow 36 pw 328
d
-NON-EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY,
WHEREAS, the C & J Ambulance Transfer Service provides quality
non-emergency ambulance service to the citizens of Indian River
County; and
WHEREAS, there has been demonstrated that there is a need for
this ambulance service to operate in the County and provide
essential services to the citizens of this County on a non-
exclusive basis; and
WHEREAS, the above ambulance service has indicated that it will
comply with all the requirements of the Emergency Medical Services
Act of 1973; as amended, the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River Bounty, Florida hereby issues a CERTIFICATE OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY to this ambulance company
from �. ,f 1978 through O-C-t 1979.
In issuing this Certificate it is understood that the above
named ambulance service will meet the requirements of State
Legislation and provide nonemergency ambulance service for
Indian River County.
_ 'BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Wi iam ocitke, Ar.
Chairman
ATTEST;
eat
Fre a ri g Vr
PACE 329
c
DISCUSSION AROSE ABOUT APPOINTMENTS TO THE MANPOWER PLANNING
ADVISORY BOARD.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
GRANTS IN GENERAL AND CETA GRANTS IN PARTICULAR ARE GOING TO INCREASE
AND SOME HAVE BEEN CONTINUED FOUR OR FIVE YEARS, HE STATED THAT THE
FACT THAT WE HAVE NOT PARTICIPATED STRONGLY IN CETA MEANS THAT THOSE
FUNDS ARE GOING TO OTHER STATES AND COUNTIES. HE, THEREFORE, FELT
WE MUST BE MORE ACTIVE IN THIS REGARD AND ASKED THAT HE BE APPOINTED
TO SERVE ON THE MANPOWER PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED TWO FURTHER
RECOMMENDATIONS, -ED SEARS WITH THE FLORIDA STATE EMPLOYMENT OFFICE
FOR THE AGENCY SECTION AND BERNARD STRECHER FOR THE CLIENT SECTOR.
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT WE WILL HAVE TO BE MORE
HEAVILY INVOLVED IN THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM AND RECOMMENDED THAT
MR. THOMAS BE MADE A PART OF IT BECAUSE OF HIS BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE,
SHE NOTED THAT ALL THREE OF THOSE RECOMMENDED HAVE SERVED ON THIS
BOARD PREVIOUSLY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 78-72,
OCT 4197
10
Boot 36 pur .3,
RESOLUTION 78-72
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board recommends
to the Governor of the State of Florida the appointment
of:
1. L. S.-TOMMY10 THOMAS, Intergovernmental Coordinator,
(Public Sector)
2. ED SEARS, The State of Florida Employment Office
(Agency)
3. BERNARD STECHER (Client Sector)
to the DISTRICT X MANPOWER ADVISORY COUNCIL.
Said Resolution to be effective as of the 4th day
of October , 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN.RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By s�C—'.
William C. Wo tke, Jr , Chairman
Attest:
Clerk
i
6 PAU 3t
OCT 4 1978 .
I
ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED A PROPOSED RESOLUTION IN REGARD
TO THE MAKE-UP OF THE 201 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND NOTED THAT
THE WORDING SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO AMEND RESOLUTION 75-62 "AS AMENDED."
IT WAS NOTED THAT THE•PROPOSED RESOLUTION CALLS FOR REPRE-
SENTATIVES FROM CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS, AND IN DISCUSSION, IT WAS FELT
THAT THIS PROBABLY SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH
ORGANIZATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 78-73, INSERTING THE
WORDS "AS AMENDED" AFTER THE PHRASE "T.0 AMEND RESOLUTION 75-62," AND
IN PARAGRAPH 2 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE, CHANGING IT TO STATE THAT
"THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SHALL BE MADE UP OF ONE (1)
REPRESENTATIVE FROM ..........."
12
mox 36 PAGE 3
RESOLUTION NO. 78-73
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1975, the
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, adopted County Resolution;NO. 75-62;' and
WHEREAS, said Resolution named particular individuals
to the TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, representing
designated agencies and units of government; and
WHEREAS, for various reasons, some of the named
,individuals are no longer available for representing
their designated agency or unit of government; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Board of County
.Commissioners to amend Resolution 75-62, as amended, to
provide specific agencies and units of government that will
make up the TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE and, thereafter,
by Motion, appoint individuals to the TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE representing the named agencies and units of
government;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
i
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Until new appointments by Motion are made by
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, the named persons established in j
Resolution 75-62, as amended, shall remain on the {
_ I
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. After new appointments
are made, said persons named in Resolution 75-62, as
amended, shall be considered removed and Resolution 75-62,
as amended, shall be amended accordingly.
2. The TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE shall be made up of
one (1) representative from each of the following -organizations, !
. t
with no person representing more than one organization:
b '
A. Department of Environmental Regulations.
B. -Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
C. Town of Orchid.
36 PAGE
0 CT A' 1978
CT 4.1978
u
D. Town of Indian River Shores
E. City of Fellsmere
F. City of Sebastian
G. City of Vero Beach
H. Indian River County
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that after the new appointments
are made by the Hoard, said appointees will function as Members
of the 201 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE for the purpose of
facilitating preparation of a Facilities Plan for the Planning
Area designated as Section 201 of the Amendments to the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. Said appointees
shall continue to serve until they resign or are replaced by
the Board.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 4th
day of October , 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By 6'�
W1 liam C. Wo tke, r., Chairman
Attest: ,
Freda Wright, Cle
ma 36 PAGE 334
8
a�
THE HOUR OF 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE CHAIRMAN
ANNOUNCED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO ADOPTION OF THE
RECREATIONAL VEHICAL ORDINANCE WOULD BE CONTINUED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HEARTILY CONCURS WITH THE
REDRAFT PROVIDED BY THE PLANNING .DEPARTMENT.
PLANNING DIRECTOR•REDICK REVIEWED THE CHANGES MADE IN LINE
WITH THE COMMENTS AT THE LAST MEETING. HE FELT ONE OF THE (QUESTIONS
WAS HOW DOES A PICK—UP TRUCK OR VAN QUALIFY, AND THEY HANDLED THAT
BY FINDING THE SIZE OF ONES THAT ARE NORMALLY USED FOR DAY TO DAY
TRANSPORTATION AND ELIMINATING THEM. 'HE NOTED THAT THE REDRAFT
PROVIDES FOR STORING A BOAT AS WELL AS A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ON A
PIECE OF PROPERTY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT•WHEN YOU ELIMINATE THE VAN
TYPE VEHICLE FROM THE DEFINITION, HE NO LONGER FELT IT IS NECESSARY TO
INCLUDE THE PROVISION ABOUT DAILY USAGE AND TRANSPORATION.
ATTORNEY COLLINS PREFERRED THAT THE DEFINITION STAY THAT WAY
TO PROVIDE A STANDARD IF AN EXCEPTION SHOULD OCCUR.
CHAIRMAN lllODTKE ASKED HOW THIS AFFECTS SOMEONE WITH A
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORED INSIDE A GARAGE — IF HE HAS ONE STORED
INSIDE, IS HE ENTITLED TO STORE ONE OUTSIDE?
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK STATED THAT THIS ORDINANCE SPEAKS
OF STORING ON A LOT WHICH IMPLIES THAT IT SPEAKS ONLY TO EXTERIOR
STORAGE, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT EXPLICITLY SPELLED OUT. HE NOTED THAT
THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS NOT CONCERNED WITH WHAT IS INSIDE A BUILDING.
HE FELT THE POINT IS WHETHER SOMETHING IS STORED IN THE BACK .YARD AS
OPPOSED TO THE FRONT YARD, AND DID NOT FEEL IF IT ISIN AN ENCLOSED
GARAGE IT WOULD BE COUNTED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT IF THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
WERE IN A CARPORT IN THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE, BUT UNDER COVER, IT WOULD
NOT BE IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACKS BECAUSE THE CARPORT WAS A
PERMITTED STRUCTURE, AND PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK AGREED,
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE.
OCT 41978
15
BOOK
36 PACE 335
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 7&-29.
16
.00T 41978
BOOK 36 PAGED
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 78-29
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE
71-3, SECTION 25 Q (2), STORAGE OF TRAILERS AND
CAMPERS, PROVIDING FOR DEFINITION OF RECREATIONAL.
VEHICLES, CONDITIONS FOR PARKING BOATS AND RECREATIONAL
VEHICLES, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
BE
IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That Indian River County
Ordinance 71-3, Section 25 Q (2) is hereby amended in toto
to read
as follows:
Section
25 Q (2)
A.
Definitions.
1) The definition of transient trailer, travel
camper is hereby expanded to include camping
trailers, truck campers, motor homes, travel
trailers and other recreational vehicle mobile
structures intended to provide temporary living
quarters for recreational uses; provided, however,
that van type vehicles with an overall length of
less than 19 feet and pickup trucks not exceeding
3/4 tons rated load shall not be considered as
recreational vehicles within the limits of this
definition.
2) A boat shall be defined as a vehicle designed for
operation as a watercraft propelled by oars, sails
or one or more inteinal combustion engines. A
boat shall not be considered as a recreational
vehicle even though it has facilities for temporary
living quarters.
B.
Storage of trailers, campers and boats:
Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on
any lot provided that:
0
1) In any Single -Family Residential District or on
any single-family or two-family lot in any Multi -
Family District:
nox 36 PAPE 3,
OCT 41978
a) Such storage shall be limited to vehicles
owned by:
i. the occupant (s) of the residence, or
ii. the house guests of the occupant (s)
b) provided that not more than one (1) recreational
vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored upon
each site except that one (1) additional
recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be
parked on the property for a period not in
excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time
period or six (6) weeks in any one-year period,
c) provided that not more than one (1) boat per
dwelling unit shall be stored upon each site
except that one (1) additional boat per
dwelling may be parked on the property for
a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any
continuous - time period or six (6) weeks in any
one-year period,
d) such storage shall not be in any required front
yard or easement,
e) recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall
have a valid motor vehicle license at all times,
f) recreational vehicles and boats shall'not be
used for office or commercial purposes, nor
for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters
while so stored,
g) any recreational vehicle not in normal daily
usage for transportation of the occupants of
the residence, shall be considered as "stored"
for purposes of this Ordinance,
h) No recreational vehicle so stored shall be in
d excess of 32 feet in length provided that in
the event of undue hardship, petitions may be
filed for a variance to this Ordinance as to
the length requirements of this Ordinance to
aocK 36 PAGE 3,
I
f
the Indian River County Board of Adjustment;
the Indian River County Board of Adjustment,
in its consideration of any appeal, may
consider the size of the vehicle, the lot
size in question and the availability of
adequate safeguards to protect the neighbor-
hood.
C. In any apartment, condominium or other multi -family use,
recreational vehicle and boat storage shall be in a
portion of a provided parking lot designated for
recreational vehicle and boat parking.
D. This Ordinance shall become effective according to law
on October 9, 1978.
36 PAGE 339
OCT 41978
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE TAX COLLECTOR
IS REQUESTING THE BOARD ISSUE HIM A CHECK SO THAT HE CAN MAKE A
REFUND TO .JOHN S. SHERMAN,'.JR., CAUSED BY AN ERROR IN ASSESSMENT,
WHICH REFUND HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ISSUANCE OF A CHECK TO THE
TAX COLLECTOR-FOR THE COUNTY'S SHARE OF REFUND DUE .JOHN S. SHERMAN, JR.,
AS PER THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS.
20
36 PAu 340
OCT 4 1978
GENE E. MORRIS 7LLWHON6, 13051 562-2303
TAX COLLECTOR
P. o. ]BOX 1509
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA - 32960
September 19, 1978
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Sir:-
Enclosed
ir:-
Enclosed please find a copy of the breakdown on 1978 tax
certificate #728, sold to John S. Sherman, Jr. The error in €
assessment has been corrected and it is necessary to make a 4
refund to Mr. Sherman. _
These funds have been previously -distributed to your agency
and we have enclosed a copy of the Order to Refund approved by
the Department of Revenue together with a form for the Cancel.la-
tion or Correction of Tax Sale Certificate. Since we have dis-
tributed all monies collected forcurrent taxes, our previous
agreement with you to deduct from current -distributions cannot be
used in this case. We are, therefore, requesting that you issue a
check in the amount shown, back to Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector, in
order that this refund can be made back to Mr. Sherman according to
the order.
Thanking you for your kind co-operation, I am
Sincerely yours,
Gene E. Morris
County Tax Collector
Cts �
"' �
✓'i/ f 1 I'
j, I i 1 � j ;•r
B:0{6 •
OCT 4 1978
_
� a
e
w
D R- 462
Revised B-21-75 _ ~
(Sec. -19.5.106, F..S.)
REQUISITION FOR REFUND FROM COUNTY TREASURY
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Indian River
Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes,
1025 Flamevine Lane
OJohn S. Shernan. Jr., Tr. of P. 0. Box 2138, Vero Beach, F1. 32960
ayee esi ence
Hereby makes application to the Department of Revenue
for refund of $128.46 of moneys paid.to the
County, and as grounds therefor sets up the following facts:
(State reason for Refund)
Attached hereto is addit
claim, as follows:
d Sworn and subscribed to
before me this a(-.'`'tday
Of 19-2AL
Notary Public
(Payee)9f Floridi at large
My Ce-n:n''xio E:p:rac Oct. R. 1930
i..N� 8. AMI IM I- t C.—U, L* v -v
c;?o-.j
o� 36 PAGr 342-
OCT
42OCT 41978
:.._
. , C
DR -010
Rev. 6/77
FORM FOR CA %CFLLATION OR CORRECTit)N OF TAX S I.F.1CFATIFICATF.
STATE OF FLORIDA
County of Indian River
I, _ 'Gene E. Morris . Tax Coil
erhu of the al'orcsaid Count}, do
hereby certify that Tax Sale Certificate No. 778 sold at the Tax Sale of June 1 . 1978 {
19..7$_. currently held by John S. Sherman, Jr., Tr. in the fare amount {
of 203.61 and embracing the followinf: de%cribed land: Section 30 -1? -39 Indian Rivar l
Farms Co Sub PBS 2-12 'A 100 ft of W 20 A of Tract 13
f
should be Q cancelled M corrected for the following reasons:
NOTE: COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING APPLICABLE PART.
PART l: Bill C. Law (Property Appraiser) exhibited to me a
Certificate of Correction. copy of which is attached• showing: that an error was made on the above described
.land by reason of: (Check appropriate box) a lk,:npttun Assessed Value
Owner of Record Q Other
Had assessed a trailer on this property which had been removed prior to Jan. 1, 1977.
(1)e%cribi I:rrorl
Indicate change to be made Value of Land being changed from S10.050 to S3 Q30
thus changing the an)ount of taxes from $$182.28 to $63.33 and changing the face of the
Sibolbr This is a refund to the tax certificate holder [
in the+ ammint of 4198 dr, -
PART H. The taxes on the• above described land were paid prior to -the issuance of Tax Sale Certificate
No. as verified by Tax Notice/Receipt No. copy of which is attached.
Therefore, pursuant to Section 197.20(1• Florida Statutes. 1 have entered a memorandum of such fact on
i the List of Lands Sold fur Taxes in tills of fire and herel_y certify same to the 1)iartment of Revenue.
Witness my hand and official seal this .'J� �� day of 19 �f
Tax Collector
}
FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY '
Q cancellation correction a roved disapproved
PP pp
this day of aful the tax collector ' ire to process the j
appropriate refund. I%?I
i
Department of Revenue n I
Boa 36 PAs 343
OCT 41978-
ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A DRAFT OF A DEED
FROM THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO THE COUNTY FOR USE OF THE PARKING.
LOT BY THE HOSPITAL. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT CITY ATTORNEY PALMER
FORWARDED THIS DRAFT, BUT IT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE CONVEYANCE IS MADE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN
CONDITIONS CI) THAT IT BE USED ONLY FOR A PARKING LOT FOR
GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES OR PERSONS VISITING THOSE OFFICES; (2) THAT
IT NOT BE UTILIZED FOR PERSONS EMPLOYED IN OR VISITING NON-GOVERNMENTAL
LESSEES; (3) NO PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE MADE; AND (4) NO
ENCUMBRANCES PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. THE ATTORNEY DID NOT FEEL THAT 3 AND
4 REPRESENT ANY PROBLEM AND THAT 1 AND 2 ARE SOLVABLE. THE RATIONALE
OF THE CITY IS IF THERE IS NO CONSIDERATION BEING PAID FOR THE LOT,
THEN THE COUNTY SHOULDN'T BENEFIT FROM THE PARKING SITUATION, AND,
THEREFORE)GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WOULD BE ALLOWED TO USE THE PARKING
LOT, BUT NOT PRIVATE ENTERPRISE.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT THE BOARD SHOULD THINK ABOUT
BUYING THIS PROPERTY IN FEE SIMPLE AND ELIMINATE ANY PROBLEMS,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DID NOT FEEL IT IS NECESSARY, AND
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED, SINCE WE HAVE QUITE.A BIT OF LAND.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT ANY PROBLEMS THAT WOULD ARISE
COULD BE NEGOTIATED LATER,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED IT WOULD COST MORE LATER ON AND
POINTED OUT THE HOSPITAL HAD A PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE PARKING ALONG THE
DRAINAGE DISTRICT PROPERTY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT 10 YEARS AGO
THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT GAVE THE COUNTY PERMISSION TO PUT IN CULVERTS
AND PAVE THEIR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND USE THIS FOR PARKING, AND HE FELT THIS
STILL COULD BE DONE IF THE BOARD FELT IT WERE DESIRABLE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE.TO AUTHORIZE THE
ATTORNEY TO CONTINUE TO WORK ON THIS PARKING MATTER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED THE BOARD'S FEELINGS ON THE LEASE AS
DRAFTED, AND COMMISSIONER LOY FELT IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE MORE RESTRICTIVE
THAN IT NEEDS TO BE, BUT THAT WE CAN JUSTIFY USING THE PARKING LOT
STRICTLY FOR GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES. THE BOARD AGREED.
24
: OCT 41978
mox 36 PAGE 344
a
�'
CHAIRMAN WODTKE CALLED MARK FALB FORWARD AND PRESENTED HIM
WITH RESOLUTION 78-64 HONORING HIM FOR HIS SERVICES ON THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT:
SRO EEACH PRESS-JOUMM
PuMkW Weekly
VWO Bomb, Indian RiverCoulift, Hadd+
Sw
S NOTICE
fah
CODIfT/ Of INDIAN RIVER:
MTN4 Of FLORIDA
aut)writy t 11Y appmr�d SdiDmann, Jr. who on oath
NOTICE t5 HEREBY GIVEN lhtt co following's Is ersi o statement RiverComfy. Florida,or
Takin Indian howl g recal Flt ai for The
South Indian Riva County Water. Munitipel Service Takiuq unit, showing recHDh a said Talons
South Wiley,adoptedi by the ,fY Ward of County Cqm service
OY ilia fiscal Year eegfnnnK
BOf� ftle tptdefsigrmd
that ht is &Isirress Manager of thD Vero Reach Press-Joa weDklY newspaper Published
of advertisement, being
urot for said Fiscal Year aur atawu+g tna Proposed eaDsnDiluns
October 1. )97t.inwordsand figufesae follows:
try.
Vero Reath in Indian River County, Florida: that the attla= copy
.
at
Estimated ReWPIS: _
lord Sources t
ADV,aloram Takas (See Note A) 671115
Sub Total
Pl / C< ` C�'L�'�t��:—_i6�C1✓�•
In the matter of
Lns: S Pct. per F.S. (2) (D) -. 26=6
ted
Taal Estimated Receipts ,
ApproDrlatla s: .
Court, was pub-
PimPlanning .. �•
Preliminary Engineering 15'8
�'e
-
_h% the/
Taal ADpropriarfcns . •
0.asarva for Contingencies 3AC
te3.77t
t1 ry
Wed in said newspaper in the Issues Of
A detaIlea copy a me NoDo=� Nudger is Dn file in the office or me Clerk a Circuit Cour
FloNda. The sale Taking Unit will be represented by the Board of Car
ntllan Rival County,
MfWarler. and will ..at in the Caunry C anthousa, Vero Beach. Florida, at 9:70 A.M. on We
6 1978, lar the purpose of hearing requests and complaints from me puri
neaddy, October
regarding said prgRasad pudgeI
press -.)Duma) h a newspaper published at
Affwtt father says that the said Vero Beach has heretofore
newspaper
antBefif
By:-s•Wufiem C. WatltKa Jr., Chairman
Board a County Cemmissroners f
County. Florida
' Vero in said Indian Rover County, and that the said
been Continuously published in sand Indian Rrver County. Florida, weekly and has been entered
h I. silrd Indian River
Indian Rlwr .
Sept. 17, Oct. 1 197a.
as Second
the fVrst publ cation of the attached COPY
atter att
of adver.for
firm
—'"-
a period of Ona preceeding
tiser.0 ti and affiant further says that he has nenher pond nor promised any parson,
-
for the purpose of securing this adva-
earpo+ttan army discount, rebate, commission or refund
Estmarlt for pubiirahon in the said newspaper -
orn b and sulxeeribed before me this -'!�deY at
A.D. a
_ n.•Q.•:l� n. l Business �eB�) —
Q[4nk of the Circuit Court, Indian ftWa Qgylnry. Fbridal
THE CHAIRMAN AND ENGINEER BEINDORF ONCE AGAIN REVIEWED THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE TAXING DISTRICT AND POINTED OUT THE LOCATION OF THE
FRANCHISES CONTAINED WITHIN IT, AND THE CHAIRMAN ASKED ATTORNEY COLLINS
TO EXPLAIN THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOARD ON SEPTEMBER 28TH IN REGARD
TO THE MILLAGE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE STATUTES ARE CLEAR AND
RIGID IN REGARD TO THE PROCEDURE THAT MUST BE FOLLOWED IN ESTABLISHING
MILLAGE, AND THEY INDICATE THAT THE MILLAGE WILL BE ADOPTED AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING WHERE IT IS ADVERTISED AND DISCUSSED. THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT,
HE,OTHEREFORE, ADVISED THE BOARD THAT THEY COULD NOT DEFER ESTABLISHING
THE MILLAGE TO A LATER DATE WITHOUT REPUBLISHING.
25
11
AAOK
A PAGF.345
HE ALSO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IF THEY WISHED TO RESCIND
THEIR ACTION IN ADOPTING THE MILLAGE, THEY COULD DO SO AT THE NEXT
HEARING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THOSE PRESENT THAT, BASED ON THE
ATTORNEYS RECOMMENDATIONS, A MOTION WAS MADE TO ADOPT THE MILLAGE
AS ADVERTISED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING, AS STATED IN THE MOTION, THAT
IT COULD BE RESCINDEID ACCORDING TO THE OUTCOME OF THE HEARING ON THE
BUDGET TO BE HELD TODAY., _
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
CAROL LYNCk OF 646 32ND TERRACE PRESENTED PETITIONS SIGNED
BY 475 TAXPAYERS OF 3HE SOUTH COUNTY AREA OPPOSING THE TAX. MRS.
LYNCH CONTINUED THAT'SHE WAS EXTREMELY SHOCKED ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO
KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THE TAX AND ASKED THAT THE BOARD, BEFORE GIVING
THEIR APPROVAL OF SUCH A TAX, INFORM EVERYONE INVOLVED BY MAIL BECAUSE
IT IS THE CITIZENS RIGHT TO BE FULLY KNOWLEDGABLE, SHE ALSO REQUESTED
THAT THE WATER DISTRICTS BE AMENDED -BECAUSE THEY WERE SET BY A
SIX YEAR OLD OBSOLETE REPORT AND THE BOUNDARY LINES SHOULD -BE CHANGED
TO MAKE THE TAX MORE EQUITABLE. SHE FURTHER REQUESTED THAT THE
BOARD GIVE THE PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO VOTE SINCE WATER IS A VERY IMPORTANT
ISSUE AND SHE FELT THE DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE OF "NO TAXATION WITHOUT
REPRESENTATION It IS AT STAKE,
THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THAT THE PETITIONS PRESENTED
PRESENTED BY MRS. LYNCH BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES.
9
26
aooK 36' PAcF 346
September 29, 1978
Notice to Property Owners located in South Indian River
Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit District -
The Board of County Commissioners -have consistently
stated via various media forms and at Budget Hearings
that they are against increased taxes ... we feel that
this taxing unit levying a .75 mill tax on a particular
group of property owners is a definite contradiction
of what they have publicly stated.
P E T I T 1 0 N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
inproperty taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to 'said increase in property tax, and do PF-TITInN
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COL,LN!TSSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability.study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in itsplanof growth and
development, and, as suc"-, must be funded and supported by
411 property ovAmers in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
0 CT _ 4 1971
aoox F-AGF349
12
� zi
M,
S
1
s .�t t Ie a .s Ts
1 116 G -f 115 1 14-�-- 1.3
aE,ry 1 cA.•AL �_ L� c�RIVE'F?
4 3
1
1 1 1 2; 11 IJ f\q,,i LJ 12 .
2 6 1 7 E
2t 2.2 2.3
- ---- t--- - 1 I3SHOR S
- 4 i 14 IGI b o
1t ROAD.
4 1 a• 1 It, 1 4 +, s z IRFORD
•} ! 8 2, 1 7 9ft A0 •y I 3 1 2 z
9011TN 8 ,Gi_ 2.7 RcnD.' f6.RE '6 -•�5 �� /�� , .''..'X'�•-`� 2t9
12 f if i 10 • 9 12 ' li: I f0 ti4 1 �
IS Gw 1 Is ; 16 134 I 1S :-t `� I ;; Je ; 6 a 1•�
a 11 r T\yam
R 4�a I'II i 1 4 3 1 2 1
3 3 '6 3 6
37 t E 31_ 8-Y I ' f4' -4
L 35_1, - 3-^6 _ _3 - t
f L
8 12 II it It ,O
3 13 IC 1 15VE
�iIS 13 '4 1 Is IB J ` I .. l 6 a 9 1 ,o
= 414
---
B'1 7 8 y; 6 4 7•' 8 2 •p $ a
9 12 : 11 0 : g t2 : II 1 t0 9 I2z 11 6
C = 3
NA---- _�------ __ ____ __ 1 __
6
! 14 1 IS : •6 !13 14 j /S- 18- 13 1_14- •` a 7_ - _-B I
gw
gw pa
1 ,4 ! y1! 2 1 /4 3 1 2 t 4 3 ( i f �1'n1 r
8 3; rF l 7• •-e /s - 8 1 7 e 5 8 1 -- < 3 a �' J I a 5 I
R c f9 n n 10 ''�aff1• I•�faes f , ' •a �.-_•g
1II 10 : 9 2 i if to 'may 12 : is
10 6 �3 5
c6 n ! la IS I6 13 14 1 f915 13 14 IS
t61EN �AtE i !RCAM 13. R. 6,::
ISI' ,
1 4 ' a t z 1 c a: 3 1 z; 1 s a! 3 z; 1 I\ Y f 1 i
'_
g 3 8 1 T: 9 a 5 6 1 7' 8 3 .- a T T B \• = i 4 p '.
CITR'U9 t no
In 1+7
9 12 ! 11 I to : 9 12 : 11 (, to ; 9 12 11 to ; 9 a :•{ ' s a i7• i
L---- -----' --- -- i..
fg IS 14 IS -' 16 15 •: M IS .1613 14 IS r 16 J I I 1 1 6 B I
w--04TLR D E•G
1 64 3 1 2: 1 4 1 3 1 2 I 1 4 7 3 I I q
_ lS00TN • Rr! "F i .11.
—_4
• I :: P --','
_
__
_.r_-. _-_-
S! 8 1 7 6 3 2 6 1 7' 6 s: 6 7: 8 9 I O
4 'RE 'L 2t RAD 2 : C.T: 1214 Op 6 1 t9 • 20 (/ `71_ } •}'
8 utII II I t0 :.9 /II 11 i 10 ! 9 12 1 II I,O �.9 12 I T! w y3 CRAWFORO PL •da
. - -----
L----
14 X13 ! 14 } 13 ; 16 13 : 14 1 IS IB -t3; �•; 74- "ts'_i6 _73'r----1 ---• I I`+ �, D•-++-4ti 6r�� 2
'.IQsta• 'ROAD'tS-.O l
1 4 3 1 z l •; .r ! 2!'µ., D1� z I aAli>
•» .••-; _»'�_"--{'•--»»-}•--%e ..»iZ 6-•-_�'--• -- 1 1a N •NnI i -----~ _-
s s+ 6 7 e 7
tc_121 218 RbaD 27 2s I 25 - 0 --- 2f9 28 7,7
g 12 of i,t0 : 9 12 ; It I to 1 9 12 1 11 to 9 12 ; 11 ! Nn2,lk
I Z =
16 IS y 14 I IS • 16 13 14 15 i t8 13 t 14 15 i 16 13 ; 74 1 J
LOCICWaltS NE
f6 9 I ±
' 1 4 1 3 1 2: 1 4 3 E I 4: 3 1 2: 1 4; 3 1 2
Ab I
g S 8 1 rt
T! 8 S 6: B- S G. 1 7 1 8 S 6-5!6
1
.p -,D �N TRAIL 34 3!5 3!6
9 12 : 11 1 to ; 9 12 ; It to ; 9'. 12 ' 11 I 12 11 1 9 1 '-• ;` -- _ 8 1
r
18 !3 I 14 I /S ; 16 1! • f4 1 IS : 18 13 : t4 I IS 18 13 : 14 1 15 16 wt i J
W W W '
PARTIALLY REVISED 1972
RGE. 39 E. PARTIALLY REVISED 1954 RF
A N N t PARTIALLY REVISED FF.6 1956 v4aY1AtLT acv. 1.
BOOK� FAR �1
OCT 41978
t33�
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PF:TITtnN
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian*River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
AA
Ve
00 FADE
OCT 41978
Lel i 100 �
J
P E `.!` I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 rill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Inc?ian 7fiver
County Water Municipal Service faxing Unit, District.nefined
by Ordinance 76-26,.Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY RFCOR0 OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PFTITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY CmnMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasahility study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River Countv in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property ow•rners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
11
�.r _ it ..,
A40
6 , e�4'-'7 Ate
4"L41t�.— 'e
fg
0009 36 PAGE 5
L- 0cr 4 1978
L61 v 100
You
6 Pa„E 5b
i
I
t
6 Pa„E 5b
i
I
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the south Indian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HFRFBY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons; e
1. That the proposed "feasability studv" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
7 ,tea
7 ^
e>?7c- qg-ZqA0J
BL61P loo - -1
12 �/
�f - -sx/
Orr
L -e
4
4
d 4 'e_ crc�o.* c1 aso tt sT p\o,c e V 2�0 � c�c�
N .
4d2te
OA�
OCT -36 PA,,E359
Bog t$
41978
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in propert-r
taxes -proposed by The Board of'Count_v Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian Piver
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach -Press Journal, do HEREBY. 'RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons;
1 -That the proposed "feasahility study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently ooeratina
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the nroaerty
owners of the proposed district.
�.2 .2 7 {1/ ems„
f_ _l� _�� ,._il�-,off
--_
- WA4
Ile
Ile-�'�YlZ^
r7 p2 (o MJ i9'YE r,�p p �f/ S� is7.
6 PAGE 366
OCT 41978 ON
• M V 130
g1l 44
6
h Loh L-
• ver a
/ -it
`W14
r7n7V.. ;;,17(r
,tea :r�rrb
� 39d
SC
4r
f V:,7),. fr.
�� Cis' �� �
7-7
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of, real
property which ...ould be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Beard of County Commissioners', Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian '?iver
County water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY. RFCoRn oUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PFTITInN
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Ind.iar_•River, State of Florida
taking over the Nater and sewerage facilities currently oueratina
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan.of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property oeners in -the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
5.0
r 11�1
�-xL_
�y
LJ
.rte -Lf ..
/ r'="�
36 PAPE 384
OCT 41978
6
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on'behalf of the South Indian *River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District nPfined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEP—BY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PFTITInN
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons.
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of -Florida
taking over the water'and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan. of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
i all property otmers in the County and not just the Property
owners.of theproposed district.
a
L
LA
. �••�?,�/{,/�/ \ •,.-� � 4"�l.I•� � I moi.,
4 Y
WK 36 PAGE 365
OCT 41978
— � a
p.{' � iy'[.�.IL.{f t. l C..i'. r{•`.!'` 6%y, >`-G� - G_ r7• _ t/; - � `i- L �
' r
� t
OCT 41978
e
P E T I 'T' I 0 X
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which could be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by She Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance -76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Hero Beach Press Journal, _do HER.F:.By RFCnRD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COTMISSIONERS," Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the followinq reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian_ River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently ooeratina
in.the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
BOOK. .36 RAG E 6 � 1
0 CT 41978
J
�6
F
SS
f
1
BOOK 36 PAi,,E 368
0 CT 41978
3OVd g NON
3D
em 36 FAG '70
13
We,.the undersigned•Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board'of County Commissionekso'Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of .the South Indian River
County.Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by -Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEP.FBY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax,. and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian giver County, Florida
to deny Said increase for the followin4 reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
E
the. -practicality of the County of Indian-River,—State of Florida
taking over.the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
.in'the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
/ Tuz��
r I ' 1 • `
36 PAGF3 tic
OCT 41978
a
• �c v'yT, fin. � `r�� 4° `�'"�-�-�`�.%��✓Le.7�r�,! Vn�,
010
OE
zov
-
_ 00
_
--
I
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEPFBY RFCnRD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PFTITInN
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons: ,
1. That the proposed "feasability studv" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
9$7-6- 23_ ----...
e�f
PQu 3 PAuF ,3 !` 4
OCT 41978
loci
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned .Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board'of County Commissioners; Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Inclian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing -Unit, District Defined
by -Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HER.FBY RtFCORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State ot.Florida
taking over.the water and sewerage facilities currently ooeratina
in'the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
E
-----------
t _
Boa 36 PAE 376
OCT 4 197
L r4
74,�
--.---__ - - � � �1� - yes � �.�� ���.►-�
Al
1 7Z-VZ4
17 11.Zo
OCT 41978 .
e
y
. P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned.Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
d b The Board'of County Commissioners; Indian
taxes propose y
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
r
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District nefined
bi"Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27, '
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do'HEREBY 'RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PBTITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of _Indian VRiver; State o$,.Florida y
taking over.the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
.in -the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
zsy-fy )q.Aet%� Idoa.c%E
.
A44 aC /"""Q. S /2"6 'k Sin/
1"' 3 1-cr I
1
3
y
. P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned.Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
d b The Board'of County Commissioners; Indian
taxes propose y
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
r
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District nefined
bi"Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27, '
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do'HEREBY 'RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PBTITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of _Indian VRiver; State o$,.Florida y
taking over.the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
.in -the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
zsy-fy )q.Aet%� Idoa.c%E
.
A44 aC /"""Q. S /2"6 'k Sin/
1"' 3 1-cr I
1
0
36 F*
a
.\
1
0
36 F*
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Plill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian '?iver
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the followinq reasons:
1. That the proposed "feasability studv" to determine,
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of groio-th,and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
8m 36 FAu379
OCT
e
P E T I T I O N
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as.owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill', increase in property
taxes proposed by The Beard of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian '?fiver
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY. RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in propdrty tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM14_ISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the followinq reasons: ,
1. That the proposed "feasability study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its elan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by
all property p-Amers in the County and not just the propertv
owners of the proposed district.
OCT 41978 '
BOOK 36 PAGE380
0
We, the undersigned Petitioners, as owners of real
property which would be subject to the burden of the increase
in property taxes from zero to 3/4 Mill, increase in property
taxes proposed by The Board of County Commissioners, Indian
River County, Florida, on behalf of the South Indian River
County Water Municipal Service Taxing Unit, District Defined
by Ordinance 76-26, Notice of Hearing published September 27,
1978 in the Vero Beach Press Journal, do HEREBY RECORD OUR
OPPOSITION to said increase in property tax, and do PETITION
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida
to deny said increase for the following reasons;
1. That the proposed "feasahility study" to determine
the practicality of the County of Indian River, State of Florida
taking over the water and sewerage facilities currently operating
in the proposed district is a matter of concern and benefit
to the whole of Indian River County in its plan of growth and
development, and, as such, must be funded and supported by,
all property owners in the County and not just the property
owners of the proposed district.
0,7
. .. ...........
0CT 41978
BOOK i36 PAGE 3-81
RITA NELSON OF 2746 6TH PLACE STATED THAT SHE AND THE OTHERS
PRESENT ARE OPPOSED TO THE 3/4 MILL TAX, WHICH SHE FELT IS DISCRIMATORY
IN THAT NO OTHER DISTRICT IS BEING LEVIED AGAINST, SHE FURTHER FELT
THE AMOUNT OF $123,000 IS AN EXTORTIONATE AMOUNT FOR A STUDY, AND
SUGGESTED THAT COUNTY PERSONNEL BE USED FOR THE STUDY, MRS. NELSON
STATED THAT SHE WOULD GLADLY PAY TAXES TO GET GOOD WATER FOR THE
COUNTY, BUT WOULD EXPECT ALL OTHERS IN THE COUNTY TO SHARE THAT BURDEN.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE AGREED THAT THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE FULLY
KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT WHAT IS OCCURRING AND NOTED THAT THE TAXPAYERS HAVE
A RESPONSIBILITY TO FIND OUT AND KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE COUNTY.
HE NOTED THAT THERE IS NO PROGRAM IN THE COUNTY THAT IS MORE IMPORTANT
THAN WATER AND.FELT THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF MISUNDERSTANDING ABOUT
•WHAT IS OCCURRING AS IS EVIDENT IN THE WORDING THAT IS ON THE PETITIONS
SUBMITTED. THE CHAIRMAN EXPLAINED IN DETAIL WHAT THE COUNTY IS TRYING
TO DO AND EMPHASIZED THAT THE TAXPAYERS IN THIS DISTRICT ARE NOT BEING
TAXED FOR A STUDY OF THE WHOLE COUNTY; AND ANY DOLLARS RAISED, WHEREVER
THEY COME FROM, WILL BE SPENT WITHIN THIS PARTICULAR TAXING DISTRICT AND
CANNOT BE SPENT ANYWHERE ELSE. CHAIRMAN 4'IODTKE CONTINUED THAT IT IS A
NECESSITY FOR THE COUNTY TO SOLVE THEIR WATER PROBLEMS AND THE LOGICAL
PLACE TO START IS WHERE THERE ARE THE MOST PROBLEMS. HE THEN REVIEWED
THE DIFFICULTIES WE ARE HAVING WITH THE FRANCHISES IN THIS DISTRICT
AND NOTED THAT ALTHOUGH 20 PEOPLE ON THE MID FLORIDA SYSTEM HAVE SIGNED
THE PETITION OPPOSING THE MILLAGE, THERE ARE HUNDREDS ON THE SYSTEM
WHO HAVE NOT. THE CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO DISCUSS ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF
FUNDING THE STUDY AND POINTED OUT THAT IF WE CHANGE THE METHOD, IT WILL
DEFER THE PAYMENT, BUT THAT IS ALL IT WILL DO, THE CHAIRMAN FURTHER
EXPLAINED THAT THE COURTS HAVE TAKEN THE POSITION THAT THE FRANCHISE
HOLDER IS ENTITLED TO III OF THEIR INVESTMENT WHILE THE COUNTY HAS
MONEY AVAILABLE AT 5%, HAS NO PROFIT MOTIVE, AND ALSO CAN (QUALIFY FOR
GOVERNMENTAL ASSISTANCE WHICH PRIVATE COMPANIES CANNOT.
€ COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE CANNOT EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES
OF THE DISTRICT AND FUND IT IN THIS YEAR.
MRS. LYNCH FELT THIS IS UNFAIR BECAUSE THEY WILL BE PENALIZED
FOR SOMEONE WHO MIGHT USE THE WATER LATER ON.
59
OCT
�oac 36 PAu 382
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DID NOT FEEL IT IS INCONCEIVABLE THAT
FUTURE LAND OWNERS WOULD HAVE TO PAY AN IMPACT FEE TO BE MADE PART
OF THE DISTRICT.
MRS. LYNCH REITERATED THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT
WERE SET BY CONSIDERING A STUDY MADE SIX YEARS AGO, AND THEY SHOULD BE
CHANGED BEFORE ANYONE IS TAXED,
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT WE WOULD LOSE ANOTHER
TWO YEARS IF WE CHANGED THE BOUNDARIES AT THIS TIME. THERE HAS TO BE
A STARTING POINT, AND THE WHOLE REASON FOR THESE DISTRICTS IS THAT WE
WANT TO TAX THE PEOPLE WHO WILL RECEIVE THE SERVICES.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE BOUNDARIES ARE NOT ACTUALLY
SIX YEARS OLD. THE LINES WERE SET AND PREDICATED ON POPULATION
PROJECTIONS WHERE WE HAVE THE GREATEST NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS AND WHERE
WE HAVE THE GROUP WITH THE LARGEST NUMBER OF PROBLEMS. SHE NOTED THAT
WE WILL ALWAYS HAVE PEOPLE WHO ARE UNHAPPY, BUT IT IS A STARTING POINT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED THE POINT -MADE ABOUT A
REFERENDUM VOTE AND NOTED THAT THIS WOULD BE TWO YEARS OFF; UNLESS
YOU HAVE A SPECIAL ELECTION, WHICH WOULD COST ABOUT $17,000 OUT OF A
TOTAL BUDGET OF $63,000.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT THE BOARD COULD HAVE TAKEN THE
EASY WAY OUT AND GONE TO A REFERENDUM, BUT IF THE PEOPLE TURNED IT
DOWN, THE BOARD STILL WOULD BE FACED WITH THE QUESTION OF HOW TO SOLVE
THESE PROBLEMS THAT CAN ONLY GET WORSE. HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY IS
BEING FORCED INTO THE WATER BUSINESS AND HAS GOT TO DO IT ON AN
ECONOMICAL SCALE IN ORDER TO GET THE COST OF THE WATER DOWN TO A
REASONABLE RATE.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON THE ISSUES INVOLVED, AND COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT RE—EMPHASIZED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE SYSTEM ITSELF WILL NOT
BE PAID FOR OUT OF TAXES BUT WILL BE PAID.FOR BY THE PEOPLE ACTUALLY
RECEIVING THE SERVICES. HE ALSO STATED THAT•THE PEOPLE MUST REALIZE
d THAT;THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT, BUT IF THEY GET IN A BAD SITUATION
AND WE POSTPONE THIS DECISION, IT WILL BE YEARS BEFORE WE CAN DO
ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
60 '
�AflK 36 PAGE .383
OCT 41979
HEPBURN WALKER, RESIDENT OF THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, STATED THAT
THERE HAVE BEEN MANY PETITIONS, ABOUT WATER CIRCULATED IN HIS AREA AND
AND THEY HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH WELLS GOING BAD VERY QUICKLY, WHICH
HE FELT COULD HAPPEN TO THE PEOPLE HERE TODAY ALSO.
RAY CAMPBELL OF 965 22ND AVENUE, STATED THAT HE OBJECTS TO
BEING TAXED FOR CONSULTANT ENGINEERS TO DO THIS STUDY WHEN HE IS
ALREADY PAYING A TAX FOR THE SERVICES OF CERTIFIED COUNTY ENGINEERS, SUCH
AS MR. SCHMUCKER AND MR.JENNINGS, WHO HAVE THE TIME TO DO THIS STUDY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES
OF ENGINEERS AND IN ORDER TO SEARCH FOR WATER AND PUT IN TEST WELLS,
IT REQUIRES A HYDROLOGIST WHICH IS A SPECIAL FIELD, HE INFORMED
MR. CAMPBELL THAT WE DON'T HAVE A COUNTY ENGINEER, SIR. BEINDORF IS
OUR CONSULTING ENGINEER, AND OVERSEEING THIS PROJECT AND IT WAS HIS
STRONG RECOMMENDATION THAT WE SPEND OUR MONEY FOR A HYDROLOGIST.
THE BOARD CONTINUED TO EXPLAIN THAT THE COUNTY DOES NOT HAVE
AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND MUST HIRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS TO DO ALL
THE WORK THAT MUST BE DONE TO MAKE THESE STUDIES, GO THOUGH THE
PERMITTING STAGES, ETC.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT, SPEAKING AS AN ENGINEER,
THERE IS NO WAY POSSIBLE FOR ONE ENGINEER TO HAVE ALL THE CAPABILITIES
AND EXPERIENCE NECESSARY TO DESIGN SUCH A SYSTEM.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
HAS A WHOLE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND STILL•HAS TO HIRE CONSULTANTS.
MR. CAMPBELL NOTED THAT NO ONE IN GIFFORD WAS TAXED AND
ASKED IF THAT WAS DONE ON FEDERAL FUNDS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT IT WAS DONE ON FEDERAL AND BORROWED
FUNDS AND THE BORROWED MONEY WILL HAVE TO BE PAID BACK. THE ENTIRE
DISTRICT IS AN ENTERPRISE ACCOUNT AND WILL BE SELF-SUSTAINING.
MR. CAMPBELL NOTED IT'HAS BEEN STATED THAT THE TAX WILL BE
TAKEN OFF THE PEOPLE IN A FEW YEARS, BUT HE DOUBTED THAT IT WILL EVER
o COME OFF.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THE BOARD HAS.BEEN WORKING
INDEPENDENTLY TO TRY TO SECURE ALL TYPES OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO ADD
TO THE PROJECT TO CUT THE LOAD ON THE TAXPAYER AND ARE HOPEFUL THAT
THIS TAX WILL BE FOR ONE YEAR ONLY, BUT IT IS NEEDED TO GET STARTED.
61
BOX' FA. -E384
�1.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE EXPLAINED THAT AFTER THE PLANNING IS PAID FOR
THE PEOPLE WOULD NOT PAY ANYTHING FOR WATER UNTIL THEY ACTUALLY GOT THE
WATER.
MR. CAMPBELL FELT THIS INDICATED THAT HOOK-UP WILL BE
MANDATORY, AND THE CHAIRMAN AGREED THAT IS POSSIBLE.
CAROL LYNCH ASKED, SINCE THE COUNTY IS GOING INTO THE WATER
BUSINESS, WOULD IT NOT BE MORE EFFICIENT FOR THE COUNTY TO HIRE
ENGINEERS TO KEEP ON THEIR PAYROLL.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THE BOARD FELT WE ARE BETTER
OFF ECONOMICALLY TO PUT THE ENGINEERS STRICTLY ON A CONSULTING BASIS
SO WE CAN USE THEM AS WE NEED THEM. AT THIS POINT, THE COUNTY DOES
NOT NEED THEM FULL TIME, BUT THAT TIME WILL COME,
MRS. LYNCH AGAIN QUESTIONED WHY THE BOUNDARIES WERE SET AS
THEY ARE AND NOT MADE INTO A SQUARE, AND MR. BEINDORF NOTED THAT A
GROVE AREA WAS SPECIFICALLY LEFT OUT, AND THE ZONING IN THE TAXING
DISTRICT IS MAINLY SINGLE OR MULTIPLE FAMILY, INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
RITA NELSON ASKED WHY LAURELWOOD WAS EXCLUDED, AND MR. BEINDORF
STATED THAT IT IS NOT EXCLUDED, BUT JUST OUTLINED AS A FRANCHISE AREA,
AND IT WILL BE TAXED JUST AS EVERYONE ELSE IN THE.DISTRICT.
MRS. MYERS OF 37TH AVENUE ASKED HOW WILL THE PEOPLE WHO JOIN
THE DISTRICT WHEN IT IS EVENTUALLY ENLARGED, BENEFIT FROM THE STUDY
WHICH WILL BE DONE ONLY FOR THE DISTRICT AS NOW OUTLINED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT ENLARGEMENT IS ONLY ONE OF
THE ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE. OTHER DISTRICTS COULD BE SET UP. HE ALSO
NOTED THAT IF THE.AREA WERE ENLARGED IN THE FUTURE, HE WOULD ASSUME THE
STUDY WOULD BE UPDATED AND FUNDS OBTAINED FROM THE ENLARGED AREA WOULD
HAVE TO PAY FOR THE UPDATING.
CAROL LYNCH ASKED WHAT PRECIPITATED THE BOARD INTO THIS
PROGRAM, AND THE BOARD EXPLAINED TO HER IN DETAIL THE VARIOUS PROBLEMS
THAT HAVE ARISEN TO FORCE THEM INTO TAKING THIS STEP - THAT THIS TOOL
WAS NEEDED IN CASE MID FLORIDA WALKED OUT. THESE DISTRICTS WERE SET
UP WITH THE INTENTION THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE USED UNLESS IT BECAME
NECESSARY, THE CHAIRMAN SPECULATED ABOUT THE'POSSIBILITY OF ONE
DISTRICT SELLING WATER TO ANOTHER AND STATED THAT WE DO NOT CONTEMPLATE
HAVING FOUR OR FIVE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE SOUTH COUNTY.
62
8o' 36 PA'E 385
41
OCT 4 1978 J
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT -THE BOARD APPRECIATES THE
INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED -IN THIS'DISTRICT AND NOTED THAT WE HAVE
TWO OTHER DISTRICTS IN THE COUNTY WHO ARE ASKING THE BOARD TO PLEASE
COME TAX THEM AND GET GOING, BUT THE BOARD FELT THEY HAD TO TAKE THE
AREA WITH THE MOST IMMEDIATE NEEDS AND PROBLEMS. SHE FELT IN THE LONG
RUN, THE PEOPLE WILL BE HAPPY WITH THE RESULTS.
COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER AGREED T14AT THIS WILL BE TO THE
BENEFIT OF EVERYONE CONCERNED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THOSE PRESENT THAT, BASED UPON A
NEW BILL THAT HAS BEEN PASSED IN WASHINGTON VERY RECENTLY, HE NOW
FEELS THERE MAY BE SOME OTHER OPTIONS OPEN TO US TO DO THIS STUDY. THE
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS NOW FEEL THAT THERE IS.PROBABLY ONLY $15,000
TO $18,000 WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH FHA, AND THE CHAIRMAN
THEREFORE, DISCUSSED LOWERING THE TAX TO 1/4 OF A MILL TO RAISE
$21,7501 NOTING THAT, BY LAW, WE CAN ONLY BUDGET 95% OF WHAT WE TAX.
THIS WOULD NECESSITATE THE ENGINEERS STOPPING WHERE THEY ARE NOW
TO MAKE AN APPLICATION, AND THEN, AFTER IT IS APPROVED, CONTINUING
ON WITH THE STUDY. THE OTHER OPTION WOULD BE TO ASSESS NO MILLAGE
AND TRY TO RAISE THE BALANCE IN SOME OTHER WAY OR TRY TO PERSUADE
FHA TO INCLUDE THAT ALSO. THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT THESE OPTIONS
CAN BE CONSIDERED, BUT HE FELT THAT THE ORIGINAL DECISION WAS A
GOOD ONE,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THERE ARE SOME REAL PROBLEMS
IN WHAT THE CHAIRMAN HAS SUGGESTED, BUT DID NOT BELIEVE THE BOARD
HAS THE TIME TO GO INTO THEM RIGHT.
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO TAKE THIS MATTER
UP AGAIN LATER IN THE AFTERNOON.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DEFERRED ACTION ON THIS ITEM UNTIL
4:00 O'CLOCK P.M. THIS -AFTERNOON.
63
OCT 41978
BOOK 6 FuE 0386
0
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
OFRIEA�ESTATE
Pursuant to Florida Statute 125.35, the Board
if County Commissioners of Indian River
Published Weekly
'ounty, Florida, will accept written bids to the
hour of 9:30 A.M. Wednesday, October 4, 1978,
forP-Pen,e of the following described County
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
From a point of beginning at the intersection
of the east right-of-way line of a 160 foot wide
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
right-of-way for Lateral "J" Canal and the
STATE OF FLORIDA
south right-of-way line of a 250 foot wide right -
g y pe y ppeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
Before the undersigned authority personally a
of -way for the South Relief Canal n the Indian
River Farms Water Management District,
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
said P.O.B. being In the S.E. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
Section 13, Township 33 S., Range 39 E., Indian
River County, Florida;
Run northeasterly osaid south right-of-way
If..of the South Relief Canal a distance of 600
a
feet to a point;
p
Thence run southeasterly on a line parallel
L%
f�
to the east right-of-way line of Lateral "J"
^ J �_
C��'J
In the matter of �— r
Canal a distance of 600 feet to a point;
Thence run southwesterly on a line parallel
to the south 'right-of-way line of the South
Relief Canal a distance of 600 feet to the in-
tersection of the east right-of-way line of
Lateral "J" Canal;
Thence run northwesterly on said east right.
In the Court, was pub-
of -way line of Lateral "J" Canal a distance of
600 feet to said P.O. S.
(1 �>
Containing 8.26 acres more or less.
lisped in said newspaper in the issues of s -• ja �� '/
The Board of County Commissioners reserve
the right to reject any or all of the bids and
make awards in any manner which the Board
considers to be in the best interest of Indian
River County, Florida.
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
y
All bids shall not exceed a 20 year lease and
shall be in writing, by legal description as
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
listed above and shall include a check payable
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY for 10 percent (10
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
percent) of the lease price— with the balance
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
due five (5) days after acceptance, submitted
tisernent; and affiant further says thathe has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
in an envelope securely seated and marked on
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
the outside "SEALED BID FOR LEASE OF
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
COUNTY LAND" along with the date and time
of the bid opening. The bids maybe mailed or
delivered to the office of the County Ad -
Sworn to before a this d of D,1 -L1 Z_
ministrator, Room 115, County Courthouse,
and subscribed
Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Proposals received
after 9:30 A.M. October 4, 1978, will be
returned unopened.
iness Manager)
Boardof County Commissioners
Indian River County, Florida
William C. WodtkeJr., Chairman
.,Z/;L-7Sept,
13, 20,1978.
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Inio River County, Florida)
(SEAQ •
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
RUDY HUBBARD, WYL-FM Ny......22 YEAR LEASE 01,000 PER YEAR
(ENCLOSED CHECK FOOF FIRST YEAR
SINCE THERE WERE SOME -QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED,
AND THE GENTLEMEN FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE HAVE ARRIVED TO MAKE
THEIR REPORT TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD, THE BOARD
REQUESTED MR. HUBBARD TO COME BACK AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
OCT 41978
64
a
L—�
THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED THAT THE REPORT ON THE GIFFORD WATER
AND SEWER SYSTEM SCHEDULED FOR 10:30 O'CLOCK A.M. WILL BE HEARD THIS
AFTERNOON, AND THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED SO THAT THE PROPERTY
APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD MIGHT CONVENE. MINUTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD ARE FILED IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECONVENED AT 1:115 O'CLOCK
P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT.
THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED THAT THE BOARD WOULD AT THIS TIME
DISCUSS THE BID MADE BY RUDY HUBBARD OF WGYL FOR A LEASE OF COUNTY
OWNED LAND.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED THE MEANING OF A LEASE OPTION
AGREEMENT, AND RUDY HUBBARD, MANAGER OF VIGYL, EXPLAINED THAT THE
LEASE WILL NOT BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL THEY CAN CLEAR THEMSELVES WITH
THE OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES THAT WILL BE INVOLVED SINCE THEY
OBVIOUSLY WOULD HAVE NO NEED FOR A 20 YEAR LEASE IF THEY COULDN'T
GET THE NECESSARY CLEARANCE. HE NOTED THAT THE AREA INVOLVED IS 8.3
ACRES, OR ABOUT 600 SQ. FT. THE TOWER WILL BE 300' HIGH, AND THE
GUY WIRES MUST EXTEND EQUAL LENGTHS IN EACH DIRECTION.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR. HUBBARD ANTICIPATED ANY
PROBLEMS IN GETTING CLEARANCE FROM THE FhA, AND HE STATED THAT HE
DID NOT. HE NOTED THAT THEY MUST ALSO GO THROUGH THE FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THIS PROPERTY WILL GO ON THE TAX
ROLLS WHEN IT IS LEASED, AND MR. HUBBARD STATED THAT IF IT DOESN'T
FOR ANY REASON, THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO PAY THE COUNTY A REASONABLE
EQUIVALENT TO OFFSET THE TAXES. HE FELT, HOWEVER, THAT IT WOULD GO
ON THE TAX ROLLS, AND STATED THAT IF IT SHOULD, THEY WOULD PAY THE
`faf3*f
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BOARD MUST MAKE A DETERMINATION
AS TO WHETHER THE LEASE IS THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE LAND
IN QUESTION, AND FURTHER NOTED THAT IN SOME OTHER INSTANCES, THE BOARD
}HAS HAD APPRAISALS MADE TO GET SOME IDEA OF THE VALUES INVOLVED.
OCT41978
65
VOK cab PAGE 388
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS STATED THAT THE LAST
REQUEST RECEIVED BY THE COUNTY FOR USE OF THIS PARTICULAR LAND WAS
FOR A RIFLE RANGE, WHICH THE BOARD DID NOT FEEL WAS COMPATIBLE WITH
THE AREA.
COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE INVESTMENT NECESSARY
TO PUT UP SUCH A TOWER AND ASKED WHAT MR. HUBBARD USED AS A BASE TO
DETERMINE THE VALUE OF THE LEASE.
MR. HUBBARD STATED THAT THE TOWER WOULD REQUIRE AN INVESTMENT
OF ABOUT $25,000. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE BASED HIS FIGURES ON
A LAND VALUE OF $3,000 AN ACRE, BUT FELT THE LAND AS IT IS NOW IS
ACTUALLY VALUELESS.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR. HUBBARD WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO
PUTTING IN AN ESCALATOR CLAUSE OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS.
MR. HUBBARD POINTED OUT THAT THE COST IN THE LAND IS ALREADY
FIXED AND DID NOT SEE HOW AN ESCALATOR CLAUSE WOULD APPLY. HE AGREED
THAT THE VALUE OF THE LAND PROBABLY WOULD INCREASE OVER THE YEARS, BUT
NOTED THAT THE COUNTY WOULD RETAIN THE LAND.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE VALUE OF THE DOLLARS
PAID ON THE LEASE WOULD DECREASE, AND WHAT IS A FAIR RENTAL TODAY MIGHT
WELL NOT BE TEN YEARS FROM NOW.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED AN ESCALATOR CLAUSE BASED ON
THE STANDARD COST -OF -LIVING INDEX, AND COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED
POSSIBLE RENEGOTIATING THE BASE EVERY FIVE YEARS.
MR. HUBBARD NOTED THAT HE WOULD BE IN A BAD POSITION TO
NEGOTIATE AS HE COULD NOT VERY WELL MOVE EVERY FIVE YEARS. HE FELT
THAT THE PROPER VALUE OF THE LAND SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED BECAUSE IT IS
VERY POSSIBLE THAT $3,000 AN ACRE IS A HIGH FIGURE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS.AGREED THAT THE LAND SHOULD BE APPRAISED.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO VARIOUS METHODS OF ESCALATION,
AND MR. HUBBARD SUGGESTED THAT A CERTAIN AMOUNT COULD BE CHARGED FOR
THE FIRST TEN YEARS AND A HIGHER AMOUNT FOR THE SECOND.TEN, I.E.,
$1,000 FOR EACH OF THE FIRST TEN YEARS AND $1,500 POR.EACH OF THE NEXT
TEN. THE CHAIRMAN SUGGESTED THAT THE AMOUNT MIGHT JUST ESCALATE
$50.00 EVERY YEAR.
BOOK 36 PArc 389
OCT 4197
MR. HUBBARD ASKED TO BE ALLOWED TO CONSIDER THE VARIOUS
ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT MR,
HUBBARD PREPARE A PROPOSED LEASE TO PRESENT TO THE BOARD.
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO
ROBERT GASKILL, VICE PRESIDENT OF VISTA PROPERTIES OF VERO BEACH, INC.,
fa BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66.
67
va - 36 PACE %390
NOTICE
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
-NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission of Indian River
County, Florida, has tentatively approved the
Published Weekly
following changes and additions to the Zoning
Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida,
-
which changes and additions are substantially
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
asfollows: .
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
fhatthe following described property situated
' Florida, to -wit:
In Indian RI er County,
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
The North 160 feet of that part of he NEI/4 of
STATE OF FLORIDA
the SE!a East of FEC right of way except the
East 27 feet thereof (2.45 acres). vection 13,
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
Township 33 S, Range 39 East.
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
That part of the NEN of the kf,4, East of to
of way and North of the South relief
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
FEC right
canal, less road right of way, and less North
j�
160 feet except the East 27 feet thereof (12.55
a` �C}'C C 1" •
acres).
All of Government Lot 4 including riparian
-
rights, Section 18, Township 33 S, Range 40 E,
(68.46 acres).
in the matter of
That part of the West 1/2 of NELh of SWI/4, North
-,�
of the South relief canal and the NWba of SW1,14
North of the South relief canal Section 18,
Township 33 S, Range 40 E, (33.75 acres).
EXCEPT, HOWEVER, THE WESTERLY 22
ACRESTHEREOF.
The Nth of the SWI/4 of Lot 3, Section 18,
in the Court, was pub-'
Township 33 South; Range 40 East, as in Of-
ficial Record Book 412, page 449 (ap-
proximately 5.00 acres), and
�% ,Ir/
ilshed in said newspaper in the issues of 4' 3The
E1/218, of Lot 3, Section Township 33 South,
Range 40 East, as in Official Record Book 417,
page 792 (Approximately 20 acres).
The Srh of Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 18,
Township 33 South, Range 40 East.
Be changed from R -IA, R-1TM and C-1 District
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper
Ypublished at
t.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
A publiisheari
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
Planning and Zoning Commission in the
County Commission Room, Indian River
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither aid nor
y p promised any person, firm or
County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida,
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
Thursday, August 10, 1978, at 7:30 p.m., after
which said public hearing in relation thereto at
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. /
which parties in interest and citizens shall
'have to be heard will he held by
,0
�;_grno
an opportunity
the Board of County Commissioners of Indiar
Sworn to and subscribed before me this A.D
River County, Florida, in the County Com
mission Room, Indian River County Cour
°
thouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday
October 4th, 1978, at 2:00 p.m.
(Busine Manager)
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
By: William C. WodtkeJr.,
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, R County, Florida)
Chairman
Indian River County Planning & Zoning
(SEAL)
Commission
By: Dick Bird, Chairman
July 26, 30,1978.
THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO
ROBERT GASKILL, VICE PRESIDENT OF VISTA PROPERTIES OF VERO BEACH, INC.,
fa BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66.
67
va - 36 PACE %390
., ,.. _ ,r7:: .. tvv':,to. !..:<: t.-.,,• � ... .. _...,.yam.. .� '•.+..'. _ ,.._ .e. .. _ q .. _ >_ .�+-:.s � .. .. - -. L� _.-.
• d
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM C. WODTKE. JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY. Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.
EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER '
R DON DEESON
JACK G. JENNINGS. Administrator 2146,14th Avenue Vero Beach. Florida 32960
August .16, 1978
Mr. Robert Gaskill, Vice President
Vista Properties of Vero Beach, Inc.
100 Vista Royale Blvd.
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Gaskill:
In compliance with Florida Statute 125.66 the following is
a Notice of Public Hearing for rezoning, as requested by G.Kendall
Sharp, Marvin F. Olson, Helen•F. Olson and Leonard E. Gollnick.
NOTICE
The Zoning 11ap will be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida to
wit.*
The North 160 feet of that part of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 East of FEC right-of-way except the -East 27 feet
.-thereof (2.45 acres.). Section 13, Township 33S, Range
39E.
That part of the NE 1/4 of SE 1/4, East of the FEC right
of -way and NOrth of the South relief canal, less road
right-of-way, and less North 160 feet except the East
•27 feet thereof (12.55 acres).
All of Government Lot 4 -including riparian rights, Section
•18, Township 33S, Range 40E (68.46 acres).
c That part of the West 1/2 of NE 1/4 of SW 1/4, North of the
South relief canal and the N14 1/4 of SCJ 1/4 North of the
South relief canal Section 18,• Township 33S,. Range 40E,
(33.75 acres).
EXCEPT, HOWEVER,.. THE WESTERLY 22 ACRES THEREOF.
T 41978
I
The North 1/2 of the STI 1/4 of Lot 3, Section 18,
Township 33 S, Range 40 E., as in Official Record
Book 412, Page 449, (approximately 5.00 acres), and
The E 1/2 of Lot 3, Section 18, Township 33 S., Range
40 E., as in Official Record Book 417, page 792, (ap-
proximately 20 acres).
The South 1/2 of Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 18
Township 33, S., Range 40E.
Be changed from R -IA, Single Family -District, R-lTM
Transient N'obile Home District- and C-1 Commercial District
to.R•-2 Plultiple Family District
A public hearing in relation thereto will be held by the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida
in the County Commission Room in the County Courthouse, Vero
Boach, Florida on Wednesday, October 4,"1978 at 2;00 o'clock
Sincerely,
Freda Wright,
Clerk
FW:ef
CC; G. Kendall Sharp
Marvin F. Olson
Helen F. Olson -
Leonard E. Gollnick
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK STATED THAT THIS IS A REQUEST
FOR REZONING OF THE AREA BEHIND MCKEE .JUNGLE GARDENS, INCLUDING A
PORTION OF MCKEE.JUNGLE GARDENS ITSELF. THE FRONT PORTION WHICH IS
CURRENTLY ZONED C-1 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REZONING REQUEST, AND
EAST OF THE MEANDER LINE IS ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND WHICH
CANNOT BE DEVELOPED. PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK NOTED THAT THE ORIGINAL
REQUEST WAS FOR P-2 ZONING WITH A PROJECTED DENSITY OF 10-12 UNITS
PER ACRE. THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DECIDED THAT THE PROPOSED
CHANGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO MEDIUM DENSITY WOULD BE BETTER
SERVED BY AN R -2C ZONING, WHICH IS WHAT THEY HAVE RECOMMENDED. SIR.
REDICK CONTINUED THAT EVERYONE, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPERS, AGREED THIS
WAS THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THAT SHOULD BE DONE -UNDER PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT. HE STATED THAT IT IS VIRTUALLY CERTAIN THAT THIS WILL
BE A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, AND THE PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE
APPROVED AT THE REGIONAL AND LOCAL LEVEL THROUGH DRI PROCESSESS.
THE PLANNING DIRECTOR STATED THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AUTHORIZED THE PLANNING STAFF TO COME BACK WITH RECOMMENDATION FOR
.10
BOOK 36 FACE 392
OCT 4 197 J
REZONING OF THE TWO AREAS PRESENTLY ZONED R -1A AND R-ITM BASED ON THE
ACTION OF THE BOARD TODAY. MR. REDICK NOTED THAT THE R -2C ZONING
RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE
DEVELOPER.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
ROBERT GASKILL, AGENT FOR VISTA PROPERTIES, INFORMED THE
BOARD THAT THEY CURRENTLY HAVE A PROJECT SOUTH OF THIS LOCATION WHICH
HAS DEMONSTRATED THE NEEDIFOR SUCH ZONING. THIS ALSO WOULD BE A GOLF
COURSE COMMUNITY SUCH AS VISTA ROYALE. THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE 120
ACRES AND WOULD NOT INVOLVE THE GARDEN'S PROPERTY IN FRONT OR THE
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE ACREAGE. HE NOTED THAT THE 12 UNIT DENSITY
IS BASED ON THE 120 ACRES, BUT THE GOLF COURSE AREA CUTS THE DENSITY.
MR. REDICK AGREED THAT THE TOTAL RESULTING DENSITY WOULD
AMOUNT TO ABOUT 5.5 UNITS PER ACRE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT A DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS THIS POINTS
OUT THE NEED FOR A PUD ORDINANCE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAS BEEN GREATLY
CONCERNED OVER THIS PARTICULAR AREA, BUT FELT CONFIDENT THAT THESE
DEVELOPERS WHO HAVE DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB IN THE.ADJACENT PROPERTY,
WILL DEVELOP THE AREA PROPERLY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED WHAT WOULD BE THE PROBLEM WITH
GIVING THEM R-2 INSTEAD OF R -2C SINCE THEY WILL ONLY BE USING HALF
THE DENSITY ANYWAY.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK FELT THE MAIN REASON FOR THE R -2C
WAS TO MATCH MEDIUM DENSITY AS PROPOSED FOR THE MASTER PLAN CHANGE IN
THE AREA.
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT. THE ZONING COMMISSION
HAS RECOMMENDED THE R -2C, AND THE DEVELOPER HAS STATED THAT HE IS
HAPPY WITH R -2C, WHICH WILL PROVIDE HIM WITH SUFFICIENT DENSITY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 78-30 BASED UPON THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AND GRANTED A REZONING
TO R -2C,
70
BOOK' 36 ?AGE 303
A
ORDINANCE NO. 78-30
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,'
Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the herein-
after described property and pursuant thereto held a public hearing in
relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed_in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida,
to -wit:
The North 160 feet of that part of the NE 4 of the SE ;east of
x FEC right of way except the East 27 -feet thereof (2.45 acres).
Section 13, Township 33, S, Range 39 East.
That part of the NE 4 of the SE 4, East of the FEC right of way
and North of the South relief canal, less road right of way,
and less North 160 feet except the East 27 feet thereof (12.55
acres).
All of Government Lot 4 including riparian rights, Section 18,
Township 33 S, Range 40 E, (68.46 acres).
That part of the West 2 of the NE 4 of SW 4, North of the South
relief canal, and the NW 4 of SW 4 North of the South relief canal
Section 18, Range 33 S, Range 40 E., (33.75 acres).
EXCEPT, HOWEVER, THE WESTERLY 22 ACRES THEREOF.
The N 2 of the SW 4 of Lot 3, Section 18, Township 33 South,
Range 40 East, as in Official Record Book 412, page 449
(approximately 5.00 acres), and
The E 2 of Lot 3, Section 18, Township 33 South, Range 40 East,
as in Official Record Book 417, page 792 (approximately
20 acres).
The S 2 of Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 18, Township 33
South, Range 40 East.
Be changed from R -1A, R-1TM and C-1 Districts to R4C Distr..ict.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described
in said Zoning Regulations.
This Ordinance shall take effect October 9, 1978.
0
Bc ; 36 PAGE 334
L_ GCT 4,s7s
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.I. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement,*being
�in the matter of
��� /�����
in the / Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of / L C t r
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tiserrent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
��
Swom to and subscribed before methis .�aycA I A•D
(BEAU
(Busingis Manager)
of the Circuit Court, Indian V11 r County, Florida)
THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC
HEARING WAS SENT TO THOMAS H. LOCKWOOD BY THE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY
FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66.
72
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission of Indian River
County, Florida, has tentatively approved the
following changes and additions to the Zoning
Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida,
which changes and additions are substantially
as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
In Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33,
Township 31 South, Range 39 East, thence
running 40 rods North, thence West 20 rods,
thence South 40 rods, thence East 20 rods to
point of beginning, containing 5 acres, more or
less; situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Parcel One: The North 991.4 feet of the Nor-
theast quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 33, Township 31 South, Range 39 East,
said property being also described as the
Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 33, Township 31 South, Range 39 East,
less and except the South 341 feet thereof.
Parcel Two: All that part lying west of the
westernmost right-of-way of the Florida East
Coast Railway of the following described
property: Commencing at the Northwest
corner of the Northwest quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 31
South, Range 39 East, and thence run South
161.5 feet to the point of beginning; thence run
East 1348.8 feet; thence North 323 feet; thence
West 1348.6 feet, thence South to point of
beginning, containing 10 acres, more or less.
Said property being also described as all that
part lying west of the westernmost right -of.
way of the Florida East Coast Railway of the
South 161.5 feet of the Southwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 31
South, Range 31 East and the North 161.5 feet
of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 33, Township 31 South,
Range 39 East.
The East 5 acres of Nrh of NWT/4 of SWI% in
Section 33, Township 31 South, Range 39 East;
situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of
the northwest quarter of Section 33, Township
31 South, Range 39 East, the same being ten
(10) acres more or less, said land lying and
being situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section
33, Township 31 South, Range 39 East run East
770 feet for point of beginning thence South 210
feet, thence West 210 feet, thence North 210
feet, thence East 210 feet to point of beginning,
said land lying and being in Indian River
County, Florida.
Be changed from C-1 Commercial and R-1
Residential to A -Agricultural.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Planning and Zoning Commission in the
County Commission Room, Indian River
County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida,
Thursday, August 10, 1978, at 7:30 p.m., after
which said public hearing in relation thereto at
which parties in interest and citizens shall
have an opportunity to be heard will be held by
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, in the County Com-
mission Room, Indian River County Cour.
thouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday,
October 4,1978, at 2:00 o'clock p.m.
Board of Cbunty Commissioners
Indian River County
By: William C. Wodtke Jr.,
Chairman
Indian River County Planning and Zoning
Commission
By: Dick Bird, Chairman
July 26, 30,1978.
BOOK 36 PAGE 395
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLOW Q WODTKE. JR.. Chairman
ALMA LEE LOV. Vice Chairman
WLLARD W. SIEBERT. JR.
EDWIN & SCHMUCKER
R. DON DEESON
LA
JACK Q JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue ye,e 8eac,, Florida 32960
August 16, 1978
Pyr. Thomas W. Lockwood
1525 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Lockwood:
In compliance with Florida Statute 125.66 the following is
a Notice of Public Hearing for rezoning, as requested by
John D. Shaw, Thomas C. and Imogene T. Chithav%, and Anna Blake
Morrison.
NOTICE
• The Zoning Hap will be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida to -
wit:
Commencing at the SF. corner of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4
of Section 33, Township 31 S., Range 39 E., thence running
40 rods North, thence West 20 rods, thence So. 40 rods
'thence E. 20 rods to p.o.b., containing 5 acres, more or
less; situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Parcel One: The No. 997.4 feet of the NE quarter of the
SGT quarter of Section 33, Township 3.1 So. Range 39 E.,
said property being also described as the NE quarter of the
SW quarter of Section 33, Toomship 31 S., Range 39 E, less
and except the So. 341 feet thereof.
Parcel Two: All that part lying west of the westernmost
r.o.w. of the Florida East Coast Railway of the following
described property: Commencing at the NW corner of the 1V'ia
quarter of the SE quarter of Section 33, Township 31 S.,
Range 39 E., and thence run So. 161.5 feet to the p.o.b.;
thence run E. 1348,,8 feet; thence No. 323 feet; thence W.
1348.8'feet, thence So, to p.o.b., containing 10 acres,
more or less. Said Droperty being also described as all
..that part lying W. of the westernmost r.o.w. of the FECR
of the So. 161.5 feet of the SW quarter of the NE quarter
of Section 33, Township 31 So., Range 39 E. and the No. 161.5
feet of the NW quarter of the SE quarter of Section 33.
Township 31 So., Range 38 E.
.The E. 5 acres of No. 1/2 of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4
in Section 33, Township 31 So., Range 39 East,
situate in Indian River County, Florida.
NE quarter of the S14 quarter of the NW quarter of
Section 33, Township 31, So. of Range 39 E., the same
being ten (10 ) acres more or less, said land lying
and being situate in Indian -River County, Florida.
Beginning at the NW corner of Section 33, Township
31 So., Range 39 E. run E. 770 feet for p.o.b., thence
So. 210 feet, thence W 210 feet, thence No. 210 feet, -
thence E. 210 feet to p.o.b., said land lying and being
in Indian River County, Florida.
a Be changed from C-1 Commercial District and R-1 Residential
District to A -Agricultural District.•
A public hearing in relation thereto will.be held by the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the
County Commission Room in the County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida
• on Wednesday, October 4, 1978, at 2:00 o'clock P.M.
Sincerely,
Freda .Wright
FW:ef Clerk
CC: Anna Blake Morrison
Thomas C, and Impgene T. Chatham
John D. Shaw
BOOK
OCT 41979
36 PAGE 396
0
s
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK STATED THAT THIS REQUEST IS TO
REZONE THE BALANCE OF AN AREA REZONED A SHORT TIME AGO FOR THE PURPOSE
OF SAND MINING EAST OF KINGS HIGHWAY. THIS REQUEST INCLUDES THE AREAS
EXCLUDED AT THE.PREVIOUS REZONING. HE NOTED THAT A PERMIT'HAS BEEN
ISSUED ON THE PORTION RECENTLY REZONED, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REZONING BE APPROVED..
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THOMAS LOCKWOOD, REPRESENTING THOSE REQUESTING THE REZONING,
STATED THAT THIS IS THE SECOND PART OF. A'TWO-PART REQUEST AND IS
CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY ALREADY REZONED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY UNDER DISCUSSION IS
OWNED BY DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS AND ASKED IF EACH OWNER IS GOING TO
MINE THEIR OWN PARTICULAR PROPERTY,
MR. LOCKWOOD EXPLAINED THAT GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY IS IN
THE PROCESS OF ACQUIRING.ALL THIS PROPERTY, AND IT WILL ALL BE ONE
PACKAGE. HE POINTED OUT THAT THEY ARE RESTRICTED BY THE ORDINANCE
TO MINE ONLY 20 ACRES AT A TIME.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 75-31 REZONING
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO AGRICULTURAL.
74
OCT 4 1978
BOOK 36 PAU-397
ORDINANCE NO. 78-31
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners o•f Indian River County,
Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the
hereinafter described property and pursu.ant thereto held a public hearing
in relation thereto, at which parties in.interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida, and the accompanying 'Zoning Map, be amended as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida,
to -wit:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Southeast 4 of the
Northwest 4 of Section 33, Township 31 South, Range 39 East,
thence running 40 rods North, thence West 20 rods, thence
South 40 rods, thence East 20 rods to point of beginning,
containing 5 acres, more or less; situate in Indian River
County, Florida.
Parcel One: The North 997.4 feet of the Northeast quarter of
the Southwest quarter of Section 33, Township 31 South, Range
39 East, said property being also described as the Northeast
quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 33, Township 31
South, Range 39 East, less and except the South 341 feet
thereof.
Parcel Two: All that part lying west of the westernmost
right-of-way of the Florida East.Coast Railway of the following
described property: Commencing at the Northwest corner of
the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 33,
Township 31 South, Range 39 East, and thence run South 161.5
feet to the point of beginning; thence run East 1348.8 feet;
thence North 323 feet; thence West 1348.8 feet, thence South
to -point of beginning; containing 10 acres, more or less.
Said property being also described as all that part lying west
of the westernmost right -of -way -of the Florida East Coast
Railway of the South 161.5 feet of the Southwest quarter of
the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 31 South, Range
30 -East and the North 161.5 feet of the Northwest quarter of
the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 31 South, Range
39 East.
The East 5 A of Nh of 1jM4 of SW4, in Section 33, Tuwnship"31
South, Range 39 East; situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the northwest
quarter of Section 33,' Township 31 south; Range 39 east, the
same being ten (10) acres more or less, said land iying,and
being situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 33, Township 31
a South, Range 39 East run East 770 feet for point of beginning
thence South 210 feet, thence West 210 feet, thence North 210
feet, thence East 210 feet to point of beginning,.said land
lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
'Be changed from C-1 Commercial and R-1 Residential to A -Agricultural.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described
in said Zoning.Regulations.
This ordinance shall take effect October 9, 1978.
OCT 41978
I
Box 36 PAGE 308
PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND
ATTORNEY COLLINS JOINTLY HAVE PUT TOGETHER AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY, THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND THE CITY OF FELLSMERE,
IN_REGARD TO APPLYING FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT-
COMPERHENSIVE PLANNING ACT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY, THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND THE CITY OF FELLSMERE,
AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE,
76
BOOK 36 PAGE39
CT 41979 '
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT made this 9' day of Com,
1978, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the -State of Florida, the CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a municipal cor-
poration and the CITY OF FELLSMERE, a municipal corporation,
their successors and assigns.
WHEREAS, Indian River County, the City of Sebastian and the
• City of Fellsmere are required by the Local Government Compre-
hensive Planning Act to formulate and adopt comprehensive plans
on or before July 1, 1979, and
WHEREAS, the use of a single planning entity for development
of such plans can provide a mutual advantage of Indian River
County, the City of Sebastian and the City of Fellsmere and enable
them to make most efficient use of their powers through cooperative
technical assistance in meeting the requirements of the said Act;
and
WHEREAS, Indian River County, the City of Sebastian and the
City of Fellsmere have made joint application and received
approval for grant funds under the provisions of the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning Act.
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of mutual promises and other
monies in hand paid the parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. The Indian River County Planning and Zoning
Department is hereby designated as the common planning entity
for the several jurisdictions, and•the Director of the Indian
River County Planning & Zoning Department is authorized to re-
present the local governments in all matters relating to per-
formance under the contracts between Indian River County, the
City of Sebastian and the City of Fellsmere and the State of
Florida Department of Community Affairs.
SECTION 2. The Indian River County Planning &.Zoning
Department shall be responsible for completing.the.work-programs
specified in the above stated contracts and shall recommend
required plan elements to the designated Local Public Agency for
Indian River County, the City of Sebastian and the City of Fellsmere.
nox 36 PAGE 400
OCT 41978
a
SECTION 3. This agreement is for technical assistance
and recommendations and all rights to accept, reject or modify
any portion of recommended plan elements is reserved t the.
Local Public Agencies, and to the governing boards of the several
jurisdictions.
SECTION 4. This agreement shall be terminated on131 December,
1979, unless the parties shall extend it by mutual agreement.
SECTION S. Funds for accomplishment of the purposes outlined
herein shall be obtained from contracts between the several
jurisdictions and the State of Florida, Department of Community
Affairs. Amounts shall be fixed as follows:
(a) Indian River County $16,000.00
(b) City of Sebastian 4,217.00
(c) City of Fellsmere 3,944.00
Seventy-five percent (75%) of said funds shall be depo ited with
Indian River County within thirty (30) days after execution of
contracts between several jurisdictions and the State of Florida,
Department of Community Affairs.
Fifteen percent (15%) of said funds shall be deposited
with Indian River County prior to 1 March, 1979.
Ten percent.(10%) of said funds shall be deposited
with Indian River County prior to the date of terination
of this agreement. The Director of the Indian River County
Planning & Zoning Department shall be authorized to apply
directly to the State for said funds upon completion of
required activities.
SECTION 6. The Indian River County Finance.Department
shall establish a separate account for all funds received under
this -agreement and shall maintain records of all disbursements
as required by the contracts between the several jurisdictions and
the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs.)
SECTION 7. All disbursements under this agreement shall be
approved by the Director of the Indian River County Planning &
Zoning Department.
OCT 41978
'-W
MOK 36 PAGE 401
`
- 2 -
'-W
MOK 36 PAGE 401
I. r
SECTION 8. All local in-kind match required by contracts -
between the several jurisdictions and the'State of Florida,
Department of Community Affairs shall be provided by Indian River
County.
SECTION 9. The Indian River County Planning & zoning
Department shall maintain records of specifying time spent by
staff members on planning for each local jurisdiction.
SECTION 10. Property acquired through funds obtained to
complete required activities shall become the property of Indian
River County upon termination of this agreement.
SECTION 11. Time and financial^ records required under this
agreement shall be summarized in quarterly reports to the several
jurisdictions commencing for the quarter ending 31 December, 1978,
and presented within thirty (30) days of -the end of each quarter.
SECTION 12. This Interlocal Agreement may be terminated
for proper cause should any party fail to fulfill in a timely
and proper manner its obligations under this agreement; provided,
however, that proper cause shall require termination of 'contract
by the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs as
prerequisite to termination of agreement in the case of dispute
concerning adequate performance by the Indian River County Planning
& Zoning Department.
Approved by the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners this day of , 1978.
Freda Wright -
Clerk of the Court
2i
�' Q A&ld
--liam C. Wodtke, J .
Chairman, Board of ounty
Commissioners.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Sebastian
this -? A day of f0,5 det__ r 1978.
Attest
Florence Phelan
City Clerk
Pat Flood, Jr. IV
Mayor
or
boa 36 PAGE 402
Approved by the City Council of the City of Fellsmere
this ��day of OGA(;,e2, 1978.
Attest
Xit Hedman
City Clerk
OCT 41978
BOOK 36 PAGE 403
I
r
j
-PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE REZONING
HEARINGS TO BE HELD ON BOTH WABASSO ROAD AND OSLO ROAD, WHICH HE FELT
ARE QUITE SIGNIFICANTLY CONTROVERSIAL. HE ASKED WHETHER THE BOARD
WISHED TO HANDLE THESE IN THE NORMAL ROUTINE OR SET THEM UP FOR A
SPECIAL MEETING.
IN DISCUSSION, THE BOARD FELT A SPECIAL MEETING SHOULD BE
HELD AND ONE HEARING SCHEDULED IN THE MORNING AND ONE IN THE AFTERNOON.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE
A PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING OF PROPERTY ALONG VIABASSO ROAD FOR 9:00
01CLOCK A.M. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21ST, AND A PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING
OF PROPERTY ALONG OSLO ROAD FOR 1:00 O'CLOCK P.M. OF THE SAME DAY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS RECEIVED A
LETTER FROM MAYOR SCURLOCK IN REGARD TO AN EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM FOR
YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS, AS FOLLOWS:
e
81
Bov 36 PAGE 404
OCT 41978 R'
orricz Or THE
14AYOR
l
City of Vero Beach
P. 0 BOX 1389 - 1033 - 20th PLACE
VMO BEACH, FLORIDA - 32960
Tde.#K a 367-1131.
„�a712t? ember 21, 1978
Mi. William Wodtke , ' Chairman �'�y�•
100-
Board of County Commissioners .�'� `0* c�iy
Indian River Courthouse �''s,,�ay�p y
Vero Beach, Florida 32950 Ile
14
Dear Bill:
The City Council agreed on Tuesday, September 19th, to
work with the Judiciary and the Division of Youth Services
in using youthful offenders to clean up beaches, parks
and road rights-of-way.
This is an experimental pro -ram, funded at a level of
$1200 for a 90 -day period to see if youthful offenders
from the city and county benefit from the sentence of
public labor, thereby reducing juvenile offenses.
The expense incurred is for a supervisor from the City
of Vero Beach, Public Works Department, at time and
one-half for 13 Saturdays and the use of a City -vehicle.
In order to extend this trial period to amore meaning-
ful time span of six months in which to evaluate the
effectiveness of the program, the City Council requests
that the County Commission consider funding the program
for an added ninety days and utilize such city and county
juvenile offenders on similar County public works projects
under County supervision.
Mr. 1%veed of the local Division of Youth Services -is
available to appear before and brief the County Commission
on the details of the program.
• Cordially,
CI OF VERO BEACH
Don C. Scurlock., Jr.
Mayor
RICHARD TWEED OF THE LOCAL DIVISION OF YOUTH.$ERVICES CAME
BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THE PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE
MORE IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCES FOR MINOR CRIMES BASED ON THE THEORY THAT
THOSE WHO ARE TAKING SOMETHING FROM THE COMMUNITY WOULD HAVE A CHANCE
TO WORK FOR THE COMMUNITY TO GIVE SOMETHING BACK. MR. TWEED
CONTINUED THAT THE CITY FUNDED ONLY $1,200, AND HE DOES NOT KNOW
�o� 36 PAGE 405
tea.
IF THEY WANT THE COUNTY TO DONATE ANOTHER $1,200 AND WORK WITH THE
PROGRAM UNDER THEIR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, OR WHETHER THEY WANT
TO RUN THE PROGRAM FOR THREE MONTHS AND THEN HAVE THE COUNTY TAKE IT
OVER FOR ANOTHER THREE MONTHS. HE STATED THAT IT IS A TEST PROGRAM
AND HE HOPES TO HAVE SIX MONTHS TO BE ABLE TO DETERMINE THE RESULTS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED WHAT ARRANGEMENTS HAD BEEN MADE WITH
THE CITY ABOUT INSURANCE.
SIR. TWEED FELT ATTORNEY PALMER HAD DISCUSSED THIS MATTER,
BUT BELIEVED WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION WOULD BE THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD
BE NEEDED, WHICH HE FELT WOULD BE A MINIMAL COST. HE NOTED THE COST
INVOLVED IS PRIMARILY FOR ONE SUPERVISOR TO WORK S HOURS ON A SATURDAY
AND A VEHICLE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE QUESTIONED THE LEGAL LIABILITY INVOLVED IN
THIS SITUATION, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IF THE COUNTY GAVE $1,200
TO THE CITY FOR THIS PROJECT AND THE JUVENILE WAS WORKING UNDER THE
SUPERVISION OF THE CITY HE DID NOT THINK THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE ANY
LIABILITY, BUT IF THE JUVENILE WAS WORKING UNDER COUNTY SUPERVISION
ON A COUNTY PROJECT, THERE WOULD BE LIABILITY.
MR. TWEED STATED THAT THE TYPE OF WORK HE IS PROPOSING DOES
CUT DOWN THE RISK AS HE DOES NOT FEEL THEY WOULD NEED TO USE ANYTHING.
BUT A RAKE. HE NOTED THAT HE EXPECTS TO HAVE THE FIRST WORK CREW BY
ABOUT NOVEMBER 1ST AND PROBABLY WILL BE PICKING UP TRASH ON THE BEACHES,
POSSIBLY ON STREETS.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS BROUGHT UP THE PROBLEM OF PROVIDING
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE JUVENILES INTO THE COUNTY AREA.
MIR. TWEED FELT THE MAJORITY WOULD HAVE THEIR OWN TRANSPORATION,
BUT AGREED IF A SITE WERE SET IN FELLSMERE, FOR INSTANCE, ABSENTEEISM
PROBABLY WOULD BE SLIGHTLY HIGHER.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE LIKED THE PROGRAM AND FELT
IT DESERVES A CHANCE, BUT SHE WOULD PREFER TO PROVIDE THE FUNDS AND
b ASK THE CITY TO CONTINUE THE PROGRAM THEY HAVE STARTED ON THE BASIS
THAT IT WOULD-BE A MISTAKE TO CHANGE IT AFTER ONLY THREE MONTHS.
MR. TWEED AGREED THERE WOULD BE SOME ADVANTAGES TO HAVING
THE JUVENILES WORKING IN THE CITY WHICH -WOULD GIVE THEM MORE EXPOSURE
TO THEIR PEERS.
EN
8Q�� 36 PAA 406
0
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD ALSO BE FOR THE
d
PROGRAM ON THE BASIS SUGGESTED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, AND THEN
RE—EVALUATE IT AFTER SIX MONTHS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT IT IS A PROGRAM THAT MIGHT BE MEANINGFUL,
BUT VOICED CONCERN ABOUT HAVING TOO MANY IN A GROUP AND A COUNTY
EMPLOYEE HAVING TO WORK WITH EIGHT YOUNGSTERS OR MORE AT ONE TIME,
HE STATED THAT IF THE PROGRAM GOES SUCCESSFULLY FOR THREE MONTHS WITH
THE CITY, HE WOULD BE WILLING TO CONTRIBUTE THE MONEY FOR THE CITY TO
RUN IT ANOTHER THREE MONTHS. THE CHAIRMAN FELT IF THE CITY DID NOT
WISH TO EXTEND THE PROGRAM AFTER THREE MONTHS, WE WOULD THEN HAVE TO
MAKE A DECISION ABOUT WHETHER WE WOULD TAKE IT OVER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD AGREED TO FUND THE SECOND THREE MONTHS OF THE PROPOSED j
PROGRAM FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS PROVIDED THE CITY OF VERO BEACH FURNISHES
THE SUPERVISION; PROVIDED THE WORK IS DONE WITHIN THE CITY OF VERO BEACH; I
AND PROVIDED THE CITY OF VERO BEACH -RECOMMENDS EXTENSION OF THE PROGRAM.
EDWARD REGAN, DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM, REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD A LETTER RECEIVED FROM ALBERT
SNYDER OF THE WABASSO PROGRESSIVE CIVIC CENTER REQUESTING FUNDS FOR
TWO BASKETBALL BACKSTOPS, AS FOLLOWS:
6 FAGF 40 1
OCT 41978 ' J
WABASSU PROGRI'SSIVE CIVIC CENTER
i'. 0. [pox 7!.6
Wabasso, Florida 32970
October 2, 1978
Mr. Edward J. Regan, Director
Community Development Block Grant
2121 14th -Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Regan:
This is to confirm our conversation today relative to the
cost of the two basketball backstops needed to complete the
basketball court in the West Wabasso.Park.
In accord with your suggestion, I have -discussed basketball
backstops with Mr. Charles Parks, Recreation Director of the City
of Vero Beach. He recommended that a basketball backstop manu-
factured by Miracle Recreation Equipment Company, Model #360-440
would provide a long lasting backstop at a minimal cost. This
model is a single basket backstop, one fiberglass fan extended
4' from a 42" pole. Mr. Parks estimates that a single unit
will cost approximately $348.00 and that it would be an additional
$80.00 in shipping cost. The cost of a single unit being about
$428.00.
We are developing a regulation basketball court which will
allow for league play and therefore, we need two basketball
backstops; the estimated cost being $856.00. In any event, we
do not believe the cost of the two basketball backstops would
exceed $900.00.
Both Mr. Franklin Johnson and I plan to see that the back-
stops are installed, even though we are currently awaiting refunding
of our CETA program.
Yours truly,
Albert Snyder
MR. REGAN INTRODUCED MR. SNYDER AND MR. .JOHNSON AND STATED
THAT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO BE PROUD OF WHAT THEY HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IN
THAT PARK.
ALBERT SNYDER, DIRECTOR FOR THE CETA PROGRAM IN WABASSO AND
ALSO SITE SUPERVISOR FOR THE WABASSO PARK, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY
HAVE BUILT BATHROOM FACILITIES WHICH ARE ALMOST COMPLETE, COMPLETED
'o TWO TENNIS COURTS, AND A BASKETBALL COURT, AND ALSO -HAVE PICNIC TABLES
AND BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL FIELDS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED HOW THE BASKETBALL BACKSTOPS WOULD BE
INSTALLED, AND MR. SNYDER STATED THAT HE AND HIS SUPERVISOR MR. .JOHNSON
WOULD INSTALL THEM.
85
L_ OCT 41971;10
wK 36 PaGIE408
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THEY ANTICIPATE ANOTHER CETA GRANT
NEXT YEAR, AND MR. SNYDER STATED THAT THEY DO ANTICIPATE RECEIVING
FUNDING OF $100,000 FOR A CEMETERY PROJECT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HIS ONLY PROBLEM IN REGARD
TO THE BACKSTOPS IS THAT HE FEELS THEY ARE QUITE EXPENSIVE.
MR. SNYDER NOTED THAT THESE ARE FIBERGLASS BACKSTOPS AND WOULD
BE OFFSET FROM THE POLE. HE POINTED OUT THAT MR. PARKS OF THE PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED THEM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT THE FREIGHT FOR SHIPPING EACH
ONE IS $80.00 AND FELT IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN THE POLES HERE
AND JUST PURCHASE THE BACKSTOPS IN ORDER TO SAVE SOME DOLLARS.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT COMMISSIONER DEESON WORK
WITH MR. PARKS ON THIS MATTER AND SEE WHETHER SUITABLE PIPE IS AVAILABLE
AND WHETHER IT CAN BE HANDLED AS SUGGESTED BY THE CHAIRMAN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED COMMISSIONER DEESON TO MEET WITH
SIR. PARKS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE HOW PURCHASE OF
THE BASKETBALL BACKSTOPS CAN BEST BE HANDLED AND THEN ORDER THEM
ACCORDINGLY; TO BE PAID FOR OUT OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS COMPLIMENTED MR. SNYDER AND MR. JOHNSON
ON THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY HAVE HANDLED THIS PROJECT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY REGRETFULLY ACCEPTED ROBERT GRICE'S
RESIGNATION FROM THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZED THE
ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN APPROPRIATE RESOLUTION TO HONOR MR. GRICE FOR
HIS SERVICES.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS
RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM .JUNE COLE, HEAD OF THE RECORDING DEPARTMENT
FOR SOME EQUIPMENT FROM THE HOSPITAL - A REFRIGERATOR, A LONG TABLE
AND SOME OFFICE CHAIRS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAS.RECEIVED VARIOUS OTHER
REQUESTS AND HAS DISCUSSED THIS MATTER WITH ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR
NELSON. HE FELT IF THERE WAS SOMETHING NEEDED ON A REAL PRIORITY BASIS,
IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, BUT THAT,WE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL WE HAVE HAD A
36 pAsE 409
� OCT 4 1978 J
'.
'
~
'
'
.'
'
'
CHANCE TO INVENTORY THIS EQUIPMENT SO IT DOES NOT END UP SCATTERED
ALL OVER THE COURTHOUSE COMPLEX. ME AGREED THAT THE REFRIGERATOR IS
�
REALLY NEEDED cOR STORING THE UNDEVELOPED MICROFILM. �
70 DISCUSSION, IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT IF RECORDING (
CANNOT OBTAIN THE REFRIGERATOR IN THIS MANNER, THEY WILL END UP HAVING
. TO BUY DNE^ BUT THAT THE REMAINING EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE INVENTORIED
'
BEFORE BEING HANDED OUT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Sl68ERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED THE REQUEST OF THE RECORDING'
-
DEPARTMENT FOR A REFRIGERATOR FROM THE SURPLUS EQUIPMENT AT THE
HOSPITAL; INSTRUCTED THAT AN INVENTORY NUMBER BE PUT ON IT; AND THAT
IT BE ASSIGNED TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE" '
ADMINISTRATOR ]ENNyNGS REPORTED THAT HE HAS HAD COMPLAINTS
�
ABOUT PEOPLE PARKING CARS, VANS, ETC., ALONG �°.1�r H STREET IN THE
Rn8EW000 SCHOOL AREA, AND SOMEONE HAD A TRUCK PARKED OVER THE SIDEWALK
WHICH CAUSED THE CHILDREN TO HAVE TO *WALK IN THE STREET AROUND IT, .
CHIEF M'C^LL HAS REQUESTED THAT THE COUNTY POST "% PARKING" SIGNS
IN THE VICINITY OF THE RoSEWOOD SCHOOL, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDED
THAT THIS BE DONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEQERT^ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO POST '
"No �x PARKING" A��EW�OD SCHOOL ^ SIGNS IN THE VICINITY OF THE ..CHOOL AS REQIJGSTED
BY CHIEF MrC^LL.
ADMINISTRATOR ]ENNlNGS DISCUSSED' WITH THE BOARD AN EFFECTIVE
DATE FOR THE SECONDARY ROADS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION. HE NOTED THAT OCTOBER IST WAS THE DEADLINE SET
' UP SOME MONTHS AGO, THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT THE CHAIRMAN
WAS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THIS AGREEMENT AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY
5TH UPON RECEIPT OF A COMMITMENT FROM THE DMT ON EACH OF THE ROADS '
ABOUT WHICH THE BOARD WAS CONCERNED,AND THE CHAIRMAN DID SIGN THE
�
AGREEMENT ON JULY 19TH, 1978. ADMINISTRATOR ]EN0lWGBINFORMED THE
BOARD THAT HE HAS HELD THE AGREEMENT HERE AND RECENTLY HAD A CALL FROM
' THE DMT NOTING THAT WE NEED TO INSERT THEEFFECTIVE DATE IN THE '
AGREEMENT. THE ADMINISTRATOR REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE HIM
� TO INSERT THE DATE OF OCTOBER 1^ 1978» AS THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR
TAKING OVER THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SECONDARY ROADS AND SEND THE SIGNED
AGREEMENT TO THE DOT,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO INSERT
THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 1, 1978, ON THE SECONDARY ROADS
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND FORWARD SAME TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
88
36 Fm li
OCT 41978
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this dAy of ,
19 , by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an
agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "Department", and
hereinafter called the "County";
WITNESSETH':
WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into an agreement dated
providing for maintenance by the Department,of roads in the County
then designated as secondary roads on the state highway system, for which the
County has maintenance responsibility, with the cost of such maintenance to be
paid by the County; and
WHEREAS, the County is now prepared to perform the maintenance work
on such roads and the parties desire to terminate the aforesaid agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises -the parties agree:
1. The above-described agreement is terminated effective
19 , and both parties are thereupon relieved
of their obligations thereunder.
2. Upon termination of said maintenance agreement, the County assumes
full responsibility for the maintenance of the roads described in Exhibits "A"
and "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof, and shall maintain in accordance
with federal standards those roads or portions thereof, identified in Exhibit "C".
d 3. The Department hereby assigns to the County and the County does
hereby accept all the rights and responsibilities of the Department under agreements
for the sharing with certain railroad companies of maintenance costs for railroad
crossings identified in Exhibit "D", attached hereto and made a part hereof. The
• railroad company shall be notified of this assignment by copy of this agreement.
OCT 41978
4. The County shall indemnify, defend and' save harmless the Department
from all suits, actions or claims and liabilities of any nature arising out of the
operation, maintenance, or use of the subject roads.
IN WITNESS WMREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be ;
executed, the day and year first above written.
'STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMM
OF TRANSPORTATION
BY:
Director of Administration
ATTEST: (SEAL)
Executive Secretary
Indian River COUNTY, FLORIDA
9V-4
TITLE: Chairman
. ATTEST:
(SEAL)
TITLE: Clerk
PAGE 4A
OCT 4197$
80% 36 Fm,414
OCT 41978
'INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ROAD SYSTEI4
(OLD
STATE SECO14DARY SYSTEM)
EXHIBIT r"An
(!MAINTAINED)
Section_
Length
State Road No.
Description
88500
0.4
Connections from old SR 5 to new location
SR 5 between Vero Beach and Wabasso
88502
6.3
5A
SR 5 at No. Limits of Vero Bch, to SR 5 in
Wabasso
88503
4.8
609
Ranch Rd. - SR 606 (Oslo Rd.) to Barber Ave.
88505
0.9
Roads and streets in Vero Bch. & vicinity
88510
5.8
510
SR 512 to SR 5 at Wabasso
88520
6.5
611
St. Lucie Co. Line to SR 60 and section along
N. Gifford Rd. to SR 505A
88530
7.5
505
SR 60 to -SR 510
' 88540
6.8
512
SR 60 to 3.2 miles S.W. of Fellsmere
88550
11.0
505A
SR 606 to SR'516
88560
3.4
630
So. Gifford Rd. - SR4505 to SR 5
88570
5.5
607
St. Lucie Co; Line to SR 60 in Vero Bch.
88580
3.6
612
SR 505A to SR 5
88590
2.6
632
SR 505 to SR 5
88600
2.5
SR 611 to SR 5
88601
7.5
606
Oslo Rd. - SR 609/Ranch Rd. east to.
Entomological Center "
G 88602
2.4
505
Section near Sebastian Airport
80% 36 Fm,414
OCT 41978
1
EQi� 6 FACE
� OCT 41978
-INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY ROAD.SYSTBI
(OLD
STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM)
EXHIBIT "-P
'
(NON -MAINTAINED)
Section
Length
State Road No.
Description
88501
14.0
711
St. Lucie Co. Line/SR5/Wabasso Blvd.
88503
3.9
609
Ranch Rd. -Y Barber Ave. to N. Winter Bch. Rd.
88504
1.8
Citrus Rd. -SR 505A to SR 611
88506
4.2
Ind: River Dr. - Fm: S. of Sebastian River to
Bridge
88507
3.9
122nd Ave. - SR 606/Oslo Rd. to SR 60
88508
2.8
Storm Grove Rd. - SR 505 E. to SR 5
88511
1.2
Barber Ave. - SR 5 E. to Indian River Blvd.
88512
SR 5 at Gifford E. to Indian River Blvd.
88520
2.0
611
SR 60 to N. Gifford Road
88550
2.0
505A
St. Lucie Co: Line to•SR 606
88580
2.9
612
SR 60 to SR 505A
(Glendale Rd/8th St)
88602
2.5
505
SR 512 via Roseland to SR 5
1
EQi� 6 FACE
� OCT 41978
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM
(OW STATE SECONDARY SYSTLM)
EXHIBIT nB"
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
Section Length State Road No. Description
No Construction
�� � FADE 416
� OCT 41978
BOOK 3�
OCT 4 1978.
a
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM
(OLD STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM)
EXHIBIT "C^
(FEDERAL AM SYSTEM) '
Section
Length
State Road No. Description
88502
6.3
5A
SR 5 at No. Limits of Vero Bch. to SR 5 in
Wabasso
88510
5.8
510
SR 512 to SR 5 at Wabasso
88520
6.5
611
From St. -Lucie County Line to Urban Limits N.
of 606
88530
7.5
505
SR 60 to SR 510
88540
6.8
512
SR 60 to 3.2 miles S.W. of Fellsmere
88550
11.0
505A
SR 606 to SR 510 (Exception of that section within
Urban Limits)
88570
5.5
607
St. Lucie Co. Line to SR 60 in Vero Beach
88590
2.6
632
SR 505 to SR 5
88601
7.5
606
Oslo Road from 505A E. -to Urban Limits
88602
2.4
505
Section near Sebastian Airport
88602
2.5
505
SR 512 via Roseland to SR 5
BOOK 3�
OCT 4 1978.
,v
e U PACE 4.
OCT 41978
L—
INDIANS RIVER COM-ITY ROAD SYSTE14
(OLD STATE SEC01MARY SYSTFIQ
EXHIBIT "D"
(RAILROAD CROSSINSG)
Section
Railroad
a
R.R. Crossing I.D. # Location
88505
FEC
272 16ONI Sebastian/First & 2nd St.
88505
PEC
272 1631 Old Dixie Hwy. t
x;
88510
PEC
272 168T Wabasso Road (SLD 5.792)
88560
PEC
272 180A Gifford.Road (SLD 3.409) ,
88580
FEC
272 197D Vero Bch. Lendale Rd. (SLD 3.567)
88590
PEC
272 173P Winter Beach (SLD 2.580)
88600
FEC
272 195P Vero Beach 16 St. (SLD 2.184)
88601
PEC
272 200J Oslo Road (SLD 7.171)
88602
FEC
272 1590 Roseland (SLD 2.420)
,v
e U PACE 4.
OCT 41978
L—
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT—OF—COUNTY TRAVEL FOR RITA
SAUERMAN, VOLUNTEER YOUTH GUIDANCE DIRECTOR, TO ATTEND A FOUR DAY
CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ON VOLUNTEERS IN
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AT CHERRY HILL, NEW .JERSEY, OCTOBER 15."18, 1978, AS
THIS IS PROVIDED FOR IN HER BUDGET.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IT IS NECESSARY
TO GET PERMISSION FROM THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT TO USE THEIR RIGHT—OF—WAY
ALONG HOBART ROAD IN ORDER TO BE ABLE -TO GET THIS ROAD PAVED ON THE OFF—
SYSTEMS ROAD PAVING PROGRAM. HE REQUESTED THE BOARD GRANT THE CHAIRMAN
AUTHORITY TO SIGN SUCH AN AGREEMENT. ,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN, UPON APPROVAL
OF THE ATTORNEY, TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT IN
REGARD TO USE OF THEIR RIGHT—OF—WAY ON HOBART ROAD.
7 -
ROOK 36 PAQE 419
P E R M I T . •
THIS PERMIT. issued this 4day of
1978, by and between INDIAN RIVER FARKS 14ATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,
a Drainage District organized and existing under the General
Drainage Laws of the State of Florida, whose address is 4400 - 20th
Street, Vero Beach,- Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
"District", and INDIAN RIVER.COUNTY, a political subdivision of_
the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County".
NOW THEREFORE, the District does hereby grant unto the
County a permanent easement for roadway construction, maintenance
and use of the General Public on, over, and across the below
described property:
The North 40' of Section 4, Township 32 South,
Range 39 East, lying between the East Right -of -
Way line of Kings Highway (S.R. 505-A) and the
-Westerly Right -of -,Tay line of Lateral "G" Canal;
Together with that portion of Lateral "G" Canal
Right of -Way lying contiguous to above described
parcel and lying within the North 40' of Section
4, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, and the
South 40' of Section 33, Township 31 South, Range
39 East,
provided, however, that as a condition precedent to the rights
herein granted, the County agrees to and with the District as
follows:
1. The County assumes full responsibility for the
construction, operation and maintenance of said road right-of-way.
2. This Permit may not be assigned or subletted unto
a third party.
3. That this Permit is subject always to the paramount
tight of the District to keep and maintain its drainage district
functions and operations.
4. In no event shall the District be -liable for any
damages done or caused by the District to the public using said
road right-of-way, and the County shall save the District, its
OCT 41978
W
V
PAGE 420
officers, agents, supervisors, and employees harmless from any
costs, charge or expense of claim or demand of any person against
the District arising from or pertaining to the location and use
of said road right=of-way.
5. The County does hereby grant unto the District a
permanent easement for canal maintenance, on, over and across the
following described property.: z
The South 20' of the North 95' of Section 4, '
Township 33 South, Range 39 East, lying
between the East Right -of -[Jay line of Kings
Highway (S.R. 505-A) and the Westerly Right -
of -Way line of Lateral "G" Canal.
6. The County further agrees to clear and prepare a
canal maintenance bermway along the Southerly edge of Sub -Lateral
"G-6" Canal, within above granted easement, between the East Right -
of -Way of Kings Highway (S.R. 505-A) and the Westerly.Right-of-Way
of -Lateral "G" Canal and without expense or cost to the District.
IN IITNESS WHEREOF, said District has caused these presents
to be executed in its name by its president and attested by its
secretary and its corporate seal hereto affixed, by due authority
.of its Board of Supervisors.
Signed, sealed and delivered INDIAN RIVER'FMIS WATER
in the presence of; MANAMENT DISTRICT
Attest:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY hereby accepts the terms of this
Permit, and covenants and agrees that it will comply with the
terms and conditions of this Permit.
Dated this-LL'day of p�,�� der - 1978.
a
Signed, sealed and delivered BOARD OF COUNTY COAL\IISSIONER*S
in the presence of: OF INDIAN RIVIiR COUNTY, FLORIDA
i e e..+-�Z =su ' Attest:.-� Q .� ��'
nu 36 FAGS 421
OCT 41978
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE FELLSMERE
FIRE DEPARTMENT BURNED UP A PUMP ON THEIR TANK PUMPER ON A RECENT FIRE
CALL (THIS WAS AN OLD PUMP TAKEN OFF AN OLD TRUCK AND PUT ON THE NEW
VEHICLE). HE STATED THAT THIS IS A 4—CYCLE PUMP, AND REPLACEMENT WOULD
AMOUNT TO APPROXIMATELY $4,700; THEY DO, HOWEVER, HAVE IN THEIR LAST
YEAR `S BUDGET UNEXPENDED MONIES FOR REPAIRS AND EQUIPMENT. COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT CONTINUED THAT SINCE WE ARE NOW IN THE NEW BUDGET YEAR, HE DID
NOT KNOW HOW TO TELL THEM TO PROCEED.
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE FELLSMERE
FIRE DEPARTMENT SHOULD GET THE PUMP REPAIRED USING .THE MONEY IN THE
ACCOUNT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT DISCUSSION WOULD BE RESUMED
IN REGARD TO THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT AT
THIS TIME.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT THESE TAXING DISTRICTS
ARE A NECESSITY IN ORDER TO DEVELOP A WATER SYSTEM IN THIS COUNTY, AND
THE COUNTY IS THE LOGICAL AND REASONABLE ONE TO CONSTRUCT AND ORGANIZE
THESE SYSTEMS, HE FELT THAT EACH PERSON IN A DISTRICT WILL REAP BENE—
FITS OUT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THEIR WATER SYSTEMS AND IT IS ONLY FAIR
THAT EACH ONE IN THE DISTRICT SHOULD PAY THEIR SHARE. COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER WAS IN FAVOR OF ESTABLISHING THE MILLAGE RATE AS PROPOSED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT HE HAS NOT CHANGED HIS MIND ABOUT
EVERYONE IN THE DISTRICT PAYING FOR THE COSTS, BUT GAVE THE BOARD INFOR—
MATION IN REGARD TO POSSIBLE CHANGES, BECAUSE HE DOES NOT THINK THIS
OPTION WAS.OPEN TO THE BOARD WHEN THEY STARTED ADVERTISING. THE CHAIR—
MAN STATED THAT HE IS SURE THE ESTIMATE OF $123,000 IS STILL AN ACCURATE
ESTIMATE FOR ALL THE WORK THAT IS ENTAILED ,IN MAKING A STUDY, AND IF
THOSE COSTS HAVE TO GO INTO THE COST OF THE WATER, IT WILL AFFECT THE
RATE.
COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT HE FELT THOSE OF US WHO HAVE
4 SAT THROUGH SEVERAL PUBLIC HEARINGS ON WATER PROBLEMS IN RECENT MONTHS
RECOGNIZE THE NEED FOR SETTING UP THE TAXING DISTRICT TO START MOVING
TOWARDS SUPPLYING WATER TO COUNTY RESIDENTS.
99
BOOK 36 PAGE
OCT 4.1978 J
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO GAMBLE A
LITTLE BIT AND REDUCE THE MILLAGE FROM 3/4 OF A MILL TO 1/4 OF A MILL
WITH THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT IF OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING DON'T COME
THROUGH, IT WILL BE TAKEN ON AS A USER'S COST AND INTEREST WILL HAVE TO
BE PAID.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT THE ONLY REASON HE DOESN'T
LIKE THAT PSYCHOLOGY IS THAT THE SMALL TAX ORIGINALLY PROPOSED IS MINOR
IN COMPARISON TO WHAT THE COSTS WILL BE.
RALPH ENG, ENGINEER, NOTED THAT IF YOU LOWER THE MILLAGE TO
RAISE ONLY $15,000 OR $20,000, THEN YOU HAVE TO OBTAIN FHA FINANCING FOR
THE REST OF IT, AND YOU HAVE TO BE SURE THAT ONCE YOU COMPLETE YOUR
PLAN, YOU CAN PROCEED TO THE NEXT STEP; OTHERWISE, FHA WON'T GIVE YOU
THE MONEY. MR. ENG DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY HAS ANY ALTERNATIVE BUT TO
PROCEED,
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF HIS INDICATION FROM FHA IS THAT
THIS NEW PROGRAM IS ABOUT AS ASSURED AS IT CAN BE WITHOUT BEING STAMPED
ON THE APPLICATION.
MR. ENG STATED THAT THE PROGRAM WILL BE ON A FIRST COME, FIRST
SERVED BASIS SO THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
MOTION WAS' MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT TO RESCIND RESOLUTION
78-69 ESTABLISHING A LEVY OF .75 OF A MILL FOR THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY MATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT THAT•IT WOULD BE VERY BAD ECONOMICS
AND WOULD COST MORE IN THE LONG RUN.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THIS WOULD DISTRIBUTE THE BURDEN TO
THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO BENEFIT FROM THE PROGRAM INITIALLY
AND WHO ARE GOING TO BE PAYING FOR IT IN THEIR RATE STRUCTURE AND THAT
IS WHY HE MADE THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED WITH COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AND ALSO
FELT IF WE GO WITH THE REDUCTION OF THE MILLAGE, IT PROBABLY WILL CALL
FOR A SECOND OR THIRD YEAR OF TAXATION. SHE CONTINUED THAT BASED ON
THE RESPONSE FROM THE PEOPLE IN THAT AREA AND THE NEW INFORMATION THAT
100
OCT 41978
PAS 'i
JUST BECAME AVAILABLE, SHE WOULD BE WILLING TO TAKE THE CHANCE ON THE
LOWER MILLAGE, AND IN ANY EVENT, SHE IS DEFINITELY COMMITTED TO THE
PROGRAM. SHE NOTED THAT WE HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL BEFORE IN RAISING
FUNDS AND PERHAPS WE STILL WILL BE ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH OUR GOAL THOUGH
IT DEFINITELY WILL TAKE A LONGER TIME.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT WE HAVE WAITED TOO LONG NOW AND
HE HATED TO DRAG IT OUT FURTHER.
COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT HE CAN ACCEPT THIS AS A GAMBLE
TO SOME EXTENT, BUT THE COST WILL BE SPREAD OUT AND PUT TO THOSE COMING
INTO THE DISTRICT LATER ALSO,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 78-74 RESCINDING RESOLU—
TION il0. 78-69 SETTING A MILLAGE RATE FOR THE DISTRICT OF .75 MILLS.
101
�AQA PAGE
OCT 41978
a
RESOLUTION NO. 78-74
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FLORIDA, on behalf of THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WATER
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, adopted pursuant to Indian
River County Ordinance 76-26, held a public hearing on the
28th day of September, 1978; and
WHEREAS, the Board pursuant to said public hearing, adopted
a millage rate for said District of .75 mills or 75 cents per
thousand dollars of taxable value;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Resolution
No. 78- 69 is hereby rescinded and declared to be null and
void.
This Resolution shall become effective as of the 4th
day of October , 1978
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By �''"'✓�
William C. Wodtke, Jr.Chairman
Attest:
Clerk
BOOK 36 PAof 425
OCT 4 1978
ON LOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY.AUTHORIZED THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS TO
PREPARE AND THE CHAIRMAN AND ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN THE PRELIMINARY
APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FROM THE FHA FOR A STUDY FOR THE WATER DISTRICT
TO BE SUBMITTED IMMEDIATELY.
IT WAS NOTED THAT THIS WILL RESULT IN CUTTING THE BUDGET
DOWN TO A THIRD OF ITS ORIGINAL AMOUNT. THE FINANCE OFFICER WILL
WORK OUT THE EXACT FIGURES.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SI-EBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 78-75 ESTABLISHING THE
BUDGET AS AMENDED FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND PLAN -FOR THE
SOUTH COUNTY WATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, IN THE AMOUNT OF
$21,258.00.
OCT 41978
103
�VPAGE 4p
RESOLUTION NO. 78-75
WHEREAS, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, on behalf of the SOUTH COUNTY WATER
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, has held a public hearing
on October 4, 1978, for the purpose of adopting a budget
for the District for the fiscal year 1978-79; and
WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser has provided the
evaluations of the -non-exempt property in said District;
and
WHEREAS, said hearing was noticed by publication and
the needs of the District discussed in open forum;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; FLORIDA, that the
following budget is hereby adopted for the SOUTH COUNTY
WATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT for 1978-79:
1. ESTIMATED RECEIPTS:
Local Sources $ 567.00
Ad Valorem Taxes (See Note A) 21,811.00
sub total 22,378.00
Less: 5% per F. S. 129.01 (2) (b) 1,120.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS 21,258.00
2. APPROPRIATIONS:
Preplanning and Engineering 20,000.00
Total Appropriations 20,000.00
Reserve for Contingencies 1,258.00
TOTAL BUDGET $ 21,258.00
Note A - Ad Valorem Millage 0.25
mag 36 Pw 427
OCT 41978
This Resolution shall become effective as of the 4th
day of October, 1978..
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
William C. Wodtke, J .1, Chairman
Attest: _
Cler
ly
At►�K 36 PAGE 428
� OCT 4197
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY -ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 78-76 ESTABLISH-
ING THE MILLAGE OF THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WATER MUNICIPAL
SERVICE TAXING UNIT AT .25 MILLS.
S
RESOLUTION NO. 78-76
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF'INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, on behalf of THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY WATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT adopted
pursuant to Indian River County Ordinance 76-26,
after holding public hearings; and
WHEREAS, the Board must establish millages;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF•INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that said
Board hereby sets the millage rate for said District at
.25 mills or 25 cents per thousand dollars of taxable value.
This Resolution shall become effective as of the 4th
day of October, 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By Zd�& t� c Wim°
d William C. Wodtke; r.,
Chairman
ATTEST:
Freda Wright, Clerk
106
36 PAGE 499
L_OCT 41978 ik
u
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE ENGINEERS ARE IN
THE PROCESS OF CALLING FOR BIDS FOR THE EXTENSION PROGRAM IN THE GIFFORD
U,D.U. AREA. HE NOTED THAT THERE IS A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY THAT THE
COST OF SOLVING THE SEWER PROBLEM WILL RUN MUCH HIGHER THAN ANTICIPATED;-
ALSO,
NTICIPATED;ALSO, THE PINEVIEW PARK AREA WAS DEFERRED FROM THE FIRST CONTRACT AND
SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. THE CHAIRMAN FELT WE HAVE AN
EXCELLENT CHANCE OF RECEIVING FUNDS FROM THE FHA AND ASKED THE COMMISSION
TO CONSIDER HAVING THE ENGINEERS MAKE A PREAPPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL
FUNDS THAT MIGHT BE NEEDED FOR EXTENSION OF THE WATER PROGRAM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ENGINEER, THE CHAIRMAN AND
THE ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN A LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION OF A REQUEST TO THE
FHA FOR CONTINUATION OF THE GIFFORD WATER PROJECT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REPORTED THERE IS A MEETING COMING UP OCTOBER
13TH IN THE COMMISSION ROOM WITH THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATIONAL DISTRICT
AND THERE IS A LEASE AGREEMENT THAT HAS BEEN DRAFTED BY ATTORNEY COLLINS
BETWEEN THE BOARD AND FIND.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS STATED THAT IT IS ALMOST
IDENTICAL TO THE DOCUMENT WE HAVE WITH FIND CURRENTLY EXCEPT THAT THE
STATE -HAS BEEN ADDED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT MR. THOMAS HAD A MEETING WITH FIND
ABOUT THE COUNTY WORKING ON THE 44 ISLANDS FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES.
THE MAIN DIFFERENCE IS THAT THE STATE HAS BEEN ADDED AS A NAMED PARTY,
AND THEY WOULD LIKE .AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE LEASE
AGREEMENT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE TO THE
LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND FIND.
107
BOOK 36 PAP, 4 0
OCT 41978 J
S
• LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT made this/ _ day of (/�. �'��`e-� , 1978,
between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE FLORIDA INLAND'
NAVIGATION DISTRICT, a special taxing district organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Florida, THE STATE OF
FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as "Lessors", and the BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, hereinafter referred
to as "Lessee".
WHEREAS, the Lessors are the owners of the attached Exhibit
°A" parcels of land in Indian River County, legal descriptions of
which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof,
which ownership is for the use by the United States in connection
with the improvement and maintenance of the Intracoastal Waterway
from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, and the Lessors now holds the
title thereto subject to an oasement heretoforeranted b it to
5 Y
the United States of America for such•use; and
WHEREAS, said parcels of land are those -parcels known -as
spoil islands lying in the Intracoastal Waterway within the limits
of Indian River County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, said spoil islands are, in the opinion of the
Lessors, a natural resource of the State which should be preserved
and utilized as wildlife sanctuaries, recreational areas and
similar related purposes in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, said parcels of land are subject to immediate
occupancy and use at any time by the United States pursuant to
said easements and the Lessee has requested the Lessors to permit
it to use said parcels of land for public recreational or
municipal Pu (recreation, conservation or research) subject
to said prior right and easement of the United States and to the
terms and conditions of this lease in furtherance of a planned
d program of the Lessors for thereservation
p , protection and proper .
public utilization of the spoil islands in the Intracoastal
.Waterway in Indian Fiver County, and
e
• e
Boa ata PAGE 431
OCT 41978
d
M
WHEREAS, the Lessors are of -the opinion that. such -use
by the Lessee is in the public interest and should be granted
for a limited term at a nominal rental, subject only to the
terms and conditions stated herein;'
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, it is agreed
by the parties hereto:
1. SUBJECT to conditions stated herein, the Lessors do
,hereby lease the above mentioned parcels of land as is and in
their existing condition to the Lessee for a term of five (5)
years from the date hereof for use by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County for recreation, conservation,
or research and upon condition that no structures or improvements
of any kind are to be placed on said land without prior written
consent of the Lessors and that any such structures or improvements
placed thereon with Lessor's' consent are to be completely removed
-at Lessee's expense within thirty (30) days after request there-
for by Lessor.
2. Lessee shall include said parcels of land in its program
for the preservation, protection and proper public utilization
of the spoil islands in and along the Intracoastal Waterway in
Indian'River County and shall determine for each parcel the most
appropriate public use within the program. Assignments of juris-
diction, control or authority over any portion of.these parcels
to any; except officers, employees and appointees of Indian River
County, shall be subject to the written approval of the Lessors.
3. Upon and subject to the terms and conditions stated
herein,'which.it:,agrees to.gerf.orm and abide by, the Lessee does
hereby lease said parcels of land from the Lessors and further
agrees:
(a) To'accept the leased premises as is and in their
existing condition subject to the use by the'United
P States for spoil disposal in accordance with the afore-
said easement.
OCT 4 1978
mox 36 PACE 4'32
M
I
a 2 -
mox 36 PACE 4'32
M
I
(b) To promptly pay in advance the annual rental of
ONE DOLLAR ($1.00)..
'(c) Not to permit or suffer any waste in or upon said
premises; to strictly comply with any and all rules,
regulations and requirements that may be imposed from
time to time by virtue of the laws of the State of
Florida, or any rules and regulations of any governmental
agency having jurisdiction over the leased premises.
(d) To permit the Lessor, or its duly authorized agents,
free access to the leased premises at any and all reasonable
times for the purpose of examining and inspecting same.
(e) Not to assign or sublet this lease, oran-y portion
of the leased premises, without written consent of tha
Lessor, except as herein provided.
(f) Not to permit the use of said premises for purposes
other than for recreation, conservation, or research, as
herein provided.
(g) To make no unlawful, improper, or offensive use of
the premises.
(h) To make adequate provision for inspection and patrol
of the premises to insure continuing compliance with the
provisions of this agreement.
(i) To execute such maintenance and clean-up work as may
be necessary to establish and maintain the satisfactory
appearance of the premises.
(j) At the termination of this lease, by lapse of time or
otherwise, to yield immediate possession to the Lessor.
(k) *To pay any..and all taxes levied upon the leased
prem ses during the term of this lease.
(1) To save the Lessor harmless from any and all liability,
less, damage, claim, action, cost and attorney's fees
resulting from or caused by any claim, loss or damage to
person or property on or about or by reason of said leased
premises.
.
- 3 -
QOK 36 PAGE 4;33
o
(b) To promptly pay in advance the annual rental of
ONE DOLLAR ($1.00)..
'(c) Not to permit or suffer any waste in or upon said
premises; to strictly comply with any and all rules,
regulations and requirements that may be imposed from
time to time by virtue of the laws of the State of
Florida, or any rules and regulations of any governmental
agency having jurisdiction over the leased premises.
(d) To permit the Lessor, or its duly authorized agents,
free access to the leased premises at any and all reasonable
times for the purpose of examining and inspecting same.
(e) Not to assign or sublet this lease, oran-y portion
of the leased premises, without written consent of tha
Lessor, except as herein provided.
(f) Not to permit the use of said premises for purposes
other than for recreation, conservation, or research, as
herein provided.
(g) To make no unlawful, improper, or offensive use of
the premises.
(h) To make adequate provision for inspection and patrol
of the premises to insure continuing compliance with the
provisions of this agreement.
(i) To execute such maintenance and clean-up work as may
be necessary to establish and maintain the satisfactory
appearance of the premises.
(j) At the termination of this lease, by lapse of time or
otherwise, to yield immediate possession to the Lessor.
(k) *To pay any..and all taxes levied upon the leased
prem ses during the term of this lease.
(1) To save the Lessor harmless from any and all liability,
less, damage, claim, action, cost and attorney's fees
resulting from or caused by any claim, loss or damage to
person or property on or about or by reason of said leased
premises.
.
- 3 -
QOK 36 PAGE 4;33
a
4. This lease may be terminated by notice in writing
by one party thereto to the other sixty (60) days prior to
any anniversary date during the lease.period. For this purpose,
�! ( /� ; ��(% is considered to be the
anniversary date of the lease.
5. The Lessee agrees to save the Lessors harmless from
any liability by reason ofproperty damages or personal liability
to any person or persons, firm or corporation on or about said
premises, and to carry indemnity insurance as protection against
said liability for the protection of the Lessors with a reputable :•..
insurance company to be appz-oved by the Lessors, with $'250,000-
$500,000 limits, such policies to be deposited with and receipted
payment of premiums thereof sent to the Lessors during the term
of this lease, or any extension thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the pdrties.have hereunto set their
hands and seals on the day and year first -written above.
Signed, sealed and delivered BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE
in the presence: FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT
> : - . a- -� %►1. _ By ''37-."-rr I1,•.'d . �' ir�.��seal)
-
'
Attest:1� _^�, c_ �/. !, uco.-� (Seal)
Its Secretary
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By: ) (Seal)
•Its Chairman
�f uzcz- Al tea Attest(Seal)
STATE OF FLORIDA
aK PAGE 434
.-_. —
eco 550 wing 74
18U�U0
' �te3at.ttrw� Nc1. »-»
u
A RESOLUTIDV LOCATING. AND IDE ITIFYINO SPOIL
st.ANDS rq Inn. INDIAN Itivrit FItO51 TUE NORTH
' to COUNTY LUNE TL) Till: UXTII COUNTY LINE OF
W
1-6
iINDIAN RIVER COVSTY. FI.OIt1I)A, UNCLCHINO
THOSE SPOIL. IS".%DS WIT111N TIIC ItOI'NI)ARIES OF
O
ra`3
IIC TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORE'S AND THE CITY
F Y):NO NI:ACII.
C !
�ri'tr o l E IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
{ � 'IidRh Amer j'ouaty. F'lortdat
:J'
SECTION t
•� lbs (bard of County Commissioners of Indian River County.
rsorlda. does herewith find and determine that Spoil Islands located M the
eavigable water& of the Indian !liver are to be used and enjoyed by the people
in a maimer consistent with the public interest and In the further promotion
of the ecology and caviroament surrounding said Spoil Islands.
RECTION 2 ~
fipoil Islands are herewith established In the Intracoastal tidal
waters In the navigable waters lying within and off shore from any extatin�t •r, ••
- `
lands bordering thereon in the County of Indian River said Spoil Islands
being more particularly Identified, as set forth and located on a drawing
bereto attached and marked Exhibit A. and as such is made a part here*(
sod this Resolution, together with said drawing, shall be recorded in the
public records of Indian River County, Florida, in the look of Plats of said
' County. Said Spoil Islands are shown on the attached Exhibit A which con-
sists of United States Department of Commerce, Nautical Chart 845 -SC,
14th Edition, dated September 8. 1973, which said map.or chart consists
of sheets 1 throuGh 4 inclusive. The Spoil Islands are super-
imposed in tali end identified by number an said map for the purpose of
clarification. and the following definitions and descriptions are made a part.
(o -trill
(Commencing from the North boundary of bid" River County. Florida.)
LSLAI.'D 0.1 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the SW
314 Of Section 30. Township 30 South, flange 39 East, lying West of the
Intracoastal Waterway, Southerly of Channel Marker "G2" and Northwesterly
Of Channel Marker "64". as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 14 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the NW
314 of Section 31, Township 30 South. Rangc 39 East, lyinc West of the
• Lttratstastal Waterway, Southwesterly of Channel Marker "64" and North-
westerly of Channel Marker "65", as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
i ISLAND 1 3 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River In the
South 3/4 of Section 3 . Township 30 South. Range 39 Fast, lying West of
the Intracoastal Waterway. Northwesterly of Channel Marker "GS" and South
Of Chantel Marker "65"d as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC,
t°
t
e
OCT 41978
P
BOOK 36 PAGE 435
ISTJiNT1 I 4 - A paeeeJ Of sand 2. W to pro ldiae Rtes m !be SW
• lli1 of Srettoa .3_. 7a.wahm 30 so.tet. Ra ere 39 list. 1.me rest of t -1e
•araeoastal n steewa►. %grbeasterjj as CSw-ei Xararr -6a-. as destCaasrd
Qu Raaucal Chart 64i -9C.
IS A%T11 S - A partel of land I.qr to the lataso Rteer m the 71W
1Jf o! Sertasa 3. To.ashtp 31 4 1 , tt. R•aole 3? `•' M Fast of t:te �=rac=mal
Wtdetwa�- *%I d -e Fit Of Chumal Uasicer •6U% as ewstgaued as %autwal
�lttit iia -SC.
ISLAND 6 i - A parcel at bad I� is tar Indies Riser to 3e 7R
.1/f asd W 1, i of Zertio- S. Ta.nsAtp 31 Sow.-- Rm.m 39 East. list of tb.
bincoasal 6alcr"a - sad of Chaatiri Marker "Ga-. as
/,award on Nacttcal Chart 845-sC.
ISLAND 17 - A parcel of land Iww v to Par fetinm Rarer to the SW
114 of sectava S. Tosss!tp 31 Raare 3.3 r."%. tress of :he
Watrraa.. S>soleesterly Of CrAmel Master -66". as destfaa;cd as Xatt scat
cba t tis -SC.
1 ISLJ4%D I R - A doabte fslmd of land bgao i- the beim, Rtser m
tdwSW Ili of %m-xm S. Ton -%!t= 31 Actb. Ra•Ae 3S East. hest of :he
bss*cm3tat W-Uev+ay. bo •S be• y so—h of is:aui f 7. above desunbed as
deoftnaw o- Ntatwu curs aiS-SC.
ISL1rD 1 9 - A pawl of land 17=1Z Qt the tea Riser is the bra
of LL,- Vrr.esa IIi w. Sec-� a_ Tttsns-� 31 Saxh. Ramte 7? Fast.
West of the lrcracaa=al 4a:rrsa.- dae hest o: t�:arrwi 3fari:er "E9', :.
designated oa XaWAMI Chart 845 SC- be=g arerozytel3 1:JQj = !ea2th
Mlk%D 6 10 - A parcel of Imd 1-=4 = the C•s'.an Racer a tae SE
114of.w 1 3 of sect—was. To-mst n 31 32ca••!, F -wire 29 Fast. Wev. of the
latratmstal Water -a.. lr=g Z^ M-.aafel. UX -3 !e•t Saey of Chaarel
marker '63'. as Hesatmteo ea 3:ammeai Cbmn "S -SC.
ISLAND • 12 - A parcel of lamd to the tm!iaa Ricer in eke SE 314
of RW 1/4 o: a. Tbv-=--e 31 so=.i. Raere 33 East. Rest of :5r
lmtraaoas a1 :urr�a., iy:= • :c 1 c- f.et :Z -."of Cba=ael
Marker '63% ss deuvwned an :,;,==a Chart 645 -SC.
ISLAND 122 - A parol of hmd 1.•ar in thr ladiaa Ricer a tae XW
114 of tate 55144 44 a! Secuoo S. 31 So=.,. R3rme 3? F� � tirt Of
1St tettlt33>,stal Ya:et+a., ado-ez�i_e!. 11 !c et tiot aftwL erl. of f3amei
Marler -:Q'. as deaiYvated oo ti—mm, Chan a•1S-sC.
• ISiAND 1 23 - A parcel of iam3 l.ir fa the ladies River to tae
• 1Jf of Stc:3en 3. Tosas4tp 31 gib- Rat:ce 33 East. a est of the �:-aeoastal
Waterway. ar?m-==weir "* fee* Wesawty of Chamri 2Sareer `.II-. as
6-4ma" oa xaantal chart 1tS-sC:
25TAV13 f 16 - A pareeI of had Irtac is the bst4an Ricer is tae SE
114 sertioa b. 31 sc_h }--Vw 39 East. West of t5e kr-enas:ai
Watefbay- a;pros•=b!*ty 610 feet : Soocb.eaterly of Ciatmrl Stader
a -d awe-teasterlTa! Islasi 113. share a'aveaiped tis dcas�fed on �-••••tet
Dart "s-sc.
tit.AVD 0 23 - A parcel of UmW bias i4 the bsdiaa Rfeer 4t !be Sr
2N
or 5w.x •314. T*. -: v 31 Saar; R.acge 29 Fa , We= of be b.racaasral
Wlarte-al. l.rW &V9 m=3Avh• aro feet Sow'—•wrstrOy of C-lamel :Sartwr "73-
• ' asd aptteeazastel� I>✓tl leertier:'.aererty of Cbaaoei Marker '14-. as
dea>fxtrd m 3taancal Chart "S -SC.
OCL CECO M
' rs �itl czs T•
17
-..--- --
t •
OCT 41978
36 PAGE 436
A y
T 6
• ✓fps'
OFF10l:.L I:ECORD tm 550 na 70
• ISIAND 0 16 - A parcel of lend Ivine M the Indlan River In the Slif
114 of Seelvm 16. lown.hip 31 South. ilaner 39 East. West of the Intracoastal
Waterway. appro.an.atvly 000 feet East of Du.k Point a designated on
Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 117 - A parcel of Land lying in the Indian River to the SW
114 of Section 16, To.nshlp 31 9.oth. Hange 39 fast. West of the Intracoastal
• Waterway, approximately 900 feet Westerly of Channel Marker "74", as
designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND I is - A parcel of land lying In the Indian River in the
North 114 of Section 21. Township 31 South. Hanpe 39 East. West of the tntra-
coastal Waterway, approximately SSO feet Southwesterly of Channel Marker
sl4"a as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 119 - A parcel of land lying In the Indian River 1n the
North 312 of Section 21, Township 31 South. Mange 39 East, West of the Intra-
etfsstal Waterway. approximately 800 : feet South of Channel Marker "74•'.
oadesignated oa Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 120 - A parcel of land Ivinc in the Indian River in the Nest
112 of Seaport 26. Township 31 South, Hance 39 East. West of the Intracoastal
Waterway. Channel Marker "84" marking its most Northern point and
fanning, Southerly approximately 2500 feet with the Southern tin lying
approximately 400 feel Northwesterly of Channel Marker "O1". as designated
oo Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 121 - A parcel of land lying tri the Indian River In the SW
1/2 of Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 39 East. Northeasterly of Govern.
esent tot 13s in said Section 26, South of the Intracoastal Waterway, and
Saathwtalerly of Island 8 20 above described. as designated on Nautical
1 Chan 045 -SC.
ISLAND 122 - A parcel of land lying In the Indian River in the W
1/4 of Section 26, Township 31 South. Range 39 East. South of -the Intracoastal
Waterway, and North of Government Lot 13. is said Section 26, as designated
o0 Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 123 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the SE
114 of Section 35, Township 31 South. Range 39 East, Westerly of the Intra-
aoastal Waterway. South of Channel Marker "99•• and adjacent to Channel 1
Marker "1110". Easterly of Pine Island, as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLANDS 24-34 Ile within boundaries of Indian River Stares and
Out City of Vero Desch, Florida.
ISLAND'I 35 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River lying in
• Sections 7 d 8. Township 33 South. Range 40 Fast. East of the Intracoastal
Waterway, and West of Prang Island, approximately 700 feet Southwesterly
of Channel Marker "349", as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND i 38 • A parcel of land lying in the Indian River lying in t
Sections 8 & 17, Township 33 South. Range 40 Fist, Fast of the Intracoastal !
Waterway. Southwesterly of Prang Island and approximately 900 feet North- F
easterly of Channel Marker "153". as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 0 37 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River In NW
114 of SeNion 211, Township 33 South, Range 40 East, West of the Intracoastal
Waterway. approximately 1000 feel long. lying Southwesterly of Channel
Marker "154", as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND If 38 - A panel of land lying in the Indian River In the SE
1/4 of the AW 174 of Section 20, Township 33 South, Range 40 Fast. West
of the Intracoastal Waterway, Northeasterly of Crawford Point. approrimately t.
1200 fret Northwesterly of Channel Marker "156"0 as designated on Nautical
Chun 845 -SC.
a
Boa 36 PA;f 43 1
OCT 41978
• e a•
1Si.AND 139 . A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the
j lauth 114 of Section 10, Township 33 South. flange 40 Fast. West of the
jntracwaW waterway, arproximalely 500 feet Southwesterly of Channel
Marker `158". as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
L41dND 140 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the East
812 Section 29. To.mahip 33 South. Rance 40 East. lying West of the intra-
• caastal Waterway. approximately 650 feet Southwesterly of Channel Marker
•
"Aft", flat: West of Starvation Point. as designated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC.
ISLAND 141 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in Sections
39 i 12. Toa•nchip 33 %nth. Rance 40 East, 1vinG West of the Intracoastal
V411419 -1y, approximately 1500 feet Fast of the West shore of the Indian River
SM approximately 1000 feet Southwesterly of Channel Alarker •'161•'. as
dealgoated on Nautical Chart 845 -SC. _
LSLAA'D 142 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the
East 112 of Section 33. Township 33 South. Ranre 40 East, West of the Intra_
coastal Waterway. lying due West of Channel Marker "168". as designated
s.
on Nautical Chart 845 -SC. '
1 ISLAND 143 - A parcel of land lying in the Indian River in the SE
114 of Section 32. Township 33 South. Range 40 East, the South boundary of
asld Island bordering in the South boundary of said Section 32. West of the
Intracoastal Waterway, lying approximately 500 feet Northwesterly of .
Cbanael Marker "168A". and being due West of Round Island. as designated
on Nautical Ciart 843 -SC.
SECTION 3
'that the Board of County Commissioners shall attempt to obtain
from the proper State Agencies, leases necessary for the possession of
"Id Spoll Islands and for the maintenance, use, and improvements, if any.
Thereon and upon the securing of ouch leases as may be required, the. Board
*I County Commissioners of Indian River County. Florida, or its desinnated
committees, shall have jurisdiction of the use and occupancy of such Spoil
• Imbeds am the same can best be used and enjoyed by the people to a manner
consistent with the public Interest.
i SECTION 4 1
U any sentence. phrase, section, or other portions of this
Resolution be held invalid, such findings shall not effect the validity of
the remalain; portions of this Resolution.
SECTIO/ S
SLB Resolution shall be to hill force and effect Immediately
ttpoo Its Panama.
Oates this 'iso day of ism
BOARD OF COUNTY COUNUSSIONERS
e ATIMt--""4 YLllLaz C. Wodtke., .Jt�
Clt�@ 1i3�t fxslssun : �•��
S.
• s C ••......rte .
. vEFtcl a a..:.t1a.l. 550 wA 77
6
t
I OCT 41978
t
OOK 36 PAGF.438
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
NEEDS A COMMISSIONER TO HELP COUNT ABSENTEE BALLOTS ON FRIDAY,
OCTOBER -6TH, AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD ASSIST THE
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT WE HAVE A CONTRACT WITH THE HUMANE
SOCIETY WHICH CALLS FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF DOLLARS TO BE PAID FOR THE
TWELVE MONTH PERIOD AND THIS NEEDS TO BE AMENDED SETTING FORTH THE
NEW AMOUNT WHICH HAS BEEN ALLOCATED IN THE BUDGET,
ON LOTION BY COMMISSIONER SfEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
APPROPRIATE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE HUMANE SOCIETY AND
AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SAME AND FORWARD IT TO THE HUMANE
SOCIETY. SAID DOCUMENT WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN FULLY
EXECUTED.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAM MCCLURE
IS GOING TO LEAVE THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, AND THERE WILL BE A SPECIAL DINNER
IN HIS HONOR ON OCTOBER 16TH.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT RESOLUTIONS SHOULD BE PREPARED HONORING
SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE AND HIS WIFE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTIONS No. 78-78 AND 78-79 HONORING
WILLIAM MCCLURE AND GLENN MCCLURE FOR THEIR SERVICES TO THE SCHOOL
SYSTEM.
116
OCT 41978
Boar 36 pace 43
4
OF INDIAN RIVER COUN'rY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, WILLIAM H. McCLURE, began his career with the Indian
:fiver County School System in 1956, and served as a teacher in the
Vero Beach High School from,1956 to -1957; and
WHEREAS, WILLIAM Ii. McCLURE continued to serve in other capacities\
Including Principal of Vero Beach, Elementary School from 1957 to
7964; as Principal of Vero Beach Senior High School from 1964 to
966; as Assistant Superintendent for Instruction, Indian River
bounty from 1966 to 1969; and as Superintendent, Indian River Count
from 1969 to the present date; and
D WHEREAS, WILLIAM H. McCLURE has served the students and all of
,%�
:the citizens of Indian River County with diligence during his tenure-`^. -
as a teacher, principal and administrator; and
WIiEREAS, WILLIAM H. McCLURE ,pursuant to the Court-ordered
legation of the Indian River County Schools, guided the students a-
arents through this difficult time with a minimum of problems, anci_
?
WHEREAS, WILLIAM H. McCLURE took an active part in various build
urograms during his administration, among them being:
Vero Beach Elementary School 1971
Exceptional Education Facility 1973
Vocational Education Facility 1975`
Sebastian River Middle Jr. High School* 1976
Vero Beach Junior High School 1977
Renovation of Vero Beach Jr. High School
Gymnasium 1977
and
3 WHEREAS, in addition to his school administrative activities,
V�tILLIAM H. McCLURE contributed significantly to the community through
s active in
participation many Civic Organizations, including:
Board of Directors of Volunteer Ambulance Squad for 3 years
Vice President of the Vero Beach Exchange Club 1969-1970
C
President of the Vero Beach Exchange Club 1970-1971
Elected to Board of Directors of Vero Beach -Indian River Chamber
of Commerce in 1970
Elected to Board of Directors of United Fund in 1973
end
WHEREAS, WILLIAM H. McCLURE has devoted his time and abilities
make
to
the Indian River,County School System an outstanding system;
o
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
,5ISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that the Board on behalf of itself
the
%
students of Indian River Count and their
Y parents, expresses its
Seep appreciation to WILLIAWH.
d-
McCLURE for a job well done and
dishes WILLIAM II. McCLURE
every success in his future endeavors.
•� d 4
l L01
Said Resolution shall become effectiv1
the 4th day of October ' , 1978
'2'�r6d� 0- -X&'d4&fi
Chairman, County Commissi ner!
ili4
/101
1Wife
/ 11 1 1
BOOK
36 PACE 440
� OCT 41978 .- J
j� j�N�j NO. �a�78- 7 9 ��(j�� ��J/�� y � }�
BOARD Off, COUNTY CO. • �t . H IS I 1 V ERS
r.�
c�f
c/
OF INDIAN RIFER COUNTY, FLORIDA `f
WHEREAS, GLENN B. _McCLURE began her career with the Indian
River County School System on August 26, 1957 as Secretary to the
Principal of the Vero Beach Senior High School, in which capacity
she continued to serve until 1963; and
WHEREAS, in 1963, GLENN B. McCLURE became Secretary to the
Superintendent of the Indian River County School System, who at
that time was J.A. Thompson; and jr
WHEREAS, in addition to her duties as Secretary to the Super—
intendent of the Indian River County School System, GLENN B. tic'
CLURE also served as Secretary for School'Board Affairs and, as,.
her workload as Secretary for School Board Affairs became increasirrr.
)O ly more time consuming, her position as Secretary to the Super-
intendent of the Indian River County School Sys_em was gradual "T
phased out and GLENN B. McCLURE continued to serve the 7.rdian rive
County School System in the sole capacity of Secretary for Sch<,)1
Board Affairs; and
WHEREAS, GLENN B. McCLURE, during her•tenure with the Indian '-
River County School System, has served both the students and thei_rc
}cam parents with zeal and great diligence; and
WHEREAS, GLENN B. McCLURE, in addition to her manv duties in
connection with the Indian River County'School System, is an
active and participating member of the Delta Kappa Gamma Society,
an Honorary Educational Organization, devoted to bettering the
entire school system of the United States;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COf1-
MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board on
behalf of itself, the students of Indian River County, their r
parents and all the citizenry of Indian.River County, expresses
its sincere appreciation to GLENN B. McCLURE for a job well done
and wishes GLENN B. McCLURE every success in her future endeavors.
. Said Resolution shall become effective on the 4th day of
.October, 1978, a
<0�it��
OCT
�° W,4
Chainnan,County Commi loners
oA PA,€ 441
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THE BOARD COULD REQUEST
ATTORNEY COLLINS TO FORMULATE A MUNICIPAL MATER SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT
FOR THE BEACH AREA SOUTH OF THE MOORINGS TO PRESENT TO THE BOARD AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE.
THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THE ATTORNEY TO PROCEED AS REQUESTED
BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER.
COMMISSIONER DEESON EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT FILLING VACANCIES
ON THE 201 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. HE NOTED THAT THE REPRESENTATIVE
FROM THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN HAS RESIGNED, AND THEY ARE CONCERNED BECAUSE
THEY HAD NO ONE TO REPRESENT THEM AT THE LAST MEETING. ANOTHER MEETING
IS SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 12TH, AND THEY HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION FOR
A REPLACEMENT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY OF
SEBASTIAN THAT ROBERT F. LLOYD BE APPOINTED AS THEIR REPRESENTATIVE ON
THE 201 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF A REPRESENTATIVE CAN REPRESENT MORE
THAN ONE AREA BECAUSE HE FELT MR. LLOYD ALREADY REPRESENTS THE CITY OF
VERO BEACH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT FEEL THEY SHOULD.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED WHETHER .JOHN LITTLE MIGHT BE THE REPRESEN-
TATIVE FOR THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND IT WAS AGREED THAT WHEN A LETTER
IS SENT TO MR. LLOYD ADVISING HIM THAT HE HAS BEEN APPOINTED TO THE
201 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF
SEBASTIAN, IT SHOULD ALSO STATE THAT IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE
R)ARD THAT HE CAN REPRESENT ONLY ONE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY.
COMMISSIONER DEESON REQUESTED THAT A COPY OF THE LETTER BE
SENT.TO THE MAYOR OF SEBASTIAN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPOINTED EDWARD NOLAN TO THE 201 TECHNICAL
ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER
SHORES.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPOINTED .JACK G. .JENNINGS TO THE 201
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS THE BOARDS REPRESENTATIVE.
119
0
BDA 36 PA,F 442
COMMISSIONER LOY DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A LETTER RECEIVED
FROM SOUTHERN—KELTON & ASSOC-IATES, INC. IN REGARD TO A STUDY -ON DOUBLE
TAXATION. SHE NOTED THAT WE HAVE HAD A REQUEST FROM ONE MUNICIPALITY
FOR ANSWERS ON THE DOUBLE TAXATION QUESTION AND WILL UNDOUBTEDLY HAVE
MORE REQUESTS IN THE FUTURE. SHE, THEREFORE, ASKED THE BOARD TO CON
SIDER HAVING A_STUDY MADE TO GET IN A POSITION WHERE WE KNOW WE ARE ON
GOOD STRONG, SAFE GROUND IN THIS REGARD.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED THAT
THE BOARD CONSIDER SOUTHERN—KELTON'S PROPOSAL.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAS MET REPRESENTATIVES
OF THIS FIRM AND WAS FAVORABLY IMPRESSED AND ALSO FEELS THEIR FEE IS
REASONABLE.
COMMISSIONER LOY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS FIRM HAS DONE
A NUMBER OF THESE STUDIES AND HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN DEFENDING THEM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN ON BEHALF OF THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH SOUTHERN—
KELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC., TO PERFORM A DUAL TAXATION STUDY AS OUTLINED
IN THEIR LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1978.
120
OCT 4 1971
OOOK 3 6 PAsr 4 4a
-SOUTHERN-KELTON& AssociATEs, INC.
A LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
P.O. BOX 680453 MIAn, FLORIDA 33168 305/685-5572
S
RY.51—" September 13, 1978
21
&
CharW ReAw
& Rewbim Mr. George G. Collins, Jr.
A
County Attorney
Indian River County
Execw4e P. 0. Box 3686
SeKch &
Sek�cfiw Vero Beach, Florida 32960
o Dear Mr. Collins:
OP -00-
A
S=S& It was a pleasure meeting with you last week, and having
the opportunity to meet Commissioners Loy and Siebert,
om—ed- and Chairman Wodtke. We appreciate being able to discuss
=6 Our firm's capabilities and our specific experience in the
CapW area of "Double Taxation Analysis."
�& We have been involved in various aspects of the "Double
S= Taxation" problem for several years, having coordinated
creation of Volusia County's Municipal Service District
Ordinance in 1973, and the Deltona Area multi-purpose
R=:r-
Repoift Municipal Service District for Volusia County in 1974-75.
Pmbkm In 1975, we were responsible for creation of Pasco County's
Sakdm& Municipal Service Fund, an accouting and budgetary entity
created to segregate unincorporated area revenues and
expenditures from county -wide revenues and expenditures.
=& In the four budgets prepared since its creation, it has
R"* not been necessary to levy an ad valorem tax to support
&Aft & the Pasco County Municipal Service Fund.
Federal Cama
Recent activities have included a presentation to the
Dmue Toodm
Mali& Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations,
Double Taxation Committee, and input of suggested language
for inclusion in the ACIR "Double Taxation Bill," subse-
quently enacted and signed into law by Governor Askew.
We feel confident Southern -Kelton & Associates, Inc. with
its extensive experience in city and county goverment in
Florida, can be of assistance to Indian River County in
resolving its "Double Taxation" dispute with the Town of
Indian River Shores. Should the Board of County Commissioners
select SKA to provide assistance in this matter,.we would
suggest the following scope of services:
Page I of 3
36 PA,-,- 444
OCT 41978
1. Review of Town of Indian River Shores Double
Taxation petition of June 29, 1978.
2. Review and analysis of Indian River County
Budgets for.FY 75-76, 76-77, 77-78 and 78-79.
3. Identification of "point of origin" for county
revenue sources. _
4. Identification of "point of origin" for Town of
Indian River Shores revenue sources, as well as
for other Indian River County municipalities.
5. Evaluation of distribution formulae for state
and federal funds flowing to Indian River County
and its municipalities.
6. Evaluation of Indian River County Services vis--
a-vis service delivery areas.
7. Preparation of recommended response to Town of
Indian River Shores petition.
8. Preparation of report, to include findings and
recommendations.
9. Presentation of report and recommendations to
Board of County Commissioners.
In addition to the above listed "scope of services," our
personnel would be available to participate in negotiations
with the Town of Indian River Shores, and to appear as wit-
nesses in any court proceedings related to our assignment.
To effectively undertake this assignment, it will be necessary
for Indian River County to make available to SKA, all relevant
county information and records, and to assist in securing
necessary data from various County and Constitutional Officers.
Our fee proposal for this assignment is $4,000. Participation
In negotiations or meetings with the Town of Indian River Shores
and court appearances would be in addition to the proposed
study fee, and would be billed at $250 per day, plus expenses.
We can begin work on this assignment within ten (10) days of
acceptance, and will complete the project in approximately
sixty (60) days..
0
Page 2 of 3
36 PAa 445
0CT 419°lg
We most appreciate your consideration of Southern -Kelton &
Associates, Inc., for this assignment of significant public
concern. We look forward to the opportunity to be of service
to the Board of County.Commissioners of Indian River County.
Very truly yours,
jo
Richard M. Kelton
President
Attest:
Al
Clerk
Accepted for Indian River
County, Florida on October 4, 1978
Board of County Commissioners u
Indian River County, Florida
Chairman
Page 3 of 3
Pmr 446
CT 4197
t
4
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REPORTED TO THE BOARD ON HIS FURTHER NEGOTIA-
TIONS IN REGARD TO THE ACQUISITION OF MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC. HE
STATED THAT THEY HAD BROUGHT HIM A ROUGH DRAFT OF A PROPOSED CONTRACT,
AND ATTORNEY COLLINS AND HE HAVE STUDIED IT. THERE MIGHT BE ONE OR TWO
AREAS THE ATTORNEY STILL IS NOT HAPPY WITH, BUT THE BASIC PROBLEM IS
THAT THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO AGREE ON THE PRICE. HE CONTINUED THAT,
AFTER DISCUSSING THIS WITH THE BOARD AT THE LAST MEETING, THEY OFFERED
MID -FLORIDA $225,000, BUT HE HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT THEY ARE NOT RE-
CEPTIVE TO ANYTHING UNDER $250,000.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT THE PRICE IS THE ONLY MAJOR
BARRIER AT THIS POINT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES
OF MID -FLORIDA WERE GOING TO STAY OVER AND COME BEFORE THE BOARD HOPING
FOR A FINAL DETERMINATION, BUT HE INDICATED TO THEM THAT HE DID NOT
FEEL THE $250,000 FIGURE WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE BOARD SINCE WE
WOULD BE BUYING A LOT OF UNKNOWNS IN THE SYSTEM, HE NOTED THAT THEY
WILL CONTACT HIM TOMORROW TO SEE IF THE BOARD DID TAKE ANY ACTION. THE
ATTORNEY NOTED THIS IS A SOCIAL PROBLEM THAT NEEDS TO BE CURED, BUT AT
WHAT PRICE? HE FELT NOW IS THE TIME TO MAKE AN OFFER OF.WHATEVER•THE
BOARD IS WILLING TO PAY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LAY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO MAKE A FIRM OFFER
TO MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC., OF $225,000 UNDER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
TO BE APPROVED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND THE ADMINISTRATOR; THE OFFER TO BE
VALID FOR TEN DAYS.
RESOLUTION No. 78-54 AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT OF SIDE LOT LINE
EASEMENTS IN OSLO PARK TO EARL MCGRIFF ARE HEREBY. MADE A PART OF THE
MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 23, 1978.
124
6001
6 PAGr 4 A"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-54
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, has been requested to release the side lot line
easements on Lots 7, 8, 9,.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16, in Block
H of OSLO PARK, according to the Plat thereof filed in the office
of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida,
in Plat Book 3, page 96;, and
WHEREAS,.said side lot line easements were dedicated on the
Plat of OSLO PARK for public utility purposes; and
WHEREAS, the request for such release of -'easements has been
submitted in proper form; '
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIO14ERS OF IIr'DIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following
side lot line easements in OSLO PARK shall be released, abandoned
and vacated as follows:
The side lot line easements running from East to West
between Lots 7 and 8, Lots 8 and 9, Lots 9 and 10,
Lots 10 and. ll, Lots 11 and 12, Lots 13 and 14, Lots
14 and 15, and Lots 15 and 16, iinBlocc1k H ofROSLO
rds�,
as recorded in Plat Book 3, p g 9
of Indian River County, Florida.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be and they are
hereby authorized and directed to execute a release of said lot line
easements hereinabove referred to in form proper for recording and
placing in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
. DATED this 23rd day of August , 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Chairman 1
u Attest:
AK ju PAU448
�
OCT 4.197$
C
�
er
i
AK ju PAU448
�
OCT 4.197$
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
THIS RELEASE OF EASEMENT, executed this 23rd day of
August , 1978, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF IIv-PIAN
RIVER COUINTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida, first party, to EARL McGRIFF, whose post office address
is Route 4, Box 241, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, second party:
WITNESSETH:
THAT the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum
of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid
by the said second party, does hereby remise,lrelease, abandon and
quit claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title,
interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to
the following described easement, lying on land situate in the
County of Indian River, State of Florida, to -wit:
The side lot line easements running from East.to West
between Lots 7 and 3, Lots S and 9, Lots 9 and 10,
Lots 10 and 11, Lots 11 and 12, Lots 13 and 14, Lots
14 and 15, and Lots 15 and 16, in Block H of OSLO PARK,
as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 96, Public Records
of Indian River County, Florida.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the sane with all and singular the appurt-
enances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining and all the
estate, right, title, interest, equity and claim whatsoever of the
said first party either in law or equity to the only proper use,
benefit and behoof of the said second party forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed
these presents.by the parties so authorized by the law the day and
year first above written.
Attest:
r�_} /; �
if tt R_ zgll
ti
Freda Wrig t, C e'
Signed,•sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Chairman '
pm 36 PAGE 449
OCT 4 1978 ,
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this -day before me, an officer duly
-authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take -acknowledgments
personally appeared WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., as Chairman of the BOARD
- OF CJUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, and FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of
the Circuit Court, to me 'known to be the persons duly authorized by
said County to execute the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged
before me that they executed the same for andion behalf of said
political subdivision.
IWNTESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid
this 23rd day of August 1978.
Notary Public, State larida
at Large -. My commission expires:
NOTARY KRLIC STATE CF RMIDA AT LUM
Mi CCAMISSiON MUS XLY & 19z2
I MOM tM GEWL%L IM. &WOOMT55
Box 36 PA -0 45
OCT 41978
RESOLUTION N0. 78-57 AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT OF REAR AND
SIDE LOT LINE EASEMENTS IN GRANADA GARDENS, UNIT 1, TO B & H BUILDERS,
INC., ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE REGULAR
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1978.
128
BOOKA�, 45.E
OCT 4 197
I
R
u
M
RESOLUTION NO. 78-57
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
I!River County, Florida, have been requested to release the five
,foot eas—nent on the rear or east five feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3,
Pard the 2.5 foot side lot line easement on the South side of
Lot 1, the North and South sides of Lots 2 and 14, the West side
of Lot 3 and the North side, of Lot 15, all in Block "C", GRANADA j
{
GARDENS, Unit 1, according to the plat of the same filed in the i
office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County,
Florida in Plat Book 3, page 91; and
WHEREAS, said rear and side lot line easements were
!dedicated on the Plat of said GRANADA GARDENS, Unit 1, for public
yutility purposes; and
WHEREAS, the request for such release for easement has
k'
r!been submitted in proper form;
II NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
!1COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following
rear and side lot line easements in GRANADA GARDENS, Unit 1, shalli
{be released, abandoned and vacated, as follows:
The utility easement.on side and rear lot lines of
the following described:
Lot 1, Block "C" --The South side lot line easement,
being 2.5 feet, and east rear lot line easement,
being 5 feet;
Lot 2, Block "C" --The North and South side lot line
easements of 2.5 feet each, and east rear lot line
easement of five feet;
Lot 3, Block "C" --The West side lot line easement of
2.5 feet and south rear lot line easement of five feet;
Lot 14, Block "C"--The-North and South side lot line
easements of 2.5 feet each; and
Lot 15, Block "C" --The North side lot line easement
of 2.5 feet.
All as shown, reserved and dedicated on the Plat of
GRANADA GARDENS, Unit 1, according to plat of the same
filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Indian River County, Florida,.in.Plat Book 3, Page
91:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be, and
they are hereby authorized and directed to execute a release of
Smith, O'Haire, Thatcher 8 Quinn, Attorneys At Law, 3103 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32,960
(905)569-2900
wK 36 Pur U2
said lot line easements hereinabove referred to in form proper
for recording and placing in the Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida.
This 6th day of September 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
' William C. Wodtke, it., Chairman
Attest:
Freda Wright, Clerk
-2-
Smith, O'Haire, Thatcher 8 Quinn, Attorneys At Law, 3103 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(305) 569-2900
War
OCT 41978
M
[`T
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
THIS RELEASE OF EASEMENT Made and executed this 6th
�dav of September , 1978, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
I
f,OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Political Subdivision of the
State of Florida, first party, to B & H BUILDERS, INC., a
Florida corporation, whose address is 765 Dahlia Lane, Vero
Beach, Florida, second party.
W I T N E'S S E T H:
'That the said first party,•for and in consideration of
the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other good and valuable consid-
erations in hand paid by the second party, does hereby remise,
9
release, abandon and quit claim unto the second party forever,
all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said
,1first party has in and to the follol#ing described easements,
±lying on land situate in the County of Indian River and State of
Florida, to -wit:
Lot 1, Block "C" --The South side lot line easement,
being 2.5 feet, and East rear lot line easement,
being five feet;
Lot 2, Block "C -The North and South side lot line
easements of 2.5 feet each, and East rear lot line
easement of five feet;
Lot 3, Block "C" --The West side lot line easement of
2.5 feet and South rear lot line easement of five
feet;
Lot 14, Block "C" --The North and South side lot line
easements of 2.5 feet each; and
Lot 15, Block "C" --The North side lot line easement
of 2.5 feet.
All as shown, reserved and dedicated on the plat of
GRANADA GARDENS, Unit 1, according to plat of the same
filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Indian River County, Florida, in Plat Book 3, Page
91.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all and singular
the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining
and all the estate, right, title, interest, equity and claim
whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity to
the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party
forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and
sealed these presents by the parties so authorized by law the day
Smith, O'Haire, Thatcher & Quinn, Attorneys At Law, 3103 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(305)569-2900
wK 6 Pm F 454
0
and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
0
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSfONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
William C. Wodtke; Jr.,
Chairman
Attest: ..
Freda Wright, Clerk
Approved as to Form:
County Attorney
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that'on this day before me, an officer
duly authorized in the State aforesaid 'and the County'aforesaid
to take acknowledgments, personally appeared WILLIAM C. WODTY.E,
IJR., as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, a Political Subdivision in the State of
Florida, and FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, to me
known to be the persons duly authorized by said County to execute
I
the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged before me that
they executed the same for and on behalf of said Political Sub-
division.
WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last
aforesaid this 6th day of September 1978.
Notary blic, 5tate of 'lorida at
Large. My Commission expires:
M07111Y M)SLIC S'ATF OF H ?RFD Al LAACA
Ally F
IONX0 tHku Ci;:P_.l IrJS. taiJLtW'`iil:
-2-
Smith, O'Haire, Thatcher 8 Quinn, Attorneys At Law, 3103 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(305)569-2900
BOOK 36 PAGE 455
a
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND
WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND NOS.
59225 — 59631 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED
FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE
BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THERULESOF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE
TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE
i'IINUTES. -
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED
AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 5: 30 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
CLERK CHAIRMAN Lthr
133
BOOK 36 FACE 45
OCT 41978 +