HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/15/19789
1 ti
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1978
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA,
ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1978, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W.
SIEBERT, JR.; EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER; AND R. DON DEESON. ALSO PRESENT WERE
.JACK G. .JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTER-
GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, .JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; BAILIFF DAN
FLEISCHMAN; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER
COMMISSIONER WODTKE LED THE PLEDGE.OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,
AND REVEREND .JULIUS RiCE OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST - COMMUNITY
CHURCH, GAVE THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1978. THERE WERE
NONE.
ON.MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1978, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 9, 1978. THERE WERE
NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF OCTOBER 9, 1978, AS WRITTEN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE.BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO
CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF FRANK BATES, T. GRAYSON SCREWS, AND T. M.
BARNES.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A
NOV x.51978
PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM OF THE FOLLOWING:
MICHAEL C. GILLEN WILBUR BASS
FRANK L. CLAVELIN ROBERT A. WEEMS
MIKE J. .JAHOLKOWSKI
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING BUDGET AMENDMENT
TO ALLOCATE THE FUNDS FOR THE AGREEMENT WITH THE HUMANE SOCIETY:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE
HUMANE SOCIETY 01-5106-301.03 $10,000.
RESERVE FOR
CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $10,000.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING BUDGET AMENDMENT
FOR TWO BASKETBALL GOALS AND BACKSTOPS FOR WABASSO PARK TO BE PAID OUT
OF FEDERAL REVENUE $HARING FUNDS:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE
EQUIPMENT 62-6101-402.99. $ 900.
RESERVE FOR
CONTINGENCIES 62-9990-701.00 $ 900.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING GRANT AS FOLLOWS:
a
2
NOV 151978 X2 3 � �--43
- �: r:.:, .,. :..,..: .: .,.,t�.. -. _ ... n.., :... ,;..r..,,rr-,. �;:. A.R �. wm n Y w.ery l•:..., A,. uary°.c.: y�'T"'�sk°'°^-Kvi .-v.e.• naw..s'.,w.�f•-. .- mcn -
W. k „�. e. ..°5. -r:4cV..9 �a.. .,i.p.�e�y.- �. :�T.�4� :�..•.�, :.�r�.k;'"'..`�saatt° -o.. ... .: «� p•',�, +u�' "w�M.''�41"R ms -z - `__ �Lv i+' _ ._ - ..a u
t
BUDGET AMENDMENT
a
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
-
l
APPROVED
NEW;
ITEM
APPROPRIATION '
AMENDMENT'
APPROPRIATION
Salaries and Benefits - -
--- - - - - - - - - - - -
$ 1.00
$19,556.13
$ 19,557.13
Planner I, Class 16
(10 months) - - - - - - -$ 8,210.13
Planning Technician,
Class 14 (10 months) - - 7,435.57
Benefits - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -- 3,911.43
Materials and Supplies - -
- - - - - - - - - --- -
1.00
1,199.00
1,200.00
Travel - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - --
1.00
399.00
400.00
,•
Publications and Printing
- --- - - - - - - - - -
1.00
2,650.87.
2,651.87
Communications - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - ---
1.00
249.00
250.00
Rental of Equipment - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
'
1.00
99.00
100.00
Maintenance of Equipment -
- - - - - - - - - - -
1.00
-0-
a
1.00.
Capital Outlay - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
1.00
-0-
1.00
Desk, chair, table
$ 8.00
$24,153.00.
$24,161.00
•
State Planning Grant Funds
obtained through contract with State
of Florida, Dept.
of Community Affairs
co
•
LO
Z
.: ;„.. .. ,.:.. .. _.. , ..5. o-, .ewM � as -,� r.,u -w,.. . ;:z .:, „u:... a.�rc�. .awg�w4w..._..,r. ,ti � «kF-'xe.= �.r�•s.�n-.�--wn,.,r�°r^,�w ..h•arz,....�a-.�.�_.., .. _ n
...-e��"_*-4i,�'�'?��^ps.:�'5...'a?t'n,��%°''.. .- .acxa.;� veta:,�: sa. �«.,�+.w. �vr. .�•.,„��Jl..f ".�`�... sa.t. ,,,,.,._.�'S +'�++_ -_...........”"
0
1
w
BUDGET AMENDMENT
0
w
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
y
F
COASTAL ZONE PLANNING
�.
CC
X:
W
F-
APPROVED
BUDGET
NEW
w
ITEM
APPROPRIATION.
AMENDMENT
APPROPRIATION
P
ca.
-
$ 1.00
$12,314.19
.
$12,315.19
Salaries
w
and Benefits - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
z
Planner I, Class 16
-$9,852.15
W
",
Benefits - - -
- - - ---- - - --- 29463.04
,
}=
w
m�
Materials and Supplies - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00•
499.00
500.00
w
A
>
__
�
1.00
499.00
500.00
�.
0
0
Travel----------------------
- -
'
n
-
o
Publicat•iOns and Printing -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00
1,499.00
11500.00
(K
w
¢
u..
1.00
199.00
200.00
oy
Communi cati ons - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
cn
0
z
Rental Equipment - - - - -------
_ _ _ _ _ _ -
1.00
369.00
370.00
1.00
-0-
1.00
0
z �
Maintenance of Equipment -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
z
1.00
612.81
613.81
o
=
Capital outlay - - - - - -
- -- -------_ _ _
z
W
w
$ 8.00
$15,992.00
$16,000.00
0
..
¢
o
0
¢
1—
=
z
�
z~
w
z
Federal Pass Through Funds
obtained through contract with the
State of Florida,
Dept. of Environmental
Regulation
W
N
�
0
v
o
�• a
THE BOARD DISCUSSED REQUESTS FOR ITEMS FROM THE HOSPITAL,
AND FELT THESE ITEMS SHOULD ONLY BE APPROVED ON THE BASIS OF A DIRE
NEED. IT WAS AGREED THERE WAS A DIRE NEED FOR THE CHAIRS REQUESTED
BY THE FINANCE OFFICER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST OF THE FINANCE
OFFICER FOR THREE DESK CHAIRS WITH CASTORS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETROACTIVE APPROVAL OF THE
ADMISSION OF DAVID LEE .JORDON TO THE A. G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLL, CIRCUIT
COURT, FALL TERM, 1978, IN THE AMOUNT OF $105.20.
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, OCTOBER, 1978
TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME, OCTOBER, 1978
DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., CAME BEFORE THE BOARD
REPRESENTING .JAY LESHAW AND REQUESTING FINAL APPROVAL OF WHITE SURF
SUBDIVISION. HE EXPLAINED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO
ROUND ISLAND PARK ON THE SOUTH AND IS COMPOSED OF JUST THREE LOTS.
THERE WILL BE AN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS TO LOT 1.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS CONCURRED THAT THIS PLAT IS COMPLETE
AND READY FOR RECORDING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF WHITE SURF
SUBDIVISION WAS GRANTED SUBJECT TO A HOLDING LANE BEING PROVIDED FOR
CARS TO STAND IN BEFORE ENTERING STATE ROAD AlA. MR. HOWARD CONFIRMED
THAT THIS HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF WHITE SURF
SUBDIVISION.
MR. HOWARD NEXT REQUESTED FINAL APPROVAL OF WINTER BEACH PARK
SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED BY HIS CLIENT ROGER SKILLMAN. HE NOTED THAT
THIS IS NOT A PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION, AND THE STREETS AND EASEMENTS ARE
5
NOV 151978
BEING DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY. MR. HOWARD INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS
SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED ABOUT 1/4 MILE EAST OF KINGS HIGHWAY, AND THE
LAND IS ZONED R-1.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONFIRMED THAT THE SUBDIVISION HAS
COMPLIED WITH ALL THE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS AND IS READY FOR APPROVAL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF WINTER BEACH
PARK SUBDIVISION.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS DISCUSSED FINAL APPROVAL OF TREASURE
COAST DEVELOPMENT, KNOWN AS OCEANSIDE SUBDIVISION, REQUESTED BY ENGINEER
ROBERT F. LLOYD, WHICH IS ITEM 4 ON THE AGENDA. HE INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT MR. LLOYD IS IN THE PROCESS OF TRYING TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL
BOND AND HAS REQUESTED THAT THIS ITEM BE KEPT ON THE AGENDA UNTIL LATER
TODAY.. THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD QUESTIONED MR. LLOYD
ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS, ROADS; ETC., AND MR. LLOYD HAD STATED THAT HE WOULD
HAVE TESTS DONE. IT NOW SEEMS THAT THE TESTS DONE ON THE ROADS WERE
NOT SATISFACTORY, AND MR. LLOYD WISHES TO BRING IN AN ADDITIONAL BOND
TO COVER THIS SITUATION. THE.ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDED THAT THIS ITEM
BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AND RESCHEDULED UNTIL IT CAN BE DETERMINED
THAT EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PROPER MANNER.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, TO REMOVE CONSIDERATION OF FINAL APPROVAL OF OCEANSIDE SUBDIVISION
FROM TODAY IS AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS SUBDIVIDED
INTO 1/3 ACRE LOTS AND WILL BE RELYING ON WELL WATER. HE SUGGESTED THAT
THERE SHOULD BE SOME KIND OF STATEMENT ON THE PLAT IN REGARD TO THE
POSSIBILITY OF SALT WATER INTRUSION AS LONG AS WELL WATER IS GOING TO
BE USED.
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED AND NOTED IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THIS PLAT
WAS NOT PROPERLY PREPARED IN TIME TO BE CORRECTLY PLACED ON THE AGENDA.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS EMPHASIZED THAT WHEN THIS MATTER WAS
PLACED ON THE AGENDA, HE HAD A CHECK FOR THE CASH BOND AND A LETTER
FROM THE ENGINEER STATING THAT ALL WAS IN ORDER, BUT HE HAS SINCE
DISCOVERED THAT ALL WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY, AND THE CASH BOND, THEREFORE,
P
Q�
r:4 247
al
IS NOT SUFFICIENT. HE AND COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER QUESTIONED WHETHER
IT IS PROPER PROCEDURE TO PUT A STATEMENT IN REGARD TO SALT WATER
INTRUSION ON A PLAT OF RECORD,
THE BOARD FELT THE ATTORNEY SHOULD CHECK ON HOW THIS COULD.
BE HANDLED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED
ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, AND ITEM 4 WAS REMOVED FROM TODAY'S AGENDA.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS DISCUSSED BORROWING MONEY
FOR THE GIFFORD WATER SYSTEM AND STATED THAT IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO
AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP A NOTE NOT TO EXCEED $100,000. HE
EXPLAINED THAT WE HAVE ALREADY DRAWN DOWN $200,000 AGAINST THE $405,000
COMMITMENT. FHA REQUIREMENTS NECESSITATE THIS INTERIM FINANCING.
ON POTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN INTERIM
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE FOR THE FHA FINANCING OF THE GIFFORD WATER SYSTEM
IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. COPY OF.SAID DOTE IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE
MINUTES.
37 v,1248
No.
5
$100,000.00
Dated: December 8, 1978
UNITED ATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
n
kW TER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1979
' FM �TLUE RYCNIVED, the County of Indian River, Florida
(Ve"INdr" herby promises to pay to the order of THE FIRST
CNK O NDIAN RIVER COUNTY, at its principal office in the
City of Vero Beach, Florida, on or before September 30, 1979, solely
from the special funds hereinafter mentioned, in lawful money of the
United States of America, the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($100,000.00) and, quarterly from.the date hereof, solely
from such special funds, interest on such principal sum from the date
hereof at the rate of six per centum (6%) per annum, until such
principal sum shall be paid.
This Note is issued pursuant to the Contitution and laws of the
State of Florida, particularly Section 215.431, Florida Statutes (1975),
and a resolution duly adopted by the Issuer on January 23, 1978, (the
"Resolution"), in anticipation of the receipt by the Issuer of the
proceeds from the sale of not exceeding $402,500 principal amount of
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series,•1979, of the Issuer (the "Bonds").
This Note and the interest due thereon are payable solely from and
secured by a prior lien upon and a pledge of the proceeds to be derived
•
from the sale of the Bonds and, if.necessary, from and secured by a prior
lien upon and a pledge of the gross revenues to be derived from the
I.
operation of the Issuer's water and sewer system, all in the manner
provided in the Resolution.
This Note shall not constitute a general obligation of the Issuer,
and the holder thereof shall never have the right to require of compel
the exercise of the power of the Issuer to levy ad valorem taxes for
the payment of the principal or interest on this Note.
NOV` Fp,
1978
0
D
It is hereby certified, recited and declared that all acts,
conditions and things required to exist, to happen and to be performed
precedent to and in connection with the issuance of this Note, exist,
have happened, and have been performed in regular and due form and
time as required by the laws and Constitution of -the State of Florida
applicable thereto= and that the issuance of this Note and of the issue
of Notes of which this Note is one does not violate any constitutional
or statutory limitations or provisions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Indian River, Florida, has
issued this Note and has caused the same to be signed by the Chairman
of its Board of County Commissioners and its corporate seal to be
impressed hereon and attested and countersigned by the Clerk of .such
Board, all as of the 8th day of December, 1978.
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER, FLORIDA
v j
By
Chairman, Board of—Cofatty
Commissioners
(SEAL)
ATTESTED AND COUNTERSIGNED:
Clerk, Boar• of my commissioners
NOV 151978
By% 7 P;IaPM 2 0
0
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS NEXT DISCUSSED FOUR
PROJECTS BEING CARRIED OUT UNDER THE FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM: THE FISHING AND BOATING DOCKS AT WINTER BEACH ROAD AND JUNGLE
TRAIL ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDES OF THE INDIAN RIVER; THE DAY MARKERS
AT OSLO RAMP; THE SEBASTI,AN PIER; AND CLEARING UNDERNEATH THE WEST
BRIDGE ON THE WABASSO CAUSEWAY. THE COORDINATOR STATED THAT HE WOULD
LIKE APPROVAL TO APPLY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR
$15,942 FROM THE BOATING TRUST FUND TO COMPLETE THESE FOUR PROJECTS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,.SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COORDINATOR TO MAKE APPLICATION
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR $15,942 FROM THE BOATING
TRUST FUND FOR THE FOUR PROJECTS DISCUSSED ABOVE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT AT A PREVIOUS MEETING THE BOARD
HAD DENIED ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM TO WILLIE
M. POOLE, HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD.HAD A LETTER FROM SHERIFF .JOYCE
STATING THAT HE HAD NO OBJECTION TO ISSUANCE OF SUCH A PERMIT IF THE
BOARD WAS SURE MR. POOLE,.WHO IS EXTREMELY SHAKY AS THE RESULT OF A
STROKE, COULD ADEQUATELY HANDLE A GUN. THE -CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT A
LETTER WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. POOLE'S PHYSICIAN, STATING -THAT MR. POOLE
HAD BEEN BITTEN BY A DOG BUT ALSO STATING THAT HE HOPED THERE WAS ANOTHER
SOLUTION -FOR MR. POOLE'S PROBLEMS.
COMMISSIONER DEESON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD SPOKEN WITH
MR. POOLE, WHO HAD ASSURED HIM THAT HE HAD NO INTENTION OF SHOOTING DOGS
BUT THAT HE WISHED TO HAVE THE PISTOL PERMIT FOR SELF-PROTECTION IN
VIEW OF THE FACT THAT HE TAKES DAILY WALKS ALONG U. S. I IN THE VERY
EARLY MORNING HOURS FOR HEALTH REASONS. COMMISSIONER DEESON POINTED OUT
THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID INDICATE THAT MR. POOLE COULD HANDLE A WEAPON.
COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED IF MR. POOLE HAD INDICATED TO
COMMISSIONER DEESON THAT HE WAS AWARE OF OTHER METHODS OF HANDLING
PROBLEM ANIMALS, AND COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT HE DID.
COMMISSIONER LOY THEN STATED THAT BASED ON MR, POOLE'S
CONVERSATION WITH COMMISSIONER DEESON, SHE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO
ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO MR. POOLE. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AGREED.
NOV 151978
101
6:04 9 �i .
t
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RESCINDED THEIR EARLIER DENIAL AND
APPROVED THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO CARRY A FIREARM TO WILLIE M. POOLE.
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'dLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a LC
in the matter of C
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of e L24 { y
)em _' 1; % q 7S?
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal Is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
>12-D
Swom to and Subscribed before me this A.D.
Managed
(Clerk of the Circuit lCouourt, India r County, Florida)
(SEAQ
NOTICE OF LEASE
OF REAL ESTATE
Pursuant to Florida Statute, 125.35, the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, will accept written bids
to the hour of 9:30 A.M. Wednesday, November
15, 1978, for lease of the following described
County Property:
Indian River Farms Company Subdivision
Pas 2-25 W. 10 A. of E. 20.54 A. of Tract 8,
described on that tax roll as 21 33 39 01 0080
002.0.
The Board of County Commissioner
reserves the right to reject any or all of the
bids and make awards in any manner which
the Board considers to be in the best interest of
Indian River County, Florida.
All bids shall be for one (1) Year lease, in
writing by legal descriptionas listedto aboianve
and
shall include a check payable
River
County for to percent (10 percent) of the lease
.price — with the balance due five (5) days
,after acceptance, submitted in an envelope
side
ecurely
DeBID FOR and LEASE
on the OF COUNTY
`LAND" along with the date and time of the bid
opening. The bids may M mailed or delivered
to the office of the County Administrator,
Room 115, County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida
Proposals received
after
November , 978,wl be eturned
e
�o d. Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida
By: -s -William c. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
25, NOV. 1,1978. T_
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
FRANK BURDICK
$250
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS A CHECK FROM
MR. BURDICK IN THE AMOUNT OF $250 AND A COPY OF A CERTIFICATE OF
INSURANCE WITH PUBLIC LIABILITY OF $300,000 AND PROPERTY DAMAGE OF
NOV 151978
11
$100,000, FOR THE PERIOD 12112/77 - 12/12/7$. HE NOTED THAT ADDITIONAL
COVERAGE WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE ENSUING YEAR.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE $250 BID OF FRANK BURDICK
FOR A ONE YEAR LEASE OF THE COUNTY -OWNED LAND DESCRIBED IN THE ADVERTISE-
MENT. LEASE AND INSURANCE CERTIFICATE ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF -THE
MINUTES.
NOV 151978
12
37r:st�V
6
s
L E A S E
THIS LEASE, Made and entered into this 15th day of November,
1978, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision.
of the State of Florida, hereinafter called "LESSOR", and FRANK
R. BURDICK, herinafter called the "LESSEE".
WITNESSETH:
That in consideration of the covenants herein contained, on
the part of the said Lessee to be kept and performed, the said
Lessor does hereby lease to the said Lessee the following described
property, located in the County of Indian River, State of Florida,
to -wit:
Indian River Farms Company Subdivision
PBS 2-25 W. 10 acres of E. 20.54 acres
of Tract 8; described on the tax roll as
21 33 39 01 0080 002.0
1. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises for
a term of one (1) year, commencing on the 15th day of November,
1978, to and including the 14th day of November, 1979.
2. The Lessor hereby leases to the Lessee and the Lessee
hereby leases from the Lessor the above described premises for
the term set out in this Lease for the total rent of Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
3. At the expiration of the term, the Lessee will yield.up
to Lessor the demised premises in the same condition as they
were received.
4. The Lessor shall provide liability insurance in an
amount of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00)
per occurrence, naming Lessor as a co-insured under said liability
insurance policy.
5. Lessee, by acceptance of this Lease, hereby agrees to
indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any damage that may
result while Lessee exercises his rights under this Lease and
to pay all costs including court costs and reasonable attorneys'
fees resulting therefrom.
NOV 151978
�x,oi 37 v,3 X54
I
6. The Lessee will not make or suffer any unlawful or
improper use of the premises. Premises are being leased for
the purposes of vegetable farming.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto
executed this instrument for the purposes herein expressed, the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOR DA
By.?%A.-t
WIlliam C. Wodtke,•l C 'airman
air
Attest:
As tYounty Freda Wright, U-1-e-rk 6J
LESSOR
NOV 15 1978
LESSEE
I it
L�J
ROMArtifitatt (Of n$urante `
FLORIDA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE C0.0
P. a BOX 730
GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32602
DATE 12ecember 4l 1978
THIS IS TO CERTI FY that Me Company named above has iaeurd PoliW(las) to the Imureo name below. If weft polky(Ies) an car"ed or charges
during paO CE of covaae• u stated herein, in such a mannan as to affect this cartif1w"___daira written notice w11i be mailed to Me Party de -
tutted below for whom this prtificeto is issuad
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PARTY TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED.
Indian RiverCounty Frank R. Burdick and/or
2145 14th Avenue Vinylox Service Co.
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Rt 1 Box 281
Vero Beach, Florida 3296
i
DESCRIPTION OF This includes Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 22
INSURED OPERATION
W 10 Acres of E. 20.5 Acres of Tract , Sec 21 Twp 33, Rge 3
policy the Policy number need not be repeated.
•Absence of an entry in these »mea- that Insur-
arce is not afforded with resWt to the coverages Orr
pOsite thereto.
• � i•.
7_•cial ati>'_ . 02079 ORIGINAL
in
ME r a
I�THORI2ED AGENT
t
:�LxJ� 45�� 'Ijt:U_3@9
AUTOMOBILE
RWRV Injury Liability Each Person $
Each A k mtt $
Property & Damage Liability Each Accidint $
PUBLIC LIABILITY EachA Parson $
GL 635299 dh $3294-0-0—Q
Each
12/12/'[8
1.2/20/79
Mdgy Injury Liability Aoeldeflt
." ,
Property Damage Liability . r Axidemt S
PRODUCTS — COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY
$
s s�
Bodily Injury Liability . _ Each Parson $
},
l
. � Prdperry LiaisRltl(' 0eCt►At4idemt$
t.
CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY ,.
Bodily Injury Uabgit$ - ,' , Each Person s
r Each Aeeklent $
ft"" Damage Liability Each Accident $
AggrOM $
^ Dnw*tlm Of CfAlt M (e) CUMS&
EMPLOYERS LIABILITY Each Parson $
Each Aocklmtt $
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION $ STATUTORY
THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS COUNTER SIGNED BY A A F lRE
-- t. wt—n'— nna
T1YE OF THE COMPANY.
policy the Policy number need not be repeated.
•Absence of an entry in these »mea- that Insur-
arce is not afforded with resWt to the coverages Orr
pOsite thereto.
• � i•.
7_•cial ati>'_ . 02079 ORIGINAL
in
ME r a
I�THORI2ED AGENT
t
:�LxJ� 45�� 'Ijt:U_3@9
s
=F
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A. M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. 1. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
v MWr ilM,
in the Court ,was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of �� � Atf_ 7Zol
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
VeroBeach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver.
tiserrent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver.
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
i
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day i A.D. �7r�
( in anger)
(sEAu (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian Ir County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will receive bids to the hour of
9:30 a.m. Wednesday, November 13, 1978, for
Me following:
1949 Caterpillar, IVIode112,
Motor Grader
Equipment to be bid on may be inspected at
the Indian River County Garage, South Gifford
Road, (Route No. 630), Vero Beach, Florida.
The Board of County Commissioners
reserves the right to reject any or all bids and
make awards in any manner which the Board
considers to be in the best interest of Indian
River County, Florida.
Bids for the above item shall be submitted in
an envelope satureiy seated and marked on the
outside to show the item being bid on and the
date and time of the opening. The bids may be
mailed or delivered to the Office of the County
Administrator, Room 11S, County Court House,
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960. Proposals
received after 9:30 a.m. November 15, 1918,
will be returned unopened.
Indian River County, Florida
Board of County Commissioners
William C. WodtkeJr.,
firman
Oct. 29, Nov. s, 1978.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
A. R. HOGAN $1,805.00
KNIGHT GROVE CARE, INC. $2,176.60
FLORIDA—ATLANTIC GROVE SERVICE $1,850.00
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE HIGH BID OF KNIGHT GROVE
CARE, INC., FOR THE 1949 CATERPILLAR, MODEL 12, MOTOR GRADER.
NOV 151978
16
� LdJi rw 11 7
J
e
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr, who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
NOTICE th
NOTICECounty IS HERcommEBY
GI of Indian River
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
of
County, Florida, will receive bids to the hour of
$251.00
9:30 a.m. Wednesday, November 15, 1978, -for
J^
the following vehicles:
1970 Ford 4 Door Sedan
a�
1974 Plymouth Duster
n
be b Ford Maverick
be Vehicles to bid on may be inspected at the
In the matter of 7 %
Indian River County Garage, South Gifford
$127.75
Road, (Route No. 630), Vero Beach, Florida.
BASS
The Board of County Commissioners
the right to reject any or all of the
„
reserves
bids make ake awards in any manner which
the Board considers to be in the best interest of
in the Court, was may-
Indian River County, Florida.
Bids for the above items shall be submitted
�%
In an envelope securely seated and marked on
to show the item being bid on and
fished in said newspaper in the issues of �°� �' %
the outside
the date and time iv the opening. The bids may
d or of the
FORD MAVERICK
counbe t
Administrator,, Rooerd m 115, County
Court Nouse, Vero Beach, Florida, 34960.
J. B.
proppapproposais'received after 9:30 a.m.
November 15, 197S, will be returned unopened.
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
that the said newspaper has heretofore
Indian River County, Florida
Board of County Commissioners
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
by: William C. Wodtke Jr.,
Chairman
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
Oct. 49, Nov. 5. 1978.
tisen-ent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D.
` (usiness Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, lufdan River County, Florida)
(SEAQ
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTICE
AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
JACK
LISENBY
1972
PLYMOUTH DUSTER
$251.00
CITY
CAB
n
n n
$255.00
J. B.
STORAGE
„
n 14F
$127.75
L. L.
BASS
n
„
$175.00
CITY
CAB
1973
FORD MAVERICK
$205.00
J. B.
STORAGE
n
n n
$167.75
J. DAVID MARSH
„
n n
$176.80
L. L.
BASS
n
$175.00
J. B.
STORAGE
1970
FORD 4 DOOR SEDAN
$105.75
L. L.
BASS
„ ,, - It
$155.00
CITY
CAB
n
n .n
$105.00
17
ow.K 9 Fon,258
NOV 151978
®
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
$CHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IT WAS MADE
EXPLICIT THAT THE RADIOS DO NOT GO WITH THE CARS. HE NOTED THEY WOULD
BE OF NO VALUE EXCEPT TO ANYONE ON THAT PARTICULAR FREQUENCY, AND STATED
THAT ON THE NOTICE TO'THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER, THIS WOULD BE RECONFIRMED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE THEN READ ALOUD RESOLUTION No. 78-85, AND
PRESENTED IT TO COMMISSIONER $CHMUCKER, HONORING HIM FOR HIS SERVICE ON
THE -BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. $AID RESOLUTION WAS APPROVED AT
THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER IST AND IS A PART OF THE MINUTES OF THAT MEETING.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ED REGAN PRESENTED COMMISSIONER
$CHMUCKER WITH A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, AS FOLLOWS:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development Advisory
Committee wishes to make known its appreciation of the efforts
of its retiring chairman, Edwin S. Schmucker.
The.committee was particularly pleased that a member of
the Board of County Commissioners and a man of his caliber held
this post.
He has helped to improve the quality of life for low and
moderate income families throughout Indian.River.
Between Oslo, Gifford and Wabasso, alone, he has been
instrumental in paving 5.7 miles of road, extensive drainage,
contributed to Indian River County Utilities, street lighting,
West Wabasso Park and the North Gifford Park, the demolition of
dilapidated structures, the rehabilitation of homes and encouraged
housing. These were the physical things.
His real contribution is in the area of the human spirit.
He looks not only to filling physical need but gives
consideration to human.aspirations. He accomplishe's in a soft
voice and a smile of encouragement what sometimes seems almost
irresolvable.
18
NOV 1 51978
•
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vera Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a I '4.Ifl-Z i. C -.
in the matter of
in the Court, was pub -
lisped in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach press-Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been ccntinuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before men�jla J_ A -D
— „ (B,psiness Manager)
(SEAQ (Clerk of the Circuit Court, In�o River County, Florida)
NOTICE
t NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Board
lif County Commissioners of Indian River
i'ounty, Florida, will receive bids to the hour of
17:3o a.m. Wednesday, November 15, 1978, for
e following:
'bOne New 12,000
s GPM Turbine Pump
t Specifications, instructions to bidders and
911lding blanks are available at the Office of
to County Administrator, Room 115, County
=ourt House, or will he mailed upon request.
11 The Board of County Commissioners
i"rves the right to reiect any or all of the
I lids and make awards in any manner which
t a Board considers to be in the best interest of
tdiae River County, Florida.
Bids for the above item shall be submitted in
.fit envelope securely sealed and marked on the
'Wside to show the item being bid on and the
eate and time of the opening. The bids may be
nailed or delivered to the Office of the County
administrator, Room 115, County Court House,
IAero Beach, Florida 32960. Proposals received
itter 9:30 a.m. November 15, 1978, will be
,returned unopened.
r Indian River County, Florida
I • Board of County Commissioners
by: William C. Wodtke Jr.,
Chairman
Nov. 5, Ib 1978.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NOTICE -AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
M. D. MOODY NO BID
COUCH MANUFACTURING CO. $23,020.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BID BEING REFERRED TO
THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION.
NOV 15 1978
19'
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,. TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian.River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of /�� ��' t r C r �R titi
62 . '7
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of / 2t . •J .Q, 19? p
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Swom to and subscribed before me this apot
/1
(SEAU
e
A /Business Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, rn¢ian River County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will receive bids to the hour of
9:30 a.m. Wednesday, November. 15, 1978, for
the following:
One and one-half tt1/2)
Ton Truck, Cab -Chassis
V-8 engine, minimum
345 CIO and iS7 net HP
Specifications, instructions to bidders and
bidding blanks are available at the Office of
the County Administrator, Room 115 County
Court House, or will be mailed upon request.
The Board of County Commissioners
reserves the right to reject any or all pf the
bids and make awards in any. manner which
the Board considers to be in the best interest of
IndianRiver County, Florida.
Bids for the above item shall be submitted in
an envelope securely seated and marked on the
outside to show the item being bid on and the
date and time of the opening. The bids may be
mailed or delivered to the Office of the County
Administrator, Room 115, County Court House,
Vero Beach, Florida 32940. Proposals received
after 9:30 a.m. November 15, 1978, will be
returned unopened.
Indian River County, Florida
Board of County Commissioners
by: William C. WodlkeJr.,
Chairman
Nov. 8, 8, 1978.
THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT"OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ:
SUNRISE FORD CO., FT. PIERCE
1979 FORD F-700 $10,740.19
y� VELDE FORD, VERO BEACH
1979 FORD F-600 $104629.43
FRED COYNE CHEVROLET
1979 CHEVROLET C6D042 $10,588.66
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION.
29
ilii37
Nov 151978
ZONING DIRECTOR DEWEY WALKER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS
RELEASE OF EASEMENT REQUESTED BY .JOHN T. WELTON IN OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION.
HE NOTED THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER RELEASES MADE IN THIS SAME AREA.
DISCUSSION AROSE ABOUT ACCESS FOR UTILITIES, AND MR. WALKER
STATED THAT IN THIS BLOCK, AS IN MOST BLOCKS IN THE AREA, THE UTILITIES
COME IN FROM THE NORTH AND RUN DOWN THE CENTER;'HOWEVER, PEOPLE ARE
BEING SERVICED WITH UTILITIES FROM EVERY DIRECTION IN THIS AREA. HE
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERE ALREADY IS A BUILDING ON THIS PROPERTY,
AND THE EDGE OF IT IS ON THE EASEMENT. HE NOTED THAT APPARENTLY THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION TOLD MR. WELTON THEY WANTED HIM TO SAVE
SOME TREES, AND THE PEOPLE ERECTING THE BUILDING TOOK THIS LITERALLY
AND MOVED THE BUILDING OVER 9' IN ORDER TO SAVE THE TREES.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN NO
APPROVAL GIVEN FOR TAKING PART OF AN EASEMENT AND USING IT FOR ANYTHING
UNTIL THAT EASEMENT HAS BEEN RELEASED BY THE COUNTY,
MR. WALKER EXPLAINED THAT THE PLAT SHOWED THE BUILDING BEING
9' FROM THE EASEMENT. THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DID NOT INDICATE
TO MR. WELTON THAT HE SHOULD MOVE OVER 9' ONTO.THE EASEMENT, JUST THAT
HE SHOULD SAVE AS MANY TREES AS POSSIBLE, AND THIS WAS THE RESULT, HE
NOTED WE CAN ALWAYS INSTRUCT THEM TO MOVE IT BACK.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING ANOTHER
EASEMENT, AND COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE EASEMENT MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED
IN THE MIDDLE BECAUSE THE UTILITIES COULD COME IN FROM THE SIDE..
' CHAIRMAN WODTKE BROUGHT UP THE PROBLEM OF WATER LINES, BECAUSE
THIS IS PART OF THE WATER TAXING DISTRICT. IT WAS NOTED WE HAVE RELEASED
QUITE A FEW SIDE LOT LINE EASEMENTS IN THIS AREA, BUT MAINLY HAVE HELD
ONTO THE REAR LOT LINE EASEMENTS.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED VARIOUS WAYS TO PREVENT THE SITUATION OF
HAVING A BUILDING MOVED ONTO AN EASEMENT OCCUR IN THE FUTURE.
`t MR. WALKER NOTED THAT MR. WELTON RELIED ON HIS BUILDERS, AND
THEY SLIPPED UP.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT PEOPLE DO MAKE MISTAKES, AND
HE DID NOT FEEL WE SHOULD MAKE THE MAN MOVE THE BUILDING, BUT JUST MAKE E
SURE THAT THIS CANNOT REOCCUR.
i•
21
NOV 151978 3
y l
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER.,TO RELEASE THE EASEMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF LOT 11 AND THE
WEST SIDE OF LOT 12, BLOCK C, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED.BY
.JOHN WELTON .
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT IT SHOULD BE MADE CLEAR THIS WILL
NOT BE MADE A GENERAL POLICY IN THIS AREA.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF WE CAN'T OBTAIN ANOTHER EASEMENT,
AND COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT IT WOULD NOT BE PRACTICAL TO GET A 5'
EASEMENT BETWEEN THE IMPROVEMENTS.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON THE PROBLEMS INVOLVED AND ALTERNATIVE
SOLUTIONS, SUCH AS RELEASING JUST A PORTION OF THE EASEMENT. -
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS -MOTION AND COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER WITHDREW HIS SECOND.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 78-86, AGREEING
TO RELEASE THAT PORTION OF THE SIDE LOT EASEMENT ON THE WEST LOT LINE
OF LOT 12, BLOCK C, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION, THAT PRESENTLY HAS A STRUCTURE
CONSTRUCTED ON IT; TO LEAVE THE BALANCE OF THAT EASEMENT UNRELEASED;
AND TO REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL 5' EASEMENT ABUTTING ON THE WEST THE 2-1/2'
EASEMENT .ON THE EAST SIDE OF LOT 11; DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE
EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT;.AND STATED THAT THE OTHER OPTION IS TO MOVE
THE BUILDING.
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE. FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT:
22
'% L ta7lr.Pc
NOV 15197
•
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press-Joumal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
'�'g•,T{f�q�4LJ�li��6ti.0 ■r �\t>•16/L41�
In the Court was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of C C -7 - �T1222
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumol is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firth or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
�l
Sworn to and subscribed before me this y of A.D. !9?�
\ (nrsiness Manager)
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, 1 is River County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of CountyCommissioners of Indian River
County, lorida, will hold a public hearing on
November 15, 1978, at 11:00 P.M. in the County
Commission Chambers of the Indian River
County Courthouse to Consider the adoption of:
An Ordinance Amending Indian River
County Ordinance 77-10 by adding a Section 32
to paragraph 14, Electrical Codd, which shall
read as follows:
Whosoever desires to enter the electrical
business or offers electrical services in Indian
River County shall be licensed in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 468, Part VII,
Florida Statutes (1977). The Board of
Examiners of the City of Vero Beach is hereby
appointed as the Indian River County Board of
Examiners,
and providing an effective date.
Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida
By: William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
Oct. 11, 1978.
BUILDING DIRECTOR ESTHER RYMER APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD TO
EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR.THE AMENDMENT. SHE COMMENTED THAT ORDINANCE 77-13
TOOK CARE OF LICENSING THE PLUMBING TRADE. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT
HE WAS ADVERTISING A HEARING FOR THE PLUMBING TRADE AND HAD APPARENTLY
MISUNDERSTOOD MRS. RYMER'S REQUEST. SHE EXPLAINED THAT THE PLUMBING
TRADE WAS TAKEN CARE OF IN 1977, AND SHE HAD ONLY MENTIONED IT SO THAT
THE.SAME TERMINOLOGY WOULD BE USED FOR THE ELECTRICAL TRADE,
MRS. RYMER THEN ASKED THE ATTORNEY ABOUT THE.PROPER STATUTE
TO REFER TO FOR THE ELECTRICAL TRADE AND ASKED IF.STATUTE 468 WOULD
APPLY TO ALL CONTRACTING BUSINESSES.
23
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT STATUTE 468, PART VII, APPLIES
TO THE ELECTRICAL TRADE IN PARTICULAR; STATUTE 468, PART II, APPLIES
TO THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN GENERAL.
MRS. RYMER THEN EXPLAINED THAT THE REASON THIS AMENDMENT IS
DESIRED IS BECAUSE THE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, WHO ISSUES ALL OCCUPATIONAL
LICENSESIAT PRESENT DOES NOT REQUIRE INSURANCE BONDS OR ANY QUALIFICATIONS
AT ALL FOR AN ELECTRICAL LICENSE. YOU CAN JUST WALK IN, PAY YOUR $9.00,
AND GET YOUR LICENSE. THE BUILDING DIRECTOR STATED THIS CREATES A LOT
OF PROBLEMS FOR THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING INSPECTORS HAVE
TO MAKE EXTRA INSPECTIONS BECAUSE OF INSTALLATIONS WHICH ARE NOT DONE
PROPERLY ANDA N MANY CASES, END UP TEACHING PEOPLE HOW TO MAKE PROPER
INSTALLATIONS.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AGREED WITH THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO REQUIRE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS TO MEET CERTAIN QUALIFICATIONS,
BUT STATED HE IS NOT NECESSARILY IN AGREEMENT WITH THE TEST THAT IS GIVEN
BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. HE NOTED THAT THE SEBASTIAN LICENSING BOARD
USES THE H. H. BLOCK PROCTORED TEST, WHICH IS USED IN MOST FLORIDA
COUNTIES.
MRS. RYMER STATED THAT THE CITY DOES ACCEPT THE H. H. BLOCK
PROCTORED TEST. SHE POINTED OUT THAT IN ALL OTHER TRADES, A LICENSE IS
NOT ISSUED UNLESS THE PERSON CAN SUPPLY A COMPETENCY CARD STATING THEY
HAVE QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE A LICENSE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON HAVING THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF THE
• CITY OF VERO BEACH BEING APPOINTED AS THE COUNTY BOARD.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE CITY BOARD COULD ACT AS THE
COUNTY BOARD, NOTING THAT IF ANY PROBLEM SHOULD COME UP, WE COULD ALWAYS
CREATE ANOTHER BOARD.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
FRANK CASANO OF 625 COLONIAL DRIVE, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR,
ASKED IF THERE IS SOME WAY A MEMO COULD BE SENT TO THE TAX COLLECTOR
TO STOP THE ISSUING OF THE ELECTRICAL LICENSES RIGHT NOW UNTIL THIS IS
IRONED OUT. HE FELT THERE WILL BE,A MAD RUSH FOR LICENSES BEFORE THIS
CAN COME INTO EFFECT,
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HIM THAT THE ORDINANCE WILL TAKE
EFFECT BASICALLY UPON BEING MAILED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE.
24
NOV 151978
a �v1r
MR. CASANO STATED THAT HE IS VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 78-37.
ORDINANCE NO. 78-37
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE
77-10•PROVIDING FOR LICENSING PURSUANT TO CHAPTER
468, PART VII, FLORIDA STATUTES (1977)
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That Indian River County
Ordinance 77-10 is hereby amended by the addition of a
new Section 32 to Paragraph 14, Electrical Code, which Section
reads as follows:
Section 32. Licensing. Whoever desires to enter the
electrical business or offers electrical services in Indian
River County shall be licensed in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 468, Part VII, Florida Statutes (1977). The Board
of Examiners of the City of Vero'Beach is hereby appointed as
the Indian River County Board of Examiners.
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
This Ordinance shall take effect November 20, 1978.
1
25
s
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INTRODUCED DON COPELAND,
PRESIDENT OF SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TO MAKE A PRESENTATION ON THE
CAPABILITIES OF HIS FIRM. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION
HAS MAINTAINED THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS IN THE COUNTY SINCE THE 1ST OF
NOVEMBER AND HAS BEEN DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB.
MR. COPELAND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS FIRM, WHICH HAS BEEN
IN BUSINESS IN SOUTH FLORIDA FOR IO YEARS, IS INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION,
DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. THEY WORK PRIMARILY
FOR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE DOT. THEIR BASIC SERVICE WOULD
INVOLVE THE ROUTINE DAY-BY-DAY MAINTENANCE OF THE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM
THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY AND THEIR SERVICE CONTRACT IS TAILORED TO -FIT THE
NEEDS OF AN INDIVIDUAL COUNTY. HE NOTED THAT THEIR CONTRACTS'WITH MARTIN
AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES ARE TYPICAL. MR. COPELAND INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT THEY OFFER A 24 HOUR, SEVEN DAY A WEEK SERVICE WITH RADIO.DISPATCHED
TRUCKS. RESPONSE TIME IS THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR IN DETERMINING COST,
AND THE COUNTY MUST DECIDE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE THEY DESIRE. HE CON-
TINUED THAT THEIR SERVICE INCLUDES AERIAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, ETC., AND THEY
HAVE A LARGE REPAIR SHOP INJUPITER. HE NOTED THEY WOULD GO THROUGH
THE WHOLE COUNTY SYSTEM ON START-UP, SURVEY AND MAP IT, AND REVAMP IN
ORDER TO START OUT ON A GOOD BASIS. MR. COPELAND NOTED THAT THEY PURCHASE
AND STOCK SPARE PARTS, INCLUDING TRAFFIC POLES, WIRE AND CABLES, AND
HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF REPLACING ALMOST ANYTHING. THERE IS SUBSTITUTE
EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES IN THE EVENT OF A KNOCK -DOWN. THE
COUNTY WOULD BE BILLED FOR THE SPARE PARTS AS THEY ARE USED. THE CONTRACT
IS ARRANGED ON A TWO-YEAR BASIS, AND THE BASE PORTION WOULD REPRESENT
A FIXED MONTHLY COST FOR ALL SERVICES FOR THE EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTER-
SECTIONS, OF WHICH THE COUNTY PRESENTLY HAS 26. IF ANY ARE ADDED OR
DELETED, THERE IS A SEPARATE SCHEDULE TO COVER THIS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED IF WE SHOULD DECIDE ON A 6 HOUR
RESPONSE TIME, FOR INSTANCE, WOULD THEY RESPOND TO AN EMERGENCY QUICKER.
MR. COPELAND STATED THAT IN AN EMERGENCY, THERE IS ALWAYS A
QUICKER RESPONSE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT PREVIOUSLY WE HAD UNDERSTOOD
WE WOULD HAVE TO PURCHASE AN AERIAL TRUCK, WHICH WE DID NOT DESIRE.
Nov 115 1978
26
.ti
MR. COPELAND STATED THAT THEIR FIGURES ARE NOW BASED ON
SUPPLYING SUCH EQUIPMENT. HE NOTED THAT IF THE COUNTY HAS THE EQUIPMENT
AVAILABLE, THEY CHARGE LESS, BUT POINTED OUT THAT IF YOU HAVE TO GO
-OUT AND BUY SUCH EQUIPMENT AND HAVE A MAN TO OPERATE IT, IT WOULD BE
VERY EXPENSIVE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED ABOUT THEIR INSURANCE.
MR. COPELAND STATED THAT THEY MAINTAIN A RATHER LARGE COVERAGE,
WHICH HE FELT WOULD INDEMNIFY THE COUNTY FOR THEIR WORK, BUT HE DID NOT
KNOW IF IT WOULD INDEMNIFY THEM COMPLETELY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED HOW THEY DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN .
THEIR BASE COST AND COST-PLUS.
MR. COPELAND STATED THAT THE BASE COST IS FOR START-UP AND
REGULAR SERVICE. COST PLUS IS SIMPLY THE SERVICE CHARGE TO ACT AS THE
COUNWS PURCHASING AGENT TO BUY AND MAINTAIN PARTS THAT ARE TO BE USED
FOR THE COUNTY SYSTEM. THERE IS NO SEPARATE LABOR CHARGE - THE 25%
APPLIES ONLY TO PARTS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE SPOKE OF THE BENEFITS OF HAVING A REPAIR
SERVICE AVAILABLE AND ALSO A PREVENTIVE PROGRAM WHICH WOULD PAY OFF. IN
THE LONG RUN. HE ASKED IF MR. COPELAND NEEDED AN INDICATION OF THE
RESPONSE TIME DESIRED.
MR. COPELAND STATED THAT THIS IS THE KEY ELEMENT, AND 'NOTED
THAT THEY WORK ON A SIX HOUR RESPONSE TIME IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, WHICH
SEEMS TO BE AN ACCEPTABLE TIME.
IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT A SIX HOUR RESPONSE TIME WAS
SATISFACTORY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT MR. COPELAND CHECK INTO HAVING
THE COUNTY ADDED AS A CO-INSURED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy,SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY REQUESTED MR. COPELAND TO PRESENT A FIRM CONTRACT
BASED ON THE PRESENTATION MADE TODAY FOR THE WORK AS OUTLINED IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY AND THAT THE CHAIRMAN BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE CONTRACT
UPON APPROVAL OF THE ATTORNEY.
THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK P.M. FOR LUNCH
AND RECONVENED AT 1:45 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT.
NOIT 151978
27
mf,,.:r'268,
i�
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT—OF—COUNTY TRAVEL FOR CIVIL
DEFENSE DIRECTOR, S. LEE NUZIE, TO ATTEND PHASE I OF THE CAREER DEVELOP—
MENT PROGRAM WHICH IS BEING PRESENTED IN ORLANDO BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED THE VACANCY TO BE FILLED ON THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL, AND NOTED THAT BOBBY
MEADOWS, ADMINISTRATOR OF INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, HAS INDICATED
HIS WILLINGNESS TO CONTINUE TO SERVE AS THE BOARD'S REPRESENTATIVE ON
THIS COUNCIL.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN DRASTIC CHANGES
MADE IN THIS COUNCIL AND STATED SHE IS ESPECIALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE
REPRESENTATION FOR THE SMALL COUNTIES, WHICH HAS BEEN REDUCED. SHE
CONTINUED THAT SINCE WE HAVE ONLY ONE APPOINTMENT, IT IS IMPORTANT TO
HAVE SOMEONE REALLY KNOWLEDGABLE, AND SHE FELT THAT MR. MEADOWS WOULD
BE THE OBVIOUS CHOICE.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, TO APPOINT BOBBY MEADOWS AS THE BOARD'S OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE
TO THE HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL.
WILLIAM KOOLAGE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE ATTENDED A MEETING
OF THE HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL AND IT IS HIS OBSERVATION THAT THE SMALLER
COUNTIES ARE NOT BEING TREATED FAIRLY AT ALL BECAUSE OF THE REQUIREMENT
THAT REPRESENTATION BE BASED ON POPULATION. HE FELT THERE SHOULD BE SOME
ATTEMPT MADE TO SPLIT US OFF FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY WHICH DOMINATES THE
VOTING AND OBTAINS THE FUNDS BECAUSE OF THEIR LARGE POPULATION.
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT WE NEED TO FIND A SOLUTION.
THE CHAIRMAN.CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HEARINGS WILL NOW BE
HELD IN REGARD TO VARIOUS HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES, HE NOTED.THAT THESE ARE
ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES THAT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT SINCE THE PREVIOUS HEARINGS. BUILDING DIRECTOR
• n
RYMER AND ZONING DIRECTOR DEWEY WALKER ARE PRESENT TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS
THAT MAY ARISEm
28
NOV 15197 u �% 269
D
THE FIRST HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE TO BE REVIEWED WAS ONE OWNED
BY ROOSEVELT BANKS AND CARRIE COPELAND. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED
THAT THIS HOUSE HAS BEEN VACANT A LONG TIME. THE FIRST NOTICE WAS SENT
JULY 6, 1977 AND THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY REPLY. SHE NOTED THIS WAS
REINSPECTED IN JUNE OF 1978; AND IT WAS SUCH A DANGEROUS SITUATION, SHE
HAD THE POWER CUT AT THAT TIME. SHE PRESENTED A PHOTO OF THE STRUCTURE.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MR. BANKS
HAS INFORMED HIM THAT THE STRUCTURE DOES NOT BELONG TO HIM, BUT TO A
MR. JORDAN. A NOTICE HAS SINCE BEEN SENT TO MR. JORDAN ASKING HIM TO
APPEAR TODAY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT WE NEED TO SEE A COPY OF THE
NOTICE SENT TO MR. JORDAN BEFORE WE CAN PROCEED, AND ASKED THAT THIS BE
DEFERRED UNTIL MR. WALKER CAN SUPPLY THE NOTICE.
THE NEXT STRUCTURE TO BE DISCUSSED WAS THAT OWNED BY ELLIS
BARDEN. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT THEY MADE THEIR LAST INSPECTION IN
JULY OF 1978 AND HAVE NEVER HEARD ANYTHING FROM MR. BARDEN.
RIVERS ANDERSON, REALTOR, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MR, BARDEN
HAS A VERY LIMITED EDUCATION AND HE IS, THEREFORE, APPEARING IN MR.
BARDEN'S BEHALF. HE NOTED THAT MR. BARDEN DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE
STRUCTURE BEING DEMOLISHED, BUT WANTS IT DONE AS CHEAPLY AS POSSIBLE.
HE INQUIRED ABOUT THE PROCEDURE THAT IS FOLLOWED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HIM THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR CAN HAVE
THE COUNTY CREWS DO THIS OR IT CAN BE BID OUT. THE ATTORNEY FELT THAT
THE COUNTY COULD PROBABLY DO THIS CHEAPER, AND THERE WOULD BE AN ADVAN-
TAGE IN THAT THE MONIES WOULD BE DEFERRED.
THE ADMINISTRATOR AGREED THAT HE WILL DISCUSS THIS WITH MR.
ANDERSON AND NOTED THAT THE ONLY CHARGE IS THE ACTUAL COST OF LABOR FOR
TEARING THE STRUCTURE DOWN AND CLEARING IT UP.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED TO
ABATE'THE NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY ELLIS
BARDEN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST 3.5 ACRES OF TRACT 2, LESS
SOUTH 392.33', 28-32-39, 01-0020-001.0.
29
wis fi,X70
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE SENT A
NOTICE TO MARY ELLA LAWSON IN APRIL IN REGARD TO THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
ON HER PROPERTY. MRS. RYMER NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY IS OVERGROWN AND
CREATES A HAZARD FOR THE NEIGHBORS. SHE STATED THAT MS, LAWSON ANSWERED
THAT SHE INTENDS TO MOVE BACK IN, BUT THAT SHE HAS BEEN IN THE HOSPITAL.
MRS. RYMER CONTINUED THAT SHE INFORMED MS. LAWSON THAT THE STRUCTURE
MUST BE BROUGHT UP TO CODE AND THAT WE DID NOT WANT TO TEAR DOWN ANYTHING
SHE WANTED TO RESTORE, BUT SHE HAS NOT HEARD FROM MS. LAWSON SINCE,
MS. LAWSON APPEARED AND STATED THAT WHILE SHE WAS IN THE
HOSPITAL, PEOPLE WENT AND DID THINGS TO.THE HOUSE; THEY TORE OUT THE
SIDE OF THE BATHROOM AND TORE OUT A WINDOW AND PUT TREES RIGHT UP BY
THE HOUSE. IT WAS A PERFECT HOUSE BEFORE THAT.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED MS. LAWSON WHERE SHE IS LIVING NOW AND
HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN SINCE SHE LIVED IN THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.
MS. LAWSON STATED THAT SHE IS LIVING ON QUAY DOCK ROAD AND
HAS NOT LIVED IN HER HOUSE IN ABOUT TWO YEARS. SHE STATED THAT WHEN SHE
CAME BACK FROM THE HOSPITAL, HER LINES WERE CUT. SHE TOLD THE BOARD OF
HER VARIOUS PROBLEMS.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF SHE LIVES WITH RELATIVES, AND MS.
LAWSON STATED THAT SHE DOES NOT LIVE WITH ANYONE. SHE COMPLAINED THAT
NEIGHBORS WERE USING HER YARD FOR A DUMP.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE SHOWED HER A PICTURE OF HER HOUSE, AND SHE
STATED THAT THE PICTURE WAS TAKEN BEFORE SHE CLEANED IT UP AND THAT THE
0
PLANTS MUST HAVE GROWN UP SINCE THAT TIME,
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED HER WHERE SHE INTENDS TO LIVE, AND SHE
STATED THAT SHE INTENDS TO MOVE BACK IN AND FIX IT UP.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE COMMISSIONER'S BURDEN IS TO
DETERMINE WHETHER THE STRUCTURE IS, IN FACT, A NUISANCE STRUCTURE AT
THIS POINT IN TIME.
`.� ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER DISPLAYED A PICTURE OF THE STRUCTURE
TAKEN TODAY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED MS. LAWSON IF SHE HAD ENOUGH
INCOME TO FIX UP THE HOUSE.
MS. LAWSON STATED THAT SHE HAS $133,00 A MONTH AND IS SUPPOSED
TO GET A WIDOW'S PENSION FROM SOCIAL SECURITY AND ALSO IS ENTITLED TO
DISABILITY.
30
NOV 151978 awA 37 ax271
CHAIRMAN WODTKE EXPLAINED THAT WE HAVE TWO CHOICES - WE
CAN EITHER DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE OR MS. LAWSON MUST RECONSTRUCT THE
HOUSE TO MEET THE BUILDING CODE STANDARDS. HE NOTED THAT SHE'WOULD
HAVE TO HAVE SOME PLANS DRAWN FOR THE BUILDING DIRECTOR TO APPROVE TO
BRING THE HOUSE TO CODE, AND ASKED HER IF SHE HAD ANY IDEA OF THE
COST THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED.
SHE SAID THAT SHE DID NOT AND STATED THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE
WINDOW OUT.
BUILDING DIRECTOR.RYMER INFORMED HER THAT SHE MUST HAVE A
TERMITE INSPECTION MADE TO SEE IF THE BOARDS ARE ROTTEN. THE PLUMBING
MUST WORK AND THE ELECTRICAL WIRING MUST BE SAFE. SHE STATED THAT SHE
WOULD HATE TO SEE MS. LAWSON PUT HER HARD EARNED MONEY INTO SOMETHING
THAT IS NOT WORTH IT.
COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT MS. LAWSON HAS NOT TRIED
TO FIX THE HOUSE UP IN OVER TWO YEARS, AND SHE REPLIED THAT SHE HAS NOT
HAD THE MONEY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED HOW LONG MS. LAWSON HAD OWNED THE HOUSE
AND SHE STATED ABOUT ZO YEARS AND THAT SHE LIVED IN IT UP UNTIL SHE WAS
IN A CAR WRECK IN 1972. THE CHAIRMAN NOTED THAT IT COULD TAKE AS MUCH
AS $10,000 TO RECONSTRUCT THE HOUSE, AND MSr LAWSON STATED THAT SHE
WOULD RAISE THE MONEY IF SHE HAS TO.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED HER IF SHE OWNED THE LAND, AND
SHE STATED THAT SHE OWNS ONE LOT.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THIS BOARD IS ALWAYS EXTREMELY
SYMPATHETIC, BUT SHE FEELS THAT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS INDICATED
THAT THIS PARTICULAR STRUCTURE IS HAZARDOUS AND A NUISANCE AND THAT
MS. LAWSON HAS CORROBORATED THIS. SHE NOTED THAT MS. LAWSON DOES HAVE
SOMEWHERE TO LIVE AND THE BOARD HAS HAD NO INDICATION WHEN ANYTHING
COULD BE DONE TO RECTIFY THIS SITUATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED
TO ABATE THE NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY MARY
ELLA LAWSON, LOCATED ON LOT 5, BLOCK 1, .KENNINGS ADDITION TO QUAY.
31
NOV 15 1978
4
9
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ZONING DIRECTOR
WALKER NOW HAS SUPPLIED HIM'WITH EVIDENCE THAT FLETCHER .JORDAN, WHO
OWNS THE STRUCTURE PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT TO BE OWNED BY ROOSEVELT BANKS,
HAS BEEN GIVEN SUFFICIENT NOTICE.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED MR. WALKER IF HE HAD TALKED TO MR. .JORDAN,
AND MR. WALKER STATED THAT THE .JORDANS ARE ELDERLY PEOPLE, INCAPABLE
OF TAKING CARE OF THE YARD OR HOUSE, WHICH IS COMPLETELY FALLING APART,
FLOOR AND ALL. HE STATED THAT HE ORIGINALLY NOTIFIED ROOSEVELT BANKS
AND WENT WITH HIM TO HIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS TO THE NORTH OF THIS.
THROUGH HIM, HE LEARNED OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE .JORDANS.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT WE MUST BE ABSOLUTELY
SURE OF THE PROPER LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP OF THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED TO
ABATE THE NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY JOYCE
ANN .JORDAN AND FLETCHER JORDAN, LOCATED ON LOTS M;& B, 22-32-39,
00-7000-077.0; SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT DISCUSSED THE HOUSE OWNED BY
O. B. AND KATHLEEN COLLINS AND INFORMED THE BOARD THERE IS REALLY NO
QUESTION ABOUT THIS STRUCTURE; IT IS ON NORTH U. S. I IN MINTER BEACH
AND IS ABOUT TO FALL DOWN. SHE STATED THAT THEY HAVE NOT HAD ANY COMMU-
NICATION FROM -THE COLLINS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED
TO ABATE THE NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY
O.B. AND KATHLEEN M. COLLINS LOCATED ON LOTS 8, 10, 11 & 12, .JENNINGS
ADDITION TO QUAY, 10-32-39, 001-0040-008-0.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE HAS REMOVED
THE STRUCTURE OWNED BY WILLIAM MILLS AND CHESTER HOGAN FROM HER•LIST
BECAUSE THEY HAVE GONE IN AND CLEANED OUT THE BURNED STRUCTURE, OAKS
LANDSCAPING NURSERY, AND HAVE PLANS READY TO REBUILD.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT OVER -THE PAST YEAR.
AND A HALF HE HAS HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH MR. TOWNSEND AND HIS ATTORNEY
ABOUT MR. TOWNSEND'S PROPERTY IN SUMMERPLACE, BUT HAD DIFFICULTY IN
32
'. N
COMING UP WITH A PROPER ADDRESS FOR MR. TOWNSEND. HE NOTED THAT THIS
IS A PIECE OF PROPERTY IN SUMMERPLACE RIGHT ON THE OCEAN, WHERE MR.
TOWNSEND POURED A FOUNDATION THREE OR FOUR YEARS AGO, BUT HAS NOT
CONTINUED THE STRUCTURE AND THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS FROM
THE RESIDENTS OF SUMMERPLACE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE STRUCTURE IS WITHIN THE DUNE LINE,
AND ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER STATED THAT IT IS, BUT THAT IT WAS PUT IN
BEFORE THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION SETBACK WAS ESTABLISHED AND IS GRAND-
FATHERED IN.
MR. WALKER CONTINUED THAT ACTUALLY THIS IS A BIG PILE OF SAND
WHICH BLOCKS THE WALKWAY TO THE BEACH. THE FOUNDATION IS THERE, A FEW
BLOCKS HAVE BEEN LAID, AND SOME STEEL IS STICKING UP. HE FELT IT
CONSTITUTES A REAL HAZARD.
MRS. RYMER AGREED AND STATED THAT THEY ARE ASKING THAT THE
STEEL BARS BE BENT BACK AND THE FOUNDATION COVERED WITH SAND,
A RESIDENT OF SUMMERPLACE STATED THAT THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE
WEST OF THIS PROPERTY HAVE LOST THEIR EASEMENT TO THE OCEAN BECAUSE
MR. TOWNSEND EXCAVATED THIS FOR HIS SO-CALLED FOUNDATION. HE NOTED THAT
IT IS A TERRIBLE EYESORE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED
TO ABATE THE NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY
JACK F. TOWNSEND ON LOT 9, BLOCK G, SUMMERPLACE UNIT FOUR, BY BENDING
OVER THE STEEL RODS THAT ARE PROTRUDING AND COVERING THE FOUNDATION
WITH SAND.
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE STRUCTURE OWNED BY EZEKIEL AND
EVELINE FENNEL, AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE HAS NEVER BEEN ABLE TO
GET A NOTICE TO THESE PEOPLE,
MR. -WALKER STATED THAT MR. FENNEL IS DECEASED, AND ATTORNEY
COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BURDEN UNDER THE ORDINANCE IS TO SEND NOTICE TO
THE LAST KNOWN OWNER ON THE TAX ROLL, WHICH HAS BEEN DONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY_COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED
33
3vii �P
TO ABATE THE NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY
EZEKIEL AND EVELINE FENNEL, LOCATED ON 42ND ST., WEST OF 24TH AVENUE,
26-32-39, 00-3000-018.0.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT .JOE IDLETTE
HAS STATED THAT HE DOES NOT OWN THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE LOCATED AT LOT
B, UNIT 3, HILLCREST SUBDIVISION, AND SHE WILL RESEND NOTICES UPON
DETERMINING WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THIS PROPERTY,
THE BOARD NEXT TOOK UP THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED -BY MRS.
ELIZABETH STARK IN DIXIE HIGHLANDS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THIS LADY IS INCAPACITATED TO A
GREAT EXTENT. HE CONTINUED THAT PAT HAZEN'HAS BEEN IN TOUCH WITH MRS.
STARK AND TRIED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS, BUT ALL HER EFFORTS HAVE
FAILED.
MRS. RYMER NOTED THAT THE FIRST NOTICE WAS SENT LAST MAY, AND
SHE HAS HAD A LOT OF COMPLAINTS FROM NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA. THEY HAVE
BEEN HAVING RAT PROBLEMS,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ABATE THE
NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES OWNEDBYMRS. ELIZABETH
STARK, LOCATED ON LOT 6,,BLOCK B, AND LOT 7, BLOCK C, DIXIE HIGHLANDS.
MRS. RYMER THEN DISCUSSED THE OLD DRIVE-IN THEATRE STRUCTURE
OWNED BY ARTHUR LEE HENDERSON IN GIFFORD. SHE NOTED THAT THIS HAS BEEN
A PROBLEM SINCE 1971.
MR. HENDERSON APPEARED AND STATED HE ALSO HAD PROPERTY ON
OLD DIXIE AND DID NOT KNOW TO WHICH BUILDING THEY WERE REFERRING.
MRS. RYMER INFORMED HIM THAT THE BUILDING ON OLD DIXIE WAS
AUTHORIZED TO BE DEMOLISHED AT A PREVIOUS MEETING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ABATE THE
yt NUISANCE AND DEMOLISH THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES OWNED BY ARTHUR LEE
HENDERSON, LOCATED ON LOTS 51 AND 52, LESS THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF,
ESPY'S SUBDIVISION.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REPORTED THAT THE HOUSING STUDY ADVISORY
COMMITTEE IS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COUNTY
HOUSING AUTHORITY. SOME OF THEIR REASONS ARE THAT IT WOULD PROVIDE
34
NOV 151978 a�a� i 7
9
ACCESS TO A GREAT DEAL MORE FUNDS THAN WE OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE ACCESS
TO, AND ALSO IT WOULD PUT THE COUNTY IN A VERY POSITIVE POSITION FOR
OUR NEXT APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT AFTER WEIGHING THE PITFALLS AND THE
ADVANTAGES, HE STILL CONCURS WITH THIS RECOMMENDATION, EVEN THOUGH A
LARGER CONTRIBUTION WOULD BE NEEDED TOWARDS THE START-UP THAN HE INITIALLY
BELIEVED. HE THEN INTRODUCED JUDY TRUETT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMU-
NITY AFFAIRS, WHO HAS A GREAT INTEREST AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HOUSING
THROUGHOUT THE STATE.
MS. TRUETT CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND EXPLAINED THAT SHE
ADMINISTERS A REVOLVING LAND FUND FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.
THIS FUND CAN LEND UP TO $200,000 TO A HOUSING AUTHORITY IN A RURAL AREA,
SUCH AS THIS COUNTY, SO THEY CAN ACQUIRE LAND AND DEVELOP HOMESITES, WHICH
CAN BE SOLD UNDER THE 502 SINGLE FAMILY HOME LOAN PROGRAM. SHE NOTED
THAT THE LAND FUND WAS DEVELOPED TO PROVIDE SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT BEING
PROVIDED BY THE PRIVATE SECTOR - FULLY DEVELOPED SITES AT A COST LOW
ENOUGH FOR FHA TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE. SHE THEN DISCUSSED THE HOUSING
AUTHORITY SET UP IN PASCO COUNTY AND HOW IT WORKS. MS. TRUETT AGREED
THAT THERE ARE SOME PROBLEMS WITH A HOUSING AUTHORITY BECAUSE IT DOES
NOT JUST IMMEDIATELY COME INTO BEING AND TAKE CARE OF ITSELF FINANCIALLY,
AND MIGHT.WELL REQUIRE SOME IN-KIND AND POSSIBLY CASH OUTLAY BY THE
COUNTY UNTIL IT BECAME SELF-SUFFICIENT. SHE POINTED OUT, HOWEVER, THAT
YOU CAN START THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR A VERY LOW BUDGET CASH OUTLAY;
EMPLOYEES FOR THE AUTHORITY INITIALLY WERE FUNDED THROUGH CETA, AND THE
SECTION 8 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM COULD BE SWITCHED OVER TO THE
HOUSING AUTHORITY. SHE NOTED, IN ADDITION, THAT FHA HAS A GREAT MANY
PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO A HOUSING AUTHORITY THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO A
COUNTY COMMISSION. SIS. TRUETT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT FHA HAS SOME 64
MILLION DOLLARS AVAILABLE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIS YEAR FOR HOUSING,
AND THEY ARE MANDATED TO LEND IT OUT EVERY QUARTER. SHE STATED THAT
MICHAEL HIGHTOWER IS NOW HEAD OF THE HOUSING PROGRAMS FOR FHA, AND HE
HAS BEEN VERY COOPERATIVE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE FEELS THERE MAY WELL
BE A TREMENDOUS SLOW DOWN IN HOUSING BECAUSE OF INTEREST RATES, CONSTRUC-
TION COSTS, ETC., AND IF WE ARE GOING TO GET. INTO A HOUSING AUTHORITY,
HE COULDNIT THINK OF A MORE APPROPRIATE TIME.
NOV 151978
35
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT MS. TRUETT STATED THAT FHA HAS
BEEN ALLOCATED A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF DOLLARS AND MUST GET THIS MONEY USED.
SHE ASKED WHAT HAPPENS IF IT IS NOT USED.
-MS. TRUETT STATED THAT THESE FUNDS, WHICH ARE OUR TAX DOLLARS,
GO INTO A REGIONAL POOL AND ARE THEN USED BY OTHER STATES. THERE ARE
SEVERAL WAYS THIS IS APPORTIONED BY CONGRESS, ONE IS NEED - ONE IS
POPULATION.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY OF A HOUSING AUTHORITY,
WHICH IS AUTONOMOUS, GETTING INTO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT EVERYONE WORKS WITH THEM TO
SEE THAT THEY DON'T GET IN THAT SITUATION, AND HE REALLY DID NOT KNOW
OF ANY THAT ARE,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT ONE OF THE THINGS WE HAVE BEEN
VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IS THAT THERE ARE SOME FEDERAL HOUSING PROJECTS
IN NEIGHBORING COUNTIES THAT ARE OF A TYPE WE WOULD NOT WISH TO BE
INVOLVED WITH, AND THEY HAVE GOTTEN IN A SHORT TIME INTO VERY DEPLORABLE
CONDITION.
Ms. TRUETT STATED THAT THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS EXTREMELY
IMPORTANT AND THE KEY TO THE WHOLE THING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THESE PROJECTS ARE ON THE TAX ROLLS,
AND MS. TRUETT STATED THAT THEY ARE TAX EXEMPT, BUT THEY DO PAY FOR
GARBAGE COLLECTION, ETC.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED THAT HE DID NOT
BELIEVE THEY HAVE TO PAY SALES TAX ON THE RENTAL AND AS FAR AS AD VALOREM
TAX IS CONCERNED, HE FELT THEY REACH AN AGREED AMOUNT TO PAY IN LIEU OF
THE STANDARD AMOUNT.
COMMISSIONER-SIEBERT NOTED THAT ONE OF OUR MAIN CONCERNS IS
THAT WE HAVE PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY WHO COULD AFFORD TO PAY RENT, BUT
THEY JUST DON T HAVE.ANYWHERE TO GO. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE HOUSING
•,t AUTHORITY IS PRIMARILY GEARED TOWARDS LOW INCOME, BUT A HOUSING FINANCE
AUTHORITY IS. AVAILABLE WHEREBY LOW COST CONSTRUCTION LOANS CAN BE MADE
TO PEOPLE WHO DON T FALL IN THAT CATEGORY. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT
CONTINUED THAT ONCE A HOUSING AUTHORITY IS ESTABLISHED, YOU CANT ABOLISH
IT, BUT HE POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY HAS SOME DEGREE OF CONTROL,
U
MIir�^i�T� ril
p 11
BECAUSE UNITS CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED THAT DON T HOOK ONTO A WATER SYSTEM
OR HAVE A FRANCHISE, AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME THROUGH SITE PLAN
REVIEW ALSO.
MS. TRUETT STRESSED THAT IT WOULD BE VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE
COUNTY COMMISSION TO WORK COOPERATIVELY WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER DISCUSSED OUR BAD EXPERIENCE WITH THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, WHICH HE FELT WAS A VERY
SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM WHICH THE COUNTY HANDLED VERY EFFICIENTLY, BUT THE
AGENCY DECIDED THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH STRESS PLACED ON HOUSING AND CUT
OUR FUNDS OFF. -
WILLIAM KOOLAGE, A MEMBER OF THE HOUSING STUDY ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, STATED THAT ORIGINALLY THERE WAS NO ONE MORE SKEPTICAL THAN
HE ABOUT A HOUSING AUTHORITY, BUT HE NOW FEELS WE CANNOT OVERLOOK THE
FACT THAT THERE IS MONEY AVAILABLE THROUGH A HOUSING AUTHORITY THAT IS
NOT AVAILABLE ANY OTHER WAY. HE NOTED THAT THERE IS A GREAT NEED FOR
LOW COST HOUSING IN THE GIFFORD AND WABASSO.AREA; MANY HOUSES NEED TO BE
DEMOLISHED, AND ALL THIS WILL TAKE A LOT OF MONEY. HE FELT THE KEY TO
THE WHOLE THING IS THE SELECTION OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BE THE POLICY
MAKERS FOR -THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND NOTED THAT EVEN THOUGH IT IS
AUTONOMOUS, THE COUNTY HAS SOME CONTROLS. HE CONTINUED THAT NOW IT IS
POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT SMALLER UNITS, RATHER THAN HAVE THE WHOLE PROJECT
DONE IN ONE LARGE UNIT. HE FELT THIS WOULD ENCOURAGE THE TENANTS TO
TAKE A LITTLE MORE RESPONSIBILITY IN KEEPING THEM UP, AND STATED THAT
HE IS FIRMLY CONVINCED THAT A HOUSING AUTHORITY IS THE WAY TO GO TO GET
GOOD AND ADEQUATE HOUSING IN THE COUNTY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF MR. KOOLAGE, WHO HAS A LOT OF CONTACT
WITH RETIRED PEOPLE, FELT THAT IF THIS MATTER WERE PUT ON A REFERENDUM,
IT WOULD HAVE A CHANCE OF PASSING.
INR. KOOLAGE BELIEVED IT COULD. HE FELT ONE OF THE THINGS
•y �
AGAINST A HOUSING AUTHORITY IS THE PICTURE OF A MASS OF BEEHIVE CUBICLES,
BUT THAT IS NOT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION THAT HE ENVISIONS NOW. HE DID
NOT*KNOW WHAT IT WILL TAKE OFF THE TAX ROLLS, BUT DID NOT ANTICIPATE A
GREAT IMPACT. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE ELDERLY CITIZENS HAVE A GREAT
NEED FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING.
37
1pa2` 8
NOV 1-51978
MRS. .JACKSON, ALSO A MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE, STATED THAT
SHE IS FOR A HOUSING AUTHORITY. SHE FELT THIS PROGRAM WOULD ADDRESS
ITSELF TO MANY DIFFERENT PEOPLE, AND AGREED THAT THE SUCCESS OF THE
PROGRAM IS DEPENDENT ON GOOD MANAGEMENT. SHE ALSO STATED THAT THERE
ARE MANY SENIOR CITIZENS IN NEED OF HOMES.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER DISCUSSED THE MAXIMUM RENT THAT CAN
BE PAID, WHICH HE STATED IS $156 A MONTH. HE QUESTIONED THAT IT IS
POSSIBLE TO HAVE THE TYPE OF HOUSING THE GOVERNMENT SAYS YOU MUST HAVE
UNDER THIS PROGRAM AND RENT IT AT THAT FIGURE.
MR. REGAN NOTED THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SETS THE CRITERIA
FOR RENT, AND IT IS PERIODICALLY CHANGED, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HAS A LOW
RENT BASE, WHICH HE FELT IS UNREALISTIC. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT IT
DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF THE UNIT AND NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE FAMILY.
MS. TRUETT NOTED THAT YOU CAN REQUEST HUD TO REVIEW THE RENT
STRUCTURE, AND THEY CAN GO UP 20%.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT WE NEED TO GIVE SOME OF
OUR SLUM LANDLORDS SOME COMPETITION.
MRS. .JACKSON AGREED THAT WE VERY MUCH NEED TO DO SOMETHING
ABOUT LANDLORDS WITH SUBSTANDARD HOUSING. PEOPLE ARE LIVING IN THESE
BECAUSE THEY SIMPLY HAVE NO OTHER PLACE TO LIVE. MRS. JACKSON FELT
THAT MOST OF THESE LANDLORDS HAVE ALREADY TOLD THE TENANTS THAT THEY
DQ NOT INTEND TO IMPROVE THESE HOMES, AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE
COULD GO OUT TODAY AND SHOW THEM OVER 100 SUBSTANDARD HOMES THAT WILL
NEVER BE IMPROVED.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE FELT THE COMMITTEE HAS DONE
A GOOD JOB -AND THAT SHE IS LOOKING AT THEIR. -RECOMMENDATION I.N A POSITIVE
MANNER AS A WAY TO SOLVE SOME OF OUR PROBLEMS, BUT WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST
AT LEAST TWO WEEKS TO STUDY THIS INFORMATION BEFORE WE MAKE A FINAL
DECISION.
COMMISSIONER $IEBERT NOTED THAT BEFORE ANY OFFICIAL ACTION IS
TAKEN BY THIS BOARD, AN UNOFFICIAL DECISION IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE MADE
BECAUSE IF A RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED FOR ESTABLISHING A HOUSING AUTHORITY,
IT NEEDS TO INCLUDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS.. 'COMMISSIONER
$IEBERT THANKED MS. TRUETT FOR APPEARING, AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT THIS
MATTER WOULD BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF A .JANUARY MEETING.
0.
.Ii "Pig, 79
NOV x.51978
s
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 78-86A APPOINTING PAUL
PARENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS A
REPRESENTATIVE OF DISTRICT 5.
RESOLUTION NO: 78-86A
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that PAUL X. PARENT is hereby
appointed to the Indian River County Planning and Zoning
Commission from District 5.
Said Resolution shall become effective the 15th day
Of November , 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By2L-L7A
z
William C. Wodtke, Jr.,/Chairman
Attest:
FredaWright, Clerk
NOV 151978
091
p
0
ENGINEER .JAMES BEINDORF CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND EXPLAINED
THAT HE BASICALLY WISHED TO DISCUSS THREE ITEMS: (1) THE PRELIMINARY
ENGINEERING AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER, (Z) TO REVIEW WHAT
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WATER SYSTEM HAS BEEN COSTING IN GIFFORD AND
PROJECT AHEAD WHAT WE CAN FORESEE WITH THE BIDS THAT WILL BE COMING IN
DECEMBER 6TH, AND (3) TO DISCUSS SOLVING THE SEWAGE TREATMENT SITUATION
IN GIFFORD.
HE PRESENTED THAT BOARD WITH A PROJECT COST STATUS REPORT FOR
PHASES I AND II OF THE GIFFORD WATER SYSTEM, NOTING THAT THE FIRST SHEET
IS A SUMMARY SHOWING WHAT WE HAVE SPENT SO FAR AND WHETHER'WE ARE AHEAD
OR BEHIND. HE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE NOT TAKEN BIDS FOR PHASE II AS
YET, AND ESTIMATED THAT WITH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, WE ARE NOW AHEAD ABOUT
$131,000 AND, IN ADDITION, WE HAVE NOT TOUCHED THE CONTINGENCY FUNDS.
HE THEN REVIEWED THE REPORT, WHICH IS AS FOLLOWS:
NOV 15 1978
40
I
.
t
b
- r
�.
PHASES I AND Ii - GIFFORD AREA AND
r
'
F
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WATER SYSTEM
PROJECT COST STATUS
THROUGH NOVEMBER 1, 1978, FOR
�.
PHASES I AND Ii - GIFFORD AREA AND
4,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WATER SYSTEM
November 8, 1978
41
f�
I.
Cost Through November 1, 1978.
Approximate
Budget
Cost
Allocation
Remarks
Items
g
1
Phase I - Pump Station and
$538,302
$ 670,000
Ahead - $131,698
i
Elevated Tank
2.
UDU Purchase 75,000
75,000
No Change
1
3.
Phase II - Construction
A. Renovate Existing Water System 87,164
34,800
Behind ($52,364)
B. Sewage Pump & Transmission C 2.) -
210,000
Available
(z)
C. Renovation Existing Sewage System -
19,100
Available
D. Water Distribution System «� -
128,500
Available
Extension
4.
-
Contingencies
51,500
Available
�k
S
51,800
Behind ($3,126)
5.
Technical Services rs%r,
6.
Legal and Administrative 10,200
10,200
No Change
7
Interest During Construction 19,100
19,100,
No Change
.f
Total $7-
$1,270,000
-
71�Syy
(1) Include Change Order Nos. 1 and 2 and Leakage
Survey.
(2)' No'Construction Started to Date.
(3) Includes South Gifford Area and Extra Meters.
{
NOV 151978
3
II. Funds Available to Complete Items 3.B., C, and D, Including Related Cost
(Engineering, Legal, Interests, and Contingencies) are as follows:
Total Existing Funds $1,270,000
Less Cost'Through 11/1/78 784,692
Total Available $ 485,308
III. Summary of Total Estimated Cost to Complete and Additional Funds Required:
A. Items 3.B and C
Sewage System Renovation $313,000
B. Item 3.D.
Water Distribution System
Extension 553,650 (31
Total Amount to Complete $866,650
Therefore:
Total Amount to Complete $866,650
Less Available 485,308
9
Total Additional Funds Required $381,342
IV. Summary of Additional Funds Request
Funds Applied For:
Loan $235,492
Grant 318,158
Total $553,650
NOTE: Loan must be used prior to use of Grant Funds.
NOV 1519784W Q
; I
{
f
i
f
r
i
a
t
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST SLYMMARY
PHASES I AND II - GIFFORD AREA AND INDIAN RIVER COUNT`I WATER SYSTEM
NOVEMBER 7, 1978
ENGINEER'S JOB NOS. 5276, 5675, 5675A, B, C, D, E, F, AND G
Estimated Amount
Items
To Complete
1. Phase I - County Water System-
UDU Purchase
A. UDU Purchase
$ 75,000.00
B. Pump Station/Transmission Line
Construction ($228,260 Bid Price)
224,137.55
C. Elevated Tank Construction
1. -Bid Price
$336,500
Liq. Damages
(20,600)
Chg. Order No. 1
(11000)
Water Allowance
(736)
314,164.00
D. Engineering
1. Basic Fee
$ 26,526
2. Additional Services
13,000 C0
39,526.00
Total Phase I
$ 652,827.55
2. Phase II - Gifford Area - Water
System Renovation, Water System
Extension and Sewer System
Renovation
A. Water System Renovation
'
` t 1. Leakage Survey
$ 7,646.13
2. Renovation Construction
89,51 .00
3. Engineering
1
NOV 15 1978
{i
,J
284t
(3)
t= ,
(5) Based on Proposed Extension and. Other Costs (See Attached)
{i
3. Funds Available
f
A. Phase I/II (Existing $1,270,000.00
B. Requested (Fu MA) 553,650.00
Total $1,823,650.00
4
k
NOV 151978
I .
2
BOOK
a) Basic $ 12,828
C4G)
b) Additional Services 4,600
$114,592.13
B.
Water System Extension 553,650.00 Cs)
C.
Sewer System Renovation
1. Construction $250,000
2, Engineering @ 172 42,500
3. Contingency @ 7% 20,500
313,000.00 '
D.
Legal/Administration 10,200.00
E.
Interest During Construction 19,100.00 �¢
Total Phase II $1,010,542.10
Total Phases I and II $1,663,369.60
(1)
Additional Services for Engineering Inspection and Project Administration
from End of Contract Date to Completion of Construction.
(2)
Base Bid $57,318 Pius Additional Work.
•
(3)
Based on Total Construction Cost (Estimated)
!:FI
(4)
Additional Services for R/W Determination and Inspection.
t= ,
(5) Based on Proposed Extension and. Other Costs (See Attached)
{i
3. Funds Available
f
A. Phase I/II (Existing $1,270,000.00
B. Requested (Fu MA) 553,650.00
Total $1,823,650.00
4
k
NOV 151978
I .
2
BOOK
' PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY
FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
GIfFORD 14ATER DISTRIBUTION EXTENSION
JOB NO. 5675B
OCTOBER 13, 1978
I. TOTAL PROJECT COST
A. Construction $ 444,000
Contingency @ 6% 27,000
TOTAL $ 471,000
B. Technical Services (Total 13%, Basic,
Residential Inspection, Additional Services) 61,650
C. Legal & Administration 1 1/4% 7,000
D. Interest During Construction 7,000
E. Capitalized Interest - i year 7,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 553,650
II. COST SHARING
A. Potential Connections = 375
Assume 80% Connections = 300
B. Rate Schedule $7.10 1st 2000 Gal
1.50/1000 gal -over 2000 gal
Average Consumption @ 3500 gal/mth
Average Rate: $9.35/month
C. Therefore: Income @ $9.35/mth (12) (300) _ $33,660/yr.
Less 10% Reserve = 3,500/yr.
Less 0&M @ $4.50/mth/conn. = 16,200/yr.
$13 960/yr for Loan
$13,960/0.05928 (5% 38 yr.) _ $235,492 Loan -
D. Total Project Cost - $553,650
Loan- 235,492
Grant 318,158
3
OV 15.1978
r
E
r
WL
Am 'ham
I
ENGINEER BEINDORF THEN DISCUSSED THE SEWAGE SYSTEM. HE NOTED
THAT THE $210,000 SHOWN IN THE ORIGINAL BUDGET WOULD BE THE COST OF
TAKING THE SEWAGE TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, HE REPORTED THAT SINCE
DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR WE HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH THE CITY TRYING TO WORK
OUT VARIOUS ROUTES TO TIE IN TO THEIR LINES WITHOUT GOING ALL THE WAY
TO THE TREATMENT PLANT. FINALLY, IN EARLY OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR, AFTER
PAYING FOR ONE STUDY, IT WAS DETERMINED WE COULD NOT TIE INTO THE AIR—
PORT, AND THE ONLY OTHER PLACE WOULD BE AT THE HOSPITAL SITE. HE INFORMED
THE BOARD THAT THERE WERE ABOUT TEN OR ELEVEN CONDITIONS TIED INTO THAT
SITE, AND AS THESE CONDITIONS WERE STUDIED, IT BECAME OBVIOUS THAT WE
WERE GOING TO GO OVER THE $210,000 BY A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT — POSSIBLY
UP TO ABOUT $380,000. IN ADDITION, WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SECURE FROM
THE CITY THE COST OF TREATING THE.SEWAGE, AND HAVE BEEN GETTING NUMEROUS
COSTS; WHICH INDICATE THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE MUCH OVER WHAT WE ESTIMATED
A YEAR AGO, ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT WE HAVE A POSSIBILITY OF
ACQUIRING A 100,000 GPD TREATMENT PLANT, POSSIBLY AT NO CHARGE, SO BASED
ON THIS, WE LOOK TOWARDS A TEMPORARY SOLUTION. HE CONTINUED THAT IF
WE WERE ABLE TO OBTAIN THIS TREATMENT FACILITY FREE OF CHARGE, THEN WE
HAVE THE POSSIBILITY OF THE GIFFORD SEWAGE TREATMENT COSTING $250,000
TO $260,000 IN LIEU OF THE $313,000 SHOWN IN THE REPORT.
ENGINEER BEINDORF NEXT REPORTED THAT THEY HAD ORIGINALLY
ALLOWED $128,000 FOR EXTENSION OF THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, AND
ARE NOW ESTIMATING $553,000. HE EXPLAINED THAT THIS TIME THEY ARE TRYING
o TO SET UP THE SYSTEM WITH METERS FOR EVERY HOUSE AND TO BEEF UP LINES
FROM THE ELEVATED STORAGE TANK TO REACH FURTHER AREAS ACROSS U.S. 1.
THEY HAVE ALSO INCLUDED HYDRANTS FOR FIRE PROTECTION, AND, OF COURSE,
COSTS HAVE INCREASED FROM A YEAR AGO. ENGINEER BEINDORF EXPLAINED THAT
IN THE BIDDING THEY SET UP AREAS A THROUGH G, AND ANY OF THESE COULD BE
DELETED IF DESIRED.
ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT ABOUT A MONTH AGO THE BOARD
AUTHORIZED THE ENGINEERS TO PREPARE AN APPLICATION PACKAGE TO FHA FOR
AN ADDITIONAL LOAN AND GRANT, AND THEY HAVE NOW PUT TOGETHER SUCH A
PACKAGE. IN ORDER TO GET THE $318,000 GRANT, THEY HAVE SUGGESTED THE
COUNTY BORROW $235,000. HE NOTED THAT THIS WOULD SUPPLY MONEY TO RENOVATE
46
em 37 ��:
NOVA 51978
0
THE PINE VIEW PARK AREA AND CLEMANS AVENUE SCHOOL. THE MONEY CAN BE
,USED TO BUY EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, ETC., AND WHATEVER WILL BE APPLICABLE
TO THIS TYPE OF WORK. ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT THEY ARE JUST
PRESENTING THIS INFORMATION NOW SO THE BOARD WILL BE PREPARED TO MAKE A
DECISION AT THE NEXT MEETING, AND NOTED THAT IF THEY DECIDE TO GO AHEAD
AND ACCEPT THE LOAN AND GRANT, REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FHA WILL APPEAR
AT THE NEXT MEETING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT WE HAVE A COMMITMENT TO SOLVE BOTH THE
WATER AND SEWER PROBLEM. HE NOTED THAT WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH FUNDS TO
ACCOMPLISH THE ENTIRE PROJECT AND PROVIDE FOR EXTENSION OF THE LINES IN
THE OTHER AREAS. HE THEN REVIEWED WHAT THE LOAN AND GRANT MONEY WOULD
PROVIDE AND DISCUSSED POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS AND THE NECESSITY FOR USER'S
AGREEMENTS.
ENGINEER RALPH ENG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE LETTER OF
CONDITION WILL REQUIRE OBTAINING APPROXIMATELY 300 ADDITIONAL USER'S
AGREEMENTS BEFORE THE LOAN OR GRANT CAN BE USED. HE NOTED THAT ANY
ADDITIONAL CUSTOMERS NOW ON THE SYSTEM WILL APPLY TO THIS NUMBER EVEN
THOUGH THEY ARE IN THE OLD AREA. MR. ENG POINTED OUT THAT IT WOULD NOT
BE DESIRABLE TO EXPAND INTO ANY AREAS WHERE THERE AREN'T ANY USERS, AND
THAT IS WHY THE AREAS ARE BROKEN UP. ENGINEER BEINDORF AGREED THAT IF
THESE AREAS WANT THE SERVICE, THEY MUST BE RECEPTIVE.
THE BOARD WILL STUDY THE INFORMATION PRESENTED.
ENGINEER BEINDORF NEXT DISCUSSED THE ENGINEERING AGREEMENT
FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER TAXING DISTRICT AND STATED THAT SO FAR THEY
ARE RUNNING LESS THAN THE FIGURE ORIGINALLY PRESENTED. HE NOTED THAT
WELL EXPLORATION WILL BE WELL WITHIN WHAT WAS ESTIMATED. MR. BEINDORF
NOTED THAT THIS AGREEMENT MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE WE CAN BE ELIGIBLE
FOR AN FHA LOAN, AND MR. ENG POINTED OUT THAT ONCE THE AGREEMENT IS
EXECUTED, EVERYTHING FROM THEN•ON WILL BE CHARGEABLE TO FHA FUNDS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY -COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED MODIFICATION PLUMBER 4 TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH SVERDRUP & PARCEL AND ASSOCIATES,
INC. AND BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (A JOINT VENTURE).
COPY OF SAID AGREEMENT IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES.
47
USDA-FmHA
r
Form FmHA 442-19 MODIFICATION NUMBER 4 TO
(Rev. 1-28-77) AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
DATED DECEMBER 20, 1972
1
THIS AGREEMENT, made this �`-' day of _ �,191.E ,
by and between Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ,hereafter
Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc. and
referred to as the OWNER, and bei naa
hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER:
The OWNER intends to construct a Water System Improvements to include new water
treatment plant with new wells; new transmission and distribution systems; and re-
novations and extensions to existing distribution systems for the South Tax'District
Indian River Florida
is County, State of ,which
may be paid for in part with financial assistance from the United States of America, acting through the Farmers Home
Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture, hereinafter referred to as FmHA, pursuant to the
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, (7 U.S.C. 1921 et seq.) and the ENGINEER agrees to perform the various
professional engineering services required for the design and construction of said system.
WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, it is hereby agreed:
SECTION A — ENGINEERING SERVICES
The ENGINEER shall furnish basic engineering services as follows:
1. The ENGINEER will conduct preliminary investigations required to determine project feasibility.
2. The ENGINEER will prepare preliminary drawings and cost estimates.
3. The ENGINEER will prepare a preliminary engineering report following FmHA instructions and guides.
4. The ENGINEER will furnish 10 copies of the preliminary engineering report, cost estimates, -and layout maps to the
OWNER.
5. The ENGINEER will attend conferences with the OWNER and representatives of the FmHA and other interested
parties.
6. After the preliminary engineering report has been reviewed by FmHA and the OWNER directs the ENGINEER to
proceed, the ENGINEER will perform the necessary design surveys, accomplish the detailed design of the project,
prepare detailed drawings, specifications and contract documents, and make a final cost estimate based on the final
design for the entire system. It is also understood that if subsurface explorations such as borings, soil tests and the like
are required to determine amounts of rock excavation or foundation conditions, the ENGINEER will furnish
supervision of said explorations without additional charge, but the costs incident to such explorations, no matter
whether they are performed by the ENGINEER or by others, shall be paid for by the OWNER as set out in Section D
hereof.
7. The contract documents furnished by the ENGINEER under Section A-6 above shall utilize FmHA-endorsed standard
construction contract documents, including FmHA Supplemental General Conditions, Contract Change Orders and
partial payment estimates. All of these documents shall be subject to FmHA approval.
—8. Prior to the advertisement for bids, the ENGINEER for each contract will provide not to exceed 10 copies of detailed
drawings, specifications, and contract documents for use of the OWNER, FmHA, and the appropriate Federal, State,
and local agencies from whom approval of the project must be obtained. The cost of such drawings, specifications, and
contract documents shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER.
9. The ENGINEER will furnish additional copies of the drawings, specifications and- contract documents as required by
prospective bidders, material suppliers, and other interested parties, but may charge for the actual cost of such copies.
Upon award of each contract, the ENGINEER will furnish to the OWNER five sets of the drawings, specifications and
contract documents for execution. The cost of these sets shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the
ENGINEER. Original documents, survey notes, tracings, and the like, except those furnished to the ENGINEER by the
OWNER, are and shall remain the property of the ENGINEER.
10. The drawings prepared by the ENGINEER under the provisions of Section A-6 above shall be in sufficient detail to
permit.the actual location of the proposed improvements on the ground. The ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to
the OWNER without any additional compensation, three copies of a map showing the needed construction easements
and permanent easements and the land to be acquired. Property surveys, property plats, legal descriptions, and
negotiations for land rights shall be accomplished by the OWNER, unless the OWNER requests the ENGINEER to
perform these services. In the event the ENGINEER is requested to perform such services and make detailed surveys,
the ENGINEER shall be additionally compensated as set out in Section D hereof.
Poen 6 FmHA 442-19 (Rev. 1-28-77)
0.
NOV x.51978
•
L-
11, The ENGINEER will attend the bid opening and tabulate the bid proposals, make an analysis of the bids, and make
recommendations for awarding contracts for construction.
12. The ENGINEER will check and approve any necessary shop and working drawings -furnished by contractors.
13. The ENGINEER will interpret the intent of the drawings and specifications to protect the OWNER against defects and
deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. The ENGINEER will not, however, guarantee the
performance by any contractor.
14. The ENGINEER will provide horizontal and vertical control in the form of bench mark circuit and two baselines for
vertical control to be used by the contractor in staking the construction. Sewer lines shall be staked for laser beam
construction by the ENGINEER.
15. The ENGINEER will provide general engineering inspection of the work of the contractors as construction progresses.
Unless notified by the OWNER in writing that the OWNER will provide for such inspection, the ENGINEER will
provide detailed resident construction inspection (RESIDENT INSPECTOR) for the additional compensation set forth
in Section C. The ENGINEER does not guarantee the performance of the contractor(s) by the ENGINEER'S
performance of such detailed construction inspection. The ENGINEER'S undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the
the contractor of his obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications and
in a workmanlike manner; shall not make the ENGINEER an insurer of the contractor's performance; and shall not
impose upon the ENGINEER any obligation to see that the work is performed in a safe manner.
16. The ENGINEER will cooperate and work closely with FmHA representatives.
17. The ENGINEER will review and approve estimates for progress and final payments.
18. The ENGINEER will make final inspection of all construction and a written certification of final'inspection to the
OWNER and FmHA.
19. The ENGINEER will provide the OWNER with one set of reproducible record (as -built)' drawings, and two sets of
prints at no additional cost to the OWNER. Such drawings will be based upon information provided by the RESIDENT
INSPECTOR
20. The ENGINEER will prepare notices and advertisement of final payments if required by state statutes.
21. The ENGINEER will be available to furnish engineering service and consultations necessary to correct all unforeseen
project operating difficulties for a period of i year after the date of final inspection and acceptance of the facility by
the OWNER and FmHA. This service will include instruction of the OWNER in initial project operation and
maintenance but will not include supervision of normal operation of the system. Such consultation and advice shall be
furnished without additional charge except for travel and subsistance costs.
22. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER'S expense, such insurance as will protect
him and the OWNER from claims under the Workman's Compensation Act and from all claims for bodily injury, death,
or property damage which may arise from the negligent performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER'S
employees of the ENGINEER'S functions and services required under this Agreement.
23. The ENGINEER further agrees to provide the operation and maintenance manual for waste treatment facilities when
required by the Environmental Protection Agency or FmHA for S - N/A
24. The services called for in Section A -I through A-4 of this Agreement shall be completed and the report submitted by
February 2, 1979
Mate)
After acceptance by the OWNER and FmHA of the Preliminary Engineering Report and upon written authorization
from the OWNER, the ENGINEER will complete final plans, specifications and contract documents and submit for
approval of the OWNER, FmHA and all State regulatory agencies by december 31, 1979
tmless otherwise agreed to by both parties. (Date) '
If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by the OWNER.
NOV 15 1978
Am 37 To- ,
r
N
4
9
SECTION B — COMPENSATION FOR BASIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for basic engineering services as shown in Attachment I.
When Attachment I is used to establish compensation for basic services the construction costs on which compensation
is determined shall exclude legal fees, administrative costs, engineering fees, land rights acquisition costs, water -costs,
and Interest expense incurred during the construction period. The compensation for basic engineering services shall
be payable as follows:
1. The sum of Five Thousand----- Dollars (555000.00 ) after the review of the pre-
liminary engineering report by the FmHA and acceptance by the OWNER.
2. A sum which together with the specific sum set forth in Section B-1 above equals seventy percent (707) of the
total compensation payable after completion and submission of the final drawings, specifications, cost estimates,
and contract documents, and the acceptance of the same by the OWNER and FmHA.
3... A sum equal to ten percent (109o) of the total compensation payable immediately after the construction contracts
are awarded.
4. A sum equal to twenty percent (20%) of the total compensation will be paid on a monthly basis for general engineering
inspection of the contractor's work during the construction period on percentage ratios identical to those approved
by the ENGINEER as a basis upon which to make partial payments to the contractor(s). However, final payment
under this paragraph and of such additional sums as are due the ENGINEER by reason of any necessary adjustments
In the payment computations will be In an amount so that the aggregate of all sums paid to the ENGINEER will
equal one hundred percent (100%) of the basic compensation. Final payments shall not be made until it is determined
that all services required by this Agreement have been completed except for the services set forth in Section A-21
hereof.
The compensation for engineering services shall be:
The total sum of S
�] Established by Attachment I.
•
SECTION C — COMPENSATION FOR DETAILED RESIDENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
AS SET FORTH IN SECTION A-15
When the engineer provides detailed resident construction inspection, he will, prior to the preconstruction con-
ference, submit a resume of the construction inspectors' qualifications, anticipated duties and responsibilities for approval
by the OWNER and FmHA. The OWNER agrees to pay the ENGINEER for such service in accordance with the schedule
set out in Attachment I. The ENGINEER will render to OWNER for.such services an itcmized'bill, separate„ from any'
other billing, at the end of each month, for compensation for such services performed hereunder .during Ml.'m6nth, the
same to be due and payable by OWNER to the ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following month.
`t
t
I
I
a.
NOV 15 1978
s
SECTION D — ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES '
In addition to the foregoing being performed, the following services may be provided UPON WRITTEN AUTHORIZA-
TION OF THE OWNER and approval of the FmHA:
1. Site surveys for water treatment plants, sewage treatment works, dams and reservoirs.
Z. Laboratory tests, well tests, borings, specialized geological, hydraulic or other studies recommended by the ENGINEER.
3. Property surveys, detailed descriptions of sites, maps, drawings, or estimates related thereto; assistance in negotiating
for land and easement rights.
4. Necessary data and filing maps for water rights, water adjudication, and litigation.
5. Redesigns ordered by the OWNER after final plans have been accepted by the OWNER and FmHA.
6. Appearances before courts or boards on matters of litigation related to the project.
Payment for the services specified in this Section D shall be as agreed between the OWNER and ENGINEER and
approved by FmHA prior to commencement of the work, barring unforeseen circumstances, such payment should not exceed
S 1 70.000 The engineer will render to owner for such services an itemized bill, separate from
any other billing, at the end of each month for compensation for services performed hereunder during such month, the same
to be due and payable by OWNER to the ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following month.
SECTION E — APPROVAL BY FmHA
This agreement shall not become effective until approved by FmHA. Such approval shall be evidenced by the signature
of a duly authorized representative of FmHA in the space provided at the end of this Agreement. The approval so evidenced
by FmHA shall in no way commit FmHA to render financial assistance to the OWNER, but in the event such assistance is
provided, the approval shall signify that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the requirements of FmHA.
i
—4—
i
4
NOV .15 1978 209 K 4 U:K,'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized
officials. this Agreement in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below.
(SEAL) OWNER:
r
BY (Z ""Uw,
ATTEST•fi�-.L-� . Type Name William C. Wodtke Jr
Title Chairman _
Type Name Freda Wright gate 1gL�/Si�7�''
Title Clerk Circuit Court
(A JOINT VENTURE)
(SEAL)
ENGINEER:
ATTEST: By t
IWType Name
JC. Jones, Jr.
Type Name Ralph E. Eng Title Assistant Vice President
Title Engineer Date
APPROVED:
FARMERS HOME ADMIMSTRATION i
By By X�
i
Type Nme Jerry Ballard Type Name James L. Beindorf
Title Engineer Title President
'Date
I
1
o ,
• I_
—5—
NOV 151978 p:
M
MDIAN FEES FOR PRO ESSIMML
M
EMINURIM SERVICES - SECTION "A" FOMI Fa -'M 442-19 +
AS A PERCEIMMOE OF ITEET CONST!VLnTIO1 COST
FLORIDA
(ATTACHMENT I)' j
A. The fees are to be adjusted to suit soecial.conditions as stated i the 1
contract.
Basic Fee Res. Inso.Fee Basic Fee Res. Iaso. Fee
PTet Construction Cost • Table I Table I -A Table T- T Table TT -A
AV
50,000 12.0 5.0 9.0 4.0
100,000 11.5 4.8 8.5 3.8
200,000 10.5 4.6 7.7 3.6
300,000 9.6 4.4 7.3 3.4
400,000 9.2 4.2 7.0 3-2-
500,000
.2500,000 8.8 4.0 6.7 3.0
600,000 8.4 3.8 6.5 2.8.
700,000• 8.2 3.6 -6.3 2.6
800,000 0.0 3.4. 6.2 2.1;
900,000 7.8 3.2 6.1 2.2
1,000,000 7.6 3.0 6.o 2.0
2,000,000 7.0 2.8 5.6 1.8
3,000,000 6.8 2.6 5.4 - 1.6•
5,000,000 6.2 2.3 5.0 1.3 ,
10,000,000 5.5 2.0 4.5 1.0
For construction projects that are less than $50,000 in size, the nedis:
compensation m=y be increased o,%; --r that sho:cn in the above tables_• T'ae en;i„_er
"-will. be comoensated for basic engineering services based on a percentage of the
total, actual construction coats of vrojects of unusually complep items such as
water treatment -plants, sewers, and sewage treatment plants, rehabi?it_tion o_,
-e,cisting treatment facilities as sbms-a in Table I, and for ail other vrojects as
shown in Table II. The fee for project costs following be�ceen tae figtzras ehm.11
in above tables shall be interpolated to nearest one-tenth nercen: The ar„-ner ;,_L
be in full agreement with the engineering co=eusatio„ and will uaders-�3. t_-2
reasons why such compensation is justified.
B The Engineer also agrees to make an inspection of the facilities vzzor
to the end of the one-year warranty and report any deficiencies noteei arA
suggest nays of getting them corrected to the Association (Tuan, etc.) t thou,
' charge.
C. Ma3dmum amount of loan and/or grant funds that ' can be aut-horized to cr, oer-
sate an.engineer for providing a full-time resident insoactor it actor a,c_
`Section "C" of Agreement for Engineering Services, Fora 1F {-.A 442-19, :asci be as
sho:•m in Tables IA for wastewater systems and II A for water systems_
0-rra 8' S I►iITIAL .
EidCPrER'S INITIAL
a
NOV 151978 37 Tix^94
I
u D_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY. Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT. JR.
*� * EDWIN S. SCHMUCKER
R. DON DEESON
JACK Q JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32980
November 29, 1978
Mr. James Beindorf
Beindorf and Associates, Inc.
P. 0. Box 849
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Beindorf:
In accordance with the executed Modification No. 4,
dated November 15, 1978 to the Agreement for Engineering
Services, please find this letter as your authorization
to proceed with the preparation of the Preliminary Engi-
neering Report for the South Tax District.
The County understands that the total compensation
for the Preliminary Engineering Report is $40,000.00 of
which $5,000.00 will be credited to the County from your
basic engineering fee if the project proceeds to final
design and $35,000.00 will be charged as Additional Services
under Section D. of the Agreement.
Sincerely,
Jack G. ennings
County Administrator
JGJ/ep
w
NOV 15 1978
s.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REVIEWED THE ROUGH DRAFT OF AN AGREEMENT
WITH MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC., WHICH HE NOTED HAS, FOR THE MOST PART,
BEEN NEGOTIATED BETWEEN IIID -FLORIDA AND THE COUNTY FOR THE PURCHASE OF
THE SYSTEM. HE ASKED FOR INPUT FROM THE BOARD AS TO ANY DESIRED CHANGES.
THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL PARAGRAPH 3 (B) ON.PAGE 3
ADEQUATELY REFLECTS THE COUNTY'S STAND IN REGARD TO UNCOLLECTED -BILLS
FROM CUSTOMERS OF IIID -FLORIDA. HE COMMENTED THAT IT IS HIS UNDERSTANDING
THAT THE COUNTY WOULD FORWARD ON ANY MONIES RECEIVED, BUT WE ARE NOT
GOING TO BE A COLLECTION AGENCY FOR MID -FLORIDA. HE NOTED THAT AFTER
THE IST OF THE MONTH, THE COUNTY WILL BE ON ITS OWN IN REGARD TO BILLING.
THE REASON THE BILLS WERE PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY WAS TO TRY TO CREATE
SOME CONTINUITY TO.THE TRANSFER. ('NINETY PERCENT.WOULD BE FORWARDED WITH
10% ALLOWED FOR A COLLECTION FEE.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED HOW LONG THIS ARRANGEMENT WOULD GO ON,
AND THE ATTORNEY STATED HIS INTENT IS THAT WE WOULD DO IT ONE TIME.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT WE NEED TO HAVE A LITTLE MORE COVERAGE
IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA TO BE SURE THAT WE BILL FOR A CERTAIN LENGTH OF
TIME. HE NOTED THAT IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO SET THIS UP ON OUR BILLING
METHOD. THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT THE BEST INFORMATION HE HAS BEEN
ABLE TO OBTAIN WOULD INDICATE THAT THERE COULD BE IN THE AREA OF $1,000
PAST DUE ACCOUNTS. HE STATED THAT IT CONCERNS HIM THAT THE FIRST MONEY
RECEIVED'PAYS FOR THE OLDEST PART OF THE BILL WHICH, IN ESSENCE, MEANS
WE ARE GUARANTEEING THEM 90% OF OUR ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HIS ATTITUDE IS THAT ONCE THE
CLOSING HAS OCCURRED, WE WILL START BILLING ON A MONTHLY BASIS AND AS
LONG AS THEY ARE CURRENT, THE WATER WON'T BE TURNED OFF. IF THE
CUSTOMERS SEND IN ADDITIONAL MONIES, THEN 90% OF THAT WILL BE FORWARDED
ON TO MID -FLORIDA.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT IF YOU CAN'T TURN THE WATER
OFF, YOU CAN'T FORCE A PAYMENT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THAT IS THE
COUNTY'S PROBLEM BECAUSE MID -FLORIDA HAS THEIR OWN COLLECTION AGENCY AND
ALSO CAN GO TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT, IF NECESSARY.
55
m m-
111
0
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE DID NOT BELIEVE WE WILL HAVE
THAT MUCH PROBLEM WITH THIS, BUT JUST FELT WE NEED A CUT-OFF DATE IN
ORDER TO GET OUR COMPUTER STRAIGHTENED OUT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE BOARD SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FACT
THAT WE ARE ASSUMING THE OBLIGATIONS OF MID -FLORIDA AS FAR AS COMMITMENTS
TO SERVE CERTAIN PROJECTS, AND STATED THAT THE ONLY ONE OF ANY CONSEQUENCE
IS TROPIC GROVE, WHICH WILL MEAN A TOTAL OF ABOUT FIFTEEN I" WATER METERS
FOR 144 ADDITIONAL UNITS. HE CONTINUED THAT WE ARE ON THE AGENDA OF
THE CITY OF VERO BEACH FOR NOVEMBER 21ST TO DISCUSS THE ENTIRE SITUATION
AND TO MAKE A REQUEST OF THE CITY TO SUPPLY SUPPLEMENTAL WATER TO THE
MID -FLORIDA AREA FOR A PERIOD OF TWO TO THREE YEARS. HE SUGGESTED THE
BOARD MAKE WHATEVER CHANGES THEY DESIRE IN THE CONTRACT, SIGN IT AND
SEND IT BACK TO MID -FLORIDA.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REPORTED THAT HE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY TELEPHONE
THAT GENERAL WATERWORKS BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THE SALE OF
MID -FLORIDA TO THE COUNTY UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS BASIC CONTRACT FOR THE
AMOUNT OF $225,000.
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT ENGINEER BEINDORF BE AUTHORIZED
TO CALL WILLIAM BOSTWICK OF THE DER TO SEE IF THEY ARE GEARED UP ON
THE STATE LEVEL BECAUSE THE MID -FLORIDA SYSTEM IS WORKING UNDER A GRAND-
FATHERED PERMIT, NOT THE OPERATING PERMIT THAT WE HAVE BECOME ACCUSTOMED
TO WITH THE SMALL PLANTS IN THE COUNTY.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE AGREED AND STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
' SOME KIND OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE DER IN REGARD TO THE CITATION MID -
FLORIDA IS UNDER.
ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT HE WILL DISCUSS THIS WITH MR.
BOSTWICK.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE CLOSING IS CONDITIONED UPON
OUR GETTING SUFFICIENT FUNDS FROM FHA. HE BELIEVED MID -FLORIDA'S AGREE-
`% MENT WITH THE CITY IS GOOD UNTIL DECEMBER 20TH AND FELT WE WILL RECEIVE
COOPERATION FROM THE CITY IN THIS REGARD, BUT HE ALSO FELT THAT WE NEED
TO HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO MAKING THE.FINAL COMMITMENT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NEXT REFERRED TO PARAGRAPH 16, AND WONDERED
IF THIS WORDING IS SUFFICIENT TO ASSURE THAT MID -FLORIDA WILL CONTINUE TO
MAKE NORMAL REPAIRS.UNTIL THE DATE OF CLOSING AND IF THEY NEED THE CITY
WATER, THEY WILL USE IT AND PAY FOR IT.'
56
OV 15197 7 PAU' 7
J
s
r�
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE IS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THEM
USING THE CITY WATER AND PAYING FOR IT, BUT AS FAR AS THEM KEEPING THE
EXISTING ASSETS IN A CURRENT STATE OF REPAIR, HE FELT THAT THE WORDING
IS VERY GENERAL AND COULD BE TIGHTENED.
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED, AND THEN QUESTIONED THE DEFINITION'OF
NORMAL REPLACEMENT" IN PARAGRAPH 17. SHE ALSO HAD A QUESTION ABOUT THE
CLOSING DATE IN PARAGRAPH 13 IN REGARD TO THE METERS BEING READ THREE
DAYS BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE.
IRA MACALLISTER, GENERAL MANAGER OF THE MID—FLORIDA SYSTEM,
STATED THAT IT TAKES ABOUT TWO DAYS TO READ THE METERS, DEPENDING ON
HOW MUCH HELP HE CAN GET.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS NO WAY WE WILL HAVE
A COMMITMENT FROM FHA BY THE CLOSING DATE OF DECEMBER 15TH, AND HE FELT
THE ALTERNATIVES ARE TAX ANTICIPATION "DOTES OR REVENUE SHARING. HE DID
NOT FEEL WE SHOULD CHANGE THE WORDING ABOUT THE COMMITMENTS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE AGREEMENT WITH MID—FLORIDA
UTILITIES, INC., SUBJECT TO THE CHANGES RECOMMENDED TODAY; AUTHORIZED
THE SEEKING OF ALTERNATE FUNDING METHODS; AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE
OF THE CHAIRMAN.
SAID AGREEMENT WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES UPON BEING
FULLY EXECUTED AND RETURNED.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT A LETTER HAS BEEN RECEIVED
FROM MR. AND MRS. CHRISTENA REQUESTING THAT THE COUNTY OPEN AND CONSTRUCT
ORR AVENUE WEST OF DALE STREET AND LEWIS STREET SOUTH OF ROSELAND ROAD
SO THAT THEY MAY BUILD A ONE FAMILY DWELLING ON LOT 7, BLOCK 15, IN
ROSELAND. THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT HE KNOWS THE COUNTY POLICY, BUT
THAT HE PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE THE LETTER WAS ADDRESSED TO THE
BOARD. HE NOTED THAT THIS REQUEST WOULD ENTAIL OPENING AND CONSTRUCTING
900' OF NEW ROAD AND TYING IT INTO EXISTING ROADS. HE FURTHER INFORMED
THE BOARD THAT WE PRESENTLY MAINTAIN, AND HAVE FOR SOME TIME, OTHER
ROADS THERE THAT WERE OPENED, BUT THE REST OF THE ROADS IN THE SUBDIVISION
WERE NOT OPENED AND WE DO NOT MAINTAIN THEM. HE STATED THAT THE POLICY
IN THE PAST HAS BEEN THAT THE DEVELOPER OF A SUBDIVISION OPENS THE ROADS
TO THE REQUIRED CRITERIA.
57
m 7nr-
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AGREED THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN COUNTY POLICY
TO COMPLY WITH SUCH REQUESTS BECAUSE IF WE DID IT FOR ONE, WE WOULD HAVE
TO DO IT FOR A MULTITUDE.
MRS. CHRISTENA ASKED WHAT ALTERNATIVE THERE WAS TO OPEN UP
THE ROAD SO THEY COULD BUILD.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT OTHER OWNERS IN'THE AREA
MIGHT WANT TO JOIN IN PAYING FOR BRINGING IN THE MARL AND GRADING, IF
THE COUNTY WOULD ASSUME MAINTENANCE.
COMMISSIONER LOY EXPLAINED THAT THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION CAN
GET BY WITHOUT HAVING TO HAVE PAVED ROADS BECAUSE IT IS SUCH AN OLD
SUBDIVISION.
MRS. CHRISTENA THEN BROUGHT UP THE POSSIBILITY OF GETTING A
16' UTILITY EASEMENT REMOVED AND MOVING HER HOUSE BACK.
IN DISCUSSION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE OTHER OWNERS ON THE BLOCK
WOULD HAVE TO AGREE TO REMOVAL OF THE EASEMENT. THE BOARD SUGGESTED
THAT MRS. CHRISTENA CONTACT HER NEIGHBORS TO SEE IF THEY WISH TO JOIN
WITH HER IN OPENING THE ROAD AND ALSO INSTRUCTED HER TO TALK TO THE
ADMINISTRATOR ABOUT ELIMINATING THE EASEMENT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS DRAWN UP A
PROPOSED ORDINANCE CREATING A WATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT FOR
THE SOUTH BEACH AREA AND NEEDS AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
' SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE A
PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN ORDINANCE CREATING A WATER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT FOR THE SOUTH BEACH AREA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT THREE EMERGENCY ITEMS, ALL
HAVING DEADLINES, BE ADDED TO TODAY'S AGENDA, AS FOLLOWS:
(1) APPROVAL FOR ATTORNEY EVANS TO FORWARD BILLS TO THE
DOT FOR THE LAST CONDEMNATION DONE.
(2) AN EXTENSION OF THE TIME PERIOD FOR THE HOSPITAL BOARD
TO KEEP THEIR MOBILE HOME ON THE OLD SITE; AND ,
(3) THE RESPONSE TO INDIAN RIVER SHORES IN REGARD TO DUAL
TAXATION.
58
NOV 151978c:��.
s
777
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADD THE EMERGENCY ITEMS REQUESTED
BY ATTORNEY COLLINS TO TODAY'S AGENDA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ATTORNEY EVANS HAS
SUBMITTED A BILL FOR REPRESENTATION ON THE CONDEMNATION SUIT ON THE TWIN
PAIRS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT;
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT THE BOARD HAS REVIEWED THE BILL SUB-
MITTED BY ATTORNEY EVANS FOR REPRESENTATION ON THE CONDEMNATION SUIT ON
THE TWIN PAIRS AND APPROVED SAME BEING FORWARDED TO THE DOT FOR PAYMENT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN STATED THAT ATTORNEY STEWART HAS REQUESTED
THAT THE HOSPITAL BOARD BE ALLOWED TO MAINTAIN ITS MOBILE HOME ON THE
OLD HOSPITAL SITE FOR APPROXIMATELY 60 ADDITIONAL DAYS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO EXTEND FOR 60 DAYS THE PERIOD OF
TIME THE HOSPITAL BOARD MAY MAINTAIN THEIR MOBILE HOME ON THE OLD HOSPITAL
SITE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE FINAL DATE FOR SUMMATION OF
THE RESPONSE TO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES IN REGARD TO DUAL TAXATION
OCCURS PRIOR TO THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING. HE STATED THAT HE AND MR.
KELTON WILL FORMULATE THE RESPONSE, AND MR. KELTON WILL HAVE PREPARED
HIS REPORT ON DUAL TAXATION WHICH CAN BE GIVEN TO EACH BOARD MEMBER FOR
REVIEW. THE ATTORNEY SUGGESTED THAT THE CHAIRMAN BE AUTHORIZED TO
SIGN THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS SO WE CAN PRESENT THE REPORT.TO THE TOWN
AND STATED THAT IT IS HIS INTENT TO DISPENSE THE REPORT TO EACH BOARD
MEMBER AND GET THEIR INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS BEFORE FORWARDING IT ON TO THE
TOWN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE DOCUMENTS
NECESSARY TO SUBMIT THE DUAL TAXATION REPORT TO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER
SHORES BEFORE THE DEADLINE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON A RATE INCREASE FOR IMID-FLORIDA SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 16TH HAS BEEN
CANCELED.
NOV 15 1978
59
0
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETROACTIVE APPROVAL OF OUT -OF -
COUNTY TRAVEL FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK AND ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG
TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE FLORIDA PLANNING AND ZONING
ASSOCIATION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 15-17, 1978, IN SARASOTA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR PLANNING
DIRECTOR REDICK AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN TO ATTEND THE
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MEETING IN .JACKSONVILLE
ON NOVEMBER 27-28, 1978, TO REVIEW THE NEW FEDERAL REGULATIONS FOR
COMPLETION OF APPLICATION FOR SMALL CITIES DISCRETIONARY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
HE HAS RECEIVED A CONTRACT FROM ADLEY & ASSOCIATES FOR MAKING OUT THE
1978-79 PRE -APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS AT A COST OF
$3,500, AND THERE WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL $8,000 IF WE ARE INVITED TO
SUBMIT A FINAL CONTRACT. HE ASKED FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PURSUE THIS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SIEBERT, TO AUTHORIZE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN TO
NEGOTIATE WITH ADLEY & ASSOCIATES AS ABOVE.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHETHER WE HAVE TO HAVE ADLEY &
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PREPARE THIS, AND MR. REGAN STATED THAT WE DON'T.
BUT HE NOTED THAT THE FACT THAT WE DID NOT GET FUNDED LAST TIME WAS NOT
THEIR FAULT.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED SHE REALIZED THAT, BUT FELT MR. REGAN
AND MR. REDICK HAVE THE CAPABILITIES OF FILLING OUT THESE APPLICATIONS.
MR. REGAN NOTED THAT THERE IS AN ELEMENT OF GAMESMANSHIP IN
THIS, AND IT NEEDS EXPERTISE.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY STILL
NEGOTIATING WITH ADLEY ON THE PRE -APPLICATION AND THEN WILL BRING THE
CONTRACT BACK TO THE BOARD.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT ONE OF THE REASONS HE WAS RECEPTIVE
TO HAVING A DIRECTOR FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAN WAS TO UTILIZE
SOME OF THE EXPERTISE COVERED BY THE SALARY BEING PAID INSTEAD OF ALWAYS
HAVING TO GO OUTSIDE AND HIRE CONSULTANTS.
1
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED
ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MR. REGAN NEXT DISCUSSED THE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH'CAROL
DEMPSEY TO COMPLETE THE SECOND PORTION OF THE SECTION 8 FUNDS DOCUMEN—
TATION. THIS WOULD COST $150.00 PER DAY FOR APPROXIMATELY SEVEN DAYS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO THIS, IF
MS. DEMPSEY WILL BE DOING THE WORK HERE AND WE WILL BE LEARNING HOW TO
DO IT. a
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITH CAROL DEMPSEY AS
DESCRIBED ABOVE,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED MR. REGAN IF THERE IS MONEY IN THE
BUDGET TO COVER THIS, AND HE REPLIED THAT IT IS REIMBURSABLE FROM THE
SECTION 8 PROGRAM BECAUSE GETTING SET UP IS AN ALLOWABLE EXPENSE.
E
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS. VOTED
ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE FARMWORKERS
COUNCIL HAS HAD THEIR FUNDS CUT OFF AND HE WOULD LIKE TO FUND THEM JUST
f
SO THEY CAN COMPLETE THEIR WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED THAT THERE IS
$11,000 IN REHABILITATION FUNDS AVAILABLE TO SPEND. HE NOTED THAT HE
HAS AN ON—GOING AGREEMENT WITH THE FARMWORKERS COUNCIL, AND THERE WERE
EIGHT ADDITIONAL CASES READY TO GO WHEN THEIR FUNDING WAS SUSPENDED. I
HE FELT THEIR FUNDING WILL BE REACTIVATED ON THE 20TH OF THE MONTH, BUT
THERE IS A CATCH IN THAT ANYONE EMPLOYED UNDER CETA MUST BE UNEMPLOYEDIt
i
,z
FOR 15 WEEKS, WHICH MEANS WE WOULD HAVE TO RE—EMPLOY AND RETRAIN WORKERS.
MR. REGAN CONTINUED THAT IN ORDER TO KEEP THIS PROGRAM MOVING, HE WOULD
LIKE TO HAVE THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD'TO EMPLOY ONE SUPERVISOR AND
THREE OF THE BEST MEN WORKING ON THESE JOBS AND CONTINUE ON WITH THE I
%% REHABILITATION. HE RECOMMENDED USING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS FOR
THIS PURPOSE AND MADE IT PLAIN THAT THESE WOULD BE TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE EMPHASIZED THAT HE DOES NOT WANT THEM HIRED AS
COUNTY EMPLOYEES, AND COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR. REGAN COULD CONTRACT
WITH THEM.
61
37 pi��
NOV 51978
MR. REGAN STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO, BUT WILL HAVE TO CHECK
AND SEE IF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIRES ANY SPECIAL LICENSING.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT THEY DO NOT WANT SUCH WORKERS TO BE HIRED
AS COUNTY EMPLOYEES.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED WHO WAS PULLING THE BUILDING
PERMIT BEFORE, AND MR. REGAN STATED THAT IT WAS THE FARMWORKERS COUNCIL.
HE NOTED THAT $7,000 WOULD BE SPENT FOR THE WORKERS AND $10,000 WOULD BE
AVAILABLE FOR THE REHABILITATION PROJECT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO FINISHING
THE PROGRAM, EXCEPT HE DOES NOT WANT THE WORKERS TO BE.COUNTY EMPLOYEES,
MR. REGAN COMMENTED THAT HE HAS A TWO -FOLD PURPOSE.IN COMPLETING
THIS PROGRAM -ONE IS TO DO SOMETHING WORTHWHILE, AND THE OTHER IS TO
SPEND THE MONEY AVAILABLE FOR THIS PURPOSE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO QUALIFY 1
FOR ^FURTHER FUNDING. HE NOTED IF WE HIRE THEM AS CONTRACTORS, WE MAY
HAVE TO HAVE COMPETITIVE BIDDING.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT.THAT UNDER THIS PROGRAM ONLY
$700 CAN BE SPENT ON ONE HOUSE, AND HE DID NOT FEEL YOU COULD GET
COMPETITIVE BIDS ON SOMETHING WHICH INVOLVES ODDS AND ENDS OF REPAIRS,
BROKEN WINDOWS, A LITTLE PLUMBING, ETC.
AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD INSTRUCTED COMMUNITY DEVELOP-
MENT DIRECTOR TO CHECK INTO THE POSSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTING WITH THE
FARMWORKERS COUNCIL TO COMPLETE THIS PROGRAM.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS ASKED PERMISSION TO ADD AN EMERGENCY
ITEM TO THE AGENDA IN REGARD TO THE GIFFORD WATER SYSTEM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY THE ADMIN-
ISTRATOR TO TODAY'S AGENDA.
THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO
FILE TWO MAINTENANCE MAPS TO PROVIDE THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR THE
GIFFORD WATER SYSTEM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN AND THE ADMINIS-
TRATOR TO SIGN AND PLACE ON RECORD ONE MAINTENANCE MAP COVERING 38TH
AVENUE FROM SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD TO NORTH GIFFORD ROAD AND ANOTHER COVERING
PORTIONS OF 43RD COURT, 43RD PLACE, 44TH STREET AND 36TH AVENUE.
��
NOV 151978 mux 37 F,�,yf_303.
1
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED TO THE BOARD THAT THEY
ARE RECOMMENDING THE BID OF SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO. FOR THE TRACTOR
AND BATWING MOWER. HE NOTED THAT THEIR BID IS $298.00 HIGHER THAN THE
BID OF PIPPIN TRACTOR $ EQUIPMENT OF THE MASSEY—FERGUSON, BUT THE REASON
THEY ARE RECOMMENDING THE FORD 6600 IS BECAUSE OF THE DUAL CAPACITY FOR
THE MOWING AND SCRAPING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER VOTED IN OPPOSITION, THE BOARD ACCEPTED
THE BID OF SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO. FOR A TRACTOR AND BATWING MOWER,
AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS, IN THE AMOUNT
OF $15,293.00. BID SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION IS HEREBY MADE.A PART
OF THE MINUTES.
NOV 151978
Aj
�� 7PAU30
1
G �
CL
TRACTOR & BATWING MOWER November 1, 1978"
4
COMPANY
MAKE & MODEL
SPECS.
EXCEPTIONS
DELIVERY DATE
PRICE
Berggren Equipment Co.
John Deere
Yes
None
30 Days
$15,330.00
Fort Pierce, Fla.
2640
Bush Hog 315RW
Lake Equipment Co.
Belle Glade, Florida
Massey -Ferguson
725 -
Yes
Tires:
Rear, 18-4X26
Dec.20, 1978
$17,241.00
Caldwell -Manta
6 Ply
Ray Batwing
Front, 7.5X15
6 Ply
Sunrise Ford Tractor Co.
e Ford Model 6600
Yes
None
Nov.15, 1978
$15,293.00
Fort Pierce, Florida
Woods Batwing
Pippin Tractor & Equip.
Vero Beach, Fla.
Massey -Ferguson
275
i
Yes
None
60 Days
$14,995.00
Food Machinery
Oviedo Tractor Co.
Oviedo, Fla.
Allis-Chalmers
185
Bid Bla
ks Not Completed
Unknown
$13,966.00
Servis Flex S154,808.00
_$IS.iiTdU
Recommend that the bid of Sunrise Ford be accepted. We -have one tractor
Model 6600 and the purchase of another would give us dual capability for
both mowing and road scraping. The Massey Ferguson tractor can perform
either job, however, the attachments and parts are not interchangeable
and would require modification to achieve this dual capability on the
mowing and road scraping jobs.
El
9
MR. NELSON THEN REVIEWED THE BIDS RECEIVED ON THE THREE USED
AUTOMOBILES AND GAVE THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS.
ON MOTiON BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE.BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF L. L. BASS FOR THE 1970
4 -DOOR FORD IN THE AMOUNT OF $155.00; AND THE BID OF CITY CAB FOR THE
1973 FORD MAVERICK IN THE AMOUNT OF $205.00 AND FOR THE 1972.PLYMOUTH
DUSTER IN THE AMOUNT OF $255.00.
MR. NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE ONE
BID RECEIVED ON THE 12,000 GPM PUMPER NEEDED FOR THE SANITARY LANDFILL.
HE STATED THAT THE BID DOES MEET ALL SPECIFICATIONS, AND THEY FEEL IT IS
A FAIR BID. THEY ARE ALSO RECOMMENDING THAT THE PRICE ADDITION FOR A
FLAT GATE VALVE AND A TRASH RACK, IN THE AMOUNT OF $989.00, BE ADDED TO
THE BID PRICE OF $23,020. HE NOTED THAT THE VALVE WILL KEEP WATER FROM
FLOWING BACK INTO THE BORROW PIT. MR. NELSON STATED THAT THE INTER-
GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR RECOMMENDED USING MONEY FROM THE RESERVE FUND
FOR THIS PURCHASE,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE PUMP IS SUFFICIENT TO GO DOWN TO
40AND THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE PUMP SHOULD LAST FOR
THE ENTIRE LIFE OF THE BORROW PIT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF COUCH MANUFACTURING CO.
FOR THE 12,000 GPM TURBINE PUMP, INCLUDING FLAT GATE VALVE AND TRASH
RACK, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $24,009.00.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON CONTINUED THAT FRED COYNE
CHEVROLET SUBMITTED THE LOW BID ON THE 1-1/2 TON TRUCK, AND THEY STATE
DELIVERY WILL BE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT WEEKS. MR. NELSON NOTED THAT WHEN
WE ORDERED THE LITTER OFFICER S TRUCK FROM THEM, WE WERE TIED UP ABOUT
THREE OR FOUR MONTHS, AND THEN THEY CANCELED OUT ON US. THEREFORE, BASED
ON PAST EXPERIENCE, HE RECOMMENDED ACCEPTING THE BID OF-VELDE FORD,
WHO PROMISES 60 DAY DELIVERY.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON A F-600 TRUCK AS OPPQSED TO A F-700,
WHICH IS A HEAVIER TRUCK. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SUGGESTED ACCEPTING
65
bba PnE 306.
THE BID OF FRED COYNE CHEVROLET CONTINGENT UPON IT BEING DELIVERED IN
EIGHT WEEKS OR THE ORDER WILL BE CANCELED.
ON 140TION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED -THE BID OF FRED COYNE CHEVROLET
FOR A 1-1/2 TON TRUCK, #C6DO42, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING
SPECIFICATIONS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,558.66, CONDITIONED UPON THEIR
ACCEPTANCE OF THE EIGHT WEEK DELIVERY DATE; AND IF THEY.SHOULD NOT ACCEPT,
AGREED TO ACCEPT THE BID OF VELDE FORD FOR A FORD F-600 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $10,629.43.
THE CHAIRMAN REVIEWED INCREASES MADE ON THE BID PRICES OF GAS
AND DIESEL FUEL DURING THE YEAR; AND NOTED THAT WE IMMEDIATELY'RECEIVED
j&
f y�ffi
A NOTICE INCREASING THE PRICE ON THE RECENTLY AWARDED BID FOR PREMIUM
GAS FROM .574 TO .579.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD HIS RECOMMEN—
DATION IN REGARD TO THE BUDGET FOR DATA PROCESSING, SET OUT IN HIS MEMO
is
OF NOVEMBER 6TH, AS FOLLOWS:
1
Z �
NOV 1537 1978
E�
4
4,
F R E D A WRIGHT
CLERK. CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
9FRK �A
V,E.kZ J, ly IRMOX4.91 Eu
P. 0. BOX 1028
MEMORANDUM: VERO BEACH - FLORIDA
32960
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
-FROM:, Finance Officer
R8: DATA PROCESSING
DATE: November 6th, 1978
When the 1978-79 budget for Data Processing was submitted
to the Board, it was with the understanding that the dollar request
was cut back over the prior fiscal year request and that Data Processing
would not expand any services without approval from the Board and, at
that time, we would ask for additional funds.
Since July 1978, several things have changed, mainly, the County's
entry Into the utility business. In addition there are several projects
that need to be addressed, they are:
a. Utility billing and accounting
b. State accounting package for Chart of Accounts
c. Payroll package with Workmans Compensation
computations
d. Document recording information system
e. job cost accounting system for
I. Road and Bridge Department
2. Community Block Grant Program
A.
NOV 151979
aba 37
November 6th, 1978
Page Two
f. Vehicle maintenance and parts inventory system
g. Road and Bridge fuel cost system
h. Sheriff accounting package
We currently have three problem areas that need to be addressed:
Equipment; Software; and Manpower.
Our present Equipment is rapidly reaching a situation point. Data
Processing experienced a 1057 increase in machine utilization in 1976-77
fiscal year, over 1975-76. The increase in the 1977-78 fiscal year, over
1976-77 was 4497, (see graph). As of 10-1-78 additional systems have been
implemented such as: Clerk's books, Clerk's payroll, child support, registry
of court, e.tc. which has caused an even greater saturation of equipment use
that was outlined in the above percentage increases. The demand for services
and types of service is beginning to exceed the capacity of the equipment. It is
my feelings that upgrading the present equipment will have to be considered
before we can commit ourselves to further projects. We are experiencing
growth and we are going to have to respond to the growth and at the same time
control costs.
In the area of Software, we will have to define our needs and assign
priorities to which systems will be implemented. We have two vehicles
available in the area of software: in house development; purchasing existing
packages.
In the area of manpower we are short of help in the area of programming.
This is for modifying existing programs and development and modifying new
programs. °
O'
6a 37 pt.I 0 9
I
November 6th, 1978
Page Three
I feel the following are courses of action that should be considered:
Equipment:
Up -grade our equipment to keep data processing in-house by leasing IBM's new
System/38. This equipemtn should be delivered sometime in 1979. The System/38
will give us an on-line capability for several heavy user departments. It will
give use 12 times our present storage capacity and its a system that can be
expanded by adding additional units not be replacing the entire system. (See
Enclosed Advertisement)
Software:
We have two vehicles available in the area of software: in-house development;
.purchasing existing packages. In this area we will have to define our needs and
assign priorities to which systems will be implemented.
In either case, three developments at a minimum should -be involved
during design and implementation. (a) The user department to insure that it
meets the user's objectives. (b) The Finance Department to insure accountability,
integrity and that the system can be audited. This also insures the user that
the information is reliable. (c) The Data Processing Department to determine
cost and impact. In the case of outside software, Data Processing would require
references of sites that the software has been installed and documentation.
Manpower:
My recommendation is that we hire one programmer to assist with
In-house development or modification of purchased software. We should consider
In the. near future, one additional key puncher for keying documents to create
customer master files and addresses for the utility department. This same
I
NOV 15197$.
' ! h
November 6th, 1978
Page Four
person could then be used for keying the activity for that department once the
system has been implemented.
Budget:
I recommend a budget amendment for the 1978-79 Fiscal Year in the
following areas:
1. Equipment $ 3,000.00
2. Software $ 12,000.00
3. Manpower $ 15,000.00
Total Funds $ 30, 000.00
This is about the figure that our 1978-79 request was lowered from the
1977-78 request.
NOV 151978
o
11
1
IBM thought on a very big scale.
And System/38 can have a large
impact in stepping up the efficiency
and profitability of the organiza-
tions which use it.
Big computer functions in
a small system
System/38 is designed to let any
organization enjoy the productivity
advantages of online applications
typical of large-scale computers.
Specifically; IBM sought to in-
corporate in a simple -to -operate
smaller system advanced functions
that make work station applications
easy to design, install and maintain.
Functions like an integrated
online data base with data base
management. Single level storage.
Simplified computer-aided pro-
gramming. 7bta1 system manage-
ment through a central control
facility. Real-time inquiry and
update. Onlilae training capability.
Data integrity and security:
Atall order, you'll agree.
Especially for a system leasing
for as little as $2,800 a month.
Yet IBM System/33has all the
features listed above—and more.
Not just some of them. Every one of
them.
Together, they provide what
may be the most attractive package
of computing benefits ever offered
to business.
What can System/39s functions
mean to your organiz.ation?
Let's review them briefly.
Distributed online work stations
One of the biggest advantages of
System/38 is that users don7t have
to come to the computer to get the
vital information needed in their
jobs. Instead, the computer comes
to them where they work, by
means of online display stations and
printers called work stations.
As many as 40 local work sta-
tions—as well as additional remote
workstations—can communicate
with Systenr/3ti interactively: They
can bring the }lower ol'vit. computer
to people doing totally different.
jobs. At executive desks, in depart-
ments, plants and warehouses.
rehouses.
Across the hall or across the .coun-
try. And the same up -to -elate infor-
mation will be available concur-
rently to all autliorl7ed users for
re4d-tinge inquiry. change or update.
The value of System/38 in keep-
ing everyone up to date can scarcely
be overestimated. It cur mean him-
dreds of thousands of dollars saved
111 opera(tlilg efliciencles.
A self -managed system
There are two aspects o i c orn-
puting:. processing the data itself
and rnanagintr the system that. pro-
cesses the data. System nlanage-
nlent a an cousunue a kit cat deal of
expensive time and talent.
System/3S, however, has a
remarluzble internal facility that
eliminates much of the complexity
of system management. Call(;(} the
Control Program facility, it mon-
ftors and manages system ac tivity—
including the flow and processing
of data. As a result, users anti pro-
gratnnrers are free to concentrate
on their own.jobs, rather than
worryingabout how the computer
performs its tasks.
Central offline data base
Instead of havingseparate (lata
files for each application—one for or-
der entry, for example, and another
for inventory— System/38 lets you
combine data for related applica-
tions into a single online data base.
The integral Data Base Data 111•m -
agement facility presents data in
whatever format and :sequence is
required by the user:
Every user caul be in touch with
the same central s ource of informa-
tion. When data is updated for one
application—say order entry— it's
available for all others using that
information, such as production,
shipping, accounts receivable acrd
inventory. Duplicated and cmflict-
ingdata can be eliminated. I111i61-
mation is easier to retrieve, revise
and use.
Streamlined programming
Both new and experienced pro-
giammers will find their work sim-
plified and speeded with System/38.
Tllaulks to advanced teclulology, .
many functions that ordinarily
require programming have been
absorbed by the system.
For example, System/35 offers a
powerful "query" function which can
1-1,-1 data in the (lata base as
required by the user and present itS,ystem,138 provides an exten-
inthc desired sequenc c and report sive range of security levels. They
forillalt— without Conventional pro- vary from simple basic precautions
gramming. Executives can use a to an advanced plan which assigns
work station at their desks to obtait a personal identification code to
special management reports in nun- every user:
utes, rather than days or weeks. Uilder this plan, the informa-
tion any individual can access,
change or process is carefully des-
ignated and restricted according to
a user "profile" stored in the data
base. In a multiple work station
environment, with large numbers of
users, this kind of positive individ-
ual control can be particularly ticularly help-
ful in assuring the integrity and
security of computer data.
affected. This means that a pro -
gr amines is no longer burdened
with manual coding;, card punching
and waiting for test time and .
results.
In short, System= can mean
greater programmer productivity.
Streamlined programming like this
benefits both the progi ammer and
the user who want results fast.
Single level storage
Another feature that makes for
operating efficiency is an extension
and simplification of the virtual stor-
age used in larger computers. In
System/38, IBM has taken this
technique a big step further with
the concept known as Single Level
Storage Management.
It tregtsall storage—both main
and auxiliary --as a single unit or
level and automatically keeps track
of everything stored in it. Users,
particularly programmers, no
longer need be concerned about pro -
grain size or location or any other
aspect of storage management.
Online training
As more employees become in-
volved with the computer, training
them in its operation becomes an
important task. tiirith System/38,
your people can get "hands on"
experience at live work stations,
using actual data files—without
fear of record destruction and with-
out interfering with the use of the
system by others.
And the prompting and guiding
messages flashed on the screen can
aid both trainees and regular users
alike. There is even a "HELP" key
for use whenever further assis-
tance is needed.
Data integrity and sedurity
version of the familiar RPG lan-
guage, pJl'p>;lalrrmel S ill'C !,*11'('11 new
freedom to tailor processing of data
and flow of logic to the needs of an
application. Aloreover; new applica-
tion programs can be comp riled•
tested and "debugged" froln any
workstation—in real tinte:m(I using
real data s:u)rples—while regular
processing continues without living
S
Conversion from
System/3
Conversion to System/38 from
an IBM System/3 can be aided with
conversion utility programs. They
allow the user to do as much as pos-
sible of the conversion process on
his System/3 prior to installation of
System/38. These programs are
designed to make conversion
easier, faster and less expensive
and protect the user's investment
in software.
Growth with IBM support
Once installed, System/3$ is de-
signed to grow with your business.
New capacity and components—_
such as added work stations or ad-
ditional storage— can be attached
quickly and easily, without recom-
piling existing programming to ac-
commodrite the new configuration..
And most maintenance can be per
formed while the system continues
to operate.
Moreover, wherever you're lo-
cated—in midtown Ahinhattan or
mid-Nevada—you know that IBM
support is responsive. The IBM
commitment to customer service
goes far beyond simply suppl3•ing
hardware. IBM sta ys with you.
NVith totally new architecture
acid dramatic advanced functions.
System/38 can be an investment
that will pay dividends for many
years to come. 7b get the full story
on System/38-urd what it can do for
you, call your nearly 11311 General
Systems Division off ice. Or write
•I:O. Box 2065, Atlanta, GA 30301.
P.chind Sygem/23: atecginclogical breakthrough
At the heart of the major• 1)tieL`/Ixt•fortn:uicc intprovetnents of I Ii i
System/3S ar e two pace -setting technological advances.
711e systems rncnrory uses a new silicon chip technology it•ith up to 61,000
"lits" or elements of infor niation per chip. A spade of silicon Icss than one-tenth
of a square inch in size, the G,1K chip is the most densely packed chip yet em-
ployed as a standwil computer component.
And i» the pr oevssing section itself, System/38 uses a logic chip with asp to
704 circuits— mote than 25 times the capacity of the processor logic chips ent-
ployed in II3l1 System/3.
But that's only part of the story. A totally new architecture, incorporating
-- advanced features new in them-
selves, was developed for System/.3V5.
— Through it, it becane possible to
shift some of the customary software
�i of the computer operatiiig system to
internal handling h y S , i/
tr t t mI; . ysten 3S
li: itself In turn, the open ating system
took on functions that ordinarily call
for p•og►anntiers to write special
instructions.
System/3S thereby relieves pro-
` gramniers of much tiresome and re -
Pe
titive
e-
petitive teoi—L And the convenience
of compiling, testing and *'debugging
pttmat wl:strtrons—ntteac-
roas
tiVelyand in real time—can mean
j'• a gin etc r prole ammer productivity
and faster computing results.
Shom)t about sc cera times actual sire, a G#K
chip is depicted on.. a WPM- clip.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT UNDER THE MONTHLY LEASE
ON A SYSTEM 3800, YOU CAN RUN IT AN UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME — 24 HOURS
A DAY — AND PAY A FLAT MONTHLY CHARGE, WHICH INCLUDES A SERVICE CONTRACT
ON EVERYTHING -IN IT EXCEPT THE PRINTER. HE NOTED THAT THE MACHINE CAN
GENERATE THROUGH ITS OWN INTERNAL PROGRAMMING A TIME USE RECORD OF WHO
USES THE MACHINE AND AT WHAT TIME. MR. BARTON RECOMMENDED THAT THE
OFFICES WHICH HAVE A VIEWER EITHER PAY THE RENTAL CHARGE THEMSELVES, OR
WE COULD GO TO A STRAIGHT CHARGE.
THE FINANCE OFFICER THEN DISCUSSED THE NEED TO SET UP THE
UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM TO INCLUDE THE NEWLY ACQUIRED MID—FLORIDA SYSTEM.
73
000K 37 ajU
HE NOTED THERE IS SOME CONSIDERATION ABOUT WHO IS GOING TO BILL AND WHO
IS GOING TO COLLECT, AND POINTED OUT THAT IF MID -FLORIDA IS GOING TO
SEND US THE DECEMBER 15TH BILLS TO COLLECT AND PROCESS, WE ONLY HAVE 30
DAYS. HOWEVER, IF THEY ARE GOING TO DO THE COLLECTING AND WE ARE GOING
TO GENERATE AND SEND OUT THE JANUARY BILLS, WE HAVE 60 DAYS. MR1 BARTON
FELT WITH HIS DEPARTMENT WORKING SATURDAYS AND SUNDAYS TO GET THE BILLING
SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED AND TESTED, THAT THEY COULD POSSIBLY BE READY BY
.JANUARY 10TH IF THE METER READINGS CAME IN.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE ATTORNEY FELT WE COULD ARRANGE
FOR MID -FLORIDA TO BILL ON DECEMBER 15TH SO WE CAN HAVE ANOTHER THIRTY
DAYS, WHICH ARE VERY MUCH NEEDED, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE OF THE CHRISTMAS
HOLIDAYS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE BOARD COULD STRUCTURE THE
AGREEMENT WITH MID -FLORIDA ANY WAY THEY WISHED, AND ALSO NOTED THAT HE
DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY SHOULD BE CONCERNED WITH THE UNPAID BALANCES,
BUT SHOULD START OUT FRESH. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD MAKE THIS CHANGE
IN THE AGREEMENT.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO.UTILITY BILLING AND THE
POSSIBILITY OF VETROL TECHNICAL DOING THIS ON A ONE-SHOT BASIS. IT WAS
FELT, HOWEVER, THAT IT WOULD ENTAIL A DUPLICATION OF EFFORT TO PUT
THIS INFORMATION ON THEIR MACHINES AND THEN BACK ON OURS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FINANCE
OFFICER AS OUTLINED IN HIS MEMO OF NOVEMBER 6TH IN REGARD TO DATA
PROCESSING; ESTABLISHING ITEMS A AND B AS NECESSITIES, THE REMAINING
ITEMS TO BE ON A PRIORITY BASIS; ESTABLISHING A BUDGET OF $30,000; AND
APPROVING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TRANSFERRING $30,000 FROM RESERVE TO
CONTINGENCY, AS FOLLOWS:
CREDIT DEBIT
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $30,000
SALARIES 01-2551-102.00 $12,550
RETIREMENT AND FICA 01-2551-105.00 $ 1,902
GROUP INSURANCE 01=2551-106.00 $ 505
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 01-2551-107.00 $ 43
EXPENSES 01-2551-302.00 $15,000
74
OV 151979
THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED THE HIRING OF A PROGRAMMER AND IT
WAS FELT THAT, IF THE CLERK HAD NO OBJECTIONS, IT WOULD BE SMOOTHER AND
INDICATE COOPERATION IF THIS COULD BE RUN THROUGH THE NORMAL CHANNELS.
COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE NEXT MEETING
OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS SET FOR SOMETIME
NEXT WEEK. HE NOTED THAT BECAUSE HIS TERM ON THE BOARD WOULD SOON END,
HE DID NOT BELIEVE HE COULD LEGALLY ATTEND AND, THEREFORE, SOMEONE SHOULD
BE APPOINTED TO THAT COMMITTEE IN HIS PLACE,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT IT ALSO WOULD BE NECESSARY
TO APPOINT A NEW MEMBER TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN MEETING WITH THE
REPRESENTATIVES OF CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY, TO DISCUSS THE RENOVATION
OF THE HOSPITAL BUILDING, HE AND THE ATTORNEY HAVE FOUND FROM THE ONSET
THAT�THEY ARE INVOLVED IN TALKING ABOUT VERY TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF BUILDING
AND RENOVATION. THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT HE FEELS WE NEED TO HAVE AN
INDIVIDUAL WHO IS WORKING FOR THE COUNTY ON SOME KIND OF BASIS, WHO WILL
BE ABLE TO REPRESENT THE BOARD AND THE TAXPAYERS AND WORK WITH THE
CONSULTANTS AS THEY MAKE THEIR SURVEY AND GO INTO'THE OLD STRUCTURE
TO DETERMINE UTILIZATION AND ALSO DETERMINE WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO THE
COURTHOUSE AND ANNEX. HE DID NOT THINK WE HAVE ANYONE ON THE BOARD
WHO HAS THE NECESSARY EXPERTISE FOR THIS AND ASKED FOR THE BOARD'S
FEELINGS ON THIS RECOMMENDATION. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE FELT
IT WOULD TAKE SOMEONE WORKING A FULL EIGHT—HOUR DAY TO.REPRESENT THE
o COUNTY AND PROVIDE A DIRECT LINE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE BOARD AND
THE CONSULTANTS WHEN WE GET INTO THE ACTUAL RECONSTRUCTION STAGE.
COMMISSIONER-SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM
WITH THAT AND ASKED IF THIS WOULD BE A CONTRACT EMPLOYEE. THE CHAIRMAN
STATED THAT WOULD BE HIS IDEA.
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THAT IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT TO HAVE
`t SOMEBODY WORKING FOR US THAT IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE, WHO CAN WORK ON
THIS PROJECT EVERY DAY.
IT WAS GENERALLY FELT SUCH A PERSON WOULD NOT BE NEEDED IN
THE UTILIZATION STUDY.
W
NOV 151978. 0.1flH
11
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED WITH
INTERVIEWING OF A CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR FOR RENOVATION WORK ON THE
HOSPITAL BUILDING, ANNEX, ETC.
ATTORNEY MICHAEL O'HAIRE CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING
.JAY LESHAW AND REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD TAKE UP AT THIS TIME FINAL
APPROVAL OF TREASURE COAST DEVELOPMENT WHICH WAS POSTPONED FROM EARLY
THIS MORNING.
THE CHAIRMAN AND THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED TO ATTORNEY O'HAIRE
THAT THIS MATTER HAD BEEN FORMALLY REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA BECAUSE IT WAS
NOT PROPERLY PREPARED AND READY FOR FINAL APPROVAL, AND, THEREFORE,. IT
COULD NOT BE HEARD AT THIS TIME.
COPY OF THE EXECUTED COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING GRANT CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND THE COUNTY IS HEREBY
MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES. THIS GRANT RELATES TO THE INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SEBASTIAN, FELLSMERE AND THE COUNTY.
NOV 1519718
%6
®m
L A
Contract Number: 79TA-85-10-40-1
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ACT ASSISTANCE FUND AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
AND
COUNTY Copmaxam OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY$, FLORIDA
THIS contract, entered into (this 3rd day of November
1978) by and between the State of Florida, Department of Community
Affairs (hereinafter called the "Department") with headquarters in
the City of Tallahassee, and the County of Indian River, Plerlda
(hereinafter called the "Grantee").
WHEREAS, the Department, in furtherance of its duties under
Section 163.03, Sections 20.05(1), Sections 20.18(1), (5), (8),
Florida Statutes, Chapter 78-401, Laws of Florida, and Rule 9B-5,
Florida Administrative Code, has determined that the Grantee is
eligible to receive a grant under the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning Act Assistance Fund Program (hereinafter called the "Program").
WHEREAS, the Grantee has resolved to accept this grant under
the conditions set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, THE.PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
I. Scope of Services
(A) The Grantee agrees, under the terms and conditions of
s
this Agreement and the applicable state and local laws and regulations,
to undertake, perform, and complete certain technical and professional
services, more particularly described in Appendix A and by this refer-
ence made a part hereof. Such services shall be performed in accordance
with the schedule established in Appendix B, attached here and
incorporated in this contract. Applicable state laws and regulations
include, but are not limited to Section 163.3161 et seq F.S., Chapter
78-401, Laws of Florida and Chapter 9B-5 F.A.C.
(B) The Grantee.agrees that the technical and professional
services covered by this Agreement shall not be subcontracted unless
copies of.any sub -contract or delegation agreements are provided to
the Department.
RECEIVED
NOV 151978
Page One of Five NOV 2 197R
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIV. OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
•
(C) To the extent reasonably possible, the work to be
performed by the Grantee shall be initiated, performed and completed
in collaboration and coordination with the programs of all local,
state and federal agencies that are actively concerned with various
aspects of planning and development and with any citizen planning
advisory committee organized to provide citizen input.
(D) The Department or Grantee may, from time to time,
request changes in the scope of the services provided under this
Agreement. Such changes, which are mutually agreed upon by and
between the Department and the Grantee, shall be incorporated into
this Contract as written modifications.
(E) Except as may be expressly provided elsewhere in this
agreement, the Grantee shall perform all of the necessary services
provided under this contract in connection with and respecting the
Grantee's jurisdictional boundaries.
II. Audit Requirements
(A) The Grantee, shall include in its annual post -audit
an audit of the funds provided by the Local'Government Comprehensive
Planning Act Assistance Fund Program.
(B) This audit shall include a schedule identifying
revenues, sources, expenditures, purposes and fund balances regarding
the grant and match funds in accordance with the applicable rules,
regulations and contract provisions.
(C) A.copy of the local audit report shall be forwarded
to the Department within thirty (30) days after completion of the
audit but in no case more than six months after the termination of the
Program.
III. Reports and Records
(A) The Department may withhold payment if the required
reports are not submitted in a timely and adequately completed manner.
(B) In the event all required reports are not submitted
in a timely and adequate fashion within thirty (30) days of the due
date, the Grantee will be informed that further grant payments will
be withheld until all reports are received in proper form. Failure
to submit all reports may be cause for terminating this Agreement.
NOV 15197Q
,Page Two of Five
;8
(1) The Grantee shall submit a progress report of
the Program by February 1, 1979 in a format provided by the Department.
(2) The Grantee shall submit a final evaluation of
the Program and financial statement by October 15, 1979 in a format
provided by the Department.
(3) The Grantee shall,submi.t an informational copy
of each planning element or document produced by the Program on or
before October 30, 1979.
(C) The Grantee agrees to maintain adequate financial
procedures and adequate support documents to account for the expendi-
ture of funds under this Agreement. Support documentation shall be
maintained to identify cash -match and/or the goods, services or other
benefits claimed as in-kind match.
(D) The Grantee shall also provide the Department with
the records, reports or financial statements upon request for the
purposes of auditing and monitoring the grant funds awarded under this
Agreement.
IV. Match Requirements
(A) The Grantee agrees to provide cash match in the
amount of $ NA .
(B) The Grantee agrees to provide in-kind match, valued
at $ 8,000.00
(C) Upon termination of this agreement, an assessment
of the proportion of the state grant and of the required local match
expended as of that date will be made. Any portion of the state
grant found not to be appropriately matched and expended as of the
termination date shall be returned to the Department.
V. Time of Performance
The Grantee agrees to execute this Agreement within
twenty-one (21) days of receipt and to commence services within
fifteen (15) days after execution by the Department. All services
to be offered shall be undertaken and completed in such manner as
to assure their expeditious completion in the light of the purpose
of this Agreement; but in any event all the services required
hereunder shall be completed no later than September 30, 1979.
N0V 151978
PAge. Three. of Five
Boa
4
y
M
VI. Compensation
(A) The Department agrees to pay the Grantee the total
sum of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for the
provision of certain technical and professional services pursuant to
the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975.
(B) The Department shall advance seventy-five per
centum (75%) of the grant after the execution of this Agreement.
(C) The Department shall pay fifteen per centum (15%)
of the grant after receipt and approval of the progress report due
on February 1, 1979.
(D) The Department shall pay ten per centum (10%) of
the grant after receipt and approval of the evaluation report, an.
informational copy of each plan document produced under this Program,
and financial report due October 15, 1979.
(E) Payment of these state funds pursuant to this
Agreement are subject to and conditioned upon the total release of
authorized appropriations from the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning Act Assistance Fund Program provided by Chapter 78-401,
Laws of Florida; otherwise, a pro rata distribution of available
funds will be made.
VII. Termination of Contracts for Cause
.(A) If, through any cause, the Grantee shall fail to
fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this
Agreement, or if the Grantee shall violate any of the requirements
of this Agreement, the Department shall thereupon have the right,
without liability, to terminate this Agreement by giving written
notice to the Grantee of such termination. The Department may also
require a pro rata repayment for grant funds paid to a Grantee who
breaches any part of this Agreement.
(B) Notwithstanding the above, the Grantee shall not be
relieved of liability to the Department for damages sustained by the
Department by virtue of any breach of Agreement by the Grantee and
the Department may withhold any payments to the Grantee for purpose
of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the
Department from the Grantee is determined.
Page Four of Five
ME
F 5E.3
D
VIII. Assignability
The Grantee shall not assign any interest in this
Agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether
by assignment or novationl, without prior written consent of the
Department; provided, however, that claims for money due or to
become due the Grantee from the Department under this Agreement may.
be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial -institution
without such approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer
shall be furnished promptly to the Department.
IX. Identification of Documents
All reports, maps, and other documents completed as a
part of this Agreement shall bear in an appropriate place, preferably
in the title block of a map or plan and on the title page of a report
or document, the following legend:
"Prepared by ( ) under contract with
the Department of Community Affairs. The preparation
of this ( ) was financially
aided through a grant from the State of Florida,
under the Local Government Comprehensive Planning
Act Assistance Fund authorized by Laws of Florida."
The date (month and year) the document was prepared and the name of
the consultant or Grantee community responsible for its preparation
shall also be shown.
X. Representatives for the Parties
In all matters relating to the performance of this
Agreement, the Secretary of the Department of Community Affairs shall
represent and act for the Department, and the Director of the Indian River
County Planning and Zoning Department or other appropriately -delegated
official of the Grantee shall represent and act for the Grantee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Department and the Grantee have
executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
ATTEST:
(Signature) V
Freda Wright_
Name and Title)
Clerk of Circuit Court
,4$F /'ju - a, %&_4 If
WITNESS:
Si tune)
Indian. River County
(Gr e)
(Signature)
William C. Wodtke, Jr.
jXxyxxmxx= Chairman of
Commissioners)
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMEN�T�O COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
(Signature)
William H. Ravenell
Secretary
Page Five of Five
APPENDrx A
SCOPE OF SEPVTCES
The following services will be performed by the Indian Piver Countu
Department of Planning and zoning as provided in, terms of the Interlocal
Agreebeent between and among the Cities of Sebastian and:F llsmere and
Indian'Piver County. All services are directly related to preparation
of plan elements as required by the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning Act except that staff will work with plan implementation at
such time as the plans are completed and if funds remain in the program.
1. Land Use Plan. Update existing land use, evaluate environmental
problems and potentials, evaluate land use possibilities and
needs, and prepare a plan for the future development of land
uses within Indian River county and the Cities of Sebastian and
Fellsmere. ,
B. Conservation. Examine the physical resources and limitations of
the area and recommend conservation of those areas and features
valuable to the citizens of the area.
3.. Traffic Circulation. Study the existing road network within the
county and cities and determine deficiencies. Project future
traffic circulation needs based upon evaluation of population,
economic and land use studies and projections. Recomwnd a
Traffic Circulation Plan to the county and cities.
4. Housing Element. Development of standards, plans and principles
to be followed in provision of decent hour n -g for existing and
future population, elimination of substandard housing and im-
provement of existing housing, end propose housing implementation
programs.
S. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainaae, and Potable slater. Determine
problems sand needs for public facilities, present and future.
Determine and plan general facilities which will be reauired for
future development of the county and cities.
6. Recreation and open Space. Analysis of needs and development of a
system of sites for passive and active recreation in the county
and cities.
• 7. Utility Element. A plan in conformance with the 10 year site plan
regired by the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act.
6. Intergovernmental Coordination. Development of methods, principles
and guidelines to be used in coordinating the adopted Compre-
hensive Plans between and among the county and the several muni-
cipalities and with other units of local government such as
School Board and Drainage Districts.
S. Coastal Zone Protection. Study•the existing coastal zone in terms
of needs for conservation and preservation in order to maintain
ecological and recreational uses through development of -sound
`�. management and regulatory techniaues.
10. Plan Imnlementation Prnarama.- Determine methods of implementinq the
adopted comprehensive pians including review of existing development
regulations and recommendation of management techniques, financial
planning and budgeting and other processes which will utilize* the
information and plans developed under this program.
I b�_ IIL
.r
CO
t•
. r
APPENDIX 8 --- WORK PROORAY SCHEDULES
1. Structural Conditions Survey
Existing Land Use . . . . . . .
3: Population and Economy • . . .
4. Physical and Environmental
5. Housing Element . . . . .
6. Conservation
7. Future Land Use . .
8. Recreation and open Space . . .
9. Financial Resources Anasysis
10. SS, Water, Drainage, S Waste
11. Coastal Zone Element
12. Traffic Circulation . . . . . .
13.• Utility Element . . .
14• Intergovernmental Coordination .
I5. Implementation Programs . . . .
16. Final Plan P.eview 6 Printing .
17 f 1 t R
. Review a Deve apmen egs. . .
1978
r 1979,
Oct
Nov
Doc
Jan
Feb
Mar
P r
Mau.
Jun
Jul
Auq
Se
i
-7-
.«. ,'p_. ,.. 5+rr -.,. ,,.>,,.. =.r -_..w �....-. S•-;�..s..v �.ra„,Y;ru-.0 .'; ",... _ ,.r..�.0 ,.... 'ai lrn-'!c.,,i;, n:.:+.en`'.;`{.+�'zA"' "3;s3 �.,- N,�-.°, �r. =r.' ..`'"+.±
•
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND
WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND NOS.
.59910 - 60235 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM
THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS
PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH
RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE lOARD ADJOURNED AT 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
CLERK CHAIRMAN