Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/14/2005 INDEX TO MINUTES OF JOINT MEETING OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF VERO BEACH ON NOVEMBER 14, 2005 1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE......................... 1 2.INVOCATION ............................................................................................... 1 3.INTRODUCTIONS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF ........................................... 1 4.OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS OF CITY OF VERO BEACH CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF ....................................... 2 5.INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD ................................................................. 2 IRC .........................................................................................................2 NDIAN IVER OUNTY CVB ...........................................................................................................3 ITY OF ERO EACH 6.FIRE STATIONS .......................................................................................... 4 IRC .........................................................................................................4 NDIAN IVER OUNTY CVB ...........................................................................................................5 ITY OF ERO EACH TH 7.26 STREET ................................................................................................. 5 November 14, 2005 1 CVB ...........................................................................................................6 ITY OF ERO EACH 8.VISIONING ................................................................................................... 6 IRC .........................................................................................................6 NDIAN IVER OUNTY CVB ...........................................................................................................7 ITY OF ERO EACH 9.RECREATION .............................................................................................. 8 IRC .........................................................................................................8 NDIAN IVER OUNTY CVB ...........................................................................................................9 ITY OF ERO EACH 10.BIKE PATHS ............................................................................................... 11 IRC ...................................................................................................... 11 NDIAN IVER OUNTY CVB ........................................................................................................ 12 ITY OF ERO EACH 11.QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS ......... 13 12.PUBLIC COMMENTS............................................................................... 13 13.ADJOURNMENT ....................................................................................... 15 November 14, 2005 2 November 14, 2005 JOINT WORKSHOP OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND CITY OF VERO BEACH CITY COUNCIL The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met with the City of Vero Beach City Council for a Joint Workshop at the Richardson Center, Indian River Community College, Mueller Campus, 6155 College Lane, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, November 14, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE County Chairman Lowther called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. INVOCATION County Planning Director Stan Boling delivered the Invocation. 3. INTRODUCTIONS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF The following County representatives introduced themselves: Chairman Thomas S. Lowther, Vice Chairman Arthur R. Neuberger, Commissioners Sandra L. Bowden, Wesley S. Davis, and Gary C. Wheeler, Administrator Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Attorney William November 14, 2005 1 K. DeBraal, Executive Aide to the Board Kimberly Massung, Deputy Clerk to the Board Patricia Ridgely, Recreation Coordinator/Special Events Jim Chrulski, Recreation Director Cliff Crawford, Utilities Director Erik Olson, Planning Director Stan Boling, Community Development Director Bob Keating, MPO Staff Director Phil Matson, Emergency Services Director John King, Management & Budget Director Jason E. Brown, Recreation Supervisor/Athletics Bob Wilson, and Recreation Staff Assistant Amy Glaser. 4. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS OF CITY OF VERO BEACH CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF The following City of Vero Beach representatives introduced themselves: Mayor Mary Beth McDonald, Vice Mayor Thomas White, Council Members Debra Fromang, Bob Solari, and Sabin C. Abell, Jr., City Manager James M. Gabbard, City Attorney Charles P. Vitunac, City Clerk Tammy K. Vock, Public Works and Engineering Director Monte Falls, Interim Planning Director Nancy Carter, Recreation Director Rob Slezak, and Assistant Recreation Director Patty Mattingly. 5. INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD IRC NDIAN IVER OUNTY Director Keating explained the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) using a PowerPoint presentation (see copy on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board). He detailed the development process, the components of the plan, cost affordable alternatives, the draft of the cost affordable network, and the adoption of the cost affordable plan. The LRTP is nearly completed and was endorsed by the MPO CAC (Citizens’ Advisory Committee), the MPO TAC (Technical Advisory Committee) and the MPO in October 2005. The LRTP is in its 45-day comment period and final plan adoption is scheduled for December. November 14, 2005 2 Vice Mayor White asked when the 6-laning of Royal Palm (extension of Aviation Boulevard project) might occur, and Director Keating responded that the consultant is now working on “interim year improvement sets” and he assumed it could be as soon as the second 5-year period of the plan or starting about 2010. th Council Member Abell preferred a connection of Aviation Boulevard at 37 Street th (west of the new Emergency Center at Indian River Memorial Hospital) rather than 36 Street. He was mostly concerned about east-west evacuation routes. Director Keating explained the consultants came up with the extension of Aviation Boulevard as he had shown, that it would work, and would relieve the need for 6-laning the entire length of Indian River Boulevard. CVB ITY OF ERO EACH Public Works Director Monte Falls advised of the earlier consideration given to an extension of Aviation Boulevard to serve the hospital and undeveloped properties east of US#1 to give undeveloped commercial properties access on a “feeder” road to avoid a proliferation of driveways onto US#1. That concept got them thinking about a connection to reduce the need to 6-lane Indian River Boulevard. He recognized the need for the consultants to present alternatives before a decision is made. The intersection of Royal Palm Boulevard and Royal Palm Place is another issue; FDOT has agreed to include that improvement project in their SR 60 project design. Vice Chairman Neuberger asked if anyone had considered the feasibility of using the right-of-way for the Main Relief Canal for a roadway or if it was totally out of the realm of possibility, and Mr. Falls responded that the consultant has merely identified a need to make the connection. Council Member Fromang said her concerns were addressed and she was thankful Indian River Boulevard would not be 6-laned all the way through. Council Member Abell pointed out that traffic counts are required for developments as they are planned but that does not take into consideration all the units in the pipeline. He was November 14, 2005 3 concerned about east-west evacuation routes, minimizing traffic, and maintaining the quality of life. Vice Mayor White inquired about widening Old Dixie Highway; it was pointed out there is no right-of-way, there were numerous impediments, and it does not go all the way through the city limits. Discussion ensued regarding the planning that began 20 years ago to widen Indian River Boulevard and the suggestion that it could be a model project with extensive landscaping. County Administrator Baird expressed staff’s frustration that just when we get thrd rights-of-way purchased and begin designing a project, such as 27 or 43 Avenue, it is cancelled. These roads were in the plans but when reality comes closer, nobody wants it in their backyard. Commissioner Bowden was concerned about noise and heavy trucks on Indian River Boulevard and commented she was unaware of the plan while serving 8 years on the MPO. Mayor White specified he was opposed to the use of sound barrier walls to cut the noise. 6. FIRE STATIONS IRC NDIAN IVER OUNTY Emergency Services Director John King gave a PowerPoint presentation concerning the Fire/EMS station repairs, replacements and expansions. (Copy on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) He advised of damage to the stations by Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne in 2004. He noted that many of the damaged stations were built as single function or were basic metal buildings with limited life spans and not rated for major hurricane winds. He advised of the lack of backup power capabilities and the importance of proper facilities due to the need for emergency personnel to respond during and after emergencies. He presented a summary of funding for the planned repairs, replacements and expansions with a total of $11,464,159. He then reviewed the specifics for each of the following stations: Fire 1, Med 1, Fire/EMS Station 2, Fire Station 3, Fire/EMS November 14, 2005 4 Station 4, Fire/EMS Station 5, Fire/EMS Station 6, Fire/EMS Station 7, Fire/EMS Station 8, Fire/EMS Station 9, Fire/EMS Station 10, and Fire/EMS Station 11. (See locator map in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) Paul Dritenbas Architect addressed at length the specifics of redesign and rebuild of Fire/EMS Station 2 (located beachside near the Barber Bridge). He spoke of the need to acquire the old bridge right-of-way, the need to elevate the building in excess of the flood elevation of 6, and the need to design it to handle a 150 mph wind-load. Mr. Dritenbas also advised of the necessity to accommodate the ingress and egress of emergency vehicles so they will not be impeded by other traffic or parking. The plan is to design it in a Key West style whereas the architects will be using Station 11 and a design from Miami-Dade County as a prototype for the other stations for a 50% reduction in architectural services. He responded to questions regarding the anticipated completion times and a training room. He specified that the plans are subject to all the same regulations as everyone else’s new construction and that the training room location has not been determined yet. CVB ITY OF ERO EACH Council Member Solari urged location of the training room at Station 2 because of the proximity to other jurisdictions’ safety personnel. Chairman Lowther suggested a more central location for the training room and County Administrator Baird noted that the Station 2 area is already congested with vehicles and he did not like to mix recreation with emergency vehicles and wanted the training room to be centralized. Also Station 2 costs are up to $2.6 million and climbing since it is the “biggest and fanciest” station. Vice Mayor White believed the training should be on the mainland because of all the other challenges of Station 2’s site. TH 7. 26 STREET November 14, 2005 5 CVB ITY OF ERO EACH thrdth Council Member Solari favored widening 26 Street from 43 to 66 Avenue with a lot of landscaping. Building a community road rather than just putting down asphalt would create a positive community asset. Engineering Director Monte Falls advised that a selection committee has been set to review the design consultants’ proposals this week after the schedule was interrupted by Hurricane Wilma. After hearing the proposals, the committee will short-list the bidders. th Chairman Lowther suggested moving the 26 Street intersection at the railroad th tracks one block north to 27 Street where the Administration Building is being built. This would lessen traffic through McAnsh Park. He wanted to know the feasibility of moving that railroad crossing and what the City thought about the idea. Mr. Falls and County staff will research that suggestion. 8. VISIONING IRC NDIAN IVER OUNTY Director Keating presented a PowerPoint outline (copy on file with the backup in the Office of the Clerk to the Board) and advised that the basic concepts of the visioning plan were: how do we want to see the County grow and does the Comprehensive Plan need to be changed to achieve it. He advised of the workshops, charettes, interruptions/delays due to Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne, and the oversight committee meetings. The MPO process differed from the City’s visioning process because the oversight committee consisted of all the elected officials of the Board of County Commissioners, School Board and all five municipalities. Alternatives were developed: 1) continue the existing trends, 2) reduce development by lowering densities throughout the county, and 3) villages inside and outside the urban service area. There were a lot of diverse opinions particularly for Gifford and Fellsmere. He thought a general liking of the November 14, 2005 6 village concept resulted, but without incentives that would increase density outside the urban service area. Also, there should not be large, major-scale density reductions throughout the county. Generally, the visioning process validated the existing Comprehensive Plan. The final vision statement was to maintain and promote the “small town character” of Indian River County as a low density, low rise, and “green” county, while providing for a variety of housing and transportation choices. Commissioner Wheeler questioned whether the cost of $200,000 for the visioning process was worthwhile since no change was made to the Comprehensive Plan, and Director Keating thought the meetings gave everyone the opportunity to give input if there were major problems with the Comp Plan. Commissioner Wheeler thought our Comp Plan is in pretty good shape but he pointed out that the “villages concept” was not accepted by the Commission or the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Davis thought another thing that goes against the grain of the Visioning Committee was the reduction of densities next to the urban service area because the Commission rejected that also. Council Member Abell agreed with Commissioners Wheeler’s and Davis’ comments. CVB ITY OF ERO EACH Interim Planning Director Nancy Carter stated that in February 2005 the City Council adopted its Vision Plan and the implementation team is beginning the implementation process. A new position of manager will oversee that process. The City had a SR 60 charette to see how the City would proceed with the redesign of that road. The City Council will hold a workshop with the Planning Board in mid-December to consider the recommendations of the rd consultant. On December 3, the City will hold a beachside charette to receive input from the November 14, 2005 7 community to learn how beachside residents want to see the beachside move forward. On th November 20 the City issued a request for proposals for a Vision Plan Implementation th Consultant; the bids will be opened on December 15. Ms. Carter anticipated the selection would be sometime in January. Chairman Lowther declared a short recess at 10:40 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:50 a.m. with all the same members present. 9. RECREATION IRC NDIAN IVER OUNTY Recreation Director Crawford gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board) by advising of the department’s goals, organization, and program statistics. He also presented a breakdown of statistics in the aquatic and athletic programs, special events, and camps activities. He advised of participation in the activities, attendance summaries, income summaries, special events, junior lifeguard program, and reported on the department’s role in post-hurricane relief in handling public information, ice, water, MREs (meals ready to eat), and tarpaulin distribution. He spoke about the department’s community partners, the Children’s Assistance Program, the department’s awards, and upcoming special events. November 14, 2005 8 CVB ITY OF ERO EACH Recreation Director Rob Slezak expressed thanks for the opportunity to appear and complimented the County’s Recreation Department for an outstanding job. He distributed a booklet telling about the City’s department (Copy on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board) and asked if there were any questions. Council Member Fromang asked that the County and City recreation staffs meet to see how they can work together and to discuss issues the City has experienced since they lost the funding from the County. County Administrator Baird inquired if the City was looking for funding from the County, and Council Member Fromang stated she had spoken with Mr. Slezak about some alternatives to explore. County Administrator Baird stressed there are four other municipalities and the County must be fair to everybody. He could not recommend providing funding to any city’s recreation department. Recreation Director Rob Slezak recommended that City and County staff sit together and look for duplication of effort and report to their administrations where some costs might be reduced. In response to Vice Chairman Neuberger’s questioning, Mr. Slezak specified that sharing for special events or facilities might be possible. City Manager Gabbard stated the issue that keeps coming up is the overwhelming number (60%) of county residents who use the City’s recreational program. He and County Administrator Baird have talked about it, and he would like meet with County Administrator Baird and the recreation directors to discuss it more fully and not debate it today. County Administrator Baird countered that 60% of the participants in the County’s programs come from the municipalities. Council Member Fromang interjected that this need not be debated today, but just have our staff members meet to discuss it. November 14, 2005 9 Vice Chairman Neuberger suggested that the City and County recreation committees could be assigned to look at this, and City Manager Gabbard responded that had been considered but he felt something could be worked out now between the City and County because of their good relationship. Vice Chairman Neuberger said he would be in favor of the County reimbursing the cities for the county residents they are serving. County Administrator Baird accepted that but he also thought the cities should reimburse the County for the usage of their residents. It should not be a one-sided equation. Mayor McDonald asked if the City Manager could write a proposal to the County, but City Manager Gabbard preferred to meet to see where everyone stands and perhaps by the first of the year they could refine the numbers and report back to their elected officials. Commissioner Davis suggested they determine which services are mostly used by city residents and have the City present those and have the County present the programs most used by county residents. County Administrator Baird noted that the County does most of the athletics for the City. We need to find better ways of doing things like analyzing costs, cutting programs and determine which services the City should provide and which the County should and not just shift the taxes. City Manager Gabbard pointed out that logistics also play a part, giving an example of Leisure Square. He looked forward to having the opportunity to meet with County Administrator Baird to try to resolve the situation. Chairman Lowther pointed out that the Commission will be meeting with the City of Sebastian on Thursday and he thought this issue should be discussed. November 14, 2005 10 10. BIKE PATHS IRC NDIAN IVER OUNTY Director Keating began his last PowerPoint of the day (copy on file in the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board) by advising that the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) has had a bicycle/pedestrian plan for the past 10 years. It was updated a couple of years ago. The plan is essentially an “on-road-plan”. It does not sit on the shelf but is used by County staff constantly as a basis for determining when developers need to put in sidewalks and bike paths and when designing roadways and as a basis for submitting enhancement project candidate applications. The plan is technically based and when first done it used some innovative concepts in bicycle/pedestrian planning. There was extensive public involvement in the plan and also emphasis on planning near schools, particularly within the 2-mile walking distance. In the plan there is both a bicycle priorities map as well as a sidewalk priorities map. Ideally every road would have 5’ wide sidewalks on each side of the road and have bike path lanes on the road. Since it is not always possible to do this, there is a decision tree to identify what type of improvement needs to be on what roadway. He advised of the greenways role in planning for off-road paths. The MPO has the greenways plan as a task in its current unified planning work program. It has been in place for the last few years. A scope of services was developed last year but unfortunately the scope was greater than the budgeted dollars. MPO staff has been talking with Council Member Solari regarding greenways. The current thinking is that instead of a countywide greenways plan, maybe just a central county greenways plan would be better. That would limit the scope of the greenways plan recognizing that there is a lot of work needed to identify a system of off-road facilities. There are issues of dealing with other governmental entities but also opportunities as well of using publicly-owned lands. November 14, 2005 11 Director Keating responded to Commissioner Davis’ question regarding possible availability and use of Federal enhancement funds for the off-road facility. He also responded to Mayor McDonald’s question regarding curbing and gave further statistics about grant funding. CVB ITY OF ERO EACH Council Member Solari wanted to get the word out about the “Veteran’s Memorial Pedestrian Bikeway”. Vice Chairman Neuberger inquired when the name changed from the “Al Fletcher Memorial” and advised there was a plaque by the Catholic Church on the bike path put up in 1973 or 1974 which covers the City’s portion of the bike path. Council Member Solari wanted to get something going for bike paths around the community and have them be better designed. He wanted to raise them up a level as has been well done in other communities, particularly Davis, California. He hoped his plan would be put together after the first of the year in the form of a proposal for the City and the County in order to get funding for a designer to create a plan to include interconnections and design techniques. It would be a guide for the future. By having a plan, funding would be more available. He mentioned connections at the airport, Station 2, Dodgertown, and the Main Relief Canal in the future by partnering with the water control district. He believed the canal system was a ready-made roadmap for extending the pedestrian-bikeway system throughout the county at a low cost. He was hoping to get Commission and the Council support for his idea and take it back to the MPO. Commissioner Bowden suggested Council Member Solari look into the history of this before moving forward with his idea. He said he was unaware of the name and that was not a material point in his idea and he felt his idea would further the MPO’s plan by filling it in. November 14, 2005 12 Council Member White recounted that the local Kiwanis Club had made maps every year on the old bike path. He was certain they could get funding from the clubs in town to fund that part of it. Chairman Lowther suggested Council Member Solari meet with Public Works ththth Director Davis to work on the bike path between 12 Street and 8 Street on 20 Avenue, he would be happy to work with him in any way he can with this issue. 11. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS Mayor McDonald thought this was a wonderful and cooperative effort and thought we should have more of these meetings. It is a wonderful opportunity for both boards to gather to exchange ideas. She appreciated everyone’s time and input. Chairman Lowther commented it had been a vision of his since taking over as Chairman. 12. PUBLIC COMMENTS Council Member Abell also was appreciative of the meeting and inquired as to th whose responsibility it is to maintain the ditch on 20 Avenue south of SR 60, Public Works th Director Jim Davis responded that the center of the 20 Avenue corridor is an IRFWCD (Indian River Farms Water Control District) canal. The County owns right-of-way to the west and the east of the road, but the center belongs to the WCD. The County maintains on the east (the northbound lanes). The west side has a narrow limited right-of-way. It would be great if it were culverted but it would be very expensive. Council Member Solari commented that the bikeway plan showed it culverted and he believed, over time, it would improve that whole section of town. Vice Chairman Neuberger recalled that Craig Fletcher had proposed years ago making that a linear park. He thought that was an excellent idea. November 14, 2005 13 Kenneth Daige , a resident of the City of Vero Beach, encouraged everyone to try to attend the “Livable Communities” meetings put on by FDOT. He requested the policy makers allow more green space and not allow so many houses per acre. Joe Paladin , the Chairman of Growth Awareness Committee (private sector committee), advised that County Commissioners have been working with the GAC for over a year and a lot of those things have been accomplished by working together. The following have already been addressed: green space, bikeways and sidewalks inside developments, additional buffer requirements, landscaping on fencing, buffers and walls. As to density, a lot of these measures cut density but just reducing the density does not make any development more pleasing or more usable. The thought process was to control the growth through quality, not just reduce the density. Mr. Daige asked them to remember that once the building industry quiets down and the developers are finished, there will be many residents here and there needs to be some kind of job base with $25-$35 per hour pay. We will need more homes, roads, law enforcement, and fire protection and he asked who is going to pay for that. th Freddie Woolfork , 4590 57 Avenue, shared his concern for the children because they are our future. He told of positive steps being taking in the Gifford area to get the kids off the streets. A new program called “Front Line” targets middle and high school children to help them set goals and stop thinking about bad role models in the media. Front Line wants to put something in their heads and give them moral value training. There is a need to think about ways to stop building more jails, but instead to build facilities where the children can be nurtured to help them become productive citizens. Mr. Paladin , who owns Atlantic Coast Construction and Development, specified that the GAC is also working on workforce and affordable housing. He explained the ideas and plans they are exploring and will be bringing to the Board in the next few months. In working on all these things, they are working to make this a totally better community. Mr. Daige commented that when looking at making more roadways and adding to the roadway system, wide lanes create speedways. More law enforcement will be needed to keep November 14, 2005 14 speeding down. Also, he asked that workforce or middle income housing not be in little boxes in little areas but spread out throughout the county to avoid creating slums. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 12:06 p.m. ANY PROVIDED BACKUP DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES ATTEST: _________________________________ ________________________________ Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Thomas S. Lowther, Chairman Minutes Approved: _________________ BCC/PR/2005 Minutes November 14, 2005 15